basic assessment report - cesnet.co.za mixed use dev... · centre, boarding house 12.74 ha johnson...

www.dedea.gov.za

“Innovation for Sustainable Development”

t Floor Room 274 • Beacon Hill • Hockley Close • Kind William’s Town • 5600 | Private Bag X0054 • 5605 • Republic of South Africa TeL; 043 605 7099• Fax: 043 605 7300 | Email: • Web: www.dedeat.gov.za

VERSION 1 dated 8 December 2014

BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT

(For official use only)

File Reference Number:

Application Number:

Date Received:

Basic assessment report in terms of the Environmental Impact Assessment Regulations, 2010, promulgated in terms

of the National Environmental Management Act, 1998(Act No. 107 of 1998), as amended.

Kindly note that:

1. This basic assessment report is a standard report that may be required by a competent authority in terms of the EIA Regulations, 2014 and is meant to streamline applications. Please make sure that it is the report used by the particular competent authority for the activity that is being applied for.

www.dedea.gov.za




2. The report must be typed within the spaces provided in the form. The size of the spaces provided is not necessarily indicative of the amount of information to be provided. The report is in the form of a table that can extend itself as each space is filled with typing.

3. Where applicable tick the boxes that are applicable or black out the boxes that are not applicable in the report.

4. An incomplete report may be returned to the applicant for revision.

5. The use of ―not applicable‖ in the report must be done with circumspection because if it is used in respect of material information that is required by the competent authority for assessing the application, it may result in the rejection of the application as provided for in the regulations.

6. This report must be handed in at offices of the relevant competent authority as determined by each authority.

7. No faxed or e-mailed reports will be accepted.

8. The report must be compiled by an independent environmental assessment practitioner (EAP).

9. Unless protected by law, all information in the report will become public information on receipt by the competent authority. Any interested and affected party should be provided with the information contained in this report on request, during any stage of the application process.

10. A competent authority may require that for specified types of activities in defined situations only parts of this report need to

be completed.

www.dedea.gov.za




SECTION A: ACTIVITY INFORMATION

Has a specialist been consulted to assist with the completion of this section?

YES NO

If YES, please complete form XX for each specialist thus appointed:

Any specialist reports must be contained in Appendix D.

1. ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION

Describe the activity, which is being applied for, in detail

The proposed activity is a mixed-use development. The site proposed for development,

Remainder Erf 271 East London, is located approximately 12km north of the East London CBD.

As such it falls within the Buffalo City Metropolitan Municipality of the Eastern Cape Province of

South Africa. The site (17.89 hectares) lies between the existing suburbs of Summerpride and

Dawn, North of the N2 from King Williams Town to East London, adjacent to Voortrekker Road,

and north of a main railway line. Existing access to the site is gained directly from Voortrekker

Road. (Figure 1 below)

www.dedea.gov.za




Figure 1: Locality of the proposed Summerpride Mixed-use Development The proposed development will include a secure, mixed-use estate, for middle to upper income groups (Figure 2), with the following components:

Component Zoning Consent use Area

Commercial “Village Centre” Business 1 Commercial workshops, places of worship, institution, hypermarket

1.65 ha

806 Apartments/Flats

91 x 2 storey duplex units

16 x 3 storey 24 unit apartment blocks

20 x 3 storey 12 unit apartment blocks

Residential 5 Retirement village, day care centre, boarding house

12.74 ha

Johnson &

Johnson

N2 towards King Williams

Town

Horseshoe

Metro Station

www.dedea.gov.za




Internal Private Open Space Network with attenuation ponds

Open Space 2 (Private Open Space)

Associated facilities 1.74 ha

Public Roads Transport 2 (Public Road)

0.53 ha

Private Roads Private Road

1.23 ha

Figure 2: The proposed layout plan of the Summerpride Mixed-Use Development.

www.dedea.gov.za




2. FEASIBLE AND REASONABLE ALTERNATIVES

“alternatives”, in relation to a proposed activity, means different means of meeting the general purpose and requirements of the activity, which may include alternatives to— (a) the property on which or location where it is proposed to undertake the activity; (b) the type of activity to be undertaken; (c) the design or layout of the activity; (d) the technology to be used in the activity; (e) the operational aspects of the activity; and (f) the option of not implementing the activity.

Describe alternatives that are considered in this application. Alternatives should include a consideration of all

possible means by which the purpose and need of the proposed activity could be accomplished in the specific

instance taking account of the interest of the applicant in the activity. The no-go alternative must in all cases be

included in the assessment phase as the baseline against which the impacts of the other alternatives are assessed.

The determination of whether site or activity (including different processes etc.) or both is appropriate needs to be

informed by the specific circumstances of the activity and its environment. After receipt of this report the competent

authority may also request the applicant to assess additional alternatives that could possibly accomplish the purpose

and need of the proposed activity if it is clear that realistic alternatives have not been considered to a reasonable

extent.

Paragraphs 3 – 13 below should be completed for each alternative.

ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVES FUNDAMENTAL, INCREMENTAL AND NO-GO ALTERNATIVES

Fundamental alternatives Fundamental alternatives are developments that are totally different from the proposed project and usually include the following:

Alternative property or location where it is proposed to undertake the activity (i.e. site alternatives);

Alternative type of activity to be undertaken (i.e. land-use alternatives); and

Alternative technology to be used in the activity (i.e. technical alternatives);

www.dedea.gov.za




Incremental alternatives Incremental alternatives relate to modifications or variations to the design of a project that provide different options to reduce or minimise environmental impacts. There are several incremental alternatives that can be considered with respect to the current mixed-use development project, including:

Alternative design or layout of the activity; and No-go alternative It is mandatory to consider the “no-go” option in the EIA process. The “no-go” alternative refers to the current status quo and the risks and impacts associated to it. Some existing activities may carry risks and may be undesirable (e.g. an existing contaminated site earmarked for a development). In the case of the current proposed mixed-use development, the only “no-go” activity is:

Site remains as natural veld with scattered aliens.

COMPARATIVE ASSESSMENT OF ALTERNATIVES Table 2.1 below provides a comparative assessment of identified alternatives to the proposed activity, including advantages and disadvantages. An overall assessment is made concerning whether the identified alternatives are reasonable and feasible for the further assessment of impacts. CONCLUSION It was determined that the current proposal (the preferred option) was the only reasonable and feasible option to take into the assessment phase of the EIA, together with the No-Go option, based on the assessment in Table 2.1. Based on the manner in which the environment may be affected, a list of general environmental issues and resulting direct, indirect and cumulative impacts were identified and assessed in terms of spatial, temporal, likelihood and severity criteria for all feasible and reasonable alternatives (see Appendix F).

www.dedea.gov.za




TABLE 2-1: ASSESSMENT OF ALTERNATIVES

Alternative level Alternatives Advantages Disadvantages Reasonable

and feasible

Further

assessment

Comment

Property or

location

This refers to the

fundamental

location options,

such as Greenfield

vs. a Brownfield

site, etc. and the

environmental risks

and impacts

associated with

such options.

Alternative

location 1 -

Current

proposed

site

(Preferred

alternative)

Located close to existing necessary infrastructure for both ESKOM and Buffalo City Metro.

Land availability as the land is owned by the developer and earmarked for development in the Spatial Development Framework (BCM SDF).

Land previously undeveloped

Land use for informal grazing.

YES YES The main

determining factors

for selecting the

proposed location

were:-

The development is supported by the land owner.

Proximity to a grid connection point.

Available land.

Approval for the development has been granted previously.

www.dedea.gov.za





and feasible

Further

assessment

Comment

Alternative

location 2 -

None

identified

NA NA NA NA Alternative locations

for the current

project will not be

feasible as the

landowner does not

own other land.

Type of activity

This refers to the

fundamental land

use options, such

as industrial,

residential,

infrastructure,

farming,

conservation, etc.

and the

environmental risks

and impacts

Alternative

activity 1 -

Mixed-Use

Development

(Preferred

alternative)

Contribute to safe and attractive, middle to upmarket housing and retail facilities to meet the current demand in the area.

The site is located close to ESKOM and BCMM electrical grid connections.

The potential to

Densification of the urban settlement.

YES YES The site is suitable

for a mixed-use

development as the

land is within an

already developed

area.

www.dedea.gov.za





and feasible

Further

assessment

Comment

associated with

such options

stimulate economic activity and jobs in the area.

Alternative

activity 2 -

Conservation

The site could be conserved to protect the indigenous vegetation that exists on the site.

Illegal dumping will occur.

The spread of alien vegetation will continue throughout the site including the riparian areas.

Yes No The site is of

marginal

conservation

potential. The lack

of maintenance

would mean the site

would be more

infested with aliens

and dumping would

continue.

Alternative

activity 3 –

Intensive

agriculture

The potential to stimulate economic activity and jobs in the area.

Vegetative cover may remain.

Agriculture is not economically viable due the small area, limited access to permanent water and proximity to urban settlement.

No No The land is of

marginal agricultural

potential and water

in the area is

scarce.

www.dedea.gov.za





and feasible

Further

assessment

Comment

Design or layout

This relates mostly

to alternative ways

in which the

proposed

development or

activity can be

physically laid out

on the ground to

minimise or reduce

environmental risks

or impacts

Alternative

layout 1

(Preferred

alternative)

This layout has no residential development in close proximity of the water courses.

This layout is the optimal layout from an environmental perspective, where environmentally sensitive areas have been designated as No-Go areas.

Development will

occur in an area

that was previously

undisturbed.

Yes Yes NA

Alternative

layout 2

NA This layout places

houses within 32

metres of the water

course, increasing

the risk of

No Yes It is recommended

that this layout not

be used.

www.dedea.gov.za





and feasible

Further

assessment

Comment

degrading the

riparian vegetation.

Operational

aspects

This relates mostly

to alternative ways

in which the

development or

activity can operate

in order to reduce

environmental risks

or impacts

Alternative

operational

activity 1

(Preferred

alternative)

As with layout, operational aspects are incremental impacts that have been informed by the EIA process. Thus the operation of the facility will be informed by the operational mitigation measures identified in the BAR.

NA NA NA NA

No-go option This refers to the

current status quo

Existing

activities on

site include:

It will remain relatively undisturbed.

The land is

currently not well

managed with alien

tree species, illegal

Yes Yes Assessed in the

impact assessment

process.

www.dedea.gov.za





and feasible

Further

assessment

Comment

and the risks and

impacts associated

with it. Some

existing activities

may carry risks (e.g.

an existing

contaminated site

earmarked for a

development)

Natural veld

with

scattered

aliens

dumping and

sewerage

blockages resulting

in pollution of water

courses.

www.dedea.gov.za




3. ACTIVITY POSITION

Indicate the position of the activity using the latitude and longitude of the centre point of the site for each alternative site. The co-ordinates should be in degrees and decimal minutes. The minutes should have at least three decimals to ensure adequate accuracy. The projection that must be used in all cases is the WGS84 spheroid in a national or local projection. List alternative sites if applicable. Alternative:

Latitude (S):

Longitude (E):

Alternative S11 (preferred or only site alternative)

32 57.817‗ 27 50.488‗

Alternative S2 (if any) 32 57.817‗ 27 50.488‗

Alternative S3 (if any) o ‗ o ‗ In the case of linear activities:

Alternative: Latitude (S): Longitude (E): Alternative S1 (preferred or only route alternative)

Starting point of the activity o ‗ o ‗

Middle point of the activity o ‗ o ‗

End point of the activity o ‗ o ‗

Alternative S2 (if any)




Alternative S3 (if any)




1 “Alternative S..” refer to site alternatives.

www.dedea.gov.za




For route alternatives that are longer than 500m, please provide an addendum with co-ordinates taken every 250 meters along the route for each alternative alignment.

4. PHYSICAL SIZE OF THE ACTIVITY

Indicate the physical size of the preferred activity/technology as well as alternative activities/technologies (footprints): Alternative: Size of the activity:

Alternative A12 (preferred activity alternative) 180 000m2

Alternative A2 (if any) 180 000m2

Alternative A3 (if any) m2

or, for linear activities: Alternative: Length of the

activity:

Alternative A1 (preferred activity alternative) m

Alternative A2 (if any) m

Alternative A3 (if any) m

Indicate the size of the alternative sites or servitudes (within which the above footprints will occur): Alternative: Size of the

site/servitude:

Alternative A1 (preferred activity alternative) 180 000m2

Alternative A2 (if any) 180 000m2

Alternative A3 (if any) m2

5. SITE ACCESS

Does ready access to the site exist? YES NO

If NO, what is the distance over which a new access road will be built m

Describe the type of access road planned:

2 “Alternative A..” refer to activity, process, technology or other alternatives.

www.dedea.gov.za




The development will be accessed by the already existing Voortrekker and Beulah Road.

View of access roads to the proposed development site.

Vhdlfjlkjsdlsdjcls; A view of how the development will be accessed.

www.dedea.gov.za




There will also be an access point view two areas off Thronycroft Road.

www.dedea.gov.za




Include the position of the access road on the site plan and required map, as well as an indication of the road in relation to the site. 6. SITE OR ROUTE PLAN

A detailed site or route plan(s) must be prepared for each alternative site or alternative activity. It must be attached as Appendix A to this document. The site or route plans must indicate the following: 6.1 the scale of the plan which must be at least a scale of 1:500;

6.2 the property boundaries and numbers of all the properties within 50 metres of the site;

6.3 the current land use as well as the land use zoning of each of the properties adjoining the site or sites;

6.4 the exact position of each element of the application as well as any other structures on the site;

6.5 the position of services, including electricity supply cables (indicate above or underground), water supply

pipelines, boreholes, street lights, sewage pipelines, storm water infrastructure and telecommunication

infrastructure;

6.6 all trees and shrubs taller than 1.8 metres;

6.7 walls and fencing including details of the height and construction material;

6.8 servitudes indicating the purpose of the servitude;

6.9 sensitive environmental elements within 100 metres of the site or sites including (but not limited thereto):

rivers; the 1:100 year flood line (where available or where it is required by DWA); ridges; cultural and historical features; areas with indigenous vegetation (even if it is degraded or invested with alien species);

6.9 for gentle slopes the 1 metre contour intervals must be indicated on the plan and whenever the slope of the

site exceeds 1:10, the 500mm contours must be indicated on the plan; and

www.dedea.gov.za




6.10 the positions from where photographs of the site were taken.

