b.s. physical education cip code : program code: 378

Department Health and Physical Education

School of Education and Behavioral Sciences

B.S. Physical EducationCIP Code : 131314Program Code: 378

1Program Quality Improvement Report 2009-2010Fall 2010

Student-Learning Outcomes

2Fall 2010 Program Quality Improvement Report 2009-2010

1. Content Knowledge Physical education teachers understand physical education content and disciplinary concepts related to the development of a physically educated person.2. Growth and Development Physical education teachers understand how individuals learn and develop and can provide opportunities that support their physical, cognitive, social, and emotional development.3. Diverse Students Physical education teachers understand how individuals differ in their approaches to learning, and create appropriate instruction adapted to these differences.4. Management and Motivation Physical education teachers use an understanding of individual and group motivation and behavior to create a safe learning

environment that encourages positive social interaction, active engagement in learning, and self motivation.‑

5. Communication Physical education teachers use knowledge of effective verbal, nonverbal, and media communication techniques to enhance learning and

engagement in physical activity settings.

3Program Quality Improvement Report 2009-2010

6. Planning and Instruction Physical education teachers plan and implement a variety of developmentally appropriate instructional strategies to develop physically educated individuals, based on state and national (NASPE K-12) standards.

7. Student Assessment Physical education teachers understand and use assessment to foster physical, cognitive, social, and emotional development of students in physical activity.8. Reflection Physical education teachers are reflective practitioners who evaluate the effects of their actions on others (e.g., students, parents/guardians, fellow professionals), and seek opportunities to grow professionally.9. Technology Physical education teachers use information technology to enhance learning and to enhance personal and professional productivity.10. Collaboration Physical education teachers foster relationships with colleagues, parents/guardians, and community agencies to support students' growth and well being.‑

Each of the outcomes is required by the National Association for Sport and Physical Education (NASPE)/National Council on Accreditation for Teacher Education (NCATE) accreditation for Initial Preparation of Physical Education Teachers (2001)

Fall 2010

Alignment of Outcomes


Program outcomes are appropriately aligned with the University Mission that seeks to offer educational programs and opportunities for students in the service area.

The department seeks to produce professionals who are “competent, caring, committed and reflective decision makers”.

The Department seeks to be an essential component in the total educational process of the student through the promotion and support of health enhancing lifestyles and by preparing the student academically to pursue the academic degree in their chosen career.

Fall 2010

Strategic Plan 2013 – The department focus addresses the following aspects of the plan

• provide quality educational opportunities • increase participation in the community by sponsoring events that provide experiential learning• maintain existing accreditations• develop new partnerships within the community• continue to provide effective and efficient delivery of course content• review and analyze assessments• provide quality academic advisement• promote an active campus lifestyle

Program Quality Improvement Report 2009-2010 5Fall 2010

Measures of Learning Outcomes

Direct MeasuresOklahoma Subject Area Test (OSAT)

Lesson Plan and ReflectionStudent Teaching Evaluations

Teacher Work Sample Behavior Management Plan

Individual Education Plan Portfolio

Instructor Developed Assessments


Indirect MeasuresIDEA

Exit InterviewsStudent Surveys

Assessment Advisory Council Feedback

Strategies or Methods to Address ShortfallsAdvisement

Definitive Plan of StudyEducation Transition Points

Remediation


Report on actions from the three previously chosen priority outcomes

Outcome 5. Communication - Physical education teachers use knowledge of effective verbal, nonverbal and media communication techniques to enhance learning and engagement in physical activity settings (Knowledge, Application)

Action – Identify and develop additional assessments to meet the outcome.


