baking quality response to late season n with variable moisture during grain fill. k. o’brien, b....
TRANSCRIPT
Baking Quality Response to Late Season N with Variable Moisture During Grain Fill. K. O’Brien, B. Brown, and R. Gibson. University of Idaho
Introduction High protein premiums and higher prices have
increased traditional irrigated soft white wheat
grower interest in the production of the hard red
classes. Higher returns from the hard red spring
class are dependent on avoiding discounted
prices for low protein (<14%).
The importance of adequate nitrogen (N) for
yield and protein is generally appreciated. Late
season N (LSN) fertilizer applied at heading
(Feekes 10.1-5) has increased wheat protein in
several environments and the practice is common
in many hard wheat production areas. But LSN
rates appropriate for protein enhancement in
limited rainfall low yield environments may not be
appropriate for irrigated high yield environments.
Producers of high yielding irrigated hard red
wheat frequently fail to consistently raise wheat
protein to desirable levels (14%) with low to
moderate LSN rates reported in published studies
(1,2).
Higher wheat protein is generally associated
with improved baking quality, thus the high
protein premium and low protein discounts in
market prices. But there are reports that LSN may
not improve wheat baking quality even if wheat
protein is increased (3).
Yield is frequently limited by moisture during
grain fill. Many irrigated producers and those that
serve them commonly believe that higher and
acceptable protein is only possible with late
season moisture stress. The effect of moisture
stress on the protein and baking quality response
to LSN has received little attention.
Objective To determine the milling and baking quality
response to LSN in wheat that varies in yield due
to late season available moisture.
Methods A hard red spring wheat field study was
conducted for four seasons (1995-98) at the
University of Idaho Parma Research and
Extension Center involving early season N (ESN)
rates of 67 and 135 kg ha-1, LSN rates of 0, 45 and
90 kg ha-1 applied at heading, and irrigation
treatments (IR) of 0, 0.5, and 1.0 times estimated
ET from the last uniform wetting prior to
flowering. ESN and LSN were topdressed urea
incorporated with sprinkler irrigation. Treatments
were arranged as a split plot randomized
complete block design with four replications. The
ESN rate and IR treatments were randomized
among the main plots. Main plots were 3m wide
and 27.4m long and were divided into three
subplots of LSN each 9.1m long.
The soil was a Greenleaf-Owyhee silt loam
((fine-silty, mixed, superactive, mesic, xeric
calciargids) ). Previous crops were sudan grass
(1995-97 seasons) and potatoes (1998 season).
Vandal hard red spring wheat was seeded at 110
kg ha-1 with 17.8 cm row spacing. The wheat
Methods continued-
received uniform rainfall or sprinkler irrigation
through the boot to heading stage.
The IR treatments during grain filling were
imposed using a drip irrigation system. Four drip
lines were spaced 0.6m apart and parallel to the
planted rows in the 3.0m wide main plots that
received additional water during grain fill.
Different amounts of moisture were applied
during each drip irrigation set by spacing emitters
30cm (full irrigation) or 60cm (0.50 estimated ET)
in the drip line. Bureau of Reclamation (BOR)
evapotranspiration estimates from the Agrimet
System were used to schedule irrigations after
heading.
Baking quality measures included flour protein
(Fpro), flour yield (Fyd), Mixograph peak time
(Mpk), height (Mht), tolerance (Mto), absorbance
(Mab), bake or loaf volume (Bvo), and Bvo/Fpro
ratio (R). Baking quality was determined using
AACC method No. 10-10B at the University of
Idaho Aberdeen Wheat Quality Laboratory. Bake
volume was determined using rape seed
displacement.
All data were analyzed using analysis of
variance procedures available in SAS.