7. SITE PHOTOGRAPHS

Colour photographs from the centre of the site must be taken in at least the eight major compass directions with a

description of each photograph. Photographs must be attached under Appendix B to this form. It must be

supplemented with additional photographs of relevant features on the site, if applicable.

8. FACILITY ILLUSTRATION

A detailed illustration of the activity must be provided at a scale of 1:200 as Appendix C for activities that include structures. The illustrations must be to scale and must represent a realistic image of the planned activity. The illustration must give a representative view of the activity. 9. ACTIVITY MOTIVATION

9(a) Socio-economic value of the activity

What is the expected capital value of the activity on completion? R385

million

What is the expected yearly income that will be generated by or as a result of the

activity?

R45 million

Will the activity contribute to service infrastructure? YES NO

Is the activity a public amenity? YES NO

How many new employment opportunities will be created in the development phase of

the activity?

34

What is the expected value of the employment opportunities during the development

phase?

R185

million

What percentage of this will accrue to previously disadvantaged individuals? 53%

www.dedea.gov.za




How many permanent new employment opportunities will be created during the

operational phase of the activity?

21

What is the expected current value of the employment opportunities during the first 10

years?

R97 million

What percentage of this will accrue to previously disadvantaged individuals? 72%

9(b) Need and desirability of the activity

Motivate and explain the need and desirability of the activity (including demand for the activity):

The activity will provide safe and attractive, middle to upmarket housing and retail facilities to meet the

current demand in the area. This will create a sustainable, vibrant and supportive environment. The

development is consistent with the spatial planning of the area and therefore fulfils BCMM development

objectives.

Indicate any benefits that the activity will have for society in general:

The development will enhance the quality of life of new residents by offering desirable housing options and

the creation of a unique lifestyle. As the site is situated within the urban edge and between currently

developed areas, it is considered infill. Infill development is considered as an environmental benefit, rather

than ribbon or coastal sprawl development which is not desirable.

Indicate any benefits that the activity will have for the local communities where the activity will be located:

None.

www.dedea.gov.za




10. APPLICABLE LEGISLATION, POLICIES AND/OR GUIDELINES List all legislation, policies and/or guidelines of any sphere of government that are applicable to the application as contemplated in the EIA regulations, if applicable: Title of legislation, policy or guideline:

Administering authority:

Date:

Constitution Act (No. 108 of 1996) Constitution Assembly 1996

National Environmental Management Act (No. 107 of 1998)

Department of Environmental Affairs (DEA)

1998

National Water Act (No. 36 of 1998) Department of Water and Sanitation (DWS)

1998

National Forests Act (No 84 of 1998) Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry (DAFF)

1998

National Environmental Management: Biodiversity Act (No. 10 of 2004)

DEA & DEDEAT 2004

National Heritage Resource Act (No. 25 of 1999) South African (SAHRA) 1999 Occupational Health and Safety Act (No. 85 of 1993) Department of Labour 1993

11. WASTE, EFFLUENT, EMISSION AND NOISE MANAGEMENT

11(a) Solid waste management

Will the activity produce solid construction waste during the construction/initiation

phase?

YES NO

If yes, what estimated quantity will be produced per month? 30m3

How will the construction solid waste be disposed of (describe)?

It will be taken to the Roundhill Landfill Site and disposed of there.

Where will the construction solid waste be disposed of (describe)?

www.dedea.gov.za




It will be disposed of at the Roundhill Landfill site, which forms part of the East London

Regional Waste Site.

Will the activity produce solid waste during its operational phase? YES NO

If yes, what estimated quantity will be produced per month? m3

How will the solid waste be disposed of (describe)?

Where will the solid waste be disposed if it does not feed into a municipal waste stream (describe)?

If the solid waste (construction or operational phases) will not be disposed of in a registered landfill site

or be taken up in a municipal waste stream, then the applicant should consult with the competent

authority to determine whether it is necessary to change to an application for scoping and EIA.

Can any part of the solid waste be classified as hazardous in terms of the relevant legislation?

YES NO

If yes, inform the competent authority and request a change to an application for scoping and EIA.

Is the activity that is being applied for a solid waste handling or treatment facility?

YES NO

If yes, then the applicant should consult with the competent authority to determine whether it is necessary to change to an application for scoping and EIA.

11(b) Liquid effluent

Will the activity produce effluent, other than normal sewage, that will be disposed of in

a municipal sewage system?

YES NO

If yes, what estimated quantity will be produced per month? m3

www.dedea.gov.za




Will the activity produce any effluent that will be treated and/or disposed of on site? YES NO

If yes, the applicant should consult with the competent authority to determine whether it is necessary to

change to an application for scoping and EIA.

Will the activity produce effluent that will be treated and/or disposed of at another facility?

YES NO

If yes, provide the particulars of the facility:

Facility name:

Contact person:

Postal address:

Postal code:

Telephone: Cell:

E-mail: Fax:

Describe the measures that will be taken to ensure the optimal reuse or recycling of waste water, if any:

None. Waste water will be received into the municipal system.

11(c) Emissions into the atmosphere

Will the activity release emissions into the atmosphere? YES NO

If yes, is it controlled by any legislation of any sphere of government? YES NO

If yes, the applicant should consult with the competent authority to determine whether

it is necessary to change to an application for scoping and EIA.

If no, describe the emissions in terms of type and concentration:

www.dedea.gov.za




11(d) Generation of noise

Will the activity generate noise? YES NO

If yes, is it controlled by any legislation of any sphere of government? YES NO

If yes, the applicant should consult with the competent authority to determine whether

it is necessary to change to an application for scoping and EIA.

If no, describe the noise in terms of type and level:

12. WATER USE

Please indicate the source(s) of water that will be used for the activity by ticking the appropriate box(es)

municipal water board groundwater river, stream, dam

or lake

other the activity will not use

water

If water is to be extracted from groundwater, river, stream, dam, lake or any other natural feature,

please indicate

the volume that will be extracted per month: litres

Does the activity require a water use permit from the Department of Water Affairs? YES NO

If yes, please submit the necessary application to the Department of Water Affairs and attach proof

thereof to this application if it has been submitted.

13. ENERGY EFFICIENCY

www.dedea.gov.za




Describe the design measures, if any, that have been taken to ensure that the activity is energy

efficient:

Insulation of houses and use of solar water heaters is recommended in this EIA.

Describe how alternative energy sources have been taken into account or been built into the design of

the activity, if any:

Use of alternative renewable energy sources such as wind or solar power must be considered in the design and layout. However, if renewable energy source technology is not considered in this design, provision must be made (building the necessary infrastructure) for future installation of such technology and must be linked to the grid for future energy saving.

www.dedea.gov.za




SECTION B: SITE/AREA/PROPERTY DESCRIPTION

Important notes:

1. For linear activities (pipelines, etc) as well as activities that cover very large sites, it may be necessary to complete this section for each part of the site that has a significantly different environment. In such cases please complete copies of Section C and indicate the area, which is covered by each copy No. on the Site Plan.

Section C Copy No. (e.g.

A):

1

2. Paragraphs 1 - 6 below must be completed for each alternative.

3. Has a specialist been consulted to assist with the completion of this section?

YES NO

If YES, please complete form XX for each specialist thus appointed:

All specialist reports must be contained in Appendix D.

1. GRADIENT OF THE SITE Indicate the general gradient of the site. Alternative S1:

Flat 1:50 – 1:20 1:20 – 1:15 1:15 – 1:10 1:10 – 1:7,5 1:7,5 – 1:5 Steeper than

1:5

Alternative S2 (if any): Flat 1:50 – 1:20 1:20 – 1:15 1:15 – 1:10 1:10 – 1:7,5 1:7,5 – 1:5 Steeper than

1:5

Alternative S3 (if any): Flat 1:50 – 1:20 1:20 – 1:15 1:15 – 1:10 1:10 – 1:7,5 1:7,5 – 1:5 Steeper than

www.dedea.gov.za




1:5

2. LOCATION IN LANDSCAPE

Indicate the landform(s) that best describes the site: 2.1 Ridgeline 2.2 Plateau 2.3 Side slope of hill/mountain 2.4 Closed valley 2.5 Open valley 2.6 Plain 2.7 Undulating plain / low hills 2.8 Dune 2.9 Seafront

3. GROUNDWATER, SOIL AND GEOLOGICAL STABILITY OF THE SITE

Is the site(s) located on any of the following (tick the appropriate boxes)? Alternative S1: Alternative S2 (if

any):

Alternative S3 (if

any):

Shallow water table (less than

1.5m deep)

YES NO YES NO YES NO

Dolomite, sinkhole or doline

areas


Seasonally wet soils (often

close to water bodies)


www.dedea.gov.za




Unstable rocky slopes or steep

slopes with loose soil


Dispersive soils (soils that

dissolve in water)


Soils with high clay content

(clay fraction more than 40%)


Any other unstable soil or

geological feature


An area sensitive to erosion


If you are unsure about any of the above or if you are concerned that any of the above aspects may be an issue of concern in the application, an appropriate specialist should be appointed to assist in the completion of this section. (Information in respect of the above will often be available as part of the project information or at the planning sections of local authorities. Where it exists, the 1:50 000 scale Regional Geotechnical Maps prepared by the Council for Geo Science may also be consulted).

4. GROUNDCOVER

Indicate the types of groundcover present on the site: 4.1 Natural veld – good condition E 4.2 Natural veld – scattered aliens E 4.3 Natural veld with heavy alien infestation E 4.4 Veld dominated by alien species E 4.5 Gardens 4.6 Sport field 4.7 Cultivated land 4.8 Paved surface 4.9 Building or other structure

www.dedea.gov.za




4.10 Bare soil The location of all identified rare or endangered species or other elements should be accurately indicated on the site plan(s).

Natural veld - good

conditionE

Natural veld with

scattered aliensE

Natural veld with

heavy alien

infestationE

Veld dominated

by alien

speciesE

Gardens

Sport field Cultivated land Paved surface Building or other

structure Bare soil

If any of the boxes marked with an ―E ―is ticked, please consult an appropriate specialist to assist in the completion of this section if the environmental assessment practitioner doesn‘t have the necessary expertise.

Vegetation and floristics

According to Mucina and Rutherford (2006) the proposed Summerpride Mixed-Use Development falls

within the Albany Coastal Belt (AT 9) vegetation type (Figure 4-1). According to SANBI this vegetation type

is considered poorly protected, but ―Least Threatened‖.

This vegetation type occurs from Kei Mouth to the Sundays River, within 15-30km from the coastline. It

occurs on gently to moderately undulating slopes, and is dominated by short grasslands punctuated by

scattered bush clumps or solitary Acacia karoo.

The state of the vegetation on site is generally poor. Alien invasive plant infestation is occurring in localized

pockets in the general area.

www.dedea.gov.za




Figure 4-1: Vegetation map indicating the position of the Summerpride Mixed-Use Development in Albany Coast Belt vegetation (Mucina and Rutherford, 2006) on Erf RE/271 indicated as a polygon.

9.2 Eastern Cape Biodiversity Conservation Plan (ECBCP)

The Eastern Cape Biodiversity Conservation Plan (ECBCP) was published in 2007 and is a collaborative

initiative of various governmental (DWS, DEDEAT, EC Parks) environmental organisations to fulfill the

obligation of government to promote the conservation of the biodiversity of the Eastern Cape. The report

comprises the following main components:

Identification of Critical Biodiversity Areas (CBAs)

Identification of Biodiversity Land-use Management Classes (BLMCs)

Recommended land uses for BLMCs

www.dedea.gov.za




Use of the decision support system

The ECBCP is a broad-scale biodiversity plan. It integrates other existing broad-scale biodiversity plans in

the Province, and fills in the gaps using mainly national data. As such, the ECBCP must be used as a

guideline document only, with site verification to be conducted in order to confirm on site status.

The study area falls under two sections of one BLMC class. BLMC 4 is classified as ―towns and

settlements‖ and covers the majority of the proposed development area. The remainder of the site falls

under BLMC 4 ―Cultivated Land‖(Figure xx).

Recommended land use objective for the ―towns and settlements‖ classification involves managing

biodiversity for sustainable development.

Figure 4-2: Map of Erf RE/271 indicated as a polygon taken from the Eastern Cape Biodiversity

Conservation Programme.

www.dedea.gov.za




The study site from inspection is heavily degraded and would not be considered as an important

contribution towards biodiversity conservation in the area.

9.3 Subtropical Thicket Ecosystem Planning (STEP) project

The Subtropical Thicket Ecosystem Planning (STEP) Project provides guidelines to assist municipal

managers and planners in environmental planning and in achieving conservation targets. The natural

environment has been classified in terms of conservation importance with Class I having the highest and

Class IV the lowest conservation priority as illustrated below:

I. Critically Endangered Ecosystems

II. Endangered Ecosystems

III. Vulnerable Ecosystems

IV. Currently Not Vulnerable Ecosystems

According to STEP classification the site falls within the Thicket Mosaic Biome. The thicket unit is Buffels

Thicket Mosaic with Savanna (common name Berlin Savanna Thicket). This vegetation type is

characterised by thicket clumps occurring within a matrix of savanna, where sweet thorn (Acacia karro) is

abundant and bitter leaf (Brachylaena ilicifolia) is characteristic. Rooigras (Themeda triandra) and

Turpentine grasses (Cymbopogon spp.) are prominent in the savanna. According to STEP this vegetation

type is classified as ―Currently not vulnerable‖ (Figure 4-3).

The site does not fall within any of the STEP Corridors or the STEP Megaconcervancy Networks.

The mosaic vegetation types of this greater seaboard area is thought to be a result of man‘s disturbance,

with the original vegetation (pre-settlement) dominated by non-seasonal, dense thicket.

