biostatistics case studies 2008

21
Biostatistics Case Studies 2008 Peter D. Christenson Biostatistician http://gcrc.labiomed.org/ biostat Session 1: Survival Analysis Fundamentals

Upload: gay-gomez

Post on 04-Jan-2016

29 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Biostatistics Case Studies 2008. Session 1: Survival Analysis Fundamentals. Peter D. Christenson Biostatistician http://gcrc.labiomed.org/biostat. Question #1. Question #1. Question #2. 243/347 = 70% Mortality. 100%-20% = 80% Mortality. Kaplan-Meier: Cumulated Probabilities. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Biostatistics Case Studies 2008

Biostatistics Case Studies 2008

Peter D. Christenson

Biostatistician

http://gcrc.labiomed.org/biostat

Session 1:

Survival Analysis Fundamentals

Page 2: Biostatistics Case Studies 2008

Question #1

Page 3: Biostatistics Case Studies 2008

Question #1

Page 4: Biostatistics Case Studies 2008

Question #2

243/347 = 70% Mortality 100%-20% = 80% Mortality

Page 5: Biostatistics Case Studies 2008

Kaplan-Meier: Cumulated Probabilities

• We want the probability of surviving for 54 months.

• If all subjects were followed for 54 months, then this prob is the same as the proportion of subjects alive at that time.

• If some subjects were not followed for 54 months, then we cannot use the proportion because we don’t know the outcome for these subjects at 54 months, and hence the numerator. Denominator?

• We can divide the 54 months into intervals using the follow-up times as interval endpoints. Ns are different in these

intervals.

• Then, find proportions surviving in each interval and cumulate by multiplying these proportions to get the survival probability.

Page 6: Biostatistics Case Studies 2008

Kaplan-Meier: Cumulated Probabilities

• Suppose 104, 93, and 46 (total 243) died in months 0-18, 18-36, and 36-54. Proportion surviving=(347-243)/347=0.30.

• Of 104 survivors: suppose 11 had 18 months F/U, 51 had 36 months F/U, 35 had 54 months, and 7 had >54 months.

• Then, the 0-18 month interval has 243/347=0.70 surviving.• The 18-36 month interval has 139/232=0.60 surviving.• The 36-54 month interval has 42/88=0.48 surviving.

• So, 54-month survival is (243/347)(139/232)(42/88)=0.20.

• The real curve is made by creating a new interval whenever someone dies or completes follow-up (“censored”).

Page 7: Biostatistics Case Studies 2008

Question #3

Page 8: Biostatistics Case Studies 2008

Questions #4 and #5

81.2%

73.4%

Page 9: Biostatistics Case Studies 2008

Question #8

Page 10: Biostatistics Case Studies 2008

Question #9

Page 11: Biostatistics Case Studies 2008

Question #9

27

RR1Yr = (1-0.50)/(1-0.27)=0.68

RR2Yr = (1-0.16)/(1-0.04)=0.88

Page 12: Biostatistics Case Studies 2008

Question #10

Even more basic, why bother with “hazards”, since we have already solved the problem of

comparing groups with survival times?

Page 13: Biostatistics Case Studies 2008

Question #10

Hazard: “Sort-term” incidence at a specified time.

E.g., events per 100,000 persons per day at 1 month.

Time

Prob of Survival

Time

Hazard

1

3

e-1(time)

e-3(time)

Constant Hazard ↔ Exponential

determines

Page 14: Biostatistics Case Studies 2008

Question #10

Heuristic:

Often, HR for Group1 to Group2 ≈

Median Survival Time for Group 2

Median Survival Time for Group 1

Page 15: Biostatistics Case Studies 2008

Question #11

Time

Prob of Survival

Time

Hazard

1

3

e-1(time)

e-3(time)

Hazard Ratio (Red to Blue) = 1/3 =

Blue to Red Ratio of Survival Times

1 2 3 6

Cox Regression: Any hazard pattern for one group; other group is proportional.

Page 16: Biostatistics Case Studies 2008

Question #11

For convex curves like these, the hazard ratio is approximately the ratio of survival times

for any survival (y-axis).

HR = 6/12=0.50

HR = 12/18=0.67

HR = 24/30=0.80

So this figure “obviously” violates

proportional hazards.

The authors used an interaction to resolve this violation (bottom of p 2671)

Page 17: Biostatistics Case Studies 2008

Question #13

The circled p=0.02 verifies what seems clear in Fig 3 for subjects >65.

Page 18: Biostatistics Case Studies 2008

Question #14

mab

No mab

174 173

238 88

Case Non-Case

Case = 1-Yr Progression

For mab:

Risk = Prob(Case) = 174/347 = 0.50

Odds = Prob(Case)/Prob(Non-Case) = 174/173 = 1.00

347

326

RR = (174/347)/(238/326) = 0.50/0.73 = 0.68

OR = (174/173)/(238/ 88) = 1.00/2.70 = 0.37

→ Effect by OR almost twice RR

Page 19: Biostatistics Case Studies 2008

When is Odds Ratio ≈ Relative Risk ?

Odds = Prob(Case)/Prob(Non-Case)

≈ Risk = Prob(Case) , if Prob(Non-Case) is close to 1.

So, Odds Ratio ≈ Relative Risk in case-control studies of a rare disease.

Page 20: Biostatistics Case Studies 2008

Advantage of OR: Symmetry

A

Not A

174 173

238 88

B Not B

Case = 1-Yr Progression

347

326

RR of A on B = (174/347)/(238/326) = 0.50/0.73 = 0.68

RR of B on A = (174/412)/(173/261) = 0.42/0.67 = 0.64

OR of A on B = (174/173)/(238/ 88) = (174x88)/(173x238)

= (174/238)/(173/ 88) = OR of B on A

412 261

Page 21: Biostatistics Case Studies 2008

Odds Ratio in Case-Control Studies

In case-control studies, cannot measure RR, or risk of outcome, due to separate control selection:

Risk Factor Cases Controls1 Controls2 + 90 60 600 - 10 40 400 100 100 1000Ratio of (90/150) (90/690)Percents /(10/50) /(10/410) = 3.0 = 5.3

Odds [(90/150)/(60/150)] [(90/690)/(600/690)]Ratio /[(10/50)/(40/50)] /[(10/410)/(400/410)] = 6.0 = 6.0