belgian thyroid club
TRANSCRIPT
Belgian Thyroid ClubBelgian Thyroid Club3030thth Meeting, April 21, 2007Meeting, April 21, 2007
Increasing our understanding of thyroid function Increasing our understanding of thyroid function and dysfunction by studying twinsand dysfunction by studying twins
from physiology to overt thyroid diseasefrom physiology to overt thyroid disease
Thomas H. Brix, MD, ph.d.Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism
Odense University HospitalOdense, Denmark
TwinTwin studies and the thyroidstudies and the thyroid
• The comparison of concordance between MZ and DZ twins provides irrefutable evidence of a genetic component in the etiology of GD, HT and goiter
• But also a clue to the etiology of thyroid function, morphology and autoimmunity in healthy euthyroid subjects
• Biometric modelling showes that 60-80% and 20-40% of the phenotypic variance is attributable to genetic and environmental effects, respectively
• Biometric modelling suggests the presence of discrete genetic pleiotropybetween the serum levels of free T4 and free T3
• Despite the well known gender difference in thyroid autoimmunity, our analyses indicate that the same set of genes operate in males and females
• Investigating discordant twin pairs showed that smoking and skewed XCI is, while birth characteristics and infection with Yersinia are not, associated with an increased risk of thyroid disease / autoimmunity
Take home messageTake home message
AgendaAgenda
• Basic concepts of twin methodology» The classical twin study» Twin case-control study
• Twin studies in overt thyroid disease» Goiter» Graves’ disease» Hashimoto’s thyroiditis
• Twin studies dealing with euthyroid subjects» Thyroid function» Thyroid size» Thyroid morphology» Thyroid antibodies
• Conclusion and perspectives
Twin methodology Twin methodology –– basic concepts & assumptionsbasic concepts & assumptions
Concepts• Greater phenotypic similarity
among MZ than DZ pairs must be due to the greater genetic similarity
• Discordance in MZ must be due to environmental effects
Assumptions• Equal intra-pair environment
in MZ and DZ twin pairs• Twins are representative of
the general population• Correct classification of
zygosity• Well defined phenotypes• No gene-gene interaction
(epistasis)• No gene-environment
interaction
TwinsMZ
DZ
Individuals within each pair carry identical genes
Individuals within each pair share half of their genes
Twin methodology Twin methodology –– measuring degree of similaritymeasuring degree of similarity
• Concordance rates• Pairwise • Casewise• Probandwise
• Correlations• Pearson’s
• Heritability• Biometric modelling
Twin methodology Twin methodology –– the twin casethe twin case--control study control study
• Matched case-control study of twin pairs discordant for thyroid disease / dysfunction
• In other words, when studying discordant twin pairs, the healthy co-twin serves as a control for the affected twin
• Because the twin pairs are matched for genetic, intrauterine and early childhood environment, this design controls for confounding by these factors
Twin methodology Twin methodology -- summarysummary
Thyroid Thyroid phenotypephenotype
Genetic Genetic factorsfactors
Environmental Environmental factorsfactors
Classic twin study
Twin case-control studySpecific environmental and genetic factors
Smoking
Birth weight
X chromosome inactivation
Classical twin studies in overt thyroid disease Classical twin studies in overt thyroid disease concordance ratesconcordance rates
0.00113 (6-24)42 (26-59)103GoiterBrix et all, 1999
0.00562 (52-72)83 (74-93)157Goiter
0.06757 (31-83)82 (69-95)68Goiter
0.0100 (0.0-25)55 (23-83)24HTBrix et al, 2000
0.0014 (0.5-13)29 (16-46)99GDRingold et al, 2002
0.0013 (0.5-12)35 (21-50)105GDBrix et al, 2001
0.0120 (0.0-11)36 (17-59)55GDBrix et al, 1998
P valueDZMZNumberPhenotypeStudy
Probandwise concordance rate in % (95% CI)
Greig et all, 1967Malamos et all, 1967
MModelling genetic and environmental factors odelling genetic and environmental factors in Goiter and Gravesin Goiter and Graves’’ diseasedisease
Proportion of phenotypic variance due to additive genetic factorsProportion of phenotypic variance due to environmental factors
Data adopted from Greig et al 1967, Brix et al 1999, 2001 Data adopted from Greig et al 1967, Brix et al 1999, 2001
100%
20%
40%
60%
80%
Scotland Denmark Denmark
NGNG GDGD
Interim conclusions on classic twin studiesInterim conclusions on classic twin studies
• Higher concordance rates in MZ than in DZ twins gives evidence of a genetic component in the etiology of GD, HT, and goiter
• Biometric modelling showes that 40-80%of the phenotypic variance is attributable to genetic effects
How to investigate this?How to investigate this?
