biogeography of the antilles based on a parsimony...
TRANSCRIPT
Biogeography of the Antilles basedon a parsimony analysis of orchid distributionsJ. Carlos Trejo-Torres and James D. Ackerman Department of Biology, University of Puerto
Rico-Rõ�o Piedras, PO BOX 23360, San Juan, Puerto Rico 00931-3360
Abstract
Aim We obtain biogeographical patterns based on the distributions of shared orchidspecies of the Caribbean. These patterns are used to de®ne biogeographical zones. Wethen analyse the concordance between the distributional patterns with ecological andphysical features of the islands.
Location We use orchid species recorded on 49 islands of the Greater, Lesser, andsouthern Antilles, and the Bahamas. Three continental areas are included: Florida(North America), the Yucatan (Central America), and the Guianas (South America).
Methods We use a parsimonious analysis of species distributions that produces the bestarrangements of shared taxa among areas. The analysis uses 356 shared orchid species ofthe 863 species recorded for studied areas. The methodology has been used to inferhistorical relationships among areas but we interpret the results as static or ecologicalpatterns of biogeographical af®nities.
Results Two kinds of island groupings are revealed. (1) Groups with common geologyand geomorphology: the Bahama Archipelago, the Virgin Islands, the Cayman Islandsand the southern Dutch Antilles. (2) An aggregation of distant islands with aheterogeneous geology but a common physiography: the Greater Antilles/Trinidad/Lesser Antilles/Margarita-Tobago. The Guianas are linked with the Greater Antilles,while the Yucatan and Florida are linked to the Bahamas.
Main conclusions Groupings of islands are congruent with their gross ecologicalfeatures either from similar geomorphology or common physiography. The strongaf®nity among islands considerably distant among each other is explained by the highvagility of dust-seeded orchids. Then, ¯oristic af®nities seem determined by ecologicalcharacteristics of islands rather than by dispersal barriers. We predict that other plantgroups with dust-like diaspores and animals with good vagility should show comparablebiogeographic patterns. Parsimony analysis of distributions (PAD) is an alternativemethodology to multivariate analysis to compare biotas, and a graphic complement toquantitative methods producing numerical values.
Keywords
Antilles, Caribbean, biogeography, Orchidaceae, parsimony analysis of endemicity,distributions, dispersal, islands.
INTRODUCTION
The Antilles, or West Indies, have been frequently studied bybiogeographers. These islands make up one of the largesttropical archipelagos in the world, second only to the islands
between Asia and Australia. The Antilles are also signi®cantbecause they represent one of the two connections, by way ofan island chain, between two major biogeographical realms:the Neartic and the Neotropic. The majority of studies onAntillean biogeography concern the distributional patternsor the cladistic biogeography of animals, especially verte-brates and insects (e.g. Liebherr, 1988; Woods, 1989;Page & Lydeard, 1994; Hedges, 1996). Surprisingly, thereare only a few publications on the phytogeography of this
Correspondence: J. Carlos Trejo-Torres, Department of Biology, University of
Puerto Rico-RõÂo Piedras, PO BOX 23360, San Juan, Puerto Rico 00931-3360.
E-mail: [email protected]
Journal of Biogeography, 28, 775±794
Ó 2001 Blackwell Science Ltd
region (Howard, 1973; Samek, 1988; Adams, 1989; Lavin,1993; Borhidi, 1996), although the ¯oristics of the area havebeen actively studied for decades (Zanoni, 1986; Liogier,1996).
The Caribbean region has been divided phytogeographi-cally in three subregions by Samek (1988). These main divi-sions are: (1) Mexico to Panama, (2) Colombia to Venezuela,and (3) an insular subregion including the Antilles proper.The southern Antilles, from Aruba to Tobago are consideredpart of the Colombian±Venezuelan subregion. Borhidi(1996) joins both continental subregions, from Mexico toVenezuela, into a single one. While these authors considersouth Florida as part of the Antillean subregion, Gentry(1982) included only the Florida Keys in the Antillean region.
Distinguishing biotic regions, or de®ning biologicalboundaries, has been among the major concerns of bioge-ographers. Traditionally, this has been performed withsubjective methods (e.g. Gentry, 1982; Samek, 1988;Borhidi, 1996). However, more objective or analyticalapproaches have been developed for the analysis of distri-butional data of organisms (e.g. Gauch, 1982; McCoy et al.,1986; Patterson & Atmar, 1986; Rosen & Smith, 1988;Rosen, 1988; Vargas, 1991; Real et al., 1992; Scheiner,1992; Worthen, 1996; Puente et al., 1998). Here, we use analternative method based on a parsimonious analysis of taxadistributions (Rosen & Smith, 1988). This method repre-sents a direct way to search for the biogeographical af®nitiesamong areas (Connor, 1988; Vargas, 1991), for the detec-tion of areas of endemism (Morrone, 1994a; Cardoso daSilva & Oren, 199622 ; Bates et al., 1998), and for thedelimitation of biological boundaries (Posadas, 1996;Posadas et al., 1997; Morrone, 1998). The parsimonyanalysis presented here is a tool for searching the mostparsimonious arrangement of shared species among areas, asa means of revealing the biogeographical af®nities in ahierarchical pattern (Rosen & Smith, 1988; Brady, 1994).
The analysis presented here was originally called parsi-mony analysis of endemicity (PAE), and was suggested byRosen (198533 , cited in Rosen & Smith, 1988) and developedby Rosen & Smith (1988). It was also independentlysuggested by Legendre (1986) and Connor (1988). Sincethen it has been employed in the study of extant taxa ofNew Zealand (Craw, 1988), Australia (Cracraft, 1991),Southeast Africa (Morrone, 1994a), the Patagonia(Posadas, 1996), the Andes (Morrone, 1994b; Posadaset al., 1997), the Amazonia (Cardoso da Silva & Oren,1996; Bates et al., 1998), the Austral region (Craw, 1989;Morrone, 1998; Glasby & Alvarez, 1999), Mexico (Lunaet al., 1999), and the entire world (Conran, 1995). Theunits of comparison that have been used are sites, quad-rants or sections of regions, biogeographical areas, ornatural geographical areas (e.g. islands, continents, oceanbasins). We use entire islands or groups of them, as theunits of study. While the method has been mainly used fordiscovering the historical relationships among areas, wegive a static or non-historical interpretation to the patternsobtained (Rosen, 1992; Posadas, 1996; Posadas et al.,1997). Although the method has been called PAE, we use a
more generic name: parsimony analysis of distributions(PAD). The method excludes single-site species (includingsingle-site endemics), and takes into account shared specieswhether endemic or not to the Antilles or adjacent areas.We substitute the term distribution for endemicity to avoidconfusion.
Our goal here is to distinguish biogeographical patterns inthe Antilles based on one plant family, Orchidaceae. Thisgroup of plants, of which there are approximately 700species in the Antilles, is relatively well known taxonomi-cally and geographically because there are relatively recentorchid treatments for the Cayman Islands (Proctor, 1984,1996), Puerto Rico (Ackerman, 1995) and the Bahamas(Sauleda & Adams, 1982; Sauleda, 1992). Furthermore, atreatment for the Greater Antilles is underway (Ackerman,1997; in press). The homogeneous wind-dispersal mechan-ism (except in bird-dispersed Vanilla) of the dust-seedsamong the species of this family, makes orchids a good focalgroup for the study of distribution. Assuming that mostorchids have the same dispersal capacity, their distributionalpatterns may be explained in terms of other ecological,geographical and historical factors.
The questions we address are: (1) what are the phyto-geographical relationships among the Antillean islandsbased on shared orchid species? (2) are these relationshipsaffected when neighbouring continental regions are consid-ered? (3) what is the phytogeographical regionalization ofthe Antilles based on orchids, and (4) how do the distribu-tional patterns of orchids match with geography, geology,physiography and ecology of the region? Apart from thebiogeographical analysis per se, we discuss the use ofparsimony analysis of naturally de®ned areas (i.e. islands)with extremely dissimilar number of species, and the use ofsingle-site species to look at ®ner degrees of biogeographicaldifferentiation.
METHODS
A total of ®fty-two areas (Table 1) were included in thestudy. Data on the distribution of species were taken fromliterature and from unpublished sources (Table 2). Synony-mies and valid species names were standardized mainlyaccording to J.D. Ackerman (unpublished data).
A presence/absence matrix of the 863 orchid speciesreported for the studied areas was constructed in MacClade3.01 (Maddison & Maddison, 1992). Using this program,areas were entered in the place of taxa, while taxa wereentered in the place of characters. In the matrix, presencewas indicated with a `1' and absence with a `0'. Once weconstructed the matrix, we ran analyses of parsimony usingPAUP 4 (Swofford, 2000). A hypothetical outgroup areawith all 0s (no species) were used in the analyses to root thetrees. General heuristic searches were carried out to look forthe most parsimonious trees, which indicate the ¯oristicaf®nities among studied areas. We obtained consensus trees(Strict, Majority Rule and Adams) when more than oneequally parsimonious tree were found. A description and adiscussion of the parsimonious analysis methodology are
Ó Blackwell Science Ltd 2001, Journal of Biogeography, 28, 775±794
776 J. C. Trejo-Torres and J. D. Ackerman
found in Rosen & Smith (1988), Vargas (1991) and Rosen(1988, 1992).
Only the informative species were taken into account inthe analyses (Appendix 1). The uninformative species arethose found in only one area; therefore, they give no
information in terms of shared species af®nities. We onlyused these single-site (island or area) species for speci®c¯oristic comparisons. Also, Vanilla species were not consid-ered at all because they are animal-dispersed, an anomaly inthe orchid family.
Area relationships derived from PAD may be altereddepending on the inclusion or exclusion of different areasjust as is the case when using different ingroup/outgrouptaxa in cladistic studies. To test the robustness of our data,we conducted independent analyses of different subsets ofareas.
RESULTS
An analysis of all areas using the 356 shared orchid speciesproduced 216 equally parsimonious trees. The three con-sensus trees obtained from them produced entirely congruentgroupings (Fig. 1). The Strict consensus tree shows thegroups found in all the most parsimonious trees. TheMajority Rule tree shows the groups found in more than50% of those trees. The Adams tree gives the highestpossible resolution for data distribution.
Four main clusters of areas can be identi®ed in theconsensus trees (Fig. 1): (1) Greater Antilles/Guianas±Trini-dad/larger Lesser Antilles/smaller Lesser Antilles/VirginIslands/Margarita-Tobago/other smaller Lesser Antilles,(2) Yucatan/Florida/Isla de la Juventud/Bahamas/Mona/Anegada, (3) Cayman Islands, and (4) Aruba/CuracËao/Bonaire. Although these are well-de®ned aggregations, thepolytomic base of the trees means that relationships amongthem are not resolved. The arrangement of areas within thegroupings is highly in¯uenced by species numbers.
DISCUSSION
Groupings of areas vs. physical factors
We found two kinds of grouping patterns in the Antillesbased on orchid species distributions. One pattern aggre-gates islands that belong to single geological units while theother pattern groups areas with different geological histories(Fig. 2).
In the ®rst pattern, the groupings are easy to understandas they correspond to islands belonging to de®ned geolo-gical units. The Virgin Islands holds together as a group(except for Anegada). The islands of the Virgin IslandsBank, which excludes St Croix, were once part of a largervolcanic island that included Puerto Rico. They are oldislands, about 105 Ma (Donnelly, 1988) that separatedwhen the sea level rose after the last Pleistocene glaciation,some 18 Ma ago. They are small, low-mountain islands(to 521 m) with hot climates ranging from moist to dryconditions (Ewel & Whitmore, 1973). Similarly, the Baha-mas belong to a single geological platform, part of theNorth American plate. They are low-lying, sedimentarylimestone areas. Many of the Bahamas were interconnectedin the past (Williams, 1989). Regarding the CaymanIslands, which are located south of Cuba on the Cayman
Table 2 Primary data sources for the orchid species presence inthe studied Caribbean regions
Area Data source
Bahama Archipelago Sauleda & Adams (1982), Sauleda (1992)
Cayman Islands Proctor (1984, 1996)
Florida Wunderlin et al. (1996)
Greater Antilles Ackerman, J. D. (unpublished data)
Guianas Boggan et al. (1997)
Isla de la Juventud Jennings (1917), Sauget & Barbier (1946)
Lesser Antilles Garay & Sweet (1974), Nir, M.