Lesson Plan/Reflection Assessment• Completed by students enrolled in HPET 4773 Methods of Teaching Physical

Education• Lesson is taught to peers, evaluated by both Instructor and candidate• Lesson is revised per evaluation and taught to students at selected site

grades 5-8• Candidates complete a Reflection

Program Quality Improvement Report 2009-2010 9

Lesson Plan: HPET 4773 Methods Teaching Physical Education

Semester/Year Number of students

Unacceptable Level0-69%

Acceptable Level70-89%

Target Level90-100%

Fall 2009 6 0% 33.3% (2) 66.6% (4)

Fall 2008 1 0% 0% 100%

Percent Candidates Scoring at Each Level of Performance

Outcome 5. Communication

Lesson Plan: HPET 4773 Methods Teaching Physical EducationSemester Number

of students

Total Score

100 pts

Introduction

10 pts

Objectives

20pts

Environment

20pts

Content Analysis

25pts

Assessment Plan

15 pts

Reflection

10 pts

Fall 2009 6 91.6 9 18.5 18 23.3 12.6 8.8

Fall 2008 1 94 9 18 20 23 14 10

Candidates Average Score by Lesson Plan Category

Fall 2010

Lesson Plan/Reflection Assessment• Video Self Assessment• Passing Score = at or above the Acceptable Level (70%) • Category passing scores are at or above 70% of total points possible

Reflection: HPET 4773 Methods Teaching Physical Education

Semester/Year Number of Students % Candidates at Unacceptable Level

0-52 points

% Candidates at Acceptable Level

53-67 points

% Candidates at Target Level

68-75 points

Fall 2009 6 16% (1) 50% (3) 33.3% (2)

Fall 2008 1 0% 0% 100% (1)



Percent Candidates Scoring at Each Level of Performance

Fall 2010

Candidates Average Score by Category and Total Points

Reflection: HPET 4773 Methods Teaching Physical EducationSemester/Year Number

of Students

Total Score75 pts

Context

15 pts

Analysis of Teaching

25 pts

Critique of Teaching

25 pts

Written Communication

10 pts

Fall 2009 6 69 14 23.5 23 8.8

Fall 2008 1 70 15 22 23 10

Lesson Plan/Reflection Assessment


Teacher Work Sample Factor 1: Contextual Information and Learning Environment Decisions

Academic Year Number of Students

Standard Not MetScore = 1

Meets StandardScore= 3

Exceeds StandardScore = 5

2009-2010 6 0 3.27 0

Teacher Work Sample Factor 2: Unit Learning Goals and ObjectivesAcademic Year Number of

StudentsStandard Not Met

Score = 1Meets Standard

Score = 3Exceeds Standard

Score = 5

2009- 2010 6 0 3.48 0


Candidates Average Score By Performance Criteria

Fall 2010

Teacher Work Sample• EDUC 4313 Practicum• Multi-week Teaching Unit presented at a selected site to students• Consists of 6 Factors that are criterion-referenced• Candidates not meeting the Standard per Factor are allowed to repeat the Factor until the Standard is met• Passing Score = Meets or Exceeds Standard


Outcome 6. Planning and Instruction - Physical education teachers plan and implement a variety of developmentally appropriate instructional strategies to develop physically educated individuals, based on state and national (NASPE k-12) Standards.

Action Plan Identify and develop additional assessments to meet the Outcome.

Fall 2010



Percent Candidates Score at Each Level of Performance

Behavior Management Plan – HPET 3333 Physical Education Elementary SchoolSemester/Year Number of Students Unacceptable

Score < 48 ptsAcceptable

Score 49–62 ptsTarget

Score 63-70 pts

Spring 2010 7 14% (1) 71% (5) 14% (1)

Fall 2009 7 29% (2) 0% 71% (5)

Spring 2009 1 100% (1) 0% 0%

Fall 2008 4 0% 75% (3) 25% (1)

Outcome 6. Planning and Instruction

Behavior Management Plan• Completed by candidates in HPET 3333 Physical Education in the Elementary School• 3 hour observation at selected site• Create a student contract designed to manage a targeted student behavior• Five criteria are assessed – classroom demographics, observable behavior and performance criteria, student contract and managerial information and parent/ family/administrator communication

