board of directors clark county regional flood...

FILE COPY

BFB

NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING

BOARD OF DIRECTORS

CLARK COUNTY REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT

DECEMBER 10, 1992

8:30 A.M.

CLARK COUNTY COMMISSION CHAMBERS

225 EAST BRIDGER AVENUE

LAS VEGAS, NEVADA 89155

FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION CONTACT:

VIRGINIA BAX-VALENTINE, P.E., GENERAL MANAGER

301 EAST CLARK AVENUE, SUITE 301

LAS VEGAS NEVADA 89101

455-31 39

POSTED: DECEMBER 4, 1992

CITY OF NORTH LAS VEGAS 2200 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE NORTH LAS VEGAS, NV 89030

CLARK COUNTY BRIDGER BUILDING 225 EAST BRIDGER AVENUE LAS VEGAS, NV 89155

CITY OF LAS VEGAS CITY HALL 400 EAST STEWART LAS VEGAS, NV 89101

Fremont Street

j 1 'F!

REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT ......... I

301 EAST CLARK, SUITE 301 LAS VEGAS, NV 89101

BY: /Jon Downer

h

AGENDA CLARK COUNTY REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT

BOARD OF DIRECTORS DECEMBER 10,1992

1. CALL TO ORDER AND MINUTES

1) ACTION TO CALL THE MEETING TO ORDER AND TO APPROVE THE AGENDA

2) ACTION TO APPROVE THE MINUTES OF THE REGULARLY SCHEDULED MEETING OF NOVEMBER 12, 1992 *

II. PLANNING

3) ACTION TO AUTHORIZE THE GENERAL MANAGER TO ISSUE A REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS TO PERFORM RESTUDIES OF THE FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY FOR THE LAS VEGAS VALLEY

111. DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION

4) WESTERN TRIBUTARY TO THE LAS VEGAS WASH - CAMINO AL NORTE

A) ACTION TO APPROVE A REQUEST BY THE CITY OF NORTH LAS VEGAS TO REPRIORITIZE PROJECTS ON THE FISCAL YEAR

PROGRAM 1992-93 PROJECT LIST AND THE DISTRICT'S TEN YEAR

B) ACTION TO ACCEPT A PROJECT PRESENTATION BY THE CITY OF NORTH LAS VEGAS ON THE WESTERN TRIBUTARY TO THE LAS VEGAS WASH - CAMJNO AL NORTE

C) ACTION TO APPROVE AND AUTHORIZE THE CHAIRMAN TO SIGN A DEVELOPER PARTICIPATION CONTRACT AMONG THE DISTRICT, THE CITY OF NORTH LAS VEGAS AND PARDEE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY FOR CONSTRUCTION OF THE

NORTE WESTERN TRIBUTARY TO THE LAS VEGAS WASH - CAMINO AL

I Agenda - December 10, 1992 Board of Directors Page 2

5) ACTION TO APPROVE AND AUTHORIZE THE CHAIRMAN TO SIGN THE SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL INTERLOCAL CONTRACT FOR THE DESIGN OF THE UNNAMED WASH IN LAUGHLIN, NEVADA

6) RAWHIDE CHANNEL PHASE 111

A) ACTION TO ACCEPT A PROJECT PRESENTATION BY CLARK COUNTY ON THE RAWHIDE CHANNEL PHASE 111 PROJECT AT ANNIE OAKLEY DRIVE AND THROUGH TOMIYASU SCHOOL

B) ACTION TO APPROVE AND AUTHORIZE THE CHAIRMAN TO SIGN THE SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL INTERLOCAL CONTRACT FOR CONSTRUCTION OF THE RAWHIDE CHANNEL PHASE 111 PROJECT AT ANNIE OAKLEY DRIVE AND THROUGH TOMIYASU SCHOOL

I IV. ADMINISTRATION

7 ) ACTION TO ACCEPT THE PROJECT STATUS REPORTS

8 ) ACTION TO ACCEPT THE FINANCIAL REPORTS

9) ACTION TO ACCEPTTHE FINAL ACCOUNTING REPORT AND PROJECT CLOSE OUT

10) CITIZENS PARTICIPATION No action can be taken on any matter discussed under this item, although the Board can direct that it be placed on a future agenda

MINUTES CLARK COUNTY REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT

BOARD OF DIRECTORS NOVEMBER 12,1992

MEETING NOTICES: Public Notices of the meeting were posted November 5, 1992, by Jon Downer of the Regional Flood Control District in the following locations: Las Vegas City Hall, North Las Vegas City Hall, Clark County Bridger Building, and the Clark County Regional Flood Control District offices.

Public Notices of the meeting were also mailed on November 5, 1992 to the cities of Boulder City, Henderson, Laughlin, and Mesquite for posting on community notice boards.

MEMBERS PRESENT: Michael R. Harris, Chairman, City of Henderson Thalia Dondero, Vice-chairman, Clark County Iris Bletsch, City of Boulder City Bruce Woodbury, Clark County Jan Laverty-Jones, City of Las Vegas Scott Higginson, City of Las Vegas Bruce Jensen, City of Mesquite Theron Goynes, City of North Las Vegas

STAFF; Virginia Valentine, General Manager Gale Wm. Fraser I I , Assistant General Manager Deanna Lefko, Management Analyst I Chris Figgins, Deputy District Attorney Kevin L. Eubanks, Senior Engineer Catherine Razor, Project Administration Coordinator Chrisell Anderson-Jones, Business & Finance

JNTERESTED P A R T I B Martin J. Manning, Clark County Public Works Mike Hand, Clark County Public Works Kurt Weinrich, Regional Transportation Commission David Parks, Regional Transportation Commission Larry Bender, City of Las Vegas Planning Tom McGowan, Citizen

Board Minutes November 12, 1992 Page 2

1. CALL TO ORDER AND MINUTES

1) ACTION TO CAI ,L THE MEETING TO ORDER AND TO APPROVE THE AGENDA

AND

2) ACTION TO APPROVE THE MINUTES OF THE RFGULARLY SCHEDULED ER 8. 1992

The meeting was called to order at 8:34 a.m.

Commissioner Dondero moved to approve the minutes and the agenda. There being no further discussion, the motion carried.

VOTE: 7 AYES - 0 NAYS

4) JNTRODUCTION OF NEW BOARD MEMBFR

Chairman Harris asked that Items #3 and #4 be heard in reversed order since Councilman Leavitt was not present. Chairman Harris introduced and welcomed Bruce Jensen, recently appointed by the City of Mesquite to represent Mesquite, to the Board of Directors of the Clark County Regional Flood Control District and the Regional Transportation Commission.

3) RECOGNITION OF COUNCILMAN LEAVllT FOR SERVICE ON THE BOARD

Chairman Harris acknowledged Councilman Tommy Leavitt's dedication and service on the Regional Flood Control District's Board of Directors, and presented a plaque of appreciation. Councilman Jensen accepted the honors on Councilman Leavitt's behalf and conveyed his appreciation of the recognition.

II. DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION

5) ACTION TO APPROVE THE FIRST SUPPLEMENTAL INTERLOCAL CONTRACT FOR THE ENGINEERING OF THE GOWAN NORTH CHANNEL

Ms. Valentine stated that the predesign report had been completed and that the City of Las Vegas' request for an additional 8 10,000 would increase the interlocal contract to $1 10,000. She said Pay-as-you-go funds were available, the District Attorney had approved the contract as to form, and staff recommended approval.

I Board Minutes November 12, 1992 Page 3

Councilman Higginson moved for approval. There being no further discussion, the motion carried.


6) PUCK CREEK CHANNEL CROSSING

6A) ACTION TO ACCEPT A PRESENTATION FROM CLARK COUNTY ON TYE E T R IT AND TOMIYASU LANE

Mike Hand, Civil Engineer, Clark County Department of Public Works, made the presentation.

6B) ACTION TO APPROVE THE SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL INTERLOCAL CONTRACT FOR CONSTRUCTION OF THE DUCK CREEK CHANNEL CROSSINGS AT PACHUCA (LA CASITA) STREET AND TOMIYASU LANE

I Ms. Valentine stated that Clark County's request for additional funding of $71 0,000 will bring the total amount of the lnterlocal Contract to $855,000. Pay-as-you-go funds are available, the District Attorney has reviewed the contract as to form, and staff recommended approval.

Commissioner Woodbury moved to accept the presentation and to approve the . lnterlocal Contract. There being no further discussion, the motion carried.


7) LOWER DUCK CRFEK DETENTION BASIN

7A) ACTION TO APPROVE A REQUEST FROM CLARK COUNTY TO REPRIORITIZE PROJECTS ON THE DISTRICT'S 1 0-YEAR CONSTRUCTION PLAN AND THE FISCAL YEAR 1992/93 PROJECT LIST

Ms. Valentine stated that the area of the Duck Creek Detention Basin is the single most important facility to be constructed on the Duck Creek. The project is located at the confluence of several minor tributaries to the main channel of the Duck Creek Wash, and is a critical element of the Master Plan. Property in the area is currently in private holdings, with intense development taking place. To avoid taking any private homes or displacing citizens, Clark County has reprioritized their projects, and will not increase the funding of this project by delaying work on others. It is good


planning to proceed with right-of-way acquisition and preliminary engineering on the site before the area becomes developed as a residential neighborhood. Staff recommends approval of Clark County's request to change priorities on the list.

Commissioner Woodbury moved for approval. There being no further discussion,, the motion carried.


78) ACTION TO APPROVE THE INTERLOCAL CONTRACT FOR PRELIMINARY ENGIWRING OF THE LOWER DUCK CREEK DETENTION BASIN

Commissioner Woodbury moved for approval. There being no further discussion, the motion carried.


8) ACTION TO APPROVE THE SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL INTERLOCAL

CONTROL IMPROVEMENTS CONTRACT FOR RIGHT-OF-WAY ACQUISITION FOR THE SEARCHLIGHT FLOOD

Ms. Valentine stated that funds are programmed on the Pay-as-you-go list, the Interlocal Contract has been reviewed by the District Attorney's office, and staff recommends approval.



9) ACTION TO APPROVE THE INTERLOCAL CONTRACT FOR DESIGN OF THE SLOAN CHANNEL BETWEEN THE LAS VEGAS WASH AND OWENS AVFNUE

Ms. Valentine stated that this project is programmed for this current fiscal year and funding is available through Pay-as-you-gofunds. The District Attorney has reviewed the contract and staff recommended approval.

1 Board Minutes November 12, 1992 Page 5

Commissioner Dondero moved for approval. There being no further discussion, the motion carried.


10) ACTION TO ACCEPT A RECOMMENDATION FROM THE CITY OF LAS VEGAS FOR THE AWARD OF BID FOR CONSTRUCTION OF THE WASHINGTON AVENUE CONVEYANCE SYSTEM - SANDHILL ROAD TO VIRGIL STREET

Ms. Valentine stated that the City of Las Vegas received four bids, the best being - from Max Riggs Construction ($1,551,649.52), which is lower than the engineer's estimate. Staff recommends approval of the City of Las Vegas' recommendation to award the bid to Max Riggs Construction.

Councilman Higginson added that the bid was 21 percent (21 %) lower than the engineer's estimate.

Councilman Higginson moved for approval. There being no further discussion, the 1 motion carried.


11) ACTION TO ACCEPT A RECOMMENDATION FROM CLARK COUNTY FOR THE AWARD OF BID FOR CONSTRUCTION OF THE LOGAN WASH CHANNEL - AREA 1 .

Ms. Valentine stated that the environmental problems which previously existed on this project have been resolved and staff recommends approval of Clark County's recommendation to award the bid to Ron Williams Construction in the amount of ~ 0 7 ~ 7 1 a . 3 4 .



12) ACTION TO APPROVE A REQUEST FROM THE CITY OF LAS VEGAS FOR CONTRACT MODIFICATION NO. 1 ON THE GOWAN DETENTION BASINS PROJECT

Ms. Valentine stated the contract modification for $86,889.57 represents a water line relocation, installation of a sanitary sewer, adjustment and installation of manholes,

1


all of which need to be completed, however, were not included on the plans. Staff recommended approval.

Councilman Higginson expressed the City's appreciation for the cooperation the Regional Flood Control District, School District, and the contractor displayed during construction of this project. Since the project is located next to a school, the funding the District provided to bus children safely to and from school was very much appreciated. He also expressed thanks to the contractor for ceasing construction activities on Election Day, thus allowing the public better access to one of the a polling locations.



13) ACTION TO APPROVE A REnUEST FROM THE CITY OF LAS VEGAS FOR CONTRACT MODIFICATION NO. 1 ON THE CAREY/LAKE MEAD DETENTION BASIN PROJECT

Ms. Valentine stated the request to increase the construction in the amount of $53,000 will allow for the application of a dust suppressant on the site. The existing interlocal contract funding is sufficient to fund the requested contract modification and staff recommended approval.



111. ADMINISTRATION

14) ACTION TO ADOPT THE FISCAL YEAR 1991/92 ANNUAL REPORT AND AUTHORIZE THE GENERAL MANAGER TO PROVIDE COPIES TO THE PUBLIC AT NO COST

Ms. Valentine stated that Cathy Razor and Deanna Lefko worked extensively on the preparation of the Annual Report. This year, with the exception of the cover and the maps, the report was printed in black and white on recycled paper. She stated that

i Board Minutes November 12, 1992 Page 7

under Nevada Statutes, the District is allowed to charge for the distribution and postage of the report; however, staff requests approval to distribute the Annual Report at no cost to the public.

Councilman Bletsch expressed her satisfaction with the report and inquired about the cost-savings realized in printing the document in black and white. Ms. Razor stated that savings were approximately $1,500 in the cost of printing 1,000 copies.

Chairman Harris commented that the document is very informative and that staff was to be commended on the work done to prepare the Annual Report.

Councilman Goynes moved for approval. There being no further discussion, the motion carried.


15) RECEIVE/DISCUSS A REPORT ON THE ACQUISITION OF FUTURE OFFICE AND MEETING SPACE FOR THE REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT (RFCD) AND

AS DEEMED APPROPRIATE I J3EGIONALTRANSPORTATlON COMMISSION (RTC) AND ACTION TO DIRFCT STAFF

Ms. Valentine stated that the Board had previously discussed the financial benefits of building/owning their own building for the RFCD and RTC, rather than continuing to lease. At previous direction of the Board, and in cooperation with Kurt Weinrich and the RTC staff, staff concentrated their search for new sites primarily in the downtown area, with the City of Las Vegas' Redevelopment Agency's assistance.

Ms. Razor gave a report which included information that upon investigation, a building downtown suitable for renovation was not located; however, over fifteen (15) land properties on which a building could be constructed were considered. Staff requests that the sites be narrowed to a select few, thus enabling staff to study in more detail the overall costs, availability of redevelopment funds, adequacy of property size to accommodate the building footprint and parking, the economies of building out versus building up, and the availability of public transportation to the site.

Messrs. Weinrich and Parks were available to answer questions and to comment further.

Commissioner Dondero commented that it appeared the location had been narrowed down to the downtown location. Ms. Valentine said that based upon an earlier


directive by the Board, the investigation was concentrated in the downtown area because of the close proximity to several of the other City Councils and the County Commission.

Commissioner Dondero mentioned the County's Commercial Center and the parking available. Ms. Valentine said that by locating the offices across from the County, there would be a possibility of savings, in terms of working with the County on a parking structure. She added that the City Redevelopment Agency is also in favor of facilitating off-site parking to bring people into the downtown area. Ms. Valentine said that as a public agency, parking is one of the very high priorities in searching for the office building location.

Commissioner Woodbury asked if all of the sites were within the City's redevelopment area. Ms. Valentine replied that she believed those east of I1 5 were within the area. Ms. Razor added that specifically sites #14 and #15 were not, and while the others were, the likelihood of redevelopment assistance would be the greatest in developing either site #1 or site #2.

Chairman Harris inquired about available funds on site #11. Ms. Valentine said that the Redevelopment Agency has limited resources and priorities for areas to be redeveloped. Sites #1 and #2 fall within their criteria, and there is probably not a real good opportunity for any assistance outside of that area.

Councilman Higginson explained that on site #2 the City has the first option to purchase that site up until February 1993; therefore, the City is anxious to influence the development of that property, thereby guaranteeing the property's usage. Further, he said that the City Council has been discussing when and what type of funding can be made available and what criteria should be met for assistance. Councilman Higginson said that he personally believes, that based upon past action of keeping public entities and projects downtown, the City would assist in purchasing that land.

Commissioner Dondero inquired about the land acquisition of Minami Tower and whether or not the existing structure is usable. Councilman Higginson responded that what is in the ground now is usable if someone wants to construct a 34-story office tower. He added that the Federal Government has given the City a very strong indication that a new Federal Building will be seen on that site -- either a newly constructed building or reconstruction of the existing structure.

Addressing his question to Councilman Higginson, Chairman Harris asked what kind of assistance could be expected from the City if site #2 were chosen. And of staff, he asked how the economics would weigh if site #2 were chosen withlwithout

Board Minutes ' November 12, 1992 Page 9

assistance from the City versus choosing site #11 at a cost approximating $1 2 per square foot. Ms. Valentine replied that those are the types of questions which will be addressed once the number of sites have been narrowed down. She explained that the officials in the City's Redevelopment Agency cannot present negotiations on 15 pieces of property. It is more feasible for staff to work out the economics on a few select pieces of property, and then have discussions with the City's Redevelopment staff. In turn, they can present items to their Council which will determine to what extent it is in their interest to assist in the District's relocation.

Councilman Higginson concurred with Ms. Valentine, reiterating the necessity in narrowing down potential site locations, thus enabling City staff to proceed with determining what would be most economical and beneficial for the City, as well as for the RTC and RFCD. He added that the City would be most anxious to participate in the development of sites #1, #2, and #11.

Ms. Valentine said that considering the cost of the land, staff would like to keep either site #14 or #15 in the site review process, although the properties are outside the redevelopment area, are zoned primarily retail/commercial, and are not within walking

I distance of any of the other governmental offices.

Commissioner Dondero stated that she was in favor of using the UPRR property; however, the location of adult book stores on Main Street makes that location less desirable. Councilman Higginson gave information on some recent Supreme Court rulings pertinent to adult book stores.

Councilman Higginson suggested staff review in detail sites #1, #2, #11, #14 and #15. Councilman Bletsch stated her objection to site #1 was its small size. Ms. Valentine said that the City's Redevelopment Agency can provide many different types of assistance, which includes land acquisition and overcoming the parking problem. She added that staff's priorities in site-selection included parking, public access, availability and access to other governmental entities. From that point, the choice would be strictly economics driven.

Councilman Bletsch stated that with the growing public interest and participation in both the RFCD and the RTC, public access and parking availability are high priorities and should be planned for. She moved that staff further investigate the feasibility of building at sites #2, #11, #14 and #15.

Larry Bender, City of Las Vegas Redevelopment Agency, addressed the Board. He said that there is an existing parking garage located next to site #1. The City has

I already spoken with the developer who owns the property, and the possibility exists


of working with them to expand that parking garage. The Redevelopment Agency would probably be able to assist in this area.

Councilman Bletsch amended the motion to direct staff to review site #1, #2, #11, and, at staff's discretion, either site #14 or #15. There being no further discussion, the motion carried.


16) ACTION TO ADOPT NEW/RFVISED W I O N A t FI OOD CONTROL DISTRICT POS IT ION DESCRIPTIONS AND AUTHORIZE THE GENERM MANAGER TO PROCEEp WITH ADDITIONAL CHANGES AS R F Q U I m

Ms. Valentine stated that the primary motivation behind updating the job descriptions was to meet requirements of the American with Disabilities Act. Additionally, as a small agency many of the employees perform a myriad of functions, necessitating an update to include the hybrid positions. She announced that Dennis Johnson had left his position with the District as Manager of Business and Finance for a new position in Chicago. Acting in his place while the recruitment process to fill the vacancy continues, is an Accounting Assistant, Chrisell Anderson-Jones. There is no existing job description to allow her to function in that capacity. Staff recommended approval of the job descriptions.

Chairman Harris moved for approval. There being no further discussion, the motion carried.


17) RECEIVE THE FIRST C2UARTER STATUS REPORTS ON THE FlSCAl YFAR 1992/93 MAINTENANCE WORK PROGRAMS

Ms. Valentine stated that this is the first report since the new fiscal year, and although expenditures were minimal, work has been started. She said staff has been out to look at some of the work in progress, and expects expenditures to increase on the next update. She further explained that this report merely reflects what has been paid out, and not what work has been done. She added that the Fiscal 1991 /92 work has nearly been completed and the new program is underway.

Chairman Harris commented that the Board hoped all the entities had RFPs out and work plans are being drawn up. Ms. Valentine explained that as a new program it

I Board Minutes November 12, 1992 Page 11

took some time to get geared up; however, the entities are up-to-speed, have reached critical mass, and the work is progressing.

(Mayor Jones arrived at 9:09 a.m.)

18) ACTION TO ACCFPT THE PROJECT STATUS REPORTS

Ms. Valentine stated there are 31 projects complete to date, 10 currently under construction, and about 27 in a design phase or awaiting start of construction. She cited the significant milestones reached during the month of October in project completions and starts. Ms. Catherine Razor gave a brief overview of the status of the projects.

Commissioner Dondero requested updated information on the status of the Winnick Avenue project. Ms. Valentine explained that the Winnick Avenue project is a very complicated hydraulic system. Rather than testing the design using a mathematical model, it is better to simulate the system using a physical model. This may be the most unique facility the District will build and it took some time to find the necessary expertise to build the hydraulic model. Clark County has recently entered into a contract and the project is now back on track. I

Commissioner Dondero asked if the velocity and effects of flowing water had been tested. Mr. Manning, Director of Clark County Public Works explained that they are trying to design an inlet which will capture all the water between the Imperial Palace . and Ida Street on Winnick. The design can handle all the input which can be defined from manuals and models, but to be absolutely sure, Clark County has requested the Bureau of Reclamation to create a physical model. The Board of County Commissioners recently approved the contract. The term of the Bureau of Reclamation's study is 90 days, and there are approximately 70 days left before results will be available. The remainder of the plans are complete, and while the test results from the hydraulic model may result in some modifications in the plans, the County will be able to proceed immediately with advertisements and bidding of the project in January 1993.

Councilman Bletsch inquired, hypothetically, if a number of automobiles were stacked up, where the water would be diverted once the flow started. Mr. Manning said that the model was addressing those concerns and they are trying to capture the water into a conduit to be carried out to the rest of the wash.

Ms. Valentine stated that the District has effectively established a communication link, I with the Imperial Palace reaping the benefits of the Flood Warning System. She


explained that the District is in constant communication with the Imperial Palace during storm events. She added that the hydraulic model will more than likely prove that District projects have no upstream effect on the Imperial Palace property -- settling a controversy which has caused delay of the project.

Mr. Manning stated that a presentation of how the analysis was done would be given to the Board.

Mr. Tom McGowan, 720 South Casino Center Boulevard, introduced himself as a prior resident of Winnick Avenue. Mr. McGowan suggested that the feasibility of placing a collector device west of the Imperial Palace, conceivably east of Caesars, and/or west of Caesars Palace be reviewed. He said the problem is not Winnick Avenue, it is the water which comes from the west, down slope. On occasion, it can get jammed up in a culvert device underneath Caesars, back-up and then flood into the Imperial Palace before it gets to Winnick Avenue.

Ms. Valentine responded that Mr. McGowan's suggestion was one of the first things the District considered when planning for that area. A number of sites were located, and the Upper Flamingo Wash Detention Basin project was completed. She pointed out that it also rains downstream of detention basins, and water continues to collect between the sites. Further, she explained there is still residual water to be dealt with in the area once the expanded Upper Flamingo Wash is completed.

Construction of a detention basin ultimately being constructed at Decatur and . Flamingo Wash will have an impact in reducing the debris, as will lining the channel. Much of the debris is bank and channel erosion from the wash itself. When the channel is concrete lined and when the extra detention basin on Decatur and Tropicana is completed, the debris will be greatly reduced, as will associated maintenance and clean-up costs.

Chairman Harris moved to accept the Project Status Reports. There being no further discussion, the motion carried.


19) RECEIVE THE THIRD QUARTER PROJECT DELAY RE PORT AN D P O S S I U ACTION TO DIRECT STAFF AS DEEMED APPROPRIATE

Ms. Valentine reported that the delays were recorded from Project Delay reports submitted by the entities. Staff recommended acceptance of the reports.

1 Board Minutes November 12, 1992 Page 13

Chairman Harris moved to accept the report. There being no further discussion, the motion carried.

VOTE: a AYES - o NAYS

Ms. Valentine stated the usual monthly Financial Reports, were in order for approval.

Councilman Goynes moved for acceptance. There being no further discussion, the motion carried.


21) CITIZENS PARTICIPATION

There was none. i

ADJOURNMENT

There being no further business, Chairman Harris adjourned the meeting at 9:24 a.m.

Respectfully submitted, f l

Attest: 1992

VIR&IA VALENTINE, P.E. MICHAEL R. HARRIS GENERAL MANAGERKHIEF ENGINEER CHAIRMAN


AGENDAITEM

SUBTECT.

R E Q W T FOR PROPOSALS TO PERFORM FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY

STAFF:

RECOMMENDATION SUMMARY

Authorize the General Manager to issue a Request for PrOpOSalS.

TECHNICAL COMMITTEE: Approve. I

CITIZENS COMMIlTEE: Approve.

RFCD AGENDA ITEM X3 Date: 12/10/92

CLARKCOUNTY REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT

PETITIONER:

VIRGINIA VALENTME, P.E., GENERAL MANAGEWCHIEF ENGINEER

RECOMMENDATION OF PETITIO-

AUTHORIZE THE GENERAL MANAGEWCHIEF ENGINEER TO ISSUE A REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS FROM INTERESTED AND QUALIFIED ENGINEERING FIRMS TO PERFORM RESTUDIES OF THE FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY FOR THE LAS VEGAS VALLEY

FISCAL IMPACT:

None.

BACKGROUND:

In the past three years the District has made progress toward completing a restudy of the flood insurance study for the Las Vegas Valley. The Las Vegas Valley Flood Insurance Study (FIS) Hydrology Report was completed and adopted which established the flow rates for use in restudies. Restudies of the Tropicana Wash and a portion of the Duck CreeWBlue Diamond Wash system are presently underway and are expected to be completed by the end of 1992.

Due to the vast nature of the restudy of the Las Vegas Valley relative to budget considerations, the District divided the Valley into study packages and assigned priorities for completion of each restudy package. FEMA has expressed an interest in expending federal funds toward continued restudies in the Las Vegas Valley through completion of the Valley restudy. Study priorities are continually being evaluated and revised to reflect progress with restudies and Master Plan implementation. The latest study priorities have been transmitted to FEMA to assist them in development of their budget and are included in the backup. It is expected that FEMA will initially perform the restudies for priorities one and two and that the Regional Flood Control District will contract with a consultant to perform the restudy of priority three.

TAC AGENDA

Date: 12/10/92 Date: 11/19/92 ITEM u3 m u 7 RFCD AGENDA

At this time, the District would like to issue a Request For Proposals to interested and qualified engineering consultants to perform the FIS restudy of the third study area priority. Study priority three is titled the Northwest Las Vegas study area. It includes the area bound by Ann Road, Buffalo Drive, Washington Avenue and 1-15 (see location map in the backup). Restudy of this area is needed to resolve discrepancies between current maps at jurisdictional boundaries and to show the benefits of completion of the Gowan Detention Basins and Outfall and the Carey/Lake Mead Detention Basin.

I

&5& r /$/L

VirNJa Valentine, P.E. General ManagerKhief Engineer

TAC AGENDA RFCD AGENDA

Date: 11/19/92 Date:12/10/92

Regional Flood Control District AGENDA ITEM DEVELOPMENT

Staff Discussion: I Date: 11/10/92 I FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY - REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS

At this time, the General Manager is prepared to issue a Request For Proposals to interested and qualified engineering consultants to perform the FIS restudy of the Northwest Las Vegas study area. It includes the area bound by Ann Road, Buffalo Drive, Washington Avenue and 1-15 (see location map in agenda backup). Restudy of this area is needed to m l v e discrepancies between current maps at jurisdictional boundaries and to show the benefits of completion of the Gowan Detention Basins and Outfall and the Carey/Lake Mead Detention Basin.

Staff Recommendation:

Authorize the General Manager to issue a Request for Proposals from interested and qualified engineering firms to perform restudies of the flood insurance study for the Las Vegas Valley.

Discussion by Technical Advisory Committee!: 1 AGENDA #7 Date:11/19/92

Recommendation:

Approve.

Discussion by Citizens Advisory Committee: I AGENDA #7 Date: 1 1/30/92

Recommendation:

Approve.

C.

C L A I I C O U N T Y

c

.'

Mr. William R. Locke 'Chief of Risk Studies Division Federal Insurance Administration Federal Emergency Management Agency 500 c street S.W. Washington, D.C. 20472

F ' l o d . Insurance Study Priorities Dear Mr. Lncke:

At its October 8, 1992 meeting, the Clark County Regional Flood Control District Board of Directors approved an updated priority list for restudies of flood insurance studies for the Las Vegas Valley. I expect that this will be an annually recurring event as restudies and flood control projects are completed, The latest updated priority list reads as follows:

Blue Diamond/Duck Creek - Complete unstud ied reaches.

Las Vega Wash - Initial reaches of multi- reach study. Priority upgraded due to construction of Upper Las Vegas Detention Basin.

Northwest Las Vegas - The'area bound by Ann Road, Buffalo Drive, Washington Avenue and 1-15. Priority upgraded due to the need to resolve discrepancies between current maps at jurisdictional boundaries. Pittman Wash - priority upgtaded to reflect completion of phase I and I1 improvements.

