bioetica

Upload: david-amao

Post on 01-Mar-2016

216 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

jj

TRANSCRIPT

  • Bioethics of Fish Production: Energy and the Environment*

    DAVID PIMENTEL, ROLAND E. SHANKS and JASON C. RYLANDER

    Comstock Hall College of Agriculture & Life Sciences Cornell University Ithaca, NY 14853-0901 USA

    Abstract Aquatic ecosystems are vital to the structure and function of all environments on earth. Worldwide, approximately 95 million metric tons of fishery products are harvested from marine and freshwater habitats. A major problem in fisheries around the world is the bioethics of overfishing. A wide range of management techniques exists for fishery, managers and policy-makers to improve fishery production in the future. The best approach to limit overfishing is to have an effective, federally regulated fishery, based on environmental standards and fishery carrying capacity. Soon, overfishing is more likely to cause fish scarcity than fossil fuel shortages and high energy prices for fish harvesting. However, oil and other, fuel shortages are projected to influence future fishery policies and the productive capacity of the fishery industry. Overall, small-scale fishing systems are more energy efficient than large-scale systems. Aquaculture is not the solution to wild fishery production. The energy input~output ratio of aquacultural fish is much higher than that of the harvest of wild populations. In addition, the energy ratios for aquaculture systems are higher than those for most livestock systems.

    Keywords: bioethics, fish, energy, environment, food.

    Oceans and other aquatic ecosystems are vital to the sustainability of all life on Earth. These aquatic systems provide food for humans and livestock. Their con- tinued productivity is facing increasing pressures from both overfishing and pollu- tion of fresh and salt water habitats.

    Worldwide, approximately 95 million metric tons of seafood-including fishes, crustaceans, and molluscs-are harvested annually from both marine and fresh- water habitats (Figure 1). Nearly 90% of all harvested fish are from the marine hab- itat; the remaining 10% are from freshwater habitats. Of the total fishery produc- tion, aquaculture supplies about 13 million tons (FAO, 1992). Of the harvest, about

    Journal of Agricu|tural and Environmental Ethics 1996, 9(2), 144-164

  • 120

    Bioethics ofFish Production 145

    = o

    I,= = e ;, ..

    100

    80

    60

    40

    20

    0 1940 19150 19160 19170 19~80 19~J0

    Year 2000

    Figure I World Fish Catch (after WRI, 1992)

    28 million tons of fish are fed to livestock, while humans consume an estimated 67 million tons (NOAA, 1991). Fish protein represents less than 5% of the total food protein (387 million tons) consumed annually by the world population (FAO, 1991). In terms of food energy, fish contribute less than 1% of the annual food caloric in- take of the world population (FAO, 1991).

    As with agricultural food production, significant quantities of fossil energy are expended to harvest fishery products (Scott 1982; Bardach, 1982, 1991; Mitchell and Cleveland 1993). Because the United States is already importing more than one-half of its oil at a cost of $65 billion per year (Gibbons and Blair, 1991) and proven U.S. oil reserves are projected to be depleted in 10 to 15 years and 30 to 50 years world- wide (Matare, 1989; Gever et al., 1991; BP, 1991; Worldwatch Institute 1992a), ana- lysing the use of energy in fishery production is timely. Information is also needed about which fishery systems are relatively energy efficient and which are not. Energy shortages and high fuel prices are projected to influence future fishery poli- cies and the productive capacity of the industry (Samples, 1983; Mitchell and Cleve- land, 1993).

    The energy inputs, ecological aspects, and relative efficiency of various domestic and international fisheries are assessed in this study. Also included are effects of

  • 146 D. Pimentel, R.E. Shanks and J.C. Rylander

    different vessels and gear on the efficiency and sustainability of fisheries.

    Ecological Aspects of Fish Production

    More than 70G of the Earth is covered with water, but only about 0.039 of the sunlight reaching an aquatic ecosystem is fixed by aquatic plants, primarily phyto- plankton (Odum, 1978). This equates to about 4 million kcal/ha per year, or about one-third of the energy fixed in terrestrial habitats (Pimentel et al., 1978).

    The phytoplankton that collect light energy in oceans and freshwater are eaten by zooplankton. After passing through four to six links in the food chain, the light energy is then harvested as fish. With the transfer of energy through each link in the food chain, energy is dissipated, and the final quantity available to humans is much less than that available at the phytoplankton level. Only approximately one- tenth of the energy entering one link is passed on to the next one in the food chain (Odum, 1978).

    Assuming that each year 4 million kcal of light energy per hectare per year are collected in the ocean ecosystem, and that the food chain has on average four links, the energy harvested as fish would be about 400 kcal/ha per year. Measured in dressed weight of fish, this amounts to only 0.15 kg. of harvested fish per hectare per year.

    If the 115 kg. of meat consumed per person per year in the United States were to be supplied by fish from the oceans, and assuming a 0.15 kg. of dressed weight of fish yield per hectare, nearly 2000 ha of ocean area per person would be required. This estimate assumes that the entire fish yield is suitable for human food and that 409 of the catch is edible when cleaned and dressed. Actually, humans eat only a few species of fish and feed other fishery products to livestock. Because so many square kilometres of ocean have to be searched for fish, any attempt to increase fish production would be difficult. The further a vessel must travel from the port, the more energy intensive the fishing operation.

    Ecological fishery management must be improved, coastal pollution problems solved, and fertilizer-nutrient contamination from onshore sources limited if the sea is to remain a viable source of human and livestock food in the future (Bell, 1978; NOAA, 1991).

    Energy Efficiency of Fishery Production

    In ocean fishing, the United States' production of 5.4 million metric tons per year ranks fifth in the world; the nations ranked higher in order are Japan, the former U.S.S.R., China, and Peru (WRI, 1994). The Alaskan region is the largest U.S. pro- ducer, contributing about 56c~ of the total production by weight: the Gulf of Mexico region is next, providing about 17c~ of the total (Table 11.

