bibliographyparkfamilyreunion.net/diss/backmatter.pdfappendix a: materials for notating a folk dance...

21
290 Bibliography Abrahams, Roger. 1968. “Introductory Remarks to a Rhetorical Theory of Folklore.” Journal of American Folklore 81:143-158. ———. 1969. “The Complex Relations of Simple Forms.” Genre 2:104-128. Reprinted in Ben-Amos 1976:193-214. Bascom, William R. 1955. “Verbal Art.” Journal of American Folklore 68:245- 252. Bateson, Gregory. 1972. “A Theory of Play and Fantasy,” in Steps to an Ecology of Mind. Collected Essays in Anthropology, Psychiatry, Evolution, and Epistemology, 177-193. Reprinted 1987. Northvale, New Jersey: Aronson. Bauman, Richard. 1975. “Verbal Art as Performance.” American Anthropologist 77:290-311. Reissued in revised book form with the same title. Prospect Heights, Ill.: Waveland Press, 1977. ———. 1986. Story, Performance, and Event. Contextual Studies of Oral Narrative. New York: Cambridge University Press. ———, ed. 1971. Toward New Perspectives in Folklore. Journal of American Folklore, Vol. 84, No. 331. Bauman, Richard, and Joel Sherzer, eds. 1974. Explorations in the Ethnography of Speaking. New York: Cambridge University Press. Bealle, John Rufus. 1989. American Folklore Revival: A Study of an Old-time Music and Dance Community. Ph.D. diss., Indiana University. Ben-Amos, Dan. 1969. “Analytical Categories and Ethnic Genres.” Genre 2:273- 301. Reprinted in Ben-Amos 1976:215-242. ———. 1971. “Toward a Definition of Folklore in Context.” Journal of American Folklore 84:3-15. ———, ed. 1976. Folklore Genres, Publications of the American Folklore Society, Bibliographical and Special Series 26. Austin: University of Texas Press. Birdwhistell, Ray L. 1970. Kinesics and Context. Essays on Body Motion Communication. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

Upload: others

Post on 11-Feb-2020

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Bibliographyparkfamilyreunion.net/diss/BackMatter.pdfAppendix A: Materials for Notating a Folk Dance Event The following table sketches a methodology for notating (or, in Propp’s

290

Bibliography

Abrahams, Roger. 1968. “Introductory Remarks to a Rhetorical Theory of Folklore.” Journal of American Folklore 81:143-158.

———. 1969. “The Complex Relations of Simple Forms.” Genre 2:104-128. Reprinted in Ben-Amos 1976:193-214.

Bascom, William R. 1955. “Verbal Art.” Journal of American Folklore 68:245-252.

Bateson, Gregory. 1972. “A Theory of Play and Fantasy,” in Steps to an Ecology of Mind. Collected Essays in Anthropology, Psychiatry, Evolution, and Epistemology, 177-193. Reprinted 1987. Northvale, New Jersey: Aronson.

Bauman, Richard. 1975. “Verbal Art as Performance.” American Anthropologist 77:290-311. Reissued in revised book form with the same title. Prospect Heights, Ill.: Waveland Press, 1977.

———. 1986. Story, Performance, and Event. Contextual Studies of Oral Narrative. New York: Cambridge University Press.

———, ed. 1971. Toward New Perspectives in Folklore. Journal of American Folklore, Vol. 84, No. 331.

Bauman, Richard, and Joel Sherzer, eds. 1974. Explorations in the Ethnography of Speaking. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Bealle, John Rufus. 1989. American Folklore Revival: A Study of an Old-time Music and Dance Community. Ph.D. diss., Indiana University.

Ben-Amos, Dan. 1969. “Analytical Categories and Ethnic Genres.” Genre 2:273-301. Reprinted in Ben-Amos 1976:215-242.

———. 1971. “Toward a Definition of Folklore in Context.” Journal of American Folklore 84:3-15.

———, ed. 1976. Folklore Genres, Publications of the American Folklore Society, Bibliographical and Special Series 26. Austin: University of Texas Press.

Birdwhistell, Ray L. 1970. Kinesics and Context. Essays on Body Motion Communication. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

Page 2: Bibliographyparkfamilyreunion.net/diss/BackMatter.pdfAppendix A: Materials for Notating a Folk Dance Event The following table sketches a methodology for notating (or, in Propp’s

291

Bourdieu, Pierre. 1993. Outline of a Theory of Practice. Trans. Richard Nice. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.

