AUTH, SGUL

IPR issues

1

IPR issues

2

2 Actions:

WP2: Action 2.3. Resolve IPR issues for provided and new content

WP3: Action 3.2. Resolve IPR issues for repurposed content

Partners responsible: AUTH, SGUL

Partners contributing: UCY, COVENTRY, ECCA, OU

2 deliverables

D. 2.4. mEducator IPR resolution best practice guidelines.

(Part 1): mEducator in the context of the international legal framework on IPR.

D.3.2. mEducator IPR resolution best practice guidelines for re-purposed content.

(Part 2): mEducator in the context of Law 2121/1993 as an Open Educational Resources application.

3

2.4.

4 Palma de Mallorca, 28-29 September 2009

D.2.4 & D.3.2. Timetable

Deliverable 2.4.: mEducator IPR resolution best practice guidelines SØ = Friday, 29 January 2010

Actions and Timetable According to QA Plan Proposed Detailed Schedule Actual Dates of Delivery & Comments

QA actions QA timetable proposed date weeks date comments

Production of outlines SØ – 610-12-2009

to 15-12-2009SØ – 6

Distribution of outlines SØ – 6 Tuesday, 15-12-2009 SØ – 6 16-12-2009

Review of outlines SØ – 415-12-2009

To 18-12-2009SØ – 5

16-12-2009

to

04-01-2010

Work on first draft s

SØ – 5

to

SØ – 3

18-12-2009

to Friday, 08-01-2010

SØ – 5

to

SØ – 3

Distribution of first drafts SØ – 3 Friday, 08-01-2010 SØ – 3 08-01-2010

Internal Review of first draft / review-meeting SØ – 2Friday, 08-01-2010

To Thursday, 14-01-2010SØ – 2

Submission of internal reviewers’ comments on first draft SØ – 2 Thursday, 14-01-2010 SØ – 2

Production of final deliverable SØ – 2

Thursday, 14-01-2010

to

Thursday, 21-01-2010

SØ – 2

Submission of final deliverable to internal reviewers SØ – 1 Thursday, 21-01-2010 SØ – 1

Internal Review of final deliverable SØ – 1Friday, 22-01-2010

to Tuesday, 26-01-2010

SØ – 1

SØ

Submission of reviewers’ comments on final deliverable SØ – 1 Tuesday, 26-01-2010 SØ

