bmj open · smoking (which was rare) had no apparent hypertension effect. among males, regular...

132
For peer review only Health-risk factors and the incidence of hypertension: 4- year prospective findings from a national cohort of 60,569 Thai open university students Journal: BMJ Open Manuscript ID: bmjopen-2013-002826 Article Type: Research Date Submitted by the Author: 06-Mar-2013 Complete List of Authors: thawornchaisit, prasutr; Faculty of Health Sciences, School of Medicine; Lerdsin Hospital, Medicine de Looze, Ferdinandus; Faculty of Health Sciences, School of Medicine Reid, Christopher; Monash University, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine Seubsman, Sam-ang; Sukhothai Thammathirat Open University, School of Human Ecology Sleigh, Adrian; The Australian National University, National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health <b>Primary Subject Heading</b>: Epidemiology Secondary Subject Heading: Epidemiology, Public health Keywords: Hypertension < CARDIOLOGY, General diabetes < DIABETES & ENDOCRINOLOGY, Risk management < HEALTH SERVICES ADMINISTRATION & MANAGEMENT, Adult nephrology < NEPHROLOGY For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml BMJ Open on February 4, 2020 by guest. Protected by copyright. http://bmjopen.bmj.com/ BMJ Open: first published as 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002826 on 25 June 2013. Downloaded from

Upload: others

Post on 19-Jan-2020

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: BMJ Open · smoking (which was rare) had no apparent hypertension effect. Among males, regular drinking increased the risk of incident hypertension Strengths In Thailand, this cohort

For peer review only

Health-risk factors and the incidence of hypertension: 4-year prospective findings from a national cohort of 60,569

Thai open university students

Journal: BMJ Open

Manuscript ID: bmjopen-2013-002826

Article Type: Research

Date Submitted by the Author: 06-Mar-2013

Complete List of Authors: thawornchaisit, prasutr; Faculty of Health Sciences, School of Medicine; Lerdsin Hospital, Medicine de Looze, Ferdinandus; Faculty of Health Sciences, School of Medicine

Reid, Christopher; Monash University, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine Seubsman, Sam-ang; Sukhothai Thammathirat Open University, School of Human Ecology Sleigh, Adrian; The Australian National University, National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health

<b>Primary Subject Heading</b>:

Epidemiology

Secondary Subject Heading: Epidemiology, Public health

Keywords: Hypertension < CARDIOLOGY, General diabetes < DIABETES & ENDOCRINOLOGY, Risk management < HEALTH SERVICES ADMINISTRATION & MANAGEMENT, Adult nephrology < NEPHROLOGY

For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml

BMJ Open on F

ebruary 4, 2020 by guest. Protected by copyright.

http://bmjopen.bm

j.com/

BM

J Open: first published as 10.1136/bm

jopen-2013-002826 on 25 June 2013. Dow

nloaded from

Page 2: BMJ Open · smoking (which was rare) had no apparent hypertension effect. Among males, regular drinking increased the risk of incident hypertension Strengths In Thailand, this cohort

For peer review only

1

Health-risk factors and the incidence of hypertension: 4-year prospective findings

from a national cohort of 60,569 Thai open university students

Prasutr Thawornchaisit, School of Medicine, Faculty of Health Science, University of Queensland, 288

Herston Road, Herston, Brisbane, QLD, 4006 Australia and Department of Medicine, Lerdsin Hospital,

Silom road, Bangrak, Bangkok, 10500 Thailand

Email: [email protected]

Telephone: 662-585-8015

Fax: 662-912-0121

Prasutr Thawornchaisit, MD, MPH1, Ferdinandus de Looze, MBBS, MSc1, Christopher M Reid, PhD2, Sam-

ang Seubsman, PhD3, Adrian Sleigh, MD4, Thai Cohort Study Team*

1 School of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia, 2 School of Public Health and

Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia, 3 School of Human Ecology, Sukhothai

Thammathirat Open University, Nonthaburi, Thailand, 4 National Centre for Epidemiology and Population

Health, ANU College of Medicine, Biology and Environment, The Australian National University,

Canberra, Australia.

Health-risk factors and the incidence of hypertension: 4-year prospective findings from a national cohort of 60,569

Thai open university students

Key words: hypertension; socioeconomic status; body mass index; smoking, drinking

Page 1 of 24

For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml

BMJ Open

123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960

on February 4, 2020 by guest. P

rotected by copyright.http://bm

jopen.bmj.com

/B

MJ O

pen: first published as 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002826 on 25 June 2013. D

ownloaded from

Page 3: BMJ Open · smoking (which was rare) had no apparent hypertension effect. Among males, regular drinking increased the risk of incident hypertension Strengths In Thailand, this cohort

For peer review only

2

Article summary

Article focus

To evaluate the role of health-risk factors in 2005 Thai Cohort Study (phase I) such as age, personal income,

educational attainment, obesity (body mass index), physical activity, diabetes mellitus, kidney diseases, high

lipids, cigarette smoking and alcohol consumption in the development of hypertension in phase II of the

Thai Cohort Study 2009.

Key Messages

Overall, the incidence of self-reported hypertension in Thai adults was 3.5% and the rate in males was more

than twice the corresponding rate in females (5.2% vs. 2.1%).

Marriage or having a partner increased the risk of hypertension in females but not in males. Planned

exercise, averaged across the 4-year follow-up, was protective for males. In males, higher LPPA (≥15

sessions / week) associated with lower incidence of hypertension however this was not observed in females.

In males, current-smokers had a higher risk of developing hypertension than non-smokers while in females,

smoking (which was rare) had no apparent hypertension effect. Among males, regular drinking increased the

risk of incident hypertension

Strengths

In Thailand, this cohort constitutes the largest study to examine the longitudinal effect of most health-risk

factors on hypertension development. The influence of risk factors on hypertension incidence is clearly

demonstrated since this is a large longitudinal cohort covering a 4-year period. As a consequence, the

independent risk factors for hypertension in Thais can be identified.

Our cohort represents Thais well in geography and socio-economy so the results reflect the trend of health-

risk transition in the Thai population.

Limitations

Page 2 of 24

For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml

BMJ Open

123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960

on February 4, 2020 by guest. P

rotected by copyright.http://bm

jopen.bmj.com

/B

MJ O

pen: first published as 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002826 on 25 June 2013. D

ownloaded from

Page 4: BMJ Open · smoking (which was rare) had no apparent hypertension effect. Among males, regular drinking increased the risk of incident hypertension Strengths In Thailand, this cohort

For peer review only

3

However, our study has limitations since it relied on self-report. There may be recall and reporting errors.

Because of the better education attainment of STOU students combined with their representative income and

geographical location, they represent the next generation of Thais.

Abstract

Objective

As Thailand is transitioning from a developing to a middle-income developed country, chronic diseases

particularly cardiovascular disease have emerged as major health issues. Hypertension is a major risk factor

for heart attack and stroke and earlier cross-sectional studies have indicated that the prevalence is increasing.

This study evaluates the impact of a number of demographic and lifestyle related health risk factors on the

incidence of hypertension over a 4-year period.

Designs

This 4-year prospective study analysed the health-risk factors and their effects on incidence of hypertension

in the national Thai Cohort Study (TCS) from 2005 to 2009. 56,072 Sukhothai Thammathirat Open

University students who participated in both 2005 and 2009 questionnaire surveys and who were

normotensive in 2005 were included in the analysis. Adjusted relative risks of association between each risk

factor and incidence of hypertension were calculated by sex, after controlling for the confounding factors

such as age, SES, BMI and underlying diseases.

Results

The overall 4-year incidence of hypertension was 3.5% with the rate in men being remarkably higher than

that in women (5.2% vs. 2.1%). Hypertension associated with age, a higher BMI and having co-morbidities

in both sexes. In men, hypertension associated with physical inactivity, smoking, alcohol and fast food

intake. In women, hypertension was only related to having a partner.

Conclusion

In both men and women, hypertension was highly associated with age, obesity and co-morbidities while it

had no association with socio-economic factors. The cohort pattern of socio-economy and hypertension

reflects that the health-risk transition in Thais is likely to be at the middle stage. Dietary and lifestyle factors

are associated with the incidence of hypertension in Thais and may be amenable targets for community

based hypertension control programs.

Page 3 of 24

For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml

BMJ Open

123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960

on February 4, 2020 by guest. P

rotected by copyright.http://bm

jopen.bmj.com

/B

MJ O

pen: first published as 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002826 on 25 June 2013. D

ownloaded from

Page 5: BMJ Open · smoking (which was rare) had no apparent hypertension effect. Among males, regular drinking increased the risk of incident hypertension Strengths In Thailand, this cohort

For peer review only

4

Introduction

Hypertension is a global public health challenge due to its high prevalence and the concomitant increase in

risk of stroke and cardiovascular diseases [1]. In 2007, according to the World Health Organization,

cardiovascular diseases caused 33.7% of all deaths in the world, while other chronic diseases were

responsible for 26.5% [2]. Globally, it has been estimated that premature deaths resulting from hypertension

annually are approximately 7.1 million, which account for 64 million disability-adjusted life years (DALYs)

[3]. Hypertension ranks third, after underweight and unsafe sex, of the six major risk factors contributing to

the global disease burden[3].

In Thailand, hypertension is the third major risk factor of the national disease burden and causes 600,000

DALY losses per year [4]. The prevalence of hypertension has been estimated from a number of cross-

sectional studies among adults and has been increasing over the past decades from 20% in 1985 to 22% in

2004 [4-6]. The emergence of hypertension has been the result of rapid socioeconomic development which

has resulted in one third of Thais migrating to urban areas [7]. Urbanization has been associated with

increased obesity as people become less physically active and adopt sedentary life styles such as spending

more time watching television, sitting and using computers [7 8]. These factors, in association with

Thailand’s ageing population [9], underpin the importance of controlling hypertension in Thai community.

As there is limited longitudinal research on health risk factors and hypertension incidence in Thailand [5].

The purpose of this study is to address that knowledge gap. We prospectively examined the influence of a

cluster of health-risk factors on the incidence of hypertension during 4 years of follow-up in the Thai Cohort

Study (TCS). This large national cohort of Thai adults has been followed since 2005 for risk factor trends

and associated disease outcomes, including hypertension.

Methods

Study population

The first TCS evaluation was conducted in 2005 by sending twenty-page health-risk questionnaires to the

200,000 distance-learning students enrolled at Sukhothai Thammathirat Open University (STOU) and

87,134 (44%) completed them and signed the consent forms. The cohort has been shown to be socio-

economically and geographically well representative of the Thai population [10]. However, they resided

Page 4 of 24

For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml

BMJ Open

123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960

on February 4, 2020 by guest. P

rotected by copyright.http://bm

jopen.bmj.com

/B

MJ O

pen: first published as 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002826 on 25 June 2013. D

ownloaded from

Page 6: BMJ Open · smoking (which was rare) had no apparent hypertension effect. Among males, regular drinking increased the risk of incident hypertension Strengths In Thailand, this cohort

For peer review only

5

more in urban areas (51.8% vs. 31.1%) and on average were younger and better educated than most Thai

adults. Details of the baseline TCS methodology have been published [10]. This questionnaire focused on

socio-demography, habitation, work, health services, injury, sedentary habits, physical activity, transport,

underlying diseases, family history, personal behaviours, BMI, and consumption of foods, vegetables and

fruit. A 4-year follow-up was carried out in 2009. Overall, 71% of the cohort responded generating

longitudinal data on 60,569 participants.

Incident Hypertension

Incident hypertension was defined as being normotensive in 2005 and self-reported hypertensive in 2009.

Hypertension incidence was the dependent variable for analyses and the person-time denominator included

all individuals at risk - those 57,558 participants with longitudinal data who were negative for hypertension

in 2005, the beginning of the 4-year study period.

Risk Factors

Participants were grouped into three age categories: younger (≤30 years), middle (31-40 years) and older

(>40 years). Urbanization status was based on rural (R) or urban (U) residence, first when aged 10-12 years

old and again in 2005, producing four groups: lifelong ruralites (RR), urbanizers (RU), de-urbanizers (UR)

and urbanites (UU). Personal monthly income was divided into four categories: ≤7000 baht, 7001–10000

baht, 10001–20000 baht and >20000 baht. In 2005, one US dollar was equivalent to 42 baht so most of

participants had quite low incomes. Household assets were classified into three categories: low (≤30,000

baht), medium (30,001-60,000) and high (>60,000).

Sedentariness was assessed by screen time (hours/day spent before TV or computer) and (separately) sitting

time (hours per day spent sitting for any purpose). Incidental exercise was measured by the frequency of

housework or gardening, categorised as follows: ≤3 times per month; 1-2 times per week; 3-4 times per

week; most days. We measured planned physical activity at the beginning and end of the 4-year follow up

period. On both occasions, cohort members reported the number of sessions per week of strenuous and

moderate exercise for at least 20 minutes, and of walking for at least 10 minutes. We derived an “overall

measure” of planned physical activity calculated separately at both the baseline and the 4-year mark. The

measure was weighted as follows: (2 × strenuous + 1 × moderate + 1 × walking) sessions per week. This

weighting system is based on the recommendation of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire and

the Active Australia Survey as used in other analyses of the cohort data [11 12]. Finally, for each individual,

the “overall measures” of weekly exercise for 2005 and 2009 were added and then averaged by dividing by

2, creating a longitudinal measure of planned physical activity (LPPA).

Page 5 of 24

For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml

BMJ Open

123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960

on February 4, 2020 by guest. P

rotected by copyright.http://bm

jopen.bmj.com

/B

MJ O

pen: first published as 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002826 on 25 June 2013. D

ownloaded from

Page 7: BMJ Open · smoking (which was rare) had no apparent hypertension effect. Among males, regular drinking increased the risk of incident hypertension Strengths In Thailand, this cohort

For peer review only

6

Smoking status was classified as never, ex-smoker or current-smoker. Alcohol exposure was classified by

four categories: never, ex-drinker, occasional drinker or current-drinker. Body mass index (BMI) was

calculated from self-reported height in metres and weight in kilograms as weight/ height2. It was divided

into 4 categories as follows according to Asian criteria:[8 13-16] underweight (BMI <18.5), normal (18.5 to

<23), overweight (23 to <25), and obese (≥25). Foods that could potentially influence blood pressure (deep

fried, instant, roast or smoked, soybean products and soft drinks) were assessed for consumption frequency

based on a five-point Likert scale ranging from less than once a month to once or more a day. Western-style

fast food exposure was noted on a three-point scale from less than once to more than 3 times per month.

Fruit and vegetable consumption were recorded as standard serves eaten per day.

Statistical analyses

All analyses were performed using SPSS software. The incidence of hypertension and its 95% confidence

interval (CI) were calculated for each value of each categorical variable in both male and female participants

and the influence on incidence by each variable was evaluated by Chi-square test. For statistical inference,

all p-values were 2 tailed and significance was set at 5%.

Relative risks in a large study of an uncommon disease (incidence less than 10%) can be accurately

estimated as odds ratios [17]. Accordingly, for each risk variable, the relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence

interval were estimated using logistic regression to calculate the bivariate odds ratio for hypertension.

Adjusted RRs (ARRs) were estimated by calculating multivariate logistic regression odds ratios. The ARRs

were controlled for confounding by age, marital status, SES, BMI, underlying diseases and personal

behaviours (cigarette smoking and alcohol drinking). A variable was included in a multivariate model if

bivariate analysis had indicated a statistically significant association with incidence of hypertension. Some

variables were included because earlier analyses reported elsewhere had shown significant or substantial

association with hypertension.

Results

Baseline Characteristics

Baseline characteristics of study participants self-reporting as normotensive in 2005 are shown in Table 1.

The highest proportion of males resided in the North-eastern regions and Central while there were more

females in the Central and Bangkok area. More than half of the male and female participants lived in urban

areas. Males had a higher monthly income than females whereas females had a higher educational

attainment than males. The distribution of household assets for males and females was similar and over half

Page 6 of 24

For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml

BMJ Open

123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960

on February 4, 2020 by guest. P

rotected by copyright.http://bm

jopen.bmj.com

/B

MJ O

pen: first published as 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002826 on 25 June 2013. D

ownloaded from

Page 8: BMJ Open · smoking (which was rare) had no apparent hypertension effect. Among males, regular drinking increased the risk of incident hypertension Strengths In Thailand, this cohort

For peer review only

7

of them were in medium and high categories. The study population had a similar socio-demography, income

and location of residence to the general Thai population [9].

Incidence and risks of hypertension

Overall, the incidence of self-reported hypertension in Thai adults was 3.5% and the rate in males was more

than twice the corresponding rate in females (5.2% vs. 2.1%) (Table 2). In males and females, the incidence

of hypertension increased with increasing age. Marriage or having a partner increased the risk of

hypertension in females only. Educational attainment and personal income had no influence on the risk of

hypertension in both sexes. In males and females, the risk of hypertension increased with an increased BMI.

The risk of hypertension increased in both males and females who had diabetes mellitus, high blood lipids

and kidney disease.

Planned exercise, averaged across the 4-year follow-up, was protective for males. In males, higher LPPA

(≥15 sessions / week) associated with lower incidence of hypertension however this was not observed in

females.

In males, current-smokers had a higher risk of developing hypertension than non-smokers while in females,

smoking (which was rare) had no apparent hypertension effect. Among males, regular drinking increased the

risk of incident hypertension; patterns of relative risks were similar for females but, reflecting the low

frequency of female drinking, did not reach statistical significance. In males, the risk of hypertension had a

direct association with the frequency of instant food consumption but there was no such association detected

in females.

Over the 4-year period, a variety of factors that could have been risks for hypertension were shown not to be

in this setting (data not shown). Thus, in males and females, factors that had no statistically significant

influence on the longitudinal risk of hypertension incidence were urbanization status, non-participation in

housework or gardening, high levels of television and computer watching, sleeping and sitting time, and

food consumption habits that included deep fried food and soft drink, Western fast food, roasted or smoked

foods, fruit, vegetables and soybean products.

Discussion

Page 7 of 24

For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml

BMJ Open

123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960

on February 4, 2020 by guest. P

rotected by copyright.http://bm

jopen.bmj.com

/B

MJ O

pen: first published as 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002826 on 25 June 2013. D

ownloaded from

Page 9: BMJ Open · smoking (which was rare) had no apparent hypertension effect. Among males, regular drinking increased the risk of incident hypertension Strengths In Thailand, this cohort

For peer review only

8

This large prospective cohort of adults living all over Thailand has been the first studied nationally for a

wide array of risk factors for incident hypertension. Overall, the 4-year incidence of hypertension from 2005

to 2009 was 3.5%, notably higher in men (5.2%) than women (2.1%). In both sexes, age, obesity and co-

morbidity with diabetes mellitus, high blood lipids and kidney disease strongly linked to hypertension

incidence; in males, instant food consumption, smoking and drinking alcohol had a moderate adverse effect

while planned exercise averaging 15 or more sessions per week over the 4-year period was substantially

protective, reducing risk by 22%. In females, having a partner linked to an increased incidence of

hypertension.

The age effect on hypertension incidence noted by us is consistent with findings of many other population

studies of hypertension including (for example) a longitudinal study in China [18] and cross-sectional

studies in Korea [19], Taiwan [20] and the USA [21]. The noticeably greater incidence of hypertension in

men than in women that we found in Thailand has also been reported from many parts of the world

including neighboring Malaysia [22] and distant USA [23] as well as in a recent global review [24].

In men and women of the Thai cohort, a progressively higher BMI was positively and significantly

associated with an increased risk of incident hypertension over the four years. This finding was similar to

that reported for other prospective cohorts in the US [25 26] and Finland [27]. Furthermore, after seven

years of follow-up in a US study [28], weight loss associated with a decreased risk of incident hypertension.

Among a cohort of US nurses, the risk of incident hypertension increased 5% for each kilogram addition of

weight [29], and rose 15% for each increase of one kilogram per meter squared of BMI in Taiwan [18].

These results suggest that the adverse effect of high BMI on risk of hypertension does not depend on

ethinicity or sex and is wide spread.

In our cohort, we noted a higher risk of incident hypertension among those with diabetes mellitus. This

finding is consistent with longitudinal studies in the USA [30 31] which reported, respectively, that in

diabetic patients the risk of incident hypertension rose 41% and 56%. As well, prospective cohort studies in

Japan showed that diabetes [32] and impaired fasting blood glucose [33] were associated with an increased

risk of hypertension incidence. Supportive cross-sectional results emerge from studies in diverse settings

including Bangladesh and India [34], Barbados [35] and the USA [36]. A causal association between

diabetes and hypertension is suspected and possible mechanisms include endothelial dysfunction and

vascular inflammation [37].

Page 8 of 24

For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml

BMJ Open

123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960

on February 4, 2020 by guest. P

rotected by copyright.http://bm

jopen.bmj.com

/B

MJ O

pen: first published as 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002826 on 25 June 2013. D

ownloaded from

Page 10: BMJ Open · smoking (which was rare) had no apparent hypertension effect. Among males, regular drinking increased the risk of incident hypertension Strengths In Thailand, this cohort

For peer review only

9

We also found that high blood lipids significantly associated with increased risk of incident hypertension.

This supports the results from previous longitudinal studies in men [38 39], women [40 41] and adults [32

42]. The risk of hypertension increased with an increase of total cholesterol, triglyceride and low-density

lipoprotein cholesterol levels and decreased with an increase of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol level

[38 39 41].The mechanism by which dyslipidemia provokes high blood pressure is uncertain but could

reflect blood vessel dysfunction and damaged endothelium [43].

Among men and women in the Thai cohort, kidney disease strongly associated with increased risk of

hypertension incidence. This result is supported by cross-sectional data from the Czech Republic [44] and

the USA [45]. Microalbuminuria is a biomarker for renal hypertension [45] and the risk increases with the

severity of kidney impairment, revealed by the serum creatinine level [46 47]. Glomerular damage is more

closely connected with hypertension than tubular or interstitial disease [47]. Chronic kidney disease

facilitates high blood pressure through many mechanisms including excessive intravascular volume,

increased endothelin production, activity of the renin-angiotensin system and sympathetic nervous system

and decreased vasodilators, nitric oxide production and endothelial function [48].

In men we found that cigarette smoking modestly associated with increased risk of developing hypertension.

This is consistent with many other reports such as longitudinal studies in Japanese [49] and American men

[50] and a cross-sectional study in French men [51]. In addition, smoking Jordanian men had significantly

higher blood pressure than their non-smoking counterparts [52]. However, we also found that smoking had

no influence on hypertension in women. This result for females is compatible with reports from Korea [53]

and the USA [54]. In contrast, one prospective US study [55] reported an increased risk of hypertension

among women. It is likely that men tend to smoke more cigarette than women and the impact of smoking on

hypertension is a dose-response pattern [49].

Regular alcohol consumption was strongly associated with an increased risk of incident hypertension. This

result is supported by findings from longitudinal studies in Japan [56 57] and cross-section studies in

China[58] and Korea [53]. In Japanese men, alcohol consumption, particularly more than 200 grams per

week, significantly associated with an increase of blood pressure [59] while alcohol restriction was

noticeably related to a decreased blood pressure [60]. Among our Thai cohort females, alcohol consumption

had no influence on hypertension; this result was supported by longitudinal data from Japan [56] and cross-

sectional data from Korea [53]. In American females the quantity of alcohol consumption per week had no

effect on systolic blood pressure [61]. Males usually consume more alcohol than females and the

Page 9 of 24

For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml

BMJ Open

123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960

on February 4, 2020 by guest. P

rotected by copyright.http://bm

jopen.bmj.com

/B

MJ O

pen: first published as 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002826 on 25 June 2013. D

ownloaded from

Page 11: BMJ Open · smoking (which was rare) had no apparent hypertension effect. Among males, regular drinking increased the risk of incident hypertension Strengths In Thailand, this cohort

For peer review only

10

hypertension risk is linear with a dose-response [57 62]. Our results suggest that regular alcohol

consumption, especially in males, is a significant risk factor for developing hypertension.

Marital status in males had no influence on hypertension which supports the results from more economically

developed countries, the USA and Korea [53 54]. However, in middle-income countries, results diverged:

married males, when compared to their unmarried counterparts, had a higher risk of hypertension in

Barbados [35] and a lower risk in Poland [63]. Married individuals had higher emotional and social support

and lower stress [63] and probability of being a current smoker [64]. We found incident hypertension was

relatively more frequent among married females, unlike the no-sex-link pattern in developed countries such

as the USA and Korea [53 54]. The influence of marrital status on hypertension varies from one country to

another country partly due to the difference of socio-economy and social structure. For our Thai cohort, the

pattern in males was similar to that in developed countries and in females it was not.

Participant educational attainment did not protect against hypertension in either sex. This is similar to cross-

sectional results for adults in developed countries such as Korea [53] and the USA [36 65]. However, other

studies in various settings and with diverse designs reported educational attainment protects against

hypertension in adults; these included a prospective cohort in middle income Thailand [5], a cross-sectional

study in middle income Malaysia [22] and a cross-sectional study in high income USA [66]. Opposite

findings have been reported in low income settings in both Bangladesh and India [34] where education was

a risk factor for hypertension. Taken collectively, these data suggest that income modifies the protective

education-hypertension effect, inverting it when income is low and boosting it when income is high. Our

middle-income cohort could be in the middle stage of this education effect as it is transiting from the low-

income pattern.

We found no association of personal monthly income and risk of hypertension in either sex. This was similar

to previous studies in middle-income countries including a longitudinal study in Thailand [5] and a cross-

sectional study in Malaysia [67] and in cross-sectional studies in high-income countries such as in Korea

[53] and the USA [21 36]. However, income had an inverse association with risk of hypertension in another

study in high-income developed countries such as the USA [65] while it had a direct association in a low-

income developing country such as Ghana [68]. The health transition in Thailand is likely to be in the

middle stage, according to the concept of a tipping-point for the relationship between socio-economic status,

body size and hypertension risk factors. High income, large body size and high blood pressure is seen in

developing countries while in developed countries, high income is a protective factor [69-71]. Indeed, the

Page 10 of 24

For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml

BMJ Open

123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960

on February 4, 2020 by guest. P

rotected by copyright.http://bm

jopen.bmj.com

/B

MJ O

pen: first published as 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002826 on 25 June 2013. D

ownloaded from

Page 12: BMJ Open · smoking (which was rare) had no apparent hypertension effect. Among males, regular drinking increased the risk of incident hypertension Strengths In Thailand, this cohort

For peer review only

11

Thai cohort has already been shown to be at a transitional point for metabolic states because females had an

inverse relationship between income and BMI whereas males had a positive (traditional) relationship [14].

However, now all Thais benefit from universal health insurance so access to health care is not dependent on

their income making disease associations more attenuated than before [72].

In our cohort, the reduction of risk of hypertension incidence in males but not in females by a longitudinal

measure of planned physical activity was comparable with a prospective study in the middle-aged American

whites [73]. In another prospective study in middle-aged Finns, the hypertension protective effect of

vigorous physical activity or total energy expenditure from leisure-time physical activity was observed in

men but not in women [74]. Such physical activity among females may be less intense than among males so

having no effect on the risk of hypertension [74]. A large Finnish study [27] demonstrated that the incidence

of hypertension was inversely associated with the level of physical activity in a dose-response manner in

both sexes. In our cohort study, risk of obesity had an inverse association with quantified planned exercise in

both sexes but the effect was significantly stronger in males than in females [12]. As Thailand progresses

economically, more people migrate to urban areas and decrease their physical activity [7]. Therefore, in the

future, Thai people may encounter a higher risk of hypertension due to a lower physical activity.

Instant food - mostly combinations of carbohydrate, fat and salt - associated with an increased risk of

incident hypertension in males but not in females. Other foods, fruit and vegetables had no impact on

hypertension. This may be as a result of men comsuming more instant foods, such as instant noodles, than

women. For example a study in Korea showed daily instant food consumption in men and women averages

23.7 and 11.1 grams respectively [75]. Other studies showed that carbohydrate [76 77], fruit and vegetables

[78 79] consumption had no influence on hypertension. Most students consume instant noodles which lead

to a higher intake of energy, fat, sodium, thiamine, and riboflavin but a lower intake of protein, calcium,

phosphorus [75]. Koreans who favor instant noodles have a salt intake more than three times higher than the

daily recommendation (6.4 vs 2 gms) [75]. Daily salt consumption of Thai people has been reported to

average 10.8gm which is much higher than the recommendation

(http://www.worldactiononsalt.com/worldaction/asia/75286.pdf). High salt consumption was associated with

an increased risk of developing hypertension in a longitudinal study in Taiwan [80] and in cross-sectional

studies in China [81 82] while other reports revealed that salt restriction reduced blood pressure [83 84].

High plasma sodium, due to an overwhelmed capacity of the kidney to excrete excessive salt consumption,

leads to excessive intravascular volume and high blood pressure [85]. It seems reasonable to conclude that

high salt intake from instant noodle consumption is likely to be causally associated with an increased risk of

hypertension in Thailand.

Page 11 of 24

For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml

BMJ Open

123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960

on February 4, 2020 by guest. P

rotected by copyright.http://bm

jopen.bmj.com

/B

MJ O

pen: first published as 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002826 on 25 June 2013. D

ownloaded from

Page 13: BMJ Open · smoking (which was rare) had no apparent hypertension effect. Among males, regular drinking increased the risk of incident hypertension Strengths In Thailand, this cohort

For peer review only

12

In Thailand, this cohort constitutes the largest study to examine the longitudinal effect of most health-risk

factors on hypertension development. Indeed, the study size along with its national representation are

important factors to consider when exploring study validity. The influence of risk factors on hypertension

incidence is clearly demonstrated since this is a large longitudinal cohort covering a 4-year period. As a

consequence, the independent risk factors for hypertension in Thais can be identified. Our cohort represents

Thais well in geography and socio-economy [9] so the results reflect the trend of health-risk transition in the

Thai population. Because of the better education attainment of STOU students combined with their

representative income and geographical location, they represent the next generation of Thais. It would be

reasonable to conclude that our 4-year follow-up results show the future hypertension trends for Thai people.

However, our study has limitations since it relied on self-report. There may be recall and reporting errors.

But a study of the validity of self-reported weight and height in our cohort found that the accurary was quite

acceptable [86]. As well, we have conducted a validation study of self-reported hypertension (Prasutr

Thawornchaisit, 2013, under review) in a random age-sex matched sub-sample of the cohort reporting

hypertension (n=240) or no hypertension (n=240). We found the sensitivity was high (82%) and that

negative reports were usually accurate (86%). The findings from our study are likely to be robust and

represent well the future trends of health-risk transition in middle-income Thailand and similar ASEAN

countries.

In conclusion, older age, obesity and underlying morbidity due to diabetes, high blood lipids and kidney

disease were strongly associated with an increased risk of incident hypertension in both sexes while in

males, physical inactivity, instant food consumption, smoking and drinking alcohol had a moderate

association. Sedentary life-style and the consumption of friut and vegetables had no detected influence on

hypertension. The Thai health-risk transition is likely to be in the middle stage since education attainment

and income still have no net effect to protect against hypertension. Prevention should focus on obesity, high

blood lipids and high salt consumption and people should be encouraged to increase physical exercise and

consume low fat foods and less instant foods. A reduction of salt consumption should be a national policy by

limiting the concentration of salt in ready-to-eat and industrial foods. Smoking and drinking cessation

should be promoted for males. Thailand should also consciously aim to take advantage of its culturally

determined low rate of drinking and smoking among women and ensure that there is no attempt to

undermine this situation and develop the market for the female half of the population.

Page 12 of 24

For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml

BMJ Open

123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960

on February 4, 2020 by guest. P

rotected by copyright.http://bm

jopen.bmj.com

/B

MJ O

pen: first published as 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002826 on 25 June 2013. D

ownloaded from

Page 14: BMJ Open · smoking (which was rare) had no apparent hypertension effect. Among males, regular drinking increased the risk of incident hypertension Strengths In Thailand, this cohort

For peer review only

13

Thai Cohort Study Team*

Thailand: Jaruwan Chokhanapitak, Suttanit Hounthasarn, Suwanee Khamman, Daoruang Pandee, Suttinan

Pangsap, Tippawan Prapamontol, Janya Puengson, Sam-ang Seubsman, Boonchai Somboonsook, Nintita

Sripaiboonkij, Pathumvadee Somsamai, Prasutr Thawornchaisit, Duangkae Vilainerun, Wanee

Wimonwattanaphan, Cha-aim Pachanee, Arunrat Tangmunkongvorakul, Benjawan Tawatsupa, Wimalin

Rimpeekool.

Australia: Chris Bain, Emily Banks, Cathy Banwell, Bruce Caldwell, Gordon Carmichael, Tarie Dellora,

Jane Dixon, Sharon Friel, David Harley, Matthew Kelly, Tord Kjellstrom, Lynette Lim, Anthony

McMichael, Tanya Mark, Adrian Sleigh, Lyndall Strazdins, Vasoontara Yiengprugsawan, Susan Jordan,

Janneke Berecki-Gisolf, Rod McClure.

Acknowledgements and Funding

This study was supported by the International Collaborative Research Grants Scheme with joint grants from

the Wellcome Trust UK (GR071587MA) and the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council

(268055), and by a global health grant from the NHMRC (585426). We thank the staff at Sukhothai

Thammathirat Open University (STOU) who assisted with student contact and the STOU students who are

participating in the cohort study. We also thank Dr Bandit Thinkamrop and his team from Khon Kaen

University for guiding us successfully through the complex data processing.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

Ethical considerations

Ethical approval was obtained from Sukhothai Thammathirat Open University Research and Development

Institute (protocol 0522/10) and the Australian National University Human Research Ethics Committee

(protocol 2004344 and 2009570). Informed, written consent was obtained from all participants.

Authors' contributions

PT, FD, CR, SS, and AS jointly planned the study. PT performed the data collection and analysis and

drafted the manuscript. SS managed and coordinated the data collection. FD, CR, SS and AS participated in

the study conduction and manuscript preparation. FD, CR, SS and AS commented and corrected the

manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Data Sharing

No additional data available.

Page 13 of 24

For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml

BMJ Open

123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960

on February 4, 2020 by guest. P

rotected by copyright.http://bm

jopen.bmj.com

/B

MJ O

pen: first published as 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002826 on 25 June 2013. D

ownloaded from

Page 15: BMJ Open · smoking (which was rare) had no apparent hypertension effect. Among males, regular drinking increased the risk of incident hypertension Strengths In Thailand, this cohort

For peer review only

14

Table 1 Characteristics of 57558 participants normotensive at the 2005 Thai Cohort Study baseline

Male Female Difference Factor n % n % P-valuea

Demographic data

Participants 25320 44.0 32238 56.0 <0.0001 Age (y) mean 32.9 30.0 <0.0001

b

(SD) (8.5) (7.6) Age group <0.0001 ≤30 y 11293 44.6 19229 59.6 31-40 y 9177 36.2 9638 29.9 >40 y 4850 19.2 3371 10.5 Married/partnered <0.0001 No 11060 44.8 18851 60.1 Yes 13607 55.2 12513 39.9 Regions <0.0001 Bangkok 3488 13.9 6057 18.9 Central 5712 22.7 8267 25.8 North 5180 20.6 5818 18.1 North-east 6142 24.4 5760 18.0 East 1515 6.0 1922 6.0 South 3103 12.3 4254 13.3 Urbanization status

c <0.0001

Rural–rural (RR) 11512 46,1 13895 43.6 Rural–urban (RU) 7891 31.6 9546 29.9 Urban–rural (UR) 1078 4.3 1344 4.2 Urban–urban (UU) 4495 18.0 7114 22.3

Socioeconomic status

Education level <0.0001 High school 13366 52.9 13135 40.8 Diploma 5749 22.8 9791 30.4 University 6153 24.4 9231 28.7 Personal monthly income (baht)

d <0.0001 ≤7000 8025 32.3 13890 44.1 7001–10000 5790 23.3 7578 24.0 10001–20000 7549 30.4 7194 22.8 >20000 3452 13.9 2851 9.0 Household assets

e (baht)

d <0.001

Low 9852 39.1 12434 38.7 Medium 8065 32.0 9863 30.7 High 7298 28.9 9804 30.5 aChi-square test b unpaired t test cLocation of residence (rural, R, or urban, U) at age 10-12 years and again in 2005. dAt the time of the survey in 2009, US$1 = 31 Thai baht eReplacement value in Thai baht: low ≤30,000, medium 30,001-60,000 and high >60,000

Page 14 of 24

For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml

BMJ Open

123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960

on February 4, 2020 by guest. P

rotected by copyright.http://bm

jopen.bmj.com

/B

MJ O

pen: first published as 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002826 on 25 June 2013. D

ownloaded from

Page 16: BMJ Open · smoking (which was rare) had no apparent hypertension effect. Among males, regular drinking increased the risk of incident hypertension Strengths In Thailand, this cohort

For peer review only

15

Table 2 Hypertension incidence and association with risk factors in male and female participants.

Males Females HT(n) Incia%(95% CI) ARRb(95% CI) HT(n) Incia%(95% CI) ARRb(95% CI) Participants 1306 5.2 (4.9-5.4) 690 2.1 (2.0-2.3)

Demography

Age group

≤30 y 279 2.5 (2.2-2.8) 1 215 1.1 (0.97-1.3) 1 31-40 y 484 5.3 (4.8-5.7) 1.66 (1.39-1.98) 245 2.5 (2.23-2.9) 1.93 (1.56-2.39) >40 y 543 11.2 (10.3-12.1) 3.13 (2.57-3.81) 230 6.8 (6.0-7.7) 4.2 (3.26-5.42) P-trend <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001

Marital status (married/partnered)

No 368 3.3 (3.0-3.7) 1 303 1.6 (1.43-1.8) 1 Yes 896 6.6 (6.17-7.0) 0.97 (0.83-1.12) 368 2.9 (2.65-3.2) 1.22 (1.03-1.45)

Socio-economic status

Education level

High school 697 5.2 (4.8-5.6) 1 303 2.3 (2.05-2.57) 1 Diploma 276 4.8 (4.25-5.4) 1.0 (0.86-1.17) 180 1.8 (1.57-2.1) 0.81 (0.66-0.99) University 331 5.4 (4.8-5.9) 0.93 (0.8-1.1) 204 2.2 (1.9-2.51) 0.87 (0.71-1.07) P-trend 0.83 0.61 0.463 0.1 Personal monthly income (baht)c ≤7000 268 3.3 (2.95-3.7) 1 217 1.6 (1.36-1.8) 1 7001-10000 229 4.0 (3.45-4.5) 1.0 (0.81-1.2) 142 1.9 (1.57-2.2) 1.1 (0.87-1.37) 10001-20000 497 6.6 (6.0-7.14) 1.1 (0.91-1.31) 196 2.7 (2.35-3.1) 0.97 (0.77-1.23) >20000 289 8.4 (7.46-9.3) 1.0 (0.8-1.25) 122 4.3 (3.54-5.0) 1.04 (0.78-1.39) P-trend <0.0001 0.527 <0.0001 0.783

BMI classificationd

Underweight 359 2.9 (2.62-3.2) 0.46 (0.27-0.78) 60 0.85 (0.63-1.15) 0.9 (0.67-1.21) (BMI <18.5) Normal 16 1.1 (0.56-1.6) 1 258 1.4 (1.2-1.5) 1 (18.5 ≤ BMI < 23) Overweight 333 5.9 (5.3-6.54) 1.66 (1.41-1.95) 129 3.9 (3.3-4.62) 2.32 (1.8-2.91) (23 ≤ BMI < 25) Obese 575 10.4 (9.6-11.2) 2.82 (2.43-3.27) 231 7.4 (6.4-8.27) 4.14 (3.4-5.05) (BMI ≥25) P-trend <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001

aIncidence of Hypertension

bAdjusted relative risks (ARR) were calculated from multi-variate logistic regression models of hypertension

adjusted for age, marital status, education, income, BMI category, underlying diseases, personal behaviours. cAt the time of the survey in 2005, US$1 = 42 Thai baht dAsian standard BMI classification

Continued….

Page 15 of 24

For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml

BMJ Open

123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960

on February 4, 2020 by guest. P

rotected by copyright.http://bm

jopen.bmj.com

/B

MJ O

pen: first published as 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002826 on 25 June 2013. D

ownloaded from

Page 17: BMJ Open · smoking (which was rare) had no apparent hypertension effect. Among males, regular drinking increased the risk of incident hypertension Strengths In Thailand, this cohort

For peer review only

16

Table 2 (continued...)

Males Females HT(n) Inci

a%(95% CI) ARR

b(95% CI) HT(n) Inci

a%(95% CI) ARR

b(95% CI)

Physical activities

Weighted total sessions exercise-related physical activity (average between 2005 and 2009) 0-7 ses/wc 198 6.3 (5.5-7.1) 1 162 2.2 (1.8-2.6) 1 8-14 ses/w 589 5.2 (4.8-5.6) 0.9 (0.76-1.07) 352 2.1 (1.9-2.3) 1.0 (0.82-1.23)

≥15 ses/w 380 4.4 (4.0-5.0) 0.78 (0.65-0.95) 119 2.2 (1.8-2.6) 1.0 (0.77-1.3)

P-trend <0.0001 <0.029 0.905 1.0

Underlying diseases

Diabetes mellitus

No 1251 5.0 (4.7-5.27) 1 674 2.1 (1.9-2.26) 1 Yes 55 18.3 (13.9-22.7) 1.81 (1.29-2.52) 16 10.7 (5.7-15.8) 2.54 (1.41-4.56)

High lipids

No 983 4.4 (4.13-4.67) 1 576 1.9 (1.76-2.1) 1 Yes 323 10.8 (9.7-11.9) 1.4 (1.21-1.63) 114 5.4 (4.47-6.4) 1.38 (1.09-1.75)

Kidney diseases

No 1248 5.1 (4.8-5.33) 1 659 2.1 (1.9-2.26) 1 Yes 58 9.6 (7.2-11.9) 1.62 (1.19-2.2) 31 3.9 (2.52-5.2) 1.77 (1.19-2.63)

Personal behaviours

Smoking status Never 506 4.1 (3.7-4.4) 1 617 2.1 (1.9-2.23) 1 Ex-smoker 496 6.6 (6.0-7.13) 1.15 (1.0-1.32) 37 3.2 (2.2-4.22) 1.28 (0.88-1.87) Cur-smokerd 276 5.8 (5.16-6.5) 1.22 (1.04-1.44) 8 3.1 (0.97-5.2) 1.54 (0.74-3.2) P-trend <0.0001 <0.032 <0.008 0.23

Drinking status

Never 105 3.9 (3.2-4.7) 1 268 2.1 (1.8-2.32) 1 Ex-drinker 155 5.7 (4.85-6.6) 0.98 (0.74-1.3) 50 2.2 (1.6-2.85) 1.14 (0.82-1.59) Occ- drinkere 821 4.8 (4.45-5.1) 1.0 (0.8-1.25) 352 2.1 (1.9-2.36) 1.14 (0.96-1.36) Reg- drinker

f 212 8.6 (7.5-9.7) 1.61 (1.23-2.11) 9 4.7 (1.66-7.7) 1.83 (0.86-3.9)

P-trend <0.0001 <0.0001 0.471 0.254

Food consumption habit

Instant food

<1 time/m 335 6.3 (5.6-6.95) 1 168 2.8(2.36-3.2) 1 1-3 times/m 485 5.1 (4.63-5.5) 1.02 (0.87-1.19) 273 2.1 (1.84-2.3) 0.95 (0.77-1.17) 1-2 times/wk 280 4.4 (3.9-4.9) 1.09 (0.91-1.30) 153 1.9 (1.6-2.2) 1.04 (0.81-1.33) 3-6 times/wk 165 5.0 (4.3-5.75) 1.36 (1.1-1.69) 73 1.8 (1.4-2.22) 1.14 (0.84-1.55) ≥1 times/d 32 5.5 (3.6-7.33) 1.67 (1.11-2.52) 18 2.3 (1.3-3.35) 1.48 (0.86-2.53) P-trend <0.002 <0.008 <0.002 0.403 aIncidence of Hypertension

bAdjusted relative risks were calculated from multi-variate logistic regression models of hypertension adjusted for age, marital status, education, income, BMI category, underlying diseases, personal behaviours. cSessions / week dCurrent-smoker eOccasional drinker fRegular drinker

Page 16 of 24

For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml

BMJ Open

123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960

on February 4, 2020 by guest. P

rotected by copyright.http://bm

jopen.bmj.com

/B

MJ O

pen: first published as 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002826 on 25 June 2013. D

ownloaded from

Page 18: BMJ Open · smoking (which was rare) had no apparent hypertension effect. Among males, regular drinking increased the risk of incident hypertension Strengths In Thailand, this cohort

For peer review only

17

References:

1. Chobanian AV, Bakris GL, Black HR, et al. Seventh report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention,

Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure. Hypertension 2003;42(6):1206-52 doi:

10.1161/01.HYP.0000107251.49515.c2

01.HYP.0000107251.49515.c2 [pii][published Online First: Epub Date]|.

