biomechanics of thoracic trauma in frontal impact [compatibility mode]12

94
THE BIOMECHANICS OF THORACIC TRAUMA IN FRONTAL IMPACT JM Cavanaugh BME, ECE, ME 7160

Upload: tare

Post on 19-Feb-2016

224 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Biomechanics of Thoracic Trauma in Frontal Impact [Compatibility Mode]12

THE BIOMECHANICS OFTHORACIC TRAUMA IN FRONTAL

IMPACT

JM CavanaughBME, ECE, ME 7160

Page 2: Biomechanics of Thoracic Trauma in Frontal Impact [Compatibility Mode]12

Introduction• The U.S. Centers for Disease Control (CDC) reported that

injuries to the torso are the second major cause of death byspecific body region next to the head and neck.

• During a motor vehicle impact, the thorax can contact variouscomponents of the automobile interior, including restraintsystems. Contacts include unrestrained driver or passenger withsteering wheel or instrument panel, and contact with active orpassive restraints, including three point lap/shoulder belts,two-point shoulder belts, knee bolsters, and air bags.

• Injury to the thorax commonly occurs in frontal and side impactsand in oblique directions intermediate to these two.

2

Page 3: Biomechanics of Thoracic Trauma in Frontal Impact [Compatibility Mode]12

Epidemiology• Nirula and Pintar analyzed the National Automotive Sampling

System (NASS) databases from 1993 to 2001 and the CrashInjury Research and Engineering Network (CIREN) databasesfrom 1996 to 2004.

• The incidence of severe chest injury (AIS 3 and greater) inNASS and CIREN were 5.5% and 33%, respectively.

• The steering wheel, door panel, armrest and seat were identifiedas contact points associated with an increased risk of severechest injury. The door panel and arm rest were consistently afrequent cause of severe injury.

Nirula R, Pintar FA (2008) Identification of vehicle components associated with severe thoracic injury in motor vehicle crashes: aCIREN and NASS analysis. Accident; analysis and prevention 40 (1):137-141. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2007.04.013

3

Page 4: Biomechanics of Thoracic Trauma in Frontal Impact [Compatibility Mode]12

Epidemiology• In a study of motor vehicle crashes in the UK, Morris et al. examined

vehicle crash injury data to determine to determine the relative injuryrisk of occupants of different age groups.

• For all occupants, the body region most prone to injury in frontalimpact crashes was the chest.

• Older and middle-aged occupants were at greater risk of sustainingMAIS3+ chest injuries.

• In frontal impacts, the majority of chest injuries were caused by therestraint system, whereas other interior vehicle componentsaccounted for only 4% of the injuries.

• A significant portion of middle-aged and older passengers werefemale. A seat-belt pre-tensioner was found to have a general effect ofreducing the risk of MAIS 3+ chest injury to all age groups.

Morris A, Welsh R (2003) Requirements for the crash protection of older vehicle passengers. Annu Proc Assoc Adv Automot Med47:165-180

4

Page 5: Biomechanics of Thoracic Trauma in Frontal Impact [Compatibility Mode]12

Outline of talk

• Epidemiology• Introduction to FMVSS 208• Chest anatomy• Chest injury mechanisms• Chest injury tolerance• Chest injury criteria adapted by NHTSA

and IIHS5

Page 6: Biomechanics of Thoracic Trauma in Frontal Impact [Compatibility Mode]12

The following 5 slidesfrom Jeff Pike’s lecture

6

Page 7: Biomechanics of Thoracic Trauma in Frontal Impact [Compatibility Mode]12

7

Page 8: Biomechanics of Thoracic Trauma in Frontal Impact [Compatibility Mode]12

8

Page 9: Biomechanics of Thoracic Trauma in Frontal Impact [Compatibility Mode]12

New FMVSS 208 Injury Criteria

• I

9

Page 10: Biomechanics of Thoracic Trauma in Frontal Impact [Compatibility Mode]12

yCriteria

10

Page 11: Biomechanics of Thoracic Trauma in Frontal Impact [Compatibility Mode]12