    Energy expenditures for fishing vary, depending on the distance travelled to harvest and the type of fishing gear used. For example, Washington fishers located near the Alaskan region use significantly less fuel in capturing fish than do the Ja- panese. Wiviott and Mathews (1975) report that the Washington trawl fleet produced

  • Bioethics o fF i sh Production 147

    Table 1 The total amounts of fishery production in different regions of the United States

    (NOAA, 1991) Region Billion Tons Percentage Alaska 2.45 56 Pacific Coast and Hawaii 0.30 7 Great Lakes 0.02 < 1 New England 0.30 7 Mid-Atlantic 0.09 2 Chesapeake 0.39 9 South Atlantic 0.12 3 Gulf 0.73 17 Total 4.40 = 100%

    Table 2 Fish production per litre of fuel in different fishing situations (Bardach, 1982)

    Fishing Technology Kg. of Fish Coastal fishing net and longline in Northern Norway 13.3 Longlining on continental shelf 7.0 Factory vessels 3.4

    61.5 kg. offish per litre of fuel compared to the Japanese production of only 11.4 kg. of fish per litre of fuel. They attribute the difference to the fact that the Japanese frequently have to travel long distances for fishing.

    Other fishing situations produce different quantities of fish per litre of fuel ex- pended (Table 2). For example, Norwegian coastal net fishers produced 13.3 kg. of fish per litre of fuel (Bardach, 1982). However, using large factory vessels, only 3.4 kg. of fish were produced per litre of fuel. Note that in the Norway example the yield/fuel figure only refers to catching fish, but in the factory vessel example the yield/fuel figure includes both catching and processing. No data were given for the catching activity excluding the processing operations.

    Another problem in comparing figures for fish produced per litre of fuel is the condition of the fish when weighed. The Norway figure, for example, reported weight of fish in the round landed at pert, but the weight figure reported for the factory vessel was not qualified and could represent fish in the round or fish after processing. These issues point to some major problems in assessing the productivity or energy efficiency of the fishery industry. Certainly, the energy inputs for various fisheries differ according to the fishery, the type of gear used, the type of vessel used, the level of processing on the vessel, and the fishery region (Schaffer et al. 1989). In the fol- lowing analysis, an attempt is made to be explicit while providing a broad perspec- tive of the energy inputs in fish production for a wide array of different fishery sys- tems.

  • 148 D. Pimentel, R.E. Shanks and J.C. Rylander

    Table 3 Energy inputs for the production of various seafoods in the United States (Folke

    and Kautsky, 1992)

    Seafood type Kcal Fossil Energy Input / Kcal Protein Output

    Sea-ranching of Atlantic salmon applying delayed release Mussel rearing Conventional sea-ranching of Atlantic salmon Cod fisheries Cage-farming of rainbow trout Atlantic salmon fisheries King salmon fisheries Cage-farming of Atlantic salmon Lobster fisheries Shrimp fisheries

    7 10 12 20 24 29 40 50

    192 3 to 198

    Energy Efficiency of Ocean Fisheries

    The major equipment used in harvesting ocean fish are ships and the diverse gear needed to search for, capture, and transport the fish. Both the construction and operation of this equipment consumes energy. Although fishing vessels also require human power, it is not a large energy input in the system, especially on the heavily mechanized fishing vessels of today. Unfortunately, there is limited information on the energy efficiency of world ocean fisheries. The data available are assessed in this section.

    U.S. Fishery

    Folke and Kautsky (1992) analysed the energy inputs for several types of seafood and estimated that inputs ranged from 7 kcal to 198 kcal per kcal of fish protein pro- ducod (Table 3). The average for all fish produced for t~e U.S. market was approxi- mately 27 kcal of fossil energy per kcal of fish protein produced (Hirst, 1974).

    The most efficient fish protein produced is sea-ranching of Atlantic salmon, with only 7 kcal of fossil energy expended to produce I kcal of protein (Table 3). A com- mon fish like cod requires an input of 20 kcal of fossil energy per output protein kcal. The largest input is more than 190 kcal of fossil energy per kcal of lobster and shrimp protein produced. The high energy cost for the production of lobster and shrimp pro- tein is not surprising considering the relative abundance of lobsters and shrimp and the extensive fishing effort that goes into harvesting. In part, the high energy costs reflect the high economic value of certain seafood products such as lobster and shrimp.

    Northeast U.S. Fishery

    The location of large fmh populations along the continental shelf in the northeastern United States has made it one of the most productive fishery regions of the world

  • 149

    500

    400

    ..J

    D u_ z u;

    u FISH PROTEIN / ~ l

    300

    200

    100

    Bioethics offish Production

    " . . " . , ~ a

    0 1960 19170 19180 1990 YEAR

    Figure 2 Billion kilocalories of fish protein harvested and fuel consumed (after Mitchell and Cleveland, 1993)

    (NOAA, 1993) As with all food production systems, energy must be invested in equipment, fuel, and labour to operate the system

    Fishing in this region is done in two ways: (1) the inshore system that uses small fishing vessels weighing less than 110 GRT (gross registered tons) and (2) the off- shore fishing system that employs larger vessels weighing more than 110 GRT. For the inshore fishery, an input of only 1.03 kcal of fossil fuel was expended to harvest 1 kcal offish protein (Rochereau and Pimentel, 1978). The offshore fishery required an input of 3.9 kcal of fossil energy per kcal of fish protein harvested. Thus, small fishing units are nearly four times more efficient than the larger vessels that travel and fish great distances offshore. Also, the lower ratio for the inshore fishery is due in part to the greater productivity of the inshore region. Offshore fishes are primarily carnivorous and are higher in the food chain than inshore fish species.

    U.S. government policies continue to support the trend to launch larger vessels for use in the rich Northeast fishery grounds (McGoodwin, 1990; Satchell, 1992). Such vessels are far less efficient in fossil energy use than smaller ones. Surely this is a questionable policy in view of rising fossil fuel prices and unemployment in the

  • 150 D. Pimentel, R.E. Shanks and J.C. Rylander

    Table 4 The exploitation and status of 49 monitored fishery stocks in the Northeast

    Fishery (NOAA, 1992)

    Exploitation Status Number of Stocks Overexploited 27 Fully exploited 9 Under exploited 10 Variable exploitation 2 Protected (closed to exploitation) 10 Total 58

    industrial world (McGoodwin, 1990; Bardach, 1991). The reason for implementing such questionable policies probably is that the decision-makers have not fully assessed the disadvantages of their policies.

