best practice business analyse (kam201302)

65
Business analyse Deutsche Essent

Upload: crowdalecom

Post on 29-Nov-2014

236 views

Category:

Education


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Voorbeeld Business Analyse tbv Key Account Management

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Best practice business analyse (KAM201302)

Business analyse Deutsche Essent

Page 2: Best practice business analyse (KAM201302)

Deutsche Essent GmbH

Employees: ca. 2.500 * (consolidated)

Managing Directors: Paul van Son (Speaker), Dr. M.A.M. Boersma 

Turnover: ca. 1,2 Mrd. Euro (2005)* (consolidated)

Page 3: Best practice business analyse (KAM201302)

Deutsche Essent GmbH

Business areas: 

Deutsche Essent GmbH covers all areas of the energy value chain and aims to further develop the core business. The focus of the Deutsche Essent is on transport and storage of natural gas and trade and distribution of Renewable Energy. In addition the Deutsche Essent is partner of municipal utilities.

Page 4: Best practice business analyse (KAM201302)

Key Figures from 2005

· Turnover 6.3 billion euros· Electricity sales 36.04 billion kWh· Production capacity Approx. 6,000 MW· Gas sales 80 TWh (7.6 billion m3)· Electricity customers 2.5 million· Gas customers 1.9 million· "Groene Stroom" customers 0.8 million· Employees Approx. 11,250rgy supplier in North West

Europe

Page 5: Best practice business analyse (KAM201302)

Essent Shareholding

Page 6: Best practice business analyse (KAM201302)

Positioning of Deutsche Essent in the German media· Deutsche Essent GmbH based in Düsseldorf since

1999.· Is a holding company for the German shareholdings

of Essent N.V.· The company is pursuing a long-term growth

strategy. · It holds 51% of shares in swb AG in Bremen, 51% of

shares in the KOM-STROM AG in Leipzig and 100% of WINKRA-ENERGIE, based in Hanover.

Page 7: Best practice business analyse (KAM201302)

Trends (1)

· Deutsche Essent is continuously expanding upon its market position in the electricity and gas sector, as well as in the market for renewable energy resources.

Page 8: Best practice business analyse (KAM201302)

Trends (2)

· ESSENT EXPANDS WIND ENERGY PARKS IN GERMANY - it plans to construct wind energy parks with a total capacity of 138 MW in Germany in 2007.

Of these, seven wind energy parks with a total of 86 MW are to be erected in Lower-Saxony, and to be transferred to the ownership of an affiliate of the US investment company ArcLight Capital Partners, LLC

Page 9: Best practice business analyse (KAM201302)

Trends (3)

· Deutsche Essent has secured one third of the planned capacity of the 800 MW at the ultra-modern gas fired power stations still under construction in Hürth, near Cologne and is planning to build further power stations in co-operation with public utilities.

· Essent is also involved in the construction of the LNG terminal in Eemshaven in the Netherlands.

Page 10: Best practice business analyse (KAM201302)

Activities

· Active in the Natural gas market - via Novogate Novogate is a joint subsidiary of Deutsche Essent and Bayerngas GmbH. – Deutsche Essent has a gas storage in Epe.

· Essent Wind is a 100 % daughter company (Hanover and Zwolle) of Deutsche Essent GmbH and is responsible for all wind energy operations and developments within the Essent group. – With an installed load of about 480 MW, it is one of

the leading wind energy operators and developers in northwest Europe.

Page 11: Best practice business analyse (KAM201302)

Activities(2)

· Essent wind - Installed capacity: 480 MW (2006 - for D + NL)

· Planning permission for 400 Offshore-MW in 2004

Page 12: Best practice business analyse (KAM201302)

Activities (3)

· The generation of power from sustainable sources, such as wind energy, is part of the strategic core activity of Essent," explained Paul van Son, Managing Director of Deutsche Essent. "We are continuing to invest in expansion and, with an installed capacity of approximately 480 megawatts, 390 megawatt of which are in Germany, we are now one of the leading generators and suppliers in north western Europe."

Page 13: Best practice business analyse (KAM201302)

Data on

German Electricity

Market

Page 14: Best practice business analyse (KAM201302)

Energy demand, growth ratio

Page 15: Best practice business analyse (KAM201302)

Electricity Generation (Mtoe)

1973 1990 1999 2000 20052010

32 47 47 49 4951

Electricity Consumption (Mtoe)

1973 1990 1999 2000 20052010

27 39 40 42 4345

Quelle: IEA Report Germany 2002

Page 16: Best practice business analyse (KAM201302)

Electricity Generation (growth rates in % per year)*

73-90 90-00 00-05 05-10

2.3 0.4 0.0 0.8

Electricity Consumption (growth rates in % per year)

73-79 79-90 90-99 99-00 00-05 05-10

3.8 1.4 0.3 5.0 0.3 0.8Quelle: IEA Report Germany 2002* eigene Berechnung

Page 17: Best practice business analyse (KAM201302)

Quelle: IEA Report Germany 2002

Page 18: Best practice business analyse (KAM201302)

Main energy sources(power generation)

Page 19: Best practice business analyse (KAM201302)
Page 20: Best practice business analyse (KAM201302)

Quelle: IEA Report Germany 2002

Page 21: Best practice business analyse (KAM201302)
Page 22: Best practice business analyse (KAM201302)