Range Wash - This constitutes a combination of'the hydrographic basins for the East and West Range washes. Priority upgraded due to pro sed construction within the time frame o p" Commencement of this study.

C-1 Channel and Fan

Flamingo Wash and Fan

WilliamLnctre October 26; 1992 Page 2

8) Northwest Fan

A map is attached which shows the study areas for .the top five priorities and studies presently undenvay.

this updated priority list i s . submitted pursuant to a teleconference held ~September 3, 1992 during which FEMA’s five year FIS work schedule was discussed. We appreciate your agency’s involvement in the Duck CreeUBlue Diamond FIS restudy and were pleased to learn, during the teleconference, of FEMA’s interest in remaining committed to restudies.of the Las Vegas Valley study areas. The District suggests that the next phase of the restudy performed by FEMA be the completion of the Duck Creek study area. This a n be followed by the restudy of the Las Vegas Wash. It is recognized that the maenitude of these study areas, relative to available funding over time, may requtre breaking the study areas further into reaches. This can be discussed furthe as study proposals and budgets are finalized. Once authorized by our Board of Directors, the District plans to fund and manage the restudy of the Northwest Las Vegas study area to select a study contractor.

If you should have any questions or require M e r idormation, please contact Gale Fraser at your earliest convenience.

Sincerely,

Chief Engincer/oeneral Manager

Enclosure

cc: Mr. Jack adridge, FEMA Region IX, Flood Branch, w/enclosure Mr. Johnny Taylor, FEMA Region IX, w/enclosure Mr. Oak Wm. Fraser, 11, P.E., Assistant Otneral Manager, Regional

Flood Control District

.

BfVISED PRIORITY LIST

. ...

TO: INTERESTED CONSULTING ENGINEERING FIRMS

FROM: VIRGINIA BAX-VALENTINE, P.E., GENERAL MANAGEWCHIEF ENGINEER

SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS TO PERFORM FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY RESTUDY

DATE:

The Board of Directors of the Clark County Regional Flood Control District invites your firm to submit a Proposal to provide consulting services to perform a restudy of the Flood Insurance Study (FIS) for the Las Vegas Valley. The Board has identified hydrologic study areas, adopted a hydrologic analysis and assigned priorities to study reaches. Streams and reaches will be . restudied as prioritized and as funds become available until the flood hazard boundaries for the entire Las Vegas Valley are restudied. This request for proposals is to perform a restudy of the Northwest Las Vegas study area. The study area is bound by Ann Road, Buffalo Drive, Washington Avenue and Interstate Highway 15.

Proposals must follow the prescribed format (attached). Proposals will be received up to the hour of 4:OO p.m., prevailing local time, on January 4, 1993, at the District offices located at 301 East Clark Avenue, suite 301, Las Vegas, Nevada, 89101. Submittals must be clearly labeled "A?TENTION: Las Vegas Valley Flood Insurance Study - Proposal to Provide Services". Please direct any questions you might have to Kevin Eubanks, at 455-3139.

VBV:KLE:

NOTICE CLARK COUNTY REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS TO PROVIDE CONSULTING SERVICES FOR FLOOD INSURANCE RESTUDIES

FOR THE LAS VEGAS VALLEY

The Clark County Regional Flood Control District is requesting Proposals from engineering firms desiring to provide engineering services to perform a Flood Insurance Restudy of the Northwest Las Vegas study area. The study area is bound by Ann Road, Buffalo Drive, Washington Avenue and Interstate Highway 15.

Respondents should specifically note their qualifications, qudified key personnel and experience in preparing Flood Insurance Studies. The District will be working with the Entities and the Federal Emergency Management Agency to update the Flood Insurance Studies and Flood Insurance Rate Maps for the Las Vegas Valley to reflect progress in land development, flood control improvements and the findings of the Board adopted Flood Insurance Study Hydrology Report.

The work to be performed will involve the application of the modeling techniques of hydrology, floodplain hydraulics, sediment transport and alluvial fans and a thorough knowledge of federal guidelines and study requirements. A history of successful involvement with the appropriate government agencies and their contractors will be beneficial.

I

Interested consulting firms are requested to submit ten (10) copies of their Proposal to the Clark County Regional Flood Control District, 301 East Clark Avenue, Suite 301, Las Vegas, Nevada, 89101, "A'ITENTION - Las Vegas Valley Flood Insurance Study - Proposal to Provide Services". Submittals must be received no later than the hour of 4:OO p.m., prevailing local time on January 4, 1993 to be considered. LATE SUBMI'ITALS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED!

Proposals must follow the format prescribed below to be considered for evaluation.

Part 1. Cover letter

Part 2. Up to four pages of standard typewritten text is allowed to describe what talents, skills, experience and expertise the consultant has to offer with respect to Flood Insurance Studies and Restudies. The discussion should include descriptions of past performance in management, cost control, timely performance and thoroughness of work on similar projects.

Part 3. Organizational Chart

Part 4. Resumes of key personnel

Part 5. Flood Control - Statement of Qualifications (Forms Attached). Item 17, flood control experience, will be reviewed for demonstration of experience with Flood Insurance Studies and Restudies.

Part 6. Corporate brochures may be attached to the Proposal (Optional).

Proposals will be evaluated based on demonstration of the following:

- Specific understanding of the factors involved in preparation and coordination of a Flood Insurance Restudy.

- Ability to coordinate and schedule work with local, state and federal agencies

- Experience in preparation of Flood Insurance Studies and Restudies and the ability to perform the appropriate engineering analyses

- Experience of key personnel in preparation of Flood Insurance Studies and Restudies.

- Past technical and project management performance on similar projects

Submittals WILL be disqualified from evaluation for the following reasons:

- Submittals received after 4 9 0 p.m., prevailing local time on January 4, 1993. THERE WILL BE NO EXCEPTIONS TO THIS DEADLINE

- Failure to follow the format outlined above

- Failure to demonstrate that the firm has a Nevada registered professional engineer . . in residence and in direct responsible supervision of the work to be performed (NRS 625.240)

This Request for Proposals does not commit the Clark County Regional Flood Control District to pay any costs incurred in the submittal of your Proposal. This Request for Proposals does not commit the Clark County Regional Flood Control District to procure or contract respondent’s services. The Clark County Regional Flood Control District reserves the right to reject any or all firms if deemed to be in the best interest of the District.

I 192 VIRGINIA VALENTINE, P.E. DATE

-- General ManagerIChief Engineer Clark County Regional Flood Control District

FLOOD CONTROL STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS

1.

2.

3 .

4 .

5 .

6 .

7 .

8 .

Date prepared: -1-1-

Firm's name:

Firm's address:

Year firm established:

Yearlocalofficeestablished:

Location of:

a. Main office:

b. Local office:

~~~~ ~

C. Office where work will be performed:

Year former firm(s) were established:

a.

b.

C.

d.

Name, title, and telephone number of two principals in firm that can be contacted:

a.

b.

9 . Name, title, office location and Nevada registration number of professional engineers resident on staff to be in direct responsible supervision of the work.

a.

C .

10. List locations of other offices (no more that five):

Address Telephone No. of Personnel

d.

e.

11. Errors and omissions insurance:

a. Amount your firm presently carries: $

b. Carrier's name and address:

c. If no insurance, state other arrangements:

12.

13.

14 .

Total number presently employed:

a. At local office:

b. In firm:

Number of projects your firm is currently working on and has worked on in the last five years as indicated:

Current/Active Last 5 Years

a. Public/Governmental

b. Commercial

c. Residential

d. Other

Present and past CCRFCD funded project history:

Project Name Entity Consultant Contract Amount

15. List all professional engineers envisioned to participate in the performance of the work . Nevada Percent of time Clerk County Veers With

Registration avmlde for Resident Local Name Comments this DIObCt Y N Firm Office Number Title

I

16. List alltechnical staff envisioned to participate in the performance of thxwork.. __

17. List subconsultants frequently used:

Firm Name/ Address Firm Name/ Address

t

4

1 i

18. List firm's experience for last five years in flood control studies:

. Project Name

-

'reject Description: . List location and owner of project !. List any special features or function of project I. List name of engineer in charge of project

Describe Services Rendered

Total Fees

Earned

Total Project costs

Flood Insurance Study Restudy

Tropicana Wash and Tributaries

DRAFT SCOPE OF WORK

Proiect DescriDtion

The project involves mapping of flood insurance rate zones, floodplains and floodways for the area bound by Ann Road, Buffalo Drive, Washington Avenue and 1-15. The study area is shown as Area 3 on Exhibit A.

The consultant will develop a backwater model of the riverine study reaches to determine shallow flooding, floodplain and floodway delineations for the 100-year peak flow. Floodplain and floodway delineations will be reconciled with current applicable flood insurance study delineations. All work will be performed in accordance with The Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Document No. 37, Flood Insurance Studv Guidelines and SDecifications for Studv Contractors dated March, 1991 (FEMA Document No. 37). Discharge values for 100-year peak flows will be provided to the consultant as obtained from the Clark County Regional Flood Control District (District, CCRFCD) adopted Las Venas Valley Flood Insurance Studs Hydrolow ReDort, dated September, 1991, prepared by James M. Montgomery Consulting Engineers, Inc. The need for additional hydrologic information will be identified and supplied by the consultant.

Work under this scope must be reviewed and accepted by FEMA prior to finalization of this contract. As a part of this requirement, the Consultant shall be responsible for Public Notification regarding this project. Work under this scope will be completed within 365 days from the date of the notice to proceed, including 60 days for District reviews.

Task 1 - Data Collection

1.1

1.2

1.3

The Consultant will collect and review pertinent data from FEMA, the District, NDOT and Clark County Public Works Department. Pertinent data under this task will include previous flood control design reports for public and private projects within the study area: historical flooding information; as-built plans for existing structures; FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Maps and Letters of Map Revision and/or Amendments and supporting data; Other pertinent information.

A written summary of the data collection effort will be submitted to the District for information purposes.

The Consultant will investigate the existence of available topographic

1.3 The Consultant will investigate the existence of available topographic information; determine the quality of the information as compared to the standards referenced in FEMA Document No. 37, Appendix 4, and make a recommendation as to the need for the development of additional topographic maps by either photogrammetric and/or land survey methods. Any additional topographic mapping will be performed as a supplemental item to this scope and only subsequent to written request by the contractor and authorization by the District.

1.4 The Consultant will submit a project schedule showing coordination meetings and completion dates for each of the tasks in this contract.

Task 2 - Flooddain. Floodwav Delineations

2.1

2.2

2.3

2.4

The hydrology for the subject drainage basins has been completed under separate contract and is presented in the document entitled Las Veeas Vallev Flood Insurance Studv Hvdroloev ReDm, dated September, 1991, prepared by James M. Montgomery Consulting Engineers, Inc.(FIS Hydrology Study). The FIS Hydrology study has been adopted by the CCRFCD Board. The consultant will be provided with a copy of the FIS Hydrology Study, supporting appendices and a computer diskette containing model input. The 100-year discharges presented in the FIS hydrology study will be briefly reviewed by the consultant and used for completion of the hydraulic analysis. If flow rates for additional concentration points are necessary, the HEC-1 model provided can be expanded once authorized in writing by the District. Any additional hydrologic calculations will be submitted to the District for review and approval prior to commencing the affected hydraulic analysis.

Available topographic mapping determined suitable for use in this study and any new topographic maps developed in accordance with the Supplemental Services section of this contract will be tied to 1983 NAD and Clark County Vertical datum prior to encoding hydraulic models.

For riverine reaches, existing Clark County survey control markers will be identified and described for use as elevation reference markers (ERMs). ERM description, location and elevation will be tabulated and submitted with the FIS report-

Floodplain and floodway delineations and base flood elevations (BFEs) will be determined for the 100-year flood for each riverine reach using the most recent version of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers HEC-2 Water Surface Profiles computer model and/or methodologies acceptable to FEMA. These models will simulate the effects of floodplain geomorphology, flow changes, bridges, culverts, hydraulic roughness, effective flow limitations, split flows, and other considerations to most realistically and accurately represent flooding conditions.

2

2.5

2.6

2.7

2.8

2.9

2.10

2.8

The consultant will analyze riverine and shallow flooding areas and prepare the study and maps according to the guidelines outlined in FEMA Document No. 37.

Bridges and culverts will be modeled in compliance with modeling requirements for the appropriate method. Where multiple bridges OcCuT, each bridge will be modeled separately.

Cross section stationing will be from left to right looking downstream. Cross sections will be spaced at 500 foot intervals unless geographic or physical constraints dictate otherwise. Identification of cross sections shall be in river miles, increasing in the upstream direction from each confluence and will be consistent with existing FIS stationing. The location and alignment of cross sections and channel centerline will be submitted to the District for review and approval prior to digitizing cross section data. Cross section ‘orientation may need to be altered after initial profde executions to ensure proper orientation perpendicular to flow per F E U criteria.

Cross sections will be plotted using a pen plotter. The plots will show water surface elevations, ineffective flow areas, roughness values, encroachments, channel stationing and all other pertinent input and output data.

For floodplains identified as ponding areas, the area will be analyzed using the storage routing methods within the HEC-1 computer program to determine ponding elevations.

Flood zones will be established according to FEMA criteria.

The consultant will prepare work maps and models of the 100-year floodplain and floodway during the course of the hydraulic analysis for review by the District during progress meetings. Floodways will be initially determined by application of the equal conveyance encroachment methods with maximum surcharge of one (1) foot and will be finalized by exclusively applying encroachment method 1.

The final report for the floodplaidfloodway mapping study will include, but is not limited to the following:

I. Introduction

a. Purpose of Study b. Authority for Study c. Coordination and Acknowledgements

3

a. Scope of Study b. Community Description c. Principal Flood Problems d. Flood Protection Measures

ID. Engineering Methods

a. Hydrologic Analysis b. Hydraulic Analysis c. Alluvial Fan Analysis

N. Floodplain Management Applications

a. Floodplains b. Floodways c. Alluvial Fans

V. Insurance Applications

VI. Other Studies

VII. Bibliography

Appendices - Supporting Technical Data

Task 3 Coordination

3.1 The consultant will coordinate and participate in regular progress meetings with the District and the impacted communities at least monthly and at milestones in the development of the hydraulic analyses.

3.2 The consultant will submit maps, report and the riverine hydraulic analyses to all applicable government agency reviewers through the District.

3.3 The consultant will coordinate with FEMA and FEMAs Technical Evaluation Contractor (TEC) throughout the restudy effort in order to proceed in the most time efficient manner.

3.4 The consultant will be responsible for responding to and interacting with FEMAs TEC throughout the review and community appeals process as outlined in FEMA document No. 37.

Task 4 F'inal Products

4

Task 4 Final Products

All reports and map copies will be submitted in triplicate to each of the impacted study area entities.

4.1 Mapping

a. Available topography identified as acceptable under Task 1.3 will be reproduced from their source and delivered to the District in a durable reproducible form acceptable to the District.

b. Additional topographic maps, contact prints, photo mylars, etc. will be delivered to the District as required by the Supplemental Services Section and authorized per Task 1.3.

c. Final Flood Insurance Rate Maps in ARUINFO format tied to state plane coordinate system, NAD 1983 and Clark County datum on 3 1/2 inch, 1.44 Mb, high density diskette or T U 0 magnetic tape.

4.2 Report

a. The consultant will produce a final report incorporating all previous comments from the District, FEMA and other reviewers. Six hard copies of the report and appendices will be delivered.

b. Report text in Wordperfect 5.1 format on a 3 1/2 inch. 1.440 Mb, diskette compatible with IBM personal computers.

c. # copies of the Technical Support Data Notebook.

Task 5 Supplemental Services

5.1

5.2

The consultant is responsible for obtaining all necessary rights-of-entry for the study area. The District will assist as may be necessary.

An aerial survey subconsultant will be retained by the consultant as part of this contract. The consultant will coordinate the work of the aerial surveying subconsultant to ensure that the specifications of the aerial surveying work are met. Quality control of aerial surveys will be per FEMA Document No. 37, Flood Insurance Studs Guidelines and Specifications for Studs Contractors, dated March 199 1.

5

5.2.1 Prepare topographic mapping with a 4-fOOt contour interval at a scale of 1-inch = 400-feet.

5.2.2 Ground Control

a. The consultant shall provide survey control using 1983 NAD.

b. The consultant will systematically set panel points and establish horizontal and vertical control throughout the areas to be mapped for use in compilation by the aerial survey subconsultant. Where readily available, surveys will be tied to the State Plane Coordinate System. Field control wiII use existing documented Clark County survey points where possible and be of an adequate density and . location to meet the requirements of the aerial surveying subconsultant and FEMA Document No. 37. Clark County vertical datum will be used.

5.2.3 Digital contour and planimetric data developed under this task shall be delivered to the District in ARC/INFO format on 3 1/2 inch, 1.44 Mb, high density diskette or TK50 magnetic tape.

5.2.4 The consultant will provide the District permanent non-erasable topographic mylar sheets 24" X 36" at the scale and contour interval specified in Task 5.2.1. A cover sheet will be provided with project title, date of topography and sheet index. Each sheet of topography will include at a minimum a north arrow, scale, photo date, section and quarter comers, street names, State Plane Coordinate information, major drainage features, corporate and town boundaries, cross section lines, channel centerline station, 100-year flood limits, description and elevation of control points and ERMs and reference marks used in ground control.

6

. *

REVISED' PRIORITY LIST

. .

I 2 3, 4, 51

EXHIBIT A


AGENDA I'I"

SUBJECT:

WESTERN TRIBUTARY TO THE LAS VEGAS WASH, CAMINO AL NORTE CROSSING - CHANGE IN PRIORITIES (NLV.PENDING)

STAFF:


Aprove.

TECHNICAL C 0 M " E E : Approve.

CITIZENS COhanTrIm Approve.

I 1 RFCD AGENDA iTEM #4A Date!: 12110192

CLARX COUNTY

REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT

AGENDA ITEM

I SUBJECT: WESTERN TRIBUTARY TO THE LAS VEGAS WASH - CHANGE IN I PRIORITIES

PETITIONER City of North Las Vegas

It is rcommended that the Board approve the placement of the Camino AI Norte culvert (Structure No. LVMD 1953) on the high priority project list.

FlsCAL IMPACE

BACKGROUND: None.

The West Tributary (Las Vegas Blvd. to U.P.R.R.) Channel Improvement Project is one of 14 projects within the North Las Vegas Valley Planning area Ten Year Construction Program. The Camino A1 Norte culvert is also a Master Plan Facility within the Northern Las Vega Valley Planning Area, but was not placed on the Ten Year Construction Program. However, rapid development in the neighborhood, large increases in traffic on Camino AI Norte and the opportunity to gain heavy developer participation at this time nnke it necessary to request that the Plan be modified as follows:

COST F.Y. SCHEDULED EXISTING PLAN; West Tributary Channel Construction: (Las Vegas Blvd. to U.P.R.R.)

PROPOSED PLAN; West Tributary Channel Construction: Camino A1 Norte Culvert Construction:

CD Participation Only)

/

GARY W. HOLLER, P.E.

$3,470,000.00 2000 - 2001

$3,170,OOO.00 2000 - 2001 300,000.00 1992 - 1993

AG-152a TAC AGENDA

Date: 12/10/92 Date: 11/19/92 ITEM # 4A ITEM # 8A RFCD AGENDA

FC-00.20-19.61.34.09

AGENDA ITEM DEVELOPMENT Regional Flood Control District

StaffDiscusim: Date: 12/1/92

AMENDED FY 1992/93 PROJECT LIST (NLV.Pending) WESTERN TRIBUTARY TO THE LAS VEGAS WASH, CAMINO AL NORTE CROSSING -

The City of North Las Vegas has requested that the Western Tributary of the Las Vegas Wash, Camino Al Norte Crossing ('A' Channel) be included on the FY 1992/93 Project List. The change in the FY 1992/93 Project List is requested due to rapid development in the area, large increases in traffic across the Western Tributary at this location and the opportunity to gain fifty-one percent (51 96) of the construction costs through a Developer Participation Contract. Funding for the project is provided from a modification of the 10-Yeax Construction Program by decreasing funding for the Western Tributary of the Range Wash by $300,000 in FY 2000/01 (Year 9 of the 10-Year Program) and combining that amount in the current fiscal year with the fifty-one percent (51%) proposed in the Developer Participation Contract. Work was anticipated to begin on the Western Tributary of the Las Vegas Wash in FY 2001/02 (Year 10). The backup includes North Las Vegas' FY 1992/93 Project List identifying the requested change.

Approve the request for a change in North Las Vegas' FY 1992/93 Priority List and the District's Ten Year Plan.

Discussion by Technical Advisory committee: AGENDA 1 #8A Date:11/19/92

i Approve.

1 Discussion by Citizens Advisory Committee: e #8A Date: 1 1/30/92

Recommendatioa:

Approve.

FY 92/93 PROJECT LIST, Proposed Amendment by the City of North Las Vega8 lOl16ls2 cl*~llorwm*&

Shading represents proposed changer I &

Planning

Facility Description Area

NORTH LA8 VEaAS (Northorn Las Vogas Valky) : Confluence Detention Basin (incl. Range

ROW)

Upper L a m Vows Wash Interception N. LV Wash

BennlChannel

Upper L a m Vega8 Wash Detention N. LV Wash

Besin

North Les Veges Detention Basin N. LV Wash

(Outlet modifications) West Range Wash Diversion Dike Range

Sloan Channel (La6 Vega# Wash - Range

Confluence Dot. Barin)

Kyle Canyon Detention Bsrin (incl. N. LV Weeh

Amount Programmed Comments

I North Lam Voaas FY 92/93 Total : (2.430.000


AGENDAITEM

SUBTECT:

WESTERN TRIBUTARY TO THE LAS VEGAS WASH, CAMINO AL NORTE CROSSING - PROJECT PRESENTATION (NLV. PENDING)


STAFF: Accept the presentation.

TECHNICAL COMMITIEE: Accpet the presentation.

I CITIZENS COMMITrEE: Accept the presentation.

ITEM U4B Date: 12/10/92

CLARKCOUNTY


AGENDA ITEM

SUBJECE I PROJECT PRESENTATION - CAMINO AL NORTE CULVERT

I PETITIONER City of North Las Vegas

RECOMMENDAnON OF PETITIONER

It is requested that the Board accept the presentation and provide comments.

FISCAL IMPACT:

None by this action.

BACKGROUND Preparation of plans for the Camino AI Norte Culvert, Structure No. LVMD 1953, are nearing completion. Acquisition of Right-of-way is complete. The project is located on Camino AI Norte approximately 1.0 mile north of Craig Road, and will consist of two reinforced arch spans, each span 24 feet wide and 10 feet high at the crown, appropriate end walk, channel protection and roadway approaches. (See Exhibit "A")

The City of North Las Vegas will make the presentation.

Respectfully submitted, \

FC-OO.20-19.61.34.09 AG-154b

CAC AGENDA IRPCD AGENDA 1

GARY w. [ HOLLER, P. E.


Staff Discussion: Date: 12/1/92

WESTERN TRIBUTARY TO THE LAS W A S WASH, CAMINO AL NORTE CROSSING - PROJECT PRESENTATION (NLV.Pending)

In accordance with District Policies and Procedures and NRS 543.580, a presentation will be made at the meeting.

Staf'f Recommendation:

Accept the presentation.

Discussion by Technical Advisory Committee: E #SB Date:11/19/92

Recommendation:


Discussion by Citizens Advisory Committee: AGENDA 1 ISB Date: 11/30/92

Recommendation:


http://www.leg.state.nv.us/NRS/NRS-543.html

November 12, 1992

Mr. Gale Fraser, Assistant General Manager Clark County Regional Flood Control District 301 East Clark Avenue, Suite 300 Las Vegas, Nevada 89 101

SUBJECT: CAMINO AL NORTE BLVD. CULVERT

Dear Gale:

The design plans for the above project are nearing completion and are under review by the City and the Clark County Regional Flood Control District staff. We are pleased to be able to present the design to the Technical Advisory Committee and the District Board.

The following information is being submitted to comply kith the requirements of NRS 543.580.

Jhveloper Participation CCRFCD Particbation Project Cos& Plans & Specifications: $ 35,000 -0- Right-of-way: -0- -0- Construction: 177,000 170,000 Construction Engineering: 35.W -0-

SUBTOTAL: $ 247,000 $ 170,000 TOTAL: $417,000

The Right-of-way has been secured by the City of North Las Vegas.

Prolect Benefit

City of North Las Vegas 2200 Civic Center Drive

North Las Vegas. Nevada 89036 P.O. Box 4086 . (702) 649-581 1

Mayw James K. Seastrand

Councilmen Theron H. Goynes

Mary J. Kincaid William E. Robinson

W. Brent Hardy

Clty Manager Michael Dval

The Camino A1 Norte Blvd. reach of the Western Tributary (approximately 2,500 L.F.), of which the proposed culvert is an integral part, will protect not less than $1,030,000 worth of flood-prone property from the 100-year storm.

In addition, the culvert proper, plus the associated road realignment and straightening (to be constructed by others) will eliminate a severe dip (a ford during large storms) in Camino A1 Norte Blvd. Due to rapid build-up in the area, Camino A1 Norte will, within the near future, have a traffic loading of not less than 3,000,000 vehicles per year and will provide a fully-paved, all-weather access to the nearby fire station and school.

) ! f q + h l l y Yours,

FC-oO.20-19.61.34.09 Gl4lk0 Director of Public Works


.. .' - 1 1 1 1

c .

24'-0' SPAN 2' t 24' -0' S P A N -c

WEST END.'ELEVATION 5 c A L e * ye'' - l ' = u l l

! . . *

. . *. .. . ..


AGENDAITEM ~~ ~

SUBJECT:

WESTERN TRIBUTARY TO THE LAS VEGAS WASH, CAMINO AL NORTE CROSSING - DEVELOPER PARTICIPATION CONTRACT (NLV. PENDING)


STAFF: Approve.

TECHNICAL CO"ITI7EE: Approve.

CITIZENS COMMITrEE: Approve.

RF'CD AGENDA ITEM U4C Date. 12/10/92

CLARK COUNTY


AGENDA ITEM

S U B J E a DEVELOPER PARTICIPATION CONTRACT FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A BOX CULVERT ON THE WESTERN TRIBUTARY TO THE LAS VEGAS WASH AT CAMINO AL NORTE

I PETITIONER: City of North Las Vegas

RECOMMENDATlON OF PEllTlONER

It is rcommended that the Board approve the Developer Participation Contract with Pardee Construction Co. of Nevada.

$300,000

BACKGROUND:

The proposed culvert at Camino A1 Norte is master planned as part of the major improvement project of the Western Tributary. A developer in the area, Pardee Construction Co. of Nevada, is required to participate in the design and construction of the culvert at this time. The culvert is described as Structure No. LVMD 1953, on Figure F-7 of the Master Plan Update of the Las Vegas Valley, August 1991.

The proposed Participation Contract authorizes financial commitments for the project as follows:

Participation bv: J3eineer inP & Administration Construction ESTIMATED COSTS

Clark County Regional Flood Control District

onstruction Co. 0% 49% (Max: $300,000)

100% ($70,000) 51 % (Apx: $300,000) TAC AGENDA

Date: 12/10/92 Dats: 11/19/92 ITEM U 4C ITEM U 8C RF'CD AGENDA

FC-00.20-19.61.34-09 A G - l S l a



WESTERN TRIBUTARY TO THE LAS W A S WASH, CAMINO AL NORTE CROSSING - DEVELOPER PARTICIPATION CONTRACT (NLV.Pmding)

The City of North Las Vegas has submitted a request for a Developer Participation Contract to fund forty-nine percent (49%) of the costs of construction of the Western Tributary to the Las Vegas Wash, Camino Al Norte Crossing (Master Plan Facility No. LVMD 1953). The developer, Pardee Construction Company, will fund the design and fifty-one percent (51%) of the costs of construction. Camino Al Norte currently crosses the Western Tributary to the Las Vegas Wash through a temporary dip section. This project will provide an &-weather crossing. The amount requested for the Camino Al Norte project is $300,000. The project has been proposed to be identified on the FY 1992/93 Project List and Pay-as-you-go funds (Fund 443) are available. The District Attorney has reviewed the contract as to form. Ninety percent plans and specifications have been received by the District. The developer has executed the Contract.

Staf'f Recommendation:

Approve.

Discussion by Technical Advisory Committee: I AGENDA USC Date:11/19/92

Recommendation:

Approve.

Discussion by Citizens Advisory Committee: I AGENDA #8C Date: 1 1/30/92

Recommendation:

Approve.

I '

PARTICIPATION CONTRACT CAMINO AL NORTE CULVERT

(LVMD 1953)

.THIS PARTICIPATION CONTRACT is made and entered into as of the I.%/q day of OCfd~n I , 1992, by and between the Clark County Regional Flood Control

District, hereinafter referred to as "DISTRICT", the City of North Las Vegas, hereinafter

referred to as "CITY", and Pardee Construction Company of Nevada, hereinafter referred to as "PARDEE" .

W I T N E S S E T H

WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 543.360 of the Nevada Revised Statutes, the DISTRICT may approve a project to design and construct flood control improvements, and;

WHEREAS, the flood control improvement of the Western Tributary of the Las Vegas Wash proposed herein is the same as that identified in the Master Plan Update of the Las Vegas

Valley, August 1991, Structure No. LVMD 1953, hereinafter referred to as "PROJECT"; and

WHEREAS, the PROJECT is identified and shown on the attached Exhibit "A"; and

WHEREAS, the PROJECT has been approved by the DISTRICT on its annual project priority list; and

WHEREAS, the PROJECT has regional flood control significance and is located in the same hydrographic area as Clark County, the City of Las Vegas, the City of North Las Vegas

and the City of Henderson. WHEREAS, PARDEE has agreed to fund the total cost of the PROJECT less the

participation by the DISTRICT and less the participation of the CITY; and

WHEREAS, the DISTRICT and the CITY each agree to participate in funding the

PROJECT as set forth herein; and, WHEREAS, all rights-of-way for the PROJECT have been obtained by the CITY; and

WHEREAS, the CITY, as the sponsoring agency, agrees to provide the DISTRICT with

the information required in N R S 543.580.

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the covenants, conditions, contracts, and

promises of the parties hereto, the DISTRICT, the CITY and PARDEE agree to the following:

1



. .

This PARTICIPATION CONTRACT applies to the improvement of the Western Tributary to the Las Vegas Wash shown in Exhibit "A" and hereinafter referred to as "PROJECT". The

improvements to be designed and constructed shall consist of excavation and backfill, a box

culvert or its equivalent, hydraulic transitions, roadway approaches, utility relocations and related appurtenances. PARDEE will be responsible for the design and construction of the

PROJECT with the participation of the CITY and DISTRICT as herein described.

1. DISTRICT agrees to fund a portion of the PROJECT costs within the limits specified below: a. DISTRICT shall fund forty-nine (49) percent of the cost of construction or

$300,000, whichever is the lesser. Cost of construction shall be defined as the bid submitted by the lowest responsive bidder of three (3) class A contractors as described in SECTION I11 - GENERAL, paragraph 11 of this PARTICIPATION

CONTRACT.

b. DISTRICT shall not participate in the cost of any reviews, plans checking, construction supervision, permits, fees, inspections bonds or performance bonds.

c. DISTRICT shall not participate in the cost of rights-of-way for the PROJECT, surveys or engineering services.

d. Upon completion of the PROJECT and release of the surety bond by CITY, PARDEE will be paid for the amount specified herein. Payment will be made

within 30 days of written notification to the DISTRICT of the completion of the PROJECT and the release of the bond.

2. PARDEE agrees to fund the PROJECT costs within the limits specified below: a. PARDEE shall fund the actual cost of construction less the DISTRICT

contribution as specified in Section 11 1.a. of this PARTICIPATION

CONTRACT.

2

. .

b. PARDEE shall not be responsible for the cost of reviews, plans checking, or

inspection bonds as normally would be paid to the CITY. c. PARDEE shall be solely responsible for all surveys and engineering services

associated with this PROJECT. d. PARDEE shall be solely responsible for complying with any insurance or bonding

requirements which may be imposed by the CITY or are set forth in this PARTICIPATION CONTRACT and must warrant the PROJECT for one year after its completion and acceptance by the DISTRICT and the CITY against any and all defects including design and construction defects or negligent construction.

e. ’ PARDEE shall be solely responsible for all other costs and expenses associated

with the PROJECT except for the DISTRICT’S obligation set forth in Section 11, paragraph la herein, and the CITY’S obligations as set forth in this PARTICIPATION CONTRACT.

3. CITY agrees to fund the PROJECT costs within the limits specified below:

a. CITY shall be solely responsible for the cost of reviews, plans checking,

construction supervision, permits, fees and inspection bonds as these costs are

normally incurred by CITY staff or normally charged to developers and

contractors. b. Upon completion of the construction of the PROJECT and acceptance by the

CITY and DISTRICT, all ownership rights and maintenance responsibility for the

PROJECT will be that of the CITY.

4. If it becomes necessary to increase any of the amounts specified above, a written request

with justification will be submitted to the DISTRICT by the CITY upon PARDEE’s

request. If approved by the DISTRICT, a supplement to this PARTICIPATION

CONTRACT will be executed. In any event, however, the maximum amount funded by the DISTRICT shall not exceed the sum of $300,000 or forty-nine (49) percent of the

construction cost, whichever is the lesser amount.

. . . .

. . . . 3

1. The CITY, with the participation of PARDEE, will provide the DISTRICT with a schedule indicating the anticipated dates for completion of final plans, specifications and

estimates.

2. The title sheet of both the plans and the specifications shall show the Clark County Regional Flood Control District as a funding agency.

3. The award of bid for this PROJECT shall occur no later than March 1, 1993. The CITY and PARDEE will take all reasonable steps possible to avoid delays in the construction

of the PROJECT. If the award of bid for the PROJECT does not occur by March 1,

1993, a formal review will occur by both the DISTRICT'S Technical Advisory

Committee and the DISTRICT'S Board of Directors. At that review, the CITY and

PARDEE will have an opportunity to present information relative to the delays, measures

taken to avoid the delays and the likelihood of those delays continuing. The Board will make a determination, in view of the delays and limited available funding, whether PROJECT funding should continue. If the Board chooses to discontinue funding, the

Board may cancel any Interlocal or PARTICIPATION CONTRACT(s) associated with the PROJECT and discontinue funding for the remainder of the PROJECT. Funding

already spent or appropriated by the CITY or PARDEE will not be required to be refunded to the DISTRICT. If the DISTRICT discontinues funding, PARDEE shall also

have the right to discontinue funding the PROJECT and to cause all work upon the PROJECT to cease. 'PROJECT funding will be reconsidered at any time when the CITY

can demonstrate that the PROJECT can proceed on an acceptable schedule.

1

4. The CITY and PARDEE, their employees and representatives shall at all times comply with all applicable laws, ordinances, statutes, rules and regulations in effect at the time

work is performed on the PROJECT.

5. The CITY will require and PARDEE shall obtain an appropriate surety bond in an amount equal to or greater than the cost of construction of the PROJECT. PARDEE

may satisfy this obligation by requiring its CONTRACTOR to obtain such financial

security so long as the security is acceptable to the CITY and DISTRICT and is for the I 4

benefit of PARDEE, the CITY and DISTRICT. CITY and PARDEE shall be jointly and

severally liable for the failure to obtain the appropriate financial security for construction

of the PROJECT. 6. The CITY and PARDEE shall provide all impacted entities and the DISTRICT with the

opportunity to provide the CITY and PARDEE with input relative to the following

processes: scope of services development; consultant selection; design; construction and

maintenance review; and monitoring of the effectiveness and impacts of facilities on flood flows.

