best practice include ration 218878
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/12/2019 Best Practice Include Ration 218878
1/5
G00218878
Best Practice: Include Rationalization and
Consolidation in Your Virtualization PlansPublished: 28 September 2011
Analyst(s): Philip Dawson
IT managers know that virtualization can deliver efficiencies and cost savings
across the IT infrastructure, enabling many other projects and functions.
However, a virtualization strategy that does not include the rationalization of
workloads and the consolidation of servers leaves money on the table,
which is inexcusable in times of tight budgets and limited growth.
Key Findings Server rationalization offers one of the biggest cost savings of all the elements of a virtualization
and consolidation strategy by reducing the number of hardware platforms.
Vendors are in business to sell hardware, software and services, and they may not be aligned
with your rationalization projects.
You may not be able to modernize legacy systems and may be better off leaving big, scale-upapplications as is.
Virtualization of infrastructure should simplify and consolidate technology, not create more
issues to be managed.
Recommendations IT managers/buyers should include rationalization projects in their virtualization efforts.
IT managers/buyers should work with more than one vendor to reduce dependence and obtain
realistic insights into your virtualization plans.
Don't let vendors sell you on "100% virtualization"; double your 40% virtualization efforts today
to 80% and be cautious about the last 20%.
Consider retiring workloads that are obsolete or bring low business value.
IT managers/buyers should reduce complexity by rationalizing, retiring or outsourcing complex
niche and legacy workloads, or by moving them to a mainstream platform.
-
8/12/2019 Best Practice Include Ration 218878
2/5
AnalysisIT managers in most enterprises are enthusiastically moving ahead with plans to virtualize many
systems in the IT infrastructure. They recognize that virtualization delivers efficiencies and cost
savings, freeing up funds that can be applied to many other IT projects and functions. However, in
the rush to virtualize everything from storage to servers, the need to rationalize or reduce types ofworkloads can become lost. IT managers should build a comprehensive plan that takes all variables
into account and includes the rationalization of certain workloads and the consolidation of
applications as part of the virtualization strategy. Failure to do this can end up costing the
organization, and can have other negative impacts, as managers juggle a variety of extraneous
systems.
The Gartner Rationalization Model
For more than 10 years, Gartner has been refining its virtualization and consolidation models
through client engagements, workshops and interactions. We have added the rationalization
function to existing collocation, storage consolidation and workload consolidation models.
Rationalization involves a reduction in the number of physical servers, OS instances and
applications. We recommend that IT rationalize servers, consolidate storage and reduce complexity
by performing one or both of the following tasks:
Retire or outsource complex, niche and legacy workloads move them to a mainstream
platform (predominantly toward x86) and/or storage protocol and formation, such as Fibre
Channel (FC), Network File System (NFS), Common Internet File System (CIFS) and Internet
Small Computer System Interface (iSCSI).
Collapse users of multiple similar applications onto a single choice (e.g., if several ERP
packages are being used, then the company moves to use a single one).
Look for suite products that can address multiple requirements in one application, where
previously multiple separate applications and servers were used to meet one requirement
apiece.
Look for opportunities to host more than one application on a single server instance, thus
reducing the number of virtual machines (VMs) and the costs, but still delivering the same
number of running apps.
Look for opportunities to combine users onto fewer instances, such as moving users from two
or more file servers onto a single file server with higher capacity.
Rationalization Advances Cost Reduction
By getting rid of the infrastructure "dead wood," rationalization can further your virtualization
strategy's progress in reducing costs. IT managers know that random server proliferation is highly
inefficient. Take the following steps:
Assess physical systems and measure their associated capital expenditures (capex) versus
operating expenses (opex).
Page 2 of 5 Gartner, Inc. | G00218878
-
8/12/2019 Best Practice Include Ration 218878
3/5
Separate direct-attached storage (DAS) systems, for example, by deploying storage-attached
networks (SANs), that enable devices such as disk arrays and tape libraries to be consolidated
and shared by many servers. This can be achieved by attaching them via an FC or iSCSI SAN to
the OS, or network-attached storage (NAS). This will enable faster data access, easier
administration, increased productivity and simpler configuration. Storage/server/DAS separation
is necessary to move forward and can expose storage costs.
Logically consolidate physical servers. For example, move from 1,000 servers to 1,000 blades.
Commodity hardware can address this space focus around blades with virtual input/output.
Server management is key.
