“bias” indonesia school based immunization program · why indonesia implement “bias”for...

20
“BIAS” Indonesia School Based Immunization Program Dr Andi Muhadir, MPH Director, Surveillance Epidemiology and Immunization, Ministry of Health, Republic of Indonesia Global Immunization Meeting New York 17-19 Feb 2009 1

Upload: trinhxuyen

Post on 27-Apr-2019

226 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

“BIAS”

Indonesia School Based

Immunization Program

Dr Andi Muhadir, MPH

Director, Surveillance Epidemiology and Immunization, Ministry of Health,

Republic of Indonesia

Global Immunization Meeting

New York

17-19 Feb 2009 1

Eastern

Indonesia

n Time

INDONESIA

Total infant (0-11 month): 4,8 million

Total school immunization target: 15 million

Central

Indonesia

n Time

Western

Indonesia

n Time

2

School Immunization Program (“BIAS”)

• School Immunization Month is immunization services conducted at all primary schools nation wide in the months of August and November

• This was introduced as collaboration of four Ministries

• Target: children in grades 1, 2 & 3

• Vaccines: DT, Measles & TT

• Started since 1984 and evolved gradually in 1997 and in 2002.

3

Why Indonesia Implemented “BIAS”

DT/TT• Basic immunization (DPT 3x) produces immunity

up to <5 years old children

• National Institute of Health and Research Development (NIHRD) conducted serological studies among 4-5 yrs old in 1996 in Papua & Central Kalimantan, it revealed declining immunity levels against Diphtheria (74-77%)

• Need of booster dose for Diphtheria

• Low TT2+ coverage among CBAW

• As part of School Health Program (UKS) which is existing since 1956

• School enrollment rate >95% (boys and girls)

4

Why Indonesia Implement “BIAS” for

Measles control

• NIHRD serological study among primary school children in 1997 at Yogyakarta, Ambon & Palu showed only 72% of children were protected against measles

• Surveillance data showed high proportion (52-79%) of Measles cases in East Java in 1996 among school going children (5-14 years old)

• In 1998-2000 surveillance data showed 40% of measles cases nationally were in children above 5 years of age

• As a measles control strategy: 2nd dose of Measles vaccine

5

Objectives of

School Based Immunization

• To provide life-long immunity

against tetanus to all primary

school graduates

• To provide a booster dose for

Diphtheria

• To reduce measles mortality

and morbidity

6

School Immunization Schedule

Dynamic and Evolving

1984-1997 2001/2 onwards ����1998-2000

Grade 1 DT 2x DT 1x DT 1x Measles

Grade 2 TT 1x TT 1x

Grade 3 TT 1x TT 1x

Grade 4 TT 1x

Grade 5 TT 1x

Grade 6 TT 2x TT 1x

ELIGIBLE TARGET 9 MILLION 29 MILLION 15 MILLION

2002 onwards: inclusion of routine second dose measles in class 1 on rolling basis province by province 7

“BIAS” Strategies

• Effective inter-sector collaboration (involving four Ministries: Health, Education, Religion Affair, Internal Affair)

• Sound policy and guidelines for both health workers and other stake holders in place

• Trained health workers in all 8,000 primary health centers across the country

• Central government provides vaccines and logistics (includes cold-chain)

8

“BIAS” Strategies (cont..)

• 15 million children studying in 175,000 primary schools (public, private and religious) targeted across the country

• Strong commitment with regular contribution by provincial and district governments is provided

• Monitoring and supervision done by inter-sectoral teams

9

Roles and Responsibilities

• Micro planning done by teachers & health workers

• Schools inform parents and this is considered as public informed consent s when children come to school for vaccination

• Vaccination conducted in school by local health center staff

• School immunization coverage is reported by health centers on same channels as for routine EPI

• Monitoring and supervision is undertaken by joint interdepartmental school health program supervisory team 10

Result of “BIAS”

• High coverage achieved for all antigens

• NIHRD serological studies showed high protection level against Diphtheria (98%) and against TT (100%) among 10-14 yrs old after “BIAS”

• Low vaccine wastage rates (<20%)

• Declining trends of measles incidences

• High acceptance of BIAS by parents

11

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007

Percentage of DT Coverage

Grade I (age 6-7 years), 1998 - 2007

Source: Sub Dir EPI, CDC, MoH 2008

12

Percentage of TT Coverage

Grade II and III (age 7-10 years), 1998 - 2007

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007

Source: Sub Dir EPI, CDC, MoH 2008

13

Percentage of Measles Coverage

Grade- I (6-7 years of age), 2003 - 2007

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

2003 2004 2005 2006 2007

Source: Sub Dir EPI, CDC, MoH 2008

14

Measles Immunization Coverage and Measles Cases*

Indonesia, 1983-2008

0

20

40

60

80

100

1983

1984

1985

1986

1987

1988

1989

1990

1991

1992

1993

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

% C

overa

ge

0

10000

20000

30000

40000

50000

60000

70000

80000

90000

Measle

s C

ases

Measles Cases Reported doses administered (%) School measles dose

: SIAs*Source: Surveillance Unit, MOH

**

15

Key Factors Which Make “BIAS” Successful

� Compulsory education, free of charge in public schools

� High enrollment of girls and boys in early primary schools (97%)

� Sufficient number of health centers and staff

� Regular budget: vaccines and logistics provided by MOH

� Inter ministerial coordination exits through BIAS

� Clear roles and responsibilities through guidelines for health provider and teachers and periodic training for providers

16

• Absenteeism is around 5 – 10% on vaccination day

• Non compliance to the public consent by some schools

• Mechanism to reach for out of school children still not developed

• Limited sources for monitoring and evaluation

• Competing priorities at local level specifically in decentralization context, need for regular advocacy with local governments

ChallengesChallenges

17

Conclusion (1)

• Indonesia’s school immunization program is well-established

• Key elements for a successful program exist

– official policy

– operational guidelines for health workers and teachers

• High immunization coverage for all antigens

• Not a heavy burden on health center staff

18

Conclusion (2)

• Unit cost per student vaccinated is cost effective in comparison with routine vaccination – $0,70 for TT , $0,80 for Measles

• Strengthen tetanus elimination strategy in a sustainable fashion and contribute significantly in measles control

• Builds infrastructure for future vaccine preventable disease control programs

• BIAS inline with GIVS to reach immunization beyond the traditional target groups

19

20