(unpublished)
Margarita Hoyos (1985)
Southern Dutch Antilles van Proosdij, A. (unpublished)
Trinidad and Tobago Garay & Sweet (1974); Kenny (1988)
Yucatan Carnevali, G. (unpublished)
Table 1 Antillean islands and neighbouring continental areasincluded in the study. The Bahamas islands are combined followingCorrell & Correll (1982); names in italics are the ones used in ®guresand appendix
Greater Antilles Virgin IslandsCuba Anegada
Hispaniola
(Dominican Republic & Haiti)
Culebra
Jamaica St John
Puerto Rico St Thomas
Isla de la Juventud St Croix
Mona Tortola
Cayman Brac Vieques
Grand Cayman Virgin Gorda
Little Cayman
Bahama Archipelago
Lesser Antilles Abacos ± Grand Bahama
Antigua Andros ± Biminis
Barbados Cat
Barbuda Crooked ± Mayaguana
Dominica Exumas
Grenada Inaguas
Guadeloupe Long ± Ragged Island Range
Martinique New Providence ± Eleutheras
Montserrat San Salvador ± Rum Cay
Nevis Turks and Caicos
Saba
St BartheÂlemy
St Eustatius Trinidad bank
St Kitts Margarita
St Lucia Tobago
St Martin Trinidad
St Vincent
Continental regions Southern Dutch Antilles
Florida (North America) Aruba
Yucatan (Central America) Bonaire
Guianas: Guyana, Surinam and
French Guyana (South America)
CuracËao
Ó Blackwell Science Ltd 2001, Journal of Biogeography, 28, 775±794
Biogeography of the Antilles based on a parsimony analysis of orchid distributions 777
Ridge, are small, low-lying islands with limestone sedimen-tary substrate to 36 Ma; no connection between theseislands and other lands occurred in the past (Proctor,1984). Lastly, Aruba, Bonaire and CuracËao, with volcanicand sedimentary substrates, are geologically related andpart of the South Caribbean Island Chain (Bellizzia &Dengo, 1990). They are also small, low-elevation islands(to 372 m) with volcanic and sedimentary substrates, andhave dry climates. In addition to their common origin, eachone of these island aggregates has a common geomorphol-ogy and physiography with relatively homogeneous ecolog-ical conditions and low species richness. The anomalous¯oristic connection of St Croix with the Virgin Islandsgroup is understandable if we look at the physiographyrather than the geology. St Croix has an independent originfrom the Virgin Islands Bank; nevertheless, they arephysiographically similar.
The second pattern is represented by areas differing ingeological origin and that are separated by wide geograph-ical distances among themselves. One example is representedby the Bahamas/Isla de la Juventud/Mona/Anegada group.As mentioned above, the Bahama Archipelago is composedof low-lying, sedimentary limestone islands located on theNorth American plate. The Isla de la Juventud, which lies onthe western part of the Cuban Bank, is almost entirely low-lying, part calcareous and part metamorphic (CRAC, 1978).Mona is a small, ¯at, calcareous island between two of theGreater Antilles (Puerto Rico and Hispaniola). Lastly,Anegada is part of the Virgin Islands Bank; however, unlikethe other Virgin Islands, it is ¯at, low-lying and calcareous(D'Arcy, 1971). In spite of the separate geologicalorigin, these islands have a similar geomorphology andphysiography. The other example of the second pattern isthe Greater Antilles/Trinidad/larger Lesser Antilles/smaller
Figure 1 Consensus trees of ¯oristic af®nities of the Antilles and some continental areas based on a parsimony analysis of 356 sharedorchid species distributions. Consensus trees were obtained from 216 most parsimonious trees built by a general heuristic search (treelength � 903, CI � 0.395, RI � 0.626, RC � 0.247). Majority Rule and Adams trees are almost identical, except for placement of Anegada andbasal areas within the Bahamas branch. Many basal areas of different groups in Majority Rule and Adams trees appear collapsed in the Stricttree. Numbers on branches of Majority Rule tree indicate the percentage of the most parsimonious trees that support the grouping; +̀' afternumbers indicates the same value for subsequent internodes. Numbers in parentheses after the area-names in the Majority Rule tree are numbersof shared species. Relationships among areas are interpreted through branch connections and not in terms of vicinity in tree branches.Polytomies indicate unresolved af®nities among areas. Names in bold call the attention of some area af®nities.
Ó Blackwell Science Ltd 2001, Journal of Biogeography, 28, 775±794
778 J. C. Trejo-Torres and J. D. Ackerman
Eastern Antilles/Virgin Islands/Margarita±Tobago/othersmaller Lesser Antilles group. The origin of the GreaterAntilles, whether continental or oceanic, is under debate(Rosen, 1985; Iturralde-Vinent & MacPhee, 1999); how-ever, they are quite old, ranging from 105 to 80 Ma(Donnelly, 1988), or perhaps 150 Ma (Lewis & Draper,1990). The Lesser Antilles ®rst emerged as an oceanic islandarc about 43 Ma, and later expanded 11 Ma to form thenorth-western Lesser Antilles, from Dominica to Saba(Coney, 1982; Maury et al., 1990). Finally, the islands ofTrinidad, Margarita and Tobago, belong to the CaribbeanMountain System that is part of the continental SouthAmerican plate (Bellizzia & Dengo, 1990). There has beenno connection between these islands and the Lesser Antilles(Donnelly, 1988). Trinidad lost connection with SouthAmerica some 5 Ma (Persad, 1985). Notwithstanding thedifferences in geology and age, most of the islands of thisgrouping are volcanic, mountainous, have a variety ofclimates and natural communities, and complex speciesassemblages.
Orchid distribution patterns also seem to be in¯uenced bytheir high vagility. On a regional scale (the Antilles) cohesiveclusters of islands spread over hundreds to thousands ofkilometres (e.g. Bahamas±Anegada or the Greater Antilles±Eastern Antilles) re¯ect the high potential for orchid disper-sal, a capacity that may override the effects of geologicalhistory in de®ning the af®nities among those islands.
In general, distribution patterns of orchids are explainableaccording to the physical features of the islands. The similargeomorphology and/or physiography of these islands pre-sumably results in similar ecological conditions that conse-quently produce similar assemblages of species. However,geology clearly plays an important role in de®ning biogeo-graphical af®nities at a more restricted geographical scale.We do not know to what extent the biogeographical patterns
are affected by other factors such as prevailing winds andhurricane tracks.
Analysis of areas using different island data sets
Different analyses using subsets of areas (using the informativespecies for each data set) show patterns compatible with thegeneral analysis of all areas. Nevertheless, they do addinformation about the relationships among some groupingsand areas. The following observations are based mainly on theMajority Rule consensus trees (trees not presented).
1 When we analyse only the islands, excluding the contin-ental areas of Florida, the Guianas and the Yucatan, theBahamas split into two branches. The north-westernareas (Andros/Abacos/Providence) form a group with theIsla de la Juventud as basal. The Cayman Islands becomea sister clade of this Bahama group. Meanwhile, the restof the Bahama islands form another group with Monastill as basal.
2 If we eliminate the Isla de la Juventud (and the contin-ental areas), the Bahamas are not divided into two groupsas before and form a monocladic group. Mona andAnegada remain as basal areas.
3 When we eliminate the Bahamas (and the continentalareas), the Isla de la Juventud interestingly forms a pairwith Margarita, and together a sister group of theCayman Islands, all of them belong to an unresolvedclade. Meanwhile, Mona is left unresolved.
4 An analysis of the north-western areas, that is, theYucatan and Florida, the Bahamas, the Greater Antilles,the Isla de la Juventud, the Cayman Islands, Mona, andthe Virgin Islands, shows the Isla de la Juventud in an inter-mediate position between the Yucatan/Florida/GreaterAntilles and the Bahamas/Mona/Virgin Islands. TheCayman Islands remain monocladic and again unresolved.
Figure 2 Biogeographical patterns of af®nityof the Antilles based on a parsimoniousanalysis of 356 shared orchid species distri-butions. See Fig. 1 for detailed patterns ofaf®nity and single-island names. Dotted are-as: continental areas; short-dashed lines:island groups; long-dashed lines: relation-ships with continental areas; question marks:unresolved group or controversial af®nity;arrow: presumed af®liation. Island or group-ing names: A � Anegada, B � Barbados,C � Cuba, CI � Cayman Islands, H � His-paniola, IJ � Isla de la Juventud, J �Jamaica, LLA � Larger Lesser Antilles,M �Mona, MT �Margarita and Tobago,NBA � North-western Bahama Archipelago,PR � Puerto Rico, SBA � South-easternBahama Archipelago, SDA � SouthernDutch Antilles, SLA � Smaller Lesser Antil-les, T � Trinidad, VI � Virgin Islands.
Ó Blackwell Science Ltd 2001, Journal of Biogeography, 28, 775±794
Biogeography of the Antilles based on a parsimony analysis of orchid distributions 779
5 We also evaluated distributions of just the GreaterAntillean area, which includes the Isla de la Juventud,the Cayman Islands, the Virgin Islands and Mona. Thisanalysis reveals the Virgin Islands and Mona as basal ofthe Greater Antilles in the order mentioned. Meanwhilethe Isla de la Juventud joins the Cayman Islands formingan unresolved clade.
6 An analysis of our Eastern Antilles, from the VirginIslands to Margarita, links Trinidad as basal to the largerLesser Antilles, particularly as the sister area of neigh-bouring Grenada. Tobago and Margarita appear as sisterareas inserted within the Eastern Antilles group. TheVirgin Islands remain monocladic.
7 After merging islands belonging to banks (de®ned by the200 m bathimetric line: Trinidad+Tobago+Margarita,Virgin Islands except St Croix, Antigua+Barbuda,St Kitts+Nevis+ St BartheÂlemy), the Trinidad bankremains as a sister and basal group of the Greater Antilles(as Trinidad alone).
Points (1), (3) and (5) denote a close af®nity among theIsla de la Juventud, the Cayman Islands, and the Bahamas.
Relationships among the groupings using exclusive
and endemic species
The parsimony analysis produced consistent assemblages ofareas. Nevertheless, the relationships among some of thegroupings are not resolved. We attempt to understand theseunde®ned af®nities by subjectively examining the number ofendemic species, the number of exclusive species (single-site,non-endemic species), and the presence of species of restric-ted distribution of every island or group. Are all theunresolved clusters of islands in the consensus trees, inde-pendent biogeographical provinces?
The Eastern Antilles, from the Virgin Islands to Margaritaconstitute a distinct branch with several minor subgroups.First, the larger Lesser Antilles from Guadeloupe to St Lucia isthe most de®ned group, with seven endemic species [Ellean-thus dussii Cogniaux, Epidendrum discoidale Lindley, Max-illaria guadalupensis Cogniaux, Pleurothallis dussiiCogniaux, P. ophioglossoides (Jacquin) Garay, Pseudocen-trum guadalupense Cogniaux, Stelis dussii Cogniaux]. Sec-ondly, the smaller Lesser Antilles (islands north ofGuadeloupe from Montserrat to St Martin) is a `group' thatsplits along the Eastern Antilles branch (Figs 1 and 2). Someof these islands share two endemic species with the largerLesser Antilles group (Epidendrum difforme Jacquin andEpidendrum patens Swartz). We recognize that this smallerLesser Antilles `group' is not cast in stone because basalspecies-poor areas are prone to changing af®nities. Thirdly,the Virgin Islands, except Anegada, constitute a monocladicbut weakly differentiated (no endemic species) group which is®rmly allied with the Lesser Antilles. Nevertheless, the VirginIslands have two species that they share exclusively withneighbouring Puerto Rico [Psychilis macconnelliae Sauleda,Tolumnia prionochila (KraÈnzlin) Braem]. This connectionwas insuf®cient to alter the ¯oristic af®nities of the Virgin
Islands with the Lesser Antilles in our analyses. Lastly,Tobago and Margarita form a pair within the Eastern Antillesbranch. The fact that these island groups appear as basal andpectinate with respect to the Greater Antilles, indicates a closeaf®nity among the islands of our Island Arc group.