    The energy efficiency of the Northeast fishing fleet has been declining steadily since the early 1960s, a decline attributed both to the upsurge of international fish- ing competition on the Northeast fishing grounds and to the decline in fish stocks in this fishery region (Smith, 1991). Mitchell and Cleveland (1993) document this in their analysis of fisheries in New Bedford, Massachusetts (Figure 2). For instance, in 1966 the ratio of fuel kcal to fish protein kcal was 5:1; in 1989, the ratio dramati- cally increased to 35:1.

    Another major factor contributing to the deterioration of the Northeast fishery is the continued overfishing of the coastal water zone. Yearly harvests are well above the maximum sustainable yield level of the area (NOAA, 1992). Of the 49 fishery stocks monitored in the Northeast, 27 have been identified as overexploited (Table 4). Large harvests continue because the fishing system in this region is over-capi- talized and requires this high level of exploitation to remain economical (Gulland, 1971; FAO, 1972; USDC, 1974). Many scientists believe no extra biological stock is available to act as a buffer against the large fishery over-exploitation (WRI, 1992; NO/kA, 1992).

    As early as 1967-1974, the decline in fish protein production and increase in fos- sil energy input had resulted in a decline in the investment return of a typical 50 GRT trawler (Rochereau, 1976). Based on annual operating cost figures which re- flect the level of seasonal activity, an inverse relationship exists between the return on the investment and the level of fishing effort in the Northeast fishery region (Mitchell and Cleveland, 1993). As the amount of fishing increases, the return in money decreases (Bardach, 1991). Indeed, the eventual outcome of such a system ap- pears to be that the value of the catch will cover only the operating costs and that some operations will be run on a deficit.

    Canadian Native Fisheries

    Northern native fishers operating in the Fort George region in Quebec, Canada use motorized canoes for fishing (Berkes, 1982). The subsistence activities of families in this region require large amounts of fuel for fishing. For example, the average

  • Bioethics offish Production 15/

    amount of fossil energy used per kcal of fish protein harvested was 16.2 kcal and ranged from 14.0 to 21.8 kcal. These results suggest that there is a heavy depend- ence on energy subsidies to harvest fish for this remote, subsistence system.

    U.S. Gulf of Mexico and Australia

    Compared to herring, haddock, and anchovies, the production of shrimp in the Gulf of Mexico requires large inputs of energy- about 206 kcal of fossil energy expended per kcal of shrimp protein produced (Leach, 1976). Also, this ratio is higher than the average of 150 kcal energy input per kcal of shrimp protein produced in the United States (Table 4).

    Although shrimp production in the Gulf of Mexico is energy intensive, the invest- ment is economical. Shrimp is considered an extremely choice seafood, and the dol- lar return is currently high enough to offset the costs of energy and production. However, shrimp imported from Asian and South American aquaculture are plac- ing severe economic pressure on the U.S. wild shrimp fishery industry (Coastwatch, 1990; Matherne, 1990).

    In the Australian wild shrimp industry, only 22 kcal of fossil energy input are ex- pended to produce i kcal of shrimp protein (Leach, 1976). This is also significantly less than the U.S. average of 150 kcal and the Gulf of Mexico average of 206 kcal of fossil energy input per kcal of shrimp protein harvested.

    Malta

    The Malta fishing industry reported an input of 25 kcal of fossil energy per kcal of fish protein produced (Leach, 1976). This input/output ratio of 25:1 is similar to the 27:1 reported for the U.S. fishery and the 20:1 for the U.K. fishery (Hirst, 1974; Leach, 1976).

    Adriatic

    An analysis of fish production in the Adriatic region indicates that this fishery sys- tem is energy intensive. When small vessels capable of harvesting 50 tons of fish per vessel per year were used, the average energy input was about 68 kcal of energy per kcal of fish protein produced (Leach, 1976). However, when large vessels, capable of harvesting 150 tons offish per vessel per year were used, energy inputs increased to about 100 kcal of fossil energy per kcal of protein produced. The efficiencies of small versus large vessels were similar to those used in the U.S. Northeast fishery in- dustry, where the smaller vessels were four times as efficient as the large vessels (Rochereau, 1976).

    M a n a g e m e n t o f F i s h e r y Sys t ems a n d t h e E n v i r o n m e n t

    Serious overfishing of common fishes already is a serious problem in many parts of the world, and the increased pressure on numerous fish populations appears to be

  • 152 D. Pimentel, R.E. Shanks and J.C. Rylander

    a worldwide trend (Pauly and Thia-Eng, 1988; SatcheU, 1992; Worldwatch Institute, 1992b). In addition, other threats to fishery sustainability include seaside develop- ment, loss of coastal wetland, pollution of bays and estuaries, and by-catch or un- used seafood (Worldwatch Institute, 1992b). Urban development along the coast has infringed on piscatorial breeding grounds and caused massive changes in coastal ecology. For example, Louisiana loses 50 square miles offish breeding ground each year due to development, and only 9% of California's original 3.5 million acres of wetlands remain (Satchell, 1992). Although some attempt has been made to protect wetlands, nearly one half of U.S. wetlands to date have been drained and converted into agricultural and urban development (Satchell, 1992).

    All nations, including the United States, have sought ways to protect their fish- eries from foreign exploitation. In 1976, the United States asserted a claim to the sea's resources within the Economic Exclusive Zone which is within 200 miles of the coast (Sullivan, 1981). The Magnuson Fisheries Conservation and Management Act of 1976 marked the dawning of a new era in fisheries management and eventually decreased the foreign fish catch. Currently, only 1% of the fish landed from Ameri- can waters are caught under foreign flags (NOAA, 1991).

    The Magnuson Act created regional committees to implement management pro- grams. It required that fisheries be managed for their optimum sustainable yield (OSY), a new concept which is difficult to define. OSY is intended to combine social, economic, ecological, and biological factors into one s tandard-an extremely diffi- cult task to say the least (Weber, 1987).

