arX

iv1

512

0518

7v1

[nl

inS

I] 1

6 D

ec 2

015

On the dispersionless Kadomtsev-Petviashvili equationwith arbitrary nonlinearity and dimensionality

exact solutions longtime asymptotics of the Cauchyproblem wave breaking and discontinuous shocks

F Santucci13 and P M Santini24

1 Istituto Superiore IIS GMarconi via Reno snc 04100 Latina Italy2 Dipartimento di Fisica Universita di Roma rdquoLa Sapienzardquo and

Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare Sezione di Roma 1

Piazzle Aldo Moro 2 I-00185 Roma Italy

3e-mail nadir17liberoit4e-mail paolosantiniroma1infnit

August 20 2018

Abstract

We study the generalization of the dispersionless Kadomtsev -Petviashvili (dKP) equation in n + 1 dimensions and with nonlin-earity of degree m + 1 a model equation describing the propagationof weakly nonlinear quasi one dimensional waves in the absence ofdispersion and dissipation and arising in several physical contextslike acoustics plasma physics hydrodynamics and nonlinear opticsIn 2 + 1 dimensions and with quadratic nonlinearity this equation isintegrable through a novel IST and it has been recently shown to bea prototype model equation in the description of the two dimensionalwave breaking of localized initial data In higher dimensions and withhigher nonlinearity the generalized dKP equations are not integrablebut their invariance under motions on the paraboloid allows one toconstruct in this paper a family of exact solutions describing wavesconstant on their paraboloidal wave front and breaking simultaneouslyin all points of it developing after breaking either multivaluedness orsingle valued discontinuous shocks Then such exact solutions are usedto build the longtime behavior of the solutions of the Cauchy prob-lem for small and localized initial data showing that wave breakingof small initial data takes place in the longtime regime if and only ifm(nminus1) le 2 At last the analytic aspects of such a wave breaking areinvestigated in detail in terms of the small initial data in both cases inwhich the solution becomes multivalued after breaking or it develops

1

a discontinuous shock These results contained in the 2012 masterthesis of one of the authors (FS) [1] generalize those obtained in [2]for the dKP equation in n+1 dimensions with quadratic nonlinearityand are obtained following the same strategy

1 Introduction

In this paper we investigate the following generalized dispersionless Kadomt-sev - Petviashvili equation

(ut + umux)x +perpu = 0 u = u(x ~y t) isin R

perp =sumnminus1

i=1 part2yi ~y = (y1 middot middot middot ynminus1) isin R

nminus1 x t isin R(11)

in (n + 1) dimensions where (m + 1) is the degree of the nonlinearity andmn isin N

+ Hereafter we refer to (11) as the dKP (mn) equation Equa-tions (11) contain as particular cases the integrable (through the methodof characteristics) Riemann equation [3]

ut + umux = 0 (12)

for n = 1 the integrable dispersionless Kadomtsev - Petviashvili (dKP)equation [4 5 6 7]

(ut + uux)x + uyy = 0 (13)

for (mn) = (1 2) the nonintegrable Khokhlov - Zobolotskaya (KZ) equation[6]

(ut + uux)x + uy1y1 + uy2y2 = 0 (14)

for (mn) = (1 3) and the nonintegrable modified dKP (mdKP) equation[8]

(ut + u2ux)x + uyy = 0 (15)

for (mn) = (2 2)Equation (11) describes weakly nonlinear and quasi one-dimensional waves

with negligeable dissipation and dispersion if the linear approximation of theoriginal theory is given by the (n + 1) - dimensional wave equation at leastin some limiting cases like the long wave approximation [2] In equation(11) there are two competing terms the nonlinear term umux responsiblefor the steepening of the profile and the perpu term describing diffraction

2

in the transversal (n minus 1) dimensional hyperplane (reminiscence throughthe multiscale expansion leading to (11) of the diffraction described by thewave operator) therefore diffraction increases as n increases [2] The degree(m+1) of the nonlinearity originates from expanding the nonlinear terms ofthe original PDEs in power series when the first m powers of the expansionare absent due usually to some symmetry of the problem In this sense thedegree of universality of (11) decreases as the degree of nonlinearity grows(see sect2) dKP (1 n) n = 2 3 are relevant in acoustics [4 5 6 2] and alsoin plasma physics [7 2 1] in the long wave approximation dKP (1 2) in hy-drodynamics again in the long wave approximation [9 10] dKP (1 3) anddKP (2 3) in nonlinear optics [1] and dKP (2 2) in the study of sound wavesin antiferromagnets [11]

We remark that equation (11) arises as the x-dispersionless limit of thenatural generalization in n + 1 dimensions and with nonlinearity of degreem+ 1

(ut + uxxx + umux)x +perpu = 0 u = u(x ~y t) isin R (16)

of the 2+1 dimensional Kadomtsev-Petviashvili (KP) equation [7 12 9 10]Apart from the Riemann equation (12) integrable by the method of

characteristics in the family of equations (11) only the dKP equation (13) isintegrable through a novel Inverse Scattering Transform (IST) for integrabledispersionless PDEs [13 14 15] recently made rigorous in [16] on the exampleof the Pavlov equation [17] This IST allows one to show in particular thatsolutions u(x y t) of dKP depend on x through the combination xminus2ut [18]ie these solutions can be written in the characteristic form [18 19]

u = F (ζ y t) ζ = xminus 2F (ζ y t)t (17)

in analogy with the case of the Riemann equation (12) for which the depen-dence of the solution u(x t) on x is through the combination x minus umt Forthis reason the IST for dKP can be viewed as a significant generalizationof the method of characteristics The formulation (17) has allowed one tostudy in an analytically explicit way the interesting features of the gradi-ent catastrophe of two dimensional waves at finite time [18 19] and in thelongtime regime [18] in terms of the initial data

The other examples of dKP (mn) equations are not integrable there-fore the possibility to investigate a generic wave breaking through equationslike (17) and the precise form that these equations should take are in ouropinion challenging open problems in addition blow up of the solutions is

3

expected for sufficiently large m [8] to complicate the picture In the recentpaper [20] fi the formal dependence xminus umt motivated by the y indepen-dent limit was used to study the generic breaking features of dKP (m 2) andits dispersive shock formation

In our paper we give some light on the problem of finding a conve-nient characteristic form of the type (17) for the study of wave breakingof dKP (mn) solutions i) from the construction of a family of exact solu-tions of dKP (mn) exhibiting wave breaking and ii) from the constructionof the longtime behavior of solutions of the Cauchy problem of dKP (mn)for small initial data

Indeed after showing in sect2 the universality of (15) starting from a familyof nonlinear wave equations in sect3 we use the invariance of the dKP (mn)equations under motions on the paraboloid to construct a family of exact so-lutions involving an arbitrary function of one variable and describing wavesconstant on their paraboloidal wave front breaking simultaneously in allpoints of it and developing after breaking either multivalued overturningprofiles or single valued discontinuous shocks Then we use in sect4 such solu-tions to build a uniform approximation of the solution of the Cauchy problemin the longtime regime and for small and localized initial data showing thatsuch a small and localized data evolving according to the dKP (mn) equa-tion break in the longtime regime iff m(n minus 1) le 2 In sect5 we study theanalytic aspects of such a wave breaking given explicitely in terms of theinitial data providing in particular a description of the overturning profileand of the development of a discontinuous shock immediately after breakingwe concentrate in particular on the mdKP (15) case and on its comparisonwith the already known dKP (13) case The results of this paper containedin the 2012 master thesis of one of the authors (FS) [1] generalize analogousones for the dKP (1 n) equation in [2] and are obtained following the samestrategy

We end this introduction considering the following consequence of theseresults for the family of exact solutions of dKP (mn) and for the long-time asymptotics of the solutions of the small data Cauchy problem thedependence of the solutions u(x ~y t) on x is fi through the combinationsxminus cminus1

mnumt if cmn gt 0 and xminus umt log t if cmn = 0 where

cmn = 1minus m(nminus 1)

2 (18)

Therefore this dependence involves in a simple way the degree m+ 1 of the

4

nonlinearity and the dimensionality n+ 1 of the problem through the coeffi-cient cmn and it is consistent with the case of the Riemann equation (12)for which cm1 = 1 and with the dKP equation (13) for which c12 = 12(confirming the apparently mysterious factor 2 in (17)) it is not consistentinstead with the formal dependence xminus umt used in [20]

In analogy with the dKP case the results of our paper seem to suggestthe following conjecture (admittedly a weak conjecture due to the absencein the generic case of an IST generalizing the method of characteristics)Conjecture The solutions of the dKP (mn) equation around breaking forcmn ge 0 are described by the following characteristic formulae

u = G(ζ y t)

ζ =

xminus cminus1mnG

m(ζ ~y t)t if cmn gt 0xminusGm(ζ ~y t)t log t if cmn = 0

(19)

This paper is dedicated to the memory of S V Manakov

2 Universality and applicability of dKP (mn)

The universality (and therefore the applicability) of (11) through a multi-scale expansion is well described by the following simple model the familyof nonlinear wave equations

(f(w))TT = w =nsum

i=1

part2Xi w = w( ~X T ) (21)

For small amplitudes w rarr ǫw 0 lt ǫ ≪ 1 we substitute in (21) thenonlinear term by its Taylor expansion

f(ǫw) = f(0) + f prime(0)ǫw +1

2f primeprime(0)ǫ2w2 + middot middot middot (22)

obtaining at O(ǫ) the wave equation

wTT = c2w c = 1radic

f prime(0) (23)

where f prime(0) is assumed to be positiveIf the waves are quasi one-dimensional and we choose X1 as the direc-

tion of propagation the wave lengths in the trasversal directions are small

5

~kperp = ǫα~κperp where ~kperp is the transversal wave vector and α gt 0 has to befixed Then the dispersion relation becomes [2]

ω = c

radic

k21 +

~k2perp = ck1

radic

1 + ǫ2α~κ2perpk21

≃ ck1

(

1 + ǫ2α~κ2perp

2k21

)

(24)

and the phase of a monochromatic wave reads

~k middot ~X minus ωT = k1 (X1 minus cT ) + ǫα~κperp middot ~Xperp minus cǫ2α

2

~κ2perpk21

T (25)

motivating the introduction of the new variables

x = X1 minus cT

~y = ǫα ~Xperp yi = Xi+1 i = 1 nminus 1t = ǫ2α c

2T

(26)

Rewriting (21) in the new variables and imposing α = 12 to get the maximalbalance one obtains at O(ǫ2) the dKP (1 n) equation

(ut + uux)x +perpu = 0 (27)

where u = minus c2

2f primeprime(0)w and perp is the tranversal Laplacian given in (11b)

If the term f primeprime(0) vanishes the maximal balance must involve the cubicterm if also f primeprimeprime(0) = 0 the maximal balance must involve the quartic termand so on In the very special case in which f (l)(0) = 0 l = 2 m andf (m+1)(0) 6= 0 then the maximal balance must involve the term of orderm + 1 and is achieved for α = m2 at the first nontrivial order O(ǫm+1)obtaining the dKP (mn) equation (11) with u = C1mw and

C = minusc2f (m+1)(0)

m (28)

if m is odd and

(

ut minus sgn(f (m+1)(0)) umux

)

x+perpu = 0 (29)

with u = |C|1mw if m is evenThe above considerations explain well why equations (11) are less and

less universal and applicable as m increases

6

3 Exact solutions of dKP (mn)

It was observed in [2] that dKP (1 n) is invariant under the following Liesymmetry group of transformations

x = x+sumnminus1

i=1 (δiyi minus δ2i t)yj = yj minus 2δjt j = 1 middot middot middot nminus 1t = t

(31)

where δj j = 1 nminus1 are the arbitrary parameters of the group leavinginvariant the paraboloid

ξ = x+1

4t

nminus1sum

i=1

y2i (32)

Such a symmetry was used to construct a family of exact and implicit solu-tions of dKP (1 n) exhibiting wave breaking and playing a relevant role inthe longtime regime of the small data Cauchy problem for dKP (1 n) [2]

Since dKP (mn) is also invariant under the transformation (31) follow-ing the same strategy as in [2] such a symmetry will be used in this sectionto construct a family of exact and implicit solutions of dKP (mn) In thispaper we add to the exact solutions exhibiting a gradient catastrophe andmultivaluedness after breaking also the exact weak solutions of dKP (mn)developing after breaking single valued discontinuous shocks of dissipativenature

Therefore we look for solutions of (11) in the form

u = v(ξ t) ξ = x+1

4t

nminus1sum

i=1

y2i (33)

reducing (11) to the (1 + 1) dimensional PDE

vt + vmvξ +nminus 1

2tv = 0 (34)

The following change of variables

v(ξ t) = tminusnminus12 q(ξ τ) (35)

where

τ(t) =

1cmn

tcmn + α if cmn 6= 0

ln t+ β if cmn = 0 (36)

7

α β are real constants and the coefficient cmn is defined in (18) transforms(34) into the Riemann equation (12) in the variables (ξ τ)

qτ + qmqξ = 0 (37)

We recall [3] that (37) has the general implicit solution

q = A(ζ) ζ = ξ minusAm(ζ)τ hArr q = A(ξ minus qmτ) (38)

where A is an arbitrary differentiable function of one argument If in par-ticular A describes a localized positive hump the solution breaks first atτ = τb on the characteristic ζb where

τb = min ζ

(

minus 1

mAmminus1(ζ)Aprime(ζ)

)

= minus 1

mAmminus1(ζb)Aprime(ζb)gt 0 (39)

For τ gt τb the solution becomes multivalued and not acceptable in manyphysical contexts Alternatively for τ gt τb the regular multivalued solutioncan be replaced by a weak solution a single valued discontinuous shockof dissipative nature whose wave front discontinuity s(τ) is described byequations [3]

dsdτ

= 1m+1

Am+1(ζ1)minusAm+1(ζ2)A(ζ1)minusA(ζ2)

s = ζ1 + Am(ζ1)τ = ζ2 + Am(ζ2)τ

(310)

with the initial conditions

s(τb) = ξb ζ1(τb) = ζ2(τb) = ζb (311)

Behind and ahead the shock the solution is given by

q =

q2 = A(ζ2) if ξ lt s(τ)q1 = A(ζ1) if ξ gt s(τ)

(312)

where q2 and q1 are respectively the maximum and the minimum among the(three in the case of a single hump) branches of the implicit equations (38)

We remark that τ(t) in (36) is a monotonically increasing function of tto have it positive we choose the constants α β and the t-intervals as follows

τ(t) =

1cmn

tcmn t gt 0 if cmn gt 0

ln t t gt 1 if cmn = 01

|cmn|

(

tminus|cmn|0 minus tminus|cmn|

)

t gt t0 if cmn lt 0

(313)

8

Recalling (33) (35) and (313) the exact solutions of dKP (mn) in theoriginal variables corresponding to (38) read

u =

tminusnminus12 A

(

x+ 14t

sumnminus1i=1 y2i minus 1

cmnumt)

t gt 0 if cmn gt 0

tminusnminus12 A

(

x+ 14t

sumnminus1i=1 y2i minus umt ln t

)

t gt 1 if cmn = 0

tminusnminus12 A

(

x+ 14t

sumnminus1i=1 y2i minus 1

|cmn|umt

(

(

tt0

)|cmn|minus 1

))

t gt t0 if cmn lt 0

(314)where cmn is defined in (18)

If again A is a localized hump (314) describes a wave constant onthe paraboloidal wave front (32) and simultaneously breaking on it Moreprecisely the solution breaks at time tb defined by

tb =

(cmnτb)1cmn if cmn gt 0

eτb if cmn = 0(315)

on the paraboloid

x+1

4t

nminus1sum

i=1

y2i = ζb + Am(ζb)τb (316)

where τb ζb are defined in (39) (see Figures 1)

Figures 1 Plotting of the exact solution of the mdKP equation (15) (c22 =0) before at and after breaking Here we have chosen A(x) = eminusx2

conse-quently ζb = 12 τb =

radice2 tb = e

radice2

If cmn lt 0 τ(t) rarr τ(infin) equiv |cmn|minus1tminus|cmn|0 as t rarr infin and the wave

freezes asymptotically If tminus|cmn|0 gt τb|cmn| then τ(infin) gt τb and the wave

breaks before freezing at

tb =(

tminus|cmn|0 minus τb|cmn|

)minus1|cmn| (317)

9

on the paraboloid (316) If instead tminus|cmn|0 lt τb|cmn| then τ(infin) lt τb and

no breaking takes place before the wave freezesIf n = 1 forallm (314) reduces to the general solution u = A(xminusumt) of the

Riemann equation (12) if m = 1 foralln (314) reduces to the class of particu-lar solutions of the dKP equation with quadratic nonlinearity and arbitrarydimensions (dKP (1 n)) constructed in [2] It is interesting to remark thatthis type of exact solutions was first derived for the integrable dKP equation(13) using its nonlinear Riemnann - Hilbert inverse problem [21]

After breaking t gt tb the regular multivalued solutions (314) can bereplaced by the discontinuous single valued solutions of dKP (mn) obtainedusing (33) (35) and (313) in (310) (311) (312) More precisely fort gt tb where tb is defined in (315) and (317) the dKP (mn) solutiondescribed by (314) for t lt tb develops a discontinuous shock on the parabola

x+ y2

4t= S(t) S(t) equiv s(τ(t)) (318)

where s(τ) is characterized by equations (310) (311) and τ(t) is defined in(313) Behind and ahead the shock the solution is given by

u =

u2(x ~y t) if x+ y4

4tlt S(t)

u1(x ~y t) if x+ y4

4tgt S(t)

(319)

where u2 and u1 are respectively the maximum and the minimum among the(three in the case of a localized bump) branches u12 = tminus(nminus1)2A(ζ12) ofthe implicit equations (314)

We end this section remarking that as already mentioned in sect1 in theabove class of exact solutions of (11) the dependences of u on x throughthe combinations x minus cminus1

mnumt (if cmn gt 0) x minus umt log t (if cmn = 0) and

xminus|cmn|minus1umt[(tt0)|cmn|minus1] if cmn lt 0 are not consistent with the formal

dependence x minus umt recently postulated to study the breaking features ofdKP (m 2) in [20]

4 The Cauchy problem for small and local-

ized initial data and longtime wave break-

ing

In analogy with [2] now we use the exact solutions of the previous sectionto construct the longtime behaviour of solutions of the Cauchy problem of

10

(11) for small and localized initial data showing in particular that smalland localized initial data evolving according to (11) break in thelongtime regime only if m(nminus 1) le 2 (cmn ge 0)

For small and localized initial data of the type

u(x ~y 0) = ǫu0(x ~y) 0 lt ǫ ≪ 1 (41)

evolving according to equation (11) the behavior of the solution may beapproximated by the solution of the linearized dKP (mn) equation untilnonlinearity becomes relevant

For O(ǫ) initial data equations (37)(39) imply that the breaking timeis

τb = O(ǫminusm) ≫ 1 (42)

so the nonlinear regime for dKP (mn) is characterized by the condition

t = O(

τminus1(ǫminusm))

=

O(

ǫminus m

cmn

)

cmn gt 0

O(

eǫminusm)

cmn = 0(43)

where τminus1(middot) is the inverse of (36) while for cmn lt 0 large values of t arenot compatible with (42) and a nonlinear regime never occurs

So for t ≪ τminus1(ǫminusm) the solution of the Cauchy problem is approximatedby the solution of the linearized dKP (mn) equation while for t sim τminus1(ǫminusm)a matching will be made between the linearized solution and the exact solu-tion (314)

In the linear regime when 0 lt t ≪ O(τminus1(ǫminusm)) the dKP (mn) solutionis well described by that of the linearized dKP (mn) ie

u(x ~y t) sim ǫ

(2π)n

int

Rn

u0(k1 ~kperp) exp

[

ı(k1x+ ~kperp middot ~y minus k2perpk1

t)

]

dk1d~kperp (44)

where

u0(k1 ~kperp) =

int

Rn

u0(x ~y) exp[

minusı(k1x+ ~kperp middot ~y)]

dxd~y

In the longtime regime

1 ≪ t ≪ O(τminus1(ǫminusm)) (45)

11

the multiple integral can be evaluated by the stationary phase method whichgives [2]

u(x ~y t) sim tminusnminus12 ǫG

(

x+1

4t

nminus1sum

i=1

y2i ~y

2t

)

(46)

where

G(ξ ~η) =1

2nπn+12

int

R

dk1|k1|nminus12 u0 (k1 ~ηk1) exp

[

ık1ξ minus ı(nminus 1)π

4sgn(k1)

]

(47)in the space-time region

(xminus ξ)t yit = O(1) i = 1 nminus 1 (48)

on the paraboloid (32) and decays faster outside it Therefore small andlocalized initial data set in the longtime regime (45) governed bythe linear theory on the paraboloid (32)

When nonlinearity becomes relevant ie when t = O(τminus1(ǫminusm)) theasymptotic solution of dKP (mn) is built matching the longtime solution(46)(47) of the linearized Cauchy problem with the exact solution (314)If fi cmn gt 0 the first argument ξ of function G(ξ η) defined in (47) isreplaced by ξminus cminus1

mnumt or equivalently the arbitrary function A(ζ) in (38)

acquires the dependence on the second argument ~η = ~y2t and is identifiedwith G As a result of this matching in the nonlinear regime (42) (43) thesolution reads

u(x ~y t) ≃ uasmn(x ~y t)

uasmn(x ~y t) equiv

tminusnminus12 ǫG

(

x+ 14t

sumnminus1i=1 y2i minus 1

cmnumt ~y

2t

)

cmn gt 0

tminusnminus12 ǫG

(

x+ 14t

sumnminus1i=1 y2i minus umt ln t ~y

2t

)

cmn = 0

(49)with umt = O(1) for cmn gt 0 and umt log t = O(1) for cmn = 0 becominginfinitesimal in the linear regime as it has to be

For cmn lt 0 the solution is described by its linear form (46) thereforewave breaking takes place for the particular values of (mn) described by thecondition

cmn ge 0 hArr m(nminus 1) le 2 (410)

ie forn = 1 n = 2 n = 3forallm m = 1 2 m = 1

(411)

12

For n = 1 forallm uasmn reduces to the general solution of the Riemann equation

(12) [3] The cases (mn) = (2 1) and (mn) = (3 1) the dKP and theKZ equations have been already investigated in [18] and [2] respectivelytherefore in the following section we mainly focus on the case (mn) = (2 2)corresponding to the nonintegrable modified dKP equation (15) and to itsasymptotic solution

u ≃ uas22(x y t) =

1radictǫG

(

x+y2

4tminus u2t ln t

y

2t

)

(412)

comparing the results with the dKP case (mn) = (1 2) investigated in [18]with its asymptotic solution

u ≃ uas12(x y t) =

1radictǫG

(

x+y2

4tminus 2ut

y

2t

)

(413)

Remark 1 The estimate of the first correction to the asymptotics (49)reads

u = uasnm(x ~y t)(1 +O(tminus1)) (414)

Indeed if cmn gt 0 one has

u sim uasnm(x ~y t) +

ǫ1+ m

cmn

tnminus12

H

(

x+1

4t

nminus1sum

i=1

y2i ~y

2t τ

)

(415)

where τ = ǫmτ and H(ξ ~η τ ) is expressed in terms of G(ζ ~η) (ζ is definedin the second of equations (51)) through the PDE

(

Hτ +GmHξ

1 +mGmminus1Gζ τ

)

ξ

+1

4(cmnτ )1+cminus1mn

nminus1sum

j=1

(

Gηj

1 +mGmminus1Gζ τ

)

ηj

= 0 (416)

Since from (43) ǫm

cmn = O(tminus1) equation (415) yields (414) Similarly ifcmn = 0

u sim uasnm(x ~y t) +

ǫ

tn+12

H

(

x+1

4t

nminus1sum

i=1

y2i ~y

2t τ

)

(417)

where H(ξ ~η τ) now solves the PDE

(

H

1 +mGmminus1Gζ τ

)

ξ

=1

4

nminus1sum

j=1

(

Gηj

1 +mGmminus1Gζ τ

)

ηj

(418)

13

Then equation (417) yields equation (414) too

Remark 2 As is was observed in [2] for a gaussian initial condition

u0(x y) = d exp

[

minusx2 + ~y2

4

]

(419)

where d is constant the asymptotic solution can be written in terms of specialfunctions obtaining for G(ξ ~η)

G(ξ ~η) =dradicπ

1

(1+~η2)n+14

[

cos(

π4(nminus 1)

)

Γ(

n+14

)

1F1

(

n+14 12minusY 2

4

)

+ sin(

π4(nminus 1)

)

Γ(

n+34

)

Y 1F1

(

n+34 32minusY 2

4

) ]

(420)

where

Y =ξ

radic

1 + ~η2 (421)

Γ is the Euler gamma function and 1F1 is the Kummer confluent hypergeo-metric function [22 23] For n = 2 and d =

radic2π it yields respectively

G(ξ η) =1

(1+η2)34

[

Γ(

34

)

1F1

(

34 12minusY 2

4

)

+ Y Γ(

54

)

1F1

(

54 32minusY 2

4

)]

(422)

Remark 3 The fact that small data break only when the inequality (410) issatisfied was expected from physical considerations Indeed as already men-tioned in the introduction in equation (11) there are two competing termsthe nonlinear term umux responsible for the steepening of the profile andthe perpu term describing diffraction in the transversal (n minus 1) dimensionalhyperplane (reminiscence through the multiscale expansion leading to (11)of the wave operator) therefore diffraction increases as (nminus 1) increases [2]For small initial data the umux term is initially smaller and smaller increas-ing m and the solution evolves in a linear way for a longer and longer timediffracting transversally through the (nminus1) diffraction channels So diffrac-tion increasing with (n minus 1) acts on a very long time increasing with mbefore the nonlinear regime could become relevant and if (nminus 1) andor mare sufficiently large one expects that the solution would be diffracted awayalmost completely before reaching the nonlinear regime and will not break

14

We have in particular that breaking takes place in the following longtimeregimes (see (43))m = n = 1 (the Riemann equation with quadratic nonlinearity) tb = O(ǫminus1)m = 1 n = 2 (the dKP equation) tb = O(ǫminus2)m = 1 n = 3 (the KZ equation) tb = O(eǫ

minus1)

m = 2 n = 1 (the Riemann equation with cubic nonlinearity) tb = O(ǫminus2)m = 2 n = 2 (the mdKP equation) O(tb = eǫ

minus2)

It is interesting to remark that as it was observed in [2] if m = 1 (thephysically more relevant case) wave breaking takes place only for n le 3 iein physical space

We end this section remarking that also in the longtime behaviour of thesolutions of the small data Cauchy problem for equation (11) the depen-dence of the solution u on x as in the case of the exact solutions (314) isnot consistent with the formal ansatz recently made in [20]

5 Analytic aspects of the wave breaking

In this section we use the longtime behavior of solutions of the small dataCauchy problem for dKP (mn) to show explicitly the analytic aspects ofthe solution in the neighbourhood of the breaking time in terms of the initialdata represented by function G defined in (47) as it was already done in[18 2]

Choosing cmn ge 0 we rewrite equation (49) in the characteristic form

q sim ǫG(ζ ~η)ξ = ǫmF (ζ ~ηm)τ + ζ F (ζ ~ηm) equiv Gm(ζ ~η)

(51)

where

q = utnminus12 ξ = x+

1

4t

nminus1sum

j=1

y2j ~η =~y

2t(52)

and

τ(t) =

1cmn

tcmn if cmn gt 0

ln t if cmn = 0(53)

One solves the second of equations (51) with respect to the parameterζ obtaining ζ(ξ ~η τ) and replaces it into the first to obtain the solutionq sim ǫG(ζ(ξ ~η τ) ~η) The inversion of the second of equations (51) is possibleiff its ζ-derivative is different from zero Therefore the singularity manifold

15

(SM) of the solution is the n - dimensional manifold characterized by theequation

S(ζ ~η τ) equiv 1 + ǫmFζ(ζ ~ηm)τ = 0 rArr τ = minus 1

ǫmFζ(ζ ~ηm) (54)

Sincenabla(ξ~η)q =

ǫnabla(ζ~η)G(ζ~η)

1+ǫmFζ(ζ~ηm)τ (55)

the slope of the localized wave becomes infinity (the so-called gradient catas-trophe) on the SM and the n-dimensional wave ldquobreaksrdquo except on the di-

rection represented by the vector field V =nminus1sum

i=1

partηi +mǫmGmminus1(nminus1sum

i=1

Gηi)partξ [2]

[19] on which

V q = ǫ

nminus1sum

i=1

Gηi (56)

Since the KZ case (mn) = (1 3) has been studied in detail in [2] in thefollowing we mainly concentrate on the mdKP case (mn) = (2 2) and wecompare it with the dKP case (mn) = (1 2) investigated in [18]

From (54) the first breaking time τb and the corresponding characteristic

parameters ~ζb = (ζb ηb) are defined by the global minimum of a function ofthe 2 variables (ζ η)

τb = minus 1

ǫmFζ(ζb ηbm)= inf

(

minus 1

ǫmFζ(ζ ηm)

)

gt 0 (57)

and it is characterized together with the condition Fζ(~ζbm) lt 0 by thefollowing equations

Fζζ(~ζbm) = Fζη(~ζbm) = 0

α equiv Fζζζ(~ζbm)Fζηη(~ζbm)minus F 2ζζη(

~ζbm) gt 0 Fζζζ(~ζbm) gt 0(58)

The corresponding point at which the first wave breaking takes place is from(51) ~ξb = (ξb ηb) isin R

2 where

ξb = ζb + ǫmF (~ζbm)τb = ζb minusF (~ζbm)

Fζ(~ζbm) (59)

Now we evaluate equations (51) and (54) near breaking in the regime

ξ = ξb + ξprime η = ηb + ηprime τ = τb + τ prime ζ = ζb + ζ prime (510)

16

where ξprime ηprime τ prime ζ prime are small Using (57) - (59) the second of equations (51)becomes at the leading order the following cubic equation in ζ prime

ζ prime3+ a(ηprime)ζ prime

2+ b(ηprime τ)ζ prime minus γX(ξprime ηprime τ) = 0 (511)

where

a(ηprime) =3Fζζη

Fζζζηprime

b(ηprime τ) = 3Fζζζ

[

2Fζ τ + Fζηηηprime2]

X(ξprime ηprime τ ) = ξprime minus ǫF (ζb ηb + ηprime)τ prime minus ǫ [F (ζb ηb + ηprime)minus F ] τb simξprime minus Fη

|Fζ |ηprime minus F

|Fζ | τ minus Fηη

2|Fζ |ηprime2 minus Fη

|Fζ |ηprimeτ minus Fηηη

6|Fζ |ηprime3 γ =

6|Fζ |Fζζζ

(512)

and

τ equiv τ prime

τb=

τ minus τbτb

(513)

corresponding to the maximal balance

|ζ prime| |ηprime| = O(|τ |12) |X| = O(|τ |32) (514)

In (512) and in the rest of this section G F = Gm and all their partialderivatives whose arguments are not indicated are meant to be evaluated at~ζb = (ζb ηb)

The three roots of the cubic are given by the well-known Cardano-Tartagliaformula

ζ prime0 (ξprime ~ηprime τ) = minusa

3+ (A+)

13 + (Aminus)

13

ζ primeplusmn (ξprime ~ηprime τ) = minusa3minus 1

2

(

(A+)13 + (Aminus)

13

)

plusmnradic32i(

(A+)13 minus (Aminus)

13

)

(515)where

Aplusmn = Rplusmnradic∆ (516)

and the discriminant ∆ reads

∆ = R2 +Q3 (517)

withQ(ηprime τ ) = 3bminusa2

9= minus2|Fζ |

Fζζζτ + α

F 2ζζζ

ηprime2

R(ξprime ηprime τ) = γ2X(ξprime ηprime τ ) + ab

18+ a

3Q(ηprime τ)

(518)

17

At the same order function S in (54) becomes

S(ζ prime ηprime τ ) = minusτ + 12|Fζ |

[

Fζζζζprime2 + 2Fζζηζ

primeηprime + Fζηηηprime2]

=

Fζζζ

2|Fζ |

(

Q(ηprime τ ) +(

ζ prime +Fζζη

Fζζζηprime)2)

(519)

Known ζ prime as function of (ξprime ηprime τ) from the cubic (511) the solution q andits gradient are then approximated near breaking by the formulae

q(ξ η τ) sim ǫG(ζb + ζ prime ηb + ηprime) = ǫ (G+Gζζprime +Gηη

prime +O(|τ |)) nabla(ξη)q sim ǫ

nabla(ζprimeηprime)G(ζb+ζprimeηb+ηprime)

S(ζprimeηprimeτ) (520)

Before breaking

Before breaking τ lt τb (τ lt 0) the coefficient Q in (518) is strictlypositive (see the second of (58)) then the discriminant ∆ = R2 + Q3 isalso strictly positive and only the root ζ prime0 is real Correspondingly the realsolution q is single valued and described by Cardanorsquos formula and by (520)In addition function S in (519) is also strictly positive and nabla(ξ~η)q is finiteforall ξ η

To have a more explicit solution than that provided by Cardanorsquos formulawe first restrict the asymptotic region to a narrower area so that the cubic(511) reduces to the linear equation bζ prime = γX and X contains only linearterms This is achieved choosing

ηprime = O(τ r) X = O(τ p+1) 12lt p lt p+1

2lt r lt p+ 1 (521)

implying

ζ prime = O(τ p)

X = ξprime + Fη

Fζηprime + F

Fζτ + o(τ p+1) = ξprime + Gη

Gζηprime + G

mGζτ + o(τ p+1)

bζ prime = γX rArr ζ prime sim minus 1τ

(

ξprime + Gη

Gζηprime + G

mGζτ)

(522)

Then

q = ǫG(ζb + ζ prime ηb + ηprime) sim ǫG + ǫGζζprime sim ǫ

(

1minus 1

m

)

Gminus ǫGζ

τ

(

ξprime +Gη

Gζηprime)

(523)

18

Since q sim ǫG and recalling the definitions (57)(513) it follows that q isdescribed by the exact similarity solution

q sim(

ξ + (GηGζ)ηprime

τ prime

)1m

(524)

of equation (37)The cubic simplifies also in the asymptotic region in which ξprime ηprime are of

the same order while τ prime le O(|ηprime|) reducing to ζ prime3 = γX so that the solutionq and its gradient are

q sim ǫG(ζb +3radic

γX(ξprime ηprime τ) ηb + ηprime) (525)

nablaξηq sim3radicγ

3

ǫnablaζηG3radic

X2(ξprime ηprime τ ) (526)

At breaking

When τ = τb the singularity manifold S (519) is positive everywhere inthe (ξ η) plane except at the breaking point (ξb ηb) in which it is zerotogether with Q R and the discriminant ∆ The solution q is well describedagain by Cardanorsquos formula and by (520) To have a more explicit solutionthan that provided by Cardanorsquos formula we choose ξprime ηprime of the same orderthe cubic (511) reduces to ζ prime3 = γX and equations (525) become

q sim ǫG(ζb +3radic

γX(ξprime ηprime 0) ηb + ηprime)

nablaξηq sim 3radicγ

3

ǫnablaξηG3radic

X2(ξprimeηprime0)

(527)

The expression of Xb(ξprime ~ηprime) equiv X(ξprime ~ηprime 0) is given in (512) Xb(ξ

prime ηprime) simξprime minus Fη

|Fζ |ηprime if ξprime prop ηprime but ξprime 6= (FηFζ)η

prime while X(ξprime ηprime 0) = minus Fηη

2|Fζ |ηprime2 if

ξprime = (FηFζ)ηprime

Equation (527) implies that all the derivatives of q blow up at τ = τb in

the breaking point (ξb ηb) with the universal lawXminus23b except the derivative

along the transversal line Xb(ξprime ηprime 0) = 0 represented by the vector field

V = partη minusXbηpartξ (compare with (56)) for which [2 19]

V q|(ξbηb) = ǫGη (528)

After breaking I the overturning profile

19

After breaking the solution becomes three-valued in a compact regionof the (ξ η) - plane (see Figures 3) and in general does not describe anyphysics nevertheless a detailed study of the multivalued region is importantin view of a proper regularization of the models

If τ gt τb (τ gt 0) in the regime (514) the SM equation S = 0

2|Fζ|τ = Fζζζζprime2 + 2Fζζηζ

primeηprime + Fζηηηprime2 (529)

describes an ellipsoidal paraboloid in the (ζ prime ηprime τ) space with minimum at

the breaking point (~ξb τb)One can check that eliminating ζ prime from equations (529) and (511) one

obtains the SM equation in space-time coordinates coinciding with the equa-tion ∆ = R2+Q3 = 0 where ∆ is the discriminant (517) of the cubic (511)and Q and R are defined in (518) Such equation can be satisfied only ifQ le 0 ie only if

|ηprime| le ηprimecusp(τ) (530)

where

ηprimecusp(τ ) equivradic

2|Fζ |Fζζζ

α

radicτ (531)

and is given by the following analytic and universal expression

ξprime minus Fη

|Fζ |ηprime minus F

|Fζ | τ minus Fηη

2|Fζ |ηprime2 minus

(

Fη

|Fζ | +Fζζη

Fζζζ

)

ηprimeτ + 16|Fζ |F 2

ζζζ

[

minus FηηηF2ζζζ

+Fζζη(3FζζζFζηη minus 2F 2ζζη)]

ηprime32

= α3

9F 2ζ F

4ζζζ

(

(

ηprimecusp(τ))2 minus ηprime2

)3

(532)Equation (532) describes a closed curve with two cusps in the (ξ η) - planeat the points

~ξplusmncusp(τ ) = (ξb ηb) + (ξplusmnprime

cusp(τ )plusmnηprimecusp(τ)) (533)

where

ξplusmnprime

cusp(τ ) sim plusmnFη

radic

2Fζζζ

α|Fζ|radicτ +

(

F

|Fζ |+

FηηFζζζ

α

)

τ plusmn Bτ 32 (534)

where B = O(1) (see Figures 6 for dKP and 7 for mdKP) corresponding tothe conditions Q = R = 0 on which the three real solutions of the cubiccoincide (in 1 + 1 dimensions it is not possible to have three coincidentsolutions)

ζ0 = ζplusmn = minusFζζη

Fζζζηprime rArr q0 = qplusmn =sim ǫ

(

G+ (Gη minusGζFζζη

Fζζζ)ηprime)

(535)

20

On the remaining part of the closed curve ∆ = 0 two of the three realbranches coincide Outside the closed curve ∆ gt 0 and the real solution q issingle valued inside the closed curve ∆ lt 0 and the real solution q is threevalued with the three branches

q = ǫG(ζb + ζ prime ηb + ηprime) sim ǫ(G +Gζζprime +Gηη

prime +O(τ)) (536)

where ζ prime are the three real solutions of the cubic (511) (see fi Figures 2for dKP)

Figures 2 Plotting of the dKP analytic solution in the (q ξ η τ) variablesfor G given by (422) ǫ = 02 at times τ = 0 τb minus 2 τb τb + 2 whereτb = 657

Such a three-valued region of the (ξ η) plane is characterized by the

21

conditions|ηprime| lt ηprimecusp(τ) ξminusM(ηprime τ) lt ξprime lt ξ+M(ηprime τ) (537)

where

ξplusmnM(ηprime τ) equiv Fη

|Fζ |ηprime + F

|Fζ | τ + Fηη

2|Fζ |ηprime2 +

(

Fη

|Fζ | +Fζζη

Fζζζ

)

ηprimeτ minus 16|Fζ |F 2

ζζζ

[

minus FηηηF2ζζζ

+Fζζη(3FζζζFζηη minus 2F 2ζζη)]

ηprime3 plusmn Fζζζ

3|Fζ | |Q| 32(538)

(see Figures 3 for dKP)Since

∆ξ equiv ξ+M(ηprime τ)minus ξminusM(ηprime τ) =2Fζζζ

3|Fζ||Q(ηprime τ)|32 le 4

radic2

3

radic

|Fζ|Fζζζ

τ 32 (539)

we infer that the longitudinal width of the multivalued region is O(τ 32) thetransversal widths delimited by the two cusps is instead O(τ 12) thereforethe multivalued region develops at τ = τb from the breaking point (ξb ηb)with an infinite speed in the tranversal direction and with zero speed in thelongitudinal direction All these results are a common feature to the class ofdynamics (11) (see the previously derived results for the dKP equation forfinite times [18 19] and in the longtime regime [18] and those for the KZequation in the longtime regime [2])

-15-10-050005101-15-10-0500051015

-15-10-050005101-15-10-0500051015

Figures 3 Plotting of the three valued regions of the (ξ η) plane for dKPat times τ = 02 05 for G given by (422) and ǫ = 02 The center of thesquare frame is the breaking point (ξb ηb) Notice that the two cusps havethe same ξ coordinate ξ+cusp(τ) sim ξminuscusp(τ) since for solution (422) Gη = 0(see (531)(534))

22

We end this subsection remarking that as it was already observed in [19]since dKP (mn) is symmetric wrt y if the initial datum is also symmetricwrt y like the Gaussian (419) also its evolution will be so u(x y t) =u(xminusy t) This implies that ηb = yb = 0 and that all partial derivatives ofF and G containing an odd number of η derivatives are 0 at breaking As aconsequence the transversal direction on which the derivative of the profiledoes not blow up is the η (y) direction and on it the derivative is 0 atbreaking (see (56))

After breaking II the discontinuous shock

Using the matching rules of sect3 the shock formulae (310) become

parts

partτ=

ǫm

m+ 1

Gm+1(ζ1 η)minusGm+1(ζ2 η)

G(ζ1 η)minusG(ζ2 η) (540)

s = ζ1 + ǫmGm(ζ1 η) τ = ζ2 + ǫmGm(ζ2 η) τ (541)

where subscript 2 is for values behind the shock and subscript 1 for valuesahead Equations (541) are two implicit equations for ζ1 and ζ2 solvingthese equations yields ζ1(s η τ) ζ2(s η τ) and substituting these expres-sions in (540) it results in a nonlinear first order differential equation fors This equation and the initial conditions (311) give uniquely s(η τ) andconsequently ζ12(η τ) = ζ12(s(η τ) η τ)

We recall that immediately after breaking and if (530) holds equation(541) reduces to the cubic (511)(512) in which ξprime must be replaced by sprimepossessing three real roots where

sprime(ηprime τ) = sminus ξb (542)

Therefore the values of ζ1 and ζ2 are chosen among the three solutions (515)so that q2 = ǫG(ζb + ζ prime2 η) has the maximum value and q1 = ǫG(ζb + ζ prime1 η)the minimum one among the three branches of q Since Gζ lt 0 it followsthat

ζ1 = maxζ prime0 ζ primeplusmn ζ2 = minζ prime0 ζ primeplusmn (543)

To identify ζ12 with one of the three roots ζ prime0 ζprimeplusmn let us rewrite them as

follows

ζ prime0 = minusa

3+ 2 3

radicρ cos

(

θ

3

)

(544)

ζ prime+ = minusa

3minus 3

radicρ

(

cos

(

θ

3

)

+radic3 sin

(

θ

3

))

(545)

23

ζ primeminus = minusa

3minus 3

radicρ

(

cos

(

θ

3

)

minusradic3 sin

(

θ

3

))

(546)

where

ρ =radic

R2 + |∆| θ = arctan

(

radic

|∆|R

)

(547)

We observe that for 0 le θ le π the following inequalities hold

minus cos

(

θ

3

)

minusradic3 sin

(

θ

3

)

le minus cos

(

θ

3

)

+radic3 sin

(

θ

3

)

le 2 cos

(

θ

3

)

so that

ζ prime+ le ζ primeminus le ζ prime0 rArr q(ζb + ζ prime0 η) le q(ζb + ζ primeminus η) le q(ζb + ζ prime+ η) (548)

for q decreasing in ζ Hence

ζ prime1(sprime ηprime τ prime) = ζ prime0(s

prime ηprime τ prime) ζ prime2(sprime ηprime τ prime) = ζ prime+(s

prime ηprime τ prime) (549)

Then (540) reduces to the equations

dsprime

dτ+ G

Gζ+ Gη

Gζηprime + 1

2

[

ζ prime0(sprime ηprime τ ) + ζ prime+(s

prime ηprime τ)]

= 0 for dKPdsprime

dτ+ G

2Gζ+ Gη

Gζηprime + 1

2

[

ζ prime0(sprime ηprime τ) + ζ prime+(s

prime ηprime τ)]

= 0 for mdKP

sprime(0) = ξb

(550)

obtained expanding (540) near the breaking point and recalling that τ equivτ primeτb

We remark that in the differential equations (550) sprime depends on ηprime

parametrically So the discontinuous (dissipative) shocks of the longtime so-lutions of the small data Cauchy problems for dKP and mdKP has a simplegeometric construction given τ gt 0 for any fixed |ηprime| le ηcusp the overturn-ing profile in the (ξ q) plane is intercepted by a vertical straight line cuttingoff equal area lobi in analogy with the 1 + 1 dimensional case

Going back to the dKP variables

The above formulae written in the convenient variables q ξ η τ are es-sentially the same for both dKP and mdKP relevant differences appear whenwe go back to the original variables u x y t inverting equations (52)(53)

u = 1radictq t = τ2

4 y = ητ2

2 x = ξ minus η2τ2

4 for dKP

u = 1radictq t = eτ y = 2ηeτ x = ξ minus η2eτ for mdKP

(551)

24

and all the above universal formulae are easily transfered to the dKP (mn)equations In particular small and localized initial data break i) at tb =τ 2b 4 in the point (xb yb) = (ξb minus τ 2b η

2b4 ηbτ

2b 2) of the parabolic wave front

x+ y2(4tb) = ξb evolving according to dKP and ii) at tb = eτb in the point(xb yb) = (ξb minus η2be

τb 2ηbeτb) of the parabolic wave front x + y2(4tb) = ξb

evolving according to mdKP If for instance we use the same Gaussian initialcondition (419) for both dKP and mdKP with ǫ = 02 then G is given by(422) in both cases Consequently for dKP

ζb = 196 ηb = 0 ξb = 327 τb = 657 (552)

and wave breaking takes place at tb = 108 in the point (xb yb) = (327 0)on the parabola x+ 231 middot 10minus2y2 = 327 (see Figure 4)

Figure 4 Plotting of the analytic dKP solution u in the physical variablesx y t for G given by (422) (corresponding to the gaussian initial condition)ǫ = 02 at breaking

For mdKP

ζb = 161 ηb = 0 ξb = 251 τb = 1431 (553)

and wave breaking takes place at tb = 164middot106 in the point (xb yb) = (251 0)on the parabola x + 152 middot 10minus7y2 = 251 and at breaking the amplitude ofthe wave is u = ǫtb

minus12G(ζb ηb) = 195 middot 10minus4 (see Figure 5)

25

Figure 5 Plotting of the analytic mdKP solution u in the physical variablesx y t for G given by (422) (corresponding to the gaussian initial condition)ǫ = 02 at breaking

Since in the mdKP case tb is very large and the wave amplitude atbreaking is very small we wonder if such a wave breaking could be actuallydetected numerically

Now we go into the analytic details For the dKP case

tprime equiv tminus tb sim 2tbτ yprime = y minus yb ≃ 2tb(ηprime + 2ηbτ + 2ηprimeτ )

xprime = xminus xb sim ξprime minus ηbyprime minus yprime2

4tb+ η2b t

prime + ηbtbyprimetprime

(554)

and we choose τ prime to be sufficiently small to have |tprime| |yprime| ≪ 1The dKP solution reads

u(x y t) =ǫradictG(ζb + ζ prime ηb + ηprime) =

ǫradict

(

G+Gζζprime +Gη

yprime

2tb+O

(

tprime

tb

))

(555)where ζ prime is the solution of the cubic (511) with

a =3Fζζη

2Fζζζ

yprime

tb b = 3

Fζζζ

(

Fζtprime

tb+ Fζηη

yprime2

4t2b

)

X = xprime +(

ηb minus Fη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime minus[

η2b +(

F2minus ηbFη

)

1|Fζ |tb

]

tprime

+(

1minus Fηη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime2

4tb+[

minusηb +(

Fη

2+ ηbFηη

)

12|Fζ |tb

]

yprimetprime

tb

minus Fηηη

48|Fζ |yprime3

t3b

(556)

26

The three-valued region (532) after breaking becomes

xprime +(

ηb minus Fη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime minus[

η2b +(

F2minus ηbFη

)

1|Fζ |tb

]

tprime

+(

1minus Fηη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime2

4tb+[

minusηb +(

Fη

2|Fζ |tb +ηbFηη

|Fζ | minus Fζζη

2Fζζζ

)

12tb

]

yprimetprime

tb

+ 16|Fζ |F 2

ζζζ

[

minus FηηηF2ζζζ + Fζζη(3FζζζFζηη minus 2F 2

ζζη)]

yprime3

8t3b

2

=

α3

9middot64F 2ζF 4ζζζ

t6b

(

(

yprimecusp(tprime))2 minus yprime2

)3

(557)

where

yprimecusp(tprime) = 2

radic

|Fζ |Fζζζ

α

radictbtprime (558)

Equation (557) describes a closed curve with two cusps in the (x y) - planeat the points

~xplusmncusp(t

prime) = (xb yb) + (xplusmnprime

cusp(tprime)plusmnyprimecusp(t

prime)) (559)

where

xplusmnprime

cusp(tprime) sim ∓2ηb

radic

|Fζ |Fζζζ

α

radictbtprime plusmn Fη

radic

Fζζζ

α|Fζ |

radic

tprime

tb

+(

η2b minus|Fζ |Fζζζ

α

)

tprime +(

F|Fζ | +

FηηFζζζ

α

)

tprime

2tbplusmn 2ηb

radic

|Fζ |Fζζζ

αtprime

32radictb+O(τ 32)

(560)At last the analogue of (539) reads

∆xprime le 2

3

radic

|Fζ|Fζζζ

(

tprime

tb

)32

(561)

it follows that the longitudinal width ∆long and the transversal width ∆transv

of the multivalued region are respectively

∆long = O

(

(

tprime

tb

)32

)

∆transv = O(

(tbtprime)

12

)

rArr ∆long

∆transv= O

(

tprime

t2b

)

(562)

For the mdKP case

tprime = tminus tb sim tbτprime yprime = y minus yb sim 2tb(η

prime + ηbtprime

tb+ ηprimetprime

tb)

xprime = xminus xb sim ξprime minus ηbyprime + η2b t

prime minus yprime2

4tb+ ηb

yprimetprime

tb

(563)

27

and we choose τ prime sufficiently small to have |tprime| |yprime| ≪ 1The mdKP solution reads

u(x y t) =ǫradictG(ζb+ζ prime ηb+ηprime) =

ǫradict

(

G+Gζζprime +Gη

yprime

2tb+O

(

tprime

tb log tb

))

(564)where ζ prime is the solution of the cubic (511) with

a =3Fζζη

2Fζζζ

yprime

tb b = 3

Fζζζ

(

2Fζtprime

tb log tb+ Fζηη

yprime2

4t2b

)

X = xprime +(

ηb minus Fη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime minus[

η2b +(

Flog tb

minus ηbFη

)

1|Fζ |tb

]

tprime

+(

1minus Fηη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime2

4tb+[

minusηb +(

Fη

|Fζ |(1minus1

log tb) + ηbFηη

|Fζ |

)

12tb

]

yprimetprime

tb

minus Fηηη

48|Fζ |yprime3

t3b

(565)

The three-valued region (532) after breaking becomes

xprime +(

ηb minus Fη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime minus[

η2b +(

Flog tb

minus ηbFη

)

1|Fζ |tb

]

tprime

+(

1minus Fηη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime2

4tb+[

minusηb +(

Fη

|Fζ |(1minus1

log tb) + ηbFηη

|Fζ| minus Fζζη

Fζζζ log tb

)

12tb

]

yprimetprime

tb

+ 16|Fζ |F 2

ζζζ

[

minus FηηηF2ζζζ + Fζζη(3FζζζFζηη minus 2F 2

ζζη)]

yprime3

8t3b

2

=

α3

9middot64F 2ζ F

4ζζζt

6b

(

(

yprimecusp(tprime))2 minus yprime2

)3

(566)where

yprimecusp(tprime) = 2

radic

2|Fζ |Fζζζ

α

radic

tbtprime

log tb (567)

Equation (566) describes a closed curve with two cusps in the (x y) - planeat the points

~xplusmncusp(t

prime) = (xb yb) + (xplusmnprime

cusp(tprime)plusmnyprimecusp(t

prime)) (568)

where

xplusmnprime

cusp(tprime) sim ∓2ηb

radic

|Fζ |Fζζζ

α

radic

tbtprime

log tbplusmn Fη

radic

Fζζζ

α|Fζ |

radic

tprime

tb log tb

+(

η2b minus|Fζ |Fζζζ

α log tb

)

tprime +(

F|Fζ | +

FηηFζζζ

α

)

tprime

tb log tbplusmn 2ηb

radic

|Fζ |Fζζζ

αtprime

32radic

tb log tb

+O(τ 32)

(569)

28

At last the analogue of (539) reads

∆xprime le 4radic2

3

radic

|Fζ |Fζζζ

(

tprime

tb log tb

)32

(570)

it follows that the longitudinal width ∆long and the transversal width ∆transv

of the multivalued region are respectively

∆long = O

(

(

tprime

tb log tb

)32

)

∆transv = O

(

(

tbtprime

log tb

)12

)

rArr ∆long

∆transv= O

(

tprime

t2blog tb

)

(571)

References

[1] F Santucci Onde debolmente non lineari e quasi unidimensionali in

Natura La rottura di tali onde e il problema della regolarizzazione dis-

sipativa Tesi della Laurea Specialistica in Fisica supervisor P M San-tini Dipartimento di Fisica dellrsquoUniversita di Roma ldquoLa Sapienzardquo AA2011-2012

[2] S V Manakov and P M Santini On the dispersionless Kadomtsev-Petviashvili equation in n + 1 dimensions exact solutions the Cauchyproblem for small initial data and wave breaking J Phys A MathTheor 44 (2011) 405203

[3] G B Whitham Linear and nonlinear waves John Wiley amp Sons 1974

[4] C Lin E Reissner and H S Tien On two-dimensional nonsteadymotion of a slender body in a compressible fluid J Math Phys 27(1948) 220-231

[5] R Timman Unsteady motion in transonic flow Symposium Transson-icum Aachen 1962 EdKOswatitsch Springer 394-401

[6] E A Zobolotskaya and R V Khokhlov Quasi-plane waves in the non-linear acoustics of confined beams Soviet Physics- Acoustics Vol15N1 (1969)

29

[7] B B Kadomtsev and V I Petviashvili On the stability of solitarywaves in weakly dispersing media Soviet Physics-Doklady Vol15 N6(1970)

[8] X P Wang M J Ablowitz and H Segur Wave collapse and instabil-

ity of solitary waves of a generalized Kadomtsev-Petviashvili equationPhysica D 78 (1994) 241-265

[9] M J Ablowitz and H Segur Solitons and the Inverse Scattering Trans-

form SIAM Philadelphia 1981

[10] M J Ablowitz and P A Clarkson Solitons nonlinear evolution equa-

tions and inverse scattering Cambridge University Press 1991

[11] S Turitsyn and G Falkovitch Stability of magneto-elastic solitons andself-focusing of sound in antiferromagnets Sov Phys J Exp TheorPhys 62 (1985) 146-152

[12] S Novikov S V Manakov L P Pitaevskii V E Zakharov Theory of

solitons Consultant Bureau 1984

[13] S V Manakov and P M Santini Inverse scattering problem for vectorfields and the heavenly equation httparXivnlinSI0512043

[14] S V Manakov and P M Santini Inverse scattering problem forvector fields and the Cauchy problem for the heavenly equationPhys Lett A 359 613-619 (2006) doi101016jphysleta200607011httparXivnlinSI0604017

[15] S V Manakov and P M Santini The Cauchy problem on theplane for the dispersionless Kadomtsev-Petviashvili equation JETPLetters 83 No 10 462-466 (2006) 101134S0021364006100080httparXivnlinSI0604016

[16] P G Grinevich P M Santini and D Wu The Cauchy problem for thePavlov equation Nonlinearity 28 (2015) 3709-3754 doi1010880951-771528113709 Preprint arXiv13105834v2

[17] M V Pavlov Integrable hydrodynamic chains J Math Phys 44 (2003)4134-4156

30

in the transversal (n minus 1) dimensional hyperplane (reminiscence throughthe multiscale expansion leading to (11) of the diffraction described by thewave operator) therefore diffraction increases as n increases [2] The degree(m+1) of the nonlinearity originates from expanding the nonlinear terms ofthe original PDEs in power series when the first m powers of the expansionare absent due usually to some symmetry of the problem In this sense thedegree of universality of (11) decreases as the degree of nonlinearity grows(see sect2) dKP (1 n) n = 2 3 are relevant in acoustics [4 5 6 2] and alsoin plasma physics [7 2 1] in the long wave approximation dKP (1 2) in hy-drodynamics again in the long wave approximation [9 10] dKP (1 3) anddKP (2 3) in nonlinear optics [1] and dKP (2 2) in the study of sound wavesin antiferromagnets [11]

We remark that equation (11) arises as the x-dispersionless limit of thenatural generalization in n + 1 dimensions and with nonlinearity of degreem+ 1

(ut + uxxx + umux)x +perpu = 0 u = u(x ~y t) isin R (16)

of the 2+1 dimensional Kadomtsev-Petviashvili (KP) equation [7 12 9 10]Apart from the Riemann equation (12) integrable by the method of

characteristics in the family of equations (11) only the dKP equation (13) isintegrable through a novel Inverse Scattering Transform (IST) for integrabledispersionless PDEs [13 14 15] recently made rigorous in [16] on the exampleof the Pavlov equation [17] This IST allows one to show in particular thatsolutions u(x y t) of dKP depend on x through the combination xminus2ut [18]ie these solutions can be written in the characteristic form [18 19]

u = F (ζ y t) ζ = xminus 2F (ζ y t)t (17)

in analogy with the case of the Riemann equation (12) for which the depen-dence of the solution u(x t) on x is through the combination x minus umt Forthis reason the IST for dKP can be viewed as a significant generalizationof the method of characteristics The formulation (17) has allowed one tostudy in an analytically explicit way the interesting features of the gradi-ent catastrophe of two dimensional waves at finite time [18 19] and in thelongtime regime [18] in terms of the initial data

The other examples of dKP (mn) equations are not integrable there-fore the possibility to investigate a generic wave breaking through equationslike (17) and the precise form that these equations should take are in ouropinion challenging open problems in addition blow up of the solutions is

3

expected for sufficiently large m [8] to complicate the picture In the recentpaper [20] fi the formal dependence xminus umt motivated by the y indepen-dent limit was used to study the generic breaking features of dKP (m 2) andits dispersive shock formation

In our paper we give some light on the problem of finding a conve-nient characteristic form of the type (17) for the study of wave breakingof dKP (mn) solutions i) from the construction of a family of exact solu-tions of dKP (mn) exhibiting wave breaking and ii) from the constructionof the longtime behavior of solutions of the Cauchy problem of dKP (mn)for small initial data

Indeed after showing in sect2 the universality of (15) starting from a familyof nonlinear wave equations in sect3 we use the invariance of the dKP (mn)equations under motions on the paraboloid to construct a family of exact so-lutions involving an arbitrary function of one variable and describing wavesconstant on their paraboloidal wave front breaking simultaneously in allpoints of it and developing after breaking either multivalued overturningprofiles or single valued discontinuous shocks Then we use in sect4 such solu-tions to build a uniform approximation of the solution of the Cauchy problemin the longtime regime and for small and localized initial data showing thatsuch a small and localized data evolving according to the dKP (mn) equa-tion break in the longtime regime iff m(n minus 1) le 2 In sect5 we study theanalytic aspects of such a wave breaking given explicitely in terms of theinitial data providing in particular a description of the overturning profileand of the development of a discontinuous shock immediately after breakingwe concentrate in particular on the mdKP (15) case and on its comparisonwith the already known dKP (13) case The results of this paper containedin the 2012 master thesis of one of the authors (FS) [1] generalize analogousones for the dKP (1 n) equation in [2] and are obtained following the samestrategy

We end this introduction considering the following consequence of theseresults for the family of exact solutions of dKP (mn) and for the long-time asymptotics of the solutions of the small data Cauchy problem thedependence of the solutions u(x ~y t) on x is fi through the combinationsxminus cminus1

mnumt if cmn gt 0 and xminus umt log t if cmn = 0 where

cmn = 1minus m(nminus 1)

2 (18)

Therefore this dependence involves in a simple way the degree m+ 1 of the

4

nonlinearity and the dimensionality n+ 1 of the problem through the coeffi-cient cmn and it is consistent with the case of the Riemann equation (12)for which cm1 = 1 and with the dKP equation (13) for which c12 = 12(confirming the apparently mysterious factor 2 in (17)) it is not consistentinstead with the formal dependence xminus umt used in [20]

In analogy with the dKP case the results of our paper seem to suggestthe following conjecture (admittedly a weak conjecture due to the absencein the generic case of an IST generalizing the method of characteristics)Conjecture The solutions of the dKP (mn) equation around breaking forcmn ge 0 are described by the following characteristic formulae

u = G(ζ y t)

ζ =

xminus cminus1mnG

m(ζ ~y t)t if cmn gt 0xminusGm(ζ ~y t)t log t if cmn = 0

(19)

This paper is dedicated to the memory of S V Manakov

2 Universality and applicability of dKP (mn)

The universality (and therefore the applicability) of (11) through a multi-scale expansion is well described by the following simple model the familyof nonlinear wave equations

(f(w))TT = w =nsum

i=1

part2Xi w = w( ~X T ) (21)

For small amplitudes w rarr ǫw 0 lt ǫ ≪ 1 we substitute in (21) thenonlinear term by its Taylor expansion

f(ǫw) = f(0) + f prime(0)ǫw +1

2f primeprime(0)ǫ2w2 + middot middot middot (22)

obtaining at O(ǫ) the wave equation

wTT = c2w c = 1radic

f prime(0) (23)

where f prime(0) is assumed to be positiveIf the waves are quasi one-dimensional and we choose X1 as the direc-

tion of propagation the wave lengths in the trasversal directions are small

5

~kperp = ǫα~κperp where ~kperp is the transversal wave vector and α gt 0 has to befixed Then the dispersion relation becomes [2]

ω = c

radic

k21 +

~k2perp = ck1

radic

1 + ǫ2α~κ2perpk21

≃ ck1

(

1 + ǫ2α~κ2perp

2k21

)