Briggs, Charles L. 1988. Competence in Performance. The Creativity of Tradition in Mexicano Verbal Art. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

Bronner, Simon. 1988. “Art, Performance, and Praxis: The Rhetoric of Contemporary Folklore Studies.” Western Folklore 47:75-101.

Brown, Penelope, and Stephen C. Levinson. 1987. Politeness. Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.

Carlin, Richard. 1995. “Yuppies Invaded My Tradition at Midnight: A Sociological Study of a Contemporary American Contra Dance,” in Spalding and Woodside 1995:221-236.

Dart, Mary McNab. 1987. “Cuing in Contradance.” Folklore Forum 20:85-107.

———. 1995. Contra Dance Choreography. A Reflection of Social Change. New York and London: Garland Publishing, Inc.

Deely, John. 1990. Basics of Semiotics. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.

Douglas, Mary. 1972. “Deciphering a Meal.” Daedalus 101:61-81.

Eco, Umberto. 1989. The Open Work. Translated by Anna Cancogni. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

Feld, Steven. 1990. Sound and Sentiment. Birds, Weeping, Poetics, and Song in Kaluli Expression. Second Edition. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

Fine, Elizabeth C. 1994. The Folklore Text: From Performance to Print. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.

Gardner, John. 1986. “Contradances and Cotillions: Dancing in Eighteenth-Century Delaware.” Delaware History XXII:1 (Spring-Summer):39-47.

Garfinkel, Harold. 1967. Studies in Ethnomethodology. Cambridge, U.K.: Polity Press.

Georges, Robert A. 1969. “Toward an Understanding of Storytelling Events.” Journal of American Folklore 82:313-329.

Page 3: Bibliographyparkfamilyreunion.net/diss/BackMatter.pdfAppendix A: Materials for Notating a Folk Dance Event The following table sketches a methodology for notating (or, in Propp’s

292

———. 1979. “Feedback and Response in Storytelling.” Western Folklore 38:104-110.

———. 1981. “Do Narrators Really Digress? A Reconsideration of ‘Audience Asides’ in Narrating.” Western Folklore 40:245-252.

———. 1994. “The Concept of ‘Repertoire’ in Folkloristics.” Western Folklore 53:313-323.

Georges, Robert A., and Michael Owen Jones. 1995. Folkloristics: An Introduction. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.

Goffman, Erving. 1959. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York: Doubleday.

———. 1963. Behavior in Public Places. Notes on the Social Organization of Gatherings. New York: The Free Press.

———. 1974. Frame Analysis. An Essay on the Organization of Experience. Boston: Northeastern University Press.

Grice, Paul. 1989. Studies in the Way of Words. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

Grunzenhauser, Margot. 1996. The Square Dance and Contra Dance Handbook. Jefferson, N.C., and London, U.K.: McFarland and Co.

Gumperz, John J. 1982. Discourse Strategies. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Gumperz, John J., and Dell Hymes. 1964. The Ethnography of Communication. Amerian Anthropologist, Special Publication. Vol. 66, No. 6.

———, eds. 1972. Directions in Sociolinguistics: the Ethnography of Communication. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

Hast, Dorothea E. 1993. “Performance, Transformation, and Community: Contra Dance in New England.” Dance Research Journal 25:21-32.

———. 1995. Music, Dance, and Community: Contra Dance in New England. Ph.D. diss., Wesleyan University.

Hodge, Robert, and Gunther Kress. 1988. Social Semiotics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

Page 4: Bibliographyparkfamilyreunion.net/diss/BackMatter.pdfAppendix A: Materials for Notating a Folk Dance Event The following table sketches a methodology for notating (or, in Propp’s

293

Huizinga, Johan. 1950. Homo Ludens. A Study of the Play-Element in Culture. Boston: The Beacon Press.

Hymes, Dell. 1964. “Introduction: Toward Ethnographies of Communication,” in Gumperz and Hymes 1964:1-34.

———. 1972. “Models of the Interaction of Language and Social Life,” in Gumperz and Hymes 1972:35-71.

———. 1974. Foundations in Sociolinguistics. An Ethnographic Approach. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

———. 1975. “Breakthrough into Performance,” in Hymes 1981b:79-141.

———. 1981a. “Breakthrough into Performance Revisited,” in Hymes 1981b:200-259.

———. 1981b. “In Vain I Tried to Tell You.” Essays in Native American Ethnopoetics. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

Jones, Michael Owen. 1976. “The Study of Folk Art Study: Reflection on Images,” in Folklore Today, ed. Linda Dégh, Henry Glassie, and Felix J. Oinas, 291-303. Bloomington, Ind.: Center for Language and Semiotic Studies.

