boomtime: risk as economics (allison miller, siracon15)

19
Allison Miller [email protected] @selenakyle

Upload: a-e-miller

Post on 11-Feb-2017

3.577 views

Category:

Technology


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Allison Miller [email protected]

@selenakyle

THEMES OF SECURITY ECONOMICS Security ROI Cybercrime supply chains Market for Lemons Make it more expensive for the

attacker Tragedy of the Commons Risk Tolerance Exploit/Vuln markets Behavioral Economics / Gamification

#B O O M T I M E #R I S K @ S E L E N A K Y L E

MICROECONOMICS Model for estimating consumption given individual

preferences, under a budget constraint •  Utility maximization

•  Preferences: Consumption mix •  Good A vs Good B •  Labor vs leisure •  Budget constraint

#B O O M T I M E #R I S K @ S E L E N A K Y L E

THE CONSUMER MODEL: EXPANDED Extensible from micro into macro •  Extensible to firms Ø  Estimate production given profits under cost/demand/price constraints

•  Extensible to competition for resources (consumers, firms) Ø  Roots of game theory

•  Extensible to markets Ø  Aggregation across many to many (markets for goods, money, labor)

•  Extensible to public sector Ø  Government spend (fiscal) & policy (monetary)

•  Extensible to economies

#B O O M T I M E #R I S K @ S E L E N A K Y L E

THE LANGUAGE OF RISK Some optimization functions

assume *certainty* •  e.g. preferences, costs

But making decisions under uncertainty is core to:

•  Competition •  Investment •  Reality

#B O O M T I M E #R I S K @ S E L E N A K Y L E

RISK AVERSION Concept where theory meets behavior •  Expected value vs expected variance •  Probability gives you both, we tend to focus on E(x)

•  Risk aversion is a condition that relies on V(x)

#B O O M T I M E #R I S K @ S E L E N A K Y L E

AN EXAMPLE You have $20k, but a 50/50 chance of losing $10k •  Expected value? •  $15k (i.e. .5($20k)+.5($10k))

Insurance costing $5k will cover full loss. Should you buy it or not? •  Expected value w/insurance? •  $15k (for sure) •  Expected value w/o insurance •  $15k (but as EITHER $10k or $20k)

The risk averse individual will opt for the same expected value with less uncertainty (less risk) §  People seek utility maximization, not payoffs §  Risk, i.e. uncertainty, reduces overall utility (wealth)

#B O O M T I M E #R I S K @ S E L E N A K Y L E

AN EXAMPLE…CONTINUED You have $20k, but a 50/50 chance of losing $10k •  Expected value = $15k You are offered partial insurance costing $2.5k will cover half of the loss ($5k). @ No Loss: $17.5k ($20k – 2.5k) @ Loss: $12.5k ($20k – 2.5k – 10k – 5k) •  Expected value = •  $15k (but as EITHER $17.5k or $12.5k)

Risk, i.e. uncertainty, is reduced but there is still a $5k variance

#B O O M T I M E #R I S K @ S E L E N A K Y L E

WHAT THIS LOOKS LIKE Utility

Wealth E(V)

U(total) U(partial)

U(no insurance)

12.5 17.5 15

#B O O M T I M E #R I S K @ S E L E N A K Y L E

HOW TO WIN AT RISK Win or lose? •  Game theory approach: maximize payoff …Tends to gravitate towards expected value •  The “defender’s dilemma” assumes a risk intolerant

system manager …Lower expected loss. Ok, sounds like expected value. •  Optimal investments manage to value and variance …Build systems with better risk capacity …Portfolio theory, not just point performance Boom or bust maybe a better analogy?

#B O O M T I M E #R I S K @ S E L E N A K Y L E

WINNING AT ECONOMICS

BOOM! #B O O M T I M E #R I S K @ S E L E N A K Y L E

A BIT ABOUT ECONOMICS Speaking of econ

#B O O M T I M E #R I S K @ S E L E N A K Y L E

META ON MACRO Early 20th century: Ø  Panics! Chaos!

Depression!

30’s-50’s: Data Ø  Gather, Count & Measure

50’s-70’s: Models Ø  Keynesians Rule!

70’s - now: Modern Macro Ø  RBC vs New Keynesians

Given that the structure of an econometric model consists of optimal decision rules of economic agents,

and that optimal decision rules vary systematically with changes in the structure of series relevant to the decision maker, it follows that any change in policy will

systematically alter the structure of econometric models. −Lucas' Critique (1976)

#B O O M T I M E #R I S K @ S E L E N A K Y L E

SUPERMODELS

Lucas Critique The α coefficients in Keynesian macroeconometric frameworks should be

thought of as depending on government policy directly.

Source: Modern Macroeconomics, Sanjay Chugh http://skchugh.com/teachingmanuscript.html

#B O O M T I M E #R I S K @ S E L E N A K Y L E

POSITIVE VS NORMATIVE ECONOMICS

Positive Normative

What it is

What it should be

Descriptions Recommendations

#B O O M T I M E #R I S K @ S E L E N A K Y L E

CURRENCY OF RISK

Preferences Utility Money

Returns Competition

Tolerances Uncertainty

Data

Returns Adversaries

#B O O M T I M E #R I S K @ S E L E N A K Y L E

BOOMTIME

Preferences Utility Money

Returns Competition

Tolerances Uncertainty

Data

Returns Adversaries

Policy Analysis Graph Theory Dynamic Threat Models

Cyberinsurance Security Econometrics Classification

Inferior Goods Security “CPI” Incentive Design Coalitional Game Theory

#B O O M T I M E #R I S K @ S E L E N A K Y L E

HOW TO WIN [RISK] FRIENDS & INFLUENCE [INVESTMENT] PEOPLE

BoomTime •  Consider framing our goals

as “booming” vs “winning”

All about that base…variance

•  Bring your E(x) AND V(x) game

Positive vs Normative Risk •  Your model’s in my policy…

your policy’s in my model

#B O O M T I M E #R I S K @ S E L E N A K Y L E

#B O O M T I M E #R I S K @ S E L E N A K Y L E