208 Phase In

11

Page 12: Biomechanics of Thoracic Trauma in Frontal Impact [Compatibility Mode]12

ANATOMY OF THE THORAX

12

Page 13: Biomechanics of Thoracic Trauma in Frontal Impact [Compatibility Mode]12

13

Page 14: Biomechanics of Thoracic Trauma in Frontal Impact [Compatibility Mode]12

14

Page 15: Biomechanics of Thoracic Trauma in Frontal Impact [Compatibility Mode]12

15

Page 16: Biomechanics of Thoracic Trauma in Frontal Impact [Compatibility Mode]12

16

Page 17: Biomechanics of Thoracic Trauma in Frontal Impact [Compatibility Mode]12

AIS INJURY SCALING

17

Page 18: Biomechanics of Thoracic Trauma in Frontal Impact [Compatibility Mode]12

AIS: RIB FRACTURES

• AIS 1: 1 RIB FRACTURE• AIS 2: 2-3 RIB FRACTURES• AIS 3: > 3 ON ONE SIDE, =< 3 ON OTHER

SIDE• AIS 4: > 3 RIB FRACTURES ON BOTH SIDES;

ALSO FLAIL CHEST• AIS 5: BILATERAL FLAIL CHEST

18

Page 19: Biomechanics of Thoracic Trauma in Frontal Impact [Compatibility Mode]12

19

Page 20: Biomechanics of Thoracic Trauma in Frontal Impact [Compatibility Mode]12

AIS: OTHER CHEST INJURY• AIS 1: skin abrasion, contusion or minor

laceration• AIS 2: major skin laceration, partial

thickness tear of bronchus• AIS 3: minor heart contusion, unilateral

lung contusion• AIS 4: severe heart contusion, intimal

tear of aorta• AIS 5: major aortic laceration, heart

perforation, ventricular heart rupture 20

Page 21: Biomechanics of Thoracic Trauma in Frontal Impact [Compatibility Mode]12

Aortic Trauma

• In studies from the 1980s it was estimated that7500-8000 cases of blunt aortic injury occurredeach year (Jackson, 1984; Mattox, 1989).

21

Page 22: Biomechanics of Thoracic Trauma in Frontal Impact [Compatibility Mode]12

22

Page 23: Biomechanics of Thoracic Trauma in Frontal Impact [Compatibility Mode]12

Prospective study at 50 trauma centers(Fabian et al, 1997)

• 274 cases over 2.5 years• 81% caused by MVAs

Of these, 72% head on, 24% side impact• Overall mortality was 31%• This does not include the 80-85% who are dead

at the scene.

23

Page 24: Biomechanics of Thoracic Trauma in Frontal Impact [Compatibility Mode]12

Various Aortic Injury MechanismsProposed

• Traction or shear forces between mobile pointsof the vessel and points of fixation.

• Direct compression over the vertebral column.• Sudden increases in intraluminal pressure.

24

Page 25: Biomechanics of Thoracic Trauma in Frontal Impact [Compatibility Mode]12

Prof. King-Hay YangHuman Thorax vs. FE Thorax

AortaPulmonary Trunk Heart Lung DiaphragmSVC25

Page 26: Biomechanics of Thoracic Trauma in Frontal Impact [Compatibility Mode]12

Parametric Study

0 (6.5)30 (6.5)

60 (6.5)

90 (6.5 and 6.9)

120 (6.5)

150 (6.5)180 (6.5)

L

R

AP

Mass: 23 kg

Diameter: 150 mm

Edge Radius: 12 mm

Impactor

Impact angle (Velocity in m/s)

26

Page 27: Biomechanics of Thoracic Trauma in Frontal Impact [Compatibility Mode]12

FE Aorta

Isthmus

Root

Valve

Mid Descending

Level of Hiatus

27

Page 28: Biomechanics of Thoracic Trauma in Frontal Impact [Compatibility Mode]12