On-site the vegetation is considered to be slightly degraded. While the site has not been developed to date, and is currently vacant, the following factors are thought to have led to the slight degradation of the vegetation on site:

Invasion of exotic vegetation (e.g. Black Wattle), particularly along the drainage lines;

Lack of utilisation of grassland- grassland is devoid of pristine diversity, being invaded by Acacia karoo

www.dedea.gov.za




Disturbance of natural fire patterns; and

Utilisation for dumping.

Leaking sewage manholes resulting in the spillage of raw sewage on site and down the drainage streams

Figure 4-3: STEP project map of the area surrounding Summerpride. The site is indicated by the yellow outline. Faunal Biodiversity It is very likely that given the dense vegetation along the drainage lines and the fact that the site is currently only informally utilised, that a number of species from various phyla pass through and/or utilise the site. For example, a number of surrounding landowners have informed us that buck are seen on site. These are likely to be either duiker or bush buck, which would most certainly represent the largest indigenous faunal species to occur on site. It is also highly likely, given the size of the site, that the larger fauna are represented in very small numbers. Due to the lack of fencing at certain points of the site, and the nature of the fencing where it does exist, it is believed that the fauna utilising the site can and currently do move onto surrounding land. Particularly to the

www.dedea.gov.za




north which is more rural in nature. No threatened faunal species are known to occur on site or in the immediate area. The site does not represent a unique habitat for any threatened species, however the development of the site will reduce habitat area, increasing pressure on remaining natural resources. Fish eagles are seen and heard, but are not likely to nest on site. Ecological State According to the National Spatial Biodiversity Assessment (2004), the ecosystem in which the site falls is considered ―least threatened‖. The ecological state of the grassland is poor, impacted, contaminated and will be invaded by aliens or Acacia karroo (bush encroachment) in the future. The ecological state of the site could be considered largely unmodified. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: BIOPHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT Climate The climate of the greater East London area is considered to be warm-temperate and moist with an average yearly rainfall of 921mm, peaking in both spring and autumn. At no time during the year could it be considered exceptionally dry. Thunder showers with high intensity, with the potential to cause serious erosion, occur during the summer months. Temperatures vary between 3OC and 42 OC, with an average daily minimum of 14OC and an average daily maximum of 23OC (South African Weather Service data for past 30 years – www.weathersa.co.za/climat/climstats). Geology

The site broadly falls within the Adelaide Subgroup (Beaufort Group, Karoo Supergroup), and comprises

mudrock and sandstones on the surface. On a broader scale dolerite intrusions occur mainly as sills, either

sloping east-west or west-south-west.

Geohydrology

It is possible that boreholes are utilised to the north of the site, given its rural nature, and extraction of water

from rivers may still occur for irrigation purposes. However, on site no water is extracted from either

www.dedea.gov.za




boreholes or rivers.

Hydrology

Generally the site slopes from the southern boundary to north eastern corner of the site. There are two

drainage lines on site that follow this general slope. There is a plateau on the south western portion of the

site and fairly steep slopes over the rest of the site.

The two drainage lines on site meet in the north eastern corner of the site. These drainage lines are non-

perrenial, and collect water from a fairly small catchment (an area only slightly beyond the boundaries of

the site). Hence they are not affected by 1:50 or 1:100 floodlines.

The water exiting the site, eventually makes it way downstream to the Nahoon River. Frequently, sewerage

manholes have been observed to be blocked, resulting in raw, untreated sewage flowing into the water

courses, polluting water in the catchment and downstream.

There are currently no dams on site.

Soils

Due to the fact that the site falls within the BCMM urban edge, an area targeted for urban development, it is

unlikely that the land will be utilised for agricultural purposes in future. In addition to this, the site has fairly

steep slopes and hence would not be suitable for cultivation purposes.

5. LAND USE CHARACTER OF SURROUNDING AREA

Indicate land uses and/or prominent features that currently occur within a 500m radius of the site and give description of how this influences the application or may be impacted upon by the application: 5.1 Natural area 5.2 Low density residential 5.3 Medium density residential 5.4 High density residential 5.5 Informal residential 5.6 Retail commercial & warehousing 5.7 Light industrial

www.dedea.gov.za




5.8 Medium industrial AN 5.9 Heavy industrial AN 5.10 Power station 5.11 Office/consulting room 5.12 Military or police base/station/compound 5.13 Spoil heap or slimes damA 5.14 Quarry, sand or borrow pit 5.15 Dam or reservoir 5.16 Hospital/medical centre 5.17 School 5.18 Tertiary education facility 5.19 Church 5.20 Old age home 5.21 Sewage treatment plantA 5.22 Train station or shunting yard N 5.23 Railway line N 5.24 Major road (4 lanes or more) N 5.25 Airport N 5.26 Harbour 5.27 Sport facilities 5.28 Golf course 5.29 Polo fields 5.30 Filling station H 5.31 Landfill or waste treatment site 5.32 Plantation 5.33 Agriculture 5.34 River, stream or wetland 5.35 Nature conservation area 5.36 Mountain, koppie or ridge 5.37 Museum 5.38 Historical building 5.39 Protected Area 5.40 Graveyard 5.41 Archaeological site 5.42 Other land uses (describe)

www.dedea.gov.za




If any of the boxes marked with an ―N ―are ticked, how will this impact / be impacted upon by the proposed activity. The Horseshoe train station, the railway line and the N2 will not be impacted by the proposed development. The development is separated from all these structures by Voortrekker Road. If any of the boxes marked with an "An" are ticked, how will this impact / be impacted upon by the proposed activity. If YES, specify and explain:

If YES, specify:

If any of the boxes marked with an "H" are ticked, how will this impact / be impacted upon by the proposed activity. If YES, specify and explain:

If YES, specify:

6. CULTURAL/HISTORICAL FEATURES

Are there any signs of culturally or historically significant elements, as defined in section 2 of the National Heritage Resources Act, 1999, (Act No. 25 of 1999), including

YES NO

Archaeological or paleontological sites, on or close (within 20m) to the site?

UNCERTAIN

If YES, explain:

If uncertain, conduct a specialist investigation by a recognised specialist in the field to establish whether there is such a feature(s) present on or close to the site.

www.dedea.gov.za




Briefly explain the findings of the specialist:

The specialist study conducted in the previous EIA (see Appendix D) found that there were no archaeological, cultural or historically sensitive sites in the area, although high vegetation cover did not lend itself to full disclosure of artefacts. It was stated that if any concentrations of archaeological material (and/or graves) are discovered during development construction, it should be reported immediately to the necessary authorities. Based on these findings it was recommended that the proposed development go ahead.

Will any building or structure older than 60 years be affected in any way? YES NO

Is it necessary to apply for a permit in terms of the National Heritage Resources Act, 1999 (Act 25 of 1999)?

YES NO

If yes, please submit or, make sure that the applicant or a specialist submits the necessary application to SAHRA or the relevant provincial heritage agency and attach proof thereof to this application if such application has been made.

www.dedea.gov.za




SECTION C: PUBLIC PARTICIPATION

1. ADVERTISEMENT The person conducting a public participation process must take into account any guidelines applicable to public participation as contemplated in section 24J of the Act and must give notice to all potential interested and affected parties of the application which is subjected to public participation by— (a) fixing a notice board (of a size at least 60cm by 42cm; and must display the required information

in lettering and in a format as may be determined by the competent authority) at a place conspicuous to the public at the boundary or on the fence of— (i) the site where the activity to which the application relates is or is to be undertaken; and

(ii) any alternative site mentioned in the application; (b) giving written notice to—

(i) the owner or person in control of that land if the applicant is not the owner or person in control of the land;

(ii) the occupiers of the site where the activity is or is to be undertaken or to any alternative site where the activity is to be undertaken;

(iii) owners and occupiers of land adjacent to the site where the activity is or is to be undertaken or to any alternative site where the activity is to be undertaken;

(iv) the municipal councillor of the ward in which the site or alternative site is situated and any organisation of ratepayers that represent the community in the area;

(v) the municipality which has jurisdiction in the area; (vi) any organ of state having jurisdiction in respect of any aspect of the activity; and (vii) any other party as required by the competent authority;

(c) placing an advertisement in— (i) one local newspaper; or

(ii) any official Gazette that is published specifically for the purpose of providing public notice of applications or other submissions made in terms of these Regulations;

(d) placing an advertisement in at least one provincial newspaper or national newspaper, if the activity has or may have an impact that extends beyond the boundaries of the metropolitan or local municipality in which it is or will be undertaken: Provided that this paragraph need not be complied with if an advertisement has been placed in an official Gazette referred to in subregulation 54(c)(ii); and

www.dedea.gov.za




(e) using reasonable alternative methods, as agreed to by the competent authority, in those instances where a person is desiring of but unable to participate in the process due to— (i) illiteracy; (ii) disability; or (iii) any other disadvantage.

2. CONTENT OF ADVERTISEMENTS AND NOTICES A notice board, advertisement or notices must:

(a) indicate the details of the application which is subjected to public participation; and (b) state—

(i) that the application has been submitted to the competent authority in terms of these Regulations, as the case may be; (ii) whether basic assessment or scoping procedures are beingapplied to the

application, in the case of an application for environmental authorisation;

(iii) the nature and location of the activity to which the application relates; (iv) where further information on the application or activity can be obtained; and (iv) the manner in which and the person to whom representations in respect of the application

may be made. 3. PLACEMENT OF ADVERTISEMENTS AND NOTICES Where the proposed activity may have impacts that extend beyond the municipal area where it is located, a notice must be placed in at least one provincial newspaper or national newspaper, indicating that an application will be submitted to the competent authority in terms of these regulations, the nature and location of the activity, where further information on the proposed activity can be obtained and the manner in which representations in respect of the application can be made, unless a notice has been placed in any Gazette that is published specifically for the purpose of providing notice to the public of applications made in terms of the EIA regulations. Advertisements and notices must make provision for all alternatives.

www.dedea.gov.za




Figure 3-1: A copy of the page on which an advertisement appeared on the 16 th of March 2015 in the Daily Dispatch.

www.dedea.gov.za




Figure 3-2: Map depicting the position of the sign on Voortrekker Road.

www.dedea.gov.za




Figure 3-3: Photos of the sign erected on Voortrekker Road.

4. DETERMINATION OF APPROPRIATE MEASURES The practitioner must ensure that the public participation is adequate and must determine whether a public meeting or any other additional measure is appropriate or not based on the particular nature of each case. Special attention should be given to the involvement of local community structures such as Ward Committees, ratepayers associations and traditional authorities where appropriate. Please note that public concerns that emerge at a later stage that should have been addressed may cause the competent authority to withdraw any authorisation it may have issued if it becomes apparent that the public participation process was inadequate. 5. COMMENTS AND RESPONSE REPORT The practitioner must record all comments and respond to each comment of the public before the application is submitted. The comments and responses must be captured in a comments and response report as prescribed in the EIA regulations and be attached to this application. The comments and response report must be attached under Appendix E.

www.dedea.gov.za




6. AUTHORITY PARTICIPATION Authorities are key interested and affected parties in each application and no decision on any application will be made before the relevant local authority is provided with the opportunity to give input. The planning and the environmental sections of the local authority must be informed of the application at least 30 (thirty) calendar days before the submission of the application.

www.dedea.gov.za




List of authorities informed: Name/Organisation Contact person Address Tel: Fax: cell e-mail

Authorities identified and notified via email

Department of Water & Sanitation Lizna Fourie [email protected]

Eastern Cape Provincial Heritage Resource Agency Sello Mokhanya [email protected]

Department of Agriculture, Forestry & Fisheries (DAFF) M Xolisiama [email protected]

BCMM Electricity Jean Smit (043) 705 9644 [email protected]

BCMM Engineering Water & Sanitation Jean Dove (043) 705 2883 [email protected]

BCMM Roads & Storm Water Melanie Matroos (043) 705 2401

[email protected]

Department of Economic Development, Environmental Affairs & Tourism (DEDEAT) Briant Noncembu

[email protected]

Ward Councillor - Ward 16 Councillor Monwabisi 49099 Msenge Street, Amalinda Frest, East London. 084 857 6287

Registered Mail has been sent to all surrounding landowners within 100 metres of the development (see attached registered proof).

Transnet Harold Kleber (043) 700 2402

[email protected]

Metro Rail Colin Bosch (043) 700 2030 [email protected]

IAPs registered through previous database

Surrounding Landowner Peter Tottle 28 Thornycroft Road (043) 745 2716 [email protected]

Arcus Gibb Sam Rheeder P O Box 19844, Tecoma, 5214 (043) 706 3600

(043) 706 3647 [email protected]

Surrounding Landowner Rowan Blundell 4 Arnold Rd Summerpride (043) 745 2146 (h) 083 559 0489

[email protected]

Surrounding Landowner Mr & Mrs Durrant 37 Thornycroft Road, Summerpride 082 255 6711 086 502 2095 082 530 3597

[email protected]

Surrounding Landowner Arlene & Wayne Hewitt 86 Thornycroft Road, Summerpride

(043) 745 1818 083 727 8225 [email protected]

Surrounding Landowner Mnikelo Samuel Mqingwana 22 Thornycroft Road , Summerpride.

