bdm dark matter (solving cdm problems) · 2012-06-25 · evolution of gauge coupling constanta vs...
TRANSCRIPT
Instituto Avanzado de Cosmología
El Universo Invisible 1er Congreso de Cosmología IAC
BDM Dark Matter
(solving CDM problems)
PASCOS 2012, Merida
Axel de la Macorra
Instituto de Física, UNAM
Instituto Avanzado de Cosmologia
• Jorge Cevantes (ININ, Mexico) Students• Jorge Mastache (UNAM, Mexico)• Jesus Cereceres (UNAM, Mexico)
References:• BDM Dark Matter: CDM with a core profile and a free streaming scale
A. de la Macorra, Astropart.Phys. 33:195‐200,2010.
• Galactic Phase Transition at Ec= 0.11 eV from Rotation Curves of Cored LSB and nonperturbative Dark Matter Mass. A. de la Macorra, J. Mastache, J. Cervantes. PRD Rapid Communications: Phys.Rev. D84 (2011) 121301
• Core‐Cusp revisited and Dark Matter Phase Transition Constrained at 0.11 eV with LSB Rotation Curve. J. Mastache, A. de la Macorra, J. Cervantes arXiv:1107.5560
• High‐Resolution Rotation Curves and Galaxy Mass Models from THINGS. De Blok et al Astrophys. J. 136, 2648, 2008
Collaborators and References
Evidence for Dark Matter:
Rotation curves in galaxies and cluster of galaxies , weak and strong lensing, CMB, Structure Formation, BAO …
Dark Matter
Type of Dark Matter
• CDM Massive particle with vanishing dispersion speed v = 0 ok (standard DM and with CDM is the “concordance cosmological model”)e.g. WIMPS (susy particles, axions etc) typical m > GeV
• HDM Relativistic particles with dispersion speed v=cstructure on small scales cannot grow NOT ok
e.g. neutrinos m=O(eV)
• Warm WDM Particles with mass m=O(keV) ok
• BDM (Bound Dark Matter) particles which acquire a non perturbative (large) mass M (with M >> mo) at a phase transition scale Ec
• e.g. m = mo for E > Ecm = mo + M for E < Ec
as for example protons and neutrons
CDM or BDMAT THE BEGINNING OF THE UNIVERSE
Problems of CDM:\\\\
1) Too much substructure
2) Cuspy vs Core DM profile(many DM dominated galaxies show a core profile)
Can they have a common answer ?
Substructure:
CDM predicts a large number of small galaxies which are not seen (satellite galaxies )
Galactic Rotation Curves => missing matter (Dark Matter)
CDM has NFW cuspy profile
(not preferred by data )
de Blok et al 01
20
1
ss
NFW
rr
rr
BDM particles behave as =
Radiation as HDM, w=1/3above the scale energy Ecwith m = 0
Where can find this transition ?1. As the Universe expands and cools (we go from high to low energy denisty )2. Inside Galaxies as we approach the center region (we go from low to high energy density)
BDM: Bound Dark MatterPhase transtion at Ec
ca 3
ca 44Ecc cv
0v
Matter, CDM w = 0Below the scale energy Ecwith E = m
Phase transtion at
CDM or BDMSubstructure Problem (satelites galaxies)
The formation of small structures are surpressed inBDM compared to CDM.
• BDM particles have a dispersion velocity v = c,i.e. are HDM, above Ec while they behave as CDMbelow this scale with v = 0.
• We obtain a cut off in the power spectrum, due tothe free streaming of the particles , λfs:
NO formation of structure for scales smaller than fs
The observational data requires fs < 1 Mpc
giving galaxies with mass M > 109 Mo
Galaxy Mass
CDM or BDM
NFW CDM cuspy profile
BDM has a core profile
rc size of the core
Rotation Curves => DM profiles
Evolution of gauge coupling constanta vs Energy
SU(3) Interacción Fuerte
SU(N) Dark Matter
SU(2) Interacción Débil
SU(1) E.M. Interac.