    Along with these legal steps has come modernization and the use of larger ships, as mentioned earlier. Concurrently, the number of harbour facilities, processing plants, and fish handling systems has increased. Overcapitalization and overcapac- ity now plague the U.S. fishery industry (SatcheU, 1992).

    The 1982 Law of the Sea Convention represented the culmination of a series of unilateral declarations of sovereignty over the oceans in the post-World War II era- the United States has never signed this agreement. Although some nations were more concerned about oil and mineral rights than fishing, protection of fish from foreign exploitation was a major concern for many nations. The agreement on fish protection has helped to a small degree, but a major overfishing problem remains.

    Small-scale fishing employs 100 million people worldwide either directly as fish- ers or workers in supporting industries (McGoodwin, 1990). Large-scale fishing, in contrast, employs only 500,000 people. The economic contribution of small-scale fishers continues to increase (McGoodwin, 1990; Bardach, 1991).

    Small-scale fishing is more effective in several ways (Pauly and Thia-Eng, 1988). For example, its capital cost per job averages 100 times less than that of large-scale fishing (McGoodwin, 1990; Bardach, 1991). It is less likely to be overcapitalized, which is the major problem with many large-scale fisheries today. Small-scale fish- ing consumes only about 11% of the total fuel oil used in all commercial fishing, but produces nearly five times as much fish per unit of fuel oil consumed as the large- scale fishing sector (McGoodwin, 1990; Bardach, 1991). In addition to the large size of the vessels, the number of vessels also contributes to overcapitalization.

    Most experts agree that the best way to halt overfishing and save the troubled

  • Bioethics ofFish Production 153

    fisheries is to ban all fishing in overexploited areas for five to ten years (Worldwatch Institute, 1993). This, in fact, has been done with the cod fishery in Newfoundland, Canada (Worldwatch Institute, 1993). Concurrently, all commercial fishers have been placed on welfare while the fishery is shut down for two years (Worldwatch In- stitute, 1993). This approach works for the fisheries of individual nations, but it is doubtful that such a ban would prove effective globally.

    The Newfoundland approach is drastic, but the situation is critical. Most fishery management policies have two components: first, conservation-determining the level of harvest that will ensure the sustainability of the fishery; and second, alloca- t i on - determining who fishes and ultimately benefits. McGoodwin (1990) identifies seven basic management strategies to achieve sustainability. These include: (1) clos- ing overfished areas, as in Newfoundland, to allow the fish populations to come back, (2) establishing closed seasons, (3) establishing aggregate quotas or total allowable catch, (4) restricting gear and technology, (5) using monetary measures such as taxes and subsidies to develop a controlled fishing effort, (6) limiting entry in the fishery area, and (7) instituting various forms of property rights over the fishery area.

    Gear restrictions and seasonal closings are the traditional methods used to man- age fisheries. Many economists dislike these policies because they claim the policies mandate economic inefficiency. However, in certain regions this approach has met with considerable success in reducing overfishing and maintaining the long-term productivity of the fishery (Anderson, 1985). For example, gear restrictions applied to the New England soft clam industry forced clam diggers to use only hand rakes and to harvest only clams above a certain size (Townsend, 1985, 1990; Koppleman and Davies, 1987). As a result, more clam diggers are employed, and most impor- tantly, the clam population has not been overexploited in New England. These strategies may not be effective in pelagic fisheries unless the number of fishers in the area is limited as well.

    One of the most effective management tools for preventing overfishing is to limit access to the fishery. The four major strategies for this are: (1) licensing which limits the number of fishing boats or fishers per area, (2) allocation of quotas by auction to fishers, (3) implementing restrictive taxes and/or fees that indirectly limit fish- ers, or (4) establishing a system of catching rights (McGoodwin, 1990; Townsend, 1990; Waters, 1991). A limited entry system has to be based on something other than money because money will always grow faster than the fishery resource (N. Shack- ell, DFO, St. John's NF, Canada, personal communication, 1993). The best approach to limit overfishing is to have an effective, federally regulated fishery based on en- vironmental standards and the fishery carrying capacity.

    With attention and action devoted to preserving the sustainability of fish produc- tion, increased quantities of fish could become available for human consumption but with less energy expended in production. Certainly, inaction will result in a world fishery in as critical a condition as that which Newfoundland is now experiencing. Perhaps the world harvest of fishery products could be improved by combining more effective use of unexploited fish, reducing pollution, and implementing sound man- agement of fish populations based on the knowledge of their population ecology (Brown et al., 1993). However, if the world population doubles in the next 40 years

  • 154 D. Pimentel, R.E. Shanks and J.C. Rylander

    Table 5 Energy inputs for commercial catfish production per hectare in Mississippi (after

    Waldrop and Dillard, 1985) Quantity/ha Kcal/ha

    Inputs Labour 95 h 50, 072 Equipment 9,500,000 kcal 9,500,000 Pumping 4,400,000 kcal 4,400,000 Fertilizer and other chemicals 15 kg 300,000 Feed 10,800 kg 70,200,000 Fingerlings 4,500 9,000,000 Total 93,450,072

    Outputs Catfish yield 5,100 kg Protein yield* 704 kg

    2,815,200

    Ratio kcal input/kcal output 1:33.2 * Assuming a dressed weight of 60ok and 23~7c protein in the catfish fillet.

    as expected, the amount of world food calories provided by fish will decline below the current level of less than 1%.

    A q u a c u l t u r e

    Aquaculture is the culture or farming of fish, shellfish, and other aquatic animals in fresh or salt water for food (Bardach, 1980). In the United States, commercial cat- fish aquaculture is practised in many regions. Catfish is an excellent eating fish, and its popularity has spread throughout the United States.

