bob deragisch, dir. of engineering services, parker ... · bob deragisch, dir. of engineering...
TRANSCRIPT
1
Bob Deragisch, Dir. Of Engineering Services, Parker Hannifin
Tony Anderson, VP & General Manager, Kubotek USA
2
Agenda
• Parker Overview
• Kubotek USA products utilized
• CAD Standardization Project
• Design Review & ECO process (past, current, future)
3
Parker Hannifin Corporation
A worldwide, diversified manufacturer of
motion and control technologies and systems
• Headquartered in Cleveland, Ohio
• 58,000+ employees
• $13B+ Revenue
4
Parker Aerospace
5
Global leader in flight control, hydraulic, fuel and
inerting, fluid conveyance, thermal management,
and engine systems and components
• $2+ billion in annual sales
• 6,500 employees
• Seven divisions, 45 worldwide locations
Parker Aerospace
Updated 07/01/12
6
Engineering Centers, Asia
Bangalore, India
Nagoya, Japan
Shanghai, China
Worldwide Divisions and Facilities A Global Organization
Aircraft Wheel & Brake Avon, Ohio Guaymas, Mexico
Control Systems Dublin, Georgia Irvine, California Ogden, Utah
Customer Support Operations Irvine, California - HQ
Fluid Systems Elyria, Ohio Guaymas, Mexico Hauppauge, New York Irvine, California Naples, Florida Tolleson, Arizona
Gas Turbine Fuel Systems Clyde, New York Devens, Massachusetts Glendale, Arizona Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia Liberty Lake, Washington Mentor, Ohio Moncks Corner, So. Carolina
Hydraulic Systems Kalamazoo, Michigan Wiesbaden, Germany
Stratoflex Products Apodaca, Mexico Camarillo, California Fort Worth, Texas Jacksonville, Florida Mansfield, Texas
Engineering Centers, Americas
Everett, Washington
Fort Worth, Texas
Irvine, California
Montreal, Canada
Portsmouth, New Hampshire
São José dos Campos, Brazil
Engineering Centers, Europe
Bremen, Germany
Bristol, England
Derby, England
Komsomolsk, Russia
Moscow, Russia
Toulouse, France
Wiesbaden, Germany
7
Standard Design and Development Process Lean Product Development (LPD)
Risk and cycle time reduced
8
Multi-function Fuel Cell System
“ We want to make our aircraft even more efficient, cleaner, and quieter.”
Tom Enders President and CEO, Airbus
Airbus is fully committed to the fuel cell technology as a key contributor to achieve the ACARE* 2020 goals
-80% NOx
emissions
-50% CO2
emissions
-50% Fuel
consumptions
-50% Noise
emissions
*Advisory Council for Aeronautics Research in Europe
9
Serving the World’s Aerospace Leaders
10
Parker Aerospace
11
Kubotek USA
12
Kubotek USA Comparison Suite
13
Parker CAD Standardization Project
• Moved From Legacy Systems to CATIA V5
• SolidWorks
• SolidEdge
• NX
• Pro-E
• Wildfire 2, Wildfire 4
• Inventor
• Anvil
• Bravo
• CADDS 5
• Why?
14
Business Objectives in Design Engineering
Reduce design and development costs
Reduce cycle time by 50% Reduce NRE by 30%
Reduce design and development lead times
Reduce lead time by 25% Reduce process time by 30%
Minimize/eliminate operational problems at entry into service
Improve information quality by 50% Reduce EIS cycle time by 25%
Maximize customer satisfaction
Reduce warranty returns by 50%
Support Programs Throughout LIFE (50+ years)
15
Customer Expectations
16
CAD at Parker Aerospace
And… Bravo Anvil AutoCAD Inventor UG NX Wildfire IronCAD …
1918
Parker founded
1927
Parker Aerospace founded (fuel pumps for Ryan Aircraft – Spirit of St. Louis)
1977
Computervision (CADDS4, 4x, 5, 5x)
1981
CADAM Implemented
1984
CATIA V2 Implemented
1992
Pro/E Implemented
1997
SolidWorks Implemented
CAD data stored ‘everywhere’!
