biomass heating - cornell university · practical guide for users who are interested in using...
TRANSCRIPT
Biomass Heating A practical guide for potential users with emphasis on the Southern Tier of New York State
2014
Xuejiao (Snow) Yang, MEng, Cornell University, Albert R. George, Faculty Advisor, and Kenneth Schlather, External Advisor May 2013 Revision, Albert George, 1/26/2014
As fuel prices increase, the fuel costs of individuals and business owners also increase.
The goal of this project is to study the potential substitution of expensive fossil fuel
with biomass resources and to conduct a feasibility study of using biomass as a primary
heating fuel to serve the areas that are not served by natural gas in the Southern Tier
region of New York State. This report examines different types of biomass fuels,
outlines the areas in Southern Tier region that do not have natural gas pipelines running
through them. The report examines different biomass conversion technologies (direct
combustion, gasification, combined heat and power), provides fuel cost comparisons,
and determines regional economic impact in term of fuel costs savings, job creation,
and greenhouse gas emissions. It also studies the government incentives for utilizing
biomass resources. The end result of this project is an interactive, user-friendly
spreadsheet which allows the individuals and communities to see the savings from
using biomass in terms of individual and regional cost savings as well as job creation
and carbon dioxide reduction. It is shown that biomass could become an important
substitute for heating oil, kerosene and propane because of its low cost per million Btu,
its zero net carbon dioxide emission into the environment, and its job creation.
Biomass Heating
Page 1 of 63
Executive Summary
As fuel prices and concern for the environment rise, many individuals and business entities are
looking to alternative energies to lower their costs and to be more environmentally friendly. The
main goal of this one-year project was to investigate the potential feasibility of substituting fossil
fuel heating with biomass energy resources in the Southern Tier region of New York State,
especially in the areas that are not served by natural gas. However, most of the results can easily
be applied to any individual building or region.
The study starts off by providing an introduction to different biomass fuel resources and benefits
of using biomass. The report then provides a detailed study of woody biomass which includes
wood pellets and wood chips, and their supply chains. The report also provides a comparison
between choosing wood chips, wood pellets, and grass pellets to assist the selection of biomass
fuel. A comparison between the dollars per million Btu for the commonly used fuels in the
Southern Tier region is also included in the report. Moreover, the report also includes results on
the greenhouse gas emissions (carbon dioxide, methane and nitrous oxide) from burning various
fuels as well as some information on local job creation.
In addition to biomass fuel and emissions, the study involved researching biomass conversion
technologies, which range from wood furnace to boilers and gasifiers. The technology readiness
level (TRL), capital cost, operation and maintenance cost for each biomass conversion
technology are also discussed in the report. Furthermore, the report provides a flowchart that
helps users to select the most suitable biomass combustion system for their application.
The end product of this project is an interactive Excel spreadsheet that allows residents, business
entities, and communities in Southern Tier region and elsewhere to see the potential economic
benefits, greenhouse gas reduction, and local job creation with the substitution of biomass energy
as a fuel source for heating and power. A detailed explanation on how to use the spreadsheet is
also provided in the report.
Lastly, the report includes several case studies on several biomass projects that have been
successfully installed in New York. They are the BioMax100 at Morrisville State College, an
ACT bioenergy boiler at Cayuga Nature Center, a Hurst biomass boiler at Wagner Lumber and
lastly a grass pellet stove at the Big Red Barn of Cornell University.
©2014 A .R. George, Cornell University. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-
NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ or send a letter to Creative Commons, 444 Castro Street, Suite 900,
Mountain View, California, 94041, USA
Biomass Heating
Page 2 of 63
Acknowledgements Many people helped to provide information and data. A special recognition goes to those that provide
valuable resources, contacts and technical support for this project:
Professor Albert R. George – J.F. Carr Professor of Mechanical Engineering, Mechanical & Aerospace
Engineering and Systems Engineering, Cornell University
Kenneth Schlather – Executive Director of Cornell Cooperate Extension, Tompkins County
Elizabeth Keokosky – Energy Advocate of Danby Land Bank Cooperative
Leslie Schill – Tompkins County Planning Department
Katie Borgella– Tompkins County Planning Department
Professor Jerry H. Cherney – E.V Baker Professor of Agriculture, Department of Corp & Soil Sciences,
Cornell University
Professor Benjamin D. Ballard – Director of Renewable Energy Training Center; Assistant Professor of
Renewable Energy, Morrisville State College
Mark Ranalli – Community Power Corporation
David L. Kay – Senior Extension Associate of the Community and Rural Development Institute,
Department of Development Sociology, Cornell University
Kevin Pudney (Plant manager), Don Goodrich - Wagner Lumber
Kevin B. Lanigan, Head of Maintenance, Cayuga Nature Center
Biomass Heating
Page 3 of 63
Contents Executive Summary ...................................................................................................................................... 1
Acknowledgements ....................................................................................................................................... 2
Introduction ................................................................................................................................................... 5
Project Goals Statement ................................................................................................................................ 6
About the Southern Tier Region ................................................................................................................... 7
Biomass Resources ....................................................................................................................................... 7
What is biomass? ...................................................................................................................................... 7
Types of biomass resources ...................................................................................................................... 7
Benefits of biomass ................................................................................................................................... 8
Biomass fuels and supply chains ............................................................................................................... 9
Wood pellets’ properties .................................................................................................................... 10
Wood chips ......................................................................................................................................... 11
Fuel selection – wood pellets or wood chips? .................................................................................... 11
Wood vs. grass pellets ............................................................................................................................. 12
Wood logs ........................................................................................................................................... 13
Natural gas pipelines ................................................................................................................................... 13
Energy Consumption .................................................................................................................................. 14
Residential energy consumption ............................................................................................................ 14
Residential Fuel Prices ............................................................................................................................ 15
Other industrial energy consumption ..................................................................................................... 17
Biomass Conversion Technology ............................................................................................................... 18
Rankine Cycle .......................................................................................................................................... 18
Boiler ....................................................................................................................................................... 19
Stoker boilers ...................................................................................................................................... 20
Fluidized bed boiler ............................................................................................................................. 20
Residential Wood Burning Outdoor Wood Boiler ............................................................................... 21
Combined heat and power ..................................................................................................................... 24
Furnaces and stoves ................................................................................................................................ 24
Homemade wood stoves .................................................................................................................... 25
Why advanced stoves are worth the extra cost?................................................................................ 26
Gasification ............................................................................................................................................. 27
Biomass Heating
Page 4 of 63
Gasifiers characteristic ........................................................................................................................ 28
Heating system selection ........................................................................................................................ 31
Technology Readiness Level (TRL) ........................................................................................................... 33
Job creation ................................................................................................................................................. 34
Incentives and economic benefits ............................................................................................................... 35
European Incentives Examples ............................................................................................................... 36
United States Federal Tax incentives ...................................................................................................... 38
New York State programs ....................................................................................................................... 38
Spreadsheet ................................................................................................................................................. 39
Conclusion .................................................................................................................................................. 45
Appendix A: Biomass projects in New York State ..................................................................................... 47
Project profile 1: Biomax100 at Morrisville State College, Morrisville, NY ............................................ 47
Project profile 2: ACT Bioenergy boiler at Cayuga Nature Center, Ithaca, NY ........................................ 49
Project profile 3: Hurst Biomass Boiler at Wagner Lumber, Cayuta, NY ................................................ 50
Project profile 4: Grass Pellet Stove @ Big Red Barn, Cornell University ............................................... 51
Appendix B: Technology Readiness Level descriptions ............................................................................ 53
Appendix C: List of NYS Certified Outdoor Wood Boilers Models .......................................................... 56
Appendix D: More resources on biomass ................................................................................................... 58
Appendix E: Works Cited ........................................................................................................................... 59
Biomass Heating
Page 5 of 63
Introduction
Many heating fuel bills have been increasing dramatically over the past few years due to the
increases in prices of many fossil fuels. The upward price trend of fossil fuels not only affects
individuals or homeowners, but also it impacts sectors such as commercial, industrial,
greenhouse, educational institutions, etc., especially when the users are not located on natural gas
pipelines.
Biomass energy can provide a partial solution not only to this challenging problem but it also can
reduce the net emissions of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases. The abundant biomass
resources including wood chips, wood pellets, and grass pellets in the Southern Tier region of
New York State could provide a cheap renewable energy resource. Wood pellets and wood chips
have substantially higher fuel heat content per dollar compared to many fossil fuels. Although
wood pellets are priced at $200-$250 per ton (depending on the pellet manufacturer), the high
fuel heat content range, from 15-17 million Btu per ton (depending on the moisture content and
type of wood), makes biomass affordable at the average price of $18.94 per million Btu. Propane
sells for around $2.40 per gallon but has significantly lower fuel heat content per dollar. Thus, if
converted to dollars per million Btu, propane is priced around $33.55 per million Btu. Using
same calculation method, heating oil is priced around $37 per million Btu. This shows that
biomass is a very cost competitive energy resource. As a result, biomass energy resources have
the potential to substitute for expensive fossil fuels such as propane or oil.
In addition to its competitive prices, biomass is carbon neutral and it supports the local economy
by creating local green jobs and businesses. The green jobs could range from growing and
harvesting plants, to manufacturing pellets, or operating biomass facilities, etc.
“Technology Readiness level” (TRL) is a measure used to assess the maturity of evolving
technology during its development and in its operations1. There are a total of 9 levels associated
with TRL. The higher the TRL, the more mature the technology is. The detailed description of
each TRL level can be found in Appendix B. In this report the TRL’s of biomass utilization
technologies are estimated. It is seen that many technologies are useful for widespread use.
The common ways to utilize biomass energy are through combustion and gasification.
Residential scale biomass systems use a boiler or furnace to burn the pellets to produce heat
(typically 38,000 Btu - 68,000 Btu)2. The cost of a facility is approximately $2,400-$8,000 and
requires labor for loading pellets daily, minor cleaning a few times a week, and maintenance
twice per year. The TRL for a small biomass furnace or boiler is very high (Level 7 or 8)
however more research needs to be done to increase their robustness for some fuels that contain
1 (Technology Readiness Level)
2 (Pellet Stoves)
Biomass Heating
Page 6 of 63
corrosive elements (such as chlorine in grass pellets). Large scale biomass distributed generation
may use combustion or gasification to produce heat and electricity. The cost of the facilities is
roughly $450,000 to millions of dollars, depending on facility size. Usually larger scale facilities
have automated feedstock loading systems with a few staff handling daily operations and only
yearly or twice-yearly maintenance work. Some of the larger facilities only produce heat, some
produce electricity, and some use combined heat and power (CHP) which uses waste heat
recovery technology to supply process or space heating. This captures a significant proportion of
the energy in the waste heat after the electricity generation which increases the overall efficiency
of a system from about 50% to about 75%3.
All of these heating and energy technologies have different levels of development, some are very
established and reliable such as natural gas furnaces, other are still in development, such as
biomass gasification with combined heat and power. This results in different reliabilities and
maintenance requirements which will be discussed in various sections below.
Project Goals Statement
The goals of this project are to create a framework that individuals, business owners,
communities or anyone with sensitivity to fuel price or emissions can use to learn about biomass
use possibilities. In addition it supplies information and tools to determine the feasibility of
biomass energy resources as fuel for generating heat and power and to develop cost-effective
projects that use local biomass resources efficiently. In other words, this project also provides a
practical guide for users who are interested in using biomass as feedstock for home and
businesses heating and possibly electricity generation.
This project developed an interactive Excel spreadsheet and supporting documents that aid in the
identification of areas for dollar savings from using biomass energy resources, job creation in the
region, emissions reductions, and appropriate technologies to produce a promising opportunity
for biomass utilization.
3 (Method for Calculating Efficiency, 2013)
Biomass Heating
Page 7 of 63
About the Southern Tier Region The Southern Tier region is located near the Pennsylvania border of New York State. It contains
a total of eight counties: Broome, Chemung, Chenango, Delaware, Schuyler, Steuben, Tioga and
Tompkins counties. The Southern Tier has abundant natural resources to house a booming
tourism industry and several prominent educational institutions, for example, Cornell University
and Binghamton University, which provide well-educated workforces. In addition, the region
boasts some large engineering and industrial manufacturing companies such as Corning,
Lockheed Martin, etc. 4
Biomass Resources
What is biomass?
Biomass is a renewable resource usually based on wood and other plant materials that can be
used as a fuel for producing electricity and heat. Biomass for heating can be used in small scale
units for individual houses, in commercial buildings, in district heating and in industry. The
present small U.S. biomass industry is estimated to support more than 15,500 jobs, with many of
those jobs based in rural areas5.
Types of biomass resources Biomass feedstock or energy sources are any organic matter available on a renewable basis for
conversion to energy. There are a large number of different sources of biomass. Each of these
can be used to produce fuel. However not all forms are suitable for all the different types of
energy conversion technologies. The main basic sources of biomass resources are6’7.
Grains and starch crops - corn, wheat, etc.
Agricultural residues – wheat straw, corn Stover, etc.
Food waste – waste produce, food processing waste, etc.
Forestry materials – logging residues, forest thinnings, sawdust, wood chips, wood pellets,
etc.