    The largest energy input in catfish aquaculture is the feed. Waldrop and Dillard (1985) reported that 10.8 tons of feed were fed per hectare to catfish over the 1.5 years necessary to reach marketable weight of 0.6 kg. per fish. The catfish yield was 5100 kg. per hectare (Table 5). The total fossil energy input for the production of catfish feed is estimated to be 70 million kcal. The other major inputs for this sys- tem are 9.5 million kcal/ha for production and maintenance of equipment, and 9.0 million for the fingerlings. An additional 4.4 million kcal per one-hectare pond is ex- pended in pumping and circulating the water. The pumping and circulation of water is necessary to remove wastes and protect fish from diseases, a problem when fish are raised in dense populations. A significant environmental problem is the treat- ment of the wastewater from catfish production (Schwartz and Boyd, 1994). The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency recently adopted new regulations dealing with wastewater from aquacultural systems.

    The total energy inputs required to produce a yield of about 5100 kg. of catfish per hectare are 93.4 million kcal of fossil energy. Assuming a 60% dressed weight and 23% protein, the total production of catfish protein is 704 kg/ha and is equiv- alent to 2.8 million kcal of food energy. Thus, the input/output ratio is about 33 kcal of fossil energy input per kcal of catfish protein produced. This ratio is similar to

  • Bioethics ofFish Production 155

    300

    200

    _

    100

    Z W -r C) ~@ "0 (o r- > > m O -r O

    -n r - 0 "n -n ~ ~ - I m 0 co m

    Figure 3 Fossil energy inputs (kcal) per protein output (kcal) for various fishery and several livestock systems (Rawitscher and Mayer, 1977; Pimentel et al., 1980; Folke and Kautsky, 1992)

    Table 6 Farm production of Malaysian prawn (Macrobrachium rosenbergi) on Oahu,

    Hawaii (after Bardach, 1980)

    Item Amount Kcal Inputs, fixed Pond construction 3.5 ha of land Tractor grader 27.5 days/year Pipes 350 m 6 in. PVC 125 psi Cement flumes 120 ft 2 total (8 flumes) Wooden building 2000 ft2217,143 Labour 122 days/year

    1,922,291 36,120

    238,286

  • 156 D. Pimentel, R.E. Shanks and J.C. Rflander

    Table 6 contd.

    Item Amount Kcal

    Inputs, annual operating Water Labour; manual/miscellaneous Machinery use:

    Running maintenance Harvesting (50 hp vehicle/tractor)

    Materials: Net

    Fertilizer: Sodium nitrate Triplesuperphosphate

    Feed: Broilerchicken mash Larva for planting (seed)

    Total inputs

    130 l/ha/min 72 days/year

    91 days/year on 3.5 ha 10,102,698 Shared with other farms, used 1 day/week; 4 cm mesh 135 m/2m) nylon 7,000 14 kg/ha 17,250 5 kg/ha 9,000 4500 kg/ha 9,000,000 50,000 larva/ton of production 19,333

    21,569,092

    Output Live Malaysian prawn a 3,000 kg/ha 3,240,000

    Kcal input / g protein output Kcal input / kcal output Kcal output / labour hour

    328.3 66.6

    129.6 aEdible portion about 45%; caloric content 720 kcal/l~, protein content in prawn flesh 14.6% (65.7 kg protein from 450 kg of prawn that is edible in I metric ton).

    T a b l e 7 Intensive oyster production (annual basis) on land in Oahu, Hawaii (after

    Bardach, 1980)

    Item Amount Kcal

    Water area under production 0.45 ha Inputs, fired Building farm, prorated 2,884,436 Machinery (tractor, grader, dredger) 5 days Labour 72,200 Pipes and cement flumes

    Plastic trays for oysters

    26 days 3 3 level, 30m, 1000 m 6 in. and 4 in. PVC 34,700,000 3400 kg 129,956

    Inputs, operating Seed Labour 1095 days Electricity, water pumping 10,000 kWh/month 343,560,000 Fertilizer: triplesuperphosphate 5 kg/day/ha 7,391,250 sodium nitrate 20 kg/day/ha 109,500,000

    Total inputs 498,237,842

    Output Oysters a (Grassostrea gigas) 13,636 kg/ha 5,583,760

    Kcal input / kcal output Kcal input/gprotein ouput Kcal output / labour hour

    89.2 766.5 619.9

    aEdible weight (flesh) 45%, 910 kcal / kg oyster flesh, protein content oyster flesh 10.6%.

  • Bioethics o f f i sh Production 157

    Table 8 Experimental production of lake perch (Perca flavescens) in Wisconsin (after

    Bardach, 1980)

    Item Amount Kcal Inputs, fixed Land Containment structures: Machinery 50 hp Pipes, conduits Buildings

    Water Labour Inputs, operating Labour: Maintenance Operation Harvest (for farm)

    Nets, pails, etc.

    Stocking material: fingerlings Fertilizer: dried alfalfa Medication Feed: 40% protein dry poUets Direct energy inputs

    Pumping Total inputs

    2.08 ha (0.2 ha/ton)

    15.3 days 596,277 1200 m 4 in. PVC pipe 125 psi 765,217 estimat~h 1,200,000 3,400 m/ton 16 days

    250 days 1095 days/year 95 days 30/lm seine, wt about 20 kg Dipnets (for farm), 10/20 1 plastic pails 50 kg/ha 200 kg/ha 5 kg/ha 1750 kg/ton of fish 2862 | fuel oil 20,190 kWh

    4,634,200 3,440

    350,000 5,250,000

    32,666,868 57,803,970

    103,280,922

    Output Lake (yellow porch) per ton 546,000

    910 kcal/kg for the net edible portion (60%)

    Protein in yellow porch 19.3% 115.8 kg protein/ton 891.9

    Kcal input / kcal output Kcal output / labour hour

    189.2 181.4

    that of another catfish production system that has an input/output ratio of 35:1 (Pi- mentel et al., 1975), both of which are remarkably similar to the 35:1 ratio for U.S. beef production (Pimentol et al., 1980).

    Although catfish are cold-blooded and use no energy in heating their bodies, they are not particularly efficient in converting feed into protein. For example, they are much less efficient than broilers hut more efficient than pork, shrimp, and lobster (Figure 3).

    In addition to the catfish system described, five other aquaculture systems were analysed. The first is the production of Malaysian prawn on Oahu, Hawaii. The fos- sil energy input per kcal of protein output for this system was about 67:1, or nearly twice that for catfish (Tables 5 and 6). Prawns, however, have a much higher market value than catfish, and this makes the prawn system profitable.

