authority, power & politics dr. len elovitz chapters 6 &12 in hoy & miskel
TRANSCRIPT
Authority, Power & Politics
Dr. Len ElovitzChapters 6 &12 in Hoy & Miskel
POWER
The ability to influence thought and behavior
The ability for A to get B to do what B would normally not do
Authority
Often used interchangeably with power.
I believe authority needs to be granted by a third party
In this context think of the most powerful individual you know in an organization. What was the source of his/her power? What assumptions did he/she have about
subordinates? What strategies did/he or she employ? What were the consequences of his/her
actions?
Sources of Power – French & Raven
Reward Power – controlling rewards will induce others to comply
Coercive Power – potential of punishment Expert Power – Having knowledge that others
want for themselves compels them to complyLegitimate Power – Holding a position of
authority in the organizationReferent Power – Personal Charisma
Sources of Authority - Sergiovanni
BureaucraticPersonalTechnical-rationalProfessionalMoral
Bureaucratic - Source
HierarchyRules And Regulations MandatesRole Expectation
Teachers Are Expected To Comply Or Face The Consequences
Bureaucratic - Assumptions
Teachers Are SubordinatesTeachers Can’t Be TrustedSupervisors Are TrustworthySupervisors’ And Teachers’ Goals DifferSupervisors Must Be WatchfulSupervisors Know More Than TeachersExternal Accountability Works Best
Bureaucratic - Strategies
Expect and InspectHold teachers to predetermined standardsDirectly supervise and closely monitorDetermine teacher needs and In-service
themFind out how to motivate teacher and get
them to change
Bureaucratic - Consequences
With proper monitoring, teachers respond as technicians in executing predetermined scripts
Teachers’ performance is narrowed
Personal - Source
Motivation technologyInterpersonal skillsHuman relations leadership
Teachers will want to comply because of the congenial climate provided and to reap rewards offered in exchange.
Personal - Assumptions
Supervisors’ And Teachers’ Goals Differ but can be bartered so each gets what they want
Meet teachers’ needs & the work gets doneCongenial climate makes teachers content,
easier to work with & more apt to cooperateSupervisors must be expert at handling
people to increase compliance & performance
Personal - Strategies
Develop a congenial school climate
Expect and rewardWhat gets rewarded gets
done
Personal - Consequences
Teachers respond as required when rewards are available but not otherwise.
Performance is narrowed
Technical Rationality - Source
Evidence by logic and scientific research
Teachers comply in light of what is considered to be the truth
Technical Rationality - Assumptions
Supervision & teaching are applied sciences
Knowledge & research is privilegedScientific knowledge supercedes practice Teachers are skilled techniciansValues, preferences & beliefs don’t count
- facts & objective evidence do
Technical Rationality - Strategies
Use research to identify the best practice
Standardize the work of teachersIn-service teachers in the best
practiceMonitor to insure compliance
Technical Rationality - Consequences
With proper monitoring, teachers respond as technicians in executing predetermined scripts.
Performance is narrowed
Professional - Source
Informed knowledge of craftPersonal expertise
Teacher responds on the basis of professional values, accepted tenets of practice, and internalized expertness
Professional - Assumptions
No one best way existsScientific knowledge is to inform not
to prescribe practiceAcceptance of authority comes from
within the teacherSupervisor is respected for knowledge,
training & experience
Professional - Strategies
Promote a dialogue among teachers to determine accepted practices
Provide teachers with as much discretion as they want or need
Require teachers to hold each other accountableMake available assistance, support &
professional development opportunities
Professional - Consequences
Teachers respond to professional norms and thus little monitoring is required.
Performance is expansive.
Moral - Source
Full obligation and duties derived from widely shared community values, ideas and ideals
Teachers respond to shared commitments and felt interdependence
Moral - Assumptions
Schools are professional learning communities
Schools are defined by their shared values, beliefs & commitments
What is right and good is as important as what works & is effective
Collegiality is a professional virtue
Moral - Strategies
Promote collegialityRely on teachers to respond to their
own sense of duties and obligationsRely on teachers informal norm
system to enforce professional and community values
Moral - Consequences
Teachers respond to community values for moral reasons
Performance is expansive and sustained.