7. Applicable portions of the current editions of the Policies and Procedures, the Hydrologic Criteria and Drainage Design Manual, and Uniform .Regulations for $e Control of Drainage adopted by the DISTRICT will apply in developing this PROJECT unless specifically superseded by this PARTICIPATION CONTRACT.

8. Prior to the construction of the PROJECT, PARDEE will submit plans and specifications

to the DISTRICT and the CITY for review and approval, which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed. The PROJECT plans and specifications must be prepared and sealed by a professional engineer registered in the State of Nevada. The PROJECT will then be constructed in accordance with the approved plans and

specifications. If no written comments are received by PARDEE within thirty (30) days after the submittal of such plans and specifications, the same shall be deemed to have

been approved. Any modification to PARDEE'S proposed plans and specifications shall be subject to PARDEE'S review and approval. Failure of the parties to agree upon an approved set of phis and specifications within ninety (90) days of submittal to the

DISTRICT, will result in automatic termination of this PARTICIPATION CONTRACT and the DISTRICT and CITY will be relieved of all obligations set forth in this PARTICIPATION CONTRACT and will have no payment obligation whatsoever and

will incur no liability for damages of any kind.

9. PARDEE is responsible for the design of the subject PROJECT and will ensure that all

work is accomplished in accordance with professionally recognized standards. 10. PROJECT is a jointly funded project which is funded with a combination of public and

private monies and is excluded from the provisions of NRS 332,338 and 339 except that

5


1

11.

12.

13.

14.

15.

16.

17.

the requirements of N R S 338.010 to 338.090, inclusive, apply to any construction work performed pursuant to this PARTICIPATION CONTRACT.

DISTRICT will make a payment to PARDEE for the cost of construction as outlined in

SECTION II - PROJECT COSTS. PARDEE shall obtain sealed bids from a minimum of three (3) class A contractors selected by PARDEE to perform the work based on approved plans and specifications. The sealed bids shall be opened in the presence of representatives of the DISTRICT, the CITY, and PARDEE. The lowest responsive bid

shall be used to establish the cost of construction. No compensation will be provided for preparing bids. PARDEE shall award the construction contract to the responsive bidder of its choice.

The DISTRICT reserves the right to review and/or audit all records pertaining to this

PROJECT both during and after PROJECT completion. Accurate documentation of all

work done and payments made will be maintained by the CITY for a period of three (3)

years after find PROJECT approval and payment.

The CITY will be responsible for any loss, damage, liability, cost or expense caused by the actions or inactions of its employees, consultants, contractors or agents, excluding

PARDEE and DISTRICT, arising under this PARTICIPATION CONTRACT and hereby

holds the DISTRICT and PARDEE harmless therefrom.

PARDEE will be responsible for any loss, damage, liability, cost or expense caused by

the actions or inactions of its employees, consultants, contractors or agents arising under - this PARTICIPATION CONTRACT and hereby holds the DISTRICT and CITY

harmless therefrom. '

Following completion of construction of this PROJECT, except as warranted by SECTION II, paragraph 2.d. above, the CITY will assume responsibility for maintenance and/or repairs that are necessary to protect the improvements and to provide a safe and

functional facility. In the event the items covered herein have not been completed to the satisfaction of the

DISTRICT prior to November 1, 1993, the DISTRICT may, at any time thereafter,

terminate this PARTICIPATION CONTRACT and the CITY and PARDEE agree to

repay to the DISTRICT all funds advanced therefor. This PARTICIPATION

6


. . $ 8

18.

19.

20.

21.

CONTR9CT may be extended by mutual agreement by the parties hereto.

Any costs found to be improperly allocated to this PROJECT will be refunded to the DISTRICT by PARDEE. Notice: Any notice or submittals required to be given herein shall be deemed to have been given when received by the party to whom it is directed by personal service, hand delivery, or U.S. mail at the following addresses:

TO DISTRICT: Clark County Regional Flood Control District

301 East Clark Avenue, Suite 301 Las Vegas, Nevada 89101

TO CITY: City of North Las Vegas P. 0. Box 4086

North Las Vegas, Nevada 89036

TO PARDEE: Pardee Construction Company of Nevada

10880 WiIshire Boulevard, Suite 1400

Los Angeles, California 90024

ATIN: Theodore J. Cullen Nevada law shall govern the interpretation of this PARTICIPATION CONTRACT.

PARDEE or its CONTRACTOR, at its own expense, shall obtain and maintain, for the duration of the construction of the PROJECT, insurance against claims for injuries to .

persons or damages to property or other losses which may arise from or in connection with PARDEE or its'CONTRACTOR negligence or fault in the performance of the work

hereunder by PARDEE or its CONTRACTOR, its agents, representatives, employees,

or subcontractors of any tier. PARDEE will provide the DISTRICT with certificates of insurance for coverage as listed

below and endorsements, establishing coverage required by this PARTICIPATION

CONTRACT prior to commencement of construction of the PROJECT. The certificate

of endorsements for each insurance policy are to be signed by a person authorized by the insurer and licensed by the State of Nevada.

PARDEE or its CONTRACTOR will maintain in full force and effect the following

7

. .

I insurance coverages: a.

b.

C.

d.

e.

Comprehensive or Commercial General Liability, including premises,

operations, contractual, explosion, collapse, and underground (XCU) hazards with minimum limits of $2 million per occurrence and $5 million general aggregate. The DISTRICT and the CITY and their officers,

employees and volunteers shall be named as additional insureds. Comprehensive Automobile Liability covering owned, hired and

nonowned vehicles, with minimum limits of $500,000 per person, $1

million per accident for bodily injury, and $500,OOO property damage, or

combined single limit of $1 million. .

Workers’ Compensation Insurance as required by law, including Employers’ Liability with minimum limits of $1 million per occurrence.

All of the insurance described above shall be maintained in effect at all times during all the work performed pursuant to this agreement, until such

work has been accepted by the CITY and the DISTRICT. In addition, Comprehensive or Commercial General Liability insurance shall be maintained continuously until ten years from completion of the PROJECT

and acceptance thereof by the CITY and the DISTRICT pursuant to this

PARTICIPATION CONTRACT, so long as said policies are commercially available. PARDEE shall give the CITY and the

DISTRICT at least 30 days written notice prior to any material change or cankllation of said coverage, either in whole or in part, and the failure

of PARDEE to give said notice as required shall be a default by PARDEE

under this PARTICIPATION CONTRACT.

All deductibles and self-insured retention shall be fully disclosed in the certificate of insurance., No deductible or self-insured retention may

exceed $150,000. All aggregates must be fully disclosed and the amount

entered on the required certificate. Any notice given to PARDEE or its CONTRACTOR with respect to exhaustion of limits of insurance shall

also be sent to the DISTRICT. The adequacy of the insurance supplied

8

by PARDEE or its CONTRACTOR, including the rating and financial health of each insurance company providing coverage, is subject to the

approval of the DISTRICT and CITY. f. PARDEE or its CONTRACTOR’S insurance shall be primary as respects

to the DISTRICT and CITY and their officers, employees, and volunteers. Any other coverage available to the DISTRICT, its officers, employees

and volunteers shall be excess over the insurance required of PARDEE or its CONTRACTOR. The insurance and bonding requirements specified in this PARTICIPATION CONTRACT d6 not relieve PARDEE or its CONTRACTOR of its responsibility or limit the amount of its liability to the DISTRICT or other persons and PARDEE or its CONTRACTOR is

encouraged to purchase such additional insurance as it deems necessary.

g. If PARDEE or its CONTRACTOR fail to maintain any of the insurance coverage required herein, then the DISTRICT will have the option to either terminate the PARTICIPATION CONTRACT; declare PARDEE in breach; purchase replacement insurance; or pay the premiums that are due on existing policies in order that the required coverage may be

maintained. PARDEE is responsible for any expenses paid by the

DISTRICT to maintain such insurance and the DISTRICT may collect the

same from PARDEE or deduct the amount paid from any sums due PARbEE under this PARTICIPATION CONTRACT.

9

I . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . CLARK COUNTY REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT

Date of District Action:

Attest:

DEANNA LEFKO Board Secretary

MICHAEL, R. HARRIS, Chairman

CHRISTOPHER FIGGINS Deputy District Attorney

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

CITY OF NORTH LAS VEGAS

Date of Council Action:

Attest: JAMES K. SEASTRAND, Mayor

EILEEN M. SEVIGNY, City Clerk

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

PARDEE CONSTRUCTION CO.

THEODORE J. CULLm, Vice President

Attest:

10

" I CLARK COUNTY REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT

AGENDA ITEM

I I RECOMMENDATION SUMMARY

STAFF: Approve.

TECHNICAL COMMITTEE: Approve.

CITIZENS COMMITTEE: Approve.

RFCD AGENDA ITEM #5 Date. 12/10/92

I I

CLARK COUNTY


AGENDA ITEM

SUBJEC'E

UNNAMED WASH, LAUGHLIN

PETITIONER M. J. MANNING, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS

RECOMMENDATION OF PETITIONER:

THAT THE REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT APPROVE AND AUTHORIZE THE CHAIRMAN TO SIGN THE SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL INTERLOCAL CONTRACT TO ALLOW FOR AN EXTENSION OF DESIGN TIME.

FlsCAL IMPACE

NONE

BACKGROUND:

On September 14, 1989 the Regional Flooc 3 Control Dis trict approGed an Interlocal Contract for preliminary engineering, engineering design, and right-of-way engineering for the Unnamed Wash in Laughlin, Nevada, in an amount not to exceed $350,000.00

On April 9, 1992, the Regional Flood Control District approved a First Supplemental Interlocal Contract to allow a redistribution Of previously approved funding and extended the completion date to December 31, 1992.

This Supplemental Interlocal Contract provides for an extension of design time to allow for wetlands mitigation engineering at the Colorado River outfall.

Respectfully submitted, ,- 1

M. u. MANNING DIRECTOR O F PU MJM:WCB:jdc

AGENDA ITEM DEVELOPMENT Regional Flood Control District


UNNAMED WASH FLOOD CONTROL IMPROVEMENTS - SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL INTERLOCAL CONTRACT (LAU.Ol.A.89)

Clark County has submitted a request for a Second Supplemental Interlocal Contract to change the contract completion date from December 31, 1992 to June 30, 1993. The request will modify the design contract completion date to allow for finalization of the wetlands mitigation plan required at the Colorado River outfall. No additional funding is requested. The District Attorney has reviewed the contract as to form.


Approve.

Discussion by Technicial Advisory Committee: AGENDA #9 Date: 11/19/92

Recommendation:

Approve.

Discussion by Citizens Advisory Committee: AGENDA #9 Date: 11/30/92

SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL INTERLOCAL CONTRACT FOR

UNNAMED WASH, LAUGHLIN

THIS SUPPLEMENTAL CONTRACT, made and entered into this

day of , 1992, by and between the County of Clark, a

political subdivision, hereinafter referred to as llCOUNTY1l, and the

Clark County Regional Flood Control District, hereinafter referred

to as

W I T N E S S E T I I

WHEREAS, on September 14, 1989 the DISTRICT approved an

Interlocal Contract to provide funds for the preliminary

engineering, engineering design, and right-of-way engineering of

the Unnamed Wash in Laughlin, Nevada; and

WHEREAS, design of the flood control improvements identified

in the Master Plan Amendment for Unnamed Wash in Laughlin, Nevada

is nearing completion and property appraisals have been obtained;

and

WHEREAS, negotiations are proceeding with the Division of

State Parks to provide engineering design of wetlands mitigation,

to be jointly shared in a partnering agreement, to the satisfaction

of the USEPA with resultant release of the U.S. Corps of Engineers

404 Permit; and

-1-

I WHEREAS, to effect engineered design of wetlands mitigation

additional design completion time is required.

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the covenants, conditions,

agreements, and promises hereto, it is mutually understood and

agreed to supplement the Interlocal Contract approved September 14,

1989 as follows:

SECTION I11 - GENERAL paragraph 15 shall be changed to read as

follows:

.

.

. I

15. The items covered in paragraphs one, two, and three of

SECTION I1 - PROJECT COSTS must be completed to the

satisfaction of the DISTRICT prior to June 30, 1993. The

DISTRICT may, at any time thereafter, grant extensions or

terminate this Contract after thirty (30) days notice and

may require all sums advanced to the COUNTY be repaid.

-2-

The remainder of the Interlocal Contract dated September 14, 1989

remains unchanged.

ATTEST :

LORETTA BOWMAN, County Clerk

Data of Commission Aation:

CLARK COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS

BY : JAY BINGflAM, Chairman

ATTEST: REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT

BY : DEANNA LEFKO, Secretary MICHAEL HARRIS, Chairman


Approved as to legality and form:

CHRISTOPHER FIGGINS Deputy District Attorney

-3-


AGENDA ITEM

1 I RAWHIDE CHANNEL PHASE III FLOOD CONTROL IMPROVEMENTS - PROJECT

PRESENTATION (CLA.02.F.92)


STAFF: Accept the presentation.

TECHNICAL COMMTITEE: Accept the presentation.

CITIZENS COMMIlTEE: Accept the presentation.

RFCD AGENDA ITEM #6A Date: 12/10/92

CLARK COUNTY


AGENDA ITEM

SUBJEm

RAWHIDE CHANNEL PHASE I11

r""ONrn M. J. MANNING, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS

RECOMMENDA~ON OF PEITIIONER:

THAT THE REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT RECEIVE A PRESENTA- TION ON THE RAWHIDE CHANNEL (PHASE 111) CROSSINGS AT ANNIE OAKLEY DRIVE AND THROUGH TOMIYASU SCHOOL.

FlSCAL IMPACE .

None

BACKGROW.

The Regional Flood Control District has provided funding for the design of Rawhide Channel Phase 111. The design is nearing completion and Clark County Public Works is Prepared to make a presentation on the proposed i~provements to the District.

Reo~ectfdlv 8ubmitted.

J. MANNING DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS MJM:WCB:slh


~ _ _


RAWHIDE CHANNEL FLOOD CONTROL I ” E N T S - PROJECT PRESENTATION (CLA.02.F.92)

In accordance with NRS 543.580 and District Policies and Procedures, a presentation will be made at the meeting.



Discussion by Technical Advisory Committee:

Recommendation:


Discussion by Citizens Advisory Committee!: e #lOA Date:l1/30/92

Recommendation:



PROJECT SUMMARY RAWHIDE CHANNEL PHASE I11

ANNIE OAKLEY DRIVE AND TOMIYASU SCHOOL

In accordance with NRS Chapter 543.580, the County submits the following information for the Rawhide Channel Phase I11 Improvements:

Rawhide Channel currently passes beneath the Tomiyasu School playground and Annie Oakley Drive through three 54 Inch diameter reinforced concrete pipes with an approximate capacity of 560 cfs. The need for improvements to this reach of Rawhide Channel is identified in the Flood Control Master Plan Ur>date prepared by James M. Montgomery Engineers, Inc. adopted by the Clark County Regional Flood Control District (CCRFCD) , see exhibit 'A', and also in the Pawhide Channel Pre-Desian ReDort. 1989 prepared by G.C. Wallace, Inc. . The proposed improvements for this phase of Rawhide Channel improvements consist of constructing a dual 8 I x 5' reinforced concrete box culvert at Annie Oakley Drive and closed conveyance system beneath the playground of Tomiyasu School both with an approximate capacity of 1350 cfs.. Through Tomiyasu School the system will bid with two separate alternates, the first utilizing three 78 inch diameter cast-in-place or reinforced concrete pipes and the second with dual 8 ' x 5' reinforced concrete boxes. The proposed improvements are shown in exhibit IBI.

The box culvert at Annie Oakley Drive will be constructed within existing street right-of-way. The conveyance system through the Tomiyasu School playground will be constructed in a 30' wide easement obtained from the Clark County School District.

The estimated cost to the CCRFCD for construction of the proposed Rawhide Channel Phase I11 improvements is $800,000.00. Of this amount the construction engineering will not exceed $52,336.00 and the construction will not exceed $747,664.00.

A direct benefit of this project is the elimination of major storm flows crossing the school playground. When this is considered, the total cost of the proposed project is minimal compared to the cost of repair, or replacement of the school property, not to mention the possibility of loss due to injury or death.


. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS RAWHIDE CHANNEL - PHASE 111

ANNIE OAKLEY .. TOMYASU SCHOOL

1

1.i I


AGENDA ITEM

SUBTECT:

RAWHIDE CHANNEL PHASE 111 FLOOD CONTROL IMPROVEMENTS - SFXOND SUPPLEMENTAL INTERLCCAL CONTRACT (CLA.02.F.92)

1 I


STAFF: Approve, subject to Clark County obtaining the easement from the School District.

TECHNICAL COMMITEE: Approve.

I CITIZENS CO-: Approve.

RFCD AGENDA

Date: 12/10/92

CLARK COUNTY


SUBJECE

RAWHIDE CHANNEL PHASE I11

I PEITIIONER: M. J. MANNING, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS

RECOMMENDAmON OF PETITIONER:

THAT THE REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT APPROVE AND AUTHORIZE THE CHAIRMAN TO SIGN THE SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL INTERLOCAL CONTRACT FOR CONSTRUCTION OF RAWHIDE CHANNEL PHASE 111.

FlSCAL IMPAm. $ 1,391,000 Original Interlocal Contract. $ 594,485 Supplemental No. 1 Increase Cost.

$ 2,785,485 Total per Supplemental Interlocal Contract. s 800.000 Increase in Construction Administration and Construction Cost.

BACKGROUND. On February 13, 1992, the Regional Flood Control District amroved an Interlocal Contract for Rawhide Channel Phase I. Construction of this phase is substantially complete.

On July 9, 1992, the Regional Flood Control District approved the First Supplemental Interlocal Contract for Rawhide Channel Phase 11. The contract for this phase has been awarded and construction will start soon.

- ~ c c ~

Clark County is nearing completion of construction plans and right-of-way has been obtained for Rawhide Channel Crossings at Annie Oakley Drive and upstream of Annie Oakley Drive through the Tomiyasu School grounds.

Clark County is proposinq this Supplemental Interlocal Contract to provide funding for construction administration and construction costs for this phase of work on the Rawhide Channel System.

TAC AGENDA

D8te: 12/10/92 D 8 h 11/19/92 ITEM # 6~ ITEM# 10B RFCD AGENDA

DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS MJM:JJC:bat


StafTDiscussion: Date: 12/1/92

RAWHIDE CHANNEL PHASE III FLOOD CONTROL IMPROVEMENTS - SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL INTERUXAL CONTRACT (CLA.02.F.92)

Clark County has submitted a request for a Second Supplemental Interlocal Contract to provide funding for the Rawhide Channel, Phase III flood control improvements. The request will provide funding for the construction and construction administration for those improvements from Annie Oakley Drive and upstream through Tomiyasu School. The $8OO,OOO request brings the total of the Second Supplemental Interlocal Contract amount to $2,785,485. Ninety percent plans and specifications have been submitted for review. Clark County is in the process of obtaining an easement from the School District for the construction of the project. The additional amount requested is within the amount programmed on the Bond Project List. Bond Funds (Fund 444) are available to cover the request. The District Attorney has reviewed the contract as to form.

StaffReCommendation:

Approve, subject to Clark County obtaining the easement from the School District.

e XlOB Date:11/19/92

Recommendatian:

Approve.

Discussion by Citizens Advisory Cmmittee:

Recommendatioa:

Approve.

SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL

INTERLOCAL CONTRACT FOR

RAWHIDE CHANNEL

THIS CONTRACT, made and entered into this day of

, 1992, by and between the County of Clark, a political

subdivision, hereinafter referred to as nCOUNTY1g, and the Clark

County Regional Flood Control District, hereinafter referred to as

".DISTRICT".

W I T N E S S E T H

Whereas, on July 9, 1992 the DISTRICT approved the first

supplemental interlocal contract to expand the Scope of Services to

include the Rawhide Channel crossings at Pecos Road, Sandhill Road

and Mountain Vista Street; and

1

Whereas, the COUNTY now desires to expand the Scope of

Services to include the Rawhide Channel crossings at Annie Oakley

Drive and through the Tomiyasu School grounds; and

1

WHEREAS, the flood control improvements proposed herein are

the same as those identified in the Master Plan as facilities DCRH

0027, 0052, 0053, 0094, 0096, 0130, 0188, and 0102, hereinafter

referred to as '*PROJECT**; and

WHEREAS, the PROJECT is a priority project and has been

approved by the DISTRICT on its annual project priority list, and

WHEREAS, the PROJECT has regional flood control significance

and is located in the Las Vegas Valley hydrographic area; and I

WHEREAS, it is desirable to proceed with the construction of

the project in accordance with the Master Plan, and it is necessary

to provide additional funding for construction engineering

inspection, inspection, testing, survey, and construction costs for

the Rawhide Channel crossings at Annie Oakley Drive and through the

Tomiyasu School grounds.

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the covenants, conditions,

agreements, and promises of the parties hereto, the DISTRICT

authorizes the COUNTY to proceed with the construction engineering,

inspection, testing, and survey and construction of this project

2

as is mutually understood and agreed to supplement the Interlocal

Contract approved on February 13, 1992 and First Supplemental

Interlocal Contract approved on July 9,1992 as follows:

SECTION I - SCOPE OF PROJECT shall be changed to read as follows:

This Interlocal Contract applies to flood control facilities

associated with the Rawhide Channel system from Pecos Road to

Mountain Vista Street and shall consist of the following phases of

construction:

PHASE I- Rawhide Channel facilities from Annie Oakley Drive to

Palm Avenue consisting of the design and construction of two

channel crossings and approximately 3,000 linear feet of

channel, inlet and outlet structures and other necessary and

related construction.

PHASE II- Rawhide Channel facilities consisting of three

channel crossings located at Pecos Road, Sandhill Road, and

Mountain Vista Street, channel transitions and other necessary

and related construction.

3

PHASE III- Rawhide Channel facilities consisting of a channel

crossing at Annie Oakley Drive and a closed conveyance system

approximately 750 feet in length located upstream of Annie

Oakley Drive through the Tomiyasu School grounds.

SECTION 11 - PROJECT COSTS shall be changed to read as

follows :

' . . The DISTRICT agrees to provide "funding for project costs .-

within the limits specified below:

1. Constructionengineering, contract administration, inspection,

testing, and survey shall not exceed $1998409.00.

1 2. The cost of construction not to exceed $2,586,076.00

3. The total cost of this Contract shall not exceed

A written request must be made to the DISTRICT and a

supplemental interlocal contract approved to increase any of the

amounts noted above prior to payment of any additional funds.

4

SECTION I11 - GENERAL - Change paragraph 16 to read as

follows:

16. The items covered in paragraphs one and two of SECTION I1 - PROJECTS COSTS must be completed to the satisfaction of the

DISTRICT prior to September 31, 1993. The DISTRICT may, at

any time thereafter, grant extensions or terminate this

Contract after thirty (30) days notice and may require all

sums advanced to the COUNTY be repaid.

SECTION I11 - GENERAL - Change the following paragraph to read as follows:

20. The award of bid for this PROJECT shall occur no later than

January 31, 1992. The Lead Entity will take all reasonable

steps possible to avoid delays in the construction of District funded projects. Project delays more than four months, as

measured from the award date, may be subject to a formal

review by both the Technical Advisory Committee and the

District Board of Directors. At the review, the lead Entity

will have an opportunity to present information relative to

the delays, measures taken to avoid the delays and the

likelihood of those delays continuing. The Board will make a

determination, in view of the delays and limited available funding, the Board may cancel any Interlocal Contract(s)

associated with the project and discontinue funding for the

remainder of the project. Funding already spent or

appropriated by the entity will not be required to be refunded

5

i to the District. Project funding can be reconsidered at any time

when the Lead Entity can demonstrate that the project can proceed

on an acceptable schedule.

The remainder of the interlocal contract dated February 13, 1992

and first supplemental interlocal contract dated July 9, 1992

remains unchanged.

ATTEST: CLARK COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS

LORETTA BOWMAN, County Clerk 3AY BINGHAM, Chairman

Date of Commission Action:

I ATTEST: REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT

CHAEL R. HARRIS, Chairman


Approved as to Legality and Form:

BY : CHRISTOPHER FIGGINS Deputy District Attorney

6

. / .

. .

!

SPICANA

. .

4VENUE -

0027 MP FACILITY NO. (DC,RH) 0 CULVERT CROSSING' IMPROVEMENT 0 CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT


SUBJECT:

PROJECT STATUS REPORTS

PETITIONER:

VIRGINIA VALENTINE, P.E., GENERAL MANAGEWCHIEF ENGINEER


THAT THE BOARD ACCEPT THE REPORTS. ~ ~~~~ ~ ~~ ~~

FISCAL IMPACT:

None. BACKGROUND:

The following Projects Status Reports for the month of November, 1992 are submitted for your review:

I 92/93 PROJECT LIST AND BOND PROJECTS

Paees 1-4 Project Charts 5-7 Project Summary Sheets 8-28 Clark County 29-42 City of Las Vegas 43 City of Boulder City 44-47 City of Henderson 48-52 City of North Las Vega

OTHER PROJECTS OF INTEREST

Pages 53 Clark County - Hiko Springs Remapping 54 Henderson - Pittman Wash Phase II 55-59 Regional Flood Control Respectfully submitted,

I

Catherine A. Razor Project Administration Coordinator

TAC AGENDA I T E M U

RFCD AGENDA

Date: 12/10/92 Date: ITEM% 7

CLARK COUNTY PROJECT STATUS CHART AS OF 1 1/30/92 .jd Aug 8.p Oct Nov !Doc Jan Fob Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sop Oct DOC JUI h b

DUCK CREEK BRIDGES #/#/#/Ztz&B E RANGE WASH DETENTION BASIN /////////////L-- FLAMINGO BRIDGE @ PALOS VERDE

FLAMINGO BRIDGE @ PARADISE

WINNICK AVE IMPROV w/#///$gjAJ-: RAWHIDE CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS

E 1993 1994

I I I I I

I I

Annie Oakley to Palm Mtn Vista, Pecw, Sandhill Tomiysru,Annie Oakley, Perd,Mojwe

SLOAN CHANNEL I

I

.

4

I

CLARK COUNTY - OUTLYING PROJECT STATUS CHART AS OF 1 1130192

BUNKERWLLE CHANNEL

GOODSPRINGS

HlKO SPRINGS

LOGAN WASH - Ares 1 Area 2

MUDDY RIVER WEST LEVEE

NELSON FLOOD CONTROL

SEARCHLIGHT FLOOD CONTROL

UNNAMED WASH

CITY OF LAS VEGAS PROJECT STATUS CHART AS OF 1 1I30192

ALTA STORM DRAIN (Medow VI

ANGEL PARK DB EXPANSION

BUFFALO CHANNEUm-WeStdiffI

BUFFALO CH(Summrlii-Vegas)

BUFFALO CHWestdHf-Summedin)

CHEYENNE CHANNEL

CAREYILAKE MEAD DET. BASIN

GOWANICAM 10 & LONE MTN

GOWAN DETENTION BASIN

GOWAN OUTFALL

OAKEY BL DET BASIN SYSTEM

OAKEY COLLECTION SYSTEM

RAMPART STORM DRAIN

WASHINGTON AVE. SYSTEM DESIGN

WASHINGTON AVE. ROW

WASHINGTONISANDHILL ounn WASHINGTONISANDHILL-VIRGIL CONSTRUCTION

I I

I I I

I I

I I I

I

PROJECTSTATUSCHART AS OF 11/30/92

BOULDER CITY HEMENWAY WASH

HENDERSON C-1 CHANNEL SYSTEM

PrrrMAN WASH - PHASE 111

SUNSET DETENTION BASIN

UPRR CHANNEL

4

MESQUITE TOWN WASH DET. BASIN

NORTH LAS VEGAS GOWAN OUTFALL-PHASE I

KYLE CANYON DET. BASIN

NLV DETENTION BASIN-OUTLET

I

UPPER LV WASH DET BASIN

WEST RANGE WASH DIKE I

-4-

REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL SCHEDULE CHANGE FROM PREVIOUS '

DISTRICT SUMMARY SHEET AS OF MONTH

d + indicate8 cumlative delay in months .

-58-

I DISTRICT SUMMARY SHEET AS OF 11130/92

PROJECT s WEGAS

Storm Drain - Meadows V

Angel Perk Detention W n

annel(Doe to Wmtdiff)

Eluffdo Channel ( V o w Dr-

=anf&(Smmmnfin::- . . ....... .... ,iii$,i';.., .

pkw-Avm, ': .::: :. ::. :. .... ........................ .................... ................... ..: .:.: : :.:....:.

. . . . . . . . . . . .

Buffalo Channel(Wwtdiff- S u m d i n Pkwy.)

Cheyenne Channel

Freeway Channel I C15 to hhoc

Gowan ICAM-10 & Lone Mtn DB's Predadgn Gowan Detention Basins . ::;.;:' '.::::j ,(..

Gowan North Channel Master Plan Amendment

Gowan Outfall - Phase 2

-

Oakey Collection Swem &

Ram~art Storm Drdn

(Washington Avo. System Deign

Washington Avo. Channd ROW

Washington Aw.~sndhilIHI:bud~'

Washington Ave./Sandhill-Virgil

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..................... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .........................

Iconstmction

I I ISTART ICOMPLETE ISTART DATE lcorm DATE I PREVIOUS MONTH

$270,000

$1,700.600 $1,700,000 DONE DONE DONE DONE

DONE DONE 01 A3 06193 I

I d + indicates wmulativa month

-6- delay dnce 9/30/92

II REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT

PROJECT STATUS REPORT II ENTITY: CLARK COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS DATE PREPARED: .31/30/92

REVIEW PERIOD FRm: JUOVEMeER 1 TO: NOVEMBER 30

PROJECT: DUCK CREEK BRIDGES AT TOMIYASU AND PACHUCA (LA CASITA)

DESCRIPTION: NEW BRIDGES OVER DUCK CREEK AT PACHUCA (LA CASITA) AND TOMIYASU

PERCENT COMPLETE: ESTIMATED COST OF PROJECT: $645.000.0Q

SCHEDULE FOR COMPLETION; (DATES )

DESIGN 12/01/92

R/W CLEARANCES

ENVIR CLEARANCES

BIDS OPEN 01/01/93

CONSTRUCTION START 92/01/93

CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE 07/01/93

CONSULTANT/PROJECT MANAGER: HEFNER

CONSTRUCTION PRIME CONTRACTOR:

r I1

DELAYS OR PROBLEMS AREAS: ADDITIONAL ROW REQUIRED AT TOMIYASU.

WORK COMPLETED DURING CURRENT MONTH: RETURNED 90% COMMENTS TO CONSULTANT.

1

WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING NEXT MONTH: ADVERTISE PROJECT.

I'

-8- PROJECT MANAGER: .HAND PHONE #: 455-8339


PROJECT STATUS =PORT

ENTITY: CLARK COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS DATE PREPARED: 11/30/92

REVIEW PERIOD FROM: WOVEMBER 1 TO: NOVEMBER 30

PROJECT: EAST RANGE WASH DETENTION FACILITY

DESCRIPTION: DETENTION BASIN AND 0UTLET.CHANNEL FACILITIES

PERCENT COMPLETE : 3 ESTIHATED COST OF PROJECT: $9,387,500.00


DESIGN 12/03/92

R/W CLEARANCES

ENVIR CLEARANCES

BIDS OPEN 08/11/93



~~

CONSULTANT/PROJECT W A G E R : BOYLE ENGINEERING CORP.


I, 11

DELAYS OR PROBLEMS AREAS: USAF PREFERS WORK START IN 01/94 AS PLANS CAN NOT MAKE 01/93 SCHEDULE (DUE TO PROPERTY ACQUISITION). USAF WANTS GOLF COURSE WORK ONLY IN JANUARY OR FEBRUARY.

