btster2011.pdf

3
SESSION 2011 BTSTERTIAIRES GROUPE 1 J - 4 ' - _ - _ . P EPRETIVE EICRilTE DE LAN{GUE V/IVANTE ANGLAIS Durée : 2 heures Dictio n naire bilinqu e autorisé ,"u, Communication : dictionnaire unilingue autorisé Cal euIatri ce i nterd ite Management desunités commerciales coefficient 1.5 Assu rance coefficient 1 Banque coefficient 1 Com mu nication coefficient 2 Professions im mobilières coefficient 1 Notariat coefficient 1 11 LVE1AGL page 1/3

Upload: poley-nianzou-eugene

Post on 07-Feb-2016

12 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: btsTER2011.PDF

SESSION 2011

BTS TERTIAIRES GROUPE 1J

- 4 ' - _ - _ . P

EPRETIVE EICRilTE DE LAN{GUE V/IVANTE

ANGLAIS

Durée : 2 heures

Dictio n naire bilinqu e autorisé

, "u,Communicat ion : dict ionnaire uni l ingue autor isé

Cal e u I at ri ce i nterd ite

Management des uni tés commercia les coe f f i c i en t 1 .5

Assu rance coef f ic ient 1

Banque coeff ic ient 1

Com mu n icat ion coef f ic ient 2

Professions im mobi l ières coeff icient 1

Notariat coeff icient 1

1 1 L V E 1 A G L page 1 /3

Page 2: btsTER2011.PDF

TRAVAIL À FAIRE PAR LE CANDIDAT

I . COMPREHENSION

A rédiger en FRANÇA1S

Après avoir lu attentivement I 'art icle, vous en dégagerez200 mors (+ ou - 10%).Vous indiquerez le nombre de mots ut i l isés.Toute présentat ion sous forme de notes sera pénar isée.

10 po in ts

les idées essent ie l les en

I I . EXPRESSION

Vous devez répondre aux deux quest ions en ANGLAIS.

10 po in ts

5 pointsA. " lf you don't show up on Google, you don't exist." (1.34-35) Do you think

everyone (pr ivate indiv iduals, employees, publ ic f igures and companies)should publ ish informat ion about themselves on the Internet?

B. ls l i f e wi thout the Internet possib le today?lnternet in your professional and pr ivate l i feyour answer.

(100 words min imum)

5 pointsThink about how you use theand give examples to i l lust rate

(100 words min imum)

1 1 L V E 1 A G L page 2/3

Page 3: btsTER2011.PDF

1 0

Remember - the Internet never,forgets!A recent survey by Microsoft f inds three-quarters of American recruiters and humanresources professionals perform onl ine searehes into the activi t ies of potentialemployees.

Most people have learned - some the hard way - that the lnternet 's memorym akes e lephants look f o rget f u l ."The Internet makes everyone a publ ic f igure," says Michael Fert ik , CEO of theonl ine image management f i rm Reputat ionDefender, of which an est imated g7"/ . ofc l ients are ord inary c i t izens."Even i f you don' t put a lot of s tuf f about yoursel f onl ine, someone else is doing i tfor you . . . So you ei ther do something about i t , or learn to l ive wi th i t . "Fer t ik 's customers pay h is company anywhere f rom $4 per month to $1,000 peryear to help manage personal Google search resul ts , remove thei r names f romcorporate databases, per form onl ine damage-contro l , and c losely moni tor thei rInternet footpr ints.

1 5 A recent survey by Microsoft, for instance, f inds three-quarters of Americanrecrui ters and human resources professionals per form onl ine searches into theactivi t ies of potential employees.The lnternet startup Klout wi l l analyze a person's social inf luence and authoritybased on thei r Twi t ter account . Pip l scours onl ine photos, publ ic records, courtdocuments, academic journals and forum post ings to reveal a person's , 'deep-web, ,h is tory.

Because someone, somewhere, wi l ldecid ing whether they want thoseSaturday-night dates.

Even a basic Facebook search can turn upusers having inadvertent ly le f t par ts, or a l l ,pu b l i c .

be fo l lowing that same electronic t ra i l inpeople as co-workers, students, or even

surpr is ingly in t imate resul ts , wi th manyof thei r personal prof i les open to the

20

25

30

35

And as more and more of these reputation queries are performed, experts saycompanies wi l l probably seek a one-stop shopping source for aggregatedinformation think eBay star rat ings, social media àctivi t ies, old blot en"tr ies,comments made in onl ine d iscussion groups, and cached documents.This possib i l i ty is so l ike ly, in fact , that there 's a l ready speculat ion about how thesystem could be legal ly navigated. Harvard cyber law professor Jonathan Zit trainsupports the idea of being able to declare " reputat ion bankruptcy" , wip ing c lean thedigital slate to start f resh every 10 years or so."We don' t t rust people who are b lank s lates these days," says Sidneyeve Matr ix ,professor of media at Queen's Univers i ty in Kingston, Ont . " l i 's l ike that saying, , l iyou don' t show up on Google, you don' t ex is t . , ""The problem wi th reputat ion reformatt ing, or a d ig i ta l reset , is that in format ionabout us exists on privately owned and corporate servers," says Matrix. "So we cannever real ly erase everyth ing."

It/isty Harris, Postmedia l,lews (adapted)August 4 , 20 i0

11 LVE1 AGL page 3/3