b-vectorfield tomography on cu/co febid nwsmagnetism.eu/esm/2019/slides/lubk-slides2.pdffresnel...
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: B-vectorfield tomography on Cu/Co FEBID NWsmagnetism.eu/Esm/2019/Slides/Lubk-slides2.pdfFresnel imaging: Pros & Cons Pro: simple fast sensitivity adjustable Con: (partially) non-linear](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022042211/5eb44daa93b6ea699b56ff8f/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Electron Holography
Axel Lubk
![Page 2: B-vectorfield tomography on Cu/Co FEBID NWsmagnetism.eu/Esm/2019/Slides/Lubk-slides2.pdfFresnel imaging: Pros & Cons Pro: simple fast sensitivity adjustable Con: (partially) non-linear](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022042211/5eb44daa93b6ea699b56ff8f/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Converting phase shifts to contrasts: Fresnel imaging
2
⊗ ⊙ ⊗
-
area of reduced
intensity
area of increased
intensity
area of reduced
intensity
area of increased
intensity
+𝛿𝑓
−𝛿𝑓
![Page 3: B-vectorfield tomography on Cu/Co FEBID NWsmagnetism.eu/Esm/2019/Slides/Lubk-slides2.pdfFresnel imaging: Pros & Cons Pro: simple fast sensitivity adjustable Con: (partially) non-linear](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022042211/5eb44daa93b6ea699b56ff8f/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Fresnel imaging: Pros & Cons
Pro:
simple
fast
sensitivity adjustable
Con:
(partially) non-linear contrast
defocus → unsharp images
quantification difficult (but
possible)
sensitiv to dynamical scattering
Can be overcome by Holography! (now)
Recommended reading:
1. Völkl, Edgar, Allard, Lawrence F., Joy,
David C. (Eds.) , Introduction to Electron
Holography, Springer (1999).
![Page 4: B-vectorfield tomography on Cu/Co FEBID NWsmagnetism.eu/Esm/2019/Slides/Lubk-slides2.pdfFresnel imaging: Pros & Cons Pro: simple fast sensitivity adjustable Con: (partially) non-linear](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022042211/5eb44daa93b6ea699b56ff8f/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
1. Fundamentals of electron scatteringa. Axial scattering
b. Magnetic and electric Ehrenberg–Siday–Aharonov–Bohm effect
2. Fundamentals of Electron Holography and Tomographya. Holographic Principle (interference, reconstruction)
b. Holographic Setups (inline, off-axis) and instrumental requirements
c. Separation of electrostatic and magnetic contributions
d. Tomographic reconstruction of 3D electric potential and magnetic
induction vector field from tilt series of projections
![Page 5: B-vectorfield tomography on Cu/Co FEBID NWsmagnetism.eu/Esm/2019/Slides/Lubk-slides2.pdfFresnel imaging: Pros & Cons Pro: simple fast sensitivity adjustable Con: (partially) non-linear](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022042211/5eb44daa93b6ea699b56ff8f/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
How do fields act on electrons waves?
⊗⊗⊗
⊗⊗⊗
⊗⊗⊗
⊗⊗⊗
⊗⊗⊗
⊗⊗⊗
⊗⊗⊗
⊗⊗⊗
⊗⊗⊗
⊗⊗⊗
⊗⊗⊗
𝛽
𝛽 = −𝑒𝑡
𝑚𝑣02
𝐸𝒙𝐸𝒚
𝛽 = −𝑒𝑡
𝑚𝑣0
−𝐵𝒚𝐵𝒙
𝛽
𝜑 =𝑒𝑡
ℏ𝑣0𝛷
𝛽 =1
𝑘𝛻𝜑
𝜑 =𝑒𝑡
ℏ𝐴𝑧
deflectio
n angle
phase
shift
semiclassics
tinitial
velocity
𝑝 = 𝑚𝑣0 = ℏ𝑘
momentum wave number
magnetic vector
potential
electrostatic
potential
![Page 6: B-vectorfield tomography on Cu/Co FEBID NWsmagnetism.eu/Esm/2019/Slides/Lubk-slides2.pdfFresnel imaging: Pros & Cons Pro: simple fast sensitivity adjustable Con: (partially) non-linear](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022042211/5eb44daa93b6ea699b56ff8f/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
How do fields act on electrons waves? *
𝐸Ψ =ො𝑝2
2𝑚− 𝑒𝑉 Ψreduced Klein-Gordon equation
(high-energy approximation)
Ψ = 𝑒𝑖𝑘𝑧𝑧𝜓
−2𝑘𝑧ℏ Ƹ𝑝𝑧𝜓 = Ƹ𝑝⊥2 − 2𝑚𝑒𝑉 𝜓
𝜕𝑧𝜓 ≈ 𝑖− Ƹ𝑝⊥
2
2ℏ2𝑘𝑧+ 𝜎𝑉 −
𝑒
ℏ𝐴𝑧 𝜓
paraxial approximation
• small-angle scattering
• no backscattering
2D time-dependent
Schrödinger equation
axial approximation
(wavelength << object details)
• very small angle scattering
𝜕𝑧𝜓 ≈ 𝑖 𝜎𝑉 −𝑒
ℏ𝐴𝑧 𝜓
ො𝑝 = −𝑖ℏ𝛻 + 𝑒𝑨
𝜓 = 𝑒𝑖𝜑𝜓0 → 𝜑 = න
object
𝑒
ℏ𝑣𝑉 −
𝑒
ℏ𝐴𝑧 𝑑𝑧
kinetic momentum
operator
* It is a good exercise to do derivation by yourself.
![Page 7: B-vectorfield tomography on Cu/Co FEBID NWsmagnetism.eu/Esm/2019/Slides/Lubk-slides2.pdfFresnel imaging: Pros & Cons Pro: simple fast sensitivity adjustable Con: (partially) non-linear](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022042211/5eb44daa93b6ea699b56ff8f/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Phase shift by electric potential
𝜑
s1 s2
𝜑 = 𝑘 න
𝑠2−𝑠1
𝑛𝑑𝑠 =𝑒
ℏ𝑣න
object
V𝑑𝑧
refractive index
![Page 8: B-vectorfield tomography on Cu/Co FEBID NWsmagnetism.eu/Esm/2019/Slides/Lubk-slides2.pdfFresnel imaging: Pros & Cons Pro: simple fast sensitivity adjustable Con: (partially) non-linear](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022042211/5eb44daa93b6ea699b56ff8f/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
electric magnetic
Δ𝜑 = 𝜎 න
𝑠2−𝑠1
𝑉 𝑑𝑠 − 2𝜋𝑒
ℎර
𝑠2+𝑠1
Ԧ𝐴(Ԧ𝑟)𝑑 Ԧ𝑠
Δ𝜑 = 𝜎 𝑉p,1 − 𝑉p,2 − 2𝜋𝑒
ℎΦ
Detectable phase shift *
phase difference
s1 s2
V1 V2
source
detector
* Why can we only detect phase differences?