The Cayman Islands are always monocladic and usuallyoccur as an independent clade. They have three endemicspecies [Dendrophylax fawcettii Rolfe, Encyclia kingsii(C. D. Adams) Nir, Myrmecophila albopurpurea (Strachanex Fawcett) Ackerman; recent morphological and moleculardata fail to distinguish T. caymanense (Moir) Braem fromT. variegata (Swartz) Braem]. Among the species of restricteddistribution two are shared with the Greater Antilles, Floridaand the Yucatan [Harrisella porrecta (Reichenbach f.)Fawcett & Rendle, Tropidia polystachya (Swartz) Ames],other two are shared only with the Greater Antilles[T. calochila (Cogniaux) Braem, T. variegata], and anotheris shared only with Cuba [Myrmecophilla thomsoniana(Reichenbach f.) Rolfe]. These species in common suggest aclose af®nity among the Cayman Islands, the GreaterAntilles and the peninsulas of Yucatan and Florida.
The Bahamas are also an independent clade in the generalanalysis. They have ®ve endemic species [Encyclia caicensis(Sauleda & Adams), E. fehlingii (Sauleda) Sauleda &Adams, E. gracilis (Lindley) Schlechter, E. inaguensis Nashex Britton & Millspaugh, T. sasseri (Moir) Braem]. Of thespecies with the most restricted distribution, there is onlyone exclusively shared with Florida [T. bahamense (Nash exBritton & Millspaugh) Braem] while there are seven sharedexclusively with the Greater Antilles [Broughtonia lindeniiLindley, Domingoa haematochila (Reichenbach f.) Carabia,Encyclia fucata (Lindley) Britton & Millspaugh, E. plicata(Lindley) Schlechter, Tetramicra urbaniana Cogniaux,T. gauntletii (Withner & Jesup) Braem, T. lucayana (Nashex Britton & Millspaugh) Braem]. Thus, the relationshipsamong the Bahamas and the Greater Antilles seems to beconsiderable.
Lastly, Aruba, Bonaire and CuracËao form another inde-pendent group. These islands have only three speciesreported, none of which is endemic. One occurs on differentcontinental and insular areas [Polystachya foliosa (Hooker)Reichenbach f.], one held in common with Central andSouth America [Brassavola nodosa (Linnaeus) Lindley], andone shared only with Venezuela [Myrmecophila humboldtii(Reichenbach f.) Rolfe]. Thus, the ABC islands show nospecial af®nity to the rest of the Antilles.
Relationships with continental areas
The inclusion of the Guianas as a South American contin-ental area was thought as a heuristic exercise. First, theGuianas is a politically de®ned area rather than a biogeo-graphical region. Secondly, the Guianas is likely outside theCaribbean ¯oristic region and part of the Amazonian region(Gentry, 1982). If we were to include other South Americanregions in this study, no doubt the Guianas would shiftaf®nities dramatically. The Guianas form a sister group tothe Greater Antilles, which is indicative of the strong
Ó Blackwell Science Ltd 2001, Journal of Biogeography, 28, 775±794
780 J. C. Trejo-Torres and J. D. Ackerman
af®nities among insular and continental orchid ¯oras (as hasbeen put forth for the ¯ora in general by Samek, 1988;Borhidi, 1996).
The Yucatan and Florida form a sister pair of the north-western Bahamas/Isla de la Juventud group. All these aresedimentary, calcareous, low-lying and ¯at areas. Samek(1988) and Borhidi (1996) de®ned South Florida togetherwith the Bahamas as one province. On the other hand,Gentry (1982) excluded Florida (except for the Keys) fromhis Caribbean (insular) region. We consider Florida andthe Yucatan as provinces not belonging to the Antilleansubregion, which are supposedly part of the Continentalsubregion of the Caribbean.
To de®ne more clearly the relationships among the insularAntilles and their neighbouring continental areas, morethorough studies are necessary. Also, the inclusion of othercontinental areas, working as distant sister areas in theanalyses, would be useful. For example, a sister continentalarea for the Yucatan biogeographical province (DuraÂn et al.,1998) could be a province in central-western Mexico. Bothoutside provinces belong to the same ¯oristic Mexican-Central American Caribbean subregion (sensu Samek, 1988).
Islands with unresolved af®nity
The unresolved islands or island groupings found in someconsensus trees could be explained in a number of ways.First, it is possible that an incomplete record of the speciesfor these islands could be hampering the resolution of theiraf®nities. As we improved the species record for the smallerLesser Antillean islands they became progressively resolved.We expect this trend to continue. Alternatively, the recordmay be complete and these unresolved areas could be theresult of: (1) a lower number of species which would preventtheir af®liation with other groups, (2) an equally strongaf®nity with more than one of the other groups, and (3) anon-hierarchical structure in the data (Ronquist, 1997;Glasby & Alvarez, 1999). One way an unresolved area orgroup could be considered distinctive would be if it had awell-differentiated ¯ora (i.e. endemic or exclusive species). Itis likely a combination of these factors that play a role inunresolved cases.
PAD, species richness and species±area curves
The position of areas in tree branches is in¯uenced by speciesnumbers. This pattern is not evident for the Antilleanarchipelago as a whole and only becomes obvious within themajor island assemblages. As we move from the tip to thebase of the tree branches, species numbers tend to diminish.This apparent numerical artefact has been stated as one ofthe main problems resulting from the use of areas withhighly dissimilar number of species, and a comparablenumber of taxa per site has been recommended as a pre-requisite for PAE analyses (Rosen, 1988, 1992; Rosen &Smith, 1988; Vargas, 1991; Conran, 1995). What our studyshows is that even with very few species the af®liation of anisland to a speci®c group occurs when the taxa permit it.
Every main cluster has its own species-poor islands. Weinterpret the basal position of an area as indicative of¯oristic subordination to the distal areas in the group.Otherwise, when the few species of an area do not de®ne itsaf®liation, such an area turns out to be unresolved orunstable, being located at the base of the whole tree or at thebase of different branches, respectively. In other words,either a high or a low number of species can de®nemembership patterns among areas. Limiting the analysis toareas with a similar number of species would unnecessarilyrestrict the use of this methodology for the Caribbean andmany other regions.
Differences in species numbers within our island groupscan be converted into species±area curves. We have foundthat the geologically and physiographically diverse montaneislands have a different species±area curve than that for low-lying islands, which are basically calcareous and physio-graphically homogeneous (Ackerman et al., submitted). Thecalcareous group, comprised of nineteen islands (includingthe Cayman Islands), has a z-value of 0.25 (however, r � 0.4,P � 0.07), a typical value for islands (Rosenzweig, 1995).Meanwhile, the montane island group, composed of twenty-six islands (our island arc group), has a z-value of 0.51(r � 0.89, P � 0.0001). This is close to an interarchipelagicvalue found by Adler (1992, cited by Rosenzweig, 1995).Moreover, if a species±area curve for this montane group iscalculated with only the endemic species (using only nineislands that have single-island endemics), z � 0.68 (r � 0.88,P � 0.0019) suggesting that habitat diversity is important forautochthonous speciation. The two z-values for the montanegroup seem to indicate that the Island Arc group behaves as acluster of provinces (Rosenzweig, 1995) as has beenproposed by Borhidi & MunÄ iz (1986). In contrast, theendemic species±area curve for the relatively homogeneouscalcareous group was not run because there are only threeislands (island banks indeed) with endemic species.
Phytogeographical regionalization of the Antilles
The Antilles is among the principal phytogeographicalregions of the world (Gentry, 1982). It has been includedwithin the Caribbean region that extends to continentallands from Mexico to Venezuela (Samek, 1988; Borhidi,1996). Our orchid data seem to support this view. Thephytogeographic sectorization of Samek (1988) and Borhidi(1996) consider every one of the Greater Antilles asprovinces. Major geographical aggregations of islands (i.e.the Bahamas, the Lesser Antilles) are also de®ned asprovinces, while minor groups of islands (e.g. the VirginIslands, the Cayman Islands) are integrated with some of thebig islands. Apart from the recognition of these kind ofdivisions, we also examined af®nities among and withinthem in a tree-like hierarchical structure (Fig. 2).
1 Every one of the major islands of the Greater Antilles(i.e. Cuba, Hispaniola, Jamaica and Puerto Rico) issuf®ciently differentiated to be recognized as a separateprovince of the Antilles.
Ó Blackwell Science Ltd 2001, Journal of Biogeography, 28, 775±794
Biogeography of the Antilles based on a parsimony analysis of orchid distributions 781
2 The Lesser Antilles were taken as a single phytogeo-graphic province by Samek (1988) and Borhidi (1996).Their orchid ¯ora is suf®ciently distinctive, supportingthis view. Our analysis places them as part of the EasternAntilles group and at the same time subordinate to theGreater Antillean main group.
3 The Virgin Islands were integrated as part of Puerto Ricoby Samek (1988) and Borhidi (1996). However, our studyplaces them rather close to the Lesser Antilles, andaltogether, as subordinate of the Greater Antilles.
4 The Cayman Islands were considered part of Jamaica bySamek (1988) but as part of Cuba according to Borhidi(1996). Our analysis suggests that these islands havecomplex af®nities with the Greater Antilles, the Yucatanand Florida continental areas, and also with the Bahamas.
5 The Bahama archipelago was one of the Caribbeanprovinces distinguished by Samek (1988), Borhidi (1996),and Gentry (1982), and this is also supported by ourorchid data. Moreover, our study relates the Isla de laJuventud, Mona and Anegada (geographically and geo-logically part of the Greater Antilles) as subordinates ofthe Bahamian Province. The Isla de la Juventud shows astrong af®nity with the north-western Bahamas, whileMona and Anegada are small islands with close af®nity tothe rest of the Bahamas.
6 Trinidad, Tobago and Margarita were considered part ofthe Venezuela±Colombia Caribbean subregion by Samek(1988) and Borhidi (1996), while no clear af®liation forTrinidad and Tobago can be obtained from Gentry(1982). Our data support a closer af®nity of Trinidadwith the Greater Antilles instead of the neighbouringLesser Antilles. Based on its differentiated orchid ¯ora(approximately thirteen endemic species) we considerTrinidad as a ¯oristic province. On the other hand,Margarita and Tobago are linked with the Lesser Antilles±Virgin Islands group rather than with Trinidad. There aretwo potential problems with these islands. First, weconsider that the species record for these islands is notwell updated, especially for Trinidad and Tobago whosemost recent complete orchid ¯ora was published bySchultes (1960). Secondly, the Venezuelan Guyana maybe a more appropriate neighbouring continental area,instead of our Guianas area. If this is true, the islands ofthe Trinidad bank may be more related to the continentthan to the rest of the Antillean islands, as suggested bybat distribution patterns (Trejo-Torres & Rivera, unpub-lished data) and by geological history.
7 Aruba, Bonaire and CuracËao seem to be independent ofthe Antillean subregion and apparently part of theContinental Caribbean subregion.
Perspectives of PAD
The pattern we found for orchids is not necessarily the samefor the general ¯ora or for the entire biota of the region. Weexpect that phytogeographic relationships revealed byorchids might be similar to that of other highly vagile groupsof organisms such as wind-dispersed plants, ¯ying insects,
¯ying birds and bats. In this case, area af®nities appear to bede®ned by physical factors, such as geomorphology, physi-ography, climate, geography and island area. At the sametime, it is plausible to predict that less vagile organisms, suchas non-¯ying vertebrates and freshwater ®shes, will de®nedifferent patterns of area relationships, perhaps more in¯u-enced by geological and geographical history of areas.
