big river watershed group relevance to community
DESCRIPTION
Big River Watershed Group Relevance to Community. Government agencies will be doing something in this county soon, based on the recent ASARCO settlement: Make decisions about how lead (metals) will be removed or managed (i.e. - where/how) Plan/Implement Construction Projects - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Big River Watershed GroupRelevance to Community
• Government agencies will be doing something in this county soon, based on the recent ASARCO settlement:
• Make decisions about how lead (metals) will be removed
or managed (i.e. - where/how)
• Plan/Implement Construction Projects
• Suggest/Implement New Regulations and/or Restrictions
on Use of Floodplain Resources
• Address lead-health issues inside/out of floodplain
Big River Watershed GroupRelevance to Community
• Agencies have asked for Community Input
• Questions & Concerns
• Outcomes & Objectives
• Local knowledge; Current & Historical
• Perspectives
• Etc.
Big River Watershed GroupRelevance to Community
• Local Impacts to be considered:– Environment: How we deal with contaminants?– Natural Resources: How do we repair damages?– Economics How do the construction projects
affect local:• Jobs/contracts?• New/existing recreational amenities?• Commercial operations on River/Floodplain?• Agriculture?
– Public Health: How to protect our citizens?
Big River Watershed GroupRelevance to Community
Developing a Road Map for Long Term Management of the Watershed
Multiple Administrations◦ Political◦ Bureaucratic
Multiple Agency Interests
Multiple Funding Sources/Opportunities
Big River Master Planning Process
How did we get here?• U.S. EPA Superfund Actions throughout Old Leadbelt• Six Superfund Designations in St. Francois County• Successful suit against PRP (Potentially Responsible
Party)• “ASARCO” - the American Smelting & Refining Company• Significant financial resources awarded in suit for clean-up
and repair of natural resource damages throughout nation• $100 MM awarded to MO• $10’s MM designated for use in Old Lead Belt
• Trustees: U.S. EPA; U.S. Fish/Wildlife; MO DNR
Big River Master Planning Process
How did we get here?
St. Francois County Big River Watershed Group◦ Formed by MO DNR to address lead load in Big
River◦ Met for several years to address watershed
issues Including Active Stream Team
◦ Helped inform and engage County Commission in Watershed Discussion with the agencies.
Big River Master Planning Process
How did we get here?
– Commission/Agencies discussed path forward– Contemplated notion of multi-county initiative– Washington, Jefferson & St. Francois County
Commissions/Council formed collaborative– Collaborative applied to EPA for funding– Superfund Cooperative Agreement Executed
to develop “Master Plan”– Collaborative Issued RFQ for/hired consultant
Big River Master Planning Process
How did we get here? Consultant – URS Corporation, St. Louis
◦ Accomplished in Regional Collaborations◦ Previous Involvement in SEMO-specific Initiatives◦ Project Manager is a St. Francois County resident◦ Hired in December, 2010 by Counties
Scope of Work:◦ Create and support local Watershed Groups◦ Facilitate meaningful/thoughtful communications◦ Create Master Plan
Big River Master Planning Process
How did we get here?
URS met with Officials from each CountyURS met with each agency – multiple programsURS worked with each County to secure local
leadership/participation for Watershed GroupsURS created a draft Master Plan OutlineLocal Group Leaders provided for Watershed
Group meeting logistics, outreach and facilitation (tonight)
Big River Master Planning Process
What are we going to do?Create a communications network for the group
◦ You don’t have to be present at meetings to be informed or provide input – Subcommittees may also be contemplated
Review Master Plan Outline (tonight)Populate, refine and complete the Master PlanContinuously share input/insights with
◦ Local citizenry, advocacy organizations, industry associations
◦ Elective officials◦ Agency representatives & officials◦ Media
Big River Master Planning Process
Draft Master Plan Outline
1. Executive Summary
2. Watershed Planning – General Issues
3. Big River Watershed Issues – regulatory, statutory & legal status
4. Big River Watershed – Defined
5. Stakeholder Objectives
6. Institutional Participation
7. Information/Data Summary
8. Information/Data Gap Summary (fluid)
9. Master Planning Process Defined/Memorialized
10. Assimilation of Plans
11. Plan & Implementation Schedules
12. Monitoring/Oversight Summaries, Follow-up, Etc.
4. Big River Watershed - Defined
◦ Big River & its Tributaries Physical attributes Historical, current and anticipated future use Known & suspected deterioration
◦ Watershed Characterization Legacy of Mining
Known challenges Unknown challenges – material carried off site
Other Land Use Issues - downstream Impacts yet to be determined
319 Program Assistance
4. Big River Watershed – Defined (Cont’d)
• Jurisdictions•Counties •Communities
Legislative & Congressional Districts
Local, state and federal agencies
•Soil & Water Conservation Districts•Waste Water Treatment/Utility Districts•Etc.
4. Big River Watershed – Defined (Cont’d)
◦ Stakeholders & Partners Inhabitants (citizens) of the watershed County residents Transient users of the watershed (tourists, sportsman, etc.) Environmental & Conservation Advocates Public Health Advocates Economic Interests
Community/Region Economic Development Organizations Business Associations and individual commercial operators Agricultural Associations and farmers Labor Unions/collaboratives
Jurisdictional Interests Other…..
5. Stakeholder Objectives, Perspectives, Etc.?
◦ Healthy river/tributary/watershed eco-system Mitigate known threat to populations in Big &
Meramec Rivers (Mussels, etc.)
◦ Healthy human population Mitigate threats to citizens from heavy metal
concentrations in materials in-stream as well as materials removed from the watershed (soil/gravel/etc.).
5. Stakeholder Objectives, Perspectives, Etc.? (Cont’d)
◦ Healthy regional community/economy Increased utility of water resources for recreation Maximum benefit from plan implementation (planned
construction) Local contractors & labor used on construction projects Leverage planned construction to support new infrastructure
and/or amenities in/about watershed
Commercial Exploitation of Floodplain
◦ Satisfaction of all known regulatory requirements◦ Creation of new and/or necessary
statutory/regulatory controls in support of the Watershed
Contact Information
Mike Alesandrini
Senior Consultant
URS Corporation
314-753-2416
*Underscore between mike_alesandrini, above