• Concordance rates < 1 suggests environmental factors to be of importance
• Biometric modelling showes that 20-60%of the phenotypic variance is attributable to environmental effects
Investigating environmental factors of possible Investigating environmental factors of possible influence in thyroid disease by means of twinsinfluence in thyroid disease by means of twins
• Matched case-control study of same sex twin pairs discordant for thyroid disease
Exemplified by:- Smoking habits- Fetal conditions- Skewed X chromosome inactivation
Twin caseTwin case--control study control study -- smoking and thyroid diseasesmoking and thyroid disease
Brix et al. Arch. Int. Med. 2000Brix et al. Arch. Int. Med. 2000
1
2
3
4
5
Odd
s ra
tio
0.004P- value
3.0OR
MZ + DZZygosity
Phenotype Thyroid dis
0.03
2.7
MZ + DZ
GoiterGD
MZ + DZ
3.5
0.02
In all phenotypes, the effect of smoking was more pronounced in MZ than in DZ pairs
-8
-4
0
4
8
Pack
yea
r dif f
e ren
c e
Thyroid disease: proband vs co-twin, n = 51 pairs, p = 0.02
AITD: proband vs co-twin, n = 17 pairs, p = 0.03
Goiter: proband vs co-twin, n = 34 pairs, p = 0.20
Twin caseTwin case--control studiescontrol studiesCigarette smoking in the etiology of overt thyroid diseaseCigarette smoking in the etiology of overt thyroid disease
Brix et al, 2000
Is low birth weight a risk factor forIs low birth weight a risk factor forthyroid disease?thyroid disease?
Twin caseTwin case--control studiescontrol studiesImpact of birth weight in clinically overt thyroid diseaseImpact of birth weight in clinically overt thyroid disease
-1000
-500
0
500
1000 Autoimmune thyroid disease
Birt
h w
eigh
t diff
eren
ce (g
)
Proband vs co-twin, 49 pairs, p = 0.78
GD, n = 35 pairs, p = 0.74. HT, n = 14 pairs, p = 0.95
-1000
-500
0
500
1000Non-autoimmune thyroid disease
Birt
h w
eigh
t diff
eren
ce (g
)
proband vs co-twin, 82 pairs, p = 0.55
Brix et al. Clin. Endocrinol. 2000Brix et al. Clin. Endocrinol. 2000
Twin caseTwin case--control studiescontrol studiesOdds ratio of different birth characteristics in Odds ratio of different birth characteristics in AITDAITD and NGand NG
Autoimmune aa Non-autoimmune bb
Risk factor odds ratio (95 % limits) odds ratio (95 % limits)
Birth weight / 100 g 0.98 ( 0.92 - 1.08 ) 1.01 ( 0.95 - 1.08 )
Birth length per cm 0.97 ( 0.83 - 1.14 ) 1.00 ( 0.88 - 1.15 )
Birth order: 1. vs 2. 0.56 ( 0.25 - 1.25 ) 0.82 ( 0.45 - 1.52 )
Term vs premature 1.10 ( 0.44 - 2.23 ) 0.92 ( 0.54 - 1.86 )
a Covers both Graves’ disease and Hashimotos’ thyroiditisb Covers both simple goiter and toxic nodular goiter
Brix et al. Clin. Endocrinol. 2000Brix et al. Clin. Endocrinol. 2000
Investigating epigenetic factors of possible Investigating epigenetic factors of possible influence in AITD by means of twinsinfluence in AITD by means of twins
• Matched case-control study of same sex twin pairs discordant for AITD
Exemplified by:- X chromosome inactivation
The phenomenon of X chromosome inactivationThe phenomenon of X chromosome inactivation
• In female mammalian cells one of the two X chromosomes is inactivated in early embryonic life
• Thus, females are mosaics for two cell lines, maternel vs paternal X
• Most females have a 50:50 distribution of these two cell lines
• Skewed X chromosome inactivation is a marked deviation from the 50:50 distribution