Animal byproducts – fish oil, manure, etc.
Energy crops – switchgrass, willow, wheat, etc.
Urban and suburban wastes – municipal solid wastes, lawn wastes, etc.
4 (Inside Southern Tier)
5 (About Biomass - Biomass Power is the Natural Solution)
6 (Types of Biomass Fule)
7 (Biomass Feedstocks)
Biomass Heating
Page 8 of 63
Benefits of biomass8
Renewable source of energy
Widely available sources of energy
Reduces the dependence
on imported oil
Supports local economy,
creates local green jobs
Ideal for areas without
access to natural gas
pipelines (will be
discussed in later
sections)
Relatively inexpensive
compared to other fossil
fuels (as discussed in
later sections)
Steady, reliable and
dependable, is not
affected by day to day
changes in weather or
environmental conditions
Emits zero net carbon dioxide (exclusive of extraction and transportation of fuels) – The
amount of carbon dioxide emitted during combustion is equivalent to the amount
absorbed by trees or plants during photosynthesis. In other words, biomass is considered
carbon neutral because it recycles carbon in the atmosphere9.
Table 1: Comparison of emission produced by different fuels
Fuel Type
Emission Gas (kg/MMBtu)10
CH4 (CO2
equivalent)11
CO2 N2O
12 (CO2 equivalent)
Heating Oil 0.075 73.96 0.1788
Natural Gas 0.025 53.02 0.0298
Propane 0.075 61.46 0.1788
Wood 0.8 0 1.2516
Kerosene 0.075 75.2 0.1788
8 (Biomass Energy and its Benefits)
9 (Mahajam & Shah, 2006)
10 (ghg Calculator Fuel Combust)
11 Carbon dioxide equivalent is used to reflect the time-integrated greenhouse effects of emission into the
atmosphere. For methane over 100 years, the emission of 1 million metric tons of methane and nitrous oxide respectively is equivalent to emission of 25 and 298 million metric tons of carbon dioxide (Carbon dioxide equivalent). Note: The hidden costs of energy, including public health costs, are not within the scope of this project. For more information on those costs, please visit The National Academies Press (Hidden costs of energy: Unpriced Consequences of Energy Production and Use, 2010). 12
The health effects of methane and nitrous oxide are not in the scope of the project. The health effects of nitrous oxide can be found at (Akram). The health effects of methane can be found at (Methane, 2012)
Figure 1: Availability of Woody Biomass Worldwide (O'Carroll, 2012)
Biomass Heating
Page 9 of 63
Biomass fuels and supply chains The biomass energy sources this project focuses on are wood chips, wood pellets and grass
pellets which are the most common type of biomass resources available on the market.
Wood Pellets Sources:http://blog.mlive.com/grpress/business_impact/2008/
09/large_pellets.jpg
Wood Chips Sources: http://sequoiascape.com/wp-
content/uploads/2012/05/Wood-Chip.jpg
Biomass energy is produced by combustion (burning) or gasification. Biomass may be burned to
produce hot water or steam in a boiler or hot air in a furnace for distribution throughout
building(s). The amount of energy generated from woody biomass depends primarily on type of
woods or plants, heat output, moisture content, ash content, and efficiency of the equipment.
The amount of thermal energy produced by biomass is measured in British thermal unit (Btu) or
million Btu (MMBtu). Premium wood pellets produce around 8000-8400 Btu for every pound of
pellet. In other words, 1 ton of pellets can produce 16-16.8 MMBtu. The ash content and
moisture content are measured as a percentage. Moisture content is the key factor determining
the net energy content of biomass material. High moisture content means less energy available.
Premium wood pellets have less than 8% of moisture.
Ash refers to the non-combustible content of biomass13
. High ash content leads to more fouling
problems which mean more maintenance is needed. Premium wood pellets produce less than 1%
of ash. At an average retail price of $250/ton, wood pellets offer a fuel cost per MMBtu of
$18.60. Wood chips sell for on average of $125/ton with fuel cost of $12.60 per MMBtu.
13
(Biomass Burn Characteristics, 2011)
Biomass Heating
Page 10 of 63
Wood pellets’ properties
Wood pellets are a clean and carbon neutral product that is made primarily of sawdust, wood
shavings and fines left over after processing trees for lumber and other wood products. They are
compressed under high pressure into a cylindrical shape with 0.23 – 0.285 inches in diameter and
less than 1.5 inches in length. Since wood pellets are a highly standardized and energy-dense
fuel, they have several key advantages over other fuel types:
Pellets can be cost-effectively transported
Readily utilized in automatic boiler systems
Ultra-low emission profile14
Below is a table of the technical fuel requirements for wood pellets according to Pellet Fuel
Institute:
Figure 2: Residential/Commercial Densified Fuel Standards15
In New York, wood pellets are predominantly produced from hardwood. The major pellet mill in
New York is New England Wood Pellet (NEWP) which opened a manufacturing plant in the
United States in Schuyler, NY in December 2008. This plant planned to produce 850,000 tons of
14
(Christiane Egger; Christine Ohlinger; Bettina Auinger; Briqitte Brandstater; Nadja Richler; Gerhard Dell) 15
(Pellet Fuel Institute)
Biomass Heating
Page 11 of 63
pellets per year which could heat 33,000 homes and businesses16
. In June 2011, NEWP opened a
new plant at Deposit, NY. This plant is scheduled to produce 85,000 tons of wood pellets
annually for the domestic wood fuel pellet market17
. A list of New York Woody Biomass
Feedstock suppliers and processed biomass fuel manufactures can be found at
www.nycwatershed.org18
.
Wood chips
For decades, wood chips have been used to produce heat. Wood chips require more storage
capacity because the volume is about four times that of wood pellets and require more operation
and maintenance efforts. On the other hand, wood chips have a significant cost advantage over
wood pellets19
.
Wood chips are primarily used in larger buildings where fuel storage space requirements are not
a limiting factor. Homeowners who have extra space and are willing to invest more time in
operations and maintenance can choose to use wood chips as a fuel source because it can be a
very economical heating solution. One of the largest local wood chips mills in New York State is
Wagner Lumber. They also burn wood chips as their primary energy source.
The price of quality wood chips ranges from $90 - $125 per ton with moisture content between
20% - 35%. The transportation cost of wood chips is around $15 - $25 per ton20
.
Fuel selection – wood pellets or wood chips?
Wood chips and wood pellets have different advantages and disadvantages for use as a fuel for a
heating system. The state of Upper Austria in Europe has a leading position in biomass heating.
It has more than 25% of all modern biomass boilers installed in the European Union and has one
of the highest densities of small-scale automatic heating systems in the world. In Upper Austria,
homeowners usually prefer pellet heating systems while owners of systems larger than 100kW
usually use wood chips. The following table provides guidance on selecting the right fuel for
your system21
.
16
(Facilities and Ventures) 17
(Facilities and Ventures) 18
(New York Woody Biomass Feedstock Suppliers and Processed Biomass Fuel Manufacturers) 19
(Christiane Egger; Christine Ohlinger; Bettina Auinger; Briqitte Brandstater; Nadja Richler; Gerhard Dell) 20
(Bergman & Zerbe, 2004) 21
(Christiane Egger; Christine Ohlinger; Bettina Auinger; Briqitte Brandstater; Nadja Richler; Gerhard Dell)
Biomass Heating
Page 12 of 63
Figure 3: Comparison between wood chips and wood pellets22
Wood vs. grass pellets
In Northeastern region of United States, there is a considerable acreage of unused or
underutilized agricultural land. New York States has about 1.5 million acres of unused or
underutilized agricultural land; most of those lands have grass growing already. In 2008, some
retired dairy farmers started Enviro Energy LLC that turned the weeds and briars growing on
those unused lands into fuel pellets for heating building23
. These grass materials made from low-
grade hay are called grass pellets.
Grass has about 95% percent of the energy value found in wood and grass can be pelletized as
easily as wood. Grass pellets produce 6,600Btu per pound which is equivalent to 13.2MMBtu
per ton. Like wood pellets the grass pellets also produced much less greenhouse gas than fossil
fuels.
The challenges with grass are its relatively high ash content and a higher concentration of
corrosion-causing elements (for instances, potassium, chlorine, and sulfur) compared with wood.
Potassium is by far the most abundant in grasses. It reduces the melting temperature of ash and
as a result could contribute significantly to corrosion potential. In addition, a corrosive reaction is
catalyzed by chlorine elements that presents in grasses which could damage the furnace
components. Furthermore, the reactions between sulfur and alkali metals will form deposits on
heat transfer surfaces. 24
22
(Christiane Egger; Christine Ohlinger; Bettina Auinger; Briqitte Brandstater; Nadja Richler; Gerhard Dell) 23
(Tietz, 2011) 24
(Cherney)
Biomass Heating
Page 13 of 63
The lack of residential-scale appliances specifically designed to burn high ash pellet fuels is the
primary technical stumbling block for a grass combustion industry in the United States. Large
industrial sized ceramic-lined boilers (more than 1 MMBtu) are capable of burning 100% grass.
However, residential scale boilers from Europe with ceramic-lined combustion chambers,
electronically controlled shaker grates, auto cleaning of heat exchanger tubes, and auto de-ashing
are also capable of burning pure grass pellets. However, the number of suitable appliances for
grass combustion can be expanded by mixing grass with wood, corn or other biomass fuels25
.
Wood Pellets Grass Pellets
Composites Timber harvesting or wood products
manufacturing residue
Weeds and briars growing on unused
land
Energy content 8,400 Btu/lb = 16.8MMBtu/ton <8,400 Btu/lb = 16.8MMBtu/ton
Ash content 0.5-3% 3-8%
Appliances Every appliance(stove, furnace,
boiler for all sizes)
Only work with industrial scale
ceramic-lined boilers and residential
scale boilers from Europe with
ceramic-lined combustion chambers
Price range Average at $250 Average at $220
Availability Available all year round; easily
accessible
Seasonal; harvested in certain regions
in Autumn
Corrosive
elements
Relatively low corrosive elements
(potassium, chlorine, sulfur)
High corrosive elements (potassium,
chlorine, sulfur)
Wood logs
Many homeowners in the Northeast heat their house with wood (commonly known as logs or
firewood). It is difficult to evaluate heat value of wood because it depends on types of wood,
moisture content and how long have the logs been stored. Freshly cut Missouri hardwoods
commonly have a 75% moisture content and the available energy content carried in the wood is
4,900 Btu/lb. Air-dried hardwood firewood typically contains about 20% moisture and available
energy content is 7,100 Btu/lb26
.
Natural gas pipelines The primary sources for energy consumption in most homes, commercial, and industrial
buildings are electricity and natural gas. They are supplied by local utility companies. NYSEG
is an energy services and delivery company in upstate New York and New England. It owns the
transmission and distribution rights in Tompkins County and throughout most of the Central
New York27
.
25
(Cherney) 26
(Stelzer, 2012) 27
(Service area)
Biomass Heating
Page 14 of 63
Natural gas is presently (2013) a very cost effective fuel and it is difficult for biomass to compete
directly with it. However not all residences and business in the Southern Tier have access to
natural gas service. The map below shows the service areas of NYSEG in the Southern Tier
region28
. The red colored areas are the areas where electricity and natural gas are served by
NYSEG; the orange color regions indicate only natural gas is served; the yellow regions indicate
only electricity is served in those region.
It is seen from the diagram below that the majority of the Southern Tier region does not have
natural gas service (yellow area). Even many local areas in the red or orange regions do not have
natural gas distribution pipelines, such as the northern region of Tompkins County or in more
rural areas away from the largest roads.
Energy Consumption
Residential energy consumption
Electricity in Southern Tier region is supplied by three main local utilities, New York State
Electric & Gas Corp (NYSEG), Steuben Rural Electric Cooperative and Corning Natural Gas
28
(Service area)
Biomass Heating
Page 15 of 63
Corporation. The average per capita monthly consumption of electricity in New York homes in
2011 is 611kWh29
, which means the average per day electricity consumption is 20.4kWh.
For home heating, the sources of fuels vary geographically and regionally. The sources for
residential heating includes natural gas, kerosene, fuel oil, electricity, liquefied petroleum gases
(LPG), wood and others. The graph30
below shows the proportion of each type of fuels used in
houses and condominiums in Tompkins County. The graph shows utility gas (natural gas) is the
most common fuel used in houses and condos and it accounts for 50%. 22% of houses and
condos use fuel oil and kerosene for heating; 11% of heating come from bottled, tank or LP gas;
7% comes from electricity. Only 8% come from wood which includes logs, wood pellets and
wood chips.
Figure 4: Most commonly used heating fuel for houses and condominiums in Tompkins County
Residential Fuel Prices The cost of each fuel in terms of dollars per million Btu (MMBtu) is needed in order to calculate
the cost of a given amount of heat and to increase the awareness of the consumer of the amount
they pay for their heating fuel.