Hardy WN, Shah CS, Kopacz JM, Yang KH, Van Ee CA, Morgan R, Digges K(2006) Study of potential mechanisms of traumatic rupture of the aorta using

insitu experiments. Stapp Car Crash J 50:247-266

Hardy et al. investigated TRA mechanisms in PMHS in four quasi-static and onedynamic tests . The quasi-static tests included anterior, superior, and lateraldisplacement of the heart and aortic arch in the mediastinum, resulting in partial tears tocomplete transection. All injuries occurred within the peri-isthmic region.

The average failure load and stretch were 148 N and 30 % for the quasi-static tests.The results indicated that intraluminal pressure and whole-body acceleration are notrequired for TRA to occur and that the role of the ligamentum-arteriosum is likelylimited.

The studies indicated that tethering of the descending thoracic aorta by the parietalpleura was a principal aspect of this injury.

28

Page 29: Biomechanics of Thoracic Trauma in Frontal Impact [Compatibility Mode]12

Hardy WN, Shah CS, Mason MJ, Kopacz JM, Yang KH, King AI, Van Ee CA,Bishop JL, Banglmaier RF, Bey MJ, Morgan RM, Digges KH (2008) Mechanisms

of traumatic rupture of the aorta and associated peri-isthmic motion anddeformation. Stapp Car Crash J 52:233-265

Hardy et al. investigated the mechanisms of traumatic rupture of the aorta (TRA) ineight unembalmed PMHS which were inverted and tested in various dynamic bluntloading modes . Impacts were conducted using a 32-kg impactor with a 152-mm face.High-speed biplane x-rays of radiopaque markers on the aorta were used to visualizeaortic motion.

Clinically relevant TRA was observed in seven of the tests. Peak average longitudinalLagrangian strain was 0.644 and the average peak strain for all tests was 0.208 +/-0.216. Peak intraluminal pressure was 165 kPa.

Longitudinal stretch of the aorta was found to be a principal component of injurycausation. Stretch of the aorta was generated by thoracic deformation, which wasrequired for injury to occur. Atherosclerosis further promoted injury.

29

Page 30: Biomechanics of Thoracic Trauma in Frontal Impact [Compatibility Mode]12

INJURY CRITERIA

IN FRONTAL IMPACT

30

Page 31: Biomechanics of Thoracic Trauma in Frontal Impact [Compatibility Mode]12

Acceleration Criterion

• 60 g limit in FMVSS 208 for adults.

31

Page 32: Biomechanics of Thoracic Trauma in Frontal Impact [Compatibility Mode]12

Colonel John Stapp, MD

• Rocket sled acceleration studies in 1950s.• Human tolerance when belt restraints worn.• 40-45 g’s for 100 ms or less was tolerated.• 30 g’s reached at 1000 g/s were not tolerated.

32

Page 33: Biomechanics of Thoracic Trauma in Frontal Impact [Compatibility Mode]12

33

Page 34: Biomechanics of Thoracic Trauma in Frontal Impact [Compatibility Mode]12

Eiband analyzed Stapp data

• Acceleration tolerance decreased asduration of exposure increased

34

Page 35: Biomechanics of Thoracic Trauma in Frontal Impact [Compatibility Mode]12

35

Page 36: Biomechanics of Thoracic Trauma in Frontal Impact [Compatibility Mode]12

Mertz and Gadd (1971)

• Studied 16 free falls in a 40 year oldstunt man.

• 27-57 foot fall onto a thick mattress• Chest decel measured in 10 tests• Authors concluded that 50 g chest

acceleration for pulses < 100 ms waswithin tolerance for healthy adult males.