ResultsMoisture Received
Water received uniformly as rain or irrigation after
May 15 was 5.1 cm in 95, only 1.5 cm in 96, 7.8 cm
in 97, and 5.3 cm in 98. By the end of the season,
wettest and driest IR treatments differed by 16.5,
32.6, 12.7, and 17.4 cm water for the 95, 96, 97,
and 98 seasons, respectively. IR treatments
differed more in 96 because they were started
earlier and there was little rainfall during the rest
of the season.
Grain Yield and Protein
Grain yield and crude protein were reported in
greater detail in a previous poster and are not
shown here. Briefly, water added at the 0.5ET rate
during grain fill increased yield in all seasons but
the full irrigation treatment was necessary for
maximum production in only 96 and 97. Yield
increased from as little as 28%in ‘95 to as much
as 286% in ‘96 with additional water during grain
fill.
Except for the 95 season, crude protein
declined as yield increased from the first
increment of added water. With a threefold yield
increase in 1996 with full IR, protein decreased
from 17.5 to 13%. Crude protein increased
linearly in all years with each increment of LSN,
unless protein without LSN was above 16%.
Baking Quality
Baking quality measures as affected by IR and
LSN main effects are shown in Tables 1 and 2.
Flour Yield- Avoiding moisture stress during grain
fill increased Fyd in three of four years. The
higher EN rate reduced Fyd in two years but LSN
did not affect Fyd. Fyd was affected no more than
2% by treatments in any year but varied as much
as 5.8% among years.
Results continued
Flour Protein-Fpro generally declined as additional
water during grain fill increased yield. The higher EN
rate increased Fpro in two years but LSN increased
Fpro in all years. The increase in Fpro with 90 kg ha-
1 ranged from 0.6 to 2.1 percentage units. The Fpro
response to LSN was generally greatest with the first
LSN increment.
Mixograph Peak-Mpk decreased with additional
water during grain fill and these effects were
generally greater than the effects of EN and LSN. EN
increased Mpk slightly whereas LSN had little affect
other than in 1997 when it reduced Mpk.
Mixograph Tolerance-Higher Mto gives more
flexibility for adjusting mixing time to capture
optimum gluten strength. Watering during grain fill
had mixed effects, appreciably decreasing Mto in ‘95
and ‘97 but increasing Mto in ‘96. LSN generally
reduced Mto. Seasons typically had more influence
on Mto than LSN treatments.
Mixograph Height-Mht, an indication of gluten
strength, decreased with additional water during
grain fill. Moisture and seasonal influence generally
were greater than LSN affects, which were mixed,
appreciably increasing Mht in 1997 but reducing it
slightly in 1998.
Mixograph Absorbance-Mab is the capacity of flour
to absorb moisture. Added moisture had minimal
effects on Mab other than in ‘96 when IR reduced
Mab 5.8 units. LSN typically increased Mab from 0.4
to 2.6 units, but the effects were minimal compared
to the seasonal influence.
Bake volume-Added moisture during grain fill had
contrasting effects in different years, increasing Bvo
in ‘95 but reducing it in ‘96 and ‘98. LSN increased
Bvo every year, moreso in 97-98 than in 95-96. Bvo
tended to increase with higher protein regardless of
whether the protein increase was due to additional N
or lower yields from moisture stress. Bvo
improvement with LSN was limited if wheat without
LSN was at or above 15% protein.
Baking volumes were not consistently related to
specific protein concentrations. For example, 96
Bvo associated with 17% protein was smaller than
Bvo in ‘97 or ‘98 wheat testing less than 14% protein.
Baking quality is clearly dependent on more than
crude protein. Nevertheless, baking quality was
invariably improved when protein was enhanced
with LSN.
Bvo/Fpro-Higher R values indicate better quality
protein. Despite increased protein with stress, R
decreased. In contrast, with the exception of ‘97,
protein quality was only marginally affected by LSN.
Acceptable protein and baking quality was achieved
in this study without sacrificing yield by stressing
wheat during grain fill. Whereas yield limiting late
moisture stress increased protein in three years,
overall end quality (represented by Bvo) was
improved in only two years, and protein quality
(represented by R) actually decreased each year. In
contrast, LSN improved both Fpro and Bvo every
year of the study without affecting protein quality
(R).