• Skewed X chromosome inactivation offers a potential mechanism whereby X linked self antigenes may escape presentation in the thymus
X chromosome inactivationX chromosome inactivationMatched twin caseMatched twin case--control studycontrol study
AITD twins versus co-twins, p = 0.003
20
40
60
80
100
Co-twins
Random Skewed
AITD twins
prevalence of random and skewed X-inactivation
66
89
34
11
Brix et al. JCEM 2005Brix et al. JCEM 2005
• Genetic factors play a major role in GD, HT and NG
• Environmental factors are also of importance. Best documented for iodine intake and smoking habits
Conclusions Conclusions –– overt thyroid diseaseovert thyroid disease
• However, despite intensive research, it has not been possible to identify genes or genetic polymorphisms with major impact
How to overcome this?How to overcome this?
• Clinically overt thyroid diseases are complex and multidetermined phenotypes with numerous genes and environmental triggers each making small contributions to the overall clinical presentation
Endophenotypes Endophenotypes –– Why study healthy twins?Why study healthy twins?
Genes
Low levelphenotype
Intermediatephenotype
Clinical EndpointThyroid Disease
Thyroid Volume
Thyroid Morphology
Presence of thyroid antibodies
TSH
FreeT4FreeT3
Thyroid Function
Immunesystem
Regulation of blood glucose
Lipidmetabolism
Regulation ofgrowth hormone
Environmental contribution
ln TSHln TSH
lnTS
H in
Tw
in 2
lnTSH in Twin 1-2.5 -2 -1.5 -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5
-2.5
-2
-1.5
-1
-.5
0
.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
lnTS
H in
Tw
in 2
lnTSH in Twin 1-2.5 -2 -1.5 -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5
-2.5
-2
-1.5
-1
-.5
0
.5
1
1.5
2
2.5rMZ=0.64 (CI 0.56-0.70) rDZ=0.29 (CI 0.18-0.39)
MZn=284 pairs
DZn=285 pairs
p-value<0.00005 Hansen PS et al. JCEM 2004Hansen PS et al. JCEM 2004
Thyroid function Thyroid function –– euthyroid subjectseuthyroid subjects
Free T4Free T4
Free
T4
in T
win
2
Free T4 in Twin 18 10 12 14 16 18 20 22
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
22
Free
T4
in T
win
2
Free T4 in Twin 18 10 12 14 16 18 20 22
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
22
MZn=284 pairs
DZn=285 pairs
p-value<0.00005
rMZ=0.63 (CI 0.56-0.70) rDZ=0.30 (CI 0.19-0.40)
Hansen PS et al. JCEM 2004Hansen PS et al. JCEM 2004
Thyroid function Thyroid function –– euthyroid subjectseuthyroid subjects
Free
T3
in T
win
2
Free T3 in Twin 13 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Free
T3
in T
win
2
Free T3 in Twin 13 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
MZn=284 pairs
DZn=285 pairs
p-value<0.00005
rMZ=0.59 (CI 0.51-0.66) rDZ=0.37 (CI 0.27-0.47)
Free T3Free T3
Hansen PS et al. JCEM 2004Hansen PS et al. JCEM 2004
Thyroid function Thyroid function –– euthyroid subjectseuthyroid subjects
6436 35 366564
0
20
40
60
80
100
lnTSH Free T4 Free T3
Genetic effects Environmental effects
Per
cent
Hansen PS et al. JCEM 2004Hansen PS et al. JCEM 2004
Thyroid function Thyroid function –– euthyroid subjectseuthyroid subjectsBiometric modellingBiometric modelling
Hypothalamus
Paraventricular TRH-neuron
somatostatin-producing neuron
GRF-synthesizing cells
SST
Deiodinase I
ppTRH ppTRH TRH
TRHRTSHα
Thyrotroph cell
TSHβ
Somatotroph cell
GH
TSHα TSHβ
Apical membrane
TSH
TSHR activated
TPO
NIS
TSHRIGF1
Deiodinase I
TG
TGF β1
EGF
T4T3
TG
Follicular cell
