behind the buzzwords the basic physics of adaptive optics keck observatory oa meeting 29 january...

44
Behind the Buzzwords The basic physics of adaptive optics Keck Observatory OA Meeting 29 January 2004 James W. Beletic

Upload: aubrey-brown

Post on 17-Jan-2016

218 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Behind the Buzzwords The basic physics of adaptive optics Keck Observatory OA Meeting 29 January 2004 James W. Beletic

Behind the Buzzwords

The basic physics of adaptive optics

Keck Observatory OA Meeting29 January 2004

James W. Beletic

Page 2: Behind the Buzzwords The basic physics of adaptive optics Keck Observatory OA Meeting 29 January 2004 James W. Beletic

Isoplanatic angle

Strehl

Kolmogorov

r0

0Shack-Hartmann

speckle

inner scaleouter scale

Curvature

Page 3: Behind the Buzzwords The basic physics of adaptive optics Keck Observatory OA Meeting 29 January 2004 James W. Beletic

Wave modelof image formation

Shui’s excellent animation

Page 4: Behind the Buzzwords The basic physics of adaptive optics Keck Observatory OA Meeting 29 January 2004 James W. Beletic

Interferometric modelof image formation

Phasors

Complex addition

Speckles

Page 5: Behind the Buzzwords The basic physics of adaptive optics Keck Observatory OA Meeting 29 January 2004 James W. Beletic

Images of Arcturus (bright star)

Lick Observatory, 1 m telescope

Long exposureimage

Short exposureimage

Image with adaptive optics

~ 1 arc sec ~ / D

Lick Observatory 1-meter telescope

Page 6: Behind the Buzzwords The basic physics of adaptive optics Keck Observatory OA Meeting 29 January 2004 James W. Beletic

Velocity of light

•Velocity V of light through any medium

V = c / n

c = speed of light in a vacuum (3.28108m/s)

n = index of refraction

• Index of refraction of air ~ 1.0003

Page 7: Behind the Buzzwords The basic physics of adaptive optics Keck Observatory OA Meeting 29 January 2004 James W. Beletic

Atmospheric distortions are due to temperature

fluctuations• Refractivity of air

where P = pressure in millibars, T = temp. in K, n = index of refraction. VERY weak dependence on

• Temperature fluctuations cause index

fluctuations

(pressure is constant, because velocities are highly sub-sonic -- pressure differences are rapidly smoothed out by sound wave propagation)

N (n 1) 106 77.6 1 7.5210 3 2 (P /T)

N 77.6 (P /T 2 )T

Page 8: Behind the Buzzwords The basic physics of adaptive optics Keck Observatory OA Meeting 29 January 2004 James W. Beletic

Index of refraction of dry air at sea level

Page 9: Behind the Buzzwords The basic physics of adaptive optics Keck Observatory OA Meeting 29 January 2004 James W. Beletic

Important things to remember

from index of refraction formula• We can measure in visible (where we have

better high speed, low noise detectors) and assume distortion is the same in the infrared (where it is easier to correct).

• 1.6 °C temp difference at the summit causes change of 1 part in million in index of refraction. Doesn’t seem like much, eh?

1 wave distortion in 1 meter! (=1 m) • Thermal issues bite all who don’t pay

attention! Keck is almost certainly degrading the great natural Mauna Kea seeing!

Page 10: Behind the Buzzwords The basic physics of adaptive optics Keck Observatory OA Meeting 29 January 2004 James W. Beletic

Misrepresentations & Misinterpretations

• Almost all drawings are exaggerated, since need to exaggerate to show distortions & angles.

Maximum phase deviation across 10-m wavefront is about 10 m – 1 part in 1 million. Like one dot offset on a straight line of 600 dpi printer in 140 feet.

• From the point of view of the light, the atmosphere is totally frozen (30 sec through atmos). We draw one wavefront, but about 1012 pass through telescope before atmospheric distortion changes.

Page 11: Behind the Buzzwords The basic physics of adaptive optics Keck Observatory OA Meeting 29 January 2004 James W. Beletic

Goofy scales of AO

• 10 meter telescope aperture• 20 cm deformable mirror – set by actuator

spacing• 2 mm diameter – set by max size detector

that can read out fastFactor of 5,000 reduction in horizontal dimension of the wavefront! But orthogonal dimension kept the same.

Page 12: Behind the Buzzwords The basic physics of adaptive optics Keck Observatory OA Meeting 29 January 2004 James W. Beletic

Kolmogorov turbulence cartoon

Outer scale L0

ground

Inner scale l0

hconvection

solar

h

Wind shear

Page 13: Behind the Buzzwords The basic physics of adaptive optics Keck Observatory OA Meeting 29 January 2004 James W. Beletic

Kolmogorov Turbulence Spectrum

Energy

Spatial Frequency

-5/3

= 2/

outerscale

innerscale

von Karmann spectrum(Kolmogorov + outer scale)

Page 14: Behind the Buzzwords The basic physics of adaptive optics Keck Observatory OA Meeting 29 January 2004 James W. Beletic

Kolmogorov turbulencein a nutshell

- L. F. Richardson (1881-1953)

Big whorls have little whorls,which feed on their velocity.