2. Gaziano TA, Bitton A, Anand S, et al. Growing epidemic of coronary heart disease in low- and middle-income

countries. Curr Probl Cardiol 2010;35(2):72-115 doi: S0146-2806(09)00127-3 [pii]

10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2009.10.002[published Online First: Epub Date]|.

3. Whitworth JA, World Health Organization and International Society of Hypertension Writing Group. 2003 World

Health Organization (WHO)/International Society of Hypertension (ISH) statement on management of

hypertension. J Hypertens 2003;21(11):1983-92 doi: 10.1097/01.hjh.0000084751.37215.d2[published Online

First: Epub Date]|.

4. Aekplakorn W, Sangthong R, Kessomboon P, et al. Changes in prevalence, awareness, treatment and control of

hypertension in Thai population, 2004-2009: Thai National Health Examination Survey III-IV. J Hypertens

2012;30(9):1734-42 doi: 10.1097/HJH.0b013e3283568158[published Online First: Epub Date]|.

5. Vathesatogkit P, Woodward M, Tanomsup S, et al. Long-term effects of socioeconomic status on incident

hypertension and progression of blood pressure. J Hypertens 2012;30(7):1347-53 doi:

10.1097/HJH.0b013e32835465ca[published Online First: Epub Date]|.

6. Aekplakorn W, Abbott-Klafter J, Khonputsa P, et al. Prevalence and management of prehypertension and

hypertension by geographic regions of Thailand: the Third National Health Examination Survey, 2004. J

Hypertens 2008;26(2):191-8 doi: 10.1097/HJH.0b013e3282f09f57

00004872-200802000-00009 [pii][published Online First: Epub Date]|.

7. Lim LYL, Kjellstrom T, Sleigh A, et al. Associations between urbanisation and components of the health-risk

transition in Thailand. A descriptive study of 87,000 Thai adults. Glob Health Action 2009;2 doi:

10.3402/gha.v2i0.1914[published Online First: Epub Date]|.

8. Banwell C, Lim L, Seubsman SA, et al. Body mass index and health-related behaviours in a national cohort of

87,134 Thai open university students. J Epidemiol Community Health 2009;63(5):366-72 doi:

jech.2008.080820 [pii]

10.1136/jech.2008.080820[published Online First: Epub Date]|.

9. Seubsman S, Yiengprugsawan V, Sleigh A, et al. A Large National Thai Cohort Study of the Health-Risk Transition

based on Sukhothai Thammathirat Open University Students. ASEAN Journal of Open Distance Learning

2012;4(1):58-69

10. Sleigh AC, Seubsman SA, Bain C. Cohort profile: The Thai Cohort of 87,134 Open University students. Int J

Epidemiol 2008;37(2):266-72 doi: dym161 [pii]

10.1093/ije/dym161[published Online First: Epub Date]|.

11. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. The Active Australia Survey: a guide and manual for implementation,

analysis and reporting Canberra. AIHW 2003

12. Banks E, Lim L, Seubsman SA, et al. Relationship of obesity to physical activity, domestic activities, and sedentary

behaviours: cross-sectional findings from a national cohort of over 70,000 Thai adults. BMC Public Health

2011;11:762 doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-762[published Online First: Epub Date]|.

13. Yiengprugsawan V, Banwell C, Seubsman SA, et al. Short sleep and obesity in a large national cohort of Thai

adults. BMJ open 2012;2(1):e000561 doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2011-000561[published Online First: Epub

Date]|.

Page 17 of 24

For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml

BMJ Open

123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960

on February 4, 2020 by guest. P

rotected by copyright.http://bm

jopen.bmj.com

/B

MJ O

pen: first published as 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002826 on 25 June 2013. D

ownloaded from

Page 19: BMJ Open · smoking (which was rare) had no apparent hypertension effect. Among males, regular drinking increased the risk of incident hypertension Strengths In Thailand, this cohort

For peer review only

18

14. Seubsman SA, Lim LL, Banwell C, et al. Socioeconomic status, sex, and obesity in a large national cohort of 15-87-

year-old open university students in Thailand. J Epidemiol 2010;20(1):13-20 doi: JST.JSTAGE/jea/JE20090014

[pii][published Online First: Epub Date]|.

15. Weisell RC. Body mass index as an indicator of obesity. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr 2002;11 Suppl 8:S681-4 doi: 367

[pii][published Online First: Epub Date]|.

16. Kanazawa M, Yoshiike N, Osaka T, et al. Criteria and classification of obesity in Japan and Asia-Oceania. Asia Pac J

Clin Nutr 2002;11 Suppl 8:S732-7

17. Webb P, Bain C. Essential Epidemiology : An Introduction for Students and Health Professionals. 2 ed: Cambridge

University Press, 2011:461.

18. Chuang SY, Chou P, Hsu PF, et al. Presence and progression of abdominal obesity are predictors of future high

blood pressure and hypertension. Am J Hypertens 2006;19(8):788-95 doi:

10.1016/j.amjhyper.2006.01.010[published Online First: Epub Date]|.

19. Choi KM, Park HS, Han JH, et al. Prevalence of prehypertension and hypertension in a Korean population: Korean

National Health and Nutrition Survey 2001. J Hypertens 2006;24(8):1515-21 doi:

10.1097/01.hjh.0000239286.02389.0f

00004872-200608000-00010 [pii][published Online First: Epub Date]|.

20. Su TC, Bai CH, Chang HY, et al. Evidence for improved control of hypertension in Taiwan: 1993-2002. J Hypertens

2008;26(3):600-6 doi: 10.1097/HJH.0b013e3282f3b352

00004872-200803000-00031 [pii][published Online First: Epub Date]|.

21. Bassett DR, Jr., Fitzhugh EC, Crespo CJ, et al. Physical activity and ethnic differences in hypertension prevalence in

the United States. Prev Med 2002;34(2):179-86 doi: 10.1006/pmed.2001.0969

S0091743501909697 [pii][published Online First: Epub Date]|.

22. Rampal L, Rampal S, Azhar MZ, et al. Prevalence, awareness, treatment and control of hypertension in Malaysia:

a national study of 16,440 subjects. Public Health 2008;122(1):11-8 doi: S0033-3506(07)00170-9 [pii]

10.1016/j.puhe.2007.05.008[published Online First: Epub Date]|.

23. Lloyd-Jones D, Adams R, Carnethon M, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics--2009 update: a report from the

American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Circulation

2009;119(3):e21-181 doi: CIRCULATIONAHA.108.191261 [pii]

10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.191261[published Online First: Epub Date]|.

24. Barton M, Meyer MR. Postmenopausal hypertension: mechanisms and therapy. Hypertension 2009;54(1):11-8

doi: HYPERTENSIONAHA.108.120022 [pii]

10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.108.120022[published Online First: Epub Date]|.

25. Shihab HM, Meoni LA, Chu AY, et al. Body Mass Index and Risk of Incident Hypertension over the Life Course: The

Johns Hopkins Precursors Study. Circulation 2012 doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.117333[published

Online First: Epub Date]|.

26. Gelber RP, Gaziano JM, Manson JE, et al. A prospective study of body mass index and the risk of developing

hypertension in men. Am J Hypertens 2007;20(4):370-7 doi: S0895-7061(06)00781-3 [pii]

10.1016/j.amjhyper.2006.10.011[published Online First: Epub Date]|.

27. Hu G, Barengo NC, Tuomilehto J, et al. Relationship of physical activity and body mass index to the risk of

hypertension: a prospective study in Finland. Hypertension 2004;43(1):25-30 doi:

10.1161/01.HYP.0000107400.72456.19

01.HYP.0000107400.72456.19 [pii][published Online First: Epub Date]|.

28. He J, Whelton PK, Appel LJ, et al. Long-term effects of weight loss and dietary sodium reduction on incidence of

hypertension. Hypertension 2000;35(2):544-9

29. Huang Z, Willett WC, Manson JE, et al. Body weight, weight change, and risk for hypertension in women. Ann

Intern Med 1998;128(2):81-8

30. Levin G, Kestenbaum B, Ida Chen YD, et al. Glucose, insulin, and incident hypertension in the multi-ethnic study

of atherosclerosis. Am J Epidemiol 2010;172(10):1144-54 doi: kwq266 [pii]

Page 18 of 24

For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml

BMJ Open

123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960

on February 4, 2020 by guest. P

rotected by copyright.http://bm

jopen.bmj.com

/B

MJ O

pen: first published as 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002826 on 25 June 2013. D

ownloaded from

Page 20: BMJ Open · smoking (which was rare) had no apparent hypertension effect. Among males, regular drinking increased the risk of incident hypertension Strengths In Thailand, this cohort

For peer review only

19

10.1093/aje/kwq266[published Online First: Epub Date]|.

31. Wang W, Lee ET, Fabsitz RR, et al. A longitudinal study of hypertension risk factors and their relation to

cardiovascular disease: the Strong Heart Study. Hypertension 2006;47(3):403-9 doi:

10.1161/01.HYP.0000200710.29498.80[published Online First: Epub Date]|.

32. Fukui M, Tanaka M, Toda H, et al. Risk factors for development of diabetes mellitus, hypertension and

dyslipidemia. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2011 doi: S0168-8227(11)00356-1 [pii]

10.1016/j.diabres.2011.07.006[published Online First: Epub Date]|.

33. Suematsu C, Hayashi T, Fujii S, et al. Impaired fasting glucose and the risk of hypertension in Japanese men

between the 1980s and the 1990s. The Osaka Health Survey. Diabetes Care 1999;22(2):228-32

34. Hypertension Study Group. Prevalence, awareness, treatment and control of hypertension among the elderly in

Bangladesh and India: a multicentre study. Bull World Health Organ 2001;79(6):490-500

35. Rodrigues Barbosa A, Ferreti Borgatto A. Arterial hypertension in the elderly of bridgetown, barbados:

prevalence and associated factors. J Aging Health 2010;22(5):611-30 doi: 0898264310371123 [pii]

10.1177/0898264310371123[published Online First: Epub Date]|.

36. Bell CN, Thorpe RJ, Jr., Laveist TA. Race/Ethnicity and hypertension: the role of social support. Am J Hypertens

2010;23(5):534-40 doi: ajh201028 [pii]

10.1038/ajh.2010.28[published Online First: Epub Date]|.

37. Marso SP, Hiatt WR. Peripheral arterial disease in patients with diabetes. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;47(5):921-9 doi:

S0735-1097(05)02862-7 [pii]

10.1016/j.jacc.2005.09.065[published Online First: Epub Date]|.

38. Laaksonen DE, Niskanen L, Nyyssonen K, et al. Dyslipidaemia as a predictor of hypertension in middle-aged men.

Eur Heart J 2008;29(20):2561-8 doi: ehn061 [pii]

10.1093/eurheartj/ehn061[published Online First: Epub Date]|.

39. Halperin RO, Sesso HD, Ma J, et al. Dyslipidemia and the risk of incident hypertension in men. Hypertension

2006;47(1):45-50 doi: 01.HYP.0000196306.42418.0e [pii]

10.1161/01.HYP.0000196306.42418.0e[published Online First: Epub Date]|.

40. Tohidi M, Hatami M, Hadaegh F, et al. Triglycerides and triglycerides to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio

are strong predictors of incident hypertension in Middle Eastern women. J Hum Hypertens 2011 doi:

jhh201170 [pii]

10.1038/jhh.2011.70[published Online First: Epub Date]|.

41. Sesso HD, Buring JE, Chown MJ, et al. A prospective study of plasma lipid levels and hypertension in women. Arch

Intern Med 2005;165(20):2420-7 doi: 165/20/2420 [pii]

10.1001/archinte.165.20.2420[published Online First: Epub Date]|.

42. Haffner SM, Miettinen H, Gaskill SP, et al. Metabolic precursors of hypertension. The San Antonio Heart Study.

Arch Intern Med 1996;156(17):1994-2001

43. Selwyn AP, Kinlay S, Libby P, et al. Atherogenic lipids, vascular dysfunction, and clinical signs of ischemic heart

disease. Circulation 1997;95(1):5-7

44. Jancova E, Vankova Z, Honsova E, et al. Prevalence and risk of hypertension in renal disease--data from the Czech

Registry of Renal Biopsies. Kidney Blood Press Res 2008;31(2):135-42 doi: 000126736 [pii]

10.1159/000126736[published Online First: Epub Date]|.

45. Kalaitzidis R, Li S, Wang C, et al. Hypertension in early-stage kidney disease: an update from the Kidney Early

Evaluation Program (KEEP). Am J Kidney Dis 2009;53(4 Suppl 4):S22-31 doi:

10.1053/j.ajkd.2008.11.028[published Online First: Epub Date]|.

46. Johnston PA, Davison AM. Hypertension in adults with idiopathic glomerulonephritis and normal serum

creatinine. A report from the MRC Glomerulonephritis Registry. Nephrol Dial Transplant 1993;8(1):20-4

47. Buckalew VM, Jr., Berg RL, Wang SR, et al. Prevalence of hypertension in 1,795 subjects with chronic renal

disease: the modification of diet in renal disease study baseline cohort. Modification of Diet in Renal Disease

Page 19 of 24

For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml

BMJ Open

123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960

on February 4, 2020 by guest. P

rotected by copyright.http://bm

jopen.bmj.com

/B

MJ O

pen: first published as 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002826 on 25 June 2013. D

ownloaded from

Page 21: BMJ Open · smoking (which was rare) had no apparent hypertension effect. Among males, regular drinking increased the risk of incident hypertension Strengths In Thailand, this cohort

For peer review only

20

Study Group. Am J Kidney Dis 1996;28(6):811-21 doi: S0272638696002363 [pii][published Online First: Epub

Date]|.

48. Campese VM, Mitra N, Sandee D. Hypertension in renal parenchymal disease: why is it so resistant to treatment?

Kidney Int 2006;69(6):967-73 doi: 5000177 [pii]

10.1038/sj.ki.5000177[published Online First: Epub Date]|.

49. Niskanen L, Laaksonen DE, Nyyssonen K, et al. Inflammation, abdominal obesity, and smoking as predictors of

hypertension. Hypertension 2004;44(6):859-65 doi: 01.HYP.0000146691.51307.84 [pii]

10.1161/01.HYP.0000146691.51307.84[published Online First: Epub Date]|.

50. Halperin RO, Gaziano JM, Sesso HD. Smoking and the risk of incident hypertension in middle-aged and older men.

Am J Hypertens 2008;21(2):148-52 doi: ajh200736 [pii]

10.1038/ajh.2007.36[published Online First: Epub Date]|.

51. Halimi JM, Giraudeau B, Vol S, et al. The risk of hypertension in men: direct and indirect effects of chronic

smoking. J Hypertens 2002;20(2):187-93

52. Al-Safi SA. Does smoking affect blood pressure and heart rate? European journal of cardiovascular nursing :

journal of the Working Group on Cardiovascular Nursing of the European Society of Cardiology

2005;4(4):286-9 doi: 10.1016/j.ejcnurse.2005.03.004[published Online First: Epub Date]|.

53. Jo I, Ahn Y, Lee J, et al. Prevalence, awareness, treatment, control and risk factors of hypertension in Korea: the

Ansan study. J Hypertens 2001;19(9):1523-32

54. Schwandt HM, Coresh J, Hindin MJ. Marital Status, Hypertension, Coronary Heart Disease, Diabetes, and Death

Among African American Women and Men: Incidence and Prevalence in the Atherosclerosis Risk in

Communities (ARIC) Study Participants. J Fam Issues 2010;31(9):1211-29 doi:

10.1177/0192513X10365487[published Online First: Epub Date]|.

55. Bowman TS, Gaziano JM, Buring JE, et al. A prospective study of cigarette smoking and risk of incident

hypertension in women. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;50(21):2085-92 doi: S0735-1097(07)02729-5 [pii]

10.1016/j.jacc.2007.08.017[published Online First: Epub Date]|.

56. Ohmori S, Kiyohara Y, Kato I, et al. Alcohol intake and future incidence of hypertension in a general Japanese

population: the Hisayama study. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 2002;26(7):1010-6 doi:

10.1097/01.ALC.0000021147.31338.C2[published Online First: Epub Date]|.

57. Nakanishi N, Yoshida H, Nakamura K, et al. Alcohol consumption and risk for hypertension in middle-aged

Japanese men. J Hypertens 2001;19(5):851-5

58. Wildman RP, Gu D, Muntner P, et al. Alcohol intake and hypertension subtypes in Chinese men. J Hypertens

2005;23(4):737-43 doi: 00004872-200504000-00012 [pii][published Online First: Epub Date]|.

59. Yoshita K, Miura K, Morikawa Y, et al. Relationship of alcohol consumption to 7-year blood pressure change in

Japanese men. J Hypertens 2005;23(8):1485-90 doi: 00004872-200508000-00010 [pii][published Online First:

Epub Date]|.

60. Minami J, Yoshii M, Todoroki M, et al. Effects of alcohol restriction on ambulatory blood pressure, heart rate, and

heart rate variability in Japanese men. Am J Hypertens 2002;15(2 Pt 1):125-9 doi: S0895706101022658

[pii][published Online First: Epub Date]|.

61. Fuchs FD, Chambless LE, Whelton PK, et al. Alcohol consumption and the incidence of hypertension: The

Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study. Hypertension 2001;37(5):1242-50

62. Taylor B, Irving HM, Baliunas D, et al. Alcohol and hypertension: gender differences in dose-response

relationships determined through systematic review and meta-analysis. Addiction 2009;104(12):1981-90 doi:

ADD2694 [pii]

10.1111/j.1360-0443.2009.02694.x[published Online First: Epub Date]|.

63. Lipowicz A, Lopuszanska M. Marital differences in blood pressure and the risk of hypertension among Polish men.

Eur J Epidemiol 2005;20(5):421-7

64. Trivedi RB, Ayotte B, Edelman D, et al. The association of emotional well-being and marital status with treatment

adherence among patients with hypertension. Journal of behavioral medicine 2008;31(6):489-97 doi:

10.1007/s10865-008-9173-4[published Online First: Epub Date]|.

65. Kaplan MS, Huguet N, Feeny DH, et al. Self-reported hypertension prevalence and income among older adults in

Canada and the United States. Soc Sci Med 2010;70(6):844-9 doi: S0277-9536(09)00814-4 [pii]

Page 20 of 24

For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml

BMJ Open

123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960

on February 4, 2020 by guest. P

rotected by copyright.http://bm

jopen.bmj.com

/B

MJ O

pen: first published as 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002826 on 25 June 2013. D

ownloaded from

Page 22: BMJ Open · smoking (which was rare) had no apparent hypertension effect. Among males, regular drinking increased the risk of incident hypertension Strengths In Thailand, this cohort

For peer review only

21

10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.11.019[published Online First: Epub Date]|.

66. Vargas CM, Ingram DD, Gillum RF. Incidence of hypertension and educational attainment: the NHANES I

epidemiologic followup study. First National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Am J Epidemiol

2000;152(3):272-8

67. Rashid AK, Azizah AM. Prevalence of hypertension among the elderly Malays living in rural Malaysia. Australian

Medical Journal 2011;4(6):283-90

68. Addo J, Smeeth L, Leon DA. Socioeconomic position and hypertension: a study of urban civil servants in Ghana. J

Epidemiol Community Health 2009;63(8):646-50 doi: 10.1136/jech.2008.081828[published Online First:

Epub Date]|.

69. Ball K, Crawford D. Socioeconomic status and weight change in adults: a review. Soc Sci Med 2005;60(9):1987-

2010 doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.08.056[published Online First: Epub Date]|.

70. Diez-Roux AV, Nieto FJ, Caulfield L, et al. Neighbourhood differences in diet: the Atherosclerosis Risk in

Communities (ARIC) Study. J Epidemiol Community Health 1999;53(1):55-63

71. Sobal J, Stunkard AJ. Socioeconomic status and obesity: a review of the literature. Psychological bulletin

1989;105(2):260-75

72. Yiengprugsawan V, Seubsman SA, Lim LL, et al. Used and foregone health services among a cohort of 87,134

adult open university students residing throughout Thailand. The Southeast Asian journal of tropical

medicine and public health 2009;40(6):1347-58

73. Pereira MA, Folsom AR, McGovern PG, et al. Physical activity and incident hypertension in black and white adults:

the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study. Prev Med 1999;28(3):304-12 doi: S0091743598904315

[pii][published Online First: Epub Date]|.

74. Haapanen N, Miilunpalo S, Vuori I, et al. Association of leisure time physical activity with the risk of coronary

heart disease, hypertension and diabetes in middle-aged men and women. Int J Epidemiol 1997;26(4):739-47

75. Park J, Lee JS, Jang YA, et al. A comparison of food and nutrient intake between instant noodle consumers and

non-instant noodle consumers in Korean adults. Nutr Res Pract 2011;5(5):443-9 doi:

10.4162/nrp.2011.5.5.443[published Online First: Epub Date]|.

76. Jolly SE, Eilat-Adar S, Wang H, et al. Sex-specific associations of nutrition with hypertension and systolic blood

pressure in Alaska Natives findings from the GOCADAN study. Int J Circumpolar Health 2011;70(3):254-65

doi: 1098 [pii][published Online First: Epub Date]|.

77. Alonso A, Beunza JJ, Bes-Rastrollo M, et al. Vegetable protein and fiber from cereal are inversely associated with

the risk of hypertension in a Spanish cohort. Arch Med Res 2006;37(6):778-86 doi: S0188-4409(06)00087-7

[pii]

10.1016/j.arcmed.2006.01.007[published Online First: Epub Date]|.

78. Steffen LM, Kroenke CH, Yu X, et al. Associations of plant food, dairy product, and meat intakes with 15-y

incidence of elevated blood pressure in young black and white adults: the Coronary Artery Risk Development

in Young Adults (CARDIA) Study. Am J Clin Nutr 2005;82(6):1169-77; quiz 363-4 doi: 82/6/1169

[pii][published Online First: Epub Date]|.

79. Schulze MB, Hoffmann K, Kroke A, et al. Risk of hypertension among women in the EPIC-Potsdam Study:

comparison of relative risk estimates for exploratory and hypothesis-oriented dietary patterns. Am J

Epidemiol 2003;158(4):365-73

80. Chien KL, Hsu HC, Chen PC, et al. Urinary sodium and potassium excretion and risk of hypertension in Chinese:

report from a community-based cohort study in Taiwan. J Hypertens 2008;26(9):1750-6 doi:

10.1097/HJH.0b013e328306a0a7[published Online First: Epub Date]|.

81. Zhang L, Qin LQ, Liu AP, et al. Prevalence of risk factors for cardiovascular disease and their associations with diet

and physical activity in suburban Beijing, China. J Epidemiol 2010;20(3):237-43 doi:

JST.JSTAGE/jea/JE20090119 [pii][published Online First: Epub Date]|.

82. Sun Z, Zheng L, Xu C, et al. Prevalence of prehypertension, hypertension and, associated risk factors in Mongolian

and Han Chinese populations in Northeast China. Int J Cardiol 2008;128(2):250-4 doi: S0167-5273(07)01900-

6 [pii]

10.1016/j.ijcard.2007.08.127[published Online First: Epub Date]|.

83. He FJ, MacGregor GA. Effect of modest salt reduction on blood pressure: a meta-analysis of randomized trials.

Implications for public health. J Hum Hypertens 2002;16(11):761-70 doi: 10.1038/sj.jhh.1001459[published

Online First: Epub Date]|.

Page 21 of 24

For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml

BMJ Open

123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960

on February 4, 2020 by guest. P

rotected by copyright.http://bm

jopen.bmj.com

/B

MJ O

pen: first published as 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002826 on 25 June 2013. D

ownloaded from

Page 23: BMJ Open · smoking (which was rare) had no apparent hypertension effect. Among males, regular drinking increased the risk of incident hypertension Strengths In Thailand, this cohort

For peer review only

22

84. Sacks FM, Svetkey LP, Vollmer WM, et al. Effects on blood pressure of reduced dietary sodium and the Dietary

Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) diet. DASH-Sodium Collaborative Research Group. N Engl J Med

2001;344(1):3-10 doi: 10.1056/NEJM200101043440101[published Online First: Epub Date]|.

85. He FJ, MacGregor GA. Reducing population salt intake worldwide: from evidence to implementation. Prog

Cardiovasc Dis 2010;52(5):363-82 doi: S0033-0620(09)00127-3 [pii]

10.1016/j.pcad.2009.12.006[published Online First: Epub Date]|.

86. Lim LL, Seubsman SA, Sleigh A. Validity of self-reported weight, height, and body mass index among university

students in Thailand: Implications for population studies of obesity in developing countries. Population

health metrics 2009;7:15 doi: 10.1186/1478-7954-7-15[published Online First: Epub Date]|.

Page 22 of 24

For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml

BMJ Open

123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960

on February 4, 2020 by guest. P

rotected by copyright.http://bm

jopen.bmj.com

/B

MJ O

pen: first published as 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002826 on 25 June 2013. D

ownloaded from

Page 24: BMJ Open · smoking (which was rare) had no apparent hypertension effect. Among males, regular drinking increased the risk of incident hypertension Strengths In Thailand, this cohort

For peer review only

STROBE 2007 (v4) Statement—Checklist of items that should be included in reports of cohort studies

Section/Topic Item

# Recommendation Reported on page #

Title and abstract 1 (a) Indicate the study’s design with a commonly used term in the title or the abstract 1

(b) Provide in the abstract an informative and balanced summary of what was done and what was found 2

Introduction

Background/rationale 2 Explain the scientific background and rationale for the investigation being reported 3

Objectives 3 State specific objectives, including any prespecified hypotheses 3

Methods

Study design 4 Present key elements of study design early in the paper 3

Setting 5 Describe the setting, locations, and relevant dates, including periods of recruitment, exposure, follow-up, and data

collection

4

Participants 6 (a) Give the eligibility criteria, and the sources and methods of selection of participants. Describe methods of follow-up 3

(b) For matched studies, give matching criteria and number of exposed and unexposed 3-4

Variables 7 Clearly define all outcomes, exposures, predictors, potential confounders, and effect modifiers. Give diagnostic criteria, if

applicable

4

Data sources/

measurement

8* For each variable of interest, give sources of data and details of methods of assessment (measurement). Describe

comparability of assessment methods if there is more than one group

4-5

Bias 9 Describe any efforts to address potential sources of bias 11

Study size 10 Explain how the study size was arrived at 3

Quantitative variables 11 Explain how quantitative variables were handled in the analyses. If applicable, describe which groupings were chosen and

why

4-5

Statistical methods 12 (a) Describe all statistical methods, including those used to control for confounding 5

(b) Describe any methods used to examine subgroups and interactions 5

(c) Explain how missing data were addressed 5

(d) If applicable, explain how loss to follow-up was addressed 5

(e) Describe any sensitivity analyses 5

Results 5-6

Page 23 of 24

For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml

BMJ Open

123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960

on February 4, 2020 by guest. Protected by copyright. http://bmjopen.bmj.com/ BMJ Open: first published as 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002826 on 25 June 2013. Downloaded from

Page 25: BMJ Open · smoking (which was rare) had no apparent hypertension effect. Among males, regular drinking increased the risk of incident hypertension Strengths In Thailand, this cohort

For peer review only

Participants 13* (a) Report numbers of individuals at each stage of study—eg numbers potentially eligible, examined for eligibility, confirmed

eligible, included in the study, completing follow-up, and analysed

3

(b) Give reasons for non-participation at each stage 4

(c) Consider use of a flow diagram

Descriptive data 14* (a) Give characteristics of study participants (eg demographic, clinical, social) and information on exposures and potential

confounders

5

(b) Indicate number of participants with missing data for each variable of interest

(c) Summarise follow-up time (eg, average and total amount) 4

Outcome data 15* Report numbers of outcome events or summary measures over time 6

Main results 16 (a) Give unadjusted estimates and, if applicable, confounder-adjusted estimates and their precision (eg, 95% confidence

interval). Make clear which confounders were adjusted for and why they were included

6

(b) Report category boundaries when continuous variables were categorized 6

(c) If relevant, consider translating estimates of relative risk into absolute risk for a meaningful time period 6

Other analyses 17 Report other analyses done—eg analyses of subgroups and interactions, and sensitivity analyses 6

Discussion

Key results 18 Summarise key results with reference to study objectives 7

Limitations

Interpretation 20 Give a cautious overall interpretation of results considering objectives, limitations, multiplicity of analyses, results from

similar studies, and other relevant evidence

11

Generalisability 21 Discuss the generalisability (external validity) of the study results 11

Other information

Funding 22 Give the source of funding and the role of the funders for the present study and, if applicable, for the original study on

which the present article is based

12

*Give information separately for cases and controls in case-control studies and, if applicable, for exposed and unexposed groups in cohort and cross-sectional studies.

Note: An Explanation and Elaboration article discusses each checklist item and gives methodological background and published examples of transparent reporting. The STROBE

checklist is best used in conjunction with this article (freely available on the Web sites of PLoS Medicine at http://www.plosmedicine.org/, Annals of Internal Medicine at

http://www.annals.org/, and Epidemiology at http://www.epidem.com/). Information on the STROBE Initiative is available at www.strobe-statement.org.

Page 24 of 24

For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml

BMJ Open

123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960

on February 4, 2020 by guest. Protected by copyright. http://bmjopen.bmj.com/ BMJ Open: first published as 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002826 on 25 June 2013. Downloaded from

Page 26: BMJ Open · smoking (which was rare) had no apparent hypertension effect. Among males, regular drinking increased the risk of incident hypertension Strengths In Thailand, this cohort

For peer review only

Health-risk factors and the incidence of hypertension: 4-year prospective findings from a national cohort of 60,569

Thai open university students

Journal: BMJ Open

Manuscript ID: bmjopen-2013-002826.R1

Article Type: Research

Date Submitted by the Author: 10-Apr-2013

Complete List of Authors: thawornchaisit, prasutr; Faculty of Health Sciences, School of Medicine; Lerdsin Hospital, Medicine de Looze, Ferdinandus; Faculty of Health Sciences, School of Medicine

Reid, Christopher; Monash University, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine Seubsman, Sam-ang; Sukhothai Thammathirat Open University, School of Human Ecology Sleigh, Adrian; The Australian National University, National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health

<b>Primary Subject Heading</b>:

Epidemiology

Secondary Subject Heading: Epidemiology, Public health

Keywords: Hypertension < CARDIOLOGY, General diabetes < DIABETES & ENDOCRINOLOGY, Risk management < HEALTH SERVICES ADMINISTRATION & MANAGEMENT, Adult nephrology < NEPHROLOGY

For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml

BMJ Open on F

ebruary 4, 2020 by guest. Protected by copyright.

http://bmjopen.bm

j.com/

BM

J Open: first published as 10.1136/bm

jopen-2013-002826 on 25 June 2013. Dow

nloaded from

Page 27: BMJ Open · smoking (which was rare) had no apparent hypertension effect. Among males, regular drinking increased the risk of incident hypertension Strengths In Thailand, this cohort

For peer review only

1

Health-risk factors and the incidence of hypertension: 4-year prospective

findings from a national cohort of 60,569 Thai open university students

Prasutr Thawornchaisit, School of Medicine, Faculty of Health Science, University of Queensland, 288

Herston Road, Herston, Brisbane, QLD, 4006 Australia and Department of Medicine, Lerdsin Hospital,

Silom road, Bangrak, Bangkok, 10500 Thailand

Email: [email protected]

Telephone: 662-585-8015

Fax: 662-912-0121

Prasutr Thawornchaisit, MD, MPH1, Ferdinandus de Looze, MBBS, MSc1, Christopher M Reid, PhD2, Sam-

ang Seubsman, PhD3, Adrian Sleigh, MD4, Thai Cohort Study Team*

1 School of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia, 2 School of Public Health and

Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia, 3 School of Human Ecology, Sukhothai

Thammathirat Open University, Nonthaburi, Thailand, 4 National Centre for Epidemiology and Population

Health, ANU College of Medicine, Biology and Environment, The Australian National University,

Canberra, Australia.

*Thailand: Jaruwan Chokhanapitak, Suttanit Hounthasarn, Suwanee Khamman, Daoruang Pandee, Suttinan

Pangsap, Tippawan Prapamontol, Janya Puengson, Sam-ang Seubsman, Boonchai Somboonsook, Nintita

Sripaiboonkij, Pathumvadee Somsamai, Prasutr Thawornchaisit, Duangkae Vilainerun, Wanee

Wimonwattanaphan, Cha-aim Pachanee, Arunrat Tangmunkongvorakul, Benjawan Tawatsupa, Wimalin

Rimpeekool.

Australia: Chris Bain, Emily Banks, Cathy Banwell, Bruce Caldwell, Gordon Carmichael, Tarie Dellora,

Jane Dixon, Sharon Friel, David Harley, Matthew Kelly, Tord Kjellstrom, Lynette Lim, Anthony

McMichael, Tanya Mark, Adrian Sleigh, Lyndall Strazdins, Vasoontara Yiengprugsawan, Susan Jordan,

Janneke Berecki-Gisolf, Rod McClure.

Running Head: Health-risks and hypertension incidence in the Thai Cohort Study

Key words: hypertension; health-risks; cohort; Thailand; socioeconomic

Page 1 of 54

For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml

BMJ Open

123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960

on February 4, 2020 by guest. P

rotected by copyright.http://bm

jopen.bmj.com

/B

MJ O

pen: first published as 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002826 on 25 June 2013. D

ownloaded from

Page 28: BMJ Open · smoking (which was rare) had no apparent hypertension effect. Among males, regular drinking increased the risk of incident hypertension Strengths In Thailand, this cohort

For peer review only

2

Abstract

Objective

This study evaluates the impact of a number of demographic, biological, behavioural and lifestyle health-

risk factors on the incidence of hypertension in Thailand over a 4-year period.

Design

A 4-year prospective study of health-risk factors and their effects on incidence of hypertension in a national

Thai Cohort Study (TCS) from 2005 to 2009

Setting

As Thailand is transitioning from a developing to a middle-income developed country, chronic diseases

(particularly cardiovascular disease) have emerged as major health issues. Hypertension is a major risk

factor for heart attack and stroke and cross-sectional studies have indicated that the prevalence is increasing.

Study participants

Sukhothai Thammathirat Open University students (57,558) who participated in both 2005 and 2009

questionnaire surveys and who were normotensive in 2005 were included in the analysis.

Measures

Adjusted relative risks associating each risk factor and incidence of hypertension by sex, after controlling for

confounders such as age, socio-economic status, body mass index (BMI) and underlying diseases.

Results

The overall 4-year incidence of hypertension was 3.5% with the rate in men being remarkably higher than

that in women (5.2% vs. 2.1%). In both sexes, hypertension associated with age, higher BMI and co-

morbidities but did not associate with income and education. In men, hypertension associated with physical

inactivity, smoking, alcohol and fast food intake. In women, hypertension was related to having a partner.

Conclusion

In both men and women, hypertension strongly associated with age, obesity and co-morbidities while it had

no association with socio-economic factors. The cohort pattern of socio-economy and hypertension reflects

that the health-risk transition in Thais is likely to be at the middle stage. Diet and lifestyle factors associate

with incidence of hypertension in Thais and may be amenable targets for hypertension control programs.

Page 2 of 54

For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml

BMJ Open

123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960

on February 4, 2020 by guest. P

rotected by copyright.http://bm

jopen.bmj.com

/B

MJ O

pen: first published as 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002826 on 25 June 2013. D

ownloaded from

Page 29: BMJ Open · smoking (which was rare) had no apparent hypertension effect. Among males, regular drinking increased the risk of incident hypertension Strengths In Thailand, this cohort

For peer review only

3

Article summary

Article focus

In a large Thai Cohort Study, we measured the effect of exposure to health-risk factors recorded in 2005 on

the incidence rate of hypertension over the following 4 years. This is part of a study of the health-risk

transition underway in Thailand. We investigated socio-demographic factors, co-morbidity, body size,

physical activity and health behaviour. Cohort members are Open University students, live nationwide, are

well educated and of modest means, representing the next generation of adult Thais.

Key Messages

Overall, the incidence of self-reported hypertension in Thai adults was 3.5% with the rate for males much

higher than females (5.2% vs. 2.1%). In both sexes hypertension incidence was associated with age, higher

body mass index, kidney disease, diabetes and high lipids, but not with socioeconomic status.

Marriage or partnering increased risk of hypertension in females but not in males. Planned physical activity,

averaged across the 4-year follow-up, protected males: ≥15 sessions /week associated with lower incidence

of hypertension. However, this was not observed in females.

In males, current-smokers had a higher risk of developing hypertension than non-smokers while in females

smoking (which was rare) had no apparent hypertension effect. Among males, regular drinking increased the

risk of incident hypertension.

Strengths

In Thailand, this cohort constitutes the largest longitudinal study of health-risk factors and hypertension

development. As a consequence, many independent risk factors for hypertension in Thais can be identified.

Our cohort represents Thais well in geography and socio-economy so the results reflect trends of the health-

risk transition in the population.

Limitations

Our study relies on self-report. There may be recall and reporting errors. Some risk factors may take more

than four years to produce hypertension and will manifest as the cohort ages.

Introduction

Page 3 of 54

For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml

BMJ Open

123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960

on February 4, 2020 by guest. P

rotected by copyright.http://bm

jopen.bmj.com

/B

MJ O

pen: first published as 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002826 on 25 June 2013. D

ownloaded from

Page 30: BMJ Open · smoking (which was rare) had no apparent hypertension effect. Among males, regular drinking increased the risk of incident hypertension Strengths In Thailand, this cohort

For peer review only

4

Hypertension is a global public health challenge due to its high prevalence and the concomitant increase in

risk of stroke and cardiovascular diseases [1]. In 2007, according to the World Health Organization,

cardiovascular diseases caused 33.7% of all deaths in the world, while other chronic diseases were

responsible for 26.5% [2]. Globally, it has been estimated that premature deaths resulting from hypertension

annually are approximately 7.1 million, which account for 64 million disability-adjusted life years (DALYs)

[3]. Hypertension ranks third, after underweight and unsafe sex, of the six major risk factors contributing to

the global disease burden[3].

In Thailand, hypertension is the third major risk factor of the national disease burden and causes 600,000

DALY losses per year [4]. The prevalence of hypertension has been estimated from a number of cross-

sectional studies among adults and has been increasing over the past decades from 20% in 1985 to 22% in

2004 [4-6]. The recent Thai National Health Examination Survey (NHES) in 2009 reported the prevalence

of hypertension in adults was 21.5% [4]. The emergence of hypertension has been the result of rapid

socioeconomic development which has resulted in one third of Thais migrating to urban areas [7].

Urbanization has been associated with increased obesity as people become less physically active and adopt

sedentary life styles such as spending more time watching television, sitting and using computers [7 8].

These factors, in association with Thailand’s ageing population [9], underpin the importance of controlling

hypertension in Thai community.

There is limited longitudinal research on health risk factors and hypertension incidence in Thailand [5]. The

purpose of this study is to address that knowledge gap. We prospectively examined the influence of an array

of demographic, biological, health-risk and lifestyle factors on the incidence of hypertension during 4 years

of follow-up in the Thai Cohort Study (TCS). This is part of an overarching research program investigating

Thailand’s health-risk transition from high maternal-child and infectious disease mortality to increased

longevity and emerging chronic disease. The large national cohort of Thai adults reported on here has been

followed since 2005 for risk factor trends and associated disease outcomes, including hypertension.

Methods

Study population

The first TCS evaluation was conducted in 2005 by sending twenty-page health-risk questionnaires to the

200,000 distance-learning students enrolled at Sukhothai Thammathirat Open University (STOU) and

87,134 (44%) completed them and signed the consent forms. The cohort has been shown to be socio-

Page 4 of 54

For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml

BMJ Open

123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960

on February 4, 2020 by guest. P

rotected by copyright.http://bm

jopen.bmj.com

/B

MJ O

pen: first published as 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002826 on 25 June 2013. D

ownloaded from

Page 31: BMJ Open · smoking (which was rare) had no apparent hypertension effect. Among males, regular drinking increased the risk of incident hypertension Strengths In Thailand, this cohort

For peer review only

5

economically and geographically well representative of the Thai population [10]. However, they resided

more in urban areas (51.8% vs. 31.1%) and on average were younger and better educated than most Thai

adults. Details of the baseline TCS methodology have been published [10]. This questionnaire focused on

socio-demography, habitation, work, health services, injury, sedentary habits, physical activity, transport,

underlying diseases, family history, personal behaviours, BMI, and consumption of foods, vegetables and

fruit. A 4-year follow-up was carried out in 2009. Overall, 71% of the cohort responded generating

longitudinal data on 60,569 participants.

Incident Hypertension

Incident hypertension was defined as being normotensive in 2005 and self-reported doctor diagnosed

hypertensive in 2009. Hypertension incidence was the dependent variable for analyses and the person-time

denominator included all individuals at risk - those 57,558 participants with longitudinal data who were

negative for hypertension in 2005, the beginning of the 4-year study period.

Risk Factors

Hypertension was defined as describe above, underlying diseases diagnosed by a doctor were also reported

including diabetes mellitus, kidney diseases and high blood lipids, all of which were investigated as

potential risk factors of hypertension.

Participants were grouped into three age categories: younger (≤30 years), middle (31-40 years) and older

(>40 years). Urbanization status was based on rural (R) or urban (U) residence, first when aged 10-12 years

old and again in 2005, producing four groups: lifelong ruralites (RR), urbanizers (RU), de-urbanizers (UR)

and urbanites (UU). Personal monthly income was divided into four categories: ≤7000 baht, 7001–10000

baht, 10001–20000 baht and >20000 baht. In 2005, one US dollar was equivalent to 42 baht so most of

participants had quite low incomes. Household assets were classified into three categories: low (≤30,000

baht), medium (30,001-60,000) and high (>60,000).

Sedentariness was assessed by screen time (hours/day spent before TV or computer) and (separately) sitting

time (hours per day spent sitting for any purpose). Incidental exercise was measured by the frequency of

housework or gardening, categorised as follows: ≤3 times per month; 1-2 times per week; 3-4 times per

week; most days. We measured planned physical activity at the beginning and end of the 4-year follow up

period. On both occasions, cohort members reported the number of sessions per week of strenuous and

moderate exercise for at least 20 minutes, and of walking for at least 10 minutes. We derived an “overall

measure” of planned physical activity calculated separately at both the baseline and the 4-year mark. The

measure was weighted as follows: (2 × strenuous + 1 × moderate + 1 × walking) sessions per week. This

weighting system is based on the recommendation of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire and

Page 5 of 54

For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml

BMJ Open

123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960

on February 4, 2020 by guest. P

rotected by copyright.http://bm

jopen.bmj.com

/B

MJ O

pen: first published as 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002826 on 25 June 2013. D

ownloaded from

Page 32: BMJ Open · smoking (which was rare) had no apparent hypertension effect. Among males, regular drinking increased the risk of incident hypertension Strengths In Thailand, this cohort

For peer review only

6

the Active Australia Survey as used in other analyses of the cohort data [11 12]. Finally, for each individual,

the “overall measures” of weekly exercise for 2005 and 2009 were added and then averaged by dividing by

2, creating a longitudinal measure of planned physical activity (LPPA).