Fall 2010


Lesson Plan: HPET 4773 Methods Teaching Physical EducationSemester/Year Number of

StudentsUnacceptable Level

0-69%Acceptable Level

70-89%Target Level

90-100%

Fall 2009 6 0% 34% (2) 66% (4)

Fall 2008 1 0% 0% 100% (1)

Reflection: HPET 4773 Methods Teaching Physical Education

Semester/Year Number of Students Unacceptable Level0-52 points

Acceptable Level 53-67 points

Target Level68-75points

Fall 2009 6 16.6% (1) 50% (3) 33.3% (2)

Fall 2008 1 0% 0% 100% (1)


Fall 2010



Lesson Plan/Reflection• Plan includes Unit outline• Developmentally appropriate objectives• Sequencing of skills• Detail skills and teaching cues



Portfolio Competencies – AY 2009-2010Competency Number of Students Does Not Meet Standard

1Meets Standard

3Exceeds Standard

5

Competency 1 9 0 9 0

Competency 14 10 0 10 0

Candidates Score By Level of Performance

Education Portfolio• Competency 1: Content Knowledge – Introductory Lesson Plan/Methods NASPE Standards 6 and 1 (Content Knowledge)• Competency 14: Core Curriculum (PASS) - Introductory Lesson Plan (EDUC 3003) NASPE Standard 6

Fall 2010


Student Teaching AssessmentCategory Supervisor Evaluation Mentor Evaluation

Follows Oklahoma Criteria for Teaching Performance Instructional Indicators

2.0 2.5

Dispositions 2.38 3.0

Knowledge and Skills 3.0 2.8


Candidate’s Average Score by Category N=1 Spring 2010

Student Teaching Assessment

• Supervisor assesses candidate twice at each placement (elementary/secondary)• Mentor assesses candidate at completion of each placement

1= Does Not Meet Expectations 2 = Meets Expectations 3 = Exceeds Expectations



Student Teaching Evaluation Physical Education Addendum

Criteria Mentor Supervisor Overall

Instructional Phase 3.0 2.66 2.75

Method of Delivery 3.0 3.0 3.0

Classroom Management 3.0 3.0 3.0

Motivation 3.0 3.0 3.0

Professionalism 3.0 3.0 3.0

Fall 2010

Candidate’s Average Score by Category N=1

Student Teaching Assessment• Physical Education Addendum – University Supervisor assesses candidate performance twice at each placement

Passing Score at or above Acceptable Level of Performance3 = Target – performs competently2 = Acceptable – performs somewhat competently1 = Unacceptable- demonstrates little or no competency


Outcome 7. Student Assessment - Physical education teachers understand and use assessment to foster physical, cognitive, social and emotional development of students in physical activity. (Analysis, Evaluate)

Action Plan Identify and develop additional assessments to meet outcome.

Fall 2010



Individual Education Plan – HLTH 3013 Adapted Physical EducationAcademic Year Number of

StudentsUnacceptableScore < 70%

AcceptableScore 70%-89%

Target90%-100%

2009 - 2010 12 0 8 4

2008 - 2009 9 3 0 6

Spring 2008 1 0 0 1

Outcome 7. Student Assessment

Overall Candidate Performance at Each Performance Level

Fall 2010

Individual Education Plan (IEP) • Candidates enrolled in HLTH 3013 Adapted Physical Education complete

the assignment• Observation hours (3) at a selected site• Identify assessment tools/screening procedures for selected condition• Plan the Program• Identify services



Individual Education Plan

Academic Year Number of Students Demographics20 points

Assessment25 points

Planning Program50 points

2009 - 2010 12 17 21.8 44.9

2008 - 2009 9 18 22.5 34.5

Spring 2008 1 20 25 50

Teacher Work Sample Factor 3: Assessment PlanAcademic Year Number of


1Meets Standard

3Exceeds the Standard

5

2009 - 2010 6 0 3.65 0

Candidate Average Score by Factor

Teacher Work SampleCandidate Average Score by Performance Criteria

IEP• Demographics – identifies present level of performance• Assessment/Screening – test to be administered, appropriateness• Program – based on relevant information, annual goals, placement