Veränderung der Energieträgeranteile an derNetto-Stromerzeugung zwischen 1995 und 2005:

Kernenergie: − 4 %

Braunkohle: − 2 %

Steinkohle: − 5 %

Erdgas: + 5 %

Erneuerbare Energien: + 6 %

Heizöl, Pumpspeicher, Sonstige: ± 0 %

Page 23: Best practice business analyse (KAM201302)

Strong/weak grid,

interconnection capacity

mentioned underSecurity of supply

Page 24: Best practice business analyse (KAM201302)

Transitkapazitäten vs. Nettoströme (2006)

Page 25: Best practice business analyse (KAM201302)

Quality of the energy system

(e.g. ageing)

Page 26: Best practice business analyse (KAM201302)

Durchschnittliche Betriebsdauer aller Kraftwerke in Deutschlandab einer elektrischen Bruttoleistung von 100 MW (Stand: 31.12.2006)

total: 29 Jahre

Steinkohle: 54 Jahre

Wasser: 45 Jahre

Braunkohle: 32 Jahre

Gichtgas: 29 Jahre

Uran: 25 Jahre

Heizöl: 25 Jahre

Erdgas: 23 Jahre

Wind: 4 Jahre Quelle: eigene Berechnung aus Daten des Umweltbundesamtes

Page 27: Best practice business analyse (KAM201302)

Main characteristicsof energy market

Page 28: Best practice business analyse (KAM201302)

Electricity Market Germany

Quelle: IEA Report Germany 2002

Page 29: Best practice business analyse (KAM201302)
Page 30: Best practice business analyse (KAM201302)
Page 31: Best practice business analyse (KAM201302)
Page 32: Best practice business analyse (KAM201302)

Quelle: emw 2006

Page 33: Best practice business analyse (KAM201302)

Quelle: emw 2006

Page 34: Best practice business analyse (KAM201302)

Quelle: emw 2006

Page 35: Best practice business analyse (KAM201302)

Quelle: emw 2006

Page 36: Best practice business analyse (KAM201302)

Quelle: emw 2006

Page 37: Best practice business analyse (KAM201302)

Business Driversas not mentioned under Key Figures

Page 38: Best practice business analyse (KAM201302)

Security of supply / fuel mix

mentioned underMain energy sources

Page 39: Best practice business analyse (KAM201302)

Quelle: http://www.vdn-berlin.de/versorgungsqualitaet.asp

Page 40: Best practice business analyse (KAM201302)

Quelle: VDE – Versorgungsqualität im deutschen Stromversorgungssystem 2006

Page 41: Best practice business analyse (KAM201302)

Ageing assets / new capacity

(generation and grid)

mentioned underQuality of the energy system

Page 42: Best practice business analyse (KAM201302)
Page 43: Best practice business analyse (KAM201302)
Page 44: Best practice business analyse (KAM201302)

Quelle: emw 2006

Page 45: Best practice business analyse (KAM201302)
Page 46: Best practice business analyse (KAM201302)

Gesamtstrombedarf für ca. 3 Jahre

Quelle: Bundesumweltministerium

Page 47: Best practice business analyse (KAM201302)

Quelle: VKU

Investitionen der im VKU zusammengeschlossenen Betriebe

Page 48: Best practice business analyse (KAM201302)

Quelle: VKU

Page 49: Best practice business analyse (KAM201302)

Profitability (utilities, industry)

Page 50: Best practice business analyse (KAM201302)

Beschäftigte UmsatzGewinn Umsatz-

(Mrd. €) (Mrd. €) rentabilität

E.ON (2006) 80.000 67,8 5,0 7,4 %

RWE (2006) 68.000 44,3 6,1 13,8 %

Vattenfall (2005) 18.000 13,7 1,1 8,0 %

EnBW (2005) 17.000 10,8 1,110,2 %

Stadtwerke (2006) 238.000 73,8 - -

Page 51: Best practice business analyse (KAM201302)

Market regulation andprice control

Page 52: Best practice business analyse (KAM201302)

Quelle: emw 2006

Page 53: Best practice business analyse (KAM201302)
Page 54: Best practice business analyse (KAM201302)
Page 55: Best practice business analyse (KAM201302)

Environmental concern

Page 56: Best practice business analyse (KAM201302)
Page 57: Best practice business analyse (KAM201302)

Innovation

Page 58: Best practice business analyse (KAM201302)

Stromerzeugung aus regenerativen Energiequellen

Brennstoffzelle

Geothermische Energie

Solarenergie

Windenergie

Wasserkraft

Biomasse

Page 59: Best practice business analyse (KAM201302)
Page 60: Best practice business analyse (KAM201302)

Customer care

(public image, quality of service, …)

Page 61: Best practice business analyse (KAM201302)

Quelle: VDE – Versorgungsqualität im deutschen Stromversorgungssystem 2006

Page 62: Best practice business analyse (KAM201302)

Quelle: VDE – Versorgungsqualität im deutschen Stromversorgungssystem 2006

Page 63: Best practice business analyse (KAM201302)

Quelle: emw 2006

Page 64: Best practice business analyse (KAM201302)

Contribution of

Deutsche Essent

in the German Market.

Page 65: Best practice business analyse (KAM201302)

Opportunities for

Deutsche Essent

In the German Market