(043) 7451497 082 378 9219 [email protected]

Surrounding Landowners Mark Gendell 8 Chase road Summerpride 0833093197 [email protected]

Surrounding Landowners I Jacobs 3 Cooper Cresent Summerpride

Surrounding Landowners Felicity Gower 7 Cooper Crescent Summerpride 0834527310 [email protected]

Surrounding Landowners Judy and Colin James 4 Chase Road Summerpride 0824302621/ 0832914505 [email protected]

Surrounding Landowners Lea Myburg and Karen Waheb 5 Cooper Crescent Summerpride 0826121941 [email protected]

Surrounding Landowners Pat Meisie 42 Beulah Road Summerpride 0734600005 / 043 7451632 [email protected]

Surrounding Landowners Jannie and Ronnie Cloete Beulah Road Summerpride 0824667365 [email protected]

mailto:[email protected]

















www.dedea.gov.za




Name/Organisation Contact person Address Tel: Fax: cell e-mail

Surrounding Landowners Garry Gravett Nahoon Mouth Summerpride 082 321 7917 [email protected]

Surrounding Landowners Dirk & Yvette Odendaal 13 Cooper Crescent

(043) 745 2744 082 670 1688

Surrounding Landowners S Gomba 23 Cooper Crescent 082 3270154

Surrounding Landowners Yuyelwa Nomwembu 48 Beulah Road (043) 705 2000 083 665 8821 [email protected]

Surrounding Landowners Lyn Myburg & Karen Waheb 5 Cooper Crescent 082 612 1941 [email protected]

Surrounding Landowners Tammy Hobler 14 Cooper Crescent 084 581 9534

Surrounding Landowners F & Remamt 70 Thornycroft Road (043) 730 7300 [email protected]

Surrounding Landowners Belinda Ross Hope Farm 079 367 7151 [email protected]

Surrounding Landowners Jacques Jordaan Farm Santa Paloma, Thornycroft Road 083 659 98939 [email protected]

Surrounding Landowners JHC Jordaan Farm Santa Paloma, Thornycroft Road 082 222 1642

Surrounding Landowners Ruan Jordaan 101 Thornycroft Road 084 506 7834 [email protected]

Surrounding Landowners Nadia Jordaan 101 Thornycroft Road 078 602 9229

Surrounding Landowners Michael Bauer 34 Thompson Road (043) 700 3110

[email protected]

Surrounding Landowner Tracey Heightman Thornycroft Road

Surrounding Landowner Charle & Anton Pretorius PO Box 12116 Amalinda

(043) 745 0325

(043) 745 0378 [email protected]

Surrounding Landowner Jan Kriel 101A Thornycroft Road (043) 721 2866 [email protected]

Surrounding Landowner Andrew Crisp 38 Thornycroft Road 084 489 8009 [email protected]

Surrounding Landowner Sonika & Tertius Van Zyl 18 Thornycroft Road

083 651 7561/086 670 0726 [email protected]


www.dedea.gov.za




List of authorities from whom comments have been received:

Currently none have been received.

7. CONSULTATION WITH OTHER STAKEHOLDERS

Note that, for linear activities, or where deviation from the public participation requirements may be appropriate, the

person conducting the public participation process may deviate from the requirements of that subregulation to the

extent and in the manner as may be agreed to by the competent authority.

Any stakeholder that has a direct interest in the site or property, such as servitude holders and service providers, should be informed of the application at least 30 (thirty) calendar days before the submission of the application and be provided with the opportunity to comment.

Has any comment been received from stakeholders? YES NO

If ―YES‖, briefly describe the feedback below (also attach copies of any correspondence to and from the stakeholders to this application):

Feedback has been received from six (6) stakeholders thus far. The issues raised include: 1. Increased traffic on Voortrekker Road, stating that the road will not be able to handle

the extra load. 2. The increased load of sewage would also not be handled well by the current

infrastructure. 3. It is believed that the development would ruin the aesthetics of the area, disturb

wildlife, increase robbery and theft and decrease the property value of the area as a whole.

www.dedea.gov.za




SECTION D: IMPACT ASSESSMENT

The assessment of impacts must adhere to the minimum requirements in the EIA Regulations, 2010, and should take

applicable official guidelines into account. The issues raised by interested and affected parties should also be

addressed in the assessment of impacts.

1. ISSUES RAISED BY INTERESTED AND AFFECTED PARTIES

List the main issues raised by interested and affected parties.

Feedback has been received from six (6) stakeholders thus far. The issues raised include: 1. Increased traffic on Voortrekker Road, stating that the road will not be able to handle

the extra load. 2. The increased load of sewage would also not be handled well by the current

infrastructure. 3. It is believed that the development would ruin the aesthetics of the area, disturb

wildlife, increase robbery and theft and decrease the property value of the area as a whole.

Response from the practitioner to the issues raised by the interested and affected parties (A full response must be given in the Comments and Response Report that must be attached to this report): Please see Appendix E.

2.IMPACTS THAT MAY RESULT FROM THE PLANNING AND DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION, OPERATIONAL, DECOMMISSIONING AND CLOSURE PHASES AS WELL AS PROPOSED MANAGEMENT OF IDENTIFIED IMPACTS AND PROPOSED MITIGATION MEASURES

List the potential direct, indirect and cumulative property/activity/design/technology/operational alternative related impacts (as appropriate) that are likely to occur as a result of the planning and design phase, construction phase, operational phase, decommissioning and closure phase, including impacts relating to the choice of site/activity/technology alternatives as well as the mitigation measures that may eliminate or reduce the potential impacts listed.

www.dedea.gov.za




PLEASE NOTE THAT THE FULL ASSESSMENT OF IMPACTS IS ATTACHED IN APPENDIX G

Table 1: Impacts associated with the planning and design phase of the development, and their

mitigation measures

Activity Impact summary Significance Proposed mitigation

PLANNING AND DESIGN PHASE

Alternative 1 (preferred layout alternative) Policy compliance During the planning and design

phase the lack of policy and legislation compliance such as conditions of the EA and EMPr, National Forestry Act, National Water Act and BCM Environmental Policy, may lead to inappropriate environmental development layout and damage the riparian environment in particular.

HIGH Once the EA has been received, the conditions must be incorporated into all project phases, including planning and design, construction and operation. Other legal conditions of

relevant policy and

legislation (e.g. National

Forestry Act, National Water

Act and BCM Environmental

Policy) must be compiled

and adhered to.

Technology employed During the planning and design phase, failure to consider technologies that reduce consumption of natural resources (particularly water and electricity) will result in lost opportunity to conserve resources.

HIGH Water: Rainwater tanks should be considered in the design and planning phase. Tanks will reduce the runoff created by the housing footprint and reduce municipal water usage. Water piping material and infrastructure must comply with SABA to insure as far as possible pipeline failures and future indirect impacts resulting from burst pipes do not result in water loss.

www.dedea.gov.za




Energy: Insulation of houses and use of solar water heaters should be considered. Use of alternative renewable energy sources such as wind or solar power (PV) should be considered in the design and layout. However, if renewable energy technology is not implemented initially, provisions should be made in design to allow for easier post-construction retrofitting.

Stormwater management

During the planning and design phase, the inappropriate routing and management of stormwater may lead to the loss of riparian vegetation, soil erosion and stream sedimentation.

HIGH A flood attenuation and

stormwater management

plan must be drawn up by a

qualified engineer and

submitted to DWS and

DAFF for comment and

approval.

The stormwater

management plan must

include stormwater

attenuation berms that are

situated 32 m away from the

watercourse. These berms

should be able to hold a

1:100 year flood to be

released as a 1:5 year flood.

During the planning and design phase the inclusion of large areas of impermeable surfaces (e.g. roofs, building paving,

HIGH As above. Impermeable surfaces should be minimised as

www.dedea.gov.za




internal roads and parking) will increase the risk of run-off and flooding downstream.

much as possible through permeable surface technology, such as grassed gardens and verges, permeable paving and internal roads, etc.

Socio-economic During the planning and design phase inappropriate architectural design may lead to visual and aesthetic impacts.

HIGH The architectural design should be as unobtrusive as possible in terms of colour and building material used. An architectural code could include use of natural/earth tone colours for the walls and a suitable blending colour (such as grey) is used for the roof. Vegetation could be planted to mitigate visual impacts

The establishment of the proposed mixed-used development and densification of the area could lead to a decline in the value of surrounding properties.

UNKNOWN No mitigation provided

The establishment of the proposed mixed-used development could lead to economic upliftment of the area

MODERATE POSITIVE

No mitigation provided

The establishment of the proposed mixed-used development will contribute to urban infill development, preventing urban sprawl into more sensitive areas

HIGH POSITIVE No mitigation provided

Stream crossing During the planning and design phase the inappropriate design of a bridge across the

HIGH The planning and design of the stream crossing must take into account bank

www.dedea.gov.za




watercourse could lead to soil erosion and sedimentation of the watercourse.

restoration, re-vegetation and stabilization.

Traffic and transport During the planning and design phase, inappropriate access road design (the addition of two traffic circles) could lead to traffic congestion.

MODERATE The recommendation of the Traffic Impact Assessment covering the construction of a traffic circle at the main access point between Voortrekker Road and Arnold Road should be adhered to.

During the planning and design phase, inappropriate routing of internal roads through or close to watercourses could lead to unnecessary impacts on riparian vegetation

MODERATE All internal roads must not affect any of the watercourses. There could be two access points to the development from Thornycroft Road and one access point from Beulah Road (providing access to houses situated on the eastern side of the development) in order to avoid constructing an internal road across the watercourse.

Increased traffic as a result of the proposed mixed-use development will contribute to further degradation of the municipal roads and increased air pollution in the area

MODERATE No mitigation provided

Waste Management During the planning and design phase, inappropriate provisions for solid waste storage and disposal services may lead to litter, pollution and general nuisances and health hazards.

MODERATE Provisions must be made for

temporary storage of

domestic waste, prior to

municipal pick-up and

disposal.

A waste management plan incorporating recycling and

www.dedea.gov.za




waste minimisation must be developed and implemented for the construction and operational phases. The waste facility must be enclosed to avoid the spread of foul odours and to ensure that the spread of pests (flies) and vermin (rats and monkeys) are deterred.

Sanitation During the design phase the effluent generated may exceed the capacity that Buffalo City Municipality can accommodate in terms of its infrastructure capacity limitations

HIGH A letter from the Buffalo City Municipality must be obtained confirming that they will be able to accommodate the proposed levels of sewage that the mixed-use development will generate.

Biodiversity During the planning and design phase, inappropriate layout may cause development to enter into sensitive areas, affecting the watercourses and riparian vegetation

MODERATE The development layout must ensure that all development is located outside the riparian vegetation and watercourse. As per the previous EA, indigenous vegetation that occurs on drainage lines must not be harmed and a ten metre (10 m) buffer zone must be maintained from the forest vegetation.

Alternative 2 (layout option 2)

As above

Biodiversity and erosion

During the planning and design phase, locating buildings close to the watercourse will lead to stripping and clearing of riparian vegetation along the banks of the watercourse. This

VERY HIGH No mitigation will reduce the impacts except for limiting construction within or close to the watercourse. As per the previous EA, indigenous vegetation that

www.dedea.gov.za




will lead to soil erosion and sedimentation of the watercourse. It would also result in the loss of an intact, but degraded, riparian ecosystem, which is important for stream health.

occurs on drainage lines must not be harmed and a ten metres (10 m) buffer zone must be maintained from the forest vegetation.

Table 2: Impacts associated with the construction phase of the development, and their mitigation measures


Alternative 1 (preferred layout alternative)

CONSTRUCTION PHASE

Biological impacts due to clearing and construction onsite

During the construction phase unplanned clearing and removal of potential plant species of special concern will decrease the level of intact biodiversity in the area

MODERATE Prior to the commencement of construction, a permit must be obtained to remove and transplant protected plant and tree species. Prior to construction all sensitive areas must be demarcated and signs erected to ensure these areas are maintained. This must be done with the assistance of the ECO. As per the previous EA, indigenous vegetation that occurs on drainage lines must not be harmed and a ten metre (10 m) buffer zone must be maintained from the forest vegetation.

During the construction phase unplanned and unnecessary disturbance of vegetated areas by the contractor may occur, resulting in loss of biodiversity.

HIGH The construction footprint must be surveyed and demarcated prior to construction. The surveyed construction

www.dedea.gov.za




footprint must be approved by an ECO to ensure that vegetation is not unnecessarily damaged.

During the construction phase land disturbance can lead to increased spreading of noxious weeds, and invasive alien plants

MODERATE Alien plants must be removed from the site through appropriate methods e.g. hand pulling, chemical, cutting, etc., and under the supervision of the ECO. After construction, exposed areas must be rehabilitated with indigenous vegetation. Post-construction monitoring of rehabilitation must be implemented.

During the construction phase there is the potential risk of poaching of indigenous wild animals by staff employed by the contractor

MODERATE All staff employed during construction must undergo environmental induction training. No construction workers should reside onsite.

During construction there is the potential risk of littering on and around the site by the contractor, which can become unsightly and in some cases lead to health risks.

MODERATE Construction personnel must be educated in appropriate waste management practices. Collected waste must be categorised as ―hazardous‖, ―general waste‖ and ―construction rubble‖. Separate, distinguishable containers should be provided for different waste categories. Litter and construction waste must be removed

During the construction phase inappropriate accumulation and disposal of building waste and rubble could result in environmental pollution of surface and ground water sources

MODERATE

www.dedea.gov.za




on a regular basis and disposed of in an approved registered landfill. Potentially hazardous materials must be handled and stored onsite in secure containers and disposed of at an appropriately permitted hazardous waste disposal site through appointment of a reputable hazardous waste disposal company. The Contractor should maintain a register of the hazardous materials and should document the use, storage, final destination and method of disposal.

Policy compliance During the construction phase the failure of the contractor to implement mitigation measures can result in non-compliance with the EA and EMPr.

MODERATE The developer must employ an independent Environmental Control Officer (ECO) for the construction phase to ensure that construction is implemented according to specifications in the EA and EMPr.

Erosion During the construction phase soil exposure due to clearing of land may result in erosion, which in turn may cause sedimentation of the watercourses

MODERATE Wind screening and stormwater control should be undertaken to prevent soil erosion. All erosion control mechanisms must be regularly maintained. Vegetation must be retained

www.dedea.gov.za




where possible to avoid soil erosion. Construction must be phased in order to minimise the area of exposed soil at any one time. Re-vegetation of disturbed surfaces should occur immediately after the construction activities are completed with indigenous vegetation.

Stream crossing During the construction phase the building of a bridge across the watercourse could lead to soil erosion and sedimentation of the watercourse.

HIGH The construction of the bridge must take place in the shortest possible time period and during the low rainfall season. Bank restoration, re-vegetation and stabilisation must be implemented once construction is complete and must include the use of gabions for bank stablisation.