Smoking status was classified as never, ex-smoker or current-smoker. Alcohol exposure was classified by

four categories: never, ex-drinker, occasional drinker or current-drinker. Body mass index (BMI) was

calculated from self-reported height in metres and weight in kilograms as weight/height2. It was divided into

4 categories as follows according to Asian criteria:[8 13-16] underweight (BMI <18.5), normal (18.5 to

<23), overweight (23 to <25), and obese (≥25). Foods that could potentially influence blood pressure (deep

fried, instant, roast or smoked, soybean products and soft drinks) were assessed for consumption frequency

based on a five-point Likert scale ranging from less than once a month to once or more a day. Western-style

fast food exposure was noted on a three-point scale from less than once to more than 3 times per month.

Fruit and vegetable consumption were recorded as standard serves eaten per day.

Statistical analyses

All analyses were performed using SPSS software. The incidence of hypertension and its 95% confidence

interval (CI) were calculated for each value of each categorical variable in both male and female participants

and the influence on incidence by each variable was evaluated by Chi-square test. For statistical inference,

all p-values were 2 tailed and significance was set at 5%.

Relative risks in a large study of an uncommon disease (incidence less than 10%) can be accurately

estimated as odds ratios [17]. Accordingly, for each risk variable, the relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence

interval were estimated using logistic regression to calculate the bivariate odds ratio for hypertension.

Adjusted RRs (ARRs) were estimated by calculating multivariate logistic regression odds ratios. The ARRs

were controlled for confounding by age, marital status, SES, BMI, underlying diseases and personal

behaviours (cigarette smoking and alcohol drinking). A variable was included in a multivariate model if

bivariate analysis had indicated a statistically significant association with incidence of hypertension. Some

variables were included because earlier analyses reported elsewhere had shown significant or substantial

association with hypertension.

Results

Baseline Characteristics

Baseline characteristics of study participants self-reporting as normotensive in 2005 are shown in Table 1.

The highest proportion of males resided in the North-eastern regions and Central while there were more

females in the Central and Bangkok area. More than half of the male and female participants lived in urban

Page 6 of 54

For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml

BMJ Open

123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960

on February 4, 2020 by guest. P

rotected by copyright.http://bm

jopen.bmj.com

/B

MJ O

pen: first published as 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002826 on 25 June 2013. D

ownloaded from

Page 33: BMJ Open · smoking (which was rare) had no apparent hypertension effect. Among males, regular drinking increased the risk of incident hypertension Strengths In Thailand, this cohort

For peer review only

7

areas. Males had a higher monthly income than females whereas females had a higher educational

attainment than males. The distribution of household assets for males and females was similar and over half

of them were in medium and high categories. The study population had a similar socio-demography, income

and location of residence to the general Thai population [9].

Incidence and risks of hypertension

Overall, the incidence of self-reported doctor diagnosed hypertension in Thai adults was 3.5% and the rate in

males was more than twice the corresponding rate in females (5.2% vs. 2.1%) (Table 2). In males and

females, the incidence of hypertension increased with increasing age. Marriage or having a partner increased

the risk of hypertension in females. Educational attainment and personal income had no influence on the risk

of hypertension in both sexes. In males and females, the risk of hypertension increased with an increased

BMI. The risk of hypertension increased in both males and females who had diabetes mellitus, high blood

lipids and kidney disease.

Planned physical activity, averaged across the 4-year follow-up, was protective for males. In males, higher

LPPA (≥15 sessions / week) associated with lower incidence of hypertension; however, this association was

not observed in females. In males, current-smokers had a higher risk of developing hypertension than non-

smokers while in females, smoking (which was rare) had no apparent hypertension effect. Among males,

regular drinking increased the risk of incident hypertension; patterns of relative risks were similar for

females but, reflecting the low frequency of female drinking, did not reach statistical significance. In males,

the risk of hypertension had a direct association with the frequency of instant food consumption but there

was no such association detected in females.

Over the 4-year period, a variety of factors that could have been risks for hypertension over a longer period

were found not to be in this setting (data not shown). Thus, in males and females, factors that had no

statistically significant influence on the longitudinal 4-year risk of hypertension incidence were urbanization

status, sedentary lifestyle (non-participation in housework or gardening, high levels of television and

computer watching, sleeping and sitting time), and food consumption habits that included deep fried food

and soft drink, Western fast food, roasted or smoked foods, fruit, vegetables and soybean products.

Discussion

Page 7 of 54

For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml

BMJ Open

123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960

on February 4, 2020 by guest. P

rotected by copyright.http://bm

jopen.bmj.com

/B

MJ O

pen: first published as 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002826 on 25 June 2013. D

ownloaded from

Page 34: BMJ Open · smoking (which was rare) had no apparent hypertension effect. Among males, regular drinking increased the risk of incident hypertension Strengths In Thailand, this cohort

For peer review only

8

This large prospective cohort of adults living all over Thailand has been the first studied nationally for a

wide array of risk factors for incident hypertension. Overall, the 4-year incidence of hypertension from 2005

to 2009 was 3.5%, notably higher in men (5.2%) than women (2.1%). These incidence rates are drawn from

a cohort of adults on average younger than the Thai population so they are lower than corresponding rates of

the adult population. However, our focus was on risk factor associations and we noted that in both sexes,

age, obesity and co-morbidity with diabetes mellitus, high blood lipids and kidney disease strongly linked to

hypertension incidence. In males, instant food consumption, smoking and drinking alcohol had a moderate

adverse effect on hypertension risk while planned physical activity averaging 15 or more sessions per week

over the 4-year period was substantially protective, reducing risk by 22%. In females, having a partner was

associated with increased incidence of hypertension.

The age effect on hypertension incidence noted by us is consistent with findings of many other population

studies of hypertension including (for example) a longitudinal study in China [18] and cross-sectional

studies in Korea [19], Taiwan [20] and the USA [21]. The noticeably greater incidence of hypertension in

men than in women that we found in Thailand has also been reported from many parts of the world

including neighboring Malaysia [22] and distant USA [23] as well as in a recent global review [24].

In men and women of the Thai cohort, a progressively higher BMI was positively and significantly

associated with an increased risk of incident hypertension over the four years. This finding was similar to

that reported for other prospective cohorts in the US [25 26] and Finland [27]. Furthermore, after seven

years of follow-up in a US study [28], weight loss associated with a decreased risk of incident hypertension.

Among a cohort of US nurses, the risk of incident hypertension increased 5% for each kilogram addition of

weight [29], and rose 15% for each increase of one kilogram per meter squared of BMI in Taiwan [18].

These results suggest that the adverse effect of high BMI on risk of hypertension does not depend on

ethinicity or sex and is wide spread around the world.

In our cohort, we noted a higher risk of incident hypertension among those with diabetes mellitus. This

finding is consistent with longitudinal studies in the USA [30 31] which reported, respectively, that in

diabetic patients the risk of incident hypertension rose 41% and 56%. As well, prospective cohort studies in

Japan showed that diabetes [32] and impaired fasting blood glucose [33] were associated with an increased

risk of hypertension incidence. Supportive cross-sectional results emerge from studies in diverse settings

including Bangladesh and India [34], Barbados [35] and the USA [36]. A causal association between

Page 8 of 54

For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml

BMJ Open

123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960

on February 4, 2020 by guest. P

rotected by copyright.http://bm

jopen.bmj.com

/B

MJ O

pen: first published as 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002826 on 25 June 2013. D

ownloaded from

Page 35: BMJ Open · smoking (which was rare) had no apparent hypertension effect. Among males, regular drinking increased the risk of incident hypertension Strengths In Thailand, this cohort

For peer review only

9

diabetes and hypertension is suspected and possible mechanisms include endothelial dysfunction and

vascular inflammation [37].

We also found that high blood lipids significantly associated with increased risk of incident hypertension.

This supports the results from previous longitudinal studies in men [38 39], women [40 41] and adults [32

42]. The risk of hypertension increased with an increase of total cholesterol, triglyceride and low-density

lipoprotein cholesterol levels and decreased with an increase of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol level

[38 39 41].The mechanism by which dyslipidemia provokes high blood pressure is uncertain but could

reflect blood vessel dysfunction and damaged endothelium [43].

Among men and women in the Thai cohort, kidney disease strongly associated with increased risk of

hypertension incidence. This result is supported by cross-sectional data from the Czech Republic [44] and

the USA [45]. Microalbuminuria is a biomarker for renal hypertension [45] and the risk increases with the

severity of kidney impairment, revealed by the serum creatinine level [46 47]. Glomerular damage is more

closely connected with hypertension than tubular or interstitial disease [47]. Chronic kidney disease

facilitates high blood pressure through many mechanisms including excessive intravascular volume,

increased endothelin production, activity of the renin-angiotensin system and sympathetic nervous system

and decreased vasodilators, nitric oxide production and endothelial function [48].

In men we found that cigarette smoking modestly associated with increased risk of developing hypertension.

This is consistent with many other reports such as longitudinal studies in Japanese [49] and American men

[50] and a cross-sectional study in French men [51]. In addition, smoking Jordanian men had significantly

higher blood pressure than their non-smoking counterparts [52]. However, we also found that smoking had

no influence on hypertension in women. This result for females is compatible with reports from Korea [53]

and the USA [54]. In contrast, one prospective US study [55] reported an increased risk of hypertension

among women. It is likely that men tend to smoke more cigarettes than women and the impact of smoking

on hypertension is a dose-response pattern [49].

Regular alcohol consumption was strongly associated with an increased risk of incident hypertension. This

result is supported by findings from longitudinal studies in Japan [56 57] and cross-sectional studies in

China [58] and Korea [53]. In Japanese men, alcohol consumption, particularly more than 200 grams per

week, significantly associated with an increase of blood pressure [59] while alcohol restriction was

Page 9 of 54

For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml

BMJ Open

123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960

on February 4, 2020 by guest. P

rotected by copyright.http://bm

jopen.bmj.com

/B

MJ O

pen: first published as 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002826 on 25 June 2013. D

ownloaded from

Page 36: BMJ Open · smoking (which was rare) had no apparent hypertension effect. Among males, regular drinking increased the risk of incident hypertension Strengths In Thailand, this cohort

For peer review only

10

noticeably related to a decreased blood pressure [60]. Among our Thai cohort females, alcohol consumption

had no influence on hypertension; this result was supported by longitudinal data from Japan [56] and cross-

sectional data from Korea [53]. In American females the quantity of alcohol consumption per week had no

effect on systolic blood pressure [61]. Males usually consume more alcohol than females and the

hypertension risk is linear with a dose-response [57 62]. Our results suggest that regular alcohol

consumption, especially in males, is a significant risk factor for developing hypertension.

Marital status in males had no influence on hypertension which supports the results from more economically

developed countries, the USA and Korea [53 54]. However, in middle-income countries, results diverged:

married males, when compared to their unmarried counterparts, had a higher risk of hypertension in

Barbados [35] and a lower risk in Poland [63]. Married individuals had higher emotional and social support

and lower stress [63] and probability of being a current smoker [64]. We found incident hypertension was

relatively more frequent among married females, unlike the no-sex-link pattern in developed countries such

as the USA and Korea [53 54]. The influence of marrital status on hypertension varies from one country to

another partly due to the difference of socio-economy and social structure. For our Thai cohort, the pattern

in males was similar to that in developed countries and in females it was not.

Participant educational attainment did not protect against hypertension in either sex. This is similar to cross-

sectional results for adults in developed countries such as Korea [53] and the USA [36 65]. However, other

studies in various settings and with diverse designs reported educational attainment protects against

hypertension in adults; these included a prospective cohort in middle income Thailand [5], a cross-sectional

study in middle income Malaysia [22] and a cross-sectional study in high income USA [66]. Opposite

findings have been reported in low income settings in both Bangladesh and India [34] where education was

a risk factor for hypertension. Taken collectively, these data suggest that income modifies the protective

education-hypertension effect, inverting it when income is low and boosting it when income is high. Our

middle-income cohort could be in the middle stage of this education effect as it is transiting from the low-

income pattern.

We found no association of personal monthly income and risk of hypertension in either sex. This was similar

to previous studies in middle-income countries including a longitudinal study in Thailand [5] and a cross-

sectional study in Malaysia [67] and in cross-sectional studies in high-income countries such as in Korea

[53] and the USA [21 36]. However, income had an inverse association with risk of hypertension in another

study in high-income developed USA [65] while it had a direct positive association in a low-income

developing country such as Ghana [68]. The health transition in Thailand is likely to be in the middle stage,

Page 10 of 54

For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml

BMJ Open

123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960

on February 4, 2020 by guest. P

rotected by copyright.http://bm

jopen.bmj.com

/B

MJ O

pen: first published as 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002826 on 25 June 2013. D

ownloaded from

Page 37: BMJ Open · smoking (which was rare) had no apparent hypertension effect. Among males, regular drinking increased the risk of incident hypertension Strengths In Thailand, this cohort

For peer review only

11

according to the concept of a tipping-point for the relationship between socio-economic status, body size and

hypertension risk factors. High income, large body size and high blood pressure is seen in developing

countries while in developed countries, high income is a protective factor [69-71]. Indeed, the Thai cohort

has already been shown to be at a transitional point for metabolic states because females had an inverse

relationship between income and BMI whereas males had a positive (traditional) relationship [14]. However,

now all Thais benefit from universal health insurance so access to health care is not dependent on their

income making disease associations more attenuated than before [72].

In our cohort, the reduction of risk of hypertension incidence in males but not in females by a longitudinal

measure of planned physical activity was comparable with a prospective study in middle-aged American

whites [73]. In another prospective study in middle-aged Finns, the hypertension protective effect of

vigorous physical activity or total energy expenditure from leisure-time physical activity was observed in

men but not in women [74]. Such physical activity among females may be less intense than among males so

having no effect on the risk of hypertension [74]. A large Finnish study [27] demonstrated that the incidence

of hypertension was inversely associated with the level of physical activity in a dose-response manner in

both sexes. In our cohort study, risk of obesity had an inverse association with quantified planned exercise in

both sexes but the effect was significantly stronger in males than in females [12]. As Thailand progresses

economically, more people migrate to urban areas and decrease their physical activity [7]. Therefore, in the

future, Thai people may encounter a higher risk of hypertension due to lower physical activity.

Instant food - mostly combinations of carbohydrate, fat and salt - associated with an increased risk of

incident hypertension in males but not in females. Other foods, fruit and vegetables had no impact on

hypertension. This may be as a result of men comsuming more instant foods, such as instant noodles, than

women. For example a study in Korea showed daily instant food consumption in men and women averages

23.7 and 11.1 grams respectively [75]. Other studies showed that carbohydrate [76 77], fruit and vegetables

[78 79] consumption had no influence on hypertension. Most students consume instant noodles which lead

to a higher intake of energy, fat, sodium, thiamine, and riboflavin but a lower intake of protein, calcium,

phosphorus [75]. Koreans favoring instant noodles have a salt intake more than three times higher than the

daily recommendation (6.4 vs 2 gms) [75]. Daily salt intake of Thai people has been reported to average

10.8gm, much higher than recommended (http://www.worldactiononsalt.com/worldaction/asia/75286.pdf).

High salt consumption was associated with an increased risk of developing hypertension in a longitudinal

study in Taiwan [80] and in cross-sectional studies in China [81 82] while other reports revealed that salt

restriction reduced blood pressure [83 84]. High plasma sodium, due to an overwhelmed capacity of the

kidney to excrete excessive salt consumption, leads to excessive intravascular volume and high blood

Page 11 of 54

For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml

BMJ Open

123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960

on February 4, 2020 by guest. P

rotected by copyright.http://bm

jopen.bmj.com

/B

MJ O

pen: first published as 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002826 on 25 June 2013. D

ownloaded from

Page 38: BMJ Open · smoking (which was rare) had no apparent hypertension effect. Among males, regular drinking increased the risk of incident hypertension Strengths In Thailand, this cohort

For peer review only

12

pressure [85]. It seems reasonable to conclude that high salt intake from instant noodle consumption is likely

to be causally associated with an increased risk of hypertension in Thailand.

In Thailand, this cohort constitutes the largest study to examine the longitudinal effect of most health-risk

factors on hypertension development. Indeed, the study size along with its national representation are

important factors to consider when exploring study validity and utility. The influence of risk factors on

hypertension incidence is clearly demonstrated since this is a large longitudinal cohort covering a 4-year

period. As a consequence, independent risk factors for hypertension in Thais can be identified. Our cohort

represents Thais well in geography and socio-economy [9] so the results reflect the trend of health-risk

transition in the Thai population. STOU students, with better education attainment combined with their

representative incomes and geographical location, represent the next generation of Thais. It would be

reasonable to conclude that our 4-year follow-up results show the future hypertension trends for Thai people.

However, our study has limitations since it relied on self-report. There may be recall and reporting errors.

But a study of the validity of self-reported weight and height in our cohort found that the accuracy was quite

acceptable [86]. As well, we have conducted a validation study of self-reported hypertension (Prasutr

Thawornchaisit, 2013, under review) in a random age-sex matched sub-sample of the cohort reporting

hypertension (n=240) or no hypertension (n=240). We found the sensitivity was high (82%) and that

negative reports were usually accurate (86%). In another report, we investigated the impact of the non-

responses to the 2009 follow up and found small effects with under-representation of young urban males;

this missing group would have a minor influence on our results and would not be expected to have a high

rate of incident hypertension [87]. The findings from our study are likely to be robust and represent well the

future trends of health-risk transition in middle-income Thailand and similar ASEAN countries.

In conclusion, older age, obesity and underlying morbidity due to diabetes, high blood lipids and kidney

disease were strongly associated with an increased risk of incident hypertension in both sexes while in

males, physical inactivity, instant food consumption, smoking and drinking alcohol had a moderate

association. Sedentary life-style and the consumption of friut and vegetables had no detected influence on

hypertension. The Thai health-risk transition is likely to be in the middle stage since education attainment

and income still have no net effect to protect against hypertension. Prevention should focus on obesity, high

blood lipids and high salt consumption and people should be encouraged to increase physical exercise and

consume low fat foods and less instant foods. A reduction of salt consumption should be a national policy by

limiting the concentration of salt in ready-to-eat and industrial foods. Smoking and drinking cessation

Page 12 of 54

For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml

BMJ Open

123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960

on February 4, 2020 by guest. P

rotected by copyright.http://bm

jopen.bmj.com

/B

MJ O

pen: first published as 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002826 on 25 June 2013. D

ownloaded from

Page 39: BMJ Open · smoking (which was rare) had no apparent hypertension effect. Among males, regular drinking increased the risk of incident hypertension Strengths In Thailand, this cohort

For peer review only

13

should be promoted for males. Thailand should also consciously aim to take advantage of its culturally

determined low rate of drinking and smoking among women and ensure that there is no attempt to

undermine this situation and develop the market for the female half of the population.

Acknowledgements and Funding

This study was supported by the International Collaborative Research Grants Scheme with joint grants from

the Wellcome Trust UK (GR071587MA) and the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council

(268055), and by a global health grant from the NHMRC (585426). We thank the staff at Sukhothai

Thammathirat Open University (STOU) who assisted with student contact and the STOU students who are

participating in the cohort study. We also thank Dr Bandit Thinkamrop and his team from Khon Kaen

University for guiding us successfully through the complex data processing.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

Ethical considerations

Ethical approval was obtained from Sukhothai Thammathirat Open University Research and Development

Institute (protocol 0522/10) and the Australian National University Human Research Ethics Committee

(protocol 2004344 and 2009570). Informed, written consent was obtained from all participants.

Author contribution: PT devised the hypertension study, analysed the data and wrote the paper. FDL and

CR assisted with planning the study, analysis and interpretation. AS and SS conceived and developed the

cohort, and helped plan, analyse and interpret this study. All authors approved the final manuscript.

Page 13 of 54

For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml

BMJ Open

123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960

on February 4, 2020 by guest. P

rotected by copyright.http://bm

jopen.bmj.com

/B

MJ O

pen: first published as 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002826 on 25 June 2013. D

ownloaded from

Page 40: BMJ Open · smoking (which was rare) had no apparent hypertension effect. Among males, regular drinking increased the risk of incident hypertension Strengths In Thailand, this cohort

For peer review only

14

Table 1 Characteristics of 57558 participants normotensive at the 2005 Thai Cohort Study baseline

Male Female Difference

Factor

n % n % P-valuea

Demographic data

Participants 25320 44.0 32238 56.0 <0.0001 Age (y) mean 32.9 30.0 <0.0001

b

(SD) (8.5) (7.6) Age group <0.0001 ≤30 y 11293 44.6 19229 59.6 31-40 y 9177 36.2 9638 29.9 >40 y 4850 19.2 3371 10.5 Married/partnered <0.0001 No 11060 44.8 18851 60.1 Yes 13607 55.2 12513 39.9 Regions <0.0001 Bangkok 3488 13.9 6057 18.9 Central 5712 22.7 8267 25.8 North 5180 20.6 5818 18.1 North-east 6142 24.4 5760 18.0 East 1515 6.0 1922 6.0 South 3103 12.3 4254 13.3 Urbanization status

c <0.0001

Rural–rural (RR) 11512 46,1 13895 43.6 Rural–urban (RU) 7891 31.6 9546 29.9 Urban–rural (UR) 1078 4.3 1344 4.2 Urban–urban (UU) 4495 18.0 7114 22.3

Socioeconomic status

Education level <0.0001 High school 13366 52.9 13135 40.8 Diploma 5749 22.8 9791 30.4 University 6153 24.4 9231 28.7 Personal monthly income (baht)

d <0.0001 ≤7000 8025 32.3 13890 44.1 7001–10000 5790 23.3 7578 24.0 10001–20000 7549 30.4 7194 22.8 >20000 3452 13.9 2851 9.0 Household assets

e (baht)

d <0.001

Low 9852 39.1 12434 38.7 Medium 8065 32.0 9863 30.7 High 7298 28.9 9804 30.5 aChi-square test

b unpaired t test cLocation of residence (rural, R, or urban, U) at age 10-12 years and again in 2005. dAt the time of the survey in 2009, US$1 = 31 Thai baht eReplacement value in Thai baht: low ≤30,000, medium 30,001-60,000 and high >60,000

Page 14 of 54

For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml

BMJ Open

123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960

on February 4, 2020 by guest. P

rotected by copyright.http://bm

jopen.bmj.com

/B

MJ O

pen: first published as 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002826 on 25 June 2013. D

ownloaded from

Page 41: BMJ Open · smoking (which was rare) had no apparent hypertension effect. Among males, regular drinking increased the risk of incident hypertension Strengths In Thailand, this cohort

For peer review only

15

Table 2 Hypertension incidence and association with risk factors in male and female participants.

Males Females

HT(n) Incia%(95% CI) ARR

b(95% CI) HT(n) Inci

a%(95% CI) ARR

b(95% CI)

Participants 1306 5.2 (4.9-5.4) 690 2.1 (2.0-2.3)

Demography

Age group

≤30 y 279 2.5 (2.2-2.8) 1 215 1.1 (0.97-1.3) 1 31-40 y 484 5.3 (4.8-5.7) 1.66 (1.39-1.98) 245 2.5 (2.23-2.9) 1.93 (1.56-2.39) >40 y 543 11.2 (10.3-12.1) 3.13 (2.57-3.81) 230 6.8 (6.0-7.7) 4.2 (3.26-5.42) P-trend <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001

Marital status (married/partnered)

No 368 3.3 (3.0-3.7) 1 303 1.6 (1.43-1.8) 1 Yes 896 6.6 (6.17-7.0) 0.97 (0.83-1.12) 368 2.9 (2.65-3.2) 1.22 (1.03-1.45)

Socio-economic status

Education level

High school 697 5.2 (4.8-5.6) 1 303 2.3 (2.05-2.57) 1 Diploma 276 4.8 (4.25-5.4) 1.0 (0.86-1.17) 180 1.8 (1.57-2.1) 0.81 (0.66-0.99) University 331 5.4 (4.8-5.9) 0.93 (0.8-1.1) 204 2.2 (1.9-2.51) 0.87 (0.71-1.07) P-trend 0.83 0.61 0.463 0.1 Personal monthly income (baht)c ≤7000 268 3.3 (2.95-3.7) 1 217 1.6 (1.36-1.8) 1 7001-10000 229 4.0 (3.45-4.5) 1.0 (0.81-1.2) 142 1.9 (1.57-2.2) 1.1 (0.87-1.37) 10001-20000 497 6.6 (6.0-7.14) 1.1 (0.91-1.31) 196 2.7 (2.35-3.1) 0.97 (0.77-1.23) >20000 289 8.4 (7.46-9.3) 1.0 (0.8-1.25) 122 4.3 (3.54-5.0) 1.04 (0.78-1.39) P-trend <0.0001 0.527 <0.0001 0.783 BMI classification

d

Underweight 359 2.9 (2.62-3.2) 0.46 (0.27-0.78) 60 0.85 (0.63-1.15) 0.9 (0.67-1.21) (BMI <18.5) Normal 16 1.1 (0.56-1.6) 1 258 1.4 (1.2-1.5) 1 (18.5 ≤ BMI < 23) Overweight 333 5.9 (5.3-6.54) 1.66 (1.41-1.95) 129 3.9 (3.3-4.62) 2.32 (1.8-2.91) (23 ≤ BMI < 25) Obese 575 10.4 (9.6-11.2) 2.82 (2.43-3.27) 231 7.4 (6.4-8.27) 4.14 (3.4-5.05) (BMI ≥25) P-trend <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001

Continued….

Page 15 of 54

For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml

BMJ Open

123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960

on February 4, 2020 by guest. P

rotected by copyright.http://bm

jopen.bmj.com

/B

MJ O

pen: first published as 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002826 on 25 June 2013. D

ownloaded from

Page 42: BMJ Open · smoking (which was rare) had no apparent hypertension effect. Among males, regular drinking increased the risk of incident hypertension Strengths In Thailand, this cohort

For peer review only

16

Table 2 (continued...)

Males Females HT(n) Inci

a%(95% CI) ARR

b(95% CI) HT(n) Inci

a%(95% CI) ARR

b(95% CI)

Physical activities

Weighted total sessions exercise-related physical activity (average between 2005 and 2009) 0-7 ses/we 198 6.3 (5.5-7.1) 1 162 2.2 (1.8-2.6) 1 8-14 ses/w 589 5.2 (4.8-5.6) 0.9 (0.76-1.07) 352 2.1 (1.9-2.3) 1.0 (0.82-1.23)

≥15 ses/w 380 4.4 (4.0-5.0) 0.78 (0.65-0.95) 119 2.2 (1.8-2.6) 1.0 (0.77-1.3)

P-trend <0.0001 <0.029 0.905 1.0

Underlying diseases

Diabetes mellitus

No 1251 5.0 (4.7-5.27) 1 674 2.1 (1.9-2.26) 1 Yes 55 18.3 (13.9-22.7) 1.81 (1.29-2.52) 16 10.7 (5.7-15.8) 2.54 (1.41-4.56)

High lipids

No 983 4.4 (4.13-4.67) 1 576 1.9 (1.76-2.1) 1 Yes 323 10.8 (9.7-11.9) 1.4 (1.21-1.63) 114 5.4 (4.47-6.4) 1.38 (1.09-1.75)

Kidney diseases

No 1248 5.1 (4.8-5.33) 1 659 2.1 (1.9-2.26) 1 Yes 58 9.6 (7.2-11.9) 1.62 (1.19-2.2) 31 3.9 (2.52-5.2) 1.77 (1.19-2.63)

Personal behaviours

Smoking status Never 506 4.1 (3.7-4.4) 1 617 2.1 (1.9-2.23) 1 Ex-smoker 496 6.6 (6.0-7.13) 1.15 (1.0-1.32) 37 3.2 (2.2-4.22) 1.28 (0.88-1.87) Cur-smokerf 276 5.8 (5.16-6.5) 1.22 (1.04-1.44) 8 3.1 (0.97-5.2) 1.54 (0.74-3.2) P-trend <0.0001 <0.032 <0.008 0.23

Drinking status

Never 105 3.9 (3.2-4.7) 1 268 2.1 (1.8-2.32) 1 Ex-drinker 155 5.7 (4.85-6.6) 0.98 (0.74-1.3) 50 2.2 (1.6-2.85) 1.14 (0.82-1.59) Occ- drinkerg 821 4.8 (4.45-5.1) 1.0 (0.8-1.25) 352 2.1 (1.9-2.36) 1.14 (0.96-1.36) Reg- drinker

h 212 8.6 (7.5-9.7) 1.61 (1.23-2.11) 9 4.7 (1.66-7.7) 1.83 (0.86-3.9)

P-trend <0.0001 <0.0001 0.471 0.254

Food consumption habit

Instant food

<1 time/m 335 6.3 (5.6-6.95) 1 168 2.8(2.36-3.2) 1 1-3 times/m 485 5.1 (4.63-5.5) 1.02 (0.87-1.19) 273 2.1 (1.84-2.3) 0.95 (0.77-1.17) 1-2 times/wk 280 4.4 (3.9-4.9) 1.09 (0.91-1.30) 153 1.9 (1.6-2.2) 1.04 (0.81-1.33) 3-6 times/wk 165 5.0 (4.3-5.75) 1.36 (1.1-1.69) 73 1.8 (1.4-2.22) 1.14 (0.84-1.55) ≥1 times/d 32 5.5 (3.6-7.33) 1.67 (1.11-2.52) 18 2.3 (1.3-3.35) 1.48 (0.86-2.53) P-trend <0.002 <0.008 <0.002 0.403 aIncidence of Hypertension

bAdjusted relative risks were calculated from multi-variate logistic regression models of hypertension adjusted for age, marital status, education, income, BMI category, underlying diseases, personal behaviours. cAt the time of the survey in 2005, US$1 = 42 Thai baht dAsian standard BMI classification eSessions / week fCurrent-smoker gOccasional drinker hRegular drinker

Page 16 of 54

For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml

BMJ Open

123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960

on February 4, 2020 by guest. P

rotected by copyright.http://bm

jopen.bmj.com

/B

MJ O

pen: first published as 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002826 on 25 June 2013. D

ownloaded from

Page 43: BMJ Open · smoking (which was rare) had no apparent hypertension effect. Among males, regular drinking increased the risk of incident hypertension Strengths In Thailand, this cohort

For peer review only

17

References

1. Chobanian AV, Bakris GL, Black HR, et al. Seventh report of the Joint National Committee on

Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure. Hypertension

2003;42(6):1206-52.

2. Gaziano TA, Bitton A, Anand S, et al. Growing epidemic of coronary heart disease in low- and middle-

income countries. Curr Probl Cardiol 2010;35(2):72-115.

3. Whitworth JA, World Health Organization and International Society of Hypertension Writing Group.

2003 World Health Organization (WHO)/International Society of Hypertension (ISH) statement on

management of hypertension. J Hypertens 2003;21(11):1983-92.

4. Aekplakorn W, Sangthong R, Kessomboon P, et al. Changes in prevalence, awareness, treatment and

control of hypertension in Thai population, 2004-2009: Thai National Health Examination Survey

III-IV. J Hypertens 2012;30(9):1734-42.

5. Vathesatogkit P, Woodward M, Tanomsup S, et al. Long-term effects of socioeconomic status on incident

hypertension and progression of blood pressure. J Hypertens 2012;30(7):1347-53.

6. Aekplakorn W, Abbott-Klafter J, Khonputsa P, et al. Prevalence and management of prehypertension and

hypertension by geographic regions of Thailand: the Third National Health Examination Survey,

2004. J Hypertens 2008;26(2):191-8.

7. Lim LL, Kjellstrom T, Sleigh A, et al. Associations between urbanisation and components of the health-

risk transition in Thailand. A descriptive study of 87,000 Thai adults. Glob Health Action

2009;20(1914):1-13.

8. Banwell C, Lim L, Seubsman SA, et al. Body mass index and health-related behaviours in a national

cohort of 87,134 Thai open university students. J Epidemiol Community Health 2009;63(5):366-72.

9. Seubsman S, Yiengprugsawan V, Sleigh A, et al. A Large National Thai Cohort Study of the Health-Risk

Transition based on Sukhothai Thammathirat Open University Students. ASEAN Journal of Open

Distance Learning 2012;4(1):58-69.

Page 17 of 54

For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml

BMJ Open

123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960

on February 4, 2020 by guest. P

rotected by copyright.http://bm

jopen.bmj.com

/B

MJ O

pen: first published as 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002826 on 25 June 2013. D

ownloaded from

Page 44: BMJ Open · smoking (which was rare) had no apparent hypertension effect. Among males, regular drinking increased the risk of incident hypertension Strengths In Thailand, this cohort

For peer review only

18

10. Sleigh AC, Seubsman SA, Bain C. Cohort profile: The Thai Cohort of 87,134 Open University students.

Int J Epidemiol 2008;37(2):266-72.

11. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. The Active Australia Survey: a guide and manual for

implementation, analysis and reporting Canberra. AIHW 2003:1-55.

12. Banks E, Lim L, Seubsman SA, et al. Relationship of obesity to physical activity, domestic activities,

and sedentary behaviours: cross-sectional findings from a national cohort of over 70,000 Thai adults.

BMC Public Health 2011;11(762):1-14.

13. Yiengprugsawan V, Banwell C, Seubsman SA, et al. Short sleep and obesity in a large national cohort of

Thai adults. BMJ open 2012;2(1):e000561-7.

14. Seubsman SA, Lim LL, Banwell C, et al. Socioeconomic status, sex, and obesity in a large national

cohort of 15-87-year-old open university students in Thailand. J Epidemiol 2010;20(1):13-20.

15. Weisell RC. Body mass index as an indicator of obesity. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr 2002;11 Suppl 8:S681-4.

16. Kanazawa M, Yoshiike N, Osaka T, et al. Criteria and classification of obesity in Japan and Asia-

Oceania. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr 2002;11 Suppl 8:S732-7.

17. Webb P, Bain C. Essential Epidemiology : An Introduction for Students and Health Professionals. 2 ed.

New York: Cambridge University Press, 2011:461.

18. Chuang SY, Chou P, Hsu PF, et al. Presence and progression of abdominal obesity are predictors of

future high blood pressure and hypertension. Am J Hypertens 2006;19(8):788-95.

19. Choi KM, Park HS, Han JH, et al. Prevalence of prehypertension and hypertension in a Korean

population: Korean National Health and Nutrition Survey 2001. J Hypertens 2006;24(8):1515-21.

20. Su TC, Bai CH, Chang HY, et al. Evidence for improved control of hypertension in Taiwan: 1993-2002.

J Hypertens 2008;26(3):600-6.

21. Bassett DR, Jr., Fitzhugh EC, Crespo CJ, et al. Physical activity and ethnic differences in hypertension

prevalence in the United States. Prev Med 2002;34(2):179-86.

Page 18 of 54

For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml

BMJ Open

123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960

on February 4, 2020 by guest. P

rotected by copyright.http://bm

jopen.bmj.com

/B

MJ O

pen: first published as 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002826 on 25 June 2013. D

ownloaded from

Page 45: BMJ Open · smoking (which was rare) had no apparent hypertension effect. Among males, regular drinking increased the risk of incident hypertension Strengths In Thailand, this cohort

For peer review only

19

22. Rampal L, Rampal S, Azhar MZ, et al. Prevalence, awareness, treatment and control of hypertension in

Malaysia: a national study of 16,440 subjects. Public Health 2008;122(1):11-8.

23. Lloyd-Jones D, Adams R, Carnethon M, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics--2009 update: a report

from the American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee.

Circulation 2009;119(3):e21-181.

24. Barton M, Meyer MR. Postmenopausal hypertension: mechanisms and therapy. Hypertension

2009;54(1):11-8.

25. Shihab HM, Meoni LA, Chu AY, et al. Body Mass Index and Risk of Incident Hypertension over the

Life Course: The Johns Hopkins Precursors Study. Circulation 2012;126(25):2983-9.

26. Gelber RP, Gaziano JM, Manson JE, et al. A prospective study of body mass index and the risk of

developing hypertension in men. Am J Hypertens 2007;20(4):370-7.

27. Hu G, Barengo NC, Tuomilehto J, et al. Relationship of physical activity and body mass index to the risk

of hypertension: a prospective study in Finland. Hypertension 2004;43(1):25-30.

28. He J, Whelton PK, Appel LJ, et al. Long-term effects of weight loss and dietary sodium reduction on

incidence of hypertension. Hypertension 2000;35(2):544-9.

29. Huang Z, Willett WC, Manson JE, et al. Body weight, weight change, and risk for hypertension in

women. Ann Intern Med 1998;128(2):81-8.

30. Levin G, Kestenbaum B, Ida Chen YD, et al. Glucose, insulin, and incident hypertension in the multi-

ethnic study of atherosclerosis. Am J Epidemiol 2010;172(10):1144-54.

31. Wang W, Lee ET, Fabsitz RR, et al. A longitudinal study of hypertension risk factors and their relation

to cardiovascular disease: the Strong Heart Study. Hypertension 2006;47(3):403-9.

32. Fukui M, Tanaka M, Toda H, et al. Risk factors for development of diabetes mellitus, hypertension and

dyslipidemia. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2011;94(1):e15-8.

Page 19 of 54

For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml

BMJ Open

123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960

on February 4, 2020 by guest. P

rotected by copyright.http://bm

jopen.bmj.com

/B

MJ O

pen: first published as 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002826 on 25 June 2013. D

ownloaded from

Page 46: BMJ Open · smoking (which was rare) had no apparent hypertension effect. Among males, regular drinking increased the risk of incident hypertension Strengths In Thailand, this cohort

For peer review only

20

33. Suematsu C, Hayashi T, Fujii S, et al. Impaired fasting glucose and the risk of hypertension in Japanese

men between the 1980s and the 1990s. The Osaka Health Survey. Diabetes Care 1999;22(2):228-32.

34. Hypertension Study Group. Prevalence, awareness, treatment and control of hypertension among the

elderly in Bangladesh and India: a multicentre study. Bull World Health Organ 2001;79(6):490-500.

35. Rodrigues Barbosa A, Ferreti Borgatto A. Arterial hypertension in the elderly of bridgetown, barbados:

prevalence and associated factors. J Aging Health 2010;22(5):611-30.

36. Bell CN, Thorpe RJ, Jr., Laveist TA. Race/Ethnicity and hypertension: the role of social support. Am J

Hypertens 2010;23(5):534-40.

37. Marso SP, Hiatt WR. Peripheral arterial disease in patients with diabetes. J Am Coll Cardiol

2006;47(5):921-9.

38. Laaksonen DE, Niskanen L, Nyyssonen K, et al. Dyslipidaemia as a predictor of hypertension in middle-

aged men. Eur Heart J 2008;29(20):2561-8.

39. Halperin RO, Sesso HD, Ma J, et al. Dyslipidemia and the risk of incident hypertension in men.

Hypertension 2006;47(1):45-50.

40. Tohidi M, Hatami M, Hadaegh F, et al. Triglycerides and triglycerides to high-density lipoprotein

cholesterol ratio are strong predictors of incident hypertension in Middle Eastern women. J Hum

Hypertens 2011;26(9):525-32.

41. Sesso HD, Buring JE, Chown MJ, et al. A prospective study of plasma lipid levels and hypertension in

women. Arch Intern Med 2005;165(20):2420-7.

42. Haffner SM, Miettinen H, Gaskill SP, et al. Metabolic precursors of hypertension. The San Antonio

Heart Study. Arch Intern Med 1996;156(17):1994-2001.

43. Selwyn AP, Kinlay S, Libby P, et al. Atherogenic lipids, vascular dysfunction, and clinical signs of

ischemic heart disease. Circulation 1997;95(1):5-7.

Page 20 of 54

For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml

BMJ Open

123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960

on February 4, 2020 by guest. P

rotected by copyright.http://bm

jopen.bmj.com

/B

MJ O

pen: first published as 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002826 on 25 June 2013. D

ownloaded from

Page 47: BMJ Open · smoking (which was rare) had no apparent hypertension effect. Among males, regular drinking increased the risk of incident hypertension Strengths In Thailand, this cohort

For peer review only

21

44. Jancova E, Vankova Z, Honsova E, et al. Prevalence and risk of hypertension in renal disease--data from

the Czech Registry of Renal Biopsies. Kidney Blood Press Res 2008;31(2):135-42.

45. Kalaitzidis R, Li S, Wang C, et al. Hypertension in early-stage kidney disease: an update from the

Kidney Early Evaluation Program (KEEP). Am J Kidney Dis 2009;53(4 Suppl 4):S22-31.

46. Johnston PA, Davison AM. Hypertension in adults with idiopathic glomerulonephritis and normal serum

creatinine. A report from the MRC Glomerulonephritis Registry. Nephrol Dial Transplant

1993;8(1):20-4.

47. Buckalew VM, Jr., Berg RL, Wang SR, et al. Prevalence of hypertension in 1,795 subjects with chronic

renal disease: the modification of diet in renal disease study baseline cohort. Modification of Diet in

Renal Disease Study Group. Am J Kidney Dis 1996;28(6):811-21.

48. Campese VM, Mitra N, Sandee D. Hypertension in renal parenchymal disease: why is it so resistant to

treatment? Kidney Int 2006;69(6):967-73.

49. Niskanen L, Laaksonen DE, Nyyssonen K, et al. Inflammation, abdominal obesity, and smoking as

predictors of hypertension. Hypertension 2004;44(6):859-65.

50. Halperin RO, Gaziano JM, Sesso HD. Smoking and the risk of incident hypertension in middle-aged and

older men. Am J Hypertens 2008;21(2):148-52.

51. Halimi JM, Giraudeau B, Vol S, et al. The risk of hypertension in men: direct and indirect effects of

chronic smoking. J Hypertens 2002;20(2):187-93.

52. Al-Safi SA. Does smoking affect blood pressure and heart rate? European journal of cardiovascular

nursing : journal of the Working Group on Cardiovascular Nursing of the European Society of

Cardiology 2005;4(4):286-9.

53. Jo I, Ahn Y, Lee J, et al. Prevalence, awareness, treatment, control and risk factors of hypertension in

Korea: the Ansan study. J Hypertens 2001;19(9):1523-32.

Page 21 of 54

For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml

BMJ Open

123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960

on February 4, 2020 by guest. P

rotected by copyright.http://bm

jopen.bmj.com

/B

MJ O

pen: first published as 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002826 on 25 June 2013. D

ownloaded from

Page 48: BMJ Open · smoking (which was rare) had no apparent hypertension effect. Among males, regular drinking increased the risk of incident hypertension Strengths In Thailand, this cohort

For peer review only

22

54. Schwandt HM, Coresh J, Hindin MJ. Marital Status, Hypertension, Coronary Heart Disease, Diabetes,

and Death Among African American Women and Men: Incidence and Prevalence in the

Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study Participants. J Fam Issues 2010;31(9):1211-29.

55. Bowman TS, Gaziano JM, Buring JE, et al. A prospective study of cigarette smoking and risk of incident

hypertension in women. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;50(21):2085-92.

56. Ohmori S, Kiyohara Y, Kato I, et al. Alcohol intake and future incidence of hypertension in a general

Japanese population: the Hisayama study. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 2002;26(7):1010-6.

57. Nakanishi N, Yoshida H, Nakamura K, et al. Alcohol consumption and risk for hypertension in middle-

aged Japanese men. J Hypertens 2001;19(5):851-5.

58. Wildman RP, Gu D, Muntner P, et al. Alcohol intake and hypertension subtypes in Chinese men. J

Hypertens 2005;23(4):737-43.

59. Yoshita K, Miura K, Morikawa Y, et al. Relationship of alcohol consumption to 7-year blood pressure

change in Japanese men. J Hypertens 2005;23(8):1485-90.

60. Minami J, Yoshii M, Todoroki M, et al. Effects of alcohol restriction on ambulatory blood pressure,

heart rate, and heart rate variability in Japanese men. Am J Hypertens 2002;15(2 Pt 1):125-9.

