beam stability requirements: experience from the nsls x1a stxms chris jacobsen department of physics...

19
Beam stability requirements: experience from the NSLS X1A STXMs Chris Jacobsen Department of Physics & Astronomy Stony Brook University, NY, USA [email protected]

Upload: clinton-harrison

Post on 18-Dec-2015

216 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Beam stability requirements: experience from the NSLS X1A STXMs Chris Jacobsen Department of Physics & Astronomy Stony Brook University, NY, USA Chris.Jacobsen@stonybrook.edu

Beam stability requirements: experience from the NSLS

X1A STXMs

Chris Jacobsen

Department of Physics & Astronomy

Stony Brook University, NY, USA

[email protected]

Page 2: Beam stability requirements: experience from the NSLS X1A STXMs Chris Jacobsen Department of Physics & Astronomy Stony Brook University, NY, USA Chris.Jacobsen@stonybrook.edu

Coherence requirements for microscopy

•General property of lenses: preserve size•angle product (Liouville’s Theorem), so

•Microprobe/STXM: want so that diffraction limit of optic rather than geometrical image of source dominates spot size•Rayleigh resolution of thus gives phase space of

•Full-field: each pixel in object is diffraction limit of optic, but can have many pixels simultaneously!•Fluctuations of illumination from one pixel to its neighbor are therefore unimportant.

Full-field

Scanning

Page 3: Beam stability requirements: experience from the NSLS X1A STXMs Chris Jacobsen Department of Physics & Astronomy Stony Brook University, NY, USA Chris.Jacobsen@stonybrook.edu

Effects of spatial incoherence on STXM

How close must p=hθ be to λ?

Effect on modulation transfer function MTF (50% central stop)

Effect on point spread function PSF (50% central stop)

Jacobsen et al., Ultramicroscopy 47, 55 (1992); Winn et al., J. Synch. Rad. 7, 395 (2000).

Page 4: Beam stability requirements: experience from the NSLS X1A STXMs Chris Jacobsen Department of Physics & Astronomy Stony Brook University, NY, USA Chris.Jacobsen@stonybrook.edu

Controlling spatial coherence

Diagram, photo from Newport catalog

•Coherent flux: phase space area of λ in each dimension. Coherent flux is B•λ2. Green, BNL-50522 (1976); Kondratenko and Skrinsky, Opt. Spectr. 42, 189 (1977).•Spatial filter: pinhole at the focus of a lens. Passes only the spatially coherent fraction of an incident beam.

Page 5: Beam stability requirements: experience from the NSLS X1A STXMs Chris Jacobsen Department of Physics & Astronomy Stony Brook University, NY, USA Chris.Jacobsen@stonybrook.edu

Beam sharing at X1A•Electron beam emittance determines photon source emittance.

•Horizontal emittance is about 100λ; vertical emittance is about 3λ.

Incoherent flux for spectroscopy (X1B)

One-mode slices for spatial coherence (X1A1 and X1A2)

Flux losses:•Because we cannot scan the gap, we often work 2-4x off of the spectral peak.

•Because of sharing with X1B we often lose around 2x from center of horizontal distribution, and our sensitivity to noise is magnified.

Page 6: Beam stability requirements: experience from the NSLS X1A STXMs Chris Jacobsen Department of Physics & Astronomy Stony Brook University, NY, USA Chris.Jacobsen@stonybrook.edu

Optical configuration of X1ASee Winn et al., J. Synch. Rad. 7, 395 (2000).

Page 7: Beam stability requirements: experience from the NSLS X1A STXMs Chris Jacobsen Department of Physics & Astronomy Stony Brook University, NY, USA Chris.Jacobsen@stonybrook.edu

Beam stability has been inconsistent

Aug. 27, 2004: discrete flux changes, ~100 Hz oscillations.

•Problem is intermittent; there are good beam days and bad beam days. •Beam stability was much better in late 1990s/early 2000 than in the last few years. •Accelerator physics staff has been unable to correlate any of their diagnostics with our problems, but that may reflect limitations in beam diagnostics.

Page 8: Beam stability requirements: experience from the NSLS X1A STXMs Chris Jacobsen Department of Physics & Astronomy Stony Brook University, NY, USA Chris.Jacobsen@stonybrook.edu

8

What is needed for beam stability?

• Month-to-month, fill-to-fill, and hour-to-hour for steady flux levels.

• For present-day NSLS, STXM experiments work with 1-10 msec dwell time so need stability at much better than 0.1-1 kHz. For NSLS II, scale the bandwidth requirements up by the brightness gain!