![Page 9: B-vectorfield tomography on Cu/Co FEBID NWsmagnetism.eu/Esm/2019/Slides/Lubk-slides2.pdfFresnel imaging: Pros & Cons Pro: simple fast sensitivity adjustable Con: (partially) non-linear](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022042211/5eb44daa93b6ea699b56ff8f/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
electric magnetic
phase difference
s1 s2
V1 V2
source
detector
Detectable phase shift
Δ𝜑 = 𝜎 න
𝑠2−𝑠1
𝑉 𝑑𝑠 −𝑒
ℏර
𝑠2+𝑠1
𝑨𝑑𝒔
Δ𝜑 = 𝜎 𝑉p,1 − 𝑉p,2 −𝑒
ℏΦ
![Page 10: B-vectorfield tomography on Cu/Co FEBID NWsmagnetism.eu/Esm/2019/Slides/Lubk-slides2.pdfFresnel imaging: Pros & Cons Pro: simple fast sensitivity adjustable Con: (partially) non-linear](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022042211/5eb44daa93b6ea699b56ff8f/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
electric magnetic
Detectable phase shift
Δ𝜑 = 𝜎 න
𝑠2−𝑠1
𝑉 𝑑𝑠 −𝑒
ℏර
𝑠2+𝑠1
𝑨𝑑𝒔
Δ𝜑 = 𝜎 𝑉p,1 − 𝑉p,2 −𝑒
ℏΦ
phase difference
s1 s2
V1 V2
source
detectorFor the magnetic phase shift a Lorentz force
is not required at the electron trajectories !
![Page 11: B-vectorfield tomography on Cu/Co FEBID NWsmagnetism.eu/Esm/2019/Slides/Lubk-slides2.pdfFresnel imaging: Pros & Cons Pro: simple fast sensitivity adjustable Con: (partially) non-linear](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022042211/5eb44daa93b6ea699b56ff8f/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Ehrenberg - Siday – Aharonov - Bohm EffectProposal: Ehrenberg & Siday 1949
Aharonov & Bohm 1958
Experiment: Möllenstedt & Bayh 1962
Increasing
Magnetic
Flux
Time
![Page 12: B-vectorfield tomography on Cu/Co FEBID NWsmagnetism.eu/Esm/2019/Slides/Lubk-slides2.pdfFresnel imaging: Pros & Cons Pro: simple fast sensitivity adjustable Con: (partially) non-linear](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022042211/5eb44daa93b6ea699b56ff8f/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
z
i
f
x
Magnetic phase shift
𝜑(𝑥)
t
𝜑(𝑥) =𝑒
ℏΦ(𝑥)
Φ(𝑥)
= 2𝜋 Φ =ℏ
𝑒for
ref
magnetic flux quantum
![Page 13: B-vectorfield tomography on Cu/Co FEBID NWsmagnetism.eu/Esm/2019/Slides/Lubk-slides2.pdfFresnel imaging: Pros & Cons Pro: simple fast sensitivity adjustable Con: (partially) non-linear](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022042211/5eb44daa93b6ea699b56ff8f/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Amplitude object a Phase object
a exp[i ]
Summary: object exit wave
![Page 14: B-vectorfield tomography on Cu/Co FEBID NWsmagnetism.eu/Esm/2019/Slides/Lubk-slides2.pdfFresnel imaging: Pros & Cons Pro: simple fast sensitivity adjustable Con: (partially) non-linear](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022042211/5eb44daa93b6ea699b56ff8f/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Summary: object exit wave
phase modulation (𝑥, 𝑦) :
micro- /nanofields
• electric
• magnetic
amplitude modulation 𝑎(𝑥, 𝑦):• scattering into large angles
• interference effects
• inelastic scattering
![Page 15: B-vectorfield tomography on Cu/Co FEBID NWsmagnetism.eu/Esm/2019/Slides/Lubk-slides2.pdfFresnel imaging: Pros & Cons Pro: simple fast sensitivity adjustable Con: (partially) non-linear](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022042211/5eb44daa93b6ea699b56ff8f/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
1. Fundamentals of electron scatteringa. Axial scattering
b. Magnetic and electric Ehrenberg–Siday–Aharonov–Bohm effect
2. Fundamentals of Electron Holography and Tomographya. Holographic Principle (interference, reconstruction)
b. Holographic Setups (inline, off-axis) and instrumental requirements
c. Separation of electrostatic and magnetic contributions
d. Tomographic reconstruction of 3D electric potential and magnetic
induction vector field from tilt series of projections
![Page 16: B-vectorfield tomography on Cu/Co FEBID NWsmagnetism.eu/Esm/2019/Slides/Lubk-slides2.pdfFresnel imaging: Pros & Cons Pro: simple fast sensitivity adjustable Con: (partially) non-linear](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022042211/5eb44daa93b6ea699b56ff8f/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
1902-1979
Nobel Prize 1971
Easter 1947, on the tennis court:
... and all of sudden it came to me, without any effort on my side.