61. Fuchs FD, Chambless LE, Whelton PK, et al. Alcohol consumption and the incidence of hypertension:

The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study. Hypertension 2001;37(5):1242-50.

62. Taylor B, Irving HM, Baliunas D, et al. Alcohol and hypertension: gender differences in dose-response

relationships determined through systematic review and meta-analysis. Addiction

2009;104(12):1981-90.

63. Lipowicz A, Lopuszanska M. Marital differences in blood pressure and the risk of hypertension among

Polish men. Eur J Epidemiol 2005;20(5):421-7.

64. Trivedi RB, Ayotte B, Edelman D, et al. The association of emotional well-being and marital status with

treatment adherence among patients with hypertension. Journal of behavioral medicine

2008;31(6):489-97.

Page 22 of 54

For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml

BMJ Open

123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960

on February 4, 2020 by guest. P

rotected by copyright.http://bm

jopen.bmj.com

/B

MJ O

pen: first published as 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002826 on 25 June 2013. D

ownloaded from

Page 49: BMJ Open · smoking (which was rare) had no apparent hypertension effect. Among males, regular drinking increased the risk of incident hypertension Strengths In Thailand, this cohort

For peer review only

23

65. Kaplan MS, Huguet N, Feeny DH, et al. Self-reported hypertension prevalence and income among older

adults in Canada and the United States. Soc Sci Med 2010;70(6):844-9.

66. Vargas CM, Ingram DD, Gillum RF. Incidence of hypertension and educational attainment: the

NHANES I epidemiologic followup study. First National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.

Am J Epidemiol 2000;152(3):272-8.

67. Rashid AK, Azizah AM. Prevalence of hypertension among the elderly Malays living in rural Malaysia.

Australian Medical Journal 2011;4(6):283-90.

68. Addo J, Smeeth L, Leon DA. Socioeconomic position and hypertension: a study of urban civil servants

in Ghana. J Epidemiol Community Health 2009;63(8):646-50.

69. Ball K, Crawford D. Socioeconomic status and weight change in adults: a review. Soc Sci Med

2005;60(9):1987-2010.

70. Diez-Roux AV, Nieto FJ, Caulfield L, et al. Neighbourhood differences in diet: the Atherosclerosis Risk

in Communities (ARIC) Study. J Epidemiol Community Health 1999;53(1):55-63.

71. Sobal J, Stunkard AJ. Socioeconomic status and obesity: a review of the literature. Psychological

bulletin 1989;105(2):260-75.

72. Yiengprugsawan V, Seubsman SA, Lim LL, et al. Used and foregone health services among a cohort of

87,134 adult open university students residing throughout Thailand. The Southeast Asian journal of

tropical medicine and public health 2009;40(6):1347-58.

73. Pereira MA, Folsom AR, McGovern PG, et al. Physical activity and incident hypertension in black and

white adults: the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study. Prev Med 1999;28(3):304-12.

74. Haapanen N, Miilunpalo S, Vuori I, et al. Association of leisure time physical activity with the risk of

coronary heart disease, hypertension and diabetes in middle-aged men and women. Int J Epidemiol

1997;26(4):739-47.

75. Park J, Lee JS, Jang YA, et al. A comparison of food and nutrient intake between instant noodle

consumers and non-instant noodle consumers in Korean adults. Nutr Res Pract 2011;5(5):443-9.

Page 23 of 54

For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml

BMJ Open

123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960

on February 4, 2020 by guest. P

rotected by copyright.http://bm

jopen.bmj.com

/B

MJ O

pen: first published as 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002826 on 25 June 2013. D

ownloaded from

Page 50: BMJ Open · smoking (which was rare) had no apparent hypertension effect. Among males, regular drinking increased the risk of incident hypertension Strengths In Thailand, this cohort

For peer review only

24

76. Jolly SE, Eilat-Adar S, Wang H, et al. Sex-specific associations of nutrition with hypertension and

systolic blood pressure in Alaska Natives findings from the GOCADAN study. Int J Circumpolar

Health 2011;70(3):254-65.

77. Alonso A, Beunza JJ, Bes-Rastrollo M, et al. Vegetable protein and fiber from cereal are inversely

associated with the risk of hypertension in a Spanish cohort. Arch Med Res 2006;37(6):778-86.

78. Steffen LM, Kroenke CH, Yu X, et al. Associations of plant food, dairy product, and meat intakes with

15-y incidence of elevated blood pressure in young black and white adults: the Coronary Artery Risk

Development in Young Adults (CARDIA) Study. Am J Clin Nutr 2005;82(6):1169-77; quiz 363-4.

79. Schulze MB, Hoffmann K, Kroke A, et al. Risk of hypertension among women in the EPIC-Potsdam

Study: comparison of relative risk estimates for exploratory and hypothesis-oriented dietary patterns.

Am J Epidemiol 2003;158(4):365-73.

80. Chien KL, Hsu HC, Chen PC, et al. Urinary sodium and potassium excretion and risk of hypertension in

Chinese: report from a community-based cohort study in Taiwan. J Hypertens 2008;26(9):1750-6.

81. Zhang L, Qin LQ, Liu AP, et al. Prevalence of risk factors for cardiovascular disease and their

associations with diet and physical activity in suburban Beijing, China. J Epidemiol 2010;20(3):237-

43.

82. Sun Z, Zheng L, Xu C, et al. Prevalence of prehypertension, hypertension and, associated risk factors in

Mongolian and Han Chinese populations in Northeast China. Int J Cardiol 2008;128(2):250-4.

83. He FJ, MacGregor GA. Effect of modest salt reduction on blood pressure: a meta-analysis of

randomized trials. Implications for public health. J Hum Hypertens 2002;16(11):761-70.

84. Sacks FM, Svetkey LP, Vollmer WM, et al. Effects on blood pressure of reduced dietary sodium and the

Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) diet. DASH-Sodium Collaborative Research

Group. N Engl J Med 2001;344(1):3-10.

85. He FJ, MacGregor GA. Reducing population salt intake worldwide: from evidence to implementation.

Prog Cardiovasc Dis 2010;52(5):363-82.

Page 24 of 54

For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml

BMJ Open

123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960

on February 4, 2020 by guest. P

rotected by copyright.http://bm

jopen.bmj.com

/B

MJ O

pen: first published as 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002826 on 25 June 2013. D

ownloaded from

Page 51: BMJ Open · smoking (which was rare) had no apparent hypertension effect. Among males, regular drinking increased the risk of incident hypertension Strengths In Thailand, this cohort

For peer review only

25

86. Lim LL, Seubsman SA, Sleigh A. Validity of self-reported weight, height, and body mass index among

university students in Thailand: Implications for population studies of obesity in developing

countries. Population health metrics 2009;7:1-15.

87. Thinkhamrop K, Seubsman S, Sleigh A, et al. Reasons for Non-Response to Mailed Questionnaires –

Experience of a Large Cohort Study in Thailand. KKU Jph Research 2011;4(3):73-87.

Page 25 of 54

For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml

BMJ Open

123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960

on February 4, 2020 by guest. P

rotected by copyright.http://bm

jopen.bmj.com

/B

MJ O

pen: first published as 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002826 on 25 June 2013. D

ownloaded from

Page 52: BMJ Open · smoking (which was rare) had no apparent hypertension effect. Among males, regular drinking increased the risk of incident hypertension Strengths In Thailand, this cohort

For peer review only

1

Health-risk factors and the incidence of hypertension: 4-year

prospective findings from a national cohort of 60,569 Thai open

university students

Prasutr Thawornchaisit, School of Medicine, Faculty of Health Science, University of

Queensland, 288 Herston Road, Herston, Brisbane, QLD, 4006 Australia and Department of

Medicine, Lerdsin Hospital, Silom road, Bangrak, Bangkok, 10500 Thailand

Email: [email protected]

Telephone: 662-585-8015

Fax: 662-912-0121

Prasutr Thawornchaisit, MD, MPH1, Ferdinandus de Looze, MBBS, MSc

1, Christopher M Reid,

PhD2, Sam-ang Seubsman, PhD

3, Adrian Sleigh, MD

4, Thai Cohort Study Team*

1 School of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia, 2 School of Public Health

and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia, 3 School of Human

Ecology, Sukhothai Thammathirat Open University, Nonthaburi, Thailand, 4 National Centre for

Epidemiology and Population Health, ANU College of Medicine, Biology and Environment, The

Australian National University, Canberra, Australia.

*Thailand: Jaruwan Chokhanapitak, Suttanit Hounthasarn, Suwanee Khamman, Daoruang

Pandee, Suttinan Pangsap, Tippawan Prapamontol, Janya Puengson, Sam-ang Seubsman,

Boonchai Somboonsook, Nintita Sripaiboonkij, Pathumvadee Somsamai, Prasutr

Thawornchaisit, Duangkae Vilainerun, Wanee Wimonwattanaphan, Cha-aim Pachanee, Arunrat

Tangmunkongvorakul, Benjawan Tawatsupa, Wimalin Rimpeekool.

Australia: Chris Bain, Emily Banks, Cathy Banwell, Bruce Caldwell, Gordon Carmichael, Tarie

Dellora, Jane Dixon, Sharon Friel, David Harley, Matthew Kelly, Tord Kjellstrom, Lynette Lim,

Anthony McMichael, Tanya Mark, Adrian Sleigh, Lyndall Strazdins, Vasoontara

Yiengprugsawan, Susan Jordan, Janneke Berecki-Gisolf, Rod McClure.

Running Head: Health-risks and hypertension incidence in the Thai Cohort Study

Page 26 of 54

For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml

BMJ Open

123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960

on February 4, 2020 by guest. P

rotected by copyright.http://bm

jopen.bmj.com

/B

MJ O

pen: first published as 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002826 on 25 June 2013. D

ownloaded from

Page 53: BMJ Open · smoking (which was rare) had no apparent hypertension effect. Among males, regular drinking increased the risk of incident hypertension Strengths In Thailand, this cohort

For peer review only

2

Key words: hypertension; health-risks; cohort; Thailand; socioeconomic

Word Count: 4483

Page 27 of 54

For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml

BMJ Open

123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960

on February 4, 2020 by guest. P

rotected by copyright.http://bm

jopen.bmj.com

/B

MJ O

pen: first published as 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002826 on 25 June 2013. D

ownloaded from

Page 54: BMJ Open · smoking (which was rare) had no apparent hypertension effect. Among males, regular drinking increased the risk of incident hypertension Strengths In Thailand, this cohort

For peer review only

3

Page 28 of 54

For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml

BMJ Open

123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960

on February 4, 2020 by guest. P

rotected by copyright.http://bm

jopen.bmj.com

/B

MJ O

pen: first published as 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002826 on 25 June 2013. D

ownloaded from

Page 55: BMJ Open · smoking (which was rare) had no apparent hypertension effect. Among males, regular drinking increased the risk of incident hypertension Strengths In Thailand, this cohort

For peer review only

STROBE 2007 (v4) Statement—Checklist of items that should be included in reports of cohort studies

Section/Topic Item

# Recommendation Reported on page #

Title and abstract 1 (a) Indicate the study’s design with a commonly used term in the title or the abstract 1

(b) Provide in the abstract an informative and balanced summary of what was done and what was found 2

Introduction

Background/rationale 2 Explain the scientific background and rationale for the investigation being reported 4

Objectives 3 State specific objectives, including any prespecified hypotheses 4

Methods

Study design 4 Present key elements of study design early in the paper 4

Setting 5 Describe the setting, locations, and relevant dates, including periods of recruitment, exposure, follow-up, and data

collection

5

Participants 6 (a) Give the eligibility criteria, and the sources and methods of selection of participants. Describe methods of follow-up 4

(b) For matched studies, give matching criteria and number of exposed and unexposed 5-6

Variables 7 Clearly define all outcomes, exposures, predictors, potential confounders, and effect modifiers. Give diagnostic criteria, if

applicable

5

Data sources/

measurement

8* For each variable of interest, give sources of data and details of methods of assessment (measurement). Describe

comparability of assessment methods if there is more than one group

5-6

Bias 9 Describe any efforts to address potential sources of bias 12

Study size 10 Explain how the study size was arrived at 4-5

Quantitative variables 11 Explain how quantitative variables were handled in the analyses. If applicable, describe which groupings were chosen and

why

5-6

Statistical methods 12 (a) Describe all statistical methods, including those used to control for confounding 6

(b) Describe any methods used to examine subgroups and interactions 6

(c) Explain how missing data were addressed 12

(d) If applicable, explain how loss to follow-up was addressed 12

(e) Describe any sensitivity analyses 12

Results 7

Page 29 of 54

For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml

BMJ Open

123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960

on February 4, 2020 by guest. Protected by copyright. http://bmjopen.bmj.com/ BMJ Open: first published as 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002826 on 25 June 2013. Downloaded from

Page 56: BMJ Open · smoking (which was rare) had no apparent hypertension effect. Among males, regular drinking increased the risk of incident hypertension Strengths In Thailand, this cohort

For peer review only

Participants 13* (a) Report numbers of individuals at each stage of study—eg numbers potentially eligible, examined for eligibility, confirmed

eligible, included in the study, completing follow-up, and analysed

4-5

(b) Give reasons for non-participation at each stage 12

(c) Consider use of a flow diagram

Descriptive data 14* (a) Give characteristics of study participants (eg demographic, clinical, social) and information on exposures and potential

confounders

5

(b) Indicate number of participants with missing data for each variable of interest

(c) Summarise follow-up time (eg, average and total amount) 5

Outcome data 15* Report numbers of outcome events or summary measures over time 7

Main results 16 (a) Give unadjusted estimates and, if applicable, confounder-adjusted estimates and their precision (eg, 95% confidence

interval). Make clear which confounders were adjusted for and why they were included

7

(b) Report category boundaries when continuous variables were categorized 7

(c) If relevant, consider translating estimates of relative risk into absolute risk for a meaningful time period 7

Other analyses 17 Report other analyses done—eg analyses of subgroups and interactions, and sensitivity analyses 7

Discussion

Key results 18 Summarise key results with reference to study objectives 7

Limitations

Interpretation 20 Give a cautious overall interpretation of results considering objectives, limitations, multiplicity of analyses, results from

similar studies, and other relevant evidence

12

Generalisability 21 Discuss the generalisability (external validity) of the study results 12

Other information

Funding 22 Give the source of funding and the role of the funders for the present study and, if applicable, for the original study on

which the present article is based

13

*Give information separately for cases and controls in case-control studies and, if applicable, for exposed and unexposed groups in cohort and cross-sectional studies.

Note: An Explanation and Elaboration article discusses each checklist item and gives methodological background and published examples of transparent reporting. The STROBE

checklist is best used in conjunction with this article (freely available on the Web sites of PLoS Medicine at http://www.plosmedicine.org/, Annals of Internal Medicine at

http://www.annals.org/, and Epidemiology at http://www.epidem.com/). Information on the STROBE Initiative is available at www.strobe-statement.org.

Page 30 of 54

For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml

BMJ Open

123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960

on February 4, 2020 by guest. Protected by copyright. http://bmjopen.bmj.com/ BMJ Open: first published as 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002826 on 25 June 2013. Downloaded from

Page 57: BMJ Open · smoking (which was rare) had no apparent hypertension effect. Among males, regular drinking increased the risk of incident hypertension Strengths In Thailand, this cohort

For peer review only

1

Health-risk factors and the incidence of hypertension: 4-year prospective

findings from a national cohort of 60,569 Thai open university students

Prasutr Thawornchaisit, MD, MPH1, Ferdinandus de Looze, MBBS, MSc

1, Christopher M

Reid, PhD2, Sam-ang Seubsman, PhD

3, Adrian Sleigh, MD

4, Thai Cohort Study Team*

1 School of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia; 2 School of Public Health and

Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia; 3 School of Human Ecology, Sukhothai

Thammathirat Open University, Nonthaburi, Thailand; 4 National Centre for Epidemiology and Population

Health, ANU College of Medicine, Biology and Environment, The Australian National University,

Canberra, Australia.

*Thai Cohort Study Team

Thailand: Jaruwan Chokhanapitak, Suttanit Hounthasarn, Suwanee Khamman, Daoruang Pandee, Suttinan

Pangsap, Tippawan Prapamontol, Janya Puengson, Sam-ang Seubsman, Boonchai Somboonsook, Nintita

Sripaiboonkij, Pathumvadee Somsamai, Prasutr Thawornchaisit, Duangkae Vilainerun, Wanee

Wimonwattanaphan, Cha-aim Pachanee, Arunrat Tangmunkongvorakul, Benjawan Tawatsupa, Wimalin

Rimpeekool.

Australia: Chris Bain, Emily Banks, Cathy Banwell, Bruce Caldwell, Gordon Carmichael, Tarie Dellora,

Jane Dixon, Sharon Friel, David Harley, Matthew Kelly, Tord Kjellstrom, Lynette Lim, Anthony

McMichael, Tanya Mark, Adrian Sleigh, Lyndall Strazdins, Vasoontara Yiengprugsawan, Susan Jordan,

Janneke Berecki-Gisolf, Rod McClure.

Corresponding author: Prasutr Thawornchaisit, School of Medicine, Faculty of Health Science, University

of Queensland, 288 Herston Road, Herston, Brisbane, QLD, 4006 Australia and Department of Medicine,

Lerdsin Hospital, Silom road, Bangrak, Bangkok, 10500 Thailand

Email: [email protected] Telephone: 66-2-585-8015 Fax: 66-2-912-0121

Running Head: Health-risks and hypertension incidence in the Thai Cohort Study

Key words: hypertension; health-risks; cohort; Thailand; socioeconomic; body mass index; smoking;

drinking; physical activity

Page 31 of 54

For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml

BMJ Open

123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960

on February 4, 2020 by guest. P

rotected by copyright.http://bm

jopen.bmj.com

/B

MJ O

pen: first published as 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002826 on 25 June 2013. D

ownloaded from

Page 58: BMJ Open · smoking (which was rare) had no apparent hypertension effect. Among males, regular drinking increased the risk of incident hypertension Strengths In Thailand, this cohort

For peer review only

2

Abstract

Objective

This study evaluates the impact of a number of demographic, biological, behavioural and lifestyle health-

risk factors on the incidence of hypertension in Thailand over a 4-year period.

Design

A 4-year prospective study of health-risk factors and their effects on incidence of hypertension in a national

Thai Cohort Study (TCS) from 2005 to 2009.

Setting

As Thailand is transitioning from a developing to a middle-income developed country, chronic diseases

(particularly cardiovascular disease) have emerged as major health issues. Hypertension is a major risk

factor for heart attack and stroke and cross-sectional studies have indicated that the prevalence is increasing.

Study participants

Sukhothai Thammathirat Open University students (57,558) who participated in both 2005 and 2009

questionnaire surveys and who were normotensive in 2005 were included in the analysis.

Measures

Adjusted relative risks associating each risk factor and incidence of hypertension by sex, after controlling for

confounders such as age, socio-economic status, body mass index (BMI) and underlying diseases.

Results

The overall 4-year incidence of hypertension was 3.5% with the rate in men being remarkably higher than

that in women (5.2% vs. 2.1%). In both sexes, hypertension associated with age, higher BMI and co-

morbidities but did not associate with income and education. In men, hypertension associated with physical

inactivity, smoking, alcohol and fast food intake. In women, hypertension was related to having a partner.

Conclusion

In both men and women, hypertension strongly associated with age, obesity and co-morbidities while it had

no association with socio-economic factors. The cohort pattern of socio-economy and hypertension reflects

that the health-risk transition in Thais is likely to be at the middle stage. Diet and lifestyle factors associate

with incidence of hypertension in Thais and may be amenable targets for hypertension control programs.

Page 32 of 54

For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml

BMJ Open

123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960

on February 4, 2020 by guest. P

rotected by copyright.http://bm

jopen.bmj.com

/B

MJ O

pen: first published as 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002826 on 25 June 2013. D

ownloaded from

Page 59: BMJ Open · smoking (which was rare) had no apparent hypertension effect. Among males, regular drinking increased the risk of incident hypertension Strengths In Thailand, this cohort

For peer review only

3

Introduction

Hypertension is a global public health challenge due to its high prevalence and the concomitant increase in

risk of stroke and cardiovascular diseases [1]. In 2007, according to the World Health Organization,

cardiovascular diseases caused 33.7% of all deaths in the world, while other chronic diseases were

responsible for 26.5% [2]. Globally, it has been estimated that premature deaths resulting from hypertension

annually are approximately 7.1 million, which account for 64 million disability-adjusted life years (DALYs)

[3]. Hypertension ranks third, after underweight and unsafe sex, of the six major risk factors contributing to

the global disease burden[3].

In Thailand, hypertension is the third major risk factor of the national disease burden and causes 600,000

DALY losses per year [4]. The prevalence of hypertension has been estimated from a number of cross-

sectional studies among adults and has been increasing over the past decades from 20% in 1985 to 22% in

2004 [4-6]. The recent Thai National Health Examination Survey (NHES) in 2009 reported the prevalence

of hypertension in adults was 21.5% [4]. The emergence of hypertension has been the result of rapid

socioeconomic development which has resulted in one third of Thais migrating to urban areas [7].

Urbanization has been associated with increased obesity as people become less physically active and adopt

sedentary life styles such as spending more time watching television, sitting and using computers [7 8].

These factors, in association with Thailand’s ageing population [9], underpin the importance of controlling

hypertension in Thai community.

There is limited longitudinal research on health risk factors and hypertension incidence in Thailand [5]. The

purpose of this study is to address that knowledge gap. We prospectively examined the influence of an array

of demographic, biological, health-risk and lifestyle factors on the incidence of hypertension during 4 years

of follow-up in the Thai Cohort Study (TCS). This is part of an overarching research program investigating

Thailand’s health-risk transition from high maternal-child and infectious disease mortality to increased

longevity and emerging chronic disease. The large national cohort of Thai adults reported on here has been

followed since 2005 for risk factor trends and associated disease outcomes, including hypertension.

Methods

Study population

Page 33 of 54

For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml

BMJ Open

123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960

on February 4, 2020 by guest. P

rotected by copyright.http://bm

jopen.bmj.com

/B

MJ O

pen: first published as 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002826 on 25 June 2013. D

ownloaded from

Page 60: BMJ Open · smoking (which was rare) had no apparent hypertension effect. Among males, regular drinking increased the risk of incident hypertension Strengths In Thailand, this cohort

For peer review only

4

The first TCS evaluation was conducted in 2005 by sending twenty-page health-risk questionnaires to the

200,000 distance-learning students enrolled at Sukhothai Thammathirat Open University (STOU) and

87,134 (44%) completed them and signed the consent forms. The cohort has been shown to be socio-

economically and geographically well representative of the Thai population [10]. However, they resided

more in urban areas (51.8% vs. 31.1%) and on average were younger and better educated than most Thai

adults. Details of the baseline TCS methodology have been published [10]. This questionnaire focused on

socio-demography, habitation, work, health services, injury, sedentary habits, physical activity, transport,

underlying diseases, family history, personal behaviours, BMI, and consumption of foods, vegetables and

fruit. A 4-year follow-up was carried out in 2009. Overall, 71% of the cohort responded generating

longitudinal data on 60,569 participants.

Incident Hypertension

Incident hypertension was defined as being normotensive in 2005 and self-reported doctor diagnosed

hypertensive in 2009. Hypertension incidence was the dependent variable for analyses and the person-time

denominator included all individuals at risk - those 57,558 participants with longitudinal data who were

negative for hypertension in 2005, the beginning of the 4-year study period.

Risk Factors

Hypertension was defined as describe above, underlying diseases diagnosed by a doctor were also reported

including diabetes mellitus, kidney diseases and high blood lipids, all of which were investigated as

potential risk factors of hypertension.

Participants were grouped into three age categories: younger (≤30 years), middle (31-40 years) and older

(>40 years). Urbanization status was based on rural (R) or urban (U) residence, first when aged 10-12 years

old and again in 2005, producing four groups: lifelong ruralites (RR), urbanizers (RU), de-urbanizers (UR)

and urbanites (UU). Personal monthly income was divided into four categories: ≤7000 baht, 7001–10000

baht, 10001–20000 baht and >20000 baht. In 2005, one US dollar was equivalent to 42 baht so most of

participants had quite low incomes. Household assets were classified into three categories: low (≤30,000

baht), medium (30,001-60,000) and high (>60,000).

Sedentariness was assessed by screen time (hours/day spent before TV or computer) and (separately) sitting

time (hours per day spent sitting for any purpose). Incidental exercise was measured by the frequency of

housework or gardening, categorised as follows: ≤3 times per month; 1-2 times per week; 3-4 times per

week; most days. We measured planned physical activity at the beginning and end of the 4-year follow up

period. On both occasions, cohort members reported the number of sessions per week of strenuous and

moderate exercise for at least 20 minutes, and of walking for at least 10 minutes. We derived an “overall

Page 34 of 54

For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml

BMJ Open

123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960

on February 4, 2020 by guest. P

rotected by copyright.http://bm

jopen.bmj.com

/B

MJ O

pen: first published as 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002826 on 25 June 2013. D

ownloaded from

Page 61: BMJ Open · smoking (which was rare) had no apparent hypertension effect. Among males, regular drinking increased the risk of incident hypertension Strengths In Thailand, this cohort

For peer review only

5

measure” of planned physical activity calculated separately at both the baseline and the 4-year mark. The

measure was weighted as follows: (2 × strenuous + 1 × moderate + 1 × walking) sessions per week. This

weighting system is based on the recommendation of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire and

the Active Australia Survey as used in other analyses of the cohort data [11 12]. Finally, for each individual,

the “overall measures” of weekly exercise for 2005 and 2009 were added and then averaged by dividing by

2, creating a longitudinal measure of planned physical activity (LPPA).

Smoking status was classified as never, ex-smoker or current-smoker. Alcohol exposure was classified by

four categories: never, ex-drinker, occasional drinker or current-drinker. Body mass index (BMI) was

calculated from self-reported height in metres and weight in kilograms as weight/ height2. It was divided

into 4 categories as follows according to Asian criteria:[8 13-16] underweight (BMI <18.5), normal (18.5 to

<23), overweight (23 to <25), and obese (≥25). Foods that could potentially influence blood pressure (deep

fried, instant, roast or smoked, soybean products and soft drinks) were assessed for consumption frequency

based on a five-point Likert scale ranging from less than once a month to once or more a day. Western-style

fast food exposure was noted on a three-point scale from less than once to more than 3 times per month.

Fruit and vegetable consumption were recorded as standard serves eaten per day.

Statistical analyses

All analyses were performed using SPSS software. The incidence of hypertension and its 95% confidence

interval (CI) were calculated for each value of each categorical variable in both male and female participants

and the influence on incidence by each variable was evaluated by Chi-square test. For statistical inference,

all p-values were 2 tailed and significance was set at 5%.

Relative risks in a large study of an uncommon disease (incidence less than 10%) can be accurately

estimated as odds ratios [17]. Accordingly, for each risk variable, the relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence

interval were estimated using logistic regression to calculate the bivariate odds ratio for hypertension.

Adjusted RRs (ARRs) were estimated by calculating multivariate logistic regression odds ratios. The ARRs

were controlled for confounding by age, marital status, SES, BMI, underlying diseases and personal

behaviours (cigarette smoking and alcohol drinking). A variable was included in a multivariate model if

bivariate analysis had indicated a statistically significant association with incidence of hypertension. Some

variables were included because earlier analyses reported elsewhere had shown significant or substantial

association with hypertension.

Page 35 of 54

For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml

BMJ Open

123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960

on February 4, 2020 by guest. P

rotected by copyright.http://bm

jopen.bmj.com

/B

MJ O

pen: first published as 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002826 on 25 June 2013. D

ownloaded from

Page 62: BMJ Open · smoking (which was rare) had no apparent hypertension effect. Among males, regular drinking increased the risk of incident hypertension Strengths In Thailand, this cohort

For peer review only

6

Results

Baseline Characteristics

Baseline characteristics of study participants self-reporting as normotensive in 2005 are shown in Table 1.

The highest proportion of males resided in the North-eastern regions and Central while there were more

females in the Central and Bangkok area. More than half of the male and female participants lived in urban

areas. Males had a higher monthly income than females whereas females had a higher educational

attainment than males. The distribution of household assets for males and females was similar and over half

of them were in medium and high categories. The study population had a similar socio-demography, income

and location of residence to the general Thai population [9].

Incidence and risks of hypertension

Overall, the incidence of self-reported doctor diagnosed hypertension in Thai adults was 3.5% and the rate in

males was more than twice the corresponding rate in females (5.2% vs. 2.1%) (Table 2). In males and

females, the incidence of hypertension increased with increasing age. Marriage or having a partner increased

the risk of hypertension in females. Educational attainment and personal income had no influence on the risk

of hypertension in both sexes. In males and females, the risk of hypertension increased with an increased

BMI. The risk of hypertension increased in both males and females who had diabetes mellitus, high blood

lipids and kidney disease.

Planned physical activity, averaged across the 4-year follow-up, was protective for males. In males, higher

LPPA (≥15 sessions / week) associated with lower incidence of hypertension; however, this association was

not observed in females. In males, current-smokers had a higher risk of developing hypertension than non-

smokers while in females, smoking (which was rare) had no apparent hypertension effect. Among males,

regular drinking increased the risk of incident hypertension; patterns of relative risks were similar for

females but, reflecting the low frequency of female drinking, did not reach statistical significance. In males,

the risk of hypertension had a direct association with the frequency of instant food consumption but there

was no such association detected in females.

Over the 4-year period, a variety of factors that could have been risks for hypertension over a longer period

were found not to be in this setting (data not shown). Thus, in males and females, factors that had no

statistically significant influence on the longitudinal 4-year risk of hypertension incidence were urbanization

status, sedentary lifestyle (non-participation in housework or gardening, high levels of television and

Page 36 of 54

For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml

BMJ Open

123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960

on February 4, 2020 by guest. P

rotected by copyright.http://bm

jopen.bmj.com

/B

MJ O

pen: first published as 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002826 on 25 June 2013. D

ownloaded from

Page 63: BMJ Open · smoking (which was rare) had no apparent hypertension effect. Among males, regular drinking increased the risk of incident hypertension Strengths In Thailand, this cohort

For peer review only

7

computer watching, sleeping and sitting time), and food consumption habits that included deep fried food

and soft drink, Western fast food, roasted or smoked foods, fruit, vegetables and soybean products.

Discussion

This large prospective cohort of adults living all over Thailand has been the first studied nationally for a

wide array of risk factors for incident hypertension. Overall, the 4-year incidence of hypertension from 2005

to 2009 was 3.5%, notably higher in men (5.2%) than women (2.1%). These incidence rates are drawn from

a cohort of adults on average younger than the Thai population so they are lower than corresponding rates of

the adult population. However, our focus was on risk factor associations and we noted that in both sexes,

age, obesity and co-morbidity with diabetes mellitus, high blood lipids and kidney disease strongly linked to

hypertension incidence. In males, instant food consumption, smoking and drinking alcohol had a moderate

adverse effect on hypertension risk while planned physical activity averaging 15 or more sessions per week

over the 4-year period was substantially protective, reducing risk by 22%. In females, having a partner was

associated with increased incidence of hypertension.

The age effect on hypertension incidence noted by us is consistent with findings of many other population

studies of hypertension including (for example) a longitudinal study in China [18] and cross-sectional

studies in Korea [19], Taiwan [20] and the USA [21]. The noticeably greater incidence of hypertension in

men than in women that we found in Thailand has also been reported from many parts of the world

including neighboring Malaysia [22] and distant USA [23] as well as in a recent global review [24].

In men and women of the Thai cohort, a progressively higher BMI was positively and significantly

associated with an increased risk of incident hypertension over the four years. This finding was similar to

that reported for other prospective cohorts in the US [25 26] and Finland [27]. Furthermore, after seven

years of follow-up in a US study [28], weight loss associated with a decreased risk of incident hypertension.

Among a cohort of US nurses, the risk of incident hypertension increased 5% for each kilogram addition of

weight [29], and rose 15% for each increase of one kilogram per meter squared of BMI in Taiwan [18].

These results suggest that the adverse effect of high BMI on risk of hypertension does not depend on

ethinicity or sex and is wide spread around the world.

In our cohort, we noted a higher risk of incident hypertension among those with diabetes mellitus. This

finding is consistent with longitudinal studies in the USA [30 31] which reported, respectively, that in

Page 37 of 54

For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml

BMJ Open

123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960

on February 4, 2020 by guest. P

rotected by copyright.http://bm

jopen.bmj.com

/B

MJ O

pen: first published as 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002826 on 25 June 2013. D

ownloaded from

Page 64: BMJ Open · smoking (which was rare) had no apparent hypertension effect. Among males, regular drinking increased the risk of incident hypertension Strengths In Thailand, this cohort

For peer review only

8

diabetic patients the risk of incident hypertension rose 41% and 56%. As well, prospective cohort studies in

Japan showed that diabetes [32] and impaired fasting blood glucose [33] were associated with an increased

risk of hypertension incidence. Supportive cross-sectional results emerge from studies in diverse settings

including Bangladesh and India [34], Barbados [35] and the USA [36]. A causal association between

diabetes and hypertension is suspected and possible mechanisms include endothelial dysfunction and

vascular inflammation [37].

We also found that high blood lipids significantly associated with increased risk of incident hypertension.

This supports the results from previous longitudinal studies in men [38 39], women [40 41] and adults [32

42]. The risk of hypertension increased with an increase of total cholesterol, triglyceride and low-density

lipoprotein cholesterol levels and decreased with an increase of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol level

[38 39 41].The mechanism by which dyslipidemia provokes high blood pressure is uncertain but could

reflect blood vessel dysfunction and damaged endothelium [43].

Among men and women in the Thai cohort, kidney disease strongly associated with increased risk of

hypertension incidence. This result is supported by cross-sectional data from the Czech Republic [44] and

the USA [45]. Microalbuminuria is a biomarker for renal hypertension [45] and the risk increases with the

severity of kidney impairment, revealed by the serum creatinine level [46 47]. Glomerular damage is more

closely connected with hypertension than tubular or interstitial disease [47]. Chronic kidney disease

facilitates high blood pressure through many mechanisms including excessive intravascular volume,

increased endothelin production, activity of the renin-angiotensin system and sympathetic nervous system

and decreased vasodilators, nitric oxide production and endothelial function [48].

In men we found that cigarette smoking modestly associated with increased risk of developing hypertension.

This is consistent with many other reports such as longitudinal studies in Japanese [49] and American men

[50] and a cross-sectional study in French men [51]. In addition, smoking Jordanian men had significantly

higher blood pressure than their non-smoking counterparts [52]. However, we also found that smoking had

no influence on hypertension in women. This result for females is compatible with reports from Korea [53]

and the USA [54]. In contrast, one prospective US study [55] reported an increased risk of hypertension

among women. It is likely that men tend to smoke more cigarettes than women and the impact of smoking

on hypertension is a dose-response pattern [49].

Page 38 of 54

For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml

BMJ Open

123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960

on February 4, 2020 by guest. P

rotected by copyright.http://bm

jopen.bmj.com

/B

MJ O

pen: first published as 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002826 on 25 June 2013. D

ownloaded from

Page 65: BMJ Open · smoking (which was rare) had no apparent hypertension effect. Among males, regular drinking increased the risk of incident hypertension Strengths In Thailand, this cohort

For peer review only

9

Regular alcohol consumption was strongly associated with an increased risk of incident hypertension. This

result is supported by findings from longitudinal studies in Japan [56 57] and cross-sectional studies in

China [58] and Korea [53]. In Japanese men, alcohol consumption, particularly more than 200 grams per

week, significantly associated with an increase of blood pressure [59] while alcohol restriction was

noticeably related to a decreased blood pressure [60]. Among our Thai cohort females, alcohol consumption

had no influence on hypertension; this result was supported by longitudinal data from Japan [56] and cross-

sectional data from Korea [53]. In American females the quantity of alcohol consumption per week had no

effect on systolic blood pressure [61]. Males usually consume more alcohol than females and the

hypertension risk is linear with a dose-response [57 62]. Our results suggest that regular alcohol

consumption, especially in males, is a significant risk factor for developing hypertension.

Marital status in males had no influence on hypertension which supports the results from more economically

developed countries, the USA and Korea [53 54]. However, in middle-income countries, results diverged:

married males, when compared to their unmarried counterparts, had a higher risk of hypertension in

Barbados [35] and a lower risk in Poland [63]. Married individuals had higher emotional and social support

and lower stress [63] and probability of being a current smoker [64]. We found incident hypertension was

relatively more frequent among married females, unlike the no-sex-link pattern in developed countries such

as the USA and Korea [53 54]. The influence of marrital status on hypertension varies from one country to

another partly due to the difference of socio-economy and social structure. For our Thai cohort, the pattern

in males was similar to that in developed countries and in females it was not.

Participant educational attainment did not protect against hypertension in either sex. This is similar to cross-

sectional results for adults in developed countries such as Korea [53] and the USA [36 65]. However, other

studies in various settings and with diverse designs reported educational attainment protects against

hypertension in adults; these included a prospective cohort in middle income Thailand [5], a cross-sectional

study in middle income Malaysia [22] and a cross-sectional study in high income USA [66]. Opposite

findings have been reported in low income settings in both Bangladesh and India [34] where education was

a risk factor for hypertension. Taken collectively, these data suggest that income modifies the protective

education-hypertension effect, inverting it when income is low and boosting it when income is high. Our

middle-income cohort could be in the middle stage of this education effect as it is transiting from the low-

income pattern.

We found no association of personal monthly income and risk of hypertension in either sex. This was similar

to previous studies in middle-income countries including a longitudinal study in Thailand [5] and a cross-

Page 39 of 54

For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml

BMJ Open

123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960

on February 4, 2020 by guest. P

rotected by copyright.http://bm

jopen.bmj.com

/B

MJ O

pen: first published as 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002826 on 25 June 2013. D

ownloaded from

Page 66: BMJ Open · smoking (which was rare) had no apparent hypertension effect. Among males, regular drinking increased the risk of incident hypertension Strengths In Thailand, this cohort

For peer review only

10

sectional study in Malaysia [67] and in cross-sectional studies in high-income countries such as in Korea

[53] and the USA [21 36]. However, income had an inverse association with risk of hypertension in another

study in high-income developed USA [65] while it had a direct positive association in a low-income

developing country such as Ghana [68]. The health transition in Thailand is likely to be in the middle stage,

according to the concept of a tipping-point for the relationship between socio-economic status, body size and

hypertension risk factors. High income, large body size and high blood pressure is seen in developing

countries while in developed countries, high income is a protective factor [69-71]. Indeed, the Thai cohort

has already been shown to be at a transitional point for metabolic states because females had an inverse

relationship between income and BMI whereas males had a positive (traditional) relationship [14]. However,

now all Thais benefit from universal health insurance so access to health care is not dependent on their

income making disease associations more attenuated than before [72].

In our cohort, the reduction of risk of hypertension incidence in males but not in females by a longitudinal

measure of planned physical activity was comparable with a prospective study in middle-aged American

whites [73]. In another prospective study in middle-aged Finns, the hypertension protective effect of

vigorous physical activity or total energy expenditure from leisure-time physical activity was observed in

men but not in women [74]. Such physical activity among females may be less intense than among males so

having no effect on the risk of hypertension [74]. A large Finnish study [27] demonstrated that the incidence

of hypertension was inversely associated with the level of physical activity in a dose-response manner in

both sexes. In our cohort study, risk of obesity had an inverse association with quantified planned exercise in

both sexes but the effect was significantly stronger in males than in females [12]. As Thailand progresses

economically, more people migrate to urban areas and decrease their physical activity [7]. Therefore, in the

future, Thai people may encounter a higher risk of hypertension due to lower physical activity.

Instant food - mostly combinations of carbohydrate, fat and salt - associated with an increased risk of

incident hypertension in males but not in females. Other foods, fruit and vegetables had no impact on

hypertension. This may be as a result of men comsuming more instant foods, such as instant noodles, than

women. For example a study in Korea showed daily instant food consumption in men and women averages

23.7 and 11.1 grams respectively [75]. Other studies showed that carbohydrate [76 77], fruit and vegetables

[78 79] consumption had no influence on hypertension. Most students consume instant noodles which lead

to a higher intake of energy, fat, sodium, thiamine, and riboflavin but a lower intake of protein, calcium,

phosphorus [75]. Koreans favoring instant noodles have a salt intake more than three times higher than the

daily recommendation (6.4 vs 2 gms) [75]. Daily salt intake of Thai people has been reported to average

10.8gm, much higher than recommended (http://www.worldactiononsalt.com/worldaction/asia/75286.pdf).

Page 40 of 54

For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml

BMJ Open

123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960

on February 4, 2020 by guest. P

rotected by copyright.http://bm

jopen.bmj.com

/B

MJ O

pen: first published as 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002826 on 25 June 2013. D

ownloaded from

Page 67: BMJ Open · smoking (which was rare) had no apparent hypertension effect. Among males, regular drinking increased the risk of incident hypertension Strengths In Thailand, this cohort

For peer review only

11

High salt consumption was associated with an increased risk of developing hypertension in a longitudinal

study in Taiwan [80] and in cross-sectional studies in China [81 82] while other reports revealed that salt

restriction reduced blood pressure [83 84]. High plasma sodium, due to an overwhelmed capacity of the

kidney to excrete excessive salt consumption, leads to excessive intravascular volume and high blood

pressure [85]. It seems reasonable to conclude that high salt intake from instant noodle consumption is likely

to be causally associated with an increased risk of hypertension in Thailand.

In Thailand, this cohort constitutes the largest study to examine the longitudinal effect of most health-risk

factors on hypertension development. Indeed, the study size along with its national representation are

important factors to consider when exploring study validity and utility. The influence of risk factors on

hypertension incidence is clearly demonstrated since this is a large longitudinal cohort covering a 4-year

period. As a consequence, independent risk factors for hypertension in Thais can be identified. Our cohort

represents Thais well in geography and socio-economy [9] so the results reflect the trend of health-risk

transition in the Thai population. STOU students, with better education attainment combined with their

representative incomes and geographical location, represent the next generation of Thais. It would be

reasonable to conclude that our 4-year follow-up results show the future hypertension trends for Thai people.

However, our study has limitations since it relied on self-report. There may be recall and reporting errors.

But a study of the validity of self-reported weight and height in our cohort found that the accuracy was quite

acceptable [86]. As well, we have conducted a validation study of self-reported hypertension (Prasutr

Thawornchaisit, 2013, under review) in a random age-sex matched sub-sample of the cohort reporting

hypertension (n=240) or no hypertension (n=240). We found the sensitivity was high (82%) and that

negative reports were usually accurate (86%). In another report, we investigated the impact of the non-

responses to the 2009 follow up and found small effects with under-representation of young urban males;

this missing group would have a minor influence on our results and would not be expected to have a high

rate of incident hypertension [87]. The findings from our study are likely to be robust and represent well the

future trends of health-risk transition in middle-income Thailand and similar ASEAN countries.

In conclusion, older age, obesity and underlying morbidity due to diabetes, high blood lipids and kidney

disease were strongly associated with an increased risk of incident hypertension in both sexes while in

males, physical inactivity, instant food consumption, smoking and drinking alcohol had a moderate

association. Sedentary life-style and the consumption of friut and vegetables had no detected influence on

hypertension. The Thai health-risk transition is likely to be in the middle stage since education attainment

Page 41 of 54

For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml

BMJ Open

123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960

on February 4, 2020 by guest. P

rotected by copyright.http://bm

jopen.bmj.com

/B

MJ O

pen: first published as 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002826 on 25 June 2013. D

ownloaded from

Page 68: BMJ Open · smoking (which was rare) had no apparent hypertension effect. Among males, regular drinking increased the risk of incident hypertension Strengths In Thailand, this cohort

For peer review only

12

and income still have no net effect to protect against hypertension. Prevention should focus on obesity, high

blood lipids and high salt consumption and people should be encouraged to increase physical exercise and

consume low fat foods and less instant foods. A reduction of salt consumption should be a national policy by

limiting the concentration of salt in ready-to-eat and industrial foods. Smoking and drinking cessation

should be promoted for males. Thailand should also consciously aim to take advantage of its culturally

determined low rate of drinking and smoking among women and ensure that there is no attempt to

undermine this situation and develop the market for the female half of the population.