Fall 2010



Teacher Work Sample Factor 4: Instructional Design


Standard Not Met

1

Meets Standard

3

Exceeds Standard

5

2009 - 2010 6 0 3.7 0

Teacher Work Sample Factor 5 : Analysis of Learning ResultsAcademic Year Number of

StudentsStandard Not

Met1

Meets Standard

3

Exceeds Standard

5

2009 - 2010 6 2.8 (2) 3.4 (4) 0

Candidate Average Score by Performance Criteria

Candidate Average Score by Performance Criteria

Fall 2010

TWS• Instructional Design - Assessment-based adaptations, multiple learning strategies, motivational elements• Analysis of Learning – graphics and data, narrative demonstrates learning, aligned with goals



Teaching Portfolio: Competency 8 Academic Year Number

of Students

Standard Not Met1

Meets Standard3

Exceeds Standard5

2009 –2010 6 0 100% 0

Exit Exam from previous report has been abandoned.

Education Portfolio• Competency 8 – Teacher - made Test and Rubric

Percent Candidates at Each Standard of Performance

Fall 2010

Student-learning outcome and measurements Priority Outcome 1

PROGRAM OUTCOME

CURRICULUM AREA OR TARGET AUDIENCE

MEASUREMENTS OF STUDENT LEARNING OR SERVICE OUTCOME

Measurements

Methods used to determine validity of measurement instruments

Methods used to determine reliability of measurements

Schedule for measurements

4. Management and MotivationPhysical education teachers use an understanding of individual and group motivation and behavior to create a safe learning environment that encourages positive social interaction, active engagement in learning, and self-motivation.

HPET 3333

HPET 3333

Upper division Education courses

Behavior Management Plan (Direct)

Field Experience/Observation Report (Direct)

Teacher Work Sample – Factors 1, 2 and 4 (Direct)

Student Teaching Evaluation – Physical Education Addendum (Direct)

Criterion – Referenced

Face – Validity


Criterion-Referenced

Inter-rater reliability

Multiple assessors

Inter –rater Reliability

Multiple-Assessors

Fall, Spring

Fall, Spring

Fall, Spring

Fall, Spring


Display of Assessment DataPriority Outcome 1

Behavior Management Plan – Physical Education Elementary School

Semester N Unacceptable Level0 – 48 points

Acceptable Level 49 - 62 points

Target Level63 - 70 points

Spring 2010 7 14% (1) 71% (5) 14% (1)

Fall 2009 7 29% (2) 0% 71% (5)

Spring 2009 1 100% 0% 0%

Fall 2008 4 0% 75% (3) 25% (1)


Percentage of Candidates Scoring at Each Level of Performance

Fall 2010

Behavior Management Plan – Physical Education Elementary SchoolAcademic Year N Observable Behavior /Performance Criteria

20 points

Acceptable 14 -20 points

Student Contract and Managerial Information

20 pointsAcceptable 14 - 20 points

2009 - 2010 14 15 15.0

2008 - 2009 5 15.4 15.2

Average Score by Criteria



Field Experience/Observation Report – Physical Education Elementary School

Semester Number of Students

Unacceptable Level 0 – 29 points

Acceptable Level30 – 39 points

Target Level10 – 50 points

Spring 2010 7 42% (3) 29% (2) 29% (2)

Fall 2009 7 29% (2) 0% 71% (5)

Spring 2009 2 50% (1) 50% (1) 0%

Percentage of Candidates Scoring at Each Level of Performance

Management and Motivation

Field Experience/Observation Report• Candidates reflect on the students behavior in each learning domain• Candidates provide a description of the teacher/student interactions