———. 1993. “Why Take a Behavioral Approach to Folk Objects?” in History from Things: Essays on Material Culture, ed. Steven Lubar and W. David Kingery, 182-196. Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Institution Press.

———. 1994. “How Do You Get Inside the Art of Outsiders?” in Creativity and the Boundaries of Culture, ed. Eugene Metcalf and Michael Hall, 312-330. Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Institution Press.

———. 1995. “The 1995 Archer Taylor Memorial Lecture: Why Make (Folk) Art?” Western Folklore 54:253-276.

———. 1996a. “Icon Painters in Western Canada and the Conundrums of Classification: Who Creates Folk Art, When, and Why?” in The Icon in Canada: Recent Findings from the Canadian Museum of Civilization, ed. Robert B. Klymasz, 7-34. Hull, Quebec: Canadian Museum of Civilization.

———. 1996b. Studying Organizational Symbolism: What, How, Why? Newbury Park, Calif.: Sage Publications.

———. 1997. “How Can We Apply Event Analysis to ‘Material Behavior,’ and Why Should We?” Western Folklore 56:199-214.

Page 5: Bibliographyparkfamilyreunion.net/diss/BackMatter.pdfAppendix A: Materials for Notating a Folk Dance Event The following table sketches a methodology for notating (or, in Propp’s

294

Kaeppler, Adrienne. 1985. “Structure Movement System in Tonga,” in Williams, ed. 1997:88-122.

Keller, Kate Van Winkle, and Genevieve Shiner. 1994. The Playford Ball. 103 Early Country Dances 1651-1820. As Interpreted by Cecil Sharp and His Followers. Second edition. Northampton, Mass.: The Country Dance and Song Society.

Kirshenblatt-Gimblett, Barbara. 1975. “A Parable in Context: A Social Interactional Analysis of Storytelling Performance,” in Folklore: Performance and Communication, ed. Dan Ben-Amos and Kenneth S. Goldstein, 11-74. The Hague: Mouton.

Kroskrity, Paul V. 1993. Language, History, and Identity: Ethnolinguistic Studies of the Arizona Tewa. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.

Lester, Gloria Gene. 1992. The United States Scandinavian-Dance-Community and Norsk bygdedans. A thesis submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Dance. Los Angeles: University of California.

Mitchell, J. Clyde, ed. 1969. Social Networks in Urban Situations. Analysis of Personal Relationships in Central African Towns. Manchester, U.K.: Manchester University Press.

Musello, Christopher. 1992. “Objects in Process: Material Culture and Communication.” Southern Folklore 49:37-59.

Ness, Sally Ann. 1992. Body, Movement, and Culture. Kinesthetic and Visual Symbolism in a Philippine Community. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

Nöth, Winfried. 1990. Handbook of Semiotics. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.

Novack, Cynthia J. 1990. Sharing the Dance. Contact Improvisation and American Culture. Madison, Wis.: University of Wisconsin Press.

Parkes, Tony. 1992. Contra Dance Calling. A Basic Text. Bedford, Mass.: Hands Four Books.

Playford, John. 1651. The English Dancing-Master. London: John Playford.

Page 6: Bibliographyparkfamilyreunion.net/diss/BackMatter.pdfAppendix A: Materials for Notating a Folk Dance Event The following table sketches a methodology for notating (or, in Propp’s

295

Poyatos, Fernando. 1983. New Perspectives in Nonverbal Communication. Studies in Cultural Anthropology, Social Psychology, Linguistics, Literature, and Semiotics. Oxford and New York: Pergamon Press.

Propp, Vladimir. 1968. Morphology of the Folktale. Austin: University of Texas Press.

Quigley, Colin. 1995. “Anglo-American Dance in Appalachia and Newfoundland: Toward a Comparative Framework,” in Spalding and Woodside 1995:73-86.

Sannella, Ted. 1995. Balance and Swing. Northampton, Mass.: The Country Dance and Song Society.

Saville-Troike, Muriel. 1996. The Ethnography of Communication. An Introduction. Second edition. Oxford U.K. and Cambridge, Mass.: Blackwell.

Schechner, Richard. 1988. Performance Theory. New York: Routledge.

Sebeok, Thomas. 1991. A Sign Is Just a Sign. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

Sharp, Cecil. 1985. The Country Dance Book. London: H. Styles. 3 vols. Reprint of various editions originally published 1909-1934.