Acknowledgements and Funding

This study was supported by the International Collaborative Research Grants Scheme with joint grants from

the Wellcome Trust UK (GR071587MA) and the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council

(268055), and by a global health grant from the NHMRC (585426). We thank the staff at Sukhothai

Thammathirat Open University (STOU) who assisted with student contact and the STOU students who are

participating in the cohort study. We also thank Dr Bandit Thinkamrop and his team from Khon Kaen

University for guiding us successfully through the complex data processing.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

Ethical considerations

Ethical approval was obtained from Sukhothai Thammathirat Open University Research and Development

Institute (protocol 0522/10) and the Australian National University Human Research Ethics Committee

(protocol 2004344 and 2009570). Informed, written consent was obtained from all participants.

Author contribution: PT devised the hypertension study, analysed the data and wrote the paper. FDL and

CR assisted with planning the study, analysis and interpretation. AS and SS conceived and developed the

cohort, and helped plan, analyse and interpret this study. All authors approved the final manuscript.

Page 42 of 54

For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml

BMJ Open

123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960

on February 4, 2020 by guest. P

rotected by copyright.http://bm

jopen.bmj.com

/B

MJ O

pen: first published as 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002826 on 25 June 2013. D

ownloaded from

Page 69: BMJ Open · smoking (which was rare) had no apparent hypertension effect. Among males, regular drinking increased the risk of incident hypertension Strengths In Thailand, this cohort

For peer review only

13

Table 1 Characteristics of 57558 participants normotensive at the 2005 Thai Cohort Study baseline

Male Female Difference

Factor

n % n % P-valuea

Demographic data

Participants 25320 44.0 32238 56.0 <0.0001 Age (y) mean 32.9 30.0 <0.0001

b

(SD) (8.5) (7.6) Age group <0.0001 ≤30 y 11293 44.6 19229 59.6 31-40 y 9177 36.2 9638 29.9 >40 y 4850 19.2 3371 10.5 Married/partnered <0.0001 No 11060 44.8 18851 60.1 Yes 13607 55.2 12513 39.9 Regions <0.0001 Bangkok 3488 13.9 6057 18.9 Central 5712 22.7 8267 25.8 North 5180 20.6 5818 18.1 North-east 6142 24.4 5760 18.0 East 1515 6.0 1922 6.0 South 3103 12.3 4254 13.3 Urbanization status

c <0.0001

Rural–rural (RR) 11512 46,1 13895 43.6 Rural–urban (RU) 7891 31.6 9546 29.9 Urban–rural (UR) 1078 4.3 1344 4.2 Urban–urban (UU) 4495 18.0 7114 22.3

Socioeconomic status

Education level <0.0001 High school 13366 52.9 13135 40.8 Diploma 5749 22.8 9791 30.4 University 6153 24.4 9231 28.7 Personal monthly income (baht)

d <0.0001 ≤7000 8025 32.3 13890 44.1 7001–10000 5790 23.3 7578 24.0 10001–20000 7549 30.4 7194 22.8 >20000 3452 13.9 2851 9.0 Household assets

e (baht)

d <0.001

Low 9852 39.1 12434 38.7 Medium 8065 32.0 9863 30.7 High 7298 28.9 9804 30.5 aChi-square test

b unpaired t test cLocation of residence (rural, R, or urban, U) at age 10-12 years and again in 2005. dAt the time of the survey in 2009, US$1 = 31 Thai baht eReplacement value in Thai baht: low ≤30,000, medium 30,001-60,000 and high >60,000

Page 43 of 54

For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml

BMJ Open

123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960

on February 4, 2020 by guest. P

rotected by copyright.http://bm

jopen.bmj.com

/B

MJ O

pen: first published as 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002826 on 25 June 2013. D

ownloaded from

Page 70: BMJ Open · smoking (which was rare) had no apparent hypertension effect. Among males, regular drinking increased the risk of incident hypertension Strengths In Thailand, this cohort

For peer review only

14

Table 2 Hypertension incidence and association with risk factors in male and female participants.

Males Females HT(n) Incia%(95% CI) ARRb(95% CI) HT(n) Incia%(95% CI) ARRb(95% CI) Participants 1306 5.2 (4.9-5.4) 690 2.1 (2.0-2.3)

Demography

Age group

≤30 y 279 2.5 (2.2-2.8) 1 215 1.1 (0.97-1.3) 1 31-40 y 484 5.3 (4.8-5.7) 1.66 (1.39-1.98) 245 2.5 (2.23-2.9) 1.93 (1.56-2.39) >40 y 543 11.2 (10.3-12.1) 3.13 (2.57-3.81) 230 6.8 (6.0-7.7) 4.2 (3.26-5.42) P-trend <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001

Marital status (married/partnered)

No 368 3.3 (3.0-3.7) 1 303 1.6 (1.43-1.8) 1 Yes 896 6.6 (6.17-7.0) 0.97 (0.83-1.12) 368 2.9 (2.65-3.2) 1.22 (1.03-1.45)

Socio-economic status

Education level

High school 697 5.2 (4.8-5.6) 1 303 2.3 (2.05-2.57) 1 Diploma 276 4.8 (4.25-5.4) 1.0 (0.86-1.17) 180 1.8 (1.57-2.1) 0.81 (0.66-0.99) University 331 5.4 (4.8-5.9) 0.93 (0.8-1.1) 204 2.2 (1.9-2.51) 0.87 (0.71-1.07) P-trend 0.83 0.61 0.463 0.1 Personal monthly income (baht)c ≤7000 268 3.3 (2.95-3.7) 1 217 1.6 (1.36-1.8) 1 7001-10000 229 4.0 (3.45-4.5) 1.0 (0.81-1.2) 142 1.9 (1.57-2.2) 1.1 (0.87-1.37) 10001-20000 497 6.6 (6.0-7.14) 1.1 (0.91-1.31) 196 2.7 (2.35-3.1) 0.97 (0.77-1.23) >20000 289 8.4 (7.46-9.3) 1.0 (0.8-1.25) 122 4.3 (3.54-5.0) 1.04 (0.78-1.39) P-trend <0.0001 0.527 <0.0001 0.783

BMI classificationd

Underweight 359 2.9 (2.62-3.2) 0.46 (0.27-0.78) 60 0.85 (0.63-1.15) 0.9 (0.67-1.21) (BMI <18.5) Normal 16 1.1 (0.56-1.6) 1 258 1.4 (1.2-1.5) 1 (18.5 ≤ BMI < 23) Overweight 333 5.9 (5.3-6.54) 1.66 (1.41-1.95) 129 3.9 (3.3-4.62) 2.32 (1.8-2.91) (23 ≤ BMI < 25) Obese 575 10.4 (9.6-11.2) 2.82 (2.43-3.27) 231 7.4 (6.4-8.27) 4.14 (3.4-5.05) (BMI ≥25) P-trend <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001

aIncidence of Hypertension

bAdjusted relative risks (ARR) were calculated from multi-variate logistic regression models of hypertension

adjusted for age, marital status, education, income, BMI category, underlying diseases, personal behaviours. cAt the time of the survey in 2005, US$1 = 42 Thai baht dAsian standard BMI classification

Continued….

Page 44 of 54

For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml

BMJ Open

123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960

on February 4, 2020 by guest. P

rotected by copyright.http://bm

jopen.bmj.com

/B

MJ O

pen: first published as 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002826 on 25 June 2013. D

ownloaded from

Page 71: BMJ Open · smoking (which was rare) had no apparent hypertension effect. Among males, regular drinking increased the risk of incident hypertension Strengths In Thailand, this cohort

For peer review only

15

Table 2 (continued...)

Males Females HT(n) Inci

a%(95% CI) ARR

b(95% CI) HT(n) Inci

a%(95% CI) ARR

b(95% CI)

Physical activities

Weighted total sessions exercise-related physical activity (average between 2005 and 2009) 0-7 ses/wc 198 6.3 (5.5-7.1) 1 162 2.2 (1.8-2.6) 1 8-14 ses/w 589 5.2 (4.8-5.6) 0.9 (0.76-1.07) 352 2.1 (1.9-2.3) 1.0 (0.82-1.23)

≥15 ses/w 380 4.4 (4.0-5.0) 0.78 (0.65-0.95) 119 2.2 (1.8-2.6) 1.0 (0.77-1.3)

P-trend <0.0001 <0.029 0.905 1.0

Underlying diseases

Diabetes mellitus

No 1251 5.0 (4.7-5.27) 1 674 2.1 (1.9-2.26) 1 Yes 55 18.3 (13.9-22.7) 1.81 (1.29-2.52) 16 10.7 (5.7-15.8) 2.54 (1.41-4.56)

High lipids

No 983 4.4 (4.13-4.67) 1 576 1.9 (1.76-2.1) 1 Yes 323 10.8 (9.7-11.9) 1.4 (1.21-1.63) 114 5.4 (4.47-6.4) 1.38 (1.09-1.75)

Kidney diseases

No 1248 5.1 (4.8-5.33) 1 659 2.1 (1.9-2.26) 1 Yes 58 9.6 (7.2-11.9) 1.62 (1.19-2.2) 31 3.9 (2.52-5.2) 1.77 (1.19-2.63)

Personal behaviours

Smoking status

Never 506 4.1 (3.7-4.4) 1 617 2.1 (1.9-2.23) 1 Ex-smoker 496 6.6 (6.0-7.13) 1.15 (1.0-1.32) 37 3.2 (2.2-4.22) 1.28 (0.88-1.87) Cur-smokerd 276 5.8 (5.16-6.5) 1.22 (1.04-1.44) 8 3.1 (0.97-5.2) 1.54 (0.74-3.2) P-trend <0.0001 <0.032 <0.008 0.23

Drinking status

Never 105 3.9 (3.2-4.7) 1 268 2.1 (1.8-2.32) 1 Ex-drinker 155 5.7 (4.85-6.6) 0.98 (0.74-1.3) 50 2.2 (1.6-2.85) 1.14 (0.82-1.59) Occ- drinkere 821 4.8 (4.45-5.1) 1.0 (0.8-1.25) 352 2.1 (1.9-2.36) 1.14 (0.96-1.36) Reg- drinker

f 212 8.6 (7.5-9.7) 1.61 (1.23-2.11) 9 4.7 (1.66-7.7) 1.83 (0.86-3.9)

P-trend <0.0001 <0.0001 0.471 0.254

Food consumption habit

Instant food

<1 time/m 335 6.3 (5.6-6.95) 1 168 2.8(2.36-3.2) 1 1-3 times/m 485 5.1 (4.63-5.5) 1.02 (0.87-1.19) 273 2.1 (1.84-2.3) 0.95 (0.77-1.17) 1-2 times/wk 280 4.4 (3.9-4.9) 1.09 (0.91-1.30) 153 1.9 (1.6-2.2) 1.04 (0.81-1.33) 3-6 times/wk 165 5.0 (4.3-5.75) 1.36 (1.1-1.69) 73 1.8 (1.4-2.22) 1.14 (0.84-1.55) ≥1 times/d 32 5.5 (3.6-7.33) 1.67 (1.11-2.52) 18 2.3 (1.3-3.35) 1.48 (0.86-2.53) P-trend <0.002 <0.008 <0.002 0.403 aIncidence of Hypertension

bAdjusted relative risks were calculated from multi-variate logistic regression models of hypertension adjusted for age, marital status, education, income, BMI category, underlying diseases, personal behaviours. cAt the time of the survey in 2005, US$1 = 42 Thai baht dAsian standard BMI classification eSessions / week fCurrent-smoker gOccasional drinker hRegular drinker

Page 45 of 54

For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml

BMJ Open

123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960

on February 4, 2020 by guest. P

rotected by copyright.http://bm

jopen.bmj.com

/B

MJ O

pen: first published as 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002826 on 25 June 2013. D

ownloaded from

Page 72: BMJ Open · smoking (which was rare) had no apparent hypertension effect. Among males, regular drinking increased the risk of incident hypertension Strengths In Thailand, this cohort

For peer review only

16

References

1. Chobanian AV, Bakris GL, Black HR, et al. Seventh report of the Joint National Committee on

Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure. Hypertension

2003;42(6):1206-52 doi: 10.1161/01.HYP.0000107251.49515.c2

01.HYP.0000107251.49515.c2 [pii][published Online First: Epub Date]|.

2. Gaziano TA, Bitton A, Anand S, et al. Growing epidemic of coronary heart disease in low- and middle-

income countries. Curr Probl Cardiol 2010;35(2):72-115 doi: S0146-2806(09)00127-3 [pii]

10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2009.10.002[published Online First: Epub Date]|.

3. Whitworth JA, World Health Organization and International Society of Hypertension Writing Group.

2003 World Health Organization (WHO)/International Society of Hypertension (ISH) statement on

management of hypertension. J Hypertens 2003;21(11):1983-92 doi:

10.1097/01.hjh.0000084751.37215.d2[published Online First: Epub Date]|.

4. Aekplakorn W, Sangthong R, Kessomboon P, et al. Changes in prevalence, awareness, treatment and

control of hypertension in Thai population, 2004-2009: Thai National Health Examination Survey

III-IV. J Hypertens 2012;30(9):1734-42 doi: 10.1097/HJH.0b013e3283568158[published Online

First: Epub Date]|.

5. Vathesatogkit P, Woodward M, Tanomsup S, et al. Long-term effects of socioeconomic status on incident

hypertension and progression of blood pressure. J Hypertens 2012;30(7):1347-53 doi:

10.1097/HJH.0b013e32835465ca[published Online First: Epub Date]|.

6. Aekplakorn W, Abbott-Klafter J, Khonputsa P, et al. Prevalence and management of prehypertension and

hypertension by geographic regions of Thailand: the Third National Health Examination Survey,

2004. J Hypertens 2008;26(2):191-8 doi: 10.1097/HJH.0b013e3282f09f57

00004872-200802000-00009 [pii][published Online First: Epub Date]|.

7. Lim LL, Kjellstrom T, Sleigh A, et al. Associations between urbanisation and components of the health-

risk transition in Thailand. A descriptive study of 87,000 Thai adults. Glob Health Action

2009;20(1914):1-13 doi: 10.3402/gha.v2i0.1914[published Online First: Epub Date]|.

8. Banwell C, Lim L, Seubsman SA, et al. Body mass index and health-related behaviours in a national

cohort of 87,134 Thai open university students. J Epidemiol Community Health 2009;63(5):366-72

doi: jech.2008.080820 [pii]

10.1136/jech.2008.080820[published Online First: Epub Date]|.

Page 46 of 54

For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml

BMJ Open

123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960

on February 4, 2020 by guest. P

rotected by copyright.http://bm

jopen.bmj.com

/B

MJ O

pen: first published as 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002826 on 25 June 2013. D

ownloaded from

Page 73: BMJ Open · smoking (which was rare) had no apparent hypertension effect. Among males, regular drinking increased the risk of incident hypertension Strengths In Thailand, this cohort

For peer review only

17

9. Seubsman S, Yiengprugsawan V, Sleigh A, et al. A Large National Thai Cohort Study of the Health-Risk

Transition based on Sukhothai Thammathirat Open University Students. ASEAN Journal of Open

Distance Learning 2012;4(1):58-69

10. Sleigh AC, Seubsman SA, Bain C. Cohort profile: The Thai Cohort of 87,134 Open University students.

Int J Epidemiol 2008;37(2):266-72 doi: dym161 [pii]

10.1093/ije/dym161[published Online First: Epub Date]|.

11. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. The Active Australia Survey: a guide and manual for

implementation, analysis and reporting Canberra. AIHW 2003:1-55

12. Banks E, Lim L, Seubsman SA, et al. Relationship of obesity to physical activity, domestic activities,

and sedentary behaviours: cross-sectional findings from a national cohort of over 70,000 Thai adults.

BMC Public Health 2011;11(762):1-14 doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-762[published Online First:

Epub Date]|.

13. Yiengprugsawan V, Banwell C, Seubsman SA, et al. Short sleep and obesity in a large national cohort of

Thai adults. BMJ open 2012;2(1):e000561-7 doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2011-000561[published Online

First: Epub Date]|.

14. Seubsman SA, Lim LL, Banwell C, et al. Socioeconomic status, sex, and obesity in a large national

cohort of 15-87-year-old open university students in Thailand. J Epidemiol 2010;20(1):13-20 doi:

JST.JSTAGE/jea/JE20090014 [pii][published Online First: Epub Date]|.

15. Weisell RC. Body mass index as an indicator of obesity. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr 2002;11 Suppl 8:S681-4

doi: 367 [pii][published Online First: Epub Date]|.

16. Kanazawa M, Yoshiike N, Osaka T, et al. Criteria and classification of obesity in Japan and Asia-

Oceania. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr 2002;11 Suppl 8:S732-7

17. Webb P, Bain C. Essential Epidemiology : An Introduction for Students and Health Professionals. 2 ed.

New York: Cambridge University Press, 2011:461.

18. Chuang SY, Chou P, Hsu PF, et al. Presence and progression of abdominal obesity are predictors of

future high blood pressure and hypertension. Am J Hypertens 2006;19(8):788-95 doi:

10.1016/j.amjhyper.2006.01.010[published Online First: Epub Date]|.

19. Choi KM, Park HS, Han JH, et al. Prevalence of prehypertension and hypertension in a Korean

population: Korean National Health and Nutrition Survey 2001. J Hypertens 2006;24(8):1515-21

doi: 10.1097/01.hjh.0000239286.02389.0f

00004872-200608000-00010 [pii][published Online First: Epub Date]|.

20. Su TC, Bai CH, Chang HY, et al. Evidence for improved control of hypertension in Taiwan: 1993-2002.

J Hypertens 2008;26(3):600-6 doi: 10.1097/HJH.0b013e3282f3b352

00004872-200803000-00031 [pii][published Online First: Epub Date]|.

Page 47 of 54

For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml

BMJ Open

123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960

on February 4, 2020 by guest. P

rotected by copyright.http://bm

jopen.bmj.com

/B

MJ O

pen: first published as 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002826 on 25 June 2013. D

ownloaded from

Page 74: BMJ Open · smoking (which was rare) had no apparent hypertension effect. Among males, regular drinking increased the risk of incident hypertension Strengths In Thailand, this cohort

For peer review only

18

21. Bassett DR, Jr., Fitzhugh EC, Crespo CJ, et al. Physical activity and ethnic differences in hypertension

prevalence in the United States. Prev Med 2002;34(2):179-86 doi: 10.1006/pmed.2001.0969

S0091743501909697 [pii][published Online First: Epub Date]|.

22. Rampal L, Rampal S, Azhar MZ, et al. Prevalence, awareness, treatment and control of hypertension in

Malaysia: a national study of 16,440 subjects. Public Health 2008;122(1):11-8 doi: S0033-

3506(07)00170-9 [pii]

10.1016/j.puhe.2007.05.008[published Online First: Epub Date]|.

23. Lloyd-Jones D, Adams R, Carnethon M, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics--2009 update: a report

from the American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee.

Circulation 2009;119(3):e21-181 doi: CIRCULATIONAHA.108.191261 [pii]

10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.191261[published Online First: Epub Date]|.

24. Barton M, Meyer MR. Postmenopausal hypertension: mechanisms and therapy. Hypertension

2009;54(1):11-8 doi: HYPERTENSIONAHA.108.120022 [pii]

10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.108.120022[published Online First: Epub Date]|.

25. Shihab HM, Meoni LA, Chu AY, et al. Body Mass Index and Risk of Incident Hypertension over the

Life Course: The Johns Hopkins Precursors Study. Circulation 2012;126(25):2983-9 doi:

10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.117333[published Online First: Epub Date]|.

26. Gelber RP, Gaziano JM, Manson JE, et al. A prospective study of body mass index and the risk of

developing hypertension in men. Am J Hypertens 2007;20(4):370-7 doi: S0895-7061(06)00781-3

[pii]

10.1016/j.amjhyper.2006.10.011[published Online First: Epub Date]|.

27. Hu G, Barengo NC, Tuomilehto J, et al. Relationship of physical activity and body mass index to the risk

of hypertension: a prospective study in Finland. Hypertension 2004;43(1):25-30 doi:

10.1161/01.HYP.0000107400.72456.19

01.HYP.0000107400.72456.19 [pii][published Online First: Epub Date]|.

28. He J, Whelton PK, Appel LJ, et al. Long-term effects of weight loss and dietary sodium reduction on

incidence of hypertension. Hypertension 2000;35(2):544-9

29. Huang Z, Willett WC, Manson JE, et al. Body weight, weight change, and risk for hypertension in

women. Ann Intern Med 1998;128(2):81-8

30. Levin G, Kestenbaum B, Ida Chen YD, et al. Glucose, insulin, and incident hypertension in the multi-

ethnic study of atherosclerosis. Am J Epidemiol 2010;172(10):1144-54 doi: kwq266 [pii]

10.1093/aje/kwq266[published Online First: Epub Date]|.

Page 48 of 54

For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml

BMJ Open

123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960

on February 4, 2020 by guest. P

rotected by copyright.http://bm

jopen.bmj.com

/B

MJ O

pen: first published as 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002826 on 25 June 2013. D

ownloaded from

Page 75: BMJ Open · smoking (which was rare) had no apparent hypertension effect. Among males, regular drinking increased the risk of incident hypertension Strengths In Thailand, this cohort

For peer review only

19

31. Wang W, Lee ET, Fabsitz RR, et al. A longitudinal study of hypertension risk factors and their relation

to cardiovascular disease: the Strong Heart Study. Hypertension 2006;47(3):403-9 doi:

10.1161/01.HYP.0000200710.29498.80[published Online First: Epub Date]|.

32. Fukui M, Tanaka M, Toda H, et al. Risk factors for development of diabetes mellitus, hypertension and

dyslipidemia. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2011;94(1):e15-8 doi: S0168-8227(11)00356-1 [pii]

10.1016/j.diabres.2011.07.006[published Online First: Epub Date]|.

33. Suematsu C, Hayashi T, Fujii S, et al. Impaired fasting glucose and the risk of hypertension in Japanese

men between the 1980s and the 1990s. The Osaka Health Survey. Diabetes Care 1999;22(2):228-32

34. Hypertension Study Group. Prevalence, awareness, treatment and control of hypertension among the

elderly in Bangladesh and India: a multicentre study. Bull World Health Organ 2001;79(6):490-500

35. Rodrigues Barbosa A, Ferreti Borgatto A. Arterial hypertension in the elderly of bridgetown, barbados:

prevalence and associated factors. J Aging Health 2010;22(5):611-30 doi: 0898264310371123 [pii]

10.1177/0898264310371123[published Online First: Epub Date]|.

36. Bell CN, Thorpe RJ, Jr., Laveist TA. Race/Ethnicity and hypertension: the role of social support. Am J

Hypertens 2010;23(5):534-40 doi: ajh201028 [pii]

10.1038/ajh.2010.28[published Online First: Epub Date]|.

37. Marso SP, Hiatt WR. Peripheral arterial disease in patients with diabetes. J Am Coll Cardiol

2006;47(5):921-9 doi: S0735-1097(05)02862-7 [pii]

10.1016/j.jacc.2005.09.065[published Online First: Epub Date]|.

38. Laaksonen DE, Niskanen L, Nyyssonen K, et al. Dyslipidaemia as a predictor of hypertension in middle-

aged men. Eur Heart J 2008;29(20):2561-8 doi: ehn061 [pii]

10.1093/eurheartj/ehn061[published Online First: Epub Date]|.

39. Halperin RO, Sesso HD, Ma J, et al. Dyslipidemia and the risk of incident hypertension in men.

Hypertension 2006;47(1):45-50 doi: 01.HYP.0000196306.42418.0e [pii]

10.1161/01.HYP.0000196306.42418.0e[published Online First: Epub Date]|.

40. Tohidi M, Hatami M, Hadaegh F, et al. Triglycerides and triglycerides to high-density lipoprotein

cholesterol ratio are strong predictors of incident hypertension in Middle Eastern women. J Hum

Hypertens 2011;26(9):525-32 doi: jhh201170 [pii]

10.1038/jhh.2011.70[published Online First: Epub Date]|.

41. Sesso HD, Buring JE, Chown MJ, et al. A prospective study of plasma lipid levels and hypertension in

women. Arch Intern Med 2005;165(20):2420-7 doi: 165/20/2420 [pii]

10.1001/archinte.165.20.2420[published Online First: Epub Date]|.

Page 49 of 54

For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml

BMJ Open

123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960

on February 4, 2020 by guest. P

rotected by copyright.http://bm

jopen.bmj.com

/B

MJ O

pen: first published as 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002826 on 25 June 2013. D

ownloaded from

Page 76: BMJ Open · smoking (which was rare) had no apparent hypertension effect. Among males, regular drinking increased the risk of incident hypertension Strengths In Thailand, this cohort

For peer review only

20

42. Haffner SM, Miettinen H, Gaskill SP, et al. Metabolic precursors of hypertension. The San Antonio

Heart Study. Arch Intern Med 1996;156(17):1994-2001

43. Selwyn AP, Kinlay S, Libby P, et al. Atherogenic lipids, vascular dysfunction, and clinical signs of

ischemic heart disease. Circulation 1997;95(1):5-7

44. Jancova E, Vankova Z, Honsova E, et al. Prevalence and risk of hypertension in renal disease--data from

the Czech Registry of Renal Biopsies. Kidney Blood Press Res 2008;31(2):135-42 doi: 000126736

[pii]

10.1159/000126736[published Online First: Epub Date]|.

45. Kalaitzidis R, Li S, Wang C, et al. Hypertension in early-stage kidney disease: an update from the

Kidney Early Evaluation Program (KEEP). Am J Kidney Dis 2009;53(4 Suppl 4):S22-31 doi:

10.1053/j.ajkd.2008.11.028[published Online First: Epub Date]|.

46. Johnston PA, Davison AM. Hypertension in adults with idiopathic glomerulonephritis and normal serum

creatinine. A report from the MRC Glomerulonephritis Registry. Nephrol Dial Transplant

1993;8(1):20-4

47. Buckalew VM, Jr., Berg RL, Wang SR, et al. Prevalence of hypertension in 1,795 subjects with chronic

renal disease: the modification of diet in renal disease study baseline cohort. Modification of Diet in

Renal Disease Study Group. Am J Kidney Dis 1996;28(6):811-21 doi: S0272638696002363

[pii][published Online First: Epub Date]|.

48. Campese VM, Mitra N, Sandee D. Hypertension in renal parenchymal disease: why is it so resistant to

treatment? Kidney Int 2006;69(6):967-73 doi: 5000177 [pii]

10.1038/sj.ki.5000177[published Online First: Epub Date]|.

49. Niskanen L, Laaksonen DE, Nyyssonen K, et al. Inflammation, abdominal obesity, and smoking as

predictors of hypertension. Hypertension 2004;44(6):859-65 doi: 01.HYP.0000146691.51307.84

[pii]

10.1161/01.HYP.0000146691.51307.84[published Online First: Epub Date]|.

50. Halperin RO, Gaziano JM, Sesso HD. Smoking and the risk of incident hypertension in middle-aged and

older men. Am J Hypertens 2008;21(2):148-52 doi: ajh200736 [pii]

10.1038/ajh.2007.36[published Online First: Epub Date]|.

51. Halimi JM, Giraudeau B, Vol S, et al. The risk of hypertension in men: direct and indirect effects of

chronic smoking. J Hypertens 2002;20(2):187-93

52. Al-Safi SA. Does smoking affect blood pressure and heart rate? European journal of cardiovascular

nursing : journal of the Working Group on Cardiovascular Nursing of the European Society of

Cardiology 2005;4(4):286-9 doi: 10.1016/j.ejcnurse.2005.03.004[published Online First: Epub

Date]|.

Page 50 of 54

For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml

BMJ Open

123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960

on February 4, 2020 by guest. P

rotected by copyright.http://bm

jopen.bmj.com

/B

MJ O

pen: first published as 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002826 on 25 June 2013. D

ownloaded from

Page 77: BMJ Open · smoking (which was rare) had no apparent hypertension effect. Among males, regular drinking increased the risk of incident hypertension Strengths In Thailand, this cohort

For peer review only

21

53. Jo I, Ahn Y, Lee J, et al. Prevalence, awareness, treatment, control and risk factors of hypertension in

Korea: the Ansan study. J Hypertens 2001;19(9):1523-32

54. Schwandt HM, Coresh J, Hindin MJ. Marital Status, Hypertension, Coronary Heart Disease, Diabetes,

and Death Among African American Women and Men: Incidence and Prevalence in the

Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study Participants. J Fam Issues 2010;31(9):1211-29

doi: 10.1177/0192513X10365487[published Online First: Epub Date]|.

55. Bowman TS, Gaziano JM, Buring JE, et al. A prospective study of cigarette smoking and risk of incident

hypertension in women. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;50(21):2085-92 doi: S0735-1097(07)02729-5 [pii]

10.1016/j.jacc.2007.08.017[published Online First: Epub Date]|.

56. Ohmori S, Kiyohara Y, Kato I, et al. Alcohol intake and future incidence of hypertension in a general

Japanese population: the Hisayama study. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 2002;26(7):1010-6 doi:

10.1097/01.ALC.0000021147.31338.C2[published Online First: Epub Date]|.

57. Nakanishi N, Yoshida H, Nakamura K, et al. Alcohol consumption and risk for hypertension in middle-

aged Japanese men. J Hypertens 2001;19(5):851-5

58. Wildman RP, Gu D, Muntner P, et al. Alcohol intake and hypertension subtypes in Chinese men. J

Hypertens 2005;23(4):737-43 doi: 00004872-200504000-00012 [pii][published Online First: Epub

Date]|.

59. Yoshita K, Miura K, Morikawa Y, et al. Relationship of alcohol consumption to 7-year blood pressure

change in Japanese men. J Hypertens 2005;23(8):1485-90 doi: 00004872-200508000-00010

[pii][published Online First: Epub Date]|.

60. Minami J, Yoshii M, Todoroki M, et al. Effects of alcohol restriction on ambulatory blood pressure,

heart rate, and heart rate variability in Japanese men. Am J Hypertens 2002;15(2 Pt 1):125-9 doi:

S0895706101022658 [pii][published Online First: Epub Date]|.

61. Fuchs FD, Chambless LE, Whelton PK, et al. Alcohol consumption and the incidence of hypertension:

The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study. Hypertension 2001;37(5):1242-50

62. Taylor B, Irving HM, Baliunas D, et al. Alcohol and hypertension: gender differences in dose-response

relationships determined through systematic review and meta-analysis. Addiction

2009;104(12):1981-90 doi: ADD2694 [pii]

10.1111/j.1360-0443.2009.02694.x[published Online First: Epub Date]|.

63. Lipowicz A, Lopuszanska M. Marital differences in blood pressure and the risk of hypertension among

Polish men. Eur J Epidemiol 2005;20(5):421-7

64. Trivedi RB, Ayotte B, Edelman D, et al. The association of emotional well-being and marital status with

treatment adherence among patients with hypertension. Journal of behavioral medicine

2008;31(6):489-97 doi: 10.1007/s10865-008-9173-4[published Online First: Epub Date]|.

Page 51 of 54

For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml

BMJ Open

123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960

on February 4, 2020 by guest. P

rotected by copyright.http://bm

jopen.bmj.com

/B

MJ O

pen: first published as 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002826 on 25 June 2013. D

ownloaded from

Page 78: BMJ Open · smoking (which was rare) had no apparent hypertension effect. Among males, regular drinking increased the risk of incident hypertension Strengths In Thailand, this cohort

For peer review only

22

65. Kaplan MS, Huguet N, Feeny DH, et al. Self-reported hypertension prevalence and income among older

adults in Canada and the United States. Soc Sci Med 2010;70(6):844-9 doi: S0277-9536(09)00814-4

[pii]

10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.11.019[published Online First: Epub Date]|.

66. Vargas CM, Ingram DD, Gillum RF. Incidence of hypertension and educational attainment: the

NHANES I epidemiologic followup study. First National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.

Am J Epidemiol 2000;152(3):272-8

67. Rashid AK, Azizah AM. Prevalence of hypertension among the elderly Malays living in rural Malaysia.

Australian Medical Journal 2011;4(6):283-90

68. Addo J, Smeeth L, Leon DA. Socioeconomic position and hypertension: a study of urban civil servants

in Ghana. J Epidemiol Community Health 2009;63(8):646-50 doi:

10.1136/jech.2008.081828[published Online First: Epub Date]|.

69. Ball K, Crawford D. Socioeconomic status and weight change in adults: a review. Soc Sci Med

2005;60(9):1987-2010 doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.08.056[published Online First: Epub Date]|.

70. Diez-Roux AV, Nieto FJ, Caulfield L, et al. Neighbourhood differences in diet: the Atherosclerosis Risk

in Communities (ARIC) Study. J Epidemiol Community Health 1999;53(1):55-63

71. Sobal J, Stunkard AJ. Socioeconomic status and obesity: a review of the literature. Psychological

bulletin 1989;105(2):260-75

72. Yiengprugsawan V, Seubsman SA, Lim LL, et al. Used and foregone health services among a cohort of

87,134 adult open university students residing throughout Thailand. The Southeast Asian journal of

tropical medicine and public health 2009;40(6):1347-58

73. Pereira MA, Folsom AR, McGovern PG, et al. Physical activity and incident hypertension in black and

white adults: the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study. Prev Med 1999;28(3):304-12 doi:

S0091743598904315 [pii][published Online First: Epub Date]|.

74. Haapanen N, Miilunpalo S, Vuori I, et al. Association of leisure time physical activity with the risk of

coronary heart disease, hypertension and diabetes in middle-aged men and women. Int J Epidemiol

1997;26(4):739-47

75. Park J, Lee JS, Jang YA, et al. A comparison of food and nutrient intake between instant noodle

consumers and non-instant noodle consumers in Korean adults. Nutr Res Pract 2011;5(5):443-9 doi:

10.4162/nrp.2011.5.5.443[published Online First: Epub Date]|.

76. Jolly SE, Eilat-Adar S, Wang H, et al. Sex-specific associations of nutrition with hypertension and

systolic blood pressure in Alaska Natives findings from the GOCADAN study. Int J Circumpolar

Health 2011;70(3):254-65 doi: 1098 [pii][published Online First: Epub Date]|.

Page 52 of 54

For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml

BMJ Open

123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960

on February 4, 2020 by guest. P

rotected by copyright.http://bm

jopen.bmj.com

/B

MJ O

pen: first published as 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002826 on 25 June 2013. D

ownloaded from

Page 79: BMJ Open · smoking (which was rare) had no apparent hypertension effect. Among males, regular drinking increased the risk of incident hypertension Strengths In Thailand, this cohort

For peer review only

23

77. Alonso A, Beunza JJ, Bes-Rastrollo M, et al. Vegetable protein and fiber from cereal are inversely

associated with the risk of hypertension in a Spanish cohort. Arch Med Res 2006;37(6):778-86 doi:

S0188-4409(06)00087-7 [pii]

10.1016/j.arcmed.2006.01.007[published Online First: Epub Date]|.

78. Steffen LM, Kroenke CH, Yu X, et al. Associations of plant food, dairy product, and meat intakes with

15-y incidence of elevated blood pressure in young black and white adults: the Coronary Artery Risk

Development in Young Adults (CARDIA) Study. Am J Clin Nutr 2005;82(6):1169-77; quiz 363-4

doi: 82/6/1169 [pii][published Online First: Epub Date]|.

79. Schulze MB, Hoffmann K, Kroke A, et al. Risk of hypertension among women in the EPIC-Potsdam

Study: comparison of relative risk estimates for exploratory and hypothesis-oriented dietary patterns.

Am J Epidemiol 2003;158(4):365-73

80. Chien KL, Hsu HC, Chen PC, et al. Urinary sodium and potassium excretion and risk of hypertension in

Chinese: report from a community-based cohort study in Taiwan. J Hypertens 2008;26(9):1750-6

doi: 10.1097/HJH.0b013e328306a0a7[published Online First: Epub Date]|.

81. Zhang L, Qin LQ, Liu AP, et al. Prevalence of risk factors for cardiovascular disease and their

associations with diet and physical activity in suburban Beijing, China. J Epidemiol 2010;20(3):237-

43 doi: JST.JSTAGE/jea/JE20090119 [pii][published Online First: Epub Date]|.

82. Sun Z, Zheng L, Xu C, et al. Prevalence of prehypertension, hypertension and, associated risk factors in

Mongolian and Han Chinese populations in Northeast China. Int J Cardiol 2008;128(2):250-4 doi:

S0167-5273(07)01900-6 [pii]

10.1016/j.ijcard.2007.08.127[published Online First: Epub Date]|.

83. He FJ, MacGregor GA. Effect of modest salt reduction on blood pressure: a meta-analysis of

randomized trials. Implications for public health. J Hum Hypertens 2002;16(11):761-70 doi:

10.1038/sj.jhh.1001459[published Online First: Epub Date]|.

84. Sacks FM, Svetkey LP, Vollmer WM, et al. Effects on blood pressure of reduced dietary sodium and the

Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) diet. DASH-Sodium Collaborative Research

Group. N Engl J Med 2001;344(1):3-10 doi: 10.1056/NEJM200101043440101[published Online

First: Epub Date]|.

85. He FJ, MacGregor GA. Reducing population salt intake worldwide: from evidence to implementation.

Prog Cardiovasc Dis 2010;52(5):363-82 doi: S0033-0620(09)00127-3 [pii]

10.1016/j.pcad.2009.12.006[published Online First: Epub Date]|.

86. Lim LL, Seubsman SA, Sleigh A. Validity of self-reported weight, height, and body mass index among

university students in Thailand: Implications for population studies of obesity in developing

Page 53 of 54

For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml

BMJ Open

123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960

on February 4, 2020 by guest. P

rotected by copyright.http://bm

jopen.bmj.com

/B

MJ O

pen: first published as 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002826 on 25 June 2013. D

ownloaded from

Page 80: BMJ Open · smoking (which was rare) had no apparent hypertension effect. Among males, regular drinking increased the risk of incident hypertension Strengths In Thailand, this cohort

For peer review only

24

countries. Population health metrics 2009;7:1-15 doi: 10.1186/1478-7954-7-15[published Online

First: Epub Date]|.

87. Thinkhamrop K, Seubsman S, Sleigh A, et al. Reasons for Non-Response to Mailed Questionnaires –

Experience of a Large Cohort Study in Thailand. KKU Jph Research 2011;4(3):73-87

Page 54 of 54

For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml

BMJ Open

123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960

on February 4, 2020 by guest. P

rotected by copyright.http://bm

jopen.bmj.com

/B

MJ O

pen: first published as 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002826 on 25 June 2013. D

ownloaded from

Page 81: BMJ Open · smoking (which was rare) had no apparent hypertension effect. Among males, regular drinking increased the risk of incident hypertension Strengths In Thailand, this cohort

For peer review only

Health-risk factors and the incidence of hypertension: 4-year prospective findings from a national cohort of 60,569

Thai open university students

Journal: BMJ Open

Manuscript ID: bmjopen-2013-002826.R2

Article Type: Research

Date Submitted by the Author: 31-May-2013

Complete List of Authors: thawornchaisit, prasutr; Faculty of Health Sciences, School of Medicine; Lerdsin Hospital, Medicine de Looze, Ferdinandus; Faculty of Health Sciences, School of Medicine

Reid, Christopher; Monash University, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine Seubsman, Sam-ang; Sukhothai Thammathirat Open University, School of Human Ecology Sleigh, Adrian; The Australian National University, National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health

<b>Primary Subject Heading</b>:

Epidemiology

Secondary Subject Heading: Cardiovascular medicine, Public health

Keywords: Hypertension < CARDIOLOGY, General diabetes < DIABETES & ENDOCRINOLOGY, Risk management < HEALTH SERVICES ADMINISTRATION & MANAGEMENT, Adult nephrology < NEPHROLOGY

For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml

BMJ Open on F

ebruary 4, 2020 by guest. Protected by copyright.

http://bmjopen.bm

j.com/

BM

J Open: first published as 10.1136/bm

jopen-2013-002826 on 25 June 2013. Dow

nloaded from

Page 82: BMJ Open · smoking (which was rare) had no apparent hypertension effect. Among males, regular drinking increased the risk of incident hypertension Strengths In Thailand, this cohort

For peer review only

1

Health-risk factors and the incidence of hypertension: 4-year prospective

findings from a national cohort of 60,569 Thai open university students

Prasutr Thawornchaisit, School of Medicine, Faculty of Health Science, University of Queensland, 288

Herston Road, Herston, Brisbane, QLD, 4006 Australia and Department of Medicine, Lerdsin Hospital,

Silom road, Bangrak, Bangkok, 10500 Thailand

Email: [email protected]

Telephone: 662-585-8015

Fax: 662-912-0121

Prasutr Thawornchaisit, MD, MPH1, Ferdinandus de Looze, MBBS, MSc1, Christopher M Reid, PhD2, Sam-

ang Seubsman, PhD3, Adrian Sleigh, MD4, Thai Cohort Study Team*

1 School of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia, 2 School of Public Health and

Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia, 3 School of Human Ecology, Sukhothai

Thammathirat Open University, Nonthaburi, Thailand, 4 National Centre for Epidemiology and Population

Health, ANU College of Medicine, Biology and Environment, The Australian National University,

Canberra, Australia.

*Thailand: Jaruwan Chokhanapitak, Suttanit Hounthasarn, Suwanee Khamman, Daoruang Pandee, Suttinan

Pangsap, Tippawan Prapamontol, Janya Puengson, Sam-ang Seubsman, Boonchai Somboonsook, Nintita

Sripaiboonkij, Pathumvadee Somsamai, Prasutr Thawornchaisit, Duangkae Vilainerun, Wanee

Wimonwattanaphan, Cha-aim Pachanee, Arunrat Tangmunkongvorakul, Benjawan Tawatsupa, Wimalin

Rimpeekool.

Australia: Chris Bain, Emily Banks, Cathy Banwell, Bruce Caldwell, Gordon Carmichael, Tarie Dellora,

Jane Dixon, Sharon Friel, David Harley, Matthew Kelly, Tord Kjellstrom, Lynette Lim, Anthony

McMichael, Tanya Mark, Adrian Sleigh, Lyndall Strazdins, Vasoontara Yiengprugsawan, Susan Jordan,

Janneke Berecki-Gisolf, Rod McClure.

Running Head: Health-risks and hypertension incidence in the Thai Cohort Study

Key words: hypertension; health-risks; cohort; Thailand; socioeconomic

Page 1 of 51

For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml

BMJ Open

123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960

on February 4, 2020 by guest. P

rotected by copyright.http://bm

jopen.bmj.com

/B

MJ O

pen: first published as 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002826 on 25 June 2013. D

ownloaded from

Page 83: BMJ Open · smoking (which was rare) had no apparent hypertension effect. Among males, regular drinking increased the risk of incident hypertension Strengths In Thailand, this cohort

For peer review only

2

Abstract

Objective

This study evaluates the impact of a number of demographic, biological, behavioural and lifestyle health-

risk factors on the incidence of hypertension in Thailand over a 4-year period.

Design

A 4-year prospective study of health-risk factors and their effects on incidence of hypertension in a national

Thai Cohort Study (TCS) from 2005 to 2009

Setting

As Thailand is transitioning from a developing to a middle-income developed country, chronic diseases

(particularly cardiovascular disease) have emerged as major health issues. Hypertension is a major risk

factor for heart attack and stroke and cross-sectional studies have indicated that the prevalence is increasing.

Study participants

Sukhothai Thammathirat Open University students (57,558) who participated in both 2005 and 2009

questionnaire surveys and who were normotensive in 2005 were included in the analysis.

Measures

Adjusted relative risks associating each risk factor and incidence of hypertension by sex, after controlling for

confounders such as age, socio-economic status, body mass index (BMI) and underlying diseases.