Priority Outcome 1Management and Motivation

Teacher Work Sample: Factor 1 Contextual Information and Learning EnvironmentAcademic Year Number of


1Meets Standard

3Exceeds Standard

5

2009 - 2010 6 0 3.27 0

Teacher Work Sample: Factor 2 Unit Learning Goals and Objectives


Standard Not Met1

Meets Standard3

Exceeds Standard5

2009 - 2010 6 0 3.47 0

Candidates Average Score by Performance Standard

Fall 2010

Teacher Work Sample• Factor 1 - demographics, developmental student characteristics• Factor 2 - goals and objectives - student performance• Factor 4 – multiple learning strategies, motivational elements identified in the plan

• Scoring Standards 1 = Does Not Meet 3=Meets 5= Exceeds


Priority Outcome 1Management and Motivation

Fall 2010

Student Teacher Evaluation – Physical Education AddendumStandard Mentor Supervisor Overall

Organization and Management 3.0 3.0 3.0

Motivation 3.0 3.0 3.0

Student Teacher EvaluationPassing Score = 2 or better3 = Target 2 = Acceptable 1 = Unacceptable (Demonstrates little or no competency)

Spring 2010 N = 1

Teacher Work Sample: Factor 4 Instructional DesignAcademic Year Number of


1Meets Standard

3Exceeds Standard

5

2009 - 2010 6 0 3.65 0


Analysis of Assessment DataPriority Outcome 1


Behavior Management Plan• With the exception of one semester (spring 2009) candidates perform at the acceptable or target level of performance• Candidates appear to be able to identify a behavior issue and plan a student contract based on that issue

Field Experience/Observation Report• Candidates score at or above the acceptable level of performance except for spring 2009 (N=1)• Data would suggest to have better performance, candidates need additional instruction in observing teacher/student interactions and reflective writing

TWS 1, 2, 4• Average scores of candidates place them in the “Meets Standard” performance category• Candidates, spring 2010, performed on average better on all three Factors

Physical Education Addendum-Student Teaching• Candidate performed well on assessment (N=1)

Action Plan for Student Learning OutcomePriority Outcome 1


Outcome 4. Physical education teachers use an understanding of individual and group motivation and behavior to create a safe learning environment that encourages positive social interaction, active engagement in learning, and self-motivation.

Action Time Implementation Time Completion Human and/or Fiscal Resources needed

Review assessment rubrics. Involve other faculty.

Each semester Continuing Faculty Instructor

Provide input to Education faculty - exemplary programs for experiential learning.

Each semester Each semester Education Faculty Provide opportunities for site visitations – reduced load, travel expenses

Review and revise syllabi as necessary.

Each semester End of Semester Faculty


PROGRAM OUTCOME



Measurements




3. Diverse Students Physical education teachers understand how individuals differ in their approaches to learning, and create appropriate instruction to adapt to these differences. (Comprehension, Application, Synthesis)

HLTH 3013

HPET 3333

Upper Division Education Courses

IEP (Direct)

Behavior Management Plan (Direct)

TWS Factors 2, 3(Direct)

Portfolio Competencies 2 and 13 (Direct)


Criterion-referenced

Criterion-Referenced

Criterion-referenced

Inter-rater

Inter-rater

Multiple assessors

Multiple Assessors

Fall, Spring

Fall, Spring

Fall, Spring

Fall, Spring




Individual Education Plan – HLTH 3013 Adapted Physical Education

Academic Year Number of

Students

UnacceptableScore < 70%

AcceptableScore 70%-89%

Target90%-100%

2009 - 2010 12 0 8 4

2008 - 2009 9 3 0 6

Overall Candidate Performance by Performance Level

Diverse Students

Individual Education PlanDemographic information – student’s disability or special needPlan – measureable goals that address disability or need and addresses approach strategiesServices – based on assessment

Passing Score = 70% or better of total points possible



Diverse Students


Behavior Management Plan – HPET 3333 Physical Education Elementary SchoolSemester/Year Number of Students Unacceptable