Shotter, John. 1993a. Cultural Politics of Everyday Life. Social Constructionism, Rhetoric and Knowing of the Third Kind. Toronto and Buffalo: University of Toronto Press.

———. 1993b. Conversational Realities. Constructing Life through Language. London, Thousand Oaks (Calif.), New Delhi: Sage Publications.

Spalding, Susan Eike, and Jane Harris Woodside. 1995. Communities in Motion: Dance, Community, and Tradition in America’s Southeast and Beyond. Westport, Conn.: Greenwood.

Spiegel, John, and Pavel Machotka. 1974. Messages of the Body. New York: The Free Press.

“Statuter för polskmärkesuppdansning.” [1999.] [N.p.]: Dalarnes Hembygdsring och Jämtland-Härjedalens distrikt av Svenska Ungdomsringen för Bygdekultur.

Tannen, Deborah. 1989. Talking Voices. Repetition, Dialogue, and Imagery in Conversational Discourse. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.

———, ed. 1993. Framing in Discourse. New York: Oxford University Press.

Page 7: Bibliographyparkfamilyreunion.net/diss/BackMatter.pdfAppendix A: Materials for Notating a Folk Dance Event The following table sketches a methodology for notating (or, in Propp’s

296

Toelken, Barre. 1996. The Dynamics of Folklore. Revised and Expanded Edition. Logan, Utah: Utah State University Press.

Tolman, Beth, and Ralph Page. 1937. The Country Dance Book. The Best of the Early Contras, and Squares Their History, Lore, Callers, Tunes and Joyful Instructions. Reprinted 1976. Brattleboro, Vt.: The Stephen Greene Press.

Williams, Drid, ed. 1997. Anthropology and Human Movement. The Study of Dances. Readings in the Anthropology of Human Movement, No. 1. Landham, Md., and London: The Scarecrow Press.

Page 8: Bibliographyparkfamilyreunion.net/diss/BackMatter.pdfAppendix A: Materials for Notating a Folk Dance Event The following table sketches a methodology for notating (or, in Propp’s

297

Appendix A: Materials for Notating a Folk Dance Event

The following table sketches a methodology for notating (or, in Propp’s

terminology, tabulating) a folk dance event. The individual items presented here

are derived from direct observation of activities undertaken by participants in the

events included in the data base. It is not presumed to be a complete table, but a

starting point for folk event notation.

α: Predance (setup) activities

α1 sweeping and clearing the dance floor of chairs or other obstacles to dancing

α2 moving a piano

α3 setting up sound equipment such as a mixer, cables, microphones, monitors, and speakers

α4 setting up and stocking a refreshment area

α5 setting up a place for the collection of admission fees

α6 setting out flyers advertising other dance venues

α7 performing “sound checks” with the musicians and caller in order to set volume levels

β: Instruction prior to the beginning of the main dance activity

β1 announcing the start of instruction and inviting participants to assemble

β2 assembly of participants

β3 requests for experienced dancers to help balance a set

β4 explanations and demonstrations of figures by caller or instructor

β5 performance of figures by dancers

β6 performance of dance

Page 9: Bibliographyparkfamilyreunion.net/diss/BackMatter.pdfAppendix A: Materials for Notating a Folk Dance Event The following table sketches a methodology for notating (or, in Propp’s

298

γ: Admission fee collection activities

γ1 setting up a cash box

γ2 setting out sign-up sheets such as membership rosters, mailing lists, and insurance rosters

γ3 advising participants or posting a notice of fees

γ4 collecting fees

A: Welcoming and invitation activities

A1 announcing the beginning of the dance or dance segment

A2 introducing the band and caller

A3 an invitation to form sets

B: Partnering activities

B1 asking someone to dance

B2 being asked to dance

B3 accepting a request

B4 rejecting a request

B5 escorting one’s partner onto the dance floor

B6 “finding a place in the set” independently of one’s partner

C: Formation in sets

C1 deciding which set to dance in

C2 finding and taking a place in the set

C3 caller’s suggestion to form a new set, or fill out a short one

C4 signaling the need for more couples to complete a set

D: Pre-dance amenities

D1 introducing oneself

Page 10: Bibliographyparkfamilyreunion.net/diss/BackMatter.pdfAppendix A: Materials for Notating a Folk Dance Event The following table sketches a methodology for notating (or, in Propp’s

299

D2 conversation with one’s partner

D3 conversation with one’s neighbors

E: Organization of the set

E1 directions to take “hands four” or other organizing gesture

E2 announcement of set organization (by name)