N fN cb
Eg
GeVE
EELogb
gutEgEg
gut
gut
gut
3
2/1)(
,10
][8)(2
1
)(21
2
16
2
,1016GeVEgut
2g
Particle motivation of BDM BOUND DARK MATTERA. de la Macorra, A.de la M. Astropart.Phys. 33:195‐200,2010
ELog 10
• We assume a new Dark Gauge Group withSU(Nc) and Nf number of elementaryparticles.
• The mass of these elementary particles issmall or zero but at low energy a largemass M is generated due to nonperturbative physics
One loop Beta‐Function evolution
MeVEQCD 200 ,1016GeVEgut
2g
High energy
u
dd
ELog 10
N fN cb
Eg
GeVE
EELogb
gutEgEg
gut
gut
gut
3
2/1)(
,10
][8)(2
1
)(21
2
16
2
SU(3) Strong Interaction
SU(N) Dark Matter
SU(2) Weak Interaction
SU(1) E.M. Interaction
• We assume a new Dark Gauge Group withSU(Nc) and Nf number of elementaryparticles.
• The mass of these elementary particles issmall or zero but at low energy a largemass M is generated due to nonperturbative physics
Evolution of gauge coupling constanta vs Energy
One loop Beta‐Function evolution
Particle motivation of BDM BOUND DARK MATTERA. de la Macorra, A.de la M Astropart.Phys. 33:195‐200,2010Particle motivation of BDM BOUND DARK MATTERA. de la Macorra, A.de la M Astropart.Phys. 33:195‐200,2010
One loop Beta‐Function evolution
MeVEQCD 200 ,1016GeVEgut
2gPhase
Transition
ELog 10
N fN cb
Eg
GeVE
EELogb
gutEgEg
gut
gut
gut
3
2/1)(
,10
][8)(2
1
)(21
2
16
2
High energy
u
dd
12 g
The condensation scale or phase transitionscale is defined when the gauge couplingconstant becomes strong, i.e.
Evolution of gauge coupling constanta vs Energy
SU(3) Strong Interaction
SU(N) Dark Matter
SU(2) Weak Interaction
SU(1) E.M. Interaction
Particle motivation of BDM BOUND DARK MATTERA. de la Macorra, A.de la M Astropart.Phys. 33:195‐200,2010
MeVEQCD 200 ,1016GeVEgut
2g
u
udLow Energy
uud
P
dud n
uudP
ELog 10
N fN cb
Eg
GeVE
EELogb
gutEgEg
gut
gut
gut
3
2/1)(
,10
][8)(2
1
)(21
2
16
2
Evolution of gauge coupling constanta vs Energy
SU(3) Strong Interaction
SU(N) Dark Matter
SU(2) Weak Interaction
SU(1) E.M. Interaction
The value of EQD is determine by gaugedynamics and may be phenomenologicallyobtained from cosmological data.
One loop Beta‐Function evolution
Particle motivation of BDM BOUND DARK MATTERA. de la Macorra, A.de la M Astropart.Phys. 33:195‐200,2010
MeVEQCD 200?CE ,1016GeVEgut
2g
PhaseTransition
ELog 10
N fN cb
Eg
GeVE
EELogb
gutEgEg
gut
gut
gut
3
2/1)(
,10
][8)(2
1
)(21
2
16
2The value of Ec is determine by gaugedynamics and may be phenomenologicallyobtained from cosmological data.