Results

The overall 4-year incidence of hypertension was 3.5% with the rate in men being remarkably higher than

that in women (5.2% vs. 2.1%). In both sexes, hypertension associated with age, higher BMI and co-

morbidities but did not associate with income and education. In men, hypertension associated with physical

inactivity, smoking, alcohol and fast food intake. In women, hypertension was related to having a partner.

Conclusion

In both men and women, hypertension strongly associated with age, obesity and co-morbidities while it had

no association with socio-economic factors. The cohort pattern of socio-economy and hypertension reflects

that the health-risk transition in Thais is likely to be at the middle stage. Diet and lifestyle factors associate

with incidence of hypertension in Thais and may be amenable targets for hypertension control programs.

Page 2 of 51

For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml

BMJ Open

123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960

on February 4, 2020 by guest. P

rotected by copyright.http://bm

jopen.bmj.com

/B

MJ O

pen: first published as 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002826 on 25 June 2013. D

ownloaded from

Page 84: BMJ Open · smoking (which was rare) had no apparent hypertension effect. Among males, regular drinking increased the risk of incident hypertension Strengths In Thailand, this cohort

For peer review only

3

Article summary

Article focus

In a large Thai Cohort Study, we measured the effect of exposure to health-risk factors recorded in 2005 on

the incidence rate of hypertension over the following 4 years. This is part of a study of the health-risk

transition underway in Thailand. We investigated socio-demographic factors, co-morbidity, body size,

physical activity and health behaviour. Cohort members are Open University students, live nationwide, are

well educated and of modest means, representing the next generation of adult Thais.

Key Messages

Overall, the incidence of self-reported hypertension in Thai adults was 3.5% with the rate for males much

higher than females (5.2% vs. 2.1%). In both sexes hypertension incidence was associated with age, higher

body mass index, kidney disease, diabetes and high lipids, but not with socioeconomic status.

Marriage or partnering increased risk of hypertension in females but not in males. Planned physical activity,

averaged across the 4-year follow-up, protected males: ≥15 sessions /week associated with lower incidence

of hypertension. However, this was not observed in females.

In males, current-smokers had a higher risk of developing hypertension than non-smokers while in females

smoking (which was rare) had no apparent hypertension effect. Among males, regular drinking increased the

risk of incident hypertension.

Strengths

In Thailand, this cohort constitutes the largest longitudinal study of health-risk factors and hypertension

development. As a consequence, many independent risk factors for hypertension in Thais can be identified.

Our cohort represents Thais well in geography and socio-economy so the results reflect trends of the health-

risk transition in the population.

Limitations

Our study relies on self-report. There may be recall and reporting errors. Some risk factors may take more

than four years to produce hypertension and will manifest as the cohort ages.

Introduction

Page 3 of 51

For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml

BMJ Open

123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960

on February 4, 2020 by guest. P

rotected by copyright.http://bm

jopen.bmj.com

/B

MJ O

pen: first published as 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002826 on 25 June 2013. D

ownloaded from

Page 85: BMJ Open · smoking (which was rare) had no apparent hypertension effect. Among males, regular drinking increased the risk of incident hypertension Strengths In Thailand, this cohort

For peer review only

4

Hypertension is a global public health challenge due to its high prevalence and the concomitant increase in

risk of stroke and cardiovascular diseases [1]. In 2007, according to the World Health Organization,

cardiovascular diseases caused 33.7% of all deaths in the world, while other chronic diseases were

responsible for 26.5% [2]. Globally, it has been estimated that premature deaths resulting from hypertension

annually are approximately 7.1 million, which account for 64 million disability-adjusted life years (DALYs)

[3]. Hypertension ranks third, after underweight and unsafe sex, of the six major risk factors contributing to

the global disease burden[3].

In Thailand, hypertension is the third major risk factor of the national disease burden and causes 600,000

DALY losses per year [4]. The prevalence of hypertension has been estimated from a number of cross-

sectional studies among adults and has been increasing over the past decades from 20% in 1985 to 22% in

2004 [4-6]. The recent Thai National Health Examination Survey (NHES) in 2009 reported the prevalence

of hypertension in adults was 21.5% [4]. The emergence of hypertension has been the result of rapid

socioeconomic development which has resulted in one third of Thais migrating to urban areas [7].

Urbanization has been associated with increased obesity as people become less physically active and adopt

sedentary life styles such as spending more time watching television, sitting and using computers [7 8].

These factors, in association with Thailand’s ageing population [9], underpin the importance of controlling

hypertension in Thai community.

There is limited longitudinal research on health risk factors and hypertension incidence in Thailand [5]. The

purpose of this study is to address that knowledge gap. We prospectively examined the influence of an array

of demographic, biological, health-risk and lifestyle factors on the incidence of hypertension during 4 years

of follow-up in the Thai Cohort Study (TCS). This is part of an overarching research program investigating

Thailand’s health-risk transition from high maternal-child and infectious disease mortality to increased

longevity and emerging chronic disease. The large national cohort of Thai adults reported on here has been

followed since 2005 for risk factor trends and associated disease outcomes, including hypertension.

Methods

Study population

The first TCS evaluation was conducted in 2005 by sending twenty-page health-risk questionnaires to the

200,000 distance-learning students enrolled at Sukhothai Thammathirat Open University (STOU) and

87,134 (44%) completed them and signed the consent forms. The cohort has been shown to be socio-

Page 4 of 51

For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml

BMJ Open

123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960

on February 4, 2020 by guest. P

rotected by copyright.http://bm

jopen.bmj.com

/B

MJ O

pen: first published as 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002826 on 25 June 2013. D

ownloaded from

Page 86: BMJ Open · smoking (which was rare) had no apparent hypertension effect. Among males, regular drinking increased the risk of incident hypertension Strengths In Thailand, this cohort

For peer review only

5

economically and geographically well representative of the Thai population [10]. However, they resided

more in urban areas (51.8% vs. 31.1%) and on average were younger and better educated than most Thai

adults. Details of the baseline TCS methodology have been published [10]. This questionnaire focused on

socio-demography, habitation, work, health services, injury, sedentary habits, physical activity, transport,

underlying diseases, family history, personal behaviours, BMI, and consumption of foods, vegetables and

fruit. A 4-year follow-up was carried out in 2009. Overall, 71% of the cohort responded generating

longitudinal data on 60,569 participants.

Incident Hypertension

Incident hypertension was defined as being normotensive in 2005 and self-reported doctor diagnosed

hypertensive in 2009. Hypertension incidence was the dependent variable for analyses and the person-time

denominator included all individuals at risk - those 57,558 participants with longitudinal data who were

negative for hypertension in 2005, the beginning of the 4-year study period.

Risk Factors

Hypertension was defined as describe above, underlying diseases diagnosed by a doctor were also reported

including diabetes mellitus, kidney diseases and high blood lipids, all of which were investigated as

potential risk factors of hypertension.

Participants were grouped into three age categories: younger (≤30 years), middle (31-40 years) and older

(>40 years). Urbanization status was based on rural (R) or urban (U) residence, first when aged 10-12 years

old and again in 2005, producing four groups: lifelong ruralites (RR), urbanizers (RU), de-urbanizers (UR)

and urbanites (UU). Personal monthly income was divided into four categories: ≤7000 baht, 7001–10000

baht, 10001–20000 baht and >20000 baht. In 2005, one US dollar was equivalent to 42 baht so most of

participants had quite low incomes. Household assets were classified into three categories: low (≤30,000

baht), medium (30,001-60,000 baht) and high (>60,000 baht).

Sedentariness was assessed by screen time (hours/day spent before TV or computer) and (separately) sitting

time (hours per day spent sitting for any purpose). Incidental exercise was measured by the frequency of

housework or gardening, categorised as follows: ≤3 times per month; 1-2 times per week; 3-4 times per

week; most days. We measured planned physical activity at the beginning and end of the 4-year follow up

period. On both occasions, cohort members reported the number of sessions per week of strenuous and

moderate exercise for at least 20 minutes, and of walking for at least 10 minutes. We derived an “overall

measure” of planned physical activity calculated separately at both the baseline and the 4-year mark. The

measure was weighted as follows: (2 × strenuous + 1 × moderate + 1 × walking) sessions per week. This

weighting system is based on the recommendation of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire and

Page 5 of 51

For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml

BMJ Open

123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960

on February 4, 2020 by guest. P

rotected by copyright.http://bm

jopen.bmj.com

/B

MJ O

pen: first published as 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002826 on 25 June 2013. D

ownloaded from

Page 87: BMJ Open · smoking (which was rare) had no apparent hypertension effect. Among males, regular drinking increased the risk of incident hypertension Strengths In Thailand, this cohort

For peer review only

6

the Active Australia Survey as used in other analyses of the cohort data [11 12]. Finally, for each individual,

the “overall measures” of weekly exercise for 2005 and 2009 were added and then averaged by dividing by

2, creating a longitudinal measure of planned physical activity (LPPA).

Smoking status was classified as never, ex-smoker or current-smoker. Alcohol exposure was classified by

four categories: never, ex-drinker, occasional drinker or current-drinker. Body mass index (BMI) was

calculated from self-reported height in metres and weight in kilograms as weight/height2. It was divided into

4 categories as follows according to Asian criteria:[8 13-16] underweight (BMI <18.5), normal (18.5 to

<23), overweight (23 to <25), and obese (≥25). Foods that could potentially influence blood pressure (deep

fried, instant, roast or smoked, soybean products and soft drinks) were assessed for consumption frequency

based on a five-point Likert scale ranging from less than once a month to once or more a day. Western-style

fast food exposure was noted on a three-point scale from less than once to more than 3 times per month.

Fruit and vegetable consumption were recorded as standard serves eaten per day.

Statistical analyses

All analyses were performed using SPSS software. The incidence of hypertension and its 95% confidence

interval (CI) were calculated for each value of each categorical variable in both male and female participants

and the influence on incidence by each variable was evaluated by Chi-square test. For statistical inference,

all p-values were 2 tailed and significance was set at 5%.

Relative risks in a large study of an uncommon disease (incidence less than 10%) can be accurately

estimated as odds ratios [17]. Accordingly, for each risk variable, the relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence

interval were estimated using logistic regression to calculate the bivariate odds ratio for hypertension.

Adjusted RRs (ARRs) were estimated by calculating multivariate logistic regression odds ratios. The ARRs

were controlled for confounding by age, marital status, SES, BMI, underlying diseases and personal

behaviours (cigarette smoking and alcohol drinking). A variable was included in a multivariate model if

bivariate analysis had indicated a statistically significant association with incidence of hypertension. Some

variables were included because earlier analyses reported elsewhere had shown significant or substantial

association with hypertension.

Results

Baseline Characteristics

Baseline characteristics of study participants self-reporting as normotensive in 2005 are shown in Table 1.

The highest proportion of males resided in the North-eastern regions and Central while there were more

females in the Central and Bangkok area. More than half of the male and female participants lived in urban

Page 6 of 51

For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml

BMJ Open

123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960

on February 4, 2020 by guest. P

rotected by copyright.http://bm

jopen.bmj.com

/B

MJ O

pen: first published as 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002826 on 25 June 2013. D

ownloaded from

Page 88: BMJ Open · smoking (which was rare) had no apparent hypertension effect. Among males, regular drinking increased the risk of incident hypertension Strengths In Thailand, this cohort

For peer review only

7

areas. Males had a higher monthly income than females whereas females had a higher educational

attainment than males. The distribution of household assets for males and females was similar and over half

of them were in medium and high categories. The study population had a similar socio-demography, income

and location of residence to the general Thai population [9].

Incidence and risks of hypertension

Overall, the incidence of self-reported doctor diagnosed hypertension in Thai adults was 3.5% and the rate in

males was more than twice the corresponding rate in females (5.2% vs. 2.1%) (Table 2). In males and

females, the incidence of hypertension increased with increasing age. Marriage or having a partner increased

the risk of hypertension in females. However, this was not noticed in male. Educational attainment and

personal income had no influence on the risk of hypertension in both sexes. In males and females, the risk of

hypertension increased with an increased BMI. The risk of hypertension increased in both males and females

who had diabetes mellitus, high blood lipids and kidney disease.

Planned physical activity, averaged across the 4-year follow-up, was protective for males. In males, higher

LPPA (≥15 sessions / week) associated with lower incidence of hypertension; however, this association was

not observed in females. In males, current-smokers had a higher risk of developing hypertension than non-

smokers while in females, smoking (which was rare) had no apparent hypertension effect. Among males,

regular drinking increased the risk of incident hypertension; patterns of relative risks were similar for

females but, reflecting the low frequency of female drinking, did not reach statistical significance. In males,

the risk of hypertension had a direct association with the frequency of instant food consumption but there

was no such association detected in females.

Over the 4-year period, a variety of factors that could have been risks for hypertension over a longer period

were found not to be in this setting (data not shown). Thus, in males and females, factors that had no

statistically significant influence on the longitudinal 4-year risk of hypertension incidence were urbanization

status, sedentary lifestyle (non-participation in housework or gardening, high levels of television and

computer watching, sleeping and sitting time), and food consumption habits that included deep fried food

and soft drink, Western fast food, roasted or smoked foods, fruit, vegetables and soybean products.

Discussion

Page 7 of 51

For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml

BMJ Open

123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960

on February 4, 2020 by guest. P

rotected by copyright.http://bm

jopen.bmj.com

/B

MJ O

pen: first published as 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002826 on 25 June 2013. D

ownloaded from

Page 89: BMJ Open · smoking (which was rare) had no apparent hypertension effect. Among males, regular drinking increased the risk of incident hypertension Strengths In Thailand, this cohort

For peer review only

8

This large prospective cohort of adults living all over Thailand has been the first studied nationally for a

wide array of risk factors for incident hypertension. Overall, the 4-year incidence of hypertension from 2005

to 2009 was 3.5%, notably higher in men (5.2%) than women (2.1%). These incidence rates are drawn from

a cohort of adults on average younger than the Thai population so they are lower than corresponding rates of

the adult population. However, our focus was on risk factor associations and we noted that in both sexes,

age, obesity and co-morbidity with diabetes mellitus, high blood lipids and kidney disease strongly linked to

hypertension incidence. In males, instant food consumption, smoking and drinking alcohol had a moderate

adverse effect on hypertension risk while planned physical activity averaging 15 or more sessions per week

over the 4-year period was substantially protective, reducing risk by 22%. In females, having a partner was

associated with increased incidence of hypertension.

The age effect on hypertension incidence noted by us is consistent with findings of many other population

studies of hypertension including (for example) a longitudinal study in China [18] and cross-sectional

studies in Korea [19], Taiwan [20] and the USA [21]. The noticeably greater incidence of hypertension in

men than in women that we found in Thailand has also been reported from many parts of the world

including neighboring Malaysia [22] and distant USA [23] as well as in a recent global review [24].

In men and women of the Thai cohort, a progressively higher BMI was positively and significantly

associated with an increased risk of incident hypertension over the four years. This finding was similar to

that reported for other prospective cohorts in the US [25 26] and Finland [27]. Furthermore, after seven

years of follow-up in a US study [28], weight loss associated with a decreased risk of incident hypertension.

Among a cohort of US nurses, the risk of incident hypertension increased 5% for each kilogram addition of

weight [29], and rose 15% for each increase of one kilogram per meter squared of BMI in Taiwan [18].

These results suggest that the adverse effect of high BMI on risk of hypertension does not depend on

ethinicity or sex and is wide spread around the world.

In our cohort, we noted a higher risk of incident hypertension among those with diabetes mellitus. This

finding is consistent with longitudinal studies in the USA [30 31] which reported, respectively, that in

diabetic patients the risk of incident hypertension rose 41% and 56%. As well, prospective cohort studies in

Japan showed that diabetes [32] and impaired fasting blood glucose [33] were associated with an increased

risk of hypertension incidence. Supportive cross-sectional results emerge from studies in diverse settings

including Bangladesh and India [34], Barbados [35] and the USA [36]. A causal association between

Page 8 of 51

For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml

BMJ Open

123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960

on February 4, 2020 by guest. P

rotected by copyright.http://bm

jopen.bmj.com

/B

MJ O

pen: first published as 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002826 on 25 June 2013. D

ownloaded from

Page 90: BMJ Open · smoking (which was rare) had no apparent hypertension effect. Among males, regular drinking increased the risk of incident hypertension Strengths In Thailand, this cohort

For peer review only

9

diabetes and hypertension is suspected and possible mechanisms include endothelial dysfunction and

vascular inflammation [37].

We also found that high blood lipids significantly associated with increased risk of incident hypertension.

This supports the results from previous longitudinal studies in men [38 39], women [40 41] and adults [32

42]. The risk of hypertension increased with an increase of total cholesterol, triglyceride and low-density

lipoprotein cholesterol levels and decreased with an increase of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol level

[38 39 41].The mechanism by which dyslipidemia provokes high blood pressure is uncertain but could

reflect blood vessel dysfunction and damaged endothelium [43].

Among men and women in the Thai cohort, kidney disease strongly associated with increased risk of

hypertension incidence. This result is supported by cross-sectional data from the Czech Republic [44] and

the USA [45]. Microalbuminuria is a biomarker for renal hypertension [45] and the risk increases with the

severity of kidney impairment, revealed by the serum creatinine level [46 47]. Glomerular damage is more

closely connected with hypertension than tubular or interstitial disease [47]. Chronic kidney disease

facilitates high blood pressure through many mechanisms including excessive intravascular volume,

increased endothelin production, activity of the renin-angiotensin system and sympathetic nervous system

and decreased vasodilators, nitric oxide production and endothelial function [48].

In men we found that cigarette smoking modestly associated with increased risk of developing hypertension.

This is consistent with many other reports such as longitudinal studies in Japanese [49] and American men

[50] and a cross-sectional study in French men [51]. In addition, smoking Jordanian men had significantly

higher blood pressure than their non-smoking counterparts [52]. However, we also found that smoking had

no influence on hypertension in women. This result for females is compatible with reports from Korea [53]

and the USA [54]. In contrast, one prospective US study [55] reported an increased risk of hypertension

among women. It is likely that men tend to smoke more cigarettes than women and the impact of smoking

on hypertension is a dose-response pattern [49].

Regular alcohol consumption was strongly associated with an increased risk of incident hypertension. This

result is supported by findings from longitudinal studies in Japan [56 57] and cross-sectional studies in

China [58] and Korea [53]. In Japanese men, alcohol consumption, particularly more than 200 grams per

week, significantly associated with an increase of blood pressure [59] while alcohol restriction was

Page 9 of 51

For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml

BMJ Open

123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960

on February 4, 2020 by guest. P

rotected by copyright.http://bm

jopen.bmj.com

/B

MJ O

pen: first published as 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002826 on 25 June 2013. D

ownloaded from

Page 91: BMJ Open · smoking (which was rare) had no apparent hypertension effect. Among males, regular drinking increased the risk of incident hypertension Strengths In Thailand, this cohort

For peer review only

10

noticeably related to a decreased blood pressure [60]. Among our Thai cohort females, alcohol consumption

had no influence on hypertension; this result was supported by longitudinal data from Japan [56] and cross-

sectional data from Korea [53]. In American females the quantity of alcohol consumption per week had no

effect on systolic blood pressure [61]. Males usually consume more alcohol than females and the

hypertension risk is linear with a dose-response [57 62]. Our results suggest that regular alcohol

consumption, especially in males, is a significant risk factor for developing hypertension.

Marital status in males had no influence on hypertension which supports the results from more economically

developed countries, the USA and Korea [53 54]. However, in middle-income countries, results diverged:

married males, when compared to their unmarried counterparts, had a higher risk of hypertension in

Barbados [35] and a lower risk in Poland [63]. Married individuals had higher emotional and social support

and lower stress [63] and probability of being a current smoker [64]. We found incident hypertension was

relatively more frequent among married females, unlike the no-sex-link pattern in developed countries such

as the USA and Korea [53 54]. The influence of marrital status on hypertension varies from one country to

another partly due to the difference of socio-economy and social structure. For our Thai cohort, the pattern

in males was similar to that in developed countries and in females it was not.

Participant educational attainment did not protect against hypertension in either sex. This is similar to cross-

sectional results for adults in developed countries such as Korea [53] and the USA [36 65]. However, other

studies in various settings and with diverse designs reported educational attainment protects against

hypertension in adults; these included a prospective cohort in middle income Thailand [5], a cross-sectional

study in middle income Malaysia [22] and a cross-sectional study in high income USA [66]. Opposite

findings have been reported in low income settings in both Bangladesh and India [34] where education was

a risk factor for hypertension. Taken collectively, these data suggest that income modifies the protective

education-hypertension effect, inverting it when income is low and boosting it when income is high. Our

middle-income cohort could be in the middle stage of this education effect as it is transiting from the low-

income pattern.

We found no association of personal monthly income and risk of hypertension in either sex. This was similar

to previous studies in middle-income countries including a longitudinal study in Thailand [5] and a cross-

sectional study in Malaysia [67] and in cross-sectional studies in high-income countries such as in Korea

[53] and the USA [21 36]. However, income had an inverse association with risk of hypertension in another

study in high-income developed USA [65] while it had a direct positive association in a low-income

developing country such as Ghana [68]. The health transition in Thailand is likely to be in the middle stage,

Page 10 of 51

For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml

BMJ Open

123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960

on February 4, 2020 by guest. P

rotected by copyright.http://bm

jopen.bmj.com

/B

MJ O

pen: first published as 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002826 on 25 June 2013. D

ownloaded from

Page 92: BMJ Open · smoking (which was rare) had no apparent hypertension effect. Among males, regular drinking increased the risk of incident hypertension Strengths In Thailand, this cohort

For peer review only

11

according to the concept of a tipping-point for the relationship between socio-economic status, body size and

hypertension risk factors. High income, large body size and high blood pressure is seen in developing

countries while in developed countries, high income is a protective factor [69-71]. Indeed, the Thai cohort

has already been shown to be at a transitional point for metabolic states because females had an inverse

relationship between income and BMI whereas males had a positive (traditional) relationship [14]. However,

now all Thais benefit from universal health insurance so access to health care is not dependent on their

income making disease associations more attenuated than before [72].

In our cohort, the reduction of risk of hypertension incidence in males but not in females by a longitudinal

measure of planned physical activity was comparable with a prospective study in middle-aged American

whites [73]. In another prospective study in middle-aged Finns, the hypertension protective effect of

vigorous physical activity or total energy expenditure from leisure-time physical activity was observed in

men but not in women [74]. Such physical activity among females may be less intense than among males so

having no effect on the risk of hypertension [74]. A large Finnish study [27] demonstrated that the incidence

of hypertension was inversely associated with the level of physical activity in a dose-response manner in

both sexes. In our cohort study, risk of obesity had an inverse association with quantified planned exercise in

both sexes but the effect was significantly stronger in males than in females [12]. As Thailand progresses

economically, more people migrate to urban areas and decrease their physical activity [7]. Therefore, in the

future, Thai people may encounter a higher risk of hypertension due to lower physical activity.

Instant food - mostly combinations of carbohydrate, fat and salt - associated with an increased risk of

incident hypertension in males but not in females. Other foods, fruit and vegetables had no impact on

hypertension. This may be as a result of men comsuming more instant foods, such as instant noodles, than

women. For example a study in Korea showed daily instant food consumption in men and women averages

23.7 and 11.1 grams respectively [75]. Other studies showed that carbohydrate [76 77], fruit and vegetables

[78 79] consumption had no influence on hypertension. Most students consume instant noodles which lead

to a higher intake of energy, fat, sodium, thiamine, and riboflavin but a lower intake of protein, calcium,

phosphorus [75]. Koreans favoring instant noodles have a salt intake more than three times higher than the

daily recommendation (6.4 vs 2 gms) [75]. Daily salt intake of Thai people has been reported to average

10.8gm, much higher than recommended (http://www.worldactiononsalt.com/worldaction/asia/75286.pdf).

High salt consumption was associated with an increased risk of developing hypertension in a longitudinal

study in Taiwan [80] and in cross-sectional studies in China [81 82] while other reports revealed that salt

restriction reduced blood pressure [83 84]. High plasma sodium, due to an overwhelmed capacity of the

kidney to excrete excessive salt consumption, leads to excessive intravascular volume and high blood

Page 11 of 51

For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml

BMJ Open

123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960

on February 4, 2020 by guest. P

rotected by copyright.http://bm

jopen.bmj.com

/B

MJ O

pen: first published as 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002826 on 25 June 2013. D

ownloaded from

Page 93: BMJ Open · smoking (which was rare) had no apparent hypertension effect. Among males, regular drinking increased the risk of incident hypertension Strengths In Thailand, this cohort

For peer review only

12

pressure [85]. It seems reasonable to conclude that high salt intake from instant noodle consumption is likely

to be causally associated with an increased risk of hypertension in Thailand.

In Thailand, this cohort constitutes the largest study to examine the longitudinal effect of most health-risk

factors on hypertension development. Indeed, the study size along with its national representation are

important factors to consider when exploring study validity and utility. The influence of risk factors on

hypertension incidence is clearly demonstrated since this is a large longitudinal cohort covering a 4-year

period. As a consequence, independent risk factors for hypertension in Thais can be identified. With the high

initial non-response rate and participants drawn from only one university distance-learning students enrolled

at Sukhothai Thammathirat Open University may not be representative of the Thai people or next generation

of Thais. However, our nationwide cohort represents STOU students well and also represents the Thai

population well in geography and socio-economy [9] so the results to some extent reflect the trend of health-

risk transition in the Thai population. Indeed, STOU students, with better education attainment combined

with their representative incomes and geographical location, are likely to represent the next generation of

Thais. It would be reasonable to conclude that our 4-year follow-up results may indicate future hypertension

trends for Thai people.

However, our study has limitations since it relied on self-report. There may be recall and reporting errors.

But a study of the validity of self-reported weight and height in our cohort found that the accuracy was quite

acceptable [86]. As well, we have conducted a validation study of self-reported hypertension (Prasutr

Thawornchaisit, 2013, under review) in a random age-sex matched sub-sample of the cohort reporting

hypertension (n=240) or no hypertension (n=240). We found the sensitivity was high (82%) and that

negative reports were usually accurate (86%). In another report, we investigated the impact of the non-

responses to the 2009 follow up and found small effects with under-representation of young urban males;

this missing group would have a minor influence on our results and would not be expected to have a high

rate of incident hypertension [87]. The findings from our study are likely to be robust and represent well the

future trends of health-risk transition in middle-income Thailand and similar ASEAN countries.

In conclusion, older age, obesity and underlying morbidity due to diabetes, high blood lipids and kidney

disease were strongly associated with an increased risk of incident hypertension in both sexes while in

males, physical inactivity, instant food consumption, smoking and drinking alcohol had a moderate

association. Sedentary life-style and the consumption of friut and vegetables had no detected influence on

Page 12 of 51

For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml

BMJ Open

123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960

on February 4, 2020 by guest. P

rotected by copyright.http://bm

jopen.bmj.com

/B

MJ O

pen: first published as 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002826 on 25 June 2013. D

ownloaded from

Page 94: BMJ Open · smoking (which was rare) had no apparent hypertension effect. Among males, regular drinking increased the risk of incident hypertension Strengths In Thailand, this cohort

For peer review only

13

hypertension. The Thai health-risk transition is likely to be in the middle stage since education attainment

and income still have no net effect to protect against hypertension. Prevention should focus on obesity, high

blood lipids and high salt consumption and people should be encouraged to increase physical exercise and

consume low fat foods and less instant foods. A reduction of salt consumption should be a national policy by

limiting the concentration of salt in ready-to-eat and industrial foods. Smoking and drinking cessation

should be promoted for males. Thailand should also consciously aim to take advantage of its culturally

determined low rate of drinking and smoking among women and ensure that there is no attempt to

undermine this situation and develop the market for the female half of the population.

Acknowledgements and Funding

This study was supported by the International Collaborative Research Grants Scheme with joint grants from

the Wellcome Trust UK (GR071587MA) and the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council

(268055), and by a global health grant from the NHMRC (585426). We thank the staff at Sukhothai

Thammathirat Open University (STOU) who assisted with student contact and the STOU students who are

participating in the cohort study. We also thank Dr Bandit Thinkamrop and his team from Khon Kaen

University for guiding us successfully through the complex data processing.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

Ethical considerations

Ethical approval was obtained from Sukhothai Thammathirat Open University Research and Development

Institute (protocol 0522/10) and the Australian National University Human Research Ethics Committee

(protocol 2004344 and 2009570). Informed, written consent was obtained from all participants.

Author contribution: PT devised the hypertension study, analysed the data and wrote the paper. FDL and

CR assisted with planning the study, analysis and interpretation. AS and SS conceived and developed the

cohort, and helped plan, analyse and interpret this study. All authors approved the final manuscript.

Data sharing: No additional data available.

Page 13 of 51

For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml

BMJ Open

123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960

on February 4, 2020 by guest. P

rotected by copyright.http://bm

jopen.bmj.com

/B

MJ O

pen: first published as 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002826 on 25 June 2013. D

ownloaded from

Page 95: BMJ Open · smoking (which was rare) had no apparent hypertension effect. Among males, regular drinking increased the risk of incident hypertension Strengths In Thailand, this cohort

For peer review only

14

Table 1 Characteristics of 57558 participants normotensive at the 2005 Thai Cohort Study baseline

Male Female Difference

Factor

n % n % P-valuea

Demographic data

Participants 25320 44.0 32238 56.0 <0.0001 Age (y) mean 32.9 30.0 <0.0001

b

(SD) (8.5) (7.6) Age group <0.0001 ≤30 y 11293 44.6 19229 59.6 31-40 y 9177 36.2 9638 29.9 >40 y 4850 19.2 3371 10.5 Married/partnered <0.0001 No 11060 44.8 18851 60.1 Yes 13607 55.2 12513 39.9 Regions <0.0001 Bangkok 3488 13.9 6057 18.9 Central 5712 22.7 8267 25.8 North 5180 20.6 5818 18.1 North-east 6142 24.4 5760 18.0 East 1515 6.0 1922 6.0 South 3103 12.3 4254 13.3 Urbanization status

c <0.0001

Rural–rural (RR) 11512 46,1 13895 43.6 Rural–urban (RU) 7891 31.6 9546 29.9 Urban–rural (UR) 1078 4.3 1344 4.2 Urban–urban (UU) 4495 18.0 7114 22.3

Socioeconomic status

Education level <0.0001 High school 13366 52.9 13135 40.8 Diploma 5749 22.8 9791 30.4 University 6153 24.4 9231 28.7 Personal monthly income (baht)

d <0.0001 ≤7000 8025 32.3 13890 44.1 7001–10000 5790 23.3 7578 24.0 10001–20000 7549 30.4 7194 22.8 >20000 3452 13.9 2851 9.0 Household assets

e (baht)

d <0.001

Low 9852 39.1 12434 38.7 Medium 8065 32.0 9863 30.7 High 7298 28.9 9804 30.5 aChi-square test

b unpaired t test cLocation of residence (rural, R, or urban, U) at age 10-12 years and again in 2005. dAt the time of the survey in 2009, US$1 = 31 Thai baht eReplacement value in Thai baht: low ≤30,000, medium 30,001-60,000 and high >60,000

Page 14 of 51

For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml

BMJ Open

123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960

on February 4, 2020 by guest. P

rotected by copyright.http://bm

jopen.bmj.com

/B

MJ O

pen: first published as 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002826 on 25 June 2013. D

ownloaded from

Page 96: BMJ Open · smoking (which was rare) had no apparent hypertension effect. Among males, regular drinking increased the risk of incident hypertension Strengths In Thailand, this cohort

For peer review only

15

Table 2 Hypertension incidence and association with risk factors in male and female participants.

Males Females

HT(n) Incia%(95% CI) ARR

b(95% CI) HT(n) Inci

a%(95% CI) ARR

b(95% CI)

Participants 1306 5.2 (4.9-5.4) 690 2.1 (2.0-2.3)

Demography

Age group

≤30 y 279 2.5 (2.2-2.8) 1 215 1.1 (0.97-1.3) 1 31-40 y 484 5.3 (4.8-5.7) 1.66 (1.39-1.98) 245 2.5 (2.23-2.9) 1.93 (1.56-2.39) >40 y 543 11.2 (10.3-12.1) 3.13 (2.57-3.81) 230 6.8 (6.0-7.7) 4.2 (3.26-5.42) P-trend <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001

Marital status (married/partnered)

No 368 3.3 (3.0-3.7) 1 303 1.6 (1.43-1.8) 1 Yes 896 6.6 (6.17-7.0) 0.97 (0.83-1.12) 368 2.9 (2.65-3.2) 1.22 (1.03-1.45)

Socio-economic status

Education level

High school 697 5.2 (4.8-5.6) 1 303 2.3 (2.05-2.57) 1 Diploma 276 4.8 (4.25-5.4) 1.0 (0.86-1.17) 180 1.8 (1.57-2.1) 0.81 (0.66-0.99) University 331 5.4 (4.8-5.9) 0.93 (0.8-1.1) 204 2.2 (1.9-2.51) 0.87 (0.71-1.07) P-trend 0.83 0.61 0.463 0.1 Personal monthly income (baht)c ≤7000 268 3.3 (2.95-3.7) 1 217 1.6 (1.36-1.8) 1 7001-10000 229 4.0 (3.45-4.5) 1.0 (0.81-1.2) 142 1.9 (1.57-2.2) 1.1 (0.87-1.37) 10001-20000 497 6.6 (6.0-7.14) 1.1 (0.91-1.31) 196 2.7 (2.35-3.1) 0.97 (0.77-1.23) >20000 289 8.4 (7.46-9.3) 1.0 (0.8-1.25) 122 4.3 (3.54-5.0) 1.04 (0.78-1.39) P-trend <0.0001 0.527 <0.0001 0.783 BMI classification

d

Underweight 359 2.9 (2.62-3.2) 0.46 (0.27-0.78) 60 0.85 (0.63-1.15) 0.9 (0.67-1.21) (BMI <18.5) Normal 16 1.1 (0.56-1.6) 1 258 1.4 (1.2-1.5) 1 (18.5 ≤ BMI < 23) Overweight 333 5.9 (5.3-6.54) 1.66 (1.41-1.95) 129 3.9 (3.3-4.62) 2.32 (1.8-2.91) (23 ≤ BMI < 25) Obese 575 10.4 (9.6-11.2) 2.82 (2.43-3.27) 231 7.4 (6.4-8.27) 4.14 (3.4-5.05) (BMI ≥25) P-trend <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001

Continued….

Page 15 of 51

For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml

BMJ Open

123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960

on February 4, 2020 by guest. P

rotected by copyright.http://bm

jopen.bmj.com

/B

MJ O

pen: first published as 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002826 on 25 June 2013. D

ownloaded from

Page 97: BMJ Open · smoking (which was rare) had no apparent hypertension effect. Among males, regular drinking increased the risk of incident hypertension Strengths In Thailand, this cohort

For peer review only

16

Table 2 (continued...)

Males Females HT(n) Inci

a%(95% CI) ARR

b(95% CI) HT(n) Inci

a%(95% CI) ARR

b(95% CI)

Physical activities

Weighted total sessions exercise-related physical activity (average between 2005 and 2009) 0-7 ses/we 198 6.3 (5.5-7.1) 1 162 2.2 (1.8-2.6) 1 8-14 ses/w 589 5.2 (4.8-5.6) 0.9 (0.76-1.07) 352 2.1 (1.9-2.3) 1.0 (0.82-1.23)

≥15 ses/w 380 4.4 (4.0-5.0) 0.78 (0.65-0.95) 119 2.2 (1.8-2.6) 1.0 (0.77-1.3)

P-trend <0.0001 <0.029 0.905 1.0

Underlying diseases

Diabetes mellitus

No 1251 5.0 (4.7-5.27) 1 674 2.1 (1.9-2.26) 1 Yes 55 18.3 (13.9-22.7) 1.81 (1.29-2.52) 16 10.7 (5.7-15.8) 2.54 (1.41-4.56)

High lipids

No 983 4.4 (4.13-4.67) 1 576 1.9 (1.76-2.1) 1 Yes 323 10.8 (9.7-11.9) 1.4 (1.21-1.63) 114 5.4 (4.47-6.4) 1.38 (1.09-1.75)

Kidney diseases

No 1248 5.1 (4.8-5.33) 1 659 2.1 (1.9-2.26) 1 Yes 58 9.6 (7.2-11.9) 1.62 (1.19-2.2) 31 3.9 (2.52-5.2) 1.77 (1.19-2.63)

Personal behaviours

Smoking status Never 506 4.1 (3.7-4.4) 1 617 2.1 (1.9-2.23) 1 Ex-smoker 496 6.6 (6.0-7.13) 1.15 (1.0-1.32) 37 3.2 (2.2-4.22) 1.28 (0.88-1.87) Cur-smokerf 276 5.8 (5.16-6.5) 1.22 (1.04-1.44) 8 3.1 (0.97-5.2) 1.54 (0.74-3.2) P-trend <0.0001 <0.032 <0.008 0.23

Drinking status

Never 105 3.9 (3.2-4.7) 1 268 2.1 (1.8-2.32) 1 Ex-drinker 155 5.7 (4.85-6.6) 0.98 (0.74-1.3) 50 2.2 (1.6-2.85) 1.14 (0.82-1.59) Occ- drinkerg 821 4.8 (4.45-5.1) 1.0 (0.8-1.25) 352 2.1 (1.9-2.36) 1.14 (0.96-1.36) Reg- drinker

h 212 8.6 (7.5-9.7) 1.61 (1.23-2.11) 9 4.7 (1.66-7.7) 1.83 (0.86-3.9)

P-trend <0.0001 <0.0001 0.471 0.254

Food consumption habit

Instant food

<1 time/m 335 6.3 (5.6-6.95) 1 168 2.8(2.36-3.2) 1 1-3 times/m 485 5.1 (4.63-5.5) 1.02 (0.87-1.19) 273 2.1 (1.84-2.3) 0.95 (0.77-1.17) 1-2 times/wk 280 4.4 (3.9-4.9) 1.09 (0.91-1.30) 153 1.9 (1.6-2.2) 1.04 (0.81-1.33) 3-6 times/wk 165 5.0 (4.3-5.75) 1.36 (1.1-1.69) 73 1.8 (1.4-2.22) 1.14 (0.84-1.55) ≥1 times/d 32 5.5 (3.6-7.33) 1.67 (1.11-2.52) 18 2.3 (1.3-3.35) 1.48 (0.86-2.53) P-trend <0.002 <0.008 <0.002 0.403 aIncidence of Hypertension

bAdjusted relative risks were calculated from multi-variate logistic regression models of hypertension adjusted for age, marital status, education, income, BMI category, underlying diseases, personal behaviours. cAt the time of the survey in 2005, US$1 = 42 Thai baht dAsian standard BMI classification eSessions / week fCurrent-smoker gOccasional drinker hRegular drinker

Page 16 of 51

For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml

BMJ Open

123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960

on February 4, 2020 by guest. P

rotected by copyright.http://bm

jopen.bmj.com

/B

MJ O

pen: first published as 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002826 on 25 June 2013. D

ownloaded from

Page 98: BMJ Open · smoking (which was rare) had no apparent hypertension effect. Among males, regular drinking increased the risk of incident hypertension Strengths In Thailand, this cohort

For peer review only

17

References

1. Chobanian AV, Bakris GL, Black HR, et al. Seventh report of the Joint National Committee on

Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure. Hypertension

2003;42(6):1206-52.

2. Gaziano TA, Bitton A, Anand S, et al. Growing epidemic of coronary heart disease in low- and middle-

income countries. Curr Probl Cardiol 2010;35(2):72-115.

3. Whitworth JA, World Health Organization and International Society of Hypertension Writing Group.

2003 World Health Organization (WHO)/International Society of Hypertension (ISH) statement on

management of hypertension. J Hypertens 2003;21(11):1983-92.

4. Aekplakorn W, Sangthong R, Kessomboon P, et al. Changes in prevalence, awareness, treatment and

control of hypertension in Thai population, 2004-2009: Thai National Health Examination Survey

III-IV. J Hypertens 2012;30(9):1734-42.

5. Vathesatogkit P, Woodward M, Tanomsup S, et al. Long-term effects of socioeconomic status on incident

hypertension and progression of blood pressure. J Hypertens 2012;30(7):1347-53.

6. Aekplakorn W, Abbott-Klafter J, Khonputsa P, et al. Prevalence and management of prehypertension and

hypertension by geographic regions of Thailand: the Third National Health Examination Survey,

2004. J Hypertens 2008;26(2):191-8.

7. Lim LL, Kjellstrom T, Sleigh A, et al. Associations between urbanisation and components of the health-

risk transition in Thailand. A descriptive study of 87,000 Thai adults. Glob Health Action

2009;20(1914):1-13.

8. Banwell C, Lim L, Seubsman SA, et al. Body mass index and health-related behaviours in a national

cohort of 87,134 Thai open university students. J Epidemiol Community Health 2009;63(5):366-72.

9. Seubsman S, Yiengprugsawan V, Sleigh A, et al. A Large National Thai Cohort Study of the Health-Risk

Transition based on Sukhothai Thammathirat Open University Students. ASEAN Journal of Open

Distance Learning 2012;4(1):58-69.

Page 17 of 51

For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml

BMJ Open

123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960

on February 4, 2020 by guest. P

rotected by copyright.http://bm

jopen.bmj.com

/B

MJ O

pen: first published as 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002826 on 25 June 2013. D

ownloaded from

Page 99: BMJ Open · smoking (which was rare) had no apparent hypertension effect. Among males, regular drinking increased the risk of incident hypertension Strengths In Thailand, this cohort

For peer review only

18

10. Sleigh AC, Seubsman SA, Bain C. Cohort profile: The Thai Cohort of 87,134 Open University students.

Int J Epidemiol 2008;37(2):266-72.

11. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. The Active Australia Survey: a guide and manual for

implementation, analysis and reporting Canberra. AIHW 2003:1-55.

12. Banks E, Lim L, Seubsman SA, et al. Relationship of obesity to physical activity, domestic activities,

and sedentary behaviours: cross-sectional findings from a national cohort of over 70,000 Thai adults.

BMC Public Health 2011;11(762):1-14.

13. Yiengprugsawan V, Banwell C, Seubsman SA, et al. Short sleep and obesity in a large national cohort of

Thai adults. BMJ open 2012;2(1):e000561-7.

14. Seubsman SA, Lim LL, Banwell C, et al. Socioeconomic status, sex, and obesity in a large national

cohort of 15-87-year-old open university students in Thailand. J Epidemiol 2010;20(1):13-20.

15. Weisell RC. Body mass index as an indicator of obesity. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr 2002;11 Suppl 8:S681-4.

16. Kanazawa M, Yoshiike N, Osaka T, et al. Criteria and classification of obesity in Japan and Asia-

Oceania. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr 2002;11 Suppl 8:S732-7.

17. Webb P, Bain C. Essential Epidemiology : An Introduction for Students and Health Professionals. 2 ed.

New York: Cambridge University Press, 2011:461.

18. Chuang SY, Chou P, Hsu PF, et al. Presence and progression of abdominal obesity are predictors of

future high blood pressure and hypertension. Am J Hypertens 2006;19(8):788-95.

19. Choi KM, Park HS, Han JH, et al. Prevalence of prehypertension and hypertension in a Korean

population: Korean National Health and Nutrition Survey 2001. J Hypertens 2006;24(8):1515-21.

20. Su TC, Bai CH, Chang HY, et al. Evidence for improved control of hypertension in Taiwan: 1993-2002.

J Hypertens 2008;26(3):600-6.

21. Bassett DR, Jr., Fitzhugh EC, Crespo CJ, et al. Physical activity and ethnic differences in hypertension

prevalence in the United States. Prev Med 2002;34(2):179-86.

Page 18 of 51

For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml

BMJ Open

123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960

on February 4, 2020 by guest. P

rotected by copyright.http://bm

jopen.bmj.com

/B

MJ O

pen: first published as 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002826 on 25 June 2013. D

ownloaded from

Page 100: BMJ Open · smoking (which was rare) had no apparent hypertension effect. Among males, regular drinking increased the risk of incident hypertension Strengths In Thailand, this cohort

For peer review only

19

22. Rampal L, Rampal S, Azhar MZ, et al. Prevalence, awareness, treatment and control of hypertension in

Malaysia: a national study of 16,440 subjects. Public Health 2008;122(1):11-8.