Sanitation During the construction phase the lack of appropriate sanitation facilities for construction workers could lead to the contamination of ground and ground water

MODERATE Adequate sanitary and ablutions facilities must be provided for construction workers The facilities must be regularly serviced to reduce the risk of surface or groundwater pollution. Portable toilets must not be located within 50 metres of any watercourse.

Inappropriate storage of building equipment and hazardous materials

During the construction phase inappropriate storage and disposal of building material may pollute the soil and ground

MODERATE The storage of potentially hazardous material must be controlled to reduce the risk of environmental

www.dedea.gov.za




water

contamination. Drip trays must be placed under all machinery to avoid soil contamination. All vehicles and machinery must be regularly maintained and in good working order to reduce the risk of contamination of soil and ground water. All areas that have been contaminated during the construction phase must be rehabilitated.

Concrete batching During the construction phase inappropriate cement mixing techniques can lead to ground and ground water pollution

MODERATE Cement and concrete must not be mixed directly on the ground, or during rainfall events when the potential for transport of pollutants to watercourses is the greatest. Cement and concrete must only be mixed in the area demarcated for this purpose and on an impermeable substratum. All construction water and contaminated runoff must be directed away from the drainage line.

Disposal of construction material

During the construction phase there is the potential for the inappropriate disposal of construction material off-site and subsequently polluting the environment

MODERATE Construction material must be removed to an approved, licenced off-site disposal site by the appointment of a reputable waste services provider.

Noise pollution During the construction phase activities onsite can produce noise that can become a nuisance to surrounding

HIGH Construction activities, which include the movement of construction vehicles and the operation of machinery,

www.dedea.gov.za




residents must be restricted to normal working hours (07:00am – 17:00pm).

Fires onsite could pose a threat to adjacent land users

During the construction phase fires started at construction camps could result in uncontrolled fires, posing a threat to wild animals, indigenous vegetation and the surrounding landowners.

HIGH Fires must be prohibited onsite. Any source of fire hazards must be removed. The construction personnel must be educated regarding fire and fire management. Fire extinguishers must be available onsite. In order to reduce the risk of fires:

All flammable substances must be stored in dry areas which do not pose an ignition risk to the said substances.

Smoking must not be permitted near flammable substances.

All cooking must be done in demarcated areas that are safe in terms of runaway or uncontrolled fires.

The contractor must have operational fire-fighting equipment available on site at all times.

Dust (air) pollution caused by grading and levelling exposed land

During the construction phase the clearing, grading and levelling of land may generate dust

MODERATE Vegetation should only be stripped as construction progresses. The time that stripped areas are exposed should be minimised wherever possible.

www.dedea.gov.za




The sites must be re-vegetated as soon as possible during the construction phase, and indigenous trees, shrubbery and grass species must be retained wherever possible, for this purpose. Exposed soils must be dampened whenever possible and especially in dry and windy conditions to avoid excessive dust generation. Any soil excavated and not utilised for rehabilitation must be removed from site or incorporated into landscaping.

Socio-economic During the construction phase there may be temporary job-creation

MODERATE POSITIVE

No mitigation provided

During the construction phase construction activities could lead to temporary market devaluation of surrounding properties

UNKNOWN No mitigation provided

During the construction phase increased number of labourers could lead to an increase in security risks in the community.

HIGH Access control to the site must ensure no unauthorised person shall enter. The site must be secured in order to reduce the opportunity for the criminal activity in the locality of the construction site.

During the construction phase an increase in the use of roads by heavy vehicles will lead to

MODERATE No mitigation provided

www.dedea.gov.za




road degradation. Alternative 2 (layout option 2)

As above Biodiversity and erosion During the construction phase,

building activities close to the watercourse will lead to stripping and clearing of riparian vegetation along the banks of the watercourse, this will lead to soil erosion and sedimentation of the watercourse. It would also result in the loss of an intact, but degraded, riparian ecosystem, which is important for downstream health.

VERY HIGH No mitigation will reduce the impacts except for limiting construction within or close to the watercourse. As per the previous EA, indigenous vegetation that occurs on drainage lines must not be harmed and a ten metres (10 m) buffer zone must be maintained from the forest vegetation.

Table 3: Impacts associated with the operational phase of the development, and their mitigation measures


OPERATIONAL PHASE

Alternative 1 & 2

Socio-economic During the operational phase non-compliance with an approved architectural code and controls could result in visual and aesthetic impacts for the surrounding residents

HIGH Vegetation could be planted to mitigate visual impacts and residents should be encouraged to plant indigenous trees.

During the operational phase there may be increased employment opportunities and stimulation of the local economy

MODERATE POSITIVE

No mitigation provided.

During the operational phase the increase in road usage may further degrade the public road

HIGH The effectiveness of traffic control measures must be monitored on an on-going basis and appropriate

www.dedea.gov.za




remediation steps implemented if necessary.

During the operational phase the lack of maintenance and general general noise can lead to market devaluation of the surrounding properties

UNKNOWN Controls stipulated in Homeowners Association Agreement dealing with noise, maintenance etc. must be adhered to.

During the operational phase there may be potential long-term increases of neighbouring land value

UNKNOWN No mitigation provided.

Technology employed During the operational phase increased water and energy consumption may lead to a loss in natural resources such as water and energy

HIGH Measures must be taken to reduce the consumption of natural resources. These measures should include, but not be limited to, the installation of rainwater tanks to reduce stormwater runoff and the pressure on the municipal water supply, as well as alternative renewable energy sources such as wind or solar (PV) power.

Waste management During the operational phase inappropriate waste storage and disposal practices may lead to litter, pollution and general nuisances and health hazards

MODERATE During the operational phase the Home Owners Association (HOA) should monitor the area for temporary storage of domestic waste, prior to municipal pick-up and disposal. The HOA must ensure that the area is contained in a bunded area to avoid leachate contamination.

Biological impacts During the operational phase the inappropriate disturbance of land may increase spreading

MODERATE An independent ECO must inspect the site during the first 6 months of the

www.dedea.gov.za




of noxious weeds, invasive and alien plants in the development open space area and surrounds

operational phase to assess the level of rehabilitation and address accordingly. There should be on-going alien plant removal from the site. Residents should be encouraged to plant indigenous garden plants


During the operational phase the failure of stormwater management measures may result in soil erosion and stream sedimentation

VERY HIGH The effectiveness of the flood attenuation and stormwater management measures must be monitored by the body corporate. The effectiveness of attenuation berms that are situated 32 m above the watercourse must be monitored. If the stormwater management measures put in place are deemed insufficient, alternative measures should be drawn up by a qualified engineer and approved by DEDEAT and DWS before being implemented.

Table 4: Impacts associated with the NO-GO phase of the development, and their mitigation measures


NO-GO OPTION

Site Degradation Degradation and misuse of site MODERATE Develop the site with an appropriate land-use activity

All negative activities from the MODERATE No mitigation provided.

www.dedea.gov.za




proposed development will be avoided

POSITIVE

Infrastructure Continued poor water pressure problems in the area

MODERATE No mitigation provided.

Visual and Aesthetics The visual impact will remain the same.

MODERATE POSITIVE

No mitigation provided.

Socio-Economic Construction job losses MODERATE No mitigation provided.

Biological Continued contamination of soil and ground water as well as stream due to overflowing sewerage manholes

HIGH No mitigation provided.

Security Increased security risks due to vagrancy

MODERATE No mitigation provided.

www.dedea.gov.za




3. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT

Taking the assessment of potential impacts into account, please provide an environmental impact statement that summarises the impact that the proposed activity and its alternatives may have on the environment after the management and mitigation of impacts have been taken into account, with specific reference to types of impact, duration of impacts, likelihood of potential impacts actually occurring and the significance of impacts.

PLEASE NOTE THAT THE FULL ASSESSMENT OF IMPACTS IS ATTACHED IN APPENDIX G

Alternative A (preferred alternative)

SUMMARY OF THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT Moneyline 1082 CC is proposing a mixed-use residential development that will include high density residential departments and a business centre. The development (17.89 Ha) will lie between the existing suburbs of Summerpride and Dawn, north of the N2 from King Williams Town to East London, adjacent to Voortrekker Road, and north of a main railway line. This area is the Remainder of Erf 271, East London, Buffalo City Metropolitan Municipality in the Eastern Cape Province. CONSIDERATION OF ALTERNATIVES Two alternative layouts for the proposed development were assessed. The preferred layout differs on slightly from the Alternative 2 in that the apartments along the eastern border are restricted to the higher lying ridge along the border. The environmental difference however is significant. Alternative layout 2 placed some of the apartment block in very close proximity to the water course and associated riparian vegetation, which is considered to be a sensitive area. The preferred layout avoids these areas and therefore the associated impacts are prevented. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT IMPACTS (all impacts that are High pre-mitigation) (SEE APPENDIX G for unabridged IMPACT STATEMENT) The proposed development will result in a number of impacts, both positive and negative, during the Planning and Design, Construction and Operation Phases (see table below). The phase with the highest number of impacts is the construction phase. The following table provides a summary of the pre-mitigation impacts that were ranked as HIGH or VERY HIGH. For the detailed environmental impact statement, please refer to the Appendix G.

www.dedea.gov.za




PLANNING & DESIGN PHASE

Impacts Significance

pre-mitigation

Significance post-

mitigation

Alternative 1 (Preferred layout alternative)

POLICY COMPLIANCE

During the planning and design phase the lack of

policy and legislation compliance such as conditions

of the EA and EMPr, National Forestry Act, National

Water Act and BCM Environmental Policy, may lead

to inappropriate environmental development layout

and damage the riparian environment in particular.

HIGH MODERATE

TECHNOLOGY EMPLOYED

During the planning and design phase, failure to

consider technologies that reduce consumption of

natural resources (particularly water and electricity)

will result in lost opportunity to conserve resources.

HIGH LOW

STORMWATER MANAGEMENT

During the planning and design phase, the

inappropriate routing and management of

stormwater may lead to the loss of riparian

vegetation, soil erosion and stream sedimentation.

HIGH MODERATE

During the planning and design phase the inclusion

of large areas of impermeable surfaces (e.g. roofs,

building paving, internal roads and parking) will

increase the risk of run-off and flooding downstream.

HIGH LOW

SOCIO-ECONOMIC

During the planning and design phase inappropriate

architectural design may lead to visual and aesthetic

HIGH MODERATE

www.dedea.gov.za




impacts.

The establishment of the proposed mixed-used

development will contribute to urban infill

development, preventing urban sprawl into more

sensitive areas

HIGH

POSITIVE

HIGH POSITIVE

STREAM CROSSING

During the planning and design phase the

inappropriate design of a bridge across the

watercourse could lead to soil erosion and

sedimentation of the watercourse.

HIGH MODERATE

TRAFFIC and TRANSPORT

During the design phase the effluent generated may

exceed the capacity that Buffalo City Municipality

can accommodate in terms of its infrastructure

capacity limitations

HIGH MODERATE


As above

BIODIVERSITY AND EROSION

During the planning and design phase, locating

buildings close to the watercourse will lead to

stripping and clearing of riparian vegetation along

the banks of the watercourse. This will lead to soil

erosion and sedimentation of the watercourse. It

would also result in the loss of an intact, but

degraded, riparian ecosystem, which is important

for stream health.

VERY HIGH HIGH

www.dedea.gov.za




CONSTRUCTION PHASE


pre-mitigation

Significance post-

mitigation


BIOLOGICAL IMPACTS DUE TO CLEARING AND CONSTRUCTION

During the construction phase unplanned and

unnecessary disturbance of vegetated areas by the

contractor may occur, resulting in loss of biodiversity.

HIGH MODERATE

STREAM CROSSING

During the construction phase the building of a

bridge across the watercourse could lead to soil

erosion and sedimentation of the watercourse.

HIGH MODERATE

NOISE POLLUTION

During the construction phase activities onsite can

produce noise that can become a nuisance to

surrounding residents

HIGH LOW

FIRES ONSITE

During the construction phase fires started at

construction camps could result in uncontrolled fires,

posing a threat to wild animals, indigenous

vegetation and the surrounding landowners.

HIGH LOW

SOCIO-ECONOMIC

During the construction phase increased number of

labourers could lead to an increase in security risks

in the community.

HIGH MODERATE

www.dedea.gov.za





As above

BIODIVERSITY AND EROSION

During the construction phase, building activities

close to the watercourse will lead to stripping and

clearing of riparian vegetation along the banks of the

watercourse, this will lead to soil erosion and

sedimentation of the watercourse. It would also

result in the loss of an intact, but degraded, riparian

ecosystem, which is important for downstream

health.

VERY HIGH HIGH

OPERATIONAL PHASE


pre-mitigation

Significance post-

mitigation


SOCIO-ECONOMIC

During the operational phase non-compliance with

an approved architectural code and controls could

result in visual and aesthetic impacts for the

surrounding residents

HIGH MODERATE

During the operational phase the increase in road

usage may further degrade the public road

HIGH MODERATE

TECHNOLOGY EMPLOYED

During the operational phase increased water and

energy consumption may lead to a loss in natural

HIGH MODERATE

www.dedea.gov.za




resources such as water and energy


During the operational phase the failure of

stormwater management measures may result in soil

erosion and stream sedimentation

VERY HIGH MODERATE

SUMMARY OF IMPACT ASSESSMENT SIGNIFICANCE, PRE- AND POST-MITIGATION

PRE-MITIGATION POST-MITIGATION

LOW MODERATE HIGH VERY

HIGH LOW MODERATE HIGH

VERY

HIGH

Planning and

Design 0 5(+1) 7(+1) 0 6 6(+1) (+1) 0

Construction 0 13(+1) 5 0 14 4(+1) 0 0

Operation 0 2(+1) 3 1 2 4(+1) 0 0

TOTAL 0 20(+3) 15(+1) 1 22 14(+1) (+1) 0

Most of the impacts identified are associated with the construction phase. In terms of the environmental assessment, no significant impacts were identified that could not be adequately mitigated. OPINION OF THE EAP EOH Coastal and Environmental Services (the EAP) hereby provides the following opinion concerning the proposed Summerpride Mixed-Use Development: It is the opinion of EOH Coastal and Environmental Service that NO FATAL FLAWS are associated with the proposed Summerpride Mixed-Use Development and that the impacts can be adequately mitigated to reduce the risk or significance of impacts to an acceptable level. It is also the opinion of EOH-CES that this Basic Assessment Report contains sufficient information to allow DEDEAT to make an informed decision. EOH-CES therefore recommends that the application for Authorisation should be approved on condition that the recommended mitigation measures

www.dedea.gov.za




stated herein are effectively implemented. MITIGATION MEASURES – See section E below.