Interference and diffractionare mutually inverse
Electron Holographymeasures phases
Dennis Gabor
![Page 17: B-vectorfield tomography on Cu/Co FEBID NWsmagnetism.eu/Esm/2019/Slides/Lubk-slides2.pdfFresnel imaging: Pros & Cons Pro: simple fast sensitivity adjustable Con: (partially) non-linear](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022042211/5eb44daa93b6ea699b56ff8f/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Holography
Object wave hologram Image wave
interference diffraction
Dennis Gabor
![Page 18: B-vectorfield tomography on Cu/Co FEBID NWsmagnetism.eu/Esm/2019/Slides/Lubk-slides2.pdfFresnel imaging: Pros & Cons Pro: simple fast sensitivity adjustable Con: (partially) non-linear](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022042211/5eb44daa93b6ea699b56ff8f/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Common Forms of Electron Holography
focal series inline off-axis transport of intensity
J.M. Cowley, 20 forms of holography, Ultramicroscopy 41 (1992), 335-348
![Page 19: B-vectorfield tomography on Cu/Co FEBID NWsmagnetism.eu/Esm/2019/Slides/Lubk-slides2.pdfFresnel imaging: Pros & Cons Pro: simple fast sensitivity adjustable Con: (partially) non-linear](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022042211/5eb44daa93b6ea699b56ff8f/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
object
pro
pag
ation
object
exit wave
prop
wave
Holography - Dennis Gabor´s idea
![Page 20: B-vectorfield tomography on Cu/Co FEBID NWsmagnetism.eu/Esm/2019/Slides/Lubk-slides2.pdfFresnel imaging: Pros & Cons Pro: simple fast sensitivity adjustable Con: (partially) non-linear](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022042211/5eb44daa93b6ea699b56ff8f/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
h o l o g r a m p
rop
agatio
n
prop
wave
object
exit wave
object
Holography - Dennis Gabor´s idea
![Page 21: B-vectorfield tomography on Cu/Co FEBID NWsmagnetism.eu/Esm/2019/Slides/Lubk-slides2.pdfFresnel imaging: Pros & Cons Pro: simple fast sensitivity adjustable Con: (partially) non-linear](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022042211/5eb44daa93b6ea699b56ff8f/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
h o l o g r a m
bac
k-p
rop
agat
ion
prop
wave
object
exit wave
objectINVERSE
PROBLEM
Holography - reconstruction of wave
![Page 22: B-vectorfield tomography on Cu/Co FEBID NWsmagnetism.eu/Esm/2019/Slides/Lubk-slides2.pdfFresnel imaging: Pros & Cons Pro: simple fast sensitivity adjustable Con: (partially) non-linear](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022042211/5eb44daa93b6ea699b56ff8f/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Holography: basic scheme
𝜓
𝑟
![Page 23: B-vectorfield tomography on Cu/Co FEBID NWsmagnetism.eu/Esm/2019/Slides/Lubk-slides2.pdfFresnel imaging: Pros & Cons Pro: simple fast sensitivity adjustable Con: (partially) non-linear](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022042211/5eb44daa93b6ea699b56ff8f/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Holography: recording hologram
𝜓
𝑟
ℎ𝑜𝑙 = (𝜓 + 𝑟)(𝜓 + 𝑟)∗
= 𝜓𝜓∗ + 𝑟𝑟∗ + 𝜓𝑟∗ + 𝜓∗𝑟
![Page 24: B-vectorfield tomography on Cu/Co FEBID NWsmagnetism.eu/Esm/2019/Slides/Lubk-slides2.pdfFresnel imaging: Pros & Cons Pro: simple fast sensitivity adjustable Con: (partially) non-linear](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022042211/5eb44daa93b6ea699b56ff8f/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Holography: reconstruction of wave
𝜓
𝜓 ⋅ ℎ𝑜𝑙 = (𝜓𝜓∗)𝜓 + (𝑟𝑟∗)𝜓 + (𝜓𝑟∗)𝜓 + (𝜓∗𝑟)𝜓
= 𝜓(𝜓𝜓∗ + 𝑟𝑟∗) + 𝑟∗(𝜓𝜓) + 𝑟(𝜓𝜓∗)
𝑟𝑟∗-wave
modulated in
amp/phase 𝜓
𝑟-wave
modulated in
amp 𝜓
𝜓-wave
modulated in
amp 𝜓; 𝑟
𝜓
𝑟 ∗
![Page 25: B-vectorfield tomography on Cu/Co FEBID NWsmagnetism.eu/Esm/2019/Slides/Lubk-slides2.pdfFresnel imaging: Pros & Cons Pro: simple fast sensitivity adjustable Con: (partially) non-linear](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022042211/5eb44daa93b6ea699b56ff8f/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Holography: reconstruction of wave
𝜓
𝑟
𝑟 ⋅ ℎ𝑜𝑙 = (𝜓𝜓∗)𝑟 + (𝑟𝑟∗)𝑟 + (𝜓𝑟∗)𝑟 + (𝜓∗𝑟)𝑟
= 𝑟(𝜓𝜓∗ + 𝑟𝑟∗) + 𝜓(𝑟∗𝑟) + 𝜓∗(𝑟𝑟)
𝑟
𝜓 ∗
𝜓-wave
modulated in
amp 𝑟
𝜓∗-wave
modulated in
amp/phase 𝑟
𝑟-wave
modulated in
amp 𝜓; 𝑟
![Page 26: B-vectorfield tomography on Cu/Co FEBID NWsmagnetism.eu/Esm/2019/Slides/Lubk-slides2.pdfFresnel imaging: Pros & Cons Pro: simple fast sensitivity adjustable Con: (partially) non-linear](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022042211/5eb44daa93b6ea699b56ff8f/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Plane reference wave r
𝜓
𝑟
𝑟 ⋅ ℎ𝑜𝑙 = (𝜓𝜓∗)𝑟 + (𝑟𝑟∗)𝑟 + (𝜓𝑟∗)𝑟 + (𝜓∗𝑟)𝑟
= 𝑟(𝜓𝜓∗ + 𝑟𝑟∗) + 𝜓(𝑟∗𝑟) + 𝜓∗(𝑟𝑟)
𝜓 ∗
-wave 𝜓 -wave
modulated in
phase
𝜓 ∗
𝑟
-wave
modulated in
amp
𝑟
𝜓
𝑟
![Page 27: B-vectorfield tomography on Cu/Co FEBID NWsmagnetism.eu/Esm/2019/Slides/Lubk-slides2.pdfFresnel imaging: Pros & Cons Pro: simple fast sensitivity adjustable Con: (partially) non-linear](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022042211/5eb44daa93b6ea699b56ff8f/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Where to take the hologram ?
Object plane
Fresnel region
Fraunhofer region
Fourier plane
?
In principle: „where“ is not essential,
but with electrons we are „coherency-limited“ .....
![Page 28: B-vectorfield tomography on Cu/Co FEBID NWsmagnetism.eu/Esm/2019/Slides/Lubk-slides2.pdfFresnel imaging: Pros & Cons Pro: simple fast sensitivity adjustable Con: (partially) non-linear](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022042211/5eb44daa93b6ea699b56ff8f/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Where to take the hologram ?
Inline Holography
Fraunhofer (far field)
Fresnel (near field)
Figure from Lee, Optics Express Vol. 15, Issue 26, pp. 18275-18282 (2007)
Illumination
Defocus Series
Reconstruction
Fraunhofer Holography
2 /k
Reconstruction SchemesScattering Regimes
Differential Defocus /
Transport of Intensity
Reconstruction
![Page 29: B-vectorfield tomography on Cu/Co FEBID NWsmagnetism.eu/Esm/2019/Slides/Lubk-slides2.pdfFresnel imaging: Pros & Cons Pro: simple fast sensitivity adjustable Con: (partially) non-linear](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022042211/5eb44daa93b6ea699b56ff8f/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
1. Fundamentals of electron scatteringa. Axial scattering
b. Magnetic and electric Ehrenberg–Siday–Aharonov–Bohm effect
2. Fundamentals of Electron Holography and Tomographya. Holographic Principle (interference, reconstruction)
b. Holographic Setups (inline, off-axis) and instrumental
requirements
c. Separation of electrostatic and magnetic contributions
d. Tomographic reconstruction of 3D electric potential and magnetic
induction vector field from tilt series of projections
![Page 30: B-vectorfield tomography on Cu/Co FEBID NWsmagnetism.eu/Esm/2019/Slides/Lubk-slides2.pdfFresnel imaging: Pros & Cons Pro: simple fast sensitivity adjustable Con: (partially) non-linear](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022042211/5eb44daa93b6ea699b56ff8f/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Transport of Intensity Reconstruction
( , ) 1( , )
1( , ) ( , )
zj z
z k
z zk
rr
r r
( , )( , )
2
z iz
z k
rr
2
2
2
2
z z z z zO z
z z
z z z zz O z
Continuity Eq. / Transport of Intensity Eq.