23. Lloyd-Jones D, Adams R, Carnethon M, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics--2009 update: a report

from the American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee.

Circulation 2009;119(3):e21-181.

24. Barton M, Meyer MR. Postmenopausal hypertension: mechanisms and therapy. Hypertension

2009;54(1):11-8.

25. Shihab HM, Meoni LA, Chu AY, et al. Body Mass Index and Risk of Incident Hypertension over the

Life Course: The Johns Hopkins Precursors Study. Circulation 2012;126(25):2983-9.

26. Gelber RP, Gaziano JM, Manson JE, et al. A prospective study of body mass index and the risk of

developing hypertension in men. Am J Hypertens 2007;20(4):370-7.

27. Hu G, Barengo NC, Tuomilehto J, et al. Relationship of physical activity and body mass index to the risk

of hypertension: a prospective study in Finland. Hypertension 2004;43(1):25-30.

28. He J, Whelton PK, Appel LJ, et al. Long-term effects of weight loss and dietary sodium reduction on

incidence of hypertension. Hypertension 2000;35(2):544-9.

29. Huang Z, Willett WC, Manson JE, et al. Body weight, weight change, and risk for hypertension in

women. Ann Intern Med 1998;128(2):81-8.

30. Levin G, Kestenbaum B, Ida Chen YD, et al. Glucose, insulin, and incident hypertension in the multi-

ethnic study of atherosclerosis. Am J Epidemiol 2010;172(10):1144-54.

31. Wang W, Lee ET, Fabsitz RR, et al. A longitudinal study of hypertension risk factors and their relation

to cardiovascular disease: the Strong Heart Study. Hypertension 2006;47(3):403-9.

32. Fukui M, Tanaka M, Toda H, et al. Risk factors for development of diabetes mellitus, hypertension and

dyslipidemia. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2011;94(1):e15-8.

Page 19 of 51

For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml

BMJ Open

123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960

on February 4, 2020 by guest. P

rotected by copyright.http://bm

jopen.bmj.com

/B

MJ O

pen: first published as 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002826 on 25 June 2013. D

ownloaded from

Page 101: BMJ Open · smoking (which was rare) had no apparent hypertension effect. Among males, regular drinking increased the risk of incident hypertension Strengths In Thailand, this cohort

For peer review only

20

33. Suematsu C, Hayashi T, Fujii S, et al. Impaired fasting glucose and the risk of hypertension in Japanese

men between the 1980s and the 1990s. The Osaka Health Survey. Diabetes Care 1999;22(2):228-32.

34. Hypertension Study Group. Prevalence, awareness, treatment and control of hypertension among the

elderly in Bangladesh and India: a multicentre study. Bull World Health Organ 2001;79(6):490-500.

35. Rodrigues Barbosa A, Ferreti Borgatto A. Arterial hypertension in the elderly of bridgetown, barbados:

prevalence and associated factors. J Aging Health 2010;22(5):611-30.

36. Bell CN, Thorpe RJ, Jr., Laveist TA. Race/Ethnicity and hypertension: the role of social support. Am J

Hypertens 2010;23(5):534-40.

37. Marso SP, Hiatt WR. Peripheral arterial disease in patients with diabetes. J Am Coll Cardiol

2006;47(5):921-9.

38. Laaksonen DE, Niskanen L, Nyyssonen K, et al. Dyslipidaemia as a predictor of hypertension in middle-

aged men. Eur Heart J 2008;29(20):2561-8.

39. Halperin RO, Sesso HD, Ma J, et al. Dyslipidemia and the risk of incident hypertension in men.

Hypertension 2006;47(1):45-50.

40. Tohidi M, Hatami M, Hadaegh F, et al. Triglycerides and triglycerides to high-density lipoprotein

cholesterol ratio are strong predictors of incident hypertension in Middle Eastern women. J Hum

Hypertens 2011;26(9):525-32.

41. Sesso HD, Buring JE, Chown MJ, et al. A prospective study of plasma lipid levels and hypertension in

women. Arch Intern Med 2005;165(20):2420-7.

42. Haffner SM, Miettinen H, Gaskill SP, et al. Metabolic precursors of hypertension. The San Antonio

Heart Study. Arch Intern Med 1996;156(17):1994-2001.

43. Selwyn AP, Kinlay S, Libby P, et al. Atherogenic lipids, vascular dysfunction, and clinical signs of

ischemic heart disease. Circulation 1997;95(1):5-7.

Page 20 of 51

For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml

BMJ Open

123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960

on February 4, 2020 by guest. P

rotected by copyright.http://bm

jopen.bmj.com

/B

MJ O

pen: first published as 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002826 on 25 June 2013. D

ownloaded from

Page 102: BMJ Open · smoking (which was rare) had no apparent hypertension effect. Among males, regular drinking increased the risk of incident hypertension Strengths In Thailand, this cohort

For peer review only

21

44. Jancova E, Vankova Z, Honsova E, et al. Prevalence and risk of hypertension in renal disease--data from

the Czech Registry of Renal Biopsies. Kidney Blood Press Res 2008;31(2):135-42.

45. Kalaitzidis R, Li S, Wang C, et al. Hypertension in early-stage kidney disease: an update from the

Kidney Early Evaluation Program (KEEP). Am J Kidney Dis 2009;53(4 Suppl 4):S22-31.

46. Johnston PA, Davison AM. Hypertension in adults with idiopathic glomerulonephritis and normal serum

creatinine. A report from the MRC Glomerulonephritis Registry. Nephrol Dial Transplant

1993;8(1):20-4.

47. Buckalew VM, Jr., Berg RL, Wang SR, et al. Prevalence of hypertension in 1,795 subjects with chronic

renal disease: the modification of diet in renal disease study baseline cohort. Modification of Diet in

Renal Disease Study Group. Am J Kidney Dis 1996;28(6):811-21.

48. Campese VM, Mitra N, Sandee D. Hypertension in renal parenchymal disease: why is it so resistant to

treatment? Kidney Int 2006;69(6):967-73.

49. Niskanen L, Laaksonen DE, Nyyssonen K, et al. Inflammation, abdominal obesity, and smoking as

predictors of hypertension. Hypertension 2004;44(6):859-65.

50. Halperin RO, Gaziano JM, Sesso HD. Smoking and the risk of incident hypertension in middle-aged and

older men. Am J Hypertens 2008;21(2):148-52.

51. Halimi JM, Giraudeau B, Vol S, et al. The risk of hypertension in men: direct and indirect effects of

chronic smoking. J Hypertens 2002;20(2):187-93.

52. Al-Safi SA. Does smoking affect blood pressure and heart rate? European journal of cardiovascular

nursing : journal of the Working Group on Cardiovascular Nursing of the European Society of

Cardiology 2005;4(4):286-9.

53. Jo I, Ahn Y, Lee J, et al. Prevalence, awareness, treatment, control and risk factors of hypertension in

Korea: the Ansan study. J Hypertens 2001;19(9):1523-32.

Page 21 of 51

For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml

BMJ Open

123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960

on February 4, 2020 by guest. P

rotected by copyright.http://bm

jopen.bmj.com

/B

MJ O

pen: first published as 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002826 on 25 June 2013. D

ownloaded from

Page 103: BMJ Open · smoking (which was rare) had no apparent hypertension effect. Among males, regular drinking increased the risk of incident hypertension Strengths In Thailand, this cohort

For peer review only

22

54. Schwandt HM, Coresh J, Hindin MJ. Marital Status, Hypertension, Coronary Heart Disease, Diabetes,

and Death Among African American Women and Men: Incidence and Prevalence in the

Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study Participants. J Fam Issues 2010;31(9):1211-29.

55. Bowman TS, Gaziano JM, Buring JE, et al. A prospective study of cigarette smoking and risk of incident

hypertension in women. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;50(21):2085-92.

56. Ohmori S, Kiyohara Y, Kato I, et al. Alcohol intake and future incidence of hypertension in a general

Japanese population: the Hisayama study. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 2002;26(7):1010-6.

57. Nakanishi N, Yoshida H, Nakamura K, et al. Alcohol consumption and risk for hypertension in middle-

aged Japanese men. J Hypertens 2001;19(5):851-5.

58. Wildman RP, Gu D, Muntner P, et al. Alcohol intake and hypertension subtypes in Chinese men. J

Hypertens 2005;23(4):737-43.

59. Yoshita K, Miura K, Morikawa Y, et al. Relationship of alcohol consumption to 7-year blood pressure

change in Japanese men. J Hypertens 2005;23(8):1485-90.

60. Minami J, Yoshii M, Todoroki M, et al. Effects of alcohol restriction on ambulatory blood pressure,

heart rate, and heart rate variability in Japanese men. Am J Hypertens 2002;15(2 Pt 1):125-9.

61. Fuchs FD, Chambless LE, Whelton PK, et al. Alcohol consumption and the incidence of hypertension:

The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study. Hypertension 2001;37(5):1242-50.

62. Taylor B, Irving HM, Baliunas D, et al. Alcohol and hypertension: gender differences in dose-response

relationships determined through systematic review and meta-analysis. Addiction

2009;104(12):1981-90.

63. Lipowicz A, Lopuszanska M. Marital differences in blood pressure and the risk of hypertension among

Polish men. Eur J Epidemiol 2005;20(5):421-7.

64. Trivedi RB, Ayotte B, Edelman D, et al. The association of emotional well-being and marital status with

treatment adherence among patients with hypertension. Journal of behavioral medicine

2008;31(6):489-97.

Page 22 of 51

For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml

BMJ Open

123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960

on February 4, 2020 by guest. P

rotected by copyright.http://bm

jopen.bmj.com

/B

MJ O

pen: first published as 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002826 on 25 June 2013. D

ownloaded from

Page 104: BMJ Open · smoking (which was rare) had no apparent hypertension effect. Among males, regular drinking increased the risk of incident hypertension Strengths In Thailand, this cohort

For peer review only

23

65. Kaplan MS, Huguet N, Feeny DH, et al. Self-reported hypertension prevalence and income among older

adults in Canada and the United States. Soc Sci Med 2010;70(6):844-9.

66. Vargas CM, Ingram DD, Gillum RF. Incidence of hypertension and educational attainment: the

NHANES I epidemiologic followup study. First National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.

Am J Epidemiol 2000;152(3):272-8.

67. Rashid AK, Azizah AM. Prevalence of hypertension among the elderly Malays living in rural Malaysia.

Australian Medical Journal 2011;4(6):283-90.

68. Addo J, Smeeth L, Leon DA. Socioeconomic position and hypertension: a study of urban civil servants

in Ghana. J Epidemiol Community Health 2009;63(8):646-50.

69. Ball K, Crawford D. Socioeconomic status and weight change in adults: a review. Soc Sci Med

2005;60(9):1987-2010.

70. Diez-Roux AV, Nieto FJ, Caulfield L, et al. Neighbourhood differences in diet: the Atherosclerosis Risk

in Communities (ARIC) Study. J Epidemiol Community Health 1999;53(1):55-63.

71. Sobal J, Stunkard AJ. Socioeconomic status and obesity: a review of the literature. Psychological

bulletin 1989;105(2):260-75.

72. Yiengprugsawan V, Seubsman SA, Lim LL, et al. Used and foregone health services among a cohort of

87,134 adult open university students residing throughout Thailand. The Southeast Asian journal of

tropical medicine and public health 2009;40(6):1347-58.

73. Pereira MA, Folsom AR, McGovern PG, et al. Physical activity and incident hypertension in black and

white adults: the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study. Prev Med 1999;28(3):304-12.

74. Haapanen N, Miilunpalo S, Vuori I, et al. Association of leisure time physical activity with the risk of

coronary heart disease, hypertension and diabetes in middle-aged men and women. Int J Epidemiol

1997;26(4):739-47.

75. Park J, Lee JS, Jang YA, et al. A comparison of food and nutrient intake between instant noodle

consumers and non-instant noodle consumers in Korean adults. Nutr Res Pract 2011;5(5):443-9.

Page 23 of 51

For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml

BMJ Open

123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960

on February 4, 2020 by guest. P

rotected by copyright.http://bm

jopen.bmj.com

/B

MJ O

pen: first published as 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002826 on 25 June 2013. D

ownloaded from

Page 105: BMJ Open · smoking (which was rare) had no apparent hypertension effect. Among males, regular drinking increased the risk of incident hypertension Strengths In Thailand, this cohort

For peer review only

24

76. Jolly SE, Eilat-Adar S, Wang H, et al. Sex-specific associations of nutrition with hypertension and

systolic blood pressure in Alaska Natives findings from the GOCADAN study. Int J Circumpolar

Health 2011;70(3):254-65.

77. Alonso A, Beunza JJ, Bes-Rastrollo M, et al. Vegetable protein and fiber from cereal are inversely

associated with the risk of hypertension in a Spanish cohort. Arch Med Res 2006;37(6):778-86.

78. Steffen LM, Kroenke CH, Yu X, et al. Associations of plant food, dairy product, and meat intakes with

15-y incidence of elevated blood pressure in young black and white adults: the Coronary Artery Risk

Development in Young Adults (CARDIA) Study. Am J Clin Nutr 2005;82(6):1169-77; quiz 363-4.

79. Schulze MB, Hoffmann K, Kroke A, et al. Risk of hypertension among women in the EPIC-Potsdam

Study: comparison of relative risk estimates for exploratory and hypothesis-oriented dietary patterns.

Am J Epidemiol 2003;158(4):365-73.

80. Chien KL, Hsu HC, Chen PC, et al. Urinary sodium and potassium excretion and risk of hypertension in

Chinese: report from a community-based cohort study in Taiwan. J Hypertens 2008;26(9):1750-6.

81. Zhang L, Qin LQ, Liu AP, et al. Prevalence of risk factors for cardiovascular disease and their

associations with diet and physical activity in suburban Beijing, China. J Epidemiol 2010;20(3):237-

43.

82. Sun Z, Zheng L, Xu C, et al. Prevalence of prehypertension, hypertension and, associated risk factors in

Mongolian and Han Chinese populations in Northeast China. Int J Cardiol 2008;128(2):250-4.

83. He FJ, MacGregor GA. Effect of modest salt reduction on blood pressure: a meta-analysis of

randomized trials. Implications for public health. J Hum Hypertens 2002;16(11):761-70.

84. Sacks FM, Svetkey LP, Vollmer WM, et al. Effects on blood pressure of reduced dietary sodium and the

Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) diet. DASH-Sodium Collaborative Research

Group. N Engl J Med 2001;344(1):3-10.

85. He FJ, MacGregor GA. Reducing population salt intake worldwide: from evidence to implementation.

Prog Cardiovasc Dis 2010;52(5):363-82.

Page 24 of 51

For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml

BMJ Open

123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960

on February 4, 2020 by guest. P

rotected by copyright.http://bm

jopen.bmj.com

/B

MJ O

pen: first published as 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002826 on 25 June 2013. D

ownloaded from

Page 106: BMJ Open · smoking (which was rare) had no apparent hypertension effect. Among males, regular drinking increased the risk of incident hypertension Strengths In Thailand, this cohort

For peer review only

25

86. Lim LL, Seubsman SA, Sleigh A. Validity of self-reported weight, height, and body mass index among

university students in Thailand: Implications for population studies of obesity in developing

countries. Population health metrics 2009;7:1-15.

87. Thinkhamrop K, Seubsman S, Sleigh A, et al. Reasons for Non-Response to Mailed Questionnaires –

Experience of a Large Cohort Study in Thailand. KKU Jph Research 2011;4(3):73-87.

Page 25 of 51

For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml

BMJ Open

123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960

on February 4, 2020 by guest. P

rotected by copyright.http://bm

jopen.bmj.com

/B

MJ O

pen: first published as 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002826 on 25 June 2013. D

ownloaded from

Page 107: BMJ Open · smoking (which was rare) had no apparent hypertension effect. Among males, regular drinking increased the risk of incident hypertension Strengths In Thailand, this cohort

For peer review only

STROBE 2007 (v4) Statement—Checklist of items that should be included in reports of cohort studies

Section/Topic Item

# Recommendation Reported on page #

Title and abstract 1 (a) Indicate the study’s design with a commonly used term in the title or the abstract 1

(b) Provide in the abstract an informative and balanced summary of what was done and what was found 2

Introduction

Background/rationale 2 Explain the scientific background and rationale for the investigation being reported 4

Objectives 3 State specific objectives, including any prespecified hypotheses 4

Methods

Study design 4 Present key elements of study design early in the paper 4

Setting 5 Describe the setting, locations, and relevant dates, including periods of recruitment, exposure, follow-up, and data

collection

5

Participants 6 (a) Give the eligibility criteria, and the sources and methods of selection of participants. Describe methods of follow-up 4

(b) For matched studies, give matching criteria and number of exposed and unexposed 5-6

Variables 7 Clearly define all outcomes, exposures, predictors, potential confounders, and effect modifiers. Give diagnostic criteria, if

applicable

5

Data sources/

measurement

8* For each variable of interest, give sources of data and details of methods of assessment (measurement). Describe

comparability of assessment methods if there is more than one group

5-6

Bias 9 Describe any efforts to address potential sources of bias 12

Study size 10 Explain how the study size was arrived at 4-5

Quantitative variables 11 Explain how quantitative variables were handled in the analyses. If applicable, describe which groupings were chosen and

why

5-6

Statistical methods 12 (a) Describe all statistical methods, including those used to control for confounding 6

(b) Describe any methods used to examine subgroups and interactions 6

(c) Explain how missing data were addressed 12

(d) If applicable, explain how loss to follow-up was addressed 12

(e) Describe any sensitivity analyses 12

Results 7

Page 26 of 51

For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml

BMJ Open

123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960

on February 4, 2020 by guest. Protected by copyright. http://bmjopen.bmj.com/ BMJ Open: first published as 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002826 on 25 June 2013. Downloaded from

Page 108: BMJ Open · smoking (which was rare) had no apparent hypertension effect. Among males, regular drinking increased the risk of incident hypertension Strengths In Thailand, this cohort

For peer review only

Participants 13* (a) Report numbers of individuals at each stage of study—eg numbers potentially eligible, examined for eligibility, confirmed

eligible, included in the study, completing follow-up, and analysed

4-5

(b) Give reasons for non-participation at each stage 12

(c) Consider use of a flow diagram

Descriptive data 14* (a) Give characteristics of study participants (eg demographic, clinical, social) and information on exposures and potential

confounders

5

(b) Indicate number of participants with missing data for each variable of interest

(c) Summarise follow-up time (eg, average and total amount) 5

Outcome data 15* Report numbers of outcome events or summary measures over time 7

Main results 16 (a) Give unadjusted estimates and, if applicable, confounder-adjusted estimates and their precision (eg, 95% confidence

interval). Make clear which confounders were adjusted for and why they were included

7

(b) Report category boundaries when continuous variables were categorized 7

(c) If relevant, consider translating estimates of relative risk into absolute risk for a meaningful time period 7

Other analyses 17 Report other analyses done—eg analyses of subgroups and interactions, and sensitivity analyses 7

Discussion

Key results 18 Summarise key results with reference to study objectives 7

Limitations

Interpretation 20 Give a cautious overall interpretation of results considering objectives, limitations, multiplicity of analyses, results from

similar studies, and other relevant evidence

12

Generalisability 21 Discuss the generalisability (external validity) of the study results 12

Other information

Funding 22 Give the source of funding and the role of the funders for the present study and, if applicable, for the original study on

which the present article is based

13

*Give information separately for cases and controls in case-control studies and, if applicable, for exposed and unexposed groups in cohort and cross-sectional studies.

Note: An Explanation and Elaboration article discusses each checklist item and gives methodological background and published examples of transparent reporting. The STROBE

checklist is best used in conjunction with this article (freely available on the Web sites of PLoS Medicine at http://www.plosmedicine.org/, Annals of Internal Medicine at

http://www.annals.org/, and Epidemiology at http://www.epidem.com/). Information on the STROBE Initiative is available at www.strobe-statement.org.

Page 27 of 51

For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml

BMJ Open

123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960

on February 4, 2020 by guest. Protected by copyright. http://bmjopen.bmj.com/ BMJ Open: first published as 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002826 on 25 June 2013. Downloaded from

Page 109: BMJ Open · smoking (which was rare) had no apparent hypertension effect. Among males, regular drinking increased the risk of incident hypertension Strengths In Thailand, this cohort

For peer review only

1

Health-risk factors and the incidence of hypertension: 4-year prospective

findings from a national cohort of 60,569 Thai open university students

Prasutr Thawornchaisit, MD, MPH1, Ferdinandus de Looze, MBBS, MSc

1, Christopher M

Reid, PhD2, Sam-ang Seubsman, PhD

3, Adrian Sleigh, MD

4, Thai Cohort Study Team*

1 School of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia; 2 School of Public Health and

Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia; 3 School of Human Ecology, Sukhothai

Thammathirat Open University, Nonthaburi, Thailand; 4 National Centre for Epidemiology and Population

Health, ANU College of Medicine, Biology and Environment, The Australian National University,

Canberra, Australia.

*Thai Cohort Study Team

Thailand: Jaruwan Chokhanapitak, Suttanit Hounthasarn, Suwanee Khamman, Daoruang Pandee, Suttinan

Pangsap, Tippawan Prapamontol, Janya Puengson, Sam-ang Seubsman, Boonchai Somboonsook, Nintita

Sripaiboonkij, Pathumvadee Somsamai, Prasutr Thawornchaisit, Duangkae Vilainerun, Wanee

Wimonwattanaphan, Cha-aim Pachanee, Arunrat Tangmunkongvorakul, Benjawan Tawatsupa, Wimalin

Rimpeekool.

Australia: Chris Bain, Emily Banks, Cathy Banwell, Bruce Caldwell, Gordon Carmichael, Tarie Dellora,

Jane Dixon, Sharon Friel, David Harley, Matthew Kelly, Tord Kjellstrom, Lynette Lim, Anthony

McMichael, Tanya Mark, Adrian Sleigh, Lyndall Strazdins, Vasoontara Yiengprugsawan, Susan Jordan,

Janneke Berecki-Gisolf, Rod McClure.

Corresponding author: Prasutr Thawornchaisit, School of Medicine, Faculty of Health Science, University

of Queensland, 288 Herston Road, Herston, Brisbane, QLD, 4006 Australia and Department of Medicine,

Lerdsin Hospital, Silom road, Bangrak, Bangkok, 10500 Thailand

Email: [email protected] Telephone: 66-2-585-8015 Fax: 66-2-912-0121

Running Head: Health-risks and hypertension incidence in the Thai Cohort Study

Key words: hypertension; health-risks; cohort; Thailand; socioeconomic; body mass index; smoking;

drinking; physical activity

Page 28 of 51

For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml

BMJ Open

123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960

on February 4, 2020 by guest. P

rotected by copyright.http://bm

jopen.bmj.com

/B

MJ O

pen: first published as 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002826 on 25 June 2013. D

ownloaded from

Page 110: BMJ Open · smoking (which was rare) had no apparent hypertension effect. Among males, regular drinking increased the risk of incident hypertension Strengths In Thailand, this cohort

For peer review only

2

Abstract

Objective

This study evaluates the impact of a number of demographic, biological, behavioural and lifestyle health-

risk factors on the incidence of hypertension in Thailand over a 4-year period.

Design

A 4-year prospective study of health-risk factors and their effects on incidence of hypertension in a national

Thai Cohort Study (TCS) from 2005 to 2009.

Setting

As Thailand is transitioning from a developing to a middle-income developed country, chronic diseases

(particularly cardiovascular disease) have emerged as major health issues. Hypertension is a major risk

factor for heart attack and stroke and cross-sectional studies have indicated that the prevalence is increasing.

Study participants

Sukhothai Thammathirat Open University students (57,558) who participated in both 2005 and 2009

questionnaire surveys and who were normotensive in 2005 were included in the analysis.

Measures

Adjusted relative risks associating each risk factor and incidence of hypertension by sex, after controlling for

confounders such as age, socio-economic status, body mass index (BMI) and underlying diseases.

Results

The overall 4-year incidence of hypertension was 3.5% with the rate in men being remarkably higher than

that in women (5.2% vs. 2.1%). In both sexes, hypertension associated with age, higher BMI and co-

morbidities but did not associate with income and education. In men, hypertension associated with physical

inactivity, smoking, alcohol and fast food intake. In women, hypertension was related to having a partner.

Conclusion

In both men and women, hypertension strongly associated with age, obesity and co-morbidities while it had

no association with socio-economic factors. The cohort pattern of socio-economy and hypertension reflects

that the health-risk transition in Thais is likely to be at the middle stage. Diet and lifestyle factors associate

with incidence of hypertension in Thais and may be amenable targets for hypertension control programs.

Page 29 of 51

For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml

BMJ Open

123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960

on February 4, 2020 by guest. P

rotected by copyright.http://bm

jopen.bmj.com

/B

MJ O

pen: first published as 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002826 on 25 June 2013. D

ownloaded from

Page 111: BMJ Open · smoking (which was rare) had no apparent hypertension effect. Among males, regular drinking increased the risk of incident hypertension Strengths In Thailand, this cohort

For peer review only

3

Introduction

Hypertension is a global public health challenge due to its high prevalence and the concomitant increase in

risk of stroke and cardiovascular diseases [1]. In 2007, according to the World Health Organization,

cardiovascular diseases caused 33.7% of all deaths in the world, while other chronic diseases were

responsible for 26.5% [2]. Globally, it has been estimated that premature deaths resulting from hypertension

annually are approximately 7.1 million, which account for 64 million disability-adjusted life years (DALYs)

[3]. Hypertension ranks third, after underweight and unsafe sex, of the six major risk factors contributing to

the global disease burden[3].

In Thailand, hypertension is the third major risk factor of the national disease burden and causes 600,000

DALY losses per year [4]. The prevalence of hypertension has been estimated from a number of cross-

sectional studies among adults and has been increasing over the past decades from 20% in 1985 to 22% in

2004 [4-6]. The recent Thai National Health Examination Survey (NHES) in 2009 reported the prevalence

of hypertension in adults was 21.5% [4]. The emergence of hypertension has been the result of rapid

socioeconomic development which has resulted in one third of Thais migrating to urban areas [7].

Urbanization has been associated with increased obesity as people become less physically active and adopt

sedentary life styles such as spending more time watching television, sitting and using computers [7 8].

These factors, in association with Thailand’s ageing population [9], underpin the importance of controlling

hypertension in Thai community.

There is limited longitudinal research on health risk factors and hypertension incidence in Thailand [5]. The

purpose of this study is to address that knowledge gap. We prospectively examined the influence of an array

of demographic, biological, health-risk and lifestyle factors on the incidence of hypertension during 4 years

of follow-up in the Thai Cohort Study (TCS). This is part of an overarching research program investigating

Thailand’s health-risk transition from high maternal-child and infectious disease mortality to increased

longevity and emerging chronic disease. The large national cohort of Thai adults reported on here has been

followed since 2005 for risk factor trends and associated disease outcomes, including hypertension.

Methods

Study population

Page 30 of 51

For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml

BMJ Open

123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960

on February 4, 2020 by guest. P

rotected by copyright.http://bm

jopen.bmj.com

/B

MJ O

pen: first published as 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002826 on 25 June 2013. D

ownloaded from

Page 112: BMJ Open · smoking (which was rare) had no apparent hypertension effect. Among males, regular drinking increased the risk of incident hypertension Strengths In Thailand, this cohort

For peer review only

4

The first TCS evaluation was conducted in 2005 by sending twenty-page health-risk questionnaires to the

200,000 distance-learning students enrolled at Sukhothai Thammathirat Open University (STOU) and

87,134 (44%) completed them and signed the consent forms. The cohort has been shown to be socio-

economically and geographically well representative of the Thai population [10]. However, they resided

more in urban areas (51.8% vs. 31.1%) and on average were younger and better educated than most Thai

adults. Details of the baseline TCS methodology have been published [10]. This questionnaire focused on

socio-demography, habitation, work, health services, injury, sedentary habits, physical activity, transport,

underlying diseases, family history, personal behaviours, BMI, and consumption of foods, vegetables and

fruit. A 4-year follow-up was carried out in 2009. Overall, 71% of the cohort responded generating

longitudinal data on 60,569 participants.

Incident Hypertension

Incident hypertension was defined as being normotensive in 2005 and self-reported doctor diagnosed

hypertensive in 2009. Hypertension incidence was the dependent variable for analyses and the person-time

denominator included all individuals at risk - those 57,558 participants with longitudinal data who were

negative for hypertension in 2005, the beginning of the 4-year study period.

Risk Factors

Hypertension was defined as describe above, underlying diseases diagnosed by a doctor were also reported

including diabetes mellitus, kidney diseases and high blood lipids, all of which were investigated as

potential risk factors of hypertension.

Participants were grouped into three age categories: younger (≤30 years), middle (31-40 years) and older

(>40 years). Urbanization status was based on rural (R) or urban (U) residence, first when aged 10-12 years

old and again in 2005, producing four groups: lifelong ruralites (RR), urbanizers (RU), de-urbanizers (UR)

and urbanites (UU). Personal monthly income was divided into four categories: ≤7000 baht, 7001–10000

baht, 10001–20000 baht and >20000 baht. In 2005, one US dollar was equivalent to 42 baht so most of

participants had quite low incomes. Household assets were classified into three categories: low (≤30,000

baht), medium (30,001-60,000) and high (>60,000).

Sedentariness was assessed by screen time (hours/day spent before TV or computer) and (separately) sitting

time (hours per day spent sitting for any purpose). Incidental exercise was measured by the frequency of

housework or gardening, categorised as follows: ≤3 times per month; 1-2 times per week; 3-4 times per

week; most days. We measured planned physical activity at the beginning and end of the 4-year follow up

period. On both occasions, cohort members reported the number of sessions per week of strenuous and

moderate exercise for at least 20 minutes, and of walking for at least 10 minutes. We derived an “overall

Page 31 of 51

For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml

BMJ Open

123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960

on February 4, 2020 by guest. P

rotected by copyright.http://bm

jopen.bmj.com

/B

MJ O

pen: first published as 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002826 on 25 June 2013. D

ownloaded from

Page 113: BMJ Open · smoking (which was rare) had no apparent hypertension effect. Among males, regular drinking increased the risk of incident hypertension Strengths In Thailand, this cohort

For peer review only

5

measure” of planned physical activity calculated separately at both the baseline and the 4-year mark. The

measure was weighted as follows: (2 × strenuous + 1 × moderate + 1 × walking) sessions per week. This

weighting system is based on the recommendation of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire and

the Active Australia Survey as used in other analyses of the cohort data [11 12]. Finally, for each individual,

the “overall measures” of weekly exercise for 2005 and 2009 were added and then averaged by dividing by

2, creating a longitudinal measure of planned physical activity (LPPA).

Smoking status was classified as never, ex-smoker or current-smoker. Alcohol exposure was classified by

four categories: never, ex-drinker, occasional drinker or current-drinker. Body mass index (BMI) was

calculated from self-reported height in metres and weight in kilograms as weight/ height2. It was divided

into 4 categories as follows according to Asian criteria:[8 13-16] underweight (BMI <18.5), normal (18.5 to

<23), overweight (23 to <25), and obese (≥25). Foods that could potentially influence blood pressure (deep

fried, instant, roast or smoked, soybean products and soft drinks) were assessed for consumption frequency

based on a five-point Likert scale ranging from less than once a month to once or more a day. Western-style

fast food exposure was noted on a three-point scale from less than once to more than 3 times per month.

Fruit and vegetable consumption were recorded as standard serves eaten per day.

Statistical analyses

All analyses were performed using SPSS software. The incidence of hypertension and its 95% confidence

interval (CI) were calculated for each value of each categorical variable in both male and female participants

and the influence on incidence by each variable was evaluated by Chi-square test. For statistical inference,

all p-values were 2 tailed and significance was set at 5%.

Relative risks in a large study of an uncommon disease (incidence less than 10%) can be accurately

estimated as odds ratios [17]. Accordingly, for each risk variable, the relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence

interval were estimated using logistic regression to calculate the bivariate odds ratio for hypertension.

Adjusted RRs (ARRs) were estimated by calculating multivariate logistic regression odds ratios. The ARRs

were controlled for confounding by age, marital status, SES, BMI, underlying diseases and personal

behaviours (cigarette smoking and alcohol drinking). A variable was included in a multivariate model if

bivariate analysis had indicated a statistically significant association with incidence of hypertension. Some

variables were included because earlier analyses reported elsewhere had shown significant or substantial

association with hypertension.

Page 32 of 51

For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml

BMJ Open

123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960

on February 4, 2020 by guest. P

rotected by copyright.http://bm

jopen.bmj.com

/B

MJ O

pen: first published as 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002826 on 25 June 2013. D

ownloaded from

Page 114: BMJ Open · smoking (which was rare) had no apparent hypertension effect. Among males, regular drinking increased the risk of incident hypertension Strengths In Thailand, this cohort

For peer review only

6

Results

Baseline Characteristics

Baseline characteristics of study participants self-reporting as normotensive in 2005 are shown in Table 1.

The highest proportion of males resided in the North-eastern regions and Central while there were more

females in the Central and Bangkok area. More than half of the male and female participants lived in urban

areas. Males had a higher monthly income than females whereas females had a higher educational

attainment than males. The distribution of household assets for males and females was similar and over half

of them were in medium and high categories. The study population had a similar socio-demography, income

and location of residence to the general Thai population [9].

Incidence and risks of hypertension

Overall, the incidence of self-reported doctor diagnosed hypertension in Thai adults was 3.5% and the rate in

males was more than twice the corresponding rate in females (5.2% vs. 2.1%) (Table 2). In males and

females, the incidence of hypertension increased with increasing age. Marriage or having a partner increased

the risk of hypertension in females. Educational attainment and personal income had no influence on the risk

of hypertension in both sexes. In males and females, the risk of hypertension increased with an increased

BMI. The risk of hypertension increased in both males and females who had diabetes mellitus, high blood

lipids and kidney disease.

Planned physical activity, averaged across the 4-year follow-up, was protective for males. In males, higher

LPPA (≥15 sessions / week) associated with lower incidence of hypertension; however, this association was

not observed in females. In males, current-smokers had a higher risk of developing hypertension than non-

smokers while in females, smoking (which was rare) had no apparent hypertension effect. Among males,

regular drinking increased the risk of incident hypertension; patterns of relative risks were similar for

females but, reflecting the low frequency of female drinking, did not reach statistical significance. In males,

the risk of hypertension had a direct association with the frequency of instant food consumption but there

was no such association detected in females.

Over the 4-year period, a variety of factors that could have been risks for hypertension over a longer period

were found not to be in this setting (data not shown). Thus, in males and females, factors that had no

statistically significant influence on the longitudinal 4-year risk of hypertension incidence were urbanization

status, sedentary lifestyle (non-participation in housework or gardening, high levels of television and

Page 33 of 51

For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml

BMJ Open

123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960

on February 4, 2020 by guest. P

rotected by copyright.http://bm

jopen.bmj.com

/B

MJ O

pen: first published as 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002826 on 25 June 2013. D

ownloaded from

Page 115: BMJ Open · smoking (which was rare) had no apparent hypertension effect. Among males, regular drinking increased the risk of incident hypertension Strengths In Thailand, this cohort

For peer review only

7

computer watching, sleeping and sitting time), and food consumption habits that included deep fried food

and soft drink, Western fast food, roasted or smoked foods, fruit, vegetables and soybean products.

Discussion

This large prospective cohort of adults living all over Thailand has been the first studied nationally for a

wide array of risk factors for incident hypertension. Overall, the 4-year incidence of hypertension from 2005

to 2009 was 3.5%, notably higher in men (5.2%) than women (2.1%). These incidence rates are drawn from

a cohort of adults on average younger than the Thai population so they are lower than corresponding rates of

the adult population. However, our focus was on risk factor associations and we noted that in both sexes,

age, obesity and co-morbidity with diabetes mellitus, high blood lipids and kidney disease strongly linked to

hypertension incidence. In males, instant food consumption, smoking and drinking alcohol had a moderate

adverse effect on hypertension risk while planned physical activity averaging 15 or more sessions per week

over the 4-year period was substantially protective, reducing risk by 22%. In females, having a partner was

associated with increased incidence of hypertension.

The age effect on hypertension incidence noted by us is consistent with findings of many other population

studies of hypertension including (for example) a longitudinal study in China [18] and cross-sectional

studies in Korea [19], Taiwan [20] and the USA [21]. The noticeably greater incidence of hypertension in

men than in women that we found in Thailand has also been reported from many parts of the world

including neighboring Malaysia [22] and distant USA [23] as well as in a recent global review [24].

In men and women of the Thai cohort, a progressively higher BMI was positively and significantly

associated with an increased risk of incident hypertension over the four years. This finding was similar to

that reported for other prospective cohorts in the US [25 26] and Finland [27]. Furthermore, after seven

years of follow-up in a US study [28], weight loss associated with a decreased risk of incident hypertension.

Among a cohort of US nurses, the risk of incident hypertension increased 5% for each kilogram addition of

weight [29], and rose 15% for each increase of one kilogram per meter squared of BMI in Taiwan [18].

These results suggest that the adverse effect of high BMI on risk of hypertension does not depend on

ethinicity or sex and is wide spread around the world.

In our cohort, we noted a higher risk of incident hypertension among those with diabetes mellitus. This

finding is consistent with longitudinal studies in the USA [30 31] which reported, respectively, that in

Page 34 of 51

For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml

BMJ Open

123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960

on February 4, 2020 by guest. P

rotected by copyright.http://bm

jopen.bmj.com

/B

MJ O

pen: first published as 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002826 on 25 June 2013. D

ownloaded from

Page 116: BMJ Open · smoking (which was rare) had no apparent hypertension effect. Among males, regular drinking increased the risk of incident hypertension Strengths In Thailand, this cohort

For peer review only

8

diabetic patients the risk of incident hypertension rose 41% and 56%. As well, prospective cohort studies in

Japan showed that diabetes [32] and impaired fasting blood glucose [33] were associated with an increased

risk of hypertension incidence. Supportive cross-sectional results emerge from studies in diverse settings

including Bangladesh and India [34], Barbados [35] and the USA [36]. A causal association between

diabetes and hypertension is suspected and possible mechanisms include endothelial dysfunction and

vascular inflammation [37].

We also found that high blood lipids significantly associated with increased risk of incident hypertension.

This supports the results from previous longitudinal studies in men [38 39], women [40 41] and adults [32

42]. The risk of hypertension increased with an increase of total cholesterol, triglyceride and low-density

lipoprotein cholesterol levels and decreased with an increase of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol level

[38 39 41].The mechanism by which dyslipidemia provokes high blood pressure is uncertain but could

reflect blood vessel dysfunction and damaged endothelium [43].

Among men and women in the Thai cohort, kidney disease strongly associated with increased risk of

hypertension incidence. This result is supported by cross-sectional data from the Czech Republic [44] and

the USA [45]. Microalbuminuria is a biomarker for renal hypertension [45] and the risk increases with the

severity of kidney impairment, revealed by the serum creatinine level [46 47]. Glomerular damage is more

closely connected with hypertension than tubular or interstitial disease [47]. Chronic kidney disease

facilitates high blood pressure through many mechanisms including excessive intravascular volume,

increased endothelin production, activity of the renin-angiotensin system and sympathetic nervous system

and decreased vasodilators, nitric oxide production and endothelial function [48].

In men we found that cigarette smoking modestly associated with increased risk of developing hypertension.

This is consistent with many other reports such as longitudinal studies in Japanese [49] and American men

[50] and a cross-sectional study in French men [51]. In addition, smoking Jordanian men had significantly

higher blood pressure than their non-smoking counterparts [52]. However, we also found that smoking had

no influence on hypertension in women. This result for females is compatible with reports from Korea [53]

and the USA [54]. In contrast, one prospective US study [55] reported an increased risk of hypertension

among women. It is likely that men tend to smoke more cigarettes than women and the impact of smoking

on hypertension is a dose-response pattern [49].

Page 35 of 51

For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml

BMJ Open

123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960

on February 4, 2020 by guest. P

rotected by copyright.http://bm

jopen.bmj.com

/B

MJ O

pen: first published as 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002826 on 25 June 2013. D

ownloaded from

Page 117: BMJ Open · smoking (which was rare) had no apparent hypertension effect. Among males, regular drinking increased the risk of incident hypertension Strengths In Thailand, this cohort

For peer review only

9

Regular alcohol consumption was strongly associated with an increased risk of incident hypertension. This

result is supported by findings from longitudinal studies in Japan [56 57] and cross-sectional studies in

China [58] and Korea [53]. In Japanese men, alcohol consumption, particularly more than 200 grams per

week, significantly associated with an increase of blood pressure [59] while alcohol restriction was

noticeably related to a decreased blood pressure [60]. Among our Thai cohort females, alcohol consumption

had no influence on hypertension; this result was supported by longitudinal data from Japan [56] and cross-

sectional data from Korea [53]. In American females the quantity of alcohol consumption per week had no

effect on systolic blood pressure [61]. Males usually consume more alcohol than females and the

hypertension risk is linear with a dose-response [57 62]. Our results suggest that regular alcohol

consumption, especially in males, is a significant risk factor for developing hypertension.

Marital status in males had no influence on hypertension which supports the results from more economically

developed countries, the USA and Korea [53 54]. However, in middle-income countries, results diverged:

married males, when compared to their unmarried counterparts, had a higher risk of hypertension in

Barbados [35] and a lower risk in Poland [63]. Married individuals had higher emotional and social support

and lower stress [63] and probability of being a current smoker [64]. We found incident hypertension was

relatively more frequent among married females, unlike the no-sex-link pattern in developed countries such

as the USA and Korea [53 54]. The influence of marrital status on hypertension varies from one country to

another partly due to the difference of socio-economy and social structure. For our Thai cohort, the pattern

in males was similar to that in developed countries and in females it was not.

Participant educational attainment did not protect against hypertension in either sex. This is similar to cross-

sectional results for adults in developed countries such as Korea [53] and the USA [36 65]. However, other

studies in various settings and with diverse designs reported educational attainment protects against

hypertension in adults; these included a prospective cohort in middle income Thailand [5], a cross-sectional

study in middle income Malaysia [22] and a cross-sectional study in high income USA [66]. Opposite

findings have been reported in low income settings in both Bangladesh and India [34] where education was

a risk factor for hypertension. Taken collectively, these data suggest that income modifies the protective

education-hypertension effect, inverting it when income is low and boosting it when income is high. Our

middle-income cohort could be in the middle stage of this education effect as it is transiting from the low-

income pattern.

We found no association of personal monthly income and risk of hypertension in either sex. This was similar

to previous studies in middle-income countries including a longitudinal study in Thailand [5] and a cross-

Page 36 of 51

For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml

BMJ Open

123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960

on February 4, 2020 by guest. P

rotected by copyright.http://bm

jopen.bmj.com

/B

MJ O

pen: first published as 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002826 on 25 June 2013. D

ownloaded from

Page 118: BMJ Open · smoking (which was rare) had no apparent hypertension effect. Among males, regular drinking increased the risk of incident hypertension Strengths In Thailand, this cohort

For peer review only

10

sectional study in Malaysia [67] and in cross-sectional studies in high-income countries such as in Korea

[53] and the USA [21 36]. However, income had an inverse association with risk of hypertension in another

study in high-income developed USA [65] while it had a direct positive association in a low-income

developing country such as Ghana [68]. The health transition in Thailand is likely to be in the middle stage,

according to the concept of a tipping-point for the relationship between socio-economic status, body size and

hypertension risk factors. High income, large body size and high blood pressure is seen in developing

countries while in developed countries, high income is a protective factor [69-71]. Indeed, the Thai cohort

has already been shown to be at a transitional point for metabolic states because females had an inverse

relationship between income and BMI whereas males had a positive (traditional) relationship [14]. However,

now all Thais benefit from universal health insurance so access to health care is not dependent on their

income making disease associations more attenuated than before [72].