(24)

and the phase of a monochromatic wave reads

~k middot ~X minus ωT = k1 (X1 minus cT ) + ǫα~κperp middot ~Xperp minus cǫ2α

2

~κ2perpk21

T (25)

motivating the introduction of the new variables

x = X1 minus cT

~y = ǫα ~Xperp yi = Xi+1 i = 1 nminus 1t = ǫ2α c

2T

(26)

Rewriting (21) in the new variables and imposing α = 12 to get the maximalbalance one obtains at O(ǫ2) the dKP (1 n) equation

(ut + uux)x +perpu = 0 (27)

where u = minus c2

2f primeprime(0)w and perp is the tranversal Laplacian given in (11b)

If the term f primeprime(0) vanishes the maximal balance must involve the cubicterm if also f primeprimeprime(0) = 0 the maximal balance must involve the quartic termand so on In the very special case in which f (l)(0) = 0 l = 2 m andf (m+1)(0) 6= 0 then the maximal balance must involve the term of orderm + 1 and is achieved for α = m2 at the first nontrivial order O(ǫm+1)obtaining the dKP (mn) equation (11) with u = C1mw and

C = minusc2f (m+1)(0)

m (28)

if m is odd and

(

ut minus sgn(f (m+1)(0)) umux

)

x+perpu = 0 (29)

with u = |C|1mw if m is evenThe above considerations explain well why equations (11) are less and

less universal and applicable as m increases

6

3 Exact solutions of dKP (mn)

It was observed in [2] that dKP (1 n) is invariant under the following Liesymmetry group of transformations

x = x+sumnminus1

i=1 (δiyi minus δ2i t)yj = yj minus 2δjt j = 1 middot middot middot nminus 1t = t

(31)

where δj j = 1 nminus1 are the arbitrary parameters of the group leavinginvariant the paraboloid

ξ = x+1

4t

nminus1sum

i=1

y2i (32)

Such a symmetry was used to construct a family of exact and implicit solu-tions of dKP (1 n) exhibiting wave breaking and playing a relevant role inthe longtime regime of the small data Cauchy problem for dKP (1 n) [2]

Since dKP (mn) is also invariant under the transformation (31) follow-ing the same strategy as in [2] such a symmetry will be used in this sectionto construct a family of exact and implicit solutions of dKP (mn) In thispaper we add to the exact solutions exhibiting a gradient catastrophe andmultivaluedness after breaking also the exact weak solutions of dKP (mn)developing after breaking single valued discontinuous shocks of dissipativenature

Therefore we look for solutions of (11) in the form

u = v(ξ t) ξ = x+1

4t

nminus1sum

i=1

y2i (33)

reducing (11) to the (1 + 1) dimensional PDE

vt + vmvξ +nminus 1

2tv = 0 (34)

The following change of variables

v(ξ t) = tminusnminus12 q(ξ τ) (35)

where

τ(t) =

1cmn

tcmn + α if cmn 6= 0

ln t+ β if cmn = 0 (36)

7

α β are real constants and the coefficient cmn is defined in (18) transforms(34) into the Riemann equation (12) in the variables (ξ τ)

qτ + qmqξ = 0 (37)

We recall [3] that (37) has the general implicit solution

q = A(ζ) ζ = ξ minusAm(ζ)τ hArr q = A(ξ minus qmτ) (38)

where A is an arbitrary differentiable function of one argument If in par-ticular A describes a localized positive hump the solution breaks first atτ = τb on the characteristic ζb where

τb = min ζ

(

minus 1

mAmminus1(ζ)Aprime(ζ)

)

= minus 1

mAmminus1(ζb)Aprime(ζb)gt 0 (39)

For τ gt τb the solution becomes multivalued and not acceptable in manyphysical contexts Alternatively for τ gt τb the regular multivalued solutioncan be replaced by a weak solution a single valued discontinuous shockof dissipative nature whose wave front discontinuity s(τ) is described byequations [3]

dsdτ

= 1m+1

Am+1(ζ1)minusAm+1(ζ2)A(ζ1)minusA(ζ2)

s = ζ1 + Am(ζ1)τ = ζ2 + Am(ζ2)τ

(310)

with the initial conditions

s(τb) = ξb ζ1(τb) = ζ2(τb) = ζb (311)

Behind and ahead the shock the solution is given by

q =

q2 = A(ζ2) if ξ lt s(τ)q1 = A(ζ1) if ξ gt s(τ)

(312)

where q2 and q1 are respectively the maximum and the minimum among the(three in the case of a single hump) branches of the implicit equations (38)

We remark that τ(t) in (36) is a monotonically increasing function of tto have it positive we choose the constants α β and the t-intervals as follows

τ(t) =

1cmn

tcmn t gt 0 if cmn gt 0

ln t t gt 1 if cmn = 01

|cmn|

(

tminus|cmn|0 minus tminus|cmn|

)

t gt t0 if cmn lt 0

(313)

8

Recalling (33) (35) and (313) the exact solutions of dKP (mn) in theoriginal variables corresponding to (38) read

u =

tminusnminus12 A

(

x+ 14t

sumnminus1i=1 y2i minus 1

cmnumt)

t gt 0 if cmn gt 0

tminusnminus12 A

(

x+ 14t

sumnminus1i=1 y2i minus umt ln t

)

t gt 1 if cmn = 0

tminusnminus12 A

(

x+ 14t

sumnminus1i=1 y2i minus 1

|cmn|umt

(

(

tt0

)|cmn|minus 1

))

t gt t0 if cmn lt 0

(314)where cmn is defined in (18)

If again A is a localized hump (314) describes a wave constant onthe paraboloidal wave front (32) and simultaneously breaking on it Moreprecisely the solution breaks at time tb defined by

tb =

(cmnτb)1cmn if cmn gt 0

eτb if cmn = 0(315)

on the paraboloid

x+1

4t

nminus1sum

i=1

y2i = ζb + Am(ζb)τb (316)

where τb ζb are defined in (39) (see Figures 1)

Figures 1 Plotting of the exact solution of the mdKP equation (15) (c22 =0) before at and after breaking Here we have chosen A(x) = eminusx2

conse-quently ζb = 12 τb =

radice2 tb = e

radice2

If cmn lt 0 τ(t) rarr τ(infin) equiv |cmn|minus1tminus|cmn|0 as t rarr infin and the wave

freezes asymptotically If tminus|cmn|0 gt τb|cmn| then τ(infin) gt τb and the wave

breaks before freezing at

tb =(

tminus|cmn|0 minus τb|cmn|

)minus1|cmn| (317)

9

on the paraboloid (316) If instead tminus|cmn|0 lt τb|cmn| then τ(infin) lt τb and

no breaking takes place before the wave freezesIf n = 1 forallm (314) reduces to the general solution u = A(xminusumt) of the

Riemann equation (12) if m = 1 foralln (314) reduces to the class of particu-lar solutions of the dKP equation with quadratic nonlinearity and arbitrarydimensions (dKP (1 n)) constructed in [2] It is interesting to remark thatthis type of exact solutions was first derived for the integrable dKP equation(13) using its nonlinear Riemnann - Hilbert inverse problem [21]

After breaking t gt tb the regular multivalued solutions (314) can bereplaced by the discontinuous single valued solutions of dKP (mn) obtainedusing (33) (35) and (313) in (310) (311) (312) More precisely fort gt tb where tb is defined in (315) and (317) the dKP (mn) solutiondescribed by (314) for t lt tb develops a discontinuous shock on the parabola

x+ y2

4t= S(t) S(t) equiv s(τ(t)) (318)

where s(τ) is characterized by equations (310) (311) and τ(t) is defined in(313) Behind and ahead the shock the solution is given by

u =

u2(x ~y t) if x+ y4

4tlt S(t)

u1(x ~y t) if x+ y4

4tgt S(t)

(319)

where u2 and u1 are respectively the maximum and the minimum among the(three in the case of a localized bump) branches u12 = tminus(nminus1)2A(ζ12) ofthe implicit equations (314)

We end this section remarking that as already mentioned in sect1 in theabove class of exact solutions of (11) the dependences of u on x throughthe combinations x minus cminus1

mnumt (if cmn gt 0) x minus umt log t (if cmn = 0) and

xminus|cmn|minus1umt[(tt0)|cmn|minus1] if cmn lt 0 are not consistent with the formal

dependence x minus umt recently postulated to study the breaking features ofdKP (m 2) in [20]

4 The Cauchy problem for small and local-

ized initial data and longtime wave break-

ing

In analogy with [2] now we use the exact solutions of the previous sectionto construct the longtime behaviour of solutions of the Cauchy problem of

10

(11) for small and localized initial data showing in particular that smalland localized initial data evolving according to (11) break in thelongtime regime only if m(nminus 1) le 2 (cmn ge 0)

For small and localized initial data of the type

u(x ~y 0) = ǫu0(x ~y) 0 lt ǫ ≪ 1 (41)

evolving according to equation (11) the behavior of the solution may beapproximated by the solution of the linearized dKP (mn) equation untilnonlinearity becomes relevant

For O(ǫ) initial data equations (37)(39) imply that the breaking timeis

τb = O(ǫminusm) ≫ 1 (42)

so the nonlinear regime for dKP (mn) is characterized by the condition

t = O(

τminus1(ǫminusm))

=

O(

ǫminus m

cmn

)

cmn gt 0

O(

eǫminusm)

cmn = 0(43)

where τminus1(middot) is the inverse of (36) while for cmn lt 0 large values of t arenot compatible with (42) and a nonlinear regime never occurs

So for t ≪ τminus1(ǫminusm) the solution of the Cauchy problem is approximatedby the solution of the linearized dKP (mn) equation while for t sim τminus1(ǫminusm)a matching will be made between the linearized solution and the exact solu-tion (314)

In the linear regime when 0 lt t ≪ O(τminus1(ǫminusm)) the dKP (mn) solutionis well described by that of the linearized dKP (mn) ie

u(x ~y t) sim ǫ

(2π)n

int

Rn

u0(k1 ~kperp) exp

[

ı(k1x+ ~kperp middot ~y minus k2perpk1

t)

]

dk1d~kperp (44)

where

u0(k1 ~kperp) =

int

Rn

u0(x ~y) exp[

minusı(k1x+ ~kperp middot ~y)]

dxd~y

In the longtime regime

1 ≪ t ≪ O(τminus1(ǫminusm)) (45)

11

the multiple integral can be evaluated by the stationary phase method whichgives [2]

u(x ~y t) sim tminusnminus12 ǫG

(

x+1

4t

nminus1sum

i=1

y2i ~y

2t

)

(46)

where

G(ξ ~η) =1

2nπn+12

int

R

dk1|k1|nminus12 u0 (k1 ~ηk1) exp

[

ık1ξ minus ı(nminus 1)π

4sgn(k1)

]

(47)in the space-time region

(xminus ξ)t yit = O(1) i = 1 nminus 1 (48)

on the paraboloid (32) and decays faster outside it Therefore small andlocalized initial data set in the longtime regime (45) governed bythe linear theory on the paraboloid (32)

When nonlinearity becomes relevant ie when t = O(τminus1(ǫminusm)) theasymptotic solution of dKP (mn) is built matching the longtime solution(46)(47) of the linearized Cauchy problem with the exact solution (314)If fi cmn gt 0 the first argument ξ of function G(ξ η) defined in (47) isreplaced by ξminus cminus1

mnumt or equivalently the arbitrary function A(ζ) in (38)

acquires the dependence on the second argument ~η = ~y2t and is identifiedwith G As a result of this matching in the nonlinear regime (42) (43) thesolution reads

u(x ~y t) ≃ uasmn(x ~y t)

uasmn(x ~y t) equiv

tminusnminus12 ǫG

(

x+ 14t

sumnminus1i=1 y2i minus 1

cmnumt ~y

2t

)

cmn gt 0

tminusnminus12 ǫG

(

x+ 14t

sumnminus1i=1 y2i minus umt ln t ~y

2t

)

cmn = 0

(49)with umt = O(1) for cmn gt 0 and umt log t = O(1) for cmn = 0 becominginfinitesimal in the linear regime as it has to be

For cmn lt 0 the solution is described by its linear form (46) thereforewave breaking takes place for the particular values of (mn) described by thecondition

cmn ge 0 hArr m(nminus 1) le 2 (410)

ie forn = 1 n = 2 n = 3forallm m = 1 2 m = 1

(411)

12

For n = 1 forallm uasmn reduces to the general solution of the Riemann equation

(12) [3] The cases (mn) = (2 1) and (mn) = (3 1) the dKP and theKZ equations have been already investigated in [18] and [2] respectivelytherefore in the following section we mainly focus on the case (mn) = (2 2)corresponding to the nonintegrable modified dKP equation (15) and to itsasymptotic solution

u ≃ uas22(x y t) =

1radictǫG

(

x+y2

4tminus u2t ln t

y

2t

)

(412)

comparing the results with the dKP case (mn) = (1 2) investigated in [18]with its asymptotic solution

u ≃ uas12(x y t) =

1radictǫG

(

x+y2

4tminus 2ut

y

2t

)

(413)

Remark 1 The estimate of the first correction to the asymptotics (49)reads

u = uasnm(x ~y t)(1 +O(tminus1)) (414)

Indeed if cmn gt 0 one has

u sim uasnm(x ~y t) +

ǫ1+ m

cmn

tnminus12

H

(

x+1

4t

nminus1sum

i=1

y2i ~y

2t τ

)

(415)

where τ = ǫmτ and H(ξ ~η τ ) is expressed in terms of G(ζ ~η) (ζ is definedin the second of equations (51)) through the PDE

(

Hτ +GmHξ

1 +mGmminus1Gζ τ

)

ξ

+1

4(cmnτ )1+cminus1mn

nminus1sum

j=1

(

Gηj

1 +mGmminus1Gζ τ

)

ηj

= 0 (416)

Since from (43) ǫm

cmn = O(tminus1) equation (415) yields (414) Similarly ifcmn = 0

u sim uasnm(x ~y t) +

ǫ

tn+12

H

(

x+1

4t

nminus1sum

i=1

y2i ~y

2t τ

)

(417)

where H(ξ ~η τ) now solves the PDE

(

H

1 +mGmminus1Gζ τ

)

ξ

=1

4

nminus1sum

j=1

(

Gηj

1 +mGmminus1Gζ τ

)

ηj

(418)

13

Then equation (417) yields equation (414) too

Remark 2 As is was observed in [2] for a gaussian initial condition

u0(x y) = d exp

[

minusx2 + ~y2

4

]

(419)

where d is constant the asymptotic solution can be written in terms of specialfunctions obtaining for G(ξ ~η)

G(ξ ~η) =dradicπ

1

(1+~η2)n+14

[

cos(

π4(nminus 1)

)

Γ(

n+14

)

1F1

(

n+14 12minusY 2

4

)

+ sin(

π4(nminus 1)

)

Γ(

n+34

)

Y 1F1

(

n+34 32minusY 2

4

) ]

(420)

where

Y =ξ

radic

1 + ~η2 (421)

Γ is the Euler gamma function and 1F1 is the Kummer confluent hypergeo-metric function [22 23] For n = 2 and d =

radic2π it yields respectively

G(ξ η) =1

(1+η2)34

[

Γ(

34

)

1F1

(

34 12minusY 2

4

)

+ Y Γ(

54

)

1F1

(

54 32minusY 2

4

)]

(422)

Remark 3 The fact that small data break only when the inequality (410) issatisfied was expected from physical considerations Indeed as already men-tioned in the introduction in equation (11) there are two competing termsthe nonlinear term umux responsible for the steepening of the profile andthe perpu term describing diffraction in the transversal (n minus 1) dimensionalhyperplane (reminiscence through the multiscale expansion leading to (11)of the wave operator) therefore diffraction increases as (nminus 1) increases [2]For small initial data the umux term is initially smaller and smaller increas-ing m and the solution evolves in a linear way for a longer and longer timediffracting transversally through the (nminus1) diffraction channels So diffrac-tion increasing with (n minus 1) acts on a very long time increasing with mbefore the nonlinear regime could become relevant and if (nminus 1) andor mare sufficiently large one expects that the solution would be diffracted awayalmost completely before reaching the nonlinear regime and will not break

14

We have in particular that breaking takes place in the following longtimeregimes (see (43))m = n = 1 (the Riemann equation with quadratic nonlinearity) tb = O(ǫminus1)m = 1 n = 2 (the dKP equation) tb = O(ǫminus2)m = 1 n = 3 (the KZ equation) tb = O(eǫ

minus1)

m = 2 n = 1 (the Riemann equation with cubic nonlinearity) tb = O(ǫminus2)m = 2 n = 2 (the mdKP equation) O(tb = eǫ

minus2)

It is interesting to remark that as it was observed in [2] if m = 1 (thephysically more relevant case) wave breaking takes place only for n le 3 iein physical space

We end this section remarking that also in the longtime behaviour of thesolutions of the small data Cauchy problem for equation (11) the depen-dence of the solution u on x as in the case of the exact solutions (314) isnot consistent with the formal ansatz recently made in [20]

5 Analytic aspects of the wave breaking

In this section we use the longtime behavior of solutions of the small dataCauchy problem for dKP (mn) to show explicitly the analytic aspects ofthe solution in the neighbourhood of the breaking time in terms of the initialdata represented by function G defined in (47) as it was already done in[18 2]

Choosing cmn ge 0 we rewrite equation (49) in the characteristic form

q sim ǫG(ζ ~η)ξ = ǫmF (ζ ~ηm)τ + ζ F (ζ ~ηm) equiv Gm(ζ ~η)

(51)

where

q = utnminus12 ξ = x+

1

4t

nminus1sum

j=1

y2j ~η =~y

2t(52)

and

τ(t) =

1cmn

tcmn if cmn gt 0

ln t if cmn = 0(53)

One solves the second of equations (51) with respect to the parameterζ obtaining ζ(ξ ~η τ) and replaces it into the first to obtain the solutionq sim ǫG(ζ(ξ ~η τ) ~η) The inversion of the second of equations (51) is possibleiff its ζ-derivative is different from zero Therefore the singularity manifold

15

(SM) of the solution is the n - dimensional manifold characterized by theequation

S(ζ ~η τ) equiv 1 + ǫmFζ(ζ ~ηm)τ = 0 rArr τ = minus 1

ǫmFζ(ζ ~ηm) (54)

Sincenabla(ξ~η)q =

ǫnabla(ζ~η)G(ζ~η)

1+ǫmFζ(ζ~ηm)τ (55)

the slope of the localized wave becomes infinity (the so-called gradient catas-trophe) on the SM and the n-dimensional wave ldquobreaksrdquo except on the di-

rection represented by the vector field V =nminus1sum

i=1

partηi +mǫmGmminus1(nminus1sum

i=1

Gηi)partξ [2]

[19] on which

V q = ǫ

nminus1sum

i=1

Gηi (56)

Since the KZ case (mn) = (1 3) has been studied in detail in [2] in thefollowing we mainly concentrate on the mdKP case (mn) = (2 2) and wecompare it with the dKP case (mn) = (1 2) investigated in [18]

From (54) the first breaking time τb and the corresponding characteristic

parameters ~ζb = (ζb ηb) are defined by the global minimum of a function ofthe 2 variables (ζ η)

τb = minus 1

ǫmFζ(ζb ηbm)= inf

(

minus 1

ǫmFζ(ζ ηm)

)

gt 0 (57)

and it is characterized together with the condition Fζ(~ζbm) lt 0 by thefollowing equations

Fζζ(~ζbm) = Fζη(~ζbm) = 0

α equiv Fζζζ(~ζbm)Fζηη(~ζbm)minus F 2ζζη(

~ζbm) gt 0 Fζζζ(~ζbm) gt 0(58)

The corresponding point at which the first wave breaking takes place is from(51) ~ξb = (ξb ηb) isin R

2 where

ξb = ζb + ǫmF (~ζbm)τb = ζb minusF (~ζbm)

Fζ(~ζbm) (59)

Now we evaluate equations (51) and (54) near breaking in the regime

ξ = ξb + ξprime η = ηb + ηprime τ = τb + τ prime ζ = ζb + ζ prime (510)

16

where ξprime ηprime τ prime ζ prime are small Using (57) - (59) the second of equations (51)becomes at the leading order the following cubic equation in ζ prime

ζ prime3+ a(ηprime)ζ prime

2+ b(ηprime τ)ζ prime minus γX(ξprime ηprime τ) = 0 (511)

where

a(ηprime) =3Fζζη

Fζζζηprime

b(ηprime τ) = 3Fζζζ

[

2Fζ τ + Fζηηηprime2]

X(ξprime ηprime τ ) = ξprime minus ǫF (ζb ηb + ηprime)τ prime minus ǫ [F (ζb ηb + ηprime)minus F ] τb simξprime minus Fη

|Fζ |ηprime minus F

|Fζ | τ minus Fηη

2|Fζ |ηprime2 minus Fη

|Fζ |ηprimeτ minus Fηηη

6|Fζ |ηprime3 γ =

6|Fζ |Fζζζ

(512)

and

τ equiv τ prime

τb=

τ minus τbτb

(513)

corresponding to the maximal balance

|ζ prime| |ηprime| = O(|τ |12) |X| = O(|τ |32) (514)

In (512) and in the rest of this section G F = Gm and all their partialderivatives whose arguments are not indicated are meant to be evaluated at~ζb = (ζb ηb)

The three roots of the cubic are given by the well-known Cardano-Tartagliaformula

ζ prime0 (ξprime ~ηprime τ) = minusa

3+ (A+)

13 + (Aminus)

13

ζ primeplusmn (ξprime ~ηprime τ) = minusa3minus 1

2

(

(A+)13 + (Aminus)

13

)

plusmnradic32i(

(A+)13 minus (Aminus)

13

)

(515)where

Aplusmn = Rplusmnradic∆ (516)

and the discriminant ∆ reads

∆ = R2 +Q3 (517)

withQ(ηprime τ ) = 3bminusa2

9= minus2|Fζ |

Fζζζτ + α

F 2ζζζ

ηprime2

R(ξprime ηprime τ) = γ2X(ξprime ηprime τ ) + ab

18+ a

3Q(ηprime τ)

(518)

17

At the same order function S in (54) becomes

S(ζ prime ηprime τ ) = minusτ + 12|Fζ |

[

Fζζζζprime2 + 2Fζζηζ

primeηprime + Fζηηηprime2]

=

Fζζζ

2|Fζ |

(

Q(ηprime τ ) +(

ζ prime +Fζζη

Fζζζηprime)2)

(519)

Known ζ prime as function of (ξprime ηprime τ) from the cubic (511) the solution q andits gradient are then approximated near breaking by the formulae

q(ξ η τ) sim ǫG(ζb + ζ prime ηb + ηprime) = ǫ (G+Gζζprime +Gηη

prime +O(|τ |)) nabla(ξη)q sim ǫ

nabla(ζprimeηprime)G(ζb+ζprimeηb+ηprime)

S(ζprimeηprimeτ) (520)

Before breaking

Before breaking τ lt τb (τ lt 0) the coefficient Q in (518) is strictlypositive (see the second of (58)) then the discriminant ∆ = R2 + Q3 isalso strictly positive and only the root ζ prime0 is real Correspondingly the realsolution q is single valued and described by Cardanorsquos formula and by (520)In addition function S in (519) is also strictly positive and nabla(ξ~η)q is finiteforall ξ η

To have a more explicit solution than that provided by Cardanorsquos formulawe first restrict the asymptotic region to a narrower area so that the cubic(511) reduces to the linear equation bζ prime = γX and X contains only linearterms This is achieved choosing

ηprime = O(τ r) X = O(τ p+1) 12lt p lt p+1

2lt r lt p+ 1 (521)

implying

ζ prime = O(τ p)

X = ξprime + Fη

Fζηprime + F

Fζτ + o(τ p+1) = ξprime + Gη

Gζηprime + G

mGζτ + o(τ p+1)

bζ prime = γX rArr ζ prime sim minus 1τ

(

ξprime + Gη

Gζηprime + G

mGζτ)

(522)

Then

q = ǫG(ζb + ζ prime ηb + ηprime) sim ǫG + ǫGζζprime sim ǫ

(

1minus 1

m

)

Gminus ǫGζ

τ

(

ξprime +Gη

Gζηprime)

(523)

18

Since q sim ǫG and recalling the definitions (57)(513) it follows that q isdescribed by the exact similarity solution

q sim(

ξ + (GηGζ)ηprime

τ prime

)1m

(524)

of equation (37)The cubic simplifies also in the asymptotic region in which ξprime ηprime are of

the same order while τ prime le O(|ηprime|) reducing to ζ prime3 = γX so that the solutionq and its gradient are

q sim ǫG(ζb +3radic

γX(ξprime ηprime τ) ηb + ηprime) (525)

nablaξηq sim3radicγ

3

ǫnablaζηG3radic

X2(ξprime ηprime τ ) (526)

At breaking

When τ = τb the singularity manifold S (519) is positive everywhere inthe (ξ η) plane except at the breaking point (ξb ηb) in which it is zerotogether with Q R and the discriminant ∆ The solution q is well describedagain by Cardanorsquos formula and by (520) To have a more explicit solutionthan that provided by Cardanorsquos formula we choose ξprime ηprime of the same orderthe cubic (511) reduces to ζ prime3 = γX and equations (525) become

q sim ǫG(ζb +3radic

γX(ξprime ηprime 0) ηb + ηprime)

nablaξηq sim 3radicγ

3

ǫnablaξηG3radic

X2(ξprimeηprime0)

(527)

The expression of Xb(ξprime ~ηprime) equiv X(ξprime ~ηprime 0) is given in (512) Xb(ξ

prime ηprime) simξprime minus Fη

|Fζ |ηprime if ξprime prop ηprime but ξprime 6= (FηFζ)η

prime while X(ξprime ηprime 0) = minus Fηη

2|Fζ |ηprime2 if

ξprime = (FηFζ)ηprime

Equation (527) implies that all the derivatives of q blow up at τ = τb in

the breaking point (ξb ηb) with the universal lawXminus23b except the derivative

along the transversal line Xb(ξprime ηprime 0) = 0 represented by the vector field

V = partη minusXbηpartξ (compare with (56)) for which [2 19]

V q|(ξbηb) = ǫGη (528)

After breaking I the overturning profile

19

After breaking the solution becomes three-valued in a compact regionof the (ξ η) - plane (see Figures 3) and in general does not describe anyphysics nevertheless a detailed study of the multivalued region is importantin view of a proper regularization of the models

If τ gt τb (τ gt 0) in the regime (514) the SM equation S = 0

2|Fζ|τ = Fζζζζprime2 + 2Fζζηζ

primeηprime + Fζηηηprime2 (529)

describes an ellipsoidal paraboloid in the (ζ prime ηprime τ) space with minimum at

the breaking point (~ξb τb)One can check that eliminating ζ prime from equations (529) and (511) one

obtains the SM equation in space-time coordinates coinciding with the equa-tion ∆ = R2+Q3 = 0 where ∆ is the discriminant (517) of the cubic (511)and Q and R are defined in (518) Such equation can be satisfied only ifQ le 0 ie only if

|ηprime| le ηprimecusp(τ) (530)

where

ηprimecusp(τ ) equivradic

2|Fζ |Fζζζ

α

radicτ (531)

and is given by the following analytic and universal expression

ξprime minus Fη

|Fζ |ηprime minus F

|Fζ | τ minus Fηη

2|Fζ |ηprime2 minus

(

Fη

|Fζ | +Fζζη

Fζζζ

)

ηprimeτ + 16|Fζ |F 2

ζζζ

[

minus FηηηF2ζζζ

+Fζζη(3FζζζFζηη minus 2F 2ζζη)]

ηprime32

= α3

9F 2ζ F

4ζζζ

(

(

ηprimecusp(τ))2 minus ηprime2

)3

(532)Equation (532) describes a closed curve with two cusps in the (ξ η) - planeat the points

~ξplusmncusp(τ ) = (ξb ηb) + (ξplusmnprime

cusp(τ )plusmnηprimecusp(τ)) (533)

where

ξplusmnprime

cusp(τ ) sim plusmnFη

radic

2Fζζζ

α|Fζ|radicτ +

(

F

|Fζ |+

FηηFζζζ

α

)

τ plusmn Bτ 32 (534)

where B = O(1) (see Figures 6 for dKP and 7 for mdKP) corresponding tothe conditions Q = R = 0 on which the three real solutions of the cubiccoincide (in 1 + 1 dimensions it is not possible to have three coincidentsolutions)

ζ0 = ζplusmn = minusFζζη

Fζζζηprime rArr q0 = qplusmn =sim ǫ

(

G+ (Gη minusGζFζζη

Fζζζ)ηprime)

(535)

20

On the remaining part of the closed curve ∆ = 0 two of the three realbranches coincide Outside the closed curve ∆ gt 0 and the real solution q issingle valued inside the closed curve ∆ lt 0 and the real solution q is threevalued with the three branches

q = ǫG(ζb + ζ prime ηb + ηprime) sim ǫ(G +Gζζprime +Gηη

prime +O(τ)) (536)

where ζ prime are the three real solutions of the cubic (511) (see fi Figures 2for dKP)

Figures 2 Plotting of the dKP analytic solution in the (q ξ η τ) variablesfor G given by (422) ǫ = 02 at times τ = 0 τb minus 2 τb τb + 2 whereτb = 657

Such a three-valued region of the (ξ η) plane is characterized by the

21

conditions|ηprime| lt ηprimecusp(τ) ξminusM(ηprime τ) lt ξprime lt ξ+M(ηprime τ) (537)

where

ξplusmnM(ηprime τ) equiv Fη

|Fζ |ηprime + F

|Fζ | τ + Fηη

2|Fζ |ηprime2 +

(

Fη

|Fζ | +Fζζη

Fζζζ

)

ηprimeτ minus 16|Fζ |F 2

ζζζ

[

minus FηηηF2ζζζ

+Fζζη(3FζζζFζηη minus 2F 2ζζη)]

ηprime3 plusmn Fζζζ

3|Fζ | |Q| 32(538)

(see Figures 3 for dKP)Since

∆ξ equiv ξ+M(ηprime τ)minus ξminusM(ηprime τ) =2Fζζζ

3|Fζ||Q(ηprime τ)|32 le 4

radic2

3

radic

|Fζ|Fζζζ

τ 32 (539)

we infer that the longitudinal width of the multivalued region is O(τ 32) thetransversal widths delimited by the two cusps is instead O(τ 12) thereforethe multivalued region develops at τ = τb from the breaking point (ξb ηb)with an infinite speed in the tranversal direction and with zero speed in thelongitudinal direction All these results are a common feature to the class ofdynamics (11) (see the previously derived results for the dKP equation forfinite times [18 19] and in the longtime regime [18] and those for the KZequation in the longtime regime [2])

-15-10-050005101-15-10-0500051015

-15-10-050005101-15-10-0500051015

Figures 3 Plotting of the three valued regions of the (ξ η) plane for dKPat times τ = 02 05 for G given by (422) and ǫ = 02 The center of thesquare frame is the breaking point (ξb ηb) Notice that the two cusps havethe same ξ coordinate ξ+cusp(τ) sim ξminuscusp(τ) since for solution (422) Gη = 0(see (531)(534))

22

We end this subsection remarking that as it was already observed in [19]since dKP (mn) is symmetric wrt y if the initial datum is also symmetricwrt y like the Gaussian (419) also its evolution will be so u(x y t) =u(xminusy t) This implies that ηb = yb = 0 and that all partial derivatives ofF and G containing an odd number of η derivatives are 0 at breaking As aconsequence the transversal direction on which the derivative of the profiledoes not blow up is the η (y) direction and on it the derivative is 0 atbreaking (see (56))

After breaking II the discontinuous shock

Using the matching rules of sect3 the shock formulae (310) become

parts

partτ=

ǫm

m+ 1

Gm+1(ζ1 η)minusGm+1(ζ2 η)

G(ζ1 η)minusG(ζ2 η) (540)

s = ζ1 + ǫmGm(ζ1 η) τ = ζ2 + ǫmGm(ζ2 η) τ (541)

where subscript 2 is for values behind the shock and subscript 1 for valuesahead Equations (541) are two implicit equations for ζ1 and ζ2 solvingthese equations yields ζ1(s η τ) ζ2(s η τ) and substituting these expres-sions in (540) it results in a nonlinear first order differential equation fors This equation and the initial conditions (311) give uniquely s(η τ) andconsequently ζ12(η τ) = ζ12(s(η τ) η τ)

We recall that immediately after breaking and if (530) holds equation(541) reduces to the cubic (511)(512) in which ξprime must be replaced by sprimepossessing three real roots where

sprime(ηprime τ) = sminus ξb (542)

Therefore the values of ζ1 and ζ2 are chosen among the three solutions (515)so that q2 = ǫG(ζb + ζ prime2 η) has the maximum value and q1 = ǫG(ζb + ζ prime1 η)the minimum one among the three branches of q Since Gζ lt 0 it followsthat

ζ1 = maxζ prime0 ζ primeplusmn ζ2 = minζ prime0 ζ primeplusmn (543)

To identify ζ12 with one of the three roots ζ prime0 ζprimeplusmn let us rewrite them as

follows

ζ prime0 = minusa

3+ 2 3

radicρ cos

(

θ

3

)

(544)

ζ prime+ = minusa

3minus 3

radicρ

(

cos

(

θ

3

)

+radic3 sin

(

θ

3

))

(545)

23

ζ primeminus = minusa

3minus 3

radicρ

(

cos

(

θ

3

)

minusradic3 sin

(

θ

3

))

(546)

where

ρ =radic

R2 + |∆| θ = arctan

(

radic

|∆|R

)

(547)

We observe that for 0 le θ le π the following inequalities hold

minus cos

(

θ

3

)

minusradic3 sin

(

θ

3

)

le minus cos

(

θ

3

)

+radic3 sin

(

θ

3

)

le 2 cos

(

θ

3

)

so that

ζ prime+ le ζ primeminus le ζ prime0 rArr q(ζb + ζ prime0 η) le q(ζb + ζ primeminus η) le q(ζb + ζ prime+ η) (548)

for q decreasing in ζ Hence

ζ prime1(sprime ηprime τ prime) = ζ prime0(s

prime ηprime τ prime) ζ prime2(sprime ηprime τ prime) = ζ prime+(s

prime ηprime τ prime) (549)

Then (540) reduces to the equations

dsprime

dτ+ G

Gζ+ Gη

Gζηprime + 1

2

[

ζ prime0(sprime ηprime τ ) + ζ prime+(s

prime ηprime τ)]

= 0 for dKPdsprime

dτ+ G

2Gζ+ Gη

Gζηprime + 1

2

[

ζ prime0(sprime ηprime τ) + ζ prime+(s

prime ηprime τ)]

= 0 for mdKP

sprime(0) = ξb

(550)

obtained expanding (540) near the breaking point and recalling that τ equivτ primeτb

We remark that in the differential equations (550) sprime depends on ηprime

parametrically So the discontinuous (dissipative) shocks of the longtime so-lutions of the small data Cauchy problems for dKP and mdKP has a simplegeometric construction given τ gt 0 for any fixed |ηprime| le ηcusp the overturn-ing profile in the (ξ q) plane is intercepted by a vertical straight line cuttingoff equal area lobi in analogy with the 1 + 1 dimensional case

Going back to the dKP variables

The above formulae written in the convenient variables q ξ η τ are es-sentially the same for both dKP and mdKP relevant differences appear whenwe go back to the original variables u x y t inverting equations (52)(53)

u = 1radictq t = τ2

4 y = ητ2

2 x = ξ minus η2τ2

4 for dKP

u = 1radictq t = eτ y = 2ηeτ x = ξ minus η2eτ for mdKP

(551)

24

and all the above universal formulae are easily transfered to the dKP (mn)equations In particular small and localized initial data break i) at tb =τ 2b 4 in the point (xb yb) = (ξb minus τ 2b η

2b4 ηbτ

2b 2) of the parabolic wave front

x+ y2(4tb) = ξb evolving according to dKP and ii) at tb = eτb in the point(xb yb) = (ξb minus η2be

τb 2ηbeτb) of the parabolic wave front x + y2(4tb) = ξb

evolving according to mdKP If for instance we use the same Gaussian initialcondition (419) for both dKP and mdKP with ǫ = 02 then G is given by(422) in both cases Consequently for dKP

ζb = 196 ηb = 0 ξb = 327 τb = 657 (552)

and wave breaking takes place at tb = 108 in the point (xb yb) = (327 0)on the parabola x+ 231 middot 10minus2y2 = 327 (see Figure 4)

Figure 4 Plotting of the analytic dKP solution u in the physical variablesx y t for G given by (422) (corresponding to the gaussian initial condition)ǫ = 02 at breaking

For mdKP

ζb = 161 ηb = 0 ξb = 251 τb = 1431 (553)

and wave breaking takes place at tb = 164middot106 in the point (xb yb) = (251 0)on the parabola x + 152 middot 10minus7y2 = 251 and at breaking the amplitude ofthe wave is u = ǫtb

minus12G(ζb ηb) = 195 middot 10minus4 (see Figure 5)

25

Figure 5 Plotting of the analytic mdKP solution u in the physical variablesx y t for G given by (422) (corresponding to the gaussian initial condition)ǫ = 02 at breaking

Since in the mdKP case tb is very large and the wave amplitude atbreaking is very small we wonder if such a wave breaking could be actuallydetected numerically

Now we go into the analytic details For the dKP case

tprime equiv tminus tb sim 2tbτ yprime = y minus yb ≃ 2tb(ηprime + 2ηbτ + 2ηprimeτ )

xprime = xminus xb sim ξprime minus ηbyprime minus yprime2

4tb+ η2b t

prime + ηbtbyprimetprime

(554)

and we choose τ prime to be sufficiently small to have |tprime| |yprime| ≪ 1The dKP solution reads

u(x y t) =ǫradictG(ζb + ζ prime ηb + ηprime) =

ǫradict

(

G+Gζζprime +Gη

yprime

2tb+O

(

tprime

tb

))

(555)where ζ prime is the solution of the cubic (511) with

a =3Fζζη

2Fζζζ

yprime

tb b = 3

Fζζζ

(

Fζtprime

tb+ Fζηη

yprime2

4t2b

)

X = xprime +(

ηb minus Fη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime minus[

η2b +(

F2minus ηbFη

)

1|Fζ |tb

]

tprime

+(

1minus Fηη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime2

4tb+[

minusηb +(

Fη

2+ ηbFηη

)

12|Fζ |tb

]

yprimetprime

tb

minus Fηηη

48|Fζ |yprime3

t3b

(556)

26

The three-valued region (532) after breaking becomes

xprime +(

ηb minus Fη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime minus[

η2b +(

F2minus ηbFη

)

1|Fζ |tb

]

tprime

+(

1minus Fηη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime2

4tb+[

minusηb +(

Fη

2|Fζ |tb +ηbFηη

|Fζ | minus Fζζη

2Fζζζ

)

12tb

]

yprimetprime

tb

+ 16|Fζ |F 2

ζζζ

[

minus FηηηF2ζζζ + Fζζη(3FζζζFζηη minus 2F 2

ζζη)]

yprime3

8t3b

2

=

α3

9middot64F 2ζF 4ζζζ

t6b

(

(

yprimecusp(tprime))2 minus yprime2

)3

(557)

where

yprimecusp(tprime) = 2

radic

|Fζ |Fζζζ

α

radictbtprime (558)

Equation (557) describes a closed curve with two cusps in the (x y) - planeat the points

~xplusmncusp(t

prime) = (xb yb) + (xplusmnprime

cusp(tprime)plusmnyprimecusp(t

prime)) (559)

where

xplusmnprime

cusp(tprime) sim ∓2ηb

radic

|Fζ |Fζζζ

α

radictbtprime plusmn Fη

radic

Fζζζ

α|Fζ |

radic

tprime

tb

+(

η2b minus|Fζ |Fζζζ

α

)

tprime +(

F|Fζ | +

FηηFζζζ

α

)

tprime

2tbplusmn 2ηb

radic

|Fζ |Fζζζ

αtprime

32radictb+O(τ 32)

(560)At last the analogue of (539) reads

∆xprime le 2

3

radic

|Fζ|Fζζζ

(

tprime

tb

)32

(561)

it follows that the longitudinal width ∆long and the transversal width ∆transv

of the multivalued region are respectively

∆long = O

(

(

tprime

tb

)32

)

∆transv = O(

(tbtprime)

12

)

rArr ∆long

∆transv= O

(

tprime

t2b

)

(562)

For the mdKP case

tprime = tminus tb sim tbτprime yprime = y minus yb sim 2tb(η

prime + ηbtprime

tb+ ηprimetprime

tb)

xprime = xminus xb sim ξprime minus ηbyprime + η2b t

prime minus yprime2

4tb+ ηb

yprimetprime

tb

(563)

27

and we choose τ prime sufficiently small to have |tprime| |yprime| ≪ 1The mdKP solution reads

u(x y t) =ǫradictG(ζb+ζ prime ηb+ηprime) =

ǫradict

(

G+Gζζprime +Gη

yprime

2tb+O

(

tprime

tb log tb

))

(564)where ζ prime is the solution of the cubic (511) with

a =3Fζζη

2Fζζζ

yprime

tb b = 3

Fζζζ

(

2Fζtprime

tb log tb+ Fζηη

yprime2

4t2b

)

X = xprime +(

ηb minus Fη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime minus[

η2b +(

Flog tb

minus ηbFη

)

1|Fζ |tb

]

tprime

+(

1minus Fηη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime2

4tb+[

minusηb +(

Fη

|Fζ |(1minus1

log tb) + ηbFηη

|Fζ |

)

12tb

]

yprimetprime

tb

minus Fηηη

48|Fζ |yprime3

t3b

(565)

The three-valued region (532) after breaking becomes

xprime +(

ηb minus Fη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime minus[

η2b +(

Flog tb

minus ηbFη

)

1|Fζ |tb

]

tprime

+(

1minus Fηη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime2

4tb+[

minusηb +(

Fη

|Fζ |(1minus1

log tb) + ηbFηη

|Fζ| minus Fζζη

Fζζζ log tb

)

12tb

]

yprimetprime

tb

+ 16|Fζ |F 2

ζζζ

[

minus FηηηF2ζζζ + Fζζη(3FζζζFζηη minus 2F 2

ζζη)]

yprime3

8t3b

2

=

α3

9middot64F 2ζ F

4ζζζt

6b

(

(

yprimecusp(tprime))2 minus yprime2

)3

(566)where

yprimecusp(tprime) = 2

radic

2|Fζ |Fζζζ

α

radic

tbtprime

log tb (567)

Equation (566) describes a closed curve with two cusps in the (x y) - planeat the points

~xplusmncusp(t

prime) = (xb yb) + (xplusmnprime

cusp(tprime)plusmnyprimecusp(t

prime)) (568)

where

xplusmnprime

cusp(tprime) sim ∓2ηb

radic

|Fζ |Fζζζ

α

radic

tbtprime

log tbplusmn Fη

radic

Fζζζ

α|Fζ |

radic

tprime

tb log tb

+(

η2b minus|Fζ |Fζζζ

α log tb

)

tprime +(

F|Fζ | +

FηηFζζζ

α

)

tprime

tb log tbplusmn 2ηb

radic

|Fζ |Fζζζ

αtprime

32radic

tb log tb

+O(τ 32)

(569)

28

At last the analogue of (539) reads

∆xprime le 4radic2

3

radic

|Fζ |Fζζζ

(

tprime

tb log tb

)32

(570)

it follows that the longitudinal width ∆long and the transversal width ∆transv

of the multivalued region are respectively

∆long = O

(

(

tprime

tb log tb

)32

)

∆transv = O

(

(

tbtprime

log tb

)12

)

rArr ∆long

∆transv= O

(

tprime

t2blog tb

)

(571)

References

[1] F Santucci Onde debolmente non lineari e quasi unidimensionali in

Natura La rottura di tali onde e il problema della regolarizzazione dis-

sipativa Tesi della Laurea Specialistica in Fisica supervisor P M San-tini Dipartimento di Fisica dellrsquoUniversita di Roma ldquoLa Sapienzardquo AA2011-2012

[2] S V Manakov and P M Santini On the dispersionless Kadomtsev-Petviashvili equation in n + 1 dimensions exact solutions the Cauchyproblem for small initial data and wave breaking J Phys A MathTheor 44 (2011) 405203

[3] G B Whitham Linear and nonlinear waves John Wiley amp Sons 1974

[4] C Lin E Reissner and H S Tien On two-dimensional nonsteadymotion of a slender body in a compressible fluid J Math Phys 27(1948) 220-231

[5] R Timman Unsteady motion in transonic flow Symposium Transson-icum Aachen 1962 EdKOswatitsch Springer 394-401

[6] E A Zobolotskaya and R V Khokhlov Quasi-plane waves in the non-linear acoustics of confined beams Soviet Physics- Acoustics Vol15N1 (1969)

29

[7] B B Kadomtsev and V I Petviashvili On the stability of solitarywaves in weakly dispersing media Soviet Physics-Doklady Vol15 N6(1970)

[8] X P Wang M J Ablowitz and H Segur Wave collapse and instabil-

ity of solitary waves of a generalized Kadomtsev-Petviashvili equationPhysica D 78 (1994) 241-265

[9] M J Ablowitz and H Segur Solitons and the Inverse Scattering Trans-

form SIAM Philadelphia 1981

[10] M J Ablowitz and P A Clarkson Solitons nonlinear evolution equa-

tions and inverse scattering Cambridge University Press 1991

[11] S Turitsyn and G Falkovitch Stability of magneto-elastic solitons andself-focusing of sound in antiferromagnets Sov Phys J Exp TheorPhys 62 (1985) 146-152

[12] S Novikov S V Manakov L P Pitaevskii V E Zakharov Theory of

solitons Consultant Bureau 1984

[13] S V Manakov and P M Santini Inverse scattering problem for vectorfields and the heavenly equation httparXivnlinSI0512043

[14] S V Manakov and P M Santini Inverse scattering problem forvector fields and the Cauchy problem for the heavenly equationPhys Lett A 359 613-619 (2006) doi101016jphysleta200607011httparXivnlinSI0604017

[15] S V Manakov and P M Santini The Cauchy problem on theplane for the dispersionless Kadomtsev-Petviashvili equation JETPLetters 83 No 10 462-466 (2006) 101134S0021364006100080httparXivnlinSI0604016

[16] P G Grinevich P M Santini and D Wu The Cauchy problem for thePavlov equation Nonlinearity 28 (2015) 3709-3754 doi1010880951-771528113709 Preprint arXiv13105834v2

[17] M V Pavlov Integrable hydrodynamic chains J Math Phys 44 (2003)4134-4156

30

expected for sufficiently large m [8] to complicate the picture In the recentpaper [20] fi the formal dependence xminus umt motivated by the y indepen-dent limit was used to study the generic breaking features of dKP (m 2) andits dispersive shock formation

In our paper we give some light on the problem of finding a conve-nient characteristic form of the type (17) for the study of wave breakingof dKP (mn) solutions i) from the construction of a family of exact solu-tions of dKP (mn) exhibiting wave breaking and ii) from the constructionof the longtime behavior of solutions of the Cauchy problem of dKP (mn)for small initial data

Indeed after showing in sect2 the universality of (15) starting from a familyof nonlinear wave equations in sect3 we use the invariance of the dKP (mn)equations under motions on the paraboloid to construct a family of exact so-lutions involving an arbitrary function of one variable and describing wavesconstant on their paraboloidal wave front breaking simultaneously in allpoints of it and developing after breaking either multivalued overturningprofiles or single valued discontinuous shocks Then we use in sect4 such solu-tions to build a uniform approximation of the solution of the Cauchy problemin the longtime regime and for small and localized initial data showing thatsuch a small and localized data evolving according to the dKP (mn) equa-tion break in the longtime regime iff m(n minus 1) le 2 In sect5 we study theanalytic aspects of such a wave breaking given explicitely in terms of theinitial data providing in particular a description of the overturning profileand of the development of a discontinuous shock immediately after breakingwe concentrate in particular on the mdKP (15) case and on its comparisonwith the already known dKP (13) case The results of this paper containedin the 2012 master thesis of one of the authors (FS) [1] generalize analogousones for the dKP (1 n) equation in [2] and are obtained following the samestrategy

We end this introduction considering the following consequence of theseresults for the family of exact solutions of dKP (mn) and for the long-time asymptotics of the solutions of the small data Cauchy problem thedependence of the solutions u(x ~y t) on x is fi through the combinationsxminus cminus1

mnumt if cmn gt 0 and xminus umt log t if cmn = 0 where

cmn = 1minus m(nminus 1)

2 (18)

Therefore this dependence involves in a simple way the degree m+ 1 of the

4

nonlinearity and the dimensionality n+ 1 of the problem through the coeffi-cient cmn and it is consistent with the case of the Riemann equation (12)for which cm1 = 1 and with the dKP equation (13) for which c12 = 12(confirming the apparently mysterious factor 2 in (17)) it is not consistentinstead with the formal dependence xminus umt used in [20]

In analogy with the dKP case the results of our paper seem to suggestthe following conjecture (admittedly a weak conjecture due to the absencein the generic case of an IST generalizing the method of characteristics)Conjecture The solutions of the dKP (mn) equation around breaking forcmn ge 0 are described by the following characteristic formulae

u = G(ζ y t)

ζ =

xminus cminus1mnG

m(ζ ~y t)t if cmn gt 0xminusGm(ζ ~y t)t log t if cmn = 0

(19)

This paper is dedicated to the memory of S V Manakov

2 Universality and applicability of dKP (mn)

The universality (and therefore the applicability) of (11) through a multi-scale expansion is well described by the following simple model the familyof nonlinear wave equations

(f(w))TT = w =nsum

i=1

part2Xi w = w( ~X T ) (21)

For small amplitudes w rarr ǫw 0 lt ǫ ≪ 1 we substitute in (21) thenonlinear term by its Taylor expansion

f(ǫw) = f(0) + f prime(0)ǫw +1

2f primeprime(0)ǫ2w2 + middot middot middot (22)

obtaining at O(ǫ) the wave equation

wTT = c2w c = 1radic

f prime(0) (23)

where f prime(0) is assumed to be positiveIf the waves are quasi one-dimensional and we choose X1 as the direc-

tion of propagation the wave lengths in the trasversal directions are small

5

~kperp = ǫα~κperp where ~kperp is the transversal wave vector and α gt 0 has to befixed Then the dispersion relation becomes [2]

ω = c

radic

k21 +

~k2perp = ck1

radic

1 + ǫ2α~κ2perpk21

≃ ck1

(

1 + ǫ2α~κ2perp

2k21

)

(24)

and the phase of a monochromatic wave reads

~k middot ~X minus ωT = k1 (X1 minus cT ) + ǫα~κperp middot ~Xperp minus cǫ2α

2

~κ2perpk21

T (25)

motivating the introduction of the new variables

x = X1 minus cT

~y = ǫα ~Xperp yi = Xi+1 i = 1 nminus 1t = ǫ2α c

2T

(26)

Rewriting (21) in the new variables and imposing α = 12 to get the maximalbalance one obtains at O(ǫ2) the dKP (1 n) equation

(ut + uux)x +perpu = 0 (27)

where u = minus c2

2f primeprime(0)w and perp is the tranversal Laplacian given in (11b)

If the term f primeprime(0) vanishes the maximal balance must involve the cubicterm if also f primeprimeprime(0) = 0 the maximal balance must involve the quartic termand so on In the very special case in which f (l)(0) = 0 l = 2 m andf (m+1)(0) 6= 0 then the maximal balance must involve the term of orderm + 1 and is achieved for α = m2 at the first nontrivial order O(ǫm+1)obtaining the dKP (mn) equation (11) with u = C1mw and

C = minusc2f (m+1)(0)

m (28)

if m is odd and

(

ut minus sgn(f (m+1)(0)) umux

)

x+perpu = 0 (29)

with u = |C|1mw if m is evenThe above considerations explain well why equations (11) are less and

less universal and applicable as m increases

6

3 Exact solutions of dKP (mn)

It was observed in [2] that dKP (1 n) is invariant under the following Liesymmetry group of transformations

x = x+sumnminus1

i=1 (δiyi minus δ2i t)yj = yj minus 2δjt j = 1 middot middot middot nminus 1t = t

(31)

where δj j = 1 nminus1 are the arbitrary parameters of the group leavinginvariant the paraboloid

ξ = x+1

4t

nminus1sum

i=1

y2i (32)

Such a symmetry was used to construct a family of exact and implicit solu-tions of dKP (1 n) exhibiting wave breaking and playing a relevant role inthe longtime regime of the small data Cauchy problem for dKP (1 n) [2]

Since dKP (mn) is also invariant under the transformation (31) follow-ing the same strategy as in [2] such a symmetry will be used in this sectionto construct a family of exact and implicit solutions of dKP (mn) In thispaper we add to the exact solutions exhibiting a gradient catastrophe andmultivaluedness after breaking also the exact weak solutions of dKP (mn)developing after breaking single valued discontinuous shocks of dissipativenature

Therefore we look for solutions of (11) in the form

u = v(ξ t) ξ = x+1

4t

nminus1sum

i=1

y2i (33)

reducing (11) to the (1 + 1) dimensional PDE

vt + vmvξ +nminus 1

2tv = 0 (34)

The following change of variables

v(ξ t) = tminusnminus12 q(ξ τ) (35)

where

τ(t) =

1cmn

tcmn + α if cmn 6= 0

ln t+ β if cmn = 0 (36)

7

α β are real constants and the coefficient cmn is defined in (18) transforms(34) into the Riemann equation (12) in the variables (ξ τ)

qτ + qmqξ = 0 (37)

We recall [3] that (37) has the general implicit solution

q = A(ζ) ζ = ξ minusAm(ζ)τ hArr q = A(ξ minus qmτ) (38)

where A is an arbitrary differentiable function of one argument If in par-ticular A describes a localized positive hump the solution breaks first atτ = τb on the characteristic ζb where

τb = min ζ

(

minus 1

mAmminus1(ζ)Aprime(ζ)

)

= minus 1

mAmminus1(ζb)Aprime(ζb)gt 0 (39)

For τ gt τb the solution becomes multivalued and not acceptable in manyphysical contexts Alternatively for τ gt τb the regular multivalued solutioncan be replaced by a weak solution a single valued discontinuous shockof dissipative nature whose wave front discontinuity s(τ) is described byequations [3]

dsdτ

= 1m+1

Am+1(ζ1)minusAm+1(ζ2)A(ζ1)minusA(ζ2)

s = ζ1 + Am(ζ1)τ = ζ2 + Am(ζ2)τ

(310)

with the initial conditions

s(τb) = ξb ζ1(τb) = ζ2(τb) = ζb (311)

Behind and ahead the shock the solution is given by

q =

q2 = A(ζ2) if ξ lt s(τ)q1 = A(ζ1) if ξ gt s(τ)

(312)

where q2 and q1 are respectively the maximum and the minimum among the(three in the case of a single hump) branches of the implicit equations (38)

We remark that τ(t) in (36) is a monotonically increasing function of tto have it positive we choose the constants α β and the t-intervals as follows

τ(t) =

1cmn

tcmn t gt 0 if cmn gt 0

ln t t gt 1 if cmn = 01

|cmn|

(

tminus|cmn|0 minus tminus|cmn|

)

t gt t0 if cmn lt 0

(313)

8

Recalling (33) (35) and (313) the exact solutions of dKP (mn) in theoriginal variables corresponding to (38) read

u =

tminusnminus12 A

(

x+ 14t

sumnminus1i=1 y2i minus 1

cmnumt)

t gt 0 if cmn gt 0

tminusnminus12 A

(

x+ 14t

sumnminus1i=1 y2i minus umt ln t

)

t gt 1 if cmn = 0

tminusnminus12 A

(

x+ 14t

sumnminus1i=1 y2i minus 1

|cmn|umt

(

(

tt0

)|cmn|minus 1

))

t gt t0 if cmn lt 0

(314)where cmn is defined in (18)

If again A is a localized hump (314) describes a wave constant onthe paraboloidal wave front (32) and simultaneously breaking on it Moreprecisely the solution breaks at time tb defined by

tb =

(cmnτb)1cmn if cmn gt 0

eτb if cmn = 0(315)

on the paraboloid

x+1

4t

nminus1sum

i=1

y2i = ζb + Am(ζb)τb (316)

where τb ζb are defined in (39) (see Figures 1)

Figures 1 Plotting of the exact solution of the mdKP equation (15) (c22 =0) before at and after breaking Here we have chosen A(x) = eminusx2

conse-quently ζb = 12 τb =

radice2 tb = e

radice2

If cmn lt 0 τ(t) rarr τ(infin) equiv |cmn|minus1tminus|cmn|0 as t rarr infin and the wave

freezes asymptotically If tminus|cmn|0 gt τb|cmn| then τ(infin) gt τb and the wave

breaks before freezing at

tb =(

tminus|cmn|0 minus τb|cmn|

)minus1|cmn| (317)

9

on the paraboloid (316) If instead tminus|cmn|0 lt τb|cmn| then τ(infin) lt τb and

no breaking takes place before the wave freezesIf n = 1 forallm (314) reduces to the general solution u = A(xminusumt) of the

Riemann equation (12) if m = 1 foralln (314) reduces to the class of particu-lar solutions of the dKP equation with quadratic nonlinearity and arbitrarydimensions (dKP (1 n)) constructed in [2] It is interesting to remark thatthis type of exact solutions was first derived for the integrable dKP equation(13) using its nonlinear Riemnann - Hilbert inverse problem [21]

After breaking t gt tb the regular multivalued solutions (314) can bereplaced by the discontinuous single valued solutions of dKP (mn) obtainedusing (33) (35) and (313) in (310) (311) (312) More precisely fort gt tb where tb is defined in (315) and (317) the dKP (mn) solutiondescribed by (314) for t lt tb develops a discontinuous shock on the parabola

x+ y2

4t= S(t) S(t) equiv s(τ(t)) (318)

where s(τ) is characterized by equations (310) (311) and τ(t) is defined in(313) Behind and ahead the shock the solution is given by

u =

u2(x ~y t) if x+ y4

4tlt S(t)

u1(x ~y t) if x+ y4

4tgt S(t)

(319)

where u2 and u1 are respectively the maximum and the minimum among the(three in the case of a localized bump) branches u12 = tminus(nminus1)2A(ζ12) ofthe implicit equations (314)

We end this section remarking that as already mentioned in sect1 in theabove class of exact solutions of (11) the dependences of u on x throughthe combinations x minus cminus1

mnumt (if cmn gt 0) x minus umt log t (if cmn = 0) and

xminus|cmn|minus1umt[(tt0)|cmn|minus1] if cmn lt 0 are not consistent with the formal

dependence x minus umt recently postulated to study the breaking features ofdKP (m 2) in [20]

4 The Cauchy problem for small and local-

ized initial data and longtime wave break-

ing

In analogy with [2] now we use the exact solutions of the previous sectionto construct the longtime behaviour of solutions of the Cauchy problem of

10

(11) for small and localized initial data showing in particular that smalland localized initial data evolving according to (11) break in thelongtime regime only if m(nminus 1) le 2 (cmn ge 0)

For small and localized initial data of the type

u(x ~y 0) = ǫu0(x ~y) 0 lt ǫ ≪ 1 (41)

evolving according to equation (11) the behavior of the solution may beapproximated by the solution of the linearized dKP (mn) equation untilnonlinearity becomes relevant

For O(ǫ) initial data equations (37)(39) imply that the breaking timeis

τb = O(ǫminusm) ≫ 1 (42)

so the nonlinear regime for dKP (mn) is characterized by the condition

t = O(

τminus1(ǫminusm))

=

O(

ǫminus m

cmn

)

cmn gt 0

O(

eǫminusm)

cmn = 0(43)

where τminus1(middot) is the inverse of (36) while for cmn lt 0 large values of t arenot compatible with (42) and a nonlinear regime never occurs

So for t ≪ τminus1(ǫminusm) the solution of the Cauchy problem is approximatedby the solution of the linearized dKP (mn) equation while for t sim τminus1(ǫminusm)a matching will be made between the linearized solution and the exact solu-tion (314)

In the linear regime when 0 lt t ≪ O(τminus1(ǫminusm)) the dKP (mn) solutionis well described by that of the linearized dKP (mn) ie

u(x ~y t) sim ǫ

(2π)n

int

Rn

u0(k1 ~kperp) exp

[

ı(k1x+ ~kperp middot ~y minus k2perpk1

t)

]

dk1d~kperp (44)

where

u0(k1 ~kperp) =

int

Rn

u0(x ~y) exp[

minusı(k1x+ ~kperp middot ~y)]

dxd~y

In the longtime regime

1 ≪ t ≪ O(τminus1(ǫminusm)) (45)

11

the multiple integral can be evaluated by the stationary phase method whichgives [2]

u(x ~y t) sim tminusnminus12 ǫG

(

x+1

4t

nminus1sum

i=1

y2i ~y

2t

)

(46)

where

G(ξ ~η) =1

2nπn+12

int

R

dk1|k1|nminus12 u0 (k1 ~ηk1) exp

[

ık1ξ minus ı(nminus 1)π

4sgn(k1)

]

(47)in the space-time region

(xminus ξ)t yit = O(1) i = 1 nminus 1 (48)

on the paraboloid (32) and decays faster outside it Therefore small andlocalized initial data set in the longtime regime (45) governed bythe linear theory on the paraboloid (32)

When nonlinearity becomes relevant ie when t = O(τminus1(ǫminusm)) theasymptotic solution of dKP (mn) is built matching the longtime solution(46)(47) of the linearized Cauchy problem with the exact solution (314)If fi cmn gt 0 the first argument ξ of function G(ξ η) defined in (47) isreplaced by ξminus cminus1

mnumt or equivalently the arbitrary function A(ζ) in (38)

acquires the dependence on the second argument ~η = ~y2t and is identifiedwith G As a result of this matching in the nonlinear regime (42) (43) thesolution reads

u(x ~y t) ≃ uasmn(x ~y t)

uasmn(x ~y t) equiv

tminusnminus12 ǫG

(

x+ 14t

sumnminus1i=1 y2i minus 1

cmnumt ~y

2t

)

cmn gt 0

tminusnminus12 ǫG

(

x+ 14t

sumnminus1i=1 y2i minus umt ln t ~y

2t

)

cmn = 0

(49)with umt = O(1) for cmn gt 0 and umt log t = O(1) for cmn = 0 becominginfinitesimal in the linear regime as it has to be

