blogs.longwood.edublogs.longwood.edu/.../2017/...lot-49-final-paper.docx · web viewabout radios...
TRANSCRIPT
Bondurant 1
Dani Bondurant
Dr. Van Ness
2 May 2017
“No end to it, baby”: Pynchon, Communication, and The Crying of Lot 49
The experimental novel subverts the norms and conventions generally exemplified in
traditional narrative literature. Post-modern techniques, such as metafiction and hyper-reality, are
strategically used in Thomas Pynchon’s The Crying of Lot 49 to express the flaws of American
culture in the 1960s, primarily focusing on the human inability to communicate effectively.
Pynchon declared in an article for the New York Times on October 28, 1984: “But if we do insist
upon fictional violations of the laws of nature— of space, time, thermodynamics, and the big
one, mortality itself— then we risk being judged by the literary mainstream as insufficiently
serious” (Pynchon 1, 40). These violations of nature, Pynchon suggests, are exemplified by The
Bordando el Manto Terrestre triptych, the puzzling musical qualities shown by The Paranoids,
and other narrative elements that appear in the novel and that characterize the failure of
communication in America during the 1960s.
After Oedipa is named executrix of her former lover’s estate, a series of abnormal events
occur that leave her more uncertain of her findings than when her search began. As Oedipa tries
to assemble the miscellaneous information she is given over the course of the novel, she
simultaneously attempts to organize the strange discoveries into a pattern she can understand.
However, her attempts to make sense of the clues are futile, as too many vague and incomplete
Bondurant 2
findings present themselves. She becomes entrapped in a sequence of highly unusual discoveries,
often meeting bizarre individuals in the process, such as the child movie star and lawyer,
Metzger; the playwright, Randolph Dribblette; and the obsessive scientist, John Nefastis. After
she discovers Pierce Inverarity’s extensive stamp collection, meets a member of the Peter
Pinguid Society, and finds the muted post horn symbol scrawled on a bathroom stall, Oedipa
believes she has enough information to discern the answers of Inverarity’s will. Believing “Each
clue that comes is supposed to have its own clarity, its fine chances for permanence” (95), she
does not realize her entrapment within the search. She trudges on in her journey, however, to
understand the secret postal service, the Tristero, which is an ambiguous and conspiracy-driven
mail distribution company. Oedipa’s inability, finally, to uncover the inner workings of the
Tristero supports the novel’s meditation on communication by presenting an underground postal
service intended to be used as means to send messages, even though it appears flawed, cryptic,
and possibly even non-existent. Oedipa’s endless obstacles are heightened by her nonsensical
and disconnected conversations wherein she attempts to gain information regarding the estate,
which only leave her knowing less than she initially discerned.
Early in the novel, the circuit card to which Oedipa compares the landscape of San
Narciso exemplifies the deterioration of communication that Pynchon asserts is prevalent in
America in the 1960s. As Oedipa approaches San Narciso, her flawed tendency to mold
information and images into patterns is revealed when she notices the way in which the houses
and landscape are arranged:
The ordered swirl of houses and streets, from this high angle, sprang at her now with the
same unexpected, astonishing clarity as the circuit card had. Though she knew even less
Bondurant 3
about radios than about Southern Californians, there were to both outward patterns a
hieroglyphic sense of concealed meaning, of an intent to communicate. There’d seemed
no limit to what the printed circuit could have told her (if she had tried to find out); so in
her first minute of San Narciso, a revelation also trembled just path the threshold of her
understanding. (Pynchon 14)
Comparing the landscape to a circuit card, Oedipa categorizes these two entities as forming a
pattern in order to execute their purpose. The circuit board’s purpose is to permit an electrical
object to work, while the roads and houses that make up the landscape allow for the community
to function easily. As suggested by Pynchon, the problem with Oedipa’s pattern-seeking is that
she may be imagining the design to better grasp the information. One of Oedipa’s subtle flaws is
that she assumes everything must follow a pattern. Circuits follow a predetermined configuration
to produce an electrical effect, such as the creation of noise or light. Feeling as though she is “on
some other frequency” (14), Oedipa’s search does not follow a similar pattern because it does not
end with a satisfactory, conclusive product. Her journey throughout The Crying of Lot 49, as one
critic notes, leads to “an informational overload that collapses ‘communication’ in a chaos of
signals. In this way, informational entropy promotes communicational disorder: it generates an
excess of output that cannot be reduced to meaning, sense or coherence” (Vine 167). She is
desperately traveling to different locations and meeting unrelated people to connect the obscure
information about Inverarity’s estate, but by the conclusion of the novel, the clues do not link
together in the satisfactory way that the circuit board does.