The PAE/PAD is an alternative to the use of multivariatephenetic methods for classi®cation of biotas (Rosen, 1988;Vargas, 1991) and for comparing species assemblages. Infact, giving a static interpretation of area relationships, thisis a method equivalent to multivariate ones (Rosen, 1988,1992). Some important differences between PAE/PAD andmultivariate methods are: (1) The PAE/PAD uses parsimonyalgorithms instead of similarity indexes. This means that thehierarchy selected in this manner will be the best supportedby evidence, for it maximizes congruence between data andhierarchical patterns (Brady, 1994). (2) The PAE/PAD usescharacters (taxa) selected a priori based on their informat-iveness, that is, species found in all sites and single-sitespecies are eliminated as they give no information on theaf®nities among areas (3). The PAE/PAD provides a moreuni®ed methodology as multivariate methods use manydifferent similarity indices, which can also yield differentresults.
The PAE/PAD can be seen as a complementary method.While many community analyses are intended to describequantitative parameters, PAE/PAD is directed to describecomposition patterns, based on the identity of species(Worthen, 1996). Also, results of PAE/PAD in the form oftrees with a hierarchical structure could be a graphiccomplement to other methods which produce results thatare single numerical values, such as indexes, scores orexponents (i.e. nestedness analysis, Patterson & Atmar,1986). The hierarchical nature of the results does notnecessarily mean that communities are organized that way.After all, af®nities among communities may have anunderlying reticulate structure (Ronquist, 1997). We viewPAE/PAD as only one way to represent structure in biogeo-graphical data.
The PAE/PAD has the potential as a method for under-standing ecological biogeographic problems. This is suppor-ted by the Caribbean orchids for which composition patternsstrikingly match physical and ecological factors. The use ofthe method as a complement to vicariance and other histor-ical biogeographic methods has been suggested (Cracraft,199144 ). Because of its phenetic nature, patterns foundthrough PAE/PAD could be re¯ecting ecological phenomena,rather than historical ones. Nevertheless, until now, it hasalways been used under the historical point of view. Some ofthe aspects pointed out as disadvantages to the historicalapproach, do not exist in the ecological context. Forexample, ¯oristic af®nities, biodiversity comparisons andcomposition patterns can be seen as phenetic phenomena.
For the demarcation of biogeographical units PAE/PADcould be employed before searching for speci®c patterns indistributional data sets. This could avoid distortions frompossible structure in the data caused by mixing areas
Ó Blackwell Science Ltd 2001, Journal of Biogeography, 28, 775±794
782 J. C. Trejo-Torres and J. D. Ackerman
belonging to different biotas. Within the same context,Morrone & Crisci (1995) suggested the use of panbiogeo-graphic methods as an initial step to do other historicalbiogeographic analyses.
The PAE/PAD could prioritize conservation efforts at theregional level (Posadas, 1996) by identifying areas or islandsof high diversity. We have shown that such use can behelpful for the Antilles, one of the world's biodiversityhotspots (Myers et al., 2000). However, conservationefforts often focus on unique species, particularly endemics(island endemics in our case), but PAD uses only sharedspecies. The exclusive use of PAD in formulating conserva-tion strategies can thus be misleading. This is especially truefor species-poor islands that appear subordinated to species-rich islands. Impoverished islands may thus be falselyinterpreted as irrelevant for biodiversity conservation. Forexample, the tiny island of Mona lies subordinate to otherislands of our calcareous group yet it is certainly worthy ofconservation efforts because Mona has its own set ofendemic plants and animals (including an orchid, Psychilismonensis Sauleda).
The PAE/PAD do have problems that need to be resolvedand these are the interpretation of: (1) the unresolved statusamong the main groupings of areas, (2) the area relation-ships when using islands as well as continental regions, (3)the potential use of branch-lengths in the trees. Specialattention should also be given when selecting data sets fororganisms with diverse ecological characteristics (e.g. birds,which could belong to different guilds: residents vs. migra-tory, volant vs. non-volant).
CONCLUSIONS
According to our orchid data, the Antillean islands consti-tute a phytogeographical subregion of the Caribbean. TheLesser Antilles and the Bahamas are well-de®ned provinces.Meanwhile, the Virgin Islands and the Cayman Islands arepoorly differentiated aggregates, perhaps to be considered asincipient provinces. All of them are subordinated to the mainGreater Antillean group.
Within islands groupings detected by PAD ordering ofareas is highly in¯uenced by species numbers. The species-rich islands form cohesive groupings to which other species-poor islands unite as subordinates. These subordinate islandsare liable to changing af®nities.
Orchid species show three core zones of high diversityin the Antilles: the Greater Antilles (Hispaniola, Cuba,Jamaica, Puerto Rico); the larger Lesser Antilles (Guade-loupe, Dominica, Martinique, St Vincent, Grenada,St Lucia); and the north-western Bahamas (Andros, Abacos,Grand Bahama, New Providence, Eleuthera).
The patterns we found for orchid distributions in theAntilles are in¯uenced primarily by physical characteristicsof areas. That is, areas with common ecological featureseither because of similar physiographical conditions orcommon geomorphology form tight clusters, despite theirdifferences in geology or the long distances among them.
The highly compatible patterns obtained from differentisland sets and from different consensus trees indicate thatrelationships of areas obtained are well supported by thedata. In other words, the groups identi®ed are not arti®cial,but rather the result of their orchid-species af®nities.
Whereas PAE/PAD is an appropriate methodology for thestudy of geographical regions based on shared species,single-site species (the majority of which are endemics) areindicative of ®ner degrees of biogeographical differentiation.We suggest using both data sets to analyse biogeographicalaf®nities, for it integrates differences and similarities. Thisapproach provides a more thorough use of ¯oristic infor-mation for the analysis of biogeographical relationships.
The parsimony methodology seems to be appropriate forthe analysis of areas, or any other natural unit, with verydissimilar number of species. The low number of speciesfound in a unit can de®ne its af®liation or can produce anunresolved ¯oristic af®nity. The lack of af®nity of an area toany group may be either real or an artefact caused by anincomplete species record.
The PAE/PAD has great potential as an alternative,complementary or ®rst-step method to other multivariateand phylogenetic methodologies in biogeography.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The study was supported by NSF grants to JDA (DEB-9505459, HRD-9353549, HRD-9628475). Arkelio Alicea,Kary GarcõÂa, Eileen Bravo, and Yanet Crespo were studentsparticipating in the study under Alliance for MinoritiesParticipation Program at UPR. We thank Steve Rehnerlogistic assistance in data analysis. We are grateful to BrianRosen, David Lees, Susan AragoÂn, Marta DõÂaz, and JuanJ. Morrone who had made relevant comments on themanuscript. Timothy Johnston assisted editing the manu-script and Celene Espadas, Guillermo Bianchi, and AnaPorzecanski shared important references. GermaÂn Carnevali,Andre van Proosdij, Mark Nir and Hagen Stenzel providedunpublished data.
REFERENCES
Ackerman, J.D. (1995) An orchid ¯ora of Puerto Rico and theVirgin Islands. Memoires of the New York Botanical Garden,73, 1±203.
Ackerman, J.D. (1997) The orchid ¯ora of the Caribbean: newrecords and combinations. Lindleyana, 12, 149±152.
Ackerman, J.D. (2000) Notes on the Caribbean orchid ¯ora. II.Lindleyana, 15, 89±95.55
Ackerman, J.D., Trejo-Torres, J.C. & Crespo-Chuy, Y. (sub-mitted) Ecological Biogeography of the Caribbean: where arethe orchids?66
Adams, R.P. (1989) Biogeography and evolution of the junipersof the West Indies. Biogeography of the West Indies: Past,Present, and Future (ed. C.A. Woods), pp. 167±190. SandhillCrane Press, Florida, USA.
Bates, J.M., Hackett, S.J. & Cracraft, J. (1998) Area-relation-ships in the Neotropical lowlands: an hypothesis based on
Ó Blackwell Science Ltd 2001, Journal of Biogeography, 28, 775±794
Biogeography of the Antilles based on a parsimony analysis of orchid distributions 783
raw distributions of Passerine birds. Journal of Biogeography,25, 783±793.
Bellizzia, A. & Dengo, G. (1990) The Caribbean mountainsystem, northern South America; a summary. The geology ofNorth America: the Caribbean region, Vol. H, Chapter 6 (edsG. Dengo and J.E. Case), pp. 167±175. Geological Society ofAmerica, Colorado, USA.
Boggan, J., Funk, V., Kelloff, C., Hoff, M., Cremers, C. &Feuillet, C. (1997) Checklist of the Plants of the Guianas(Guyana, Surinam, French Guyana), 2th edn. SmithsonianInstitution, Washington DC, USA.
Borhidi, A. (1996) Phytogeography and Vegetation: Ecology ofCuba, 2th edn. AkadeÂmiai Nyomda, MartonvaÂsaÂr, Hungary.
Borhidi, A. & MunÄ iz, O. (1986) The phytogeographic survey ofCuba. II. Floristic relationships and phytogeographic subdivi-sion. Acta Botanica, Academy of Sciences, Hungary, 32, 3±48.
Brady, R.H. (1994) Pattern description, process explanation,and the history of morphological sciences. Interpreting theHierarchy of Nature: from Systematic Patterns to EvolutionaryProcess Theories (eds L. Grande and O. Rieppel), pp. 7±31.Academic Press, USA.
Cardoso da Silva, J.M. & Oren, D.C. (1996) Application ofparsimony analysis of endemicity in Amazonian biogeograpy:an example with primates. Biological Journal of the LinnaeanSociety, 59, 427±437.
Coney, P.J. (1982) Plate tectonic constraints on the biogeographyof Middle America and the Caribbean region. Annals of theMissouri Botanical Garden, 69, 432±443.
Connor, E.F. (1988) Fossils, phenetics, and phylogenetics:Inferring the historical dynamics of biogeographic distribu-tions Zoogeography of Caribbean Insects (ed. J.K. Liebherr),pp. 254±269. Cornell University Press, New York, USA.
Conran, J.G. (1995) Family distributions in the Lilii¯orae andtheir biogeographical implications. Journal of Biogeography,22, 1023±1034.
Correll, D.S. & Correll, H.B. (eds) (1982) Flora of the BahamaArchipelago (including Turks and Caicos Islands). J. Kramer,Vaduz, Liechtenstein.
CRAC (Consejo de RedaccioÂn del Atlas de Cuba) (1978) Atlasde Cuba. Instituto Cubano de Geodesia y CartografõÂa, LaHabana, Cuba.
Cracraft, J. (1991) Patterns of diversi®cation within continentalbiotas: hierarchical conguence among the areas of endemismof Australian vertebrates. Australian Systematic Botany, 4,211±227.
Craw, R. (1988) Continuing the synthesis between panbio-geography, phylogenetic systematics and geology as illustratedby empirical studies on the biogeography of New Zealandand the Chatham Islands. Systematic Zoology, 37, 291±310.
Craw, R. (1989) New Zealand biogeography: a panbiogeographicapproach. New Zealand Journal of Zoology, 16, 527±547.
D'Arcy, W.G. (1971) The island of Anegada and its ¯ora. AtollResearch Bulletin, 139, 1±21.
Donnelly, T.W. (1988) Geologic constraints on Caribbeanbiogeography. Zoogeography of Caribbean Insects(ed. J.K. Liebherr), pp. 15±37. Cornell University Press,New York, USA.
DuraÂn, R., Trejo-Torres, J.C. & Ibarra-ManrõÂquez, G. (1998)Endemic phytotaxa of the peninsula of YucataÂn. HarvardPapers in Botany, 3, 263±314.
Ewel, J.J. & Whitmore, J.L. (1973) The ecological life zones ofPuerto Rico and the US Virgin Islands, Res. Pap. 18, p. 72.US For. Serv., Inst. Trop. For., San Juan, Puerto Rico.
Garay, L.A. & Sweet, H.R. (1974) Orchidaceae. Flora of theLesseries Antilles: Leward and Windward Islands (ed. R.A.Howard). Arnold Arboretum, Harvard University, USA.
Gauch, H.G. (1982) Multivariate analysis in community ecology.Cambridge University Press, USA.
