basic assessment principles chapter 2. nominal ordinal interval ratio measurement scales

26
Basic Assessment Principles Chapter 2

Upload: reynard-cox

Post on 13-Dec-2015

231 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

Basic Assessment Principles

Chapter 2

Nominal

Ordinal

Interval

Ratio

Measurement Scales

Individual’s score is compared to performance of others who have taken the same instrument (norming group)

Example: personality inventory

Evaluating the norming group size sampling representation

Norm-Referenced Instruments

Individual’s performance is compared to specific criterion or standard

Example: third-grade spelling test

How are standards determined? common practice professional organizations or experts empirically-determined

Criterion-Referenced Instruments

Robert 72 Miles 96 Jason 68 Whitney 79

Alice 82 Paul 59 Pedro 86 Jane 85

Beth 94 John 82 Kelly 92 Michael 81

Amy 77 Kevin 85 Justin 72 Rebecca 88

Porter 62 Ling 98 Sherry 67 Maria 86

Norm-Referenced: Sample Scores

X 50-59 60-69 70-79 80-89 90-100

f 1 3 4 8 4

Frequency Distribution

Frequency Polygon

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

50-59 60-69 70-79 80-89 90-100

Histogram

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

60-69 70-79 80-89 90-100

Measures of Central Tendency

Mode – most frequent score

Median – evenly divides scores into two halves (50% of scores fall above, 50% fall below)

Mean – arithmetic average of the scores

Formula: N

XM

Measures of Central Tendency

Example:

Sample scores – 98, 98, 97, 50, 49

Mode = 98

Median = 97

Mean = 78.4

Measures of Variability

Range – highest score minus lowest score

Variance – sum of squared deviations from the mean

Standard Deviation – square root of variance

Formula:

2

N

MXs

Normal Distribution

Skewed Distribution

Raw scores

Percentile scores/Percentile ranks

Standard scores z scores T scores Stanines Age/grade-equivalent scores

Types of Scores

X 50 60 70 80 90

f 1 3 4 9 4

% 5% 14% 19% 43% 19%

%ile 5 19 38 81 99*

Percentiles

98th percentile 98% of the group had a score at or below

this individual’s score

32nd percentile 32% of the group had a score at or below

this individual’s score If there were 100 people taking the

assessment, 32 of them would have a score at or below this individual’s score

Interpreting Percentiles

Units are not equal

Useful for providing information about relative position in normative sample

Not useful for indicating amount of difference between scores

Interpreting Percentiles

Types of Standard Scores

z Scores

z score = X-M s

Mean = 0

Standard deviation = 1

Mean = 50

Standard deviation = 10

T Scores

Stanines

Standard Scores: Summary

Possible problematic scores Age-equivalent scores Grade-equivalent scores

Problematic because: These scores do not reflect precise performance on an

instrument Learning does not always occur in equal

developmental levels Instruments vary in scoring

Additional Converted Scores

Adequacy of norming group depends on: Clients being assessed Purpose of the assessment How information will be used

Examine methods used for selecting group

Examine characteristics of norming group

Evaluating the Norming Group

Methods for selecting norming group:

Simple random sample

Stratified sample

Cluster sample

Sampling Methods

Size Gender Race/ethnicity Educational background Socioeconomic status

Is the norming group appropriate for use with this client?

Norming Group Characteristics