    Oysters were produced through aquaculture on Oahu, Hawaii (Table 7). The energy input/output ratio for this system was 89:1, or about one-third higher than

  • 158 D. Pimentel, R.E. Shanks and J.C. Rylander

    Table 9 Pond polyculture in Israel (after Bardach, 1980)

    Item Amount Kcal Inputs, fixed Pond construction Pond inlet: steel pipe Pond outlet: Asbestos-cement pipe Cement base (Monk)

    Machinery (used on 100 ha for 10 years)

    Nets (used on 100 ha for 5 yrs)

    Inputs, operating Labour Machinery operation

    Fertilizer: liquid ammonia superphospbate

    Herbicide Feed: sorghum pellets (25% crude protein)

    Seed production

    Total inputs

    Moving 3000 m s of soil i00 m, 20 cm dia. (4100 kg)

    610,000 2,150,000

    20 m, 35 cm dia. (35 kg) 3,500 40 kg 3,000 Jeep, tractors, etc., tank cars (22,800 kg of steel) 705,200 200 kg nylon 16,000

    27 days/year Fuel for jeeps, trucks, tractors aerators, pumping 21,744,000 6001 (494 kg N2) 7,200,000 600 kg 1,800,000 About 2 kg 99,000 4.14 tons 9,108,000 3.38 tons 6,216,000 prorated from grow-out figs 15,000

    Output Production total 4,150 kg

    Common carp 65.5% Silver carp 15.7 % Tilapia 15.1% Mullet 3.7%

    49,67o, ooo

    4,772,500

    Kcal input / kcal output 10.4 Kcal input / g protein output (unprocessed) 64.7

    that for shrimp production (Tables 6 and 7). The major U.S. oyster producing re- gions include Virginia, Maryland, New York, and Connecticut.

    An aquaculture system for lake perch production in Wisconsin proved to be highly energy intensive (Table 8). The energy input/output ratio for the perch system was calculated to be 189:1. I t is doubtful that with such a high input this system will prove to be economical as a protein source unless ways are found to reduce the costs through further research. However, it may become more economical if the fish are raised for sport fishing because sport fish might have a relatively high market value.

    In contrast to U.S. perch production, fish polyculture in Israel has proven to be efficient in terms of energy (Table 9). The fish used in the entire polyculture system were the common carp, silver carp, tilapia, and mullet. The energy input/output for this polyculture system was reported to be 10:1, or one of the most efficient aqua- culture systems for which data are available. The energy advantage of polyculture is mainly due to its fish-herbivore component, that is, having fish types that feed directly on the plants in the system.

  • Bioethics ofFish Production 159

    Table 10 Energy inputs and outputs for sea bass production in Thailand calculated from

    economic data presented by Pillay (1990) Quantity/ha 103 kcal/ha

    Inputs Labour 80 h 47.4 Ponds & operation 50 x l0 s kcal 50,000 Fuel & lubrication 1890 liters 18,900 Feed 35,000 kg 231,000 Total 299,947.4

    Outputs Sea bass yield 14,000 kg Protein yield 1,848 kg Kcal input/kcal output 65.2

    Table 11 The energy inputs in shrimp production in Thailand

    Quantity/ha Kcal/ha Inputs 1 Labour 70 h 41,475 Electricity + fuel 31,000,000 kcal 31,000,000 Seed 250 kg 125,000 Feed 6,000 kg 24,000,000 Maintenance 14,000,000 kcal 14,000,000 Total 69,500,000 Outputs Shrimp yield 2,135 kg Kcal input/kcal output 69.5 Protein yield 427 kg 1,067,500 1 The inputs were calculated from the economic data of Shang (1992).

    The energetics of an aquacultural system for sea bass and shrimp in Thailand were calculated from data presented by Pillay (1990) and Shang (1992), respectively. The energy input/output ratios for these high value fishery systems were about 65:1 and 70:1, respectively (Table 10 and 11). These values are significantly higher than fish polyculture in Israel and catfish production in Louisiana (Tables 5, 9-11).

    In contrast to pond-type aquaculture, Atlantic salmon are being mass produced in cages along the coasts of Norway and Sweden. These salmon are fed pellets made from fish byproducts. The production of fish pellets to feed caged salmon requires the solar energy fixed by phytoplankten from a sea surface estimated to be 40,000 to 50,000 times larger than the area of the cages housing the salmon (Falke and Kautsky, 1989, 1992). Therefore, low-value fish living over vast areas of the sea are harvested and concentrated into pellets in order to feed high-value caged salmon. The energetics of this system have been calculated to be about 50 kcal of fossil energy per kcal offish protein produced (Folke and Kautsky, 1989, 1992). This system com- pares well with the other aquacu]tural systems mentioned earlier.

  • 160 D. Pimentel, R.E. Shanks and J.C. Rylander

    Norway is producing more than 40 tens of ~lmon each year (Folke and Kautsky, 1992). This highly productive system has many economic advantages; however, there are two msjor environmental problems. First, the caged Atlantic salmon are not as fit for survival in the wild as the wild Atlantic salmon. Second, escaped caged sal- mon are mating with the wild salmon and are having a negative impact on the wild salmon population. In addition, the heavy concentration of caged salmon along the Norwegian coast is polluting some of the t]ords with wastes produced by the concen- trated fish (T. Edland, personal communication, ,~s, Norway, 1992).

    Conclusion

    Finfish production in the Northeast fishery system is economical beth in terms of energy inputs and dollar returns. In contrast, other fishery production systems in the Northeast and Gulf regions-like lobster and shrimp production-are expensive and require extremely high energy inputs. Currently, however, the relatively high market value of these species makes them profitable despite the high costs of harvesting. Although fishing for shrimp and lobster may be profitable, the economi- cally high cost of these foods makes them impractical as a common and abundant food source. Some fish production systems, such as those in some coastal regions, compare favourably to livestock production systems in terms of energy inputs and efficiency, but many systems require more energy inputs per kcal of fish protein pro- duced than livestock protein.