Gentry, A.H. (1982) Neotropical ¯oristic diversity: phyto-geographical connections between Central and SouthAmerica, Pleistocene climatic ¯uctuations, or an accident ofthe Andean orogeny. Annals of the Missouri BotanicalGarden, 69, 557±593.
Glasby, C.J. & Alvarez, B. (1999) Distribution patterns andbiogeographic analysis of Austral polychaeta (Annelida).Journal of Biogeography, 26, 507±533.
Hedges, S.B. (1996) Historical biogeography of West Indianvertebrates. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 27,163±193.
Howard, R.A. (1973) The vegetation of the Antilles. Vegetationand Vegetational History of Northern Latin America(ed. R. Graham), pp. 1±38. Elsevier Scienti®c Publications,Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Hoyos, J. (1985) Flora de la Isla Margarita, Venezuela. Sociedady FundacioÂn la Salle de Ciencias Naturales, Caracas,Venezuela.
Iturralde-Vinent, M.A. & MacPhee, R.D.E. (1999) Paleogeo-graphy of the Caribbean region: implications for Cenozoicbiogeography. Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat.8 Hist. 238.
Jennings, O.E. (1917) A contribution to the botany of the Isle ofPines, Cuba, based upon the specimens of plants from thatisland contained in the herbarium of the Carnegie Museumunder date of October, 1916. Annals of the CarnegieMuseum, 11, 19±290.
Kenny, J. (1988) Native Orchids of the Eastern Caribbean,p. 88. MacMillan Caribbean, Hong Kong.
Lavin, M. (1993) Biogeography and systematics of Poitea(Leguminosae). Systematic Monographs, 37, 87.
Legendre, P. (1986) Reconstructing biogeographic history usingphylogenetic-tree analysis of community structure. SystematicZoology, 35, 68±80.
Lewis, J.F. & Draper, G. (1990) Geology and tectonic evolutionof the northern Caribbean margin. The geology of NorthAmerica: the Caribbean region, Vol. H, Chapter 4 (edsG. Dengo and J.E. Case), pp. 77±140. Geological Society ofAmerica, Colorado, USA.
Liebherr, J.K. (ed.) (1988) Zoogeography of Caribbean insects,p. 285. Cornell University Press, New York, USA.
Liogier, H.A. (1996) Botany and botanists in Puerto Rico. TheScienti®c Survey of Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands(ed. J.C. Figueroa), pp. 41±54. Annals of the New YorkAcademy of Sciences, Vol. 776, New York, USA.
Luna, I., AlcaÂntara, O., Espinosa, D. & Morrone, J.J. (1999)Historical relationships of the Mexican cloud forests: apreliminary vicariance model applying Parsimony Analysisof Endemicity to vascular plant taxa. Journal of Biogeogra-phy, 26, 1299±1305.
Maddison, W.P. & Maddison, D.R. (1992) Macclade: Analysisof Phylogeny and Character Evolution, Version 3.01. SinauerAssociates, USA.
Ó Blackwell Science Ltd 2001, Journal of Biogeography, 28, 775±794
784 J. C. Trejo-Torres and J. D. Ackerman
Maury, R.C., Westbrook, G.K., Baker, P.E., Bouysse, Ph& Westercamp, D. (1990) Geology of the Lesser Antilles.The geology of North America: the Caribbean region, Vol. H,Chapter 5 (eds G. Dengo and J.E. Case), pp. 141±166.Geological Society of America, Colorado, USA.
McCoy, E.D., Bell, S.S. & Walters, K. (1986) Identifying bioticboundaries along environmental gradients. Ecology, 67,749±759.
Morrone, J.J. (1994a) On the identi®cation of areas ofendemism. Systematic Zoology, 43, 438±441.
Morrone, J.J. (1994b) Distributional patterns of species ofRhytirrhini (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) and historical rela-tionships of the Andean provinces. Global Ecology andBiogeographical Letters, 4, 188±194.
Morrone, J.J. (1998) On Udvardy's Insulantarctica province: atest from the weevils (Coleoptera: Curculionoidea). Journal ofBiogeography, 25, 947±955.
Morrone, J.J. & Crisci, J.V. (1995) Historical biogeography:introduction to methods. Annual Review of Ecology andSystematics, 26, 373±401.
Myers,N.,Mittermeier,R.A.,Mittermeier,C.G.,daFonseca,G.A.B.& Kent, J. (2000) Biodiversity hotspots for conservationpriorities. Nature, 403, 853±858.
Page, R.D.M. & Lydeard, C. (1994) Towards a cladisticbiogeography of the Caribbean. Cladistics, 10, 21±41.
Patterson, B.D. & Atmar, U. (1986) Nested subsets and thestructure of insular mammalian faunas and archipelagoes.Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 28, 65±82.
Persad, K.M. (1985) Outline of the geology of the Trinidadarea. Transactions of the Fourth Latin American GeologicalConference (July, 1979), Vol. II, pp. 738±769. Port of Spain,Trinidad & Tobago.
Posadas, P. (1996) Distributional patterns of vascular plants inTierra del Fuego: a study applying parsimony analysis ofendemicity (PAE). Biogeographica, 72, 161±177.
Posadas, P., EsteÂvez, J.M. & Morrone, J.J. (1997) Distributionalpatterns and endemism of vascular plants in the AndeanSubregion. Fontqueria, 48, 1±10.
Proctor, G.R. (1984) Additions and corrections to `Flora of theCayman Islands'. Kew Bulletin, 51, 483±507.
Proctor, G.R. (1996) Flora of the Cayman Islands, p. 834. HerMajesty's Stationary Of®ce, London, UK.
Puente, A.I., Altonaga, K., Prieto, C.E. & Rallo, A. (1998)Delimitation of biogeographical areas in the Iberian Peninsulaon the basis of Helicoidea species (Pulmonata: Stylomatopho-ra). Global Ecology and Biogeography Letters, 7, 97±113.
Real, R., Vargas, J.M. & Guerrero, J.C. (1992) AnaÂlisisbiogeogra®co de clasi®cacioÂn de aÂres y de especies. Monogr.Herpetol., 2, 73±84.
Ronquist, F. (1997) Dispersal-vicariance analyses: a newapproach to the quanti®cation of historical biogeography.Systematic Biology, 46, 195±203.
Rosen, B.R. (1988) From fossils to earth history: appliedhistorical biogeography. Analytical Biogeography: an Integ-rated Approach to the Study of Animal and Plant Distributions(eds A.A. Myers and P.S. Giller), pp. 437±481. Chapman& Hall, UK.
Rosen, B.R. (1992) Empiricism and the biogeographical blackbox: concepts and methods in marine palaeobiogeography.Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 92,171±205.
Rosen, B.R. & Smith, A.B. (1988) Tectonics from fossils?Analysis of reef-coral and sea-urchin distributions from lateCretaceous to Recent, using a new method. Gondwana andTethys (eds M.G. Audeley-Charles and A. Hallam). Geolo-gical Society Special Publication (London), 37, 275±306.
Rosenzweig, M.L. (1995) Species diversity in space and time,p. 436. Cambridge University Press, UK.
Samek, V. (1988) FitorregionalizacioÂn del Caribe. Revista DelJardõ�n BotaÂnico Nacional (Cuba), 9, 25±38.
Sauget, J. & Barbier, J.S. (1946) OrquõÂdeas. Flora deCuba, Vol. 1 (eds J.S. Sauget and E.E. Liogier), pp. 341±404. Contribuciones Ocasionales del museo de HistoriaNatural, La Habana, Cuba.
Sauleda, R.P. (1992) A checklist of Bahamian orchids. AmericanOrchid Society Bulletin, 61, 1022±1023.
Sauleda, R. & Adams, R. (1982) Orchidaceae. Flora of theBahama Archipelago (Including Turks and Caicos Islands)(eds D.S. Correll and H.B. Correll), pp. 336±401. Kramer,Vaduz, Leichtenstein.
Scheiner, S.M. (1992) Measuring pattern diversity. Ecology, 73,1860±1867.
Schultes, R.E. (1960) Native Orchids of Trinidad and Tobago,p. 275. Pergamon Press, UK.
Swofford, D.L. (2000) PAUPAUP: Phylogenetic Analysis UsingParsimony (and other methods), Version 4 for Apple Mac-intosh. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA, USA.
Vargas, J.M. (1991) Escuelas y tendencias en biogeografõÂahisto rica. Rev. Esp. Herp., 6, 107±136.
Williams, E.E. (1989) Old problems and new opportunities inWest Indian biogeography. Biogeography of the West Indies:Past, Present, and Future (ed. C.A. Woods), pp. 1±146.Sandhill Crane Press, FL, USA.
Woods, C.A. (ed.) (1989) Biogeography of the West Indies: Past,Present, and Future, p. 878. Sandhill Crane Press, FL, USA.
Worthen, W.B. (1996) Community composition and nested-subset analyses: basic descriptors for community ecology.Oikos, 76, 417±426.
Wunderlin, R.P., Hansan, B.F. & Bridges, E.L. (1996) Atlas ofFlorida Vascular Plants, CD-ROM. Department of Biology,University of South Florida, FL, USA.
Zanoni, T.A. (1986) Las expediciones botaÂnicas de William L.Abbott y Emery C. Leonard a la isla de la EspanÄ ola. Moscosoa,4, 6±38.
Ó Blackwell Science Ltd 2001, Journal of Biogeography, 28, 775±794
Biogeography of the Antilles based on a parsimony analysis of orchid distributions 785
BIOSKETCHES
J. Carlos Trejo-Torres is a graduate student at the University of Puerto Rico-RõÂo Piedras working under the guidance of James D.Ackerman. He is studying composition patterns in the limestone forest of the Greater Antilles. He is also working on thebiogeography of Caribbean bats. He worked on the community description, ¯oristics and taxonomy of the Yucatan forests andwetlands, especially the endemic ¯ora.
James D. Ackerman is a biologist at the University of Puerto Rico-RõÂo Piedras. He has interests in plant ecology, systematics andevolution, particularly of orchids. He has published numerous papers on the evolution of deception pollination and the processesinvolved in the diversi®cation of the Orchidaceae. Among his current projects is the Orchid treatment for the Flora of the GreaterAntilles.
Ó Blackwell Science Ltd 2001, Journal of Biogeography, 28, 775±794
786 J. C. Trejo-Torres and J. D. Ackerman
Ap
pen
dix
1D
ata
mat
rix
of
the
®ft
y-tw
oC
arib
bea
nar
eas
and
the
356
shar
edorc
hid
spec
ies
incl
uded
inth
est
udy.
Spec
ies
nam
eshav
ebee
nst
andar
diz
edby
Ack
erm
an.
Spec
ies
pre
sence
isin
dic
ated
wit
ha
one,
whil
eab
sence
wit
ha
zero
.T
he
Bah
ama
isla
nds
are
grouped
foll
ow
ing
Corr
ell
&C
orr
ell
(1982).