For cmn lt 0 the solution is described by its linear form (46) thereforewave breaking takes place for the particular values of (mn) described by thecondition

cmn ge 0 hArr m(nminus 1) le 2 (410)

ie forn = 1 n = 2 n = 3forallm m = 1 2 m = 1

(411)

12

For n = 1 forallm uasmn reduces to the general solution of the Riemann equation

(12) [3] The cases (mn) = (2 1) and (mn) = (3 1) the dKP and theKZ equations have been already investigated in [18] and [2] respectivelytherefore in the following section we mainly focus on the case (mn) = (2 2)corresponding to the nonintegrable modified dKP equation (15) and to itsasymptotic solution

u ≃ uas22(x y t) =

1radictǫG

(

x+y2

4tminus u2t ln t

y

2t

)

(412)

comparing the results with the dKP case (mn) = (1 2) investigated in [18]with its asymptotic solution

u ≃ uas12(x y t) =

1radictǫG

(

x+y2

4tminus 2ut

y

2t

)

(413)

Remark 1 The estimate of the first correction to the asymptotics (49)reads

u = uasnm(x ~y t)(1 +O(tminus1)) (414)

Indeed if cmn gt 0 one has

u sim uasnm(x ~y t) +

ǫ1+ m

cmn

tnminus12

H

(

x+1

4t

nminus1sum

i=1

y2i ~y

2t τ

)

(415)

where τ = ǫmτ and H(ξ ~η τ ) is expressed in terms of G(ζ ~η) (ζ is definedin the second of equations (51)) through the PDE

(

Hτ +GmHξ

1 +mGmminus1Gζ τ

)

ξ

+1

4(cmnτ )1+cminus1mn

nminus1sum

j=1

(

Gηj

1 +mGmminus1Gζ τ

)

ηj

= 0 (416)

Since from (43) ǫm

cmn = O(tminus1) equation (415) yields (414) Similarly ifcmn = 0

u sim uasnm(x ~y t) +

ǫ

tn+12

H

(

x+1

4t

nminus1sum

i=1

y2i ~y

2t τ

)

(417)

where H(ξ ~η τ) now solves the PDE

(

H

1 +mGmminus1Gζ τ

)

ξ

=1

4

nminus1sum

j=1

(

Gηj

1 +mGmminus1Gζ τ

)

ηj

(418)

13

Then equation (417) yields equation (414) too

Remark 2 As is was observed in [2] for a gaussian initial condition

u0(x y) = d exp

[

minusx2 + ~y2

4

]

(419)

where d is constant the asymptotic solution can be written in terms of specialfunctions obtaining for G(ξ ~η)

G(ξ ~η) =dradicπ

1

(1+~η2)n+14

[

cos(

π4(nminus 1)

)

Γ(

n+14

)

1F1

(

n+14 12minusY 2

4

)

+ sin(

π4(nminus 1)

)

Γ(

n+34

)

Y 1F1

(

n+34 32minusY 2

4

) ]

(420)

where

Y =ξ

radic

1 + ~η2 (421)

Γ is the Euler gamma function and 1F1 is the Kummer confluent hypergeo-metric function [22 23] For n = 2 and d =

radic2π it yields respectively

G(ξ η) =1

(1+η2)34

[

Γ(

34

)

1F1

(

34 12minusY 2

4

)

+ Y Γ(

54

)

1F1

(

54 32minusY 2

4

)]

(422)

Remark 3 The fact that small data break only when the inequality (410) issatisfied was expected from physical considerations Indeed as already men-tioned in the introduction in equation (11) there are two competing termsthe nonlinear term umux responsible for the steepening of the profile andthe perpu term describing diffraction in the transversal (n minus 1) dimensionalhyperplane (reminiscence through the multiscale expansion leading to (11)of the wave operator) therefore diffraction increases as (nminus 1) increases [2]For small initial data the umux term is initially smaller and smaller increas-ing m and the solution evolves in a linear way for a longer and longer timediffracting transversally through the (nminus1) diffraction channels So diffrac-tion increasing with (n minus 1) acts on a very long time increasing with mbefore the nonlinear regime could become relevant and if (nminus 1) andor mare sufficiently large one expects that the solution would be diffracted awayalmost completely before reaching the nonlinear regime and will not break

14

We have in particular that breaking takes place in the following longtimeregimes (see (43))m = n = 1 (the Riemann equation with quadratic nonlinearity) tb = O(ǫminus1)m = 1 n = 2 (the dKP equation) tb = O(ǫminus2)m = 1 n = 3 (the KZ equation) tb = O(eǫ

minus1)

m = 2 n = 1 (the Riemann equation with cubic nonlinearity) tb = O(ǫminus2)m = 2 n = 2 (the mdKP equation) O(tb = eǫ

minus2)

It is interesting to remark that as it was observed in [2] if m = 1 (thephysically more relevant case) wave breaking takes place only for n le 3 iein physical space

We end this section remarking that also in the longtime behaviour of thesolutions of the small data Cauchy problem for equation (11) the depen-dence of the solution u on x as in the case of the exact solutions (314) isnot consistent with the formal ansatz recently made in [20]

5 Analytic aspects of the wave breaking

In this section we use the longtime behavior of solutions of the small dataCauchy problem for dKP (mn) to show explicitly the analytic aspects ofthe solution in the neighbourhood of the breaking time in terms of the initialdata represented by function G defined in (47) as it was already done in[18 2]

Choosing cmn ge 0 we rewrite equation (49) in the characteristic form

q sim ǫG(ζ ~η)ξ = ǫmF (ζ ~ηm)τ + ζ F (ζ ~ηm) equiv Gm(ζ ~η)

(51)

where

q = utnminus12 ξ = x+

1

4t

nminus1sum

j=1

y2j ~η =~y

2t(52)

and

τ(t) =

1cmn

tcmn if cmn gt 0

ln t if cmn = 0(53)

One solves the second of equations (51) with respect to the parameterζ obtaining ζ(ξ ~η τ) and replaces it into the first to obtain the solutionq sim ǫG(ζ(ξ ~η τ) ~η) The inversion of the second of equations (51) is possibleiff its ζ-derivative is different from zero Therefore the singularity manifold

15

(SM) of the solution is the n - dimensional manifold characterized by theequation

S(ζ ~η τ) equiv 1 + ǫmFζ(ζ ~ηm)τ = 0 rArr τ = minus 1

ǫmFζ(ζ ~ηm) (54)

Sincenabla(ξ~η)q =

ǫnabla(ζ~η)G(ζ~η)

1+ǫmFζ(ζ~ηm)τ (55)

the slope of the localized wave becomes infinity (the so-called gradient catas-trophe) on the SM and the n-dimensional wave ldquobreaksrdquo except on the di-

rection represented by the vector field V =nminus1sum

i=1

partηi +mǫmGmminus1(nminus1sum

i=1

Gηi)partξ [2]

[19] on which

V q = ǫ

nminus1sum

i=1

Gηi (56)

Since the KZ case (mn) = (1 3) has been studied in detail in [2] in thefollowing we mainly concentrate on the mdKP case (mn) = (2 2) and wecompare it with the dKP case (mn) = (1 2) investigated in [18]

From (54) the first breaking time τb and the corresponding characteristic

parameters ~ζb = (ζb ηb) are defined by the global minimum of a function ofthe 2 variables (ζ η)

τb = minus 1

ǫmFζ(ζb ηbm)= inf

(

minus 1

ǫmFζ(ζ ηm)

)

gt 0 (57)

and it is characterized together with the condition Fζ(~ζbm) lt 0 by thefollowing equations

Fζζ(~ζbm) = Fζη(~ζbm) = 0

α equiv Fζζζ(~ζbm)Fζηη(~ζbm)minus F 2ζζη(

~ζbm) gt 0 Fζζζ(~ζbm) gt 0(58)

The corresponding point at which the first wave breaking takes place is from(51) ~ξb = (ξb ηb) isin R

2 where

ξb = ζb + ǫmF (~ζbm)τb = ζb minusF (~ζbm)

Fζ(~ζbm) (59)

Now we evaluate equations (51) and (54) near breaking in the regime

ξ = ξb + ξprime η = ηb + ηprime τ = τb + τ prime ζ = ζb + ζ prime (510)

16

where ξprime ηprime τ prime ζ prime are small Using (57) - (59) the second of equations (51)becomes at the leading order the following cubic equation in ζ prime

ζ prime3+ a(ηprime)ζ prime

2+ b(ηprime τ)ζ prime minus γX(ξprime ηprime τ) = 0 (511)

where

a(ηprime) =3Fζζη

Fζζζηprime

b(ηprime τ) = 3Fζζζ

[

2Fζ τ + Fζηηηprime2]

X(ξprime ηprime τ ) = ξprime minus ǫF (ζb ηb + ηprime)τ prime minus ǫ [F (ζb ηb + ηprime)minus F ] τb simξprime minus Fη

|Fζ |ηprime minus F

|Fζ | τ minus Fηη

2|Fζ |ηprime2 minus Fη

|Fζ |ηprimeτ minus Fηηη

6|Fζ |ηprime3 γ =

6|Fζ |Fζζζ

(512)

and

τ equiv τ prime

τb=

τ minus τbτb

(513)

corresponding to the maximal balance

|ζ prime| |ηprime| = O(|τ |12) |X| = O(|τ |32) (514)

In (512) and in the rest of this section G F = Gm and all their partialderivatives whose arguments are not indicated are meant to be evaluated at~ζb = (ζb ηb)

The three roots of the cubic are given by the well-known Cardano-Tartagliaformula

ζ prime0 (ξprime ~ηprime τ) = minusa

3+ (A+)

13 + (Aminus)

13

ζ primeplusmn (ξprime ~ηprime τ) = minusa3minus 1

2

(

(A+)13 + (Aminus)

13

)

plusmnradic32i(

(A+)13 minus (Aminus)

13

)

(515)where

Aplusmn = Rplusmnradic∆ (516)

and the discriminant ∆ reads

∆ = R2 +Q3 (517)

withQ(ηprime τ ) = 3bminusa2

9= minus2|Fζ |

Fζζζτ + α

F 2ζζζ

ηprime2

R(ξprime ηprime τ) = γ2X(ξprime ηprime τ ) + ab

18+ a

3Q(ηprime τ)

(518)

17

At the same order function S in (54) becomes

S(ζ prime ηprime τ ) = minusτ + 12|Fζ |

[

Fζζζζprime2 + 2Fζζηζ

primeηprime + Fζηηηprime2]

=

Fζζζ

2|Fζ |

(

Q(ηprime τ ) +(

ζ prime +Fζζη

Fζζζηprime)2)

(519)

Known ζ prime as function of (ξprime ηprime τ) from the cubic (511) the solution q andits gradient are then approximated near breaking by the formulae

q(ξ η τ) sim ǫG(ζb + ζ prime ηb + ηprime) = ǫ (G+Gζζprime +Gηη

prime +O(|τ |)) nabla(ξη)q sim ǫ

nabla(ζprimeηprime)G(ζb+ζprimeηb+ηprime)

S(ζprimeηprimeτ) (520)

Before breaking

Before breaking τ lt τb (τ lt 0) the coefficient Q in (518) is strictlypositive (see the second of (58)) then the discriminant ∆ = R2 + Q3 isalso strictly positive and only the root ζ prime0 is real Correspondingly the realsolution q is single valued and described by Cardanorsquos formula and by (520)In addition function S in (519) is also strictly positive and nabla(ξ~η)q is finiteforall ξ η

To have a more explicit solution than that provided by Cardanorsquos formulawe first restrict the asymptotic region to a narrower area so that the cubic(511) reduces to the linear equation bζ prime = γX and X contains only linearterms This is achieved choosing

ηprime = O(τ r) X = O(τ p+1) 12lt p lt p+1

2lt r lt p+ 1 (521)

implying

ζ prime = O(τ p)

X = ξprime + Fη

Fζηprime + F

Fζτ + o(τ p+1) = ξprime + Gη

Gζηprime + G

mGζτ + o(τ p+1)

bζ prime = γX rArr ζ prime sim minus 1τ

(

ξprime + Gη

Gζηprime + G

mGζτ)

(522)

Then

q = ǫG(ζb + ζ prime ηb + ηprime) sim ǫG + ǫGζζprime sim ǫ

(

1minus 1

m

)

Gminus ǫGζ

τ

(

ξprime +Gη

Gζηprime)

(523)

18

Since q sim ǫG and recalling the definitions (57)(513) it follows that q isdescribed by the exact similarity solution

q sim(

ξ + (GηGζ)ηprime

τ prime

)1m

(524)

of equation (37)The cubic simplifies also in the asymptotic region in which ξprime ηprime are of

the same order while τ prime le O(|ηprime|) reducing to ζ prime3 = γX so that the solutionq and its gradient are

q sim ǫG(ζb +3radic

γX(ξprime ηprime τ) ηb + ηprime) (525)

nablaξηq sim3radicγ

3

ǫnablaζηG3radic

X2(ξprime ηprime τ ) (526)

At breaking

When τ = τb the singularity manifold S (519) is positive everywhere inthe (ξ η) plane except at the breaking point (ξb ηb) in which it is zerotogether with Q R and the discriminant ∆ The solution q is well describedagain by Cardanorsquos formula and by (520) To have a more explicit solutionthan that provided by Cardanorsquos formula we choose ξprime ηprime of the same orderthe cubic (511) reduces to ζ prime3 = γX and equations (525) become

q sim ǫG(ζb +3radic

γX(ξprime ηprime 0) ηb + ηprime)

nablaξηq sim 3radicγ

3

ǫnablaξηG3radic

X2(ξprimeηprime0)

(527)

The expression of Xb(ξprime ~ηprime) equiv X(ξprime ~ηprime 0) is given in (512) Xb(ξ

prime ηprime) simξprime minus Fη

|Fζ |ηprime if ξprime prop ηprime but ξprime 6= (FηFζ)η

prime while X(ξprime ηprime 0) = minus Fηη

2|Fζ |ηprime2 if

ξprime = (FηFζ)ηprime

Equation (527) implies that all the derivatives of q blow up at τ = τb in

the breaking point (ξb ηb) with the universal lawXminus23b except the derivative

along the transversal line Xb(ξprime ηprime 0) = 0 represented by the vector field

V = partη minusXbηpartξ (compare with (56)) for which [2 19]

V q|(ξbηb) = ǫGη (528)

After breaking I the overturning profile

19

After breaking the solution becomes three-valued in a compact regionof the (ξ η) - plane (see Figures 3) and in general does not describe anyphysics nevertheless a detailed study of the multivalued region is importantin view of a proper regularization of the models

If τ gt τb (τ gt 0) in the regime (514) the SM equation S = 0

2|Fζ|τ = Fζζζζprime2 + 2Fζζηζ

primeηprime + Fζηηηprime2 (529)

describes an ellipsoidal paraboloid in the (ζ prime ηprime τ) space with minimum at

the breaking point (~ξb τb)One can check that eliminating ζ prime from equations (529) and (511) one

obtains the SM equation in space-time coordinates coinciding with the equa-tion ∆ = R2+Q3 = 0 where ∆ is the discriminant (517) of the cubic (511)and Q and R are defined in (518) Such equation can be satisfied only ifQ le 0 ie only if

|ηprime| le ηprimecusp(τ) (530)

where

ηprimecusp(τ ) equivradic

2|Fζ |Fζζζ

α

radicτ (531)

and is given by the following analytic and universal expression

ξprime minus Fη

|Fζ |ηprime minus F

|Fζ | τ minus Fηη

2|Fζ |ηprime2 minus

(

Fη

|Fζ | +Fζζη

Fζζζ

)

ηprimeτ + 16|Fζ |F 2

ζζζ

[

minus FηηηF2ζζζ

+Fζζη(3FζζζFζηη minus 2F 2ζζη)]

ηprime32

= α3

9F 2ζ F

4ζζζ

(

(

ηprimecusp(τ))2 minus ηprime2

)3

(532)Equation (532) describes a closed curve with two cusps in the (ξ η) - planeat the points

~ξplusmncusp(τ ) = (ξb ηb) + (ξplusmnprime

cusp(τ )plusmnηprimecusp(τ)) (533)

where

ξplusmnprime

cusp(τ ) sim plusmnFη

radic

2Fζζζ

α|Fζ|radicτ +

(

F

|Fζ |+

FηηFζζζ

α

)

τ plusmn Bτ 32 (534)

where B = O(1) (see Figures 6 for dKP and 7 for mdKP) corresponding tothe conditions Q = R = 0 on which the three real solutions of the cubiccoincide (in 1 + 1 dimensions it is not possible to have three coincidentsolutions)

ζ0 = ζplusmn = minusFζζη

Fζζζηprime rArr q0 = qplusmn =sim ǫ

(

G+ (Gη minusGζFζζη

Fζζζ)ηprime)

(535)

20

On the remaining part of the closed curve ∆ = 0 two of the three realbranches coincide Outside the closed curve ∆ gt 0 and the real solution q issingle valued inside the closed curve ∆ lt 0 and the real solution q is threevalued with the three branches

q = ǫG(ζb + ζ prime ηb + ηprime) sim ǫ(G +Gζζprime +Gηη

prime +O(τ)) (536)

where ζ prime are the three real solutions of the cubic (511) (see fi Figures 2for dKP)

Figures 2 Plotting of the dKP analytic solution in the (q ξ η τ) variablesfor G given by (422) ǫ = 02 at times τ = 0 τb minus 2 τb τb + 2 whereτb = 657

Such a three-valued region of the (ξ η) plane is characterized by the

21

conditions|ηprime| lt ηprimecusp(τ) ξminusM(ηprime τ) lt ξprime lt ξ+M(ηprime τ) (537)

where

ξplusmnM(ηprime τ) equiv Fη

|Fζ |ηprime + F

|Fζ | τ + Fηη

2|Fζ |ηprime2 +

(

Fη

|Fζ | +Fζζη

Fζζζ

)

ηprimeτ minus 16|Fζ |F 2

ζζζ

[

minus FηηηF2ζζζ

+Fζζη(3FζζζFζηη minus 2F 2ζζη)]

ηprime3 plusmn Fζζζ

3|Fζ | |Q| 32(538)

(see Figures 3 for dKP)Since

∆ξ equiv ξ+M(ηprime τ)minus ξminusM(ηprime τ) =2Fζζζ

3|Fζ||Q(ηprime τ)|32 le 4

radic2

3

radic

|Fζ|Fζζζ

τ 32 (539)

we infer that the longitudinal width of the multivalued region is O(τ 32) thetransversal widths delimited by the two cusps is instead O(τ 12) thereforethe multivalued region develops at τ = τb from the breaking point (ξb ηb)with an infinite speed in the tranversal direction and with zero speed in thelongitudinal direction All these results are a common feature to the class ofdynamics (11) (see the previously derived results for the dKP equation forfinite times [18 19] and in the longtime regime [18] and those for the KZequation in the longtime regime [2])

-15-10-050005101-15-10-0500051015

-15-10-050005101-15-10-0500051015

Figures 3 Plotting of the three valued regions of the (ξ η) plane for dKPat times τ = 02 05 for G given by (422) and ǫ = 02 The center of thesquare frame is the breaking point (ξb ηb) Notice that the two cusps havethe same ξ coordinate ξ+cusp(τ) sim ξminuscusp(τ) since for solution (422) Gη = 0(see (531)(534))

22

We end this subsection remarking that as it was already observed in [19]since dKP (mn) is symmetric wrt y if the initial datum is also symmetricwrt y like the Gaussian (419) also its evolution will be so u(x y t) =u(xminusy t) This implies that ηb = yb = 0 and that all partial derivatives ofF and G containing an odd number of η derivatives are 0 at breaking As aconsequence the transversal direction on which the derivative of the profiledoes not blow up is the η (y) direction and on it the derivative is 0 atbreaking (see (56))

After breaking II the discontinuous shock

Using the matching rules of sect3 the shock formulae (310) become

parts

partτ=

ǫm

m+ 1

Gm+1(ζ1 η)minusGm+1(ζ2 η)

G(ζ1 η)minusG(ζ2 η) (540)

s = ζ1 + ǫmGm(ζ1 η) τ = ζ2 + ǫmGm(ζ2 η) τ (541)

where subscript 2 is for values behind the shock and subscript 1 for valuesahead Equations (541) are two implicit equations for ζ1 and ζ2 solvingthese equations yields ζ1(s η τ) ζ2(s η τ) and substituting these expres-sions in (540) it results in a nonlinear first order differential equation fors This equation and the initial conditions (311) give uniquely s(η τ) andconsequently ζ12(η τ) = ζ12(s(η τ) η τ)

We recall that immediately after breaking and if (530) holds equation(541) reduces to the cubic (511)(512) in which ξprime must be replaced by sprimepossessing three real roots where

sprime(ηprime τ) = sminus ξb (542)

Therefore the values of ζ1 and ζ2 are chosen among the three solutions (515)so that q2 = ǫG(ζb + ζ prime2 η) has the maximum value and q1 = ǫG(ζb + ζ prime1 η)the minimum one among the three branches of q Since Gζ lt 0 it followsthat

ζ1 = maxζ prime0 ζ primeplusmn ζ2 = minζ prime0 ζ primeplusmn (543)

To identify ζ12 with one of the three roots ζ prime0 ζprimeplusmn let us rewrite them as

follows

ζ prime0 = minusa

3+ 2 3

radicρ cos

(

θ

3

)

(544)

ζ prime+ = minusa

3minus 3

radicρ

(

cos

(

θ

3

)

+radic3 sin

(

θ

3

))

(545)

23

ζ primeminus = minusa

3minus 3

radicρ

(

cos

(

θ

3

)

minusradic3 sin

(

θ

3

))

(546)

where

ρ =radic

R2 + |∆| θ = arctan

(

radic

|∆|R

)

(547)

We observe that for 0 le θ le π the following inequalities hold

minus cos

(

θ

3

)

minusradic3 sin

(

θ

3

)

le minus cos

(

θ

3

)

+radic3 sin

(

θ

3

)

le 2 cos

(

θ

3

)

so that

ζ prime+ le ζ primeminus le ζ prime0 rArr q(ζb + ζ prime0 η) le q(ζb + ζ primeminus η) le q(ζb + ζ prime+ η) (548)

for q decreasing in ζ Hence

ζ prime1(sprime ηprime τ prime) = ζ prime0(s

prime ηprime τ prime) ζ prime2(sprime ηprime τ prime) = ζ prime+(s

prime ηprime τ prime) (549)

Then (540) reduces to the equations

dsprime

dτ+ G

Gζ+ Gη

Gζηprime + 1

2

[

ζ prime0(sprime ηprime τ ) + ζ prime+(s

prime ηprime τ)]

= 0 for dKPdsprime

dτ+ G

2Gζ+ Gη

Gζηprime + 1

2

[

ζ prime0(sprime ηprime τ) + ζ prime+(s

prime ηprime τ)]

= 0 for mdKP

sprime(0) = ξb

(550)

obtained expanding (540) near the breaking point and recalling that τ equivτ primeτb

We remark that in the differential equations (550) sprime depends on ηprime

parametrically So the discontinuous (dissipative) shocks of the longtime so-lutions of the small data Cauchy problems for dKP and mdKP has a simplegeometric construction given τ gt 0 for any fixed |ηprime| le ηcusp the overturn-ing profile in the (ξ q) plane is intercepted by a vertical straight line cuttingoff equal area lobi in analogy with the 1 + 1 dimensional case

Going back to the dKP variables

The above formulae written in the convenient variables q ξ η τ are es-sentially the same for both dKP and mdKP relevant differences appear whenwe go back to the original variables u x y t inverting equations (52)(53)

u = 1radictq t = τ2

4 y = ητ2

2 x = ξ minus η2τ2

4 for dKP

u = 1radictq t = eτ y = 2ηeτ x = ξ minus η2eτ for mdKP

(551)

24

and all the above universal formulae are easily transfered to the dKP (mn)equations In particular small and localized initial data break i) at tb =τ 2b 4 in the point (xb yb) = (ξb minus τ 2b η

2b4 ηbτ

2b 2) of the parabolic wave front

x+ y2(4tb) = ξb evolving according to dKP and ii) at tb = eτb in the point(xb yb) = (ξb minus η2be

τb 2ηbeτb) of the parabolic wave front x + y2(4tb) = ξb

evolving according to mdKP If for instance we use the same Gaussian initialcondition (419) for both dKP and mdKP with ǫ = 02 then G is given by(422) in both cases Consequently for dKP

ζb = 196 ηb = 0 ξb = 327 τb = 657 (552)

and wave breaking takes place at tb = 108 in the point (xb yb) = (327 0)on the parabola x+ 231 middot 10minus2y2 = 327 (see Figure 4)

Figure 4 Plotting of the analytic dKP solution u in the physical variablesx y t for G given by (422) (corresponding to the gaussian initial condition)ǫ = 02 at breaking

For mdKP

ζb = 161 ηb = 0 ξb = 251 τb = 1431 (553)

and wave breaking takes place at tb = 164middot106 in the point (xb yb) = (251 0)on the parabola x + 152 middot 10minus7y2 = 251 and at breaking the amplitude ofthe wave is u = ǫtb

minus12G(ζb ηb) = 195 middot 10minus4 (see Figure 5)

25

Figure 5 Plotting of the analytic mdKP solution u in the physical variablesx y t for G given by (422) (corresponding to the gaussian initial condition)ǫ = 02 at breaking

Since in the mdKP case tb is very large and the wave amplitude atbreaking is very small we wonder if such a wave breaking could be actuallydetected numerically

Now we go into the analytic details For the dKP case

tprime equiv tminus tb sim 2tbτ yprime = y minus yb ≃ 2tb(ηprime + 2ηbτ + 2ηprimeτ )

xprime = xminus xb sim ξprime minus ηbyprime minus yprime2

4tb+ η2b t

prime + ηbtbyprimetprime

(554)

and we choose τ prime to be sufficiently small to have |tprime| |yprime| ≪ 1The dKP solution reads

u(x y t) =ǫradictG(ζb + ζ prime ηb + ηprime) =

ǫradict

(

G+Gζζprime +Gη

yprime

2tb+O

(

tprime

tb

))

(555)where ζ prime is the solution of the cubic (511) with

a =3Fζζη

2Fζζζ

yprime

tb b = 3

Fζζζ

(

Fζtprime

tb+ Fζηη

yprime2

4t2b

)

X = xprime +(

ηb minus Fη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime minus[

η2b +(

F2minus ηbFη

)

1|Fζ |tb

]

tprime

+(

1minus Fηη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime2

4tb+[

minusηb +(

Fη

2+ ηbFηη

)

12|Fζ |tb

]

yprimetprime

tb

minus Fηηη

48|Fζ |yprime3

t3b

(556)

26

The three-valued region (532) after breaking becomes

xprime +(

ηb minus Fη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime minus[

η2b +(

F2minus ηbFη

)

1|Fζ |tb

]

tprime

+(

1minus Fηη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime2

4tb+[

minusηb +(

Fη

2|Fζ |tb +ηbFηη

|Fζ | minus Fζζη

2Fζζζ

)

12tb

]

yprimetprime

tb

+ 16|Fζ |F 2

ζζζ

[

minus FηηηF2ζζζ + Fζζη(3FζζζFζηη minus 2F 2

ζζη)]

yprime3

8t3b

2

=

α3

9middot64F 2ζF 4ζζζ

t6b

(

(

yprimecusp(tprime))2 minus yprime2

)3

(557)

where

yprimecusp(tprime) = 2

radic

|Fζ |Fζζζ

α

radictbtprime (558)

Equation (557) describes a closed curve with two cusps in the (x y) - planeat the points

~xplusmncusp(t

prime) = (xb yb) + (xplusmnprime

cusp(tprime)plusmnyprimecusp(t

prime)) (559)

where

xplusmnprime

cusp(tprime) sim ∓2ηb

radic

|Fζ |Fζζζ

α

radictbtprime plusmn Fη

radic

Fζζζ

α|Fζ |

radic

tprime

tb

+(

η2b minus|Fζ |Fζζζ

α

)

tprime +(

F|Fζ | +

FηηFζζζ

α

)

tprime

2tbplusmn 2ηb

radic

|Fζ |Fζζζ

αtprime

32radictb+O(τ 32)

(560)At last the analogue of (539) reads

∆xprime le 2

3

radic

|Fζ|Fζζζ

(

tprime

tb

)32

(561)

it follows that the longitudinal width ∆long and the transversal width ∆transv

of the multivalued region are respectively

∆long = O

(

(

tprime

tb

)32

)

∆transv = O(

(tbtprime)

12

)

rArr ∆long

∆transv= O

(

tprime

t2b

)

(562)

For the mdKP case

tprime = tminus tb sim tbτprime yprime = y minus yb sim 2tb(η

prime + ηbtprime

tb+ ηprimetprime

tb)

xprime = xminus xb sim ξprime minus ηbyprime + η2b t

prime minus yprime2

4tb+ ηb

yprimetprime

tb

(563)

27

and we choose τ prime sufficiently small to have |tprime| |yprime| ≪ 1The mdKP solution reads

u(x y t) =ǫradictG(ζb+ζ prime ηb+ηprime) =

ǫradict

(

G+Gζζprime +Gη

yprime

2tb+O

(

tprime

tb log tb

))

(564)where ζ prime is the solution of the cubic (511) with

a =3Fζζη

2Fζζζ

yprime

tb b = 3

Fζζζ

(

2Fζtprime

tb log tb+ Fζηη

yprime2

4t2b

)

X = xprime +(

ηb minus Fη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime minus[

η2b +(

Flog tb

minus ηbFη

)

1|Fζ |tb

]

tprime

+(

1minus Fηη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime2

4tb+[

minusηb +(

Fη

|Fζ |(1minus1

log tb) + ηbFηη

|Fζ |

)

12tb

]

yprimetprime

tb

minus Fηηη

48|Fζ |yprime3

t3b

(565)

The three-valued region (532) after breaking becomes

xprime +(

ηb minus Fη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime minus[

η2b +(

Flog tb

minus ηbFη

)

1|Fζ |tb

]

tprime

+(

1minus Fηη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime2

4tb+[

minusηb +(

Fη

|Fζ |(1minus1

log tb) + ηbFηη

|Fζ| minus Fζζη

Fζζζ log tb

)

12tb

]

yprimetprime

tb

+ 16|Fζ |F 2

ζζζ

[

minus FηηηF2ζζζ + Fζζη(3FζζζFζηη minus 2F 2

ζζη)]

yprime3

8t3b

2

=

α3

9middot64F 2ζ F

4ζζζt

6b

(

(

yprimecusp(tprime))2 minus yprime2

)3

(566)where

yprimecusp(tprime) = 2

radic

2|Fζ |Fζζζ

α

radic

tbtprime

log tb (567)

Equation (566) describes a closed curve with two cusps in the (x y) - planeat the points

~xplusmncusp(t

prime) = (xb yb) + (xplusmnprime

cusp(tprime)plusmnyprimecusp(t

prime)) (568)

where

xplusmnprime

cusp(tprime) sim ∓2ηb

radic

|Fζ |Fζζζ

α

radic

tbtprime

log tbplusmn Fη

radic

Fζζζ

α|Fζ |

radic

tprime

tb log tb

+(

η2b minus|Fζ |Fζζζ

α log tb

)

tprime +(

F|Fζ | +

FηηFζζζ

α

)

tprime

tb log tbplusmn 2ηb

radic

|Fζ |Fζζζ

αtprime

32radic

tb log tb

+O(τ 32)

(569)

28

At last the analogue of (539) reads

∆xprime le 4radic2

3

radic

|Fζ |Fζζζ

(

tprime

tb log tb

)32

(570)

it follows that the longitudinal width ∆long and the transversal width ∆transv

of the multivalued region are respectively

∆long = O

(

(

tprime

tb log tb

)32

)

∆transv = O

(

(

tbtprime

log tb

)12

)

rArr ∆long

∆transv= O

(

tprime

t2blog tb

)

(571)

References

[1] F Santucci Onde debolmente non lineari e quasi unidimensionali in

Natura La rottura di tali onde e il problema della regolarizzazione dis-

sipativa Tesi della Laurea Specialistica in Fisica supervisor P M San-tini Dipartimento di Fisica dellrsquoUniversita di Roma ldquoLa Sapienzardquo AA2011-2012

[2] S V Manakov and P M Santini On the dispersionless Kadomtsev-Petviashvili equation in n + 1 dimensions exact solutions the Cauchyproblem for small initial data and wave breaking J Phys A MathTheor 44 (2011) 405203

[3] G B Whitham Linear and nonlinear waves John Wiley amp Sons 1974

[4] C Lin E Reissner and H S Tien On two-dimensional nonsteadymotion of a slender body in a compressible fluid J Math Phys 27(1948) 220-231

[5] R Timman Unsteady motion in transonic flow Symposium Transson-icum Aachen 1962 EdKOswatitsch Springer 394-401

[6] E A Zobolotskaya and R V Khokhlov Quasi-plane waves in the non-linear acoustics of confined beams Soviet Physics- Acoustics Vol15N1 (1969)

29

[7] B B Kadomtsev and V I Petviashvili On the stability of solitarywaves in weakly dispersing media Soviet Physics-Doklady Vol15 N6(1970)

[8] X P Wang M J Ablowitz and H Segur Wave collapse and instabil-

ity of solitary waves of a generalized Kadomtsev-Petviashvili equationPhysica D 78 (1994) 241-265

[9] M J Ablowitz and H Segur Solitons and the Inverse Scattering Trans-

form SIAM Philadelphia 1981

[10] M J Ablowitz and P A Clarkson Solitons nonlinear evolution equa-

tions and inverse scattering Cambridge University Press 1991

[11] S Turitsyn and G Falkovitch Stability of magneto-elastic solitons andself-focusing of sound in antiferromagnets Sov Phys J Exp TheorPhys 62 (1985) 146-152

[12] S Novikov S V Manakov L P Pitaevskii V E Zakharov Theory of

solitons Consultant Bureau 1984

[13] S V Manakov and P M Santini Inverse scattering problem for vectorfields and the heavenly equation httparXivnlinSI0512043

[14] S V Manakov and P M Santini Inverse scattering problem forvector fields and the Cauchy problem for the heavenly equationPhys Lett A 359 613-619 (2006) doi101016jphysleta200607011httparXivnlinSI0604017

[15] S V Manakov and P M Santini The Cauchy problem on theplane for the dispersionless Kadomtsev-Petviashvili equation JETPLetters 83 No 10 462-466 (2006) 101134S0021364006100080httparXivnlinSI0604016

[16] P G Grinevich P M Santini and D Wu The Cauchy problem for thePavlov equation Nonlinearity 28 (2015) 3709-3754 doi1010880951-771528113709 Preprint arXiv13105834v2

[17] M V Pavlov Integrable hydrodynamic chains J Math Phys 44 (2003)4134-4156

30

nonlinearity and the dimensionality n+ 1 of the problem through the coeffi-cient cmn and it is consistent with the case of the Riemann equation (12)for which cm1 = 1 and with the dKP equation (13) for which c12 = 12(confirming the apparently mysterious factor 2 in (17)) it is not consistentinstead with the formal dependence xminus umt used in [20]

In analogy with the dKP case the results of our paper seem to suggestthe following conjecture (admittedly a weak conjecture due to the absencein the generic case of an IST generalizing the method of characteristics)Conjecture The solutions of the dKP (mn) equation around breaking forcmn ge 0 are described by the following characteristic formulae

u = G(ζ y t)

ζ =

xminus cminus1mnG

m(ζ ~y t)t if cmn gt 0xminusGm(ζ ~y t)t log t if cmn = 0

(19)

This paper is dedicated to the memory of S V Manakov

2 Universality and applicability of dKP (mn)

The universality (and therefore the applicability) of (11) through a multi-scale expansion is well described by the following simple model the familyof nonlinear wave equations

(f(w))TT = w =nsum

i=1

part2Xi w = w( ~X T ) (21)

For small amplitudes w rarr ǫw 0 lt ǫ ≪ 1 we substitute in (21) thenonlinear term by its Taylor expansion

f(ǫw) = f(0) + f prime(0)ǫw +1

2f primeprime(0)ǫ2w2 + middot middot middot (22)

obtaining at O(ǫ) the wave equation

wTT = c2w c = 1radic

f prime(0) (23)

where f prime(0) is assumed to be positiveIf the waves are quasi one-dimensional and we choose X1 as the direc-

tion of propagation the wave lengths in the trasversal directions are small

5

~kperp = ǫα~κperp where ~kperp is the transversal wave vector and α gt 0 has to befixed Then the dispersion relation becomes [2]

ω = c

radic

k21 +

~k2perp = ck1

radic

1 + ǫ2α~κ2perpk21

≃ ck1

(

1 + ǫ2α~κ2perp

2k21

)

(24)

and the phase of a monochromatic wave reads

~k middot ~X minus ωT = k1 (X1 minus cT ) + ǫα~κperp middot ~Xperp minus cǫ2α

2

~κ2perpk21

T (25)

motivating the introduction of the new variables

x = X1 minus cT

~y = ǫα ~Xperp yi = Xi+1 i = 1 nminus 1t = ǫ2α c

2T

(26)

Rewriting (21) in the new variables and imposing α = 12 to get the maximalbalance one obtains at O(ǫ2) the dKP (1 n) equation

(ut + uux)x +perpu = 0 (27)

where u = minus c2

2f primeprime(0)w and perp is the tranversal Laplacian given in (11b)

If the term f primeprime(0) vanishes the maximal balance must involve the cubicterm if also f primeprimeprime(0) = 0 the maximal balance must involve the quartic termand so on In the very special case in which f (l)(0) = 0 l = 2 m andf (m+1)(0) 6= 0 then the maximal balance must involve the term of orderm + 1 and is achieved for α = m2 at the first nontrivial order O(ǫm+1)obtaining the dKP (mn) equation (11) with u = C1mw and

C = minusc2f (m+1)(0)

m (28)

if m is odd and

(

ut minus sgn(f (m+1)(0)) umux

)

x+perpu = 0 (29)

with u = |C|1mw if m is evenThe above considerations explain well why equations (11) are less and

less universal and applicable as m increases

6

3 Exact solutions of dKP (mn)

It was observed in [2] that dKP (1 n) is invariant under the following Liesymmetry group of transformations

x = x+sumnminus1

i=1 (δiyi minus δ2i t)yj = yj minus 2δjt j = 1 middot middot middot nminus 1t = t

(31)

where δj j = 1 nminus1 are the arbitrary parameters of the group leavinginvariant the paraboloid

ξ = x+1

4t

nminus1sum

i=1

y2i (32)

Such a symmetry was used to construct a family of exact and implicit solu-tions of dKP (1 n) exhibiting wave breaking and playing a relevant role inthe longtime regime of the small data Cauchy problem for dKP (1 n) [2]

Since dKP (mn) is also invariant under the transformation (31) follow-ing the same strategy as in [2] such a symmetry will be used in this sectionto construct a family of exact and implicit solutions of dKP (mn) In thispaper we add to the exact solutions exhibiting a gradient catastrophe andmultivaluedness after breaking also the exact weak solutions of dKP (mn)developing after breaking single valued discontinuous shocks of dissipativenature

Therefore we look for solutions of (11) in the form

u = v(ξ t) ξ = x+1

4t

nminus1sum

i=1

y2i (33)

reducing (11) to the (1 + 1) dimensional PDE

vt + vmvξ +nminus 1

2tv = 0 (34)

The following change of variables

v(ξ t) = tminusnminus12 q(ξ τ) (35)

where

τ(t) =

1cmn

tcmn + α if cmn 6= 0

ln t+ β if cmn = 0 (36)

7

α β are real constants and the coefficient cmn is defined in (18) transforms(34) into the Riemann equation (12) in the variables (ξ τ)

qτ + qmqξ = 0 (37)

We recall [3] that (37) has the general implicit solution

q = A(ζ) ζ = ξ minusAm(ζ)τ hArr q = A(ξ minus qmτ) (38)

where A is an arbitrary differentiable function of one argument If in par-ticular A describes a localized positive hump the solution breaks first atτ = τb on the characteristic ζb where

τb = min ζ

(

minus 1

mAmminus1(ζ)Aprime(ζ)

)

= minus 1

mAmminus1(ζb)Aprime(ζb)gt 0 (39)

For τ gt τb the solution becomes multivalued and not acceptable in manyphysical contexts Alternatively for τ gt τb the regular multivalued solutioncan be replaced by a weak solution a single valued discontinuous shockof dissipative nature whose wave front discontinuity s(τ) is described byequations [3]

dsdτ

= 1m+1

Am+1(ζ1)minusAm+1(ζ2)A(ζ1)minusA(ζ2)

s = ζ1 + Am(ζ1)τ = ζ2 + Am(ζ2)τ

(310)

with the initial conditions

s(τb) = ξb ζ1(τb) = ζ2(τb) = ζb (311)

Behind and ahead the shock the solution is given by

q =

q2 = A(ζ2) if ξ lt s(τ)q1 = A(ζ1) if ξ gt s(τ)

(312)

where q2 and q1 are respectively the maximum and the minimum among the(three in the case of a single hump) branches of the implicit equations (38)

We remark that τ(t) in (36) is a monotonically increasing function of tto have it positive we choose the constants α β and the t-intervals as follows

τ(t) =

1cmn

tcmn t gt 0 if cmn gt 0

ln t t gt 1 if cmn = 01

|cmn|

(

tminus|cmn|0 minus tminus|cmn|

)

t gt t0 if cmn lt 0

(313)

8

Recalling (33) (35) and (313) the exact solutions of dKP (mn) in theoriginal variables corresponding to (38) read

u =

tminusnminus12 A

(

x+ 14t

sumnminus1i=1 y2i minus 1

cmnumt)

t gt 0 if cmn gt 0

tminusnminus12 A

(

x+ 14t

sumnminus1i=1 y2i minus umt ln t

)

t gt 1 if cmn = 0

tminusnminus12 A

(

x+ 14t

sumnminus1i=1 y2i minus 1

|cmn|umt

(

(

tt0

)|cmn|minus 1

))

t gt t0 if cmn lt 0

(314)where cmn is defined in (18)

If again A is a localized hump (314) describes a wave constant onthe paraboloidal wave front (32) and simultaneously breaking on it Moreprecisely the solution breaks at time tb defined by

tb =

(cmnτb)1cmn if cmn gt 0

eτb if cmn = 0(315)

on the paraboloid

x+1

4t

nminus1sum

i=1

y2i = ζb + Am(ζb)τb (316)

where τb ζb are defined in (39) (see Figures 1)

Figures 1 Plotting of the exact solution of the mdKP equation (15) (c22 =0) before at and after breaking Here we have chosen A(x) = eminusx2

conse-quently ζb = 12 τb =

radice2 tb = e

radice2

If cmn lt 0 τ(t) rarr τ(infin) equiv |cmn|minus1tminus|cmn|0 as t rarr infin and the wave

freezes asymptotically If tminus|cmn|0 gt τb|cmn| then τ(infin) gt τb and the wave

breaks before freezing at

tb =(

tminus|cmn|0 minus τb|cmn|

)minus1|cmn| (317)

9

on the paraboloid (316) If instead tminus|cmn|0 lt τb|cmn| then τ(infin) lt τb and

no breaking takes place before the wave freezesIf n = 1 forallm (314) reduces to the general solution u = A(xminusumt) of the

Riemann equation (12) if m = 1 foralln (314) reduces to the class of particu-lar solutions of the dKP equation with quadratic nonlinearity and arbitrarydimensions (dKP (1 n)) constructed in [2] It is interesting to remark thatthis type of exact solutions was first derived for the integrable dKP equation(13) using its nonlinear Riemnann - Hilbert inverse problem [21]

After breaking t gt tb the regular multivalued solutions (314) can bereplaced by the discontinuous single valued solutions of dKP (mn) obtainedusing (33) (35) and (313) in (310) (311) (312) More precisely fort gt tb where tb is defined in (315) and (317) the dKP (mn) solutiondescribed by (314) for t lt tb develops a discontinuous shock on the parabola

x+ y2

4t= S(t) S(t) equiv s(τ(t)) (318)

where s(τ) is characterized by equations (310) (311) and τ(t) is defined in(313) Behind and ahead the shock the solution is given by

u =

u2(x ~y t) if x+ y4

4tlt S(t)

u1(x ~y t) if x+ y4

4tgt S(t)

(319)

where u2 and u1 are respectively the maximum and the minimum among the(three in the case of a localized bump) branches u12 = tminus(nminus1)2A(ζ12) ofthe implicit equations (314)

We end this section remarking that as already mentioned in sect1 in theabove class of exact solutions of (11) the dependences of u on x throughthe combinations x minus cminus1

mnumt (if cmn gt 0) x minus umt log t (if cmn = 0) and

xminus|cmn|minus1umt[(tt0)|cmn|minus1] if cmn lt 0 are not consistent with the formal

dependence x minus umt recently postulated to study the breaking features ofdKP (m 2) in [20]

4 The Cauchy problem for small and local-

ized initial data and longtime wave break-

ing

In analogy with [2] now we use the exact solutions of the previous sectionto construct the longtime behaviour of solutions of the Cauchy problem of

10

(11) for small and localized initial data showing in particular that smalland localized initial data evolving according to (11) break in thelongtime regime only if m(nminus 1) le 2 (cmn ge 0)

For small and localized initial data of the type

u(x ~y 0) = ǫu0(x ~y) 0 lt ǫ ≪ 1 (41)

evolving according to equation (11) the behavior of the solution may beapproximated by the solution of the linearized dKP (mn) equation untilnonlinearity becomes relevant

For O(ǫ) initial data equations (37)(39) imply that the breaking timeis

τb = O(ǫminusm) ≫ 1 (42)

so the nonlinear regime for dKP (mn) is characterized by the condition

t = O(

τminus1(ǫminusm))

=

O(

ǫminus m

cmn

)

cmn gt 0

O(

eǫminusm)

cmn = 0(43)

where τminus1(middot) is the inverse of (36) while for cmn lt 0 large values of t arenot compatible with (42) and a nonlinear regime never occurs

So for t ≪ τminus1(ǫminusm) the solution of the Cauchy problem is approximatedby the solution of the linearized dKP (mn) equation while for t sim τminus1(ǫminusm)a matching will be made between the linearized solution and the exact solu-tion (314)

In the linear regime when 0 lt t ≪ O(τminus1(ǫminusm)) the dKP (mn) solutionis well described by that of the linearized dKP (mn) ie

u(x ~y t) sim ǫ

(2π)n

int

Rn

u0(k1 ~kperp) exp

[

ı(k1x+ ~kperp middot ~y minus k2perpk1

t)

]

dk1d~kperp (44)

where

u0(k1 ~kperp) =

int

Rn

u0(x ~y) exp[

minusı(k1x+ ~kperp middot ~y)]

dxd~y

In the longtime regime

1 ≪ t ≪ O(τminus1(ǫminusm)) (45)

11

the multiple integral can be evaluated by the stationary phase method whichgives [2]

u(x ~y t) sim tminusnminus12 ǫG

(

x+1

4t

nminus1sum

i=1

y2i ~y

2t

)

(46)

where

G(ξ ~η) =1

2nπn+12

int

R

dk1|k1|nminus12 u0 (k1 ~ηk1) exp

[

ık1ξ minus ı(nminus 1)π

4sgn(k1)

]

(47)in the space-time region

(xminus ξ)t yit = O(1) i = 1 nminus 1 (48)

on the paraboloid (32) and decays faster outside it Therefore small andlocalized initial data set in the longtime regime (45) governed bythe linear theory on the paraboloid (32)

When nonlinearity becomes relevant ie when t = O(τminus1(ǫminusm)) theasymptotic solution of dKP (mn) is built matching the longtime solution(46)(47) of the linearized Cauchy problem with the exact solution (314)If fi cmn gt 0 the first argument ξ of function G(ξ η) defined in (47) isreplaced by ξminus cminus1

mnumt or equivalently the arbitrary function A(ζ) in (38)

acquires the dependence on the second argument ~η = ~y2t and is identifiedwith G As a result of this matching in the nonlinear regime (42) (43) thesolution reads

u(x ~y t) ≃ uasmn(x ~y t)

uasmn(x ~y t) equiv

tminusnminus12 ǫG

(

x+ 14t

sumnminus1i=1 y2i minus 1

cmnumt ~y

2t

)

cmn gt 0

tminusnminus12 ǫG

(

x+ 14t

sumnminus1i=1 y2i minus umt ln t ~y

2t

)

cmn = 0

(49)with umt = O(1) for cmn gt 0 and umt log t = O(1) for cmn = 0 becominginfinitesimal in the linear regime as it has to be

For cmn lt 0 the solution is described by its linear form (46) thereforewave breaking takes place for the particular values of (mn) described by thecondition

cmn ge 0 hArr m(nminus 1) le 2 (410)

ie forn = 1 n = 2 n = 3forallm m = 1 2 m = 1

(411)

12

For n = 1 forallm uasmn reduces to the general solution of the Riemann equation

(12) [3] The cases (mn) = (2 1) and (mn) = (3 1) the dKP and theKZ equations have been already investigated in [18] and [2] respectivelytherefore in the following section we mainly focus on the case (mn) = (2 2)corresponding to the nonintegrable modified dKP equation (15) and to itsasymptotic solution

u ≃ uas22(x y t) =

1radictǫG

(

x+y2

4tminus u2t ln t

y

2t

)

(412)

comparing the results with the dKP case (mn) = (1 2) investigated in [18]with its asymptotic solution

u ≃ uas12(x y t) =

1radictǫG

(

x+y2

4tminus 2ut

y

2t

)

(413)

Remark 1 The estimate of the first correction to the asymptotics (49)reads

u = uasnm(x ~y t)(1 +O(tminus1)) (414)

Indeed if cmn gt 0 one has

u sim uasnm(x ~y t) +

ǫ1+ m

cmn

tnminus12

H

(

x+1

4t

nminus1sum

i=1

y2i ~y

2t τ

)

(415)

where τ = ǫmτ and H(ξ ~η τ ) is expressed in terms of G(ζ ~η) (ζ is definedin the second of equations (51)) through the PDE

(

Hτ +GmHξ

1 +mGmminus1Gζ τ

)

ξ

+1

4(cmnτ )1+cminus1mn

nminus1sum

j=1

(

Gηj

1 +mGmminus1Gζ τ

)

ηj

= 0 (416)

Since from (43) ǫm

cmn = O(tminus1) equation (415) yields (414) Similarly ifcmn = 0

u sim uasnm(x ~y t) +

ǫ

tn+12

H

(

x+1

4t

nminus1sum

i=1

y2i ~y

2t τ

)

(417)

where H(ξ ~η τ) now solves the PDE

(

H

1 +mGmminus1Gζ τ

)

ξ

=1

4

nminus1sum

j=1

(

Gηj

1 +mGmminus1Gζ τ

)

ηj

(418)

13

Then equation (417) yields equation (414) too

Remark 2 As is was observed in [2] for a gaussian initial condition

u0(x y) = d exp

[

minusx2 + ~y2

4

]

(419)

where d is constant the asymptotic solution can be written in terms of specialfunctions obtaining for G(ξ ~η)

G(ξ ~η) =dradicπ

1

(1+~η2)n+14

[

cos(

π4(nminus 1)

)

Γ(

n+14

)

1F1

(

n+14 12minusY 2

4

)

+ sin(

π4(nminus 1)

)

Γ(

n+34

)

Y 1F1

(

n+34 32minusY 2

4

) ]

(420)

where

Y =ξ

radic

1 + ~η2 (421)

Γ is the Euler gamma function and 1F1 is the Kummer confluent hypergeo-metric function [22 23] For n = 2 and d =

radic2π it yields respectively

G(ξ η) =1

(1+η2)34

[

Γ(

34

)

1F1

(

34 12minusY 2

4

)

+ Y Γ(

54

)

1F1

(

54 32minusY 2

4

)]

(422)

Remark 3 The fact that small data break only when the inequality (410) issatisfied was expected from physical considerations Indeed as already men-tioned in the introduction in equation (11) there are two competing termsthe nonlinear term umux responsible for the steepening of the profile andthe perpu term describing diffraction in the transversal (n minus 1) dimensionalhyperplane (reminiscence through the multiscale expansion leading to (11)of the wave operator) therefore diffraction increases as (nminus 1) increases [2]For small initial data the umux term is initially smaller and smaller increas-ing m and the solution evolves in a linear way for a longer and longer timediffracting transversally through the (nminus1) diffraction channels So diffrac-tion increasing with (n minus 1) acts on a very long time increasing with mbefore the nonlinear regime could become relevant and if (nminus 1) andor mare sufficiently large one expects that the solution would be diffracted awayalmost completely before reaching the nonlinear regime and will not break

14

We have in particular that breaking takes place in the following longtimeregimes (see (43))m = n = 1 (the Riemann equation with quadratic nonlinearity) tb = O(ǫminus1)m = 1 n = 2 (the dKP equation) tb = O(ǫminus2)m = 1 n = 3 (the KZ equation) tb = O(eǫ

minus1)

m = 2 n = 1 (the Riemann equation with cubic nonlinearity) tb = O(ǫminus2)m = 2 n = 2 (the mdKP equation) O(tb = eǫ

minus2)

It is interesting to remark that as it was observed in [2] if m = 1 (thephysically more relevant case) wave breaking takes place only for n le 3 iein physical space

We end this section remarking that also in the longtime behaviour of thesolutions of the small data Cauchy problem for equation (11) the depen-dence of the solution u on x as in the case of the exact solutions (314) isnot consistent with the formal ansatz recently made in [20]

5 Analytic aspects of the wave breaking

In this section we use the longtime behavior of solutions of the small dataCauchy problem for dKP (mn) to show explicitly the analytic aspects ofthe solution in the neighbourhood of the breaking time in terms of the initialdata represented by function G defined in (47) as it was already done in[18 2]

Choosing cmn ge 0 we rewrite equation (49) in the characteristic form

q sim ǫG(ζ ~η)ξ = ǫmF (ζ ~ηm)τ + ζ F (ζ ~ηm) equiv Gm(ζ ~η)

(51)

where

q = utnminus12 ξ = x+

1

4t

nminus1sum

j=1

y2j ~η =~y

2t(52)

and

τ(t) =

1cmn

tcmn if cmn gt 0

ln t if cmn = 0(53)

One solves the second of equations (51) with respect to the parameterζ obtaining ζ(ξ ~η τ) and replaces it into the first to obtain the solutionq sim ǫG(ζ(ξ ~η τ) ~η) The inversion of the second of equations (51) is possibleiff its ζ-derivative is different from zero Therefore the singularity manifold

15

(SM) of the solution is the n - dimensional manifold characterized by theequation

S(ζ ~η τ) equiv 1 + ǫmFζ(ζ ~ηm)τ = 0 rArr τ = minus 1

ǫmFζ(ζ ~ηm) (54)

Sincenabla(ξ~η)q =

ǫnabla(ζ~η)G(ζ~η)

1+ǫmFζ(ζ~ηm)τ (55)

the slope of the localized wave becomes infinity (the so-called gradient catas-trophe) on the SM and the n-dimensional wave ldquobreaksrdquo except on the di-

rection represented by the vector field V =nminus1sum

i=1

partηi +mǫmGmminus1(nminus1sum

i=1

Gηi)partξ [2]

[19] on which

V q = ǫ

nminus1sum

i=1

Gηi (56)

Since the KZ case (mn) = (1 3) has been studied in detail in [2] in thefollowing we mainly concentrate on the mdKP case (mn) = (2 2) and wecompare it with the dKP case (mn) = (1 2) investigated in [18]

From (54) the first breaking time τb and the corresponding characteristic

parameters ~ζb = (ζb ηb) are defined by the global minimum of a function ofthe 2 variables (ζ η)

τb = minus 1

ǫmFζ(ζb ηbm)= inf

(

minus 1

ǫmFζ(ζ ηm)

)

gt 0 (57)

and it is characterized together with the condition Fζ(~ζbm) lt 0 by thefollowing equations

Fζζ(~ζbm) = Fζη(~ζbm) = 0

α equiv Fζζζ(~ζbm)Fζηη(~ζbm)minus F 2ζζη(

~ζbm) gt 0 Fζζζ(~ζbm) gt 0(58)

The corresponding point at which the first wave breaking takes place is from(51) ~ξb = (ξb ηb) isin R

2 where

ξb = ζb + ǫmF (~ζbm)τb = ζb minusF (~ζbm)

Fζ(~ζbm) (59)

Now we evaluate equations (51) and (54) near breaking in the regime

ξ = ξb + ξprime η = ηb + ηprime τ = τb + τ prime ζ = ζb + ζ prime (510)

16

where ξprime ηprime τ prime ζ prime are small Using (57) - (59) the second of equations (51)becomes at the leading order the following cubic equation in ζ prime

ζ prime3+ a(ηprime)ζ prime

2+ b(ηprime τ)ζ prime minus γX(ξprime ηprime τ) = 0 (511)

where

a(ηprime) =3Fζζη

Fζζζηprime

b(ηprime τ) = 3Fζζζ

[

2Fζ τ + Fζηηηprime2]

X(ξprime ηprime τ ) = ξprime minus ǫF (ζb ηb + ηprime)τ prime minus ǫ [F (ζb ηb + ηprime)minus F ] τb simξprime minus Fη

|Fζ |ηprime minus F

|Fζ | τ minus Fηη

2|Fζ |ηprime2 minus Fη

|Fζ |ηprimeτ minus Fηηη

6|Fζ |ηprime3 γ =

6|Fζ |Fζζζ

(512)

and

τ equiv τ prime

τb=

τ minus τbτb

(513)

corresponding to the maximal balance

|ζ prime| |ηprime| = O(|τ |12) |X| = O(|τ |32) (514)

In (512) and in the rest of this section G F = Gm and all their partialderivatives whose arguments are not indicated are meant to be evaluated at~ζb = (ζb ηb)

The three roots of the cubic are given by the well-known Cardano-Tartagliaformula

ζ prime0 (ξprime ~ηprime τ) = minusa

3+ (A+)

13 + (Aminus)

13

ζ primeplusmn (ξprime ~ηprime τ) = minusa3minus 1

2

(

(A+)13 + (Aminus)

13

)

plusmnradic32i(

(A+)13 minus (Aminus)

13

)

(515)where

Aplusmn = Rplusmnradic∆ (516)

and the discriminant ∆ reads

∆ = R2 +Q3 (517)

withQ(ηprime τ ) = 3bminusa2

9= minus2|Fζ |

Fζζζτ + α

F 2ζζζ

ηprime2

R(ξprime ηprime τ) = γ2X(ξprime ηprime τ ) + ab

18+ a

3Q(ηprime τ)

(518)

17

At the same order function S in (54) becomes

S(ζ prime ηprime τ ) = minusτ + 12|Fζ |

[

Fζζζζprime2 + 2Fζζηζ

primeηprime + Fζηηηprime2]

=

Fζζζ

2|Fζ |

(

Q(ηprime τ ) +(

ζ prime +Fζζη

Fζζζηprime)2)

(519)

Known ζ prime as function of (ξprime ηprime τ) from the cubic (511) the solution q andits gradient are then approximated near breaking by the formulae

q(ξ η τ) sim ǫG(ζb + ζ prime ηb + ηprime) = ǫ (G+Gζζprime +Gηη

prime +O(|τ |)) nabla(ξη)q sim ǫ

nabla(ζprimeηprime)G(ζb+ζprimeηb+ηprime)

S(ζprimeηprimeτ) (520)

Before breaking

Before breaking τ lt τb (τ lt 0) the coefficient Q in (518) is strictlypositive (see the second of (58)) then the discriminant ∆ = R2 + Q3 isalso strictly positive and only the root ζ prime0 is real Correspondingly the realsolution q is single valued and described by Cardanorsquos formula and by (520)In addition function S in (519) is also strictly positive and nabla(ξ~η)q is finiteforall ξ η

To have a more explicit solution than that provided by Cardanorsquos formulawe first restrict the asymptotic region to a narrower area so that the cubic(511) reduces to the linear equation bζ prime = γX and X contains only linearterms This is achieved choosing

ηprime = O(τ r) X = O(τ p+1) 12lt p lt p+1

2lt r lt p+ 1 (521)

implying

ζ prime = O(τ p)

X = ξprime + Fη

Fζηprime + F

Fζτ + o(τ p+1) = ξprime + Gη

Gζηprime + G

mGζτ + o(τ p+1)

bζ prime = γX rArr ζ prime sim minus 1τ

(

ξprime + Gη

Gζηprime + G

mGζτ)

(522)

Then

q = ǫG(ζb + ζ prime ηb + ηprime) sim ǫG + ǫGζζprime sim ǫ

(

1minus 1

m

)

Gminus ǫGζ

τ

(

ξprime +Gη

Gζηprime)

(523)

18

Since q sim ǫG and recalling the definitions (57)(513) it follows that q isdescribed by the exact similarity solution

q sim(

ξ + (GηGζ)ηprime

τ prime

)1m

(524)

of equation (37)The cubic simplifies also in the asymptotic region in which ξprime ηprime are of

the same order while τ prime le O(|ηprime|) reducing to ζ prime3 = γX so that the solutionq and its gradient are

q sim ǫG(ζb +3radic

γX(ξprime ηprime τ) ηb + ηprime) (525)

nablaξηq sim3radicγ

3

ǫnablaζηG3radic

X2(ξprime ηprime τ ) (526)

At breaking

When τ = τb the singularity manifold S (519) is positive everywhere inthe (ξ η) plane except at the breaking point (ξb ηb) in which it is zerotogether with Q R and the discriminant ∆ The solution q is well describedagain by Cardanorsquos formula and by (520) To have a more explicit solutionthan that provided by Cardanorsquos formula we choose ξprime ηprime of the same orderthe cubic (511) reduces to ζ prime3 = γX and equations (525) become

q sim ǫG(ζb +3radic

γX(ξprime ηprime 0) ηb + ηprime)

nablaξηq sim 3radicγ

3

ǫnablaξηG3radic

X2(ξprimeηprime0)

(527)

The expression of Xb(ξprime ~ηprime) equiv X(ξprime ~ηprime 0) is given in (512) Xb(ξ

prime ηprime) simξprime minus Fη

|Fζ |ηprime if ξprime prop ηprime but ξprime 6= (FηFζ)η

prime while X(ξprime ηprime 0) = minus Fηη

2|Fζ |ηprime2 if

ξprime = (FηFζ)ηprime

Equation (527) implies that all the derivatives of q blow up at τ = τb in

the breaking point (ξb ηb) with the universal lawXminus23b except the derivative

along the transversal line Xb(ξprime ηprime 0) = 0 represented by the vector field

