beps: practical responses to action items 7, 8–10 and 13 · page 3 beps: practical responses to...
TRANSCRIPT
Page 1 BEPS: Practical responses to action items 7, 8–10 and 13
Disclaimers
► This presentation is provided solely for the purpose of enhancing knowledge on tax matters. It does not provide tax advice to any taxpayer because it does not take into account any specific taxpayer’s facts and circumstances
► These slides are for educational purposes only and are not intended, and should not be relied upon, as accounting advice.
Page 2 BEPS: Practical responses to action items 7, 8–10 and 13
Start
Direct sales model
(non LRD/reseller)
Cost plus % of revenue
Cost plus % of cost
Commission
Commission agent Commissionaire
Cost plus (service)
BEPS action 7 Direct sales decision framework
Options 1. Keep status quo 2. Prepare better documentation on Transfer Pricing, internal processes and external statements (e.g., LinkedIn) 3. (Introduce a) Master Distributor 4. Increase local compensation (i.e., margin) 5. File local tax returns for Permanent Establishment (PE) of the principal (with/without income) 6. Change model to a buy-sell model 7. Identify/quantify third party comparable transactions 8. Divest distribution network Considerations 1. APA/PE Rulings 2. Financial statements impact
Page 3 BEPS: Practical responses to action items 7, 8–10 and 13
BEPS actions 8-10 IP alignment decision framework
Start
Maintain IP offshore A
1. Onshore functions ► New headcount – hires,
transfers, secondees, travelers ► New Roles, Reporting
2. Timing ► Business Change – external or
internal 3. Location
► Substance – In country and/or in branch (US, Other)
► Availability of IP regimes, step-up/amortization, debt funding
4. Valuation
Indefinite Temporary*
Restructure IP company Restructure
Restructure
Full Onshore Partial Onshore
Onshore IP
Split Technology vs.
Brand IP
Phased Platform IP vs. Buy-Sell Rights
1. Reporting requirements ► Country-by-country reporting ► Master/Local file
2. Developments in the international tax landscape ► OECD and EU developments
(e.g., BEPS) ► Unilateral law changes (e.g.,
UK DPT) 3. Transparency
► Ruling analysis in view of exchange of information under BEPS Action 5 and automatic EU exchange of information
1. Board of Directors ► Composition of the board ► Location/frequency of meetings ► Substance of the meeting
(content) 2. IP/Risk Management Committee
(BoD appointed) ► Meeting at rotating locations
(no branch) ► Semi-Permanent (branch?)
3. Employees ► Offshore hires, transfers ► Branch (US, other)
New IP Owner – see B5
Historic IP Owner – See A4
B3 B4 B5
B1 B2
B
A1
A4
*E.g., Double Irish structure
A2
B6
Low or zero tax offshore IP ownership
Considerations Considerations Considerations
1. Hub Co operations ► Supply chain (production
oversight) ► Sales/marketing, regional
management, (including limited DEMPE functions)
2. Transfer Pricing ► Margin on revenue (or even
profit split) after royalty to IP company –DEMPE oversight substance? (See A4)
► Bilateral v unilateral APA options
Considerations
Status Quo (Re)structure Principal/Hubco
A3 A5
Page 4 BEPS: Practical responses to action items 7, 8–10 and 13
BEPS action 13 – key considerations
Master file High-level information about the multinational enterprise’s (MNE’s) business, transfer pricing policies and agreements with tax authorities in a single document available to all tax authorities where the MNE has operations
Local file Detailed information about the local business, including related-party payments and receipts for products, services, royalties, interest, etc.
CbC report High-level information about the jurisdictional allocation of profits, revenues, employees and assets
Key Considerations:
1. Plan on needing to create a CbCR, Master file and Local file for 2016
2. Master file/Local file: Identify gaps between current documentation and future state requirements
3. CbCR: Determine timing and location; mock up form; assess technology and process
Page 5 BEPS: Practical responses to action items 7, 8–10 and 13
Master file transfer pricing gap analysis template
Page 6 BEPS: Practical responses to action items 7, 8–10 and 13
Local file transfer pricing gap analysis template
Page 7 BEPS: Practical responses to action items 7, 8–10 and 13
CbC reporting decision tree 2016 transition planning
Identify which of those have
secondary reporting rules.
Create initial shortlist of reporting
jurisdictions.
Identify which from the initial shortlist
exempt local filing if there is a surrogate
parent.
Identify which from the initial shortlist
exempt local filing if there are information exchange provisions.
Create second shortlist of reporting
and potentially exempt jurisdictions.
Review surrogate rules to determine
limitations of exemptions.
Create third shortlist of final potential
reporting jurisdictions.
Identify provisional surrogate parent/
representative filer.
Monitor local country
developments and additions to
list in item 2.
Identify jurisdictions of operations
outside the US.
1
Re-perform periodically
The decision tree illustrated below represents the sequential decisions to consider when creating your 2016 CbC reporting compliance plan.
2
3 6
5
7 4
8
9
Page 8 BEPS: Practical responses to action items 7, 8–10 and 13
Assess risks and opportunities Gain insight into your company’s profile
Prepare a sample CbC report to identify issues to be addressed before compliance requirements begin. The report should identify: a) Data sourcing and quality issues b) Potential structural changes c) Transfer pricing policy amendments d) Intercompany agreement review e) Detect outliers and evaluate potential tax
exposure f) Assess your readiness for CbC reporting g) Connection to master file/local file h) If actions are necessary for your company in
advance of your initial filing(s)
Pre-filing risk assessment Action steps
Page 9 BEPS: Practical responses to action items 7, 8–10 and 13
Key considerations Data inventory dictionary
Steps to create the Data Inventory Dictionary (a comprehensive list of discrete data elements and their source)
1. Identify and map CbC data points to existing sources. 2. Determine transformation necessary to reach fit-for-purpose
validated data (e.g., carve-out of branch information). 3. Determine data quality and identify solutions to solve bad
quality data. 4. Determine and assess alternative data sources for each
CbC data point. 5. Create a mapping between group Chart of Accounts and
the CbC data items. 6. Determine data sources for unstructured data
(e.g., business activities). 7. Identify missing data and determine solutions to add data to
the consolidation system (e.g., through manual input).