Oedipa’s husband, Mucho, represents society’s inability to communicate because he
broadcasts on his radio station, KCUF, yet resorts to LSD as a result of his failed attempts to
Bondurant 4
send a message to his audience. Mucho initially owned a car lot but later switched to
broadcasting for the radio station because he “could never accept the way each owner— each
shadow, filed in only to exchange a dented, malfunctioning version of himself for another, just as
futureless, automotive projection of somebody else’s life” (Pynchon 5). Mucho’s car lot business
is symbolic of the way humans conform their communication based on the situation they are in
or the individual with whom they are interacting. Mucho’s character exemplifies the obscurity
surrounding communication that Pynchon asserts as a failure throughout the novel. As a radio
broadcaster, Mucho attempts to communicate with a wide audience through his radio station, but
feels it is a failure and turns to usage of LSD. He tells Oedipa: “You take it because it’s good.
Because you hear and see things, even smell them, taste like you never could. Because the world
is so abundant. No end to it, baby” (Pynchon 118). Mucho depicts the world as extravagant, yet
can only come to this conclusion under the influence of LSD. His abandonment of
communication altogether is a result of the fragmented and distorted methods humans have to
interact.
Mucho’s embrace of drugs exemplifies Pynchon’s assertion regarding the deterioration of
elective communication. When characters attempt to talk to each other in The Crying of Lot 49,
information is always given that becomes misinterpreted or is unclear. Matthew Guillen explores
Pynchon’s stance on communication, asserting: “The scaffolding of society, presented in this
light, is well in the process of irreversible collapse. Pynchon certainly does work on post-
modernist themes which underscore the inscrutability, relativity and ultimate subjectivity of
reality. And, with the possible exception of Schaub [a critic who analyzes how thermodynamic
entropy reveals Pynchon’s stance on American civilization], Pynchon is generally perceived as
Bondurant 5
celebrating the logical self-destruction of Western institutions” (Guillen 109). Guillen’s
suggestion of a “scaffolding of society” implies we are guided from an early age to follow the
norms of communication. However, Pynchon in The Crying of Lot 49 suggests these conventions
are flawed and have further deteriorated, so much so that it actually hinders Oedipa from
fulfilling her duty as executrix. Instead of continuing to follow these failed attempts at
communication with the listeners of KCUF, Mucho takes LSD to gain a sense of the world he is
unable to have by relying on his verbal communication with other individuals.
As Oedipa becomes more invested in her attempts to understand the underground postal
service, more cryptic clues come forward that have questionable usefulness. For example,
Oedipa and Metzger, the lawyer assigned to her to help her execute Pierce Inverarity’s will, see a
play entitled made-up Jacobean play entitled The Courier’s Tragedy in hopes there will a
connection to the vague information they have uncovered. The play is extremely convoluted, but
Oedipa hears one word in the script that causes her surprise: Trystero, which she thinks proves
that she has found another piece of the puzzle in understanding Inverarity’s estate. The Courier’s
Tragedy symbolizes the tangled mess into which Oedipa has entrapped herself by fully trusting
that every clue will lead her to the answers. Like the characters of The Courier’s Tragedy,
Oedipa is enveloped in chaos. She is encouraged to continue her research into the underground
postal service because she hears the word “Trystero” within the play, taking the information at
face-value.
The play contains short monologues, one of them being, “The swan has yielded but one
hollow quill, / The hapless mutton, but his tegument; / Yet what, transmuted, swart and silken
flows / Between, was neither plucked nor harshly flayed, / But gathered up, from wildly different
Bondurant 6
beasts” (Pynchon 54). Even though Oedipa does not realize it, her journey and her inability to
communicate effectively are reflected in these lines. She is symbolized by the swan that “has
yielded but one hollow quill,” the quill representing the one piece of information Oedipa has
possibly obtained regarding Pierce Inverarity’s estate: the Tristero. However, as said in the play,
it is “hollow.” The clue is not even useful to her in understanding his estate. She acquires this
knowledge by coming upon various different individuals, the “wildly different beasts” as they
are called in The Courier’s Tragedy. Oedipa’s false pretense of gained insight into Inverarity’s
estate foreshadows her failure to execute the will as a result of her failed methods of
communication.