Proteolysis ofTG
Deiodinase I
leptincold exposure
Pituitary
ThyroidGHRH
TRH degradingenzyme
Liver
rT3
Suprachiasmatic nucleus
Per1 Per2
light
Deiodinase III
Skin
Deiodinase III
Deiodinase II Deiodinase II
IGF1
FGF β1
Insulin
Iodine
ThyroidThyroid functionfunction regulation regulation -- complexcomplex
Hansen PS et al. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 2007
Thyroid function Thyroid function –– euthyroid subjectseuthyroid subjectsGenetic pleiotropy?Genetic pleiotropy?
•• Discrete genetic pleiotropy between serum free T3 and serum free T4 levels – only 7% of the genetic component of T3 levels is shared with T4
• Serum TSH and thyroid hormones did not share any genetic influences
Thyroid function Thyroid function –– summarysummary
• A much larger phenotypic similarity in MZ twins as compared to DZ twins was found in serum TSH, serum Free T4 and Free T3 levels
• Using structural equation model fitting it was estimated that about 65% of the variation was due to genetic effects
• Discrete genetic pleiotropy between serum free T3and serum free T4 levels
-1.5 -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2
-1.5
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
-1.5 -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2
-1.5
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
1.5
2rMZ=0.71 (0.60-0.79) rDZ=0.18 (-0.01-0.36)
lnVo
lum
e in
Tw
in 2
lnVo
lum
e in
Tw
in 2
lnVolume in Twin 1 lnVolume in Twin 1
a
b
MZn=104 pairs
DZn=107 pairs
p-value < 0.00005
a+b, outliers. Excluded from the correlation
Thyroid size, total cohortThyroid size, total cohort
Results Results -- thyroid sizethyroid size
Hansen PS et al. JCEM 2004Hansen PS et al. JCEM 2004
rDZ=0.10 (-0.17-0.35)
-1.5 -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2
-1.5
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
aln
Volu
me
in T
win
2
rMZ=0.80 (0.68-0.87)
-1.5 -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2
-1.5
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
lnVo
lum
e in
Tw
in 2
lnVolume in Twin 1 lnVolume in Twin 1
MZ, malesn = 58 pairs
DZ, malesn = 57 pairs
p-value < 0.00005
a, outlier. Excluded from the correlation
Thyroid size, malesThyroid size, males
Hansen PS et al. JCEM 2004Hansen PS et al. JCEM 2004
Results Results -- thyroid sizethyroid size
Thyroid size, femalesThyroid size, females
-1.5 -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2
-1.5
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
1.5
2 rMZ=0.48 (0.21-0.68)
-1.5 -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2
rDZ=0.13 (-0.16-0.40)
-1.5
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
bln
Volu
me
in T
win
2
lnVo
lum
e in
Tw
in 2
lnVolume in Twin 1 lnVolume in Twin 1
MZ, femalesn = 46 pairs
DZ, femalesn = 48 pairs
p-value = 0.035
b, outlier. Excluded from the correlation
Hansen PS et al. JCEM 2004Hansen PS et al. JCEM 2004
Results Results -- thyroid sizethyroid size
5029 21 5079710
20
40
60
80
100
lnVolume Males Females
Per
cent
Genetic effects Environmental effects
Hansen PS et al. JCEM 2004Hansen PS et al. JCEM 2004
Thyroid size Thyroid size –– biometric modellingbiometric modellingTheThe heritabilityheritability estimate was not estimate was not significantly different between males significantly different between males and femalesand females
Results Results –– thyroid nodularitythyroid nodularity