WORK COMPLETED DURING CURRENT MONTH: CONTINUED FINAL DESIGN.

WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING NEXT MONTH: CONTINUE FINAL DESIGN AND ESTABLISH ROW TAKES.

PROJECT MANAGER: jWlNDT -9-

PHONE #: 455-7707

ll REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT

PROJECT STATUS REPORT II ENTITY: CLARK COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS DATE PREPARED: f 1 / 3 0 / 9 2

RFVIEW PERIOD FROM: NOVEMBER 1 TO: YOVEMBER 3 0

PROJECT: FLAMINGO WASH AT WINNICK AVENUE

DESCRIPTION: COLLECT FLAMINGO WASH AND DISCHARGE AT KOVAL

PERCENT COMPLETE: ESTIMATED COST OF PROJECT: $4.300.000.00

SCHEDULE FOR COMPLETION: (DATES)

DESIGN 01 /01 /93

R/W CLEARANCES

ENVIR CLEARANCES

BIDS OPEN 03 /01 /93


CONSULTANT/PROJECT MANAGER: G.C. WALLACE


DELAYS OR PROBLEMS AREAS: CONSTRUCTION OF A WORKING HYDRAULIC MODEL.

WORK COMPLETED DURING CURRENT MONTH: USBR BEGAN CONSTRUCTION OF HYDRAULIC MODEL.

It !I WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING NEXT MONTH: CONTINUE HYDRAULIC MODEL (USBR) .

-1c PHONE #: 455-8339

i t 11

// REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT

PROJECT STA!RJS REPORT I/ ENTITY: CLARK COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS DATE PREPARED: 11/30/92

REVIEW PERIOD FROM: NOVEMBER 1 TO: NOVEMBER 30

PROJECT: RAWHIDE CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS PHASE I1 - CROSSINGS DESCRIPTION: PECOS. SANDHILL. MTN VISTA - COMPLETE REMAINING PROJECT

COMPONENTS

PERCENT COMPLETE : 8% ESTIMATED COST OF PROJECT: ~3,000,000.00

SCHEDULE FOR COMPLETION: (DATES )

DESIGN 06/30/92

R/W CLEARANCES

ENVIR CLEARANCES

BIDS OPEN 09/18/92



_ _ _ _ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

CONSULTANT/PROJECT MANAGER:

CONSTRUCTION PRIME CONTRACTOR: LAS VEGAS PAVING

DELAYS OR PROBLEMS AREAS:

WORK COMPLETED DURING CURRENT MONTH: HELD PRE-CONSTRUCTION MEETING.

WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING NEXT MONTH: BEGIN CONSTRUCTION.

'1

-11- PROJECT MANAGER: PHILLIPS PHONE #: 455-7747

. . . ._ .. --r - - - T - -

9


PROJECT STATUS REPORT

ENTITY: CLARK COuNm PUBLIC WORKS DATE PREPARED: 11/30/92

REVIEW PERIOD FROM: NOVEMBER 1 TO: EJOVEMBER 30

PROJECT: RAWHIDE CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS PHASE I11 - CROSSINGS DESCRIPTION: TOMIYASU ELEMENTARY SCHOOL. ANNIE OAKLEY. PERAL. AND MOJAVE.

PERCENT COMPLETE: 6% EST-= COST OF PROJECT: $3.000.000.00


DESIGN 12/14/92

R/W CLEARANCES

ENVIR CLEARANCES

BIDS OPEN 91/19/92


CONSTRUCTION COMF'LETE 06/20/93

~ ~~



DELAYS OR PROBLEMS AREAS; ACQUIRING DRAINAGE EASEMENT THROUGH TOMIYASU SCHOOL PROPERTY.

I! !I WORK COMPLETED DURING CURRENT MONTH: MADE PRESENTATIONS TO RFCD TECHNICAL AND CAC. SUBMITTED PLANS AND SPECS. FOR 90% REVIEW AND SUBMITTED HYDRAULIC ANALYSIS FOR REVIEW.

I! 'I WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING NEXT MONTH: ACQUIRE DRAINAGE EASMENT FROM SCHOOL DISTRICT. FINALIZE PLANS AND SPECS. ADVERTISE ON 12/14/92.

I' I

PROJECT MANAGER: CATANESE -12-

PHONE #: 455-8309




REVIEPQ PERIOD FROM: JVOWMBER 1 TO: NOVEMBER 30 PROJECT: VAN BUSKIRK CHANNEL - SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS (PHASE IIA) DESCRIPTION: ROCHELLE/HILDEBRAND TO PECOS-MCLEOD & VIKING - ALSQ

DETENTION BASIN E

PERCENT COMPLETE : 5% ESTIMATED COST OF PROJECT: $3,500,000.00


DESIGN 11/09/92

R/W CLEARANCES

ENVIR CLEARANCES

BIDS OPEN 02/11/93



CONSULTANT/PROJECT W A G E R : SEA


- DELAYS OR PROBLEMS AREAS. ZONING PROBLEMS - - ZONE & N G E HEARING ON 12/02/92. SUPPLEMENTAL HYDRAULIC TO BE SUBMITTED.

WORK COMPLETED DURING CURRENT MONTH: CONTINUED DESIGN. ZONE CHANGE AND VARIANCE FILED.

WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING NEXT MONTH: DETERMINE PROPERTY TO BE ACQUIRED. ATTEND ZONE CHANGE HEARING ON 12/03/92 FOR BASIN E.

-13- PROJECT MANAGER: BRANDT PHONE #: 455-7707



ENTITY: CLARK COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS DATE PREPARED: &1/30/92

REVIEW PERIOD FROM: JVOVEWBER 1 TO: NOVEMBER 3 0

PROJECT: VAN BUSKIRK CHANNEL - SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS (PHASE IIB) DESCRIPTION: TWAIN/MONUMENT TO PECOS/FLAMINGO INCL. DETENTION BASIN 0

PERCENT COMPLETg: p% ESTIMATED COST OF PROJECT: $1,300,000.00

DESIGN


07/01/93

R/W CLEARANCES

ENVIR CLEARANCES

BIDS OPEN 08/01/93



CONSULTANT/PROJECT W A G E R :



WORK COMPLETED DURING CURRENT MONTH: HELD KICKOFF MEETING WITH CONSULTANT ON 11/24/92.

I! !I WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING NEXT MONTH: CONTINUE PRE-DESIGN.

PROJECT W A G E R : J3AND PHONE #: 455-8339 -14-

e

I REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT

PROJECT STATUS RBPORT



PROJECT: VAN BUSKIRK CHANNEL - SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS (PHASE IIIL DESCRIPTION: FLOOD CONTROL FACILITIES - ROCHELLE TO UNIVERSITY/MCLEOD.

PERCENT COMPLETE: 30% ESTIMATED COST OF PROJECT: $922,000.00


DESIGN 06/08/92

R/W CLEARANCES

ENVIR CLEARANCES

BIDS OPEN 08/05/92



CONSULTANT/PROJECT MANAGER: MEA

CONSTRUCTION PRIME CONTRACTOR: PROGRESSIVE CONTRACTOR


WORK COMPLETED DURING CURRENT MONTH: CONTINUED PLACEMENT OF PRECAST SECTIONS AND CHANNEL BOTTOM.

I! ;I WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING NEXT MONTH: CONTINUE PLACEMENT OF PRECAST SECTION AND CHANNEL BOTTOM. INSTALL RCB AT UNIVERSITY AND MCLEOD.

1 '1

-15- PROJECT MANAGER: HALL PHONE #: 455-7788





PROJECT: VAN BUSKIRK CHANNEL - SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS (PHASE IV) DESCRIPTION: FLOOD CONTROL FACILITIES & DETENTION BASIN C BETWEEN

MCLEOD/UNIVERSITY & HARMON/HARRISON INTERSECTIONS

PERCENT COMPLETE: 8% ESTIMATED COST OF PROJECT: $1,072.000.00

DESIGN


10/08/92

R/W CLEARANCES

ENVIR CLEARANCES

BIDS OPEN 12/16/92



CONSULTANT/PROJECT MANAGER: DELTA ENGINEERING

CONSTRUCTION PRIXE CONTRACTOR:

WORK COMPLETED DURING CURRENT MONTH: ADVERTISED ON 11/19/92 AND HELD PRE-BID ON 11/23/92.

3

WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING NEXT MONTH: OPEN BIDS ON 12/16/92 AND AWARD ON 01/19/93.

PROJECT MANAGER: BRANDT -16-

PHONE #: 455-7707

* ' . I .I

I REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT



REVIEM PERIOD FROM: NOVEMBER 1 TO: NOVEMBER 30

PROJECT: VAN BUSKIRK CHANNEL - SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS (PHASE V) DESCRIPTION: FLOOD CONTROL FACILITIES BETWEEN HARMON/HARRISON

INTERSECTION & TROPICANA AVE.

PERCENT COMPLETE : - 8% ESTIMATED COST OF PROJECT: $1.627.000.00


DESIGN 08/14/92

ENVIR CLEARANCES

BIDS OPEN 12/16/92



CONSULTANT/PROJECT W A G E R : PENTACORE


DELAYS OR PROBLEMS AREAS: PROJECT SCHEDULE ADJUSTED TO COINCIDE WITH VAN BUSKIRK CHANNEL IV BASIN C CONSTRUCTION.

WORK COMPLETED DURING CURRENT MONTH; ADVERTISED ON 11/19/92 AND HELD PRE-BID ON 11/30/92.

WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING NEXT MONTH: OPEN BIDS AND PREPARE TO AWARD CONTRACT.

'1

-17- PROJECT W A G E R : BRANDT PHONE #: 455-7707


PROJECT STATUS REPORT I/ ENTITY: CLARK COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS DATE PREPARED: 11/30/92

W I E W PERIOD FRmt NOVEMBER 1 TO: NOVEMBER 30

PROJECT: VAN BUSKIRK CHANNEL - ROW ACOUISTION DESCRIPTION: APPRAISE AND ACOUIRE ROW FOR DETENTION BASIN SITES.

PERCENT C-LETE: 1Q%: ESTIMATED COST OF PROJECT: $3.100.000.00

SCHEDULE FOR COMPLETION: (DATES 1

DESIGN

R/W CLEARANCES 02/26/93

ENVIR CLEARANCES

BIDS OPEN

CONSTRUCTION START

CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE




WORK COMPLETED DURING CURRENT MONTH: CONTINUED NEGOTIATIONS ON SITE 0.

WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING NEXT MONTH; CONTINUE NEGOTIATIONS ON SITE 0.

PHONE #: 455-8300 -18-


I PROJECT STATUS REPORT

ENTITY: CLARK COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS DATE PRBPARED: 11/30/92


PROJECT: BUNKERVILLE FLOOD CONTROL CHANNEL

DESCRIPTION: CONSTRUCT CONCRETE LINED CHANNEL FROM HIGHWAY THRU TOWN & EARTHEN CHANNEL FROM EDGE OF TOWN TO VIRGIN RIVER. DESIGN ONLY.

PERCENT COHPLETE: fi ESTIMATED COST OF PROJECT: $1.714.648.00

DESIGN SCHEDULE FOR COMPLETION:

(DATES)

10/22/92

R/W CLl"sARANCES 04/15/92

ENVIR CLEARANCES 08/01/93

BIDS OPEN

CONSTRUCTION START


CONSULTANT/PROJECT MANAGER: THE MARK GROUP


PROBLEMS AREAS: PROJECT ON HOLD DUE TO PROJECT PROTEST BY BUNKERVILLE TAB. PROJECT WILL BE DELAYED DUE TO ENVIRONMENTAL REQUIREMENTS.

I' WORK COMPLETED DURING CURRENT MONTH: COMPLETED DESIGN AND CLOSED-OUT CONTRACT WITH THE MARK GROUP.

WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING NEXT MONTH:

I- I1

-19- PROJECT W A G E R : CATANESE PHONE #: 455-8309



KNTITY: CLARK COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS DATE PREPARED: 11/30/92

REVIEW PERIOD FROM: FOVEMBER 1 TO: POVEMBER 30 PROJECT: GOODSPRINGS - FLOOD CONTROL DESCRIPTION: DESIGN AND CONSTRUCT BERM AND CHANNEL ALONG SOUTH SIDE OF

TOWN AND WIDEN CHANNEL ALONG PACIFIC ST. ON NORTH SIDE OF TOWN.

PERCENT COMPLETE:

DESIGN

fi ESTIMATED COST OF PROJECT:


$99,000.00

11/30/92



BIDS OPEN 08/15/93



~ ~~~ ~~~~~~ ~ ~ ~

CONSULTANT/PROJECT MANAGER: G. C. WALLACE CONSTRUCTION PRIKE CONTRACTOR:

DELAYS OR PROBLEMS AREAS.

ACQUISITION OF ROW WITHIN SAN PEDRO AVE. TO PROPOSED DISCHARGE POINT. PROJECT CONSTRUCTION DEL~Y DUE TO ENVIRONMENTAL REQUIREMENTS.

ll WORK COMPLETED DURING CURRENT MONTH; CONTINUED DESIGN EFFORTS.

WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING NEXT MONTH: RESECHEDULE MEETING WITH TAB TO DISCUSS ALTERNATIVES.

1' -20-

PROJECT W A G E R : CATANESE PHONE #: 455-8309



4 ?

i


REVIEW PERIOD FROM: NOVEMBER 1 TO: JV0V"BER 30 PROJECT: LAUGHLIN - HIKO SPRINGS DESCRIPTION: DESIGN FACILITY ON HIKO SPRINGS TO CONTROL 100-YEAR FLOWS.

FACILITIES INCLUDE DETENTION BASIN, CHANNEL. AND FIVE BRIDGES.

PERCENT COMPLETE: fi ESTIMATED COST OF PROJECT: $19.000.000.00

DESIGN SCHEDULE FOR COMPLETION:

(DATES )

R/W CLEARAEJCES

ENVIR CLEARANCES

BIDS OPEN

CONSTRUCTION START


CONSULTANT/PROJECT W A G E R : BOYLE ENG'G

CONSTRUCTION PRIXE CONTRACTOR:

DELAYS OR PROBLEMS AREAS: SCHEDULE IS DEPENDENT ON SID FUNDING,LESS THAN 50% SUPPORT AT PRESENT

WORK COMPLETED DURING CURRENT MONTH: SCHEDULED SID STEPS TO DETERMINE ACCEPTANCE LEVEL.

WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING NEXT MONTH: CONTINUE TO SCHEDULE SID STEPS TO DETERMINE ACCEPTANCE LEVEL. SOLICIT INTEREST FOR SID.


II REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT

PROJECT STATUS REPORT II ENTITY: CLARK COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS DATE PREPARED: 11/30/92


PROJECT: MOAPA VALLEY - LOGAN WASH DIVERSION/CHANNEL AREA 1

DESCRIPTION: PESIGN DIVERSION OF LOGAN WASH INTO ANDERSON WASH TO REDUCE PEAK FLOWS.

PERCENT COMPLETE : 8% ESTIMATED COST OF PROJECT: $500.000.00

DESIGN


08/24/92

R/W CLEARANCES

ENVIR CLEARANCES -

BIDS OPEN 10/26/92



CONSULTANT/PROJECT W A G E R : DAMES & MOORE

CONSTRUCTION PRIME CONTRACTOR: RON WILLIAMS

DELAYS OR PROBLEMS AREAS: PROJECT CONSTRUCTION SHOULD BE ON SCHEDULE.

WORK COMPLETED DURING CURRENT MONTH: BID AWARDED TO RON WILLIAMS FOR $407,718.34.

WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING NEXT MONTH; PRESENT FOR RFCD AWARD ON 11/12/92. PREPARE BCC AGENDA FOR AWARD ON 11/17/92.

PROJECT W A G E R : W O N D M -22-

PHONE #: 455-7748

b 4



ENTITY: CLARK COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS DATE PIZEPARED: J.1/30/92

REVIEW PERIOD FROM: POVEMBER 1 TO: NOVEMBER 30

PROJECT: MOAPA VALLEY - LOGAN WASH DIVERSION/CHANNEL AREA 2

DESCRIPTION: INLET STRUCTURE AT UPRR BRIDGE, TWO 10' X 8 ' RCBS. CROSSING AT SR 169 AND OPEN CHANNEL.

PERCENT COMPLETE: ESTIMATED COST OF PROJECT: $3.269.540.00

DESIGN


01/03/92



BIDS OPEN 04/23/92



CONSULTANT/PROJECT MANAGER: GREINER

CONSTRUCTION PRIME CONTRACTOR: MEADOW VALLEY

DELAYS OR PROBLEMS AREAS: NEWTON PROPERTY CAUSING DELAY. NEWTON TO DEDICATE ROW. IN-HOUSE UNDERGROUND DESIGN AND BCC APPROVED $200,000 CHANGE ORDER TO CONSTRUCT 2 10' CAST IN PLACE PIPES INSTEAD OF OPEN CHANNEL.

WORK COMPLETED DURING CURRENT MONTH: CONTINUED RCB AND INLET/OUTLET STRUCTURE.

WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING NEXT MONTH; CONTINUE RCB AND INLET/OUTLET STRUCTURES.

, -

I -23-

PROJECT MANAGER: WONDRA/KOLHOSS PHONE #: 455-7748

L


PROJECT STATUS REPORT II ENTITY: CLARK c o r n PUBLIC WORKS DATE PREPARED: 11/30/92

REVIEM PERIOD FROM: NOVEMBER 1 TO: NOVEMBER 30

PROJECT: MOAPA VALLEY - MUDDY RIVER (WEST) LEVEE DESCRIPTION: DESIGN EARTH LEVEE ON THE WEST SIDE OF THE RIVER TO CONTAIN

100-YEAR STORM.

PERCENT COMPLETE : B ESTIMATED COST OF PROJECT: $2.439.118.00

SCHEDULE FOR COMPJlETION; (DATES )

DESIGN

R/W CLEARANCES

ENVIR CLEARANCES

BIDS OPEN

CONSTRUCTION START


CONSULTANT/PROJECT MANAGER: THE MARK GROUP


DELAYS OR PROBLEMS AREAS: PROJECT SCHEDULE & DATES TO BE REVISED ONCE PROJECT PROBLEMS RESOLVED. ID & ACQUISITION OF ROW & EASEMENTS FROM THE 60 PLUS PROPERTY OWNERS WILL BE EXTREMELY LENGTHY.

WORK COMPLETED DURING CURRENT MONTH: MET WITH CONSULTANT TO DETERMINE CHANNEL WORK TO BE DONE.

WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING NEXT MONTH- DETERMINE PHASING POSSIBILITIES TO PRO~ECT SERVERE FLOODING AREAS.

PROJECT MANAGER: BRANDT PHONE #: 455-7707 -24-


PROJEET STATUS REPORT



PROJECT: NELSON FLOOD CONTROL

DESCRIPTION: DESIGN AND CONSTRUCT DIVERSION BERM UPSTREAM OF ROAD. WIDEN CHANNEL AND DIP.

PERCENT COMPLETE : ESTIWATED COST OF PROJECT: $70.000.00


DESIGN

R/W CLEARANCES

ENVIR CLEARANCES

BIDS OPEN

CONSTRUCTION START


CONSULTANT/PROJECT MANAGER: G C WALLACE


DELAYS OR PROBLEMS AREAS: 11 COST OF FACILITIES EXCEEDS BUDGETED AMOUNT. MASTER PLAN UPDATE PROPOSES ACQUIRING PROPERTY IN LIEU OF BUILDING FACILITIES.

WORK COMPLETED DURING CURRENT MONTH:

WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING NEXT MONTH: 11 MEET WITH RFCD TO DISCUSS COURSE OF ACTION FOR THE RECOMMENDED MASTER

II PLAN FACILITIES. UPDATE CURRENT INTERLOCAL CONTRACT.

PROJECT MANAGER: CATANESE PHONE #: 455-8309 -25-


PROJECT STATlJS REPORT

ENTITY: CLARK COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS DATg PREPARED: 11/30/92

REWIEW PERIOD FROM: NOVEMBER 1 TO: NOVEMBER 3 0

PROJECT: SEARCHLIGHT - DIKE DESCRIPTION: MASTER PLAN STRUCTURES #5014. 5015, 5016 & 5017

PERCENT COMPLETE : 6%: ESTIMATED COST OF PROJECT: $172.000.00

SCHEDULE FOR COMPLETION: (DATES)

DESIGN 05/01/93

R/W CLEARANCES


BIDS OPEN 07/27/93




DELAYS OR PROBLEMS AREAS: PROJECT CONSTRUCTION DELAYS DUE TO ENVIRONMENTAL REQUIREMENTS. NEED TO SECURE DRAINAGE EASEMENTS OR ACQUIRE NECESSARY ROW AT OUTFALL. BIOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT NEEDS TO BE CONDUCTED AND THEN REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY BLM (FISH & WILDLIFE) .

WORK COMPLETED DURING CURRENT MONTH-

LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS FOR ROW ACQUISITION. SUBMITTED 90% PLANS FOR REVIEW. BEGAN BIOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT. REVISED

WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING NEXT MONTH: BEGIN APPRAISAL PROCESS.

PROJECT W A G E R : CATANESE PHONE #: 455-8309

A h


PROJECT STATUS REPORT -



PROJECT: LAUGHLIN - UNNAMED WASH DESCRIPTION: DESIGN FACILITY TO CONTROL 100-YEAR STORM FLOWS. INCLUDING

CHANNEL. SED. BASIN & BRIDGE.

PERCENT COMPLETE: 8%: ESTIMATED COST OF PROJECT: $8,000.000.00


DESIGN 06/15/91



BIDS OPEN 03/15/93



CONSULTANT/PROJECT MANAGER: SIMONS. LI & ASSOCIATES


DELAYS OR PROBLEMS AREAS: PROV. ORDER 06-04-91--64% PROTEST. 2ND SID TRY. EPA WANTS MITIG. PLAN IN PLACE & REVIEWED BEFORE 404 ISSUANCE. REC. 47 ACRES FROM COL. RIVER C O W . ADS 2/1/93, PRE-BID 2/15/93, & AWARD 4/6/93.

WORK COMPLETED DURING CURRENT MONTH: 404 APPLICATION PENDING & WILL CLEAR W/MITIGATION DESIGN IN PROGRESS. RECEIVED STATE PARKS AGREEMENT.

WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING NEXT MONTH: REVIEW FINAL PLANS & SPECS. NEG. W/CONSULTANT ON MITIGATION DESIGN. APPROVE STATE PARKS AGREEMENT.



PROJECT STATUS REPORT II ENTITY: CLARK COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS DATE PELEPARED: 11/30/92

REWIEW PERIOD P m : POVEMBER 1 TO: POVEMBER 30 PROJECT: VAN BUSKIRK CHANNEL - SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS (PHASE VI) DESCRIPTION: FLOOD CONTROL FACILITIES - EASTERN/TOMPKINS TO MARYLAND/RENO

& SPENCER - TROPICANA TO RENO AND DETENTION BASIN A

PERCENT COMPLETE : - 4% ESTIMAm COST OF PROJECT: ~4.870.000.00

DESIGN

s (DATES )

11/27/92

R/W CLEARANCES

ENVIR CLEARANCES

BIDS OPEN 02/17/93



~~

CONSULTANT/PROJECT MANAGER: JM MONTGOMERY


WORK COMPLETED DURING CURRENT MONTH: BEGAN REVIEW OF FINAL PRE-DESIGN.

WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING NEXT MONTH: COMPLETE DESIGN.

PROJECT MANAGER: BRANDT - 2 t

PHONE #: 455-7707

REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT PROJECT STATUS REPORT

ENTITY: Citv of Las Veaas DATE PREPARED: 1 1 /23/92

.REVIEW PERIOD FROM: 10/24/92 TO: 1 1 /20/92 41i4 Sf2fn DR9,49,

Project: Meadows Detention Basin Phase V

Descripti0n:Storm drain installation on Aha Drive from Falcon to Jones.

Percent Complete: 97% Desian Estimated Cost of Project: $954,800

Schedule for Completion Complete

Design 01 /18/93 - R/W Clearances Ql / l8 /93 - Envir Clearances Q1 /18/93 - Bids Open 03/09/93 - Starrconstruction 05/01 /93 -- - Construction Complete 12/01 /93 -

' qsultant/Project Manager: In-house redesicln

Construction Prime Contractor:

Delays or problems area: I None.

Work completed during month: Modifying Meadows Detention Basin Phase IV design plans to remove Decatur t o Jones design as separate bid package to be named Phase V.

I I

Work to be completed during next month: Continuing redesign of Phase V.

I 1 ,--. t

I loject Manager: Mark TeeDen. P.E. Phone:229-2211 -29-



REVIEW PERIOD FROM: 10/24/92 TO: 1 1 /20/92

Project: Buffalo Drive: Sahara to Westcliff

Description:Construction of full imDrovements between Sahara and Westcliff: jncludes a flood control channel between Doe and Westcliff.

Percent Complete: 60% Desian Estimated Cost of Project: $6,93O,OOO


Design Qm.ZE3 - RNV Clearances 0 5 1 1 . - Envir Clearances 05/17/93 - Bids Open QZLBLs - Start Construction 10/04/93

Construction Complete Q9/04/94 -

. - . . . . -

Consultant/Project Manager: W N Enaineerina: Ken Gilbreth, P.E.


Delays or problems area: None.

Work completed during month: Continued with design.

Work to be completed during next month: 70% design submittal due 11/30/92.

Project Manager: David Nathan. P.E. Phone:229-6733 -30-


ENTITY: Citv of Las Veaas DATE PREPARED: 1 1 /23/92 I REVIEW PERIOD FROM: 10/24/92 TO: 1 1 /20/92

Project: Buffalo Channel: Summerlin Parkwav to Veaas

Description:Construction a flood control channel from Summerlin Parkwav to Veaas Dr.

Percent Complete: 100% Desian Estimated Cost of Project: $1,908,000


Design 0813 1 I92 x RDV Clearances 10/30/92 - Envir Clearances 9813 1 I92 x Bids Open u - Start Construction - u - Construction Complete A ! L -

-

r -wwltant/Project Manager: VTN Enaineers, Ken Gilbreth, P.E.'


Delays or problems area: Project can not be advertised for bids until final right-of-way is obtained.

Work completed during month: Obtaining final right-of-way.

Work to be completed during next month: Project to be advertised for bids.

. Jject Manager: Dave Nathan, P.E. Phone:229-6733 -31-

. . -7 - - * . - 1 7 T --- 1 I .-r----




Project: Buffalo lnterchanae

Descripti0n:Desian and construction of an interchanae on Buffalo at Summerlin Parkwav includina a box culvert from Westcliff to Washinaton

Percent Complete: 68% Construction Estimated Cost of Project: $7,361,000


Design 0412219 1 x RAN Clearances 0 4 / 2 2 / 9 1 . * x Envir Clearances 04/22/91 - X

Bids Open 03/31 /92 - X

Start Construction - 06/15/92

Construction Complete 06/19/93 -

- .

X -

Consultant/Project Manager: G B & L Consultants, Georae Brizendine. P.E.

Construction Prime Contractor:Max riclas Construction


Work completed during month: The box culvert is complete. Imported fill for north abutment and placed concrete for north abutment walls. Complete placing concrete for south footings and abutment walls.

Work to be completed during next month: Continue importing material for north and south abutment. Continue placing concrete for footings and abutment walls.

Project Manager: Brian P. Walsh. P.E. Phone:229-6736 -32-


Fu'rlTY: Citv of Las Veaas DATE PREPARED: 1 1 /23/92 I


Project: Chevenne Channel: Buffalo to Gowan Detention Basin

Descripti0n:pesian the construction of Chevenne channel from Buffalo to Gowan Detention Basin. -~

Percent Complete: 0% Desian Estimated Cost of Project:

Schedule for Completion

Design J-L-

R/W Clearances J-L-

Envir Clearances L Bids Open !!

Start Construction LL Construction Complete L

. .

ksultant/Project Manager:


$0

Complete


~~

Work completed during month: Funding agreement approved.

Work to be completed during next month: Begin negotiating with design consultant.

I

I Project Manager: Joe Christensen. P.E. Phone:229-2212 -33-




Project: Carev / Lake Mead Detention Basin

Descripti0n:pesian and construction of the Carev / Lake Mead Detention Basin and convevance svstem.

3



Design

R M I Clearances

Envir Clearances

Bids Open

Start Construction

Construction Complete

98/01 /92

08/01 /92

08/01/92

QWml -1 1 /06/91

08/31/92

_-

x x x x

x x

Consultant/Project Manager: VTN Nevada, Ken Gilbreth. P.E.

Construction Prime Contractor:Meadow Vallev Contractors

r~ Delays or problems area:

Work completed during month: Negotiated final costs with contractor and consultant. Final punchlist work completed.

~~

4

Work to be completed during next month: Dust control material to be placed on project site. Final acceptance of project by North Las Vegas.

Project Manager: Joe Christensen. P.E. Phone:229-2212 -34-



REVIEW PERIOD -FROM:09/28/92 TO: 1 1 /14/92

Project: Gowan North Channel (Phase I I Proiect)

Descripti0n:Channel t o interceDt and convev flows from the Northwest into the Gowan North Detention Basin.

Percent Complete: 100 Pre-desian Estimated Cost of Project: $7,490,000


Design L - R / W Clearances / / . - Envir Clearances L L - - Bids Open 07/01 I97 - Start Construction 07/01/97

Construction Complete 07/01 I97 -

. . -

wultant/Project Manager: church Enaineerinanodd Kenner, P.E.


Delays or problems area: I

Work completed during month: Pre-design complete.

Work to be completed during next month: Begin Master Plan amendment change process.

I rroject Manager: Randv Fultz. P.E. Phone:229-6276 -35-



REVIEW PERIOD FROM: 1 1 /02/92 TO: 1 1 /24/92

Project: Gowan North and South Detention Basins

Description:Construction of the Detention Basins and 72-inch connector DiDe.

Percent Complete: 60 Construction Estimated Cost of Project:

Schedule for Completion

Design J!.L

R/W Clearances L Envir Clearances -LL

Bids Open sl!X!m2 Start Construction 07/15/92

Construction Complete 07/31/93

$6,300,000

Complete

x x X

- X

x- -

-

Consultant/Project Manager: Poaaemever Desian GrouD/Larrv Carrol

Construction Prime Contractor:American AsDhalt

Delays or problems area:

Work completed during month: Excavation from lower north basin complete. Library site compaction and Gowan Road from Tenaya to Pioneer compaction complete. Made the connection, Gowan Outfall 8x5 R.C.B. to Gowan Detention Basin 8x5 R.C.B.. Berm lining south basin complete. Excavation from upper north basin underway.

r Work to be completed during next month: Continue excavation of upper North Detention Basin. North Spillway; South Basin inlet structures: berm lining upper and lower north basins; south spillway construction; landscaping; pavement on Gowan Road.

Project Manager: Thomas D. Chiatovich. P.E. Phone:z29-6276 -36-


ENTITY: Citv of Las Veaas DATE PREPARED: 1 1 /02/92 I

REVIEW PERIOD FROM: 1 1 /02/92 TO: 1 1 /24/92

Project: Gowan Detention Basin Outfall

Description:Construction of 5'x 8' RCB from Decatur to Tenava alona Gowan Road.

Percent Complete: 7 95 Construction Estimated Cost of Project: $4,300,000


Design u - X

R/W Clearances -lL x Envir Clearances L x Bids Open Ad!- x Start Construction 04/15/92 x Construction Complete 01 /30/93 -

-.

- ;Isultant/Project Manager: Poagemever Desian GroudLarrv Carroll

Construction Prime Contractor:Las Vegas Pavina

Work completed during month: 8'x5' R.C.B. is complete except for approximately 180' at Jones and Gowan. There are nine D.l.'s under construction. These are the last nine D.l.'s. Paving is complete from Torrey Pines to Rainbow.

r

Work to be completed during next month: Complete project approximately December 15, 1992. Pave Rainbow to Tenaya, complete water line relocation and pavement at Gowan and Jones; complete all drop inlets.

I I

. ,b-ject Manager: Thomas D. Chiatovich. P.E. Phone:229-6276 -37-




Project: Oakev Detention Basin and Convevance Svstem

Description:Construction of flood control facilities which include basin. collection svstem and outfall.

Percent Complete: 100% Pesian Estimated Cost of Project: $10,855,000


Design 08/01 /92 x R/W Clearances 08/01 /92 - X

Envir Clearances 1 012 1 192 x Bids Open 1 1 /24/92 x Start Construction 02/08/93 Construction Complete 12/05/93 -

. ~- _ _ -

Consultant/Project Manager: Bovle Enaineerina, Gerald Moleton, P.E.

Construction Prime Contractor:Las Veaas Pavina

Delays or problems area: City Council to approve new project schedule.

I Work completed during month: Project being advertised for bid and pre-bid meeting held.

I 1

Work to be completed during next month: Bid opening 11/24/92. Las Vegas Paving is apparent low bidder at $6,181,969.88.



YITY: Citv of Las Veaas DATE PREPARED: 1 1 /23/92

REVIEW PERIOD FROM: 10/24/92 TO: 1 1120192

Project: RamDart lnterchanae - Charleston to Veaas

Description:New arterial roadwav to extend RamDart Boulevard from Charleston to Veaas includina a new interchanae at Summerlin Parkwav.



Design 07/30/93 - R/W Clearances 07/30/93 - Envir Clearances 07/30/93 - Bids Open 10/05/93 - Start Construction -1 2/06/93


~. . . . - - - - - -

,lsultant/Project Manager: G . C. Wallace / Scott Plummer, P.E.



Work completed during month: Review of 30% design report.

c

- Work to be completed during next month: Continuing with design of project.

Project Manager: David Nathan, P.E. Phone:229-6733 -39-




Project: Washinaton Ave. Svstem I Virail to Lena

Description:Tri f i I 1 * x * B in



Design 08/03/92 x R / W Clearances 08/03/92 x Envir Clearances 08/03192 x Bids Open u -

. Start Construction !I . . - - - -. . - .

Construction Complete d!.L -

Consultant/Project Manager: MEA / Laurnal Gubler, P.E.


Delays or problems area: Project funded for design only. To be constructed in 1995.

[Work completed during month:

7

Work to be completed during next month:





Project: Washinaton Ave. Svstem I Sandhill Outfall

Descripti0n:TriDle 12' x 8' RCB from the Las Veaas Wash to Washinaton Ave.



Design 12/01 /91 - X

R / W Clearances 12/01 /91 x Envir Clearances 12/01 /91 x Bids Open 01 /07/92 - X

Start Construction -- 03/01 192 L Construction Complete 08/09/92 x

Isultant/Project Manager: MEA / Laurnal Gubler, P.E.

Construction Prime Contractor:J.A. Tiberti Construction


Work completed during month: Filing of final notice of completion.

I I

Work to be completed during next month:

-

rroject Manager: Joe Christensen, P.E. Phone:229-2212 -41-

1




Project: Washinaton Ave. Svstem I Sandhill to Virail

Descripti0n:TriDle 12' x 8' RCB in Washinaton Ave. from Sandhill to Virail.

Percent Complete: 100% Pesian Estimated Cost of Project: $2,437,000


Design 05/31 /92 x R M I Clearances 0 5 / 3 1 / 9 2 . x Envir Clearances 05/31/92 x Bids Open 10/27/92 x Start Construction - - 01/05/93 -


- - -

Consultant/Project Manager: MEA / Laurnal Gubler, P.E.

Construction Prime Contractor:Max Riaas Construction


Work completed during month: Bids opened. Max Riggs is apparent low bidder at $1,551,649.

Work to be completed during next month: Bid to be awarded 12/02/92.



EN’TIw:,&:Jlder city DATE PREPARED: 12/1/92 WVIEW PERIOD FROM: November 1 November 30, 1992

PROJECT: Hornenway Valley Food Contlol

DES K3N - Sep-91

IWV CLEARANCES N /A

ENLlR CLEARANCES N I A

BIDS OPEN cct-01

STA?T CONSTRUCTION J 3n-DZ

-

mSTRUCTION COMPLETE J ia n - 0 3

CIONSULTANT~ROJECT~ANAGEP.; Coo R Van Loo, Paul Hoskins

(;ONS~UCTION PRlMti CC)NTRACTOR: Max Riggs Cowtruction Co.

-

----- ~EIAYSORrnBLEIVIS AFEAS:

--- - --------- WORK X ) BE COMPLE3ED DLJFllNG CLJPJIENr tAoNTH:

Froject dean up rnd repaoral fanuscaps, mlsc. concrete work and rail construdlon.

------ - h a w TO BE C O M P L E G ~ Z D T N E X ~ ~ W :

.L--

Project clean UP and repaira, Inndscape, nliac. concreto work and rail conctruction.

-- -- PROJEiCT MAEIAGERBlip T. Henry PHONE 293-9200

-43-

SENT BY: PUBLIC WORKS t12- 1-62 t 3:13PM 7025655687-, Clark Cnty RFCD:# 2

C U R X COUNTY REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT


E - . D A A

REYIEW PERIOD: F R 0 M : m b o r u 9 2 TO: November 30. 1992

PROJECrr: G I

DESCRIPTION: of 6 &.g of 2 rmles of a- two -tion b- zuAmsma

PERCENTCOMPLETE: 35 96 .\

ESTIMATED COST OF PROJECT: $§OO.OOO

SCHEDULE FOR COMPLETION: (-1

DESIGN -bhEu%-

RmCLEARANEs - -.b&=ua ENVIRCLEARANCES -lha&um BIDS OPEN

START CONSTRUCTION

CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE Nov- 1993

CONSULTANT/PROJECT MANAGER: W K e n Gilbrath

DELAYS OR PROBLEM AREAS: None.

W O N COMpLETEb DURING CURRENT MONTH: Finalized prt-debign mpm. Selected Alternate #I, Discussed facilitiss p l m with River Mountain Estates homeowners on November 4, 1992.

WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING NEXT MONTH: Obtain use permit from Planaing Commission nnd City Council.

farm par 10/26/90 - 4 4 -

. .

SENT BY :PUBLIC WORKS 7025655887-, Clark C n t y R F C D ; # 4



ENITTYan of Hendmbn DATE November 25. 1992

REVIEW PERIOD: FROM:.Navambsr 1. 1992 M: NovGmbsr 30- 1992

P R 0 J E C T : n -

DESCRIPTION: ~ n c r ~ x f m a t e l v 4500 fcct long with m c i w of 1- Duck Q e e k to S-.

PERCEDI" COMPLETE: 90 96 ESTIMATED COST OF PROJECT: S-000 ,

SCHKDWLE FOR COMPLETION: ( d a w

DESIGN - WWCLEARANCES Julv 1992

ENVIR CLEARANCES a 1992

BIDS OPEN

START CONSTRUCTION L CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE

CONSULTANT/PROJECT MANAGER:PoPgsmcvcr/Lamrll

CONSTRUCTION W E CONTRACTOR: None

DELAYS OR PROBLEM AREAS: Construction will be deferred until fiscal year 1999/2OOO.

WORK COMPLETED DURING CURRENT MONTH: Continue review of 90% plaae.

~~

PROJEa MANAGER: Curt Chandler PHONE X:- C:\WUJ~IRFWATAVXRFCDWPROMT form -psr 10/26/90

-45- I

SENT BY :PUBLIC WORKS . .

112- 1-82 I 3:14PM I


. PROJECT STATUS REPORT

REVIEW PERIOD; FROM: November 1 . 14pz TO: Nov- 30. 1942

PROJECT:JJJW~ Dc&@&&B& - R d ~ y

DESCRIPTION:

PERCENTCOMPLE'IE: 0 % ESTlMATED COST OF PROJECT: $JJ&WL

-- AF dere- and ..

SCHEDULEPOR COMPLETION: (dm)

DESIGN - R/W UEAMNCES J B a m k m L ENVIR CLEARANCES Undetermined

BIDS OPEN U n d e t e w

START CONSTRUCI'ION etermined

CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE Undetermined

CONSULTANTPROJECr MANAGER: None

CONSTRUCTION PRlME CONTRACTOR;:

- DELAYS OR PROBLEM AREAS:

None.

2WORK COMPLETED DURING CURRENT MONTH: Finalized the Engineering Services Agreements.

WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURINa NEXT MONTH: b Approval of Engineering Services Agrmment@ceed.

foim g o r 10/26/90

. . . . . . . . . . . .

-46-

SENT BY :PUBLIC WORKS 7025655607-, Clark Cnty RFCD;# 3



ENTITY- of Henderson DATE-92

REVIEW PERIOD: F R O M : D 9 2 TO Novcrnbar 30. 1992

PROJECT: WRR Channel 4.

DESCRIPTION:' lv 3 rpbrbs lone f r o m d . t o Pittman W&

SCHEDULE FOR COMPLETION: (d-1

DESIGN complete

WW CLBARANCES . - ENVIR CLEARANCES m d e t e

BIDS OPEN Comblctc START CONSTRUCTION June. 1992

CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE December. 1942

CONSULTANTlPROJECT MANAGER: G. C. WALLACEICalvin Black

CONSTRUCIlON PRIME CONTIRAGTOR:, Max R i m ConstrugIon

DELAYS OR PROBLEM AREAS:

PROJECT MANAGER: Curt PHONE I! 565-2729 CAWOnoPoaPIDATA\E- form -psr 10/26/90

-47-

REGXONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT PROJECT STATUS REPORT

ENTITY: City - of North Tas Veuas DATE PREP-: 11/25/92

REVIEW PERXOD FROW m 11/30/92

PRoJEm Gowan Outfall Structure

-ION. Construction of the outfall structure for the Gowan Road Detention Basin system

--: 2% mmco6ToFmm: $ 11,576,000 construction 1,153.00Q eng. 6i adm.

L3EQGN Complete

Ww-- Complete

E N v J R Q m R n N ~ Complete

BID6 OPEN Complete

START CONSTRUCIION April 1991

CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE Auqust 1992

CONSULTANT/PROJECT MANA - CONSTRUCTION PRIME CONTRACPOR. Las Veuas Pavina Comoration

Construction substantially completed.

Finalize project.

-4L

REGIONAL PLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT PROJECT STATUS REPORT

EIWTIY City of North Las Vegas DATE PREPARED: 11/25/92

REVIEW PERIOD FROM 11/01/92 T O 11/30/92

Western Tributary to the Las Vegas Wash (Stirnson Channel)

m o N L i n e d channel between Commerce Street and Lone Mountain Road, and channel entrance protection.

DESIGN Complete

m-cm N/A

ENVIRCLEARANCES N/A

BIDS OPEN Complete

STAR" CONSTRUCI'ION November 1992

wmumoN February 1993

wmTmpRoEmm . VTN Nevada/City of North Las Vegas

wNsI?IumoN COmmoR. Las Vegas Paving Corporation

DELRYS OR PROBLEM ISREAS:

- Reconciled all outstanding conflicts. - Re-started construction work. - Completed over-excavation.

- Complete 100% of lay fabric. - Complete 80% of backfill and prepare for P.C.C. pour.

PROJECT MANA- R v r a C i l C1ln-n L PHONE#* 799 5156 . . -

-49-

R€GIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRXCT PROJECT STATUS REPORT

Citv of North Jras Veaas DATE PREPARED: 11/25/92

R€VIEWPERXODFROM 11/01/92 TO: 11/30/92

Kyle Canyon Detention Basin

Desiqn and prepare plans and specifications for detention basin and collection dikes

PERcENTcoMPLEm 9 0 % ~T€DcosToFPRoJEm $ 510,000 design phase design phase only 11,000,000 construction

DESIGN

wwcLEARANc=

€NvIRaEARRNm

November 1992

November 1992

November 1992

BIDS OPEN September 1993

=ART CONSTRUCI'ION November 1993

wmumoN mm November 1994

CONSULTANT/PROIECT MKNAGEP VTN Nevada/City of North Las Vegas

CONSTRUCTION PRIME C O m O R . N/A

DELKYS OR PROBLEM AREUS:

Problem with 10-year old Indian Allotment Claim on small portion of project.

WORK COMPI.ZT€D DURING CURRENT MOIWH:

- Initial work on outfall study. - Resolved Indian Allotment Claim.

WORKTOBECOMP~DURINGNX'I"ON'lW

- Obtain Indian Allotment Claim. - Complete outfall study. - Obtain BLM permit to construct project. - Make Project Presentation to TAC. -5

PROJECT MANA- Rv* J Pi1 Pilnin PHONE #- - 6

REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DrSTRICT PROJECT STATUS REPORT

ENTITY: Citv of North Las Veqas DATE PREPARED: 11/25/92

REVIEW PERIOD FROM 11/01/92 m 11/30/92

PROJEW Upper Las Veqas Wash Detention Basin

Construct detention basin and associated facilities in the vicinity of Floyd Lamb State Park

DESIGN

WW-m

May 1991

November 1991

ENvIRcImRANcEs November 1991

BIDS OPEN March 1992

START CONSTRUCTION

CONSTRUmON COMPLETE Ju 'y

May 1992

CONSULTANTPROJECT MANRGER. Black and Veatch/City of North Las Vegas

C O N S T R U ~ O N p m CO-C;TOR. Granite Construction Company


\ - Continued damage to tortoise fence by recreation vehicles, daily. - Possible extra claim by contractor for changed conditions (R.C.C. aggregate washing)

WORK COMPLETED DURING CURRENT MONTH: Completed 80% of sheet pile driving - Completed 70% of the total embankment - Completed 40% of channel excavation - Completed 50% of the interceptor berm - Completed 98% of aggregate processing - Completed R.C.C. test section - ed back - up data from contra ctor for extra claim

WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING MONTH: - Complete 100% of sheet pile driving - Complete 80% of the total embankment - Complete 70% of channel excavation - Complete 65% of the total project - Complete 100% of interception berm - Complete 100% of aggregate processing tP 70% of R.C.C. Dlacement

-51-

FLOOD CONTROL DBTRICT PROJECT STATUS REPORT

ENTITY: City of North Las Vegas DATE PREPARED: 11/25/92

REVIEWPERXODPROM: 11/01/92 To: 11/30/92

mFm West Range Wash Diversion Dike

mow Design and prepare plans and specifications for 5-1/2 mile long dike and appurtenances

=CENT--. 9 L % ~ T € D ~ o F p R o I E c p : $ 350,000 design phase

OESIGN

wwaiEnRnNcE3

PJvIRcLEKRRNCEs

Completed

August 1992

June 1992

BIDS OPEN January 1993

m m CONSTRUCTION

CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE October 1993

February 1993

~ ~ T ~ , ~ R ~ ~ ~ ~ , . Boyle Engineering/City of North Las Vegas

CONSTRUCTION PRIME COmoR

DELlEys OR PROBLEM ARERS

BLM staff will not issue a lease/permit until resolution of outstanding mining claim.

PROJECT MANA- Rv! a Gil PHONE #. 399-5156 . .

REGIONAL



REVIEW PERIOD FROM: JUOVEMBER 1 TO: NOVEMBER 30

PROJECT: LAUGHLIN - HIKO SPRINGS BRIDGE CANYON FEMA REMAPPING DESCRIPTION: ESA FOR LOMA

PERCENT COMPLETE : 4% ESTIMATED COST OF PROJECT:


DESIGN

$70,000.00

R/W CLEARANCES

ENVIR CL-CES

BIDS OPEN

CONSTRUCTION START


CONSULTANT/PROJECT MANAGER: BOYLE ENG. CO.


DELAYS OR PROBLEMS AREAS: RFCD REVIEW REQUIRED BEFORE BCC APPROVAL NECESSITATED START DELAY.

I’ WORK COMPLETED DURING CURRENT MONTH: AWAITING SCHEDULE FOR TELE-CONFERENCE MEETING.

WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING NEXT MONTH: SCHEDULE TELE-CONFERENCE MEETING.

I PROJECT MANAGER: BRANDT

-53- PHONE #: 455-7707

SENT BY: PUBLIC WORKS



PROJECT:J&IUUJ Was- II

DESCRIPTION: lonp of

PERCENTCOMPLETE: 100 96 ESTIMATED COST OF PROJECT: $-.

DESIGN c4mD16tsd WW CLEAWCES CDmPlewd

ENVIR CLEARANCES ComPleted BIDS OPEN .cbmDlctta START CONSTRUCI'ION cnmbl#ed CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE l!ws!9L

CONSULTANTflROJECT MANAOER:-e R0btrt.a

CONSTRUCTION PRIME CONTRACTOR-ion

DELAYS OR PROBLBM AREAS: U None.

WORK COMPLETED DURING C U W N T MONTH:

' WORK To BE COMPLETED DWJUNG NEXT M O N d : Completed punch list item.

Release retention. I I -

farm psr 10/26/90 -54


Entity: REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT Date Prepared: November 30, 1992

Review Period From: 1 1 /1/92 To 1 1 /30/92

PROJECT flood Awareness and Safetv Proaram

DESCRIPTION: Imdement a flood awareness and rafetv D r m to inform residents of the danaers of

floodina. Work is accomdished bv both RFCD staff and a consyltant.

PERCENT COMPLETE: 99 Sg ESTIMATED COST OF PROJECT: $1 50,000 konsultantl

SCHEDULE FOR COMPLETION: (Dates) consultant contract ends in Feb.. 1993

CONSULTANT/PROJECT MANAGER: "erica. Burch & Dickerson / John Earv


NONE


Donrey has donated a billboard for the months of November & December.

Staff made a presentation to and manned a flood safety information booth at the Nevada State Science Teachers' Convention held on November 6-7th in Las Vegas.

Staff sent out notices to TV, radio and newspapers regarding Citizen Advisory Committee meetings.

Channel 10 broadcast flood safety video on twice on Channel 10 public TV and six times on the School District's closed-circuit system.


Continue distribution of materials.

Prepare a new contract with Merica, Burch & Dickerson for the Board's consideration.

Meet with the Citizens' Advisory Committee Public Information Program Subcommittee on December 9 at 2:OO p.m. to discuss ideas for next year's public information program.

PROJECT MANAGER: CATHY RAZOR PHONE #: 455-31 39 -55 -

f


Entity: REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT Date Prepared: 12/ 01 I 93,

Review Period From: 111 01 / 92 To 12 / 01 / 93

PROJECT. Tronicana Flood Insurance Studv

DESCRIPTION: flood Insurancgaate MaD DreDaration for the TroDicana Wash to the confluence with thg

Flaminoo Wash. Base Flood Elevation determination for north. central and southern branches and aDDrox,mate

determined for minor tributaries.

PERCENT COMPLETE: 95 % ESTIMATED COST OF PROJECT: -0

SCHEDULE FOR COMPLETION: 01 / 15 / 93

CONSULTANT/PROJECT MANAGER: CH2M Hill / Ted Davis, P.F

DELAYS OR PROBLEM AREAS: I Project is on schedule.

Draft maps and study completed and submitted for review by the District and Clark County Public


Review of Draft FIS to be completed and revised if necessary. Submittal to FEMA expected before 01 /01/93

PROJECT MANAGER: KEVIN EUBANKS. P.E. PHONE #: 455-31 39

-56


Entity: REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT Date Prepared:-

Review Period From: 1 1 /01/92 To 1 1 /30/92

PERCENT COMPLETE: 25 96 ESTIMATED COST OF PROJECT: $ 120.000

SCHEDULE FOR COMPLETION: (Dates) Mav 1993

CONSULTANT/PROJECT MANAGER: James M. Montnomerv Consultinn Ennineers Inc. / Lonnie Rov. P.F


There appears to be some slippage in the project schedule at this time. However this slippage is expected to be made up and not affect the final completion date.


Completed hydrologic modelling and draft section of the report dealing with hydrology.


Alternative development and schedule meeting with TABS to discuss preliminary findings and solicit input.

PROJECT MANAGER: GALE WM.. FRASER. II. P.E. PHONE #: 455-31 39


Entity: REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROl DISTRICT Date Prepared: 12/01/92

Review Period From: 1 1/01 192 To 1 1 /3O/Q;L

PROJECT: TroDicana/F&&ao Washes (AREA 2) Biphtsf-Wav Ac-

DESCRIPTION: Produce a centerline alionment l-lons. rioht of wav BLM r m of way

gpplications for the U. S. Armv Coms of Fnoineers T r - a w Washes Proiect located oenerally

ypstream from the DrODOSed TroDicana Wash Det- Area 1.

. .. * . - - - -

PERCENT COMPLETE: 70 ESTIMATED COST OF PROJECT: i) 1 5 0 a

SCHEDULE FOR COMPLETION: (Dates) March lw

CONSULTANTPROJECT MANAGER: Church EnoineerinD of Nevada, Inc. / Todd Kenner. P.E.

IlDELAYS OR PROBLEM AREAS:

None.


Complete alternative alignment study and submit to the Corps of Engineers.


Corps of Engineers will review the study and perform hydrologic and hydraulic analysis. The Corps of Engineers' review is expected to be completed in early 1993. At that time, the consultant will finalize the alignments. No work by consultant is expected in the following month.

PROJECT MANAGER: GALE WM.. FRASER. I I . P.E. PHONE X: 455-3139


Entity: PEGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT Date Prepared: 12/01/92

Review Period From: 1 1/01 192 To 1 1 BO192

PERCENT COMPLETE: 70 ESTIMATED COST OF PROJECT: $ 157.000

SCHEDULE FOR COMPLETION: (Dates) March 1993

CONSULTANT/PROJECT MANAGER: G. C. Wallace. Inc. / Calvin Black, P.E.


Part of the files on the consultant's computer system were lost and had to be recreated.


Finalize draft report for review.


Complete alternative alignment study and submit to Corps of Engineers. Corps of Engineers will review study and perform hydrologic and hydraulic analysis. The Corps of Engineers review is expected to be completed in early 1993. At that time the consultant will finalize the alignments.

-59- PROJECT MANAGER: GALE WM.. FRASER, 11, P.E. PHONE #: 455-31 39

. . . ~ -. - T - - I * f ---- -T . -. - -


I SUBJECT: FINANCIAL REPORTS

I PETITIO= VIRGINIA VALENTINE. P.E., GENERAL MANAGEFUCHIEF ENGINEER I RECOMMENDATION OF PETITIONER: THAT THE BOARD ACCEPT THE REPORTS 1

FISCAL IMPACT: None . BACKGROUND: The following Financial Reports for the Month of October 1992. are submitted for your review:

Section Description Paeeo A Fund 286: ................................. 1-7

Fund Balance Report ........................... 1 Sales Tax Revenue Report ........................ 2 Monthly Expenditure Report ..................... 3-4 Open Purchase Orders .......................... 5 ILA Approved . Not yet transferred . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 Accounts Payable ............................. 7

B Fund 330: Fund Balance Report ........................... 8

C Fund 443: ................................ 9-29 Fund Balance Report ........................... 9 Monthly Expenditure Report ..................... 10 ILA Approved . Not yet transferred . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 Accounts Payable ............................ 12 Project ExpenseALA Balance Report . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13-19 Project Expense Summary ..................... 20-25 Work Maintenance Program Report . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26-27 Projects List ............................. 28-29

D Fund444: ............................... 30-35 Fund Balance Report .......................... 30 Monthly Expenditure Report ..................... 31 Accounts Payable ............................ 32 Project ExpenseALA Balance Report . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33-34 Bond Projects Funding Status Report ................ 35

E Funding Request & Priorities Repodsum . . . . . . . . . . . 36-40

Reswctfully submitted .

llTEM#i lITEM#B I TAC AGENDA RFCD AGENDA

Date: 11/19/92 Date: 12/10/92

....... - . - - .

FUND 286 - FUND BALANCE REPORT REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT OCTOBER 1992

BEGINNING FUND BALANCE AB 494 Funds ( I n c l Cum I n t e r e s t ) Unused Tax Revenues

CURRENT FUNDING REQUESTS

PROJECT SCOPE

TOTAL BALANCE

REVENUES: Sales Tax I n t e r e s t E a r n e d S a l e o f M a t e r i a l s O t h e r

TOTAL REVENUES

EXPENSES: S a l a r i e s & B e n e f i t s S u p p l i e s 81 S e r v i c e s P r o f e s s i o n a l S e r v i c e s C a p i t a l E x p e n d i t u r e s T r a n s f e r t o F u n d 443 T r a n s f e r t o Fund 330

TOTAL EXPENSES

ENDING FUND BALANCE (FUND 286)

OBLIGATIONS AGAINST FUND BALANCE: P.O. Balances - P r o f S e r v a n d O p e r a t i n g C o s t s I L A ' s A p p r o v e d - f u n d s n o t y e t t r a n s f e r e d t o Fund 443 I L A ' s A p p r o v e d - f u n d s n o t y e t t r a n s f e r e d b a c k t o F u n d 2 8 6 Bond Fund 330 - P r i n c i p a l & I n t e r e s t A c c r u a l Accounts Payable

TOTAL FUND OBLIGATIONS

FUNDS AVAILABLE FOR COMMITMENT

80 , 758 11,092,210

11,172,968

1,890,649 288,041

1 , 245 0 -----__--__-_-

2,179,935

FISCAL IMPACT

LAS.10.A.91 LAS VEGAS WASH - CAMINO AL NORTE HEN.01.C.90 PITTMAN WASH CHANNEL CONSTR PHASE I

TOTAL REQUESTS

BALANCE FILE: FINRPTS\FUND286\OCTBAL

-1-

SALES TAX REVENUE REPORT REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT

FISCAL YEAR 1992/1993

DIFFERENCE MONTH SALES 1/4 CENT SALES SALES TAX OVER/(UNDER) CUM REVENUE TAX RECEIVED TAX ESTIMATE REVENUES FROM ESTIMATE FY 92/93

JULY

AUGUST

SEPTEIUBER

OCTOBER

NOVEhrBER

DECEMBER

JANUARY

FEBRUARY

MARCH

APR I L

MAY

JUNE

1,919,727 1,877,861 (41,866) 1,877,861

1 , 880,600 1 , 968 , 253 87 , 653 3,846,114

1,827,9150 1 , 907.836 80 , 786 5 , 753 , 950

l,849,40QJ 1,890,649 41 , 249 7,644 , 599

1,865 , 550

1,804,900

1 , 852 , 950

2,050,800

1 ,695 , 300

1 , 658,800

1,902,125

1,832,900

TOTAL : 22,140,102 7,644 , 599 167 , 822 7,644 , 599

FILE: FINRPTS\FUND286\SALESTAX

-2-

REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT FUND 286 - MONTHLY EXPENDITURES OCTOBER 1992

SALARIES & BENEFITS:

OCTOBER SALARIES (3-PAYROLL) OCTOBER BENEF ITS

SUPPLIES & SERVICES:

286 10.01.92 HOLMAN'S OF NEVADA 286 10.16.92 CC TREAS-CENTRAL SUPPLY 286 10.16.92 PARAGON REPRODUCTIONS INC 286 09.23.92 PRO-PROCESS 286 09.23.92 HOUSTON LUMBER 286 10.07.92 286 10.16.92 '

286 10.07.92 286 10.07.92 286 10.07.92 286 10.07.92 286 10.13.92 286 10.01.92 286 09.23.92 286 10.16.92 286 10.31.92 286 10.31.92 286 10.31 .92 286 10.31.92 286 10.07.92 286 10.1'6.92 286 09.23.92 286 10.07.92 286 10.16.92 286 10.02.92 286 10.07.92 286 10.08.92 286 10.20.92 286 10.08.92 286 10.07.92 286 10.31.92 286 10.31.92 286 09.23.92 286 09.23.92 286 09.23.92 286 09.23.92 286 10.07.92 286 10.16.92 286 09.23.92 286 09.29.92

PRO-PROCESS VALCW SARRETT'S OFFICE SUPPLY HOLM4NS OF NEVADA CENTEL CELLULAR FIDELITY PRODUCTS CO CC TREAS-AUTOMOT 1 M TEACHERS REALTY CC-TREASURER cc TREAS-IS CENTEL CENTEL CELLULAR AT&T CENTEL XEROX CORP MREX CORPORATION FEDERAL EXPRESS FEDERAL EXPRESS CC TREAS-MA I L THE LEARNING CENTER CC TREASURER DAZEY TRAVEL SERVICE DAZEY TRAVEL SVC CC TREASURER DAZEY TRAVEL SERV I CE CC-TREASURER/CUDDY AVlS KINKO'S NEVADA PHOTO K I NKO'S NEVADA PHOTO JEFF WLFLEY CC TREAS-CENTRAL WPLICATIN -- AM SOC FOR PUB AOMIN TRW-RED I

-- 106

701 0 701 0 701 0 701 0

7030 7030 7060 7060 7060 7060 7060 71 10 7120 71 30 71 30 71 40 71 40 71 40 71 40 7240 7240 7250 7250 7250 7265 7270 7270 7270 7270 7270 7270 7270 7280 7280 7280 7280 7280 7280 731 0 7310

95554 09.03.92 54.90 44796 10.14.92 492.90 92992 89.29.92 341.92 15036 09.01.92 15.25

1-452975 09.03.92 15098 09.16.92

227751-001 10.13.92 F8900 09.25.92 95877 09.25.92

LV37046 09.14.92 202025A 09.29.92

44031 10.08.92 OCT 92 10.01.92 44834 09.15.92 44895 10.14.92

AP CYD600 08.08.92 AP CY0602 09.28.92 AP CDY933 08.03.92 AP CDY989 10.09.92 034600467 09.16.92

101218 10.12.92 476740255 09.16.92 477325701 09.23.92

44903 10.14.92 15920 10.03.92

100892 10.08.92 72554 10.09.92 74066 10.05.92 91792 09.17.92

100892-6 10.08.92 AP CSC832 10.09.92 AP CSC830 09.18.92

26202 08.26.92 21925 08.25.92 26186 08.24.92 20709 07.14.92 2275 10.06.92

44789 10.13.92 0921 92 09.21 .92 ET92 09.10.92

11.6 19.00

387.23 457.00 349.50 30.00 18.46

1,843.40 7,728.33

410.00 410.00 925.27 114.94 156.13 369.82 178.48 484.00 21.75 29.75

591 .59 81.00 11.68

163.00 321 .OO 25.00

363.00 65.00 79.74 7.80

33.30 35.10 25.22

1,354.00 610.13 80.00

590.00

-3-

REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT FUND 286 - MONTHLY EXPEND1 TURES OCTOBER 1992

PROFESSIONAL SERVICES,

286 10.08.92 MERICA, BURCH 8 DICKERSON 286 10.16.92 O M S 8 MOORE 286 10.22.92 DAMES 8 MOORE 286 10.16.92 dAMES M M O N T G M R Y 286 10.06.92 ERICA, BURCH 8 DICKERSON 286 10.01.92 0 C WALLACE 286 10.07.92 CH2M HILL 286 10.07.92 CHURCH ENGlNEERlNG INC 286 10.22.92 CHURCH ENGINEERING 286 10.08.92 MERICA, BURCH 8 DICKERSON

29 1 84 76007 76007

101 291 84 35530 33280 3553 1 3553 1 291 84

721 0 721 0 721 0 721 0- 721 0 721 0 7210 721 0 721 0 721 0

24048 08.31.92 1-6702 10.09.92 1-6704 10.e.92 NVlSl6 10.07.92 24049 08.31.92

2 09.23.92 209206 09.18.92

32852-2 09.30.92 32878 10.15.92 24050 08.31 .92

7,310.25 7,602.00

12,017.85 13,286.51 3,300.00

26,541.50 28 , 078.99 34,380.00 40,730.00 8,000.00

CAPITAL EXPENDITURES:

286 10.07.92 HANDAR, INC 286 10.16.92 AVNET

TRANSFERS TO FUND 443:

NLV. 01. B. 87 LAS VEGAS WASH/CRAIG-CIVIC NLV. 01 . B. 87 LAS MGAS WASH/CRAIG-CIVIC BOU.01.A.87 HEENWAY WASH

35047 34726

8040 01 7327-02 09.25.92 14,776.00 8040 55226147 10.02.92 12.462.00

27,238.00 -------------

60,000.00 60,000.00

160,000.00

280,000.00 TRANSFERS TO FUND 330:

BOND PRINCIPLE/INTEREST DEBT SERVICE

FINRPTS\FUND286\OCTEXP

-4-

WILL 8 WYS 721 0 JM MONTGOMERY 721 0 XEROX 7240 SHOSHOWS 7210 TEACHER'S REALTY 7120 NEVADA PHOTO 7280

CH2M HILL 721 0 hERCURY BLUEPRINT 7280 HANDAR 7240 AHERN RENTERS 7120 AC HOUSTON L W E R 7f930 SEARS 7060 TEACHERS REALTY 7120 PRO-PROCESS 7030 A M 1 COMPUTER 8040 KAVOURAS. I NC 8040/7330

MERICA, BURCH a DICKERSON 7210

HANDAR, INC SARRETT OFFICE FURNITURE VALCOM CENTEL CELLULAR VALCOM MI CROSOFT CORP G.C. WALLACE, INC CHURCH ENGINEERING XEROX HOLMAN'S OF NEVADA DESERT DECOR U.S. GEOLOGICAL SllRVEY DAMS 8 MOORE PRODUCT I ON COMPANY NEVADA PHOTO GRAPHICS

KINKO'S ALL-AROUND VIDEO LABS SARREll FURNITURE WRC ENGINEERING I N C GOODMANS HOLMAN'S OF NEVADA FIDELITY PRODUCTS CO VALCOM HOLMAN'S OF NEVADA XEROX CORP WRC ENGINEERING PARAGON REPRODUCTIONS CONSTRUCTION INFO SYS GRAPH I CS VEST ALFAX JAMES M M O N T G M R Y JEFF WOLFLEY 8 AsSOC WILL EL WYS LAND I SCOR PIERCY BOWLER TAYLOR TRW-RED I JM WNTOOERY

SHOSHONE SOUTH, INC.

8040 8040 8040 7060 8040 7060 7210 721 0 7240 701 0 701 0 721 0 721 0 721 0 7280 721 0 7280 721 0 7060 7280 7060 701 0 7060 701 0 7060 7240 7280 701 0 7330 7280 7060 7210 7280 7210 731 PI 7210 7310 121 0

101 36 1 6902 19037 2 1 736 24483 28303 291 84 33280 33483 341 13 34270 34277 34301 34367 34563 34726 35043 35047 S412 35449 35463 35496 35499 35530 35531 35697 35758 35759 35899 76007 3641 5 3691 1 36603 37084 3701 8 35412 36881 37391 35768 36995 37507 35758 35697 38881 3801 7 37842 47639 47871

101 102 103 104 105 186 107

20,000.00 240,000.00

5,241.60 1,800.00

80,964.78 300.00

150,000.00 270,400.00

2,000.00 3,000.00

750.00 500.00 250.00

03,939.48 7S0.00

41 ,*7.31' 18,175.00 52.834.00

457.00 Q90.81 30.00

353.46 297.00

157,000.00 150,960.00

5,000.00 745.00 4918.00

112,500.00 744,846.00

300.00 500.00

1,000.00 200.00 450.00 457.00 550.00

1,250.00 300.00 285.64 387.23 345.00 800.00 83.15

342.00 4,160.00 3,496.00

125.00 330,900.00

3,985.00 25,000.00

450.00

590.00 120,000.00

408BB.00

18,481.79 239,765.88

3,422.31 970.00

76 , 467.70 265.84

97,589.91 41,333.40

81 .82 0.00 0.00

34.80 0.00

24 , 243.24 172.10

24,844.76 0.00 0.00

457.00 0.00

30.00 0. 00 0.00 0.00 0.00

391 .42 484.80

0.00 0.00

401,316.32 0.00

58.32 0.00

42.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

16.46 387.23

0.00 0.00 0.00

341 .92 4,160.00

0.00 0.00

33,068.26

687.70 450.00

0.00 590.00

0.00

1 ,354.00

1,518.21 234.12

1,819.29 530.00

4,497.08 34.16

52.410.09 229,066.60

1,918.18 3,000.00

750.00 465.20 250.00

69 , 696.24 577.90

16,222.55 18,175.00 52,834.00

0.00 990.81

0.00 353.46 297.00

157,000.00 150,960.00

4,608.58 260.20 400.00

343,529.68 300.00 441.68

1,000.00 157.10 450.00 457.00 550.00

1,250.00 300.00 267.18

0.00 345.00 800.00 83.15 0.08 0.00

3,496.00 125.00

297,831.74 2,031 .OO

24,312.30 0.00

4,000.00 0.00

120,000.00

112,500.00

-5-

INTERLOCAL AGREEMENTS APPROVED - FUNDS NOT VET TRANSFERED TO FUND 443 REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT FUND 286 - SEPTEhEBER 1992

ILA'S APPROVED IN SEPTEMBER: LAS.13.A.92 5 CHEYENNE CHANNEL - BUFFALO DR TO GOWAN S. DET BASIN 67.000

67,000 ------------

ILA'S APPROVED IN OCTOBER:

NONE THIS PERIOD

TOTAL TRANSFERS TO FUND 443

INTERLOCAL AGREEMNTS APPROVED - FUNDS NOT YET TRANSFERED BACK TO FUND 286 REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT FUND 286

UECT AGENDA RFCD BOARD M E R ITEM APPRVL DATE

SCOPE F I SCAL IMPACT

NLV.01.B.87 LAS VEGAS WASHKRAIG-CIVIC

TOTAL TRANSFERS BACK TO FUND 286

FILE: FINRPTS\FUND286\ILA_PEND

-6-

60 000

REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT FUND 286 - ACCOUNTS PAYABLE OCTOBER 1992

286 10.28.92 FIDELITY PRODUCTS CO. 286 09.28.92 CENTEL CELLULAR 286 10.22.92 JM MONTGOMERY 286 10.16.92 WILL 8 WYS 286 10.28.92 ALL AROUND VIDEO 286 10.28.92 XEROX 286 10.28.92 XEROX 286 10.22.92 FEDERAL EXPRESS 286 10.08.92 CC TREASURER 286 09.28.92 AVlS 286 10.07.92 CC TREASURER 286 10.07.92 MRCURY BLUEPRINT 286 10.28.92 MRCURY BLUEPRINT 286 10.28.92 WRC ENGINEERING

36995 -- 107

101 36 3701 8 35697 35697 --

33483 33483 3688 1

7060 71 40 721 0 721 0 721 0 7240 7240 7250 7270 7270 7270 7280 7280 7280

202025 10.16.92 276.58 82892 08.28.92 106.82

Nv1917 10.07.92 4,156.10 101392 10.13.92 1,518.40 102492 10.24.92 55.00

148048895 10.19.92 34.06 35023450 10.15.92 168.00

479053580 10.14.92 21.75 082492 10.09.92 10.00

U865947364 08.20.92 32.42 100892-A 10.08.92 25.00

A5561 04.10.92 7.00 92-A16699 10.27.92 9.00 1688/MISC 10.20.92 633.15

7,053.28 -------------

F 1 NRPTS\FMD286\OCTPAY. WKl

-7-

REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT FUND 330 FUND BALANCE REPORT OCTOBER 1992

BEGINNING FUND BALANCE

REVENUES: INTEREST INCOM:

TRANSFERS FROM FUND 2861 BOND DEBT SERVICE

EXPENSES: NONE M I S PERIOD


FILE: FINRPTS\FUND330\OCTL

34 , 221

0

REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT FUND 443 - FUND BALANCE REPORT OCTOBER 1992

BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 25,926,024

UIIIIIUlIDl

REVENUES: TRANSFERS IN FROM FUND 286

Las Vagas Wash/CraIg-CIvlc Las .Vega9 Wash/Cra I g-C I v I o Hemenway Wash

RETURN OF FUNDS TO FUND 286

EXPENSES: Q999 - CAPITAL IMPROMMNT PROQRAM 9999 - EXPENSE AW FROM FUND 443 TO 444 (NOV) 9999 - EXPENSE AW FROM FUND 444 TO 443 9999 - EXPENSE AW FROM FUND 443 TO 444 9999 - CONTRACTOR RETENTION INTEREST PAYMENTS 3660 - MAINTENANCE WORK PROGRAM 3560 - EXPENSE AW FROM FUND 443 TO 444


CWITTED IMPACTS TO FUND BALANCE: TRANSFER REVERSAL NLV01B87 I LA' 8 APPROMD IN SEPTEhABER ACCOUNTS PAYABLE

TOTAL C O W I TENTS

ColvMl ?TED FUND BALANCE (FUND 443)

24,851,143 lD1DDDDD11111

-9-

REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT “YD 443 - W T H L Y EXPEND1 TURES

3BER 1992

PROCESS FUND DATE MNWR NAhE

443 10.01.92 MAX RIGGS CONST 443 10.01.92 EADW VALLEY WNTRACTOR 443 10.07.92 G C WALLACE 443 10.13.92 CONTRI CONSTRUCTION 443 10.07.92 PENTACORE ENGINEERING 443 10.07.92 J M MONTGOMRY 443 10.07.92 SEA, INC 443 10.08.92 HEFNER ENGINEERING 443 10.01.92 BOYLE ENGINEERING 443 10.22.92 BOYLE ENGINEERING 443 10.08.92 POGGEMEYER DESIGN 443 10.08.92 G C WALLACE 443 10.08.92 VTN NEVADA 443 10.01.92 CITY OF LAS VEGAS 443 10.01.92 CITY OF LAS VEGAS 443 10.08.92 CITY OF LAS MOAS 443 10.08.92 CITY OF LAS MOAS 443 10.01.92 CITY OF LAS MOAS 443 10.01.92 CITY OF U S VEGAS 443 10.01.92 CITY OF LAS VEGAS 443 10.01.92 CH2M HILL 443 10.01.92 ME- VALLEY CONTRACTOR

1443 10.07.92 GREINER, INC 443 10.16.92 CITY OF NO LAS M W S 443 10.22.92 CITY OF NORTH LAS MGAS

.........................................

EXPEND1 TURES - M A 1 NTENANCE WORK PROGRAM,

443 10.16.92 CITY OF HENDERSON 443 10.07.92 CITY OF HENDERSON

P.O. PROJECT ------------ l W O l C E ------------- No. NO. NUNBER DATE AMOUNT

, ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~ ~ ~ - o ~ ~ - ~ ~ - -

28874 BW01 A87 9 09.30.92 256,807.01 14980 CLA0ZDgB 12 09.22.92 47.495.14 281 53 CLAB3B90 11 09.23.92 593 * 88 25498 CLA03B90 7 10.06.92 110,209.21 28155 CLA03W1 8 09.10.92 7,154.36 30697 cLA03D91 NV1894 09.08.92 9,115.68 29354 CLA03D91 LV-18655 09.14.92 3,771.48 30740 C M A 9 1 1082 09.17.92 10,656.38 30698 CLA06A91 6 09.11.92 17,994.75 30698 CLA06A91 7 10.07.92 1597.18 19837 HEN01A87.- 7290 09.22.92 14,891.04 .-

39 HEN03A91 1 09.23.92 1,779.72 3 1 268 MN04A9 1 6 10.01.92 32,092.36

5 -91 8295 09.21.92 8,292.00 4 LAS02C91 8296 09.21.92 2,072.38 3 LAS03889 8311 09.30.92 529,713.30 3 LAS03B89 8329 09.30.92 46,991.33

13585 LAS08A89 8297 09.21.92 19,948.69 29349 , LAS09B91 8300 09.21.92 11,581.01 3@#80 LAS10A91 8299 09.21.92 10,210.50 7548 MES01689 209739 09.17.92 3,468.98

10001 MoAp12B92 1 09.21.92 94,464.00 6 Mob82892 02593 09.18.92 29,826.55

14553 NLV01887 AR2342 10.13.92 31.,752.58 26070 NLV06A91 AR2348 10.16.92 35482.83

1,335,962.34 -------------

40 HEN01 14452 10.07.92 110,618.00 24 HEN91-92 14045 09.01.92 71,789.10

182,407.10 -------------

REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT - FUND 443 FUND 443 - INTERLOCAL AGREEMENTS APPROMD - FUNDS NOT YET TRANSFERRED OCTOBER 1992

67,000

ILA'S APPROVED I N OCTOBER:

TOTAL TRANSFERS TO FUND 443 67,000 11111111111

INTERLOCAL AGREEEMS APPROVED - FUNDS NOT YET TRANSFERED BACK TO FUND 286 REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT FUND 286

FILE: FINRPTS\FW43\OCTPEND

-11-

REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT FUND 443 - ACCOUNTS PAYABLE

TOBER 1992

443 10.28.92 CITY OF HENDERSON 443 10.28.92 MARK GROUP 443 10.28.92 MARK GROUP 443 10.28.92 CITY LAS VEGAS 443 10.28.92 CITY NO LAS MOAS 443 10.28.92 CITY NO iAs VEGAS 443 10.16.92 CITY OF NO LAS MOAS 443 10.28.92 CITY NO LAS VEGAS

PAYABLES WINTENANCE WORK PROGRAM1

443 10.16.92 CITY OF HENDERSON 443 10.22.92 C A S W N EQU I P RENTAL 443 10.22.92 HIGHWAY RENTALS 443 10.22.92 CASHMAN EQUIP RENTAL 443 10.22.92 CASHMAN EQUIP RENTAL 443 10.22.92 CASHMAN EQUIP RENTAL

'443 10.22.92 C A S W EQUIP RENTAL 443 10.22.92 CASHMAN EQUIP RENTAL 443 10.22.92 CASHMAN EQUIP RENTAL 443 10.22.92 HIGHWAY RENTALS 443 10.22.92 CITY OF NORTH LAS MGAS

TOTAL ACCOUNTS PAYABLE

FlNRPTS\FUND443\OCTPAY

3 1270 12900 12900

4 23 1 37 321 3 321 3

26070

HEN04A91 BUN01 A90 BUN01 A 9 0 LAS02C91 NLV03C91 NLV04A89 NLV04A89 NLV06A91

40 HEN01 41 HEN92-93 42 HEN92-93 41 HEN92-93 41 HEN92-93 41 HEN92-93 4 1 HEN92-93 41 HEN92-93 41 HEN92-93 42 HEN92-93 34 NLV92-93

14565 10.22.92 2775 02.18.92 2713 01.89.92 8359 10.22.92

AR2361 10.22.92 AR2364 1 0.20.92 AR2335 10.09.92 AR2360 10.22.92 --

2.750.58 24 . 427.50 5,750.00

136.068.61 848.04

1 , 154.28 11 , 167.50 1,971.69

184,138.20 .-----------

14452 10.07.92 110,618.00 A1034903 08.07.92 12,050.00

7774 08.25.92 611.60 A1039103 08.10.92 4.565.00 A1034904 09.08.92 12,0!50.00 A1091501 08.24.92 435.69 A1039104 09.09.92 4,565.00

A1034902 07.07.92 12,050.00 7988 09.03.92 183.20

AR2352 10.20.92 9,281 .OO 170,974.49-

A1039102 07.09.92 48565.00

-------------

355,112.69 1111111111111

PROJECT EXPENSEllNTERLOCAL AGREEMENT BALANCE REPORT FUND 443 CLARK COUNTY REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT

CLARK COUNTY:

CLA.01.A.87 Upper F lamingo lash Detent ion Basin 8 O u t f a l l

CLA.02,D.90 Rlvh ide Channel Eastern t o Topaz

CLA.02.E.91 Rawhide Channel YcLeod t o Ytn. V i s t a

CLA.03.B.40 Van Buski rk Channel

Ou t fa l I

CLA.03,C.N Van Buskirk Chrnnel Right -of - lay

7,713,000.00 668,155.00 Black I Veatch 58,000.61 C,C. Treasurer 12,499.00 Timothy Morse

2,000.00 N a t i o n r l T i t l e 1,212,536.30 S t t r r r t T i t l e

157,984,00 L l w y e r s T i t l e 406,732.45 Nevada T i t l e 427,500.00 Clerk of Court

4,144,949.00 Wheeler Const,

7,090,355.76 --I-------------

1,265,000.00 93,150.00 G,C. l a 1 l l c e 77,000.00 Clark County

907,322.80 Mead.Vly. Con, ---------------- 1,077,472.80

180,000.00 65,000.00 Clark County 610,00 S w i f t ----------------

65,610.00

3,760,000.00 80,141.25 Clark County 49,293.00 Clark County 18,000,00 Converse Cons.

277.44 S w i f t B l p r t g . 151,061.00 G.C. la1 lace

3,097,041.21 Contr i Const.

3,395,833.90 ----------------

3,575,000.80 15,000,00 C l r r k County 10,850.00 K.E. Lamb

130,505.20 S t e w a r t T i t l e 1,115,000.00 Clerk o f Cour t 1,253,878.50 Land T i t l e o f NV

632,321.00 Nevada T i t l e ---------------- 3,157,554.70

-13-

PROJECT EXPENSE/ INTERLOCAL AGREEYENT BALANCE REPORT FUND 443 CLARK COUNTY REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT

INTERLOCAL PURCHASE CURRENT YONTH PROJECT PROJECT AQREEYENT ORDERIINTEREST PURCHASE ORDER PURCHASE OROER PURCHASE ORDER NUYBER NAME AMOUNT AMOUNT VENDOR EXPENDITURES TOTAL EXPENDED BALANCE

CLA.03.0.91 Van Busk i rk System Spencer t o Roche1 l e Rochel le t o T r a i n 6 Upstrean Sect ion

850,000.00 15,880.00 77,250,00 50,000,00 98,508,00 226,800.00 175,265.00

171.10

Clark County 0.00 10,019.27 Del ta Enp ineer ing 0,00 62,212,40 YEA 0.00 34,434.42 Pentacore 7,154.36 93,976,82 JM Montgomery 9,115.68 107,544.51 SEA 3,771.48 70,667,53 S w i f t 0.00 171.00

CLA.04.A.89 F lan ingo l ash B r idge a t E a s t e r n Avenue

CLA.04.C.90 Flaningo Wash B r i d l e s a t P a r a d i s e 8 Palos Verde

I

CLA.05,A.91 Duck Creek Bridges

Toniyasu 8 Pachucr

CLA.06.A,91 Range l a s h Detent ion Basin F a c i l i t i e s

OUTLYING AREAS:

BUN.Bl.A.90 Bunkervi I l e Channel (aka WindPi I I l a s h )

I GSP.Bl.A.88 Goodsprings Flood

Con t ro l Improvements

642,186.00 379,025.95

4,980.73 15,031.60 15,565,58 4,523.18

118,455.49 104,597.47

0. 00

263,160.05

61,900.00 61,900.00 Tab Cont rac tors 0.00 22,610.00 39,290.00

22,610.00 39,290.00

1,702,000.00 186.82 Clark County 0. 00 1,645.16 11,458.34) 216,620.00 YEA 0.00 215,487,92 1,132.08

1,345,638.15 Yax Ripgs 0.0D 1,294,129,34 51,508.81 80,000.00 Clark County 0,00 25,414.74 54,585.26 55,672,50 Donrey Outdoor Adv 0. 00 55,672.50 0. 00

1,698,117.47 1,592,349.66 105,767.81 ---------------- __-----_______-____--------------

-14-

PROJECT EXPENSE/ INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT BALANCE REPORT FUND 443 CLARK COUNTY REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT

LAU.01.A.89 Laughl in Unnared l a s h

LAU.02.A.89 Laugh1 i n Hiko Spr inis

LAU.02.E.92 Laughl in Hiko Spr ings - Renap

MOA,Bl.B.89 Moapa Val ley Muddy R i v e r l e s t Levee