E3 directions on how to form the set

E4 actions taken to form the set

E5 reinforcement description of the set formation

E6 requests to straighten lines

E7 requests to square sets

E8 requests to otherwise regulate formation

F: Walkthrough

F1 announcement of the figure (by name)

F2 description of the figure

F3 demonstration of the figure

F4 rehearsal performance of the figure

G: Music

G1 playing “four potatoes” or other introductory section

G2 playing the first or only tune

G3 playing additional tunes in a medley

H: Calling

H1 calling by the caller

H2 calling by others

H3 singing calls

Page 11: Bibliographyparkfamilyreunion.net/diss/BackMatter.pdfAppendix A: Materials for Notating a Folk Dance Event The following table sketches a methodology for notating (or, in Propp’s

300

H4 clogging

H5 other musical performance

H6 other kinesic performance

H7 corrections by the caller

H8 corrections called by dancers or other participants

H9 verbal behavior by dancers acknowledging a figure

H10 conversations with musicians

H11 conversations with other participants

H12 preparations for the next dance

I: Dancing

I1 dancing the prescribed figures

I2 clogging or other repeated figure by the caller

I3 dancing by those not directly involved in the prescribed figures

I4 dance innovations and stylings

I5 other kinesic activity by dancers

I6 conversation

I7 partnering exchanges

I8 flirtation

I9 “repair”

I10 “revenge”

J: Sound monitoring

J1 sound monitoring at the mixer

J2 responding to musicians or caller

J3 checking individual speakers

Page 12: Bibliographyparkfamilyreunion.net/diss/BackMatter.pdfAppendix A: Materials for Notating a Folk Dance Event The following table sketches a methodology for notating (or, in Propp’s

301

K: Post-dance amenities

K1 applause

K2 thanking one’s partner

K3 hugging one’s partner

Couple dance

↑ Start of break

P: Break activities

P1 engaging in conversation

P2 taking refreshment

P4 celebrating a birthday or other event

P5 advertising/sale/purchasing of tapes and CDs

P6 forming groups on floor, near stage, outdoors, etc.

↓ End of break

S: Community announcements

S1 activities performed by the caller to assemble dancers

S2 actions taken by the dancers in response

S3 initiation of announcements (by caller)

S4 announcements (by caller or other participants)

Z: Close of dance

Z1 announcement at start of penultimate dance

Z2 announcement at start of last dance

Z3 announcement at end of last dance, with call for last waltz

Z4 turning down of the lights

χ: Payment of key participants

Page 13: Bibliographyparkfamilyreunion.net/diss/BackMatter.pdfAppendix A: Materials for Notating a Folk Dance Event The following table sketches a methodology for notating (or, in Propp’s

302

χ1 counting the money

χ2 apportioning the amounts to be paid caller and band

χ3 paying the money out

ω: Postdance (breakdown) activities

ω1 sweeping and replacing chairs

ω2 moving a piano back to its original place

ω3 taking down and removing sound equipment

ω4 clearing and cleaning a refreshment area

ω5 removal of anything set up for the collection of admission fees

ω6 removing flyers

ω7 sound experimentation and “tweaking ”

Page 14: Bibliographyparkfamilyreunion.net/diss/BackMatter.pdfAppendix A: Materials for Notating a Folk Dance Event The following table sketches a methodology for notating (or, in Propp’s

303

Appendix B: Contra dances and tunes performed at Ballard Eagles, Seattle, September 24, 1998.

Table B1 shows dances called by Warren Argo at the Ballard Eagles contra

dance event of September 24, 1998, and tunes played by the band Bag o’ Tricks.

The band consisted of Anita Anderson (piano), Dave Bartley (guitar, cittern), John

Denyes (bass), and Sande Gillette (fiddle). The arrows in column 3 indicate

medleys.

No. Dance Tunes 1 Roll in the Hay Silver Spire Canadian Holiday 2 January Jig Shores of Loch Gowna Boys of the Town 3 Proper Symmetry West Mabou Reel Names Escape Me 4 Double Boomerang Sue’s Dream Old Joe 5 Balance in the Hey Reel de Mattawa Outback 6 Say’s Swing Miller’s 28th of January Crazy Dog Come

Along, Jody 7 Joy [unnamed] Keep It Up 8 With Thanks to the

Dean The Walk Home Jack Bartley’s Jig Boys of

Antrim 9 Fiddleheads Frenchies Ti-mé

10 The Reunion Rannie McLellan’s Catharsis Devil’s Churn 11 Double Hot Fudge Sean Ryan’s Joy Red Crow 12 The Baby Rose Rom Riley’s Jean’s