V = partη minusXbηpartξ (compare with (56)) for which [2 19]

V q|(ξbηb) = ǫGη (528)

After breaking I the overturning profile

19

After breaking the solution becomes three-valued in a compact regionof the (ξ η) - plane (see Figures 3) and in general does not describe anyphysics nevertheless a detailed study of the multivalued region is importantin view of a proper regularization of the models

If τ gt τb (τ gt 0) in the regime (514) the SM equation S = 0

2|Fζ|τ = Fζζζζprime2 + 2Fζζηζ

primeηprime + Fζηηηprime2 (529)

describes an ellipsoidal paraboloid in the (ζ prime ηprime τ) space with minimum at

the breaking point (~ξb τb)One can check that eliminating ζ prime from equations (529) and (511) one

obtains the SM equation in space-time coordinates coinciding with the equa-tion ∆ = R2+Q3 = 0 where ∆ is the discriminant (517) of the cubic (511)and Q and R are defined in (518) Such equation can be satisfied only ifQ le 0 ie only if

|ηprime| le ηprimecusp(τ) (530)

where

ηprimecusp(τ ) equivradic

2|Fζ |Fζζζ

α

radicτ (531)

and is given by the following analytic and universal expression

ξprime minus Fη

|Fζ |ηprime minus F

|Fζ | τ minus Fηη

2|Fζ |ηprime2 minus

(

Fη

|Fζ | +Fζζη

Fζζζ

)

ηprimeτ + 16|Fζ |F 2

ζζζ

[

minus FηηηF2ζζζ

+Fζζη(3FζζζFζηη minus 2F 2ζζη)]

ηprime32

= α3

9F 2ζ F

4ζζζ

(

(

ηprimecusp(τ))2 minus ηprime2

)3

(532)Equation (532) describes a closed curve with two cusps in the (ξ η) - planeat the points

~ξplusmncusp(τ ) = (ξb ηb) + (ξplusmnprime

cusp(τ )plusmnηprimecusp(τ)) (533)

where

ξplusmnprime

cusp(τ ) sim plusmnFη

radic

2Fζζζ

α|Fζ|radicτ +

(

F

|Fζ |+

FηηFζζζ

α

)

τ plusmn Bτ 32 (534)

where B = O(1) (see Figures 6 for dKP and 7 for mdKP) corresponding tothe conditions Q = R = 0 on which the three real solutions of the cubiccoincide (in 1 + 1 dimensions it is not possible to have three coincidentsolutions)

ζ0 = ζplusmn = minusFζζη

Fζζζηprime rArr q0 = qplusmn =sim ǫ

(

G+ (Gη minusGζFζζη

Fζζζ)ηprime)

(535)

20

On the remaining part of the closed curve ∆ = 0 two of the three realbranches coincide Outside the closed curve ∆ gt 0 and the real solution q issingle valued inside the closed curve ∆ lt 0 and the real solution q is threevalued with the three branches

q = ǫG(ζb + ζ prime ηb + ηprime) sim ǫ(G +Gζζprime +Gηη

prime +O(τ)) (536)

where ζ prime are the three real solutions of the cubic (511) (see fi Figures 2for dKP)

Figures 2 Plotting of the dKP analytic solution in the (q ξ η τ) variablesfor G given by (422) ǫ = 02 at times τ = 0 τb minus 2 τb τb + 2 whereτb = 657

Such a three-valued region of the (ξ η) plane is characterized by the

21

conditions|ηprime| lt ηprimecusp(τ) ξminusM(ηprime τ) lt ξprime lt ξ+M(ηprime τ) (537)

where

ξplusmnM(ηprime τ) equiv Fη

|Fζ |ηprime + F

|Fζ | τ + Fηη

2|Fζ |ηprime2 +

(

Fη

|Fζ | +Fζζη

Fζζζ

)

ηprimeτ minus 16|Fζ |F 2

ζζζ

[

minus FηηηF2ζζζ

+Fζζη(3FζζζFζηη minus 2F 2ζζη)]

ηprime3 plusmn Fζζζ

3|Fζ | |Q| 32(538)

(see Figures 3 for dKP)Since

∆ξ equiv ξ+M(ηprime τ)minus ξminusM(ηprime τ) =2Fζζζ

3|Fζ||Q(ηprime τ)|32 le 4

radic2

3

radic

|Fζ|Fζζζ

τ 32 (539)

we infer that the longitudinal width of the multivalued region is O(τ 32) thetransversal widths delimited by the two cusps is instead O(τ 12) thereforethe multivalued region develops at τ = τb from the breaking point (ξb ηb)with an infinite speed in the tranversal direction and with zero speed in thelongitudinal direction All these results are a common feature to the class ofdynamics (11) (see the previously derived results for the dKP equation forfinite times [18 19] and in the longtime regime [18] and those for the KZequation in the longtime regime [2])

-15-10-050005101-15-10-0500051015

-15-10-050005101-15-10-0500051015

Figures 3 Plotting of the three valued regions of the (ξ η) plane for dKPat times τ = 02 05 for G given by (422) and ǫ = 02 The center of thesquare frame is the breaking point (ξb ηb) Notice that the two cusps havethe same ξ coordinate ξ+cusp(τ) sim ξminuscusp(τ) since for solution (422) Gη = 0(see (531)(534))

22

We end this subsection remarking that as it was already observed in [19]since dKP (mn) is symmetric wrt y if the initial datum is also symmetricwrt y like the Gaussian (419) also its evolution will be so u(x y t) =u(xminusy t) This implies that ηb = yb = 0 and that all partial derivatives ofF and G containing an odd number of η derivatives are 0 at breaking As aconsequence the transversal direction on which the derivative of the profiledoes not blow up is the η (y) direction and on it the derivative is 0 atbreaking (see (56))

After breaking II the discontinuous shock

Using the matching rules of sect3 the shock formulae (310) become

parts

partτ=

ǫm

m+ 1

Gm+1(ζ1 η)minusGm+1(ζ2 η)

G(ζ1 η)minusG(ζ2 η) (540)

s = ζ1 + ǫmGm(ζ1 η) τ = ζ2 + ǫmGm(ζ2 η) τ (541)

where subscript 2 is for values behind the shock and subscript 1 for valuesahead Equations (541) are two implicit equations for ζ1 and ζ2 solvingthese equations yields ζ1(s η τ) ζ2(s η τ) and substituting these expres-sions in (540) it results in a nonlinear first order differential equation fors This equation and the initial conditions (311) give uniquely s(η τ) andconsequently ζ12(η τ) = ζ12(s(η τ) η τ)

We recall that immediately after breaking and if (530) holds equation(541) reduces to the cubic (511)(512) in which ξprime must be replaced by sprimepossessing three real roots where

sprime(ηprime τ) = sminus ξb (542)

Therefore the values of ζ1 and ζ2 are chosen among the three solutions (515)so that q2 = ǫG(ζb + ζ prime2 η) has the maximum value and q1 = ǫG(ζb + ζ prime1 η)the minimum one among the three branches of q Since Gζ lt 0 it followsthat

ζ1 = maxζ prime0 ζ primeplusmn ζ2 = minζ prime0 ζ primeplusmn (543)

To identify ζ12 with one of the three roots ζ prime0 ζprimeplusmn let us rewrite them as

follows

ζ prime0 = minusa

3+ 2 3

radicρ cos

(

θ

3

)

(544)

ζ prime+ = minusa

3minus 3

radicρ

(

cos

(

θ

3

)

+radic3 sin

(

θ

3

))

(545)

23

ζ primeminus = minusa

3minus 3

radicρ

(

cos

(

θ

3

)

minusradic3 sin

(

θ

3

))

(546)

where

ρ =radic

R2 + |∆| θ = arctan

(

radic

|∆|R

)

(547)

We observe that for 0 le θ le π the following inequalities hold

minus cos

(

θ

3

)

minusradic3 sin

(

θ

3

)

le minus cos

(

θ

3

)

+radic3 sin

(

θ

3

)

le 2 cos

(

θ

3

)

so that

ζ prime+ le ζ primeminus le ζ prime0 rArr q(ζb + ζ prime0 η) le q(ζb + ζ primeminus η) le q(ζb + ζ prime+ η) (548)

for q decreasing in ζ Hence

ζ prime1(sprime ηprime τ prime) = ζ prime0(s

prime ηprime τ prime) ζ prime2(sprime ηprime τ prime) = ζ prime+(s

prime ηprime τ prime) (549)

Then (540) reduces to the equations

dsprime

dτ+ G

Gζ+ Gη

Gζηprime + 1

2

[

ζ prime0(sprime ηprime τ ) + ζ prime+(s

prime ηprime τ)]

= 0 for dKPdsprime

dτ+ G

2Gζ+ Gη

Gζηprime + 1

2

[

ζ prime0(sprime ηprime τ) + ζ prime+(s

prime ηprime τ)]

= 0 for mdKP

sprime(0) = ξb

(550)

obtained expanding (540) near the breaking point and recalling that τ equivτ primeτb

We remark that in the differential equations (550) sprime depends on ηprime

parametrically So the discontinuous (dissipative) shocks of the longtime so-lutions of the small data Cauchy problems for dKP and mdKP has a simplegeometric construction given τ gt 0 for any fixed |ηprime| le ηcusp the overturn-ing profile in the (ξ q) plane is intercepted by a vertical straight line cuttingoff equal area lobi in analogy with the 1 + 1 dimensional case

Going back to the dKP variables

The above formulae written in the convenient variables q ξ η τ are es-sentially the same for both dKP and mdKP relevant differences appear whenwe go back to the original variables u x y t inverting equations (52)(53)

u = 1radictq t = τ2

4 y = ητ2

2 x = ξ minus η2τ2

4 for dKP

u = 1radictq t = eτ y = 2ηeτ x = ξ minus η2eτ for mdKP

(551)

24

and all the above universal formulae are easily transfered to the dKP (mn)equations In particular small and localized initial data break i) at tb =τ 2b 4 in the point (xb yb) = (ξb minus τ 2b η

2b4 ηbτ

2b 2) of the parabolic wave front

x+ y2(4tb) = ξb evolving according to dKP and ii) at tb = eτb in the point(xb yb) = (ξb minus η2be

τb 2ηbeτb) of the parabolic wave front x + y2(4tb) = ξb

evolving according to mdKP If for instance we use the same Gaussian initialcondition (419) for both dKP and mdKP with ǫ = 02 then G is given by(422) in both cases Consequently for dKP

ζb = 196 ηb = 0 ξb = 327 τb = 657 (552)

and wave breaking takes place at tb = 108 in the point (xb yb) = (327 0)on the parabola x+ 231 middot 10minus2y2 = 327 (see Figure 4)

Figure 4 Plotting of the analytic dKP solution u in the physical variablesx y t for G given by (422) (corresponding to the gaussian initial condition)ǫ = 02 at breaking

For mdKP

ζb = 161 ηb = 0 ξb = 251 τb = 1431 (553)

and wave breaking takes place at tb = 164middot106 in the point (xb yb) = (251 0)on the parabola x + 152 middot 10minus7y2 = 251 and at breaking the amplitude ofthe wave is u = ǫtb

minus12G(ζb ηb) = 195 middot 10minus4 (see Figure 5)

25

Figure 5 Plotting of the analytic mdKP solution u in the physical variablesx y t for G given by (422) (corresponding to the gaussian initial condition)ǫ = 02 at breaking

Since in the mdKP case tb is very large and the wave amplitude atbreaking is very small we wonder if such a wave breaking could be actuallydetected numerically

Now we go into the analytic details For the dKP case

tprime equiv tminus tb sim 2tbτ yprime = y minus yb ≃ 2tb(ηprime + 2ηbτ + 2ηprimeτ )

xprime = xminus xb sim ξprime minus ηbyprime minus yprime2

4tb+ η2b t

prime + ηbtbyprimetprime

(554)

and we choose τ prime to be sufficiently small to have |tprime| |yprime| ≪ 1The dKP solution reads

u(x y t) =ǫradictG(ζb + ζ prime ηb + ηprime) =

ǫradict

(

G+Gζζprime +Gη

yprime

2tb+O

(

tprime

tb

))

(555)where ζ prime is the solution of the cubic (511) with

a =3Fζζη

2Fζζζ

yprime

tb b = 3

Fζζζ

(

Fζtprime

tb+ Fζηη

yprime2

4t2b

)

X = xprime +(

ηb minus Fη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime minus[

η2b +(

F2minus ηbFη

)

1|Fζ |tb

]

tprime

+(

1minus Fηη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime2

4tb+[

minusηb +(

Fη

2+ ηbFηη

)

12|Fζ |tb

]

yprimetprime

tb

minus Fηηη

48|Fζ |yprime3

t3b

(556)

26

The three-valued region (532) after breaking becomes

xprime +(

ηb minus Fη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime minus[

η2b +(

F2minus ηbFη

)

1|Fζ |tb

]

tprime

+(

1minus Fηη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime2

4tb+[

minusηb +(

Fη

2|Fζ |tb +ηbFηη

|Fζ | minus Fζζη

2Fζζζ

)

12tb

]

yprimetprime

tb

+ 16|Fζ |F 2

ζζζ

[

minus FηηηF2ζζζ + Fζζη(3FζζζFζηη minus 2F 2

ζζη)]

yprime3

8t3b

2

=

α3

9middot64F 2ζF 4ζζζ

t6b

(

(

yprimecusp(tprime))2 minus yprime2

)3

(557)

where

yprimecusp(tprime) = 2

radic

|Fζ |Fζζζ

α

radictbtprime (558)

Equation (557) describes a closed curve with two cusps in the (x y) - planeat the points

~xplusmncusp(t

prime) = (xb yb) + (xplusmnprime

cusp(tprime)plusmnyprimecusp(t

prime)) (559)

where

xplusmnprime

cusp(tprime) sim ∓2ηb

radic

|Fζ |Fζζζ

α

radictbtprime plusmn Fη

radic

Fζζζ

α|Fζ |

radic

tprime

tb

+(

η2b minus|Fζ |Fζζζ

α

)

tprime +(

F|Fζ | +

FηηFζζζ

α

)

tprime

2tbplusmn 2ηb

radic

|Fζ |Fζζζ

αtprime

32radictb+O(τ 32)

(560)At last the analogue of (539) reads

∆xprime le 2

3

radic

|Fζ|Fζζζ

(

tprime

tb

)32

(561)

it follows that the longitudinal width ∆long and the transversal width ∆transv

of the multivalued region are respectively

∆long = O

(

(

tprime

tb

)32

)

∆transv = O(

(tbtprime)

12

)

rArr ∆long

∆transv= O

(

tprime

t2b

)

(562)

For the mdKP case

tprime = tminus tb sim tbτprime yprime = y minus yb sim 2tb(η

prime + ηbtprime

tb+ ηprimetprime

tb)

xprime = xminus xb sim ξprime minus ηbyprime + η2b t

prime minus yprime2

4tb+ ηb

yprimetprime

tb

(563)

27

and we choose τ prime sufficiently small to have |tprime| |yprime| ≪ 1The mdKP solution reads

u(x y t) =ǫradictG(ζb+ζ prime ηb+ηprime) =

ǫradict

(

G+Gζζprime +Gη

yprime

2tb+O

(

tprime

tb log tb

))

(564)where ζ prime is the solution of the cubic (511) with

a =3Fζζη

2Fζζζ

yprime

tb b = 3

Fζζζ

(

2Fζtprime

tb log tb+ Fζηη

yprime2

4t2b

)

X = xprime +(

ηb minus Fη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime minus[

η2b +(

Flog tb

minus ηbFη

)

1|Fζ |tb

]

tprime

+(

1minus Fηη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime2

4tb+[

minusηb +(

Fη

|Fζ |(1minus1

log tb) + ηbFηη

|Fζ |

)

12tb

]

yprimetprime

tb

minus Fηηη

48|Fζ |yprime3

t3b

(565)

The three-valued region (532) after breaking becomes

xprime +(

ηb minus Fη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime minus[

η2b +(

Flog tb

minus ηbFη

)

1|Fζ |tb

]

tprime

+(

1minus Fηη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime2

4tb+[

minusηb +(

Fη

|Fζ |(1minus1

log tb) + ηbFηη

|Fζ| minus Fζζη

Fζζζ log tb

)

12tb

]

yprimetprime

tb

+ 16|Fζ |F 2

ζζζ

[

minus FηηηF2ζζζ + Fζζη(3FζζζFζηη minus 2F 2

ζζη)]

yprime3

8t3b

2

=

α3

9middot64F 2ζ F

4ζζζt

6b

(

(

yprimecusp(tprime))2 minus yprime2

)3

(566)where

yprimecusp(tprime) = 2

radic

2|Fζ |Fζζζ

α

radic

tbtprime

log tb (567)

Equation (566) describes a closed curve with two cusps in the (x y) - planeat the points

~xplusmncusp(t

prime) = (xb yb) + (xplusmnprime

cusp(tprime)plusmnyprimecusp(t

prime)) (568)

where

xplusmnprime

cusp(tprime) sim ∓2ηb

radic

|Fζ |Fζζζ

α

radic

tbtprime

log tbplusmn Fη

radic

Fζζζ

α|Fζ |

radic

tprime

tb log tb

+(

η2b minus|Fζ |Fζζζ

α log tb

)

tprime +(

F|Fζ | +

FηηFζζζ

α

)

tprime

tb log tbplusmn 2ηb

radic

|Fζ |Fζζζ

αtprime

32radic

tb log tb

+O(τ 32)

(569)

28

At last the analogue of (539) reads

∆xprime le 4radic2

3

radic

|Fζ |Fζζζ

(

tprime

tb log tb

)32

(570)

it follows that the longitudinal width ∆long and the transversal width ∆transv

of the multivalued region are respectively

∆long = O

(

(

tprime

tb log tb

)32

)

∆transv = O

(

(

tbtprime

log tb

)12

)

rArr ∆long

∆transv= O

(

tprime

t2blog tb

)

(571)

References

[1] F Santucci Onde debolmente non lineari e quasi unidimensionali in

Natura La rottura di tali onde e il problema della regolarizzazione dis-

sipativa Tesi della Laurea Specialistica in Fisica supervisor P M San-tini Dipartimento di Fisica dellrsquoUniversita di Roma ldquoLa Sapienzardquo AA2011-2012

[2] S V Manakov and P M Santini On the dispersionless Kadomtsev-Petviashvili equation in n + 1 dimensions exact solutions the Cauchyproblem for small initial data and wave breaking J Phys A MathTheor 44 (2011) 405203

[3] G B Whitham Linear and nonlinear waves John Wiley amp Sons 1974

[4] C Lin E Reissner and H S Tien On two-dimensional nonsteadymotion of a slender body in a compressible fluid J Math Phys 27(1948) 220-231

[5] R Timman Unsteady motion in transonic flow Symposium Transson-icum Aachen 1962 EdKOswatitsch Springer 394-401

[6] E A Zobolotskaya and R V Khokhlov Quasi-plane waves in the non-linear acoustics of confined beams Soviet Physics- Acoustics Vol15N1 (1969)

29

[7] B B Kadomtsev and V I Petviashvili On the stability of solitarywaves in weakly dispersing media Soviet Physics-Doklady Vol15 N6(1970)

[8] X P Wang M J Ablowitz and H Segur Wave collapse and instabil-

ity of solitary waves of a generalized Kadomtsev-Petviashvili equationPhysica D 78 (1994) 241-265

[9] M J Ablowitz and H Segur Solitons and the Inverse Scattering Trans-

form SIAM Philadelphia 1981

[10] M J Ablowitz and P A Clarkson Solitons nonlinear evolution equa-

tions and inverse scattering Cambridge University Press 1991

[11] S Turitsyn and G Falkovitch Stability of magneto-elastic solitons andself-focusing of sound in antiferromagnets Sov Phys J Exp TheorPhys 62 (1985) 146-152

[12] S Novikov S V Manakov L P Pitaevskii V E Zakharov Theory of

solitons Consultant Bureau 1984

[13] S V Manakov and P M Santini Inverse scattering problem for vectorfields and the heavenly equation httparXivnlinSI0512043

[14] S V Manakov and P M Santini Inverse scattering problem forvector fields and the Cauchy problem for the heavenly equationPhys Lett A 359 613-619 (2006) doi101016jphysleta200607011httparXivnlinSI0604017

[15] S V Manakov and P M Santini The Cauchy problem on theplane for the dispersionless Kadomtsev-Petviashvili equation JETPLetters 83 No 10 462-466 (2006) 101134S0021364006100080httparXivnlinSI0604016

[16] P G Grinevich P M Santini and D Wu The Cauchy problem for thePavlov equation Nonlinearity 28 (2015) 3709-3754 doi1010880951-771528113709 Preprint arXiv13105834v2

[17] M V Pavlov Integrable hydrodynamic chains J Math Phys 44 (2003)4134-4156

30

~kperp = ǫα~κperp where ~kperp is the transversal wave vector and α gt 0 has to befixed Then the dispersion relation becomes [2]

ω = c

radic

k21 +

~k2perp = ck1

radic

1 + ǫ2α~κ2perpk21

≃ ck1

(

1 + ǫ2α~κ2perp

2k21

)

(24)

and the phase of a monochromatic wave reads

~k middot ~X minus ωT = k1 (X1 minus cT ) + ǫα~κperp middot ~Xperp minus cǫ2α

2

~κ2perpk21

T (25)

motivating the introduction of the new variables

x = X1 minus cT

~y = ǫα ~Xperp yi = Xi+1 i = 1 nminus 1t = ǫ2α c

2T

(26)

Rewriting (21) in the new variables and imposing α = 12 to get the maximalbalance one obtains at O(ǫ2) the dKP (1 n) equation

(ut + uux)x +perpu = 0 (27)

where u = minus c2

2f primeprime(0)w and perp is the tranversal Laplacian given in (11b)

If the term f primeprime(0) vanishes the maximal balance must involve the cubicterm if also f primeprimeprime(0) = 0 the maximal balance must involve the quartic termand so on In the very special case in which f (l)(0) = 0 l = 2 m andf (m+1)(0) 6= 0 then the maximal balance must involve the term of orderm + 1 and is achieved for α = m2 at the first nontrivial order O(ǫm+1)obtaining the dKP (mn) equation (11) with u = C1mw and

C = minusc2f (m+1)(0)

m (28)

if m is odd and

(

ut minus sgn(f (m+1)(0)) umux

)

x+perpu = 0 (29)

with u = |C|1mw if m is evenThe above considerations explain well why equations (11) are less and

less universal and applicable as m increases

6

3 Exact solutions of dKP (mn)

It was observed in [2] that dKP (1 n) is invariant under the following Liesymmetry group of transformations

x = x+sumnminus1

i=1 (δiyi minus δ2i t)yj = yj minus 2δjt j = 1 middot middot middot nminus 1t = t

(31)

where δj j = 1 nminus1 are the arbitrary parameters of the group leavinginvariant the paraboloid

ξ = x+1

4t

nminus1sum

i=1

y2i (32)

Such a symmetry was used to construct a family of exact and implicit solu-tions of dKP (1 n) exhibiting wave breaking and playing a relevant role inthe longtime regime of the small data Cauchy problem for dKP (1 n) [2]

Since dKP (mn) is also invariant under the transformation (31) follow-ing the same strategy as in [2] such a symmetry will be used in this sectionto construct a family of exact and implicit solutions of dKP (mn) In thispaper we add to the exact solutions exhibiting a gradient catastrophe andmultivaluedness after breaking also the exact weak solutions of dKP (mn)developing after breaking single valued discontinuous shocks of dissipativenature

Therefore we look for solutions of (11) in the form

u = v(ξ t) ξ = x+1

4t

nminus1sum

i=1

y2i (33)

reducing (11) to the (1 + 1) dimensional PDE

vt + vmvξ +nminus 1

2tv = 0 (34)

The following change of variables

v(ξ t) = tminusnminus12 q(ξ τ) (35)

where

τ(t) =

1cmn

tcmn + α if cmn 6= 0

ln t+ β if cmn = 0 (36)

7

α β are real constants and the coefficient cmn is defined in (18) transforms(34) into the Riemann equation (12) in the variables (ξ τ)

qτ + qmqξ = 0 (37)

We recall [3] that (37) has the general implicit solution

q = A(ζ) ζ = ξ minusAm(ζ)τ hArr q = A(ξ minus qmτ) (38)

where A is an arbitrary differentiable function of one argument If in par-ticular A describes a localized positive hump the solution breaks first atτ = τb on the characteristic ζb where

τb = min ζ

(

minus 1

mAmminus1(ζ)Aprime(ζ)

)

= minus 1

mAmminus1(ζb)Aprime(ζb)gt 0 (39)

For τ gt τb the solution becomes multivalued and not acceptable in manyphysical contexts Alternatively for τ gt τb the regular multivalued solutioncan be replaced by a weak solution a single valued discontinuous shockof dissipative nature whose wave front discontinuity s(τ) is described byequations [3]

dsdτ

= 1m+1

Am+1(ζ1)minusAm+1(ζ2)A(ζ1)minusA(ζ2)

s = ζ1 + Am(ζ1)τ = ζ2 + Am(ζ2)τ

(310)

with the initial conditions

s(τb) = ξb ζ1(τb) = ζ2(τb) = ζb (311)

Behind and ahead the shock the solution is given by

q =

q2 = A(ζ2) if ξ lt s(τ)q1 = A(ζ1) if ξ gt s(τ)

(312)

where q2 and q1 are respectively the maximum and the minimum among the(three in the case of a single hump) branches of the implicit equations (38)

We remark that τ(t) in (36) is a monotonically increasing function of tto have it positive we choose the constants α β and the t-intervals as follows

τ(t) =

1cmn

tcmn t gt 0 if cmn gt 0

ln t t gt 1 if cmn = 01

|cmn|

(

tminus|cmn|0 minus tminus|cmn|

)

t gt t0 if cmn lt 0

(313)

8

Recalling (33) (35) and (313) the exact solutions of dKP (mn) in theoriginal variables corresponding to (38) read

u =

tminusnminus12 A

(

x+ 14t

sumnminus1i=1 y2i minus 1

cmnumt)

t gt 0 if cmn gt 0

tminusnminus12 A

(

x+ 14t

sumnminus1i=1 y2i minus umt ln t

)

t gt 1 if cmn = 0

tminusnminus12 A

(

x+ 14t

sumnminus1i=1 y2i minus 1

|cmn|umt

(

(

tt0

)|cmn|minus 1

))

t gt t0 if cmn lt 0

(314)where cmn is defined in (18)

If again A is a localized hump (314) describes a wave constant onthe paraboloidal wave front (32) and simultaneously breaking on it Moreprecisely the solution breaks at time tb defined by

tb =

(cmnτb)1cmn if cmn gt 0

eτb if cmn = 0(315)

on the paraboloid

x+1

4t

nminus1sum

i=1

y2i = ζb + Am(ζb)τb (316)

where τb ζb are defined in (39) (see Figures 1)

Figures 1 Plotting of the exact solution of the mdKP equation (15) (c22 =0) before at and after breaking Here we have chosen A(x) = eminusx2

conse-quently ζb = 12 τb =

radice2 tb = e

radice2

If cmn lt 0 τ(t) rarr τ(infin) equiv |cmn|minus1tminus|cmn|0 as t rarr infin and the wave

freezes asymptotically If tminus|cmn|0 gt τb|cmn| then τ(infin) gt τb and the wave

breaks before freezing at

tb =(

tminus|cmn|0 minus τb|cmn|

)minus1|cmn| (317)

9

on the paraboloid (316) If instead tminus|cmn|0 lt τb|cmn| then τ(infin) lt τb and

no breaking takes place before the wave freezesIf n = 1 forallm (314) reduces to the general solution u = A(xminusumt) of the

Riemann equation (12) if m = 1 foralln (314) reduces to the class of particu-lar solutions of the dKP equation with quadratic nonlinearity and arbitrarydimensions (dKP (1 n)) constructed in [2] It is interesting to remark thatthis type of exact solutions was first derived for the integrable dKP equation(13) using its nonlinear Riemnann - Hilbert inverse problem [21]

After breaking t gt tb the regular multivalued solutions (314) can bereplaced by the discontinuous single valued solutions of dKP (mn) obtainedusing (33) (35) and (313) in (310) (311) (312) More precisely fort gt tb where tb is defined in (315) and (317) the dKP (mn) solutiondescribed by (314) for t lt tb develops a discontinuous shock on the parabola

x+ y2

4t= S(t) S(t) equiv s(τ(t)) (318)

where s(τ) is characterized by equations (310) (311) and τ(t) is defined in(313) Behind and ahead the shock the solution is given by

u =

u2(x ~y t) if x+ y4

4tlt S(t)

u1(x ~y t) if x+ y4

4tgt S(t)

(319)

where u2 and u1 are respectively the maximum and the minimum among the(three in the case of a localized bump) branches u12 = tminus(nminus1)2A(ζ12) ofthe implicit equations (314)

We end this section remarking that as already mentioned in sect1 in theabove class of exact solutions of (11) the dependences of u on x throughthe combinations x minus cminus1

mnumt (if cmn gt 0) x minus umt log t (if cmn = 0) and

xminus|cmn|minus1umt[(tt0)|cmn|minus1] if cmn lt 0 are not consistent with the formal

dependence x minus umt recently postulated to study the breaking features ofdKP (m 2) in [20]

4 The Cauchy problem for small and local-

ized initial data and longtime wave break-

ing

In analogy with [2] now we use the exact solutions of the previous sectionto construct the longtime behaviour of solutions of the Cauchy problem of

10

(11) for small and localized initial data showing in particular that smalland localized initial data evolving according to (11) break in thelongtime regime only if m(nminus 1) le 2 (cmn ge 0)

For small and localized initial data of the type

u(x ~y 0) = ǫu0(x ~y) 0 lt ǫ ≪ 1 (41)

evolving according to equation (11) the behavior of the solution may beapproximated by the solution of the linearized dKP (mn) equation untilnonlinearity becomes relevant

For O(ǫ) initial data equations (37)(39) imply that the breaking timeis

τb = O(ǫminusm) ≫ 1 (42)

so the nonlinear regime for dKP (mn) is characterized by the condition

t = O(

τminus1(ǫminusm))

=

O(

ǫminus m

cmn

)

cmn gt 0

O(

eǫminusm)

cmn = 0(43)

where τminus1(middot) is the inverse of (36) while for cmn lt 0 large values of t arenot compatible with (42) and a nonlinear regime never occurs

So for t ≪ τminus1(ǫminusm) the solution of the Cauchy problem is approximatedby the solution of the linearized dKP (mn) equation while for t sim τminus1(ǫminusm)a matching will be made between the linearized solution and the exact solu-tion (314)

In the linear regime when 0 lt t ≪ O(τminus1(ǫminusm)) the dKP (mn) solutionis well described by that of the linearized dKP (mn) ie

u(x ~y t) sim ǫ

(2π)n

int

Rn

u0(k1 ~kperp) exp

[

ı(k1x+ ~kperp middot ~y minus k2perpk1

t)

]

dk1d~kperp (44)

where

u0(k1 ~kperp) =

int

Rn

u0(x ~y) exp[

minusı(k1x+ ~kperp middot ~y)]

dxd~y

In the longtime regime

1 ≪ t ≪ O(τminus1(ǫminusm)) (45)

11

the multiple integral can be evaluated by the stationary phase method whichgives [2]

u(x ~y t) sim tminusnminus12 ǫG

(

x+1

4t

nminus1sum

i=1

y2i ~y

2t

)

(46)

where

G(ξ ~η) =1

2nπn+12

int

R

dk1|k1|nminus12 u0 (k1 ~ηk1) exp

[

ık1ξ minus ı(nminus 1)π

4sgn(k1)

]

(47)in the space-time region

(xminus ξ)t yit = O(1) i = 1 nminus 1 (48)

on the paraboloid (32) and decays faster outside it Therefore small andlocalized initial data set in the longtime regime (45) governed bythe linear theory on the paraboloid (32)

When nonlinearity becomes relevant ie when t = O(τminus1(ǫminusm)) theasymptotic solution of dKP (mn) is built matching the longtime solution(46)(47) of the linearized Cauchy problem with the exact solution (314)If fi cmn gt 0 the first argument ξ of function G(ξ η) defined in (47) isreplaced by ξminus cminus1

mnumt or equivalently the arbitrary function A(ζ) in (38)

acquires the dependence on the second argument ~η = ~y2t and is identifiedwith G As a result of this matching in the nonlinear regime (42) (43) thesolution reads

u(x ~y t) ≃ uasmn(x ~y t)

uasmn(x ~y t) equiv

tminusnminus12 ǫG

(

x+ 14t

sumnminus1i=1 y2i minus 1

cmnumt ~y

2t

)

cmn gt 0

tminusnminus12 ǫG

(

x+ 14t

sumnminus1i=1 y2i minus umt ln t ~y

2t

)

cmn = 0

(49)with umt = O(1) for cmn gt 0 and umt log t = O(1) for cmn = 0 becominginfinitesimal in the linear regime as it has to be

For cmn lt 0 the solution is described by its linear form (46) thereforewave breaking takes place for the particular values of (mn) described by thecondition

cmn ge 0 hArr m(nminus 1) le 2 (410)

ie forn = 1 n = 2 n = 3forallm m = 1 2 m = 1

(411)

12

For n = 1 forallm uasmn reduces to the general solution of the Riemann equation

(12) [3] The cases (mn) = (2 1) and (mn) = (3 1) the dKP and theKZ equations have been already investigated in [18] and [2] respectivelytherefore in the following section we mainly focus on the case (mn) = (2 2)corresponding to the nonintegrable modified dKP equation (15) and to itsasymptotic solution

u ≃ uas22(x y t) =

1radictǫG

(

x+y2

4tminus u2t ln t

y

2t

)

(412)

comparing the results with the dKP case (mn) = (1 2) investigated in [18]with its asymptotic solution

u ≃ uas12(x y t) =

1radictǫG

(

x+y2

4tminus 2ut

y

2t

)

(413)

Remark 1 The estimate of the first correction to the asymptotics (49)reads

u = uasnm(x ~y t)(1 +O(tminus1)) (414)

Indeed if cmn gt 0 one has

u sim uasnm(x ~y t) +

ǫ1+ m

cmn

tnminus12

H

(

x+1

4t

nminus1sum

i=1

y2i ~y

2t τ

)

(415)

where τ = ǫmτ and H(ξ ~η τ ) is expressed in terms of G(ζ ~η) (ζ is definedin the second of equations (51)) through the PDE

(

Hτ +GmHξ

1 +mGmminus1Gζ τ

)

ξ

+1

4(cmnτ )1+cminus1mn

nminus1sum

j=1

(

Gηj

1 +mGmminus1Gζ τ

)

ηj

= 0 (416)

Since from (43) ǫm

cmn = O(tminus1) equation (415) yields (414) Similarly ifcmn = 0

u sim uasnm(x ~y t) +

ǫ

tn+12

H

(

x+1

4t

nminus1sum

i=1

y2i ~y

2t τ

)

(417)

where H(ξ ~η τ) now solves the PDE

(

H

1 +mGmminus1Gζ τ

)

ξ

=1

4

nminus1sum

j=1

(

Gηj

1 +mGmminus1Gζ τ

)

ηj

(418)

13

Then equation (417) yields equation (414) too

Remark 2 As is was observed in [2] for a gaussian initial condition

u0(x y) = d exp

[

minusx2 + ~y2

4

]

(419)

where d is constant the asymptotic solution can be written in terms of specialfunctions obtaining for G(ξ ~η)

G(ξ ~η) =dradicπ

1

(1+~η2)n+14

[

cos(

π4(nminus 1)

)

Γ(

n+14

)

1F1

(

n+14 12minusY 2

4

)

+ sin(

π4(nminus 1)

)

Γ(

n+34

)

Y 1F1

(

n+34 32minusY 2

4

) ]

(420)

where

Y =ξ

radic

1 + ~η2 (421)

Γ is the Euler gamma function and 1F1 is the Kummer confluent hypergeo-metric function [22 23] For n = 2 and d =

radic2π it yields respectively

G(ξ η) =1

(1+η2)34

[

Γ(

34

)

1F1

(

34 12minusY 2

4

)

+ Y Γ(

54

)

1F1

(

54 32minusY 2

4

)]

(422)

Remark 3 The fact that small data break only when the inequality (410) issatisfied was expected from physical considerations Indeed as already men-tioned in the introduction in equation (11) there are two competing termsthe nonlinear term umux responsible for the steepening of the profile andthe perpu term describing diffraction in the transversal (n minus 1) dimensionalhyperplane (reminiscence through the multiscale expansion leading to (11)of the wave operator) therefore diffraction increases as (nminus 1) increases [2]For small initial data the umux term is initially smaller and smaller increas-ing m and the solution evolves in a linear way for a longer and longer timediffracting transversally through the (nminus1) diffraction channels So diffrac-tion increasing with (n minus 1) acts on a very long time increasing with mbefore the nonlinear regime could become relevant and if (nminus 1) andor mare sufficiently large one expects that the solution would be diffracted awayalmost completely before reaching the nonlinear regime and will not break

14

We have in particular that breaking takes place in the following longtimeregimes (see (43))m = n = 1 (the Riemann equation with quadratic nonlinearity) tb = O(ǫminus1)m = 1 n = 2 (the dKP equation) tb = O(ǫminus2)m = 1 n = 3 (the KZ equation) tb = O(eǫ

minus1)

m = 2 n = 1 (the Riemann equation with cubic nonlinearity) tb = O(ǫminus2)m = 2 n = 2 (the mdKP equation) O(tb = eǫ

minus2)

It is interesting to remark that as it was observed in [2] if m = 1 (thephysically more relevant case) wave breaking takes place only for n le 3 iein physical space

We end this section remarking that also in the longtime behaviour of thesolutions of the small data Cauchy problem for equation (11) the depen-dence of the solution u on x as in the case of the exact solutions (314) isnot consistent with the formal ansatz recently made in [20]

5 Analytic aspects of the wave breaking

In this section we use the longtime behavior of solutions of the small dataCauchy problem for dKP (mn) to show explicitly the analytic aspects ofthe solution in the neighbourhood of the breaking time in terms of the initialdata represented by function G defined in (47) as it was already done in[18 2]

Choosing cmn ge 0 we rewrite equation (49) in the characteristic form

q sim ǫG(ζ ~η)ξ = ǫmF (ζ ~ηm)τ + ζ F (ζ ~ηm) equiv Gm(ζ ~η)

(51)

where

q = utnminus12 ξ = x+

1

4t

nminus1sum

j=1

y2j ~η =~y

2t(52)

and

τ(t) =

1cmn

tcmn if cmn gt 0

ln t if cmn = 0(53)

One solves the second of equations (51) with respect to the parameterζ obtaining ζ(ξ ~η τ) and replaces it into the first to obtain the solutionq sim ǫG(ζ(ξ ~η τ) ~η) The inversion of the second of equations (51) is possibleiff its ζ-derivative is different from zero Therefore the singularity manifold

15

(SM) of the solution is the n - dimensional manifold characterized by theequation

S(ζ ~η τ) equiv 1 + ǫmFζ(ζ ~ηm)τ = 0 rArr τ = minus 1

ǫmFζ(ζ ~ηm) (54)

Sincenabla(ξ~η)q =

ǫnabla(ζ~η)G(ζ~η)

1+ǫmFζ(ζ~ηm)τ (55)

the slope of the localized wave becomes infinity (the so-called gradient catas-trophe) on the SM and the n-dimensional wave ldquobreaksrdquo except on the di-

rection represented by the vector field V =nminus1sum

i=1

partηi +mǫmGmminus1(nminus1sum

i=1

Gηi)partξ [2]

[19] on which

V q = ǫ

nminus1sum

i=1

Gηi (56)

Since the KZ case (mn) = (1 3) has been studied in detail in [2] in thefollowing we mainly concentrate on the mdKP case (mn) = (2 2) and wecompare it with the dKP case (mn) = (1 2) investigated in [18]

From (54) the first breaking time τb and the corresponding characteristic

parameters ~ζb = (ζb ηb) are defined by the global minimum of a function ofthe 2 variables (ζ η)

τb = minus 1

ǫmFζ(ζb ηbm)= inf

(

minus 1

ǫmFζ(ζ ηm)

)

gt 0 (57)

and it is characterized together with the condition Fζ(~ζbm) lt 0 by thefollowing equations

Fζζ(~ζbm) = Fζη(~ζbm) = 0

α equiv Fζζζ(~ζbm)Fζηη(~ζbm)minus F 2ζζη(

~ζbm) gt 0 Fζζζ(~ζbm) gt 0(58)

The corresponding point at which the first wave breaking takes place is from(51) ~ξb = (ξb ηb) isin R

2 where

ξb = ζb + ǫmF (~ζbm)τb = ζb minusF (~ζbm)

Fζ(~ζbm) (59)

Now we evaluate equations (51) and (54) near breaking in the regime

ξ = ξb + ξprime η = ηb + ηprime τ = τb + τ prime ζ = ζb + ζ prime (510)

16

where ξprime ηprime τ prime ζ prime are small Using (57) - (59) the second of equations (51)becomes at the leading order the following cubic equation in ζ prime

ζ prime3+ a(ηprime)ζ prime

2+ b(ηprime τ)ζ prime minus γX(ξprime ηprime τ) = 0 (511)

where

a(ηprime) =3Fζζη

Fζζζηprime

b(ηprime τ) = 3Fζζζ

[

2Fζ τ + Fζηηηprime2]

X(ξprime ηprime τ ) = ξprime minus ǫF (ζb ηb + ηprime)τ prime minus ǫ [F (ζb ηb + ηprime)minus F ] τb simξprime minus Fη

|Fζ |ηprime minus F

|Fζ | τ minus Fηη

2|Fζ |ηprime2 minus Fη

|Fζ |ηprimeτ minus Fηηη

6|Fζ |ηprime3 γ =

6|Fζ |Fζζζ

(512)

and

τ equiv τ prime

τb=

τ minus τbτb

(513)

corresponding to the maximal balance

|ζ prime| |ηprime| = O(|τ |12) |X| = O(|τ |32) (514)

In (512) and in the rest of this section G F = Gm and all their partialderivatives whose arguments are not indicated are meant to be evaluated at~ζb = (ζb ηb)

The three roots of the cubic are given by the well-known Cardano-Tartagliaformula

ζ prime0 (ξprime ~ηprime τ) = minusa

3+ (A+)

13 + (Aminus)

13

ζ primeplusmn (ξprime ~ηprime τ) = minusa3minus 1

2

(

(A+)13 + (Aminus)

13

)

plusmnradic32i(

(A+)13 minus (Aminus)

13

)

(515)where

Aplusmn = Rplusmnradic∆ (516)

and the discriminant ∆ reads

∆ = R2 +Q3 (517)

withQ(ηprime τ ) = 3bminusa2

9= minus2|Fζ |

Fζζζτ + α

F 2ζζζ

ηprime2

R(ξprime ηprime τ) = γ2X(ξprime ηprime τ ) + ab

18+ a

3Q(ηprime τ)

(518)

17

At the same order function S in (54) becomes

S(ζ prime ηprime τ ) = minusτ + 12|Fζ |

[

Fζζζζprime2 + 2Fζζηζ

primeηprime + Fζηηηprime2]

=

Fζζζ

2|Fζ |

(

Q(ηprime τ ) +(

ζ prime +Fζζη

Fζζζηprime)2)

(519)

Known ζ prime as function of (ξprime ηprime τ) from the cubic (511) the solution q andits gradient are then approximated near breaking by the formulae

q(ξ η τ) sim ǫG(ζb + ζ prime ηb + ηprime) = ǫ (G+Gζζprime +Gηη

prime +O(|τ |)) nabla(ξη)q sim ǫ

nabla(ζprimeηprime)G(ζb+ζprimeηb+ηprime)

S(ζprimeηprimeτ) (520)

Before breaking

Before breaking τ lt τb (τ lt 0) the coefficient Q in (518) is strictlypositive (see the second of (58)) then the discriminant ∆ = R2 + Q3 isalso strictly positive and only the root ζ prime0 is real Correspondingly the realsolution q is single valued and described by Cardanorsquos formula and by (520)In addition function S in (519) is also strictly positive and nabla(ξ~η)q is finiteforall ξ η

To have a more explicit solution than that provided by Cardanorsquos formulawe first restrict the asymptotic region to a narrower area so that the cubic(511) reduces to the linear equation bζ prime = γX and X contains only linearterms This is achieved choosing

ηprime = O(τ r) X = O(τ p+1) 12lt p lt p+1

2lt r lt p+ 1 (521)

implying

ζ prime = O(τ p)

X = ξprime + Fη

Fζηprime + F

Fζτ + o(τ p+1) = ξprime + Gη

Gζηprime + G

mGζτ + o(τ p+1)

bζ prime = γX rArr ζ prime sim minus 1τ

(

ξprime + Gη

Gζηprime + G

mGζτ)

(522)

Then

q = ǫG(ζb + ζ prime ηb + ηprime) sim ǫG + ǫGζζprime sim ǫ

(

1minus 1

m

)

Gminus ǫGζ

τ

(

ξprime +Gη

Gζηprime)

(523)

18

Since q sim ǫG and recalling the definitions (57)(513) it follows that q isdescribed by the exact similarity solution

q sim(

ξ + (GηGζ)ηprime

τ prime

)1m

(524)

of equation (37)The cubic simplifies also in the asymptotic region in which ξprime ηprime are of

the same order while τ prime le O(|ηprime|) reducing to ζ prime3 = γX so that the solutionq and its gradient are

q sim ǫG(ζb +3radic

γX(ξprime ηprime τ) ηb + ηprime) (525)

nablaξηq sim3radicγ

3

ǫnablaζηG3radic

X2(ξprime ηprime τ ) (526)

At breaking

When τ = τb the singularity manifold S (519) is positive everywhere inthe (ξ η) plane except at the breaking point (ξb ηb) in which it is zerotogether with Q R and the discriminant ∆ The solution q is well describedagain by Cardanorsquos formula and by (520) To have a more explicit solutionthan that provided by Cardanorsquos formula we choose ξprime ηprime of the same orderthe cubic (511) reduces to ζ prime3 = γX and equations (525) become

q sim ǫG(ζb +3radic

γX(ξprime ηprime 0) ηb + ηprime)

nablaξηq sim 3radicγ

3

ǫnablaξηG3radic

X2(ξprimeηprime0)

(527)

The expression of Xb(ξprime ~ηprime) equiv X(ξprime ~ηprime 0) is given in (512) Xb(ξ

prime ηprime) simξprime minus Fη

|Fζ |ηprime if ξprime prop ηprime but ξprime 6= (FηFζ)η

prime while X(ξprime ηprime 0) = minus Fηη

2|Fζ |ηprime2 if

ξprime = (FηFζ)ηprime

Equation (527) implies that all the derivatives of q blow up at τ = τb in

the breaking point (ξb ηb) with the universal lawXminus23b except the derivative

along the transversal line Xb(ξprime ηprime 0) = 0 represented by the vector field

V = partη minusXbηpartξ (compare with (56)) for which [2 19]

V q|(ξbηb) = ǫGη (528)

After breaking I the overturning profile

19

After breaking the solution becomes three-valued in a compact regionof the (ξ η) - plane (see Figures 3) and in general does not describe anyphysics nevertheless a detailed study of the multivalued region is importantin view of a proper regularization of the models

If τ gt τb (τ gt 0) in the regime (514) the SM equation S = 0

2|Fζ|τ = Fζζζζprime2 + 2Fζζηζ

primeηprime + Fζηηηprime2 (529)

describes an ellipsoidal paraboloid in the (ζ prime ηprime τ) space with minimum at

the breaking point (~ξb τb)One can check that eliminating ζ prime from equations (529) and (511) one

obtains the SM equation in space-time coordinates coinciding with the equa-tion ∆ = R2+Q3 = 0 where ∆ is the discriminant (517) of the cubic (511)and Q and R are defined in (518) Such equation can be satisfied only ifQ le 0 ie only if

|ηprime| le ηprimecusp(τ) (530)

where

ηprimecusp(τ ) equivradic

2|Fζ |Fζζζ

α

radicτ (531)

and is given by the following analytic and universal expression

ξprime minus Fη

|Fζ |ηprime minus F

|Fζ | τ minus Fηη

2|Fζ |ηprime2 minus

(

Fη

|Fζ | +Fζζη

Fζζζ

)

ηprimeτ + 16|Fζ |F 2

ζζζ

[

minus FηηηF2ζζζ

+Fζζη(3FζζζFζηη minus 2F 2ζζη)]

ηprime32

= α3

9F 2ζ F

4ζζζ

(

(

ηprimecusp(τ))2 minus ηprime2

)3

(532)Equation (532) describes a closed curve with two cusps in the (ξ η) - planeat the points

~ξplusmncusp(τ ) = (ξb ηb) + (ξplusmnprime

cusp(τ )plusmnηprimecusp(τ)) (533)

where

ξplusmnprime

cusp(τ ) sim plusmnFη

radic

2Fζζζ

α|Fζ|radicτ +

(

F

|Fζ |+

FηηFζζζ

α

)

τ plusmn Bτ 32 (534)

where B = O(1) (see Figures 6 for dKP and 7 for mdKP) corresponding tothe conditions Q = R = 0 on which the three real solutions of the cubiccoincide (in 1 + 1 dimensions it is not possible to have three coincidentsolutions)

ζ0 = ζplusmn = minusFζζη

Fζζζηprime rArr q0 = qplusmn =sim ǫ

(

G+ (Gη minusGζFζζη

Fζζζ)ηprime)

(535)

20

On the remaining part of the closed curve ∆ = 0 two of the three realbranches coincide Outside the closed curve ∆ gt 0 and the real solution q issingle valued inside the closed curve ∆ lt 0 and the real solution q is threevalued with the three branches

q = ǫG(ζb + ζ prime ηb + ηprime) sim ǫ(G +Gζζprime +Gηη

prime +O(τ)) (536)

where ζ prime are the three real solutions of the cubic (511) (see fi Figures 2for dKP)

Figures 2 Plotting of the dKP analytic solution in the (q ξ η τ) variablesfor G given by (422) ǫ = 02 at times τ = 0 τb minus 2 τb τb + 2 whereτb = 657

Such a three-valued region of the (ξ η) plane is characterized by the

21

conditions|ηprime| lt ηprimecusp(τ) ξminusM(ηprime τ) lt ξprime lt ξ+M(ηprime τ) (537)

where

ξplusmnM(ηprime τ) equiv Fη

|Fζ |ηprime + F

|Fζ | τ + Fηη

2|Fζ |ηprime2 +

(

Fη

|Fζ | +Fζζη

Fζζζ

)

ηprimeτ minus 16|Fζ |F 2

ζζζ

[

minus FηηηF2ζζζ

+Fζζη(3FζζζFζηη minus 2F 2ζζη)]

ηprime3 plusmn Fζζζ

3|Fζ | |Q| 32(538)

(see Figures 3 for dKP)Since

∆ξ equiv ξ+M(ηprime τ)minus ξminusM(ηprime τ) =2Fζζζ

3|Fζ||Q(ηprime τ)|32 le 4

radic2

3

radic

|Fζ|Fζζζ

τ 32 (539)

we infer that the longitudinal width of the multivalued region is O(τ 32) thetransversal widths delimited by the two cusps is instead O(τ 12) thereforethe multivalued region develops at τ = τb from the breaking point (ξb ηb)with an infinite speed in the tranversal direction and with zero speed in thelongitudinal direction All these results are a common feature to the class ofdynamics (11) (see the previously derived results for the dKP equation forfinite times [18 19] and in the longtime regime [18] and those for the KZequation in the longtime regime [2])

-15-10-050005101-15-10-0500051015

-15-10-050005101-15-10-0500051015

Figures 3 Plotting of the three valued regions of the (ξ η) plane for dKPat times τ = 02 05 for G given by (422) and ǫ = 02 The center of thesquare frame is the breaking point (ξb ηb) Notice that the two cusps havethe same ξ coordinate ξ+cusp(τ) sim ξminuscusp(τ) since for solution (422) Gη = 0(see (531)(534))

22

We end this subsection remarking that as it was already observed in [19]since dKP (mn) is symmetric wrt y if the initial datum is also symmetricwrt y like the Gaussian (419) also its evolution will be so u(x y t) =u(xminusy t) This implies that ηb = yb = 0 and that all partial derivatives ofF and G containing an odd number of η derivatives are 0 at breaking As aconsequence the transversal direction on which the derivative of the profiledoes not blow up is the η (y) direction and on it the derivative is 0 atbreaking (see (56))

After breaking II the discontinuous shock

Using the matching rules of sect3 the shock formulae (310) become

parts

partτ=

ǫm

m+ 1

Gm+1(ζ1 η)minusGm+1(ζ2 η)

G(ζ1 η)minusG(ζ2 η) (540)

s = ζ1 + ǫmGm(ζ1 η) τ = ζ2 + ǫmGm(ζ2 η) τ (541)

where subscript 2 is for values behind the shock and subscript 1 for valuesahead Equations (541) are two implicit equations for ζ1 and ζ2 solvingthese equations yields ζ1(s η τ) ζ2(s η τ) and substituting these expres-sions in (540) it results in a nonlinear first order differential equation fors This equation and the initial conditions (311) give uniquely s(η τ) andconsequently ζ12(η τ) = ζ12(s(η τ) η τ)

We recall that immediately after breaking and if (530) holds equation(541) reduces to the cubic (511)(512) in which ξprime must be replaced by sprimepossessing three real roots where

sprime(ηprime τ) = sminus ξb (542)

Therefore the values of ζ1 and ζ2 are chosen among the three solutions (515)so that q2 = ǫG(ζb + ζ prime2 η) has the maximum value and q1 = ǫG(ζb + ζ prime1 η)the minimum one among the three branches of q Since Gζ lt 0 it followsthat

ζ1 = maxζ prime0 ζ primeplusmn ζ2 = minζ prime0 ζ primeplusmn (543)

To identify ζ12 with one of the three roots ζ prime0 ζprimeplusmn let us rewrite them as

follows

ζ prime0 = minusa

3+ 2 3

radicρ cos

(

θ

3

)

(544)

ζ prime+ = minusa

3minus 3

radicρ

(

cos

(

θ

3

)

+radic3 sin

(

θ

3

))

(545)

23

ζ primeminus = minusa

3minus 3

radicρ

(

cos

(

θ

3

)

minusradic3 sin

(

θ

3

))

(546)

where

ρ =radic

R2 + |∆| θ = arctan

(

radic

|∆|R

)

(547)

We observe that for 0 le θ le π the following inequalities hold

minus cos

(

θ

3

)

minusradic3 sin

(

θ

3

)

le minus cos

(

θ

3

)

+radic3 sin

(

θ

3

)

le 2 cos

(

θ

3

)

so that

ζ prime+ le ζ primeminus le ζ prime0 rArr q(ζb + ζ prime0 η) le q(ζb + ζ primeminus η) le q(ζb + ζ prime+ η) (548)

for q decreasing in ζ Hence

ζ prime1(sprime ηprime τ prime) = ζ prime0(s

prime ηprime τ prime) ζ prime2(sprime ηprime τ prime) = ζ prime+(s

prime ηprime τ prime) (549)

Then (540) reduces to the equations

dsprime

dτ+ G

Gζ+ Gη

Gζηprime + 1

2

[

ζ prime0(sprime ηprime τ ) + ζ prime+(s

prime ηprime τ)]

= 0 for dKPdsprime

dτ+ G

2Gζ+ Gη

Gζηprime + 1

2

[

ζ prime0(sprime ηprime τ) + ζ prime+(s

prime ηprime τ)]

= 0 for mdKP

sprime(0) = ξb

(550)

obtained expanding (540) near the breaking point and recalling that τ equivτ primeτb

We remark that in the differential equations (550) sprime depends on ηprime

parametrically So the discontinuous (dissipative) shocks of the longtime so-lutions of the small data Cauchy problems for dKP and mdKP has a simplegeometric construction given τ gt 0 for any fixed |ηprime| le ηcusp the overturn-ing profile in the (ξ q) plane is intercepted by a vertical straight line cuttingoff equal area lobi in analogy with the 1 + 1 dimensional case

Going back to the dKP variables

The above formulae written in the convenient variables q ξ η τ are es-sentially the same for both dKP and mdKP relevant differences appear whenwe go back to the original variables u x y t inverting equations (52)(53)

u = 1radictq t = τ2

4 y = ητ2

2 x = ξ minus η2τ2

4 for dKP

u = 1radictq t = eτ y = 2ηeτ x = ξ minus η2eτ for mdKP

(551)

24

and all the above universal formulae are easily transfered to the dKP (mn)equations In particular small and localized initial data break i) at tb =τ 2b 4 in the point (xb yb) = (ξb minus τ 2b η

2b4 ηbτ

2b 2) of the parabolic wave front

x+ y2(4tb) = ξb evolving according to dKP and ii) at tb = eτb in the point(xb yb) = (ξb minus η2be

τb 2ηbeτb) of the parabolic wave front x + y2(4tb) = ξb

evolving according to mdKP If for instance we use the same Gaussian initialcondition (419) for both dKP and mdKP with ǫ = 02 then G is given by(422) in both cases Consequently for dKP

ζb = 196 ηb = 0 ξb = 327 τb = 657 (552)

and wave breaking takes place at tb = 108 in the point (xb yb) = (327 0)on the parabola x+ 231 middot 10minus2y2 = 327 (see Figure 4)

Figure 4 Plotting of the analytic dKP solution u in the physical variablesx y t for G given by (422) (corresponding to the gaussian initial condition)ǫ = 02 at breaking

For mdKP

ζb = 161 ηb = 0 ξb = 251 τb = 1431 (553)

and wave breaking takes place at tb = 164middot106 in the point (xb yb) = (251 0)on the parabola x + 152 middot 10minus7y2 = 251 and at breaking the amplitude ofthe wave is u = ǫtb

minus12G(ζb ηb) = 195 middot 10minus4 (see Figure 5)

25

Figure 5 Plotting of the analytic mdKP solution u in the physical variablesx y t for G given by (422) (corresponding to the gaussian initial condition)ǫ = 02 at breaking

Since in the mdKP case tb is very large and the wave amplitude atbreaking is very small we wonder if such a wave breaking could be actuallydetected numerically

Now we go into the analytic details For the dKP case

tprime equiv tminus tb sim 2tbτ yprime = y minus yb ≃ 2tb(ηprime + 2ηbτ + 2ηprimeτ )

xprime = xminus xb sim ξprime minus ηbyprime minus yprime2

4tb+ η2b t

prime + ηbtbyprimetprime

(554)

and we choose τ prime to be sufficiently small to have |tprime| |yprime| ≪ 1The dKP solution reads

u(x y t) =ǫradictG(ζb + ζ prime ηb + ηprime) =

ǫradict

(

G+Gζζprime +Gη

yprime

2tb+O

(

tprime

tb

))

(555)where ζ prime is the solution of the cubic (511) with

a =3Fζζη

2Fζζζ

yprime

tb b = 3

Fζζζ

(

Fζtprime

tb+ Fζηη

yprime2

4t2b

)

X = xprime +(

ηb minus Fη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime minus[

η2b +(

F2minus ηbFη

)

1|Fζ |tb

]

tprime

+(

1minus Fηη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime2

4tb+[

minusηb +(

Fη

2+ ηbFηη

)

12|Fζ |tb

]

yprimetprime

tb

minus Fηηη

48|Fζ |yprime3

t3b

(556)

26

The three-valued region (532) after breaking becomes

xprime +(

ηb minus Fη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime minus[

η2b +(

F2minus ηbFη

)

1|Fζ |tb

]

tprime

+(

1minus Fηη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime2

4tb+[

minusηb +(

Fη

2|Fζ |tb +ηbFηη

|Fζ | minus Fζζη

2Fζζζ

)

12tb

]

yprimetprime

tb

+ 16|Fζ |F 2

ζζζ

[

minus FηηηF2ζζζ + Fζζη(3FζζζFζηη minus 2F 2

ζζη)]

yprime3

8t3b

2

=

α3

9middot64F 2ζF 4ζζζ

t6b

(

(

yprimecusp(tprime))2 minus yprime2

)3

(557)

where

yprimecusp(tprime) = 2

radic

|Fζ |Fζζζ

α

radictbtprime (558)

Equation (557) describes a closed curve with two cusps in the (x y) - planeat the points

~xplusmncusp(t

prime) = (xb yb) + (xplusmnprime

cusp(tprime)plusmnyprimecusp(t

prime)) (559)

where

xplusmnprime

cusp(tprime) sim ∓2ηb

radic

|Fζ |Fζζζ

α

radictbtprime plusmn Fη

radic

Fζζζ

α|Fζ |

radic

tprime

tb

+(

η2b minus|Fζ |Fζζζ

α

)

tprime +(

F|Fζ | +

FηηFζζζ

α

)

tprime

2tbplusmn 2ηb

radic

|Fζ |Fζζζ

αtprime

32radictb+O(τ 32)

(560)At last the analogue of (539) reads

∆xprime le 2

3

radic

|Fζ|Fζζζ

(

tprime

tb

)32

(561)

it follows that the longitudinal width ∆long and the transversal width ∆transv

of the multivalued region are respectively

∆long = O

(

(

tprime

tb

)32

)

∆transv = O(

(tbtprime)

12

)

rArr ∆long

∆transv= O

(

tprime

t2b

)

(562)

For the mdKP case

tprime = tminus tb sim tbτprime yprime = y minus yb sim 2tb(η

prime + ηbtprime

tb+ ηprimetprime

tb)

xprime = xminus xb sim ξprime minus ηbyprime + η2b t

prime minus yprime2

4tb+ ηb

yprimetprime

tb

(563)

27

and we choose τ prime sufficiently small to have |tprime| |yprime| ≪ 1The mdKP solution reads

u(x y t) =ǫradictG(ζb+ζ prime ηb+ηprime) =

ǫradict

(

G+Gζζprime +Gη

yprime

2tb+O

(

tprime

tb log tb

))

(564)where ζ prime is the solution of the cubic (511) with

a =3Fζζη

2Fζζζ

yprime

tb b = 3

Fζζζ

(

2Fζtprime

tb log tb+ Fζηη

yprime2

4t2b

)

X = xprime +(

ηb minus Fη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime minus[

η2b +(

Flog tb

minus ηbFη

)

1|Fζ |tb

]

tprime

+(

1minus Fηη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime2

4tb+[

minusηb +(

Fη

|Fζ |(1minus1

log tb) + ηbFηη

|Fζ |

)