The table31
below provides a comparison between the most commonly used fuels in term of fuel
prices for New York State. The first column provides the information on type of fuel with its
29
(How much electricity does an American home use?, 2013) 30
(Tompkins County, New York) 31
(Heating Fuel Comparison Calculator)
Natural gas 50%
Fuel oil, kerosene 22%
Bottled, tank, LP gas 11%
Electricity 7%
Wood 8%
Coal or coke 2%
Biomass Heating
Page 16 of 63
prices listed in column 3 and fuel unit listed in column 2. The value for fuel heat content listed in
column 4 provided the information on the quantity of heat (Btu) released during the combustion
process. The efficiency of the appliance is stated in column 5 of the table. Fuel price, $ per
MMBtu (column 6) is calculated using the formula below:
Fuel cost, $ per MMBtu = (Fuel price per unit x 1,000,000) ÷ (Fuel heat content per unit
x appliance efficiency)
For an example:
Kerosene
Fuel price ($ per MMBtu) = ($4.23 x 1,000,000) ÷ (135,000 x 75%) = $39.81
Wood pellets
Fuel price ($ per MMBtu) = ($250 x 1,000,000) ÷ (16,800,000 x 80%) = $18.94
Priced at $1.07 per therm, natural gas contains high fuel heat content per dollar, thus natural gas
has the lowest fuel price per MMBtu among fuels with $13.42 per MMBtu. Although propane
presently sells for a low price per gallon, $2.39, the low heat content makes propane priced at
$33.55 per MMBtu.
Wood chips and wood pellets are selling at a nominally expensive price $125/ton and $250/ton
respectively. However, the high heating values of these fuels per ton makes woody biomass
economic and price competitive with natural gas, with wood chips having a fuel price of $12.60
per MMBtu and wood pellets having fuel price of $18.94 per MMBtu respectively. Based on this
table, it seems feasible to replace other fossil fuels with wood chips or wood pellets for
residences. The annual fuel savings for homeowner, especially for those homes which are not in
the service region of natural gas will be quite significant.
Sources: http://www.omafra.gov.on.ca/english/engineer/facts/11-033.htm#3
Table 2: Heating Fuel Comparison Calculator32
Fuel Type
Fuel
Unit
Fuel
Price
per
Unit
Fuel Heat
Content per
Unit (Btu)
Appliance
Efficiency
(%)
Fuel
Price
per
MMBtu
Date
listed Sources
Heating Oil Gallon $4.0 138,690 78% $36.98 Feb 2013 NYSERDA
Electricity kW-hr $0.17 3,412 98% $51.62 Feb 2013 EIA
Natural Gas Therm $1.07 100,000 80% $13.42 Feb 2013 EIA
Propane Gallon $2.39 91,333 78% $33.55 Jan 2013 NYSERDA
Firewood
(20% moist) Ton $142 12,400,000 55% $20.82 Apr 2013 Oregonstate.edu
Wood chip
(20% moist) Ton $125 12,400,000 80% $12.60 2011 Forest2market
32
(Heating Fuel Comparison Calculator)
Biomass Heating
Page 17 of 63
Wood Pellets Ton $250 16,800,000 80% $18.94 Fall 2012 Woodburners
Grass Pellets Ton $220 13,175,000 80% $20.87 2010 Trace.tennessee.edu
Kerosene Gallon $4.3 135,000 80% $39.81 Jan 2013 NYSERDA
Coal Ton $200 25,000,000 75% $10.67 - Hearth
Other industrial energy consumption
The energy used by other economic sectors such as commercial, industrial, and educational
institutions, greenhouses or high tunnel crop farming, varies dramatically, and depends on the
size and type of businesses. However, on average, the energy consumption used by each business
in the commercial and industrial sector is much higher compared to a residential household.
The graph below shows the energy consumption used by each sector in New York State in 2010.
The commercial sector is the largest consumer of energy among all sectors and accounted for
32.8%. The residential sector is the second largest energy consumer which accounted for 30% of
the total energy consumption.
Below is a list of some biomass systems that have been installed in or near the Southern Tier:
Sector Facility Name Location Description
Residential/Institution Big Red Barn Cornell
University,
Ithaca, NY
Grass pellet stove that burns
grass pellets (more info see
Appendix)
Commercial Arnot Ogden
Medical center
Elmira, NY Biomass boiler that burns wood
chips
Commercial Cayuga Nature
Center
Ithaca, NY Biomass gasifier (more info see
Appendix)
Commercial Veteran Affairs Canandaigua, NY Biomass steam-generation CHP
Biomass Heating
Page 18 of 63
Medical Center system
Greenhouse Intergo
Greenhouse,
Inc.
Albion, NY Biomass boiler burning waste
wood
Institution Morrisville
State College
Morrisville, NY Biomass gasifier CHP (more info
see Appendix)
Industrial Wagner
Lumber
Cayuta, NY Biomass boiler that burns
sawdust or wood chips (more
info see Appendix)
Greenhouse Plainview
Growers
Allamuchy, NY Biomass boiler and pellet mill
Biomass Conversion Technology The term biomass conversion refers to the process of converting biomass into energy to generate
electricity and/or heat. The two primary categories of biomass conversion technology are simple
combustion systems and gasification systems which can be used to provide heat, power or
combined heat and power (CHP).
Rankine Cycle
The Rankine cycle, in the form of steam turbine engines generates about 90% of all electric
power used throughout the world33
. This cycle is mainly based on the conversion of input heat
energy into output power. It involves repeating four processes34,35
.
Step A: Dry saturated steam from the boiler is expanded isentropically (entropy remains
constant) in a turbine and produces work by rotating the shaft connected to an electric
generator
Step B: Wet steam from the turbine is fed into a condenser for condensation (cooling) where
heat is rejected from the steam into atmosphere or sometimes for heating
Step C: Water from the condenser is pumped into the boiler using a pump and is compressed
isentropically to the operating pressure of the boiler. This process increases the pressure in
the water
Stage D: The saturated water from the pump enters boiler as a compressed liquid and is
heated in the boiler until it reaches super-heated condition. At this stage the water is changed
from liquid into vapor.
33
(Rankine Cycle)) 34
(Simple Rankine Cycle) 35
(Vapor and Combined Power Cycle)
Biomass Heating
Page 19 of 63
The figure below provides a better illustration on how simple Rankine cycle works in a
thermal power plant.
Figure 5: How simple Rankine cycle works at a thermal power plant36
Boiler
The boiler is the one of the major components in the steam Rankine cycle. The boiler is used to
convert fuel into thermal energy resulting in superheated steam vapor which will be sent to a
steam turbine. There are numerous types of boilers used to convert the energy in the fuel to
steam. According to the Council of Industrial Boiler Owners (CIBO), the general efficiency
range of stoker and fluidized bed boilers (the two most commonly used types of boilers for
biomass firing) is between 65%-85% efficient. The major factors affecting efficiency are fuel
types, availability and operation of the boiler.
Biomass boilers are generally designed to accept wide variation in moisture content with a
practical limit of approximately 60% moisture content37
. Typical fuel supplies for biomass
generation are bark, sawdust, wood chips, and wood pellets. Some of these might leave a high
level of non-combustible constituent after combustion. Therefore, a biomass boiler must be able
to handle a high level of non-burnable constituents that are inherent with a low grade fuel
36
(Thermodynamics) 37
(Biomass Technology Review, 2010)
Biomass Heating
Page 20 of 63
resource. The fuel and then the “ash” can also contain non-carbon containing minerals like rocks
and inert gravel38
.
Two most common types of boilers are stoker boilers and fluidized bed boilers.
Stoker boilers
Stoker boilers use direct fire combustion of
solid fuels with excess air to produce hot flue
gases which then produce steam. The stokers
are designed to feed fuel onto a grate where it
burns with air passing up through it. The stoker
is located within the furnace section of the
boiler and is designed to remove the ash
residue after combustion. Stoker units use
mechanical movement to shift and refill fuel to
the fire that is located near the base of the
boiler. There are two general types of systems
which are underfeed and overfeed. Underfeed
stokers supply fuel and air from under the grate
whereas overfeed stokers supply fuel from
above the grate and air from below. The
residual ash is discharged from the opposite
end. The most common type of stoker boiler is
the spreader stoker. It introduces combustion
air primarily from below the grate but the fuel
is thrown or spread uniformly across the grate
area39
.
Fluidized bed boiler
Fluidized bed boilers are the most recent type
of boiler developed for solid fuel combustion
which focuses on reducing SO2 and NOx
emission from combustion. Fuel is burned in
a bed of hot, inert particles suspended by an
upward flow of combustion air that is
injected from the bottom of the combustor to
keep the bed in a floating or “fluidized” state.
The scrubbing action of the bed material on
the fuel can strip away the ash and char that
38
(Biomass Technology Review, 2010) 39
(Biomass Conversion Technologies)
Figure 6: Stoker boiler (RenewableEnergyWorld.com)
Figure 7: Fluidized bed boiler (Canadianbiomassmagnize.ca)
Biomass Heating
Page 21 of 63
normally forms around the fuel particles. With this design, more oxygen can reach the
combustible material more readily and thus the rate and efficiency of the combustion process
increases. The efficient mixing of fuel with air for combustion enables the fuel to be quickly
heated above its ignition temperature; it ignites and becomes part of the burning mass40
.
The table below provides a comparison of combustion characteristics and fuel issues for stoker
and fluidized bed boilers. Stoker boilers are a relatively basic technology while fluidized bed
technology is newer and more complex but offers more flexibility and operating control. The
fluidized bed systems not only offer significant operating flexibility in terms of range of load
conditions but also they maintain efficiency during system turn-down. TRL for both types of
boilers are level 8-9 because the systems have been proven through routine successful mission
operations. Moreover, a boiler is very reliable; the issues associated with boiler are rare thus
boilers are rated 1 for the likelihood and severity of the issue.
Figure 8: A comparison between stoker and fluidized bed boiler (Biomass Conversion Technologies)
Residential Wood Burning Outdoor Wood Boiler
Outdoor wood boilers (OWBs) are simple fuel burning devices designed to burn wood and other
materials. They are used to heat building space and/or water through the distribution, typically
through pipes, of a gas or liquid heated in the device41
.
Smoke emitted from OWBs contains fine particulate matter (PM) which can cause short-term
effects such as eye, nose, throat, and lung irritation, coughing, sneezing, running nose and
shortness of breath. Exposure to fine PM also can affect lung diseases such as asthma, allergies
40
(Biomass Conversion Technologies) 41
(Residential Wood Burning)
Biomass Heating
Page 22 of 63
and heart disease. In addition, wood smoke contains
carcinogens including benzene, formaldehyde, dioxins
and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons42
.
In December 29, 2010, the NYS Department of
Environmental Conservation adopted 6 NYSRR Part
247 which are numerous municipal laws enacted across
the state regarding OWBs. Section 247.3 and 247.4
provides a list of approved and prohibited fuels for
OWBs43
:
Appendix B provides a list of certified OWBs in New
York States.
Approved fuels Prohibited fuels
Seasoned clean wood Unseasoned wood
Wood pellets made from clean wood Garbage; Animal carcasses; Yard waste
Heating oil in compliances with Subpart 225-1,
LP gas or natural gas may be used as starter fuels
Wood containing preservatives or other
coatings
Non-glossy, non-colored papers (including
newspaper) may be used only to start an OWB
Tires; Household chemicals; Coal; Plywood
.
Equipment and capital costs
A biomass boiler system is a complex installation with many interrelated subsystems. The table
below provides total capital estimates (equipment and installation) for stoker and circulating
fluidized bed steam system for three biomass fuel feed rates-100tons/days, 600tons/days,
900tons/days. The installed cost varies significantly and depends on
Scope of the equipment
Output steam conditions
Geographical area
Competitive market conditions
Site requirements
Emission control requirements
Prevailing labor rates
42
(Residential Wood Burning) 43
(Requirements for OWB Owners)
Figure 9: Residential Outdoor Wood Boiler (Wood Fired Hydronic Heaters)
Biomass Heating
Page 23 of 63
The estimates presented in the table are budgetary estimates based on published data and
discussion with equipment suppliers and developers in 2003 (Biomass Conversion
Technologies).
Figure 10: A comparison of different size boiler (Biomass Conversion Technologies)
O&M costs
The O&M costs include the labor for prep-yard, and labor, materials and parts for the boiler
system itself.
Figure 11: A comparison in the O&M costs (Biomass Conversion Technologies)
Biomass Heating
Page 24 of 63
Combined heat and power Conventional thermal power plants typically only convert about one-third of the fuel energy into
electricity. The rest is lost as heat. Combined heat and power (CHP) facilities recover the waste
heat emitted from the steam or gas turbine or other engine for direct heating. As a result, CHP
provides more efficient use of fuel, producing both electricity and useful heat; typically more
than four-fifths of the fuel’s energy is converted into usable energy, resulting in both economic
and environmental benefits. In other words, CHP is the consecutive production and exploitation
of two energy products, electrical and thermal, from a system utilizing the same fuel44
.
Furnaces and stoves The pellet stove is the most common type of wood pellet burner. It is a “spot heat” type of
system. The stove is usually installed in the common area that people are generally in, for
instance, the living room. A pellet furnace is usually sited in an attached garage, utility room or
basement45.
