bimodal regime in young massive clusters leading to ... · introduction motivation: cooling winds...
TRANSCRIPT
Bimodal regime in young massive clusters leadingto formation of subsequent stellar generations
Richard WünschJ. Palouš, G. Tenorio-Tagle, C. Muñoz-Tuñón, S. Ehlerová
Astronomical institute, Czech Academy of Sciences
14th August 2015
Wünsch (AsU CAS) 2G with bimodal regime 14.8.2015 1 / 1
Introduction
Motivation: Cooling winds→ multiple populations
young massive clusters have windsstellar winds, SNe→ collisions→ hot shocked wind→ outflow
the wind may become thermally unstable inside the clusterif the cluster is massive and compact enough
dense warm/cold clumps are formeddepends whether they can self-shield against ionising stellar radiation
new stars form either in-situ or after clumps sink into the centre2nd generation (2G) stars enriched by products of massive stars chemical evolution
similarities with FRMS scenario (desressin+07)
- even fast winds can be captured
predicts formation of 2G stars in the centre (may help with mass budget problem)
Wünsch (AsU CAS) 2G with bimodal regime 14.8.2015 2 / 1
Introduction
Motivation: Cooling winds→ multiple populations
young massive clusters have windsstellar winds, SNe→ collisions→ hot shocked wind→ outflow
the wind may become thermally unstable inside the clusterif the cluster is massive and compact enough
dense warm/cold clumps are formeddepends whether they can self-shield against ionising stellar radiation
new stars form either in-situ or after clumps sink into the centre2nd generation (2G) stars enriched by products of massive stars chemical evolution
similarities with FRMS scenario (desressin+07)
- even fast winds can be captured
predicts formation of 2G stars in the centre (may help with mass budget problem)
Wünsch (AsU CAS) 2G with bimodal regime 14.8.2015 2 / 1
Introduction
Motivation: Cooling winds→ multiple populations
young massive clusters have windsstellar winds, SNe→ collisions→ hot shocked wind→ outflow
the wind may become thermally unstable inside the clusterif the cluster is massive and compact enough
dense warm/cold clumps are formeddepends whether they can self-shield against ionising stellar radiation
new stars form either in-situ or after clumps sink into the centre2nd generation (2G) stars enriched by products of massive stars chemical evolution
similarities with FRMS scenario (desressin+07)
- even fast winds can be captured
predicts formation of 2G stars in the centre (may help with mass budget problem)
Wünsch (AsU CAS) 2G with bimodal regime 14.8.2015 2 / 1
Introduction
Motivation: Cooling winds→ multiple populations
young massive clusters have windsstellar winds, SNe→ collisions→ hot shocked wind→ outflow
the wind may become thermally unstable inside the clusterif the cluster is massive and compact enough
dense warm/cold clumps are formeddepends whether they can self-shield against ionising stellar radiation
new stars form either in-situ or after clumps sink into the centre2nd generation (2G) stars enriched by products of massive stars chemical evolution
similarities with FRMS scenario (desressin+07)
- even fast winds can be captured
predicts formation of 2G stars in the centre (may help with mass budget problem)
Wünsch (AsU CAS) 2G with bimodal regime 14.8.2015 2 / 1
The cluster wind
Star cluster wind: semi-analytical model
by Chevalier & Clegg (1985, Nat., 317, 44)Ekin of stellar winds and SN ejectathermalized, hot gas fills the clustersources (stars) distributed according totop-hat profilesolution of 1D spherically sym. HDequations, cooling neglectedsonic point at the cluster bordertested by Cantó+00, Raga+01 and othersfor stellar windsinteraction of the wind with the parentalcloud not covered here(harper-clark&murray09, krause+12,14, rogers&pittard13,
rosen+14, herrera+, . . . )
Wünsch (AsU CAS) 2G with bimodal regime 14.8.2015 3 / 1
The cluster wind
Star cluster wind: semi-analytical model
by Chevalier & Clegg (1985, Nat., 317, 44)Ekin of stellar winds and SN ejectathermalized, hot gas fills the clustersources (stars) distributed according totop-hat profilesolution of 1D spherically sym. HDequations, cooling neglectedsonic point at the cluster bordertested by Cantó+00, Raga+01 and othersfor stellar windsinteraction of the wind with the parentalcloud not covered here(harper-clark&murray09, krause+12,14, rogers&pittard13,
