business models for distributed energy resources: value ... · energy storage is proliferating...
TRANSCRIPT
Scott BurgerIberdrola Annual Meeting 2/22/17
Business models for distributed energy resources: value pricing and efficient tariff design Scott Burger
EPRG & CEEPR European Energy Policy Conference 7/7/17
What we will speak about today
2
1. The power sector is evolving…
2. What is a business model, anyway?
3. The structure of DER business models
4. Tariff design and the economics of distributed PV and storage
businesses
5. Q&A
The MIT Utility of the Future Study
The power sector is evolving…
The MIT Utility of the Future Study
Today, four trends are forcing the power sector to evolve once again…
Image source: NYISO, 2016. “Distributed Energy Resources Roadmap for New York’s Wholesale Electricity Markets”
The MIT Utility of the Future Study
1. The power sector is decentralizing…
Many emerging resources are inherently more distributed than incumbent resources
Germany’s non-renewable power capacity
Source: Carbon Brief, 2016. “Mapped: How Germany generates its electricity”
Germany’s complete power capacity
The MIT Utility of the Future Study
2. The power sector is digitizing…
Deployment of information and communication technologies is rising as costs plummet
Left image source: McKinsey, 2015. “The Internet of Things: Mapping the Value Beyond the Hype”; Right: MIT analysis of EIA data
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Transport Industrial Commercial Residential Total
Average selling prices of various MEMS devices
AMI deployment as a % of metered sites in the U.S.
The MIT Utility of the Future Study
3. The resource mix is changing…
Renewable energy resources are on the rise globally
Renewable energy as a percent of electricity production
Source: MIT analysis; BP Statistical Review of World Energy data
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
US Japan Australia UK China Germany Spain Italy Denmark Canada
2004 2014
The MIT Utility of the Future Study
4. The power sector is increasingly interconnected…
The fate of the electricity sector is increasingly tied to transportation, heat, computing, and more
The MIT Utility of the Future Study
What is a business model,
anyways?
10The MIT Utility of the Future Study
These four trends are placing major pressure on utilities globally – This
financial pressure is spurring restructuring, new business models, and more
Stock price relative to May 24th, 2011
%
RWE
NRG Exelon
Source: Yahoo Finance
E.ON
S&P 500
+60.89%
-53.46%
-34.74%
-69.35%
-18.51%
11The MIT Utility of the Future Study
“Regulators set rates; utilities get guaranteed returns; investors get
sure-thing dividends. It’s a model that hasn’t changed much since
Thomas Edison invented the light bulb. And it’s doomed to
obsolescence.” – David Crane
This pressure drives many to predict dramatic change to the business
structures used to deliver energy services – This change is often depicted as
being potentially disruptive or deadly
“It would be foolish to dismiss the potential for major changes in the
utility business model” – Theodore Craver, Jr.
12The MIT Utility of the Future Study
Despite the focus on changing business models, there is still a lack of
clarity around what exactly is changing – in one review, 56% of studies did not
provide only a loose definition or no definition at all of a business model
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
Business Model Definition Loose Definition No Definition
Percent of studies of business models that explicitly define the business model
%
Source: Zott et al., The Business Model: Recent Developments and Future Research,
Journal of Management, 2011
13The MIT Utility of the Future Study
Using a simple business model framework can help us contextualize
ongoing changes – Business models are not monoliths
Source: Osterwalder & Pigneur, Business Model Generation, John Wiley and
Sons, 2010
Key
Partners
Key
Activities
Value
PropositionCustomer
Relations
Customer
Segments
ChannelsKey
Resources
Cost
Structure
Revenue
Streams
14The MIT Utility of the Future Study
Distribution utility business models are fundamentally different than
competitive energy service businesses – Activities, resources, costs, revenues,
and, as a result, value propositions, are all regulated due to monopoly power
Source: Osterwalder & Pigneur, Business Model Generation, John Wiley and
Sons, 2010
Key
Partners
Key
Activities
Value
PropositionCustomer
Relations
Customer
Segments
ChannelsKey
Resources
Cost
Structure
Revenue
Streams
The MIT Utility of the Future Study
The structure of DER business
models
