best practice include ration 218878

Upload: alaincharpentier

Post on 03-Jun-2018

215 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/12/2019 Best Practice Include Ration 218878

    1/5

    G00218878

    Best Practice: Include Rationalization and

    Consolidation in Your Virtualization PlansPublished: 28 September 2011

    Analyst(s): Philip Dawson

    IT managers know that virtualization can deliver efficiencies and cost savings

    across the IT infrastructure, enabling many other projects and functions.

    However, a virtualization strategy that does not include the rationalization of

    workloads and the consolidation of servers leaves money on the table,

    which is inexcusable in times of tight budgets and limited growth.

    Key Findings Server rationalization offers one of the biggest cost savings of all the elements of a virtualization

    and consolidation strategy by reducing the number of hardware platforms.

    Vendors are in business to sell hardware, software and services, and they may not be aligned

    with your rationalization projects.

    You may not be able to modernize legacy systems and may be better off leaving big, scale-upapplications as is.

    Virtualization of infrastructure should simplify and consolidate technology, not create more

    issues to be managed.

    Recommendations IT managers/buyers should include rationalization projects in their virtualization efforts.

    IT managers/buyers should work with more than one vendor to reduce dependence and obtain

    realistic insights into your virtualization plans.

    Don't let vendors sell you on "100% virtualization"; double your 40% virtualization efforts today

    to 80% and be cautious about the last 20%.

    Consider retiring workloads that are obsolete or bring low business value.

    IT managers/buyers should reduce complexity by rationalizing, retiring or outsourcing complex

    niche and legacy workloads, or by moving them to a mainstream platform.

  • 8/12/2019 Best Practice Include Ration 218878

    2/5

    AnalysisIT managers in most enterprises are enthusiastically moving ahead with plans to virtualize many

    systems in the IT infrastructure. They recognize that virtualization delivers efficiencies and cost

    savings, freeing up funds that can be applied to many other IT projects and functions. However, in

    the rush to virtualize everything from storage to servers, the need to rationalize or reduce types ofworkloads can become lost. IT managers should build a comprehensive plan that takes all variables

    into account and includes the rationalization of certain workloads and the consolidation of

    applications as part of the virtualization strategy. Failure to do this can end up costing the

    organization, and can have other negative impacts, as managers juggle a variety of extraneous

    systems.

    The Gartner Rationalization Model

    For more than 10 years, Gartner has been refining its virtualization and consolidation models

    through client engagements, workshops and interactions. We have added the rationalization

    function to existing collocation, storage consolidation and workload consolidation models.

    Rationalization involves a reduction in the number of physical servers, OS instances and

    applications. We recommend that IT rationalize servers, consolidate storage and reduce complexity

    by performing one or both of the following tasks:

    Retire or outsource complex, niche and legacy workloads move them to a mainstream

    platform (predominantly toward x86) and/or storage protocol and formation, such as Fibre

    Channel (FC), Network File System (NFS), Common Internet File System (CIFS) and Internet

    Small Computer System Interface (iSCSI).

    Collapse users of multiple similar applications onto a single choice (e.g., if several ERP

    packages are being used, then the company moves to use a single one).

    Look for suite products that can address multiple requirements in one application, where

    previously multiple separate applications and servers were used to meet one requirement

    apiece.

    Look for opportunities to host more than one application on a single server instance, thus

    reducing the number of virtual machines (VMs) and the costs, but still delivering the same

    number of running apps.

    Look for opportunities to combine users onto fewer instances, such as moving users from two

    or more file servers onto a single file server with higher capacity.

    Rationalization Advances Cost Reduction

    By getting rid of the infrastructure "dead wood," rationalization can further your virtualization

    strategy's progress in reducing costs. IT managers know that random server proliferation is highly

    inefficient. Take the following steps:

    Assess physical systems and measure their associated capital expenditures (capex) versus

    operating expenses (opex).

    Page 2 of 5 Gartner, Inc. | G00218878

  • 8/12/2019 Best Practice Include Ration 218878

    3/5

    Separate direct-attached storage (DAS) systems, for example, by deploying storage-attached

    networks (SANs), that enable devices such as disk arrays and tape libraries to be consolidated

    and shared by many servers. This can be achieved by attaching them via an FC or iSCSI SAN to

    the OS, or network-attached storage (NAS). This will enable faster data access, easier

    administration, increased productivity and simpler configuration. Storage/server/DAS separation

    is necessary to move forward and can expose storage costs.

    Logically consolidate physical servers. For example, move from 1,000 servers to 1,000 blades.

    Commodity hardware can address this space focus around blades with virtual input/output.