    Overall, small-scale fishing systems are more energy efficient than large-scale systems. Especially for developing countries, small-scale fishery systems provide a number of benefits in terms of increased employment and low fuel costs. Large-scale factory vessels are inefficient, usually requiring government subsidies for their operation (McGoodwin, 1990). In addition, the high costs of large vessels contribute to overeapitalization and overfishing of fishery resources.

    A wide range of management techniques exists for fisheries managers and policy- makers to improve fishery production in the future. Gear and season restrictions and limited access regimes seem to have the greatest potential to protect the biotic stability of the world's fisheries. The future of fish as a food source is dependent on our ability to maintain the productive capacity of the world's fisheries. Long-term sustainability must be the first priority of fishery managers and policy-makers.

    In the near future, overfishing is more likely to cause fish scarcity than are fos- sil fuel shortages and high energy prices. The causes and seriousness of overfishing and use of poor management practices are known. However, worldwide and nation- wide, priorities and ethics necessary to deal with the problems have not been estab- lished. In general, the problem with the world's fisheries is the classical ethical case of the "Tragedy of the Commons" (Hardin, 1968). Another related and equally seri- ous problem is understanding the limits of human carrying capacity on earth (Pi- mentel et al., 1994).

    Studies are needed on the ecology of breeding habits, population dynamics, and optimal yields of major fish species as well as on the effects of pollution offish hab- itats in order to help ensure the sustainability of the mgjor fishery regions. Finding

  • Bioethics ofFish Production 16I

    ways to protect wetlands, estuaries, and other aquatic areas will help maintain healthy ecosystems for fish populations.

    Concurrently, a need exists to improve management practices such as determin- ing the most efficient type of vessels to be used in a specific region and controlling the harvest, as well as developing more energy-effective technologies to enhance fishery production. There is also a critical need to improve state-federal and inter- state co-ordination of fmheries management. Fisheries must be managed as a whole and not necessarily based on where the fish are at the moment. This is particularly a problem for migratory species or species that move near shore to spawn. Develop- ing techniques that make effective use of currently unexploited fish will increase the total food harvested from aquatic systems.

    Aquaculture is not the solution to wild fishery production. The energy input/out- put ratio is much higher for aquaculture than for the harvest of wild populations. In addition, the energy ratios for aquaculture systems are higher than for most live- stock systems. However, even if fish production is improved, the rapid growth of the human population will negate the contribution of increased yields. In all probability, the world's fishery industry will not be able to supply more than 1% of the world's food energy in the future.

    A c k n o w l e d g e m e n t s

    We thank the following people for reading an earlier draft of this article, for their many helpful suggestions, and, in some cases, for providing additional information: J. Bardach, East-West Center, Hawaii; C.J. Cleveland, Boston University; M.E. Fraidenburg, Department of Fisheries, State of Washington; A.D. Mclntyre, Uni- versity of Aberdeen, Scotland; B.B. Nayak, College of Fisheries, Mangalore, India; D.B. Sampson, Oregon State University; N. Shackell, DFO Science Branch, St. John's, NF, Canada; J.R. Waters, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administra- tion; Wen Dazhong, Institute of Applied Ecology, China; S. Bukkens, M. Pimentel, and B. Wilkins at Cornell University; and three anonymous reviewers.

    Note

    * This article will also appear in the book "Food Energy and Society," published by the Uni- versity Press of Colorado, Niwot, CO.

    References

    Anderson, L.G. 1985. Potential economic benefits from gear restrictions and license limitation in fisheries regulation. Land Economics 61: 409418.

    Bardach, J. 1980. Aquaculture. In Handbook of Energy Utilization in Agriculture, edited by D. Pimentel, pp. 431-440. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.

    .1982. Oil, fish, and the sun and the wind. InAppropriate Technology for Alter- native Energy Sources in Fisheries, edited by R.C. May, I.R. Smi th and D.B. Thomson, pp. 1-6. Manila: International Center for Living Aquatic Resources Management.

  • 162 D. Pimentel, R.E. Shanks and J.C. Rylander

    1991. Sustainable Development of Fisheries In Ocean Yearbook 9, edited by International Ocean Institute, pp. 57-72. Chicago: University of Chicago Press

    Bell, F.W. 1978. Food from the Sea: The Economics and Politics of Ocean Fisheries Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Berkes, F. 1982. Energy subsidies and native domestic (subsistence) fisheries. Nat. Can. (Quebec, Les Presses de l'Universit6 Laval) 109(4): 1011-1019.

    BP. 1991. British Petroleum Statistical Review of World Energy London: British Petroleum Corporate Communications Services.

    Brown, L.R., H. Kane, and E. Ayres. 1993. Vital Signs 1993. New York: W.W. Nor- ton and Company

    Coastwatch. 1990. Shrimping: a fishery in trouble? Coastwatch 10: 1-2. FAO. 1972. Atlas of the Living Resources of the Seas. Rome, Italy: Food and Agricul-

    ture Organization of the United Nations, Dept. of Fisheries. 1991. Food Balance Sheets Food and Agriculture Organization of the United

    Nations. Rome, Italy. 1992. Aquaculture Production 1984--1990. FAO Fisheries Circular No. 815 Re-

    vision 4. Rome, Italy: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Na- tions.

    Folke, C., and N. Kautsky. 1989. The role of ecosystems for a sustainable develop- ment aquaculture Ambio 18: 234-243

    1992. Aquaculture with its environment: prospects for sustainability. Ocean and Coastal Management 17: 5-24.

    Gever, J., R. Kaufman, D. Skole, and C. Vorosmarty. 1991. Beyond Oil. Boulder, CO: University Press of Colorado.

    Gibbons, J.H., and P.D. Blair. 1991. U.S. Energy transition: On getting from here to there American Institute of Physics, July: 21-30

    Gulland, J.A. 1971. The Fish Resources of the Ocean. London: Fishing News (Books) LTD (for FAO of UN).

    Hardin, G. 1966. The tragedy of the commons. Science 131: 1243-1247 Hirst, E. 1974. Food-related energy requirements. Science 184: 134-139 Koppleman, L.E., and D.S. Davies 1987. Strategies and Recommendations for Re-

    vitalizing the Hard Clam Fisheries in Suffolk County. Hamppauge, NY: Suf- folk County Planning Department.

