azacitidine in aml/mds after allogeneic hsct
DESCRIPTION
Azacitidine in AML/MDS after allogeneic HSCT. 台北榮總血液腫瘤科 楊元豪 / 高志平大夫. Background. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) is the only potentially curative treatment in patients with advanced myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) or acute myeloid leukemia (AML) - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
1
台北榮總血液腫瘤科楊元豪 / 高志平大夫
2
BackgroundAllogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation
(allo-HSCT) is the only potentially curative treatment in patients with advanced myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) or acute myeloid leukemia (AML)
Treatment for disease relapse after allo-HSCT is limited to conventional salvage chemotherapy, second allo-HSCT and donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI)
DLI induce sustained second remission in some patients but also severe graft-versus-host disease (GVHD)
3
AzacitidineCALGB 9221
A randomized controlled phase III trial of subcutaneous azacitidine in MDS
Patients: AML with marrow blasts 20-30% under current WHO criteria
Treatment: subcutaneous 75 mg/m2/d x7 days q28d x4 courses v.s. best supportive care (BSC)
Azacitidine improved response rate and time to leukemia transformation in MDS but not overall survival (OS)
-Silverman LR, et al., JCO 2002
4
CALGB 9221: Azacitidine v.s. BSCTime to leukemia transformation
OS
P=0.007 P=0.10
5
AzacitidineFenaux P, JCO 2010
Phase III randomized trialPatients: elderly patients (median age 70 y)
with AML with marrow blasts 20-30% under current WHO criteria
Treatment: subcutaneous azacitidine 75 mg/m2/d v.s. BSC only, low-dose cytarabine, or intensive chemotherapy
Azacitidine significantly prolongs OS compared with conventional care regimens (CCR)
6
Azacitidine v.s. CCROS
P=0.005
7
Azazitidine after failed allo-HSCTBolaños-Meade J, BBMT 2011
Retrospective studyBetween 2007 and 2009 at Johns Hopkins
HospitalPatients: 10 patients with myeloid
malignancies that received 5-azacytidine after a failed allo-HSCT
Treatment: mostly 75 mg/m2/day for either 5 or 7 days
8
Outcomes of the patients
9
DiscussionsIn the study cohort, azacitidine results in
sustained responses in many of the patients without exacerbation of GVHD
Hypomethylating agents including azacitidine may reverse the loss of tumor antigens and enhance graft-versus-tumor reactions
10
RELAZA trialAn open-label, single-center phase II trialPatients: CD34+ MDS or AML after allo-
HSCTTreatment: azacitidine in the setting of
minimal residual disease (MRD)-triggered pre-emptive therapy
Purpose: to prevent or delay hematologic relapse in patients
-Platzbecker U, et al., Leukemia 2012
11
CD34+ donor chimerismCD34+ donor chimerism analysis: <80% in
the peripheral blood predicts almost unavoidable relapse in all patients, even in the presence of intervention of immediate interruption of immunosuppression or DLI in a median of 61 days
12
PatientsInclusion
Aged >18 yearsCD34+ MDS or AMLAfter allo-HSCTCD34+ for leukemic blasts
ExclusionHematologic relapseSevere hepatic impairmentSevere renal impairment
13
PatientsScreening
CD34+ donor chimerism in the PBMonitored 3-4 weeks during the first 8 months,
and 7-8 weeks during months 8-24Patients who experienced a drop in CD34+
donor chimerism below 80% without concurrent hematologic relapse (<5% bone marrow blats) entered the treatment phase
14
MethodsTreatment
4 cycles of azacitidine 75 mg/m2/day subcutaneously on days 1-7
Repeated cycle on day 29+/-2Major response: increase of CD34+ donor
chimerism in PB >80%Minor response: increase of CD34+ donor
chimerism in PB but <80%Additional 4 cycles in patients with minor
response and stabilization or further decrease of CD34+ donor chimerisim
15
MethodsDose adjustment
No adjustment: WBC >3x10^9/L, Plt >50x10^9/L
67% in WBC 1-3x10^9/L, Plt 25-50x10^9/LDC in WBC <1x10^9/L, Plt <25x10^9/L
ImmunosupressionsCould be withdrawn to support relapse
preventionAntibiotics
Antibiotic prophylaxis is permitted
16
ResultsA total of 59 patients entered the screening
phaseA total of 20 patients experienced a drop of
CD34+ donor chimerisim <80% and enrolled into the treatment phase
17
18
19
Summary of clinical responses
20
21
22
23
24
25
Disease course of a patient with repeated major response
26
Results13 patients (65%) in the intent-to-treat
population had relapsed within a median of 231 days after first MRD detection
8 patients (40%) were alive with a median follow-up of 487 days after the first detection of MRD
There was no GVHD reported in patients without a prior history of GVHD
Complete cessation of immunosuppressive treatment was possible in 4 of 6 patients without exacerbation of GVHD, even with history of GVHD
27
DiscussionsAfter only 4 cycles of azacitidine, MRD was
diminished or stabilized in 80% of patientsResponse were continuous without any
further treatment in 4 of these patientsBut, for the majority, hematologic relapse
finally occurred in 13 patients at a median of 231 days
28
DiscussionsStudies in mice suggest azacitidine induced
FOXP3 expression in naïve T-cells, which in turn induces a regulatory T-cell population that mitigate GVHD while preserving a GVL effect
29
ConclusionsMRD-triggerd treatment with azacitidine is
an effective strategy to prevent or to delay hematologic relapse in patients with MDS or AML after HSCT.
Azacitidine may enhance GVL reaction and, conversely, may prevent GVHD.
The development of larger, prospective trials to evaluate the efficacy of azacitidine after allo-HSCT is necessary.