• 60 g with pulse < 100 ms wasrecommended as a tolerance limit untilfurther data became available. 36

Page 37: Biomechanics of Thoracic Trauma in Frontal Impact [Compatibility Mode]12

37

Page 38: Biomechanics of Thoracic Trauma in Frontal Impact [Compatibility Mode]12

38

Page 39: Biomechanics of Thoracic Trauma in Frontal Impact [Compatibility Mode]12

39

Page 40: Biomechanics of Thoracic Trauma in Frontal Impact [Compatibility Mode]12

Indy car study (Melvin et al,1998)

• Showed that with tight wide double shoulderbelts, uniform body support and lack of intrusionthere was no serious torso injury in 202 Indyrace car crashes. The mean peak chassis decelwas 53 g with 7 cases above 100 g.

• The Melvin study throws into question the useof peak acceleration as a sole injury criterion.

40

Page 41: Biomechanics of Thoracic Trauma in Frontal Impact [Compatibility Mode]12

Critique

• Spinal acceleration is an indicator of overallseverity of impact but does not necessarilyreflect local impact conditions.

• Compression, rate of compression, and forcecan account for these.

41

Page 42: Biomechanics of Thoracic Trauma in Frontal Impact [Compatibility Mode]12

Force Criterion

42

Page 43: Biomechanics of Thoracic Trauma in Frontal Impact [Compatibility Mode]12

43

Page 44: Biomechanics of Thoracic Trauma in Frontal Impact [Compatibility Mode]12

44

Page 45: Biomechanics of Thoracic Trauma in Frontal Impact [Compatibility Mode]12

Unrestrained cadaver -sled tests

• Patrick (1965)• Gadd and Patrick (1968)• Patrick et al (1969)

45

Page 46: Biomechanics of Thoracic Trauma in Frontal Impact [Compatibility Mode]12

46

Page 47: Biomechanics of Thoracic Trauma in Frontal Impact [Compatibility Mode]12

Data used in the developmentof the energy absorbing

steering column

• 3.3 kN hub load to the sternum• 8.8 kN distributed load to the

shoulder and chest• Resulted in only minor trauma

47

Page 48: Biomechanics of Thoracic Trauma in Frontal Impact [Compatibility Mode]12

Force Criterion - Belt Loading

48

Page 49: Biomechanics of Thoracic Trauma in Frontal Impact [Compatibility Mode]12

49

Page 50: Biomechanics of Thoracic Trauma in Frontal Impact [Compatibility Mode]12

Bendjellal et al (1997) field study,belt loads

• Evaluated the 6 kN programmed restraintsystem (PRS)

• Only two cases of AIS 3• Recommended further reduction to 4 kN belt

loading

50

Page 51: Biomechanics of Thoracic Trauma in Frontal Impact [Compatibility Mode]12

Foret-Bruno (1998), belt loads

• 50% probability of AIS 3+ injury at 6.9 kN beltload

• 4 kN limit with a specially designed airbag couldprotect 95% of those in frontal impact from AIS+ chest injuries.

51

Page 52: Biomechanics of Thoracic Trauma in Frontal Impact [Compatibility Mode]12

Bag-belt loading (NHTSAstudies)

• Yoganandon et al (1993)• Morgan et al (1994)• Kallieris (1995)• Kuppa et al (1998)

52

Page 53: Biomechanics of Thoracic Trauma in Frontal Impact [Compatibility Mode]12

Compression Criterion

• 3 inch (76 mm) limit in old FMVSS 208based on work of Kroell, Nahum andViano.

• 2.5 inch (63 mm) limit in new FMVSS208 to limit probability of chest AIS to 4or less.