Country by Country Reporting - Baseline Information and Data Points
SAP Module Data Type
DatapointMaster,
Financial or Transactional
SubmissionSAP Table /
ReportComments Availability
Fitness for Purpos
C1Completion of the country by country reporting template
CO (Controlling) Master List
C1.1 Place of effective management for each entity
C1.2 Important business activity code CO (Controlling) Master ListPrescribed list of codes included in the draft CBCR Requirements consultation - page 18.
C1.4 Revenues FI (Financial Accounting) Financial Numeric FAGLFLEXT GL Fiscal Year ReportC1.6 Earnings before income tax FI (Financial Accounting) Financial Numeric FAGLFLEXT GL Fiscal Year ReportC1.7 Proft before tax per TB FAGLFLEXTC1.8 Income tax paid (on cash basis) to country of organisation FI (Financial Accounting) Financial Numeric FAGLFLEXTC1.9 Income tax paid (on cash basis) to other countries FI (Financial Accounting) Financial Numeric FAGLFLEXT
C1.10 Total withholding tax paid FI (Financial Accounting) Financial Numeric FAGLFLEXTThere is a specific withholding tax code from which a report can be run for a defined time period
C1.11 Stated capital and accumulated earnings FI (Financial Accounting) Financial Numeric FAGLFLEXT GL Fiscal Year Report
C1.12 Number of employees HR (Human Resources) Master Numeric S_AHR_61016369
Note that the draft CbCR guidance requires that employees seconded to other members of the group do not need to be reported, whereas secondees from other group members must be included.
C1.13 Total employee expense FI (Financial Accounting) Financial Numeric FAGLFLEXT
Pay Accumulation Statement (Appears to include employee expenses but it may be easier to use the GL Report)
C1.14 Tangible assets other than cash and cash equivalents FI (Financial Accounting) Financial Numeric FAGLFLEXT
This data should be based on assets and values as at 'the last day of the relevant fiscal year' per the draft CBCR Requirements (page 20 para 4).
C1.15 Royalties paid to constituent entities FI (Financial Accounting) Financial Numeric FAGLFLEXTC1.16 Royalties received from constituent entities FI (Financial Accounting) Financial Numeric FAGLFLEXTC1.17 Interest paid to constituent entities FI (Financial Accounting) Financial Numeric FAGLFLEXTC1.18 Interest received from constituent entities FI (Financial Accounting) Financial Numeric FAGLFLEXTC1.19 Service fees paid to constituent entities FI (Financial Accounting) Financial Numeric FAGLFLEXTC1.20 Service fees received from constituent entities FI (Financial Accounting) Financial Numeric FAGLFLEXT
CB
CR
TA
BLE
Current Requirements ReData Format SAP Solution
Ref
Source data readiness Action steps
Entity management
Data inventory dictionary
Page 10 BEPS: Practical responses to action items 7, 8–10 and 13
Sustain future compliance Improving and sustaining CbC process and tools
To create a sustainable and repeatable process for future years: 1. Review existing and new technology
options 2. Develop a CbC reporting process
manual 3. Convert manual data gaps to software-
enabled solutions 4. Define data governance, extraction,
mapping and analytics 5. Pilot report preparation and filing
processes
Practical considerations as you evaluate your technology alternatives and data sourcing strategy: 1. How will your CbC reporting system
integrate with your corporate tax return filing system?
2. How will you leverage enterprise data instead of duplicating it?
3. How will you approach reconciliations to ensure the CbC data agrees with a trusted and verifiable source?
4. Will local controllers have system access to validate certain aspects of the filing (e.g., related and unrelated revenue)?
Reporting technology readiness Action steps What you should be thinking about
Page 11 BEPS: Practical responses to action items 7, 8–10 and 13
Action 13: Leading practices What types of actions do we see companies taking?
► Immediate timeline: ► Creating a draft CbC template ► Gap analysis of current global documentation compared to new requirements ► Requests for proposals (RFPs): investing in and centralizing transfer pricing process and
consolidating providers ► Reviewing for longer-term consequences and restructuring:
► Debt ratios ► Rulings ► Global transfer pricing policies of supply chain structures ► Actual target margins across countries and intercompany pricing process for monitoring
the margins ► Reporting capabilities of the current technology environment ► Intercompany agreements ► Alignment of legal ownership with economic ownership ► Existing substance ► Intangible property (IP) strategy ► Advance Pricing Agreement (APA) strategy ► Global footprint compared to global tax footprint
EY | Assurance | Tax | Transactions | Advisory About EY EY is a global leader in assurance, tax, transaction and advisory services. The insights and quality services we deliver help build trust and confidence in the capital markets and in economies the world over. We develop outstanding leaders who team to deliver on our promises to all of our stakeholders. In so doing, we play a critical role in building a better working world for our people, for our clients and for our communities.
EY refers to the global organization, and may refer to one or more, of the member firms of Ernst & Young Global Limited, each of which is a separate legal entity. Ernst & Young Global Limited, a UK company limited by guarantee, does not provide services to clients. For more information about our organization, please visit ey.com.
Ernst & Young LLP is a client-serving member firm of Ernst & Young Global Limited operating in the US.
© 2016 Ernst & Young LLP. All Rights Reserved.