A subtle yet significant narrative element that suggests a failure in communication is the
scene in which Oedipa returns to her hotel and an unidentified man in a tweed coat pulls her to
him for a dance. He immediately grabs Oedipa, without speaking, as dancing overtakes speaking.
Dancing becomes communication, and Oedipa wonders:
But how long, Oedipa thought, could it go on before collisions became a serious
hindrance? There would have to be collisions. The only alternative was some unthinkable
order of music, many rhythms, all keys at once, a choreography in which each couple
meshed easy, predestined. Something they all heard with an extra sense atrophied in
herself. She followed her partner’s lead, limp in the young mute’s clasp, waiting for the
collisions to begin. But none came. (Pynchon 107)
Oedipa and the man in the tweed coat share no verbal communication because dancing fills the
void of talking in this instance, and she awaits a collision of people to occur that would destroy
the pattern of dancing they have formed. This scene embodies yet another flawed interaction
Bondurant 7
because they do not even attempt to communicate using words. As one critic states, “The silent
signs neither crash nor coalesce into epiphany, but their very movement, their ‘rustling,
shuffling’ dance, invokes the brimming energy of suspended revelation” (Serpell 107). Oedipa’s
ability to reach this “revelation” without using verbal communication reveals that messages can
be obtained through a variety of ways. Pynchon uses this scene as a way of depicting humans’
total reliance on spoken language to converse, even though other means of interaction exist. This
human dependency on verbalization, he suggests, is the reason communication has become a
failure. Even though Oedipa lacks the ability to converse properly, the individuals fail in their
attempts to impart information by being ambiguous and perplexing. They rely heavily on spoken
communication, but fail to realize the dangers of this absolute dependence.
Aside from the narrative elements that portray Pynchon’s stance on communication, art
and music also assert the inherent flaws in human relations. Oedipa tends to see herself depicted
in art, as shown when she arrives at the motel in San Narciso and looks upon a statue of a nymph
whose face, Oedipa thinks, looks just like her own (16). Just as Oedipa envisions a pattern
imbedded in the landscape which she compares to a circuit board, she also sees the physical
similarities between herself and the nymph. Oedipa’s desire to create connections between two
objects is often a figment of her imagination and exposes her impulsive nature. The Bordando el
Manto Terrestre triptych by Remedios Varos is introduced by Pynchon to depict the circular
journey in which Oedipa finds herself, and she yet again sees only a reflection of herself. The
triptych shows women in a tower who are creating a tapestry that flows out of the windows of
the tower, where it appears they are being held captive. As Oedipa recalls the moment in which
she first saw the triptych, she remembers the deep sadness she felt as she looked upon it.
Bondurant 8
Pynchon writes: “What did she so desire escape from? Such a captive maiden, having plenty of
time to think, soon realizes that her tower, its height and architecture, are like her ego only
incidental: that what really keeps her where she is magic, anonymous and malignant, visited on
her from outside and for no reason at all” (11-12). Again, Oedipa is struck by the resemblance to
herself. While the realization of her similarity to the triptych saddens her, she does not fully
understand the parallel, failing to know that the triptych is meant to depict her as trapped in her
journey; instead, she romanticizes the idea of being entrapped by imagining herself as
“Rapunzel-like.” As David Cowart declares, “Thus Oedipa sees in the painting a representation
of her own psychological-existential problems. She, too, is locked in a tower ‘like her ego only
incidental’, a tower in which she must embroider or spin out a world she finds uncongenial”
(24). The depiction of Oedipa as an entrapped figure accurately shows her bound by her frantic
journey. Pynchon’s presentation of this painting furthers the argument of communication as a
failure in America during the 1960s by offering a depiction of the human state of mind that
individuals do not recognize. In the triptych, there is no illusion of freedom. The women are
clearly trapped with no means of escape. Conversely, Oedipa is under the delusion that she has a
certain amount of control over her interactions with other individuals and can escape the
entrapment of uncovering Pierce’s will through communication. The use of art to represent
Oedipa’s situation is meant to transcend the physical world of The Crying of Lot 49 in order to
reveal ideas beyond those Oedipa can perceive.