YOA.02.A,89 Moapa Va l l ey Logan l a s h (aka Benson l a s h )

YOA,02.E.92 Yoapa Val ley-Logan l a s h (Construct ion)

350,000.00 14,000.00 Clark County 106.04 Revier Journal

314,293.96 S i r o n s L i 6 Assoc 21,600.00 Acqu is i t ion Sc ienc

350,088,08

370 , 000.00 106.04 Review Journal

---------------.

4,143.46 Cl6rk County 47,750,00 Sirons, L i

318,008,00 Boyle Engineers

370,080.00 ----------------

9,500.08 1,500.08 Clark County 6,000,00 Boyle Eng

9,586,00 ----------------

200,000,00 10,800.00 Clark County 43.00 Revieu Journal

180,000,00 The Mark Group

190,043.00

348,080,00 39,933.96 Clark County 106,04 Reviev Journal

209,960,00 Dames 8 Yoore 300.00 Appraisal Serv.

58,560.00 Clerk of the Cour t 600.00 UPRR

4,938.00 Nevada T i t l e Co.

----11----------

------.--------- 314,398.00

4,216,000.00 238,008.08 Grciner, Inc. 8,748.00 Clark County

2,589,130,00 Yeadow Val l ey Con ---------------- 2,835,878.88

-15-

PROJECT EXPENSE/ INTERLOCAL AGREEYENT BALANCE REPORT FUND 443 CLARK COUNTY REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT

NEL.Il,A.88 Nelson Flood Control Improvements

SEA.01.6.88 Searchlight Flood Control Improvements

CITY OF BOULDER CITY:

BOU.Bl.it.87 Henenway Wash

CITY OF HENDERSON:

HEN.01.A.87 Pittman lash Channel

HEN.01.C.90 Pittaan Wash Channel

HEN.03.6.91 UPRR Channel

I HEN.04.A.91 C-1 Channel System

70,000.00 12,000.00 Clark County

4,649,000.00 94,938.84 J.M.Montgomery 765.00 E.G. Radii

186,338,00 toe a Van LOO 25,769.25 ClEoulder City

4,269,188,91 Max Riggs Const

4,577,000.00 ----------------

3,000,000.00 142,471.00 ClHenderson 2,729,375.00 Superior Gunite 125,154.00 Black L Vcatch 3,000,00 Nevada Labor Coma ----------------

3,000,000.00

150,000.00 104,550.60 GL. la1 lrcc 25,000.00 C/Henderson 10,440.00 1ST AYER TITLE

139,990.00

0.00 286,534.77 275,690.23

14,891.04 215,392.50 24,607.50 0.00 9,775.00 0.00


CITY OF LAS VEGA&

LAS.02.A.87 B u f f a l o Channel 4,535,%5.00 217,211,95 G.C, l a l l a c e (aka Angel PlrklGoran 1,314,753,05 C l l a s Vegas Detent ion Basin) 4,000.00 KennedylJenks ----------------

4,535,965.00

LAS.02.B,41 Buffalo Channel 130,000.00 130,080.00 ClLas Vepas Sunuer I i n t o Vegas Dr. (aka Anpel ParklGoran Detent ion Basin)

LAS,02,C.41 B u f f a l o Channel 588,848.00 588,898,00 ClLas Vegas Nestc l i f f t o Sunner I i n (rka Angel ParklGoran Detent ion Basin)

US,02.D.42 Buffalo Channel Design 43,000.00 0,00 Doe- lestc l i f f

LAS.04.B.40 Olkey Blvd. System

LAS.08.1.89 Carey h e n u e l l a k e Mead 6,750,000.00 6,750,000,00 C lLas Ve i l s Detent ion 6 Conv. System

-17-

8 . 1 15,432.15 0.00 0.00 346,660.82 8,207.03

392,092.47 8,20?,03

0.80 0.00


INTERLOCAL PURCHASE CURRENT YONTH PROJECT PROJECT AGREEMENT ORDER/ INTEAEST PURCHASE ORDER PURCHASE ORDER PURCHASE ORDER WWER NAME AMOUNT MlOUNT VENDOR EXPENDITURES TOTAL EXPENDED BALANCE

327,000.00 313,726.91 13,273.04

US.09.B.91 lashiniton Avenue System 471,000.00 Sandhi I I t o Bruce

LAS.09.D.92 IashinQton Ave System 2,437,800.00 Construction

LAS.lB.A.91 Goran North Channel 100,000.00

LAS.ll.A.92 Aniel Park - Peccole 1 65,000.60 Rampart Storm Drain I

LAS.12.A.92 Alta Storm Drain 951,800.00

0.00

0.00

0.00 0. 00

LAS.13.A.92 Cheyenne Channel 67,000.00 Buffalo - Gowan Det Basin

0.0% 0.00 CITY OF MESQUITE:

YES.Il.B.89 Torn lash Det. Basin 660,000,00 50,000.00 ClYesquite 0, 00 30,875.00 19,125.00 610,000.00 CHZY Hi I I 3,1168.98 596,254.11 13,745,89

PROJECT EXPENSE/ INTEALOCAL AGREEMENT BALANCE REPORT FUND 443 CLARK COUNTY REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT

yIV.ll,B,87 L,V. l a s h l C t a i g t o C i v i c 2,440,600.00 645,188.00 C/N.Las Vegas Ctr, (wka King Charles 1,735,512.00 Max Riggs ----------------

2,380,600.00

kV.113.A.88 l e s t Range lash D e t e n t i o n B u i n

NLV.l3,C.91 l e s t Rtnge Uash Divers ion D ike

NLV.04.A.89 Goran Detent ion Basins Outfal I St ruc tu re

NLV.05.A.89 Upper L.V. lash Detent ion Basin

WLV.06.A.91 Ky le Canyon Detent ion Basin

360,000.00 360,000,00 C/N,Las Vegas

350,000.00 350,000.00 C/N.Las Vcgas

31,752,58 740,037.90 (94,949.90) 0.00 1,672,314.68 63,197.32

2,412,352.58 (31,752.58)

0.00 273,068.12 86,931.88

273,068.12 86,931.88

13,428,880.88 1,198,775.16 C/N.Lrs Vegas 0.00 991,743.20 207,031.96 12,220,726.00 LV Paving 0.00 11,580,021.13 640,704.87

13,419,501.16 12,571,764,33 847,736.83

450,000.00 450,880.00 C/W.Las Vegts 35,482.83 422,884.12 27,195.88

422,804.12 27,195.88

FILE: FINRPTS\FUND443\PE-llABR

-19-

P R O J E C T EXPENSE SUYMARY F U N D 443

A R K C O U N T Y R E G I O N A L FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT

CLA.01.A.87 U p p e r flamingo l a s h J u l y 9, 1987 410,000,00 J u l y 31, 1992 6,987,570.73 725,429.27 D e t e n t i o n B a s i n Sept. 14, 1989 2,081,H00.00 6 Outfall Dec. 13, 1990 5,819,008.00

A p r . 1 1 , 1991 1627,000.001 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - T O T A L 7,713,000.00

CLA.02.0.90 R a r h i d e C h a n n e l J u l y 12, 1990 100,000,klB Dec. 31, 1991 1,048,877.10 216,122.90 Eastern t o Topaz Oct. 11, 1990 1,165,000.00

TOTAL 1,265,000.00 -----I---------

CLA.02.E.91 Rawhide Channel Oct. 10, 1991 180,000,00 Ju ly 1, 1992 33,150.94 146,849.06 Y c l e o d t o Ytn. Vista

LA.03.B.90 V a n B u s k i r k Channel J u n e 14, 1990 300,001.00 A p r . 17, 1992 3,338,020.61 421,979,39 O u t f a l l A u g . 8 , 1991 3,460,000.00

T O T A L 3,760,000.00 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - *

CLA.03.Cn90 V a n B u s k i r k C h a n n e l O c t . 1 1 , 1990 2,000,000.00 J a n . 31, 1992 3,156,554.06 418,415.94 R i g h t - o f - W a y A u g . 8, 1991 1,300,000.00

J u n 11, 1992 275,000.00

CLA.03.0.91 V a n Buskirk Channel Sept. 12, 1991 360,000.00 J u l y 1 , 1992 379,025.95 470,974.05 Spencer t o Rochelle Oct, 10, 1991 290,000.00 J u l y 1 , 1992 Y a r y l a n d t Reno; A u g . 13, 1992 200,000,00 Tropicana at Spencer; B e t w e e n R o c h e l l e II T w a i n 850,000.00

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

CLA.04.A.89 Flalingo Wash B r i d g e Sept. 1 4 , 1989 61,908.00 Dec. 31, 1990 r t E a s t e r n Avenue

-20-

22,610.00 39,290.00

PROJECT EXPENSE SUYYARY FUND 4 1 3 CLARK COUNTY REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL 0 I S T R I C T

C L A . 0 4 . C . 9 0 F l a l i n g o l a s h B r d g s . a t P a r a d i s e a n d P a l o s V e r d e

CLA.05 .A .91 D u c k C r e e k C h r n n e l P r c h u c r I T o r i y r s u

C L A . 0 6 . 1 . 9 1 R a n g e W a s h D e t e n t i o n B a s i n F a c i l i t i e s

OUTLYING A R E A S :

B U N . l l . A . 9 0 B u n k e r v i I l e C h r n n e l ( a k a W i n d i i l l W a s h )

G S P . 0 1 . A . 8 8 G o o d s p r i n p s F l o o d

J u l y 1 2 , 1 9 9 0 7 5 0 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 J u l y 1 2 , 1 9 9 0 450,000.00 A p r i 1 1 1 , 1 9 9 1 3 0 0 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 J u n e 1 3 , 1 9 9 1 2 0 2 , 0 0 0 , 0 0

T O T A L 1 , 7 0 2 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

N o v , 1 1 , 1 9 9 1 480,000.00

TOTAL

J u n e 9 , 1 9 8 8 C o n t r o l i m p r o v e m e n t s

L A U . 0 1 . A . 8 9 L a u g h l i n S e p t . 1 1 , 1 9 8 9 U n n a m e d l a s h

L A U . 0 2 . A . 8 9 L a u g h l i n N o v . 9 , 1 9 8 9 H i k o S p r i n g s

L A U . 0 2 . B . 9 2 L a u g h l i n F e b . 1 3 , 1 9 9 2 H i k o S p r i n g s R e r a p

M O A , 0 1 . B , 8 9 Y o r p a VtI l e y Y a y 1 1 , 1 9 8 9 M u d d y R i v e r l e s t l e v e e

5 4 1 , 0 0 0 . 0 0

9 9 , 0 0 0 . 0 0

350,000.00

3 7 0 , 0 0 0 . 0 0

9 , 5 0 0 . 0 0

288,000 I 0 0

-21-

D e c . 3 1 , 1 9 9 1 1 , 5 9 2 , 3 4 9 . 6 6 1 0 9 , 6 5 0 . 3 4

O c t 1 , 1 9 9 2

J u l y 1 , 1 9 9 2

D e c . 3 1 , 1 9 9 1

D e c , 3 1 , 1 9 8 9

D e c . 3 1 , 1 9 9 0

D e c . 31, 1 9 9 0

J u l y 1 , 1 9 9 3

Dcc, 3 1 , 1 9 9 0

5 9 , 8 7 7 . 1 9 8 5 , 1 2 2 . 5 1

1 3 5 , 4 8 7 . 7 4 3 4 4 , 5 1 2 . 2 6

1 2 5 , 8 0 8 . 9 2 4 1 5 , 1 9 1 . t

4 , 9 8 0 . 3 2 9 4 , 8 1 9 . 6 8

3 4 9 , 7 5 9 . 1 7 2 1 0 . 8 3

3 6 1 , 9 9 3 . 4 4 5 , 0 0 6 . 5 6

0.00 9 , 5 0 0 . 0 0

1 6 2 , 6 5 1 . 6 7 3 7 , 3 4 8 . 3 3

PROJECT E X P E N S E S U M M A R Y 'UNO 4 4 3

, A R K C O U N T Y REGIONAL F L O O D CONTROL D I S T R I C T

Y O A . 0 2 . A . 8 9 M o a p a V a l l e y S e p t . 1 4 , 1 9 8 9 1 7 3 , 0 0 0 , 0 0 D e c , 3 1 , 1 9 9 1 2 8 3 , 2 7 4 . 8 9 5 6 , 7 2 5 . 1 1 L o g a n W a s h J u n e 1 3 , 1 9 9 1 7 7 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 ( a k a B e n s o n l a s h ) S e p t 1 2 , 1 9 9 1 9 0 , 0 0 0 . 0 0

T O T A L 3 4 0 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 ---I-----------

YOA.02 .B .92 M o a p a V a l l e y F e b , 1 3 , 1 9 9 2 1 , 2 1 6 , 0 0 0 . 0 6 J u l y 1 , 1 9 9 3 * 1 6 3 , 7 0 9 . 6 2 4 , 0 5 2 , 2 9 0 * . 3 8 L o g a n l a s h C o n s t r u c t i o n

N E L . B l , A . 8 8 N e l s o n F l o o d C o n t r o l J u l y 1 4 , 1 9 8 8 7 0 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 D e c , 3 1 , 1 9 8 9 2 , 9 6 1 . 9 5 6 7 , 0 3 8 . 0 5 I m p r o v e m e n t s

S E A . B l , A . 8 8 S e a r c h 1 i g h t F l o o d A p r . 1 4 , 1 9 8 8 1 7 2 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 D e c . 3 1 , 1 9 8 9 7 , 3 6 2 . 2 7 1 6 4 , 6 3 7 . 7 3 C o n t r o l l r p r o v e m e n t s

CITY O F BOULDER CITY:

B O U . 0 1 . A . 8 7 H e m e n r a y l a s h O c t , 8, 1 9 8 7 2 0 5 , 0 8 8 . 0 0 J u l y 1 , 1 9 8 8 2 , 9 9 3 , 3 2 4 . 1 6 1 , 6 5 5 , 6 7 5 . 8 4 S e p t . 1 3 , 1 9 9 0 7 0 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 M a r . 1 4 , 1 9 9 1 4 , 0 6 4 , 0 0 8 . 8 f l J u l y 9 , 1 9 9 2 1 5 0 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 S e p t . 1 0 , 1 9 9 2 1 6 0 , 0 0 0 . 0 0

T O T A L 4 , 6 4 9 , 0 0 0 , 0 0

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

CITY O F H E N D E R S O N :

H E N . 0 1 . A . 8 7 P i t t l a n l a s h C h a n n e l

HEN,01.C.90 P i t t r a n l a s h C h a n n e l

HEN.03 .A .91 U P R R C h a n n e l

H E N . 0 4 . A . 9 1 C - 1 C h a n n e l S y s t e m

d E N . 0 5 . A . 9 2 S u n s e t b e t B a s i n C o l l e c t i o n I O u t f a l l

A u g . 13, 1 9 8 7 5 2 2 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 Y a r c h 3 1 , 1 9 9 2 F e b . 1 4 , 1 9 9 1 3 1 5 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 F e b . 1 3 , 1 9 9 2 1 0 0 , 0 8 0 . 0 0

T O T A L 9 3 7 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 ----------I----

S e p t . 1 3 , 1 9 9 0 3 , 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 J a n . 31, 1 9 9 2

S e p t . 1 2 , 1 9 9 1 1 5 0 , 0 8 0 . 0 0 J u l y 1 , 1 9 9 2

S e p t . 1 2 , 1 9 9 1 6 0 0 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 Ju ly 1 , 1 9 9 2

J u l y 9 , 1 9 9 2 1 , 3 8 5 , 0 0 0 . 0 0

-22-

5 1 1 , 7 0 2 . 2 7

2 , 5 1 7 , 8 8 6 . 8 8

1 2 0 , 6 3 3 , 0 1

3 0 6 , 0 5 4 . 0 6

0,00

4 2 5 , 2 9 7 . 7 3

1 8 2 , 9 9 4 . 0 0

2 9 , 3 6 6 . 9 9

2 9 3 , 9 4 5 . 9 1

1,385,000.00

PROJECT EXPENSE SUMMARY FUND 443 CLARK COUNTY REGIONAL F L O O D CONTROL 0 ISTR IC1

INTERLOCAL PROJECT PROJECT AGREEMENT

C I T Y OF LAS VEGAS:

LAS.dl.A.87 A n g e l P a r k D e t e n t i o n J u l y 9, 1987 2,700.00 B a s i n S t r u c t u r e J a n , 12, 1989 147,300.00

J u l y 13, 1989 250,300.00

TOTAL 400,300.00

LASn02,A.87 B u f f a l o C h a n n e l J u l y 9 , 1987 84,200.00 (rkr A n g e l P r r k l G o v a n J a n . 12, 1989 1,672,700.00

D e t e n t i o n B a s i n ) J u l y 13, 1989 (250,300.00) D e c . 14, 1989 3,019,365.00

T O T A L 4,535,965.00

LAS.02.B.41 B u f f a l o C h a n n e l S e p t . 12, 1991 110,000.00 t a k a A n g e l P a r k l G o v a n A p r i l 09, 1992 20,000.00

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

D e t e n t i o n B a s i n ) ---1-1-1-1-1--1

S u m n e r l i n t o V e g a s Dr.

LAS.02.C.91 B u f f a l o C h a n n e l O c t , 10, 1941 t a k a A n g e l P a r k l G o v a n

D e t e n t i o n B a s i n ) N e s t c l i f f t o S u m B e r l i n

LAS.02,0,92 B u f f a l o C h a n n e l Doe - W e s t c l i

LAS.03.B.89 G o v a n D e t e n t i o n B a s i n s 1 O u t f a

D e s i g n J u l y 9, 1992 f

N o v . 9, 1989

J u n e 13, 1991 O c t . 10, 1991

I S e p t . 13, 1990

130,000,00

588,898.00

93,000.00

650,000.00 75,000.80

5,700,000.00 57.625.00

J a n . 31, 1994

D e c . 31, 1993

68,882.29 61,117.71

293,102.99 295,795.01

0 . 0 0 93,000

J u n e 30, 1993 3,175,825.47 2,225,174 * 53

J a n . 30, 1992 513,406.55 48,593.45

-23-

PROJECT EXPENSE SUYYARV ‘ U N O 4 4 3

_ A R K COUNTY REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL D I S T R I C T

INTERLOCAL PROJECT PROJECT AGREEMENT NUMBER NAME DATE

I NTERLOCAL AGREEMENT

AMOUNT EX

L A S . 0 8 . A . 8 9 C a r e y A v e n u e l L a k e Y e a d D e t e n t i o n a n d C o n v e y a n c e S y s t e n

S e p t . 1 4 , 1 9 8 9 1 , 9 8 0 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 A p r i l 1 2 , 1 9 9 0 570,000.00 M a y 9 , 1 9 9 1 4 , 2 0 0 , 0 0 0 . 0 8 S e p t . 1 2 , 1 9 9 1 n o n e t c h a n g e

TOTAL 6 ,750,000.00 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

D e c . 3 1 , 1 9 9 3 6 , 0 2 8 , 5 1 6 . 5 0 7 2 1 , 4 8 3 . 5 0

D e c . 3 1 , 1 9 9 2 3 1 3 , 7 2 6 , 9 1 2 2 8 , 2 7 3 , 0 9

J a n . 1 , 1 9 9 4 9 4 , 7 0 0 . 4 3 3 7 6 , 2 9 9 . 5 7

0.00 2 , 4 3 7 , 0 0 0 . 0 0

J a n . 3 1 , 1 9 9 2 9 7 , 3 3 7 . 5 8 2 , 6 6 2 . 4 2

L A S . 0 9 . A . 8 9 l a s h i n g t o n A v e n u e S y s t e n

TOTAL

O c t . 10, 1 9 9 1

5 4 2 , 0 0 0 , 0 0

4 7 1 , 0 0 0 . 8 0 L A S . 0 9 , B . 9 1 W a s h i n g t o n A v e n u e S y s t e m S a n d h i l l t o B r u c e

J u l y 9 , 1 9 9 2 2 , 4 3 7 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 ‘ A S . 0 9 . 0 . 9 2 W a s h i n g t o n A v e S y s t e n C o n s t r u c t i o n

1 0 0 , 0 0 0 . 0 0

6 5 , 0 0 0 . 8 0

L A S . 1 0 . A , 9 1 G o r a n N o r t h C h a n n e l S e p t . 1 2 , 1 9 9 1

L A S . l l , A . 9 2 A n g e l P a r k - P e c c o l e 1 J u l y 9 , 1 9 9 2 R a m p a r t S t o r m D r a i n

0.00 65,008.00

0.00

0.00

L A S . 1 2 . A . 9 2 Alta S t o r m D r a i n A u g . 1 3 , 1 9 9 2 9 5 4 , 8 0 0 . 0 0

67,000.00 L A S . 1 3 . A . 9 2 C h e y e n n e C h a n n e l S e p t . 10, 1 9 9 2 B u f f a l o - G o r a n D e t b a s i n

C I T Y OF MESOUITE:

Y E S . l l . B . 8 9 T o r n l a s h D e t e n t i o n J u l y 1 3 , 1 9 8 9 B a s i n M a r . 1 4 , 1 9 9 1

480,000.00 1 8 0 , 0 0 0 . 8 0

D e c . 1 , 1 9 9 1 6 2 7 , 1 2 9 . 1 1 3 2 , 8 7 0 . 8 9 D e c . 1 , 1 9 9 1

-24-

PROJECT EXPENSE SUMMARY FUND 4 4 3 CLARK COUNTY REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DlSTR IC1

CITY O F N O R T H LAS VEGAS:

N L V . 0 1 . B . 8 7 L . V . W a s h l C r a i g t o A u g , 3, 1 9 8 7 1 , 0 0 % , 8 0 B . 8 0 J u l y 3 1 , 1 9 9 3 2 , 4 1 2 , 3 5 2 . 5 8 ( 3 1 , 7 5 2 . 5 8 1 C i v i c C e n t e r J u l y 1 4 , 1 9 8 8 n o n e t c h a n g e ( a k a K i n g C h a r l e s S e p t . 1 4 , 1 9 8 9 580,800.00

D i v e r s i o n C h a n n e l ) J u n e 1 4 , 1 9 9 0 8 8 0 , 6 0 0 . 8 0

T O T A L 2 , 3 8 0 , 6 1 0 . 1 1 ---------------

N L V . 0 3 . A . 8 8 W e s t R a n g e W r s h Apr. 1 4 , 1 9 8 8 3 6 8 , 8 0 0 . 8 0 M a y 1 , 1 9 9 1 2 7 3 * 0 6 8 ' 1 2 8 6 , 9 3 1 . 8 8 D e t e n t i o n B t s i n

N L V . 0 3 . C . 9 1 W e s t R a n g e W a s h J u n e 1 3 , 1991 3 5 0 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 J u l y 1 , 1 9 9 2 3 2 7 , 8 6 4 . 6 5 2 2 , 1 3 5 . 3 5 D i v e r s i o n D i k e

l L V . 0 4 . A . 8 9 G o r a n D e t e n t i o n M a y 1 1 , 1 9 8 9 480,008.80 J u l y 1 , 1 9 9 4 1 2 , 5 7 1 , 7 6 4 . 3 3 8 4 8 , 2 3 5 . 6 7 B a s i n s O u t f a l I N o v 8, 1990 1 5 , 9 8 6 , 0 0 0 , 0 0 S t r u c t u r e Y a r . 1 4 , 1 9 9 1 ~ 3 , 0 4 6 , 0 0 0 . 0 8 ) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

T O T A L 1 3 , 4 2 0 , 0 0 0 . 0 0

N L V , 0 5 , A . 8 9 U p p e r L V W a s h S e p t . 1 4 , 1989 6 5 0 , 0 0 0 , 0 0 D e c , 3 1 , 1 9 9 1 1 , 5 9 5 , 1 4 2 , 3 6 5 4 , 8 5 7 . 6 4 D e t e n t i o n B a s i n M a r . 1 4 , 1 9 9 1 1,000,000.08

T O T A L 1 , 6 5 0 , 8 0 0 . 0 0

TOTALS 7 9 , 1 8 8 , 9 6 3 . 0 0 ............... 5 7 , 9 1 6 , 5 4 3 . 1 9 2 8 , 2 5 0 , 6 1 9 . 9 1 .................... .c.~.....

F I L E : F I N R P T S \ f U H D 4 4 3 \ P E - S U N

-25-

W O R K M A I N T E N A N C E P R O G R A M F Y 9 1 - 9 2 F U N D 1 1 3 R E G I O N A L F L O O D C O N T R O L 0 I S T R I C T

P a g e 2 o f 2 A S OF 1 2 - N O V - 9 2

C L A R K C O U N T Y

L A S V E G A S

N O R T H L A 5 V E G A S

H E N D E R S O N

Y E S O U I T E

B O U L D E R C I T !

T O T A L Y I P

5 2 5 , 0 0 0 . 0 0

3 2 0 , 0 0 0 . 0 0

5 4 , 9 8 5 . 0 0

2 9 3 , 3 6 3 . 0 0

4 9 , 4 3 0 . 2 0

9 0 , 0 0 0 . 0 0

3 8 7 4 2 7 5 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 30007 1 4 , 4 3 1 . 4 0 0 . 0 0 3 0 0 0 8 9 , 4 5 0 . 0 0 0 , 0 0 3 2 2 4 2 6 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 3 2 2 5 8 3 , 1 0 2 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 3 2 2 4 1 2 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 2 2 9 1 9 3 1 4 , 5 8 2 . 6 4 0 . 0 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

4 2 5 , 0 6 6 . 0 4

2 8 8 8 8 3 2 0 , 0 0 8 . 0 8 0 . 0 0

2 8 1 4 4 5 4 , 9 8 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0

2 9 3 4 8 4 9 , 4 3 0 . 2 0 0 . 0 0

3 0 0 i 8 9 0 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0

1 0 , 6 8 2 . 5 2 6 4 , 3 1 7 . 4 8 4 8 8 , 8 8 7 . 2 8 1 4 , 4 3 4 . 3 0 ( 2 . 9 0 )

8 , 5 0 5 , 0 0 9 4 5 . 8 0 0 . 0 0 6 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 3 , 1 0 2 . 0 0

2 , 4 9 0 . 9 0 9 . 1 0 0 . 0 0 3 1 4 , 5 8 2 . 6 4

2 5 , 0 6 2 . 3 2 2 9 4 , 9 3 7 . 6 8

4 7 , 5 7 2 . 0 0 7 , 4 1 3 . 0 0

0 . 0 0 1 0 0 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 , 0 0 1 2 6 , 4 4 0 . 0 0

6 , 9 9 2 . 6 5 7 . 3 5 0 . 0 0 1 6 , 0 0 0 . 0 0

1 6 , 6 1 5 . 0 0 3 , 3 8 5 . 0 0

3 2 , 7 9 2 . 1 9 1 6 , 6 3 8 . 0 1

2 6 , 1 1 4 . 4 5 6 3 , 8 8 5 . 5 5

2 9 4 , 9 3 7 . 6 8

7 , 4 1 3 . 0 0

2 6 9 , 7 5 5 . 3 5

1 6 , 6 3 8 . 0 1

6 3 , 8 8 5 . 5 5

1 , 3 3 2 , 7 7 8 . 2 0 1 , 9 0 3 , 4 2 7 , 2 8 1 8 2 , 4 0 7 . 1 0 1 9 1 , 2 6 1 . 3 3 1 , 0 1 7 , 6 5 9 , 9 1 1 , 1 4 1 , 5 1 6 . 8 7 x a x a x x ~ x ~ x ~ x s

T O T A L E X P E N D I T U R E S T H I S P E R I O D

F I L E : F I N R P T S \ F U N D 4 4 3 \ I Y P F D B A l

-26-

1 8 2 , 4 0 7 . 1 0 .L.C......X.

l O R K M A I N T E N A N C E P R O G R A M F V 9 2 - 9 3 FUND 4 4 3 REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL 0 I S T R I CT

P a g e 1 of 2 A S OF 1 2 - N o v - 9 2

CLARK COUNTY

LAS V E G A S

NORTH LAS V E G A S

HENDERSON

Y E S P U I T E

BOULDER C I T Y

TOTAL M Y P

2 1 2 2 2 3 4 4 4 8

3 2

34

I1 4 2 . 0 0 4 6 . 0 0

1 0 0 , 0 0 0 , 0 0 1 4 , 1 7 5 , 0 0 5 0 , 0 0 0 , 0 0

7 , 8 8 7 . 5 0 1 7 0 , 7 7 8 . 2 0

5 8 8 , 0 0 0 . 0 0

5 0 , 8 8 0 . 0 8

5 5 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 7 9 4 . 8 0

3 5 3 , 1 7 0 . 0 0

0 . 0 0

0 . 0 0

8 . 0 0 1 0 0 , 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 ’ 1 4 , 1 7 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 5 0 , 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 7 , 8 8 7 . 5 0 0 . 0 0 1 7 0 , 7 7 8 . 2 0

0 . 0 0 5 0 , 8 8 0 . 0 0

0 . 0 9 5 5 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 , 0 0 7 9 4 . 8 0 d . 0 0 3 5 3 , 1 7 0 . 0 0

0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0

0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0

9 7 3 , 8 3 5 . 8 0

5 8 8 , 0 0 0 . 0 0

5 0 , 8 8 0 . 0 0

4 5 3 , 1 7 0 . 0 0

4 6 , 0 2 1 . 5 0

8 5 , 8 0 0 . 8 0

1 , 3 9 0 , 6 8 5 . 5 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 , 3 9 0 , 6 8 5 . 5 0 2 , 1 9 7 , 7 0 6 , 5 0 ...............I x . ~ x x x ~ x : x ~ . . . . r I r I I . . . . . . . . x . I x I x x ~ : : x x ~ ~ ~ . I . ~ x I I ~

-27-

REGIONAL CAP I TAL ' P A Y A S A S O F OC

VAN BUSKIRK CHANNEL R IGHT-OF-NAY (DET. S ITE E ) VAN BUSKIRK CHANNEL SPENCER-ROCHELLE-TWAIN I UPSTREAY FLAY1 NGO WASH BRIDGE AT EASTERN AVENUE FLAYINGO W A S H BRIDGE AT A R V I L L E FLAYINGO' NASH BRIDGES A T PARADISE AND PALOS VERDE DUCK CREEK BRIDGES AT TOYIYASU II LA C A S I T A RANGE WASH D E T E N T I O N B A S I N F A C I L I T I E S SLOAN CHANNEL LOWER DUCK CREEK DETENTION BASIN

OUTLYING AREAS: LAUGHL I N - UNNAYED WASH L A U G H L I N - H lKO SPRINGS L A U G H L I N - HlKO SPRINGS REYAP B U N K E R V I L L E C H A N N E L ( A K A l l N D Y l L L WASH) YOAPA VALLEY - YUDDY R I V E R WEST LEVEE YOAPA VALLEY - LOGAN WASH (AKA BENSON !ASH) YOAPA VALLEY - LOGAN WASH CHANNEL GOODSPRINGS FLOOD CONTROL IYPROVEYENTS NELSON FLOOD CONTROL SEARCHLIGHT F L O O D CON

C I T Y O F HENDERSON: P I T T Y A N YlASH CHANNEL PITTYAN 1ASH CHANNEL GREEN VALLEY PARKWAY UPRR CHANNEL C-1 CHANNEL SYSTEM

MPROVEYENT ROL IYPROV

PHASE I I I ) CONSTRUCT1 R 1 DGE

S EYENTS

ON-PHASE I )

SUNSET DETENTION BASlWlCOLLECTlON SYSTEY II OUTFALL

C I T Y OF LAS VEGAS: ANGEL PARK DETENTION BASIN STRUCTURE (CLVV-1) ANGEL PARKlGOWAN CONVEYANCE (AKA BUFF CHNL CLVV-2) ANGEL PKIGOWAN D E 1 B S N ( B U F C H L I S U Y Y E R L I N - V E G A S O R ANGEL PKlGOWAN DE1 B S N ( B U F C H L ) W E S T C L I F F - S U Y Y E R L I N

C L A . 0 3 . C . 9 0 CLA.03.D.91 C L A . 0 4 . A . 8 9 C L A . 0 4 . B . 8 9 C l A . 8 4 . C . 9 0 C L A . 0 5 . A . 9 1 C L A . 6 6 . A , 9 1 C L A . 0 7 . A . 9 2 CLA. PENDING

3 , 5 7 5 , 0 0 0 850,000

6 1 , 9 0 0 2 9 4 , 8 1 9

1 4 5 , 0 0 0 4 8 0 , 0 0 0

0 0

1,702,000 I I 7 1 0 , 0 0 0

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - 2 0 , 0 2 6 , 7 1 9

L A U . B l . A . 8 9 3 5 0 , 8 0 0 L A U . 0 2 . A . 8 9 3 7 0 , 0 0 0 L A U . 0 2 . B . 9 2 9 , 5 0 0 B U N , 0 1 . A . 9 0 541,000 Y O A , B l , B . 8 9 2 0 0 , 0 0 0 N O A . 0 2 . A , 8 9 3 4 0 , 0 0 0 Y O A . 0 2 . B . 9 2 4 ,216,000 G S P , 0 1 . A . 8 8 9 9 , 0 0 0 NEL.01.A.BB 7 0 , 000 S E A . B l . A . 8 8 1 7 2 , 0 0 0

6 , 3 6 7 , 5 0 0

H E N . 0 1 . A . 8 7 9 3 7 , 0 0 0 HEN.01.C,90 3 , 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 HEN.02.A.89 1 ,128,514 HEN.03.A.91 1 5 0 , 0 0 0 H E N . 0 4 . 1 . 9 1 600,000 HEN.05.A.92 1 , 3 8 5 , 0 0 0

7 , 2 0 0 , 5 1 4

L A S , 0 1 , A . B 7 4 0 0 , 3 0 0 L A S . 0 2 . A . 8 7 4 , 5 3 5 , 9 6 5 L A S . 8 2 , 6 . 9 1 1 3 0 , 0 0 0 L A S . 0 2 . C . 9 1 5 8 8 , 8 9 8

- - - - - - - - - - - - - -

- - - - - - - - - - - - - -

I 400,000 I 3 0 0 , 0 0 0

1 5 1 , 3 0 0

REG I ONAL FLOOD CONTROL D I STR I CT CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS 'PAY AS YOU GO' FUNDS (FUND 443) A S O F OCTOBER 1 9 9 2

CURRENT I L A SUPPLEMENTS PROJECT NAME PROJECT I VALUE O R N E 1 I L A ' S ________-___- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

BUFFALO CHANNEL DESIGN ( DOE- IESTCL IFF 1 L A S . 0 2 , 0 . 9 2 9 3 , 0 0 0 G O I A N OUTFALL AND CONVEYANCE SYSTEM l A S . 0 3 . B . 8 9 5 , 4 0 1 , 0 0 0 OAKEY BLVD DETENTION 6 CONVEYANCE SYSTEM L A S . 0 4 . B . 9 0 5 6 2 , 0 0 0 OAKEY BLVO DETENTION 6 CONVEYANCE (DECATUR X-ING) L A S n 0 4 . C , 9 1 3 5 , 0 0 0 CAREY AVENUEILAKE MEAD D E 1 6 CONVEYANCE SYSTEM L A S . 0 8 . A . 8 9 6 , 7 5 0 , 0 0 0 I A S H I N G T O N AVE CONVEYANCE SYSTEM (CLVV-9) L A S . 0 9 . A . 8 9 5 4 2 , 0 0 8 IASHINGTON AYE SYSTEM - S A N D H I L L TO BRUCE L A S . 0 9 . B . 9 1 4 7 1 , 0 0 0 IASHINGTON AVE SYSTEM - CONSTRUCTION L A S . 0 9 . 0 . 9 2 2 , 4 3 7 , 6 8 0 GOYAN N O R T H CHANNEL L A S . l d . A . 9 1 1 0 0 , 1 0 0 1 0 , 0 0 0 ANGEL PARK-PECCOLE 1 (RAMPART STORM D E S I G N ) L A S 8 1 1 . A . 9 2 6 5 , 8 8 8 ALTA STORY DRAIN . L A S . 1 2 . A . 9 2 9 5 4 , 8 0 0 CHEYENNE CHANNEL - BUFFALO O R TO G O l l A N S , D E 1 B A S I N L A S , 1 3 . A . 9 2 67,1100

C I T Y O F MESQUITE: TOYN MASH D E T E N T I O N B A S I N ( D S G ) Y E S . d l . B . 8 9 6 6 0 , 000

C I T Y O F NORTH LAS VEGAS: L V I A S H C R A I G - C I V I C C E N T E R ( A K A K I N G C H A R L E S D I V I N L V . B l , B . 8 7 2 , 4 4 0 , 6 0 0 EAST RANGE YASH DETENT ION BAS I N N L V . 0 3 . A . 8 8 3 6 0 , 0 0 0 I E S T RANGE WASH D I V E R S I O N D I K E N L V . 0 3 . C , 9 1 3 5 0 , 0 0 0 GOYAN D E T E N T I O N B A S I N S O U T F A L L ( S T I Y S O N E X T E N S I O N ) N L V . 0 4 . A , 8 9 1 3 , 4 2 0 , 0 0 0

KYLE CANYON D E T E N T I O N B A S I N N L V . 0 6 . A , 9 1 4 5 0 , 0 0 0 I TR IBUTARY T O LAS VEGAS WASH e CAYINO AL NORTE N L V . P E N D I N G 2 5 0 , 0 0 0 *

U P P E R L A S V E G A S Y A S H DETENTION B A S I N ( D S N D a R O W ) N L V . 0 5 . A . 8 9 1 , 6 5 0 , 0 0 0

BOULDER C I T Y : HEYENWAY WASH GEORGIA AVENUE CHANNEL

BOU.01.A.87 4 , 6 4 9 , 0 0 0 BOU.02.A.88 6 1 3 , 5 9 1

F I L E : F I N R P T S \ F U N D 4 4 3 \ P R O J E C T

-29-

REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT FUND 444 - FUND BALANCE REPORT OCTOBER 1992

BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 70,900,018

REVENUES: 3550 - INTEREST EARNED

EXPENSES: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT EXPENDITURES CONTRACTOR RETENTION INTEREST PAYMENTS EXPENSE AD3 FROM FUND 443 TO FUND 444 EXPENSE ADJ FROM FUND 444 TO FUND 443 EXPENSE ADJ FROM FUND 44 TO FUND 443 EXPENSE ADJUSTMENT FROM FUND 443 TO FUND 444


)CURRENT OBLIGATIONS AGAINST BOND FUNDS

ACCOUNTS PAYABLE BALANCE REMAINING ON PROJECT FUNDED TO DATE

UNOBLIGATED BOND FUNDS

CURRENT FUNDING REQUESTS

-30-

REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT FUND 444 - MONTHLY EXPENDITURES OCTOBER 1992

444 10.08.92 COE 8 VAN LOO 28872 BOU01A87 632 09.21.92 11,455.95 444 10.08.92 CONVERSE CONSULTANTS 28873 BOW1 A87 38634 09.11.92 5,420.00

444 10.08.92 CITY 444 10.01.92 CITY 444 10.16.92 GRAN

444 10.01.92 CITY OF LAS VEGAS 444 10.08.92 C I T Y OF LAS VEGAS

OF LAS E G A S OF LAS VEGAS

I TE CONSTRUCT

444 10.22.92 M A W VALLEY CONTRACTORS 31052 444 10.01.92 MEADOW VALLEY CONTRACTOR 31 852 444 10.16.92 FREHNER CONSTRUCTION 28879 444 10.16.92 MAX RlGGS CONSTRUCTION 10001

30079 30079 30079 2935 1

1 ON 31267

CLA02F92 CLA02F92 HEN01 D91 HEN03B92 LAS03C91 LAS03C91 LAS03C9 1 LAs09c9 1 NLV05692

6 10.06.92 7302.52 5 09.22.92 50,869.60 9 09.30.92 107,709.24 3 09.28.92 193,353.07

8298 09.21.92 97.40 8328 09.30.92 7,258.11 8310 09.30.921,018,003.20 8301 09.21.92 21,599.58

5 10.06.92 658,965.24

2,082,033.91 ---c---------

lllLIIIIIIIlD

FINRPTS\FUND444\OCTEXP

-31-

REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT FUND 444 - ACCOUNTS PAYABLE OCTOBER 1992

444 10.28.92 CONVERSE CONSULTANTS 28873 BOU01 A87 38744 09.25.92 5,287.00 444 10.28.92 COE & VAN LOO 28872 BOU01 A87 728 10.12.92 3,577.44 444 10.28.92 CITY OF HENMRSON 30082 HEN01 W 1 14564 10.22.92 408.54 444 10.28.92 CITY OF HENDERSON 3 HEN03B92 14566 10.22.92 18,546.62 444 10.28.92 CITY NO LAS VEGAS 3074 1 NLV05B92 AR2363 10.20.92 2,077.69

29,897.29 -------------

FINRPTS\FUND444\OCTPAY

-32-

REGIONAL F L O O D CONTROL DISTRICT PROJECT EXPENSE/ INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT BALANCE REPORT FUND 4 4 4 - OCTOBER 1 9 9 2

C L A . 0 2 . F . 9 2 R A W H I D E C H A N N E L / 0 2 , 1 3 . 9 2 1 , 3 9 1 , 0 0 0 0 3 . 3 1 . 9 3 7 9 1 , 2 6 7 1 , 1 9 4 , 2 1 8 YcLEOD TO Y T N V I S T A 0 7 . 0 9 . 9 2 5 9 4 , 4 8 5

1 , 9 8 5 , 4 8 5 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

CLA.03 .E .92 V A N B U S K I R K S Y S T E M 0 6 . 1 1 . 9 2 9 2 1 , 8 0 0 0 7 . 0 1 . 9 3 (ROCHELLE-YCCLOUD)

C L A . 0 3 . F , 9 2 V A N B U S K I R K C H A N N E L 0 7 . 0 9 , 9 2 1 , 6 2 7 , 0 0 0 0 7 . 0 1 . 9 3 ( P H A S E V IMPROVENEWTS1

C L A . 0 3 . G . 9 2 VAN BUSKIRK CHANNEL 09 .10 .92 1 ,872 ,008 ( P H A S E I V l Y P R O V E Y E N T S 1

0 9 2 1 , 8 0 0

0 1 , 6 2 7 , 0 0 0

0 1 , 0 7 2 , 0 0 0

BOULDER CITY:

B O U . B l . A . 8 7 H e n e n r a y W a s h 1 1 . 1 4 . 9 1 1 , 3 2 7 , 0 0 0 1 2 . 0 1 . 9 2 B O U . 0 1 , A , 8 7 H e m e n r a y l a s h 0 2 , 1 3 . 9 2 ( 4 6 0 , 0 0 0 1

- - - - - - - - - I - - - - -

8 6 7 , 0 0 0 8 2 3 , 6 0 2 43,398

H E N D E R S O N :

H E N . 0 1 . D . 9 1 P i t t a a n wash C h n l 1 1 . 1 4 . 9 1 2 , 5 2 0 , 0 0 0 0 7 . 3 1 , 9 2 2 , 0 5 4 , 5 7 2 4 6 5 , 4 2 8 P h a s e I I

H E N . 0 3 . 6 . 9 2 U P R R C h a n n e l 0 3 . 1 2 . 9 2 2 , 6 0 0 , 0 0 0 0 1 . 3 1 . 9 3 1 7 4 , 4 8 1 2 , 1 2 5 , 5 9 9

-33-

R E B I O N A L F L O O D C O N T R O L D I S T R I C T

FUND 444 - O C T O B E R 1992 1 P R O J E C T E X P E N S E / I N T E R L O C A L A G R E E M E N T B A L A N C E R E P O R T

LAS,12.E.92 B u f f a l o C h a n n e l 18.13.92 S u m e r I i n-Veits

2,245,500 0 2,245,500

LAS.03.C.91 6oran D e t e n t i o n 11.14.91 B a s i a

1,742,595 9,157,405

1 9,519,200 LAS.Ol.D.92 O l k e y B l v d Detention 05.19.92 Baa in

9,519,201 11.01,94

LAS.19.C.91 lrshington A v e . 11.14.91 System - Slndh i 1 I O u t f I I I

1,700,000 07.01.94 993,628 706,372

MES.11.6.89 Torn l a s h 3,108,109 1,029,495 1 1 , 14,91 5,418,3 93 D e t e n t i o n B t s l n 14, 09.92

N O R T H LAS VEGASt

NLV.IS.B.92 Upper LIS V e q a a lrsb 11,09,92 D e t e n t i o n B a s i n

2,554,284 6,395,716

O U T L Y IN6 A R E A S 1

LAU.11.B.92 U n n a m e d l a s h 03.12.92

TOTALS

2,490 4,197,510

-34-

CLARK COUNTY EAST RANGE WASH DETENTION BASIN R A l H l D E CHANLIYcLEOD T O YTW VISTA RAUHIDE CHANL/McLEOD 10 Y T N VISTA V A N BUSKIRK SYSTEM IMPiOVYENTS V A N BUSKIRK S Y S T E M

VAN BUSKIRK SYSTEM

CLARK COUNTY OUTLYING A R E A S UNNAMED UASH - LAU6HL IN

CITY OF LAS VE6AS BUFFALO CHANNEL (SUMMERL I N PKUY)

G O W A N DETENT I ON BAS I IS

OAKEV BLVD. DETENTION BASIN U A S H INTON AVE/SAlDHlLL OUTFALL

CITY OF HENDERSON C - 1 CHANNEL SYSTEM PITTYAN WASH CHANNEL -PHASE 2

%. ,

PITTYAN lASH CHANNEL -PHASE 3 UPRR CHANNEL

CITY O F BOULDER CITY HEMENUAV UASH

CITY OF MESQUITE TOWN lASH DETENTION BASIN

CITY OF NORTH LA$ VEGA$ UPPER LAS VEGAS lASH DET BASIN

UEST RANGE !ASH DIVERSION DIKE

CLA.06.A.91 CLA.02.F.92 CLA,O2.F,92 CLA.03.D.91 CLA.03.E.92 CLA.13,F.02 CLA.03.6.02

LAU,Ol .B,92

LASOO2,B,01 LAS.02.E.92 LAS.OS,C.91 LAS.13.C.91 LAS,O4.D.92 LAS,IO.C.91

HEN.04,A.91 HEN.Ol.D.91 HEN,Ol , A , 8 7 HEN.03.B.92

BOU.01.1.07

YES.01.B.89

YLV.15.B.92

NLV.03.A.08

4,100,011 4,110,101 0 03/12/92

FILE1 FINRPTS\FUND444\BONDPROJ

-35-

FY 92/93 PROJECT LIST - FUNDING REQUEST SUMMARY THROUGH 11/10/92

!Carey A w b k e M o d Detention Basin Funded

[under constructionl

Oakey Detention Basin and Collection System Design fundd/part of const. on

'[begin basin 81 outfall const./const. part of collection sp.1 Bond List $ l,O99,2OO 650,000 $1,049,200

Oakey Detention Basin Outfall Design fundedlconst. on ~

[begin constructionl Bond List

Gowan outfall Structure (Decatur - Tsnaya Wry) Funded

[under construction1

Gowan Detention Basins Funded

[begin construction] $26.000 ($26,000

Angel Park Detention Basin Expansion $100.000 $100,000

[complete expansion1

Cheyenne Chsnnel $908,000 $67.000 $841 ,OOO [complete channel from Buffalo to basin/upgrade bridges1

Peccole Ranch Outfalls (Rampart Storm Drain) $65,000 $65,000 $0

[design Rampart storm drain1

Washington Avo. Ch. - Reach 1 (LV Wash - Honolulu) Des. fundedffunding acceleratd

[const. from Lao Vegas Wash to Virgil Street1

Washington Avo. Ch. - Reach 2 (Honolulu - Mojave Rd) Design funded

[complete design]

Washington Avo. Ch. - Reach 3 (Mojave Rd - 24th St) Design funded

[complete design]

Washington Avo Ch. Parallel Drain to F St. $ 270,000 $270,000

[ROW acquisition]

Buffalo Channel (Vegas Dr - Charleston) Part of design I const. funded

[const. north of Wstcliffldesign south of Westcliffl $ 188,000 $93,000 $95,000

Gowan North Channel (Detention Basin - Lone Mountain) Prdesign funded

[complete predesignl

Gowen North Ch. (Lone Mountain - CAM10 Dot. Basin) Prdesign funded

[complete prdesignl

CAM-1 0 Detention Basin (West Centennial) $50,000 $50,000

[prederignl

Lone Mountain Detention Basin $ 5 0 . 0 0 0 $50,000

[prdesignl

Meadows Phase V, Aka Driw Storm Drain (Falcon to

Jones) Iconrtruction] $954,800 $954,800 $0 1-15 Freeway Channel (Sahara to Ivanhoe) [NDOT

- oversizing conrtructionl $600,000 $0 $600.000

Gowan North Channel - Suppl. Intarlocal Contract