rosen+14, herrera+, . . . )
Wünsch (AsU CAS) 2G with bimodal regime 14.8.2015 3 / 1
The cluster wind
Star cluster wind: semi-analytical model
by Chevalier & Clegg (1985, Nat., 317, 44)Ekin of stellar winds and SN ejectathermalized, hot gas fills the clustersources (stars) distributed according totop-hat profilesolution of 1D spherically sym. HDequations, cooling neglectedsonic point at the cluster bordertested by Cantó+00, Raga+01 and othersfor stellar windsinteraction of the wind with the parentalcloud not covered here(harper-clark&murray09, krause+12,14, rogers&pittard13,
rosen+14, herrera+, . . . )
Wünsch (AsU CAS) 2G with bimodal regime 14.8.2015 3 / 1
The cluster wind
Star cluster wind: semi-analytical model
by Chevalier & Clegg (1985, Nat., 317, 44)Ekin of stellar winds and SN ejectathermalized, hot gas fills the clustersources (stars) distributed according totop-hat profilesolution of 1D spherically sym. HDequations, cooling neglectedsonic point at the cluster bordertested by Cantó+00, Raga+01 and othersfor stellar windsinteraction of the wind with the parentalcloud not covered here(harper-clark&murray09, krause+12,14, rogers&pittard13,
rosen+14, herrera+, . . . )
Wünsch (AsU CAS) 2G with bimodal regime 14.8.2015 3 / 1
The cluster wind
Catastrophic cooling of the windfor massive clusters, cooling has to betaken into accountradiative solution by silich+03→ T drops at a certain radiuspredicts different observed X-ray flux(silich+04) - good agreement withobserved X-ray fluxes(NGC4303 nuclear SSC; jiménez-bailón+03)
above certain mass limit, no stationary wind solution exists→catastrophic cooling (silich+03):
energy deposition ∝ MSC
cooling ∝ ρ2wind ∝ M2
SC
}⇒ inevitable
tenorio-tagle+05 suggests extreme positive feedback (high SFE)
Wünsch (AsU CAS) 2G with bimodal regime 14.8.2015 4 / 1
The cluster wind
Catastrophic cooling of the windfor massive clusters, cooling has to betaken into accountradiative solution by silich+03→ T drops at a certain radiuspredicts different observed X-ray flux(silich+04) - good agreement withobserved X-ray fluxes(NGC4303 nuclear SSC; jiménez-bailón+03)
above certain mass limit, no stationary wind solution exists→catastrophic cooling (silich+03):
energy deposition ∝ MSC
cooling ∝ ρ2wind ∝ M2
SC
}⇒ inevitable
tenorio-tagle+05 suggests extreme positive feedback (high SFE)
Wünsch (AsU CAS) 2G with bimodal regime 14.8.2015 4 / 1
Bimodal regime
Three wind regimes
quasi-adiabatic regimeidentical with CC85, cooling has no effectmechanical luminosity (cluster mass) substantially below Lcrit
log T
LSC
SCR
critL
rSCR
3 parameters: LSC , MSC︸ ︷︷ ︸given by MSC
, RSC
density
SN s
s
SW
Quasi− v < c
vA,∞ =√
2ηLSC
MSC
thermalization
−adiabatic
sound speed
v > c
temperature
velocity
2
0
8
7
6
5
4
3
1
Wünsch (AsU CAS) 2G with bimodal regime 14.8.2015 5 / 1
Bimodal regime
Three wind regimes
radiative regimemechanical luminosity (cluster mass) slightly below Lcritwind cools down at certain distance out of the cluster
log T
LSC
SCR
critL
rSCR
3 parameters: LSC , MSC︸ ︷︷ ︸given by MSC
, RSC
Radiative density
velocity
temperature
2
0
8
7
6
5
4
3
1
Wünsch (AsU CAS) 2G with bimodal regime 14.8.2015 5 / 1
Bimodal regime
Three wind regimes
bimodal regime (tenorio-tagle+07; wünsch+08), cluster split by Rstouter: wind, stationary solution existsinner: thermal instabilities, mass accumulation - secondary SF
log T
LSC
SCR
critL
rSCR
3 parameters: LSC , MSC︸ ︷︷ ︸given by MSC
, RSC
Bimodalvelocity
temperature
density
Rst
stagnationradius
2
0
8
7
6
5
4
3
1
Wünsch (AsU CAS) 2G with bimodal regime 14.8.2015 5 / 1
Bimodal regime
Heating efficiency and mass loading
hot gas inside cluster seems to be colder than energy / massdeposited by stars→ two new parameters:
ηML: mass loading - additional (pristine) gas added to the hot phaseηHE: heating efficiency - some thermal energy is lost from the hotphase (on the top of standard cooling)
mass loading - evidence for mixing with pristine gas ∼ 1 : 1(e.g. prantzos+07)