experimental data from 2 slightly defocussed images
,z z z z
2
Paraxial Eq.
density / intensity
arg
phase
![Page 31: B-vectorfield tomography on Cu/Co FEBID NWsmagnetism.eu/Esm/2019/Slides/Lubk-slides2.pdfFresnel imaging: Pros & Cons Pro: simple fast sensitivity adjustable Con: (partially) non-linear](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022042211/5eb44daa93b6ea699b56ff8f/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Transport of Intensity Reconstruction
simpliefied TIE reconstruction
( , )( , )
zz
z k
rr
( , ) 1( , )
1( , ) ( , )
zj z
z k
z zk
rr
r r
( , ) const.z r
phase object
Poisson problem
(e.g., solve with periodic boundary conditions)
minimal model
![Page 32: B-vectorfield tomography on Cu/Co FEBID NWsmagnetism.eu/Esm/2019/Slides/Lubk-slides2.pdfFresnel imaging: Pros & Cons Pro: simple fast sensitivity adjustable Con: (partially) non-linear](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022042211/5eb44daa93b6ea699b56ff8f/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
TIE: Pros & Cons
Pro:
linear signal
simple reconstruction
simple experiment
no external reference /
vacuum required
works at moderate
coherency
Con:
not so fast (2 recordings)
not sensitiv to small spatial
frequencies (large scale
variations)
ambiguous result (because of
unknown boundary conditions)
![Page 33: B-vectorfield tomography on Cu/Co FEBID NWsmagnetism.eu/Esm/2019/Slides/Lubk-slides2.pdfFresnel imaging: Pros & Cons Pro: simple fast sensitivity adjustable Con: (partially) non-linear](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022042211/5eb44daa93b6ea699b56ff8f/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
Inline Holography
minimal model
reconstruction algorithm
![Page 34: B-vectorfield tomography on Cu/Co FEBID NWsmagnetism.eu/Esm/2019/Slides/Lubk-slides2.pdfFresnel imaging: Pros & Cons Pro: simple fast sensitivity adjustable Con: (partially) non-linear](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022042211/5eb44daa93b6ea699b56ff8f/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
Bx
By
B||
Experimental focus series Reconstruction of B-Field
70 nmB
(T
)
B (
T)
B (
T)
Focal Series Reconstruction
![Page 35: B-vectorfield tomography on Cu/Co FEBID NWsmagnetism.eu/Esm/2019/Slides/Lubk-slides2.pdfFresnel imaging: Pros & Cons Pro: simple fast sensitivity adjustable Con: (partially) non-linear](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022042211/5eb44daa93b6ea699b56ff8f/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
Focal Series: Pros & Cons
Pro:
sensitiv to smaller (but still
not very small) spatial
frequencies
works at every TEM
no external reference /
vacuum required
Con:
very slow
ambiguous result (depending on
starting guess)
complicated reconstruction
![Page 36: B-vectorfield tomography on Cu/Co FEBID NWsmagnetism.eu/Esm/2019/Slides/Lubk-slides2.pdfFresnel imaging: Pros & Cons Pro: simple fast sensitivity adjustable Con: (partially) non-linear](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022042211/5eb44daa93b6ea699b56ff8f/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
Off-axis electron holography
Electron Source
Object Plane
Back Focal
Plane
Image Plane
Specimen
Condenser
Objective
Lens
Detector
Biprism
Reference Wave Object Exit-Wave
Reference WaveImage Wave
Virtual Electron Sources
b
Hologram
Bhol cSBC 2 coscI II r rr q r r
Hologram
UF = 0V
UF = 10V
UF = 20V
UF = 30V
UF = 40V
![Page 37: B-vectorfield tomography on Cu/Co FEBID NWsmagnetism.eu/Esm/2019/Slides/Lubk-slides2.pdfFresnel imaging: Pros & Cons Pro: simple fast sensitivity adjustable Con: (partially) non-linear](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022042211/5eb44daa93b6ea699b56ff8f/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
Biprism-Holder
![Page 38: B-vectorfield tomography on Cu/Co FEBID NWsmagnetism.eu/Esm/2019/Slides/Lubk-slides2.pdfFresnel imaging: Pros & Cons Pro: simple fast sensitivity adjustable Con: (partially) non-linear](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022042211/5eb44daa93b6ea699b56ff8f/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
Biprism-Holder
![Page 39: B-vectorfield tomography on Cu/Co FEBID NWsmagnetism.eu/Esm/2019/Slides/Lubk-slides2.pdfFresnel imaging: Pros & Cons Pro: simple fast sensitivity adjustable Con: (partially) non-linear](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022042211/5eb44daa93b6ea699b56ff8f/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
Off-axis electron holography
Electron Source
Object Plane
Back Focal
Plane
Image Plane
Specimen
Condenser
Objective
Lens
Detector
Biprism
Reference Wave Object Exit-Wave
Reference WaveImage Wave
Virtual Electron Sources
b
Hologram
Bhol cSBC 2 coscI II r rr q r r
Hologram
![Page 40: B-vectorfield tomography on Cu/Co FEBID NWsmagnetism.eu/Esm/2019/Slides/Lubk-slides2.pdfFresnel imaging: Pros & Cons Pro: simple fast sensitivity adjustable Con: (partially) non-linear](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022042211/5eb44daa93b6ea699b56ff8f/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
Magnetic phase shift in Cobalt stripe domains
Cobalt
Vacuum
Amplitude image
Phase image
Projected B-field
𝜕𝜑mag
𝜕𝑥= −
𝑒
ℏන𝐵𝑦 𝑥, 𝑦, 𝑧 d𝑧
![Page 41: B-vectorfield tomography on Cu/Co FEBID NWsmagnetism.eu/Esm/2019/Slides/Lubk-slides2.pdfFresnel imaging: Pros & Cons Pro: simple fast sensitivity adjustable Con: (partially) non-linear](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022042211/5eb44daa93b6ea699b56ff8f/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
Electric and magnetic phase shift
cos 10 × 𝜑𝑚𝑎𝑔 𝑥, 𝑦
Vortex
homogeneous
B-field
Stray fields
𝜑𝑒𝑙 𝑥, 𝑦 = 𝐶𝐸 න
−∞
+∞
𝑉 𝑥, 𝑦, 𝑧 d𝑧𝜕𝑥𝜑𝑚𝑎𝑔
𝜕𝑦𝜑𝑚𝑎𝑔= −
𝑒
ℏන
𝐵𝑦 𝑥, 𝑦, 𝑧
−𝐵𝑥 𝑥, 𝑦, 𝑧d𝑧
Sample provided by Denys Makarov, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf.