53

Page 54: Biomechanics of Thoracic Trauma in Frontal Impact [Compatibility Mode]12

Loading to mid-sternum(1970s)

• Kroell et al (1971,74)• Nahum et al (1970, 1971, 1975)• Stalnaker (1973)• Lobdell (1973)• Neathery (1974)

54

Page 55: Biomechanics of Thoracic Trauma in Frontal Impact [Compatibility Mode]12

Kroell corridors, 23.4 kgimpactor, mid sternum impact

• 4.02-5.23 m/s impacts• 6.71-7.38 m/s impacts

55

Page 56: Biomechanics of Thoracic Trauma in Frontal Impact [Compatibility Mode]12

Compression Criterion -Kroell et al

• AIS = -3.78 + 19.56 C• 30% Cmax (AIS 2): 69 mm• 40 % Cmax (AIS 4): 92 mm

56

Page 57: Biomechanics of Thoracic Trauma in Frontal Impact [Compatibility Mode]12

57

Page 58: Biomechanics of Thoracic Trauma in Frontal Impact [Compatibility Mode]12

58

Page 59: Biomechanics of Thoracic Trauma in Frontal Impact [Compatibility Mode]12

Compression Criterion

• 40% Cmax - 92 mm in 50th percentile• 40% Cmax - flail chest - Nahum et al (1975)• 40% Cmax - severe internal injury Viano (1978)

59

Page 60: Biomechanics of Thoracic Trauma in Frontal Impact [Compatibility Mode]12

Compression Criterion

• 32% Cmax - maintain rib cage integrity - 74 mm- Viano (1978)

• Old FMVSS 208 - 76 mm limit

60

Page 61: Biomechanics of Thoracic Trauma in Frontal Impact [Compatibility Mode]12

Development of new FMVSS 208

61

Page 62: Biomechanics of Thoracic Trauma in Frontal Impact [Compatibility Mode]12

62

Page 63: Biomechanics of Thoracic Trauma in Frontal Impact [Compatibility Mode]12

63

Page 64: Biomechanics of Thoracic Trauma in Frontal Impact [Compatibility Mode]12

Combined Thoracic Index(CTI)

• Reported by Kuppa et al (1998)• 71 human surrogate (cadaver) tests• Multi-center study

64

Page 65: Biomechanics of Thoracic Trauma in Frontal Impact [Compatibility Mode]12

Combined Thoracic Index(CTI)

• 3 point belt• 2 point belt/ knee bolster• 3 point belt/ air bag• air bag/ knee bolster• air bag/ lap belt

65

Page 66: Biomechanics of Thoracic Trauma in Frontal Impact [Compatibility Mode]12

Data used

• Chest bands at the 4th and 8th ribs• T1 triaxial accelerations

66

Page 67: Biomechanics of Thoracic Trauma in Frontal Impact [Compatibility Mode]12

67

Page 68: Biomechanics of Thoracic Trauma in Frontal Impact [Compatibility Mode]12

68

Page 69: Biomechanics of Thoracic Trauma in Frontal Impact [Compatibility Mode]12

Chest loading - bag-like andbelt-like

• Bag like: more uniform deformation ofthe chest.

• Belt like: more concentrateddeformation at the belt line.

69

Page 70: Biomechanics of Thoracic Trauma in Frontal Impact [Compatibility Mode]12

Univariate and mutlivariateanalyses

• 3 ms clip T1 resultant accel• Dmax• Vmax• Vcmax• Combinations of these responses

70

Page 71: Biomechanics of Thoracic Trauma in Frontal Impact [Compatibility Mode]12

71

Page 72: Biomechanics of Thoracic Trauma in Frontal Impact [Compatibility Mode]12

72

Page 73: Biomechanics of Thoracic Trauma in Frontal Impact [Compatibility Mode]12

73

Page 74: Biomechanics of Thoracic Trauma in Frontal Impact [Compatibility Mode]12

74

Page 75: Biomechanics of Thoracic Trauma in Frontal Impact [Compatibility Mode]12

75

Page 76: Biomechanics of Thoracic Trauma in Frontal Impact [Compatibility Mode]12

76

Page 77: Biomechanics of Thoracic Trauma in Frontal Impact [Compatibility Mode]12

77

Page 78: Biomechanics of Thoracic Trauma in Frontal Impact [Compatibility Mode]12

Insurance Institute forHighway Safety

www.iihs.orgThe Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) is an independent,nonprofit scientific and educational organization dedicated to reducing thelosses — deaths, injuries and property damage — from crashes on thenation's roads.