See
Tab
le1
for
Bah
ama
isla
nd
groups
and
oth
erge
ogr
aphic
algr
oupin
gs
Spec
ies
nam
e/are
anam
e
Guianas
Yucatan
Florida
PuertoRico
Jamaica
Hispaniola
Cuba
IslaJuventud
Mona
GrandCayman
LittleCayman
CaymanBrac
Turks
Inaguas
Crooked
Long
Salvador
Exumas
Cat
Providence
Andros
Abacos
StMartin
Saba
StBarth elemy
StKitts
Nevis
StEustatius
Antigua
Barbuda
Montserrat
Guadeloupe
Dominica
Martinique
StLucia
StVincent
Grenada
Barbados
Trinidad
Tobago
Margarita
Vieques
Culebra
Anegada
VirginGorda
Tortola
StThomas
StJohn
StCroix
Aruba
CuraË cao
Bonaire
Aga
nis
iapulc
hel
la1
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
01
00
00
00
00
00
00
0
Anti
llan
orc
his
gundla
chii
00
00
01
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
Asp
asia
vari
egat
a1
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
01
00
00
00
00
00
00
0
Bas
iphyl
laea
cora
llic
ola
00
11
11
10
00
00
00
00
10
00
11
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
Bas
iphyl
laea
sarc
ophyl
la0
00
00
01
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
0
Bat
eman
iaco
lley
i1
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
01
00
00
00
00
00
00
0
Bel
ogl
ott
isco
star
icen
sis
11
10
01
00
01
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
Bif
renar
iaau
ranti
aca
00
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
Bif
renar
ialo
ngi
corn
is1
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
01
00
00
00
00
00
00
0
Ble
tia
pat
ula
00
11
11
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
01
01
00
00
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
Ble
tia
purp
ure
a1
11
01
11
10
00
00
00
00
00
11
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
0
Bra
chio
nid
ium
par
vum
00
01
01
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
01
10
00
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
Bra
chio
nid
ium
sher
ingi
i0
00
10
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
0
Bra
chys
tele
guay
anen
sis
11
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
Bra
ssav
ola
cucu
llat
a1
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
01
11
00
11
01
11
00
11
01
10
00
00
01
00
00
0
Bra
ssav
ola
nodosa
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
01
11
Bra
ssia
caudat
a1
11
01
11
00
00
00
00
01
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
01
00
00
00
00
00
00
0
Bra
ssia
mac
ula
ta0
10
01
01
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
0
Bro
ugh
tonia
dom
inge
nsi
s0
00
00
10
01
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
0
Bro
ugh
tonia
linden
ii0
00
00
01
10
00
00
01
10
10
11
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
0
Bro
ugh
tonia
ort
gies
iana
00
00
00
11
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
Bulb
ophyl
lum
aris
tatu
m0
10
00
11
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
0
Bulb
ophyl
lum
pac
hyr
rhac
his
10
11
11
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
Cal
anth
eca
lanth
oid
es0
00
01
11
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
0
Cal
opogo
ntu
ber
osu
s0
01
00
01
00
00
00
00
00
00
11
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
0
Cam
pyl
oce
ntr
um
fasc
iola
11
01
01
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
Cam
pyl
oce
ntr
um
®li
form
e0
00
11
11
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
0
Cam
pyl
oce
ntr
um
mic
ranth
um
11
01
11
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
01
00
00
00
00
01
10
00
00
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
Cam
pyl
oce
ntr
um
pac
hyr
rhiz
um
11
11
11
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
Cam
pyl
oce
ntr
um
poep
pig
ii1
10
00
01
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
0
Cam
pyl
oce
ntr
um
pyg
mae
um
00
01
00
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
01
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
Cat
aset
um
cris
tatu
m1
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
01
00
00
00
00
00
00
0
Cat
aset
um
inte
gerr
imum
01
00
00
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
Cat
aset
um
mac
roca
rpum
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
Cau
lart
hro
nbic
orn
utu
m1
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
01
00
00
00
00
00
00
0
Coch
lean
thes
¯ab
elli
form
is1
00
11
11
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
01
00
00
00
00
00
00
0
Coel
iatr
ipte
ra0
00
01
01
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
0
Com
par
etti
afa
lcat
a1
00
11
11
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
0
Cory
anth
esm
acra
nth
a1
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
01
00
00
00
00
00
00
0
Cory
anth
essp
ecio
sa1
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
01
00
00
00
00
00
00
0
Cory
mbork
is¯av
a0
00
01
01
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
0
Cory
mbork
isfo
rcip
iger
a0
10
10
11
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
0
Cra
nic
his
dip
hyl
la1
00
01
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
0
Cra
nic
his
musc
osa
00
11
11
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
10
00
01
00
00
11
11
11
10
11
00
00
00
00
00
00
Cra
nic
his
ova
ta0
00
00
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
11
01
01
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
0
Ó Blackwell Science Ltd 2001, Journal of Biogeography, 28, 775±794
Biogeography of the Antilles based on a parsimony analysis of orchid distributions 787
Ap
pen
dix
1co
nti
nued
Spec
ies
nam
e/are
anam
e
Guianas
Yucatan
Florida
PuertoRico
Jamaica
Hispaniola
Cuba
IslaJuventud
Mona
GrandCayman
LittleCayman
CaymanBrac
Turks
Inaguas
Crooked
Long
Salvador
Exumas
Cat
Providence
Andros
Abacos
StMartin
Saba
StBarth elemy
StKitts
Nevis
StEustatius
Antigua
Barbuda
Montserrat
Guadeloupe
Dominica
Martinique
StLucia
StVincent
Grenada
Barbados
Trinidad
Tobago
Margarita
Vieques
Culebra
Anegada
VirginGorda
Tortola
StThomas
StJohn
StCroix
Aruba
CuraË cao
Bonaire
Cra
nic
his
rica
rtii
00
01
01
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
Cra
nic
his
tenui¯
ora
00
00
01
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
Cra
nic
his
tenuis
00
01
01
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
Cra
nic
his
wag
ener
i0
00
01
11
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
0
Cry
pta
rrhen
alu
nat
a0
00
01
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
01
00
00
00
00
00
00
0
Cyc
lopogo
ncr
anic
hoid
es0
11
11
11
00
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
01
11
00
00
00
00
10
00
0
Cyc
lopogo
nel
atus
10
11
11
10
01
00
00
00
00
00
00
10
10
01
10
11
11
10
11
10
00
00
01
11
10
00
Cyc
lopogo
nla
xi¯
oru
s0
00
01
11
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
0
Cyc
lopogo
nm
irad
ore
nse
00
01
01
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
Cyr
topodiu
man
der
sonii
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
10
00
01
10
11
11
11
10
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
Cyr
topodiu
mpunct
atum
00
11
01
10
01
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
Den
dro
phyl
axbar
rett
iae
00
00
11
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
Den
dro
phyl
axli
nden
ii0
01
00
11
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
0
Den
dro
phyl
axva
rius
00
00
01
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
Dic
hae
agl
auca
00
00
11
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
Dic
hae
agr
amin
oid
es0
00
01
11
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
01
01
00
00
00
00
00
0
Dic
hae
ahis
trio
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
10
00
00
00
00
00
Dic
hae
ahooker
i1
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
11
00
10
01
00
00
00
00
00
00
0
Dic
hae
ahys
tric
ina
00
01
01
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
01
10
00
10
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
Dic
hae
ala
tifo
lia
00
01
11
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
Dic
hae
am
orr
isii
10
00
11
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
01
11
01
10
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
Dic
hae
apen
dula
10
01
11
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
01
01
00
00
00
10
00
00
00
00
00
Dic
hae
apic
ta1
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
01
01
00
00
00
00
00
0
Dic
hae
are
ndle
i1
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
01
00
00
00
00
00
00
0
Dic
hae
atr
ichoca
rpa
00
00
11
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
Dil
om
ilis
elat
a0
00
01
01
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
0
Dil
om
ilis
monta
na
00
01
11
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
Dom
ingo
ahae
mat
och
ila
00
00
01
10
10
00
00
00
00
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
Dom
ingo
anodosa
00
00
01
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
Ell
eanth
us
cara
vata
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
01
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
Ell
eanth
us
cephal
otu
s1
00
01
11
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
10
10
11
01
00
00
00
00
00
00
0
Ell
eanth
us
cord
idac
tylu
s0
00
11
11
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
0
Ell
eanth
us
duss
ii0
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
10
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
0
Ell
eanth
us
longi
bra
ctea
tus
00
00
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
10
00
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
Elt
rople
ctri
sca
lcar
ata
10
11
11
10
01
10
00
00
00
01
11
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
Ency
clia
acuti
foli
a0
00
00
11
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
0
Ency
clia
angu
stif
oli
a0
00
00
11
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
0
Ency
clia
bre
vifo
lia
00
00
00
11
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
Ency
clia
cord
iger
a1
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
01
00
00
00
00
00
0
Ency
clia
fehli
ngi
i0
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
11
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
0
Ency
clia
fuca
ta0
00
00
01
10
00
00
00
00
00
01
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
0
Ency
clia
grac
ilis
00
00
00
00
00
00
11
11
01
11
11
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
Ency
clia
grav
ida
00
01
11
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
Ency
clia
inag
uen
sis
00
00
00
00
00
00
11
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
Ency
clia
isoch
ila
00
01
11
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
Ency
clia
kin
gsii
00
00
00
00
01
01
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
Ency
clia
nem
atoca
ulo
n0
10
00
01
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
0
Ó Blackwell Science Ltd 2001, Journal of Biogeography, 28, 775±794
788 J. C. Trejo-Torres and J. D. Ackerman
Ap
pen
dix
1co
nti
nued
Spec
ies
nam
e/are
anam
e
Guianas
Yucatan
Florida
PuertoRico
Jamaica
Hispaniola
Cuba
IslaJuventud
Mona
GrandCayman
LittleCayman
CaymanBrac
Turks
Inaguas
Crooked
Long
Salvador
Exumas
Cat
Providence
Andros
Abacos
StMartin
Saba
StBarth elemy
StKitts
Nevis
StEustatius
Antigua
Barbuda
Montserrat
Guadeloupe
Dominica
Martinique
StLucia
StVincent
Grenada
Barbados
Trinidad
Tobago
Margarita
Vieques
Culebra
Anegada
VirginGorda
Tortola
StThomas
StJohn
StCroix
Aruba
CuraË cao
Bonaire
Ency
clia
onci
dio
ides
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
Ency
clia
pli
cata
00
00
00
10
00
00
00
00
00
01
11
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
Ency
clia
rufa
00
10
00
10
00
00
11
11
11
11
11
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
Ency
clia
serr
ula
ta0
00
01
11
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
0
Ency
clia
tam
pen
sis
00
10
00
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
11
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
Epid
endru
mac
unae
00
10
00
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
Epid
endru
man
ceps
10
11
11
11
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
11
01
01
10
01
11
11
11
00
10
00
10
11
00
00
Epid
endru
man
till
anum
00
01
01
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
01
00
00
00
01
11
01
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
Epid
endru
mbla
nch
eanum
00
00
11
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
Epid
endru
mca
rpophoru
m1
00
11
11
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
11
01
11
01
00
00
00
00
00
00
0
Epid
endru
mci
liar
e1
10
11
11
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
01
11
01
11
00
11
11
11
11
01
11
01
11
11
00
0
Epid
endru
mco
mpre
ssum
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
Epid
endru
mco
ronat
um
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
Epid
endru
mcr
ista
tum
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
Epid
endru
mden
dro
bio
ides
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
01
11
01
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
Epid
endru
mdif
form
e0
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
10
10
00
11
11
11
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
0
Epid
endru
mdif
fusu
m0
10
01
01
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
0
Epid
endru
m¯ori
den
se0
01
00
01
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
0
Epid
endru
mhar
tii
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
11
00
00
00
00
00
00
Epid
endru
mib
aguen
se1
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
11
10
10
01
00
00
00
00
00
00
0
Epid
endru
mim
bri
catu
m0
00
01
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
0
Epid
endru
mis
om
erum
11
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
Epid
endru
mja
mai
cense
00
01
11
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
01
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
Epid
endru
mm
iser
rim
um
10
01
01
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
01
11
10
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
Epid
endru
mm
ute
lian
um
00
01
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
Epid
endru
mneo
porp
ax0
00
00
11
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
0
Epid
endru
mnoct
urn
um
11
11
11
11
01
00
00
00
00
01
11
00
00
00
00
01
11
01
10
10
10
00
00
00
00
00
Epid
endru
mnuta
ns
10
00