Virtualize the servers. Move from 1,000 blades to 1,000 VMs on 100 blades. Preventing VM
sprawl will enhance your benefits and reduce complexity.
Rationalize the servers. If you can move to 800 to 900 VMs onto 80 to 90 blades, even better.
This would retire and rationalize 100 to 200 workloads. Then you reduce cost and complexity by
10% to 20%.
Rationalize the actual application workload. Instead of having tens of MS Exchange or
SharePoint servers, consolidate them into fewer, but more powerful, servers and storage
devices. Similarly, consolidate database workloads from hundreds of separate database
instances on hundreds of virtual hosts to fewer larger databases on more powerful servers,
appliances or converged systems.
Virtualization of infrastructure should enable you to simplify and consolidate the technology, rather
than create more issues for you to manage. Start by retiring low-complexity, low-value workloads,
which will lead to easy savings. Then, look at simplifying infrastructure for high-value workloads,
with the drive to x86. Finally, for complex IT/low-business-value workloads, clients can choose
whether to simplify IT first before retiring workloads, depending on the cost and risk. IT departmentsshould not move the problem from one platform to another, but consolidate the application
software, the number of OS instances and the application workloads.
Exceptions and Caveats
There will always be exceptions to this approach. For example, you may not be able to modernize
proprietary legacy systems and may be better off leaving big, scale-up applications alone. Also,
analyze existing service contracts with bundled pricing. Such workloads are all right to have, but
they require fencing off and that costs be understood and realized. Furthermore, you may want to
retire or outsource some workloads that are obsolete.
Even the best vendors may not be on board with your rationalization plans. Although they aim toassist with IT infrastructure consolidation and virtualization projects, their business is to sell
hardware, software and services. Their goals may not be completely aligned with your objectives,
such as reducing the number of application license fees. Be aware that vendors may tend to view
rationalization and consolidation as a way to move other vendors applications to their own
systems. This is not rationalization, but vendor substitution. Server rationalization offers the biggest
Gartner, Inc. | G00218878 Page 3 of 5
-
8/12/2019 Best Practice Include Ration 218878
4/5
-
8/12/2019 Best Practice Include Ration 218878
5/5
Regional Headquarters
Corporate Headquarters
56 Top Gallant RoadStamford, CT 06902-7700
USA+1 203 964 0096
Japan Headquarters
Gartner Japan Ltd.Aobadai Hills, 6F
7-7, Aobadai, 4-chomeMeguro-ku, Tokyo 153-0042JAPAN+81 3 3481 3670
European Headquarters
TamesisThe GlantyEghamSurrey, TW20 9AWUNITED KINGDOM+44 1784 431611
Latin America Headquarters
Gartner do BrazilAv. das Naes Unidas, 125519 andarWorld Trade Center04578-903So Paulo SPBRAZIL+55 11 3443 1509
Asia/Pacific Headquarters
Gartner Australasia Pty. Ltd.Level 9, 141 Walker StreetNorth SydneyNew South Wales 2060
AUSTRALIA+61 2 9459 4600
2011 Gartner, Inc. and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Gartner is a registered trademark of Gartner, Inc. or its affiliates. This
publication may not be reproduced or distributed in any form without Gartners prior written permission. The information contained in thispublication has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable. Gartner disclaims all warranties as to the accuracy, completeness or
adequacy of such information and shall have no liability for errors, omissions or inadequacies in such information. This publicationconsists of the opinions of Gartners research organization and should not be construed as statements of fact. The opinions expressed
herein are subject to change without notice. Although Gartner research may include a discussion of related legal issues, Gartner does not
provide legal advice or services and its research should not be construed or used as such. Gartner isa public company, and itsshareholders may include firms and funds that have financial interests in entities covered in Gartner research. Gartners Board of
Directors may include senior managers of these firms or funds. Gartner research is produced independently by its research organization
without input or influence from these firms, funds or their managers. For further information on the independence and integrity of Gartnerresearch, see Guiding Principles on Independence and Objectivity on its website, http://www.gartner.com/technology/about/
ombudsman/omb_guide2.jsp.
Gartner, Inc. | G00218878 Page 5 of 5
http://www.gartner.com/technology/about/ombudsman/omb_guide2.jsphttp://www.gartner.com/technology/about/ombudsman/omb_guide2.jsphttp://www.gartner.com/technology/about/ombudsman/omb_guide2.jsphttp://www.gartner.com/technology/about/ombudsman/omb_guide2.jsp