![Page 42: B-vectorfield tomography on Cu/Co FEBID NWsmagnetism.eu/Esm/2019/Slides/Lubk-slides2.pdfFresnel imaging: Pros & Cons Pro: simple fast sensitivity adjustable Con: (partially) non-linear](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022042211/5eb44daa93b6ea699b56ff8f/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
Electric and magnetic phase shift
cos 10 × 𝜑𝑚𝑎𝑔 𝑥, 𝑦
homogeneous
B-field
Stray fields
𝜑𝑒𝑙 𝑥, 𝑦 = 𝐶𝐸 න
−∞
+∞
𝑉 𝑥, 𝑦, 𝑧 d𝑧𝜕𝑥𝜑𝑚𝑎𝑔
𝜕𝑦𝜑𝑚𝑎𝑔= −
𝑒
ℏන
𝐵𝑦 𝑥, 𝑦, 𝑧
−𝐵𝑥 𝑥, 𝑦, 𝑧d𝑧
Fernandez-Pacheco, A. et al. , Nat Commun 2017, 8, 15756.
Vortex
Sample provided by Denys Makarov, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf.
![Page 43: B-vectorfield tomography on Cu/Co FEBID NWsmagnetism.eu/Esm/2019/Slides/Lubk-slides2.pdfFresnel imaging: Pros & Cons Pro: simple fast sensitivity adjustable Con: (partially) non-linear](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022042211/5eb44daa93b6ea699b56ff8f/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
N. Osakabe, T. Matsuda, T. Kawasaki, J. Endo and A. Tonomura, Phys.Rev. A
34(1986), 815
Liquid Helium Cryostage
![Page 44: B-vectorfield tomography on Cu/Co FEBID NWsmagnetism.eu/Esm/2019/Slides/Lubk-slides2.pdfFresnel imaging: Pros & Cons Pro: simple fast sensitivity adjustable Con: (partially) non-linear](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022042211/5eb44daa93b6ea699b56ff8f/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
J.E. Bonevich, K. Harada, T. Matsuda, H. Kasai, T. Yoshida, G. Pozzi and A. Tonomura,
Phys.Rev.Letters, 70 (1993), 2952
Nb-film
T=4.5K <
Tc=9.2K
B=15 mT (150
Gauss)
Phase
amplification 16*
Superconductivity: Vortex lattice
![Page 45: B-vectorfield tomography on Cu/Co FEBID NWsmagnetism.eu/Esm/2019/Slides/Lubk-slides2.pdfFresnel imaging: Pros & Cons Pro: simple fast sensitivity adjustable Con: (partially) non-linear](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022042211/5eb44daa93b6ea699b56ff8f/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
Off-axis: Pros & Cons
Pro:
linear signal
simple reconstruction
unambiguous result
sensitiv to the whole spatial
frequency range
Con:
(multiple) biprisms required
reference (vacuum) required
large coherency requirements
![Page 46: B-vectorfield tomography on Cu/Co FEBID NWsmagnetism.eu/Esm/2019/Slides/Lubk-slides2.pdfFresnel imaging: Pros & Cons Pro: simple fast sensitivity adjustable Con: (partially) non-linear](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022042211/5eb44daa93b6ea699b56ff8f/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
1. Fundamentals of electron scatteringa. Axial scattering
b. Magnetic and electric Ehrenberg–Siday–Aharonov–Bohm effect
2. Fundamentals of Electron Holography and Tomographya. Holographic Principle (interference, reconstruction)
b. Holographic Setups (inline, off-axis) and instrumental requirements
c. Separation of electrostatic and magnetic contributions
d. Tomographic reconstruction of 3D electric potential and magnetic
induction vector field from tilt series of projections
3. Magnetic fields and textures in solidsa. Magnetization, Magnetic induction, Magnetic field
b. Magnetostatics
c. Micromagnetics
![Page 47: B-vectorfield tomography on Cu/Co FEBID NWsmagnetism.eu/Esm/2019/Slides/Lubk-slides2.pdfFresnel imaging: Pros & Cons Pro: simple fast sensitivity adjustable Con: (partially) non-linear](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022042211/5eb44daa93b6ea699b56ff8f/html5/thumbnails/47.jpg)
Separation of magnetic and electric phase shift *
𝑩y
𝜑𝑒𝑙
𝜑𝑚𝑎𝑔
e-
𝜑1 𝑥, 𝑦 = 𝜑𝑒𝑙 𝑥, 𝑦 + 𝜑𝑚𝑎𝑔 𝑥, 𝑦
180°𝑩
x
y
z
e-
𝜑𝑚𝑎𝑔
𝜑2 𝑥, 𝑦 = 𝜑𝑒𝑙 𝑥, 𝑦 − 𝜑𝑚𝑎𝑔 𝑥, 𝑦
𝜑𝑚𝑎𝑔 𝑥, 𝑦 = 𝜑1 𝑥, 𝑦 − 𝜑2 𝑥, 𝑦 /2
𝜑𝑒𝑙 𝑥, 𝑦 = 𝜑1 𝑥, 𝑦 + 𝜑2 𝑥, 𝑦 /2
x
x
z
* What does it have to do with time-inversion symmetry?