Pynchon brings art into The Crying of Lot 49 to show various forms of communication
that exceed the verbal communication on which Oedipa relies. The triptych portrays Oedipa
more clearly than she could describe herself by simply using words; it enables her to understand
Bondurant 9
her situation more accurately than would verbal communication with another individual. Oedipa
ponders: “because of a painting, that what she stood on had only been woven together a couple
thousand miles away in her own tower, was only by accident known as Mexico, and so Pierce
had taken her away from nothing, there’d been no escape” (Pynchon 11). Even after viewing the
painting, Oedipa remains ignorant as to how futile her journey will be.
Just as the triptych represents the entrapment of Oedipa’s journey, it holds a double-
edged meaning by also epitomizing the confinement of humans as a whole. Oedipa, symbolizing
America in the sixties, is trapped within her patterns of communication. Just as the women in the
triptych are imprisoned in the tower, Americans are constricted by their inefficient patterns of
communication. Oedipa is the clearest representation of flawed communication, but the bizarre
individuals with whom she interacts to learn more about Inverarity’s estate also possess flawed
communication styles. Each character is constructed by Pynchon in order to hold Americans
equally accountable for continuing the flawed techniques in communication that earlier
generations constructed.
Shortly after Oedipa checks into her motel in San Narciso, she meets Miles, the teenage
lead singer of The Paranoids, a bizarre band comprised of other teenagers. The band’s song
lyrics are seemingly hollow and pointless, but they point to a disorder in human communication
in 1960s America. Miles’s first song, which Oedipa hears him sing as he carries her bags to the
motel room, goes:
Too fat to Frug,
That’s what you tell me all the time,
When you really try’n’ to put me down,
Bondurant 10
But I’m hip,
So close your big fat lip,
Yeah, baby,
I may be too fat to Frug,
But at least I ain’t too slim to Swim. (16)
Miles’s short song refers to an inability to “Frug,” a dance that became popular in the 1960s. The
song’s literal depiction is that of a speaker who is too large to dance the Frug, but is still able to
“Swim,” a dance made popular by Bobby Freeman, an R&B singer in the sixties (Lee 552). The
figurative meaning, however, points to the abandonment of one form of communication in favor
of another. Particular styles of dance have techniques and patterns to follow in order to correctly
perform the movements. Dance is communication in this instance because speaking also revolves
around techniques in order to convey and receive a message. Oedipa attempts to adhere to these
patterns to gain information useful in her execution of Inverarity’s will, but she becomes
discouraged by her lack of progress and abandons her attempts in communication.
Though Oedipa regards Miles’s song as “lovely” (17), she does not realize the way in
which it alludes to her futile exploration throughout the novel. As Cowart asserts, “Music, in
these books [The Crying of Lot 49 and Gravity’s Rainbow], seems always to hint at the extra
dimensions of experience that one misses because of the narrow range of frequencies—physical
or spiritual—to which one is attuned” (81). The musical qualities Pynchon laces throughout The
Crying of Lot 49 underscore meaningless communication exemplified by Oedipa’s inconsistent
journey. The underlying meaning in The Paranoids’ songs cannot be understood by Oedipa
because she neglects the relevance of their lyrics. Utilizing emerging cultural trends in 1960s
Bondurant 11
America, Pynchon presents American culture, such as pop music, to subtly yet effectively
critique the flawed patterns of communication.
As Oedipa becomes deeply invested in her attempts to connect the Tristero to Inverarity’s
estate, The Paranoids sing yet again. Two lines from the song read: “And the older generation/
Has taught me what to do” (121). These lyrics refer to the repetition of ideas through
generations, particularly exemplified in the norms of communication that have been shaped over
history. In Pynchon’s introduction to Slow Learner, a compilation of his early stories, he writes:
“There were no more primary choices for us to make. We were onlookers: the parade has gone
by and we were already getting everything secondhand, consumers of what the media of the time
were supplying us” (193). Pynchon’s frustration with communication in the sixties is a result of
the repetition of learned habits over history, exemplified not only in this quotation but also
throughout The Crying of Lot 49.