Pellet stoves are specially made stoves that have a hopper, auger system, burn pot, combustion
blower, circulation blower, and ash system46
. General steps are fill the hopper with fuel, turn on
44
(Mohammed Shehata) 45
(Kacvinsky) 46
(Kacvinsky)
Biomass Heating
Page 25 of 63
the stove and the fire starts automatically. Some stoves require manual lighting of the fire and
others have an igniter47
. The input panel of the stove controls the blowers, igniter, and an auger
system which feeds wood pellets to the burn pot. If you need more heat, you adjust the stove to
feed more pellets into the burn pot.
The combustion blower functions to deliver a constant source of air to the burn pot and to double
as the exhaust blower for the stove. Wood pellets would not stay lit on their own and would
smolder out without the combustion blower or some other type of system to keep them lit. Some
wood pellet stoves or furnace require use of outside air for the combustion process48
.
The stove heats up as the fire burns in the burn pot. Air is draw into the stove by the circulation
blower and it circulates through chambers in the stove. After that, the circulation blower directs
the heated air out of the stove and into the room. Larger furnaces direct the air into the ductwork
of the house49
.
Ash is created as the fire burns in the burn pot. This kind of ash is called fly ash in a wood pellet
stove. The fly ash is blown or pushed by incoming pellets from the burn pot when the weight of
the burned pellet becomes light enough through the combustion process. Most fly ash will go
into the ash system and a small amount of it escapes into the exhaust system50
.
Homemade wood stoves Homemade wood stoves were usually made using old 55 gallon drums. Even today, there are
people still make their own wood stoves using 55 gallon drums or recycled hot water tanks
because they are cheap to make (around $100.51
). There are also several problems52
with simple
wood stoves. They are:
47
(Kacvinsky) 48
(Kacvinsky) 49
(Kacvinsky) 50
(Kacvinsky) 51
(Homemade Wood Stoves) 52
(Homemade Wood Stoves)
Biomass Heating
Page 26 of 63
1. Efficiency
Commercialize wood stoves are expensive because they have an advanced and high
efficiency combustion system which you won’t be able to duplicate with a homemade
welded box.
2. Legality
Using homemade wood stove may not even be legal depending on where you live
because the wood stove may not be up to local building or fire codes.
3. Not economical in the long term
The efficiency of a homemade wood stove is likely to be only to half of an EPA certified
stoves. Over time, you will lose money in the extra amount of firewood that you will
have to burn to heat up the house.
4. Aesthetics
Homemade wood stoves often look pretty ugly. Most of today’s commercial stoves have
glass doors so that you can enjoy watching the fire and ensure that it is burning efficiency.
Why advanced stoves are worth the extra cost?53
1. EPA certified stoves are 1/3 more efficient
This means that you can save 1/3 cost from purchasing fuel. Moreover, the extra cost of
advanced technology is about $200 per stove. Therefore, after a few seasons of wood
burning, the greater efficiency of stove will more than compensate for the higher initial
cost.
2. Produce 90% less particulate matter
The particulate matter is referred to smoke. Less particulate matter is better for health and
you will not see visible smoke from the chimney. Furthermore, the chance of a chimney
fire is eliminated if the stove in operated correctly and reasonable maintenance is done.
Less frequent cleaning is needed for flue pipe and chimney which save time and money.
3. Fires ignite more easily and burn more completely
This results in a more convenient and pleasurable wood burning experience. You can
also monitor the fire through the glass panel in stoves’ door and adjust it periodically to
get a perfect burn.
53
(Wood Stoves: The Most Popular Wood Heating Option)
Biomass Heating
Page 27 of 63
Installed and capital cost & Technology readiness level (TRL)
For customers who are interested in upgrading their own facilities from a fireplace to a wood
pellet stove to enhance the efficiency of the heat generated for their home, there are multiple
models of stoves, inserts and central heating units burning wood, pellets, corn or other alternative
biomass fuels. Older wood pellet stoves have an average of 65% efficiency rating whereas the
newer stoves have efficiency rating over 80%54
. As boilers, wood pellet stoves have a high TRL
level (level 8-9). However, if they are to be used for burning grass pellets more research is
required to enhance the robustness of the pellet stove to corrosive materials. Pellet stoves are a
very reliable technology with rating of level 1-2 in the severity and likelihood of issues.
Typical cost for a pellet home heating system
Investment cost: $2,419 - $3,826 (Harman pellet stove)
Installation cost: $600 - $1,20055
Fuel costs: (fuel) $250 - $279//ton, bulk delivery with min 3 tons $49 - $6956
Heat generated: 8,000 – 500,000 Btu/hour input (Harman pellet stoves)
O&M costs
If you own or are interested in upgrading or switching your current heating system to a pellet
stove, stove manufacturers provide step-by-step installation, cleaning instructions, and manuals
for cleaning pellet stoves by customers themselves. This can save money compared to hiring
workers to work on installation, operation, and maintenance. The instructions are direct and easy
to follow and can be found on most websites including at Harman stoves website.57
In general, the average pellet stove’s ash system needs to be cleaned approximately every 5-10
days for stoves that burn 24/7. A thorough cleaning is required at the end of each heating season
or every 10-12 weeks, whichever is shorter. The cost of cleaning a chimney can range from $382
to $56858
Gasification
Biomass gasification for power production involves heating solid biomass in an oxygen-starved
environment to produce a low or medium calorific combustible gas. The advantage of using
gasification over directly burning the biomass is the gas can be cleaned and filtered to remove
54
(Kacvinsky) 55
(Consumers - Frequent Questions) 56
(Pelletsdirect) 57
(Cleaning Instructions) 58
(How much does it cost to clean chimney)
Biomass Heating
Page 28 of 63
problem chemical compounds before it is burned and the gas can be easily used for power
generation in internal combustion engines such as gas turbines or reciprocating engines.
The fuel output from the gasification process is generally called syngas or biogas. The
gasification process takes 4 steps59
:
Dehydration: Drying is the first and perhaps the most important stage of biomass gasification.
During this step moisture is removed from the bio matter so that it can be heated to temperatures
above 100C in future stages.
Pyrolysis: During pyrolysis, the bio
matter is further heated to temperatures
above 240C. This process is done
without any air so that the bio matter
breaks down into charcoal and a mixture
of gasses and of liquids called tars.
Gases and tars contain hydrogen,
oxygen, and carbon molecules while
charcoal contains carbon-carbon chains.
Reduction: Reduction is the reverse of
the general combustion process. Instead
of combining a hydrocarbon with
oxygen to release heat, carbon dioxide
and water vapor, heat is used to remove
oxygen from a hydrocarbon. This uses carbon dioxide already present in the air and water vapor
to combine with the charcoal that was produced in the previous stage to produce hydrogen gas,
carbon monoxide, and carbon dioxide.
Combustion: This process varies depending on the reactor being used. In general, combustion is
used to provide the heat from the process as well as some of the carbon dioxide and water vapor
used in the reduction. The fuel sources for the combustion process include either the tar gasses or
charcoal produced in pyrolysis.
Gasifiers characteristic
There are two main types of gasifiers: fixed bed gasifiers and fluid bed gasifiers.
Fixed bed gasifiers typically have fixed grate inside the gasifier. Biomass fuel is placed on top
of the pile of fuel, char and ash inside the gasifier. The direction of air flowing inside of the
gasifiers is determined by the reactor type.
59
(How Gasification Works)
Figure 12: 4 Processes in Gasification (How Gasification Works)
Biomass Heating
Page 29 of 63
Reactors
There are several different kinds of reactors available to manufacture producer gas. Each of these
types has its own advantages and disadvantages, such as in efficiency, unwanted byproducts, and
start times. The three reactors we will be focusing on are updraft, downdraft, and crossdraft
gasifiers.
Updraft
In this type of reactor, air flows upwards through the
reactor as shown in the figure. This method doesn’t
produce as much usable gas, but it is the most efficient60
.
The gas that is produced provides heat to help dry the bio
matter61
. However, the gas that is produced must be
cleaned of tars and methane before it can be used in an
internal combustion engine.
Downdraft
As shown in Figure 5, a downdraft reactor has the air
flowing downwards through the combustion zone.
Downdraft reactors have a lower energy efficiency rating
compared to the updraft reactor62
. However, this method
is much cleaner with few tars being produced making it
an ideal choice for use in internal combustion engines63
.
Downdraft reactors can also be ignited and started sooner
than updraft reactors.
Crossdraft
In a crossdraft reactor, as shown in Figure 6, air
travels sideways through the reactor. Crossdraft
60
(What is gasification?) 61
(Gas Producers (Gasifiers)) 62
(Gas Producers (Gasifiers)) 63
(What is gasification?)
Figure 13: Updraft Gasifier
Figure 14: Downdraft Gasifier
Figure 15: Crossdraft Gasifier
Biomass Heating
Page 30 of 63
reactors have the quickest start up time and produce the most gas, but the gas comes out at a very
high temperature and contains high amounts of carbon monoxide64
. This type of reactor operates
best with dry fuel and dry air.
Fluidized bed gasifiers are
more complex and offer
higher performance than
fixed bed gasifiers but they
are more expensive. Similar
to fluidized bed boiler, the
biomass fuel is burned in a
bed of hot inert material
suspended by an upward
flow of air and the bed
become fluidized as the
amount of incoming oxygen
increased. High pressure
from incoming oxygen
increases the throughput. On
the other hand, this also
increases the cost and
complexity of the gasifier65
.
In short, a fluidized bed gasifier has high productivity in producing syngas. It can handle a wider
range of biomass feedstocks with moisture contents on average up to 30%66
.
TRL, Equipment and Installed Cost
The TRL for a gasifier is also very high (level 8 and 9). Similar to a boiler, it is a mature
technology and very reliable. The TRL rating for severity and likelihood of issues are very low
with rating of level 1-2.
The reactor is the main cost for the gasifier. Table 17 (Biomass Conversion Technologies) below
shows the capital cost of a gasifier for a biomass plant.
64
(Gas Producers (Gasifiers)) 65
(Biomass Conversion Technologies) 66
(Biomass Conversion Technologies)
Figure 16: Bubbling fluidized bed gasifier (Bubbling fluidized bed gasifier)
Biomass Heating
Page 31 of 63
Figure 17: Biomass Gasification Capital Costs to Produce Syngas (Biomass Conversion Technologies)
O&M costs
Table below are the estimated cost of O&M for gasification for biomass plant.
Figure 18: O&M Cost Estimates for Syngas Production (Biomass Conversion Technologies)
Heating system selection The flow chart67 below provides a guide for a user to select the most appropriate combination of
biomass fuel and heating system for their homes and facilities.
67
(Palmer & Tubby I. Hogan, 2011)
Biomass Heating
Page 32 of 63
Biomass Heating
Page 33 of 63
Technology Readiness Level (TRL) Technology Readiness level (TRL) is a measure used to assess the maturity of evolving
technology during its development and operations68
. Below is a table listing the summary of
definition of each level.
Technology Readiness Level Definition69
TRL 1 Basic Research: Initial scientific research has been conducted. Principles are
qualitatively postulated and observed. Focus is on new discovery rather than
applications.
TRL 2 Applied Research: Initial practical applications are identified. Potential of material
or process to solve a problem, satisfy a need, or find application is confirmed.
TRL 3 Critical Function or Proof of Concept Established: Applied research advances and
early stage development begins. Studies and laboratory measurements validate
analytical predictions of separate elements of the technology.
TRL 4 Lab Testing/Validation of Alpha Prototype Component/Process: Design,
development and lab testing of components/processes. Results provide evidence that
performance targets may be attainable based on projected or modeled systems.
TRL 5 Laboratory Testing of Integrated/Semi-Integrated System: System Component
and/or process validation is achieved in a relevant environment.
TRL 6 Prototype System Verified: System/process prototype demonstration in an
operational environment (beta prototype system level).
TRL 7 Integrated Pilot System Demonstrated: System/process prototype demonstration in
an operational environment (integrated pilot system level).
TRL 8 System Incorporated in Commercial Design: Actual system/process completed and
qualified through test and demonstration (pre-commercial demonstration).
TRL 9 System Proven and Ready for Full Commercial Deployment: Actual system
proven through successful operations in operating environment, and ready for full
commercial deployment.
Below are tables that can be used to measure the severity of issues. The higher the rating, the
more sever the issues and the more likelihood the issues will happens.
Severity of issues rating definition
Catastrophic: Whole system crashes, need more than a month to repair 4
Critical: System doesn’t work, partial system crashes, need more than 2 weeks
to repair to setup
3
Moderate: System might or might not work but need more than 3 days to repair 2
Negligible: System can still work but might need short repair time 1
The reliability of appliances measures how likelihood do people need to clean or do maintenance
on the appliances. For example, some pellet stoves (depends on the size and manufacturer) need
to be fueled on daily basis, to be cleaned on weekly basis (such as scraping out and taking out the
68
(Technology Readiness Level) 69
(Technology readiness level definitions and descriptions)
Biomass Heating
Page 34 of 63
ash) and to be cleaned by professionals on a seasonal basis. The table below provides the rating
for the likelihood of issues.
Reliability- Likelihood of issues rating definition
Likely to occur: once a day 5
Probably occur: once a week 4
May occur: once a month 3
Unlikely to occur: once a year/yearly maintenance 2
Improbable: more than a year 1
In addition to introducing the idea of TRL, severity and reliability of issues, the table below
provides a rough estimate of TRL, severity and reliability of issues for all the conversion
technologies that mentioned in the Biomass Conversion Technologies section.