16The MIT Utility of the Future StudySource: MIT Utility of the Future Study AnalysisCustomer Segments
Ele
ctr
icit
y S
erv
ice
sRevenue Streams
Solar PV and Solar-plus-storage business models rely heavily on value
pricing – These business models reflect differing degrees of market integration
17The MIT Utility of the Future StudySource: MIT Utility of the Future Study AnalysisCustomer Segments
Ele
ctr
icit
y S
erv
ice
sRevenue Streams
Solar PV and Solar-plus-storage business models rely heavily on value
pricing – These business models reflect differing degrees of market integration
Sunverge
SolarCity/
Tesla
Invenergy
Nexamp
Trina
18The MIT Utility of the Future StudyCustomer Segments
Ele
ctr
icit
y S
erv
ice
s
Reven
ue S
tream
s
Energy storage is proliferating across the value chain, from the utility to the
distributed scale – Similarly, energy storage business models reflect differing
degrees of market integration
Source: MIT Utility of the Future Study Analysis
19The MIT Utility of the Future StudyCustomer Segments
Ele
ctr
icit
y S
erv
ice
s
Energy storage is proliferating across the value chain, from the utility to the
distributed scale – Similarly, energy storage business models reflect differing
degrees of market integration
EDF Renewable
Energy
Source: MIT Utility of the Future Study Analysis
Reven
ue S
tream
s
Stem
Tesla
LG Chem
The MIT Utility of the Future Study
Tariff design and the
economics of distributed PV
and storage businesses
The MIT Utility of the Future Study
A critical feature of PV and storage business models is that their pricing is not structured to reflect underlying system costs, but to offer value relative to utility supplied power – Naturally, these systems are sensitive to utility tariff structures
38
Range of future utility
prices: PU, t
Power Price
¢/kWh
Years0 1 2 3… …N
Predefined future PV lease
or PPA price: PPV, t
PU, 0
PPV, 0
Source: MIT Analysis, United States Department of Energy, Company filings
Portfolio Average
Metrics:
- Generation: 1,391
kWh/kW
- PPA Price: $0.13/kWh
- PPA Escalator: 2.2%
“We believe that our primary competitors are traditional utilities that supply energy to our potential customers” – SolarCity 10k
The MIT Utility of the Future Study
These emerging business models require the creation of a level playing field for all resources
The best way to create a level playing field (and thus more affordable electricity) is to dramatically improve prices and regulated
charges for electricity services.
The MIT Utility of the Future Study
?
1. Ensure that all prices and charges are non-discriminatory, technology neutral, and symmetrical
Electricity rates should be based only on the injections and withdrawals of electric power – this requires the use of improved metering infrastructure
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
Po
we
r C
on
sum
pti
on
The MIT Utility of the Future Study
2. Progressively improve the granularity of price signals with respect to both time and location
Sp
atia
l gra
nu
lari
ty
Temporal granularity
Distribution nodal LMPs(DLMPs, real & reactive)
Intermediate DLMPs(substation/zonal/other)
Wholesale LMPs +distribution losses
Wholesale nodal LMPs
Wholesale zonal LMPs
Real-timespot price
Day-aheadhourly price
Critical peakpricing
Time-of-usepricing
The MIT Utility of the Future Study
3. Implement forward-looking peak-coincident network charges and scarcity-coincident generation charges to align consumer decisions with system costs
0.00
0.25
0.50
0.75
1.00
1.25
1.50
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
$/
kW
h
Hour
Energy charge Generation capacity charge Network capacity charge
The MIT Utility of the Future Study
4. Recover “residual” network and policy costs without distorting marginal consumption or production incentives
The MIT Utility of the Future Study
5. Carefully consider which costs are included in fixed electricity tariffs to avoid inefficient grid defection
Grid defection savings
Grid defection costs
Ele
ctr
icity T
ariff
Com
ponents
The MIT Utility of the Future Study
6. Explore new methods for addressing distributional & implementation challenges without sacrificing efficient signals that reduce costs for all
1. Cross subsidies: Lump-sum bill credits or surcharges can restore desired cross-subsidies
2. Spatial and temporal variability: Pre-payments and hedging arrangements can address bill variability
3. Low income support: Assistance to those that can prove need can augment subsidies built into today’s tariffs
The MIT Utility of the Future Study
Scott BurgerIberdrola Annual Meeting 2/22/17
Thank you! Scott Burger – [email protected]
EPRG & CEEPR European Energy Policy Conference 7/7/17