America in the 1960s was a time of radical events largely driven by politics. Presidents
John F. Kennedy and Lyndon B. Johnson sought to enlarge the federal government in order to
solve social problems, as well as to expand America’s influence in the world (Giglio 38) . This
desire effected innumerable political, social, and cultural protests among numerous groups,
including African Americans who struggled for civil rights (Carson 144), Mexican-American
students seeking identity (Muñoz 168), Vietnam draft protestors (Chafe 91), hippies who
searched for meaning (Miller 193), and women who wanted to dismantle the gender inequality
(Pedriana 1719). These various groups all criticized or even rejected America’s mainstream
society, deeming it impaired and acting in hopes of bringing equality to the nation. By relying on
several communication strategies in order to change aspects of the American culture with which
Bondurant 12
they disagreed, these groups exemplify Pynchon’s assertion of human manipulation of
communication in order to receive their desired outcome. Oedipa intuitively believes there may
be someone purposefully exploiting her mission to execute the estate, although it is likely her
inability to interact with others that hinders her.
Though initiated in the fifties by challenging schools’ segregation laws, the civil rights
movement evolved into a greater issue during the sixties. The National Organization for the
Advancement of Colored People, the Southern Christian Leadership Conference, and the Student
Nonviolent Coordinating Committee were all civil rights protest groups that emerged in hopes to
transform American stigmas and rules regarding African Americans (Carson 144). Mexican-
Americans became inspired by African Americans’ demonstrations and began to engage in their
own political protests as a result. These protesters wished to maintain their ethnic pride, earn
political recognition, and eliminate discrimination. Upon his declaration of candidacy in 1960,
John F. Kennedy asked leaders of this Mexican-American movement for help, to which they
complied by aiding in his political campaign (Muñoz 170). These demonstrators used their
communication and voice to reach a goal. Oedipa also attempts to do this, but cannot obtain her
desired knowledge.
Upheaval continued during Kennedy’s presidency. Involvement in Vietnam escalated
rapidly, which a large amount of Americans greatly disapproved of. After his assassination in
1963, Lyndon B. Johnson continued to heighten America’s participation in the war (Siegel 43).
As a result of this, draft resistance and protest marches became increasingly popular by 1965 .
The draft resistance held underlying meaning for its partakers because it caused their fellow
citizens to constitute them as unpatriotic, at times even ridiculing participants’ masculinity.
Bondurant 13
During organized protests by those involved in draft resistance, groups would burn their draft
cards. These burners viewed the war as criminal, and claimed they were entitled to reject the
draft. The burning of the draft cards was the protestors’ way of communicating their resistance to
the war. However, this act supports Pynchon’s assertion of flawed communication techniques
because a draft card was not an essential part of the government’s ability to recruit soldiers
(Chafe 91).
Emerging in 1967, a large amount of young individuals, termed “hippies,” blatantly
rejected American middle-class values in the way they dressed and behaved. Like African-
Americans and Mexican-Americans of the sixties, these hippies were outsiders of society. They
maintained a stigmatized identity because of their drug use, dismissal of sexual norms, and
unconventional music preferences. These distinctive qualities visually distinguished hippies from
the average American citizen, communicating their individuality to others. Their rejection of
American values through these unorthodox practices reveals how they utilized communication to
further separate themselves from society (Miller 193). New music preferences began to emerge
in the sixties, largely from England’s musical influence. Rock music’s development in the sixties
was rapid, and often contained lyrics which reflected political and cultural topics of the sixties.
Even though rock music appeared to be a way of inspiring America into action, it was essentially
a means of skillful marketing to a young generation (Hodgson 207). Just as The Paranoids in The
Crying of Lot 49 sing about deteriorating communication, rock music in the sixties’ attempt to
comment on culture and politics. However, this ideal was tarnished by America’s commercial
nature.