Okay – maybe
not whiskey
barrels (but note correct spelling)
17
CAD at Parker Aerospace
Group Engineering Leadership recognizes inherent loss of productivity with 7+ CAD tools
Establishes Strategy: SINGLE CAD TOOL for Mechanical Design across the Group
Version 5
18
Parker CAD Standardization Project
• Validation of Data Migration
• Why validate?
• Why validate automatically?
19
Why automation
• Automation is NOT a substitute for a good process
• Automation enhances a good process
• Automation speeds up bad processes too
• GIGO
• Process standards and adaptability are key
20
Parker Historical Design Review / ECO Process
Design reviews occur before every gate/review in SDDP
37 step process to create ECR, route for approval, generate
ECO, incorporate change, release!
Component, LRU, Assembly, System review
See next page for more detail -
Bid & Proposal Plan & Organize Requirements
Discovery
Trade & Select
Product Concepts Develop Product Integrate Product Verify Product Validate Product Introduce Product Deliver Product Support Product
Contract
Award
Master
Program
Plan (MPP)
System
Requirements
Review (SRR)
Prelim.
Design
Review (PDR)
Critical
Design
Review (CDR)
Test
Readiness
Review (TRR)
Flight
Readiness
Review (FRR)
Certification
Operators
Conferences Production
Readiness
Review (PRR)
21
And most steps have nothing to do with CAD data update or review!
22
Bid & Proposal Plan & Organize Requirements
Discovery
Trade & Select
Product Concepts Develop Product Integrate Product Verify Product Validate Product Introduce Product Deliver Product Support Product
Contract
Award
Master
Program
Plan (MPP)
System
Requirements
Review (SRR)
Prelim.
Design
Review (PDR)
Critical
Design
Review (CDR)
Test
Readiness
Review (TRR)
Flight
Readiness
Review (FRR)
Certification
Operators
Conferences
User Needs
DR&O
Aircraft Needs
System Require.
System Needs
System Spec.
System Config.
SDD & Comp. Specs
Comp. Config.
Install & Assy Drws
Part Config.
Detail Drawings
Aircraft Validation
User Satisfaction
System Validation
Flight Testing
Is it the right system
System Verification
System Testing
Is the system right
System Integration
System Physical &
Functional Checks
Comp. Build & Test
FAI & Qual
Part Build & Learn
SPC
Program Timeline & Maturity
Study Period Development Period Test Period Production Period
Production
Readiness
Review (PRR)
23
Parker Historical Design Review / ECO Process
• REDLINING
• “Let me understand – first you print it, then you mark it up,
then you scan it, then you route it. And every person on the
route does the same thing?”
24
Parker Historical Design Review / ECO Process
Design reviews were simple, when components were
simple.
"Software gets slower faster than hardware gets faster“ • Niklaus Wirth, 1995
25
Parker Historical Design Review / ECO Process
IS WAS
Can you tell me the difference?
26
Parker New Design Review / ECO Process
• Kubotek Products Utilized
27
Original CAD file Revised file
Manually
Overlay
Models
Manually
Document
Change
Manually
Measure
Change
Manually
Locate
Change
Old Parker Comparison Process
28
Unmanageable Change
29
Automatic Graphical Change Report
Creation Including Dimensions and
Storage of Results for Viewing by
Additional Team Members
Automatic
Geometric
Comparison
Automatic
organization of
changes
Read Into ECO
Manager and
Define
Tolerances
Revision A Revision B
New Parker Comparison Process
30
Change Manageability
31
Parker New Design Review / ECO Process
• Make all changes in 3D Master
• Identify all changes automatically
• Compare to ECR (requested changes)
• Identify discrepancies
• Changed but not requested (False positive)
• Requested but not changed (False negative)
32
Parker New Design Review / ECO Process
• Changes all verified
• Checkers are no longer ‘protein robots’ – software
does the job
• Checking time from days to seconds
• 100% of all changes captured and confirmed
33
Parker Future Processes
• Full automation (CSD Project)
• KeyMarkUp for Drawing Compare
• Especially for legacy designs brought forward
• PLM (Enovia V6) Integration
34
? ?
Questions
35
36
Bob Deragisch, [email protected], 1 (949) 851-3607
Tony Anderson, [email protected], 1 (616) 862-8653