bringing faculty into the conversation aac&u 2014

23
Bringing Faculty into the Conversation about the Future of Liberal Education

Upload: julie-sievers

Post on 27-Jun-2015

284 views

Category:

Education


2 download

DESCRIPTION

Cory Lock - St. Edward's University Julie Sievers - St. Edward's University

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Bringing Faculty into the Conversation AAC&U 2014

Bringing Faculty into the Conversation about the Future of

Liberal Education

Page 2: Bringing Faculty into the Conversation AAC&U 2014

• Cost-saving

• Global learning and technology

• Online/blended courses for traditional undergraduates

• Digital literacy

• Competency-based learning

• Promoting experimentation

Technology-Related Issues

Page 3: Bringing Faculty into the Conversation AAC&U 2014

• MOOCs

• ePortfolios

• Learning analytics (particularly for flipped and blended classrooms)

• Game-based learning

• Open educational resources

• Technology supporting flipped classrooms

Education-Related Technologies

Page 4: Bringing Faculty into the Conversation AAC&U 2014

Write down 1-3 issues/technologies being

discussed on your campus.

Page 5: Bringing Faculty into the Conversation AAC&U 2014

What groups are (and are not) participating in these conversations?

• Board of Trustees?• Senior administrators? (e.g. president, vice-

presidents, …)• Deans?• Early adopters?• All faculty?• Instructional technology? • Those charged with overseeing curriculum? (e.g.

course or program directors, chairs, …)

Page 6: Bringing Faculty into the Conversation AAC&U 2014

Problem: Need for faculty involvement decision-making related to new technologies and related issues

Page 7: Bringing Faculty into the Conversation AAC&U 2014

Frames: Current Discussions• Selingo, Jeffrey L. 2013. “Attitudes on

Innovation: How College Leaders and Faculty See the Key Issues Facing Higher Education.” Chronicle of Higher Education.

• The Changing Nature of Faculty Roles: Peer Review 15:3, Summer 2013. Especially David Paris’s piece, “The Last Artisans? Traditional and Future Faculty Roles.”

Page 8: Bringing Faculty into the Conversation AAC&U 2014

A Complex Problem• Appearance of ongoing dialogue/conversation,

BUT…

• Faculty are not always “at the table”

• Issues often are not framed in terms of their relation to liberal arts pedagogy and goals

Page 9: Bringing Faculty into the Conversation AAC&U 2014

Discussion: The Table

Page 10: Bringing Faculty into the Conversation AAC&U 2014

Questions1. How do we ensure the right people (those who

work in liberal education and pedagogy) are at the table?

2. How do we frame our approach to change in terms of liberal education values and pedagogy?

Page 11: Bringing Faculty into the Conversation AAC&U 2014
Page 12: Bringing Faculty into the Conversation AAC&U 2014

Mission (and Mission-Derived ELOs)

Page 13: Bringing Faculty into the Conversation AAC&U 2014

• Critical thinking

• Problem solving

• Communication

• Moral reasoning

• Civic engagement

• Global perspective

Mission-Derived ELOs

Page 14: Bringing Faculty into the Conversation AAC&U 2014

• Survey of undergraduates regarding their educational experiences

• Provides a detailed perspective on campus culture

• Whatever tool you use, know your institutional strengths and weaknesses

Page 15: Bringing Faculty into the Conversation AAC&U 2014

5 NSSE Benchmarks of Effective Educational Practice

• High level of academic challenge

• Active and collaborative learning

• Student/faculty interaction

• Supportive campus environment

• Enriching educational experiences

Page 16: Bringing Faculty into the Conversation AAC&U 2014

What are your strengths and weaknesses?

• A strength: Supportive Campus Environment

• Room for growth: Active and Collaborative Learning at the senior level– Class presentations, group projects, discussing class

topics outside classroom, participating in community projects, participate in class…

Page 17: Bringing Faculty into the Conversation AAC&U 2014

AAC&U High-Impact Practices

• First‐Year Seminars and Experiences

• Common Intellectual Experiences

• Learning Communities

• Writing‐Intensive Courses

• Collaborative Assignments and Projects

• Undergraduate Research

• Diversity/Global Learning

• Service Learning

• Community‐Based Learning

• Internships

• Capstone Courses

Page 18: Bringing Faculty into the Conversation AAC&U 2014

AAC&U Resources

• 12 LEAP (Liberal Education and America’s Promise) Essential Learning Outcomes

• 16 VALUE rubrics (Valid Assessment of Learning in Undergraduate Education)

Page 19: Bringing Faculty into the Conversation AAC&U 2014

• Inquiry and analysis• Critical thinking• Creative thinking• Written

communication• Oral communication• Reading• Quantitative literacy• Information literacy• Teamwork• Problem solving

• Civic knowledge and engagement

• Intercultural knowledge and competence

• Ethical reasoning• Foundations and

skills for lifelong learning

• Global learning• Integrative and

applied learning

Page 20: Bringing Faculty into the Conversation AAC&U 2014
Page 21: Bringing Faculty into the Conversation AAC&U 2014
Page 22: Bringing Faculty into the Conversation AAC&U 2014

Framing questions for new technology, pedagogy, or structure: • Does it facilitate students’ acquisition of mission-

derived learning outcomes?

• Does it facilitate implementation of high-impact practices?

• Does it move students towards “Capstone-level” mastery of ELOs? (“deep learning”)