Sergiovanni
Supervision IBureaucraticPersonalTechnical-rational
Supervision IIProfessionalMoral
Politics
Individuals form coalitions in order to influence decision making and procedures
Examples Gender Age Department Ethnic group Internal interests External interests
External Coalitions
Try to bring their own interests and power to bear in the activities and decision making practices
Related Union PTA Band Parents
Unrelated Taxpayers groups Professional Organizations Political (capital P)
Mitzberg (1983)
Dominated External Coalition Powerful coalition that dominates not only
internal coalitions but the school and district leadership as well
Divided External Coalition One or more groups with conflicting opinions
such as conservative v progressive. Can politicize the BOE
Passive External Coalition The number of outside groups increase to the
point where their power becomes defuse and limited
Apathy takes over
Power Game
Hirshman (1970) - Participants have 3 options Leave- find another place – exit Stay and play : try to change the system – voice Stay and contribute as expected- loyalty
Those who leave cease to be influencers, loyals do not participate as active influencers, those who speak out become players in the power game
Is this an oversimplification?Are there other roles that you can think of
in the power game? The destroyer – disloyal The instigator – signifier The nut – who knows
Mitzberg again
“internal politics is typically clandestine and illegitimate because it is designed to benefit the individual or group, usually at the expense of the organization; therefore, the most common consequences of politics are divisiveness and conflict.”
Do you agree?
Political Tactics
Ingratiating – Gain favors by doing favorsNetworking – Gain influence by courting
individualsInformation Management – Manipulate
information to one’s advantageImpression Management – Create a
positive image by appearence
Coalition Building – Band together with others to achieve mutual goals
Scapegoating – Shift the blame to others for bad outcomes (circle of blame)
Increasing Indispensability – Make oneself indispensable to the organization
LEADERSHIP
Copyright (c) Allyn & Bacon 2007 38
Leadership Defined
“Leadership is a process of social influence in which one person is able to enlist the aid and support of others in the accomplishment of a common task.”
Martin Chemers
Copyright (c) Allyn & Bacon 2007 39
Power and Leadership
Leadership is a group function: it occurs only when 2 or more people interact.
Leaders intentionally seek to influence the behavior of others.
Are leadership and administration synonymous?
Administrators are concerned with efficiency and stability.
Leaders are concerned with change and gaining consensus on what needs to be done
Copyright (c) Allyn & Bacon 2007 41
Leadership and Management
Are these terms are mutually exclusive? One manages things, not people, and one
leads people, not things. We manage finances, inventories and programs, but
we lead people. Warren Bennis and Burt Nanus have said that
“managers are people who do things right and leaders are people who do the right thing.”
ELCC Standard 2 vs. 3
Copyright (c) Allyn & Bacon 2007 42
Leadership and Management (continued)
Nevertheless, school leaders must be both managers and leaders.
Bureaucracies, using the factory model, were and still are typically managed, not led.
Many schools were and still are managed, not led. US schools are generally in need of better leadership. Leaders empower followers and do not play Theory X
soft games.
Copyright (c) Allyn & Bacon 2007 43
Adaptive Leadership
Leaders need to deal with two types of circumstances: Technical problems—clear cut.
The busses are lateTeacher quits
Adaptive problems—complex issues.Curriculum changeRestructuring of grade levels
Copyright (c) Allyn & Bacon 2007 44
Leadership as a Relationship With Followers
Leaders (not authority figures) relate to followers in ways that: Motivate them to unite in a shared vision. Arouse their personal commitment to the vision. Organize the working environment to make the
envisioned goals central in the organization. Facilitate the work of followers to transform the
vision into reality.
Copyright (c) Allyn & Bacon 2007 45
Leadership as a Relationship With Followers (continued)
How leaders do these things is defined in terms of the character and quality of the relationship between leaders and followers.
Leaders who accept Theory X assumptions about followers are traditional “bosses”. e.g. Machiavelli’s The Prince. e.g. Max Weber’s “bureaucracy”.
Leaders who accept Theory Y assumptions about followers see leadership as collaborating with others to reach organizational goals, thus creating a growth enhancing environment.
Copyright (c) Allyn & Bacon 2007 46
Transforming Leadership
James MacGregor Burns published Leadership in 1978. This work has influenced most scholars of leadership ever since.
Burns distinguished: Transactional leadership results in quid pro quo
transactions between leaders and followers.
Transformational leadership seeks to satisfy higher order needs of followers and engages them fully, elevating them into leaders.
Copyright (c) Allyn & Bacon 2007 47
Moral Leadership
The concept of moral leadership contains three related ideas: There is a genuine sharing of mutual needs,
aspirations, and values. Followers have the latitude in responding to the
initiatives of leaders, and that they have the ability to make informed choices. They voluntarily grant power to the leaders.
Leaders take responsibility for delivering on commitments and representations made to followers.
Copyright (c) Allyn & Bacon 2007 48
A Progression
A progression inherent in transforming leadership: At the lowest level, is the exercise of power by leaders, which
is not leadership at all. Transactional leadership is entry-level leadership where leader
bargain with followers. In transforming (or transformational) leadership followers
engage in a common cause with leaders. At the highest level, moral leadership involves shared vision, a
sense of mutual purpose, and shared values woven into daily life to inspire new and higher levels of commitment and involvement.
Copyright (c) Allyn & Bacon 2007 49
A Process of Growth and Development
Transformational and moral leadership increasingly draw on higher levels of motivation of followers, which leads to not only compliance, but also of personal commitment to the goals of the organization.