obs. evidence for low heating efficiencymissing energy from X-ray luminosities(rosen+14)recombination line profiles of SSCs inAntennae have moderately supersonicwidths (gilbert&graham07)
Wünsch (AsU CAS) 2G with bimodal regime 14.8.2015 6 / 1
Bimodal regime
Heating efficiency and mass loading
hot gas inside cluster seems to be colder than energy / massdeposited by stars→ two new parameters:
ηML: mass loading - additional (pristine) gas added to the hot phaseηHE: heating efficiency - some thermal energy is lost from the hotphase (on the top of standard cooling)
mass loading - evidence for mixing with pristine gas ∼ 1 : 1(e.g. prantzos+07)
obs. evidence for low heating efficiencymissing energy from X-ray luminosities(rosen+14)recombination line profiles of SSCs inAntennae have moderately supersonicwidths (gilbert&graham07)
Wünsch (AsU CAS) 2G with bimodal regime 14.8.2015 6 / 1
Bimodal regime
Heating efficiency and mass loading
hot gas inside cluster seems to be colder than energy / massdeposited by stars→ two new parameters:
ηML: mass loading - additional (pristine) gas added to the hot phaseηHE: heating efficiency - some thermal energy is lost from the hotphase (on the top of standard cooling)
mass loading - evidence for mixing with pristine gas ∼ 1 : 1(e.g. prantzos+07)
obs. evidence for low heating efficiencymissing energy from X-ray luminosities(rosen+14)recombination line profiles of SSCs inAntennae have moderately supersonicwidths (gilbert&graham07)
Wünsch (AsU CAS) 2G with bimodal regime 14.8.2015 6 / 1
Bimodal regime
Heating efficiency 2
HII region coinciding with SSCs in M82 are very compact(silich+09)
evidence for high heating efficiency in M82defined globally: ηHE = 30− 100 %, strickland&heckman09)
Wünsch (AsU CAS) 2G with bimodal regime 14.8.2015 7 / 1
Bimodal regime
Heating efficiency 2
HII region coinciding with SSCs in M82 are very compact(silich+09)
evidence for high heating efficiency in M82defined globally: ηHE = 30− 100 %, strickland&heckman09)
Wünsch (AsU CAS) 2G with bimodal regime 14.8.2015 7 / 1
Bimodal regime
Evolution of Massive Compact Clusters (wünsch+11)
evolution of the critical luminosity (Lcrit) for 107 M� cluster withRSC = 3 pcStarburst99 with Geneva evolutionary tracks (HighMass winds)
36
38
40
42
44
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
log L
SC
, L
crit [e
rg s
-1]
t [Myr]
LSC
Lcrit: ηhe=1, ηml=0
Lcrit: ηhe=0.05, ηml=1
Wünsch (AsU CAS) 2G with bimodal regime 14.8.2015 8 / 1
Bimodal regime
Influence of ionising radiation
Analytical estimate (palouš+14)dense warm gas sinks into centre: stream + centralclumpself-shielding mass of the central clumpmself = NUV,SC
µmHα?
kTionPhot
can streams of falling mass cool before they fall intocentre?tSS = 1
4πq2UV R5
SCR−2st (1 + ηml)
−1M−1SCµmHα
−2∗
(kTPhot
)3.
central clump
stre
am
=
*
SF
ionisedP
*
*
hotP
*
hot
HealPix ray/cone
HealPix ray/cone
target cell
tree node
RHD simulations:radiation treated by TreeRay: tree + reverseray-tracing; wünsch+(in prep.)
Wünsch (AsU CAS) 2G with bimodal regime 14.8.2015 9 / 1
Bimodal regime
Influence of ionising radiation
Analytical estimate (palouš+14)dense warm gas sinks into centre: stream + centralclumpself-shielding mass of the central clumpmself = NUV,SC
µmHα?
kTionPhot
can streams of falling mass cool before they fall intocentre?tSS = 1
4πq2UV R5
SCR−2st (1 + ηml)
−1M−1SCµmHα
−2∗
(kTPhot
)3.
central clump
stre
am
=
*
SF
ionisedP
*
*
hotP
*
hot
HealPix ray/cone
HealPix ray/cone
target cell
tree node
RHD simulations:radiation treated by TreeRay: tree + reverseray-tracing; wünsch+(in prep.)
Wünsch (AsU CAS) 2G with bimodal regime 14.8.2015 9 / 1
Bimodal regime
Influence of ionising radiation
Analytical estimate (palouš+14)dense warm gas sinks into centre: stream + centralclumpself-shielding mass of the central clumpmself = NUV,SC
µmHα?
kTionPhot
can streams of falling mass cool before they fall intocentre?tSS = 1
4πq2UV R5
SCR−2st (1 + ηml)
−1M−1SCµmHα
−2∗
(kTPhot
)3.
central clump
stre
am
=
*
SF
ionisedP
*
*
hotP
*
hot
HealPix ray/cone
HealPix ray/cone
target cell
tree node
RHD simulations:radiation treated by TreeRay: tree + reverseray-tracing; wünsch+(in prep.)