Score < 48 ptsAcceptable

Score 49–62 ptsTarget

Score 63-70 pts

Spring 2010 7 14% 71% 14%

Fall 2009 7 29% 0% 71%

Spring 2009 1 100% 0% 0%

Fall 2008 4 0% 75% 25%

Individual Education Plan – HLTH 3013 Adapted Physical EducationAcademic Year Number of

StudentsDemographics

20 pointsPlanning Program

50 pointsServices 5 points

2009 - 2010 12 17 44.9 4.5

2008 - 2009 9 18 34.5 4

Average Score by Criteria



Teacher Work Sample Factor 2: Unit Learning Goals and ObjectivesAcademic Year N Standard Not Met

1Meets Standard

3Exceeds Standard

52009 - 2010 7 0 3.5 0

Teacher Work Sample: Factor 3 Assessment PlanAcademic Year N Does Not Meet Standard

1Meets Standard

3Exceeds Standard

52009 - 2010 6 0 3.65 0

Fall 2010

Diverse Students

TWS Factor 2• Writing developmentally appropriate goals and objectives• Skill/performance objectives

TWS Factor 3• Adaptations made for the special needs student





Education Portfolio Competency 2 - Game

Academic Year N Standard Not Met1

Standard Met3

Exceeds Standard5

2009 – 2010 8 0% 62.5% (5) 37.5% (3)

Fall 2010

Education Portfolio• EDUC 3733 Developmental Psychology• Understand how students learn and develop• Can create a game based on observed student differences• Candidates note how game can be adapted to the diverse learner

Diverse Students

Percent Score Candidates by Performance Standard

Education Portfolio Competency 13 – IEP SPED 3103

Academic Year N Standard Not Met1

Standard Met 3

Exceeds Standard5

2009 – 2010 7 0% 100% (7) 0%

Analysis of assessment dataPriority Outcome 2


Diverse Students

Individual Education Plan• Candidates perform well on the assessment at or above Acceptable Level• Multi-assessors provide a measure of reliability

Behavior Management Plan• Consistently administered in Physical Education in the Elementary

School• Able to observe student behavior and hypothetically design a student

contract• Multi-assessors


Teacher Work Sample – Factors 2 and 3• Candidates average score Meets Standard• Candidates are able to establish goals and objectives using PASS Skills• Candidates appear to be capable of planning student

assessments and implementing the assessments in a practical experience

Education Portfolio Competencies 2 and 13• Candidates Meet or Exceed Standards on both Competencies• Candidates recognize legal responsibilities and subsequent impact on

student learning

Analysis of assessment dataPriority Outcome 2

Action Plan for Student-Learning OutcomePriority Outcome 2


Outcome 3. Physical education teachers understand how individuals differ in their approaches to learning, and create appropriate instruction adapted to these differences.


Monitor candidate performance on School of Education Assessments.

Each semester Each semester Faculty Committee

Identify specific areas of concern within each assessment – TWS and provide support in Physical Education course content.

Each semester Each semester Instructional Faculty

Review and revise syllabi and rubrics as necessary.

Each Semester Each Semester


PROGRAM OUTCOME



Measurements




1. Content Knowledge Physical Education teachers understand physical education content and disciplinary concepts related to the development of a physically educated person. (Knowledge, Comprehension)

Completion or concurrent enrollment (at least ½ of the course completed) in : Applied Anatomy & Kinesiology, PE in the Elementary, PE in the Secondary, Motor Learning, Methods of Teaching Physical Education

EDUC 4955 and 4985

OSAT (Direct)