Technology TRL Severity of issues Likelihood of issues
Pellet furnace and stove 8-9 1-2 4-5
Homemade wood stove 7-8 1-3 4-5
Boiler 8-9 1 1-2
Gasifier 7-9 1-3 3-4
Grass pellet 7-9 1-2 4-5
Job creation The biomass industry significantly benefits the national economy and particularly benefits local
economies. In the region of the New England and New York State, it has been estimated that for
every 100,000 tons of pellets manufactured, 342 direct jobs are generated which include logging,
chipping, and trucking70
. Another study estimated that 3-5 jobs are created per MW produced
through biomass71
.
An “economic multiplier” is a value used to estimate the economic impact with the changes in
direct employment in an industry. Each multiplier is a quantified measurement of the strength of
the economic linkage between a specific industry job with the rest of the regional economy. As
the strength of the linkage increases, the size of the multiplier is greater and therefore the greater
the employment impact of the given sector to the overall economy72
. The economic multiplier
for biomass energy varies regionally, based on fuel sources, scope of the energy project,
population density and other factors. One study found an economic multiplier of 3.2 for the
entire supply chain. In other words, for every job created directly in the industry, another 2.2 jobs
70
(Biomass and Rural Economies) 71
(Using local fuel contributes to local economy, job creation and community security) 72
(Kay, 2002)
Biomass Heating
Page 35 of 63
are created in other industries or business as a result73
. Examples of indirect jobs supported by
the fuel cost savings include hiring of new workers at gas stations and auto repair shops and
hiring of more waitresses as result of opening new restaurants near pellet mills.
(Another reference related to job creation is “The economic benefits of an energy efficiency and
onsite renewable energy strategy to meet growing electricity needs in Texas”74
)
Incentives and economic benefits A new report by ECOPROG GmbH
says that while China, India and the
U.S. will experience the most biomass
power growth over the next five years,
Europe will continue to possess the
largest market in biomass industry75
and remain the biomass power leader.
Residential wood heating especially in
the form of ultra-clean pellet stoves
and boilers increased substantially in
many countries in Europe. This is
because of strict policy measures
combined with generous incentives.
As a result, the adoption and
technological advancement of biomass
appliances are more widespread in
European countries compared to United States76
.
The mandatory directive from the European Union (EU) Parliament to increase the renewable
energy production is the reason for providing such strong incentives for home biomass heating in
Europe. The European mandates required each nation within the EU to commit to the directive
by drafting Energy Action Plans. In the United States, Renewable Portfolio Standards only target
electricity production. Europe, on the other hand, has provision for renewable fuel heating in
European standards. As a result, incentivizing biomass appliances is the method that European
nations used to meet their renewable energy targets77
.
73
(Biomass and Rural Economies) 74
(John Laitner, 2007) 75
(Simnet, 2012) 76
(Residential Appliance Incentives) 77
(Residential Appliance Incentives)
Figure 19: Savings on a $10,000 Biomass Appliance (Residential Appliance Incentives)
Biomass Heating
Page 36 of 63
European Incentives Examples Schemes to support uptake and new installations in many European countries, including UK
78:
Scheme Notes
Availability
Business Non-
profit
Public
sector
Private
Individuals
Carbon Trust
Biomass Heat
Accelerator
A technology accelerator project from the
Carbon Trust announced in April 2006, with a
£5m budget over 5 years. It aims to examine and
address the key barriers to the uptake of biomass
in the UK.
Trust Energy
Efficiency
Finance
Flexible loans for SMEs to allow investment in
energy saving equipment. Yes Yes Yes
CO2Sense
Investment Fund
Investment funding will normally be provided on
a 'revenue share' basis, where the funding is
repaid within a defined period, plus a small
royalty on related product sales / savings.
Yes,
within
Yorks &
Humber
Community
Sustainable
Energy
Programme
The Community Sustainable Energy Program
provides funds to community-based
organizations for feasibility studies and the
installation of micro-generation technologies
Yes
Energy
Entrepreneurs
Fund Scheme
DECC launched the 1st phase of the Energy
Entrepreneurs Fund scheme on 23 August 2012.
This is a competitive funding scheme to support
the development and demonstration of
innovative, new technologies, products and
processes in the areas of:
Energy efficiency and building
technologies
Power generation and storage
Yes Yes Yes
E.ON
Sustainable
Energy Fund
A grant from E.ON for community groups and
not-for-profit organizations planning to install
sustainable energy projects
Yes
Energy Saving
Scotland - small
business loans
(formerly Loan
Action Scotland)
The scheme allows a business to borrow between
£1,000 and £100,000 interest-free and repayable
up to 4 years and would be used to help a
business to reduce its energy consumption,
saving both money and CO2.
Yes
Enhanced
Capital
Allowance
Enhanced Capital Allowances (ECAs) enable a
business to claim 100% first-year capital
allowances on their spending on qualifying plant
and machinery.
Yes
Feed-in tariffs
A mechanism to support small scale generators
of renewable electricity, up to 5 MWe to
complement the Renewables Obligation for large
scale generators. Applies to AD but not currently
Yes Yes Yes Yes
78
(Grants and support)
Biomass Heating
Page 37 of 63
solid biomass.
Forestry Micro-
Enterprise Grant
Grants of between £2,500 and £25,000 will be
available towards buying new machinery or
equipment, building handling or storage facilities
or installing wood fuel systems.
It is funded by the Rural Development Program
for England and is administered jointly by the
Forestry Commission and the East Midlands
Development Agency.
If you are interested please call Anne Garner on
01673 843461 for a prospectus.
Yes
East Midlands
Forestry Micro-
enterprise Grant
Grants of between £2,500 and £25,000 will be
available towards buying new machinery or
equipment, building handling or storage facilities
or installing wood fuel systems.
Yes
Rural
Development
Program
The RDP is significant European funding for the
development of rural areas. Funding is available
for a wide range of activities including the
development and diversification of land based
businesses and the installation of biomass boilers.
Schemes are administered differently in different
areas of the UK:
England
Northern Ireland
Scotland
Wales
Yes Yes
Renewable Heat
Incentive
The Renewable Heat Incentive (RHI) opened for
applications in November 2011, and provides
financial assistance to generators of renewable
heat, and producers of renewable biogas and bio-
methane. RHI is now also available in Northern
Ireland. Phase 1 is for non-domestic installations,
with support for domestic to follow in phase 2,
expected Summer 2013.
Yes Yes Yes Phase 2
Renewable Heat
Premium
Payments
The Renewable Heat Premium Payment scheme
is a government scheme that gives money to
householders to help them buy renewable heating
technologies – solar thermal panels, heat pumps
and biomass boilers. As of next year, the
Renewable Heat Incentive will expand to cover
the domestic sector and the Green Deal will
come into force, so this is a short-term scheme
making one-off payments that will also allow us
to learn more about what people think of these
technologies and how they perform in a variety
of conditions.
Yes
Scottish
Community and
Householder
New schemes for communities and households in
Scotland; follow link on left for details Yes
Biomass Heating
Page 38 of 63
Renewables
Initiative
Wood Energy
Business
Scheme
A Forestry Commission Wales initiative which
aims to establish a network of wood fuelled
installations across Wales, producing clean heat
and electricity and strengthening the timber
supply chain.
Yes
WRAP
Anaerobic
Digestion Loan
Fund
The ADLF offers direct financial support to
organizations building new AD capacity in
England. It aims to ensure that food waste is
diverted from landfill or from other, less
environmentally sustainable operations, up the
waste hierarchy. The purpose of the loan fund is
to leverage or top up private sector funding (not
to replace it) or to materially accelerate the
projects.
Yes Yes
United States Federal Tax incentives The 2011 Federal Tax Credits for Consumer Energy Efficiency offers a 10% tax credit (up to
$500 or a specific amount from $50- $300) when you retrofit your primary residence with a new,
high efficiency wood pellet stove by December 31, 2011. The American Taxpayer Relief Act of
2012 retroactively renewed this tax credit, expiring again on December 31, 2013. This credit
applies to energy efficiency improvements in the building of existing homes and for the purchase
of high-efficiency heating, cooling and water-heating equipment79
.
New York State programs
1. Solar, wind & biomass energy system exemption80
The law encourages the installation of equipment that generated electric energy from
biogas produced by the anaerobic digestion of agricultural waste with 100% tax
exemption for 15 years between 1991 and 2014. This tax incentive is scheduled to expire
on December 31, 2014.
2. Residential wood heating fuel exemption81
New York exempts 100% retail sales of wood used for residential heating purposes from
the state sales tax
3. Commercial and Industrial efficiency program82
79
(Residential Energy Efficiency Tax Credit, 2013) 80
(Local Option - Solar Wind & Biomass Energy Systems Exemption, 2013) 81
(Residential wood heating fuel exemption, 2012) 82
(NYSEG(Gas) - Commercial and Industrial Efficiency Program, 2013)
Biomass Heating
Page 39 of 63
NYSEG and RG&E offer rebates to non-residential customers installing energy
efficiency equipment that pay a natural gas systems benefits charge. For example:
Furnaces: $100 (92% efficiency) Steam boiler: $200 (82% efficiency)
Condensing boiler: $1000-$6000 (90% efficiency), and many more
4. Energy Conservation Improvements property tax exemption83
Qualifying energy-conversation improvements to homes are exempt from real property taxation
to the extent that the addition would increase the value for the home. The exemption includes
general municipal property taxes, school district taxes and special ad valorem taxes.
Spreadsheet
An Excel spreadsheet was created that accompanies this report to provide fuel cost comparisons
between different fuels, to calculate the savings from using biomass, and to estimate the total
jobs created directly and indirectly from biomass and reductions in carbon dioxide and other
emissions. This section provides a detail explanation of each section/step in the “User Interface”
worksheet in the Excel spreadsheet.
Introduction
The “User Interface” worksheet is highlighted in several colors: pink, green and yellow. The
section that is highlighted in pink is a brief instruction and reference(s) for the section below.
The yellow highlighted section ask for user’s input which could ranges from asking the user to
select an option from a top down menu or to put an value in this section. Lastly, the green
highlighted section contains formulas to calculate the required calculation. The data in this
section will change automatically based on user’s input or the default value. Users should not
change any formulas or value in this section; the cells are locked.
83
(Energy Conservation Improvements Property Tax Exemption, 2013)
Biomass Heating
Page 40 of 63
Step 1
Step 1 asks the users to select the county that they are interested in. Users can select the county
by clicking B9 and a top down menu will show up. The counties in B4 represent the 8 counties in
the Southern Tier region in the New York. User’s input in this section will change some values
in step 6.
Step 2
Step 2 asks the users to select the sector that they represent. Two options are available for users
to select: Residential or non-residential. This step affects the fuel cost in step 3 automatically.
Step 3
3
Heating Oil Gallon 500 $4.00 $37.0 $2,000.0 38% http://www.nyserda.ny.gov/Energy-Prices-Data-and-Reports/Energy-Prices/Home-Heating-Oil/Monthly-Average-Home-Heating-Oil-Prices.aspx
Electricity kWh $0.17 $51.6 $0.0 0% http://www.eia.gov/beta/state/data.cfm?sid=NY#Prices
Natural Gas Therm $1.07 $13.4 $0.0 0% http://www.eia.gov/totalenergy/data/monthly/#prices
Propane Gallon $2.39 $33.5 $0.0 0% http://www.nyserda.ny.gov/Energy-Prices-Data-and-Reports/Energy-Prices/Propane/Monthly-Average-Propane-Prices.aspx
Firewood Cord $142.00 $20.8 $0.0 0% http://extension.oregonstate.edu/lincoln/sites/default/files/home_heating_fuels_ec1628-e.pdf , http://evanslandscaping.com/fw/main/Firewood-9.html , http://inspectapedia.com/heat/Current_Heating_Cost_Table.htm
Wood Chip (20% moist) Ton $125.00 $12.6 $0.0 0% http://www.forest2market.com/blog/Northwest-Wood-Chip-Prices-Level-Off
Wood pellets Ton 5 $200.00 $15.1 $1,000.0 47% http://www.thewoodburners.com/fuel_pellet.php
Grass pellets Ton $220.00 $20.9 $0.0 0% http://trace.tennessee.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1839&context=utk_gradthes
Kerosene Gallon 200 $4.30 $39.8 $860.0 15% http://www.nyserda.ny.gov/Energy-Prices-Data-and-Reports/Energy-Prices/Kerosene/Average-Kerosene-Prices.aspx
Coal Ton $200.00 $10.7 $0.0 0% www.hearth.com/econtent/index.php/fuels/
Total fuel cost $3,860.0
Total Btu 141,689,286
Fuel Price per
MMBtu ($ per
MMBtu)
Percentage of
your home/
facility is
heated by fuel
Fuel CostFuel Type Fuel unitTotal fuel unit
used in 1 yearDefault price
Your fuel price if it
is different from
default price
Price Reference
Your current summary of heating
Step 3: Specify the amount of fuel(s) you have been using for heating every year at column C. If your fuel price is different from the default price, please specify at column E. The total
fuel cost for current heating is listed at G29 and total BTU produced from fuels is listed at G30. Note: reference for this section is based on EIA fuel comparison calculator
(www.eia.gov/neic/experts/heatcalc.xls )
Biomass Heating
Page 41 of 63
Step 3 requires users to fill out the total amount of fuel that they use each year at column C based
on the units given in column B. Column A represents the common fuels in the region. The
default price is given in column D. If users think the price they are paying for is different from
the default price, users can input their price at column E. The fuel price per million Btu is listed
at column F. Column F will update automatically if the user’s fuel price is different from the
default price. Fuel cost for heating is calculated by multiplying total fuel unit with the fuel price
and it is listed at Column G. Column F represent the percentage of your house or facility is
heated by each type of fuel. The reference for the fuel price is listed at Column I. G30 represents
the total Btu your facility or house uses each year for heating.