    Server management is key.

    Virtualize the servers. Move from 1,000 blades to 1,000 VMs on 100 blades. Preventing VM

    sprawl will enhance your benefits and reduce complexity.

    Rationalize the servers. If you can move to 800 to 900 VMs onto 80 to 90 blades, even better.

    This would retire and rationalize 100 to 200 workloads. Then you reduce cost and complexity by

    10% to 20%.

    Rationalize the actual application workload. Instead of having tens of MS Exchange or

    SharePoint servers, consolidate them into fewer, but more powerful, servers and storage

    devices. Similarly, consolidate database workloads from hundreds of separate database

    instances on hundreds of virtual hosts to fewer larger databases on more powerful servers,

    appliances or converged systems.

    Virtualization of infrastructure should enable you to simplify and consolidate the technology, rather

    than create more issues for you to manage. Start by retiring low-complexity, low-value workloads,

    which will lead to easy savings. Then, look at simplifying infrastructure for high-value workloads,

    with the drive to x86. Finally, for complex IT/low-business-value workloads, clients can choose

    whether to simplify IT first before retiring workloads, depending on the cost and risk. IT departmentsshould not move the problem from one platform to another, but consolidate the application

    software, the number of OS instances and the application workloads.

    Exceptions and Caveats

    There will always be exceptions to this approach. For example, you may not be able to modernize

    proprietary legacy systems and may be better off leaving big, scale-up applications alone. Also,

    analyze existing service contracts with bundled pricing. Such workloads are all right to have, but

    they require fencing off and that costs be understood and realized. Furthermore, you may want to

    retire or outsource some workloads that are obsolete.

    Even the best vendors may not be on board with your rationalization plans. Although they aim toassist with IT infrastructure consolidation and virtualization projects, their business is to sell

    hardware, software and services. Their goals may not be completely aligned with your objectives,

    such as reducing the number of application license fees. Be aware that vendors may tend to view

    rationalization and consolidation as a way to move other vendors applications to their own

    systems. This is not rationalization, but vendor substitution. Server rationalization offers the biggest

    Gartner, Inc. | G00218878 Page 3 of 5

  • 8/12/2019 Best Practice Include Ration 218878

    4/5

  • 8/12/2019 Best Practice Include Ration 218878

    5/5

    Regional Headquarters

    Corporate Headquarters

    56 Top Gallant RoadStamford, CT 06902-7700

    USA+1 203 964 0096

    Japan Headquarters

    Gartner Japan Ltd.Aobadai Hills, 6F

    7-7, Aobadai, 4-chomeMeguro-ku, Tokyo 153-0042JAPAN+81 3 3481 3670

    European Headquarters

    TamesisThe GlantyEghamSurrey, TW20 9AWUNITED KINGDOM+44 1784 431611

    Latin America Headquarters

    Gartner do BrazilAv. das Naes Unidas, 125519 andarWorld Trade Center04578-903So Paulo SPBRAZIL+55 11 3443 1509

    Asia/Pacific Headquarters

    Gartner Australasia Pty. Ltd.Level 9, 141 Walker StreetNorth SydneyNew South Wales 2060

    AUSTRALIA+61 2 9459 4600

    2011 Gartner, Inc. and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Gartner is a registered trademark of Gartner, Inc. or its affiliates. This

    publication may not be reproduced or distributed in any form without Gartners prior written permission. The information contained in thispublication has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable. Gartner disclaims all warranties as to the accuracy, completeness or

    adequacy of such information and shall have no liability for errors, omissions or inadequacies in such information. This publicationconsists of the opinions of Gartners research organization and should not be construed as statements of fact. The opinions expressed

    herein are subject to change without notice. Although Gartner research may include a discussion of related legal issues, Gartner does not

    provide legal advice or services and its research should not be construed or used as such. Gartner isa public company, and itsshareholders may include firms and funds that have financial interests in entities covered in Gartner research. Gartners Board of

    Directors may include senior managers of these firms or funds. Gartner research is produced independently by its research organization

    without input or influence from these firms, funds or their managers. For further information on the independence and integrity of Gartnerresearch, see Guiding Principles on Independence and Objectivity on its website, http://www.gartner.com/technology/about/

    ombudsman/omb_guide2.jsp.

    Gartner, Inc. | G00218878 Page 5 of 5

    http://www.gartner.com/technology/about/ombudsman/omb_guide2.jsphttp://www.gartner.com/technology/about/ombudsman/omb_guide2.jsphttp://www.gartner.com/technology/about/ombudsman/omb_guide2.jsphttp://www.gartner.com/technology/about/ombudsman/omb_guide2.jsp