Alternative B

N/A

Alternative C

N/A

No-go alternative (compulsory)

NO-GO


pre-mitigation

Significance post-

mitigation

Continued contamination of soil and ground water as well

as stream due to overflowing sewage manholes. HIGH HIGH

www.dedea.gov.za




SECTION E. RECOMMENDATIONS OF PRACTITIONER

Is the information contained in this report and the documentation attached hereto

sufficient to make a decision in respect of the activity applied for (in the view of the

environmental assessment practitioner)?

YES NO

Is an EMPr attached? YES NO

The EMPr must be attached as Appendix F.

If ―NO‖, indicate the aspects that should be assessed further as part of a Scoping and EIA process before a

decision can be made (list the aspects that require further assessment):

If ―YES‖, please list any recommended conditions, including mitigation measures that should be considered for inclusion in any authorisation that may be granted by the competent authority in respect of the application:

www.dedea.gov.za




Recommendations to be considered in the planning and design phase

It is recommended that all mitigation measures provided in should be a condition of any approval from DEDEAT. In addition, a Construction and Operational Environmental Management Programme needs to be compiled. Recommendations to be considered in the planning and design phase POLICY COMPLIANCE

Once the EA has been received, the conditions must be incorporated into all project phases, including planning and design, construction and operation.

Other legal conditions of relevant policy and legislation (e.g. National Forestry Act, National Water

Act and BCM Environmental Policy) must be compiled and adhered to.

TECHNOLOGY EMPLOYED Water:

Rainwater tanks should be considered in the design and planning phase. Tanks will reduce the runoff created by the housing footprint and reduce municipal water usage.

Water piping material and infrastructure must comply with SABA to insure as far as possible pipeline failures and future indirect impacts resulting from burst pipes do not result in water loss.

Energy:

Insulation of houses and use of solar water heaters should be considered.

Use of alternative renewable energy sources such as wind or solar power (PV) should be

considered in the design and layout. However, if renewable energy technology is not implemented

initially, provisions should be made in design to allow for easier post-construction retrofitting.


A flood attenuation and stormwater management plan must be drawn up by a qualified engineer

and submitted to DWS and DAFF for comment and approval.

The stormwater management plan must include stormwater attenuation berms that are situated 32

m away from the watercourse. These berms should be able to hold a 1:100 year flood to be

released as a 1:5 year flood.

Impermeable surfaces should be minimised as much as possible through permeable surface

technology, such as grassed gardens and verges, permeable paving and internal roads, etc.

SOCIO-ECONOMIC

The architectural design should be as unobtrusive as possible in terms of colour and building

www.dedea.gov.za




material used.

An architectural code could include use of natural/earth tone colours for the walls and a suitable blending colour (such as grey) is used for the roof.

Vegetation could be planted to mitigate visual impacts

STREAM CROSSING

The planning and design of the stream crossing must take into account bank restoration, re-

vegetation and stabilization.

TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORT

The recommendation of the Traffic Impact Assessment covering the construction of a traffic circle

at the main access point between Voortrekker Road and Arnold Road should be adhered to.

All internal roads must not affect any of the watercourses.

There could be two access points to the development from Thornycroft Road and one access point

from Beulah Road (providing access to houses situated on the eastern side of the development) in

order to avoid constructing an internal road across the watercourse.

WASTE MANAGEMENT

Provisions must be made for temporary storage of domestic waste, prior to municipal pick-up and disposal.

A waste management plan incorporating recycling and waste minimisation must be developed and implemented for the construction and operational phases.

The waste facility must be enclosed to avoid the spread of foul odours and to ensure that the spread of pests (flies) and vermin (rats and monkeys) are deterred.

SANITATION

A letter from the Buffalo City Metropolitan Municipality must be obtained confirming that they will be able to accommodate the proposed levels of sewage that the mixed-use development will generate.

BIODIVERSITY

The development layout must ensure that all development is located outside the riparian vegetation and watercourse.

As per the previous EA, indigenous vegetation that occurs on drainage lines must not be harmed and a ten metre (10 m) buffer zone must be maintained from the forest vegetation.

Recommendations to be considered in the construction phase

BIOLOGICAL IMPACTS

Prior to the commencement of construction, a permit must be obtained to remove and transplant

www.dedea.gov.za




protected plant and tree species.

Prior to construction all sensitive areas must be demarcated and signs erected to ensure these areas are maintained. This must be done with the assistance of the ECO.


The construction footprint must be surveyed and demarcated prior to construction.

The surveyed construction footprint must be approved by an ECO to ensure that vegetation is not unnecessarily damaged.

Alien plants must be removed from the site through appropriate methods e.g. hand pulling, chemical, cutting, etc., and under the supervision of the ECO.

After construction, exposed areas must be rehabilitated with indigenous vegetation.

Post-construction monitoring of rehabilitation must be implemented.

All staff employed during construction must undergo environmental induction training.

No construction workers should reside onsite.

Construction personnel must be educated in appropriate waste management practices.

Collected waste must be categorised as ―hazardous‖, ―general waste‖ and ―construction rubble‖. Separate, distinguishable containers should be provided for different waste categories.

Litter and construction waste must be removed on a regular basis and disposed of in an approved registered landfill.

Potentially hazardous materials must be handled and stored onsite in secure containers and disposed of at an appropriately permitted hazardous waste disposal site through appointment of a reputable hazardous waste disposal company.

The Contractor should maintain a register of the hazardous materials and should document the use, storage, final destination and method of disposal.

POLICY COMPLIANCE

The developer must employ an independent Environmental Control Officer (ECO) for the construction phase to ensure that construction is implemented according to specifications in the EA and EMPr.

EROSION

Wind screening and stormwater control should be undertaken to prevent soil erosion.

All erosion control mechanisms must be regularly maintained.

Vegetation must be retained where possible to avoid soil erosion.

Construction must be phased in order to minimise the area of exposed soil at any one time.

Re-vegetation of disturbed surfaces should occur immediately after the construction activities are completed with indigenous vegetation.

STREAM CROSSING

The construction of the bridge must take place in the shortest possible time period and during the low rainfall season.

www.dedea.gov.za




Bank restoration, re-vegetation and stabilisation must be implemented once construction is complete and must include the use of gabions for bank stablisation.

SANITATION

Adequate sanitary and ablutions facilities must be provided for construction workers

The facilities must be regularly serviced to reduce the risk of surface or groundwater pollution.

Portable toilets must not be located within 50 metres of any watercourse. STORAGE OF EQUIPMENT AND HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES

The storage of potentially hazardous material must be controlled to reduce the risk of environmental contamination.

Drip trays must be placed under all machinery to avoid soil contamination.

All vehicles and machinery must be regularly maintained and in good working order to reduce the risk of contamination of soil and ground water.

All areas that have been contaminated during the construction phase must be rehabilitated. CONCRETE BATCHING

Cement and concrete must not be mixed directly on the ground, or during rainfall events when the potential for transport of pollutants to watercourses is the greatest. Cement and concrete must only be mixed in the area demarcated for this purpose and on an impermeable substratum.

All construction water and contaminated runoff must be directed away from the drainage line. DISPOSAL OF CONSTRUCTION MATERIAL

Construction material must be removed to an approved, licenced off-site disposal site by the appointment of a reputable waste services provider.

NOISE POLLUTION

Construction activities, which include the movement of construction vehicles and the operation of machinery, must be restricted to normal working hours (07:00am – 17:00pm).

FIRES ONSITE

Fires must be prohibited onsite.

Any source of fire hazards must be removed.

The construction personnel must be educated regarding fire and fire management.

Fire extinguishers must be available onsite.

In order to reduce the risk of fires: o All flammable substances must be stored in dry areas which do not pose an ignition risk to

the said substances. o Smoking must not be permitted near flammable substances. o All cooking must be done in demarcated areas that are safe in terms of runaway or

uncontrolled fires.


www.dedea.gov.za




DUST CONTROL

Vegetation should only be stripped as construction progresses. The time that stripped areas are exposed should be minimised wherever possible.

The sites must be re-vegetated as soon as possible during the construction phase, and indigenous trees, shrubbery and grass species must be retained wherever possible, for this purpose.

Exposed soils must be dampened whenever possible and especially in dry and windy conditions to avoid excessive dust generation.

Any soil excavated and not utilised for rehabilitation must be removed from site or incorporated into landscaping.

SOCIO-ECONOMIC

Access control to the site must ensure no unauthorised person shall enter.

The site must be secured in order to reduce the opportunity for the criminal activity in the locality of the construction site.

Recommendations to be considered for the operational phase

SOCIO-ECONOMIC

Vegetation could be planted to mitigate visual impacts and residents should be encouraged to plant indigenous trees.

The effectiveness of traffic control measures must be monitored on an on-going basis and appropriate remediation steps implemented if necessary.

Controls stipulated in Homeowners Association Agreement dealing with noise, maintenance etc. must be adhered to.

TECHNOLOGY EMPLOYED

Measures must be taken to reduce the consumption of natural resources.

These measures should include, but not be limited to, the installation of rainwater tanks to reduce stormwater runoff and the pressure on the municipal water supply, as well as alternative renewable energy sources such as wind or solar (PV) power.

WASTE MANAGEMENT

During the operational phase the Home Owners Association (HOA) should monitor the area for temporary storage of domestic waste, prior to municipal pick-up and disposal.

The HOA must ensure that the area is contained in a bunded area to avoid leachate contamination.

BIOLOGICAL IMPACTS

An independent ECO must inspect the site during the first 6 months of the operational phase to assess the level of rehabilitation and address accordingly.

www.dedea.gov.za




There should be on-going alien plant removal from the site.

Residents should be encouraged to plant indigenous garden plants STORMWATER MANAGEMENT

The effectiveness of the flood attenuation and stormwater management measures must be monitored by the body corporate.

The effectiveness of attenuation berms that are situated 32 m above the watercourse must be monitored.

If the stormwater management measures put in place are deemed insufficient, alternative measures should be drawn up by a qualified engineer and approved by DEDEAT and DWS before being implemented.

www.dedea.gov.za




SECTION F: APPENDICES

The following appendixes must be attached as appropriate:

Appendix A: Site plan(s)

Appendix B: Photographs

Appendix C: Facility illustration(s)

Appendix D: Specialist reports

Noise Impact Assessment

Heritage Impact Assessment

Appendix E: Comments and responses report

Appendix F: Environmental Management Programme (EMPr)

Appendix G: Other information

Assessment methodology

Full Impact Assessment Tables

Previous Environmental Authorisation




Appendix A (Site plans)

Site plan for the preferred alternative (Layout 1)




Site plan for alternative 2 (Layout 2)




Property boundaries and numbers of all the properties within 50 metres of the site




Land use of properties adjoining the development property. Property indicated by the polygon.




Appendix B (Photographs)

GPS point:

Summerpride Mixed-use

Development

32° 57’ 49.2” S 27° 50’ 28.7”




View of the whole site from the south-eastern edge.

View of the whole site from the north-eastern edge.

View of the site from the south-western edge View of the site from Voortrekker Road

Manhole found on the proposed development site (32° 57‘ 46.5‖ S 27° 50‘ 25.1‖ E)




Appendix C: Site illustration

Site illustration of the proposed development




Appendix D: Specialist Reports

Noise Impact Assessment (2008)

Heritage Impact Assessment (2008)




Appendix E: Comments and responses report

Issue raised by I&AP Response of the EAP

Mr A Crisp stated that there will be increased noise, too much sewage generated, a lack of privacy for surrounding landowners and too much traffic for the road to handle.

In order to counteract the problem of noise the EAP suggested that construction activities, which include the movement of construction vehicles and the operation of machinery, must be restricted to normal working hours (07:00am – 17:00pm). In response to the sewage issue, a letter from the Buffalo City Municipality must be obtained confirming that they will be able to accommodate the proposed levels of sewage that the mixed-use development will generate prior to construction commencing. The issue of privacy is noted. In terms of increased traffic the Traffic Impact Assessment has suggested a traffic circle to be constructed between Voortrekker Road and Arnold Road. It has also been suggested that there be two access points to the development from Thornycroft Road and one access point from Beulah Road (providing access to houses situated on the eastern side of the development). In order to counteract the issue of dust, the EAP has suggested that vegetation should only be stripped as construction progresses. The time that stripped areas are exposed should be minimised wherever possible. The sites must be re-vegetated as soon as possible during the construction phase, and indigenous trees, shrubbery and grass species must be retained wherever possible, for this purpose. Exposed soils must be dampened whenever possible and especially in dry and windy conditions to avoid excessive dust generation. Any soil excavated and not utilised for rehabilitation must be removed from site or incorporated into landscaping. The issue of the quality of the road being decreased by the development is noted. In terms of the issue of reduced water pressure in the area, the EAP has suggested that measures must be taken taken to reduce the consumption of natural resources. These measures should include, but not be limited to, the installation of rainwater tanks to reduce stormwater runoff and the pressure on the municipal water supply, as well as alternative renewable energy sources such as wind or solar (PV) power.

Mr and Mrs Heightman‘s also raised the issue of noise and dust during construction. They said that the 3 storey apartments will look directly into yards and this will reduce privacy. They stated that if there are going to be two access roads to the development from Thornycroft Road there will be traffic congestion. Mr and Mrs Heightman were worried about the quality of the road, stating that the increased traffic will cause the quality to decrease. The issue of where the sewage will be taken to and how the development will impact on water pressure in the area were raised. It was said that the values of the surrounding property will decrease as the area will now be classified as ―highly dense‖.