![Page 48: B-vectorfield tomography on Cu/Co FEBID NWsmagnetism.eu/Esm/2019/Slides/Lubk-slides2.pdfFresnel imaging: Pros & Cons Pro: simple fast sensitivity adjustable Con: (partially) non-linear](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022042211/5eb44daa93b6ea699b56ff8f/html5/thumbnails/48.jpg)
1. Fundamentals of electron scatteringa. Axial scattering
b. Magnetic and electric Ehrenberg–Siday–Aharonov–Bohm effect
2. Fundamentals of Electron Holography and Tomographya. Holographic Principle (interference, reconstruction)
b. Holographic Setups (inline, off-axis) and instrumental requirements
c. Separation of electrostatic and magnetic contributions
d. Tomographic reconstruction of 3D electric potential and magnetic
induction vector field from tilt series of projections
![Page 49: B-vectorfield tomography on Cu/Co FEBID NWsmagnetism.eu/Esm/2019/Slides/Lubk-slides2.pdfFresnel imaging: Pros & Cons Pro: simple fast sensitivity adjustable Con: (partially) non-linear](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022042211/5eb44daa93b6ea699b56ff8f/html5/thumbnails/49.jpg)
Separation of magnetic and electric phase shift
𝜑𝑒𝑙𝜑𝑚𝑎𝑔 = 𝜑1 − 𝜑2 /𝟐 𝜑𝑒𝑙 = 𝜑1 + 𝜑2 /𝟐
5x amplified
𝜕𝑥𝜑𝑚𝑎𝑔
𝜕𝑦𝜑𝑚𝑎𝑔= −
𝑒
ℏන
𝐵𝑦 𝑥, 𝑦, 𝑧
−𝐵𝑥 𝑥, 𝑦, 𝑧d𝑧 𝜑𝑒𝑙 𝑥, 𝑦 = 𝐶𝐸 න
−∞
+∞
𝑉 𝑥, 𝑦, 𝑧 d𝑧
![Page 50: B-vectorfield tomography on Cu/Co FEBID NWsmagnetism.eu/Esm/2019/Slides/Lubk-slides2.pdfFresnel imaging: Pros & Cons Pro: simple fast sensitivity adjustable Con: (partially) non-linear](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022042211/5eb44daa93b6ea699b56ff8f/html5/thumbnails/50.jpg)
Towards 3D nanomagnetism
Reyes et al., Nano Lett. 16 (2016) 1230
Biziere et al., Nano Lett. 13 (2013) 2053
+ structural, chemical data
Projection
Cu/Co NW
2D Magnetic
phase maps by
TEM holography
Comparison
DW
in
Co
3D modelling of M,B
(eg. micromagnetic
simulation)
![Page 51: B-vectorfield tomography on Cu/Co FEBID NWsmagnetism.eu/Esm/2019/Slides/Lubk-slides2.pdfFresnel imaging: Pros & Cons Pro: simple fast sensitivity adjustable Con: (partially) non-linear](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022042211/5eb44daa93b6ea699b56ff8f/html5/thumbnails/51.jpg)
Towards 3D nanomagnetism
Reyes et al., Nano Lett. 16 (2016) 1230
Biziere et al., Nano Lett. 13 (2013) 2053
+ structural, chemical data
Projection
Cu/Co NW
2D Magnetic
phase maps by
TEM holography
Comparison
DW
in
Co
3D modelling of M,B
(eg. micromagnetic
simulation)
Loss of 3D-information!
![Page 52: B-vectorfield tomography on Cu/Co FEBID NWsmagnetism.eu/Esm/2019/Slides/Lubk-slides2.pdfFresnel imaging: Pros & Cons Pro: simple fast sensitivity adjustable Con: (partially) non-linear](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022042211/5eb44daa93b6ea699b56ff8f/html5/thumbnails/52.jpg)
Towards 3D nanomagnetism
3D modelling of M,B
(eg. micromagnetic
simulation)
3D reconstruction
by electron holographic
vector field tomography
of B-fields
Comparison
DW
in
Co
Reyes et al., Nano Lett. 16 (2016) 1230
Biziere et al., Nano Lett. 13 (2013) 2053
Cu/Co NW
DW
in
Co
+ structural, chemical data
![Page 53: B-vectorfield tomography on Cu/Co FEBID NWsmagnetism.eu/Esm/2019/Slides/Lubk-slides2.pdfFresnel imaging: Pros & Cons Pro: simple fast sensitivity adjustable Con: (partially) non-linear](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022042211/5eb44daa93b6ea699b56ff8f/html5/thumbnails/53.jpg)
Single tilt axis holographic tomography of nanomagnets
Hologram 360° tilt
series
Phase image 360° tilt
series
1. Holographic
Acquisition
2. Holographic
Reconstruction
Magnetic field 𝐵𝑎𝑥𝑖𝑎𝑙
Electric phase image
180° tilt series
Magnetic phase derivatives
180° tilt series
Electric potential
3. Separation
electric/magnetic
4. Tomographic
Reconstruction
𝜕𝜑𝑚𝑎𝑔
𝜕𝑥= −
𝑒
ℏන𝐵𝑦 𝑥, 𝑦, 𝑧 d𝑧𝜑𝑒𝑙 𝑥, 𝑦 = 𝐶𝐸 න
−∞
+∞
𝑉 𝑥, 𝑦, 𝑧 d𝑧
4. Tomographic
Reconstruction
Wolf et al., Chem. Mater. 27 (2015) 6771
Simon, Wolf et al., Nano Lett. 16 (2016) 114
x
zy (tilt axis)
![Page 54: B-vectorfield tomography on Cu/Co FEBID NWsmagnetism.eu/Esm/2019/Slides/Lubk-slides2.pdfFresnel imaging: Pros & Cons Pro: simple fast sensitivity adjustable Con: (partially) non-linear](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022042211/5eb44daa93b6ea699b56ff8f/html5/thumbnails/54.jpg)
Electron holographic tomography of magnetic samples
3D reconstruction of 𝑉 𝑥, 𝑦, 𝑧 and 𝑩 𝑥, 𝑦, 𝑧
1. Tilt series acquisition of
off-axis electron holograms:
Two 360° tilt series around 𝑥- and 𝑦-axis
(gaps due to experimental limitations)
2. Phase shift retrieval
from electron holograms
3. Separation of electric and
magnetic phase shift and alignment
4. Tomographic
reconstruction of
5. Computation of 𝐵𝑧 𝑥, 𝑦, 𝑧from 𝛻 ∙ 𝑩 𝑥, 𝑦, 𝑧 = 0
𝑧
𝑦𝑥
𝜕𝜑𝑚𝑎𝑔
𝜕𝑥𝜕𝜑𝑚𝑎𝑔
𝜕𝑦
𝐵𝑦
𝐵𝑥
𝜑𝑒𝑙
𝑉 𝑥, 𝑦, 𝑧 𝑩 𝑥, 𝑦, 𝑧
𝑉 𝑉𝑉 𝑥, 𝑦, 𝑧 from 𝜑𝑒𝑙,
𝐵𝑥 𝑥, 𝑦, 𝑧 from 𝜕𝜑𝑚𝑎𝑔
𝜕𝑦,
𝐵𝑦 𝑥, 𝑦, 𝑧 from 𝜕𝜑𝑚𝑎𝑔
𝜕𝑥
𝜑𝑒𝑙
1.
2.3.
4. 4.
5.