Little whorls have smaller whorls,and so on unto viscosity.

Computer simulation of the breakup of a Kelvin-Helmholtz vortex

Page 15: Behind the Buzzwords The basic physics of adaptive optics Keck Observatory OA Meeting 29 January 2004 James W. Beletic

Correlation length - r0

• Fractal structure (self-similar at all scales)• Structure function (good for describing random

functions)

D(x) = [phase(x) – phase(x+x)]2

• r0 = Correlation length the distance x where D(x) = 1 rad2

• r0 = max size telescope that is diffraction-limited

• r0 is wavelength dependent – larger at longer wavelengths (since 1 radian is bigger for larger )

• But a little tricky, r0 6/5

Page 16: Behind the Buzzwords The basic physics of adaptive optics Keck Observatory OA Meeting 29 January 2004 James W. Beletic

Correlation length - r0

• Rule of thumb: 10 cm visible r0 is 1 arc sec seeing

• Visible r0 is usually quoted at 0.55 m.

0.7 arc sec - 14 cm r0 at 0.55 m 74 cm 2.2 m (K-band)

• Seeing is weakly dependent on wavelength, and gets a little better at longer wavelengths.

/r0 -1/5

Page 17: Behind the Buzzwords The basic physics of adaptive optics Keck Observatory OA Meeting 29 January 2004 James W. Beletic

Correlation time - 0

0 6/5

• To first order, atmospheric turbulence is frozen (Taylor hypothesis) and it “blows” past the telescope.

0 = correlation time, the time it takes for the distortion to move one r0

• Determines how fast the AO system needs to run.

Telescope primary

wind velocity = 30 mph = 13.4 m/sec

0 = 14 cm / v = 15 msec (visible) = 74 cm / v = 80 msec (K)

0 ≃ r0/v

Page 18: Behind the Buzzwords The basic physics of adaptive optics Keck Observatory OA Meeting 29 January 2004 James W. Beletic

Simplified AO system diagram

Page 19: Behind the Buzzwords The basic physics of adaptive optics Keck Observatory OA Meeting 29 January 2004 James W. Beletic

Wavefront sensing

• MANY ways to sense the wavefront !• Three basic things must be done:

Divide the wavefront into subapertures Optically process the wavefront Detect photons

Detecting photons must be done last, but order of the first two steps can be interchanged.Can measure the phase or 1st or 2nd derivative of the wavefront (defined by optical processing).

Page 20: Behind the Buzzwords The basic physics of adaptive optics Keck Observatory OA Meeting 29 January 2004 James W. Beletic

Wavefront sensor family tree

Divide intosubapertures

OpticalProcessing

1st

Step

0

1

2

0

1

2

Shack-Hartmann Pyramid, Shearing

Curvature

Point source diffractionDerivativeof

measure

Shack-Hartmann wavefront sensing stands alone as to howit is implemented. Will it be the dominant wavefrontsensing method in 10 years time?

Page 21: Behind the Buzzwords The basic physics of adaptive optics Keck Observatory OA Meeting 29 January 2004 James W. Beletic

Shack-Hartmann wavefront sensing

Page 22: Behind the Buzzwords The basic physics of adaptive optics Keck Observatory OA Meeting 29 January 2004 James W. Beletic

• Divide primary mirror into “subapertures” of diameter r0

• Number of subapertures ~ (D / r0)2 where r0 is evaluated at the desired observing wavelength

• Example: Keck telescope, D=10m, r0 ~ 60 cm at = m. (D / r0)2 ~ 280. Actual # for Keck : ~250.

Shack-Hartmannwavefront sensing

Page 23: Behind the Buzzwords The basic physics of adaptive optics Keck Observatory OA Meeting 29 January 2004 James W. Beletic

Adaptive Optics Works!

Show GeminiAO animation

Page 24: Behind the Buzzwords The basic physics of adaptive optics Keck Observatory OA Meeting 29 January 2004 James W. Beletic

Measuring AO performance

Inte

nsity

x

Definition of “Strehl”:Ratio of peak intensity to that of “perfect” optical

system

Strehl

ratio

• When AO system performs well, more energy in core

• When AO system is stressed (poor seeing), halo contains larger fraction of energy (diameter ~ /r0)

• Ratio between core and halo varies during night

Page 25: Behind the Buzzwords The basic physics of adaptive optics Keck Observatory OA Meeting 29 January 2004 James W. Beletic

Keck AO system performance on bright stars is very good,

but not perfect

Without AOFWHM 0.34 arc sec

Strehl = 0.6%

With AO FWHM 0.039 arc secStrehl = 34%

A 9th magnitude starImaged H band (1.6 m)

Page 26: Behind the Buzzwords The basic physics of adaptive optics Keck Observatory OA Meeting 29 January 2004 James W. Beletic