8

Page 9: Beam stability requirements: experience from the NSLS X1A STXMs Chris Jacobsen Department of Physics & Astronomy Stony Brook University, NY, USA Chris.Jacobsen@stonybrook.edu

9

• Fluctuations from pixel to pixel must be small compared to contrast variations.

• How many photons do you need to see something? Signal-to-noise goes like

• Contrast parameter is

• Number of photons required is

• Rose criterion: SNR=5 (but SNR=2 still recognizable)

Requirements on fluctuations

9

Page 10: Beam stability requirements: experience from the NSLS X1A STXMs Chris Jacobsen Department of Physics & Astronomy Stony Brook University, NY, USA Chris.Jacobsen@stonybrook.edu

10

Fluorescence or scattering• Fluorescence or large-angle scattering

detection with zero background has so .

• Thus exposure equals number of incident photons required to produce the fluorescent or scattered photons.

• Normalized fluctuation in incident beam equals normalized fluctuation in final image (few percent probably OK!)

10

Page 11: Beam stability requirements: experience from the NSLS X1A STXMs Chris Jacobsen Department of Physics & Astronomy Stony Brook University, NY, USA Chris.Jacobsen@stonybrook.edu

11

Absorption contrast: 10 nm protein in ice

Page 12: Beam stability requirements: experience from the NSLS X1A STXMs Chris Jacobsen Department of Physics & Astronomy Stony Brook University, NY, USA Chris.Jacobsen@stonybrook.edu

12

Absorption: 1 nm Au in 100 nm Si

Page 13: Beam stability requirements: experience from the NSLS X1A STXMs Chris Jacobsen Department of Physics & Astronomy Stony Brook University, NY, USA Chris.Jacobsen@stonybrook.edu

13

Demands are tighter at high resolution

• As lateral sizes get smaller, longitudinal sizes are likely to as well.

• Thinner things require more photons to deliver a certain SNR, roughly as the square of making things thinner.

13

Page 14: Beam stability requirements: experience from the NSLS X1A STXMs Chris Jacobsen Department of Physics & Astronomy Stony Brook University, NY, USA Chris.Jacobsen@stonybrook.edu

14

General comments

• If you have a multimode beam, and need only a single mode for your experiment, you gain tolerance by overfilling your beamline and selecting the single mode at the end.

• If you have a single mode beam, you have no such luxury of overfilling! NSLS II experiments will require more stability than is now needed at NSLS and even APS, ALS.

14

Page 15: Beam stability requirements: experience from the NSLS X1A STXMs Chris Jacobsen Department of Physics & Astronomy Stony Brook University, NY, USA Chris.Jacobsen@stonybrook.edu

15

Angle stability requirements

• Image position does not shift, but flux accepted by beamline does.

15

QuickTime™ and aPNG decompressor

are needed to see this picture.

Page 16: Beam stability requirements: experience from the NSLS X1A STXMs Chris Jacobsen Department of Physics & Astronomy Stony Brook University, NY, USA Chris.Jacobsen@stonybrook.edu

16

Position stability requirements

• Shifts in the beam position produce both intensity fluctuations and image position fluctuations.

16

QuickTime™ and aPNG decompressor

are needed to see this picture.

If multimode, prefer higher beta straight?

Page 17: Beam stability requirements: experience from the NSLS X1A STXMs Chris Jacobsen Department of Physics & Astronomy Stony Brook University, NY, USA Chris.Jacobsen@stonybrook.edu

Fast phase contrast detector

• Silicon drift detector

• Simultaneous recording of bright field, dark field, differential contrast at msec pixel times

• No significant upper limit to signal rate. Acceptable dark noise (~8 photons/msec equivalent; room temperature)

• High quantum efficiency (>90%)

M. Feser, B. Hornberger, C. Jacobsen (Stony Brook); P. Rehak, G. de Geronimo (BNL Instrumentation); L. Strüder, P. Holl (MPI München)

Assembly: 40 mm acrossActive area: 600 μm

Page 18: Beam stability requirements: experience from the NSLS X1A STXMs Chris Jacobsen Department of Physics & Astronomy Stony Brook University, NY, USA Chris.Jacobsen@stonybrook.edu

Simultaneous Availability Of Contrast Modes

• Silica spheres 1 μm diameter or less

• Differential phase contrast filters out intensity fluctuations of the source!

Page 19: Beam stability requirements: experience from the NSLS X1A STXMs Chris Jacobsen Department of Physics & Astronomy Stony Brook University, NY, USA Chris.Jacobsen@stonybrook.edu

19

Closing comments

• STXMs/nanoprobes are very demanding on beam stability.

• Overfilling the optical system is great if the beam is fat enough.

• Must have very stable flux on timescales of 0.01-100,000 Hz (?)

• On that timescale, must have stability in flux to 1:104 or better for transmission experiments.

19