Summary The results suggest that stressing wheat during
grain fill is a poor strategy for improving protein
and baking quality as compared to enhancing
protein with LSN.
Contrary to previous concerns that LSN
enhanced protein may result in poorer protein
quality, we found protein quality surprisingly
stable with LSN.
References1. Stark, J. C., and T. A. Tindall. 1992. Timing
split applications of nitrogen for irrigated hard red
spring wheat. J. Prod. Agric. 5:221-226.
2. Christensen, N. W. , and R. J. Killorn. 1981.
Wheat and barley growth and N fertilization under
sprinkler irrigation. Agron. J. 73:307-312.
3. Sylvester-Bradley, R. 1990. Does extra
nitrogen applied to breadmaking wheat benefit
the baker. In “Cereal Quality II” Aspects of
Applied Biology No. 25, Association of Applied
Biologists pp. 217-228.
Table 1. Late season water effects on Vandal hard red springwheat baking quality. 1995-98.
ET Fpro Fy Mpt Mh Mt Ma Bv R% % % cm3 cm3/%
19950 14.2 70.4 4.18 6.73 71.4 66.3 976 68.80.5 15.0 70.3 2.88 6.62 61.5 68.0 1056 70.71.0 14.8 70.2 3.28 6.60 65.6 67.8 1045 70.7
*** ns *** ** *** *** *** *
19960 15.7 67.8 4.44 6.94 70.5 68.2 1092 69.90.5 12.9 69.3 4.23 6.67 72,8 63.2 991 77.01.0 12.3 69.3 3.96 6.34 73.7 62.4 977 79.8
*** *** ns *** * *** *** ***
1997.0 13.3 67.8 4.08 7.18 72.4 61.9 1148 86.90.5 12.6 69.3 3.75 6.80 72.3 61.4 1145 91.41.0 13.0 69.9 3.53 7.01 67.4 61.8 1167 90.2
* *** ** ** *** ns ns *
19980 14.3 62.1 4.76 6.67 76.0 60.4 1213 84.90.5 12.6 64.6 3.62 6.26 75.8 57.3 1138 90.31.0 13.0 64.6 3.98 6.12 76.6 58.2 1194 91.8
*** ** ** ns ns ns * *ns, *, **, *** refer to nonsignificant , and significant at the 10, 5, and1% probability levels, respectively.
Table 1. Late season nitrogen effects on Vandal hard red springwheat baking quality. 1995-98.
LSN Fpro Fy Mpt Mh Mt Ma Bv Rkg ha-1 % % cm3 cm3 %-1
19950 14.3 70.3 3.43 6.58 67.3 67.1 1004 70.445 14.8 70.4 3.52 6.65 65.5 67.6 1037 70.390 14.9 70.1 3.39 6.72 65.8 67.5 1037 69.5
*** ns ns ns ns ns *** ***
19960 13.2 68.6 4.28 6.63 73.8 63.8 999 76.845 13.7 68.9 4.29 6.59 72.3 64.6 1021 75.390 14.0 68.8 4.07 6.75 71.1 65.4 1040 74.6
*** ns ns ns ** *** ** **
1997.0 11.9 68.9 4.13 6.53 74.5 60.5 1090 92.245 13.0 69.2 3.67 7.04 69.4 61.9 1170 90.290 14.0 69.0 3.56 7.43 68.2 62.7 1200 86.1
*** ns *** *** *** *** *** ***
19980 12.6 64.2 4.11 6.47 76.9 57.2 1122 89.245 13.4 63.6 4.08 6.24 76.5 58.9 1195 89.690 14.0 63.4 4.18 6.33 75.1 59.8 1230 88.2
*** ns *** *** *** *** *** ***ns, *, **, *** refer to nonsignificant , and significant at the 10, 5, and1% probability levels, respectively.