0.6780.30 (0.09 – 0.53)0.22 (0.00 – 0.53)Solitary nodules
0.0390.17 (0.00 – 0.53)0.59 (0.25 – 0.84)Multiple nodules
0.0740.36 (0.17 – 0.56)0.57 (0.36 – 0.76)Nodules,overall
MZ vs DZDZMZ
p-valueProbandwise concordance
Hansen PS et al. Clin Endocrinol 2005Hansen PS et al. Clin Endocrinol 2005
3033 23 7077670
20
40
60
80
100
Genetic effects Environmental effects
Per
cent
Nodules, overall Multiple nodules Solitary nodules
Hansen PS et al. Clin Endocrinol 2005Hansen PS et al. Clin Endocrinol 2005
Thyroid nodularity Thyroid nodularity –– biometric modellingbiometric modelling
TheThe heritabilityheritability estimate was estimate was significantly different betweensignificantly different betweenmultiple and solitary nodulesmultiple and solitary nodules
Thyroid size and morphology Thyroid size and morphology -- summarysummary
• A much larger phenotypic similarity in MZ twins as compared to DZ twins was found
• Using structural equation model fitting, we found that about 70% of the variation was due to genetic effects
• Model fitting suggests that the genetic contribution to thyroid nodularity depends on the subtype – uni or multinodularity
0.15
0.45
0
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
1.00
MZ twins DZ twins
p=0.022
Probandwise concordance according to zygosity
Thyroid antibody statusThyroid antibody status
Hansen PS et al. EJE 2006Hansen PS et al. EJE 2006
ln TPOabln TPOab
-2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
4
5
ln T
POab
in T
win
2
ln TPOab in Twin 1
rDZ=0.13 (CI 0.02-0.25)
MZn=284 pairs
DZn=285 pairs
p-value<0.0001
-2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
4
5
ln T
POab
in T
win
2
ln TPOab in Twin 1
rMZ=0.65 (CI 0.57-0.71)
Hansen PS et al. EJE 2006Hansen PS et al. EJE 2006
Classical twin studies in AITD Classical twin studies in AITD -- correlationscorrelations
-2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
4
5
-2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
4
5
ln T
gab
in T
win
2
ln T
gab
in T
win
2
ln Tgab in Twin 1 ln Tgab in Twin 1
rMZ=0.48 (CI 0.39-0.57) rDZ=0.18 (CI 0.06-0.29)
MZn=284 pairs
DZn=285 pairs
p-value<0.0001
ln Tgabln Tgab
Hansen PS et al. EJE 2006Hansen PS et al. EJE 2006
Classical twin studies in AITD Classical twin studies in AITD -- correlationscorrelations
6227 33 3867730
20
40
60
80
100
Thyroid antibody status serum TPOab concentration serum Tgab concentration
Genetic effects Environmental effects
Per
cent
Thyroid antibodies Thyroid antibodies –– biometric modellingbiometric modelling
Hansen PS et al. EJE 2006Hansen PS et al. EJE 2006
Adding OS pairs to the biometric modelling did not significantly change the estimates, indicating that it is the same set of genes that operate in males and females
Investigating environmental factors of possible Investigating environmental factors of possible influence on the level of thyroid antibodies by influence on the level of thyroid antibodies by
means of twinsmeans of twins
• Matched case-control study of same sex twin pairs discordant for AITD
Exemplified by:- Smoking habits- Iodine intake- Stress- Infections- Fetal conditions
Twin caseTwin case--control studiescontrol studiesIs infection with Yersinia enterocolitica a risk factor for thyrIs infection with Yersinia enterocolitica a risk factor for thyroid oid
autoantibodies?autoantibodies?