Wünsch (AsU CAS) 2G with bimodal regime 14.8.2015 9 / 1
Bimodal regime Simulations
RHD simulation
AMR code Flash
1283 grid
M&E src: Schusterdistribution
optically thincooling:raymond+76
fixed stellar gravity
self-gravity: treecode (wünsch+15)
heating by ionisingradiation: TreeRay
Wünsch (AsU CAS) 2G with bimodal regime 14.8.2015 10 / 1
Bimodal regime Simulations
Evolution of accumulated mass
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
5
5.5
6
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
5
5.5
6
log m
ass [M
Sun]
time [Myr]
Msc = 107 MSun, β = 1.5, Rh = 2.38 pc, ηHE = 0.05, ηML = 1.0
firstsupernova
total mass insertedsinks+gas
sinksgas
windcal
Wünsch (AsU CAS) 2G with bimodal regime 14.8.2015 11 / 1
Bimodal regime Simulations
Evolution of accumulated mass
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
5
5.5
6
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
5
5.5
6
log m
ass [M
Sun]
time [Myr]
Msc = 107 MSun, β = 1.5, Rh = 2.38 pc, ηHE = 0.05, ηML = 1.0
firstsupernova
total mass insertedsinks+gas
sinksgas
windcal
Mass budget at 3.5 Myr:1G stellar mass: 107 M�inserted by winds: 4× 105 M�mass loaded: 4× 105 M�2G stellar mass: 7× 105 M�→ very compact, in the centre→ should stay in the cluster during1G tidal removal (khalaj&baumgardt15)
remains in dense phase: 14000 M�→ rapidly removed by SNe
Wünsch (AsU CAS) 2G with bimodal regime 14.8.2015 11 / 1
Bimodal regime Simulations
Parameter space study
0
1
2
3
4
5
0.001 0.01 0.1 1
ηm
l
ηhe
log
accu
mu
late
d m
ass [
MS
un]
4
4.5
5
5.5
6
6.5
bimodal butno self-shielding
not bimodal
extended 2G
co
mp
act
2G
Wünsch (AsU CAS) 2G with bimodal regime 14.8.2015 12 / 1
Summary & conclusions
Summary
wind cooling leading to bimodal regime is inevitable for high andcompact enough clusterdense gas formed by thermal instability stays in the cluster andself-shields against ionising radiation→ secondary SFheating efficiency⇒ compact/extended 2G
low heating efficiency→ SF in the central clump: 2G concentratedin the cluster centre;high heating efficiency→ SF in streams: 2G dispersed throughoutthe cluster
much more difficult to capture SN ejecta; rapidly removeremaining accumulated gas
Wünsch (AsU CAS) 2G with bimodal regime 14.8.2015 13 / 1
Summary & conclusions
Summary
wind cooling leading to bimodal regime is inevitable for high andcompact enough clusterdense gas formed by thermal instability stays in the cluster andself-shields against ionising radiation→ secondary SFheating efficiency⇒ compact/extended 2G
low heating efficiency→ SF in the central clump: 2G concentratedin the cluster centre;high heating efficiency→ SF in streams: 2G dispersed throughoutthe cluster
much more difficult to capture SN ejecta; rapidly removeremaining accumulated gas
Wünsch (AsU CAS) 2G with bimodal regime 14.8.2015 13 / 1
Summary & conclusions
Summary
wind cooling leading to bimodal regime is inevitable for high andcompact enough clusterdense gas formed by thermal instability stays in the cluster andself-shields against ionising radiation→ secondary SFheating efficiency⇒ compact/extended 2G
low heating efficiency→ SF in the central clump: 2G concentratedin the cluster centre;high heating efficiency→ SF in streams: 2G dispersed throughoutthe cluster
much more difficult to capture SN ejecta; rapidly removeremaining accumulated gas
Wünsch (AsU CAS) 2G with bimodal regime 14.8.2015 13 / 1
Summary & conclusions
Summary
wind cooling leading to bimodal regime is inevitable for high andcompact enough clusterdense gas formed by thermal instability stays in the cluster andself-shields against ionising radiation→ secondary SFheating efficiency⇒ compact/extended 2G
low heating efficiency→ SF in the central clump: 2G concentratedin the cluster centre;high heating efficiency→ SF in streams: 2G dispersed throughoutthe cluster
much more difficult to capture SN ejecta; rapidly removeremaining accumulated gas
Wünsch (AsU CAS) 2G with bimodal regime 14.8.2015 13 / 1
Summary & conclusions
Thank you!
Wünsch (AsU CAS) 2G with bimodal regime 14.8.2015 14 / 1