12tb

]

yprimetprime

tb

minus Fηηη

48|Fζ |yprime3

t3b

(565)

The three-valued region (532) after breaking becomes

xprime +(

ηb minus Fη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime minus[

η2b +(

Flog tb

minus ηbFη

)

1|Fζ |tb

]

tprime

+(

1minus Fηη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime2

4tb+[

minusηb +(

Fη

|Fζ |(1minus1

log tb) + ηbFηη

|Fζ| minus Fζζη

Fζζζ log tb

)

12tb

]

yprimetprime

tb

+ 16|Fζ |F 2

ζζζ

[

minus FηηηF2ζζζ + Fζζη(3FζζζFζηη minus 2F 2

ζζη)]

yprime3

8t3b

2

=

α3

9middot64F 2ζ F

4ζζζt

6b

(

(

yprimecusp(tprime))2 minus yprime2

)3

(566)where

yprimecusp(tprime) = 2

radic

2|Fζ |Fζζζ

α

radic

tbtprime

log tb (567)

Equation (566) describes a closed curve with two cusps in the (x y) - planeat the points

~xplusmncusp(t

prime) = (xb yb) + (xplusmnprime

cusp(tprime)plusmnyprimecusp(t

prime)) (568)

where

xplusmnprime

cusp(tprime) sim ∓2ηb

radic

|Fζ |Fζζζ

α

radic

tbtprime

log tbplusmn Fη

radic

Fζζζ

α|Fζ |

radic

tprime

tb log tb

+(

η2b minus|Fζ |Fζζζ

α log tb

)

tprime +(

F|Fζ | +

FηηFζζζ

α

)

tprime

tb log tbplusmn 2ηb

radic

|Fζ |Fζζζ

αtprime

32radic

tb log tb

+O(τ 32)

(569)

28

At last the analogue of (539) reads

∆xprime le 4radic2

3

radic

|Fζ |Fζζζ

(

tprime

tb log tb

)32

(570)

it follows that the longitudinal width ∆long and the transversal width ∆transv

of the multivalued region are respectively

∆long = O

(

(

tprime

tb log tb

)32

)

∆transv = O

(

(

tbtprime

log tb

)12

)

rArr ∆long

∆transv= O

(

tprime

t2blog tb

)

(571)

References

[1] F Santucci Onde debolmente non lineari e quasi unidimensionali in

Natura La rottura di tali onde e il problema della regolarizzazione dis-

sipativa Tesi della Laurea Specialistica in Fisica supervisor P M San-tini Dipartimento di Fisica dellrsquoUniversita di Roma ldquoLa Sapienzardquo AA2011-2012

[2] S V Manakov and P M Santini On the dispersionless Kadomtsev-Petviashvili equation in n + 1 dimensions exact solutions the Cauchyproblem for small initial data and wave breaking J Phys A MathTheor 44 (2011) 405203

[3] G B Whitham Linear and nonlinear waves John Wiley amp Sons 1974

[4] C Lin E Reissner and H S Tien On two-dimensional nonsteadymotion of a slender body in a compressible fluid J Math Phys 27(1948) 220-231

[5] R Timman Unsteady motion in transonic flow Symposium Transson-icum Aachen 1962 EdKOswatitsch Springer 394-401

[6] E A Zobolotskaya and R V Khokhlov Quasi-plane waves in the non-linear acoustics of confined beams Soviet Physics- Acoustics Vol15N1 (1969)

29

[7] B B Kadomtsev and V I Petviashvili On the stability of solitarywaves in weakly dispersing media Soviet Physics-Doklady Vol15 N6(1970)

[8] X P Wang M J Ablowitz and H Segur Wave collapse and instabil-

ity of solitary waves of a generalized Kadomtsev-Petviashvili equationPhysica D 78 (1994) 241-265

[9] M J Ablowitz and H Segur Solitons and the Inverse Scattering Trans-

form SIAM Philadelphia 1981

[10] M J Ablowitz and P A Clarkson Solitons nonlinear evolution equa-

tions and inverse scattering Cambridge University Press 1991

[11] S Turitsyn and G Falkovitch Stability of magneto-elastic solitons andself-focusing of sound in antiferromagnets Sov Phys J Exp TheorPhys 62 (1985) 146-152

[12] S Novikov S V Manakov L P Pitaevskii V E Zakharov Theory of

solitons Consultant Bureau 1984

[13] S V Manakov and P M Santini Inverse scattering problem for vectorfields and the heavenly equation httparXivnlinSI0512043

[14] S V Manakov and P M Santini Inverse scattering problem forvector fields and the Cauchy problem for the heavenly equationPhys Lett A 359 613-619 (2006) doi101016jphysleta200607011httparXivnlinSI0604017

[15] S V Manakov and P M Santini The Cauchy problem on theplane for the dispersionless Kadomtsev-Petviashvili equation JETPLetters 83 No 10 462-466 (2006) 101134S0021364006100080httparXivnlinSI0604016

[16] P G Grinevich P M Santini and D Wu The Cauchy problem for thePavlov equation Nonlinearity 28 (2015) 3709-3754 doi1010880951-771528113709 Preprint arXiv13105834v2

[17] M V Pavlov Integrable hydrodynamic chains J Math Phys 44 (2003)4134-4156

30

3 Exact solutions of dKP (mn)

It was observed in [2] that dKP (1 n) is invariant under the following Liesymmetry group of transformations

x = x+sumnminus1

i=1 (δiyi minus δ2i t)yj = yj minus 2δjt j = 1 middot middot middot nminus 1t = t

(31)

where δj j = 1 nminus1 are the arbitrary parameters of the group leavinginvariant the paraboloid

ξ = x+1

4t

nminus1sum

i=1

y2i (32)

Such a symmetry was used to construct a family of exact and implicit solu-tions of dKP (1 n) exhibiting wave breaking and playing a relevant role inthe longtime regime of the small data Cauchy problem for dKP (1 n) [2]

Since dKP (mn) is also invariant under the transformation (31) follow-ing the same strategy as in [2] such a symmetry will be used in this sectionto construct a family of exact and implicit solutions of dKP (mn) In thispaper we add to the exact solutions exhibiting a gradient catastrophe andmultivaluedness after breaking also the exact weak solutions of dKP (mn)developing after breaking single valued discontinuous shocks of dissipativenature

Therefore we look for solutions of (11) in the form

u = v(ξ t) ξ = x+1

4t

nminus1sum

i=1

y2i (33)

reducing (11) to the (1 + 1) dimensional PDE

vt + vmvξ +nminus 1

2tv = 0 (34)

The following change of variables

v(ξ t) = tminusnminus12 q(ξ τ) (35)

where

τ(t) =

1cmn

tcmn + α if cmn 6= 0

ln t+ β if cmn = 0 (36)

7

α β are real constants and the coefficient cmn is defined in (18) transforms(34) into the Riemann equation (12) in the variables (ξ τ)

qτ + qmqξ = 0 (37)

We recall [3] that (37) has the general implicit solution

q = A(ζ) ζ = ξ minusAm(ζ)τ hArr q = A(ξ minus qmτ) (38)

where A is an arbitrary differentiable function of one argument If in par-ticular A describes a localized positive hump the solution breaks first atτ = τb on the characteristic ζb where

τb = min ζ

(

minus 1

mAmminus1(ζ)Aprime(ζ)

)

= minus 1

mAmminus1(ζb)Aprime(ζb)gt 0 (39)

For τ gt τb the solution becomes multivalued and not acceptable in manyphysical contexts Alternatively for τ gt τb the regular multivalued solutioncan be replaced by a weak solution a single valued discontinuous shockof dissipative nature whose wave front discontinuity s(τ) is described byequations [3]

dsdτ

= 1m+1

Am+1(ζ1)minusAm+1(ζ2)A(ζ1)minusA(ζ2)

s = ζ1 + Am(ζ1)τ = ζ2 + Am(ζ2)τ

(310)

with the initial conditions

s(τb) = ξb ζ1(τb) = ζ2(τb) = ζb (311)

Behind and ahead the shock the solution is given by

q =

q2 = A(ζ2) if ξ lt s(τ)q1 = A(ζ1) if ξ gt s(τ)

(312)

where q2 and q1 are respectively the maximum and the minimum among the(three in the case of a single hump) branches of the implicit equations (38)

We remark that τ(t) in (36) is a monotonically increasing function of tto have it positive we choose the constants α β and the t-intervals as follows

τ(t) =

1cmn

tcmn t gt 0 if cmn gt 0

ln t t gt 1 if cmn = 01

|cmn|

(

tminus|cmn|0 minus tminus|cmn|

)

t gt t0 if cmn lt 0

(313)

8

Recalling (33) (35) and (313) the exact solutions of dKP (mn) in theoriginal variables corresponding to (38) read

u =

tminusnminus12 A

(

x+ 14t

sumnminus1i=1 y2i minus 1

cmnumt)

t gt 0 if cmn gt 0

tminusnminus12 A

(

x+ 14t

sumnminus1i=1 y2i minus umt ln t

)

t gt 1 if cmn = 0

tminusnminus12 A

(

x+ 14t

sumnminus1i=1 y2i minus 1

|cmn|umt

(

(

tt0

)|cmn|minus 1

))

t gt t0 if cmn lt 0

(314)where cmn is defined in (18)

If again A is a localized hump (314) describes a wave constant onthe paraboloidal wave front (32) and simultaneously breaking on it Moreprecisely the solution breaks at time tb defined by

tb =

(cmnτb)1cmn if cmn gt 0

eτb if cmn = 0(315)

on the paraboloid

x+1

4t

nminus1sum

i=1

y2i = ζb + Am(ζb)τb (316)

where τb ζb are defined in (39) (see Figures 1)

Figures 1 Plotting of the exact solution of the mdKP equation (15) (c22 =0) before at and after breaking Here we have chosen A(x) = eminusx2

conse-quently ζb = 12 τb =

radice2 tb = e

radice2

If cmn lt 0 τ(t) rarr τ(infin) equiv |cmn|minus1tminus|cmn|0 as t rarr infin and the wave

freezes asymptotically If tminus|cmn|0 gt τb|cmn| then τ(infin) gt τb and the wave

breaks before freezing at

tb =(

tminus|cmn|0 minus τb|cmn|

)minus1|cmn| (317)

9

on the paraboloid (316) If instead tminus|cmn|0 lt τb|cmn| then τ(infin) lt τb and

no breaking takes place before the wave freezesIf n = 1 forallm (314) reduces to the general solution u = A(xminusumt) of the

Riemann equation (12) if m = 1 foralln (314) reduces to the class of particu-lar solutions of the dKP equation with quadratic nonlinearity and arbitrarydimensions (dKP (1 n)) constructed in [2] It is interesting to remark thatthis type of exact solutions was first derived for the integrable dKP equation(13) using its nonlinear Riemnann - Hilbert inverse problem [21]

After breaking t gt tb the regular multivalued solutions (314) can bereplaced by the discontinuous single valued solutions of dKP (mn) obtainedusing (33) (35) and (313) in (310) (311) (312) More precisely fort gt tb where tb is defined in (315) and (317) the dKP (mn) solutiondescribed by (314) for t lt tb develops a discontinuous shock on the parabola

x+ y2

4t= S(t) S(t) equiv s(τ(t)) (318)

where s(τ) is characterized by equations (310) (311) and τ(t) is defined in(313) Behind and ahead the shock the solution is given by

u =

u2(x ~y t) if x+ y4

4tlt S(t)

u1(x ~y t) if x+ y4

4tgt S(t)

(319)

where u2 and u1 are respectively the maximum and the minimum among the(three in the case of a localized bump) branches u12 = tminus(nminus1)2A(ζ12) ofthe implicit equations (314)

We end this section remarking that as already mentioned in sect1 in theabove class of exact solutions of (11) the dependences of u on x throughthe combinations x minus cminus1

mnumt (if cmn gt 0) x minus umt log t (if cmn = 0) and

xminus|cmn|minus1umt[(tt0)|cmn|minus1] if cmn lt 0 are not consistent with the formal

dependence x minus umt recently postulated to study the breaking features ofdKP (m 2) in [20]

4 The Cauchy problem for small and local-

ized initial data and longtime wave break-

ing

In analogy with [2] now we use the exact solutions of the previous sectionto construct the longtime behaviour of solutions of the Cauchy problem of

10

(11) for small and localized initial data showing in particular that smalland localized initial data evolving according to (11) break in thelongtime regime only if m(nminus 1) le 2 (cmn ge 0)

For small and localized initial data of the type

u(x ~y 0) = ǫu0(x ~y) 0 lt ǫ ≪ 1 (41)

evolving according to equation (11) the behavior of the solution may beapproximated by the solution of the linearized dKP (mn) equation untilnonlinearity becomes relevant

For O(ǫ) initial data equations (37)(39) imply that the breaking timeis

τb = O(ǫminusm) ≫ 1 (42)

so the nonlinear regime for dKP (mn) is characterized by the condition

t = O(

τminus1(ǫminusm))

=

O(

ǫminus m

cmn

)

cmn gt 0

O(

eǫminusm)

cmn = 0(43)

where τminus1(middot) is the inverse of (36) while for cmn lt 0 large values of t arenot compatible with (42) and a nonlinear regime never occurs

So for t ≪ τminus1(ǫminusm) the solution of the Cauchy problem is approximatedby the solution of the linearized dKP (mn) equation while for t sim τminus1(ǫminusm)a matching will be made between the linearized solution and the exact solu-tion (314)

In the linear regime when 0 lt t ≪ O(τminus1(ǫminusm)) the dKP (mn) solutionis well described by that of the linearized dKP (mn) ie

u(x ~y t) sim ǫ

(2π)n

int

Rn

u0(k1 ~kperp) exp

[

ı(k1x+ ~kperp middot ~y minus k2perpk1

t)

]

dk1d~kperp (44)

where

u0(k1 ~kperp) =

int

Rn

u0(x ~y) exp[

minusı(k1x+ ~kperp middot ~y)]

dxd~y

In the longtime regime

1 ≪ t ≪ O(τminus1(ǫminusm)) (45)

11

the multiple integral can be evaluated by the stationary phase method whichgives [2]

u(x ~y t) sim tminusnminus12 ǫG

(

x+1

4t

nminus1sum

i=1

y2i ~y

2t

)

(46)

where

G(ξ ~η) =1

2nπn+12

int

R

dk1|k1|nminus12 u0 (k1 ~ηk1) exp

[

ık1ξ minus ı(nminus 1)π

4sgn(k1)

]

(47)in the space-time region

(xminus ξ)t yit = O(1) i = 1 nminus 1 (48)

on the paraboloid (32) and decays faster outside it Therefore small andlocalized initial data set in the longtime regime (45) governed bythe linear theory on the paraboloid (32)

When nonlinearity becomes relevant ie when t = O(τminus1(ǫminusm)) theasymptotic solution of dKP (mn) is built matching the longtime solution(46)(47) of the linearized Cauchy problem with the exact solution (314)If fi cmn gt 0 the first argument ξ of function G(ξ η) defined in (47) isreplaced by ξminus cminus1

mnumt or equivalently the arbitrary function A(ζ) in (38)

acquires the dependence on the second argument ~η = ~y2t and is identifiedwith G As a result of this matching in the nonlinear regime (42) (43) thesolution reads

u(x ~y t) ≃ uasmn(x ~y t)

uasmn(x ~y t) equiv

tminusnminus12 ǫG

(

x+ 14t

sumnminus1i=1 y2i minus 1

cmnumt ~y

2t

)

cmn gt 0

tminusnminus12 ǫG

(

x+ 14t

sumnminus1i=1 y2i minus umt ln t ~y

2t

)

cmn = 0

(49)with umt = O(1) for cmn gt 0 and umt log t = O(1) for cmn = 0 becominginfinitesimal in the linear regime as it has to be

For cmn lt 0 the solution is described by its linear form (46) thereforewave breaking takes place for the particular values of (mn) described by thecondition

cmn ge 0 hArr m(nminus 1) le 2 (410)

ie forn = 1 n = 2 n = 3forallm m = 1 2 m = 1

(411)

12

For n = 1 forallm uasmn reduces to the general solution of the Riemann equation

(12) [3] The cases (mn) = (2 1) and (mn) = (3 1) the dKP and theKZ equations have been already investigated in [18] and [2] respectivelytherefore in the following section we mainly focus on the case (mn) = (2 2)corresponding to the nonintegrable modified dKP equation (15) and to itsasymptotic solution

u ≃ uas22(x y t) =

1radictǫG

(

x+y2

4tminus u2t ln t

y

2t

)

(412)

comparing the results with the dKP case (mn) = (1 2) investigated in [18]with its asymptotic solution

u ≃ uas12(x y t) =

1radictǫG

(

x+y2

4tminus 2ut

y

2t

)

(413)

Remark 1 The estimate of the first correction to the asymptotics (49)reads

u = uasnm(x ~y t)(1 +O(tminus1)) (414)

Indeed if cmn gt 0 one has

u sim uasnm(x ~y t) +

ǫ1+ m

cmn

tnminus12

H

(

x+1

4t

nminus1sum

i=1

y2i ~y

2t τ

)

(415)

where τ = ǫmτ and H(ξ ~η τ ) is expressed in terms of G(ζ ~η) (ζ is definedin the second of equations (51)) through the PDE

(

Hτ +GmHξ

1 +mGmminus1Gζ τ

)

ξ

+1

4(cmnτ )1+cminus1mn

nminus1sum

j=1

(

Gηj

1 +mGmminus1Gζ τ

)

ηj

= 0 (416)

Since from (43) ǫm

cmn = O(tminus1) equation (415) yields (414) Similarly ifcmn = 0

u sim uasnm(x ~y t) +

ǫ

tn+12

H

(

x+1

4t

nminus1sum

i=1

y2i ~y

2t τ

)

(417)

where H(ξ ~η τ) now solves the PDE

(

H

1 +mGmminus1Gζ τ

)

ξ

=1

4

nminus1sum

j=1

(

Gηj

1 +mGmminus1Gζ τ

)

ηj

(418)

13

Then equation (417) yields equation (414) too

Remark 2 As is was observed in [2] for a gaussian initial condition

u0(x y) = d exp

[

minusx2 + ~y2

4

]

(419)

where d is constant the asymptotic solution can be written in terms of specialfunctions obtaining for G(ξ ~η)

G(ξ ~η) =dradicπ

1

(1+~η2)n+14

[

cos(

π4(nminus 1)

)

Γ(

n+14

)

1F1

(

n+14 12minusY 2

4

)

+ sin(

π4(nminus 1)

)

Γ(

n+34

)

Y 1F1

(

n+34 32minusY 2

4

) ]

(420)

where

Y =ξ

radic

1 + ~η2 (421)

Γ is the Euler gamma function and 1F1 is the Kummer confluent hypergeo-metric function [22 23] For n = 2 and d =

radic2π it yields respectively

G(ξ η) =1

(1+η2)34

[

Γ(

34

)

1F1

(

34 12minusY 2

4

)

+ Y Γ(

54

)

1F1

(

54 32minusY 2

4

)]

(422)

Remark 3 The fact that small data break only when the inequality (410) issatisfied was expected from physical considerations Indeed as already men-tioned in the introduction in equation (11) there are two competing termsthe nonlinear term umux responsible for the steepening of the profile andthe perpu term describing diffraction in the transversal (n minus 1) dimensionalhyperplane (reminiscence through the multiscale expansion leading to (11)of the wave operator) therefore diffraction increases as (nminus 1) increases [2]For small initial data the umux term is initially smaller and smaller increas-ing m and the solution evolves in a linear way for a longer and longer timediffracting transversally through the (nminus1) diffraction channels So diffrac-tion increasing with (n minus 1) acts on a very long time increasing with mbefore the nonlinear regime could become relevant and if (nminus 1) andor mare sufficiently large one expects that the solution would be diffracted awayalmost completely before reaching the nonlinear regime and will not break

14

We have in particular that breaking takes place in the following longtimeregimes (see (43))m = n = 1 (the Riemann equation with quadratic nonlinearity) tb = O(ǫminus1)m = 1 n = 2 (the dKP equation) tb = O(ǫminus2)m = 1 n = 3 (the KZ equation) tb = O(eǫ

minus1)

m = 2 n = 1 (the Riemann equation with cubic nonlinearity) tb = O(ǫminus2)m = 2 n = 2 (the mdKP equation) O(tb = eǫ

minus2)

It is interesting to remark that as it was observed in [2] if m = 1 (thephysically more relevant case) wave breaking takes place only for n le 3 iein physical space

We end this section remarking that also in the longtime behaviour of thesolutions of the small data Cauchy problem for equation (11) the depen-dence of the solution u on x as in the case of the exact solutions (314) isnot consistent with the formal ansatz recently made in [20]

5 Analytic aspects of the wave breaking

In this section we use the longtime behavior of solutions of the small dataCauchy problem for dKP (mn) to show explicitly the analytic aspects ofthe solution in the neighbourhood of the breaking time in terms of the initialdata represented by function G defined in (47) as it was already done in[18 2]

Choosing cmn ge 0 we rewrite equation (49) in the characteristic form

q sim ǫG(ζ ~η)ξ = ǫmF (ζ ~ηm)τ + ζ F (ζ ~ηm) equiv Gm(ζ ~η)

(51)

where

q = utnminus12 ξ = x+

1

4t

nminus1sum

j=1

y2j ~η =~y

2t(52)

and

τ(t) =

1cmn

tcmn if cmn gt 0

ln t if cmn = 0(53)

One solves the second of equations (51) with respect to the parameterζ obtaining ζ(ξ ~η τ) and replaces it into the first to obtain the solutionq sim ǫG(ζ(ξ ~η τ) ~η) The inversion of the second of equations (51) is possibleiff its ζ-derivative is different from zero Therefore the singularity manifold

15

(SM) of the solution is the n - dimensional manifold characterized by theequation

S(ζ ~η τ) equiv 1 + ǫmFζ(ζ ~ηm)τ = 0 rArr τ = minus 1

ǫmFζ(ζ ~ηm) (54)

Sincenabla(ξ~η)q =

ǫnabla(ζ~η)G(ζ~η)

1+ǫmFζ(ζ~ηm)τ (55)

the slope of the localized wave becomes infinity (the so-called gradient catas-trophe) on the SM and the n-dimensional wave ldquobreaksrdquo except on the di-

rection represented by the vector field V =nminus1sum

i=1

partηi +mǫmGmminus1(nminus1sum

i=1

Gηi)partξ [2]

[19] on which

V q = ǫ

nminus1sum

i=1

Gηi (56)

Since the KZ case (mn) = (1 3) has been studied in detail in [2] in thefollowing we mainly concentrate on the mdKP case (mn) = (2 2) and wecompare it with the dKP case (mn) = (1 2) investigated in [18]

From (54) the first breaking time τb and the corresponding characteristic

parameters ~ζb = (ζb ηb) are defined by the global minimum of a function ofthe 2 variables (ζ η)

τb = minus 1

ǫmFζ(ζb ηbm)= inf

(

minus 1

ǫmFζ(ζ ηm)

)

gt 0 (57)

and it is characterized together with the condition Fζ(~ζbm) lt 0 by thefollowing equations

Fζζ(~ζbm) = Fζη(~ζbm) = 0

α equiv Fζζζ(~ζbm)Fζηη(~ζbm)minus F 2ζζη(

~ζbm) gt 0 Fζζζ(~ζbm) gt 0(58)

The corresponding point at which the first wave breaking takes place is from(51) ~ξb = (ξb ηb) isin R

2 where

ξb = ζb + ǫmF (~ζbm)τb = ζb minusF (~ζbm)

Fζ(~ζbm) (59)

Now we evaluate equations (51) and (54) near breaking in the regime

ξ = ξb + ξprime η = ηb + ηprime τ = τb + τ prime ζ = ζb + ζ prime (510)

16

where ξprime ηprime τ prime ζ prime are small Using (57) - (59) the second of equations (51)becomes at the leading order the following cubic equation in ζ prime

ζ prime3+ a(ηprime)ζ prime

2+ b(ηprime τ)ζ prime minus γX(ξprime ηprime τ) = 0 (511)

where

a(ηprime) =3Fζζη

Fζζζηprime

b(ηprime τ) = 3Fζζζ

[

2Fζ τ + Fζηηηprime2]

X(ξprime ηprime τ ) = ξprime minus ǫF (ζb ηb + ηprime)τ prime minus ǫ [F (ζb ηb + ηprime)minus F ] τb simξprime minus Fη

|Fζ |ηprime minus F

|Fζ | τ minus Fηη

2|Fζ |ηprime2 minus Fη

|Fζ |ηprimeτ minus Fηηη

6|Fζ |ηprime3 γ =

6|Fζ |Fζζζ

(512)

and

τ equiv τ prime

τb=

τ minus τbτb

(513)

corresponding to the maximal balance

|ζ prime| |ηprime| = O(|τ |12) |X| = O(|τ |32) (514)

In (512) and in the rest of this section G F = Gm and all their partialderivatives whose arguments are not indicated are meant to be evaluated at~ζb = (ζb ηb)

The three roots of the cubic are given by the well-known Cardano-Tartagliaformula

ζ prime0 (ξprime ~ηprime τ) = minusa

3+ (A+)

13 + (Aminus)

13

ζ primeplusmn (ξprime ~ηprime τ) = minusa3minus 1

2

(

(A+)13 + (Aminus)

13

)

plusmnradic32i(

(A+)13 minus (Aminus)

13

)

(515)where

Aplusmn = Rplusmnradic∆ (516)

and the discriminant ∆ reads

∆ = R2 +Q3 (517)

withQ(ηprime τ ) = 3bminusa2

9= minus2|Fζ |

Fζζζτ + α

F 2ζζζ

ηprime2

R(ξprime ηprime τ) = γ2X(ξprime ηprime τ ) + ab

18+ a

3Q(ηprime τ)

(518)

17

At the same order function S in (54) becomes

S(ζ prime ηprime τ ) = minusτ + 12|Fζ |

[

Fζζζζprime2 + 2Fζζηζ

primeηprime + Fζηηηprime2]

=

Fζζζ

2|Fζ |

(

Q(ηprime τ ) +(

ζ prime +Fζζη

Fζζζηprime)2)

(519)

Known ζ prime as function of (ξprime ηprime τ) from the cubic (511) the solution q andits gradient are then approximated near breaking by the formulae

q(ξ η τ) sim ǫG(ζb + ζ prime ηb + ηprime) = ǫ (G+Gζζprime +Gηη

prime +O(|τ |)) nabla(ξη)q sim ǫ

nabla(ζprimeηprime)G(ζb+ζprimeηb+ηprime)

S(ζprimeηprimeτ) (520)

Before breaking

Before breaking τ lt τb (τ lt 0) the coefficient Q in (518) is strictlypositive (see the second of (58)) then the discriminant ∆ = R2 + Q3 isalso strictly positive and only the root ζ prime0 is real Correspondingly the realsolution q is single valued and described by Cardanorsquos formula and by (520)In addition function S in (519) is also strictly positive and nabla(ξ~η)q is finiteforall ξ η

To have a more explicit solution than that provided by Cardanorsquos formulawe first restrict the asymptotic region to a narrower area so that the cubic(511) reduces to the linear equation bζ prime = γX and X contains only linearterms This is achieved choosing

ηprime = O(τ r) X = O(τ p+1) 12lt p lt p+1

2lt r lt p+ 1 (521)

implying

ζ prime = O(τ p)

X = ξprime + Fη

Fζηprime + F

Fζτ + o(τ p+1) = ξprime + Gη

Gζηprime + G

mGζτ + o(τ p+1)

bζ prime = γX rArr ζ prime sim minus 1τ

(

ξprime + Gη

Gζηprime + G

mGζτ)

(522)

Then

q = ǫG(ζb + ζ prime ηb + ηprime) sim ǫG + ǫGζζprime sim ǫ

(

1minus 1

m

)

Gminus ǫGζ

τ

(

ξprime +Gη

Gζηprime)

(523)

18

Since q sim ǫG and recalling the definitions (57)(513) it follows that q isdescribed by the exact similarity solution

q sim(

ξ + (GηGζ)ηprime

τ prime

)1m

(524)

of equation (37)The cubic simplifies also in the asymptotic region in which ξprime ηprime are of

the same order while τ prime le O(|ηprime|) reducing to ζ prime3 = γX so that the solutionq and its gradient are

q sim ǫG(ζb +3radic

γX(ξprime ηprime τ) ηb + ηprime) (525)

nablaξηq sim3radicγ

3

ǫnablaζηG3radic

X2(ξprime ηprime τ ) (526)

At breaking

When τ = τb the singularity manifold S (519) is positive everywhere inthe (ξ η) plane except at the breaking point (ξb ηb) in which it is zerotogether with Q R and the discriminant ∆ The solution q is well describedagain by Cardanorsquos formula and by (520) To have a more explicit solutionthan that provided by Cardanorsquos formula we choose ξprime ηprime of the same orderthe cubic (511) reduces to ζ prime3 = γX and equations (525) become

q sim ǫG(ζb +3radic

γX(ξprime ηprime 0) ηb + ηprime)

nablaξηq sim 3radicγ

3

ǫnablaξηG3radic

X2(ξprimeηprime0)

(527)

The expression of Xb(ξprime ~ηprime) equiv X(ξprime ~ηprime 0) is given in (512) Xb(ξ

prime ηprime) simξprime minus Fη

|Fζ |ηprime if ξprime prop ηprime but ξprime 6= (FηFζ)η

prime while X(ξprime ηprime 0) = minus Fηη

2|Fζ |ηprime2 if

ξprime = (FηFζ)ηprime

Equation (527) implies that all the derivatives of q blow up at τ = τb in

the breaking point (ξb ηb) with the universal lawXminus23b except the derivative

along the transversal line Xb(ξprime ηprime 0) = 0 represented by the vector field

V = partη minusXbηpartξ (compare with (56)) for which [2 19]

V q|(ξbηb) = ǫGη (528)

After breaking I the overturning profile

19

After breaking the solution becomes three-valued in a compact regionof the (ξ η) - plane (see Figures 3) and in general does not describe anyphysics nevertheless a detailed study of the multivalued region is importantin view of a proper regularization of the models

If τ gt τb (τ gt 0) in the regime (514) the SM equation S = 0

2|Fζ|τ = Fζζζζprime2 + 2Fζζηζ

primeηprime + Fζηηηprime2 (529)

describes an ellipsoidal paraboloid in the (ζ prime ηprime τ) space with minimum at

the breaking point (~ξb τb)One can check that eliminating ζ prime from equations (529) and (511) one

obtains the SM equation in space-time coordinates coinciding with the equa-tion ∆ = R2+Q3 = 0 where ∆ is the discriminant (517) of the cubic (511)and Q and R are defined in (518) Such equation can be satisfied only ifQ le 0 ie only if

|ηprime| le ηprimecusp(τ) (530)

where

ηprimecusp(τ ) equivradic

2|Fζ |Fζζζ

α

radicτ (531)

and is given by the following analytic and universal expression

ξprime minus Fη

|Fζ |ηprime minus F

|Fζ | τ minus Fηη

2|Fζ |ηprime2 minus

(

Fη

|Fζ | +Fζζη

Fζζζ

)

ηprimeτ + 16|Fζ |F 2

ζζζ

[

minus FηηηF2ζζζ

+Fζζη(3FζζζFζηη minus 2F 2ζζη)]

ηprime32

= α3

9F 2ζ F

4ζζζ

(

(

ηprimecusp(τ))2 minus ηprime2

)3

(532)Equation (532) describes a closed curve with two cusps in the (ξ η) - planeat the points

~ξplusmncusp(τ ) = (ξb ηb) + (ξplusmnprime

cusp(τ )plusmnηprimecusp(τ)) (533)

where

ξplusmnprime

cusp(τ ) sim plusmnFη

radic

2Fζζζ

α|Fζ|radicτ +

(

F

|Fζ |+

FηηFζζζ

α

)

τ plusmn Bτ 32 (534)

where B = O(1) (see Figures 6 for dKP and 7 for mdKP) corresponding tothe conditions Q = R = 0 on which the three real solutions of the cubiccoincide (in 1 + 1 dimensions it is not possible to have three coincidentsolutions)

ζ0 = ζplusmn = minusFζζη

Fζζζηprime rArr q0 = qplusmn =sim ǫ

(

G+ (Gη minusGζFζζη

Fζζζ)ηprime)

(535)

20

On the remaining part of the closed curve ∆ = 0 two of the three realbranches coincide Outside the closed curve ∆ gt 0 and the real solution q issingle valued inside the closed curve ∆ lt 0 and the real solution q is threevalued with the three branches

q = ǫG(ζb + ζ prime ηb + ηprime) sim ǫ(G +Gζζprime +Gηη

prime +O(τ)) (536)

where ζ prime are the three real solutions of the cubic (511) (see fi Figures 2for dKP)

Figures 2 Plotting of the dKP analytic solution in the (q ξ η τ) variablesfor G given by (422) ǫ = 02 at times τ = 0 τb minus 2 τb τb + 2 whereτb = 657

Such a three-valued region of the (ξ η) plane is characterized by the

21

conditions|ηprime| lt ηprimecusp(τ) ξminusM(ηprime τ) lt ξprime lt ξ+M(ηprime τ) (537)

where

ξplusmnM(ηprime τ) equiv Fη

|Fζ |ηprime + F

|Fζ | τ + Fηη

2|Fζ |ηprime2 +

(

Fη

|Fζ | +Fζζη

Fζζζ

)

ηprimeτ minus 16|Fζ |F 2

ζζζ

[

minus FηηηF2ζζζ

+Fζζη(3FζζζFζηη minus 2F 2ζζη)]

ηprime3 plusmn Fζζζ

3|Fζ | |Q| 32(538)

(see Figures 3 for dKP)Since

∆ξ equiv ξ+M(ηprime τ)minus ξminusM(ηprime τ) =2Fζζζ

3|Fζ||Q(ηprime τ)|32 le 4

radic2

3

radic

|Fζ|Fζζζ

τ 32 (539)

we infer that the longitudinal width of the multivalued region is O(τ 32) thetransversal widths delimited by the two cusps is instead O(τ 12) thereforethe multivalued region develops at τ = τb from the breaking point (ξb ηb)with an infinite speed in the tranversal direction and with zero speed in thelongitudinal direction All these results are a common feature to the class ofdynamics (11) (see the previously derived results for the dKP equation forfinite times [18 19] and in the longtime regime [18] and those for the KZequation in the longtime regime [2])

-15-10-050005101-15-10-0500051015

-15-10-050005101-15-10-0500051015

Figures 3 Plotting of the three valued regions of the (ξ η) plane for dKPat times τ = 02 05 for G given by (422) and ǫ = 02 The center of thesquare frame is the breaking point (ξb ηb) Notice that the two cusps havethe same ξ coordinate ξ+cusp(τ) sim ξminuscusp(τ) since for solution (422) Gη = 0(see (531)(534))

22

We end this subsection remarking that as it was already observed in [19]since dKP (mn) is symmetric wrt y if the initial datum is also symmetricwrt y like the Gaussian (419) also its evolution will be so u(x y t) =u(xminusy t) This implies that ηb = yb = 0 and that all partial derivatives ofF and G containing an odd number of η derivatives are 0 at breaking As aconsequence the transversal direction on which the derivative of the profiledoes not blow up is the η (y) direction and on it the derivative is 0 atbreaking (see (56))

After breaking II the discontinuous shock

Using the matching rules of sect3 the shock formulae (310) become

parts

partτ=

ǫm

m+ 1

Gm+1(ζ1 η)minusGm+1(ζ2 η)

G(ζ1 η)minusG(ζ2 η) (540)

s = ζ1 + ǫmGm(ζ1 η) τ = ζ2 + ǫmGm(ζ2 η) τ (541)

where subscript 2 is for values behind the shock and subscript 1 for valuesahead Equations (541) are two implicit equations for ζ1 and ζ2 solvingthese equations yields ζ1(s η τ) ζ2(s η τ) and substituting these expres-sions in (540) it results in a nonlinear first order differential equation fors This equation and the initial conditions (311) give uniquely s(η τ) andconsequently ζ12(η τ) = ζ12(s(η τ) η τ)

We recall that immediately after breaking and if (530) holds equation(541) reduces to the cubic (511)(512) in which ξprime must be replaced by sprimepossessing three real roots where

sprime(ηprime τ) = sminus ξb (542)

Therefore the values of ζ1 and ζ2 are chosen among the three solutions (515)so that q2 = ǫG(ζb + ζ prime2 η) has the maximum value and q1 = ǫG(ζb + ζ prime1 η)the minimum one among the three branches of q Since Gζ lt 0 it followsthat

ζ1 = maxζ prime0 ζ primeplusmn ζ2 = minζ prime0 ζ primeplusmn (543)

To identify ζ12 with one of the three roots ζ prime0 ζprimeplusmn let us rewrite them as

follows

ζ prime0 = minusa

3+ 2 3

radicρ cos

(

θ

3

)

(544)

ζ prime+ = minusa

3minus 3

radicρ

(

cos

(

θ

3

)

+radic3 sin

(

θ

3

))

(545)

23

ζ primeminus = minusa

3minus 3

radicρ

(

cos

(

θ

3

)

minusradic3 sin

(

θ

3

))

(546)

where

ρ =radic

R2 + |∆| θ = arctan

(

radic

|∆|R

)

(547)

We observe that for 0 le θ le π the following inequalities hold

minus cos

(

θ

3

)

minusradic3 sin

(

θ

3

)

le minus cos

(

θ

3

)

+radic3 sin

(

θ

3

)

le 2 cos

(

θ

3

)

so that

ζ prime+ le ζ primeminus le ζ prime0 rArr q(ζb + ζ prime0 η) le q(ζb + ζ primeminus η) le q(ζb + ζ prime+ η) (548)

for q decreasing in ζ Hence

ζ prime1(sprime ηprime τ prime) = ζ prime0(s

prime ηprime τ prime) ζ prime2(sprime ηprime τ prime) = ζ prime+(s

prime ηprime τ prime) (549)

Then (540) reduces to the equations

dsprime

dτ+ G

Gζ+ Gη

Gζηprime + 1

2

[

ζ prime0(sprime ηprime τ ) + ζ prime+(s

prime ηprime τ)]

= 0 for dKPdsprime

dτ+ G

2Gζ+ Gη

Gζηprime + 1

2

[

ζ prime0(sprime ηprime τ) + ζ prime+(s

prime ηprime τ)]

= 0 for mdKP

sprime(0) = ξb

(550)

obtained expanding (540) near the breaking point and recalling that τ equivτ primeτb

We remark that in the differential equations (550) sprime depends on ηprime

parametrically So the discontinuous (dissipative) shocks of the longtime so-lutions of the small data Cauchy problems for dKP and mdKP has a simplegeometric construction given τ gt 0 for any fixed |ηprime| le ηcusp the overturn-ing profile in the (ξ q) plane is intercepted by a vertical straight line cuttingoff equal area lobi in analogy with the 1 + 1 dimensional case

Going back to the dKP variables

The above formulae written in the convenient variables q ξ η τ are es-sentially the same for both dKP and mdKP relevant differences appear whenwe go back to the original variables u x y t inverting equations (52)(53)

u = 1radictq t = τ2

4 y = ητ2

2 x = ξ minus η2τ2

4 for dKP

u = 1radictq t = eτ y = 2ηeτ x = ξ minus η2eτ for mdKP

(551)

24

and all the above universal formulae are easily transfered to the dKP (mn)equations In particular small and localized initial data break i) at tb =τ 2b 4 in the point (xb yb) = (ξb minus τ 2b η

2b4 ηbτ

2b 2) of the parabolic wave front

x+ y2(4tb) = ξb evolving according to dKP and ii) at tb = eτb in the point(xb yb) = (ξb minus η2be

τb 2ηbeτb) of the parabolic wave front x + y2(4tb) = ξb

evolving according to mdKP If for instance we use the same Gaussian initialcondition (419) for both dKP and mdKP with ǫ = 02 then G is given by(422) in both cases Consequently for dKP

ζb = 196 ηb = 0 ξb = 327 τb = 657 (552)

and wave breaking takes place at tb = 108 in the point (xb yb) = (327 0)on the parabola x+ 231 middot 10minus2y2 = 327 (see Figure 4)

Figure 4 Plotting of the analytic dKP solution u in the physical variablesx y t for G given by (422) (corresponding to the gaussian initial condition)ǫ = 02 at breaking

For mdKP

ζb = 161 ηb = 0 ξb = 251 τb = 1431 (553)

and wave breaking takes place at tb = 164middot106 in the point (xb yb) = (251 0)on the parabola x + 152 middot 10minus7y2 = 251 and at breaking the amplitude ofthe wave is u = ǫtb

minus12G(ζb ηb) = 195 middot 10minus4 (see Figure 5)

25

Figure 5 Plotting of the analytic mdKP solution u in the physical variablesx y t for G given by (422) (corresponding to the gaussian initial condition)ǫ = 02 at breaking

Since in the mdKP case tb is very large and the wave amplitude atbreaking is very small we wonder if such a wave breaking could be actuallydetected numerically

Now we go into the analytic details For the dKP case

tprime equiv tminus tb sim 2tbτ yprime = y minus yb ≃ 2tb(ηprime + 2ηbτ + 2ηprimeτ )

xprime = xminus xb sim ξprime minus ηbyprime minus yprime2

4tb+ η2b t

prime + ηbtbyprimetprime

(554)

and we choose τ prime to be sufficiently small to have |tprime| |yprime| ≪ 1The dKP solution reads

u(x y t) =ǫradictG(ζb + ζ prime ηb + ηprime) =

ǫradict

(

G+Gζζprime +Gη

yprime

2tb+O

(

tprime

tb

))

(555)where ζ prime is the solution of the cubic (511) with

a =3Fζζη

2Fζζζ

yprime

tb b = 3

Fζζζ

(

Fζtprime

tb+ Fζηη

yprime2

4t2b

)

X = xprime +(

ηb minus Fη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime minus[

η2b +(

F2minus ηbFη

)

1|Fζ |tb

]

tprime

+(

1minus Fηη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime2

4tb+[

minusηb +(

Fη

2+ ηbFηη

)

12|Fζ |tb

]

yprimetprime

tb

minus Fηηη

48|Fζ |yprime3

t3b

(556)

26

The three-valued region (532) after breaking becomes

xprime +(

ηb minus Fη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime minus[

η2b +(

F2minus ηbFη

)

1|Fζ |tb

]

tprime

+(

1minus Fηη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime2

4tb+[

minusηb +(

Fη

2|Fζ |tb +ηbFηη

|Fζ | minus Fζζη

2Fζζζ

)

12tb

]

yprimetprime

tb

+ 16|Fζ |F 2

ζζζ

[

minus FηηηF2ζζζ + Fζζη(3FζζζFζηη minus 2F 2

ζζη)]

yprime3

8t3b

2

=

α3

9middot64F 2ζF 4ζζζ

t6b

(

(

yprimecusp(tprime))2 minus yprime2

)3

(557)

where

yprimecusp(tprime) = 2

radic

|Fζ |Fζζζ

α

radictbtprime (558)

Equation (557) describes a closed curve with two cusps in the (x y) - planeat the points

~xplusmncusp(t

prime) = (xb yb) + (xplusmnprime

cusp(tprime)plusmnyprimecusp(t

prime)) (559)

where

xplusmnprime

cusp(tprime) sim ∓2ηb

radic

|Fζ |Fζζζ

α

radictbtprime plusmn Fη

radic

Fζζζ

α|Fζ |

radic

tprime

tb

+(

η2b minus|Fζ |Fζζζ

α

)

tprime +(

F|Fζ | +

FηηFζζζ

α

)

tprime

2tbplusmn 2ηb

radic

|Fζ |Fζζζ

αtprime

32radictb+O(τ 32)

(560)At last the analogue of (539) reads

∆xprime le 2

3

radic

|Fζ|Fζζζ

(

tprime

tb

)32

(561)

it follows that the longitudinal width ∆long and the transversal width ∆transv

of the multivalued region are respectively

∆long = O

(

(

tprime

tb

)32

)

∆transv = O(

(tbtprime)

12

)

rArr ∆long

∆transv= O

(

tprime

t2b

)

(562)

For the mdKP case

tprime = tminus tb sim tbτprime yprime = y minus yb sim 2tb(η

prime + ηbtprime

tb+ ηprimetprime

tb)

xprime = xminus xb sim ξprime minus ηbyprime + η2b t

prime minus yprime2

4tb+ ηb

yprimetprime

tb

(563)

27

and we choose τ prime sufficiently small to have |tprime| |yprime| ≪ 1The mdKP solution reads

u(x y t) =ǫradictG(ζb+ζ prime ηb+ηprime) =

ǫradict

(

G+Gζζprime +Gη

yprime

2tb+O

(

tprime

tb log tb

))

(564)where ζ prime is the solution of the cubic (511) with

a =3Fζζη

2Fζζζ

yprime

tb b = 3

Fζζζ

(

2Fζtprime

tb log tb+ Fζηη

yprime2

4t2b

)

X = xprime +(

ηb minus Fη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime minus[

η2b +(

Flog tb

minus ηbFη

)

1|Fζ |tb

]

tprime

+(

1minus Fηη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime2

4tb+[

minusηb +(

Fη

|Fζ |(1minus1

log tb) + ηbFηη

|Fζ |

)

12tb

]

yprimetprime

tb

minus Fηηη

48|Fζ |yprime3

t3b

(565)

The three-valued region (532) after breaking becomes

xprime +(

ηb minus Fη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime minus[

η2b +(

Flog tb

minus ηbFη

)

1|Fζ |tb

]

tprime

+(

1minus Fηη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime2

4tb+[

minusηb +(

Fη

|Fζ |(1minus1

log tb) + ηbFηη

|Fζ| minus Fζζη

Fζζζ log tb

)

12tb

]

yprimetprime

tb

+ 16|Fζ |F 2

ζζζ

[

minus FηηηF2ζζζ + Fζζη(3FζζζFζηη minus 2F 2

ζζη)]

yprime3

8t3b

2

=

α3

9middot64F 2ζ F

4ζζζt

6b

(

(

yprimecusp(tprime))2 minus yprime2

)3

(566)where

yprimecusp(tprime) = 2

radic

2|Fζ |Fζζζ

α

radic

tbtprime

log tb (567)

Equation (566) describes a closed curve with two cusps in the (x y) - planeat the points

~xplusmncusp(t

prime) = (xb yb) + (xplusmnprime

cusp(tprime)plusmnyprimecusp(t

prime)) (568)

where

xplusmnprime

cusp(tprime) sim ∓2ηb

radic

|Fζ |Fζζζ

α

radic

tbtprime

log tbplusmn Fη

radic

Fζζζ

α|Fζ |

radic

tprime

tb log tb

+(

η2b minus|Fζ |Fζζζ

α log tb

)

tprime +(

F|Fζ | +

FηηFζζζ

α

)

tprime

tb log tbplusmn 2ηb

radic

|Fζ |Fζζζ

αtprime

32radic

tb log tb

+O(τ 32)

(569)

28

At last the analogue of (539) reads

∆xprime le 4radic2

3

radic

|Fζ |Fζζζ

(

tprime

tb log tb

)32

(570)

it follows that the longitudinal width ∆long and the transversal width ∆transv

of the multivalued region are respectively

∆long = O

(

(

tprime

tb log tb

)32

)

∆transv = O

(

(

tbtprime

log tb

)12

)

rArr ∆long

∆transv= O

(

tprime

t2blog tb

)

(571)

References

[1] F Santucci Onde debolmente non lineari e quasi unidimensionali in

Natura La rottura di tali onde e il problema della regolarizzazione dis-

sipativa Tesi della Laurea Specialistica in Fisica supervisor P M San-tini Dipartimento di Fisica dellrsquoUniversita di Roma ldquoLa Sapienzardquo AA2011-2012

[2] S V Manakov and P M Santini On the dispersionless Kadomtsev-Petviashvili equation in n + 1 dimensions exact solutions the Cauchyproblem for small initial data and wave breaking J Phys A MathTheor 44 (2011) 405203

[3] G B Whitham Linear and nonlinear waves John Wiley amp Sons 1974

[4] C Lin E Reissner and H S Tien On two-dimensional nonsteadymotion of a slender body in a compressible fluid J Math Phys 27(1948) 220-231

[5] R Timman Unsteady motion in transonic flow Symposium Transson-icum Aachen 1962 EdKOswatitsch Springer 394-401

[6] E A Zobolotskaya and R V Khokhlov Quasi-plane waves in the non-linear acoustics of confined beams Soviet Physics- Acoustics Vol15N1 (1969)

29

[7] B B Kadomtsev and V I Petviashvili On the stability of solitarywaves in weakly dispersing media Soviet Physics-Doklady Vol15 N6(1970)

[8] X P Wang M J Ablowitz and H Segur Wave collapse and instabil-

ity of solitary waves of a generalized Kadomtsev-Petviashvili equationPhysica D 78 (1994) 241-265

[9] M J Ablowitz and H Segur Solitons and the Inverse Scattering Trans-

form SIAM Philadelphia 1981

[10] M J Ablowitz and P A Clarkson Solitons nonlinear evolution equa-

tions and inverse scattering Cambridge University Press 1991

[11] S Turitsyn and G Falkovitch Stability of magneto-elastic solitons andself-focusing of sound in antiferromagnets Sov Phys J Exp TheorPhys 62 (1985) 146-152

[12] S Novikov S V Manakov L P Pitaevskii V E Zakharov Theory of

solitons Consultant Bureau 1984

[13] S V Manakov and P M Santini Inverse scattering problem for vectorfields and the heavenly equation httparXivnlinSI0512043

[14] S V Manakov and P M Santini Inverse scattering problem forvector fields and the Cauchy problem for the heavenly equationPhys Lett A 359 613-619 (2006) doi101016jphysleta200607011httparXivnlinSI0604017

[15] S V Manakov and P M Santini The Cauchy problem on theplane for the dispersionless Kadomtsev-Petviashvili equation JETPLetters 83 No 10 462-466 (2006) 101134S0021364006100080httparXivnlinSI0604016

[16] P G Grinevich P M Santini and D Wu The Cauchy problem for thePavlov equation Nonlinearity 28 (2015) 3709-3754 doi1010880951-771528113709 Preprint arXiv13105834v2

[17] M V Pavlov Integrable hydrodynamic chains J Math Phys 44 (2003)4134-4156

30

α β are real constants and the coefficient cmn is defined in (18) transforms(34) into the Riemann equation (12) in the variables (ξ τ)

qτ + qmqξ = 0 (37)

We recall [3] that (37) has the general implicit solution

q = A(ζ) ζ = ξ minusAm(ζ)τ hArr q = A(ξ minus qmτ) (38)

where A is an arbitrary differentiable function of one argument If in par-ticular A describes a localized positive hump the solution breaks first atτ = τb on the characteristic ζb where

τb = min ζ

(

minus 1

mAmminus1(ζ)Aprime(ζ)

)

= minus 1

mAmminus1(ζb)Aprime(ζb)gt 0 (39)

For τ gt τb the solution becomes multivalued and not acceptable in manyphysical contexts Alternatively for τ gt τb the regular multivalued solutioncan be replaced by a weak solution a single valued discontinuous shockof dissipative nature whose wave front discontinuity s(τ) is described byequations [3]

dsdτ

= 1m+1

Am+1(ζ1)minusAm+1(ζ2)A(ζ1)minusA(ζ2)

s = ζ1 + Am(ζ1)τ = ζ2 + Am(ζ2)τ

(310)

with the initial conditions

s(τb) = ξb ζ1(τb) = ζ2(τb) = ζb (311)

Behind and ahead the shock the solution is given by

q =

q2 = A(ζ2) if ξ lt s(τ)q1 = A(ζ1) if ξ gt s(τ)

(312)

where q2 and q1 are respectively the maximum and the minimum among the(three in the case of a single hump) branches of the implicit equations (38)

We remark that τ(t) in (36) is a monotonically increasing function of tto have it positive we choose the constants α β and the t-intervals as follows

τ(t) =

1cmn

tcmn t gt 0 if cmn gt 0

ln t t gt 1 if cmn = 01

|cmn|

(

tminus|cmn|0 minus tminus|cmn|

)

t gt t0 if cmn lt 0

(313)

8

Recalling (33) (35) and (313) the exact solutions of dKP (mn) in theoriginal variables corresponding to (38) read

u =

tminusnminus12 A

(

x+ 14t

sumnminus1i=1 y2i minus 1

cmnumt)

t gt 0 if cmn gt 0

tminusnminus12 A

(

x+ 14t

sumnminus1i=1 y2i minus umt ln t

)

t gt 1 if cmn = 0

tminusnminus12 A

(

x+ 14t

sumnminus1i=1 y2i minus 1

|cmn|umt

(

(

tt0

)|cmn|minus 1

))

t gt t0 if cmn lt 0

(314)where cmn is defined in (18)

If again A is a localized hump (314) describes a wave constant onthe paraboloidal wave front (32) and simultaneously breaking on it Moreprecisely the solution breaks at time tb defined by

tb =

(cmnτb)1cmn if cmn gt 0

eτb if cmn = 0(315)

on the paraboloid

x+1

4t

nminus1sum

i=1

y2i = ζb + Am(ζb)τb (316)

where τb ζb are defined in (39) (see Figures 1)

Figures 1 Plotting of the exact solution of the mdKP equation (15) (c22 =0) before at and after breaking Here we have chosen A(x) = eminusx2

conse-quently ζb = 12 τb =

radice2 tb = e

radice2

If cmn lt 0 τ(t) rarr τ(infin) equiv |cmn|minus1tminus|cmn|0 as t rarr infin and the wave

freezes asymptotically If tminus|cmn|0 gt τb|cmn| then τ(infin) gt τb and the wave

breaks before freezing at

tb =(

tminus|cmn|0 minus τb|cmn|

)minus1|cmn| (317)

9

on the paraboloid (316) If instead tminus|cmn|0 lt τb|cmn| then τ(infin) lt τb and

no breaking takes place before the wave freezesIf n = 1 forallm (314) reduces to the general solution u = A(xminusumt) of the

Riemann equation (12) if m = 1 foralln (314) reduces to the class of particu-lar solutions of the dKP equation with quadratic nonlinearity and arbitrarydimensions (dKP (1 n)) constructed in [2] It is interesting to remark thatthis type of exact solutions was first derived for the integrable dKP equation(13) using its nonlinear Riemnann - Hilbert inverse problem [21]

After breaking t gt tb the regular multivalued solutions (314) can bereplaced by the discontinuous single valued solutions of dKP (mn) obtainedusing (33) (35) and (313) in (310) (311) (312) More precisely fort gt tb where tb is defined in (315) and (317) the dKP (mn) solutiondescribed by (314) for t lt tb develops a discontinuous shock on the parabola

x+ y2

4t= S(t) S(t) equiv s(τ(t)) (318)

where s(τ) is characterized by equations (310) (311) and τ(t) is defined in(313) Behind and ahead the shock the solution is given by

u =

u2(x ~y t) if x+ y4

4tlt S(t)

u1(x ~y t) if x+ y4

4tgt S(t)

(319)

where u2 and u1 are respectively the maximum and the minimum among the(three in the case of a localized bump) branches u12 = tminus(nminus1)2A(ζ12) ofthe implicit equations (314)

We end this section remarking that as already mentioned in sect1 in theabove class of exact solutions of (11) the dependences of u on x throughthe combinations x minus cminus1

mnumt (if cmn gt 0) x minus umt log t (if cmn = 0) and

xminus|cmn|minus1umt[(tt0)|cmn|minus1] if cmn lt 0 are not consistent with the formal

dependence x minus umt recently postulated to study the breaking features ofdKP (m 2) in [20]

4 The Cauchy problem for small and local-

ized initial data and longtime wave break-

ing

In analogy with [2] now we use the exact solutions of the previous sectionto construct the longtime behaviour of solutions of the Cauchy problem of

10

(11) for small and localized initial data showing in particular that smalland localized initial data evolving according to (11) break in thelongtime regime only if m(nminus 1) le 2 (cmn ge 0)

For small and localized initial data of the type

u(x ~y 0) = ǫu0(x ~y) 0 lt ǫ ≪ 1 (41)

evolving according to equation (11) the behavior of the solution may beapproximated by the solution of the linearized dKP (mn) equation untilnonlinearity becomes relevant

For O(ǫ) initial data equations (37)(39) imply that the breaking timeis

τb = O(ǫminusm) ≫ 1 (42)

so the nonlinear regime for dKP (mn) is characterized by the condition

t = O(

τminus1(ǫminusm))

=

O(

ǫminus m

cmn

)

cmn gt 0

O(

eǫminusm)

cmn = 0(43)

where τminus1(middot) is the inverse of (36) while for cmn lt 0 large values of t arenot compatible with (42) and a nonlinear regime never occurs

So for t ≪ τminus1(ǫminusm) the solution of the Cauchy problem is approximatedby the solution of the linearized dKP (mn) equation while for t sim τminus1(ǫminusm)a matching will be made between the linearized solution and the exact solu-tion (314)

In the linear regime when 0 lt t ≪ O(τminus1(ǫminusm)) the dKP (mn) solutionis well described by that of the linearized dKP (mn) ie

u(x ~y t) sim ǫ

(2π)n

int

Rn

u0(k1 ~kperp) exp

[

ı(k1x+ ~kperp middot ~y minus k2perpk1

t)

]

dk1d~kperp (44)

where

u0(k1 ~kperp) =

int

Rn

u0(x ~y) exp[

minusı(k1x+ ~kperp middot ~y)]

dxd~y

In the longtime regime

1 ≪ t ≪ O(τminus1(ǫminusm)) (45)

11

the multiple integral can be evaluated by the stationary phase method whichgives [2]

u(x ~y t) sim tminusnminus12 ǫG

(

x+1

4t

nminus1sum

i=1

y2i ~y

2t

)

(46)

where

G(ξ ~η) =1

2nπn+12

int

R

dk1|k1|nminus12 u0 (k1 ~ηk1) exp

[

ık1ξ minus ı(nminus 1)π

4sgn(k1)

]

(47)in the space-time region

(xminus ξ)t yit = O(1) i = 1 nminus 1 (48)

on the paraboloid (32) and decays faster outside it Therefore small andlocalized initial data set in the longtime regime (45) governed bythe linear theory on the paraboloid (32)

When nonlinearity becomes relevant ie when t = O(τminus1(ǫminusm)) theasymptotic solution of dKP (mn) is built matching the longtime solution(46)(47) of the linearized Cauchy problem with the exact solution (314)If fi cmn gt 0 the first argument ξ of function G(ξ η) defined in (47) isreplaced by ξminus cminus1

mnumt or equivalently the arbitrary function A(ζ) in (38)

acquires the dependence on the second argument ~η = ~y2t and is identifiedwith G As a result of this matching in the nonlinear regime (42) (43) thesolution reads

u(x ~y t) ≃ uasmn(x ~y t)

uasmn(x ~y t) equiv

tminusnminus12 ǫG

(

x+ 14t

sumnminus1i=1 y2i minus 1

cmnumt ~y

2t

)

cmn gt 0

tminusnminus12 ǫG

(

x+ 14t

sumnminus1i=1 y2i minus umt ln t ~y

2t

)

cmn = 0

(49)with umt = O(1) for cmn gt 0 and umt log t = O(1) for cmn = 0 becominginfinitesimal in the linear regime as it has to be

For cmn lt 0 the solution is described by its linear form (46) thereforewave breaking takes place for the particular values of (mn) described by thecondition

cmn ge 0 hArr m(nminus 1) le 2 (410)

ie forn = 1 n = 2 n = 3forallm m = 1 2 m = 1

(411)

12

For n = 1 forallm uasmn reduces to the general solution of the Riemann equation

(12) [3] The cases (mn) = (2 1) and (mn) = (3 1) the dKP and theKZ equations have been already investigated in [18] and [2] respectivelytherefore in the following section we mainly focus on the case (mn) = (2 2)corresponding to the nonintegrable modified dKP equation (15) and to itsasymptotic solution

u ≃ uas22(x y t) =

1radictǫG

(

x+y2

4tminus u2t ln t

y

2t

)

(412)

comparing the results with the dKP case (mn) = (1 2) investigated in [18]with its asymptotic solution

u ≃ uas12(x y t) =

1radictǫG

(

x+y2

4tminus 2ut

y

2t

)

(413)

Remark 1 The estimate of the first correction to the asymptotics (49)reads

u = uasnm(x ~y t)(1 +O(tminus1)) (414)

Indeed if cmn gt 0 one has

u sim uasnm(x ~y t) +

ǫ1+ m

cmn

tnminus12

H

(

x+1

4t

nminus1sum

i=1

y2i ~y

2t τ

)

(415)

where τ = ǫmτ and H(ξ ~η τ ) is expressed in terms of G(ζ ~η) (ζ is definedin the second of equations (51)) through the PDE

(

Hτ +GmHξ

1 +mGmminus1Gζ τ

)

ξ

+1

4(cmnτ )1+cminus1mn

nminus1sum

j=1

(

Gηj

1 +mGmminus1Gζ τ

)

ηj

= 0 (416)

Since from (43) ǫm

cmn = O(tminus1) equation (415) yields (414) Similarly ifcmn = 0

u sim uasnm(x ~y t) +

ǫ

tn+12

H

(

x+1

4t

nminus1sum

i=1

y2i ~y

2t τ

)

(417)

where H(ξ ~η τ) now solves the PDE

(

H

1 +mGmminus1Gζ τ

)

ξ

=1

4

nminus1sum

j=1

(

Gηj

1 +mGmminus1Gζ τ

)

ηj

(418)

13

Then equation (417) yields equation (414) too

Remark 2 As is was observed in [2] for a gaussian initial condition

u0(x y) = d exp

[

minusx2 + ~y2

4

]

(419)

where d is constant the asymptotic solution can be written in terms of specialfunctions obtaining for G(ξ ~η)

G(ξ ~η) =dradicπ

1

(1+~η2)n+14

[

cos(

π4(nminus 1)

)

Γ(

n+14

)

1F1

(

n+14 12minusY 2

4

)

+ sin(

π4(nminus 1)

)

Γ(

n+34

)

Y 1F1

(

n+34 32minusY 2

4

) ]

(420)

where

Y =ξ

radic

1 + ~η2 (421)

Γ is the Euler gamma function and 1F1 is the Kummer confluent hypergeo-metric function [22 23] For n = 2 and d =

radic2π it yields respectively

G(ξ η) =1

(1+η2)34

[

Γ(

34

)