Bondurant 14
The feminist movement of the sixties was originally intended to rid inequality in the
workplace. Women were denied access to better jobs and salaries, and so they turned to courts
and legislators in hopes to have an act passed that would even their playing field with men in the
workplace. Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act was formed, which prohibited discrimination
in regards to employment. Women’s opinions of this act were divided; some were pleased with
the law, and others were unsettled because it threatened protective labor laws that existed
exclusively for women (Pedriana 1718-1719). The laws passed regarding women’s rights were
incredibly subjective. As Pedriana states, “law itself is a language system. The vernacular staples
of law—rights, duties, privileges, prohibitions, remedies, and so on—construct and express ideas
of social conflict and their resolution. And for exactly this reason, master legal frames can set
rigid and enduring boundaries on the very words and discourses available to challengers in their
attempt to produce and mobilize resonant cultural frames toward instrumental ends” (1727).
Unlike these law-makers who are able to manipulate their wording in order to accomplish tasks,
Oedipa’s inability to form language in a way that allows her to receive information from other
individuals may be the preventative factor in executing the estate.
Pynchon’s direct critique on the failure of human interaction in The Crying of Lot 49 is a
result of the exhaustion of communication in 1960s America. Pynchon was not the only writer
critiquing this decade, as there was a widespread frustration among individuals regarding
multiple facets of politics and culture in the 1960s. The high expectations Americans held for the
possibilities of a new era containing growth and prosperity were decisively extinguished.
Pynchon uses The Crying of Lot 49 as a means to further expand on his disappointment brought
on by the sixties, specifically focusing on how the decade maintained the flawed communication
styles developed by earlier generations. Using Oedipa Maas, a female variation of the Greek
Bondurant 15
figure Oedipus, as a means to represent this continual failure of communication, Pynchon
integrates the theme of “decline and decadence and its relationship in turn to language and
thought” (Chambers 97). He deems Americans in the 1960s as repeating old ideas and
innovations, with no real progress towards an understanding of the world and communication.
Pynchon critiques society’s flawed means of communication throughout The Crying of
Lot 49. Oedipa’s endless and meaningless interactions with a number of individuals all leave her
entrapped in a theory that may be a clue to Inverarity’s estate or that may as equally be a large
hoax. Her entire search is futile because her methods of communicating are defective. The
narrative elements Pynchon continually interposes in the novel undercut the decaying norms of
communication, while art and music serve as entities that Oedipa cannot truly understand as a
result of her closemindedness. Her expedition is purposefully bewildering and complex as to
bring attention to the unnecessary and cryptic methods of communication in 1960s America.
Bondurant 16
Works Cited
Chambers, Judith. Thomas Pynchon. New York City: Twayne Publishers, 1992. Print.
Cooper, B. Lee. "Love Me Do: 50 Songs that Shaped the Beatles." Popular Music andSociety 36.4 (2013): 550-57. JSTOR. Web. 14 Apr. 2017.
Cowart, David. Thomas Pynchon: The Art of Allusion. Carbodale: Sourthern Illinois U Press,1980. Print.
Dudley, William , ed. The 1960s. San Diego: Greenhaven Press, 2000. Print.
Guillen, Matthew. "Pynchon's Social Aesthetics: Sixties Activism in Postmodern AmericanLiterature." Revue française d'études américaines 84 (2000): 106-25. JSTOR. Web. 13Apr. 2017.
Pedriana, Nicholas. “From Protective to Equal Treatment: Legal Framing Processes andTransformation of the Women’s Movement in the 1960s.” American Journal ofSociology 111.6 (2008): 1718-1761. JSTOR. Web. 5 Oct. 2017.
Pynchon, Thomas. "Is It O.K. to Be a Luddite?" New York Times, 28 Oct. 1984.
---. Slow Learner: Early Stories. Boston: Little, Brown, 1998. Print.
---. The Crying of Lot 49. New York City: HarperCollins , 1965. Print.
Bondurant 17
Serpell, C. Namwali. "Mutual Exclusion, Oscillation, and Ethical Projection in The Crying ofLot 49 and The Turn of the Screw." Narrative 16.3 (2008): 223-55. JSTOR. Web. 1Apr. 2017.
Vine, Steve. "The Entropic Sublime in Pynchon's The Crying of Lot 49." InterdisciplinaryLiterary Studies 13.1/2 (2011): 160-77. JSTOR. Web. 10 Apr. 2017.
Pledge: I have neither given nor received help on this work, nor am I aware of any infraction of the Honor Code.
_______________________________________________________________________