~~~ __ ~~ ~~

I $10,000 I ($10.000 Lor V s g r FY 92193 Total : I $4,285,000 $1,265,800 I $3,019,200

-36-

FY 92/93 PROJECT LIST - FUNDING REQUEST SUMMARY THROUGH 11110192 fik:m:bx&fv92-s3.xl

Program

I I Funding Amount

UPRR Channel Funded


Lower C-1 Channel (Lake Meed Dr. - Drake St.) Design fundedlconst. on Bond

[complete designlconstruction to beginl List

Sunset Dot. Basin, Collection Sye. 81 Outfall (incl. ROW) $1,385,000 $1,385,000 $0 [predesign 6. ROW acquisition of basin1

Mission Hills Dot. Basin & Collection System (incl. ROW) Design part funded/part of

[complete design/construction to begin] const. on Bond List

Pittman Wash (Sunset - UPRRJ 81 Pitbnan Park Dot. Basin Design funded/channel const.

[channel under construction/completa basin predesign] funded

Pittman Wash (Duck Creek - Stephanie St) Design funded

Confluence Detention Bruin (incl. ROW) Design fundedlconstruction

[complete designbegin construction] on Bond List

Upper La6 Vegas Wash Interception BermlChannel Funded


Upper Las Vegas Wash Detention Besin Funded

lunder conrtructionl '

North La6 Vega6 Detention Basin (outlet modifications) $30.000 ' $30,000

[construct modificationsl

West Range Wash Diversion Dike Design fundedlpart of const.

lbegin constructionl on Bond List $1,200,000 0 1,200,000

Sloan Channel (Le6 Vepes Wash - Confluence Dot. Basin) $800,000 $400,000 $400,000

[design]

Kyle Canyon Detention Basin (incl. ROW) Design funded

[complete design/ROW scquisition] 8 100,000 $ 100.oO0

La6 Vegas Wash (Craig to Civic) Jcomplete construction] $60,000 $60,000 $0

A Channel (LV Blvd - Camino AI Norte) (Developer

participation for Camino AI None crossing) $300.000 $300,000 $0

~~ ~~ ~~~~~

North La6 Vogac FY 92/93 Total : I $2,490,000 $760.000 8 1,730,000

-37-

FY 92/93 PROJECT LIST - FUNDING REQUEST SUMMARY THROUGH 11/10/92 fik:m:\.xd\fvO2-8P

I I Program

Funding Amount

-

!Lower Duck Creek Detention Basin

(incl. ROW) 6300.000 $300,000 $0 ,Van Buskirk Outfall (Flamingo Wash - flamingo Rd) Funded


Van Buskirk Channel Upgrades Detention Basin C

[complete designhegin constructionl

Design fundedlconst. on

Design fundedlmodified to include June1992 List carryover Duck Creek (Mountain Vista to UPRR)

52,700,000 52,700,000 [complete designlconst. Winnick improvements1

Modified to include June 1992 List carryover Flamingo Wash (Tropicma Wash to Decatur Blvd)

remaining const. on Bond List [complete design/constructionl

Design 81 part const. funded/ Rawhide Channel (remaining system)

[complete ROW acquisition1

Funded Van Buskirk Detention Basin (ROW acq.)

[predesign/ROW acquisition1

8200,000 $200,000 Tropicma Detention Basin ( i d . ROW)

s800,000 ~200.000 Bond List $1,000.000 [complete designhegin constructionl

Design fundedlconst. on Van Buskirk - Twain, McLeod, Viking, & Tompkins Systems

Bond List

-

Logan Wash Diversion

$800,000 $800,000 lconstuct diversion1

Design funded

Design funded West Levee - Muddy River

[complete design1

Design funded Bunkerville

8 194,700 $ 151,300 $346,000 [begin constructionl

Design funded Searchlight - Eastern portion improvements

8303.000 $303,000 [begin construction]

Design funded Goodsprings - Phase 1 Improvements

I Hemenway Valley Wash Improvements IFunded I I

-38-

FUNDING REQUESTS AND PRIORITIES REPORT (FY 92/93) 12-Now92

file:GWFm:\excenfunpri93.xls

Requests Comments/ Bond FY 92/93 Entity Amount Project Description ,Received

Funding Priority Numbers

#

9-JuI-92 93-2 HEND $1,385,000 Sunset Detention Basin 9-Jun 3 9-JuI-92 93-1 B CC $594,485 Rawhide Channel - 1st Suppl. 9-Jun 2 9-Jul-92 93- 1 CLV $50,000 Oakey Detention System - 2nd Suppl. 9-Jun 1

Approval Date List List Date

I i I I I I I I I -39-

BOND PROJECT LIST - FUNDING REQUEST SUMMARY THROUGH 11/10/92

HENDERSON Pittman Wash Channel (Phase I l l

$6,000,000 $6,000,000 Black Mtn Dam/C-1 Channel System ($300,000) $2,600,000 $2,300,000 UPRR Channel

$3,162,200 $3,162,200 Pittman Wash Channel (Phase I l l ) 5950,000 $2,520,000 $3,470,000

~ .... . . . . , . . . . . , . , . . . . ,. . . . . . . . . . . .,. .. . . .... . . . . . .... :.. , . .. . ... .... ..:. . . . .::. ....,. , .:; ...,.,. :.:.. .:.. ..., >,..;. ,; .:. ;,;.:;.,.:.. . ... .:..... .:.I.: , , ...... ,, , '.'..'..,. :..: ... ...,.. :..:.:..... . . , TOTAL - HENDERSON $9,812,200 $5,120,000 $14,932,200

Town Wash Detention Basin I $5,448,304 I $4,137,504 I $1,310,800 TOTAL - MESQUITE1 S5.448.304 I $4.137.504 I $1.310.800

BOULDER CITY (no projects)

($1,327,000) $1,327,000 Hemenway Wash - 4th Suppl. $0 $0

Bond Fundl $80,000,000 1

-40-

I r T - r - - -T -T-r--


AGENDA ITEM

SUBJECT:

FINAL ACCOUNTING REPORT AND PROJECT CLOSEOUT (HEN.Ol.C.91) -


STAFF: Accept the final accounting report.

TECHNICAL COMMITIZE: Accept the report.

CITIZENS COMMIlTEE: Accept the report.

RFCD AGENDA

Date: 12/10/92


I 1 FINAL ACCOUNTING REPORT AND PROJECT CLOSEOUT

PETITIONER:

VIRGINIA HAX-VALENTINE, P.E.. GENERAL MANAGEWCHIEF ENGINEER


THAT THE BOARD ACCEPT THE FINAL ACCOUNTING REPORT AND CLOSE OUT THE INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT

FISCAL IMPACT:

$255,889.90 to be transferred back into Fund 286 for future project use

BACKGROUND:

Final accounting reports have been prepared for District funded projects which have either been completed or expired. The attached report represents an accurate accounting of the charges and the remaining balance. Upon approval, no additional funds can be expended for these projects.

The final accounting report has been prepared and approved by the corresponding entity for the following projects:

PROJECT -Im.mL BALANCE

Pittman Wash Channel Construction Phase I (HENOlC90) City of Henderson fLzwEEa

TOTAL $255,889.90

Respectfully submitted,

TAC AGENDA RFCD AGENDA

Date: 11/19/92 Date: 12/10/92 ITEMU 9

FINAL ACCOUNTING REPORT

AS OF 13-Oct-92

INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT: PITTMAN WASH CHANNEL CONSTRUCTION PHASE I

PROJECT NUMBER:

ILA VALUE:

PURCHASE ORDERS :

CITY OF HENDERSON SUPERIOR GUNITE BLACK 61 VEATCH

ILA VALUE:

ENCUMBERED BY P.O.:

UNENCUEIBERED :

HEN01C90

s3,000,000.00

$3,000,000.00 ENCUMBERED BY P.O.: $3,000,000.00

$3,sSSD000.00 EXPENDED: $2,744,110.18

AMOUNTS TO BE RETURNED TO THE REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT

CONCUR :

PUfiIC WORKS DIRECTOR DATE

board of directors clark county regional flood...

Documents