Final corrections according to the review SØTuesday, 26-01-2010

to Friday, 29-01-2010SØ

Submission to project manager SØ Friday, 29-01-2009 SØ

D.2.4. Table of contents 1/3

1. INTRODUCTION

2. BASIC NOTIONS OF COPYRIGHT

2.1.THE SUBJECT OF COPYRIGHT

2.2.TWO TYPES OF RIGHTS

2.3.THE RIGHT OF REPRODUCTION AND RELATED RIGHTS

2.4.THE RIGHTS OF PUBLIC PERFORMANCE, BROADCASTING AND COMMUNICATION TO THE PUBLIC

2.5.TRANSLATION AND ADAPTATION RIGHTS

2.6.MORAL RIGHTS

2.7.LIMITATIONS ON RIGHTS

2.8.DURATION OF COPYRIGHT

5

D.2.4. Table of contents 2/3

3. OVERVIEW OF THE EU’S LEGAL FRAMEWORK ON IPR

3.1.THE DIRECTIVES ON COPYRIGHT AND RELATED RIGHTS AND RECENT REPORTS AND PUBLICATIONS

4. THE INFORMATION SOCIETY DIRECTIVE (2001/29/EC)

4.1.HORIZONTAL COPYRIGHT DIRECTIVE

4.2.EXPLOITATION RIGHTS

4.3.LIMITATIONS AND EXCEPTIONS

4.4.TECHNOLOGICAL MEASURES AND RIGHTS MANAGEMENT INFORMATION

4.5.SANCTIONS AND REMEDIES

5. Copyright and the right of information

6

D.2.4. Table of contents 3/3

6. COPYRIGHT AND NEW TECHNOLOGIES

6.1.ORPHAN WORKS IN THE DIGITAL SPACE

6.2.WEB 2.0 AND DIGITAL RIGHTS

6.3.COPYRIGHT AND METADATA

7. THE CREATIVE COMMONS LICENSING MODEL FOR DIGITAL LIBRARIES COPYRIGHTS AND P2P ARCHITECTURES.

7.1.DL, REPOSITORIES & SIMILAR SYSTEMS LIKE MEDUCATOR

7.2.CODE OF ETHICS

7.3.A HYBRID FORM OF A LIBRARY THAT CONSIDERS P2P APPLICATIONS AND LEVERAGES ON THE CREATIVE COMMONS LICENSING MODEL

8. MEDUCATOR WORKFLOWS AND GUIDELINES.

9. CONCLUSIONS

10. REFERENCES

11. APPENDICES7

D.3.2. Table of contents 1/3

1. INTRODUCTION

2. OPENNESS AND OPEN EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES FOR MEDUCATOR

2.1.BRIEF HISTORY OF OPEN SOURCE SOFTWARE

2.2.OER FREEDOMS

2.3.OER AND OPENNESS INITIATIVES

2.4.OER AND OPLI

2.5.SCIENCE GATEWAYS

2.6.OPEN CONTENT LICENSES

2.7.ALL RIGHTS RESERVED V. SOME RIGHTS RESERVED

2.8.CREATIVE COMMONS AND OER

2.9.BRIEF HISTORY OF CREATIVE COMMONS

2.10. THE CREATIVE COMMONS LICENSE CONDITIONS

2.11. TYPES OF CREATIVE COMMONS LICENSES

2.12. SHARED BELIEFS OF THE OER8

D.3.2. Table of contents 2/3

3. THE DEFAULT LEGAL FRAMEWORK OF LAW 2121/1993 FOR MEDUCATOR

3.1.DEFAULT COPYRIGHT

3.2.ARTICLE 21 OF LAW 2121/1993

3.3.PRIVATE USE

3.4.THE THREE-STEP-TEST

4. COMMERCIAL V. NON-COMMERCIAL USE

5. OTHER ISSUES REGARDING LICENSING OF CONTENT FOR MEDUCATOR

5.1.SIGNALLING THE CREATIVE COMMONS LICENSING MODUS

5.2.STANDARD V. CUSTOMIZED LICENSING

5.3.BARRIERS TO OER

5.4.CREATIVE COMMONS AS THE MOST APPROPRIATE OPTION FOR MEDUCATOR

5.5.RECOMMENDATIONS FOR MEDUCATOR AS OER REPOSITORY LEVERAGING ON THE CREATIVE COMMONS LICENSING MODEL

9

D.3.2. Table of contents 3/3

6. THE MEDUCATOR AND OPEN COURSE WARE INITIATIVES

6.1.THE MIT OCW INITIATIVE

6.2.THE OCW CONSORTIUM

6.3.SAKAI, MERLOT, CONNEXIONS, AND OPEN LEARNING INITIATIVE

6.4.JISC OER PROGRAMME

7. MEDUCATOR WORKFLOWS AND GUIDELINES FOR REPURPOSED CONTENT

8. CONCLUSIONS

9. REFERENCES

10. APPENDICES

10

Attribution - by

You let others copy, distribute, display, and perform your copyrighted work — and derivative works based upon it — but only if they give credit the way you request.

Share Alike - sa

You allow others to distribute derivative works only under a license identical to the license that governs your work.

Non-Commercial - nc

You let others copy, distribute, display, and perform your work — and derivative works based upon it — but for non-commercial purposes only.

No Derivative Works - nd

You let others copy, distribute, display, and perform only verbatim copies of your work, not derivative works based upon it.

11

License Conditions

The Licenses

Attribution Attribution Share Alike Attribution No Derivatives Attribution Non-Commercial Attribution Non-Commercial Share Alike Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives

12