“bias” indonesia school based immunization program · why indonesia implement “bias”for...
TRANSCRIPT
“BIAS”
Indonesia School Based
Immunization Program
Dr Andi Muhadir, MPH
Director, Surveillance Epidemiology and Immunization, Ministry of Health,
Republic of Indonesia
Global Immunization Meeting
New York
17-19 Feb 2009 1
Eastern
Indonesia
n Time
INDONESIA
Total infant (0-11 month): 4,8 million
Total school immunization target: 15 million
Central
Indonesia
n Time
Western
Indonesia
n Time
2
School Immunization Program (“BIAS”)
• School Immunization Month is immunization services conducted at all primary schools nation wide in the months of August and November
• This was introduced as collaboration of four Ministries
• Target: children in grades 1, 2 & 3
• Vaccines: DT, Measles & TT
• Started since 1984 and evolved gradually in 1997 and in 2002.
3
Why Indonesia Implemented “BIAS”
DT/TT• Basic immunization (DPT 3x) produces immunity
up to <5 years old children
• National Institute of Health and Research Development (NIHRD) conducted serological studies among 4-5 yrs old in 1996 in Papua & Central Kalimantan, it revealed declining immunity levels against Diphtheria (74-77%)
• Need of booster dose for Diphtheria
• Low TT2+ coverage among CBAW
• As part of School Health Program (UKS) which is existing since 1956
• School enrollment rate >95% (boys and girls)
4
Why Indonesia Implement “BIAS” for
Measles control
• NIHRD serological study among primary school children in 1997 at Yogyakarta, Ambon & Palu showed only 72% of children were protected against measles
• Surveillance data showed high proportion (52-79%) of Measles cases in East Java in 1996 among school going children (5-14 years old)
• In 1998-2000 surveillance data showed 40% of measles cases nationally were in children above 5 years of age
• As a measles control strategy: 2nd dose of Measles vaccine
5
Objectives of
School Based Immunization
• To provide life-long immunity
against tetanus to all primary
school graduates
• To provide a booster dose for
Diphtheria
• To reduce measles mortality
and morbidity
6
School Immunization Schedule
Dynamic and Evolving
1984-1997 2001/2 onwards ����1998-2000
Grade 1 DT 2x DT 1x DT 1x Measles
Grade 2 TT 1x TT 1x
Grade 3 TT 1x TT 1x
Grade 4 TT 1x
Grade 5 TT 1x
Grade 6 TT 2x TT 1x
ELIGIBLE TARGET 9 MILLION 29 MILLION 15 MILLION
2002 onwards: inclusion of routine second dose measles in class 1 on rolling basis province by province 7
“BIAS” Strategies
• Effective inter-sector collaboration (involving four Ministries: Health, Education, Religion Affair, Internal Affair)
• Sound policy and guidelines for both health workers and other stake holders in place
• Trained health workers in all 8,000 primary health centers across the country
• Central government provides vaccines and logistics (includes cold-chain)
8
“BIAS” Strategies (cont..)
• 15 million children studying in 175,000 primary schools (public, private and religious) targeted across the country
• Strong commitment with regular contribution by provincial and district governments is provided
• Monitoring and supervision done by inter-sectoral teams
9
Roles and Responsibilities
• Micro planning done by teachers & health workers
• Schools inform parents and this is considered as public informed consent s when children come to school for vaccination
• Vaccination conducted in school by local health center staff
• School immunization coverage is reported by health centers on same channels as for routine EPI
• Monitoring and supervision is undertaken by joint interdepartmental school health program supervisory team 10
Result of “BIAS”
• High coverage achieved for all antigens
• NIHRD serological studies showed high protection level against Diphtheria (98%) and against TT (100%) among 10-14 yrs old after “BIAS”
• Low vaccine wastage rates (<20%)
• Declining trends of measles incidences
• High acceptance of BIAS by parents
11
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007
Percentage of DT Coverage
Grade I (age 6-7 years), 1998 - 2007
Source: Sub Dir EPI, CDC, MoH 2008
12
Percentage of TT Coverage
Grade II and III (age 7-10 years), 1998 - 2007
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007
Source: Sub Dir EPI, CDC, MoH 2008
13
Percentage of Measles Coverage
Grade- I (6-7 years of age), 2003 - 2007
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007
Source: Sub Dir EPI, CDC, MoH 2008
14
Measles Immunization Coverage and Measles Cases*
Indonesia, 1983-2008
0
20
40
60
80
100
1983
1984
1985
1986
1987
1988
1989
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
% C
overa
ge
0
10000
20000
30000
40000
50000
60000
70000
80000
90000
Measle
s C
ases
Measles Cases Reported doses administered (%) School measles dose
: SIAs*Source: Surveillance Unit, MOH
**
15
Key Factors Which Make “BIAS” Successful
� Compulsory education, free of charge in public schools
� High enrollment of girls and boys in early primary schools (97%)
� Sufficient number of health centers and staff
� Regular budget: vaccines and logistics provided by MOH
� Inter ministerial coordination exits through BIAS
� Clear roles and responsibilities through guidelines for health provider and teachers and periodic training for providers
16
• Absenteeism is around 5 – 10% on vaccination day
• Non compliance to the public consent by some schools
• Mechanism to reach for out of school children still not developed
• Limited sources for monitoring and evaluation
• Competing priorities at local level specifically in decentralization context, need for regular advocacy with local governments
ChallengesChallenges
17
Conclusion (1)
• Indonesia’s school immunization program is well-established
• Key elements for a successful program exist
– official policy
– operational guidelines for health workers and teachers
• High immunization coverage for all antigens
• Not a heavy burden on health center staff
18
Conclusion (2)
• Unit cost per student vaccinated is cost effective in comparison with routine vaccination – $0,70 for TT , $0,80 for Measles
• Strengthen tetanus elimination strategy in a sustainable fashion and contribute significantly in measles control
• Builds infrastructure for future vaccine preventable disease control programs
• BIAS inline with GIVS to reach immunization beyond the traditional target groups
19