In our cohort, the reduction of risk of hypertension incidence in males but not in females by a longitudinal

measure of planned physical activity was comparable with a prospective study in middle-aged American

whites [73]. In another prospective study in middle-aged Finns, the hypertension protective effect of

vigorous physical activity or total energy expenditure from leisure-time physical activity was observed in

men but not in women [74]. Such physical activity among females may be less intense than among males so

having no effect on the risk of hypertension [74]. A large Finnish study [27] demonstrated that the incidence

of hypertension was inversely associated with the level of physical activity in a dose-response manner in

both sexes. In our cohort study, risk of obesity had an inverse association with quantified planned exercise in

both sexes but the effect was significantly stronger in males than in females [12]. As Thailand progresses

economically, more people migrate to urban areas and decrease their physical activity [7]. Therefore, in the

future, Thai people may encounter a higher risk of hypertension due to lower physical activity.

Instant food - mostly combinations of carbohydrate, fat and salt - associated with an increased risk of

incident hypertension in males but not in females. Other foods, fruit and vegetables had no impact on

hypertension. This may be as a result of men comsuming more instant foods, such as instant noodles, than

women. For example a study in Korea showed daily instant food consumption in men and women averages

23.7 and 11.1 grams respectively [75]. Other studies showed that carbohydrate [76 77], fruit and vegetables

[78 79] consumption had no influence on hypertension. Most students consume instant noodles which lead

to a higher intake of energy, fat, sodium, thiamine, and riboflavin but a lower intake of protein, calcium,

phosphorus [75]. Koreans favoring instant noodles have a salt intake more than three times higher than the

daily recommendation (6.4 vs 2 gms) [75]. Daily salt intake of Thai people has been reported to average

10.8gm, much higher than recommended (http://www.worldactiononsalt.com/worldaction/asia/75286.pdf).

Page 37 of 51

For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml

BMJ Open

123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960

on February 4, 2020 by guest. P

rotected by copyright.http://bm

jopen.bmj.com

/B

MJ O

pen: first published as 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002826 on 25 June 2013. D

ownloaded from

Page 119: BMJ Open · smoking (which was rare) had no apparent hypertension effect. Among males, regular drinking increased the risk of incident hypertension Strengths In Thailand, this cohort

For peer review only

11

High salt consumption was associated with an increased risk of developing hypertension in a longitudinal

study in Taiwan [80] and in cross-sectional studies in China [81 82] while other reports revealed that salt

restriction reduced blood pressure [83 84]. High plasma sodium, due to an overwhelmed capacity of the

kidney to excrete excessive salt consumption, leads to excessive intravascular volume and high blood

pressure [85]. It seems reasonable to conclude that high salt intake from instant noodle consumption is likely

to be causally associated with an increased risk of hypertension in Thailand.

In Thailand, this cohort constitutes the largest study to examine the longitudinal effect of most health-risk

factors on hypertension development. Indeed, the study size along with its national representation are

important factors to consider when exploring study validity and utility. The influence of risk factors on

hypertension incidence is clearly demonstrated since this is a large longitudinal cohort covering a 4-year

period. As a consequence, independent risk factors for hypertension in Thais can be identified. Our cohort

represents Thais well in geography and socio-economy [9] so the results reflect the trend of health-risk

transition in the Thai population. STOU students, with better education attainment combined with their

representative incomes and geographical location, represent the next generation of Thais. It would be

reasonable to conclude that our 4-year follow-up results show the future hypertension trends for Thai people.

However, our study has limitations since it relied on self-report. There may be recall and reporting errors.

But a study of the validity of self-reported weight and height in our cohort found that the accuracy was quite

acceptable [86]. As well, we have conducted a validation study of self-reported hypertension (Prasutr

Thawornchaisit, 2013, under review) in a random age-sex matched sub-sample of the cohort reporting

hypertension (n=240) or no hypertension (n=240). We found the sensitivity was high (82%) and that

negative reports were usually accurate (86%). In another report, we investigated the impact of the non-

responses to the 2009 follow up and found small effects with under-representation of young urban males;

this missing group would have a minor influence on our results and would not be expected to have a high

rate of incident hypertension [87]. The findings from our study are likely to be robust and represent well the

future trends of health-risk transition in middle-income Thailand and similar ASEAN countries.

In conclusion, older age, obesity and underlying morbidity due to diabetes, high blood lipids and kidney

disease were strongly associated with an increased risk of incident hypertension in both sexes while in

males, physical inactivity, instant food consumption, smoking and drinking alcohol had a moderate

association. Sedentary life-style and the consumption of friut and vegetables had no detected influence on

hypertension. The Thai health-risk transition is likely to be in the middle stage since education attainment

Page 38 of 51

For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml

BMJ Open

123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960

on February 4, 2020 by guest. P

rotected by copyright.http://bm

jopen.bmj.com

/B

MJ O

pen: first published as 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002826 on 25 June 2013. D

ownloaded from

Page 120: BMJ Open · smoking (which was rare) had no apparent hypertension effect. Among males, regular drinking increased the risk of incident hypertension Strengths In Thailand, this cohort

For peer review only

12

and income still have no net effect to protect against hypertension. Prevention should focus on obesity, high

blood lipids and high salt consumption and people should be encouraged to increase physical exercise and

consume low fat foods and less instant foods. A reduction of salt consumption should be a national policy by

limiting the concentration of salt in ready-to-eat and industrial foods. Smoking and drinking cessation

should be promoted for males. Thailand should also consciously aim to take advantage of its culturally

determined low rate of drinking and smoking among women and ensure that there is no attempt to

undermine this situation and develop the market for the female half of the population.

Acknowledgements and Funding

This study was supported by the International Collaborative Research Grants Scheme with joint grants from

the Wellcome Trust UK (GR071587MA) and the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council

(268055), and by a global health grant from the NHMRC (585426). We thank the staff at Sukhothai

Thammathirat Open University (STOU) who assisted with student contact and the STOU students who are

participating in the cohort study. We also thank Dr Bandit Thinkamrop and his team from Khon Kaen

University for guiding us successfully through the complex data processing.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

Ethical considerations

Ethical approval was obtained from Sukhothai Thammathirat Open University Research and Development

Institute (protocol 0522/10) and the Australian National University Human Research Ethics Committee

(protocol 2004344 and 2009570). Informed, written consent was obtained from all participants.

Author contribution: PT devised the hypertension study, analysed the data and wrote the paper. FDL and

CR assisted with planning the study, analysis and interpretation. AS and SS conceived and developed the

cohort, and helped plan, analyse and interpret this study. All authors approved the final manuscript.

Page 39 of 51

For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml

BMJ Open

123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960

on February 4, 2020 by guest. P

rotected by copyright.http://bm

jopen.bmj.com

/B

MJ O

pen: first published as 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002826 on 25 June 2013. D

ownloaded from

Page 121: BMJ Open · smoking (which was rare) had no apparent hypertension effect. Among males, regular drinking increased the risk of incident hypertension Strengths In Thailand, this cohort

For peer review only

13

Table 1 Characteristics of 57558 participants normotensive at the 2005 Thai Cohort Study baseline

Male Female Difference

Factor

n % n % P-valuea

Demographic data

Participants 25320 44.0 32238 56.0 <0.0001 Age (y) mean 32.9 30.0 <0.0001

b

(SD) (8.5) (7.6) Age group <0.0001 ≤30 y 11293 44.6 19229 59.6 31-40 y 9177 36.2 9638 29.9 >40 y 4850 19.2 3371 10.5 Married/partnered <0.0001 No 11060 44.8 18851 60.1 Yes 13607 55.2 12513 39.9 Regions <0.0001 Bangkok 3488 13.9 6057 18.9 Central 5712 22.7 8267 25.8 North 5180 20.6 5818 18.1 North-east 6142 24.4 5760 18.0 East 1515 6.0 1922 6.0 South 3103 12.3 4254 13.3 Urbanization status

c <0.0001

Rural–rural (RR) 11512 46,1 13895 43.6 Rural–urban (RU) 7891 31.6 9546 29.9 Urban–rural (UR) 1078 4.3 1344 4.2 Urban–urban (UU) 4495 18.0 7114 22.3

Socioeconomic status

Education level <0.0001 High school 13366 52.9 13135 40.8 Diploma 5749 22.8 9791 30.4 University 6153 24.4 9231 28.7 Personal monthly income (baht)

d <0.0001 ≤7000 8025 32.3 13890 44.1 7001–10000 5790 23.3 7578 24.0 10001–20000 7549 30.4 7194 22.8 >20000 3452 13.9 2851 9.0 Household assets

e (baht)

d <0.001

Low 9852 39.1 12434 38.7 Medium 8065 32.0 9863 30.7 High 7298 28.9 9804 30.5 aChi-square test

b unpaired t test cLocation of residence (rural, R, or urban, U) at age 10-12 years and again in 2005. dAt the time of the survey in 2009, US$1 = 31 Thai baht eReplacement value in Thai baht: low ≤30,000, medium 30,001-60,000 and high >60,000

Page 40 of 51

For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml

BMJ Open

123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960

on February 4, 2020 by guest. P

rotected by copyright.http://bm

jopen.bmj.com

/B

MJ O

pen: first published as 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002826 on 25 June 2013. D

ownloaded from

Page 122: BMJ Open · smoking (which was rare) had no apparent hypertension effect. Among males, regular drinking increased the risk of incident hypertension Strengths In Thailand, this cohort

For peer review only

14

Table 2 Hypertension incidence and association with risk factors in male and female participants.

Males Females HT(n) Incia%(95% CI) ARRb(95% CI) HT(n) Incia%(95% CI) ARRb(95% CI) Participants 1306 5.2 (4.9-5.4) 690 2.1 (2.0-2.3)

Demography

Age group

≤30 y 279 2.5 (2.2-2.8) 1 215 1.1 (0.97-1.3) 1 31-40 y 484 5.3 (4.8-5.7) 1.66 (1.39-1.98) 245 2.5 (2.23-2.9) 1.93 (1.56-2.39) >40 y 543 11.2 (10.3-12.1) 3.13 (2.57-3.81) 230 6.8 (6.0-7.7) 4.2 (3.26-5.42) P-trend <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001

Marital status (married/partnered)

No 368 3.3 (3.0-3.7) 1 303 1.6 (1.43-1.8) 1 Yes 896 6.6 (6.17-7.0) 0.97 (0.83-1.12) 368 2.9 (2.65-3.2) 1.22 (1.03-1.45)

Socio-economic status

Education level

High school 697 5.2 (4.8-5.6) 1 303 2.3 (2.05-2.57) 1 Diploma 276 4.8 (4.25-5.4) 1.0 (0.86-1.17) 180 1.8 (1.57-2.1) 0.81 (0.66-0.99) University 331 5.4 (4.8-5.9) 0.93 (0.8-1.1) 204 2.2 (1.9-2.51) 0.87 (0.71-1.07) P-trend 0.83 0.61 0.463 0.1 Personal monthly income (baht)c ≤7000 268 3.3 (2.95-3.7) 1 217 1.6 (1.36-1.8) 1 7001-10000 229 4.0 (3.45-4.5) 1.0 (0.81-1.2) 142 1.9 (1.57-2.2) 1.1 (0.87-1.37) 10001-20000 497 6.6 (6.0-7.14) 1.1 (0.91-1.31) 196 2.7 (2.35-3.1) 0.97 (0.77-1.23) >20000 289 8.4 (7.46-9.3) 1.0 (0.8-1.25) 122 4.3 (3.54-5.0) 1.04 (0.78-1.39) P-trend <0.0001 0.527 <0.0001 0.783

BMI classificationd

Underweight 359 2.9 (2.62-3.2) 0.46 (0.27-0.78) 60 0.85 (0.63-1.15) 0.9 (0.67-1.21) (BMI <18.5) Normal 16 1.1 (0.56-1.6) 1 258 1.4 (1.2-1.5) 1 (18.5 ≤ BMI < 23) Overweight 333 5.9 (5.3-6.54) 1.66 (1.41-1.95) 129 3.9 (3.3-4.62) 2.32 (1.8-2.91) (23 ≤ BMI < 25) Obese 575 10.4 (9.6-11.2) 2.82 (2.43-3.27) 231 7.4 (6.4-8.27) 4.14 (3.4-5.05) (BMI ≥25) P-trend <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001

aIncidence of Hypertension

bAdjusted relative risks (ARR) were calculated from multi-variate logistic regression models of hypertension

adjusted for age, marital status, education, income, BMI category, underlying diseases, personal behaviours. cAt the time of the survey in 2005, US$1 = 42 Thai baht dAsian standard BMI classification

Continued….

Page 41 of 51

For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml

BMJ Open

123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960

on February 4, 2020 by guest. P

rotected by copyright.http://bm

jopen.bmj.com

/B

MJ O

pen: first published as 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002826 on 25 June 2013. D

ownloaded from

Page 123: BMJ Open · smoking (which was rare) had no apparent hypertension effect. Among males, regular drinking increased the risk of incident hypertension Strengths In Thailand, this cohort

For peer review only

15

Table 2 (continued...)

Males Females HT(n) Inci

a%(95% CI) ARR

b(95% CI) HT(n) Inci

a%(95% CI) ARR

b(95% CI)

Physical activities

Weighted total sessions exercise-related physical activity (average between 2005 and 2009) 0-7 ses/wc 198 6.3 (5.5-7.1) 1 162 2.2 (1.8-2.6) 1 8-14 ses/w 589 5.2 (4.8-5.6) 0.9 (0.76-1.07) 352 2.1 (1.9-2.3) 1.0 (0.82-1.23)

≥15 ses/w 380 4.4 (4.0-5.0) 0.78 (0.65-0.95) 119 2.2 (1.8-2.6) 1.0 (0.77-1.3)

P-trend <0.0001 <0.029 0.905 1.0

Underlying diseases

Diabetes mellitus

No 1251 5.0 (4.7-5.27) 1 674 2.1 (1.9-2.26) 1 Yes 55 18.3 (13.9-22.7) 1.81 (1.29-2.52) 16 10.7 (5.7-15.8) 2.54 (1.41-4.56)

High lipids

No 983 4.4 (4.13-4.67) 1 576 1.9 (1.76-2.1) 1 Yes 323 10.8 (9.7-11.9) 1.4 (1.21-1.63) 114 5.4 (4.47-6.4) 1.38 (1.09-1.75)

Kidney diseases

No 1248 5.1 (4.8-5.33) 1 659 2.1 (1.9-2.26) 1 Yes 58 9.6 (7.2-11.9) 1.62 (1.19-2.2) 31 3.9 (2.52-5.2) 1.77 (1.19-2.63)

Personal behaviours

Smoking status

Never 506 4.1 (3.7-4.4) 1 617 2.1 (1.9-2.23) 1 Ex-smoker 496 6.6 (6.0-7.13) 1.15 (1.0-1.32) 37 3.2 (2.2-4.22) 1.28 (0.88-1.87) Cur-smokerd 276 5.8 (5.16-6.5) 1.22 (1.04-1.44) 8 3.1 (0.97-5.2) 1.54 (0.74-3.2) P-trend <0.0001 <0.032 <0.008 0.23

Drinking status

Never 105 3.9 (3.2-4.7) 1 268 2.1 (1.8-2.32) 1 Ex-drinker 155 5.7 (4.85-6.6) 0.98 (0.74-1.3) 50 2.2 (1.6-2.85) 1.14 (0.82-1.59) Occ- drinkere 821 4.8 (4.45-5.1) 1.0 (0.8-1.25) 352 2.1 (1.9-2.36) 1.14 (0.96-1.36) Reg- drinker

f 212 8.6 (7.5-9.7) 1.61 (1.23-2.11) 9 4.7 (1.66-7.7) 1.83 (0.86-3.9)

P-trend <0.0001 <0.0001 0.471 0.254

Food consumption habit

Instant food

<1 time/m 335 6.3 (5.6-6.95) 1 168 2.8(2.36-3.2) 1 1-3 times/m 485 5.1 (4.63-5.5) 1.02 (0.87-1.19) 273 2.1 (1.84-2.3) 0.95 (0.77-1.17) 1-2 times/wk 280 4.4 (3.9-4.9) 1.09 (0.91-1.30) 153 1.9 (1.6-2.2) 1.04 (0.81-1.33) 3-6 times/wk 165 5.0 (4.3-5.75) 1.36 (1.1-1.69) 73 1.8 (1.4-2.22) 1.14 (0.84-1.55) ≥1 times/d 32 5.5 (3.6-7.33) 1.67 (1.11-2.52) 18 2.3 (1.3-3.35) 1.48 (0.86-2.53) P-trend <0.002 <0.008 <0.002 0.403 aIncidence of Hypertension

bAdjusted relative risks were calculated from multi-variate logistic regression models of hypertension adjusted for age, marital status, education, income, BMI category, underlying diseases, personal behaviours. cAt the time of the survey in 2005, US$1 = 42 Thai baht dAsian standard BMI classification eSessions / week fCurrent-smoker gOccasional drinker hRegular drinker

Page 42 of 51

For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml

BMJ Open

123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960

on February 4, 2020 by guest. P

rotected by copyright.http://bm

jopen.bmj.com

/B

MJ O

pen: first published as 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002826 on 25 June 2013. D

ownloaded from

Page 124: BMJ Open · smoking (which was rare) had no apparent hypertension effect. Among males, regular drinking increased the risk of incident hypertension Strengths In Thailand, this cohort

For peer review only

16

References

1. Chobanian AV, Bakris GL, Black HR, et al. Seventh report of the Joint National Committee on

Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure. Hypertension

2003;42(6):1206-52 doi: 10.1161/01.HYP.0000107251.49515.c2

01.HYP.0000107251.49515.c2 [pii][published Online First: Epub Date]|.

2. Gaziano TA, Bitton A, Anand S, et al. Growing epidemic of coronary heart disease in low- and middle-

income countries. Curr Probl Cardiol 2010;35(2):72-115 doi: S0146-2806(09)00127-3 [pii]

10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2009.10.002[published Online First: Epub Date]|.

3. Whitworth JA, World Health Organization and International Society of Hypertension Writing Group.

2003 World Health Organization (WHO)/International Society of Hypertension (ISH) statement on

management of hypertension. J Hypertens 2003;21(11):1983-92 doi:

10.1097/01.hjh.0000084751.37215.d2[published Online First: Epub Date]|.

4. Aekplakorn W, Sangthong R, Kessomboon P, et al. Changes in prevalence, awareness, treatment and

control of hypertension in Thai population, 2004-2009: Thai National Health Examination Survey

III-IV. J Hypertens 2012;30(9):1734-42 doi: 10.1097/HJH.0b013e3283568158[published Online

First: Epub Date]|.

5. Vathesatogkit P, Woodward M, Tanomsup S, et al. Long-term effects of socioeconomic status on incident

hypertension and progression of blood pressure. J Hypertens 2012;30(7):1347-53 doi:

10.1097/HJH.0b013e32835465ca[published Online First: Epub Date]|.

6. Aekplakorn W, Abbott-Klafter J, Khonputsa P, et al. Prevalence and management of prehypertension and

hypertension by geographic regions of Thailand: the Third National Health Examination Survey,

2004. J Hypertens 2008;26(2):191-8 doi: 10.1097/HJH.0b013e3282f09f57

00004872-200802000-00009 [pii][published Online First: Epub Date]|.

7. Lim LL, Kjellstrom T, Sleigh A, et al. Associations between urbanisation and components of the health-

risk transition in Thailand. A descriptive study of 87,000 Thai adults. Glob Health Action

2009;20(1914):1-13 doi: 10.3402/gha.v2i0.1914[published Online First: Epub Date]|.

8. Banwell C, Lim L, Seubsman SA, et al. Body mass index and health-related behaviours in a national

cohort of 87,134 Thai open university students. J Epidemiol Community Health 2009;63(5):366-72

doi: jech.2008.080820 [pii]

10.1136/jech.2008.080820[published Online First: Epub Date]|.

Page 43 of 51

For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml

BMJ Open

123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960

on February 4, 2020 by guest. P

rotected by copyright.http://bm

jopen.bmj.com

/B

MJ O

pen: first published as 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002826 on 25 June 2013. D

ownloaded from

Page 125: BMJ Open · smoking (which was rare) had no apparent hypertension effect. Among males, regular drinking increased the risk of incident hypertension Strengths In Thailand, this cohort

For peer review only

17

9. Seubsman S, Yiengprugsawan V, Sleigh A, et al. A Large National Thai Cohort Study of the Health-Risk

Transition based on Sukhothai Thammathirat Open University Students. ASEAN Journal of Open

Distance Learning 2012;4(1):58-69

10. Sleigh AC, Seubsman SA, Bain C. Cohort profile: The Thai Cohort of 87,134 Open University students.

Int J Epidemiol 2008;37(2):266-72 doi: dym161 [pii]

10.1093/ije/dym161[published Online First: Epub Date]|.

11. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. The Active Australia Survey: a guide and manual for

implementation, analysis and reporting Canberra. AIHW 2003:1-55

12. Banks E, Lim L, Seubsman SA, et al. Relationship of obesity to physical activity, domestic activities,

and sedentary behaviours: cross-sectional findings from a national cohort of over 70,000 Thai adults.

BMC Public Health 2011;11(762):1-14 doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-762[published Online First:

Epub Date]|.

13. Yiengprugsawan V, Banwell C, Seubsman SA, et al. Short sleep and obesity in a large national cohort of

Thai adults. BMJ open 2012;2(1):e000561-7 doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2011-000561[published Online

First: Epub Date]|.

14. Seubsman SA, Lim LL, Banwell C, et al. Socioeconomic status, sex, and obesity in a large national

cohort of 15-87-year-old open university students in Thailand. J Epidemiol 2010;20(1):13-20 doi:

JST.JSTAGE/jea/JE20090014 [pii][published Online First: Epub Date]|.

15. Weisell RC. Body mass index as an indicator of obesity. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr 2002;11 Suppl 8:S681-4

doi: 367 [pii][published Online First: Epub Date]|.

16. Kanazawa M, Yoshiike N, Osaka T, et al. Criteria and classification of obesity in Japan and Asia-

Oceania. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr 2002;11 Suppl 8:S732-7

17. Webb P, Bain C. Essential Epidemiology : An Introduction for Students and Health Professionals. 2 ed.

New York: Cambridge University Press, 2011:461.

18. Chuang SY, Chou P, Hsu PF, et al. Presence and progression of abdominal obesity are predictors of

future high blood pressure and hypertension. Am J Hypertens 2006;19(8):788-95 doi:

10.1016/j.amjhyper.2006.01.010[published Online First: Epub Date]|.

19. Choi KM, Park HS, Han JH, et al. Prevalence of prehypertension and hypertension in a Korean

population: Korean National Health and Nutrition Survey 2001. J Hypertens 2006;24(8):1515-21

doi: 10.1097/01.hjh.0000239286.02389.0f

00004872-200608000-00010 [pii][published Online First: Epub Date]|.

20. Su TC, Bai CH, Chang HY, et al. Evidence for improved control of hypertension in Taiwan: 1993-2002.

J Hypertens 2008;26(3):600-6 doi: 10.1097/HJH.0b013e3282f3b352

00004872-200803000-00031 [pii][published Online First: Epub Date]|.

Page 44 of 51

For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml

BMJ Open

123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960

on February 4, 2020 by guest. P

rotected by copyright.http://bm

jopen.bmj.com

/B

MJ O

pen: first published as 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002826 on 25 June 2013. D

ownloaded from

Page 126: BMJ Open · smoking (which was rare) had no apparent hypertension effect. Among males, regular drinking increased the risk of incident hypertension Strengths In Thailand, this cohort

For peer review only

18

21. Bassett DR, Jr., Fitzhugh EC, Crespo CJ, et al. Physical activity and ethnic differences in hypertension

prevalence in the United States. Prev Med 2002;34(2):179-86 doi: 10.1006/pmed.2001.0969

S0091743501909697 [pii][published Online First: Epub Date]|.

22. Rampal L, Rampal S, Azhar MZ, et al. Prevalence, awareness, treatment and control of hypertension in

Malaysia: a national study of 16,440 subjects. Public Health 2008;122(1):11-8 doi: S0033-

3506(07)00170-9 [pii]

10.1016/j.puhe.2007.05.008[published Online First: Epub Date]|.

23. Lloyd-Jones D, Adams R, Carnethon M, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics--2009 update: a report

from the American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee.

Circulation 2009;119(3):e21-181 doi: CIRCULATIONAHA.108.191261 [pii]

10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.191261[published Online First: Epub Date]|.

24. Barton M, Meyer MR. Postmenopausal hypertension: mechanisms and therapy. Hypertension

2009;54(1):11-8 doi: HYPERTENSIONAHA.108.120022 [pii]

10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.108.120022[published Online First: Epub Date]|.

25. Shihab HM, Meoni LA, Chu AY, et al. Body Mass Index and Risk of Incident Hypertension over the

Life Course: The Johns Hopkins Precursors Study. Circulation 2012;126(25):2983-9 doi:

10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.117333[published Online First: Epub Date]|.

26. Gelber RP, Gaziano JM, Manson JE, et al. A prospective study of body mass index and the risk of

developing hypertension in men. Am J Hypertens 2007;20(4):370-7 doi: S0895-7061(06)00781-3

[pii]

10.1016/j.amjhyper.2006.10.011[published Online First: Epub Date]|.

27. Hu G, Barengo NC, Tuomilehto J, et al. Relationship of physical activity and body mass index to the risk

of hypertension: a prospective study in Finland. Hypertension 2004;43(1):25-30 doi:

10.1161/01.HYP.0000107400.72456.19

01.HYP.0000107400.72456.19 [pii][published Online First: Epub Date]|.

28. He J, Whelton PK, Appel LJ, et al. Long-term effects of weight loss and dietary sodium reduction on

incidence of hypertension. Hypertension 2000;35(2):544-9

29. Huang Z, Willett WC, Manson JE, et al. Body weight, weight change, and risk for hypertension in

women. Ann Intern Med 1998;128(2):81-8

30. Levin G, Kestenbaum B, Ida Chen YD, et al. Glucose, insulin, and incident hypertension in the multi-

ethnic study of atherosclerosis. Am J Epidemiol 2010;172(10):1144-54 doi: kwq266 [pii]

10.1093/aje/kwq266[published Online First: Epub Date]|.

Page 45 of 51

For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml

BMJ Open

123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960

on February 4, 2020 by guest. P

rotected by copyright.http://bm

jopen.bmj.com

/B

MJ O

pen: first published as 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002826 on 25 June 2013. D

ownloaded from

Page 127: BMJ Open · smoking (which was rare) had no apparent hypertension effect. Among males, regular drinking increased the risk of incident hypertension Strengths In Thailand, this cohort

For peer review only

19

31. Wang W, Lee ET, Fabsitz RR, et al. A longitudinal study of hypertension risk factors and their relation

to cardiovascular disease: the Strong Heart Study. Hypertension 2006;47(3):403-9 doi:

10.1161/01.HYP.0000200710.29498.80[published Online First: Epub Date]|.

32. Fukui M, Tanaka M, Toda H, et al. Risk factors for development of diabetes mellitus, hypertension and

dyslipidemia. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2011;94(1):e15-8 doi: S0168-8227(11)00356-1 [pii]

10.1016/j.diabres.2011.07.006[published Online First: Epub Date]|.

33. Suematsu C, Hayashi T, Fujii S, et al. Impaired fasting glucose and the risk of hypertension in Japanese

men between the 1980s and the 1990s. The Osaka Health Survey. Diabetes Care 1999;22(2):228-32

34. Hypertension Study Group. Prevalence, awareness, treatment and control of hypertension among the

elderly in Bangladesh and India: a multicentre study. Bull World Health Organ 2001;79(6):490-500

35. Rodrigues Barbosa A, Ferreti Borgatto A. Arterial hypertension in the elderly of bridgetown, barbados:

prevalence and associated factors. J Aging Health 2010;22(5):611-30 doi: 0898264310371123 [pii]

10.1177/0898264310371123[published Online First: Epub Date]|.

36. Bell CN, Thorpe RJ, Jr., Laveist TA. Race/Ethnicity and hypertension: the role of social support. Am J

Hypertens 2010;23(5):534-40 doi: ajh201028 [pii]

10.1038/ajh.2010.28[published Online First: Epub Date]|.

37. Marso SP, Hiatt WR. Peripheral arterial disease in patients with diabetes. J Am Coll Cardiol

2006;47(5):921-9 doi: S0735-1097(05)02862-7 [pii]

10.1016/j.jacc.2005.09.065[published Online First: Epub Date]|.

38. Laaksonen DE, Niskanen L, Nyyssonen K, et al. Dyslipidaemia as a predictor of hypertension in middle-

aged men. Eur Heart J 2008;29(20):2561-8 doi: ehn061 [pii]

10.1093/eurheartj/ehn061[published Online First: Epub Date]|.

39. Halperin RO, Sesso HD, Ma J, et al. Dyslipidemia and the risk of incident hypertension in men.

Hypertension 2006;47(1):45-50 doi: 01.HYP.0000196306.42418.0e [pii]

10.1161/01.HYP.0000196306.42418.0e[published Online First: Epub Date]|.

40. Tohidi M, Hatami M, Hadaegh F, et al. Triglycerides and triglycerides to high-density lipoprotein

cholesterol ratio are strong predictors of incident hypertension in Middle Eastern women. J Hum

Hypertens 2011;26(9):525-32 doi: jhh201170 [pii]

10.1038/jhh.2011.70[published Online First: Epub Date]|.

41. Sesso HD, Buring JE, Chown MJ, et al. A prospective study of plasma lipid levels and hypertension in

women. Arch Intern Med 2005;165(20):2420-7 doi: 165/20/2420 [pii]

10.1001/archinte.165.20.2420[published Online First: Epub Date]|.

Page 46 of 51

For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml

BMJ Open

123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960

on February 4, 2020 by guest. P

rotected by copyright.http://bm

jopen.bmj.com

/B

MJ O

pen: first published as 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002826 on 25 June 2013. D

ownloaded from

Page 128: BMJ Open · smoking (which was rare) had no apparent hypertension effect. Among males, regular drinking increased the risk of incident hypertension Strengths In Thailand, this cohort

For peer review only

20

42. Haffner SM, Miettinen H, Gaskill SP, et al. Metabolic precursors of hypertension. The San Antonio

Heart Study. Arch Intern Med 1996;156(17):1994-2001

43. Selwyn AP, Kinlay S, Libby P, et al. Atherogenic lipids, vascular dysfunction, and clinical signs of

ischemic heart disease. Circulation 1997;95(1):5-7

44. Jancova E, Vankova Z, Honsova E, et al. Prevalence and risk of hypertension in renal disease--data from

the Czech Registry of Renal Biopsies. Kidney Blood Press Res 2008;31(2):135-42 doi: 000126736

[pii]

10.1159/000126736[published Online First: Epub Date]|.

45. Kalaitzidis R, Li S, Wang C, et al. Hypertension in early-stage kidney disease: an update from the

Kidney Early Evaluation Program (KEEP). Am J Kidney Dis 2009;53(4 Suppl 4):S22-31 doi:

10.1053/j.ajkd.2008.11.028[published Online First: Epub Date]|.

46. Johnston PA, Davison AM. Hypertension in adults with idiopathic glomerulonephritis and normal serum

creatinine. A report from the MRC Glomerulonephritis Registry. Nephrol Dial Transplant

1993;8(1):20-4

47. Buckalew VM, Jr., Berg RL, Wang SR, et al. Prevalence of hypertension in 1,795 subjects with chronic

renal disease: the modification of diet in renal disease study baseline cohort. Modification of Diet in

Renal Disease Study Group. Am J Kidney Dis 1996;28(6):811-21 doi: S0272638696002363

[pii][published Online First: Epub Date]|.

48. Campese VM, Mitra N, Sandee D. Hypertension in renal parenchymal disease: why is it so resistant to

treatment? Kidney Int 2006;69(6):967-73 doi: 5000177 [pii]

10.1038/sj.ki.5000177[published Online First: Epub Date]|.

49. Niskanen L, Laaksonen DE, Nyyssonen K, et al. Inflammation, abdominal obesity, and smoking as

predictors of hypertension. Hypertension 2004;44(6):859-65 doi: 01.HYP.0000146691.51307.84

[pii]

10.1161/01.HYP.0000146691.51307.84[published Online First: Epub Date]|.

50. Halperin RO, Gaziano JM, Sesso HD. Smoking and the risk of incident hypertension in middle-aged and

older men. Am J Hypertens 2008;21(2):148-52 doi: ajh200736 [pii]

10.1038/ajh.2007.36[published Online First: Epub Date]|.

51. Halimi JM, Giraudeau B, Vol S, et al. The risk of hypertension in men: direct and indirect effects of

chronic smoking. J Hypertens 2002;20(2):187-93

52. Al-Safi SA. Does smoking affect blood pressure and heart rate? European journal of cardiovascular

nursing : journal of the Working Group on Cardiovascular Nursing of the European Society of

Cardiology 2005;4(4):286-9 doi: 10.1016/j.ejcnurse.2005.03.004[published Online First: Epub

Date]|.

Page 47 of 51

For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml

BMJ Open

123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960

on February 4, 2020 by guest. P

rotected by copyright.http://bm

jopen.bmj.com

/B

MJ O

pen: first published as 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002826 on 25 June 2013. D

ownloaded from

Page 129: BMJ Open · smoking (which was rare) had no apparent hypertension effect. Among males, regular drinking increased the risk of incident hypertension Strengths In Thailand, this cohort

For peer review only

21

53. Jo I, Ahn Y, Lee J, et al. Prevalence, awareness, treatment, control and risk factors of hypertension in

Korea: the Ansan study. J Hypertens 2001;19(9):1523-32

54. Schwandt HM, Coresh J, Hindin MJ. Marital Status, Hypertension, Coronary Heart Disease, Diabetes,

and Death Among African American Women and Men: Incidence and Prevalence in the

Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study Participants. J Fam Issues 2010;31(9):1211-29

doi: 10.1177/0192513X10365487[published Online First: Epub Date]|.

55. Bowman TS, Gaziano JM, Buring JE, et al. A prospective study of cigarette smoking and risk of incident

hypertension in women. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;50(21):2085-92 doi: S0735-1097(07)02729-5 [pii]

10.1016/j.jacc.2007.08.017[published Online First: Epub Date]|.

56. Ohmori S, Kiyohara Y, Kato I, et al. Alcohol intake and future incidence of hypertension in a general

Japanese population: the Hisayama study. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 2002;26(7):1010-6 doi:

10.1097/01.ALC.0000021147.31338.C2[published Online First: Epub Date]|.

57. Nakanishi N, Yoshida H, Nakamura K, et al. Alcohol consumption and risk for hypertension in middle-

aged Japanese men. J Hypertens 2001;19(5):851-5

58. Wildman RP, Gu D, Muntner P, et al. Alcohol intake and hypertension subtypes in Chinese men. J

Hypertens 2005;23(4):737-43 doi: 00004872-200504000-00012 [pii][published Online First: Epub

Date]|.

59. Yoshita K, Miura K, Morikawa Y, et al. Relationship of alcohol consumption to 7-year blood pressure

change in Japanese men. J Hypertens 2005;23(8):1485-90 doi: 00004872-200508000-00010

[pii][published Online First: Epub Date]|.

60. Minami J, Yoshii M, Todoroki M, et al. Effects of alcohol restriction on ambulatory blood pressure,

heart rate, and heart rate variability in Japanese men. Am J Hypertens 2002;15(2 Pt 1):125-9 doi:

S0895706101022658 [pii][published Online First: Epub Date]|.

61. Fuchs FD, Chambless LE, Whelton PK, et al. Alcohol consumption and the incidence of hypertension:

The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study. Hypertension 2001;37(5):1242-50

62. Taylor B, Irving HM, Baliunas D, et al. Alcohol and hypertension: gender differences in dose-response

relationships determined through systematic review and meta-analysis. Addiction

2009;104(12):1981-90 doi: ADD2694 [pii]

10.1111/j.1360-0443.2009.02694.x[published Online First: Epub Date]|.

63. Lipowicz A, Lopuszanska M. Marital differences in blood pressure and the risk of hypertension among

Polish men. Eur J Epidemiol 2005;20(5):421-7

64. Trivedi RB, Ayotte B, Edelman D, et al. The association of emotional well-being and marital status with

treatment adherence among patients with hypertension. Journal of behavioral medicine

2008;31(6):489-97 doi: 10.1007/s10865-008-9173-4[published Online First: Epub Date]|.

Page 48 of 51

For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml

BMJ Open

123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960

on February 4, 2020 by guest. P

rotected by copyright.http://bm

jopen.bmj.com

/B

MJ O

pen: first published as 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002826 on 25 June 2013. D

ownloaded from

Page 130: BMJ Open · smoking (which was rare) had no apparent hypertension effect. Among males, regular drinking increased the risk of incident hypertension Strengths In Thailand, this cohort

For peer review only

22

65. Kaplan MS, Huguet N, Feeny DH, et al. Self-reported hypertension prevalence and income among older

adults in Canada and the United States. Soc Sci Med 2010;70(6):844-9 doi: S0277-9536(09)00814-4

[pii]

10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.11.019[published Online First: Epub Date]|.

66. Vargas CM, Ingram DD, Gillum RF. Incidence of hypertension and educational attainment: the

NHANES I epidemiologic followup study. First National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.

Am J Epidemiol 2000;152(3):272-8

67. Rashid AK, Azizah AM. Prevalence of hypertension among the elderly Malays living in rural Malaysia.

Australian Medical Journal 2011;4(6):283-90

68. Addo J, Smeeth L, Leon DA. Socioeconomic position and hypertension: a study of urban civil servants

in Ghana. J Epidemiol Community Health 2009;63(8):646-50 doi:

10.1136/jech.2008.081828[published Online First: Epub Date]|.

69. Ball K, Crawford D. Socioeconomic status and weight change in adults: a review. Soc Sci Med

2005;60(9):1987-2010 doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.08.056[published Online First: Epub Date]|.

70. Diez-Roux AV, Nieto FJ, Caulfield L, et al. Neighbourhood differences in diet: the Atherosclerosis Risk

in Communities (ARIC) Study. J Epidemiol Community Health 1999;53(1):55-63

71. Sobal J, Stunkard AJ. Socioeconomic status and obesity: a review of the literature. Psychological

bulletin 1989;105(2):260-75

72. Yiengprugsawan V, Seubsman SA, Lim LL, et al. Used and foregone health services among a cohort of

87,134 adult open university students residing throughout Thailand. The Southeast Asian journal of

tropical medicine and public health 2009;40(6):1347-58

73. Pereira MA, Folsom AR, McGovern PG, et al. Physical activity and incident hypertension in black and

white adults: the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study. Prev Med 1999;28(3):304-12 doi:

S0091743598904315 [pii][published Online First: Epub Date]|.

74. Haapanen N, Miilunpalo S, Vuori I, et al. Association of leisure time physical activity with the risk of

coronary heart disease, hypertension and diabetes in middle-aged men and women. Int J Epidemiol

1997;26(4):739-47

75. Park J, Lee JS, Jang YA, et al. A comparison of food and nutrient intake between instant noodle

consumers and non-instant noodle consumers in Korean adults. Nutr Res Pract 2011;5(5):443-9 doi:

10.4162/nrp.2011.5.5.443[published Online First: Epub Date]|.

76. Jolly SE, Eilat-Adar S, Wang H, et al. Sex-specific associations of nutrition with hypertension and

systolic blood pressure in Alaska Natives findings from the GOCADAN study. Int J Circumpolar

Health 2011;70(3):254-65 doi: 1098 [pii][published Online First: Epub Date]|.

Page 49 of 51

For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml

BMJ Open

123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960

on February 4, 2020 by guest. P

rotected by copyright.http://bm

jopen.bmj.com

/B

MJ O

pen: first published as 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002826 on 25 June 2013. D

ownloaded from

Page 131: BMJ Open · smoking (which was rare) had no apparent hypertension effect. Among males, regular drinking increased the risk of incident hypertension Strengths In Thailand, this cohort

For peer review only

23

77. Alonso A, Beunza JJ, Bes-Rastrollo M, et al. Vegetable protein and fiber from cereal are inversely

associated with the risk of hypertension in a Spanish cohort. Arch Med Res 2006;37(6):778-86 doi:

S0188-4409(06)00087-7 [pii]

10.1016/j.arcmed.2006.01.007[published Online First: Epub Date]|.

78. Steffen LM, Kroenke CH, Yu X, et al. Associations of plant food, dairy product, and meat intakes with

15-y incidence of elevated blood pressure in young black and white adults: the Coronary Artery Risk

Development in Young Adults (CARDIA) Study. Am J Clin Nutr 2005;82(6):1169-77; quiz 363-4

doi: 82/6/1169 [pii][published Online First: Epub Date]|.

79. Schulze MB, Hoffmann K, Kroke A, et al. Risk of hypertension among women in the EPIC-Potsdam

Study: comparison of relative risk estimates for exploratory and hypothesis-oriented dietary patterns.

Am J Epidemiol 2003;158(4):365-73

80. Chien KL, Hsu HC, Chen PC, et al. Urinary sodium and potassium excretion and risk of hypertension in

Chinese: report from a community-based cohort study in Taiwan. J Hypertens 2008;26(9):1750-6

doi: 10.1097/HJH.0b013e328306a0a7[published Online First: Epub Date]|.

81. Zhang L, Qin LQ, Liu AP, et al. Prevalence of risk factors for cardiovascular disease and their

associations with diet and physical activity in suburban Beijing, China. J Epidemiol 2010;20(3):237-

43 doi: JST.JSTAGE/jea/JE20090119 [pii][published Online First: Epub Date]|.

82. Sun Z, Zheng L, Xu C, et al. Prevalence of prehypertension, hypertension and, associated risk factors in

Mongolian and Han Chinese populations in Northeast China. Int J Cardiol 2008;128(2):250-4 doi:

S0167-5273(07)01900-6 [pii]

10.1016/j.ijcard.2007.08.127[published Online First: Epub Date]|.

83. He FJ, MacGregor GA. Effect of modest salt reduction on blood pressure: a meta-analysis of

randomized trials. Implications for public health. J Hum Hypertens 2002;16(11):761-70 doi:

10.1038/sj.jhh.1001459[published Online First: Epub Date]|.

84. Sacks FM, Svetkey LP, Vollmer WM, et al. Effects on blood pressure of reduced dietary sodium and the

Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) diet. DASH-Sodium Collaborative Research

Group. N Engl J Med 2001;344(1):3-10 doi: 10.1056/NEJM200101043440101[published Online

First: Epub Date]|.

85. He FJ, MacGregor GA. Reducing population salt intake worldwide: from evidence to implementation.

Prog Cardiovasc Dis 2010;52(5):363-82 doi: S0033-0620(09)00127-3 [pii]

10.1016/j.pcad.2009.12.006[published Online First: Epub Date]|.

86. Lim LL, Seubsman SA, Sleigh A. Validity of self-reported weight, height, and body mass index among

university students in Thailand: Implications for population studies of obesity in developing

Page 50 of 51

For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml

BMJ Open

123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960

on February 4, 2020 by guest. P

rotected by copyright.http://bm

jopen.bmj.com

/B

MJ O

pen: first published as 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002826 on 25 June 2013. D

ownloaded from

Page 132: BMJ Open · smoking (which was rare) had no apparent hypertension effect. Among males, regular drinking increased the risk of incident hypertension Strengths In Thailand, this cohort

For peer review only

24

countries. Population health metrics 2009;7:1-15 doi: 10.1186/1478-7954-7-15[published Online

First: Epub Date]|.

87. Thinkhamrop K, Seubsman S, Sleigh A, et al. Reasons for Non-Response to Mailed Questionnaires –

Experience of a Large Cohort Study in Thailand. KKU Jph Research 2011;4(3):73-87

Page 51 of 51

For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml

BMJ Open

123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960

on February 4, 2020 by guest. P

rotected by copyright.http://bm

jopen.bmj.com

/B

MJ O

pen: first published as 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002826 on 25 June 2013. D

ownloaded from