Table B1: Contra dances and their tunes for the September 24, 1998 event

Page 15: Bibliographyparkfamilyreunion.net/diss/BackMatter.pdfAppendix A: Materials for Notating a Folk Dance Event The following table sketches a methodology for notating (or, in Propp’s

304

Appendix C: Portland contra dance called by Mary Devlin, Portland, November 28, 1998

Table C1 shows dances called by Mary Devlin in Portland, Oregon, on

November 28, 1998. The band consisted of Anita Anderson (piano) and Sande

Gillette (fiddle), from Seattle, with Portland cellist Fred Nussbaum. In column

one, C indicates a contra dance, M a mixer, and S a square. The arrows in column

3 indicate medleys.

Num. Dance Tunes C1 Troxler’s on the Loose Sergeant Early’s Dinkey’s M1 The Flircle Shenandoah Falls Serendipity

Baker’s Favorite C2 Trip to Lambertville Teviot Bridge Crimea River C3 Another Nice

Combination Paddy on the Landfill Farewell to

Chernobyl S1 Ed’s Square Canadian Holiday S2 Lavender Moon Cul Aodh Jig C4 Weave the Line Falling Leaf Jig Devlin’s Falling Leaf C5 Uncle John’s Contra Phoenix Evil Diane Waltz Pernod Swing [Improvised blues/swing] Hambo Blue Moon Hambo C6 Close Friends Rannie MacLellan Catharsis Devil’s

Churn C7 Chorus Jig Shores of Loch Gowna Boys of the

Town C8 Meschach’s March Sue’s Dream Willafjord Gold Stud C9 Somewhere Not Far

From Here Bridgewater Boys’ Breakdown Evit

Gabriel Outback C10 The Second Time

Around Mackerron’s Mr. Danger It’s Too Hot

Waltz Two Rivers Polka Killavil Postman

Table C1: Dances called by Mary Devlin in Portland, November 28, 1998

Page 16: Bibliographyparkfamilyreunion.net/diss/BackMatter.pdfAppendix A: Materials for Notating a Folk Dance Event The following table sketches a methodology for notating (or, in Propp’s

305

In table C2, the figures named in column one are mostly standard contra

figures, except for the pousette, which is more common to English. Devlin

constructed this table prior to the dance, to make sure there were no figures that

could become tedious. The swing, which occurs in every dance, is an exception:

this is the contra dancer’s favorite figure, and dances without swings are often

regarded as defective. The ½ symbol indicates a half-hey.

Figure C

1 M1

C2

C3

S 1

S 2

C4

C 5

C6

C7

C8

C 9

C 10

Actives swing + + + Partner swing + + + + + + + + + Neighbor swing + + + + + + + + + + + Do si do + + + + Down the hall 4 in line + Circle + + + + + + + Forward and back + + + + + + + Chain + + + + + + Allemande + + + + + + + Gypsy + + + Promenade + + + + + Balance circle + + Right & left through + + Pass through + + + Star + + + + + Square through + Box the gnat + Hey ½ + ½ Shift + 1s down out/in + Cast off + Contra corners + Pousette +

Table C2: Figures in dances called by Mary Devlin, November 28, 1998

Page 17: Bibliographyparkfamilyreunion.net/diss/BackMatter.pdfAppendix A: Materials for Notating a Folk Dance Event The following table sketches a methodology for notating (or, in Propp’s

306

Appendix D: Triangle Country Dancers dance guide and Harvest Moon Folk Society tip sheets

The first document was issued in winter, 1999, by the Triangle Country

Dancers, a group based in the “research triangle” area of North Carolina. The

second document was issued in spring, 1999, by the Harvest Moon Folk Society

of Greenville, South Carolina, after an extensive email exchange on the issue of

“sleaze dancing.”

Triangle Country Dancers 1999 Guide To Dance Etiquette

Contra dancing is and should be fun! In order to help maintain a safe, friendly atmosphere, TCD offers the following helpful explanations and hints to our newcomers and to our established dance community.

SOCIAL BEHAVIOR:

Contra dance etiquette can be confusing to a newcomer. Contra dancing is highly social by nature and provides the opportunity for friendly interaction with an entire room full of people. You may observe experienced dancers flirting to various degrees during a dance. Contra dance flirting may be meaningless fun or completely serious. You may also notice dance partners holding hands while forming lines. This usually occurs between dancers who know and trust each other. It is not required, and many experienced dancers neither flirt nor engage in non-dance handholding. As with all personal interactions, respect, discretion, and common sense are your best guide to what is or is not appropriate.