Step 4
Step 4 asks the users to specify the desired new percentage of each fuel that their facility or home
will be heated with at Column C. In this step, the users should generally input some percentage
or increase in the percentage of house or facilities heated by biomass. The users should make
sure that the total percentage (C46) is 100%, otherwise, a warning sign will be shown at the cell
C47. The table will update automatically at column D and E based on user’s input in column C.
The new total fuel cost for heating with biomass is listed at E46.
4
Heating Oil Gallon 30% 392.9 $1,571.7
Electricity kWh 0% 0.0 $0.0
Natural Gas Therm 0% 0.0 $0.0
Propane Gallon 0% 0.0 $0.0
Firewood Cord 0% 0.0 $0.0
Wood Chip (20% moist) Ton 0% 0.0 $0.0
Wood pellets Ton 70% 7.5 $1,502.8
Grass pellets Ton 0% 0.0 $0.0
Kerosene Gallon 0% 0.0 $0.0
Coal Ton 0% 0.0 $0.0
100% Total $3,074.5
Step 4: Specify the percentage of fuels to be used at column C (be sure to consider some percentage for
biomass). Make sure the total percentage is 100%. Total fuel cost is listed at E46.
Fuel Cost
Percentage of
home/facility is
heated by this fuel
Your summary if switch to use partial biomass
Fuel TypeTotal fuel unit
should used in 1 yearFuel unit
Biomass Heating
Page 42 of 63
Step 5
Step 5: Individual fuel savings listed at B50
5 Individual savings when
using new fuel percentages
Savings/year $785.5
B50 in step 5 represents the individual savings when using biomass. This savings is calculated by
using the original fuel cost in step 4 subtracts the new fuel cost with biomass in step 5.
This chart represents a comparison between the original fuel cost and the new fuel cost with
using biomass. The bar chart on the left represents the fuel cost for your original system. Each
color represents a fuel type and the total cost of the system is listed on the top of the bar chart.
The bar chart on the right represents the fuel cost of the new system with biomass (or more
biomass percentage) based on your input in step 4. Based on the chart above, it is clearly shown
that the total fuel cost for the system with more percentage of biomass is lower than your original
system.
$4,110.00
$3,450.18
$0
$500
$1,000
$1,500
$2,000
$2,500
$3,000
$3,500
$4,000
$4,500
Orignal Fuel Cost Fuel Cost with biomass
Comparison of fuel cost for original and modified system
Coal
Kerosene
Grass pellets
Wood pellets
Wood Chip
Propane
Natural Gas
Electricity
Heating Oil
Total
Biomass Heating
Page 43 of 63
Step 6
This section is only applicable to residential sector. Assume every house/condominium in your
county reduces only the percentage of oil and propane in the same percentage the user listed in
step 4, while other fuel remains unchanged. The resulting total fuel cost savings in the county is
shown in B61, be aware the unit is in terms of million dollars. G56 lists the total number of
houses in the county. Line 58 lists the percentage of each fuel used by average houses/condos in
the county. The reference for the number of houses/condos in the county and percentage of each
fuel is listed at row 19 and columns AE-AM of this worksheet. Note: wood is assumed to be
firewood.
The chart on above provides a comparison between the total fuel cost for the original system in
term of million dollars at the user’s county and the new system that every house reduce the
percentage of oil and propane same percentage as the user did. Similar to the chart in step 5, the
left bar chart represents the original system and the bar chart on the right represents the system
6
County Houses/Condos # 19,583
Fuel type Utility gas Heating oil, kerosene Propane Wood Electricity Coal or coke
Fuel percentage 49.60% 21.90% 11.30% 7.80% 7.30% 21.90%
Original fuel cost (million dollars) $14.99 $18.24 $8.54 $3.66 $8.49 $5.26
Fuel cost with your model (million dollars) $14.99 $5.47 $2.56 $3.66 $8.49 $5.26
County's Fuel Savings
(million dollars) $18.74
Step 6: This section is only applicable for the residential sector. Assuming every house/condo in the county reduces only the percentage of oil and
propane the same percentage that you listed in section 4, the total fuel cost savings for the county is listed at B61. Note: reference for this section is at
line 24, AE-AM in this worksheet.
Tompkins
Residential sector: If all households in your county changed to the percentage of biomass that you chose
$50.77
$40.04
$0.00
$10.00
$20.00
$30.00
$40.00
$50.00
$60.00
Original Your fuel percentage
Fuel cost (million dollars) at your county if every house reduced the percentage of oil and propane same percentage as you did
Coal or coke
Electricity
Wood
Bottled, tank,LP gas
Fuel oil, kerosene
Utility gas
Total
Biomass Heating
Page 44 of 63
with the percentage reduction of oil and propane. The total fuel cost is listed on the top of the bar
chart. According the chart above, less money is used on the fuel for heating in the new modified
system compared to the original system.
Step 7
This section provides an estimate on the amount of jobs created both directly and indirectly
through entire biomass supply chain. There are three different ways to calculate job creation in
the region:
A range of jobs created per 100,000 tons of pellet
A range of jobs created per million dollars (from fuel savings)
A range of jobs(directly and indirectly) created using economic multiplier
The range of jobs created is shown in line 65. If the users feel the parameter for job creation is
different from the default value, the user can provide their values on line 64.
Step 8
Low end High end Low end High end Low end High end low end high end
Default 342 350 7 22 1 1 2.2 4
Your value
Range
Direct jobs/ 100,000 tons of pellet Multiplier - indirect jobs
Step 7: This section is only applicable for the residential sector. Total job created from the county's fuel savings is listed on row 64. There are mainly three ways to calculate job creation: jobs created with
every 100,000 toms of pellet being manufactured, jobs created with every million dollars savings with using biomass, and lastly direct and indirect job created using economic multiplier (3.2 for biomass in
New York). You can change the parameters in row 69 if you would like to use different numbers. Note: Rerence for this section is: Biomass and Rural Economies
(http://biomassthermal.org/resource/PDFs/Fact%20Sheet%205.pdf )
Measures
7 Economic Impact based on county's fuel savings
Direct jobs/million dollars Multiplier - direct job
8
CH4 (CO2-equivalent
kg)CO2 (kg)
N2O (CO2-equivalent
kg)
CH4 (CO2-
equivalent kg)CO2 (kg)
N2O (CO2-
equivalent kg)
Heating Oil 5.2 5128.8 12.4 4.1 4030.5 9.7
Electricity - - - - - -
Natural Gas 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Propane 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Firewood 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Wood Chip (20% moist) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Wood pellets 66.0 0.0 103.3 99.2 0.0 155.2
Grass pellets 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Kerosene 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Coal 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Individual-Total emission
(kg)71.2 5128.8 115.7 103.3 4030.5 164.9
Individual-Reduced CO2 (kg) 1098.3
County-Total emission (kg) 1,394,327.1 100,436,777.5 2,264,890.0 2,022,330.4 78,929,579.5 3,229,528.2
County-Reduced CO2 (kg)
Step 8: Amount of reduced carbon dioxide from using biomass is listed at F88 and F90. Note: Reference for this section is:
http://www.deq.state.or.us/aq/climate/docs/ghgCalculatorFuelCombust.xls
21,507,198.0
* The health effect of methane and nitrous oxide is not in the scope of the project. For more information on the health effect of methane, please visit:
(http://www.dhs.wisconsin.gov/eh/chemfs/fs/Methane.htm); nitrous oxide please visit (http://ehs.columbia.edu/NitrousOxideHealthHazards.pdf).
For other health effects from burning fuels and biomass, please see: "The Hidden costs of energy: Unpriced Consequences of Energy Production and
Use," The National Academies Press, 2010)
Emission Gas
Fuel Type
Your current emission Your emission with biomass
Emission Gas
Biomass Heating
Page 45 of 63
Step 8 represents the amount of greenhouse gas emission (methane, carbon dioxide, and nitrous
oxide) from burning each fuel. The table on the left represents the total emission from your
current house or facility. The table on the right represents the total emission based on your input
in step 4. Since carbon dioxide contribute the most to the global warning, the spreadsheet focuses
on the reduction of carbon dioxide instead of other emissions. The total reduction in carbon
dioxide is listed at F83. Note: the emissions here exclude the processes of fuel extraction and
transportation.
The chart above presents a comparison of greenhouse gas emission between the current system
and modified system (with (more) biomass). The left hand side of the chart represents the
emission from the original system and the right hand side of the system represents the emission
from the modified system. The chart shows that the amount of carbon dioxide emitted through
combustion is dominant compared to methane (CH4) and nitrous oxide (N2O). Moreover, the
modified system produced less carbon dioxide than the original system.
Conclusion
This report has reviewed and analyzed the potential benefits of using regionally available biomass for
heating and perhaps cogeneration of electricity. A spreadsheet was developed to allow individuals,
businesses, and institutions to evaluate and chose biomass heating systems by quantifying the individual
savings and benefits. It also shows the overall benefits for the example region, the Southern Tier of New
York State. The results show that large cost savings, regional economic benefits, and greenhouse gas
CH4 (CO2-equivalent
kg)CO2 (kg)
N2O (CO2-equivalent
kg)
CH4 (CO2-equivalent
kg)CO2 (kg)
N2O (CO2-equivalent
kg)
Series1 71.2 5128.8 115.7 103.3 4030.5 164.9
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
Gre
en
ho
use
Gas
Em
issi
on
(C
O2
-eq
uiv
aln
et
kg)
Comparison of Greenhouse Gas Emissions of the Systems
Current emissions Emissions with biomass
Biomass Heating
Page 46 of 63
reductions would accrue with wider use of biomass heating to replace oil, propane, and kerosene fuels.
Even more benefit would accrue if heating were combined with cogeneration. The review of the
available technologies and capital costs shows that technologies are generally available and mature for
large scale users who have some personnel and space available for operations and management. Also
mature technologies are available for pellet heating for widespread small scale applications such as home
heating. We hope that this work will assist in the adoption of cost-effective and environmentally-
beneficial energy usage by individuals, businesses and institutions.
Biomass Heating
Page 47 of 63
Appendix A: Biomass projects in New York State
Project profile 1: Biomax100 at Morrisville State College, Morrisville, NY
In December 2012, Morrisville State College installed a new biomass gasifier (BioMax 100), a
combined heat and power (CHP) system near the Commons I residence hall. The BioMax system
was designed and installed by Community Power Corporation (CPC) of Colorado. It can gasify
wood pellets, wood chips and other biomass resources to generate heat and electricity to two on-
campus residence hall buildings.
The efficiency of this CHP system is over 61% and requires an average of 2.4 tons of feedstock
per day. In optimal operation, it can produce 100kW continuous power to 125kW peak capacity.
At 75% availability, it will produce more than 657,000 kWh each year and at least 350,000 Btu
of heat in every hour. This CHP system guaranteed a 15% - 20% savings to Morrisville College.
Although the BioMax 100 runs on wood chips and wood pellets, Morrisville State College is
planning testing the feasibility of the system using waste products as feedstocks -- like cardboard,
paper, cartons, etc. Eventually the system will switch its feedstock from wood chips to waste
material produced at school to further save fuel cost and create a more sustainable environment.
Different types of feedstock that will be tested in the BioMax 100
Biomass Heating
Page 48 of 63
BioMax 100 system
Biomass Heating
Page 49 of 63
Project profile 2: ACT Bioenergy boiler at Cayuga Nature Center, Ithaca, NY A 0.5 MMBtu wood chip boiler was installed at Cayuga Nature Center in 2009 to heat the
facilities of the center. This boiler supplied by ACT Bioenergy replaced heat previously provided
by propane boilers which remain in place as back-up. The total system installed cost was
approximately $155,000. The boiler provides an annual savings of $13,000 in heating costs and
uses locally available wood chips as feedstock. The heat transfer efficiency of the system ranged
between 80% - 90%. The feed system typically requires minor attention about once a day
A 10 foot x 10 foot chip storage bin was built next the containerized boiler and hold fuel that
lasts for 3 days. A larger barn was also built that allows a dump truck to deliver loads of up to 10
ton of chips at a time.
The boiler is estimated to reduce net carbon dioxide emission by 45 tons per year which is
equivalent to carbon dioxide emission from eight average-sized cars.