Mr and Mrs Van Zyl stated that they would like to be informed as to how the development will impact the access roads and how it will affect the value of the homes.

Mr and Mrs Pretorius stated that they want to know if the area will be able to handle the increased traffic and that the development will disturb wildlife in the area.

Mr P Tottle stated that the development will block his view of the countryside and sea, reducing property value. He also raised the issue of low water pressure existing in the area, stating that a water tower will be needed. He stated that the main sewer is too small for new volumes; therefore a new and larger sewer would be required. He was also concerned about the potential threat to wildlife in the area, as well as increased traffic and noise and reduced security.

Mr J Kriel also raised the issue of increased impact on Voortrekker Road, stating that it can‘t handle the traffic during peak times as it is. He also requested to know where the sewage will go as the system cannot be maintained as it is. He also stated that Moneyline is driven for profit and we




(the EIA process) are just a mere process to be followed with no impact on the end results.

In terms of the issue of the area now being classified as ―highly dense‖, it must be noted that the open land is earmarked for development in the Spatial Development Framework (BCMM SDF). The affect that the development will have on the value of surrounding homes and land is unknown. In terms of wildlife being disturbed in the area the contruction must commenced in a phased manner, allowing slow moving animals to retreat out of the disturbed areas. The impact on the view of the surrounding landowners is noted. The EAP has suggested the architectural design should be as unobtrusive as possible in terms of colour and building material used. An architectural code could include use of natural/earth tone colours for the walls and a suitable blending colour (such as grey) is used for the roof. Vegetation could be planted to mitigate visual impacts. In terms of reduced security during construction, access control to the site must ensure no unauthorised person shall enter. The site must be secured in order to reduce the opportunity for the criminal activity in the locality of the construction site. In terms of the development affecting natural areas besides wildlife, the development layout must ensure that all development is located outside the riparian vegetation and watercourse. As per the previous EA, indigenous vegetation that occurs on drainage lines must not be harmed and a ten metre (10 m) buffer zone must be maintained from the forest vegetation. The issue of Moneyline being driven by profit is noted. The suggestion that the development be kept in line with current properties of approximately 2000 m2 per plot and be zoned as Residential 3A is noted.

Mr J Jordaan stated that he was concerned about the impact that the development would have on the surrounding natural environment. The issue of security was also raised, stating that that the increased people in the area will pose a threat to surrounding communities and wildlife. The issue of sewage was again raised; Mr Jordaan wanted to know what was proposed for the sewage generated? He also stated that Voortrekker Road will not be able to handle more vehicles. The concern of de-valuation of surrounding properties was again raised. Mr Jordaan also suggested that the development be kept in line with current properties of approximately 2000 m2 per plot.

Mrs N Jordaan also raised the issue of the impact the development will have on the surrounding natural environment and rivers. She also stated that security in the area will decrease for both people and wildlife and wanted to know the plan for generated sewage. She stated that the increased traffic on Voortrekker and Thornycroft Road will impact the roads greatly. She stated that low-cost housing in the area will greatly reduce the value of surrounding homes. Mrs N Jordaan stated that the development area be zoned as Residential 3A.




Appendix F: Environmental Management Programme (EMPr)




Appendix G: Other Information

Methodology for Assessing Impacts Identified impacts will be assessed against the following criteria:

Temporal scale

Spatial scale

Degree of confidence or certainty

Severity or benefits

Significance The relationship of the issue to the temporal scale, spatial scale and the severity are combined to describe the overall importance rating, namely the significance. Description of criteria Table 3.5.a Significance Rating Table

Significance Rating Table

Temporal Scale (The duration of the impact)

Short term Less than 5 years (Many construction phase impacts are of a short duration).

Medium term Between 5 and 20 years.

Long term Between 20 and 40 years (From a human perspective almost permanent).

Permanent Over 40 years or resulting in a permanent and lasting change that will always be there.

Spatial Scale (The area in which any impact will have an affect)

Individual Impacts affect an individual.

Localised Impacts affect a small area of a few hectares in extent. Often only a portion of the project area.

Project Level Impacts affect the entire project area.

Surrounding Areas Impacts that affect the area surrounding the development.




Municipal Impacts affect the Local Municipality, or any towns within them.

Regional Impacts affect the wider district municipality or the province as a whole.

National Impacts affect the entire country.

International/Global Impacts affect other countries or have a global influence.

Degree of Confidence or Certainty (The confidence with which one has predicted the significance of an impact)

Definite More than 90% sure of a particular fact. Should have substantial supportive data.

Probable Over 70% sure of a particular fact, or of the likelihood of that impact occurring.

Possible Only over 40% sure of a particular fact or of the likelihood of an impact occurring.

Unsure Less than 40% sure of a particular fact or of the likelihood of an impact occurring.

Impact Severity Rating

Impact severity (The severity of negative impacts, or how beneficial positive impacts would be on a particular

affected system or affected party)

Very severe Very beneficial

An irreversible and permanent change to the affected system(s) or party(ies) which cannot be mitigated. For example the permanent loss of land.

A permanent and very substantial benefit to the affected system(s) or party(ies), with no real alternative to achieving this benefit. For example the vast improvement of sewage effluent quality.

Severe Beneficial

Long term impacts on the affected system(s) or party(ies) that could be mitigated. However, this mitigation would be difficult, expensive or time consuming, or some combination of these. For example, the clearing of forest vegetation.

A long term impact and substantial benefit to the affected system(s) or party(ies). Alternative ways of achieving this benefit would be difficult, expensive or time consuming, or some combination of these. For example an increase in the local economy.

Moderately severe Moderately beneficial

Medium to long term impacts on the affected system(s) or party (ies), which could be mitigated. For example constructing the sewage treatment facility where there was vegetation with a low conservation value.

A medium to long term impact of real benefit to the affected system(s) or party(ies). Other ways of optimising the beneficial effects are equally difficult, expensive and time consuming (or some combination of these), as achieving them in this




way. For example a ‗slight‘ improvement in sewage effluent quality.

Slight Slightly beneficial

Medium or short term impacts on the affected system(s) or party(ies). Mitigation is very easy, cheap, less time consuming or not necessary. For example a temporary fluctuation in the water table due to water abstraction.

A short to medium term impact and negligible benefit to the affected system(s) or party(ies). Other ways of optimising the beneficial effects are easier, cheaper and quicker, or some combination of these.

No effect Don’t know/Can’t know

The system(s) or party(ies) is not affected by the proposed development.

In certain cases it may not be possible to determine the severity of an impact.

Overall Significance Rating

Overall Significance (The combination of all the above criteria as an overall significance)

VERY HIGH NEGATIVE VERY BENEFICIAL

These impacts would be considered by society as constituting a major and usually permanent change to the (natural and/or social) environment, and usually result in severe or very severe effects, or beneficial or very beneficial effects. Example: The loss of a species would be viewed by informed society as being of VERY HIGH significance. Example: The establishment of a large amount of infrastructure in a rural area, which previously had very few services, would be regarded by the affected parties as resulting in benefits with VERY HIGH significance.

HIGH NEGATIVE BENEFICIAL

These impacts will usually result in long term effects on the social and/or natural environment. Impacts rated as HIGH will need to be considered by society as constituting an important and usually long term change to the (natural and/or social) environment. Society would probably view these impacts in a serious light. Example: The loss of a diverse vegetation type, which is fairly common elsewhere, would have a significance rating of HIGH over the long term, as the area could be rehabilitated. Example: The change to soil conditions will impact the natural system, and the impact on affected parties (such as people growing crops in the soil) would be HIGH.

MODERATE NEGATIVE SOME BENEFITS

These impacts will usually result in medium to long term effects on the social and/or natural environment. Impacts rated as MODERATE will need to be considered by society as constituting a fairly important and usually medium term change to the (natural and/or social) environment. These impacts are real but not substantial. Example: The loss of a sparse, open vegetation type of low diversity may be regarded as MODERATELY significant.

LOW NEGATIVE FEW BENEFITS

These impacts will usually result in medium to short term effects on the social and/or natural environment. Impacts rated as LOW will need to be considered by the public and/or the specialist as constituting a fairly




unimportant and usually short term change to the (natural and/or social) environment. These impacts are not substantial and are likely to have little real effect. Example: The temporary change in the water table of a wetland habitat, as these systems is adapted to fluctuating water levels. Example: The increased earning potential of people employed as a result of a development would only result in benefits of LOW significance to people who live some distance away.

NO SIGNIFICANCE

There are no primary or secondary effects at all that are important to scientists or the public. Example: A change to the geology of a particular formation may be regarded as severe from a geological perspective, but is of NO significance in the overall context.

DON’T KNOW

In certain cases it may not be possible to determine the significance of an impact. For example, the primary or secondary impacts on the social or natural environment given the available information. Example: The effect of a particular development on people‘s psychological perspective of the environment.




Environmental Impact Statement

Issue

Impact Description Nature of impact

Temporal Spatial Likelihood Severity Significance Pre-

mitigation

Mitigation Significance Post-

mitigation


Policy compliance

During the planning and design phase the lack of policy and legislation compliance such as conditions of the EA and EMPr, National Forestry Act, National Water Act and BCM Environmental Policy, may lead to inappropriate environmental development layout and damage the riparian environment in particular.

Direct Permanent Localised Possible Severe HIGH Once the EA has been received, the conditions must be incorporated into all project phases, including planning and design, construction and operation.

Other legal conditions of relevant policy and legislation (e.g. National Forestry Act, National Water Act and BCM Environmental Policy) must be compiled and adhered to.

MODERATE

Technology employed

During the planning and design phase, failure to consider technologies that reduce consumption of natural resources (particularly water and electricity) will result in lost opportunity to conserve resources.

Direct Long-term Surrounding areas and

downstream

Possible Severe HIGH Water:

Rainwater tanks should be considered in the design and planning phase. Tanks will reduce the runoff created by the housing footprint and reduce municipal water usage.

Water piping material and infrastructure must comply with SABA to insure as far as possible pipeline failures and future indirect impacts resulting from burst pipes do not result in water loss.

Energy:

Insulation of houses and use of solar water heaters should be considered.

Use of alternative renewable energy sources such as wind or solar power (PV) should be considered in the design and layout. However, if renewable energy technology is not implemented initially, provisions should be made in design to allow for easier post-construction retrofitting.

LOW


During the planning and design phase, the inappropriate routing and management of stormwater may lead to the loss of riparian vegetation, soil erosion and stream sedimentation.

Direct Permanent Water catchment

Possible Severe HIGH A flood attenuation and stormwater management plan must be drawn up by a qualified engineer and submitted to DWS and DAFF for comment and approval.

The stormwater management plan must include stormwater attenuation berms that are situated 32 m away from the watercourse. These berms should be able to hold a 1:100 year flood to be released as a 1:5 year flood.

MODERATE

During the planning and design phase the inclusion of large areas of impermeable surfaces (e.g. roofs, building paving, internal roads and parking) will increase the risk of run-off and flooding downstream.

Indirect, Cumulative

Long-Term Water Catchment

Probably Moderately severe

HIGH As above.

Impermeable surfaces should be minimised as much as possible through permeable surface technology, such as grassed gardens and verges, permeable paving and internal roads, etc.

LOW




Issue



mitigation


mitigation


Socio-Economic

During the planning and design phase inappropriate architectural design may lead to visual and aesthetic impacts.

Direct Permanent Community Definite Moderately Severe

HIGH The architectural design should be as unobtrusive as possible in terms of colour and building material used.

An architectural code could include use of natural/earth tone colours for the walls and a suitable blending colour (such as grey) is used for the roof.

Vegetation could be planted to mitigate visual impacts

MODERATE

The establishment of the proposed mixed-used development and densification of the area could lead to a decline in the value of surrounding properties.

Indirect Medium-Term

Localised Uncertain Severe UNKNOWN No mitigation provided UNKNOWN

The establishment of the proposed mixed-used development could lead to economic upliftment of the area

Indirect Long-Term Community Probably Moderately Severe

MODERATE POSITIVE

No mitigation provided MODERATE POSITIVE

The establishment of the proposed mixed-used development will contribute to urban infill development, preventing urban sprawl into more sensitive areas

Indirect Long-Term Provincial Probable Beneficial HIGH POSITIVE

No mitigation provided HIGH POSITIVE

Stream crossing

During the planning and design phase the inappropriate design of a bridge across the watercourse could lead to soil erosion and sedimentation of the watercourse.

Direct Medium-Term

Water catchment

Probable Moderately Severe

HIGH The planning and design of the stream crossing must take into account bank restoration, re-vegetation and stabilization.

MODERATE

Traffic and Transport

During the planning and design phase, inappropriate access road design (the addition of two traffic circles) could lead to traffic congestion.

Direct Long-Term Community Probable Moderately Severe

MODERATE The recommendation of the Traffic Impact Assessment covering the construction of a traffic circle at the main access point between Voortrekker Road and Arnold Road should be adhered to.

LOW

During the planning and design phase, inappropriate routing of internal roads through or close to watercourses could lead to unnecessary impacts on riparian vegetation

Direct Long-Term Localised Probable Moderately Severe

MODERATE All internal roads must not affect any of the watercourses.

There could be two access points to the development from Thornycroft Road and one access point from Beulah Road (providing access to houses situated on the eastern side of the development) in order to avoid constructing an internal road across the watercourse.

LOW

Increased traffic as a result of the proposed mixed-use development will contribute to further degradation of the municipal roads and increased air pollution in the area

Indirect, Cumulative

Medium-Term

Community Probable Moderately Severe

MODERATE No mitigation provided MODERATE

Waste Management

During the planning and design phase, inappropriate provisions for solid waste storage and disposal services may lead to litter, pollution and general nuisances and health hazards.

Direct Short-Term

Localised Possible Severe MODERATE Provisions must be made for temporary storage of domestic waste, prior to municipal pick-up and disposal.