In Dan Lortie’s famous Schoolteacher research, he concludes that teachers are motivated by feeling successful and effective in their teaching.
Implications for leaders
Foster a culture that facilitates teaching and enhances the likelihood that one will be successful at it.
Energize and applaud the efforts of teachers
Reward and support success in teachingCelebrate teaching as the central value of
the school
Copyright (c) Allyn & Bacon 2007 51
Leadership and Vision
One of the pivotal tasks of leadership is to engage constantly in a dynamic process of stating a vision of things to come, revising in light of new ideas and restating the vision of “where we are and where we are going”. Examples: Winston Churchill, Martin Luther King,
Abraham Lincoln. Reflective practice in visioning is rethinking
assumptions, beliefs, and values and either reaffirming or revising them. As opposed to
Reflexive – Do it as we always do it
Copyright (c) Allyn & Bacon 2007 52
Whose Vision Is It, Anyway?
Leaders have something important to say about the vision and should have a clearly thought-out vision of the future.
Yet, leaders should avoid imposing their own prepared statements for ratification.
Leaders must demonstrate convincingly their interest in collegiality and shared leadership to shift the norms of the school’s culture from traditional to collaborative.
Copyright (c) Allyn & Bacon 2007 53
Manipulation and Empowerment
Critical theory is a form of social criticism that holds that institutionalized oppression of groups of people in society is often supported by those oppressed as they are led to believe that the system operates in their best interest. (Stockholm syndrome?)
Critical theorists have applied their theories to schools, principals, and teachers.
Some schools mandate compliance to school goals or that teachers embrace the organizational culture.
Where empowerment occurs however: Teachers participate actively in processes of leadership. They acquire greater personal ownership and commitment to values that
shape the vision. They are stimulated to increase their awareness of the larger mission of
the school and the connection of their own daily work to the vision and mission.
Sustainable Leadership
Michael Fullan: Sustainable leadership is “the capacity of a system to
engage in the complexities of continuous improvement consistent with deep values of human purpose.”
Hargreaves and Fink: “Sustainable educational leadership and improvement
preserves and develops deep learning for all that spreads and lasts, in ways that do no harm to and indeed create positive benefit for others around us, now and in the future.”
Are Leaders Born?
Aristotle thought so – What do you think?
What are the traits of successful leaders?
Early Trait Research – 1948
Stogdill reviewed 124 trait studies of the following factors associated with leadership Capacity- intelligence, alertness, verbal facility
originality, judgment Achievement- scholarship, knowledge, Responsibility – dependability, initiative, persistence,
aggressiveness, self-confidence, desire to excel Participation – activity, sociability, cooperation,
adaptability, humor Status – socioeconomic position, popularity
Findings
The following traits consistently differentiated leaders from non-leaders: Above average intelligence Dependability Participation Status The rest was confusing and uneven leading him to
conclude that there is not a set combination of traits that result in an individual becoming a leader
More recent research
Focus switched to what traits were associated with a successful leader. Personality traits: self-confidence, stress
tolerance, emotional maturity, integrity, extroversion
Motivation: interpersonal needs, achievement orientation, power needs, expectations, self-efficacy
Skills: technical, interpersonal, conceptual
Situational leadership
Strong reaction against the concept of born leaders lead researchers to study the characteristics of the leadership setting.
Theory - Leaders are made by the situationFactors studied – subordinates,
organization characteristics, internal environment, external environment
Peter Principle
Current thinking
To restrict thinking to one of the following: Leaders are Born Leaders are Made Leadership is Determined by the situation
is counterproductive
Servant Leadership – Robert Greenleaf
Servant-leaders achieve results for their organizations by giving priority attention to the needs of their colleagues and those they serve. Servant-leaders are often seen as humble stewards of their organization's resources (human, financial and physical).
Wikipedia
Aspects of being a servant leader
In order to be a servant leader, one needs the following qualities: listening, empathy, healing, awareness, persuasion, conceptualization, foresight, stewardship, growth and building community. Acquiring these qualities tend to give a person authority versus power.
From Greenleaf’s Essay - 1970 “The servant-leader is servant first… It begins with the natural
feeling that one wants to serve, to serve first. Then conscious choice brings one to aspire to lead. That person is sharply different from one who is leader first, perhaps because of the need to assuage an unusual power drive or to acquire material possessions…The leader-first and the servant-first are two extreme types. Between them there are shadings and blends that are part of the infinite variety of human nature. The difference manifests itself in the care taken by the servant-first to make sure that other people’s highest priority needs are being served. The best test, and difficult to administer, is: Do those served grow as persons? Do they, while being served, become healthier, wiser, freer, more autonomous, more likely themselves to become servants? And, what is the effect on the least privileged in society? Will they benefit or at least not be further deprived?”