89 euthyroid twin pairs discordant for thyroid autoantibodies
1.35 (0.72 – 2.53)YOP IgG-ab
0.94 (0.49 – 1.83)YOP IgA-ab
Odds ratio (95% CI)
Hansen et al, Clin Exp Immunol 2006
Is Is there a link between there a link between low birth low birth weight weight and and thyroithyroid autoantibodiesd autoantibodies??
TPOab (14 pairs), p = 0.01 Tgab (16 pairs), p = 0.15
Phillips et al., 2002
Twin caseTwin case--control studiescontrol studiesBirth weight and the level of thyroid autoantibodiesBirth weight and the level of thyroid autoantibodies
Within pair difference in birth weight (100 gram) -15 -10 -5 0 5 10 15
-5
0
5
p = 0.75
n = 512 pairs
Within pair difference in birth weight (100 gram) -15 -10 -5 0 5 10 15
-5
0
5
p = 0.59
Brix et al, JCEM 2006
• A much larger phenotypic similarity in MZ twins as compared to DZ twins was found in TPOab and Tgab levels
• Using quantitative genetic model fitting, we found that about 70% of the variation was due to genetic effects
• Most likely it is the same set of genes that operate in males and females
• No link between the serum concentration of thyroid antibodies and low birth weight or infection with Yersinia
Thyroid antibodies Thyroid antibodies -- summarysummary
TwinTwin studies and the thyroidstudies and the thyroid
• The comparison of concordance between MZ and DZ twins provides irrefutable evidence of a genetic component in the aetiology of GD, HT and goiter
• But also a clue to the etiology of thyroid function, morphology and autoimmunity in healthy euthyroid subjects
• Biometric modelling showes that 60-80% and 20-40% of the phenotypic variance is attributable to genetic and environmental effects, respectively
• Biometric modelling suggests the presence of discrete genetic pleiotropybetween the serum levels of free T4 and free T3
• Despite the well known gender difference in thyroid autoimmunity, our analyses indicate that the same set of genes operate in males and females
• Investigating discordant twin pairs showed that smoking and skewed XCI is, while birth characteristics and infection with Yersinia are not, associated with an increased risk of thyroid disease / autoimmunity
Take home messageTake home message
TwinTwin studies and the thyroidstudies and the thyroidResearch pointersResearch pointers
• Genetic pleiotropy? - Is the correlation between the circulating levels of TPOAb and TgAb or between GD and HT influenced by the same set of genes?
• To quantify the precise effect of specific genotypes (e.g. polymorphisms in HLA, CTLA-4,TSH-R and others)
• Using DZ twins, provides a means to enhance the power of conventional strategies to detect genetic influence via linkage and association
• Impact of epigenetic modifications – comparison of MZ pairs is an ideal design for investigating the impact of epigenetic modifications such as DNA methylation
AcknowledgmentsAcknowledgments
Department of Endocrinology
Laszlo Hegedüs, M.D., Professor
Steen J. Bonnema, M.D., Ph.D.
The Danish Twin Registry
Pia S. Hansen, M.D., Ph.D.
Kirsten O. Kyvik, M.D., Ph.D.
The work has been supported by grants fromThe Agnes & Knut Mørks FoundationThe Dagmar Marshalls FoundationThe Novo Nordisk Foundation CommitteThe A.P. Møller & Hustru Chastine Mc-Kinney Møllers FoundationThe Clinical Research Institute, University of Southern Denmark