![Page 55: B-vectorfield tomography on Cu/Co FEBID NWsmagnetism.eu/Esm/2019/Slides/Lubk-slides2.pdfFresnel imaging: Pros & Cons Pro: simple fast sensitivity adjustable Con: (partially) non-linear](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022042211/5eb44daa93b6ea699b56ff8f/html5/thumbnails/55.jpg)
Dual tilt axis holographic tomography of nanomagnets
Implementation
Automated tomographic
tilt series acquisition
• Installed at NCEM Berkeley,
U Antwerp, TU Berlin
• Adapted for different TEMs
Wolf et al. Ultramic. 110 (2010) 390
Alignment
• Displacement correction
• Tilt axis finding
Wolf et al., Chem. Mater. 27 (2015)
6771
“Reconstruct 3D”
software package
• Documentation at
www.triebenberg.de/wolf
Wolf et al. Ultramic. 136 (2014) 15
Electron Holographic
Tomography
![Page 56: B-vectorfield tomography on Cu/Co FEBID NWsmagnetism.eu/Esm/2019/Slides/Lubk-slides2.pdfFresnel imaging: Pros & Cons Pro: simple fast sensitivity adjustable Con: (partially) non-linear](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022042211/5eb44daa93b6ea699b56ff8f/html5/thumbnails/56.jpg)
Challenges and problems of 3D B field mapping
Challenges Problems
Magnetic sample • beam damage
• diffraction contrast
• stray fields
• magnetization by Lorentz lens
R. E. Dunin-Borkowski and T. Kasama, Microscopy and Microanalysis 10 (2004) 1010.
Vortex core
Permalloy disks
provided by J. Zweck, Regensburg
![Page 57: B-vectorfield tomography on Cu/Co FEBID NWsmagnetism.eu/Esm/2019/Slides/Lubk-slides2.pdfFresnel imaging: Pros & Cons Pro: simple fast sensitivity adjustable Con: (partially) non-linear](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022042211/5eb44daa93b6ea699b56ff8f/html5/thumbnails/57.jpg)
Challenges and problems of 3D B field mapping
Permalloy disks
provided by J. Zweck, Regensburg
Vortex core
Challenges Problems
Magnetic sample • beam damage
• diffraction contrast
• stray fields
• magnetization by Lorentz lens
R. E. Dunin-Borkowski and T. Kasama, Microscopy and Microanalysis 10 (2004) 1010.
![Page 58: B-vectorfield tomography on Cu/Co FEBID NWsmagnetism.eu/Esm/2019/Slides/Lubk-slides2.pdfFresnel imaging: Pros & Cons Pro: simple fast sensitivity adjustable Con: (partially) non-linear](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022042211/5eb44daa93b6ea699b56ff8f/html5/thumbnails/58.jpg)
Challenges and problems of 3D B field mapping
Challenges Problems
Magnetic sample • beam damage
• diffraction contrast
• stray fields
• magnetization by Lorentz lens
න𝐵𝑦 𝑥 𝛼 , 𝑦, 𝑧 𝛼 d𝑧 = −ℏ
𝑒
𝜕𝜑
𝜕𝑥 𝛼
y in the direction of tilt axis
• derivation enhances noise
• only 𝐵𝑦, i.e., parallel to tilt axis
R. E. Dunin-Borkowski and T. Kasama, Microscopy and Microanalysis 10 (2004) 1010.
![Page 59: B-vectorfield tomography on Cu/Co FEBID NWsmagnetism.eu/Esm/2019/Slides/Lubk-slides2.pdfFresnel imaging: Pros & Cons Pro: simple fast sensitivity adjustable Con: (partially) non-linear](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022042211/5eb44daa93b6ea699b56ff8f/html5/thumbnails/59.jpg)
Challenges and problems of 3D B field mapping
Challenges Problems
Magnetic sample • beam damage
• diffraction contrast
• stray fields
• magnetization by Lorentz lens
න𝐵𝑦 𝑥 𝛼 , 𝑦, 𝑧 𝛼 d𝑧 = −ℏ
𝑒
𝜕𝜑
𝜕𝑥 𝛼
y in the direction of tilt axis
• derivation enhances noise
• only 𝐵𝑦, i.e., parallel to tilt axis
Two ultra-high-tilt series (±90°) about
orthogonal axes to get Bx and By
• sample geometry
• holder design
• stability
R. E. Dunin-Borkowski and T. Kasama, Microscopy and Microanalysis 10 (2004) 1010.
![Page 60: B-vectorfield tomography on Cu/Co FEBID NWsmagnetism.eu/Esm/2019/Slides/Lubk-slides2.pdfFresnel imaging: Pros & Cons Pro: simple fast sensitivity adjustable Con: (partially) non-linear](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022042211/5eb44daa93b6ea699b56ff8f/html5/thumbnails/60.jpg)
Challenges and problems of 3D B field mapping
Challenges Solution
Magnetic sample itself • preparation of free-standing samples
combined with
special holder designs
Tsuneta et al., Microscopy 63 (2014) p. 469
a=80°
o=
360°
Dual-Axis Tomography Holder
Model 2040, Fischione Instruments
![Page 61: B-vectorfield tomography on Cu/Co FEBID NWsmagnetism.eu/Esm/2019/Slides/Lubk-slides2.pdfFresnel imaging: Pros & Cons Pro: simple fast sensitivity adjustable Con: (partially) non-linear](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022042211/5eb44daa93b6ea699b56ff8f/html5/thumbnails/61.jpg)
Multiple-axis rotation holder
![Page 62: B-vectorfield tomography on Cu/Co FEBID NWsmagnetism.eu/Esm/2019/Slides/Lubk-slides2.pdfFresnel imaging: Pros & Cons Pro: simple fast sensitivity adjustable Con: (partially) non-linear](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022042211/5eb44daa93b6ea699b56ff8f/html5/thumbnails/62.jpg)
Challenges and problems of 3D B field mapping
Challenges Problems
Magnetic sample • beam damage
• diffraction contrast
• stray fields
• magnetization by Lorentz lens
න𝐵𝑦 𝑥 𝛼 , 𝑦, 𝑧 𝛼 d𝑧 = −ℏ
𝑒
𝜕𝜑
𝜕𝑥 𝛼
y in the direction of tilt axis
• derivation enhances noise
• only 𝐵𝑦, i.e., parallel to tilt axis
Two ultra-high-tilt series (±90°) about
orthogonal axes to get Bx and By
• sample geometry
• holder design
• stability
Separation electric (MIP contribution)
magnetic phase shift
• acquisition of additional two tilt series with
reversed magnetization
• precise alignment (2D Affine
transformation)
