briefcase on corporation law iv shareholders’ right —— appraisal right of dissenters

11
Briefcase on Corporation Law IV Shareholders’ right —— Appraisal Right of Dissenters

Upload: darrell-holmes

Post on 05-Jan-2016

219 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Briefcase on Corporation Law IV Shareholders’ right —— Appraisal Right of Dissenters

Briefcase on Corporation Law IV

Shareholders’ right —— Appraisal Right of Dissenters  

Page 2: Briefcase on Corporation Law IV Shareholders’ right —— Appraisal Right of Dissenters

Case Summary Mr. Chen, Mr. Wang and Mr. Lee set up a real

estate company (hereinafter referred to as “the Company”). The registered capital of the Company is 20 million RMB. The Capital Structure of the Company is as follows:

Mr. Chen contributed 4 million RMB, accounting for 20% of the RC.

Mr. Wang contributed 12 million RMB, accounting for 60% of the RC.

Mr. Lee contributed 4 million RMB, accounting for 20% of the RC.

Page 3: Briefcase on Corporation Law IV Shareholders’ right —— Appraisal Right of Dissenters

Case Summary

Mr. Chen

Mr. Wang

Mr. Lee

RealEstate

Company

Mr. Chen was the Deputy General Manager of the

Company. But hehas removed from

His duty now.

Page 4: Briefcase on Corporation Law IV Shareholders’ right —— Appraisal Right of Dissenters

Case Summary Mr. Wang is the legal representative, chairman of

the board and general manager of the Company. Mr. Chen is the deputy general manager of the Company.

During the period of business operation, Mr. Chen and Mr. Wang could not reach consensus on some business issues. And the conflict between them had been worsened. Eventually Mr. Chen was removed from his duty.

Mr. Chen believed that he could not cooperate with Mr. Wang anymore and what he should do was to withdraw his contribution capital and leave the company.

Page 5: Briefcase on Corporation Law IV Shareholders’ right —— Appraisal Right of Dissenters

Case Summary Mr. Chen sued the Company to acquire his equity interests

based on a reasonable price. He claimed that He was out in the cold in the operation of the Company; It is difficult for him to participate in the daily operation

of the Company; He could not enjoy his shareholder’s right in a sound

way. The relationship among the shareholders was too bad to

conduct business in a friendly and efficient way. Mr. Wang’s behaviors showed that he intend to end up

the cooperation with Mr. Chen. Mr. Chen had no choice but to withdraw his

contribution.

Page 6: Briefcase on Corporation Law IV Shareholders’ right —— Appraisal Right of Dissenters

Case Summary

The Company defended that Mr. Wang acted properly and performed his duty in good manner. Mr. Wang did not intend to reject and ignore Mr. Chen’s shareholder’s right. The court shall not enforce Mr. Chen’s claim.

Page 7: Briefcase on Corporation Law IV Shareholders’ right —— Appraisal Right of Dissenters

What is Appraisal Right of DissentersAppraisal Right of Dissenters  ?

In corporate law the appraisal remedy gives shareholders the right to dissent from types of corporate transactions and to obtain payment for their shares from the corporation. The remedy is typically viewed as a form of protection for minority shareholders,.

The appraisal remedy in corporate law confers upon shareholders a statutory right to dissent from specified fundamental or structural changes in the life of their corporation. The remedy requires the corporation to facilitate the shareholders’ withdrawal by buying back their shares for fair value, or its equivalent, as determined through appraisal proceedings.

Page 8: Briefcase on Corporation Law IV Shareholders’ right —— Appraisal Right of Dissenters

Appraisal Right of Dissenters in Chinese Company Law 

Limited Liability Company Article 75 Under any of the following circumstances, shareholders who cast

an opposing vote to a resolution passed by the shareholders’ meeting may request that the company acquire their equity interests based on a reasonable price:

(1) the company has not made a profit distribution to the shareholders for five consecutive years although the company has been profitable for those five consecutive years and satisfy profit distribution requirements stipulated in this Law;

(2) merger, division and transfer of main assets of the company; or (3) expiry of the term of business operations stipulated in the articles of

association of the company or the occurrence of a trigger event for dissolution stipulated in the articles of association or the passing of a resolution by a shareholders’ meeting to amend the articles of association for subsistence of the company.

Where the shareholders fail to conclude an agreement for acquisition of equity interests within 60 days from the date of the resolution by the shareholders’ meeting, the shareholders may file a lawsuit with a people’s court within 90 days from the date of the resolution of the shareholders’ meeting.

Page 9: Briefcase on Corporation Law IV Shareholders’ right —— Appraisal Right of Dissenters

Appraisal Right of Dissenters in Chinese Company Law 

Company Limited by Shares Article 143 Companies shall not make a share bu

yback, except under any of the following circumstances:

(4) request from shareholders who object to a resolution of a shareholders’ general meeting on merger or division of the company for the company to acquire their shares.

Page 10: Briefcase on Corporation Law IV Shareholders’ right —— Appraisal Right of Dissenters

Questions

Shall the Company acquire Mr. Chen’s equity interests based on a reasonable price?

Can Mr. Chen enjoy Appraisal Right of Dissenters in this case?

What are the legal conditions and procedures to acquire shareholder’s equity in a LLC or a stock company?

Page 11: Briefcase on Corporation Law IV Shareholders’ right —— Appraisal Right of Dissenters

Case Analysis In this case, Mr. Chen shall not claim Appraisal Right of

Dissenters to seek remedy in accordance with the Article 75 of the Company Law. Consequently, Mr. Chen shall not require the Company to acquire his equities.

Actually, the condition in this case is common in daily operation of companies. Furthermore, it a possible risk resulting from the structure of a LLC. If a shareholder of LLC is allowed to claim Appraisal Right of Dissenters in this condition, the sound operation of LLC will be affected greatly.

This case gives a message to all the shareholders of a LLC or investors intending to establish a LLC, that is be prudent and cautious when choosing partners. Furthermore, shareholders or promoters can agree on withdrawal mechanism to avoid the future risk.