    Leach, G. 1976. Energy and Food Production. Guildford, Surrey, UK: IPC Science and Technology Press Ltd.

    Matare, H.F. 1989. Energy: Fact and Future Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press Matherne, R. 1990. Testimony of Concerned Shrimpers of America. Washington, DC:

    Fisheries and Wildlife Conservation and the Environment Subcommittee of the House of Representative Merchant Marine and Fisheries Committee, U.S. Congress, May 1, 1990.

    McGoodwin J.R. 1990. Crisis in the World's Fisheries. Stanford: Stanford Univer- sity Press

    Mitchell, C., and C.J. Cleveland 1993. Resource scarcity, energy use and en- vironmental impact: a case study of the New Bedford, Massachusetts, USA, fisheries Environ. Manage. 17: 305-317.

    NOAA. 1991. Fisheries of the United States 1990. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office

    1992. Status of Fishery Resources offthe Northeastern United States for 1992. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Technical Memorandum

  • Bioethics o f f i sh Production 163

    NMFS-F/NEC-95. Washington, DC: NOAA, U.S. Department of Commerce. 1993. Status of Fishery Resources of the Northeast United States for 1993. Tech- nical Memo NMFS-F/NEC-101. Washington, DC: NOAA.

    Odum, E.P. 1978. Fundamentals of Ecology. New York: Saunders. Pauly, D,. and C. Thia-Eng. 1988. The overflshing of marine resources: Socio-

    economic background in southeast Asia. Ambio 17(3): 200-206. Pillay, T.V.R. 1990. Aquaculture Principles and Practices. Oxford, UK: Fishing New

    Books. Pimentel, D., W. DritchiUo, J. Krummel, and J. Kutzman. 1975. Energy and land

    constraints in food-protein production. Science 190: 754-761. Pimentel, D., R. Harman, M. Pacenza, J. Pecarsky, and M. Pimentel. 1994. Natural

    resources and an optimum human population. Population and Environment 15(5): 347-369.

    Pimentel, D., D. Nafus, W. Vergara, D. Papaj, L. Jaconetta, W. Wulfe, L. Olsvig, K. French, M. Loye, and E. Mendosa. 1978. Biological solar energy conversion and U.S. energy policy. BioScience 28: 376-382.

    Pimentel, D., P.A. Oltenacu, M.C. Nesheim, J. Krummel, M.S. Allen, and S. Chick. 1980 The potential for grass-fed livestock: resource constraints. Science 207: 843-848.

    Rawitscher, M., and J. Mayer 1977. Nutritional outputs and energy inputs in sea- foods. Science 198: 261-264.

    Rochereau, S. 1976. Energy analysis and coastal shelf resource management; nuclear power generation vs. seafood protein production in the Northeast region of the U.S. Ph.D. Thesis. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University.

    - - and D. Pimente11978. Energy tradeoffs between Northeast fishery production and coastal power reactors. Journal of Energy 3: 545--589.

    Samples, K.C. 1983. An economic appraisal of sail-assisted commercial fishing ves- sels in Hawaiian waters. Marine Fisheries Review 45: 50-55.

    Satchell, M. 1992. The rape of the oceans. U.S. News & World Report 6/22/92: 64- 75.

    Schaffer, H.C., L.E. Barger, and H.E. Kumpf. 1989. The driftnet fishery in the Fort Pierce-Port Salerno area off southeast Florida. Marine Fisheries Review 51: 44-49.

    Schwartz, M.F., and C.E. Boyd. 1994. Effluent quality during harvest of channel cat- fish from watershed ponds. Progressive Fish-Culturist 56(1): 25-32.

    Scott, W.G. 1982. Energy and fish harvesting. In Proceedings of the Fishing Industry (pp. 1-34). New York, NY: Energy Conservation Conference. The Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers.

    Shang, Y.C. 1992. Penaeid markets and economics. InMarine Shrimp Culture: Prin- ciples and Practices, edited by A.W. Fast and L.J. Lester, pp. 589-604. Amster- dam: Elsevier.

    Smith, J.W. 1991. The Atlantic and Gulf menhaden purse seine fisheries: Origins, forecasting. Marine Fisheries Review 53(4): 20-41.

    Sullivan, K. 1981. Overfishing and the new Law of the Sea. OECD Observer No. 129. July 1991, pp. 16-19. Paris.

    Townsend, R.E. 1985. An economic evaluation of restricted entry in Maine's soft shell clam industry. N. Am. J. ofFish. Manage 5: 57-64.

    - - . 1990. Entry restrictions in the fishery: a survey of the evidence. Land Econom- ics 66: 359-378.

  • 164 D. Pimentel, R.E. Shanks and J.C. Rylander

    USDC. 1974. Basic Economic Indicators: Atlantic and Pacific Groundfish. Current Fish. Stat. No. 6271. Washington, DC: U.S. Dept. Commerce, Nat. Atmosp. & Ocean. Admin. Nat. Marine Fish. Serv.

    Waldrop, J.E., and J.G. Dillard. 1985. Economics (Chapter 13). In Channel Catfish Culture, edited by C.S. Tucker, pp. 621--645. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Waters, J.R. 1991. Restricted access methods of management: Toward more effec- tive regulation of fishing effort. Marine Review 53: 1-10.

    Weber, M. 1967. Federal marine fisheries management. In Audubon Wildlife Report 1987, edited by R. DiSilvestri, pp. 131-145. San Diego: Academic Press.

    Wiviott, D.J., and S.B. Mathews. 1975. Energy efficiency comparison between the Washington and Japanese otter trawl fisheries of the Northeast Pacific. Marine Fisheries Review 37(4): 21-24.

    Worldwatch Institute. 1992a. State of the World. Washington, DC: Worldwatch In- stitute.

    1992b. Vital Signs. Washington, DC: Worldwatch Institute. 1993. State of the World. Washington, DC: Worldwatch Institute. (WRI). 1992. World Resources. New York: Oxford University Press. (WRI). 1994. World Resources. New York: Oxford University Press.