1F1

(

34 12minusY 2

4

)

+ Y Γ(

54

)

1F1

(

54 32minusY 2

4

)]

(422)

Remark 3 The fact that small data break only when the inequality (410) issatisfied was expected from physical considerations Indeed as already men-tioned in the introduction in equation (11) there are two competing termsthe nonlinear term umux responsible for the steepening of the profile andthe perpu term describing diffraction in the transversal (n minus 1) dimensionalhyperplane (reminiscence through the multiscale expansion leading to (11)of the wave operator) therefore diffraction increases as (nminus 1) increases [2]For small initial data the umux term is initially smaller and smaller increas-ing m and the solution evolves in a linear way for a longer and longer timediffracting transversally through the (nminus1) diffraction channels So diffrac-tion increasing with (n minus 1) acts on a very long time increasing with mbefore the nonlinear regime could become relevant and if (nminus 1) andor mare sufficiently large one expects that the solution would be diffracted awayalmost completely before reaching the nonlinear regime and will not break

14

We have in particular that breaking takes place in the following longtimeregimes (see (43))m = n = 1 (the Riemann equation with quadratic nonlinearity) tb = O(ǫminus1)m = 1 n = 2 (the dKP equation) tb = O(ǫminus2)m = 1 n = 3 (the KZ equation) tb = O(eǫ

minus1)

m = 2 n = 1 (the Riemann equation with cubic nonlinearity) tb = O(ǫminus2)m = 2 n = 2 (the mdKP equation) O(tb = eǫ

minus2)

It is interesting to remark that as it was observed in [2] if m = 1 (thephysically more relevant case) wave breaking takes place only for n le 3 iein physical space

We end this section remarking that also in the longtime behaviour of thesolutions of the small data Cauchy problem for equation (11) the depen-dence of the solution u on x as in the case of the exact solutions (314) isnot consistent with the formal ansatz recently made in [20]

5 Analytic aspects of the wave breaking

In this section we use the longtime behavior of solutions of the small dataCauchy problem for dKP (mn) to show explicitly the analytic aspects ofthe solution in the neighbourhood of the breaking time in terms of the initialdata represented by function G defined in (47) as it was already done in[18 2]

Choosing cmn ge 0 we rewrite equation (49) in the characteristic form

q sim ǫG(ζ ~η)ξ = ǫmF (ζ ~ηm)τ + ζ F (ζ ~ηm) equiv Gm(ζ ~η)

(51)

where

q = utnminus12 ξ = x+

1

4t

nminus1sum

j=1

y2j ~η =~y

2t(52)

and

τ(t) =

1cmn

tcmn if cmn gt 0

ln t if cmn = 0(53)

One solves the second of equations (51) with respect to the parameterζ obtaining ζ(ξ ~η τ) and replaces it into the first to obtain the solutionq sim ǫG(ζ(ξ ~η τ) ~η) The inversion of the second of equations (51) is possibleiff its ζ-derivative is different from zero Therefore the singularity manifold

15

(SM) of the solution is the n - dimensional manifold characterized by theequation

S(ζ ~η τ) equiv 1 + ǫmFζ(ζ ~ηm)τ = 0 rArr τ = minus 1

ǫmFζ(ζ ~ηm) (54)

Sincenabla(ξ~η)q =

ǫnabla(ζ~η)G(ζ~η)

1+ǫmFζ(ζ~ηm)τ (55)

the slope of the localized wave becomes infinity (the so-called gradient catas-trophe) on the SM and the n-dimensional wave ldquobreaksrdquo except on the di-

rection represented by the vector field V =nminus1sum

i=1

partηi +mǫmGmminus1(nminus1sum

i=1

Gηi)partξ [2]

[19] on which

V q = ǫ

nminus1sum

i=1

Gηi (56)

Since the KZ case (mn) = (1 3) has been studied in detail in [2] in thefollowing we mainly concentrate on the mdKP case (mn) = (2 2) and wecompare it with the dKP case (mn) = (1 2) investigated in [18]

From (54) the first breaking time τb and the corresponding characteristic

parameters ~ζb = (ζb ηb) are defined by the global minimum of a function ofthe 2 variables (ζ η)

τb = minus 1

ǫmFζ(ζb ηbm)= inf

(

minus 1

ǫmFζ(ζ ηm)

)

gt 0 (57)

and it is characterized together with the condition Fζ(~ζbm) lt 0 by thefollowing equations

Fζζ(~ζbm) = Fζη(~ζbm) = 0

α equiv Fζζζ(~ζbm)Fζηη(~ζbm)minus F 2ζζη(

~ζbm) gt 0 Fζζζ(~ζbm) gt 0(58)

The corresponding point at which the first wave breaking takes place is from(51) ~ξb = (ξb ηb) isin R

2 where

ξb = ζb + ǫmF (~ζbm)τb = ζb minusF (~ζbm)

Fζ(~ζbm) (59)

Now we evaluate equations (51) and (54) near breaking in the regime

ξ = ξb + ξprime η = ηb + ηprime τ = τb + τ prime ζ = ζb + ζ prime (510)

16

where ξprime ηprime τ prime ζ prime are small Using (57) - (59) the second of equations (51)becomes at the leading order the following cubic equation in ζ prime

ζ prime3+ a(ηprime)ζ prime

2+ b(ηprime τ)ζ prime minus γX(ξprime ηprime τ) = 0 (511)

where

a(ηprime) =3Fζζη

Fζζζηprime

b(ηprime τ) = 3Fζζζ

[

2Fζ τ + Fζηηηprime2]

X(ξprime ηprime τ ) = ξprime minus ǫF (ζb ηb + ηprime)τ prime minus ǫ [F (ζb ηb + ηprime)minus F ] τb simξprime minus Fη

|Fζ |ηprime minus F

|Fζ | τ minus Fηη

2|Fζ |ηprime2 minus Fη

|Fζ |ηprimeτ minus Fηηη

6|Fζ |ηprime3 γ =

6|Fζ |Fζζζ

(512)

and

τ equiv τ prime

τb=

τ minus τbτb

(513)

corresponding to the maximal balance

|ζ prime| |ηprime| = O(|τ |12) |X| = O(|τ |32) (514)

In (512) and in the rest of this section G F = Gm and all their partialderivatives whose arguments are not indicated are meant to be evaluated at~ζb = (ζb ηb)

The three roots of the cubic are given by the well-known Cardano-Tartagliaformula

ζ prime0 (ξprime ~ηprime τ) = minusa

3+ (A+)

13 + (Aminus)

13

ζ primeplusmn (ξprime ~ηprime τ) = minusa3minus 1

2

(

(A+)13 + (Aminus)

13

)

plusmnradic32i(

(A+)13 minus (Aminus)

13

)

(515)where

Aplusmn = Rplusmnradic∆ (516)

and the discriminant ∆ reads

∆ = R2 +Q3 (517)

withQ(ηprime τ ) = 3bminusa2

9= minus2|Fζ |

Fζζζτ + α

F 2ζζζ

ηprime2

R(ξprime ηprime τ) = γ2X(ξprime ηprime τ ) + ab

18+ a

3Q(ηprime τ)

(518)

17

At the same order function S in (54) becomes

S(ζ prime ηprime τ ) = minusτ + 12|Fζ |

[

Fζζζζprime2 + 2Fζζηζ

primeηprime + Fζηηηprime2]

=

Fζζζ

2|Fζ |

(

Q(ηprime τ ) +(

ζ prime +Fζζη

Fζζζηprime)2)

(519)

Known ζ prime as function of (ξprime ηprime τ) from the cubic (511) the solution q andits gradient are then approximated near breaking by the formulae

q(ξ η τ) sim ǫG(ζb + ζ prime ηb + ηprime) = ǫ (G+Gζζprime +Gηη

prime +O(|τ |)) nabla(ξη)q sim ǫ

nabla(ζprimeηprime)G(ζb+ζprimeηb+ηprime)

S(ζprimeηprimeτ) (520)

Before breaking

Before breaking τ lt τb (τ lt 0) the coefficient Q in (518) is strictlypositive (see the second of (58)) then the discriminant ∆ = R2 + Q3 isalso strictly positive and only the root ζ prime0 is real Correspondingly the realsolution q is single valued and described by Cardanorsquos formula and by (520)In addition function S in (519) is also strictly positive and nabla(ξ~η)q is finiteforall ξ η

To have a more explicit solution than that provided by Cardanorsquos formulawe first restrict the asymptotic region to a narrower area so that the cubic(511) reduces to the linear equation bζ prime = γX and X contains only linearterms This is achieved choosing

ηprime = O(τ r) X = O(τ p+1) 12lt p lt p+1

2lt r lt p+ 1 (521)

implying

ζ prime = O(τ p)

X = ξprime + Fη

Fζηprime + F

Fζτ + o(τ p+1) = ξprime + Gη

Gζηprime + G

mGζτ + o(τ p+1)

bζ prime = γX rArr ζ prime sim minus 1τ

(

ξprime + Gη

Gζηprime + G

mGζτ)

(522)

Then

q = ǫG(ζb + ζ prime ηb + ηprime) sim ǫG + ǫGζζprime sim ǫ

(

1minus 1

m

)

Gminus ǫGζ

τ

(

ξprime +Gη

Gζηprime)

(523)

18

Since q sim ǫG and recalling the definitions (57)(513) it follows that q isdescribed by the exact similarity solution

q sim(

ξ + (GηGζ)ηprime

τ prime

)1m

(524)

of equation (37)The cubic simplifies also in the asymptotic region in which ξprime ηprime are of

the same order while τ prime le O(|ηprime|) reducing to ζ prime3 = γX so that the solutionq and its gradient are

q sim ǫG(ζb +3radic

γX(ξprime ηprime τ) ηb + ηprime) (525)

nablaξηq sim3radicγ

3

ǫnablaζηG3radic

X2(ξprime ηprime τ ) (526)

At breaking

When τ = τb the singularity manifold S (519) is positive everywhere inthe (ξ η) plane except at the breaking point (ξb ηb) in which it is zerotogether with Q R and the discriminant ∆ The solution q is well describedagain by Cardanorsquos formula and by (520) To have a more explicit solutionthan that provided by Cardanorsquos formula we choose ξprime ηprime of the same orderthe cubic (511) reduces to ζ prime3 = γX and equations (525) become

q sim ǫG(ζb +3radic

γX(ξprime ηprime 0) ηb + ηprime)

nablaξηq sim 3radicγ

3

ǫnablaξηG3radic

X2(ξprimeηprime0)

(527)

The expression of Xb(ξprime ~ηprime) equiv X(ξprime ~ηprime 0) is given in (512) Xb(ξ

prime ηprime) simξprime minus Fη

|Fζ |ηprime if ξprime prop ηprime but ξprime 6= (FηFζ)η

prime while X(ξprime ηprime 0) = minus Fηη

2|Fζ |ηprime2 if

ξprime = (FηFζ)ηprime

Equation (527) implies that all the derivatives of q blow up at τ = τb in

the breaking point (ξb ηb) with the universal lawXminus23b except the derivative

along the transversal line Xb(ξprime ηprime 0) = 0 represented by the vector field

V = partη minusXbηpartξ (compare with (56)) for which [2 19]

V q|(ξbηb) = ǫGη (528)

After breaking I the overturning profile

19

After breaking the solution becomes three-valued in a compact regionof the (ξ η) - plane (see Figures 3) and in general does not describe anyphysics nevertheless a detailed study of the multivalued region is importantin view of a proper regularization of the models

If τ gt τb (τ gt 0) in the regime (514) the SM equation S = 0

2|Fζ|τ = Fζζζζprime2 + 2Fζζηζ

primeηprime + Fζηηηprime2 (529)

describes an ellipsoidal paraboloid in the (ζ prime ηprime τ) space with minimum at

the breaking point (~ξb τb)One can check that eliminating ζ prime from equations (529) and (511) one

obtains the SM equation in space-time coordinates coinciding with the equa-tion ∆ = R2+Q3 = 0 where ∆ is the discriminant (517) of the cubic (511)and Q and R are defined in (518) Such equation can be satisfied only ifQ le 0 ie only if

|ηprime| le ηprimecusp(τ) (530)

where

ηprimecusp(τ ) equivradic

2|Fζ |Fζζζ

α

radicτ (531)

and is given by the following analytic and universal expression

ξprime minus Fη

|Fζ |ηprime minus F

|Fζ | τ minus Fηη

2|Fζ |ηprime2 minus

(

Fη

|Fζ | +Fζζη

Fζζζ

)

ηprimeτ + 16|Fζ |F 2

ζζζ

[

minus FηηηF2ζζζ

+Fζζη(3FζζζFζηη minus 2F 2ζζη)]

ηprime32

= α3

9F 2ζ F

4ζζζ

(

(

ηprimecusp(τ))2 minus ηprime2

)3

(532)Equation (532) describes a closed curve with two cusps in the (ξ η) - planeat the points

~ξplusmncusp(τ ) = (ξb ηb) + (ξplusmnprime

cusp(τ )plusmnηprimecusp(τ)) (533)

where

ξplusmnprime

cusp(τ ) sim plusmnFη

radic

2Fζζζ

α|Fζ|radicτ +

(

F

|Fζ |+

FηηFζζζ

α

)

τ plusmn Bτ 32 (534)

where B = O(1) (see Figures 6 for dKP and 7 for mdKP) corresponding tothe conditions Q = R = 0 on which the three real solutions of the cubiccoincide (in 1 + 1 dimensions it is not possible to have three coincidentsolutions)

ζ0 = ζplusmn = minusFζζη

Fζζζηprime rArr q0 = qplusmn =sim ǫ

(

G+ (Gη minusGζFζζη

Fζζζ)ηprime)

(535)

20

On the remaining part of the closed curve ∆ = 0 two of the three realbranches coincide Outside the closed curve ∆ gt 0 and the real solution q issingle valued inside the closed curve ∆ lt 0 and the real solution q is threevalued with the three branches

q = ǫG(ζb + ζ prime ηb + ηprime) sim ǫ(G +Gζζprime +Gηη

prime +O(τ)) (536)

where ζ prime are the three real solutions of the cubic (511) (see fi Figures 2for dKP)

Figures 2 Plotting of the dKP analytic solution in the (q ξ η τ) variablesfor G given by (422) ǫ = 02 at times τ = 0 τb minus 2 τb τb + 2 whereτb = 657

Such a three-valued region of the (ξ η) plane is characterized by the

21

conditions|ηprime| lt ηprimecusp(τ) ξminusM(ηprime τ) lt ξprime lt ξ+M(ηprime τ) (537)

where

ξplusmnM(ηprime τ) equiv Fη

|Fζ |ηprime + F

|Fζ | τ + Fηη

2|Fζ |ηprime2 +

(

Fη

|Fζ | +Fζζη

Fζζζ

)

ηprimeτ minus 16|Fζ |F 2

ζζζ

[

minus FηηηF2ζζζ

+Fζζη(3FζζζFζηη minus 2F 2ζζη)]

ηprime3 plusmn Fζζζ

3|Fζ | |Q| 32(538)

(see Figures 3 for dKP)Since

∆ξ equiv ξ+M(ηprime τ)minus ξminusM(ηprime τ) =2Fζζζ

3|Fζ||Q(ηprime τ)|32 le 4

radic2

3

radic

|Fζ|Fζζζ

τ 32 (539)

we infer that the longitudinal width of the multivalued region is O(τ 32) thetransversal widths delimited by the two cusps is instead O(τ 12) thereforethe multivalued region develops at τ = τb from the breaking point (ξb ηb)with an infinite speed in the tranversal direction and with zero speed in thelongitudinal direction All these results are a common feature to the class ofdynamics (11) (see the previously derived results for the dKP equation forfinite times [18 19] and in the longtime regime [18] and those for the KZequation in the longtime regime [2])

-15-10-050005101-15-10-0500051015

-15-10-050005101-15-10-0500051015

Figures 3 Plotting of the three valued regions of the (ξ η) plane for dKPat times τ = 02 05 for G given by (422) and ǫ = 02 The center of thesquare frame is the breaking point (ξb ηb) Notice that the two cusps havethe same ξ coordinate ξ+cusp(τ) sim ξminuscusp(τ) since for solution (422) Gη = 0(see (531)(534))

22

We end this subsection remarking that as it was already observed in [19]since dKP (mn) is symmetric wrt y if the initial datum is also symmetricwrt y like the Gaussian (419) also its evolution will be so u(x y t) =u(xminusy t) This implies that ηb = yb = 0 and that all partial derivatives ofF and G containing an odd number of η derivatives are 0 at breaking As aconsequence the transversal direction on which the derivative of the profiledoes not blow up is the η (y) direction and on it the derivative is 0 atbreaking (see (56))

After breaking II the discontinuous shock

Using the matching rules of sect3 the shock formulae (310) become

parts

partτ=

ǫm

m+ 1

Gm+1(ζ1 η)minusGm+1(ζ2 η)

G(ζ1 η)minusG(ζ2 η) (540)

s = ζ1 + ǫmGm(ζ1 η) τ = ζ2 + ǫmGm(ζ2 η) τ (541)

where subscript 2 is for values behind the shock and subscript 1 for valuesahead Equations (541) are two implicit equations for ζ1 and ζ2 solvingthese equations yields ζ1(s η τ) ζ2(s η τ) and substituting these expres-sions in (540) it results in a nonlinear first order differential equation fors This equation and the initial conditions (311) give uniquely s(η τ) andconsequently ζ12(η τ) = ζ12(s(η τ) η τ)

We recall that immediately after breaking and if (530) holds equation(541) reduces to the cubic (511)(512) in which ξprime must be replaced by sprimepossessing three real roots where

sprime(ηprime τ) = sminus ξb (542)

Therefore the values of ζ1 and ζ2 are chosen among the three solutions (515)so that q2 = ǫG(ζb + ζ prime2 η) has the maximum value and q1 = ǫG(ζb + ζ prime1 η)the minimum one among the three branches of q Since Gζ lt 0 it followsthat

ζ1 = maxζ prime0 ζ primeplusmn ζ2 = minζ prime0 ζ primeplusmn (543)

To identify ζ12 with one of the three roots ζ prime0 ζprimeplusmn let us rewrite them as

follows

ζ prime0 = minusa

3+ 2 3

radicρ cos

(

θ

3

)

(544)

ζ prime+ = minusa

3minus 3

radicρ

(

cos

(

θ

3

)

+radic3 sin

(

θ

3

))

(545)

23

ζ primeminus = minusa

3minus 3

radicρ

(

cos

(

θ

3

)

minusradic3 sin

(

θ

3

))

(546)

where

ρ =radic

R2 + |∆| θ = arctan

(

radic

|∆|R

)

(547)

We observe that for 0 le θ le π the following inequalities hold

minus cos

(

θ

3

)

minusradic3 sin

(

θ

3

)

le minus cos

(

θ

3

)

+radic3 sin

(

θ

3

)

le 2 cos

(

θ

3

)

so that

ζ prime+ le ζ primeminus le ζ prime0 rArr q(ζb + ζ prime0 η) le q(ζb + ζ primeminus η) le q(ζb + ζ prime+ η) (548)

for q decreasing in ζ Hence

ζ prime1(sprime ηprime τ prime) = ζ prime0(s

prime ηprime τ prime) ζ prime2(sprime ηprime τ prime) = ζ prime+(s

prime ηprime τ prime) (549)

Then (540) reduces to the equations

dsprime

dτ+ G

Gζ+ Gη

Gζηprime + 1

2

[

ζ prime0(sprime ηprime τ ) + ζ prime+(s

prime ηprime τ)]

= 0 for dKPdsprime

dτ+ G

2Gζ+ Gη

Gζηprime + 1

2

[

ζ prime0(sprime ηprime τ) + ζ prime+(s

prime ηprime τ)]

= 0 for mdKP

sprime(0) = ξb

(550)

obtained expanding (540) near the breaking point and recalling that τ equivτ primeτb

We remark that in the differential equations (550) sprime depends on ηprime

parametrically So the discontinuous (dissipative) shocks of the longtime so-lutions of the small data Cauchy problems for dKP and mdKP has a simplegeometric construction given τ gt 0 for any fixed |ηprime| le ηcusp the overturn-ing profile in the (ξ q) plane is intercepted by a vertical straight line cuttingoff equal area lobi in analogy with the 1 + 1 dimensional case

Going back to the dKP variables

The above formulae written in the convenient variables q ξ η τ are es-sentially the same for both dKP and mdKP relevant differences appear whenwe go back to the original variables u x y t inverting equations (52)(53)

u = 1radictq t = τ2

4 y = ητ2

2 x = ξ minus η2τ2

4 for dKP

u = 1radictq t = eτ y = 2ηeτ x = ξ minus η2eτ for mdKP

(551)

24

and all the above universal formulae are easily transfered to the dKP (mn)equations In particular small and localized initial data break i) at tb =τ 2b 4 in the point (xb yb) = (ξb minus τ 2b η

2b4 ηbτ

2b 2) of the parabolic wave front

x+ y2(4tb) = ξb evolving according to dKP and ii) at tb = eτb in the point(xb yb) = (ξb minus η2be

τb 2ηbeτb) of the parabolic wave front x + y2(4tb) = ξb

evolving according to mdKP If for instance we use the same Gaussian initialcondition (419) for both dKP and mdKP with ǫ = 02 then G is given by(422) in both cases Consequently for dKP

ζb = 196 ηb = 0 ξb = 327 τb = 657 (552)

and wave breaking takes place at tb = 108 in the point (xb yb) = (327 0)on the parabola x+ 231 middot 10minus2y2 = 327 (see Figure 4)

Figure 4 Plotting of the analytic dKP solution u in the physical variablesx y t for G given by (422) (corresponding to the gaussian initial condition)ǫ = 02 at breaking

For mdKP

ζb = 161 ηb = 0 ξb = 251 τb = 1431 (553)

and wave breaking takes place at tb = 164middot106 in the point (xb yb) = (251 0)on the parabola x + 152 middot 10minus7y2 = 251 and at breaking the amplitude ofthe wave is u = ǫtb

minus12G(ζb ηb) = 195 middot 10minus4 (see Figure 5)

25

Figure 5 Plotting of the analytic mdKP solution u in the physical variablesx y t for G given by (422) (corresponding to the gaussian initial condition)ǫ = 02 at breaking

Since in the mdKP case tb is very large and the wave amplitude atbreaking is very small we wonder if such a wave breaking could be actuallydetected numerically

Now we go into the analytic details For the dKP case

tprime equiv tminus tb sim 2tbτ yprime = y minus yb ≃ 2tb(ηprime + 2ηbτ + 2ηprimeτ )

xprime = xminus xb sim ξprime minus ηbyprime minus yprime2

4tb+ η2b t

prime + ηbtbyprimetprime

(554)

and we choose τ prime to be sufficiently small to have |tprime| |yprime| ≪ 1The dKP solution reads

u(x y t) =ǫradictG(ζb + ζ prime ηb + ηprime) =

ǫradict

(

G+Gζζprime +Gη

yprime

2tb+O

(

tprime

tb

))

(555)where ζ prime is the solution of the cubic (511) with

a =3Fζζη

2Fζζζ

yprime

tb b = 3

Fζζζ

(

Fζtprime

tb+ Fζηη

yprime2

4t2b

)

X = xprime +(

ηb minus Fη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime minus[

η2b +(

F2minus ηbFη

)

1|Fζ |tb

]

tprime

+(

1minus Fηη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime2

4tb+[

minusηb +(

Fη

2+ ηbFηη

)

12|Fζ |tb

]

yprimetprime

tb

minus Fηηη

48|Fζ |yprime3

t3b

(556)

26

The three-valued region (532) after breaking becomes

xprime +(

ηb minus Fη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime minus[

η2b +(

F2minus ηbFη

)

1|Fζ |tb

]

tprime

+(

1minus Fηη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime2

4tb+[

minusηb +(

Fη

2|Fζ |tb +ηbFηη

|Fζ | minus Fζζη

2Fζζζ

)

12tb

]

yprimetprime

tb

+ 16|Fζ |F 2

ζζζ

[

minus FηηηF2ζζζ + Fζζη(3FζζζFζηη minus 2F 2

ζζη)]

yprime3

8t3b

2

=

α3

9middot64F 2ζF 4ζζζ

t6b

(

(

yprimecusp(tprime))2 minus yprime2

)3

(557)

where

yprimecusp(tprime) = 2

radic

|Fζ |Fζζζ

α

radictbtprime (558)

Equation (557) describes a closed curve with two cusps in the (x y) - planeat the points

~xplusmncusp(t

prime) = (xb yb) + (xplusmnprime

cusp(tprime)plusmnyprimecusp(t

prime)) (559)

where

xplusmnprime

cusp(tprime) sim ∓2ηb

radic

|Fζ |Fζζζ

α

radictbtprime plusmn Fη

radic

Fζζζ

α|Fζ |

radic

tprime

tb

+(

η2b minus|Fζ |Fζζζ

α

)

tprime +(

F|Fζ | +

FηηFζζζ

α

)

tprime

2tbplusmn 2ηb

radic

|Fζ |Fζζζ

αtprime

32radictb+O(τ 32)

(560)At last the analogue of (539) reads

∆xprime le 2

3

radic

|Fζ|Fζζζ

(

tprime

tb

)32

(561)

it follows that the longitudinal width ∆long and the transversal width ∆transv

of the multivalued region are respectively

∆long = O

(

(

tprime

tb

)32

)

∆transv = O(

(tbtprime)

12

)

rArr ∆long

∆transv= O

(

tprime

t2b

)

(562)

For the mdKP case

tprime = tminus tb sim tbτprime yprime = y minus yb sim 2tb(η

prime + ηbtprime

tb+ ηprimetprime

tb)

xprime = xminus xb sim ξprime minus ηbyprime + η2b t

prime minus yprime2

4tb+ ηb

yprimetprime

tb

(563)

27

and we choose τ prime sufficiently small to have |tprime| |yprime| ≪ 1The mdKP solution reads

u(x y t) =ǫradictG(ζb+ζ prime ηb+ηprime) =

ǫradict

(

G+Gζζprime +Gη

yprime

2tb+O

(

tprime

tb log tb

))

(564)where ζ prime is the solution of the cubic (511) with

a =3Fζζη

2Fζζζ

yprime

tb b = 3

Fζζζ

(

2Fζtprime

tb log tb+ Fζηη

yprime2

4t2b

)

X = xprime +(

ηb minus Fη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime minus[

η2b +(

Flog tb

minus ηbFη

)

1|Fζ |tb

]

tprime

+(

1minus Fηη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime2

4tb+[

minusηb +(

Fη

|Fζ |(1minus1

log tb) + ηbFηη

|Fζ |

)

12tb

]

yprimetprime

tb

minus Fηηη

48|Fζ |yprime3

t3b

(565)

The three-valued region (532) after breaking becomes

xprime +(

ηb minus Fη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime minus[

η2b +(

Flog tb

minus ηbFη

)

1|Fζ |tb

]

tprime

+(

1minus Fηη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime2

4tb+[

minusηb +(

Fη

|Fζ |(1minus1

log tb) + ηbFηη

|Fζ| minus Fζζη

Fζζζ log tb

)

12tb

]

yprimetprime

tb

+ 16|Fζ |F 2

ζζζ

[

minus FηηηF2ζζζ + Fζζη(3FζζζFζηη minus 2F 2

ζζη)]

yprime3

8t3b

2

=

α3

9middot64F 2ζ F

4ζζζt

6b

(

(

yprimecusp(tprime))2 minus yprime2

)3

(566)where

yprimecusp(tprime) = 2

radic

2|Fζ |Fζζζ

α

radic

tbtprime

log tb (567)

Equation (566) describes a closed curve with two cusps in the (x y) - planeat the points

~xplusmncusp(t

prime) = (xb yb) + (xplusmnprime

cusp(tprime)plusmnyprimecusp(t

prime)) (568)

where

xplusmnprime

cusp(tprime) sim ∓2ηb

radic

|Fζ |Fζζζ

α

radic

tbtprime

log tbplusmn Fη

radic

Fζζζ

α|Fζ |

radic

tprime

tb log tb

+(

η2b minus|Fζ |Fζζζ

α log tb

)

tprime +(

F|Fζ | +

FηηFζζζ

α

)

tprime

tb log tbplusmn 2ηb

radic

|Fζ |Fζζζ

αtprime

32radic

tb log tb

+O(τ 32)

(569)

28

At last the analogue of (539) reads

∆xprime le 4radic2

3

radic

|Fζ |Fζζζ

(

tprime

tb log tb

)32

(570)

it follows that the longitudinal width ∆long and the transversal width ∆transv

of the multivalued region are respectively

∆long = O

(

(

tprime

tb log tb

)32

)

∆transv = O

(

(

tbtprime

log tb

)12

)

rArr ∆long

∆transv= O

(

tprime

t2blog tb

)

(571)

References

[1] F Santucci Onde debolmente non lineari e quasi unidimensionali in

Natura La rottura di tali onde e il problema della regolarizzazione dis-

sipativa Tesi della Laurea Specialistica in Fisica supervisor P M San-tini Dipartimento di Fisica dellrsquoUniversita di Roma ldquoLa Sapienzardquo AA2011-2012

[2] S V Manakov and P M Santini On the dispersionless Kadomtsev-Petviashvili equation in n + 1 dimensions exact solutions the Cauchyproblem for small initial data and wave breaking J Phys A MathTheor 44 (2011) 405203

[3] G B Whitham Linear and nonlinear waves John Wiley amp Sons 1974

[4] C Lin E Reissner and H S Tien On two-dimensional nonsteadymotion of a slender body in a compressible fluid J Math Phys 27(1948) 220-231

[5] R Timman Unsteady motion in transonic flow Symposium Transson-icum Aachen 1962 EdKOswatitsch Springer 394-401

[6] E A Zobolotskaya and R V Khokhlov Quasi-plane waves in the non-linear acoustics of confined beams Soviet Physics- Acoustics Vol15N1 (1969)

29

[7] B B Kadomtsev and V I Petviashvili On the stability of solitarywaves in weakly dispersing media Soviet Physics-Doklady Vol15 N6(1970)

[8] X P Wang M J Ablowitz and H Segur Wave collapse and instabil-

ity of solitary waves of a generalized Kadomtsev-Petviashvili equationPhysica D 78 (1994) 241-265

[9] M J Ablowitz and H Segur Solitons and the Inverse Scattering Trans-

form SIAM Philadelphia 1981

[10] M J Ablowitz and P A Clarkson Solitons nonlinear evolution equa-

tions and inverse scattering Cambridge University Press 1991

[11] S Turitsyn and G Falkovitch Stability of magneto-elastic solitons andself-focusing of sound in antiferromagnets Sov Phys J Exp TheorPhys 62 (1985) 146-152

[12] S Novikov S V Manakov L P Pitaevskii V E Zakharov Theory of

solitons Consultant Bureau 1984

[13] S V Manakov and P M Santini Inverse scattering problem for vectorfields and the heavenly equation httparXivnlinSI0512043

[14] S V Manakov and P M Santini Inverse scattering problem forvector fields and the Cauchy problem for the heavenly equationPhys Lett A 359 613-619 (2006) doi101016jphysleta200607011httparXivnlinSI0604017

[15] S V Manakov and P M Santini The Cauchy problem on theplane for the dispersionless Kadomtsev-Petviashvili equation JETPLetters 83 No 10 462-466 (2006) 101134S0021364006100080httparXivnlinSI0604016

[16] P G Grinevich P M Santini and D Wu The Cauchy problem for thePavlov equation Nonlinearity 28 (2015) 3709-3754 doi1010880951-771528113709 Preprint arXiv13105834v2

[17] M V Pavlov Integrable hydrodynamic chains J Math Phys 44 (2003)4134-4156

30

Recalling (33) (35) and (313) the exact solutions of dKP (mn) in theoriginal variables corresponding to (38) read

u =

tminusnminus12 A

(

x+ 14t

sumnminus1i=1 y2i minus 1

cmnumt)

t gt 0 if cmn gt 0

tminusnminus12 A

(

x+ 14t

sumnminus1i=1 y2i minus umt ln t

)

t gt 1 if cmn = 0

tminusnminus12 A

(

x+ 14t

sumnminus1i=1 y2i minus 1

|cmn|umt

(

(

tt0

)|cmn|minus 1

))

t gt t0 if cmn lt 0

(314)where cmn is defined in (18)

If again A is a localized hump (314) describes a wave constant onthe paraboloidal wave front (32) and simultaneously breaking on it Moreprecisely the solution breaks at time tb defined by

tb =

(cmnτb)1cmn if cmn gt 0

eτb if cmn = 0(315)

on the paraboloid

x+1

4t

nminus1sum

i=1

y2i = ζb + Am(ζb)τb (316)

where τb ζb are defined in (39) (see Figures 1)

Figures 1 Plotting of the exact solution of the mdKP equation (15) (c22 =0) before at and after breaking Here we have chosen A(x) = eminusx2

conse-quently ζb = 12 τb =

radice2 tb = e

radice2

If cmn lt 0 τ(t) rarr τ(infin) equiv |cmn|minus1tminus|cmn|0 as t rarr infin and the wave

freezes asymptotically If tminus|cmn|0 gt τb|cmn| then τ(infin) gt τb and the wave

breaks before freezing at

tb =(

tminus|cmn|0 minus τb|cmn|

)minus1|cmn| (317)

9

on the paraboloid (316) If instead tminus|cmn|0 lt τb|cmn| then τ(infin) lt τb and

no breaking takes place before the wave freezesIf n = 1 forallm (314) reduces to the general solution u = A(xminusumt) of the

Riemann equation (12) if m = 1 foralln (314) reduces to the class of particu-lar solutions of the dKP equation with quadratic nonlinearity and arbitrarydimensions (dKP (1 n)) constructed in [2] It is interesting to remark thatthis type of exact solutions was first derived for the integrable dKP equation(13) using its nonlinear Riemnann - Hilbert inverse problem [21]

After breaking t gt tb the regular multivalued solutions (314) can bereplaced by the discontinuous single valued solutions of dKP (mn) obtainedusing (33) (35) and (313) in (310) (311) (312) More precisely fort gt tb where tb is defined in (315) and (317) the dKP (mn) solutiondescribed by (314) for t lt tb develops a discontinuous shock on the parabola

x+ y2

4t= S(t) S(t) equiv s(τ(t)) (318)

where s(τ) is characterized by equations (310) (311) and τ(t) is defined in(313) Behind and ahead the shock the solution is given by

u =

u2(x ~y t) if x+ y4

4tlt S(t)

u1(x ~y t) if x+ y4

4tgt S(t)

(319)

where u2 and u1 are respectively the maximum and the minimum among the(three in the case of a localized bump) branches u12 = tminus(nminus1)2A(ζ12) ofthe implicit equations (314)

We end this section remarking that as already mentioned in sect1 in theabove class of exact solutions of (11) the dependences of u on x throughthe combinations x minus cminus1

mnumt (if cmn gt 0) x minus umt log t (if cmn = 0) and

xminus|cmn|minus1umt[(tt0)|cmn|minus1] if cmn lt 0 are not consistent with the formal

dependence x minus umt recently postulated to study the breaking features ofdKP (m 2) in [20]

4 The Cauchy problem for small and local-

ized initial data and longtime wave break-

ing

In analogy with [2] now we use the exact solutions of the previous sectionto construct the longtime behaviour of solutions of the Cauchy problem of

10

(11) for small and localized initial data showing in particular that smalland localized initial data evolving according to (11) break in thelongtime regime only if m(nminus 1) le 2 (cmn ge 0)

For small and localized initial data of the type

u(x ~y 0) = ǫu0(x ~y) 0 lt ǫ ≪ 1 (41)

evolving according to equation (11) the behavior of the solution may beapproximated by the solution of the linearized dKP (mn) equation untilnonlinearity becomes relevant

For O(ǫ) initial data equations (37)(39) imply that the breaking timeis

τb = O(ǫminusm) ≫ 1 (42)

so the nonlinear regime for dKP (mn) is characterized by the condition

t = O(

τminus1(ǫminusm))

=

O(

ǫminus m

cmn

)

cmn gt 0

O(

eǫminusm)

cmn = 0(43)

where τminus1(middot) is the inverse of (36) while for cmn lt 0 large values of t arenot compatible with (42) and a nonlinear regime never occurs

So for t ≪ τminus1(ǫminusm) the solution of the Cauchy problem is approximatedby the solution of the linearized dKP (mn) equation while for t sim τminus1(ǫminusm)a matching will be made between the linearized solution and the exact solu-tion (314)

In the linear regime when 0 lt t ≪ O(τminus1(ǫminusm)) the dKP (mn) solutionis well described by that of the linearized dKP (mn) ie

u(x ~y t) sim ǫ

(2π)n

int

Rn

u0(k1 ~kperp) exp

[

ı(k1x+ ~kperp middot ~y minus k2perpk1

t)

]

dk1d~kperp (44)

where

u0(k1 ~kperp) =

int

Rn

u0(x ~y) exp[

minusı(k1x+ ~kperp middot ~y)]

dxd~y

In the longtime regime

1 ≪ t ≪ O(τminus1(ǫminusm)) (45)

11

the multiple integral can be evaluated by the stationary phase method whichgives [2]

u(x ~y t) sim tminusnminus12 ǫG

(

x+1

4t

nminus1sum

i=1

y2i ~y

2t

)

(46)

where

G(ξ ~η) =1

2nπn+12

int

R

dk1|k1|nminus12 u0 (k1 ~ηk1) exp

[

ık1ξ minus ı(nminus 1)π

4sgn(k1)

]

(47)in the space-time region

(xminus ξ)t yit = O(1) i = 1 nminus 1 (48)

on the paraboloid (32) and decays faster outside it Therefore small andlocalized initial data set in the longtime regime (45) governed bythe linear theory on the paraboloid (32)

When nonlinearity becomes relevant ie when t = O(τminus1(ǫminusm)) theasymptotic solution of dKP (mn) is built matching the longtime solution(46)(47) of the linearized Cauchy problem with the exact solution (314)If fi cmn gt 0 the first argument ξ of function G(ξ η) defined in (47) isreplaced by ξminus cminus1

mnumt or equivalently the arbitrary function A(ζ) in (38)

acquires the dependence on the second argument ~η = ~y2t and is identifiedwith G As a result of this matching in the nonlinear regime (42) (43) thesolution reads

u(x ~y t) ≃ uasmn(x ~y t)

uasmn(x ~y t) equiv

tminusnminus12 ǫG

(

x+ 14t

sumnminus1i=1 y2i minus 1

cmnumt ~y

2t

)

cmn gt 0

tminusnminus12 ǫG

(

x+ 14t

sumnminus1i=1 y2i minus umt ln t ~y

2t

)

cmn = 0

(49)with umt = O(1) for cmn gt 0 and umt log t = O(1) for cmn = 0 becominginfinitesimal in the linear regime as it has to be

For cmn lt 0 the solution is described by its linear form (46) thereforewave breaking takes place for the particular values of (mn) described by thecondition

cmn ge 0 hArr m(nminus 1) le 2 (410)

ie forn = 1 n = 2 n = 3forallm m = 1 2 m = 1

(411)

12

For n = 1 forallm uasmn reduces to the general solution of the Riemann equation

(12) [3] The cases (mn) = (2 1) and (mn) = (3 1) the dKP and theKZ equations have been already investigated in [18] and [2] respectivelytherefore in the following section we mainly focus on the case (mn) = (2 2)corresponding to the nonintegrable modified dKP equation (15) and to itsasymptotic solution

u ≃ uas22(x y t) =

1radictǫG

(

x+y2

4tminus u2t ln t

y

2t

)

(412)

comparing the results with the dKP case (mn) = (1 2) investigated in [18]with its asymptotic solution

u ≃ uas12(x y t) =

1radictǫG

(

x+y2

4tminus 2ut

y

2t

)

(413)

Remark 1 The estimate of the first correction to the asymptotics (49)reads

u = uasnm(x ~y t)(1 +O(tminus1)) (414)

Indeed if cmn gt 0 one has

u sim uasnm(x ~y t) +

ǫ1+ m

cmn

tnminus12

H

(

x+1

4t

nminus1sum

i=1

y2i ~y

2t τ

)

(415)

where τ = ǫmτ and H(ξ ~η τ ) is expressed in terms of G(ζ ~η) (ζ is definedin the second of equations (51)) through the PDE

(

Hτ +GmHξ

1 +mGmminus1Gζ τ

)

ξ

+1

4(cmnτ )1+cminus1mn

nminus1sum

j=1

(

Gηj

1 +mGmminus1Gζ τ

)

ηj

= 0 (416)

Since from (43) ǫm

cmn = O(tminus1) equation (415) yields (414) Similarly ifcmn = 0

u sim uasnm(x ~y t) +

ǫ

tn+12

H

(

x+1

4t

nminus1sum

i=1

y2i ~y

2t τ

)

(417)

where H(ξ ~η τ) now solves the PDE

(

H

1 +mGmminus1Gζ τ

)

ξ

=1

4

nminus1sum

j=1

(

Gηj

1 +mGmminus1Gζ τ

)

ηj

(418)

13

Then equation (417) yields equation (414) too

Remark 2 As is was observed in [2] for a gaussian initial condition

u0(x y) = d exp

[

minusx2 + ~y2

4

]

(419)

where d is constant the asymptotic solution can be written in terms of specialfunctions obtaining for G(ξ ~η)

G(ξ ~η) =dradicπ

1

(1+~η2)n+14

[

cos(

π4(nminus 1)

)

Γ(

n+14

)

1F1

(

n+14 12minusY 2

4

)

+ sin(

π4(nminus 1)

)

Γ(

n+34

)

Y 1F1

(

n+34 32minusY 2

4

) ]

(420)

where

Y =ξ

radic

1 + ~η2 (421)

Γ is the Euler gamma function and 1F1 is the Kummer confluent hypergeo-metric function [22 23] For n = 2 and d =

radic2π it yields respectively

G(ξ η) =1

(1+η2)34

[

Γ(

34

)

1F1

(

34 12minusY 2

4

)

+ Y Γ(

54

)

1F1

(

54 32minusY 2

4

)]

(422)

Remark 3 The fact that small data break only when the inequality (410) issatisfied was expected from physical considerations Indeed as already men-tioned in the introduction in equation (11) there are two competing termsthe nonlinear term umux responsible for the steepening of the profile andthe perpu term describing diffraction in the transversal (n minus 1) dimensionalhyperplane (reminiscence through the multiscale expansion leading to (11)of the wave operator) therefore diffraction increases as (nminus 1) increases [2]For small initial data the umux term is initially smaller and smaller increas-ing m and the solution evolves in a linear way for a longer and longer timediffracting transversally through the (nminus1) diffraction channels So diffrac-tion increasing with (n minus 1) acts on a very long time increasing with mbefore the nonlinear regime could become relevant and if (nminus 1) andor mare sufficiently large one expects that the solution would be diffracted awayalmost completely before reaching the nonlinear regime and will not break

14

We have in particular that breaking takes place in the following longtimeregimes (see (43))m = n = 1 (the Riemann equation with quadratic nonlinearity) tb = O(ǫminus1)m = 1 n = 2 (the dKP equation) tb = O(ǫminus2)m = 1 n = 3 (the KZ equation) tb = O(eǫ

minus1)

m = 2 n = 1 (the Riemann equation with cubic nonlinearity) tb = O(ǫminus2)m = 2 n = 2 (the mdKP equation) O(tb = eǫ

minus2)

It is interesting to remark that as it was observed in [2] if m = 1 (thephysically more relevant case) wave breaking takes place only for n le 3 iein physical space

We end this section remarking that also in the longtime behaviour of thesolutions of the small data Cauchy problem for equation (11) the depen-dence of the solution u on x as in the case of the exact solutions (314) isnot consistent with the formal ansatz recently made in [20]

5 Analytic aspects of the wave breaking

In this section we use the longtime behavior of solutions of the small dataCauchy problem for dKP (mn) to show explicitly the analytic aspects ofthe solution in the neighbourhood of the breaking time in terms of the initialdata represented by function G defined in (47) as it was already done in[18 2]

Choosing cmn ge 0 we rewrite equation (49) in the characteristic form

q sim ǫG(ζ ~η)ξ = ǫmF (ζ ~ηm)τ + ζ F (ζ ~ηm) equiv Gm(ζ ~η)

(51)

where

q = utnminus12 ξ = x+

1

4t

nminus1sum

j=1

y2j ~η =~y

2t(52)

and

τ(t) =

1cmn

tcmn if cmn gt 0

ln t if cmn = 0(53)

One solves the second of equations (51) with respect to the parameterζ obtaining ζ(ξ ~η τ) and replaces it into the first to obtain the solutionq sim ǫG(ζ(ξ ~η τ) ~η) The inversion of the second of equations (51) is possibleiff its ζ-derivative is different from zero Therefore the singularity manifold

15

(SM) of the solution is the n - dimensional manifold characterized by theequation

S(ζ ~η τ) equiv 1 + ǫmFζ(ζ ~ηm)τ = 0 rArr τ = minus 1

ǫmFζ(ζ ~ηm) (54)

Sincenabla(ξ~η)q =

ǫnabla(ζ~η)G(ζ~η)

1+ǫmFζ(ζ~ηm)τ (55)

the slope of the localized wave becomes infinity (the so-called gradient catas-trophe) on the SM and the n-dimensional wave ldquobreaksrdquo except on the di-

rection represented by the vector field V =nminus1sum

i=1

partηi +mǫmGmminus1(nminus1sum

i=1

Gηi)partξ [2]

[19] on which

V q = ǫ

nminus1sum

i=1

Gηi (56)

Since the KZ case (mn) = (1 3) has been studied in detail in [2] in thefollowing we mainly concentrate on the mdKP case (mn) = (2 2) and wecompare it with the dKP case (mn) = (1 2) investigated in [18]

From (54) the first breaking time τb and the corresponding characteristic

parameters ~ζb = (ζb ηb) are defined by the global minimum of a function ofthe 2 variables (ζ η)

τb = minus 1

ǫmFζ(ζb ηbm)= inf

(

minus 1

ǫmFζ(ζ ηm)

)

gt 0 (57)

and it is characterized together with the condition Fζ(~ζbm) lt 0 by thefollowing equations

Fζζ(~ζbm) = Fζη(~ζbm) = 0

α equiv Fζζζ(~ζbm)Fζηη(~ζbm)minus F 2ζζη(

~ζbm) gt 0 Fζζζ(~ζbm) gt 0(58)

The corresponding point at which the first wave breaking takes place is from(51) ~ξb = (ξb ηb) isin R

2 where

ξb = ζb + ǫmF (~ζbm)τb = ζb minusF (~ζbm)

Fζ(~ζbm) (59)

Now we evaluate equations (51) and (54) near breaking in the regime

ξ = ξb + ξprime η = ηb + ηprime τ = τb + τ prime ζ = ζb + ζ prime (510)

16

where ξprime ηprime τ prime ζ prime are small Using (57) - (59) the second of equations (51)becomes at the leading order the following cubic equation in ζ prime

ζ prime3+ a(ηprime)ζ prime

2+ b(ηprime τ)ζ prime minus γX(ξprime ηprime τ) = 0 (511)

where

a(ηprime) =3Fζζη

Fζζζηprime

b(ηprime τ) = 3Fζζζ

[

2Fζ τ + Fζηηηprime2]

X(ξprime ηprime τ ) = ξprime minus ǫF (ζb ηb + ηprime)τ prime minus ǫ [F (ζb ηb + ηprime)minus F ] τb simξprime minus Fη

|Fζ |ηprime minus F

|Fζ | τ minus Fηη

2|Fζ |ηprime2 minus Fη

|Fζ |ηprimeτ minus Fηηη

6|Fζ |ηprime3 γ =

6|Fζ |Fζζζ

(512)

and

τ equiv τ prime

τb=

τ minus τbτb

(513)

corresponding to the maximal balance

|ζ prime| |ηprime| = O(|τ |12) |X| = O(|τ |32) (514)

In (512) and in the rest of this section G F = Gm and all their partialderivatives whose arguments are not indicated are meant to be evaluated at~ζb = (ζb ηb)

The three roots of the cubic are given by the well-known Cardano-Tartagliaformula

ζ prime0 (ξprime ~ηprime τ) = minusa

3+ (A+)

13 + (Aminus)

13

ζ primeplusmn (ξprime ~ηprime τ) = minusa3minus 1

2

(

(A+)13 + (Aminus)

13

)

plusmnradic32i(

(A+)13 minus (Aminus)

13

)

(515)where

Aplusmn = Rplusmnradic∆ (516)

and the discriminant ∆ reads

∆ = R2 +Q3 (517)

withQ(ηprime τ ) = 3bminusa2

9= minus2|Fζ |

Fζζζτ + α

F 2ζζζ

ηprime2

R(ξprime ηprime τ) = γ2X(ξprime ηprime τ ) + ab

18+ a

3Q(ηprime τ)

(518)

17

At the same order function S in (54) becomes

S(ζ prime ηprime τ ) = minusτ + 12|Fζ |

[

Fζζζζprime2 + 2Fζζηζ

primeηprime + Fζηηηprime2]

=

Fζζζ

2|Fζ |

(

Q(ηprime τ ) +(

ζ prime +Fζζη

Fζζζηprime)2)

(519)

Known ζ prime as function of (ξprime ηprime τ) from the cubic (511) the solution q andits gradient are then approximated near breaking by the formulae

q(ξ η τ) sim ǫG(ζb + ζ prime ηb + ηprime) = ǫ (G+Gζζprime +Gηη

prime +O(|τ |)) nabla(ξη)q sim ǫ

nabla(ζprimeηprime)G(ζb+ζprimeηb+ηprime)

S(ζprimeηprimeτ) (520)

Before breaking

Before breaking τ lt τb (τ lt 0) the coefficient Q in (518) is strictlypositive (see the second of (58)) then the discriminant ∆ = R2 + Q3 isalso strictly positive and only the root ζ prime0 is real Correspondingly the realsolution q is single valued and described by Cardanorsquos formula and by (520)In addition function S in (519) is also strictly positive and nabla(ξ~η)q is finiteforall ξ η

To have a more explicit solution than that provided by Cardanorsquos formulawe first restrict the asymptotic region to a narrower area so that the cubic(511) reduces to the linear equation bζ prime = γX and X contains only linearterms This is achieved choosing

ηprime = O(τ r) X = O(τ p+1) 12lt p lt p+1

2lt r lt p+ 1 (521)

implying

ζ prime = O(τ p)

X = ξprime + Fη

Fζηprime + F

Fζτ + o(τ p+1) = ξprime + Gη

Gζηprime + G

mGζτ + o(τ p+1)

bζ prime = γX rArr ζ prime sim minus 1τ

(

ξprime + Gη

Gζηprime + G

mGζτ)

(522)

Then

q = ǫG(ζb + ζ prime ηb + ηprime) sim ǫG + ǫGζζprime sim ǫ

(

1minus 1

m

)

Gminus ǫGζ

τ

(

ξprime +Gη

Gζηprime)

(523)

18

Since q sim ǫG and recalling the definitions (57)(513) it follows that q isdescribed by the exact similarity solution

q sim(

ξ + (GηGζ)ηprime

τ prime

)1m

(524)

of equation (37)The cubic simplifies also in the asymptotic region in which ξprime ηprime are of

the same order while τ prime le O(|ηprime|) reducing to ζ prime3 = γX so that the solutionq and its gradient are

q sim ǫG(ζb +3radic

γX(ξprime ηprime τ) ηb + ηprime) (525)

nablaξηq sim3radicγ

3

ǫnablaζηG3radic

X2(ξprime ηprime τ ) (526)

At breaking

When τ = τb the singularity manifold S (519) is positive everywhere inthe (ξ η) plane except at the breaking point (ξb ηb) in which it is zerotogether with Q R and the discriminant ∆ The solution q is well describedagain by Cardanorsquos formula and by (520) To have a more explicit solutionthan that provided by Cardanorsquos formula we choose ξprime ηprime of the same orderthe cubic (511) reduces to ζ prime3 = γX and equations (525) become

q sim ǫG(ζb +3radic

γX(ξprime ηprime 0) ηb + ηprime)

nablaξηq sim 3radicγ

3

ǫnablaξηG3radic

X2(ξprimeηprime0)

(527)

The expression of Xb(ξprime ~ηprime) equiv X(ξprime ~ηprime 0) is given in (512) Xb(ξ

prime ηprime) simξprime minus Fη

|Fζ |ηprime if ξprime prop ηprime but ξprime 6= (FηFζ)η

prime while X(ξprime ηprime 0) = minus Fηη

2|Fζ |ηprime2 if

ξprime = (FηFζ)ηprime

Equation (527) implies that all the derivatives of q blow up at τ = τb in

the breaking point (ξb ηb) with the universal lawXminus23b except the derivative

along the transversal line Xb(ξprime ηprime 0) = 0 represented by the vector field

V = partη minusXbηpartξ (compare with (56)) for which [2 19]

V q|(ξbηb) = ǫGη (528)

After breaking I the overturning profile

19

After breaking the solution becomes three-valued in a compact regionof the (ξ η) - plane (see Figures 3) and in general does not describe anyphysics nevertheless a detailed study of the multivalued region is importantin view of a proper regularization of the models

If τ gt τb (τ gt 0) in the regime (514) the SM equation S = 0

2|Fζ|τ = Fζζζζprime2 + 2Fζζηζ

primeηprime + Fζηηηprime2 (529)

describes an ellipsoidal paraboloid in the (ζ prime ηprime τ) space with minimum at

the breaking point (~ξb τb)One can check that eliminating ζ prime from equations (529) and (511) one

obtains the SM equation in space-time coordinates coinciding with the equa-tion ∆ = R2+Q3 = 0 where ∆ is the discriminant (517) of the cubic (511)and Q and R are defined in (518) Such equation can be satisfied only ifQ le 0 ie only if

|ηprime| le ηprimecusp(τ) (530)

where

ηprimecusp(τ ) equivradic

2|Fζ |Fζζζ

α

radicτ (531)

and is given by the following analytic and universal expression

ξprime minus Fη

|Fζ |ηprime minus F

|Fζ | τ minus Fηη

2|Fζ |ηprime2 minus

(

Fη

|Fζ | +Fζζη

Fζζζ

)

ηprimeτ + 16|Fζ |F 2

ζζζ

[

minus FηηηF2ζζζ

+Fζζη(3FζζζFζηη minus 2F 2ζζη)]

ηprime32

= α3

9F 2ζ F

4ζζζ

(

(

ηprimecusp(τ))2 minus ηprime2

)3

(532)Equation (532) describes a closed curve with two cusps in the (ξ η) - planeat the points

~ξplusmncusp(τ ) = (ξb ηb) + (ξplusmnprime

cusp(τ )plusmnηprimecusp(τ)) (533)

where

ξplusmnprime

cusp(τ ) sim plusmnFη

radic

2Fζζζ

α|Fζ|radicτ +

(

F

|Fζ |+

FηηFζζζ

α

)

τ plusmn Bτ 32 (534)

where B = O(1) (see Figures 6 for dKP and 7 for mdKP) corresponding tothe conditions Q = R = 0 on which the three real solutions of the cubiccoincide (in 1 + 1 dimensions it is not possible to have three coincidentsolutions)

ζ0 = ζplusmn = minusFζζη

Fζζζηprime rArr q0 = qplusmn =sim ǫ

(

G+ (Gη minusGζFζζη

Fζζζ)ηprime)

(535)

20

On the remaining part of the closed curve ∆ = 0 two of the three realbranches coincide Outside the closed curve ∆ gt 0 and the real solution q issingle valued inside the closed curve ∆ lt 0 and the real solution q is threevalued with the three branches

q = ǫG(ζb + ζ prime ηb + ηprime) sim ǫ(G +Gζζprime +Gηη

prime +O(τ)) (536)

where ζ prime are the three real solutions of the cubic (511) (see fi Figures 2for dKP)

Figures 2 Plotting of the dKP analytic solution in the (q ξ η τ) variablesfor G given by (422) ǫ = 02 at times τ = 0 τb minus 2 τb τb + 2 whereτb = 657

Such a three-valued region of the (ξ η) plane is characterized by the

21

conditions|ηprime| lt ηprimecusp(τ) ξminusM(ηprime τ) lt ξprime lt ξ+M(ηprime τ) (537)

where

ξplusmnM(ηprime τ) equiv Fη

|Fζ |ηprime + F

|Fζ | τ + Fηη

2|Fζ |ηprime2 +

(

Fη

|Fζ | +Fζζη

Fζζζ

)

ηprimeτ minus 16|Fζ |F 2

ζζζ

[

minus FηηηF2ζζζ

+Fζζη(3FζζζFζηη minus 2F 2ζζη)]

ηprime3 plusmn Fζζζ

3|Fζ | |Q| 32(538)

(see Figures 3 for dKP)Since

∆ξ equiv ξ+M(ηprime τ)minus ξminusM(ηprime τ) =2Fζζζ

3|Fζ||Q(ηprime τ)|32 le 4

radic2

3

radic

|Fζ|Fζζζ

τ 32 (539)

we infer that the longitudinal width of the multivalued region is O(τ 32) thetransversal widths delimited by the two cusps is instead O(τ 12) thereforethe multivalued region develops at τ = τb from the breaking point (ξb ηb)with an infinite speed in the tranversal direction and with zero speed in thelongitudinal direction All these results are a common feature to the class ofdynamics (11) (see the previously derived results for the dKP equation forfinite times [18 19] and in the longtime regime [18] and those for the KZequation in the longtime regime [2])

-15-10-050005101-15-10-0500051015

-15-10-050005101-15-10-0500051015

Figures 3 Plotting of the three valued regions of the (ξ η) plane for dKPat times τ = 02 05 for G given by (422) and ǫ = 02 The center of thesquare frame is the breaking point (ξb ηb) Notice that the two cusps havethe same ξ coordinate ξ+cusp(τ) sim ξminuscusp(τ) since for solution (422) Gη = 0(see (531)(534))

22

We end this subsection remarking that as it was already observed in [19]since dKP (mn) is symmetric wrt y if the initial datum is also symmetricwrt y like the Gaussian (419) also its evolution will be so u(x y t) =u(xminusy t) This implies that ηb = yb = 0 and that all partial derivatives ofF and G containing an odd number of η derivatives are 0 at breaking As aconsequence the transversal direction on which the derivative of the profiledoes not blow up is the η (y) direction and on it the derivative is 0 atbreaking (see (56))

After breaking II the discontinuous shock

Using the matching rules of sect3 the shock formulae (310) become

parts

partτ=

ǫm

m+ 1

Gm+1(ζ1 η)minusGm+1(ζ2 η)

G(ζ1 η)minusG(ζ2 η) (540)

s = ζ1 + ǫmGm(ζ1 η) τ = ζ2 + ǫmGm(ζ2 η) τ (541)

where subscript 2 is for values behind the shock and subscript 1 for valuesahead Equations (541) are two implicit equations for ζ1 and ζ2 solvingthese equations yields ζ1(s η τ) ζ2(s η τ) and substituting these expres-sions in (540) it results in a nonlinear first order differential equation fors This equation and the initial conditions (311) give uniquely s(η τ) andconsequently ζ12(η τ) = ζ12(s(η τ) η τ)

We recall that immediately after breaking and if (530) holds equation(541) reduces to the cubic (511)(512) in which ξprime must be replaced by sprimepossessing three real roots where

sprime(ηprime τ) = sminus ξb (542)

Therefore the values of ζ1 and ζ2 are chosen among the three solutions (515)so that q2 = ǫG(ζb + ζ prime2 η) has the maximum value and q1 = ǫG(ζb + ζ prime1 η)the minimum one among the three branches of q Since Gζ lt 0 it followsthat

ζ1 = maxζ prime0 ζ primeplusmn ζ2 = minζ prime0 ζ primeplusmn (543)

To identify ζ12 with one of the three roots ζ prime0 ζprimeplusmn let us rewrite them as

follows

ζ prime0 = minusa

3+ 2 3

radicρ cos

(

θ

3

)

(544)

ζ prime+ = minusa

3minus 3

radicρ

(

cos

(

θ

3

)

+radic3 sin

(

θ

3

))

(545)

23

ζ primeminus = minusa

3minus 3

radicρ

(

cos

(

θ

3

)

minusradic3 sin

(

θ

3

))

(546)

where

ρ =radic

R2 + |∆| θ = arctan

(

radic

|∆|R

)

(547)

We observe that for 0 le θ le π the following inequalities hold

minus cos

(

θ

3

)

minusradic3 sin

(

θ

3

)

le minus cos

(

θ

3

)

+radic3 sin

(

θ

3

)

le 2 cos

(

θ

3

)

so that

ζ prime+ le ζ primeminus le ζ prime0 rArr q(ζb + ζ prime0 η) le q(ζb + ζ primeminus η) le q(ζb + ζ prime+ η) (548)

for q decreasing in ζ Hence

ζ prime1(sprime ηprime τ prime) = ζ prime0(s

prime ηprime τ prime) ζ prime2(sprime ηprime τ prime) = ζ prime+(s

prime ηprime τ prime) (549)

Then (540) reduces to the equations

dsprime

dτ+ G

Gζ+ Gη

Gζηprime + 1

2

[

ζ prime0(sprime ηprime τ ) + ζ prime+(s

prime ηprime τ)]

= 0 for dKPdsprime

dτ+ G

2Gζ+ Gη

Gζηprime + 1

2

[

ζ prime0(sprime ηprime τ) + ζ prime+(s

prime ηprime τ)]

= 0 for mdKP

sprime(0) = ξb

(550)

obtained expanding (540) near the breaking point and recalling that τ equivτ primeτb

We remark that in the differential equations (550) sprime depends on ηprime

parametrically So the discontinuous (dissipative) shocks of the longtime so-lutions of the small data Cauchy problems for dKP and mdKP has a simplegeometric construction given τ gt 0 for any fixed |ηprime| le ηcusp the overturn-ing profile in the (ξ q) plane is intercepted by a vertical straight line cuttingoff equal area lobi in analogy with the 1 + 1 dimensional case

Going back to the dKP variables

The above formulae written in the convenient variables q ξ η τ are es-sentially the same for both dKP and mdKP relevant differences appear whenwe go back to the original variables u x y t inverting equations (52)(53)

u = 1radictq t = τ2

4 y = ητ2

2 x = ξ minus η2τ2

4 for dKP

u = 1radictq t = eτ y = 2ηeτ x = ξ minus η2eτ for mdKP

(551)

24

and all the above universal formulae are easily transfered to the dKP (mn)equations In particular small and localized initial data break i) at tb =τ 2b 4 in the point (xb yb) = (ξb minus τ 2b η