Facility crew & wood chip boiler
Chip bin auger/stirrer
Biomass Heating
Page 50 of 63
Wood chip boiler and storage bin
Project profile 3: Hurst Biomass Boiler at Wagner Lumber, Cayuta, NY Wagner Lumber is a groups of sawmills in New York and Pennsylvania that help clients in
logging and timber management as well as serving lumber customers around the globe. A
15.05MMBtu (450 horsepower) Hurst boiler is installed at a facility of Wagner Lumber located
at Cayuta, New York. For fuel the boiler uses green waste such as sawdust or wood chips from
the sawmill. They have moisture content of around 28%. The boiler facility uses 25-30 tons of
wood chips per day and generates around 11.72 MMBtu of heat per day (350hp) in winter. The
steam generated from the boiler system is used to heat up its facilities. 15-18 tons of ash is
generated and is removed once a year. The feed system typically needs minor attention about
once a day.
The boiler is inspected once per year and shut down for maintenance twice every year. During
the inspection and shutdown period, the personnel in the facility start up their backup system.
The backup system is an oil boiler which uses #2 heating oil. The cost of the heating oil is $3.65-
$3.75/gallon and it is loaded by a 45-50 gallons truck. It is much more expensive to supply the
needed heat from the oil boiler backup and they try to carry out the maintenance time of the
biomass boiler as quickly as they can.
Biomass Heating
Page 51 of 63
Hurst boiler
Heating system to control the moisture of wood
Sawdust as the feedstock
Moving wood
Project profile 4: Grass Pellet Stove @ Big Red Barn, Cornell University
The grass pellet stove installed at Big
Red Barn is the Quadra Fire Mt.
Vernon AE Fireplace insert pellet stove.
The heat output of this stove is between
14,600 and 60,200 Btu/hour depending
on the feed rate setting used. It has a 7-
day programmable wall thermostat that
allows automatic room temperature
control. The pellet feed rate is around 1
to 5 lbs/ hour depending on the feed
setting (1-5 settings). However, it is
used more for ambiance than heat. It
Biomass Heating
Page 52 of 63
only runs when people are present which is often in the evening.
The cost of this facility was around $4,198. Once a year, a technician come in from Hearth &
Home comes to clean and inspect the stove. So far, there has only been one time that Hearth and
Home was called in for a problem with the unit’s controller over the past 5 years. Therefore, the
technology readiness for this facility was very high.
Biomass Heating
Page 53 of 63
Appendix B: Technology Readiness Level descriptions84
84
(Technology readiness level definitions and descriptions)
TRL 1 Definition TRL 1 Description
Basic Research. Initial scientific
research begins. Examples
include studies on basic material
properties. Principles are
qualitatively postulated and
observed.
Basic principles are observed. Focus is on fundamental
understanding of a material or process. Examples might
include paper studies of a material’s basic properties or
experimental work that consists mainly of observations of the
physical world. Supporting information includes published
research or other references that identify the principles that
underlie the material process.
TRL 2 Definition TRL 2 Description
Applied Research. Initial
practical applications are
identified. Potential of material
or process to satisfy a technology
need is confirmed.
Once basic principles are observed, practical applications can
be identified. Applications are speculative, and there may be
no proof or detailed analysis to support the assumptions.
Examples are still limited to analytic studies. Supporting
information includes publications or other references that
outline the application being considered and that provide
analysis to support the concept. The step up from TRL 1 to
TRL 2 moves the ideas from basic to applied research. Most of
the work is analytical or paper studies with the emphasis on
understanding the science better. Experimental work is
designed to corroborate the basic scientific observations made
during TRL 1 work.
TRL 3 Definition TRL 3 Description
Critical Function, i.e., Proof of
Concept Established. Applied
research continues and early
stage development begins.
Includes studies and initial
laboratory measurements to
validate analytical predictions of
separate elements of the
technology. Examples include
research on materials,
components, or processes that
are not yet integrated.
Analytical studies and laboratory-scale studies are designed to
physically validate the predictions of separate elements of the
technology. Examples include components that are not yet
integrated. Supporting information includes results of
laboratory tests performed to measure parameters of interest
and comparison to analytical predictions for critical
components. At TRL 3 experimental work is intended to verify
that the concept works as expected. Components of the
technology are validated, but there is no strong attempt to
integrate the components into a complete system. Modeling
and simulation may be used to complement physical
experiments.
TRL 4 Definition TRL 4 Description
Laboratory Testing/Validation of
Alpha Prototype
Component/Process. Design,
development and lab testing of
technological components are
performed. Results provide
evidence that applicable
component/process performance
The basic technological components are integrated to establish
that the pieces will work together. This is relatively "low
fidelity" compared with the eventual system. Examples include
integration of ad hoc hardware in a laboratory and testing.
Supporting information includes the results of the integrated
experiments and estimates of how the experimental
components and experimental test results differ from the
expected system performance goals. TRL 4-6 represent the
Biomass Heating
Page 54 of 63
targets may be attainable based
on projected or modeled systems.
bridge from scientific research to engineering, from
development to demonstration. TRL 4 is the first step in
determining whether the individual components will work
together as a system. The laboratory system will probably be a
mix of on-hand equipment and a few special purpose
components that may require special handling, calibration, or
alignment to get them to function.
TRL 5 Definition TRL 5 Description
Laboratory Testing of
Integrated/Semi-Integrated
System. Component and/or
process validation in relevant
environment- (Beta prototype
component level).
The basic technological components are integrated so that the
system configuration is similar to (matches) the final
application in almost all respects. Supporting information
includes results from the laboratory scale testing, analysis of
the differences between the laboratory and eventual operating
system/environment, and analysis of what the experimental
results mean for the eventual operating system/environment.
The major difference between TRL 4 and 5 is the increase in
the fidelity of the system and environment to the actual
application. The system tested is almost prototypical. An
example in PV might be the fabrication of devices that closely
match or exceed the expected efficiency targets but is
fabricated in the lab manually with minimal automation.
Scientific risk should be retired at the end of TRL 5. Results
presented should be statistically relevant.
TRL 6 Definition TRL 6 Description
Prototype System Verified.
System/process prototype
demonstration in an operational
environment- (Beta prototype
system level).
Engineering-scale models or prototypes are tested in a relevant
environment. This represents a major step up in a technology’s
demonstrated readiness. Examples include fabrication of the
device on an engineering pilot line. Supporting information
includes results from the engineering scale testing and analysis
of the differences between the engineering scale, prototypical
system/environment, and analysis of what the experimental
results mean for the eventual operating system/environment.
TRL 6 begins true engineering development of the technology
as an operational system. The major difference between TRL 5
and 6 is the step up from laboratory scale to engineering scale
and the determination of scaling factors that will enable design
of the final system. For PV cell or module manufacturing, the
system that is referred to is the manufacturing system and not
the cell or module. The engineering pilot scale demonstration
should be capable of performing all the functions that will be
required of a full manufacturing system. The operating
environment for the testing should closely represent the actual
operating environment. Refinement of the cost model is
expected at this stage based on new learning from the pilot
line. The goal while in TRL 6 is to reduce engineering risk.
Results presented should be statistically relevant.
Biomass Heating
Page 55 of 63
TRL 7 Definition TRL 7 Description
Integrated Pilot System
Demonstrated. System/process
prototype demonstration in an
operational environment-
(integrated pilot system level).
This represents a major step up from TRL 6, requiring
demonstration of an actual system prototype in a relevant
environment. In the case of a new PV module, this will
include a full-scale pilot line capable of producing such
modules. Examples include manufacturing the PV devices on
a manufacturing pilot line with operations under primary
control of manufacturing. Significant amount of automation is
expected at the completion of this phase if the cost model for
full-scale ramp requires it. 24-hour production (at least for a
relevant duration) is expected to discover any unexpected
issues that might occur during scale up and ramp. Supporting
information includes results from the full-scale testing and
analysis of the differences between the test environment, and
analysis of what the experimental results mean for the eventual
operating system/environment. Final design is virtually
complete. The goal of this stage is to eliminate engineering
and manufacturing risk. To credibly achieve this goal and exit
TRL 7, scale is required as many significant engineering and
manufacturing issues can surface during the transition between
TRL 6 and 7.
TRL 8 Definition TRL 8 Description
System Incorporated in
Commercial Design. Actual
system/process completed and
qualified through test and
demonstration- (Pre-commercial
demonstration).
The technology has been proven to work in its final form and
under expected conditions. In almost all cases, this TRL
represents the end of true system development. Examples
include full-scale volume manufacturing of commercial end
product. True manufacturing costs will be determined and
deltas to models will need to be highlighted and plans
developed to address them. Product performance
improvement plan needs to be highlighted and plans to close
any gap will need to be developed.
TRL 9 Definition TRL 9 Description
System Proven and Ready for
Full Commercial Deployment.
Actual system proven through
successful operations in
operating environment, and
ready for full commercial
deployment.
The technology is in its final form and operated under the full
range of operating conditions. Examples include steady state
24/7 manufacturing meeting cost, yield, and output targets.
Emphasis shifts toward statistical process control.
Biomass Heating
Page 56 of 63
Appendix C: List of NYS Certified Outdoor Wood Boilers Models85
Manufacturer Model
Certified
Emission Rate
(lb/MMBtu,
heat output)
Classification
Minimum
Setback
(feet)
Fuel
Woodmaster 30KW 0.04 Residential 100 Cord wood
Woodmaster 60KW 0.04 Residential 100 Cord wood
Central Boiler Maxim 250 0.066 Residential 100 Wood pellets
Heatmor 200 SSP 0.07 Residential 100 Wood pellets
Polar Furnace G3 0.08 Residential 100 Cord wood
Central Boiler E-Classic 3200 0.08 Commercial 200 Cord wood
Central Boiler E-Classic 2400 0.12 Commercial 200 Cord wood
Hawken Energy,
Inc. GX10 0.14 Residential 100 Cord wood
LEI Products Bio-Burner
BB-100 0.145 Residential 100 Wood pellets
Woodmaster 60KW 0.16 Residential 100 Wood pellets
Central Boiler E-Classic 1450 0.18 Residential 100 Cord wood
Polar Furnace G2 0.19 Residential 100 Cord wood
Hardy
Manufacturing KBP270 0.20 Residential 100 Wood pellets
Nature's
Comfort LLC GT-6000 0.22 Residential 100 Cord wood
Piney
Manufacturing Optimizer 250 0.23 Residential 100 Cord wood
Pro-Fab
Industries
Empyre Pro
Series 200 0.23 Residential 100 Cord wood
Greentech
Manufacturing
Crown Royal
RS7400-E 0.236 Commercial 200 Cord wood
85
(List of NYS Certificed Outdoor Wood Boiler Models)
Biomass Heating
Page 57 of 63
Piney
Manufacturing Optimizer 350 0.291 Commercial 200 Cord wood
Heatmor 200 SSR II 0.315 Residential 100 Cord wood
Piney
Manufacturing
Economizer
100 0.315 Residential 100 Cord wood
Hardy
Manufacturing KB165 0.316 Residential 100 Cord wood
Central Boiler E-Classic 2300 0.320 Residential 100 Cord wood
Central Boiler E-Classic 1400 0.32 Residential 100 Cord wood
Biomass Heating
Page 58 of 63
Appendix D: More resources on biomass
A guide to feasibility studies
Palmer, D., Tubby, I., Hogan, G. and Rolls, W. (2011). Biomass heating: a guide to
feasibility studies. Biomass Energy Centre, Forest Research, Farnham.
Websites:
http://www.biomassenergycentre.org.uk/pls/portal/docs/PAGE/BEC_TECHNICAL/BES
T%20PRACTICE/38215_FOR_BIOMASS_3_LR.PDF
A guide to medium scale wood chips and wood pellet systems
Palmer, D., Tubby, I., Hogan, G. and Rolls, W. (2011). Biomass heating: a guide to
medium scale wood chip and wood pellet systems. Biomass Energy Centre, Forest
Research, Farnham.
Websites:
http://www.biomassenergycentre.org.uk/pls/portal/docs/PAGE/BEC_TECHNICAL/BES
T%20PRACTICE/37821_FOR_BIOMASS_2_LR.PDF
A guide to small log and wood pellet systems
Palmer, D., Tubby, I. Hogan, G. and Rolls, W. (2011). Biomass heating: a guide to small
log and wood pellet systems. Biomass Energy Centre, Forest Research, Farnham.