R. E. Dunin-Borkowski and T. Kasama, Microscopy and Microanalysis 10 (2004) 1010.
![Page 63: B-vectorfield tomography on Cu/Co FEBID NWsmagnetism.eu/Esm/2019/Slides/Lubk-slides2.pdfFresnel imaging: Pros & Cons Pro: simple fast sensitivity adjustable Con: (partially) non-linear](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022042211/5eb44daa93b6ea699b56ff8f/html5/thumbnails/63.jpg)
Challenges and problems of 3D B field mapping
Challenges Problems
Magnetic sample • beam damage
• diffraction contrast
• stray fields
• magnetization by Lorentz lens
න𝐵𝑦 𝑥 𝛼 , 𝑦, 𝑧 𝛼 d𝑧 = −ℏ
𝑒
𝜕𝜑
𝜕𝑥 𝛼
y in the direction of tilt axis
• derivation enhances noise
• only 𝐵𝑦, i.e., parallel to tilt axis
Two ultra-high-tilt series (±90°) about
orthogonal axes to get Bx and By
• sample geometry
• holder design
• stability
Separation electric (MIP contribution)
magnetic phase shift
• acquisition of additional two tilt series with
reversed magnetization
• precise alignment
𝐵𝑧 from 𝜵 ∙ 𝑩 = 0 with 𝐵𝑥 and 𝐵𝑦 inserted • second derivation enhances noise further
• unknown boundary conditions
R. E. Dunin-Borkowski and T. Kasama, Microscopy and Microanalysis 10 (2004) 1010.
![Page 64: B-vectorfield tomography on Cu/Co FEBID NWsmagnetism.eu/Esm/2019/Slides/Lubk-slides2.pdfFresnel imaging: Pros & Cons Pro: simple fast sensitivity adjustable Con: (partially) non-linear](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022042211/5eb44daa93b6ea699b56ff8f/html5/thumbnails/64.jpg)
Vectorfield tomography of Cu/Co multi-stacked
NWs: Phase diagram for a single Co-disk from
micromag simulation
O
I
V
Co
Cu
![Page 65: B-vectorfield tomography on Cu/Co FEBID NWsmagnetism.eu/Esm/2019/Slides/Lubk-slides2.pdfFresnel imaging: Pros & Cons Pro: simple fast sensitivity adjustable Con: (partially) non-linear](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022042211/5eb44daa93b6ea699b56ff8f/html5/thumbnails/65.jpg)
Vectorfield tomography of Cu/Co multi-stacked NWs:
Hologram tilt series
Tilt range -69° to +72°
45°
Tilt axis
Rotated 90° in-plane: Tilt range -69° to +72°
45°
Tilt axis
+ tilt series
flipped upside-down+ tilt series
flipped upside-down
![Page 66: B-vectorfield tomography on Cu/Co FEBID NWsmagnetism.eu/Esm/2019/Slides/Lubk-slides2.pdfFresnel imaging: Pros & Cons Pro: simple fast sensitivity adjustable Con: (partially) non-linear](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022042211/5eb44daa93b6ea699b56ff8f/html5/thumbnails/66.jpg)
Vectorfield tomography of Cu/Co multi-stacked NWs:
Hologram tilt series
Tilt range -69° to +72° Rotated 90° in-plane: Tilt range -69° to +72°
![Page 67: B-vectorfield tomography on Cu/Co FEBID NWsmagnetism.eu/Esm/2019/Slides/Lubk-slides2.pdfFresnel imaging: Pros & Cons Pro: simple fast sensitivity adjustable Con: (partially) non-linear](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022042211/5eb44daa93b6ea699b56ff8f/html5/thumbnails/67.jpg)
Vectorfield tomography of Cu/Co multi-stacked NWs:
Phase tilt series
Electric phase shift Magnetic phase shift (smoothed)
![Page 68: B-vectorfield tomography on Cu/Co FEBID NWsmagnetism.eu/Esm/2019/Slides/Lubk-slides2.pdfFresnel imaging: Pros & Cons Pro: simple fast sensitivity adjustable Con: (partially) non-linear](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022042211/5eb44daa93b6ea699b56ff8f/html5/thumbnails/68.jpg)
Electrostatic 3D potential of Cu/Co multi-stacked
NW
• 3D reconstruction
from electrostatic
phase shift
(Average of two tilt
series)
25 nm Co
15 nm Cu
![Page 69: B-vectorfield tomography on Cu/Co FEBID NWsmagnetism.eu/Esm/2019/Slides/Lubk-slides2.pdfFresnel imaging: Pros & Cons Pro: simple fast sensitivity adjustable Con: (partially) non-linear](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022042211/5eb44daa93b6ea699b56ff8f/html5/thumbnails/69.jpg)
Electrostatic 3D potential of Cu/Co multi-stacked NW:
Quantification
MIP [V]
MIP
[V
]
Central slice
17.4 20.5
25 nm Co 15 nm Cu
Histogram
MIPs reduced
due to low purity (voids);
15% Cu amount in Co
![Page 70: B-vectorfield tomography on Cu/Co FEBID NWsmagnetism.eu/Esm/2019/Slides/Lubk-slides2.pdfFresnel imaging: Pros & Cons Pro: simple fast sensitivity adjustable Con: (partially) non-linear](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022042211/5eb44daa93b6ea699b56ff8f/html5/thumbnails/70.jpg)
Reconstructed magnetic configurations in Cu-Co NW
CCW CCW CCW I-P
I-P CW CCW CW
𝐵⊥
![Page 71: B-vectorfield tomography on Cu/Co FEBID NWsmagnetism.eu/Esm/2019/Slides/Lubk-slides2.pdfFresnel imaging: Pros & Cons Pro: simple fast sensitivity adjustable Con: (partially) non-linear](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022042211/5eb44daa93b6ea699b56ff8f/html5/thumbnails/71.jpg)
Nanoscale mapping for better understanding of
3D nanomagnetism
𝑀𝑆 = 1200 × 103 ൗ𝐴 𝑚
𝐴 = 22 × 10−12 ൗ𝐽 𝑚
𝐻𝑘 = 100 × 103 ൗ𝐽𝑚3
![Page 72: B-vectorfield tomography on Cu/Co FEBID NWsmagnetism.eu/Esm/2019/Slides/Lubk-slides2.pdfFresnel imaging: Pros & Cons Pro: simple fast sensitivity adjustable Con: (partially) non-linear](https://reader034.vdocuments.mx/reader034/viewer/2022042211/5eb44daa93b6ea699b56ff8f/html5/thumbnails/72.jpg)
Nanoscale mapping for better understanding of
3D nanomagnetism
3D modelling of M,B
(eg. micromagnetic
simulation)
3D reconstruction
by electron holographic
vector field tomography
of B-fields
Comparison
DW
in
Co
Reyes et al., Nano Lett. 16 (2016) 1230
Biziere et al., Nano Lett. 13 (2013) 2053
Cu/Co NW
DW
in
Co
+ structural, chemical data