Evolution of gauge coupling constanta vs Energy
SU(3) Strong Interaction
SU(N) Dark Matter
SU(2) Weak Interaction
SU(1) E.M. Interaction
One loop Beta‐Function evolution
Particle motivation of BDM BOUND DARK MATTERA. de la Macorra, A.de la M Astropart.Phys. 33:195‐200,2010
MeVEQCD 200?CE ,1016GeVEgut
2g
PhaseTransition ELog 10
cbdm Ekm )101( Ok
e.g. proton m = 938 with
QCD = 200 MeV, c = 4.6
We expect from gauge group dynamics that the effectivemass to be of the order of the phase transition scale Ec
ibgic eEE /8 2
Evolution of gauge coupling constanta vs Energy
Particle motivation of BDM BOUND DARK MATTERA. de la Macorra, A.de la M Astropart.Phys. 33:195‐200,2010
N fN cb
Eg
GeVE
EELogb
gutEgEg
gut
gut
gut
3
2/1)(
,10
][8)(2
1
)(21
2
16
2
One loop Beta‐Function evolution
SU(3) Strong Interaction
SU(N) Dark Matter
SU(2) Weak Interaction
SU(1) E.M. Interaction
Linear Evolution of energy density perturbarions
SAMPLE: THINGS (34 High resolution Nearby Galaxies)
• We limit our sample to 17 low luminous (early type and dwarf) galaxies with smooth, symmetric and extended to large radii rotation curves and small or none bulge.
• These properties provide a good estimate of the DM halo in galaxies because it is believed that it dominates over all other components at all radii.
• Great angular resolution in sub kpc
Visible matter componentes
• Stars• Bulb• Gas
BULGE
GASSTARS
MASS MODELMatter Components
Rotation curves alsorequire extra matter:
• Dark Matter
MASS MODEL
20
1
sss
c
BDM
rr
rr
rr
Halo Profile : BDMCore
Halo Profile : NFWCuspy
20
1
ss
NFW
rr
rr
ccBDM rrEc )(4
BDM gives a core for ρg > ρc=Ec^4
c
sc r
r2
0
Pseudo‐IsotermalCore
BurkertCore
20
1
s
ISO
rr
2
0
11ss
B
rr
rr
A large number of galaxies dominated byDM, as Dwarf galaxies or LSB (LowSurface Brightness), have a better fit torotation curves with a core DM profileinstead as the CDM NFW cuspy profile.H
DM
CD
M
Phase transition from CDM to HDM
Conclusiones
20
1
sss
c
BDM
rr
rr
rr
BDM Profile
NFW Profile
20
1
ss
NFW
rr
rr
(1 2 ) 2-D contour plots of vs r core for diff. Mass models
(1 2 ) 2-D contour plots of vs r core for diff. Mass models
ConclusionesSummary of 2-D contour plots of c vs r core for diff. Mass models
Kroupa
Minimum Disk
c
c
rr1
2int
44 )06.0( eVcEc
kpcrc 3.1
INNER ANALYSIS useful to extract information on the inner region of galaxies
r0 52.00
½1
0rcrr
sc rrr
NFW has = 1
r0
c
c
rr1
2int
INNER ANALYSIS
52.0
0½1
0rcrr
sc rrr
Summary and Conclusions
• BDM DARK MATTER behave as :HDM at high energy (above Ec)CDM at low energy (below Ec)
• The phase transition Ec can be determined from gauge theory, • i.e. when the bound particles acquire a non perturbative mass
• Ec can also be determined from cosmological data
• We find this high-low energy density transition : i) due to the expansion of our universeii) in the inner region of galaxies
• BDM has a cut in the power spectrum• BDM has cored DM profile (instead of the cuspy CDM NFW profile)
• Solves the problems of CDM: substrucure and cuspy profile
• Has an equivalent or better fit to the cosmological data than CDM
References:
• BDM Dark Matter: CDM with a core profile and a free streaming scaleA. de la Macorra, Astropart.Phys. 33:195‐200,2010.
• Galactic Phase Transition at Ec= O(0.1 eV) from Rotation Curves of Cored LSB and non perturbative Dark Matter Mass. A. de la Macorra, J. Mastache, J. Cervantes. PRD Rapid Communications: Phys.Rev. D84 (2011) 121301
• Core‐Cusp revisited and Dark Matter Phase Transition Constrained at 0.1 eV with LSB Rotation Curve. J. Mastache, A. de la Macorra, J. Cervantes arXiv:1107.5560
References