In his article "Everything About Contra Dancing That Nobody Ever Talks About," Dave Goldman writes "When you fill a room with a hundred people of both genders, a wide range of behaviors will result. Some of these behaviors will surprise a newcomer, but seem perfectly appropriate to experienced contra dancers. Others exceed the bounds of appropriateness, but go unchallenged because the victim is unsure of what's considered normal in this community, or doesn't know how to react. In rare cases, the Perpetrator may not even be aware of his or her error." Here are some general dance etiquette guidelines to observe while at a Contra dance.

Page 18: Bibliographyparkfamilyreunion.net/diss/BackMatter.pdfAppendix A: Materials for Notating a Folk Dance Event The following table sketches a methodology for notating (or, in Propp’s

307

GENERAL:

Dancing is more fun when you get to know other contra dancers. We all share a common love of dancing, and there are many wonderful, friendly people with whom to socialize during and after a dance. Anyone may ask anyone else to Contra dance. Same-gender dance partners are common, especially when there are unequal numbers of men and women.

PERSONAL SPACE:

Eye contact is an integral part of Contra dancing and is often used to prevent dizziness during swings or allemandes. Eye contact is also fun and part of the friendliness of Contra dancing. Contra dancers definitely like to stare into each other's eyes, which is a practice that can be unnerving for newcomers. Holding one person after another in your arms all evening is certainly not something most of us experience anywhere else but a Contra dance. We recommend maintaining eye contact if you are comfortable doing so. If not, you may focus on your partner's ear, chin, collar, etc., being careful not to focus your gaze anywhere that could make your partner uncomfortable. It is important to maintain firm physical contact to support your partner during Contra dancing, but not anyplace that could make your partner uncomfortable. Unlike ballroom dance, turn your face toward your partner, being careful not to allow your left arm to push down hard on your partner's arm. This will prevent your partner's arm from making awkward contact with your breast.

CHILDREN:

Contra dances are family environments and many dancers who cannot find or afford child-care bring their children along from time to time. In order to maintain a safe environment for both the children and adults, we request that parents prevent non-participating children [from being] on the dance floor during the dance, as this is extremely dangerous for everyone. Children are welcome to attend beginner classes and learn to dance if they are interested.

IMPROVISING:

Many experienced contra dancers improvise or "style" during a dance. TCD encourages artistic expression and experimentation, and remind[s] dancers that being on time and helping your partner be on time is always more important than embellishments in Contradance. Do your best to maintain a sense of "place" within your line to safeguard the safety of those around you.

Page 19: Bibliographyparkfamilyreunion.net/diss/BackMatter.pdfAppendix A: Materials for Notating a Folk Dance Event The following table sketches a methodology for notating (or, in Propp’s

308

SENSITIVE ISSUES:

Most of us are uncomfortable or unwilling to confront another person about their hygiene or behaviors, regardless of how well we know them. We present this subject here in the hope of preventing the need for one-on-one conversation that could be considered embarrassing or confrontational.

PERSONAL HYGIENE:

Contra dancing, unlike most sports, promotes close physical contact with multitudes of other people. This proximity requires us be a bit more aware of ourselves than we might be otherwise. Some of our dancers are hypersensitive or allergic to highly scented products such as perfume, after-shave, shampoo, etc. Others are reactive to odors such as spices, onions, garlic, etc. Out of sensitivity to others, many dancers avoid highly spiced food before a dance. It is always preferable to arrive freshly bathed and in clean clothing. Please avoid wearing perfume, after-shave or cologne to a dance.

D.U.I. (DANCING UNDER THE INFLUENCE)

Contra dancing is an activity that requires accurate body movement and precise timing in order to be safe and fun. Another extremely sensitive issue at dances is the ingestion of substances that may cause a dancer to lose the focus required to remain safely in control. A number of dancers have voiced dismay to the organizers about individuals attending dances obviously intoxicated and it affecting their dancing and social interactions. Please exercise personal responsibility and sensibility. If you choose to have a beer with dinner before a dance, make sure you can still maintain the control necessary to dance safely. In the extreme case of a dancer who is out of control and endangering others, the organizers will ask that person to leave.

Triangle Country Dancers works hard to promote a safe, friendly environment we can all enjoy, and we welcome anyone who wishes to become a part of this dance family. We also welcome feedback on these guidelines. Any board member will be happy to hear from you and in particular, help address a specific concern of the type described above that might arise at a dance.