2b4 ηbτ

2b 2) of the parabolic wave front

x+ y2(4tb) = ξb evolving according to dKP and ii) at tb = eτb in the point(xb yb) = (ξb minus η2be

τb 2ηbeτb) of the parabolic wave front x + y2(4tb) = ξb

evolving according to mdKP If for instance we use the same Gaussian initialcondition (419) for both dKP and mdKP with ǫ = 02 then G is given by(422) in both cases Consequently for dKP

ζb = 196 ηb = 0 ξb = 327 τb = 657 (552)

and wave breaking takes place at tb = 108 in the point (xb yb) = (327 0)on the parabola x+ 231 middot 10minus2y2 = 327 (see Figure 4)

Figure 4 Plotting of the analytic dKP solution u in the physical variablesx y t for G given by (422) (corresponding to the gaussian initial condition)ǫ = 02 at breaking

For mdKP

ζb = 161 ηb = 0 ξb = 251 τb = 1431 (553)

and wave breaking takes place at tb = 164middot106 in the point (xb yb) = (251 0)on the parabola x + 152 middot 10minus7y2 = 251 and at breaking the amplitude ofthe wave is u = ǫtb

minus12G(ζb ηb) = 195 middot 10minus4 (see Figure 5)

25

Figure 5 Plotting of the analytic mdKP solution u in the physical variablesx y t for G given by (422) (corresponding to the gaussian initial condition)ǫ = 02 at breaking

Since in the mdKP case tb is very large and the wave amplitude atbreaking is very small we wonder if such a wave breaking could be actuallydetected numerically

Now we go into the analytic details For the dKP case

tprime equiv tminus tb sim 2tbτ yprime = y minus yb ≃ 2tb(ηprime + 2ηbτ + 2ηprimeτ )

xprime = xminus xb sim ξprime minus ηbyprime minus yprime2

4tb+ η2b t

prime + ηbtbyprimetprime

(554)

and we choose τ prime to be sufficiently small to have |tprime| |yprime| ≪ 1The dKP solution reads

u(x y t) =ǫradictG(ζb + ζ prime ηb + ηprime) =

ǫradict

(

G+Gζζprime +Gη

yprime

2tb+O

(

tprime

tb

))

(555)where ζ prime is the solution of the cubic (511) with

a =3Fζζη

2Fζζζ

yprime

tb b = 3

Fζζζ

(

Fζtprime

tb+ Fζηη

yprime2

4t2b

)

X = xprime +(

ηb minus Fη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime minus[

η2b +(

F2minus ηbFη

)

1|Fζ |tb

]

tprime

+(

1minus Fηη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime2

4tb+[

minusηb +(

Fη

2+ ηbFηη

)

12|Fζ |tb

]

yprimetprime

tb

minus Fηηη

48|Fζ |yprime3

t3b

(556)

26

The three-valued region (532) after breaking becomes

xprime +(

ηb minus Fη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime minus[

η2b +(

F2minus ηbFη

)

1|Fζ |tb

]

tprime

+(

1minus Fηη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime2

4tb+[

minusηb +(

Fη

2|Fζ |tb +ηbFηη

|Fζ | minus Fζζη

2Fζζζ

)

12tb

]

yprimetprime

tb

+ 16|Fζ |F 2

ζζζ

[

minus FηηηF2ζζζ + Fζζη(3FζζζFζηη minus 2F 2

ζζη)]

yprime3

8t3b

2

=

α3

9middot64F 2ζF 4ζζζ

t6b

(

(

yprimecusp(tprime))2 minus yprime2

)3

(557)

where

yprimecusp(tprime) = 2

radic

|Fζ |Fζζζ

α

radictbtprime (558)

Equation (557) describes a closed curve with two cusps in the (x y) - planeat the points

~xplusmncusp(t

prime) = (xb yb) + (xplusmnprime

cusp(tprime)plusmnyprimecusp(t

prime)) (559)

where

xplusmnprime

cusp(tprime) sim ∓2ηb

radic

|Fζ |Fζζζ

α

radictbtprime plusmn Fη

radic

Fζζζ

α|Fζ |

radic

tprime

tb

+(

η2b minus|Fζ |Fζζζ

α

)

tprime +(

F|Fζ | +

FηηFζζζ

α

)

tprime

2tbplusmn 2ηb

radic

|Fζ |Fζζζ

αtprime

32radictb+O(τ 32)

(560)At last the analogue of (539) reads

∆xprime le 2

3

radic

|Fζ|Fζζζ

(

tprime

tb

)32

(561)

it follows that the longitudinal width ∆long and the transversal width ∆transv

of the multivalued region are respectively

∆long = O

(

(

tprime

tb

)32

)

∆transv = O(

(tbtprime)

12

)

rArr ∆long

∆transv= O

(

tprime

t2b

)

(562)

For the mdKP case

tprime = tminus tb sim tbτprime yprime = y minus yb sim 2tb(η

prime + ηbtprime

tb+ ηprimetprime

tb)

xprime = xminus xb sim ξprime minus ηbyprime + η2b t

prime minus yprime2

4tb+ ηb

yprimetprime

tb

(563)

27

and we choose τ prime sufficiently small to have |tprime| |yprime| ≪ 1The mdKP solution reads

u(x y t) =ǫradictG(ζb+ζ prime ηb+ηprime) =

ǫradict

(

G+Gζζprime +Gη

yprime

2tb+O

(

tprime

tb log tb

))

(564)where ζ prime is the solution of the cubic (511) with

a =3Fζζη

2Fζζζ

yprime

tb b = 3

Fζζζ

(

2Fζtprime

tb log tb+ Fζηη

yprime2

4t2b

)

X = xprime +(

ηb minus Fη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime minus[

η2b +(

Flog tb

minus ηbFη

)

1|Fζ |tb

]

tprime

+(

1minus Fηη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime2

4tb+[

minusηb +(

Fη

|Fζ |(1minus1

log tb) + ηbFηη

|Fζ |

)

12tb

]

yprimetprime

tb

minus Fηηη

48|Fζ |yprime3

t3b

(565)

The three-valued region (532) after breaking becomes

xprime +(

ηb minus Fη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime minus[

η2b +(

Flog tb

minus ηbFη

)

1|Fζ |tb

]

tprime

+(

1minus Fηη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime2

4tb+[

minusηb +(

Fη

|Fζ |(1minus1

log tb) + ηbFηη

|Fζ| minus Fζζη

Fζζζ log tb

)

12tb

]

yprimetprime

tb

+ 16|Fζ |F 2

ζζζ

[

minus FηηηF2ζζζ + Fζζη(3FζζζFζηη minus 2F 2

ζζη)]

yprime3

8t3b

2

=

α3

9middot64F 2ζ F

4ζζζt

6b

(

(

yprimecusp(tprime))2 minus yprime2

)3

(566)where

yprimecusp(tprime) = 2

radic

2|Fζ |Fζζζ

α

radic

tbtprime

log tb (567)

Equation (566) describes a closed curve with two cusps in the (x y) - planeat the points

~xplusmncusp(t

prime) = (xb yb) + (xplusmnprime

cusp(tprime)plusmnyprimecusp(t

prime)) (568)

where

xplusmnprime

cusp(tprime) sim ∓2ηb

radic

|Fζ |Fζζζ

α

radic

tbtprime

log tbplusmn Fη

radic

Fζζζ

α|Fζ |

radic

tprime

tb log tb

+(

η2b minus|Fζ |Fζζζ

α log tb

)

tprime +(

F|Fζ | +

FηηFζζζ

α

)

tprime

tb log tbplusmn 2ηb

radic

|Fζ |Fζζζ

αtprime

32radic

tb log tb

+O(τ 32)

(569)

28

At last the analogue of (539) reads

∆xprime le 4radic2

3

radic

|Fζ |Fζζζ

(

tprime

tb log tb

)32

(570)

it follows that the longitudinal width ∆long and the transversal width ∆transv

of the multivalued region are respectively

∆long = O

(

(

tprime

tb log tb

)32

)

∆transv = O

(

(

tbtprime

log tb

)12

)

rArr ∆long

∆transv= O

(

tprime

t2blog tb

)

(571)

References

[1] F Santucci Onde debolmente non lineari e quasi unidimensionali in

Natura La rottura di tali onde e il problema della regolarizzazione dis-

sipativa Tesi della Laurea Specialistica in Fisica supervisor P M San-tini Dipartimento di Fisica dellrsquoUniversita di Roma ldquoLa Sapienzardquo AA2011-2012

[2] S V Manakov and P M Santini On the dispersionless Kadomtsev-Petviashvili equation in n + 1 dimensions exact solutions the Cauchyproblem for small initial data and wave breaking J Phys A MathTheor 44 (2011) 405203

[3] G B Whitham Linear and nonlinear waves John Wiley amp Sons 1974

[4] C Lin E Reissner and H S Tien On two-dimensional nonsteadymotion of a slender body in a compressible fluid J Math Phys 27(1948) 220-231

[5] R Timman Unsteady motion in transonic flow Symposium Transson-icum Aachen 1962 EdKOswatitsch Springer 394-401

[6] E A Zobolotskaya and R V Khokhlov Quasi-plane waves in the non-linear acoustics of confined beams Soviet Physics- Acoustics Vol15N1 (1969)

29

[7] B B Kadomtsev and V I Petviashvili On the stability of solitarywaves in weakly dispersing media Soviet Physics-Doklady Vol15 N6(1970)

[8] X P Wang M J Ablowitz and H Segur Wave collapse and instabil-

ity of solitary waves of a generalized Kadomtsev-Petviashvili equationPhysica D 78 (1994) 241-265

[9] M J Ablowitz and H Segur Solitons and the Inverse Scattering Trans-

form SIAM Philadelphia 1981

[10] M J Ablowitz and P A Clarkson Solitons nonlinear evolution equa-

tions and inverse scattering Cambridge University Press 1991

[11] S Turitsyn and G Falkovitch Stability of magneto-elastic solitons andself-focusing of sound in antiferromagnets Sov Phys J Exp TheorPhys 62 (1985) 146-152

[12] S Novikov S V Manakov L P Pitaevskii V E Zakharov Theory of

solitons Consultant Bureau 1984

[13] S V Manakov and P M Santini Inverse scattering problem for vectorfields and the heavenly equation httparXivnlinSI0512043

[14] S V Manakov and P M Santini Inverse scattering problem forvector fields and the Cauchy problem for the heavenly equationPhys Lett A 359 613-619 (2006) doi101016jphysleta200607011httparXivnlinSI0604017

[15] S V Manakov and P M Santini The Cauchy problem on theplane for the dispersionless Kadomtsev-Petviashvili equation JETPLetters 83 No 10 462-466 (2006) 101134S0021364006100080httparXivnlinSI0604016

[16] P G Grinevich P M Santini and D Wu The Cauchy problem for thePavlov equation Nonlinearity 28 (2015) 3709-3754 doi1010880951-771528113709 Preprint arXiv13105834v2

[17] M V Pavlov Integrable hydrodynamic chains J Math Phys 44 (2003)4134-4156

30

on the paraboloid (316) If instead tminus|cmn|0 lt τb|cmn| then τ(infin) lt τb and

no breaking takes place before the wave freezesIf n = 1 forallm (314) reduces to the general solution u = A(xminusumt) of the

Riemann equation (12) if m = 1 foralln (314) reduces to the class of particu-lar solutions of the dKP equation with quadratic nonlinearity and arbitrarydimensions (dKP (1 n)) constructed in [2] It is interesting to remark thatthis type of exact solutions was first derived for the integrable dKP equation(13) using its nonlinear Riemnann - Hilbert inverse problem [21]

After breaking t gt tb the regular multivalued solutions (314) can bereplaced by the discontinuous single valued solutions of dKP (mn) obtainedusing (33) (35) and (313) in (310) (311) (312) More precisely fort gt tb where tb is defined in (315) and (317) the dKP (mn) solutiondescribed by (314) for t lt tb develops a discontinuous shock on the parabola

x+ y2

4t= S(t) S(t) equiv s(τ(t)) (318)

where s(τ) is characterized by equations (310) (311) and τ(t) is defined in(313) Behind and ahead the shock the solution is given by

u =

u2(x ~y t) if x+ y4

4tlt S(t)

u1(x ~y t) if x+ y4

4tgt S(t)

(319)

where u2 and u1 are respectively the maximum and the minimum among the(three in the case of a localized bump) branches u12 = tminus(nminus1)2A(ζ12) ofthe implicit equations (314)

We end this section remarking that as already mentioned in sect1 in theabove class of exact solutions of (11) the dependences of u on x throughthe combinations x minus cminus1

mnumt (if cmn gt 0) x minus umt log t (if cmn = 0) and

xminus|cmn|minus1umt[(tt0)|cmn|minus1] if cmn lt 0 are not consistent with the formal

dependence x minus umt recently postulated to study the breaking features ofdKP (m 2) in [20]

4 The Cauchy problem for small and local-

ized initial data and longtime wave break-

ing

In analogy with [2] now we use the exact solutions of the previous sectionto construct the longtime behaviour of solutions of the Cauchy problem of

10

(11) for small and localized initial data showing in particular that smalland localized initial data evolving according to (11) break in thelongtime regime only if m(nminus 1) le 2 (cmn ge 0)

For small and localized initial data of the type

u(x ~y 0) = ǫu0(x ~y) 0 lt ǫ ≪ 1 (41)

evolving according to equation (11) the behavior of the solution may beapproximated by the solution of the linearized dKP (mn) equation untilnonlinearity becomes relevant

For O(ǫ) initial data equations (37)(39) imply that the breaking timeis

τb = O(ǫminusm) ≫ 1 (42)

so the nonlinear regime for dKP (mn) is characterized by the condition

t = O(

τminus1(ǫminusm))

=

O(

ǫminus m

cmn

)

cmn gt 0

O(

eǫminusm)

cmn = 0(43)

where τminus1(middot) is the inverse of (36) while for cmn lt 0 large values of t arenot compatible with (42) and a nonlinear regime never occurs

So for t ≪ τminus1(ǫminusm) the solution of the Cauchy problem is approximatedby the solution of the linearized dKP (mn) equation while for t sim τminus1(ǫminusm)a matching will be made between the linearized solution and the exact solu-tion (314)

In the linear regime when 0 lt t ≪ O(τminus1(ǫminusm)) the dKP (mn) solutionis well described by that of the linearized dKP (mn) ie

u(x ~y t) sim ǫ

(2π)n

int

Rn

u0(k1 ~kperp) exp

[

ı(k1x+ ~kperp middot ~y minus k2perpk1

t)

]

dk1d~kperp (44)

where

u0(k1 ~kperp) =

int

Rn

u0(x ~y) exp[

minusı(k1x+ ~kperp middot ~y)]

dxd~y

In the longtime regime

1 ≪ t ≪ O(τminus1(ǫminusm)) (45)

11

the multiple integral can be evaluated by the stationary phase method whichgives [2]

u(x ~y t) sim tminusnminus12 ǫG

(

x+1

4t

nminus1sum

i=1

y2i ~y

2t

)

(46)

where

G(ξ ~η) =1

2nπn+12

int

R

dk1|k1|nminus12 u0 (k1 ~ηk1) exp

[

ık1ξ minus ı(nminus 1)π

4sgn(k1)

]

(47)in the space-time region

(xminus ξ)t yit = O(1) i = 1 nminus 1 (48)

on the paraboloid (32) and decays faster outside it Therefore small andlocalized initial data set in the longtime regime (45) governed bythe linear theory on the paraboloid (32)

When nonlinearity becomes relevant ie when t = O(τminus1(ǫminusm)) theasymptotic solution of dKP (mn) is built matching the longtime solution(46)(47) of the linearized Cauchy problem with the exact solution (314)If fi cmn gt 0 the first argument ξ of function G(ξ η) defined in (47) isreplaced by ξminus cminus1

mnumt or equivalently the arbitrary function A(ζ) in (38)

acquires the dependence on the second argument ~η = ~y2t and is identifiedwith G As a result of this matching in the nonlinear regime (42) (43) thesolution reads

u(x ~y t) ≃ uasmn(x ~y t)

uasmn(x ~y t) equiv

tminusnminus12 ǫG

(

x+ 14t

sumnminus1i=1 y2i minus 1

cmnumt ~y

2t

)

cmn gt 0

tminusnminus12 ǫG

(

x+ 14t

sumnminus1i=1 y2i minus umt ln t ~y

2t

)

cmn = 0

(49)with umt = O(1) for cmn gt 0 and umt log t = O(1) for cmn = 0 becominginfinitesimal in the linear regime as it has to be

For cmn lt 0 the solution is described by its linear form (46) thereforewave breaking takes place for the particular values of (mn) described by thecondition

cmn ge 0 hArr m(nminus 1) le 2 (410)

ie forn = 1 n = 2 n = 3forallm m = 1 2 m = 1

(411)

12

For n = 1 forallm uasmn reduces to the general solution of the Riemann equation

(12) [3] The cases (mn) = (2 1) and (mn) = (3 1) the dKP and theKZ equations have been already investigated in [18] and [2] respectivelytherefore in the following section we mainly focus on the case (mn) = (2 2)corresponding to the nonintegrable modified dKP equation (15) and to itsasymptotic solution

u ≃ uas22(x y t) =

1radictǫG

(

x+y2

4tminus u2t ln t

y

2t

)

(412)

comparing the results with the dKP case (mn) = (1 2) investigated in [18]with its asymptotic solution

u ≃ uas12(x y t) =

1radictǫG

(

x+y2

4tminus 2ut

y

2t

)

(413)

Remark 1 The estimate of the first correction to the asymptotics (49)reads

u = uasnm(x ~y t)(1 +O(tminus1)) (414)

Indeed if cmn gt 0 one has

u sim uasnm(x ~y t) +

ǫ1+ m

cmn

tnminus12

H

(

x+1

4t

nminus1sum

i=1

y2i ~y

2t τ

)

(415)

where τ = ǫmτ and H(ξ ~η τ ) is expressed in terms of G(ζ ~η) (ζ is definedin the second of equations (51)) through the PDE

(

Hτ +GmHξ

1 +mGmminus1Gζ τ

)

ξ

+1

4(cmnτ )1+cminus1mn

nminus1sum

j=1

(

Gηj

1 +mGmminus1Gζ τ

)

ηj

= 0 (416)

Since from (43) ǫm

cmn = O(tminus1) equation (415) yields (414) Similarly ifcmn = 0

u sim uasnm(x ~y t) +

ǫ

tn+12

H

(

x+1

4t

nminus1sum

i=1

y2i ~y

2t τ

)

(417)

where H(ξ ~η τ) now solves the PDE

(

H

1 +mGmminus1Gζ τ

)

ξ

=1

4

nminus1sum

j=1

(

Gηj

1 +mGmminus1Gζ τ

)

ηj

(418)

13

Then equation (417) yields equation (414) too

Remark 2 As is was observed in [2] for a gaussian initial condition

u0(x y) = d exp

[

minusx2 + ~y2

4

]

(419)

where d is constant the asymptotic solution can be written in terms of specialfunctions obtaining for G(ξ ~η)

G(ξ ~η) =dradicπ

1

(1+~η2)n+14

[

cos(

π4(nminus 1)

)

Γ(

n+14

)

1F1

(

n+14 12minusY 2

4

)

+ sin(

π4(nminus 1)

)

Γ(

n+34

)

Y 1F1

(

n+34 32minusY 2

4

) ]

(420)

where

Y =ξ

radic

1 + ~η2 (421)

Γ is the Euler gamma function and 1F1 is the Kummer confluent hypergeo-metric function [22 23] For n = 2 and d =

radic2π it yields respectively

G(ξ η) =1

(1+η2)34

[

Γ(

34

)

1F1

(

34 12minusY 2

4

)

+ Y Γ(

54

)

1F1

(

54 32minusY 2

4

)]

(422)

Remark 3 The fact that small data break only when the inequality (410) issatisfied was expected from physical considerations Indeed as already men-tioned in the introduction in equation (11) there are two competing termsthe nonlinear term umux responsible for the steepening of the profile andthe perpu term describing diffraction in the transversal (n minus 1) dimensionalhyperplane (reminiscence through the multiscale expansion leading to (11)of the wave operator) therefore diffraction increases as (nminus 1) increases [2]For small initial data the umux term is initially smaller and smaller increas-ing m and the solution evolves in a linear way for a longer and longer timediffracting transversally through the (nminus1) diffraction channels So diffrac-tion increasing with (n minus 1) acts on a very long time increasing with mbefore the nonlinear regime could become relevant and if (nminus 1) andor mare sufficiently large one expects that the solution would be diffracted awayalmost completely before reaching the nonlinear regime and will not break

14

We have in particular that breaking takes place in the following longtimeregimes (see (43))m = n = 1 (the Riemann equation with quadratic nonlinearity) tb = O(ǫminus1)m = 1 n = 2 (the dKP equation) tb = O(ǫminus2)m = 1 n = 3 (the KZ equation) tb = O(eǫ

minus1)

m = 2 n = 1 (the Riemann equation with cubic nonlinearity) tb = O(ǫminus2)m = 2 n = 2 (the mdKP equation) O(tb = eǫ

minus2)

It is interesting to remark that as it was observed in [2] if m = 1 (thephysically more relevant case) wave breaking takes place only for n le 3 iein physical space

We end this section remarking that also in the longtime behaviour of thesolutions of the small data Cauchy problem for equation (11) the depen-dence of the solution u on x as in the case of the exact solutions (314) isnot consistent with the formal ansatz recently made in [20]

5 Analytic aspects of the wave breaking

In this section we use the longtime behavior of solutions of the small dataCauchy problem for dKP (mn) to show explicitly the analytic aspects ofthe solution in the neighbourhood of the breaking time in terms of the initialdata represented by function G defined in (47) as it was already done in[18 2]

Choosing cmn ge 0 we rewrite equation (49) in the characteristic form

q sim ǫG(ζ ~η)ξ = ǫmF (ζ ~ηm)τ + ζ F (ζ ~ηm) equiv Gm(ζ ~η)

(51)

where

q = utnminus12 ξ = x+

1

4t

nminus1sum

j=1

y2j ~η =~y

2t(52)

and

τ(t) =

1cmn

tcmn if cmn gt 0

ln t if cmn = 0(53)

One solves the second of equations (51) with respect to the parameterζ obtaining ζ(ξ ~η τ) and replaces it into the first to obtain the solutionq sim ǫG(ζ(ξ ~η τ) ~η) The inversion of the second of equations (51) is possibleiff its ζ-derivative is different from zero Therefore the singularity manifold

15

(SM) of the solution is the n - dimensional manifold characterized by theequation

S(ζ ~η τ) equiv 1 + ǫmFζ(ζ ~ηm)τ = 0 rArr τ = minus 1

ǫmFζ(ζ ~ηm) (54)

Sincenabla(ξ~η)q =

ǫnabla(ζ~η)G(ζ~η)

1+ǫmFζ(ζ~ηm)τ (55)

the slope of the localized wave becomes infinity (the so-called gradient catas-trophe) on the SM and the n-dimensional wave ldquobreaksrdquo except on the di-

rection represented by the vector field V =nminus1sum

i=1

partηi +mǫmGmminus1(nminus1sum

i=1

Gηi)partξ [2]

[19] on which

V q = ǫ

nminus1sum

i=1

Gηi (56)

Since the KZ case (mn) = (1 3) has been studied in detail in [2] in thefollowing we mainly concentrate on the mdKP case (mn) = (2 2) and wecompare it with the dKP case (mn) = (1 2) investigated in [18]

From (54) the first breaking time τb and the corresponding characteristic

parameters ~ζb = (ζb ηb) are defined by the global minimum of a function ofthe 2 variables (ζ η)

τb = minus 1

ǫmFζ(ζb ηbm)= inf

(

minus 1

ǫmFζ(ζ ηm)

)

gt 0 (57)

and it is characterized together with the condition Fζ(~ζbm) lt 0 by thefollowing equations

Fζζ(~ζbm) = Fζη(~ζbm) = 0

α equiv Fζζζ(~ζbm)Fζηη(~ζbm)minus F 2ζζη(

~ζbm) gt 0 Fζζζ(~ζbm) gt 0(58)

The corresponding point at which the first wave breaking takes place is from(51) ~ξb = (ξb ηb) isin R

2 where

ξb = ζb + ǫmF (~ζbm)τb = ζb minusF (~ζbm)

Fζ(~ζbm) (59)

Now we evaluate equations (51) and (54) near breaking in the regime

ξ = ξb + ξprime η = ηb + ηprime τ = τb + τ prime ζ = ζb + ζ prime (510)

16

where ξprime ηprime τ prime ζ prime are small Using (57) - (59) the second of equations (51)becomes at the leading order the following cubic equation in ζ prime

ζ prime3+ a(ηprime)ζ prime

2+ b(ηprime τ)ζ prime minus γX(ξprime ηprime τ) = 0 (511)

where

a(ηprime) =3Fζζη

Fζζζηprime

b(ηprime τ) = 3Fζζζ

[

2Fζ τ + Fζηηηprime2]

X(ξprime ηprime τ ) = ξprime minus ǫF (ζb ηb + ηprime)τ prime minus ǫ [F (ζb ηb + ηprime)minus F ] τb simξprime minus Fη

|Fζ |ηprime minus F

|Fζ | τ minus Fηη

2|Fζ |ηprime2 minus Fη

|Fζ |ηprimeτ minus Fηηη

6|Fζ |ηprime3 γ =

6|Fζ |Fζζζ

(512)

and

τ equiv τ prime

τb=

τ minus τbτb

(513)

corresponding to the maximal balance

|ζ prime| |ηprime| = O(|τ |12) |X| = O(|τ |32) (514)

In (512) and in the rest of this section G F = Gm and all their partialderivatives whose arguments are not indicated are meant to be evaluated at~ζb = (ζb ηb)

The three roots of the cubic are given by the well-known Cardano-Tartagliaformula

ζ prime0 (ξprime ~ηprime τ) = minusa

3+ (A+)

13 + (Aminus)

13

ζ primeplusmn (ξprime ~ηprime τ) = minusa3minus 1

2

(

(A+)13 + (Aminus)

13

)

plusmnradic32i(

(A+)13 minus (Aminus)

13

)

(515)where

Aplusmn = Rplusmnradic∆ (516)

and the discriminant ∆ reads

∆ = R2 +Q3 (517)

withQ(ηprime τ ) = 3bminusa2

9= minus2|Fζ |

Fζζζτ + α

F 2ζζζ

ηprime2

R(ξprime ηprime τ) = γ2X(ξprime ηprime τ ) + ab

18+ a

3Q(ηprime τ)

(518)

17

At the same order function S in (54) becomes

S(ζ prime ηprime τ ) = minusτ + 12|Fζ |

[

Fζζζζprime2 + 2Fζζηζ

primeηprime + Fζηηηprime2]

=

Fζζζ

2|Fζ |

(

Q(ηprime τ ) +(

ζ prime +Fζζη

Fζζζηprime)2)

(519)

Known ζ prime as function of (ξprime ηprime τ) from the cubic (511) the solution q andits gradient are then approximated near breaking by the formulae

q(ξ η τ) sim ǫG(ζb + ζ prime ηb + ηprime) = ǫ (G+Gζζprime +Gηη

prime +O(|τ |)) nabla(ξη)q sim ǫ

nabla(ζprimeηprime)G(ζb+ζprimeηb+ηprime)

S(ζprimeηprimeτ) (520)

Before breaking

Before breaking τ lt τb (τ lt 0) the coefficient Q in (518) is strictlypositive (see the second of (58)) then the discriminant ∆ = R2 + Q3 isalso strictly positive and only the root ζ prime0 is real Correspondingly the realsolution q is single valued and described by Cardanorsquos formula and by (520)In addition function S in (519) is also strictly positive and nabla(ξ~η)q is finiteforall ξ η

To have a more explicit solution than that provided by Cardanorsquos formulawe first restrict the asymptotic region to a narrower area so that the cubic(511) reduces to the linear equation bζ prime = γX and X contains only linearterms This is achieved choosing

ηprime = O(τ r) X = O(τ p+1) 12lt p lt p+1

2lt r lt p+ 1 (521)

implying

ζ prime = O(τ p)

X = ξprime + Fη

Fζηprime + F

Fζτ + o(τ p+1) = ξprime + Gη

Gζηprime + G

mGζτ + o(τ p+1)

bζ prime = γX rArr ζ prime sim minus 1τ

(

ξprime + Gη

Gζηprime + G

mGζτ)

(522)

Then

q = ǫG(ζb + ζ prime ηb + ηprime) sim ǫG + ǫGζζprime sim ǫ

(

1minus 1

m

)

Gminus ǫGζ

τ

(

ξprime +Gη

Gζηprime)

(523)

18

Since q sim ǫG and recalling the definitions (57)(513) it follows that q isdescribed by the exact similarity solution

q sim(

ξ + (GηGζ)ηprime

τ prime

)1m

(524)

of equation (37)The cubic simplifies also in the asymptotic region in which ξprime ηprime are of

the same order while τ prime le O(|ηprime|) reducing to ζ prime3 = γX so that the solutionq and its gradient are

q sim ǫG(ζb +3radic

γX(ξprime ηprime τ) ηb + ηprime) (525)

nablaξηq sim3radicγ

3

ǫnablaζηG3radic

X2(ξprime ηprime τ ) (526)

At breaking

When τ = τb the singularity manifold S (519) is positive everywhere inthe (ξ η) plane except at the breaking point (ξb ηb) in which it is zerotogether with Q R and the discriminant ∆ The solution q is well describedagain by Cardanorsquos formula and by (520) To have a more explicit solutionthan that provided by Cardanorsquos formula we choose ξprime ηprime of the same orderthe cubic (511) reduces to ζ prime3 = γX and equations (525) become

q sim ǫG(ζb +3radic

γX(ξprime ηprime 0) ηb + ηprime)

nablaξηq sim 3radicγ

3

ǫnablaξηG3radic

X2(ξprimeηprime0)

(527)

The expression of Xb(ξprime ~ηprime) equiv X(ξprime ~ηprime 0) is given in (512) Xb(ξ

prime ηprime) simξprime minus Fη

|Fζ |ηprime if ξprime prop ηprime but ξprime 6= (FηFζ)η

prime while X(ξprime ηprime 0) = minus Fηη

2|Fζ |ηprime2 if

ξprime = (FηFζ)ηprime

Equation (527) implies that all the derivatives of q blow up at τ = τb in

the breaking point (ξb ηb) with the universal lawXminus23b except the derivative

along the transversal line Xb(ξprime ηprime 0) = 0 represented by the vector field

V = partη minusXbηpartξ (compare with (56)) for which [2 19]

V q|(ξbηb) = ǫGη (528)

After breaking I the overturning profile

19

After breaking the solution becomes three-valued in a compact regionof the (ξ η) - plane (see Figures 3) and in general does not describe anyphysics nevertheless a detailed study of the multivalued region is importantin view of a proper regularization of the models

If τ gt τb (τ gt 0) in the regime (514) the SM equation S = 0

2|Fζ|τ = Fζζζζprime2 + 2Fζζηζ

primeηprime + Fζηηηprime2 (529)

describes an ellipsoidal paraboloid in the (ζ prime ηprime τ) space with minimum at

the breaking point (~ξb τb)One can check that eliminating ζ prime from equations (529) and (511) one

obtains the SM equation in space-time coordinates coinciding with the equa-tion ∆ = R2+Q3 = 0 where ∆ is the discriminant (517) of the cubic (511)and Q and R are defined in (518) Such equation can be satisfied only ifQ le 0 ie only if

|ηprime| le ηprimecusp(τ) (530)

where

ηprimecusp(τ ) equivradic

2|Fζ |Fζζζ

α

radicτ (531)

and is given by the following analytic and universal expression

ξprime minus Fη

|Fζ |ηprime minus F

|Fζ | τ minus Fηη

2|Fζ |ηprime2 minus

(

Fη

|Fζ | +Fζζη

Fζζζ

)

ηprimeτ + 16|Fζ |F 2

ζζζ

[

minus FηηηF2ζζζ

+Fζζη(3FζζζFζηη minus 2F 2ζζη)]

ηprime32

= α3

9F 2ζ F

4ζζζ

(

(

ηprimecusp(τ))2 minus ηprime2

)3

(532)Equation (532) describes a closed curve with two cusps in the (ξ η) - planeat the points

~ξplusmncusp(τ ) = (ξb ηb) + (ξplusmnprime

cusp(τ )plusmnηprimecusp(τ)) (533)

where

ξplusmnprime

cusp(τ ) sim plusmnFη

radic

2Fζζζ

α|Fζ|radicτ +

(

F

|Fζ |+

FηηFζζζ

α

)

τ plusmn Bτ 32 (534)

where B = O(1) (see Figures 6 for dKP and 7 for mdKP) corresponding tothe conditions Q = R = 0 on which the three real solutions of the cubiccoincide (in 1 + 1 dimensions it is not possible to have three coincidentsolutions)

ζ0 = ζplusmn = minusFζζη

Fζζζηprime rArr q0 = qplusmn =sim ǫ

(

G+ (Gη minusGζFζζη

Fζζζ)ηprime)

(535)

20

On the remaining part of the closed curve ∆ = 0 two of the three realbranches coincide Outside the closed curve ∆ gt 0 and the real solution q issingle valued inside the closed curve ∆ lt 0 and the real solution q is threevalued with the three branches

q = ǫG(ζb + ζ prime ηb + ηprime) sim ǫ(G +Gζζprime +Gηη

prime +O(τ)) (536)

where ζ prime are the three real solutions of the cubic (511) (see fi Figures 2for dKP)

Figures 2 Plotting of the dKP analytic solution in the (q ξ η τ) variablesfor G given by (422) ǫ = 02 at times τ = 0 τb minus 2 τb τb + 2 whereτb = 657

Such a three-valued region of the (ξ η) plane is characterized by the

21

conditions|ηprime| lt ηprimecusp(τ) ξminusM(ηprime τ) lt ξprime lt ξ+M(ηprime τ) (537)

where

ξplusmnM(ηprime τ) equiv Fη

|Fζ |ηprime + F

|Fζ | τ + Fηη

2|Fζ |ηprime2 +

(

Fη

|Fζ | +Fζζη

Fζζζ

)

ηprimeτ minus 16|Fζ |F 2

ζζζ

[

minus FηηηF2ζζζ

+Fζζη(3FζζζFζηη minus 2F 2ζζη)]

ηprime3 plusmn Fζζζ

3|Fζ | |Q| 32(538)

(see Figures 3 for dKP)Since

∆ξ equiv ξ+M(ηprime τ)minus ξminusM(ηprime τ) =2Fζζζ

3|Fζ||Q(ηprime τ)|32 le 4

radic2

3

radic

|Fζ|Fζζζ

τ 32 (539)

we infer that the longitudinal width of the multivalued region is O(τ 32) thetransversal widths delimited by the two cusps is instead O(τ 12) thereforethe multivalued region develops at τ = τb from the breaking point (ξb ηb)with an infinite speed in the tranversal direction and with zero speed in thelongitudinal direction All these results are a common feature to the class ofdynamics (11) (see the previously derived results for the dKP equation forfinite times [18 19] and in the longtime regime [18] and those for the KZequation in the longtime regime [2])

-15-10-050005101-15-10-0500051015

-15-10-050005101-15-10-0500051015

Figures 3 Plotting of the three valued regions of the (ξ η) plane for dKPat times τ = 02 05 for G given by (422) and ǫ = 02 The center of thesquare frame is the breaking point (ξb ηb) Notice that the two cusps havethe same ξ coordinate ξ+cusp(τ) sim ξminuscusp(τ) since for solution (422) Gη = 0(see (531)(534))

22

We end this subsection remarking that as it was already observed in [19]since dKP (mn) is symmetric wrt y if the initial datum is also symmetricwrt y like the Gaussian (419) also its evolution will be so u(x y t) =u(xminusy t) This implies that ηb = yb = 0 and that all partial derivatives ofF and G containing an odd number of η derivatives are 0 at breaking As aconsequence the transversal direction on which the derivative of the profiledoes not blow up is the η (y) direction and on it the derivative is 0 atbreaking (see (56))

After breaking II the discontinuous shock

Using the matching rules of sect3 the shock formulae (310) become

parts

partτ=

ǫm

m+ 1

Gm+1(ζ1 η)minusGm+1(ζ2 η)

G(ζ1 η)minusG(ζ2 η) (540)

s = ζ1 + ǫmGm(ζ1 η) τ = ζ2 + ǫmGm(ζ2 η) τ (541)

where subscript 2 is for values behind the shock and subscript 1 for valuesahead Equations (541) are two implicit equations for ζ1 and ζ2 solvingthese equations yields ζ1(s η τ) ζ2(s η τ) and substituting these expres-sions in (540) it results in a nonlinear first order differential equation fors This equation and the initial conditions (311) give uniquely s(η τ) andconsequently ζ12(η τ) = ζ12(s(η τ) η τ)

We recall that immediately after breaking and if (530) holds equation(541) reduces to the cubic (511)(512) in which ξprime must be replaced by sprimepossessing three real roots where

sprime(ηprime τ) = sminus ξb (542)

Therefore the values of ζ1 and ζ2 are chosen among the three solutions (515)so that q2 = ǫG(ζb + ζ prime2 η) has the maximum value and q1 = ǫG(ζb + ζ prime1 η)the minimum one among the three branches of q Since Gζ lt 0 it followsthat

ζ1 = maxζ prime0 ζ primeplusmn ζ2 = minζ prime0 ζ primeplusmn (543)

To identify ζ12 with one of the three roots ζ prime0 ζprimeplusmn let us rewrite them as

follows

ζ prime0 = minusa

3+ 2 3

radicρ cos

(

θ

3

)

(544)

ζ prime+ = minusa

3minus 3

radicρ

(

cos

(

θ

3

)

+radic3 sin

(

θ

3

))

(545)

23

ζ primeminus = minusa

3minus 3

radicρ

(

cos

(

θ

3

)

minusradic3 sin

(

θ

3

))

(546)

where

ρ =radic

R2 + |∆| θ = arctan

(

radic

|∆|R

)

(547)

We observe that for 0 le θ le π the following inequalities hold

minus cos

(

θ

3

)

minusradic3 sin

(

θ

3

)

le minus cos

(

θ

3

)

+radic3 sin

(

θ

3

)

le 2 cos

(

θ

3

)

so that

ζ prime+ le ζ primeminus le ζ prime0 rArr q(ζb + ζ prime0 η) le q(ζb + ζ primeminus η) le q(ζb + ζ prime+ η) (548)

for q decreasing in ζ Hence

ζ prime1(sprime ηprime τ prime) = ζ prime0(s

prime ηprime τ prime) ζ prime2(sprime ηprime τ prime) = ζ prime+(s

prime ηprime τ prime) (549)

Then (540) reduces to the equations

dsprime

dτ+ G

Gζ+ Gη

Gζηprime + 1

2

[

ζ prime0(sprime ηprime τ ) + ζ prime+(s

prime ηprime τ)]

= 0 for dKPdsprime

dτ+ G

2Gζ+ Gη

Gζηprime + 1

2

[

ζ prime0(sprime ηprime τ) + ζ prime+(s

prime ηprime τ)]

= 0 for mdKP

sprime(0) = ξb

(550)

obtained expanding (540) near the breaking point and recalling that τ equivτ primeτb

We remark that in the differential equations (550) sprime depends on ηprime

parametrically So the discontinuous (dissipative) shocks of the longtime so-lutions of the small data Cauchy problems for dKP and mdKP has a simplegeometric construction given τ gt 0 for any fixed |ηprime| le ηcusp the overturn-ing profile in the (ξ q) plane is intercepted by a vertical straight line cuttingoff equal area lobi in analogy with the 1 + 1 dimensional case

Going back to the dKP variables

The above formulae written in the convenient variables q ξ η τ are es-sentially the same for both dKP and mdKP relevant differences appear whenwe go back to the original variables u x y t inverting equations (52)(53)

u = 1radictq t = τ2

4 y = ητ2

2 x = ξ minus η2τ2

4 for dKP

u = 1radictq t = eτ y = 2ηeτ x = ξ minus η2eτ for mdKP

(551)

24

and all the above universal formulae are easily transfered to the dKP (mn)equations In particular small and localized initial data break i) at tb =τ 2b 4 in the point (xb yb) = (ξb minus τ 2b η

2b4 ηbτ

2b 2) of the parabolic wave front

x+ y2(4tb) = ξb evolving according to dKP and ii) at tb = eτb in the point(xb yb) = (ξb minus η2be

τb 2ηbeτb) of the parabolic wave front x + y2(4tb) = ξb

evolving according to mdKP If for instance we use the same Gaussian initialcondition (419) for both dKP and mdKP with ǫ = 02 then G is given by(422) in both cases Consequently for dKP

ζb = 196 ηb = 0 ξb = 327 τb = 657 (552)

and wave breaking takes place at tb = 108 in the point (xb yb) = (327 0)on the parabola x+ 231 middot 10minus2y2 = 327 (see Figure 4)

Figure 4 Plotting of the analytic dKP solution u in the physical variablesx y t for G given by (422) (corresponding to the gaussian initial condition)ǫ = 02 at breaking

For mdKP

ζb = 161 ηb = 0 ξb = 251 τb = 1431 (553)

and wave breaking takes place at tb = 164middot106 in the point (xb yb) = (251 0)on the parabola x + 152 middot 10minus7y2 = 251 and at breaking the amplitude ofthe wave is u = ǫtb

minus12G(ζb ηb) = 195 middot 10minus4 (see Figure 5)

25

Figure 5 Plotting of the analytic mdKP solution u in the physical variablesx y t for G given by (422) (corresponding to the gaussian initial condition)ǫ = 02 at breaking

Since in the mdKP case tb is very large and the wave amplitude atbreaking is very small we wonder if such a wave breaking could be actuallydetected numerically

Now we go into the analytic details For the dKP case

tprime equiv tminus tb sim 2tbτ yprime = y minus yb ≃ 2tb(ηprime + 2ηbτ + 2ηprimeτ )

xprime = xminus xb sim ξprime minus ηbyprime minus yprime2

4tb+ η2b t

prime + ηbtbyprimetprime

(554)

and we choose τ prime to be sufficiently small to have |tprime| |yprime| ≪ 1The dKP solution reads

u(x y t) =ǫradictG(ζb + ζ prime ηb + ηprime) =

ǫradict

(

G+Gζζprime +Gη

yprime

2tb+O

(

tprime

tb

))

(555)where ζ prime is the solution of the cubic (511) with

a =3Fζζη

2Fζζζ

yprime

tb b = 3

Fζζζ

(

Fζtprime

tb+ Fζηη

yprime2

4t2b

)

X = xprime +(

ηb minus Fη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime minus[

η2b +(

F2minus ηbFη

)

1|Fζ |tb

]

tprime

+(

1minus Fηη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime2

4tb+[

minusηb +(

Fη

2+ ηbFηη

)

12|Fζ |tb

]

yprimetprime

tb

minus Fηηη

48|Fζ |yprime3

t3b

(556)

26

The three-valued region (532) after breaking becomes

xprime +(

ηb minus Fη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime minus[

η2b +(

F2minus ηbFη

)

1|Fζ |tb

]

tprime

+(

1minus Fηη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime2

4tb+[

minusηb +(

Fη

2|Fζ |tb +ηbFηη

|Fζ | minus Fζζη

2Fζζζ

)

12tb

]

yprimetprime

tb

+ 16|Fζ |F 2

ζζζ

[

minus FηηηF2ζζζ + Fζζη(3FζζζFζηη minus 2F 2

ζζη)]

yprime3

8t3b

2

=

α3

9middot64F 2ζF 4ζζζ

t6b

(

(

yprimecusp(tprime))2 minus yprime2

)3

(557)

where

yprimecusp(tprime) = 2

radic

|Fζ |Fζζζ

α

radictbtprime (558)

Equation (557) describes a closed curve with two cusps in the (x y) - planeat the points

~xplusmncusp(t

prime) = (xb yb) + (xplusmnprime

cusp(tprime)plusmnyprimecusp(t

prime)) (559)

where

xplusmnprime

cusp(tprime) sim ∓2ηb

radic

|Fζ |Fζζζ

α

radictbtprime plusmn Fη

radic

Fζζζ

α|Fζ |

radic

tprime

tb

+(

η2b minus|Fζ |Fζζζ

α

)

tprime +(

F|Fζ | +

FηηFζζζ

α

)

tprime

2tbplusmn 2ηb

radic

|Fζ |Fζζζ

αtprime

32radictb+O(τ 32)

(560)At last the analogue of (539) reads

∆xprime le 2

3

radic

|Fζ|Fζζζ

(

tprime

tb

)32

(561)

it follows that the longitudinal width ∆long and the transversal width ∆transv

of the multivalued region are respectively

∆long = O

(

(

tprime

tb

)32

)

∆transv = O(

(tbtprime)

12

)

rArr ∆long

∆transv= O

(

tprime

t2b

)

(562)

For the mdKP case

tprime = tminus tb sim tbτprime yprime = y minus yb sim 2tb(η

prime + ηbtprime

tb+ ηprimetprime

tb)

xprime = xminus xb sim ξprime minus ηbyprime + η2b t

prime minus yprime2

4tb+ ηb

yprimetprime

tb

(563)

27

and we choose τ prime sufficiently small to have |tprime| |yprime| ≪ 1The mdKP solution reads

u(x y t) =ǫradictG(ζb+ζ prime ηb+ηprime) =

ǫradict

(

G+Gζζprime +Gη

yprime

2tb+O

(

tprime

tb log tb

))

(564)where ζ prime is the solution of the cubic (511) with

a =3Fζζη

2Fζζζ

yprime

tb b = 3

Fζζζ

(

2Fζtprime

tb log tb+ Fζηη

yprime2

4t2b

)

X = xprime +(

ηb minus Fη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime minus[

η2b +(

Flog tb

minus ηbFη

)

1|Fζ |tb

]

tprime

+(

1minus Fηη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime2

4tb+[

minusηb +(

Fη

|Fζ |(1minus1

log tb) + ηbFηη

|Fζ |

)

12tb

]

yprimetprime

tb

minus Fηηη

48|Fζ |yprime3

t3b

(565)

The three-valued region (532) after breaking becomes

xprime +(

ηb minus Fη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime minus[

η2b +(

Flog tb

minus ηbFη

)

1|Fζ |tb

]

tprime

+(

1minus Fηη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime2

4tb+[

minusηb +(

Fη

|Fζ |(1minus1

log tb) + ηbFηη

|Fζ| minus Fζζη

Fζζζ log tb

)

12tb

]

yprimetprime

tb

+ 16|Fζ |F 2

ζζζ

[

minus FηηηF2ζζζ + Fζζη(3FζζζFζηη minus 2F 2

ζζη)]

yprime3

8t3b

2

=

α3

9middot64F 2ζ F

4ζζζt

6b

(

(

yprimecusp(tprime))2 minus yprime2

)3

(566)where

yprimecusp(tprime) = 2

radic

2|Fζ |Fζζζ

α

radic

tbtprime

log tb (567)

Equation (566) describes a closed curve with two cusps in the (x y) - planeat the points

~xplusmncusp(t

prime) = (xb yb) + (xplusmnprime

cusp(tprime)plusmnyprimecusp(t

prime)) (568)

where

xplusmnprime

cusp(tprime) sim ∓2ηb

radic

|Fζ |Fζζζ

α

radic

tbtprime

log tbplusmn Fη

radic

Fζζζ

α|Fζ |

radic

tprime

tb log tb

+(

η2b minus|Fζ |Fζζζ

α log tb

)

tprime +(

F|Fζ | +

FηηFζζζ

α

)

tprime

tb log tbplusmn 2ηb

radic

|Fζ |Fζζζ

αtprime

32radic

tb log tb

+O(τ 32)

(569)

28

At last the analogue of (539) reads

∆xprime le 4radic2

3

radic

|Fζ |Fζζζ

(

tprime

tb log tb

)32

(570)

it follows that the longitudinal width ∆long and the transversal width ∆transv

of the multivalued region are respectively

∆long = O

(

(

tprime

tb log tb

)32

)

∆transv = O

(

(

tbtprime

log tb

)12

)

rArr ∆long

∆transv= O

(

tprime

t2blog tb

)

(571)

References

[1] F Santucci Onde debolmente non lineari e quasi unidimensionali in

Natura La rottura di tali onde e il problema della regolarizzazione dis-

sipativa Tesi della Laurea Specialistica in Fisica supervisor P M San-tini Dipartimento di Fisica dellrsquoUniversita di Roma ldquoLa Sapienzardquo AA2011-2012

[2] S V Manakov and P M Santini On the dispersionless Kadomtsev-Petviashvili equation in n + 1 dimensions exact solutions the Cauchyproblem for small initial data and wave breaking J Phys A MathTheor 44 (2011) 405203

[3] G B Whitham Linear and nonlinear waves John Wiley amp Sons 1974

[4] C Lin E Reissner and H S Tien On two-dimensional nonsteadymotion of a slender body in a compressible fluid J Math Phys 27(1948) 220-231

[5] R Timman Unsteady motion in transonic flow Symposium Transson-icum Aachen 1962 EdKOswatitsch Springer 394-401

[6] E A Zobolotskaya and R V Khokhlov Quasi-plane waves in the non-linear acoustics of confined beams Soviet Physics- Acoustics Vol15N1 (1969)

29

[7] B B Kadomtsev and V I Petviashvili On the stability of solitarywaves in weakly dispersing media Soviet Physics-Doklady Vol15 N6(1970)

[8] X P Wang M J Ablowitz and H Segur Wave collapse and instabil-

ity of solitary waves of a generalized Kadomtsev-Petviashvili equationPhysica D 78 (1994) 241-265

[9] M J Ablowitz and H Segur Solitons and the Inverse Scattering Trans-

form SIAM Philadelphia 1981

[10] M J Ablowitz and P A Clarkson Solitons nonlinear evolution equa-

tions and inverse scattering Cambridge University Press 1991

[11] S Turitsyn and G Falkovitch Stability of magneto-elastic solitons andself-focusing of sound in antiferromagnets Sov Phys J Exp TheorPhys 62 (1985) 146-152

[12] S Novikov S V Manakov L P Pitaevskii V E Zakharov Theory of

solitons Consultant Bureau 1984

[13] S V Manakov and P M Santini Inverse scattering problem for vectorfields and the heavenly equation httparXivnlinSI0512043

[14] S V Manakov and P M Santini Inverse scattering problem forvector fields and the Cauchy problem for the heavenly equationPhys Lett A 359 613-619 (2006) doi101016jphysleta200607011httparXivnlinSI0604017

[15] S V Manakov and P M Santini The Cauchy problem on theplane for the dispersionless Kadomtsev-Petviashvili equation JETPLetters 83 No 10 462-466 (2006) 101134S0021364006100080httparXivnlinSI0604016

[16] P G Grinevich P M Santini and D Wu The Cauchy problem for thePavlov equation Nonlinearity 28 (2015) 3709-3754 doi1010880951-771528113709 Preprint arXiv13105834v2

[17] M V Pavlov Integrable hydrodynamic chains J Math Phys 44 (2003)4134-4156

30

(11) for small and localized initial data showing in particular that smalland localized initial data evolving according to (11) break in thelongtime regime only if m(nminus 1) le 2 (cmn ge 0)

For small and localized initial data of the type

u(x ~y 0) = ǫu0(x ~y) 0 lt ǫ ≪ 1 (41)

evolving according to equation (11) the behavior of the solution may beapproximated by the solution of the linearized dKP (mn) equation untilnonlinearity becomes relevant

For O(ǫ) initial data equations (37)(39) imply that the breaking timeis

τb = O(ǫminusm) ≫ 1 (42)

so the nonlinear regime for dKP (mn) is characterized by the condition

t = O(

τminus1(ǫminusm))

=

O(

ǫminus m

cmn

)

cmn gt 0

O(

eǫminusm)

cmn = 0(43)

where τminus1(middot) is the inverse of (36) while for cmn lt 0 large values of t arenot compatible with (42) and a nonlinear regime never occurs

So for t ≪ τminus1(ǫminusm) the solution of the Cauchy problem is approximatedby the solution of the linearized dKP (mn) equation while for t sim τminus1(ǫminusm)a matching will be made between the linearized solution and the exact solu-tion (314)

In the linear regime when 0 lt t ≪ O(τminus1(ǫminusm)) the dKP (mn) solutionis well described by that of the linearized dKP (mn) ie

u(x ~y t) sim ǫ

(2π)n

int

Rn

u0(k1 ~kperp) exp

[

ı(k1x+ ~kperp middot ~y minus k2perpk1

t)

]

dk1d~kperp (44)

where

u0(k1 ~kperp) =

int

Rn

u0(x ~y) exp[

minusı(k1x+ ~kperp middot ~y)]

dxd~y

In the longtime regime

1 ≪ t ≪ O(τminus1(ǫminusm)) (45)

11

the multiple integral can be evaluated by the stationary phase method whichgives [2]

u(x ~y t) sim tminusnminus12 ǫG

(

x+1

4t

nminus1sum

i=1

y2i ~y

2t

)

(46)

where

G(ξ ~η) =1

2nπn+12

int

R

dk1|k1|nminus12 u0 (k1 ~ηk1) exp

[

ık1ξ minus ı(nminus 1)π

4sgn(k1)

]

(47)in the space-time region

(xminus ξ)t yit = O(1) i = 1 nminus 1 (48)

on the paraboloid (32) and decays faster outside it Therefore small andlocalized initial data set in the longtime regime (45) governed bythe linear theory on the paraboloid (32)

When nonlinearity becomes relevant ie when t = O(τminus1(ǫminusm)) theasymptotic solution of dKP (mn) is built matching the longtime solution(46)(47) of the linearized Cauchy problem with the exact solution (314)If fi cmn gt 0 the first argument ξ of function G(ξ η) defined in (47) isreplaced by ξminus cminus1

mnumt or equivalently the arbitrary function A(ζ) in (38)

acquires the dependence on the second argument ~η = ~y2t and is identifiedwith G As a result of this matching in the nonlinear regime (42) (43) thesolution reads

u(x ~y t) ≃ uasmn(x ~y t)

uasmn(x ~y t) equiv

tminusnminus12 ǫG

(

x+ 14t

sumnminus1i=1 y2i minus 1

cmnumt ~y

2t

)

cmn gt 0

tminusnminus12 ǫG

(

x+ 14t

sumnminus1i=1 y2i minus umt ln t ~y

2t

)

cmn = 0

(49)with umt = O(1) for cmn gt 0 and umt log t = O(1) for cmn = 0 becominginfinitesimal in the linear regime as it has to be

For cmn lt 0 the solution is described by its linear form (46) thereforewave breaking takes place for the particular values of (mn) described by thecondition

cmn ge 0 hArr m(nminus 1) le 2 (410)

ie forn = 1 n = 2 n = 3forallm m = 1 2 m = 1

(411)

12

For n = 1 forallm uasmn reduces to the general solution of the Riemann equation

(12) [3] The cases (mn) = (2 1) and (mn) = (3 1) the dKP and theKZ equations have been already investigated in [18] and [2] respectivelytherefore in the following section we mainly focus on the case (mn) = (2 2)corresponding to the nonintegrable modified dKP equation (15) and to itsasymptotic solution

u ≃ uas22(x y t) =

1radictǫG

(

x+y2

4tminus u2t ln t

y

2t

)

(412)

comparing the results with the dKP case (mn) = (1 2) investigated in [18]with its asymptotic solution

u ≃ uas12(x y t) =

1radictǫG

(

x+y2

4tminus 2ut

y

2t

)

(413)

Remark 1 The estimate of the first correction to the asymptotics (49)reads

u = uasnm(x ~y t)(1 +O(tminus1)) (414)

Indeed if cmn gt 0 one has

u sim uasnm(x ~y t) +

ǫ1+ m

cmn

tnminus12

H

(

x+1

4t

nminus1sum

i=1

y2i ~y

2t τ

)

(415)

where τ = ǫmτ and H(ξ ~η τ ) is expressed in terms of G(ζ ~η) (ζ is definedin the second of equations (51)) through the PDE

(

Hτ +GmHξ

1 +mGmminus1Gζ τ

)

ξ

+1

4(cmnτ )1+cminus1mn

nminus1sum

j=1

(

Gηj

1 +mGmminus1Gζ τ

)

ηj

= 0 (416)

Since from (43) ǫm

cmn = O(tminus1) equation (415) yields (414) Similarly ifcmn = 0

u sim uasnm(x ~y t) +

ǫ

tn+12

H

(

x+1

4t

nminus1sum

i=1

y2i ~y

2t τ

)

(417)

where H(ξ ~η τ) now solves the PDE

(

H

1 +mGmminus1Gζ τ

)

ξ

=1

4

nminus1sum

j=1

(

Gηj

1 +mGmminus1Gζ τ

)

ηj

(418)

13

Then equation (417) yields equation (414) too

Remark 2 As is was observed in [2] for a gaussian initial condition

u0(x y) = d exp

[

minusx2 + ~y2

4

]

(419)

where d is constant the asymptotic solution can be written in terms of specialfunctions obtaining for G(ξ ~η)

G(ξ ~η) =dradicπ

1

(1+~η2)n+14

[

cos(

π4(nminus 1)

)

Γ(

n+14

)

1F1

(

n+14 12minusY 2

4

)

+ sin(

π4(nminus 1)

)

Γ(

n+34

)

Y 1F1

(

n+34 32minusY 2

4

) ]

(420)

where

Y =ξ

radic

1 + ~η2 (421)

Γ is the Euler gamma function and 1F1 is the Kummer confluent hypergeo-metric function [22 23] For n = 2 and d =

radic2π it yields respectively

G(ξ η) =1

(1+η2)34

[

Γ(

34

)

1F1

(

34 12minusY 2

4

)

+ Y Γ(

54

)

1F1

(

54 32minusY 2

4

)]

(422)

Remark 3 The fact that small data break only when the inequality (410) issatisfied was expected from physical considerations Indeed as already men-tioned in the introduction in equation (11) there are two competing termsthe nonlinear term umux responsible for the steepening of the profile andthe perpu term describing diffraction in the transversal (n minus 1) dimensionalhyperplane (reminiscence through the multiscale expansion leading to (11)of the wave operator) therefore diffraction increases as (nminus 1) increases [2]For small initial data the umux term is initially smaller and smaller increas-ing m and the solution evolves in a linear way for a longer and longer timediffracting transversally through the (nminus1) diffraction channels So diffrac-tion increasing with (n minus 1) acts on a very long time increasing with mbefore the nonlinear regime could become relevant and if (nminus 1) andor mare sufficiently large one expects that the solution would be diffracted awayalmost completely before reaching the nonlinear regime and will not break

14

We have in particular that breaking takes place in the following longtimeregimes (see (43))m = n = 1 (the Riemann equation with quadratic nonlinearity) tb = O(ǫminus1)m = 1 n = 2 (the dKP equation) tb = O(ǫminus2)m = 1 n = 3 (the KZ equation) tb = O(eǫ

minus1)

m = 2 n = 1 (the Riemann equation with cubic nonlinearity) tb = O(ǫminus2)m = 2 n = 2 (the mdKP equation) O(tb = eǫ

minus2)

It is interesting to remark that as it was observed in [2] if m = 1 (thephysically more relevant case) wave breaking takes place only for n le 3 iein physical space

We end this section remarking that also in the longtime behaviour of thesolutions of the small data Cauchy problem for equation (11) the depen-dence of the solution u on x as in the case of the exact solutions (314) isnot consistent with the formal ansatz recently made in [20]

5 Analytic aspects of the wave breaking

In this section we use the longtime behavior of solutions of the small dataCauchy problem for dKP (mn) to show explicitly the analytic aspects ofthe solution in the neighbourhood of the breaking time in terms of the initialdata represented by function G defined in (47) as it was already done in[18 2]

Choosing cmn ge 0 we rewrite equation (49) in the characteristic form

q sim ǫG(ζ ~η)ξ = ǫmF (ζ ~ηm)τ + ζ F (ζ ~ηm) equiv Gm(ζ ~η)

(51)

where

q = utnminus12 ξ = x+

1

4t

nminus1sum

j=1

y2j ~η =~y

2t(52)

and

τ(t) =

1cmn

tcmn if cmn gt 0

ln t if cmn = 0(53)

One solves the second of equations (51) with respect to the parameterζ obtaining ζ(ξ ~η τ) and replaces it into the first to obtain the solutionq sim ǫG(ζ(ξ ~η τ) ~η) The inversion of the second of equations (51) is possibleiff its ζ-derivative is different from zero Therefore the singularity manifold

15

(SM) of the solution is the n - dimensional manifold characterized by theequation

S(ζ ~η τ) equiv 1 + ǫmFζ(ζ ~ηm)τ = 0 rArr τ = minus 1

ǫmFζ(ζ ~ηm) (54)

Sincenabla(ξ~η)q =

ǫnabla(ζ~η)G(ζ~η)

1+ǫmFζ(ζ~ηm)τ (55)

the slope of the localized wave becomes infinity (the so-called gradient catas-trophe) on the SM and the n-dimensional wave ldquobreaksrdquo except on the di-

rection represented by the vector field V =nminus1sum

i=1

partηi +mǫmGmminus1(nminus1sum

i=1

Gηi)partξ [2]

[19] on which

V q = ǫ

nminus1sum

i=1

Gηi (56)

Since the KZ case (mn) = (1 3) has been studied in detail in [2] in thefollowing we mainly concentrate on the mdKP case (mn) = (2 2) and wecompare it with the dKP case (mn) = (1 2) investigated in [18]

From (54) the first breaking time τb and the corresponding characteristic

parameters ~ζb = (ζb ηb) are defined by the global minimum of a function ofthe 2 variables (ζ η)

τb = minus 1

ǫmFζ(ζb ηbm)= inf

(

minus 1

ǫmFζ(ζ ηm)

)

gt 0 (57)

and it is characterized together with the condition Fζ(~ζbm) lt 0 by thefollowing equations

Fζζ(~ζbm) = Fζη(~ζbm) = 0

α equiv Fζζζ(~ζbm)Fζηη(~ζbm)minus F 2ζζη(

~ζbm) gt 0 Fζζζ(~ζbm) gt 0(58)

The corresponding point at which the first wave breaking takes place is from(51) ~ξb = (ξb ηb) isin R

2 where

ξb = ζb + ǫmF (~ζbm)τb = ζb minusF (~ζbm)

Fζ(~ζbm) (59)