A waste management plan incorporating recycling and waste minimisation must be

LOW




Issue



mitigation


mitigation


developed and implemented for the construction and operational phases.

The waste facility must be enclosed to avoid the spread of foul odours and to ensure that the spread of pests (flies) and vermin (rats and monkeys) are deterred.

Sanitation During the design phase the effluent generated may exceed the capacity that Buffalo City Municipality can accommodate in terms of its infrastructure capacity limitations

Direct Medium-Term

Municipal Possible Severe HIGH A letter from the Buffalo City Municipality must be obtained confirming that they will be able to accommodate the proposed levels of sewage that the mixed-use development will generate.

MODERATE

Biodiversity During the planning and design phase, inappropriate layout may cause development to enter into sensitive areas, affecting the watercourses and riparian vegetation

Direct Medium-Term

Localised Possible Moderately Severe

(due to low levels of

intact riparian

vegetation)

MODERATE The development layout must ensure that all development is located outside the riparian vegetation and watercourse.


LOW


As above


During the planning and design phase, locating buildings close to the watercourse will lead to stripping and clearing of riparian vegetation along the banks of the watercourse. This will lead to soil erosion and sedimentation of the watercourse. It would also result in the loss of an intact, but degraded, riparian ecosystem, which is important for stream health.

Direct Long-Term Water catchment

Definite Severe VERY HIGH No mitigation will reduce the impacts except for limiting construction within or close to the watercourse.

As per the previous EA, indigenous vegetation that occurs on drainage lines must not be harmed and a ten metres (10 m) buffer zone must be maintained from the forest vegetation.

HIGH

Construction phase

Issue Impact Description Nature of Impact

Temporal Spatial Likelihood Severity Significance Pre-mitigation

Mitigation Significance Post-mitigation


Biological impacts due to clearing and construction onsite

During the construction phase unplanned clearing and removal of potential plant species of special concern will decrease the level of intact biodiversity in the area

Direct Long-Term Localised Probable Moderately severe

MODERATE Prior to the commencement of construction, a permit must be obtained to remove and transplant protected plant and tree species.

Prior to construction all sensitive areas must be demarcated and signs erected to ensure these areas are maintained. This must be done with the assistance of the ECO.

LOW








During the construction phase unplanned and unnecessary disturbance of vegetated areas by the contractor may occur, resulting in loss of biodiversity.

Direct Short-Term Localised Possible Moderate HIGH The construction footprint must be surveyed and demarcated prior to construction.

The surveyed construction footprint must be approved by an ECO to ensure that vegetation is not unnecessarily damaged.

MODERATE

During the construction phase land disturbance can lead to increased spreading of noxious weeds, and invasive alien plants

Direct Medium-Term

Localised Possible Moderately severe

MODERATE Alien plants must be removed from the site through appropriate methods e.g. hand pulling, chemical, cutting, etc., and under the supervision of the ECO.

After construction, exposed areas must be rehabilitated with indigenous vegetation.

Post-construction monitoring of rehabilitation must be implemented.

LOW

During the construction phase there is the potential risk of poaching of indigenous wild animals by staff employed by the contractor

Direct Short-Term Localised Possible Moderately severe

MODERATE All staff employed during construction must undergo environmental induction training.

No construction workers should reside onsite.

LOW

During construction there is the potential risk of littering on and around the site by the contractor, which can become unsightly and in some cases lead to health risks.

Direct Short-Term Localised and water catchment

Probable Moderately severe

MODERATE Construction personnel must be educated in appropriate waste management practices.

Collected waste must be categorised as ―hazardous‖, ―general waste‖ and ―construction rubble‖. Separate, distinguishable containers should be provided for different waste categories.

Litter and construction waste must be removed on a regular basis and disposed of in an approved registered landfill.

Potentially hazardous materials must be handled and stored onsite in secure containers and disposed of at an appropriately permitted hazardous waste disposal site through appointment of a reputable hazardous waste disposal company.

The Contractor should maintain a register of the hazardous materials and should document the use, storage, final destination and method of disposal.

LOW

During the construction phase inappropriate accumulation and disposal of building waste and rubble could result in environmental pollution of surface and ground water sources


MODERATE LOW







Policy compliance

During the construction phase the failure of the contractor to implement mitigation measures can result in non-compliance with the EA and EMPr.

Indirect Short-Term Provincial Possible Moderately Severe

MODERATE The developer must employ an independent Environmental Control Officer (ECO) for the construction phase to ensure that construction is implemented according to specifications in the EA and EMPr.

LOW

Erosion During the construction phase soil exposure due to clearing of land may result in erosion, which in turn may cause sedimentation of the watercourses

Direct Medium-Term

Localised and water catchment

Possible Moderate MODERATE Wind screening and stormwater control should be undertaken to prevent soil erosion.

All erosion control mechanisms must be regularly maintained.

Vegetation must be retained where possible to avoid soil erosion.

Construction must be phased in order to minimise the area of exposed soil at any one time.

Re-vegetation of disturbed surfaces should occur immediately after the construction activities are completed with indigenous vegetation.

LOW

Stream crossing

During the construction phase the building of a bridge across the watercourse could lead to soil erosion and sedimentation of the watercourse.

Direct Medium-Term

Localised and water catchment

Probable Moderately Severe

HIGH The construction of the bridge must take place in the shortest possible time period and during the low rainfall season.

Bank restoration, re-vegetation and stabilisation must be implemented once construction is complete and must include the use of gabions for bank stablisation.

MODERATE

Sanitation During the construction phase the lack of appropriate sanitation facilities for construction workers could lead to the contamination of ground and ground water

Direct Short-Term Localised and water catchment

Possible Moderate MODERATE Adequate sanitary and ablutions facilities must be provided for construction workers

The facilities must be regularly serviced to reduce the risk of surface or groundwater pollution.

Portable toilets must not be located within 50 metres of any watercourse.

LOW







Inappropriate storage of building equipment and hazardous materials

During the construction phase inappropriate storage and disposal of building material may pollute the soil and ground water


MODERATE The storage of potentially hazardous material must be controlled to reduce the risk of environmental contamination.

Drip trays must be placed under all machinery to avoid soil contamination.

All vehicles and machinery must be regularly maintained and in good working order to reduce the risk of contamination of soil and ground water.

All areas that have been contaminated during the construction phase must be rehabilitated.

LOW

Concrete batching

During the construction phase inappropriate cement mixing techniques can lead to ground and ground water pollution


MODERATE Cement and concrete must not be mixed directly on the ground, or during rainfall events when the potential for transport of pollutants to watercourses is the greatest. Cement and concrete must only be mixed in the area demarcated for this purpose and on an impermeable substratum.

All construction water and contaminated runoff must be directed away from the drainage line.

LOW

Disposal of construction material

During the construction phase there is the potential for the inappropriate disposal of construction material off-site and subsequently polluting the environment


Community Probable Moderate MODERATE Construction material must be removed to an approved, licenced off-site disposal site by the appointment of a reputable waste services provider.

LOW

Noise pollution During the construction phase activities onsite can produce noise that can become a nuisance to surrounding residents

Direct Short-Term Localised Probable Severe HIGH Construction activities, which include the movement of construction vehicles and the operation of machinery, must be restricted to normal working hours (07:00am – 17:00pm).

LOW

Fires onsite could pose a threat to adjacent land users

During the construction phase fires started at construction camps could result in uncontrolled fires, posing a threat to wild animals, indigenous vegetation and the surrounding landowners.

Direct Short-Term Community Possible Severe HIGH Fires must be prohibited onsite.

Any source of fire hazards must be removed.

The construction personnel must be educated regarding fire and fire management.

Fire extinguishers must be available onsite.

In order to reduce the risk of fires: o All flammable substances must

be stored in dry areas which do not pose an ignition risk to the said substances.

o Smoking must not be permitted

LOW







near flammable substances. o All cooking must be done in

demarcated areas that are safe in terms of runaway or uncontrolled fires.


Dust (air) pollution caused by grading and levelling exposed land

During the construction phase the clearing, grading and levelling of land may generate dust

Direct Short-Term Localised Possible Moderate MODERATE Vegetation should only be stripped as construction progresses. The time that stripped areas are exposed should be minimised wherever possible.

The sites must be re-vegetated as soon as possible during the construction phase, and indigenous trees, shrubbery and grass species must be retained wherever possible, for this purpose.

Exposed soils must be dampened whenever possible and especially in dry and windy conditions to avoid excessive dust generation.

Any soil excavated and not utilised for rehabilitation must be removed from site or incorporated into landscaping.

LOW

Socio-economic During the construction phase there may be temporary job-creation

Indirect Short-Term Localised Probable Beneficial MODERATE POSITIVE

No mitigation provided MODERATE POSITIVE

During the construction phase construction activities could lead to temporary market devaluation of surrounding properties

Indirect Short-Term Community UNKNOWN UNKNOWN UNKNOWN No mitigation provided UNKNOWN

During the construction phase increased number of labourers could lead to an increase in security risks in the community.

Indirect Short-Term Community Probable Moderately severe

HIGH Access control to the site must ensure no unauthorised person shall enter.

The site must be secured in order to reduce the opportunity for the criminal activity in the locality of the construction site.

MODERATE

During the construction phase an increase in the use of roads by heavy vehicles will lead to road degradation.

Indirect Short-Term Along road Probable Moderately severe

MODERATE No mitigation provided MODERATE


As above


During the construction phase, building activities close to the watercourse will lead to stripping and clearing of riparian vegetation along the banks of the watercourse, this will lead to soil erosion

Direct Long-Term Water catchment

Definite Severe VERY HIGH No mitigation will reduce the impacts except for limiting construction within or close to the watercourse.

As per the previous EA, indigenous vegetation that occurs on drainage

HIGH







and sedimentation of the watercourse. It would also result in the loss of an intact, but degraded, riparian ecosystem, which is important for downstream health.

lines must not be harmed and a ten metres (10 m) buffer zone must be maintained from the forest vegetation.

Operational Phase




Alternative 1 & 2

Socio-economic During the operational phase non-compliance with an approved architectural code and controls could result in visual and aesthetic impacts for the surrounding residents

Direct Permanent Localised Possible Severe HIGH Vegetation could be planted to mitigate visual impacts and residents should be encouraged to plant indigenous trees.

MODERATE

During the operational phase there may be increased employment opportunities and stimulation of the local economy

Indirect Long-Term Community Probable Beneficial MODERATE POSITIVE

No mitigation provided. MODERATE POSITIVE

During the operational phase the increase in road usage may further degrade the public road


Along road Definite Severe HIGH The effectiveness of traffic control measures must be monitored on an on-going basis and appropriate remediation steps implemented if necessary.

MODERATE

During the operational phase the lack of maintenance and general general noise can lead to market devaluation of the surrounding properties


Community Possible UNKNOWN UNKNOWN Controls stipulated in Homeowners Association Agreement dealing with noise, maintenance etc. must be adhered to.

UNKNOWN

During the operational phase there may be potential long-term increases of neighbouring land value


Community Possible UNKNOWN UNKNOWN No mitigation provided. UNKNOWN

Technology employed

During the operational phase increased water and energy consumption may lead to a loss in natural resources such as water and energy

Direct Long-Term Provincial Definite Severe HIGH Measures must be taken to reduce the consumption of natural resources.

These measures should include, but not be limited to, the installation of rainwater tanks to reduce stormwater runoff and the pressure on the municipal water supply, as well as alternative renewable energy sources such as wind or solar (PV) power.

MODERATE

Waste management

During the operational phase inappropriate waste storage and disposal practices may lead to litter, pollution and general nuisances and health hazards

Direct Short-Term Localised Possible Severe MODERATE During the operational phase the Home Owners Association (HOA) should monitor the area for temporary storage of domestic waste, prior to municipal pick-up and disposal.

The HOA must ensure that the area is contained in a bunded area to avoid leachate contamination.

LOW







Biological impacts

During the operational phase the inappropriate disturbance of land may increase spreading of noxious weeds, invasive and alien plants in the development open space area and surrounds

Direct Medium-Term

Localised Possible Moderately severe

MODERATE An independent ECO must inspect the site during the first 6 months of the operational phase to assess the level of rehabilitation and address accordingly.

There should be on-going alien plant removal from the site.

Residents should be encouraged to plant indigenous garden plants

LOW


During the operational phase the failure of stormwater management measures may result in soil erosion and stream sedimentation

Direct Long-Term Localised and water catchment

Probable Severe VERY HIGH The effectiveness of the flood attenuation and stormwater management measures must be monitored by the body corporate.

The effectiveness of attenuation berms that are situated 32 m above the watercourse must be monitored.

If the stormwater management measures put in place are deemed insufficient, alternative measures should be drawn up by a qualified engineer and approved by DEDEAT and DWS before being implemented.

MODERATE

NO-GO




“No-go” option This refers to the current status quo and the risks and impacts associated to it

Degradation and misuse of site Direct Medium-Term

Community Probable Moderate MODERATE Develop the site with an appropriate land-use activity

MODERATE

All negative activities from the proposed development will be avoided

Direct Long-Term Community Probable Moderate MODERATE POSITIVE

No mitigation provided. MODERATE POSITIVE

Continued poor water pressure problems in the area

Direct Long-Term Community Probable Moderate MODERATE No mitigation provided. MODERATE

The visual impact will remain the same.

Direct Long-Term Localised Probable Slight MODERATE POSITIVE

No mitigation provided. MODERATE

Construction job losses Direct Short-Term Localised Definite Moderate MODERATE No mitigation provided. MODERATE







Continued contamination of soil and ground water as well as stream due to overflowing sewerage manholes

Direct Long-Term Localised and water catchment

Probable Very severe HIGH No mitigation provided. HIGH

Increased security risks due to vagrancy

Direct Long-Term Community Probable Moderate MODERATE No mitigation provided. MODERATE




Previous Environmental Authorisation

basic assessment report - cesnet.co.za mixed use dev... · centre, boarding house 12.74 ha johnson...

Documents