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
Epid
endru
mori
enta
le0
00
01
01
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
0
Epid
endru
mpal
lidi¯
oru
m0
00
00
01
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
01
01
00
11
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
0
Epid
endru
mpar
anae
nse
00
00
11
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
Epid
endru
mpat
ens
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
01
10
00
01
01
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
Epid
endru
mpoly
gonat
um
00
00
01
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
Epid
endru
mport
ori
censi
s0
00
10
11
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
0
Epid
endru
mra
mosu
m1
00
11
11
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
11
11
11
01
00
00
00
00
00
00
0
Epid
endru
mre
pen
s0
00
01
11
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
0
Epid
endru
mri
gidum
10
11
11
11
00
00
00
00
00
01
11
00
00
00
00
01
11
11
10
10
10
00
00
00
00
00
Epid
endru
mri
vula
re0
00
01
11
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
0
Epid
endru
msc
apel
lige
rum
00
00
10
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
Epid
endru
msc
hle
cter
ianum
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
Epid
endru
mse
cundum
00
01
11
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
10
01
11
11
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
Epid
endru
mst
robil
ifer
um
11
10
11
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
01
00
00
00
01
11
01
10
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
Epid
endru
mvi
nce
nti
num
10
01
11
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
Epid
endru
mw
righ
tii
00
00
01
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
Epis
tephiu
mel
lipti
cum
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
Epis
tephiu
mpar
vi¯oru
m1
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
01
00
00
00
00
00
00
0
Ery
thro
des
hir
tell
a1
00
11
11
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
10
00
11
11
11
11
00
00
00
10
00
00
0
Ó Blackwell Science Ltd 2001, Journal of Biogeography, 28, 775±794
Biogeography of the Antilles based on a parsimony analysis of orchid distributions 789
Ap
pen
dix
1co
nti
nued
Spec
ies
nam
e/are
anam
e
Guianas
Yucatan
Florida
PuertoRico
Jamaica
Hispaniola
Cuba
IslaJuventud
Mona
GrandCayman
LittleCayman
CaymanBrac
Turks
Inaguas
Crooked
Long
Salvador
Exumas
Cat
Providence
Andros
Abacos
StMartin
Saba
StBarth elemy
StKitts
Nevis
StEustatius
Antigua
Barbuda
Montserrat
Guadeloupe
Dominica
Martinique
StLucia
StVincent
Grenada
Barbados
Trinidad
Tobago
Margarita
Vieques
Culebra
Anegada
VirginGorda
Tortola
StThomas
StJohn
StCroix
Aruba
CuraË cao
Bonaire
Ery
thro
des
maj
or
10
00
01
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
Ery
thro
des
pla
nta
ginea
00
01
11
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
01
01
01
00
11
11
01
10
11
00
00
00
00
00
00
Eulo
phia
alta
11
11
11
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
01
00
00
00
10
01
11
11
10
11
00
00
01
00
00
00
Eulo
phia
ecri
stat
a0
01
00
01
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
0
Eury
styl
esan
anas
soco
mos
00
01
11
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
Fuer
tesi
ella
pte
rich
oid
es0
00
00
11
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
0
Gal
eandra
bey
rich
ii0
01
11
11
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
0
Gove
nia
utr
icula
ta0
01
11
11
00
00
00
00
00
00
01
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
0
Hab
enar
iaal
ata
00
01
11
11
00
00
00
00
00
00
10
00
00
00
10
01
11
11
10
11
00
00
00
10
00
00
Hab
enar
iaam
al®ta
na
10
01
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
10
01
00
01
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
Hab
enar
iabic
orn
is0
00
00
01
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
0
Hab
enar
iadis
tans
01
11
11
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
Hab
enar
iaduss
ii0
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
10
00
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
0
Hab
enar
iaeu
stac
hya
00
01
11
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
01
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
Hab
enar
ia¯ori
bunda
10
10
11
11
00
00
00
00
00
00
11
00
00
00
00
01
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
Hab
enar
iale
pri
euri
i1
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
01
00
00
00
00
00
00
0
Hab
enar
iam
esodac
tyla
01
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
Hab
enar
iam
onorr
hiz
a0
10
11
11
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
01
00
11
11
11
11
11
00
00
11
01
00
0
Hab
enar
iapau
ci¯ora
01
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
Hab
enar
iaquin
ques
eta
10
10
11
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
11
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
Hab
enar
iare
pen
s1
11
11
11
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
01
00
00
00
00
00
00
0
Hap
alorc
his
linea
tus
00
01
11
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
Har
rise
lla
porr
ecta
01
11
11
11
01
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
Hel
leri
ella
punct
ula
ta0
00
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
10
00
01
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
0
Hom
alopet
alum
vom
erif
orm
e0
00
01
01
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
0
Huntl
eya
luci
da
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
10
10
00
00
00
00
00
Huntl
eya
mel
eagr
is1
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
01
00
00
00
00
00
00
0
Ionopsi
ssa
tyri
oid
es1
10
11
11
00
00
00
00
01
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
10
00
01
00
00
00
00
00
00
0
Ionopsi
sutr
icula
roid
es1
11
11
11
11
00
00
00
01
00
00
00
01
00
00
00
10
11
10
01
00
00
00
01
00
00
0
Isoch
ilus
linea
ris
10
01
11
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
11
11
01
00
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
Jacq
uin
ella
globosa
11
01
11
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
01
01
01
00
01
11
11
10
10
10
00
00
00
00
00
Jacq
uin
ella
tere
tifo
lia
10
01
11
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
Keg
elie
lla
houtt
eana
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
Koel
lenst
einia
gram
inea
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
Leo
chil
us
cari
nat
us
00
00
00
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
Leo
chil
us
labia
tus
00
00
11
10
00
00
00
00
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
01
11
01
00
11
00
00
00
00
00
00
Leo
chil
us
puer
tori
censi
s0
00
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
10
00
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
0
Leo
chil
us
scri
ptu
s0
10
00
01
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
01
00
00
00
00
00
00
0
Lep
anth
opsi
san
thoct
eniu
m0
00
00
11
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
0
Lep
anth
opsi
sm
elan
anth
a0
01
11
11
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
0
Lep
anth
opsi
sm
elan
anth
a0
01
11
11
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
0
Lep
anth
opsi
sm
icro
lepan
thes
00
00
11
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
Leu
cohyl
esu
bula
ta1
00
01
01
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
01
00
00
00
00
00
00
0
Lip
aris
ner
vosa
11
11
11
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
11
01
11
01
10
10
00
00
01
10
00
00
Lip
aris
neu
rogl
oss
a0
00
01
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
0
Lip
aris
saunder
sian
a0
00
11
11
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
0
Lip
aris
vexil
life
ra0
00
11
11
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
01
00
00
00
00
00
00
0
Ó Blackwell Science Ltd 2001, Journal of Biogeography, 28, 775±794
790 J. C. Trejo-Torres and J. D. Ackerman
Ap
pen
dix
1co
nti
nued
Spec
ies
nam
e/are
anam
e
Guianas
Yucatan
Florida
PuertoRico
Jamaica
Hispaniola
Cuba
IslaJuventud
Mona
GrandCayman
LittleCayman
CaymanBrac
Turks
Inaguas
Crooked
Long
Salvador
Exumas
Cat
Providence
Andros
Abacos
StMartin
Saba
StBarth elemy
StKitts
Nevis
StEustatius
Antigua
Barbuda
Montserrat
Guadeloupe
Dominica
Martinique
StLucia
StVincent
Grenada
Barbados
Trinidad
Tobago
Margarita
Vieques
Culebra
Anegada
VirginGorda
Tortola
StThomas
StJohn
StCroix
Aruba
CuraË cao
Bonaire
Lip
aris
viri
dip
urp
ure
a0
00
01
11
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
0
Lock
har
tia
eleg
ans
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
Lophia
sis
mac
ula
ta1
11
01
01
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
01
11
11
00
01
00
00
00
00
00
0
Lyc
aste
bar
ringt
onia
e0
00
11
11
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
0
Mac
raden
ialu
tesc
ens
10
10
11
11
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
Mal
axis
dom
inge
nsi
s0
00
00
11
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
0
Mal
axis
his
pan
ola
e0
00
00
11
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
0
Mal
axis
inte
gra
00
00
11
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
Mal
axis
maj
or
00
01
00
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
01
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
Mal
axis
mas
sonii
00
01
11
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
01
00
00
01
11
00
00
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
Mal
axis
spic
ata
00
11
11
10
00
00
00
10
10
10
11
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
Mal
axis
um
bel
li¯ora
10
00
11
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
01
00
00
01
10
01
00
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
Mal
axis
unif
oli
a0
01
01
11
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
0
Max
ilar
iadis
colo
r1
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
01
00
00
00
00
00
00
0
Max
illa
ria
acuti
foli
a1
00
11
11
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
0
Max
illa
ria
aden
dro
biu
m0
00
01
11
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
0
Max
illa
ria
alba
10
00
10
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
01
11
01
00
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
Max
illa
ria
bra
chyb
ulb
on
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
Max
illa
ria
cam
arid
ii1
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
01
00
00
00
00
00
00
0
Max
illa
ria
cocc
inea
00
01
01
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
01
01
00
00
01
11
01
10
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
Max
illa
ria
cras
sifo
lia
11
10
10
11
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
Max
illa
ria
in¯ex
a0
00
01
11
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
11
00
01
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
0
Max
illa
ria
lipar
ophyl
la1
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
01
00
00
00
00
00
00
0
Max
illa
ria
par
vi¯ora
10
11
11
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
10
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
Max
illa
ria
reic
hen
hei
man
a1
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
01
00
00
00
00
00
00
0
Max
illa
ria
rufe
scen
s1
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
01
00
00
00
00
00
00
0
Max
illa
ria
unca
ta1
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
0
Max
illa
ria
vari
abil
is0
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
01
00
00
00
00
00
00
0
Mes
aden
us
luca
yanus
01
11
01
10
10
00
10
11
11
11
11
00
00
00
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
01
00
10
00
00
Myr
mec
ophil
ath
om
sonia
na
00
00
00
10
01
11
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
Nid
ema
ott
onis
10
01
11
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
Noty
lia
angu
stif
oli
a1
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
01
00
00
00
00
00
00
0
Oct
om
eria
apic
ula
ta0
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
10
00
01
01
10
00
00
00
00
00
0
Oct
om
eria
gram
inif
oli
a1
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
11
11
10
01
00
00
00
00
00
00
0
Oct
om
eria
trid
enta
ta0
00
00
01
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
01
00
00
00
00
00
00
0
Oec
eocl
ades
mac
ula
ta1
11
11
11
01
00
00
00
00
00
11
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
10
00
0
Oer
sted
ella
verr
uco
sa0
00
01
01
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
0
Onci
diu
mal
tiss
imum
00
01
01
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
11
01
00
00
00
00
00
10
00
00
Onci
diu
mam
pli
atum
00
01
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
01
11
11
10
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
Onci
diu
mce
boll
eta
11
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
01
01
10
00
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
Onci
diu
men
satu
m0
11
00
01
10
00
00
01
00
00
11
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
0
Onci
diu
mm
eira
x0
00
10
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
0
Orn
ithoce
phal
us
glad
iatu
s1
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
01
01
00
00
00
00
00
00
0
Oto
styl
isbra
chys
tali
x1
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
01
00
00
00
00
00
00
0
Pal
morc
his
pubes
cens
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
Pap
hin
iacr
ista
ta1
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
01
00
00
00
00
00
00
0
Pel
exia
adnat
a0
10
11
11
00
00
00
00
00
00
01
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
0
Ó Blackwell Science Ltd 2001, Journal of Biogeography, 28, 775±794
Biogeography of the Antilles based on a parsimony analysis of orchid distributions 791
Ap
pen
dix
1co
nti
nued
Spec
ies
nam
e/are
anam
e
Guianas
Yucatan
Florida
PuertoRico
Jamaica
Hispaniola
Cuba
IslaJuventud
Mona
GrandCayman
LittleCayman
CaymanBrac
Turks
Inaguas
Crooked
Long
Salvador
Exumas
Cat
Providence
Andros
Abacos
StMartin
Saba
StBarth elemy
StKitts
Nevis
StEustatius
Antigua
Barbuda
Montserrat
Guadeloupe
Dominica
Martinique
StLucia
StVincent
Grenada
Barbados
Trinidad
Tobago
Margarita
Vieques
Culebra
Anegada
VirginGorda
Tortola
StThomas
StJohn
StCroix
Aruba
CuraË cao
Bonaire
Per
iste
ria
ceri
na
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
Per
iste
ria
pen
dula