Happy Dancing to you all!

Page 20: Bibliographyparkfamilyreunion.net/diss/BackMatter.pdfAppendix A: Materials for Notating a Folk Dance Event The following table sketches a methodology for notating (or, in Propp’s

309

Harvest Moon Folk Society: Contra Tips For Newcomers

Harvest Moon Folk wants you to know that newcomers are welcome and important. We hope you have a good experience on the dance floor and come back for more!

1. Have fun! It's only a dance. Don't be nervous about making mistakes when learning to contra dance. Every person on the dance floor was a beginner at one time and even experienced dancers make mistakes.

2. We highly recommend that newcomers attend a beginners session 30 minutes prior to the beginning of our dances. You'll catch on more easily and have a lot more fun.

3. Men and women are equal on the contra floor. Men ask women to dance and women ask men equally.

4. In order to minimize newcomers stress, it's usually a good idea for two newcomers not to dance together the first couple of dances. Ask an experienced dancer to dance with you. They'll help get you where you need to go and you'll probably pick up the dance more easily.

5. It is typical of contra dancers to dance with a different partner each dance. When a dance ends, find a new partner (whether you know them or not) and jump back in there!

6. As lines are forming for a dance, you and your partner join in at the end of a line. It is not considered good "contra etiquette" to jump in the middle or the top of a line.

7. The caller will "walk thru" each dance before the dance actually begins. It's a very good idea to listen to the walk thrus. If you have trouble with the walk thru, ask the caller for help.

8. It's important to be on time in contra dancing. If you and your partner get off track, it's better to skip that move and try to get to the next move on time.

9. There is no fancy footwork in contra dancing. You're shooting for a smooth walking step, not a bounce. Also, unless you are a real natural, you'll probably want to keep things simple when first learning-i.e. a walking swing vs. a faster "buzz step" and unnecessary twirls. There will be many opportunities for all those twirls that you see on the dance floor once you feel more comfortable with what you're doing.

Important to contra: 1. Eye contact. Always give eye contact (and it doesn't hurt to smile either!) when you have a transaction with another person–male or female–on the dance floor, and 2. Giving weight. Giving weight to fellow dancers will help propel you flowingly into the next move. Eye contact and giving weight will help you feel that "people connection thing" that contra dancers love so much.

Page 21: Bibliographyparkfamilyreunion.net/diss/BackMatter.pdfAppendix A: Materials for Notating a Folk Dance Event The following table sketches a methodology for notating (or, in Propp’s

310

Contra Courtesies (aka Tips For Experienced Dancers)

1. Dance gently and safely, in total control (vs. with wild abandonment), particularly on a crowded dance floor. Be considerate of other dancers' space.

2. Finish a move or swing in time to make it to the next move on time.

3. As lines are forming for a dance, you and your partner join in at the bottom of a line or set. It is not considered good "contra etiquette" to jump in the middle or front of a set.

4. Dance with newcomers and help newcomers. They'll feel more welcome and become confident dancers much faster. Once upon a time, you were a newcomer too, ya know.

5. Listen to walk-thrus (vs. learning your partner's entire life history) so that those who are trying to hear the instructions can do so.

6. About twirling: Some love to twirl, some don't. Some prefer a good ole c[o]urtesy turn to a twirl, so be considerate on the dance floor. This is mainly addressed to men because men are typically the twirlers (vs. the twirlees). A woman should be given the opportunity to twirl, not be twirled by her partner. A forced or "cranked" twirl can be quite uncomfortable. After your partner twirls, it is your responsibility to help her become oriented towards the next move. In other words, don't "twirl 'em and leave 'em"!

7. About that swing: Be respectful of the person you are swinging. Do not dance or swing too closely (as in pressing yourself against your partner) or dance suggestively unless you are absolutely sure your fellow dancer wants you to dance/swing with them like that. Never do so with a minor or newcomer.

8. If a fellow dancer does anything to you that you deem inappropriate, let them know. If you cannot tell them during the dance, then do so afterwards. If they continue, notify the dance organizers. Dancers who exhibit offensive behavior repeatedly will be asked to leave.

9. No alcohol, smoking, or overbearing fragrances in the dance hall.

10. Do your part. Give a hand. Help out the few "always-there-hard workers" who give their time to make our dances happen. Come early whenever you can to help set up or stay late to help break down. A handful of people do most of the work and they could use your help!

Remember, it's only a dance. Have fun!