Student Teaching Evaluations

Norm-referenced scores and Competency-Based

Criterion-referenced Inter-rater

Periodically

Fall, Spring


Display of assessment dataPriority Outcome 3


OSAT

Semester Number of

Students

% Candidates Not Passing

Scores < 240

% Candidates Met Expectations

Scores of 240 – 269

% Candidates Exceeding Expectations

Scores of 270 - 300

Spring 2010 3 0% 100% 0%

Spring 2009 2 0% 50% 50%

Fall 2010

Oklahoma Subject Area Test (OSAT)• Asses subject-matter knowledge and skills• Candidates take test upon recommendation of faculty and after meeting identified criteria• Passing score equaled to a scaled score of 240 or better• Aligned with NASPE Standards


Content Knowledge



Content Knowledge

Semester N Scale Score

Subarea I

Subarea II

Subarea III

Subarea IV

Subarea V

Subarea VI

Spring 2010 3 257.6 234.5 250.6 253 285 263 278

State Mean 125 250.7 241 258 251 257 258 237

Spring 2009 2 259.5 254 267.5 261 286 261 245.5

Candidates Average Score by Total Score and by Subareas - OSAT

Subareas – I. Growth and Development II. Health Concepts III. Health Related Physical Fitness IV. Foundations of Movement and Sport ActivitiesV. Instruction Assessment and Professional Knowledge VI. Constructed Response



Student Teaching AssessmentCategory Supervisor Evaluation Mentor Evaluation

Follows Oklahoma Criteria for Teaching Performance Instructional Indicators

2.0 2.5

Dispositions 2.38 3.0

Knowledge and Skills 3.0 2.8

Content Knowledge

Fall 2010

Student Teaching Assessment

Scoring – Passing Score = 2 or better1=Does not meet expectations 2=Meets expectations 3= Exceeds expectations

Candidates Average Score by Criteria/all assessments N = 1 Spring 2010



Content Knowledge

Student Teaching Evaluation - Physical Education Addendum

Standard Mentor Supervisor Overall

Instructional Phase 3.0 2.66 2.75

Lesson reflected content knowledge; selects developmentally appropriate activities; aware of age appropriate skill development; attended to proper progression of content.

3.0 3.0 3.0

Objectives based on PASS Skills written in behavioral terms.

3.0 3.0 3.0

Effectively demonstrates skills. 3.0 2.33 2.50

Fall 2010

Scoring criteria1=Unacceptable 2= Acceptable 3=Target

Candidates Average Score by Criteria/all assessments N=1

Analysis of assessment data Priority Outcome 3


Oklahoma Subject Area Test• Scaled score average above the state mean (250.7) for all candidates• Average scores, spring 2010, below the State mean in two Subareas – Growth and Development (I) and Health Concepts (II) • Subarea IV – Foundation of Movement and Sports Activities appears to be an area of strength for candidates• Subarea VI scores on the Constructed Response were significantly above the State mean

Student Teaching Assessment• Candidate’s performance score at or above Acceptable Level by all assessors• Mentor teacher tends to score the candidate higher in most categories

Fall 2010

Action plan for Student-Learning OutcomePriority Outcome 3


Outcome 1. Physical education teachers understand physical education content and disciplinary concepts related to the development of a physically educated person.


Monitor candidate performance on the OSAT.

Each Administration

Continuing All Faculty

Review course content to address Subarea Scores that are below the State mean.

Annually Continuing Faculty

Provide input to Education faculty concerning exemplary programs for observation and student teaching experiences.

Each Semester Faculty

Ancillary Actions(Optional)


• Prepare to seek State and National Recognition for the program• Address the new Standards for Initial Preparation of Physical Education Teachers (2008)• Revise the curriculum, where appropriate, to meet each Element of the new Standards• Monitor and address issues related to validity and reliability of assessment rubrics• Assessment Advisory Committee – recruit practicing professionals to become involved• Conduct Follow-up Survey• Utilize the Exit Survey to enhance program

Published information on graduates

46

Academic Year 09-10 Entered Graduate School Working In Discipline Other

Summer 2009

Fall 2009

Spring 2010 1

Total 1

Program Quality Improvement Report 2009-2010Fall 2010

b.s. physical education cip code : program code: 378

Documents