Dave Letterman’s Top 10 reasons why AO does not

work perfectly

10. Not enough light to measure distortion

Page 27: Behind the Buzzwords The basic physics of adaptive optics Keck Observatory OA Meeting 29 January 2004 James W. Beletic

Most important AO performance plot

Strehl

Guide star magnitude

Lower order system

Higher order system

Better WFS detectors

Keck system limit isabout 14th magnitude

Page 28: Behind the Buzzwords The basic physics of adaptive optics Keck Observatory OA Meeting 29 January 2004 James W. Beletic

Performance predictions

ESO SINFONI instrument

Page 29: Behind the Buzzwords The basic physics of adaptive optics Keck Observatory OA Meeting 29 January 2004 James W. Beletic

Performance predictions

Gemini comparison of Shack-Hartmann and curvature

Page 30: Behind the Buzzwords The basic physics of adaptive optics Keck Observatory OA Meeting 29 January 2004 James W. Beletic

Dave Letterman’s Top 10 reasons why AO does not

work perfectly

9. Sampling error of the wavefront (subapertures too large to see small distortions)

Page 31: Behind the Buzzwords The basic physics of adaptive optics Keck Observatory OA Meeting 29 January 2004 James W. Beletic

Dave Letterman’s Top 10 reasons why AO does not

work perfectly

8. Fitting error of the deformable mirror (not enough actuators)

Page 32: Behind the Buzzwords The basic physics of adaptive optics Keck Observatory OA Meeting 29 January 2004 James W. Beletic

Most deformable mirrors today have thin glass face-

sheets

Reflective coating

Glass face-sheet

PZT or PMN actuators: get longer and shorter as voltage is changed

Cables leading to mirror’s power supply (where

voltage is applied)

Light

Page 33: Behind the Buzzwords The basic physics of adaptive optics Keck Observatory OA Meeting 29 January 2004 James W. Beletic

Deformable mirrors - many sizes

• 13 to >900 actuators (degrees of freedom)

XineticsA couple of inches

About 12”

Page 34: Behind the Buzzwords The basic physics of adaptive optics Keck Observatory OA Meeting 29 January 2004 James W. Beletic

Dave Letterman’s Top 10 reasons why AO does not

work perfectly

7. There is software in the system

Page 35: Behind the Buzzwords The basic physics of adaptive optics Keck Observatory OA Meeting 29 January 2004 James W. Beletic

Dave Letterman’s Top 10 reasons why AO does not

work perfectly

6. Temporal error (a.k.a. phase lag, lack of sufficient bandwidth)

Page 36: Behind the Buzzwords The basic physics of adaptive optics Keck Observatory OA Meeting 29 January 2004 James W. Beletic

Dave Letterman’s Top 10 reasons why AO does not

work perfectly

5. Anisoplanatism

Page 37: Behind the Buzzwords The basic physics of adaptive optics Keck Observatory OA Meeting 29 January 2004 James W. Beletic

Anisoplanatism - 0

• An object that is not in same direction as the guide star (used for AO system) has a different distortion.

0 = isoplanatic angle, the angle over which the max. Strehl drops by 50%

0 depends on distribution of turbulence and conjugate of the deformable mirror.

Telescope primary

0 ≃ r0 / h

h

Page 38: Behind the Buzzwords The basic physics of adaptive optics Keck Observatory OA Meeting 29 January 2004 James W. Beletic

• Composite J, H, K band image, 30 second exposure in each band

• Field of view is 40”x40” (at 0.04 arc sec/pixel)• On-axis K-band Strehl ~ 40%, falling to 25% at field corner

Anisoplanatism (Palomar AO system)

credit: R. Dekany, Caltech

Page 39: Behind the Buzzwords The basic physics of adaptive optics Keck Observatory OA Meeting 29 January 2004 James W. Beletic

Vertical profile of turbulence

Measured from a balloon rising through various atmospheric layers

Page 40: Behind the Buzzwords The basic physics of adaptive optics Keck Observatory OA Meeting 29 January 2004 James W. Beletic

Dave Letterman’s Top 10 reasons why AO does not

work perfectly

4. Non-common path errors

Page 41: Behind the Buzzwords The basic physics of adaptive optics Keck Observatory OA Meeting 29 January 2004 James W. Beletic

Dave Letterman’s Top 10 reasons why AO does not

work perfectly

3. Wavefront sensor measurement error

(readout noise) and noise propagation

Page 42: Behind the Buzzwords The basic physics of adaptive optics Keck Observatory OA Meeting 29 January 2004 James W. Beletic

Dave Letterman’s Top 10 reasons why AO does not

work perfectly

2. Tip/tilt error(tip/tilt mirror not shown)

Page 43: Behind the Buzzwords The basic physics of adaptive optics Keck Observatory OA Meeting 29 January 2004 James W. Beletic

Dave Letterman’s Top 10 reasons why AO does not

work perfectly

1. There is software in the system

Page 44: Behind the Buzzwords The basic physics of adaptive optics Keck Observatory OA Meeting 29 January 2004 James W. Beletic

Thank you for

your attention