ayp 2012 georgetown isd presentation
TRANSCRIPT
Adequate Yearly Progress 2011-12
Annual Report and Public Hearing
Georgetown ISD
February 26, 2013
Measures Evaluated • Reading/ELA
– Percent of students (Grades 3-8 and 10) who are Proficient in Reading/ELA
– Percent of students (Grades 3-8 and 10) who Participate in Reading/ELA
• Math – Percent of students (Grades 3-8 and 10) who are Proficient in Math
– Percent of students (Grades 3-8 and 10) who Participate in Math
• Other – Attendance Rate
• For elementary and middle school campuses
• Districts not offering 12th grade
– Graduation Rate
• For high school campuses
• Districts offering 12th grade
Standards for Performance
2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2010-11 2009-10
67 75
83
92
100
% Proficient
Math
73 80
87 93
Reading
%
of students must pass
in 2014
Student Groups Evaluated Performance
Accountability Subset
Participation All Students Enrolled
Other Indicator Attendance & Graduation
• All Students Group
• African American*
• Hispanic*
• White*
• Econ. Disadvantaged*
• Special Education*
• Limited English Proficient*
• All Students Group
• African American*
• Hispanic*
• White*
• Econ. Disadvantaged*
• Special Education*
• Limited English Proficient*
• All Students Group
• African American*
• Hispanic*
• White*
• Econ. Disadvantaged*
• Special Education*
• Limited English Proficient*
Provided that these groups meet the Minimum Size Requirement < 50 = Not Evaluated | ≥ 200 = Always Evaluated | 50-199 = Evaluated if equal to at least 10% of the All Student group *
AYP Status Labels
• Meets AYP
• Missed AYP – (Reason)
Reasons include:
• Reading (Proficiency and/or Participation)
• Mathematics (Proficiency and/or Participation)
• Attendance Rate
• Graduation Rate
2012 AYP Report Overview Page One
Performance: Reading/ELA (AYP Target: 87%)
• Reading Performance, 2011-2012
– Used to demonstrate proficiency
• Reading Performance, 2010-2011
– Used to calculate improvement (Safe Harbor)
Performance: Mathematics (AYP Target: 83%)
• Math Performance, 2011-2012
– Used to demonstrate proficiency
• Math Performance, 2010-2011
– Used to calculate improvement (Safe Harbor)
2012 AYP Report Overview Page Two
Participation: Reading/ELA & Mathematics (AYP Target: 95%)
• Reading/ELA & Math Participation, 2011-2012 – Used to demonstrate participation
• Reading/ELA & Math Participation, 2010-2011 – Used to calculate 2 year average, if needed
2012 AYP Report Overview Page Three
Graduation Rate (AYP Target: 75%) or Attendance Rate (AYP Target: 90%)
• Graduation Rate (Class of 2011) or Attendance Rate (2010-11 School Year)
– Used to calculate whether or not the campus or district met the target rate
• Graduation Rate (Class of 2010) or Attendance Rate (2009-10 School Year)
– Used to demonstrate improvement
• 5-Year Longitudinal Graduation Rate (Class of 2010)
2012 AYP Report Overview Page Four
AYP Explanation Table:
• Summarizes the results of the AYP report
• + Meets AYP
• – Not Evaluated
• % Missed AYP due to 2% and/or 1% federal caps
• X Missed AYP
2012 AYP Report Overview Page Five
Sample: Page 5 from GISD AYP Report
Final 2012 AYP Results Georgetown ISD: Missed AYP –
Reading (Performance) & Math (Performance), Stage 1
Campus Name 2012 Status Stage
Georgetown High School Meets AYP None
Richarte High School Meets AYP None
East View High School Missed AYP: Math Performance None
Benold Middle School Meets AYP None
Tippit Middle School Missed AYP: Reading Performance & Math Performance Stage 1
Forbes Middle School Meets AYP None
Purl Elementary Meets AYP None
Carver Elementary Meets AYP None
Frost Elementary Meets AYP None
Cooper Elementary Missed AYP: Reading Performance None
Pickett Elementary Meets AYP None
McCoy Elementary Missed AYP: Reading Performance & Math Performance None
Village Elementary Meets AYP None
Williams Elementary Missed AYP: Reading Performance None
Ford Elementary Meets AYP None
Mitchell Elementary Meets AYP None
2012 AYP Performance: Georgetown ISD Reading/English Language Arts (Grades 3-8 & 10)
92 87 8696
87
7379
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
All Af Am Hisp White Eco Dis Sp Ed LEP
Met Standard
2012 Standard(87%)
2013 Standard(93%)
Met Required
Improvement
2012 AYP Performance: Georgetown ISD Mathematics (Grades 3-8 & 10)
9079 84
9484
69
84
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
All Af Am Hisp White Eco Dis Sp Ed LEP
Met Standard
2012 Standard(83%)
2013 Standard(92%)
Did Not Meet Minimum Size Req.
2012 AYP Participation: Georgetown ISD Reading/English Language Arts (Grades 3-8 & 10)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
All Af Am Hisp White Eco Dis Sp Ed LEP
Participation Rate
Standard
2012 AYP Participation: Georgetown ISD Mathematics (Grades 3-8 & 10)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
All Af Am Hisp White Eco Dis Sp Ed LEP
Participation Rate
Standard
2012 AYP Graduation Rate: Georgetown ISD Four-Year Longitudinal Cohort: Class of 2011
89.680.6 82.5
93.884
68.256.8
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
All Af Am Hisp White Eco Dis Sp Ed LEP
Graduation Rate
AYP Target (75%)
Did Not Meet Minimum Size Requirements
Accessing AYP Reports • TEA Website:
http://ritter.tea.state.tx.us/ayp/2012/index.html
• GISD Website: http://www.georgetownisd.org/Page/78
• GISD Campuses & GISD Administration Building
• GISD Assessment Department, (512) 943-5000 – Becky McCoy, Assessment Director, ext. 6034
– Denise Gunn, Assessment Secretary, ext. 6098 [email protected]