The Highway Loss Data Institute (HLDI) shares and supports this missionthrough scientific studies of insurance data representing the human andeconomic losses resulting from the ownership and operation of differenttypes of vehicles and by publishing insurance loss results by vehicle makeand model.

Both organizations are wholly supported by these auto insurers andinsurance associations.

78

Page 79: Biomechanics of Thoracic Trauma in Frontal Impact [Compatibility Mode]12

79

Page 80: Biomechanics of Thoracic Trauma in Frontal Impact [Compatibility Mode]12

80

Page 81: Biomechanics of Thoracic Trauma in Frontal Impact [Compatibility Mode]12

Viscous Criterion

81

Page 82: Biomechanics of Thoracic Trauma in Frontal Impact [Compatibility Mode]12

Viscous Criterion (VCmax)

• Lau and Viano (1981a, 1981b)• Viano and Lau (1983, 1985)• Lau and Viano (1986)

82

Page 83: Biomechanics of Thoracic Trauma in Frontal Impact [Compatibility Mode]12

Viscous Criterion (VCmax)

• Kroell et al (1981, 1986)• Rouhana (1986, 1987)

83

Page 84: Biomechanics of Thoracic Trauma in Frontal Impact [Compatibility Mode]12

Viscous Criterion (VCmax)

• Soft tissue injury is compression dependent andrate dependent

• VCmax is a measure of the energy dissipated bythe viscous elements of the chest (Viano andLau, 1985)

• Derivation (attached)

84

Page 85: Biomechanics of Thoracic Trauma in Frontal Impact [Compatibility Mode]12

85

Page 86: Biomechanics of Thoracic Trauma in Frontal Impact [Compatibility Mode]12

86

Page 87: Biomechanics of Thoracic Trauma in Frontal Impact [Compatibility Mode]12

Viano and Lau (1985)

• Analyzed 39 cadaver test performed by Kroelland others

• VCmax of 1.3 m/s, 50% prob of AIS 3+• VCmax of 1.0 m/s, 25% prob of AIS 3+

87

Page 88: Biomechanics of Thoracic Trauma in Frontal Impact [Compatibility Mode]12

Lau and Viano (SAE # 861882)

88

Page 89: Biomechanics of Thoracic Trauma in Frontal Impact [Compatibility Mode]12

Summary

89

Page 90: Biomechanics of Thoracic Trauma in Frontal Impact [Compatibility Mode]12

Peak chest or spineacceleration reflects the

overall severity of torso impactto the occupant

• Peak acceleration upper limit of 60 g tospine in frontal impact in old and newFMVSS 208

90

Page 91: Biomechanics of Thoracic Trauma in Frontal Impact [Compatibility Mode]12

Chest compression reflects localskeletal injury and underlying soft

tissue injury due to crush.• Cmax of 32-33% between chest wall and

spine was old FMVSS 208 criteria to avoidflail chest and severe chest injuries in sternalimpacts. (3 inch limit for 50th percentile male)

• Cmax of 27% to limit probability of AIS 4 to5% or less in new FMVSS 208. (2.5 inch limitfor 50th percentile male).

91

Page 92: Biomechanics of Thoracic Trauma in Frontal Impact [Compatibility Mode]12

The Viscous Responsereflects rate dependent softtissue injury and to some

extent, skeletal injury.• VCmax of 1.0 m/s to limit internal organ

injury to the chest and rate-dependentrib cage injury.

• Adapted by the IIHS but not in NHTSArulemaking

92

Page 93: Biomechanics of Thoracic Trauma in Frontal Impact [Compatibility Mode]12

Compression/ accelerationcombinations were proposedby the NHTSA but have not

been adopted

93

Page 94: Biomechanics of Thoracic Trauma in Frontal Impact [Compatibility Mode]12

THANK YOU

94