Websites:
http://www.biomassenergycentre.org.uk/pls/portal/docs/PAGE/BEC_TECHNICAL/BES
T%20PRACTICE/36491_FOR_BIOMASS_1.PDF
Biomass Heating
Page 59 of 63
Appendix E: Works Cited (n.d.). Retrieved from http://blog.mlive.com/grpress/business_impact/2008/09/large_pellets.jpg
(n.d.). Retrieved February 2013, from Pellet Fuel Institute: http://pelletheat.org/wp-
content/uploads/2011/11/standards-table.jpg
(n.d.). Retrieved March 2013, from RenewableEnergyWorld.com:
http://www.renewableenergyworld.com/assets/images/story/2010/10/14/1-1332-biomass-
conversions-not-so-cut-and-dried.jpg
(n.d.). Retrieved March 2013, from Canadianbiomassmagnize.ca:
http://www.canadianbiomassmagazine.ca/images/stories/2009/June-
2009/EpiFluidizedBedBoiler.jpg
(n.d.). Retrieved March 2013, from Pelletsdirect:
http://www.pelletsdirect.com/Wood%20Pellets%20Pricing.htm
About Biomass - Biomass Power is the Natural Solution. (n.d.). Retrieved March 2013, from Biomass
Power Association: http://biomasspowerassociation.com/pages/about_facts.php
Akram, M. (n.d.). Nitrous Oxide Health Hazards. Retrieved May 2013, from
http://ehs.columbia.edu/NitrousOxideHealthHazards.pdf
Bergman, R., & Zerbe, J. (2004, May 24). Primer on Wood Biomass for Energy. Retrieved February 2013,
from USDA Forest Service, State and Private Forestry Technology Marketing Unit:
http://www.esf.edu/scme/wus/documents/primer_on_wood_biomass_for_energy.pdf
Biomass and Rural Economies. (n.d.). Retrieved April 2013, from Biomass Thermal Energy Council (BTEC):
http://biomassthermal.org/resource/PDFs/Fact%20Sheet%205.pdf
Biomass Burn Characteristics. (2011, June). Retrieved February 2013, from Ontario Ministry of
Agriculture and Food: http://www.omafra.gov.on.ca/english/engineer/facts/11-033.htm#3
Biomass Conversion Technologies. (n.d.). Retrieved March 2013, from EPA Combined Heat and Power
Partnership: http://www.epa.gov/chp/documents/biomass_chp_catalog_part5.pdf
Biomass Energy and its Benefits. (n.d.). Retrieved March 2013, from The Public Utilities Commision of
Ohio: http://www.puco.ohio.gov/puco/?LinkServID=07F1E2BB-0AA7-FBD8-20C111EC567E4C99
Biomass Feedstocks. (n.d.). Retrieved March 2013, from Enivronemntal and Energy Study Institute (EESI):
http://www.eesi.org/feedstocks
Biomass Technology Review. (2010, October 21). Retrieved March 2013, from Biomass Power
Association:
http://www.usabiomass.org/docs/2010_10_20_Biomass_Technology_Review_Rev_1.pdf
Biomass Heating
Page 60 of 63
Bubbling fluidized bed gasifier. (n.d.). Retrieved May 2013, from
http://atl.g.andritz.com/c/com2011/00/01/40/14083/1/1/0/-31641049/pp-powergeneration-
bfb-gasifer-principle.jpg
Carbon dioxide equivalent. (n.d.). Retrieved May 2013, from Wikipedia:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carbon_dioxide_equivalent
Cherney, J. H. (n.d.). Grass for BioHeat on Farms. Retrieved January 2013, from
http://www.extension.umn.edu/forages/pdfs/grass_for_bioheat_on_farms_21309.pdf
Christiane Egger; Christine Ohlinger; Bettina Auinger; Briqitte Brandstater; Nadja Richler; Gerhard Dell.
(n.d.). Biomass heating in Upper Austria. Retrieved January 2013, from
http://www.esv.or.at/fileadmin/redakteure/ESV/Info_und_Service/Publikationen/Biomass_heat
ing_2010.pdf
Cleaning Instructions. (n.d.). Retrieved March 2013, from Harman stoves:
http://www.harmanstoves.com/Customer-Care/Cleaning-Instructions.aspx
Consumers - Frequent Questions. (n.d.). Retrieved May 2013, from EPA:
http://www.epa.gov/burnwise/faqconsumer.html
Energy Conservation Improvements Property Tax Exemption. (2013, Feb 19). Retrieved March 2013,
from Databse of State Incentives for Renewables & Efficiency:
http://www.dsireusa.org/incentives/incentive.cfm?Incentive_Code=NY27F&re=1&ee=1
Facilities and Ventures. (n.d.). Retrieved March 2013, from New England Wood Pellet:
http://www.pelletheat.com/about-newp/facilities.html
Gas Producers (Gasifiers). (n.d.). Retrieved May 2013, from http://cturare.tripod.com/gas.htm
ghg Calculator Fuel Combust. (n.d.). Retrieved October 2012, from Oregon Department of
Environmental Quality:
http://www.deq.state.or.us/aq/climate/docs/ghgCalculatorFuelCombust.xls
Grants and support. (n.d.). Retrieved March 2013, from Biomass Energy Center:
http://www.biomassenergycentre.org.uk/portal/page?_pageid=77,15133&_dad=portal&_sche
ma=PORTAL
Heating Fuel Comparison Calculator. (n.d.). Retrieved April 2013, from EIA:
www.eia.gov/neic/experts/heatcalc.xls
Hidden costs of energy: Unpriced Consequences of Energy Production and Use. (2010). Retrieved May
2013, from The National Academies Press: http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=12794
Homemade Wood Stoves. (n.d.). Retrieved April 2013, from Keep-It-Simple-Firewood: http://www.keep-
it-simple-firewood.com/homemade-wood-stoves.html
Biomass Heating
Page 61 of 63
Homemade Wood Stoves. (n.d.). Retrieved April 2013, from Savvy Homemade:
http://www.savvyhomemade.com/homemade-wood-stoves.html
How Gasification Works. (n.d.). Retrieved March 2013, from ALL power Labs:
http://www.gekgasifier.com/info/gasification-basics/gasification-explained
How much does it cost to clean chimney. (n.d.). Retrieved May 2013, from Home advisor:
http://www.homeadvisor.com/cost/cleaning-services/clean-chimney/
How much electricity does an American home use? (2013, March 19). Retrieved March 2013, from U.S.
Energy Information Admistration (EIA): http://www.eia.gov/tools/faqs/faq.cfm?id=97&t=3
Inside Southern Tier. (n.d.). Retrieved November 2013, from Empire State Development:
esd.ny.gov/RegionalOverviews/SouthernTier/InsideRegion.html
John Laitner, M. E. (2007, September). The Economic Benefits of an Energy Efiiciency and Onsite
Renewable Energy Strategy to Meet Growing Electricity Needs in Texas. Retrieved May 2013,
from http://www.allianceforretailmarkets.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/e0761.pdf
Kacvinsky, E. J. (n.d.). Wood Pellet Stove 101. Retrieved March 2013, from Kinsmanstoves:
http://www.kinsmanstoves.com/pdf/pelletstoves101.pdf
Kay, D. L. (2002, December). Economic Multipliers and Local Economic Impact Analysis. Retrieved
November 2012, from http://minnesotafuturists.pbworks.com/f/PAPER-+02-Economic-
Multipliers-Kay.pdf
List of NYS Certificed Outdoor Wood Boiler Models. (n.d.). Retrieved March 2013, from Department of
Environmental Conservation: http://www.dec.ny.gov/chemical/73694.html
Local Option - Solar Wind & Biomass Energy Systems Exemption. (2013, Oct 11). Retrieved March 2013,
from Database of State Incentives for Renewables & Efficiency:
http://www.dsireusa.org/incentives/incentive.cfm?Incentive_Code=NY07F&re=0&ee=0
Mahajam, M. B., & Shah, S. R. (2006). Biomass Power Plant on Campus. Retrieved March 2013, from
http://biomasspowerassociation.com/docs/PRI%20-20Bioenergy_and_Greenhouse_Gases.pdf
Methane. (2012, December). Retrieved May 2013, from Wisconsin Department of Health Services:
http://www.dhs.wisconsin.gov/eh/chemfs/fs/Methane.htm
Method for Calculating Efficiency. (2013, April 10). Retrieved April 2013, from EPA:
http://www.epa.gov/chp/basic/methods.html
Mohammed Shehata. (n.d.). The Auspices of Tri-generation in the Data Center. Retrieved March 2013,
from Pts consulting: http://ptsconsulting.com/user-
content/documents/Articles/PTS%20Perspective%20-%20Trigeneration%20In%20DCs.pdf
Biomass Heating
Page 62 of 63
New York Woody Biomass Feedstock Suppliers and Processed Biomass Fuel Manufacturers. (n.d.).
Retrieved March 2013, from Watershed Agricultural Council Forestry Program:
http://www.nycwatershed.org/pdfs/biomass_producers_web.pdf
NYSEG(Gas) - Commercial and Industrial Efficiency Program. (2013, April 30). Retrieved May 2013, from
Database of State Incentives for Renewables & Efficiency:
http://www.dsireusa.org/incentives/incentive.cfm?Incentive_Code=NY89F&re=0&ee=0
O'Carroll, C. (2012, October 1). European Biomass Power Generation. Retrieved March 2013, from
http://www.platts.com/IM.Platts.Content/ProductsServices/ConferenceandEvents/2012/pc250/
presentations/Cormac_OCarroll.pdf
Palmer, D., & Tubby I. Hogan, G. a. (2011). Biomass heating: a guide to feasibility studies. Retrieved
March 2013, from Forest Reasearch:
http://www.biomassenergycentre.org.uk/pls/portal/docs/PAGE/BEC_TECHNICAL/BEST%20PRAC
TICE/38215_FOR_BIOMASS_3_LR.PDF
Pellet Stoves. (n.d.). Retrieved March 2013, from Harman Stoves:
http://www.harmanstoves.com/Browse/Stoves/Pellet-Stoves.aspx?ds=&ns=&va=&btu=&pr=
Rankine Cycle. (n.d.). Retrieved March 2013, from Wikipedia.org:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rankine_cycle
Requirements for OWB Owners. (n.d.). Retrieved March 2013, from Department of Environmental
Conservation: http://www.dec.ny.gov/chemical/81268.html
Residential Appliance Incentives. (n.d.). Retrieved April 2013, from Alliance for Green Heat:
http://www.forgreenheat.org/appliance/european.html
Residential Energy Efficiency Tax Credit. (2013, Jan 4). Retrieved March 2013, from Database of State
Incentives for Renewables & Efficiency:
http://www.dsireusa.org/library/includes/incentive2.cfm?Incentive_Code=US43F&State=federa
l%C2%A4tpageid=1&ee=1&re=0
Residential Wood Burning. (n.d.). Retrieved March 2013, from Deaprtment of Environemntal
Conservation: http://www.dec.ny.gov/chemical/51986.html
Residential wood heating fuel exemption. (2012, June 15). Retrieved May 2013, from Database of State
Incentives for Renewables & Efficiency:
http://www.dsireusa.org/incentives/incentive.cfm?Incentive_Code=NY101F&re=0&ee=0
Service area. (n.d.). Retrieved November 2012, from NYSEG:
http://www.nyseg.com/OurCompany/servicearea.html
Simle Rankine Cycle. (n.d.). Retrieved March 2013, from Mechteacher.com:
http://mechteacher.com/simple-rankine-cycle/
Biomass Heating
Page 63 of 63
Simnet, A. (2012, November 13). Reprot: Europe to remain biomass power leader. Retrieved April 2013,
from Biomass Magazine: http://biomassmagazine.com/articles/8301/report-europe-to-remain-
biomass-power-leader/
Stelzer, H. E. (2012, March). Wood Fuel for Heating. Retrieved April 2013, from University of Missouri
Extension: http://extension.missouri.edu/p/G5450
Technology Readiness Level. (n.d.). Retrieved March 2013, from Wikipedia:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Technology_readiness_level
Technology readiness level definitions and descriptions. (n.d.). Retrieved May 2013, from
www.bnl.gov/tcp/LinkableFiles_page/.../TRL%20Explanations.doc
Thermodynamics. (n.d.). Retrieved March 2013, from
http://www.mae.wvu.edu/~smirnov/mae320/figs/F8-1.jpg
Tietz, N. (2011, August 29). Fuel Pellets from Poor Hay. Retrieved April 2013, from Hay and Forage
Grower: http://hayandforage.com/biofuels/fuel-pellets-poor-hay-0829
Tompkins County, New York. (n.d.). Retrieved March 2013, from City-Data: http://www.city-
data.com/county/Tompkins_County-NY.html
Types of Biomass Fule. (n.d.). Retrieved November 2012, from BAXI:
http://www.baxi.co.uk/products/types-of-biomass-fuel/
Using local fule contributes to local economy, job creation and community security. (n.d.). Retrieved April
2013, from Evergreen Biomass Systems: http://evergreenbiomass.com/?page_id=29
Vapor and Combined Power Cycle. (n.d.). Retrieved March 2013, from
http://www.fkm.utm.my/~mohsin/sme2423/04.vapor.power.cycles/Chapter%2010%20Cengel%
205%20Ed.PDF
What is gasification? (n.d.). Retrieved May 2013, from Biomass Engineering:
http://www.biomass.uk.com/gasification.php
Wood Chip Boiler Reduces Heating Costs. (n.d.). Retrieved March 2013, from ACT Bioenergy:
http://actbioenergy.com/brochure/Containerized%20Wood%20Boiler%20Case%20Study.pdf
Wood Fired Hydronic Heaters. (n.d.). Retrieved from
http://www.ecy.wa.gov/programs/air/images/outdoor_BOILER.gif
Wood Stoves: The Most Popular Wood Heating Option. (n.d.). Retrieved March 2013, from Wood
Heat.org: http://www.woodheat.org/wood-stoves.html