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
Pin
elia
leoch
ilus
00
00
01
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
Pla
tanth
era
repli
cata
00
00
00
11
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
Pla
tyst
ele
ova
lifo
lia
11
00
00
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
Pla
tyst
ele
sten
ost
achia
11
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
Pla
tyth
elys
quer
ceti
cola
00
10
11
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
11
00
00
00
00
01
01
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
Ple
uro
thal
lis
ophio
gloss
oid
es0
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
11
10
10
00
01
00
00
00
00
00
0
Ple
uro
thal
lis
acuti
ssim
a1
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
01
00
00
00
00
00
00
0
Ple
uro
thal
lis
appen
dic
ula
ta0
00
10
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
0
Ple
uro
thal
lis
aris
tata
10
01
11
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
01
11
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
Ple
uro
thal
lis
bri
gham
ii0
10
01
11
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
0
Ple
uro
thal
lis
consi
mil
is1
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
01
00
00
00
00
00
00
0
Ple
uro
thal
lis
corn
icula
ta1
00
01
11
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
0
Ple
uro
thal
lis
dis
coid
ea1
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
01
01
00
00
00
00
00
0
Ple
uro
thal
lis
dom
inge
nsi
s0
00
11
11
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
0
Ple
uro
thal
lis
duss
ii0
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
11
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
0
Ple
uro
thal
lis
erosa
00
00
01
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
Ple
uro
thal
lis
geli
da
00
11
11
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
Ple
uro
thal
lis
grobyi
11
00
01
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
Ple
uro
thal
lis
hel
enae
00
00
11
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
Ple
uro
thal
lis
hym
enan
tha
10
00
00
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
Ple
uro
thal
lis
imra
ei1
00
00
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
11
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
0
Ple
uro
thal
lis
lance
ola
00
00
11
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
Ple
uro
thal
lis
laxa
00
00
11
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
Ple
uro
thal
lis
maz
ei0
00
00
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
0
Ple
uro
thal
lis
mig
uel
ii0
00
00
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
01
01
00
00
00
00
00
00
0
Ple
uro
thal
lis
monophyl
la1
00
01
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
0
Ple
uro
thal
lis
morn
icola
00
00
01
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
10
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
Ple
uro
thal
lis
mure
x0
00
00
11
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
0
Ple
uro
thal
lis
num
mula
ria
00
00
10
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
Ple
uro
thal
lis
oblo
ngi
foli
a0
00
11
11
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
01
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
0
Ple
uro
thal
lis
obova
ta1
00
10
11
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
0
Ple
uro
thal
lis
poly
gonoid
es1
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
01
00
00
00
00
00
00
0
Ple
uro
thal
lis
pru
inosa
10
01
11
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
01
11
10
10
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
Ple
uro
thal
lis
pubes
cens
10
01
01
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
Ple
uro
thal
lis
race
mi¯
ora
00
01
11
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
Ple
uro
thal
lis
revo
luta
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
10
00
00
00
00
00
Ple
uro
thal
lis
rusc
ifoli
a1
00
11
11
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
11
10
11
01
01
00
00
00
00
00
0
Ple
uro
thal
lis
scle
rophyl
la1
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
01
00
00
00
00
00
0
Ple
uro
thal
lis
sert
ula
rioid
es0
10
01
01
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
0
Ple
uro
thal
lis
sica
ria
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
Ple
uro
thal
lis
test
aefo
lia
00
00
11
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
01
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
Ple
uro
thal
lis
trib
ulo
ides
01
00
11
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
Ple
uro
thal
lis
tric
hophora
00
00
01
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
Ple
uro
thal
lis
tric
host
ata
00
01
01
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
Ple
uro
thal
lis
vela
tica
uli
s0
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
01
01
00
00
00
00
00
0
Ó Blackwell Science Ltd 2001, Journal of Biogeography, 28, 775±794
792 J. C. Trejo-Torres and J. D. Ackerman
Ap
pen
dix
1co
nti
nued
Spec
ies
nam
e/are
anam
e
Guianas
Yucatan
Florida
PuertoRico
Jamaica
Hispaniola
Cuba
IslaJuventud
Mona
GrandCayman
LittleCayman
CaymanBrac
Turks
Inaguas
Crooked
Long
Salvador
Exumas
Cat
Providence
Andros
Abacos
StMartin
Saba
StBarth elemy
StKitts
Nevis
StEustatius
Antigua
Barbuda
Montserrat
Guadeloupe
Dominica
Martinique
StLucia
StVincent
Grenada
Barbados
Trinidad
Tobago
Margarita
Vieques
Culebra
Anegada
VirginGorda
Tortola
StThomas
StJohn
StCroix
Aruba
CuraË cao
Bonaire
Ple
uro
thal
lis
wil
sonii
00
01
11
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
01
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
Pogo
nia
gran
di¯
ora
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
Pogo
nia
tenuis
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
Poly
stac
hya
concr
eta
10
11
11
11
00
10
00
00
00
01
11
00
01
01
00
11
11
11
10
10
10
00
00
10
00
00
Poly
stac
hya
foli
osa
11
01
11
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
11
00
00
00
00
10
00
00
10
10
00
00
10
10
00
10
Ponth
ieva
bri
ttonia
e0
01
00
01
00
00
00
00
00
00
11
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
0
Ponth
ieva
dip
tera
10
00
11
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
Ponth
ieva
har
risi
i0
00
01
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
0
Ponth
ieva
pau
ci¯ora
00
00
11
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
Ponth
ieva
pet
iola
ta0
00
00
11
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
10
00
00
11
11
11
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
0
Ponth
ieva
race
mosa
01
11
11
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
01
11
00
00
Ponth
ieva
ventr
icosa
00
01
11
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
Pre
scott
iaoli
ganth
a1
01
11
11
00
00
00
00
00
00
11
00
00
00
00
00
11
10
01
00
00
00
00
11
10
00
0
Pre
scott
iast
achyo
des
11
01
11
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
01
01
01
11
01
00
10
00
00
00
01
00
00
Pro
sthec
hea
booth
iana
01
10
01
11
01
11
00
00
00
00
11
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
Pro
sthec
hea
coch
leat
a1
11
11
11
10
11
10
00
00
00
11
10
00
00
00
00
11
00
00
00
01
10
00
00
01
00
0
Pro
sthec
hea
frag
ans
00
00
11
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
11
01
10
11
10
00
00
00
00
00
Pro
sthec
hea
pyg
mae
a1
11
11
11
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
01
00
00
01
00
00
00
00
00
00
0
Pro
sthec
hea
vesp
a1
00
00
11
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
01
00
00
00
00
00
00
0
Pse
udoce
ntr
um
min
us
00
00
11
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
Psi
loch
ilus
mac
rophyl
lus
10
01
11
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
01
10
11
10
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
Psy
chil
iskra
enzl
inii
00
01
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
11
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
Psy
chil
ism
acco
nnel
liae
00
01
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
01
11
11
11
10
00
Psy
gmorc
his
pusi
lla
11
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
01
00
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
Rei
chen
bac
han
thus
re¯ex
us
10
00
01
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
10
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
Rodri
guez
iala
nce
ola
ta1
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
10
01
10
00
00
00
00
00
0
Sarc
ogl
ott
issc
eptr
odes
01
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
Scap
hyg
lott
isfu
sifo
rmis
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
Scap
hyg
lott
ism
odes
ta1
00
10
11
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
11
00
11
01
00
00
00
00
00
00
0
Scap
hyg
lott
ispro
life
ra1
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
0
Schie
dee
lla
ames
iana
00
00
01
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
Schom
burg
kia
®m
bri
ata
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
Schom
burg
kia
hum
bold
tii
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
11
Schom
burg
kia
lyso
nsi
i0
00
01
01
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
0
Sobra
lia
frag
rans
11
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
Spir
anth
esto
rta
01
11
11
11
00
00
00
01
00
01
11
00
00
00
10
01
11
10
10
10
00
00
00
10
00
00
Stan
hopea
gran
di¯
ora
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
Stel
ism
usc
ifer
a1
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
01
00
00
00
00
00
00
0
Stel
isper
pusi
lli¯
ora
00
01
01
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
01
10
00
00
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
Stel
ispyg
mae
a1
00
10
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
11
10
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
0
Stel
issc
abri
da
00
00
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
10
00
01
11
11
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
Stel
istr
igoni¯
oru
m0
00
01
11
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
0
Sten
iapal
lida
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
Sten
orr
hyn
chos
lance
ola
tum
10
11
11
11
00
00
00
00
00
01
11
00
10
00
01
00
00
00
01
10
00
00
00
10
00
00
Sten
orr
hyn
chos
spec
iosu
m0
00
01
11
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
0
Sten
orr
hyn
chos
squam
ulo
sum
00
00
10
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
Tet
ram
icra
bulb
osa
00
00
11
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
Ó Blackwell Science Ltd 2001, Journal of Biogeography, 28, 775±794
Biogeography of the Antilles based on a parsimony analysis of orchid distributions 793
Ap
pen
dix
1co
nti
nued
Spec
ies
nam
e/are
anam
e
Guianas
Yucatan
Florida
PuertoRico
Jamaica
Hispaniola
Cuba
IslaJuventud
Mona
GrandCayman
LittleCayman
CaymanBrac
Turks
Inaguas
Crooked
Long
Salvador
Exumas
Cat
Providence
Andros
Abacos
StMartin
Saba
StBarth elemy
StKitts
Nevis
StEustatius
Antigua
Barbuda
Montserrat
Guadeloupe
Dominica
Martinique
StLucia
StVincent
Grenada
Barbados
Trinidad
Tobago
Margarita
Vieques
Culebra
Anegada
VirginGorda
Tortola
StThomas
StJohn
StCroix
Aruba
CuraË cao
Bonaire
Tet
ram
icra
canal
icula
ta0
00
10
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
01
00
11
10
10
10
00
11
00
00
11
01
11
00
0
Tet
ram
icra
eulo
phia
e0
00
00
11
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
0
Tet
ram
icra
par
vi¯ora
00
00
11
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
Tet
ram
icra
urb
ania
na
00
00
00
10
00
00
00
00
00
01
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
Tolu
mnia
bah
amen
se0
01
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
01
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
0
Tolu
mnia
calo
chil
a0
00
00
11
00
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
0
Tolu
mnia
gauntl
etii
00
00
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
01
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
Tolu
mnia
lyra
ta0
00
00
01
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
0
Tolu
mnia
pri
onoch
ila
00
01
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
01
11
11
11
00
00
Tolu
mnia
sass
eri
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
11
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
Tolu
mnia
uro
phyl
lum
00
00
01
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
10
11
11
11
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
Tolu
mnia
vari
egat
a0
00
10
11
01
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
11
01
11
11
00
0
Tri
chopil
iafr
agan
s0
00
00
11
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
0
Tri
chosa
lpin
xci
liar
is1
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
0
Tri
chosa
lpin
xdura
10
01
11
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
01
01
00
10
11
10
00
00
00
00
00
Tri
gonid
ium
eger
tonia
num
11
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
Tri
phora
amaz
onic
a1
01
10
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
01
00
00
00
00
00
00
0
Tri
phora
genti
anoid
es0
11
01
11
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
0
Tri
phora
has
sler
iana
00
01
01
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
Tri
phora
suri
nam
ensi
s1
00
11
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
11
00
00
01
00
00
00
00
00
00
0
Tri
phora
yuca
tanen
sis
01
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
Tri
zeuxis
falc
ata
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
Tro
pid
iapoly
stac
hya
01
10
11
10
01
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
Wull
schla
egel
lia
aphyl
la0
00
01
01
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
01
00
00
00
00
00
00
0
Wull
schla
egel
lia
calc
arat
a1
00
10
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
11
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
0
Xyl
obiu
mco
lley
i1
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
01
00
00
00
00
00
00
0
Xyl
obiu
mfo
veat
um
10
00
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
Xyl
obiu
mpal
mif
oli
um
10
00
11
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
10
01
10
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
Zootr
ophio
nat
ropurp
ure
um
00
00
11
10
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
Ó Blackwell Science Ltd 2001, Journal of Biogeography, 28, 775±794
794 J. C. Trejo-Torres and J. D. Ackerman