Now we evaluate equations (51) and (54) near breaking in the regime

ξ = ξb + ξprime η = ηb + ηprime τ = τb + τ prime ζ = ζb + ζ prime (510)

16

where ξprime ηprime τ prime ζ prime are small Using (57) - (59) the second of equations (51)becomes at the leading order the following cubic equation in ζ prime

ζ prime3+ a(ηprime)ζ prime

2+ b(ηprime τ)ζ prime minus γX(ξprime ηprime τ) = 0 (511)

where

a(ηprime) =3Fζζη

Fζζζηprime

b(ηprime τ) = 3Fζζζ

[

2Fζ τ + Fζηηηprime2]

X(ξprime ηprime τ ) = ξprime minus ǫF (ζb ηb + ηprime)τ prime minus ǫ [F (ζb ηb + ηprime)minus F ] τb simξprime minus Fη

|Fζ |ηprime minus F

|Fζ | τ minus Fηη

2|Fζ |ηprime2 minus Fη

|Fζ |ηprimeτ minus Fηηη

6|Fζ |ηprime3 γ =

6|Fζ |Fζζζ

(512)

and

τ equiv τ prime

τb=

τ minus τbτb

(513)

corresponding to the maximal balance

|ζ prime| |ηprime| = O(|τ |12) |X| = O(|τ |32) (514)

In (512) and in the rest of this section G F = Gm and all their partialderivatives whose arguments are not indicated are meant to be evaluated at~ζb = (ζb ηb)

The three roots of the cubic are given by the well-known Cardano-Tartagliaformula

ζ prime0 (ξprime ~ηprime τ) = minusa

3+ (A+)

13 + (Aminus)

13

ζ primeplusmn (ξprime ~ηprime τ) = minusa3minus 1

2

(

(A+)13 + (Aminus)

13

)

plusmnradic32i(

(A+)13 minus (Aminus)

13

)

(515)where

Aplusmn = Rplusmnradic∆ (516)

and the discriminant ∆ reads

∆ = R2 +Q3 (517)

withQ(ηprime τ ) = 3bminusa2

9= minus2|Fζ |

Fζζζτ + α

F 2ζζζ

ηprime2

R(ξprime ηprime τ) = γ2X(ξprime ηprime τ ) + ab

18+ a

3Q(ηprime τ)

(518)

17

At the same order function S in (54) becomes

S(ζ prime ηprime τ ) = minusτ + 12|Fζ |

[

Fζζζζprime2 + 2Fζζηζ

primeηprime + Fζηηηprime2]

=

Fζζζ

2|Fζ |

(

Q(ηprime τ ) +(

ζ prime +Fζζη

Fζζζηprime)2)

(519)

Known ζ prime as function of (ξprime ηprime τ) from the cubic (511) the solution q andits gradient are then approximated near breaking by the formulae

q(ξ η τ) sim ǫG(ζb + ζ prime ηb + ηprime) = ǫ (G+Gζζprime +Gηη

prime +O(|τ |)) nabla(ξη)q sim ǫ

nabla(ζprimeηprime)G(ζb+ζprimeηb+ηprime)

S(ζprimeηprimeτ) (520)

Before breaking

Before breaking τ lt τb (τ lt 0) the coefficient Q in (518) is strictlypositive (see the second of (58)) then the discriminant ∆ = R2 + Q3 isalso strictly positive and only the root ζ prime0 is real Correspondingly the realsolution q is single valued and described by Cardanorsquos formula and by (520)In addition function S in (519) is also strictly positive and nabla(ξ~η)q is finiteforall ξ η

To have a more explicit solution than that provided by Cardanorsquos formulawe first restrict the asymptotic region to a narrower area so that the cubic(511) reduces to the linear equation bζ prime = γX and X contains only linearterms This is achieved choosing

ηprime = O(τ r) X = O(τ p+1) 12lt p lt p+1

2lt r lt p+ 1 (521)

implying

ζ prime = O(τ p)

X = ξprime + Fη

Fζηprime + F

Fζτ + o(τ p+1) = ξprime + Gη

Gζηprime + G

mGζτ + o(τ p+1)

bζ prime = γX rArr ζ prime sim minus 1τ

(

ξprime + Gη

Gζηprime + G

mGζτ)

(522)

Then

q = ǫG(ζb + ζ prime ηb + ηprime) sim ǫG + ǫGζζprime sim ǫ

(

1minus 1

m

)

Gminus ǫGζ

τ

(

ξprime +Gη

Gζηprime)

(523)

18

Since q sim ǫG and recalling the definitions (57)(513) it follows that q isdescribed by the exact similarity solution

q sim(

ξ + (GηGζ)ηprime

τ prime

)1m

(524)

of equation (37)The cubic simplifies also in the asymptotic region in which ξprime ηprime are of

the same order while τ prime le O(|ηprime|) reducing to ζ prime3 = γX so that the solutionq and its gradient are

q sim ǫG(ζb +3radic

γX(ξprime ηprime τ) ηb + ηprime) (525)

nablaξηq sim3radicγ

3

ǫnablaζηG3radic

X2(ξprime ηprime τ ) (526)

At breaking

When τ = τb the singularity manifold S (519) is positive everywhere inthe (ξ η) plane except at the breaking point (ξb ηb) in which it is zerotogether with Q R and the discriminant ∆ The solution q is well describedagain by Cardanorsquos formula and by (520) To have a more explicit solutionthan that provided by Cardanorsquos formula we choose ξprime ηprime of the same orderthe cubic (511) reduces to ζ prime3 = γX and equations (525) become

q sim ǫG(ζb +3radic

γX(ξprime ηprime 0) ηb + ηprime)

nablaξηq sim 3radicγ

3

ǫnablaξηG3radic

X2(ξprimeηprime0)

(527)

The expression of Xb(ξprime ~ηprime) equiv X(ξprime ~ηprime 0) is given in (512) Xb(ξ

prime ηprime) simξprime minus Fη

|Fζ |ηprime if ξprime prop ηprime but ξprime 6= (FηFζ)η

prime while X(ξprime ηprime 0) = minus Fηη

2|Fζ |ηprime2 if

ξprime = (FηFζ)ηprime

Equation (527) implies that all the derivatives of q blow up at τ = τb in

the breaking point (ξb ηb) with the universal lawXminus23b except the derivative

along the transversal line Xb(ξprime ηprime 0) = 0 represented by the vector field

V = partη minusXbηpartξ (compare with (56)) for which [2 19]

V q|(ξbηb) = ǫGη (528)

After breaking I the overturning profile

19

After breaking the solution becomes three-valued in a compact regionof the (ξ η) - plane (see Figures 3) and in general does not describe anyphysics nevertheless a detailed study of the multivalued region is importantin view of a proper regularization of the models

If τ gt τb (τ gt 0) in the regime (514) the SM equation S = 0

2|Fζ|τ = Fζζζζprime2 + 2Fζζηζ

primeηprime + Fζηηηprime2 (529)

describes an ellipsoidal paraboloid in the (ζ prime ηprime τ) space with minimum at

the breaking point (~ξb τb)One can check that eliminating ζ prime from equations (529) and (511) one

obtains the SM equation in space-time coordinates coinciding with the equa-tion ∆ = R2+Q3 = 0 where ∆ is the discriminant (517) of the cubic (511)and Q and R are defined in (518) Such equation can be satisfied only ifQ le 0 ie only if

|ηprime| le ηprimecusp(τ) (530)

where

ηprimecusp(τ ) equivradic

2|Fζ |Fζζζ

α

radicτ (531)

and is given by the following analytic and universal expression

ξprime minus Fη

|Fζ |ηprime minus F

|Fζ | τ minus Fηη

2|Fζ |ηprime2 minus

(

Fη

|Fζ | +Fζζη

Fζζζ

)

ηprimeτ + 16|Fζ |F 2

ζζζ

[

minus FηηηF2ζζζ

+Fζζη(3FζζζFζηη minus 2F 2ζζη)]

ηprime32

= α3

9F 2ζ F

4ζζζ

(

(

ηprimecusp(τ))2 minus ηprime2

)3

(532)Equation (532) describes a closed curve with two cusps in the (ξ η) - planeat the points

~ξplusmncusp(τ ) = (ξb ηb) + (ξplusmnprime

cusp(τ )plusmnηprimecusp(τ)) (533)

where

ξplusmnprime

cusp(τ ) sim plusmnFη

radic

2Fζζζ

α|Fζ|radicτ +

(

F

|Fζ |+

FηηFζζζ

α

)

τ plusmn Bτ 32 (534)

where B = O(1) (see Figures 6 for dKP and 7 for mdKP) corresponding tothe conditions Q = R = 0 on which the three real solutions of the cubiccoincide (in 1 + 1 dimensions it is not possible to have three coincidentsolutions)

ζ0 = ζplusmn = minusFζζη

Fζζζηprime rArr q0 = qplusmn =sim ǫ

(

G+ (Gη minusGζFζζη

Fζζζ)ηprime)

(535)

20

On the remaining part of the closed curve ∆ = 0 two of the three realbranches coincide Outside the closed curve ∆ gt 0 and the real solution q issingle valued inside the closed curve ∆ lt 0 and the real solution q is threevalued with the three branches

q = ǫG(ζb + ζ prime ηb + ηprime) sim ǫ(G +Gζζprime +Gηη

prime +O(τ)) (536)

where ζ prime are the three real solutions of the cubic (511) (see fi Figures 2for dKP)

Figures 2 Plotting of the dKP analytic solution in the (q ξ η τ) variablesfor G given by (422) ǫ = 02 at times τ = 0 τb minus 2 τb τb + 2 whereτb = 657

Such a three-valued region of the (ξ η) plane is characterized by the

21

conditions|ηprime| lt ηprimecusp(τ) ξminusM(ηprime τ) lt ξprime lt ξ+M(ηprime τ) (537)

where

ξplusmnM(ηprime τ) equiv Fη

|Fζ |ηprime + F

|Fζ | τ + Fηη

2|Fζ |ηprime2 +

(

Fη

|Fζ | +Fζζη

Fζζζ

)

ηprimeτ minus 16|Fζ |F 2

ζζζ

[

minus FηηηF2ζζζ

+Fζζη(3FζζζFζηη minus 2F 2ζζη)]

ηprime3 plusmn Fζζζ

3|Fζ | |Q| 32(538)

(see Figures 3 for dKP)Since

∆ξ equiv ξ+M(ηprime τ)minus ξminusM(ηprime τ) =2Fζζζ

3|Fζ||Q(ηprime τ)|32 le 4

radic2

3

radic

|Fζ|Fζζζ

τ 32 (539)

we infer that the longitudinal width of the multivalued region is O(τ 32) thetransversal widths delimited by the two cusps is instead O(τ 12) thereforethe multivalued region develops at τ = τb from the breaking point (ξb ηb)with an infinite speed in the tranversal direction and with zero speed in thelongitudinal direction All these results are a common feature to the class ofdynamics (11) (see the previously derived results for the dKP equation forfinite times [18 19] and in the longtime regime [18] and those for the KZequation in the longtime regime [2])

-15-10-050005101-15-10-0500051015

-15-10-050005101-15-10-0500051015

Figures 3 Plotting of the three valued regions of the (ξ η) plane for dKPat times τ = 02 05 for G given by (422) and ǫ = 02 The center of thesquare frame is the breaking point (ξb ηb) Notice that the two cusps havethe same ξ coordinate ξ+cusp(τ) sim ξminuscusp(τ) since for solution (422) Gη = 0(see (531)(534))

22

We end this subsection remarking that as it was already observed in [19]since dKP (mn) is symmetric wrt y if the initial datum is also symmetricwrt y like the Gaussian (419) also its evolution will be so u(x y t) =u(xminusy t) This implies that ηb = yb = 0 and that all partial derivatives ofF and G containing an odd number of η derivatives are 0 at breaking As aconsequence the transversal direction on which the derivative of the profiledoes not blow up is the η (y) direction and on it the derivative is 0 atbreaking (see (56))

After breaking II the discontinuous shock

Using the matching rules of sect3 the shock formulae (310) become

parts

partτ=

ǫm

m+ 1

Gm+1(ζ1 η)minusGm+1(ζ2 η)

G(ζ1 η)minusG(ζ2 η) (540)

s = ζ1 + ǫmGm(ζ1 η) τ = ζ2 + ǫmGm(ζ2 η) τ (541)

where subscript 2 is for values behind the shock and subscript 1 for valuesahead Equations (541) are two implicit equations for ζ1 and ζ2 solvingthese equations yields ζ1(s η τ) ζ2(s η τ) and substituting these expres-sions in (540) it results in a nonlinear first order differential equation fors This equation and the initial conditions (311) give uniquely s(η τ) andconsequently ζ12(η τ) = ζ12(s(η τ) η τ)

We recall that immediately after breaking and if (530) holds equation(541) reduces to the cubic (511)(512) in which ξprime must be replaced by sprimepossessing three real roots where

sprime(ηprime τ) = sminus ξb (542)

Therefore the values of ζ1 and ζ2 are chosen among the three solutions (515)so that q2 = ǫG(ζb + ζ prime2 η) has the maximum value and q1 = ǫG(ζb + ζ prime1 η)the minimum one among the three branches of q Since Gζ lt 0 it followsthat

ζ1 = maxζ prime0 ζ primeplusmn ζ2 = minζ prime0 ζ primeplusmn (543)

To identify ζ12 with one of the three roots ζ prime0 ζprimeplusmn let us rewrite them as

follows

ζ prime0 = minusa

3+ 2 3

radicρ cos

(

θ

3

)

(544)

ζ prime+ = minusa

3minus 3

radicρ

(

cos

(

θ

3

)

+radic3 sin

(

θ

3

))

(545)

23

ζ primeminus = minusa

3minus 3

radicρ

(

cos

(

θ

3

)

minusradic3 sin

(

θ

3

))

(546)

where

ρ =radic

R2 + |∆| θ = arctan

(

radic

|∆|R

)

(547)

We observe that for 0 le θ le π the following inequalities hold

minus cos

(

θ

3

)

minusradic3 sin

(

θ

3

)

le minus cos

(

θ

3

)

+radic3 sin

(

θ

3

)

le 2 cos

(

θ

3

)

so that

ζ prime+ le ζ primeminus le ζ prime0 rArr q(ζb + ζ prime0 η) le q(ζb + ζ primeminus η) le q(ζb + ζ prime+ η) (548)

for q decreasing in ζ Hence

ζ prime1(sprime ηprime τ prime) = ζ prime0(s

prime ηprime τ prime) ζ prime2(sprime ηprime τ prime) = ζ prime+(s

prime ηprime τ prime) (549)

Then (540) reduces to the equations

dsprime

dτ+ G

Gζ+ Gη

Gζηprime + 1

2

[

ζ prime0(sprime ηprime τ ) + ζ prime+(s

prime ηprime τ)]

= 0 for dKPdsprime

dτ+ G

2Gζ+ Gη

Gζηprime + 1

2

[

ζ prime0(sprime ηprime τ) + ζ prime+(s

prime ηprime τ)]

= 0 for mdKP

sprime(0) = ξb

(550)

obtained expanding (540) near the breaking point and recalling that τ equivτ primeτb

We remark that in the differential equations (550) sprime depends on ηprime

parametrically So the discontinuous (dissipative) shocks of the longtime so-lutions of the small data Cauchy problems for dKP and mdKP has a simplegeometric construction given τ gt 0 for any fixed |ηprime| le ηcusp the overturn-ing profile in the (ξ q) plane is intercepted by a vertical straight line cuttingoff equal area lobi in analogy with the 1 + 1 dimensional case

Going back to the dKP variables

The above formulae written in the convenient variables q ξ η τ are es-sentially the same for both dKP and mdKP relevant differences appear whenwe go back to the original variables u x y t inverting equations (52)(53)

u = 1radictq t = τ2

4 y = ητ2

2 x = ξ minus η2τ2

4 for dKP

u = 1radictq t = eτ y = 2ηeτ x = ξ minus η2eτ for mdKP

(551)

24

and all the above universal formulae are easily transfered to the dKP (mn)equations In particular small and localized initial data break i) at tb =τ 2b 4 in the point (xb yb) = (ξb minus τ 2b η

2b4 ηbτ

2b 2) of the parabolic wave front

x+ y2(4tb) = ξb evolving according to dKP and ii) at tb = eτb in the point(xb yb) = (ξb minus η2be

τb 2ηbeτb) of the parabolic wave front x + y2(4tb) = ξb

evolving according to mdKP If for instance we use the same Gaussian initialcondition (419) for both dKP and mdKP with ǫ = 02 then G is given by(422) in both cases Consequently for dKP

ζb = 196 ηb = 0 ξb = 327 τb = 657 (552)

and wave breaking takes place at tb = 108 in the point (xb yb) = (327 0)on the parabola x+ 231 middot 10minus2y2 = 327 (see Figure 4)

Figure 4 Plotting of the analytic dKP solution u in the physical variablesx y t for G given by (422) (corresponding to the gaussian initial condition)ǫ = 02 at breaking

For mdKP

ζb = 161 ηb = 0 ξb = 251 τb = 1431 (553)

and wave breaking takes place at tb = 164middot106 in the point (xb yb) = (251 0)on the parabola x + 152 middot 10minus7y2 = 251 and at breaking the amplitude ofthe wave is u = ǫtb

minus12G(ζb ηb) = 195 middot 10minus4 (see Figure 5)

25

Figure 5 Plotting of the analytic mdKP solution u in the physical variablesx y t for G given by (422) (corresponding to the gaussian initial condition)ǫ = 02 at breaking

Since in the mdKP case tb is very large and the wave amplitude atbreaking is very small we wonder if such a wave breaking could be actuallydetected numerically

Now we go into the analytic details For the dKP case

tprime equiv tminus tb sim 2tbτ yprime = y minus yb ≃ 2tb(ηprime + 2ηbτ + 2ηprimeτ )

xprime = xminus xb sim ξprime minus ηbyprime minus yprime2

4tb+ η2b t

prime + ηbtbyprimetprime

(554)

and we choose τ prime to be sufficiently small to have |tprime| |yprime| ≪ 1The dKP solution reads

u(x y t) =ǫradictG(ζb + ζ prime ηb + ηprime) =

ǫradict

(

G+Gζζprime +Gη

yprime

2tb+O

(

tprime

tb

))

(555)where ζ prime is the solution of the cubic (511) with

a =3Fζζη

2Fζζζ

yprime

tb b = 3

Fζζζ

(

Fζtprime

tb+ Fζηη

yprime2

4t2b

)

X = xprime +(

ηb minus Fη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime minus[

η2b +(

F2minus ηbFη

)

1|Fζ |tb

]

tprime

+(

1minus Fηη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime2

4tb+[

minusηb +(

Fη

2+ ηbFηη

)

12|Fζ |tb

]

yprimetprime

tb

minus Fηηη

48|Fζ |yprime3

t3b

(556)

26

The three-valued region (532) after breaking becomes

xprime +(

ηb minus Fη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime minus[

η2b +(

F2minus ηbFη

)

1|Fζ |tb

]

tprime

+(

1minus Fηη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime2

4tb+[

minusηb +(

Fη

2|Fζ |tb +ηbFηη

|Fζ | minus Fζζη

2Fζζζ

)

12tb

]

yprimetprime

tb

+ 16|Fζ |F 2

ζζζ

[

minus FηηηF2ζζζ + Fζζη(3FζζζFζηη minus 2F 2

ζζη)]

yprime3

8t3b

2

=

α3

9middot64F 2ζF 4ζζζ

t6b

(

(

yprimecusp(tprime))2 minus yprime2

)3

(557)

where

yprimecusp(tprime) = 2

radic

|Fζ |Fζζζ

α

radictbtprime (558)

Equation (557) describes a closed curve with two cusps in the (x y) - planeat the points

~xplusmncusp(t

prime) = (xb yb) + (xplusmnprime

cusp(tprime)plusmnyprimecusp(t

prime)) (559)

where

xplusmnprime

cusp(tprime) sim ∓2ηb

radic

|Fζ |Fζζζ

α

radictbtprime plusmn Fη

radic

Fζζζ

α|Fζ |

radic

tprime

tb

+(

η2b minus|Fζ |Fζζζ

α

)

tprime +(

F|Fζ | +

FηηFζζζ

α

)

tprime

2tbplusmn 2ηb

radic

|Fζ |Fζζζ

αtprime

32radictb+O(τ 32)

(560)At last the analogue of (539) reads

∆xprime le 2

3

radic

|Fζ|Fζζζ

(

tprime

tb

)32

(561)

it follows that the longitudinal width ∆long and the transversal width ∆transv

of the multivalued region are respectively

∆long = O

(

(

tprime

tb

)32

)

∆transv = O(

(tbtprime)

12

)

rArr ∆long

∆transv= O

(

tprime

t2b

)

(562)

For the mdKP case

tprime = tminus tb sim tbτprime yprime = y minus yb sim 2tb(η

prime + ηbtprime

tb+ ηprimetprime

tb)

xprime = xminus xb sim ξprime minus ηbyprime + η2b t

prime minus yprime2

4tb+ ηb

yprimetprime

tb

(563)

27

and we choose τ prime sufficiently small to have |tprime| |yprime| ≪ 1The mdKP solution reads

u(x y t) =ǫradictG(ζb+ζ prime ηb+ηprime) =

ǫradict

(

G+Gζζprime +Gη

yprime

2tb+O

(

tprime

tb log tb

))

(564)where ζ prime is the solution of the cubic (511) with

a =3Fζζη

2Fζζζ

yprime

tb b = 3

Fζζζ

(

2Fζtprime

tb log tb+ Fζηη

yprime2

4t2b

)

X = xprime +(

ηb minus Fη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime minus[

η2b +(

Flog tb

minus ηbFη

)

1|Fζ |tb

]

tprime

+(

1minus Fηη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime2

4tb+[

minusηb +(

Fη

|Fζ |(1minus1

log tb) + ηbFηη

|Fζ |

)

12tb

]

yprimetprime

tb

minus Fηηη

48|Fζ |yprime3

t3b

(565)

The three-valued region (532) after breaking becomes

xprime +(

ηb minus Fη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime minus[

η2b +(

Flog tb

minus ηbFη

)

1|Fζ |tb

]

tprime

+(

1minus Fηη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime2

4tb+[

minusηb +(

Fη

|Fζ |(1minus1

log tb) + ηbFηη

|Fζ| minus Fζζη

Fζζζ log tb

)

12tb

]

yprimetprime

tb

+ 16|Fζ |F 2

ζζζ

[

minus FηηηF2ζζζ + Fζζη(3FζζζFζηη minus 2F 2

ζζη)]

yprime3

8t3b

2

=

α3

9middot64F 2ζ F

4ζζζt

6b

(

(

yprimecusp(tprime))2 minus yprime2

)3

(566)where

yprimecusp(tprime) = 2

radic

2|Fζ |Fζζζ

α

radic

tbtprime

log tb (567)

Equation (566) describes a closed curve with two cusps in the (x y) - planeat the points

~xplusmncusp(t

prime) = (xb yb) + (xplusmnprime

cusp(tprime)plusmnyprimecusp(t

prime)) (568)

where

xplusmnprime

cusp(tprime) sim ∓2ηb

radic

|Fζ |Fζζζ

α

radic

tbtprime

log tbplusmn Fη

radic

Fζζζ

α|Fζ |

radic

tprime

tb log tb

+(

η2b minus|Fζ |Fζζζ

α log tb

)

tprime +(

F|Fζ | +

FηηFζζζ

α

)

tprime

tb log tbplusmn 2ηb

radic

|Fζ |Fζζζ

αtprime

32radic

tb log tb

+O(τ 32)

(569)

28

At last the analogue of (539) reads

∆xprime le 4radic2

3

radic

|Fζ |Fζζζ

(

tprime

tb log tb

)32

(570)

it follows that the longitudinal width ∆long and the transversal width ∆transv

of the multivalued region are respectively

∆long = O

(

(

tprime

tb log tb

)32

)

∆transv = O

(

(

tbtprime

log tb

)12

)

rArr ∆long

∆transv= O

(

tprime

t2blog tb

)

(571)

References

[1] F Santucci Onde debolmente non lineari e quasi unidimensionali in

Natura La rottura di tali onde e il problema della regolarizzazione dis-

sipativa Tesi della Laurea Specialistica in Fisica supervisor P M San-tini Dipartimento di Fisica dellrsquoUniversita di Roma ldquoLa Sapienzardquo AA2011-2012

[2] S V Manakov and P M Santini On the dispersionless Kadomtsev-Petviashvili equation in n + 1 dimensions exact solutions the Cauchyproblem for small initial data and wave breaking J Phys A MathTheor 44 (2011) 405203

[3] G B Whitham Linear and nonlinear waves John Wiley amp Sons 1974

[4] C Lin E Reissner and H S Tien On two-dimensional nonsteadymotion of a slender body in a compressible fluid J Math Phys 27(1948) 220-231

[5] R Timman Unsteady motion in transonic flow Symposium Transson-icum Aachen 1962 EdKOswatitsch Springer 394-401

[6] E A Zobolotskaya and R V Khokhlov Quasi-plane waves in the non-linear acoustics of confined beams Soviet Physics- Acoustics Vol15N1 (1969)

29

[7] B B Kadomtsev and V I Petviashvili On the stability of solitarywaves in weakly dispersing media Soviet Physics-Doklady Vol15 N6(1970)

[8] X P Wang M J Ablowitz and H Segur Wave collapse and instabil-

ity of solitary waves of a generalized Kadomtsev-Petviashvili equationPhysica D 78 (1994) 241-265

[9] M J Ablowitz and H Segur Solitons and the Inverse Scattering Trans-

form SIAM Philadelphia 1981

[10] M J Ablowitz and P A Clarkson Solitons nonlinear evolution equa-

tions and inverse scattering Cambridge University Press 1991

[11] S Turitsyn and G Falkovitch Stability of magneto-elastic solitons andself-focusing of sound in antiferromagnets Sov Phys J Exp TheorPhys 62 (1985) 146-152

[12] S Novikov S V Manakov L P Pitaevskii V E Zakharov Theory of

solitons Consultant Bureau 1984

[13] S V Manakov and P M Santini Inverse scattering problem for vectorfields and the heavenly equation httparXivnlinSI0512043

[14] S V Manakov and P M Santini Inverse scattering problem forvector fields and the Cauchy problem for the heavenly equationPhys Lett A 359 613-619 (2006) doi101016jphysleta200607011httparXivnlinSI0604017

[15] S V Manakov and P M Santini The Cauchy problem on theplane for the dispersionless Kadomtsev-Petviashvili equation JETPLetters 83 No 10 462-466 (2006) 101134S0021364006100080httparXivnlinSI0604016

[16] P G Grinevich P M Santini and D Wu The Cauchy problem for thePavlov equation Nonlinearity 28 (2015) 3709-3754 doi1010880951-771528113709 Preprint arXiv13105834v2

[17] M V Pavlov Integrable hydrodynamic chains J Math Phys 44 (2003)4134-4156

30

the multiple integral can be evaluated by the stationary phase method whichgives [2]

u(x ~y t) sim tminusnminus12 ǫG

(

x+1

4t

nminus1sum

i=1

y2i ~y

2t

)

(46)

where

G(ξ ~η) =1

2nπn+12

int

R

dk1|k1|nminus12 u0 (k1 ~ηk1) exp

[

ık1ξ minus ı(nminus 1)π

4sgn(k1)

]

(47)in the space-time region

(xminus ξ)t yit = O(1) i = 1 nminus 1 (48)

on the paraboloid (32) and decays faster outside it Therefore small andlocalized initial data set in the longtime regime (45) governed bythe linear theory on the paraboloid (32)

When nonlinearity becomes relevant ie when t = O(τminus1(ǫminusm)) theasymptotic solution of dKP (mn) is built matching the longtime solution(46)(47) of the linearized Cauchy problem with the exact solution (314)If fi cmn gt 0 the first argument ξ of function G(ξ η) defined in (47) isreplaced by ξminus cminus1

mnumt or equivalently the arbitrary function A(ζ) in (38)

acquires the dependence on the second argument ~η = ~y2t and is identifiedwith G As a result of this matching in the nonlinear regime (42) (43) thesolution reads

u(x ~y t) ≃ uasmn(x ~y t)

uasmn(x ~y t) equiv

tminusnminus12 ǫG

(

x+ 14t

sumnminus1i=1 y2i minus 1

cmnumt ~y

2t

)

cmn gt 0

tminusnminus12 ǫG

(

x+ 14t

sumnminus1i=1 y2i minus umt ln t ~y

2t

)

cmn = 0

(49)with umt = O(1) for cmn gt 0 and umt log t = O(1) for cmn = 0 becominginfinitesimal in the linear regime as it has to be

For cmn lt 0 the solution is described by its linear form (46) thereforewave breaking takes place for the particular values of (mn) described by thecondition

cmn ge 0 hArr m(nminus 1) le 2 (410)

ie forn = 1 n = 2 n = 3forallm m = 1 2 m = 1

(411)

12

For n = 1 forallm uasmn reduces to the general solution of the Riemann equation

(12) [3] The cases (mn) = (2 1) and (mn) = (3 1) the dKP and theKZ equations have been already investigated in [18] and [2] respectivelytherefore in the following section we mainly focus on the case (mn) = (2 2)corresponding to the nonintegrable modified dKP equation (15) and to itsasymptotic solution

u ≃ uas22(x y t) =

1radictǫG

(

x+y2

4tminus u2t ln t

y

2t

)

(412)

comparing the results with the dKP case (mn) = (1 2) investigated in [18]with its asymptotic solution

u ≃ uas12(x y t) =

1radictǫG

(

x+y2

4tminus 2ut

y

2t

)

(413)

Remark 1 The estimate of the first correction to the asymptotics (49)reads

u = uasnm(x ~y t)(1 +O(tminus1)) (414)

Indeed if cmn gt 0 one has

u sim uasnm(x ~y t) +

ǫ1+ m

cmn

tnminus12

H

(

x+1

4t

nminus1sum

i=1

y2i ~y

2t τ

)

(415)

where τ = ǫmτ and H(ξ ~η τ ) is expressed in terms of G(ζ ~η) (ζ is definedin the second of equations (51)) through the PDE

(

Hτ +GmHξ

1 +mGmminus1Gζ τ

)

ξ

+1

4(cmnτ )1+cminus1mn

nminus1sum

j=1

(

Gηj

1 +mGmminus1Gζ τ

)

ηj

= 0 (416)

Since from (43) ǫm

cmn = O(tminus1) equation (415) yields (414) Similarly ifcmn = 0

u sim uasnm(x ~y t) +

ǫ

tn+12

H

(

x+1

4t

nminus1sum

i=1

y2i ~y

2t τ

)

(417)

where H(ξ ~η τ) now solves the PDE

(

H

1 +mGmminus1Gζ τ

)

ξ

=1

4

nminus1sum

j=1

(

Gηj

1 +mGmminus1Gζ τ

)

ηj

(418)

13

Then equation (417) yields equation (414) too

Remark 2 As is was observed in [2] for a gaussian initial condition

u0(x y) = d exp

[

minusx2 + ~y2

4

]

(419)

where d is constant the asymptotic solution can be written in terms of specialfunctions obtaining for G(ξ ~η)

G(ξ ~η) =dradicπ

1

(1+~η2)n+14

[

cos(

π4(nminus 1)

)

Γ(

n+14

)

1F1

(

n+14 12minusY 2

4

)

+ sin(

π4(nminus 1)

)

Γ(

n+34

)

Y 1F1

(

n+34 32minusY 2

4

) ]

(420)

where

Y =ξ

radic

1 + ~η2 (421)

Γ is the Euler gamma function and 1F1 is the Kummer confluent hypergeo-metric function [22 23] For n = 2 and d =

radic2π it yields respectively

G(ξ η) =1

(1+η2)34

[

Γ(

34

)

1F1

(

34 12minusY 2

4

)

+ Y Γ(

54

)

1F1

(

54 32minusY 2

4

)]

(422)

Remark 3 The fact that small data break only when the inequality (410) issatisfied was expected from physical considerations Indeed as already men-tioned in the introduction in equation (11) there are two competing termsthe nonlinear term umux responsible for the steepening of the profile andthe perpu term describing diffraction in the transversal (n minus 1) dimensionalhyperplane (reminiscence through the multiscale expansion leading to (11)of the wave operator) therefore diffraction increases as (nminus 1) increases [2]For small initial data the umux term is initially smaller and smaller increas-ing m and the solution evolves in a linear way for a longer and longer timediffracting transversally through the (nminus1) diffraction channels So diffrac-tion increasing with (n minus 1) acts on a very long time increasing with mbefore the nonlinear regime could become relevant and if (nminus 1) andor mare sufficiently large one expects that the solution would be diffracted awayalmost completely before reaching the nonlinear regime and will not break

14

We have in particular that breaking takes place in the following longtimeregimes (see (43))m = n = 1 (the Riemann equation with quadratic nonlinearity) tb = O(ǫminus1)m = 1 n = 2 (the dKP equation) tb = O(ǫminus2)m = 1 n = 3 (the KZ equation) tb = O(eǫ

minus1)

m = 2 n = 1 (the Riemann equation with cubic nonlinearity) tb = O(ǫminus2)m = 2 n = 2 (the mdKP equation) O(tb = eǫ

minus2)

It is interesting to remark that as it was observed in [2] if m = 1 (thephysically more relevant case) wave breaking takes place only for n le 3 iein physical space

We end this section remarking that also in the longtime behaviour of thesolutions of the small data Cauchy problem for equation (11) the depen-dence of the solution u on x as in the case of the exact solutions (314) isnot consistent with the formal ansatz recently made in [20]

5 Analytic aspects of the wave breaking

In this section we use the longtime behavior of solutions of the small dataCauchy problem for dKP (mn) to show explicitly the analytic aspects ofthe solution in the neighbourhood of the breaking time in terms of the initialdata represented by function G defined in (47) as it was already done in[18 2]

Choosing cmn ge 0 we rewrite equation (49) in the characteristic form

q sim ǫG(ζ ~η)ξ = ǫmF (ζ ~ηm)τ + ζ F (ζ ~ηm) equiv Gm(ζ ~η)

(51)

where

q = utnminus12 ξ = x+

1

4t

nminus1sum

j=1

y2j ~η =~y

2t(52)

and

τ(t) =

1cmn

tcmn if cmn gt 0

ln t if cmn = 0(53)

One solves the second of equations (51) with respect to the parameterζ obtaining ζ(ξ ~η τ) and replaces it into the first to obtain the solutionq sim ǫG(ζ(ξ ~η τ) ~η) The inversion of the second of equations (51) is possibleiff its ζ-derivative is different from zero Therefore the singularity manifold

15

(SM) of the solution is the n - dimensional manifold characterized by theequation

S(ζ ~η τ) equiv 1 + ǫmFζ(ζ ~ηm)τ = 0 rArr τ = minus 1

ǫmFζ(ζ ~ηm) (54)

Sincenabla(ξ~η)q =

ǫnabla(ζ~η)G(ζ~η)

1+ǫmFζ(ζ~ηm)τ (55)

the slope of the localized wave becomes infinity (the so-called gradient catas-trophe) on the SM and the n-dimensional wave ldquobreaksrdquo except on the di-

rection represented by the vector field V =nminus1sum

i=1

partηi +mǫmGmminus1(nminus1sum

i=1

Gηi)partξ [2]

[19] on which

V q = ǫ

nminus1sum

i=1

Gηi (56)

Since the KZ case (mn) = (1 3) has been studied in detail in [2] in thefollowing we mainly concentrate on the mdKP case (mn) = (2 2) and wecompare it with the dKP case (mn) = (1 2) investigated in [18]

From (54) the first breaking time τb and the corresponding characteristic

parameters ~ζb = (ζb ηb) are defined by the global minimum of a function ofthe 2 variables (ζ η)

τb = minus 1

ǫmFζ(ζb ηbm)= inf

(

minus 1

ǫmFζ(ζ ηm)

)

gt 0 (57)

and it is characterized together with the condition Fζ(~ζbm) lt 0 by thefollowing equations

Fζζ(~ζbm) = Fζη(~ζbm) = 0

α equiv Fζζζ(~ζbm)Fζηη(~ζbm)minus F 2ζζη(

~ζbm) gt 0 Fζζζ(~ζbm) gt 0(58)

The corresponding point at which the first wave breaking takes place is from(51) ~ξb = (ξb ηb) isin R

2 where

ξb = ζb + ǫmF (~ζbm)τb = ζb minusF (~ζbm)

Fζ(~ζbm) (59)

Now we evaluate equations (51) and (54) near breaking in the regime

ξ = ξb + ξprime η = ηb + ηprime τ = τb + τ prime ζ = ζb + ζ prime (510)

16

where ξprime ηprime τ prime ζ prime are small Using (57) - (59) the second of equations (51)becomes at the leading order the following cubic equation in ζ prime

ζ prime3+ a(ηprime)ζ prime

2+ b(ηprime τ)ζ prime minus γX(ξprime ηprime τ) = 0 (511)

where

a(ηprime) =3Fζζη

Fζζζηprime

b(ηprime τ) = 3Fζζζ

[

2Fζ τ + Fζηηηprime2]

X(ξprime ηprime τ ) = ξprime minus ǫF (ζb ηb + ηprime)τ prime minus ǫ [F (ζb ηb + ηprime)minus F ] τb simξprime minus Fη

|Fζ |ηprime minus F

|Fζ | τ minus Fηη

2|Fζ |ηprime2 minus Fη

|Fζ |ηprimeτ minus Fηηη

6|Fζ |ηprime3 γ =

6|Fζ |Fζζζ

(512)

and

τ equiv τ prime

τb=

τ minus τbτb

(513)

corresponding to the maximal balance

|ζ prime| |ηprime| = O(|τ |12) |X| = O(|τ |32) (514)

In (512) and in the rest of this section G F = Gm and all their partialderivatives whose arguments are not indicated are meant to be evaluated at~ζb = (ζb ηb)

The three roots of the cubic are given by the well-known Cardano-Tartagliaformula

ζ prime0 (ξprime ~ηprime τ) = minusa

3+ (A+)

13 + (Aminus)

13

ζ primeplusmn (ξprime ~ηprime τ) = minusa3minus 1

2

(

(A+)13 + (Aminus)

13

)

plusmnradic32i(

(A+)13 minus (Aminus)

13

)

(515)where

Aplusmn = Rplusmnradic∆ (516)

and the discriminant ∆ reads

∆ = R2 +Q3 (517)

withQ(ηprime τ ) = 3bminusa2

9= minus2|Fζ |

Fζζζτ + α

F 2ζζζ

ηprime2

R(ξprime ηprime τ) = γ2X(ξprime ηprime τ ) + ab

18+ a

3Q(ηprime τ)

(518)

17

At the same order function S in (54) becomes

S(ζ prime ηprime τ ) = minusτ + 12|Fζ |

[

Fζζζζprime2 + 2Fζζηζ

primeηprime + Fζηηηprime2]

=

Fζζζ

2|Fζ |

(

Q(ηprime τ ) +(

ζ prime +Fζζη

Fζζζηprime)2)

(519)

Known ζ prime as function of (ξprime ηprime τ) from the cubic (511) the solution q andits gradient are then approximated near breaking by the formulae

q(ξ η τ) sim ǫG(ζb + ζ prime ηb + ηprime) = ǫ (G+Gζζprime +Gηη

prime +O(|τ |)) nabla(ξη)q sim ǫ

nabla(ζprimeηprime)G(ζb+ζprimeηb+ηprime)

S(ζprimeηprimeτ) (520)

Before breaking

Before breaking τ lt τb (τ lt 0) the coefficient Q in (518) is strictlypositive (see the second of (58)) then the discriminant ∆ = R2 + Q3 isalso strictly positive and only the root ζ prime0 is real Correspondingly the realsolution q is single valued and described by Cardanorsquos formula and by (520)In addition function S in (519) is also strictly positive and nabla(ξ~η)q is finiteforall ξ η

To have a more explicit solution than that provided by Cardanorsquos formulawe first restrict the asymptotic region to a narrower area so that the cubic(511) reduces to the linear equation bζ prime = γX and X contains only linearterms This is achieved choosing

ηprime = O(τ r) X = O(τ p+1) 12lt p lt p+1

2lt r lt p+ 1 (521)

implying

ζ prime = O(τ p)

X = ξprime + Fη

Fζηprime + F

Fζτ + o(τ p+1) = ξprime + Gη

Gζηprime + G

mGζτ + o(τ p+1)

bζ prime = γX rArr ζ prime sim minus 1τ

(

ξprime + Gη

Gζηprime + G

mGζτ)

(522)

Then

q = ǫG(ζb + ζ prime ηb + ηprime) sim ǫG + ǫGζζprime sim ǫ

(

1minus 1

m

)

Gminus ǫGζ

τ

(

ξprime +Gη

Gζηprime)

(523)

18

Since q sim ǫG and recalling the definitions (57)(513) it follows that q isdescribed by the exact similarity solution

q sim(

ξ + (GηGζ)ηprime

τ prime

)1m

(524)

of equation (37)The cubic simplifies also in the asymptotic region in which ξprime ηprime are of

the same order while τ prime le O(|ηprime|) reducing to ζ prime3 = γX so that the solutionq and its gradient are

q sim ǫG(ζb +3radic

γX(ξprime ηprime τ) ηb + ηprime) (525)

nablaξηq sim3radicγ

3

ǫnablaζηG3radic

X2(ξprime ηprime τ ) (526)

At breaking

When τ = τb the singularity manifold S (519) is positive everywhere inthe (ξ η) plane except at the breaking point (ξb ηb) in which it is zerotogether with Q R and the discriminant ∆ The solution q is well describedagain by Cardanorsquos formula and by (520) To have a more explicit solutionthan that provided by Cardanorsquos formula we choose ξprime ηprime of the same orderthe cubic (511) reduces to ζ prime3 = γX and equations (525) become

q sim ǫG(ζb +3radic

γX(ξprime ηprime 0) ηb + ηprime)

nablaξηq sim 3radicγ

3

ǫnablaξηG3radic

X2(ξprimeηprime0)

(527)

The expression of Xb(ξprime ~ηprime) equiv X(ξprime ~ηprime 0) is given in (512) Xb(ξ

prime ηprime) simξprime minus Fη

|Fζ |ηprime if ξprime prop ηprime but ξprime 6= (FηFζ)η

prime while X(ξprime ηprime 0) = minus Fηη

2|Fζ |ηprime2 if

ξprime = (FηFζ)ηprime

Equation (527) implies that all the derivatives of q blow up at τ = τb in

the breaking point (ξb ηb) with the universal lawXminus23b except the derivative

along the transversal line Xb(ξprime ηprime 0) = 0 represented by the vector field

V = partη minusXbηpartξ (compare with (56)) for which [2 19]

V q|(ξbηb) = ǫGη (528)

After breaking I the overturning profile

19

After breaking the solution becomes three-valued in a compact regionof the (ξ η) - plane (see Figures 3) and in general does not describe anyphysics nevertheless a detailed study of the multivalued region is importantin view of a proper regularization of the models

If τ gt τb (τ gt 0) in the regime (514) the SM equation S = 0

2|Fζ|τ = Fζζζζprime2 + 2Fζζηζ

primeηprime + Fζηηηprime2 (529)

describes an ellipsoidal paraboloid in the (ζ prime ηprime τ) space with minimum at

the breaking point (~ξb τb)One can check that eliminating ζ prime from equations (529) and (511) one

obtains the SM equation in space-time coordinates coinciding with the equa-tion ∆ = R2+Q3 = 0 where ∆ is the discriminant (517) of the cubic (511)and Q and R are defined in (518) Such equation can be satisfied only ifQ le 0 ie only if

|ηprime| le ηprimecusp(τ) (530)

where

ηprimecusp(τ ) equivradic

2|Fζ |Fζζζ

α

radicτ (531)

and is given by the following analytic and universal expression

ξprime minus Fη

|Fζ |ηprime minus F

|Fζ | τ minus Fηη

2|Fζ |ηprime2 minus

(

Fη

|Fζ | +Fζζη

Fζζζ

)

ηprimeτ + 16|Fζ |F 2

ζζζ

[

minus FηηηF2ζζζ

+Fζζη(3FζζζFζηη minus 2F 2ζζη)]

ηprime32

= α3

9F 2ζ F

4ζζζ

(

(

ηprimecusp(τ))2 minus ηprime2

)3

(532)Equation (532) describes a closed curve with two cusps in the (ξ η) - planeat the points

~ξplusmncusp(τ ) = (ξb ηb) + (ξplusmnprime

cusp(τ )plusmnηprimecusp(τ)) (533)

where

ξplusmnprime

cusp(τ ) sim plusmnFη

radic

2Fζζζ

α|Fζ|radicτ +

(

F

|Fζ |+

FηηFζζζ

α

)

τ plusmn Bτ 32 (534)

where B = O(1) (see Figures 6 for dKP and 7 for mdKP) corresponding tothe conditions Q = R = 0 on which the three real solutions of the cubiccoincide (in 1 + 1 dimensions it is not possible to have three coincidentsolutions)

ζ0 = ζplusmn = minusFζζη

Fζζζηprime rArr q0 = qplusmn =sim ǫ

(

G+ (Gη minusGζFζζη

Fζζζ)ηprime)

(535)

20

On the remaining part of the closed curve ∆ = 0 two of the three realbranches coincide Outside the closed curve ∆ gt 0 and the real solution q issingle valued inside the closed curve ∆ lt 0 and the real solution q is threevalued with the three branches

q = ǫG(ζb + ζ prime ηb + ηprime) sim ǫ(G +Gζζprime +Gηη

prime +O(τ)) (536)

where ζ prime are the three real solutions of the cubic (511) (see fi Figures 2for dKP)

Figures 2 Plotting of the dKP analytic solution in the (q ξ η τ) variablesfor G given by (422) ǫ = 02 at times τ = 0 τb minus 2 τb τb + 2 whereτb = 657

Such a three-valued region of the (ξ η) plane is characterized by the

21

conditions|ηprime| lt ηprimecusp(τ) ξminusM(ηprime τ) lt ξprime lt ξ+M(ηprime τ) (537)

where

ξplusmnM(ηprime τ) equiv Fη

|Fζ |ηprime + F

|Fζ | τ + Fηη

2|Fζ |ηprime2 +

(

Fη

|Fζ | +Fζζη

Fζζζ

)

ηprimeτ minus 16|Fζ |F 2

ζζζ

[

minus FηηηF2ζζζ

+Fζζη(3FζζζFζηη minus 2F 2ζζη)]

ηprime3 plusmn Fζζζ

3|Fζ | |Q| 32(538)

(see Figures 3 for dKP)Since

∆ξ equiv ξ+M(ηprime τ)minus ξminusM(ηprime τ) =2Fζζζ

3|Fζ||Q(ηprime τ)|32 le 4

radic2

3

radic

|Fζ|Fζζζ

τ 32 (539)

we infer that the longitudinal width of the multivalued region is O(τ 32) thetransversal widths delimited by the two cusps is instead O(τ 12) thereforethe multivalued region develops at τ = τb from the breaking point (ξb ηb)with an infinite speed in the tranversal direction and with zero speed in thelongitudinal direction All these results are a common feature to the class ofdynamics (11) (see the previously derived results for the dKP equation forfinite times [18 19] and in the longtime regime [18] and those for the KZequation in the longtime regime [2])

-15-10-050005101-15-10-0500051015

-15-10-050005101-15-10-0500051015

Figures 3 Plotting of the three valued regions of the (ξ η) plane for dKPat times τ = 02 05 for G given by (422) and ǫ = 02 The center of thesquare frame is the breaking point (ξb ηb) Notice that the two cusps havethe same ξ coordinate ξ+cusp(τ) sim ξminuscusp(τ) since for solution (422) Gη = 0(see (531)(534))

22

We end this subsection remarking that as it was already observed in [19]since dKP (mn) is symmetric wrt y if the initial datum is also symmetricwrt y like the Gaussian (419) also its evolution will be so u(x y t) =u(xminusy t) This implies that ηb = yb = 0 and that all partial derivatives ofF and G containing an odd number of η derivatives are 0 at breaking As aconsequence the transversal direction on which the derivative of the profiledoes not blow up is the η (y) direction and on it the derivative is 0 atbreaking (see (56))

After breaking II the discontinuous shock

Using the matching rules of sect3 the shock formulae (310) become

parts

partτ=

ǫm

m+ 1

Gm+1(ζ1 η)minusGm+1(ζ2 η)

G(ζ1 η)minusG(ζ2 η) (540)

s = ζ1 + ǫmGm(ζ1 η) τ = ζ2 + ǫmGm(ζ2 η) τ (541)

where subscript 2 is for values behind the shock and subscript 1 for valuesahead Equations (541) are two implicit equations for ζ1 and ζ2 solvingthese equations yields ζ1(s η τ) ζ2(s η τ) and substituting these expres-sions in (540) it results in a nonlinear first order differential equation fors This equation and the initial conditions (311) give uniquely s(η τ) andconsequently ζ12(η τ) = ζ12(s(η τ) η τ)

We recall that immediately after breaking and if (530) holds equation(541) reduces to the cubic (511)(512) in which ξprime must be replaced by sprimepossessing three real roots where

sprime(ηprime τ) = sminus ξb (542)

Therefore the values of ζ1 and ζ2 are chosen among the three solutions (515)so that q2 = ǫG(ζb + ζ prime2 η) has the maximum value and q1 = ǫG(ζb + ζ prime1 η)the minimum one among the three branches of q Since Gζ lt 0 it followsthat

ζ1 = maxζ prime0 ζ primeplusmn ζ2 = minζ prime0 ζ primeplusmn (543)

To identify ζ12 with one of the three roots ζ prime0 ζprimeplusmn let us rewrite them as

follows

ζ prime0 = minusa

3+ 2 3

radicρ cos

(

θ

3

)

(544)

ζ prime+ = minusa

3minus 3

radicρ

(

cos

(

θ

3

)

+radic3 sin

(

θ

3

))

(545)

23

ζ primeminus = minusa

3minus 3

radicρ

(

cos

(

θ

3

)

minusradic3 sin

(

θ

3

))

(546)

where

ρ =radic

R2 + |∆| θ = arctan

(

radic

|∆|R

)

(547)

We observe that for 0 le θ le π the following inequalities hold

minus cos

(

θ

3

)

minusradic3 sin

(

θ

3

)

le minus cos

(

θ

3

)

+radic3 sin

(

θ

3

)

le 2 cos

(

θ

3

)

so that

ζ prime+ le ζ primeminus le ζ prime0 rArr q(ζb + ζ prime0 η) le q(ζb + ζ primeminus η) le q(ζb + ζ prime+ η) (548)

for q decreasing in ζ Hence

ζ prime1(sprime ηprime τ prime) = ζ prime0(s

prime ηprime τ prime) ζ prime2(sprime ηprime τ prime) = ζ prime+(s

prime ηprime τ prime) (549)

Then (540) reduces to the equations

dsprime

dτ+ G

Gζ+ Gη

Gζηprime + 1

2

[

ζ prime0(sprime ηprime τ ) + ζ prime+(s

prime ηprime τ)]

= 0 for dKPdsprime

dτ+ G

2Gζ+ Gη

Gζηprime + 1

2

[

ζ prime0(sprime ηprime τ) + ζ prime+(s

prime ηprime τ)]

= 0 for mdKP

sprime(0) = ξb

(550)

obtained expanding (540) near the breaking point and recalling that τ equivτ primeτb

We remark that in the differential equations (550) sprime depends on ηprime

parametrically So the discontinuous (dissipative) shocks of the longtime so-lutions of the small data Cauchy problems for dKP and mdKP has a simplegeometric construction given τ gt 0 for any fixed |ηprime| le ηcusp the overturn-ing profile in the (ξ q) plane is intercepted by a vertical straight line cuttingoff equal area lobi in analogy with the 1 + 1 dimensional case

Going back to the dKP variables

The above formulae written in the convenient variables q ξ η τ are es-sentially the same for both dKP and mdKP relevant differences appear whenwe go back to the original variables u x y t inverting equations (52)(53)

u = 1radictq t = τ2

4 y = ητ2

2 x = ξ minus η2τ2

4 for dKP

u = 1radictq t = eτ y = 2ηeτ x = ξ minus η2eτ for mdKP

(551)

24

and all the above universal formulae are easily transfered to the dKP (mn)equations In particular small and localized initial data break i) at tb =τ 2b 4 in the point (xb yb) = (ξb minus τ 2b η

2b4 ηbτ

2b 2) of the parabolic wave front

x+ y2(4tb) = ξb evolving according to dKP and ii) at tb = eτb in the point(xb yb) = (ξb minus η2be

τb 2ηbeτb) of the parabolic wave front x + y2(4tb) = ξb

evolving according to mdKP If for instance we use the same Gaussian initialcondition (419) for both dKP and mdKP with ǫ = 02 then G is given by(422) in both cases Consequently for dKP

ζb = 196 ηb = 0 ξb = 327 τb = 657 (552)

and wave breaking takes place at tb = 108 in the point (xb yb) = (327 0)on the parabola x+ 231 middot 10minus2y2 = 327 (see Figure 4)

Figure 4 Plotting of the analytic dKP solution u in the physical variablesx y t for G given by (422) (corresponding to the gaussian initial condition)ǫ = 02 at breaking

For mdKP

ζb = 161 ηb = 0 ξb = 251 τb = 1431 (553)

and wave breaking takes place at tb = 164middot106 in the point (xb yb) = (251 0)on the parabola x + 152 middot 10minus7y2 = 251 and at breaking the amplitude ofthe wave is u = ǫtb

minus12G(ζb ηb) = 195 middot 10minus4 (see Figure 5)

25

Figure 5 Plotting of the analytic mdKP solution u in the physical variablesx y t for G given by (422) (corresponding to the gaussian initial condition)ǫ = 02 at breaking

Since in the mdKP case tb is very large and the wave amplitude atbreaking is very small we wonder if such a wave breaking could be actuallydetected numerically

Now we go into the analytic details For the dKP case

tprime equiv tminus tb sim 2tbτ yprime = y minus yb ≃ 2tb(ηprime + 2ηbτ + 2ηprimeτ )

xprime = xminus xb sim ξprime minus ηbyprime minus yprime2

4tb+ η2b t

prime + ηbtbyprimetprime

(554)

and we choose τ prime to be sufficiently small to have |tprime| |yprime| ≪ 1The dKP solution reads

u(x y t) =ǫradictG(ζb + ζ prime ηb + ηprime) =

ǫradict

(

G+Gζζprime +Gη

yprime

2tb+O

(

tprime

tb

))

(555)where ζ prime is the solution of the cubic (511) with

a =3Fζζη

2Fζζζ

yprime

tb b = 3

Fζζζ

(

Fζtprime

tb+ Fζηη

yprime2

4t2b

)

X = xprime +(

ηb minus Fη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime minus[

η2b +(

F2minus ηbFη

)

1|Fζ |tb

]

tprime

+(

1minus Fηη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime2

4tb+[

minusηb +(

Fη

2+ ηbFηη

)

12|Fζ |tb

]

yprimetprime

tb

minus Fηηη

48|Fζ |yprime3

t3b

(556)

26

The three-valued region (532) after breaking becomes

xprime +(

ηb minus Fη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime minus[

η2b +(

F2minus ηbFη

)

1|Fζ |tb

]

tprime

+(

1minus Fηη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime2

4tb+[

minusηb +(

Fη

2|Fζ |tb +ηbFηη

|Fζ | minus Fζζη

2Fζζζ

)

12tb

]

yprimetprime

tb

+ 16|Fζ |F 2

ζζζ

[

minus FηηηF2ζζζ + Fζζη(3FζζζFζηη minus 2F 2

ζζη)]

yprime3

8t3b

2

=

α3

9middot64F 2ζF 4ζζζ

t6b

(

(

yprimecusp(tprime))2 minus yprime2

)3

(557)

where

yprimecusp(tprime) = 2

radic

|Fζ |Fζζζ

α

radictbtprime (558)

Equation (557) describes a closed curve with two cusps in the (x y) - planeat the points

~xplusmncusp(t

prime) = (xb yb) + (xplusmnprime

cusp(tprime)plusmnyprimecusp(t

prime)) (559)

where

xplusmnprime

cusp(tprime) sim ∓2ηb

radic

|Fζ |Fζζζ

α

radictbtprime plusmn Fη

radic

Fζζζ

α|Fζ |

radic

tprime

tb

+(

η2b minus|Fζ |Fζζζ

α

)

tprime +(

F|Fζ | +

FηηFζζζ

α

)

tprime

2tbplusmn 2ηb

radic

|Fζ |Fζζζ

αtprime

32radictb+O(τ 32)

(560)At last the analogue of (539) reads

∆xprime le 2

3

radic

|Fζ|Fζζζ

(

tprime

tb

)32

(561)

it follows that the longitudinal width ∆long and the transversal width ∆transv

of the multivalued region are respectively

∆long = O

(

(

tprime

tb

)32

)

∆transv = O(

(tbtprime)

12

)

rArr ∆long

∆transv= O

(

tprime

t2b

)

(562)

For the mdKP case

tprime = tminus tb sim tbτprime yprime = y minus yb sim 2tb(η

prime + ηbtprime

tb+ ηprimetprime

tb)

xprime = xminus xb sim ξprime minus ηbyprime + η2b t

prime minus yprime2

4tb+ ηb

yprimetprime

tb

(563)

27

and we choose τ prime sufficiently small to have |tprime| |yprime| ≪ 1The mdKP solution reads

u(x y t) =ǫradictG(ζb+ζ prime ηb+ηprime) =

ǫradict

(

G+Gζζprime +Gη

yprime

2tb+O

(

tprime

tb log tb

))

(564)where ζ prime is the solution of the cubic (511) with

a =3Fζζη

2Fζζζ

yprime

tb b = 3

Fζζζ

(

2Fζtprime

tb log tb+ Fζηη

yprime2

4t2b

)

X = xprime +(

ηb minus Fη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime minus[

η2b +(

Flog tb

minus ηbFη

)

1|Fζ |tb

]

tprime

+(

1minus Fηη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime2

4tb+[

minusηb +(

Fη

|Fζ |(1minus1

log tb) + ηbFηη

|Fζ |

)

12tb

]

yprimetprime

tb

minus Fηηη

48|Fζ |yprime3

t3b

(565)

The three-valued region (532) after breaking becomes

xprime +(

ηb minus Fη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime minus[

η2b +(

Flog tb

minus ηbFη

)

1|Fζ |tb

]

tprime

+(

1minus Fηη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime2

4tb+[

minusηb +(

Fη

|Fζ |(1minus1

log tb) + ηbFηη

|Fζ| minus Fζζη

Fζζζ log tb

)

12tb

]

yprimetprime

tb

+ 16|Fζ |F 2

ζζζ

[

minus FηηηF2ζζζ + Fζζη(3FζζζFζηη minus 2F 2

ζζη)]

yprime3

8t3b

2

=

α3

9middot64F 2ζ F

4ζζζt

6b

(

(

yprimecusp(tprime))2 minus yprime2

)3

(566)where

yprimecusp(tprime) = 2

radic

2|Fζ |Fζζζ

α

radic

tbtprime

log tb (567)

Equation (566) describes a closed curve with two cusps in the (x y) - planeat the points

~xplusmncusp(t

prime) = (xb yb) + (xplusmnprime

cusp(tprime)plusmnyprimecusp(t

prime)) (568)

where

xplusmnprime

cusp(tprime) sim ∓2ηb

radic

|Fζ |Fζζζ

α

radic

tbtprime

log tbplusmn Fη

radic

Fζζζ

α|Fζ |

radic

tprime

tb log tb

+(

η2b minus|Fζ |Fζζζ

α log tb

)

tprime +(

F|Fζ | +

FηηFζζζ

α

)

tprime

tb log tbplusmn 2ηb

radic

|Fζ |Fζζζ

αtprime

32radic

tb log tb

+O(τ 32)

(569)

28

At last the analogue of (539) reads

∆xprime le 4radic2

3

radic

|Fζ |Fζζζ

(

tprime

tb log tb

)32

(570)

it follows that the longitudinal width ∆long and the transversal width ∆transv

of the multivalued region are respectively

∆long = O

(

(

tprime

tb log tb

)32

)

∆transv = O

(

(

tbtprime

log tb

)12

)

rArr ∆long

∆transv= O

(

tprime

t2blog tb

)

(571)

References

[1] F Santucci Onde debolmente non lineari e quasi unidimensionali in

Natura La rottura di tali onde e il problema della regolarizzazione dis-

sipativa Tesi della Laurea Specialistica in Fisica supervisor P M San-tini Dipartimento di Fisica dellrsquoUniversita di Roma ldquoLa Sapienzardquo AA2011-2012

[2] S V Manakov and P M Santini On the dispersionless Kadomtsev-Petviashvili equation in n + 1 dimensions exact solutions the Cauchyproblem for small initial data and wave breaking J Phys A MathTheor 44 (2011) 405203

[3] G B Whitham Linear and nonlinear waves John Wiley amp Sons 1974

[4] C Lin E Reissner and H S Tien On two-dimensional nonsteadymotion of a slender body in a compressible fluid J Math Phys 27(1948) 220-231

[5] R Timman Unsteady motion in transonic flow Symposium Transson-icum Aachen 1962 EdKOswatitsch Springer 394-401

[6] E A Zobolotskaya and R V Khokhlov Quasi-plane waves in the non-linear acoustics of confined beams Soviet Physics- Acoustics Vol15N1 (1969)

29

[7] B B Kadomtsev and V I Petviashvili On the stability of solitarywaves in weakly dispersing media Soviet Physics-Doklady Vol15 N6(1970)

[8] X P Wang M J Ablowitz and H Segur Wave collapse and instabil-

ity of solitary waves of a generalized Kadomtsev-Petviashvili equationPhysica D 78 (1994) 241-265

[9] M J Ablowitz and H Segur Solitons and the Inverse Scattering Trans-

form SIAM Philadelphia 1981

[10] M J Ablowitz and P A Clarkson Solitons nonlinear evolution equa-

tions and inverse scattering Cambridge University Press 1991

[11] S Turitsyn and G Falkovitch Stability of magneto-elastic solitons andself-focusing of sound in antiferromagnets Sov Phys J Exp TheorPhys 62 (1985) 146-152

[12] S Novikov S V Manakov L P Pitaevskii V E Zakharov Theory of

solitons Consultant Bureau 1984

[13] S V Manakov and P M Santini Inverse scattering problem for vectorfields and the heavenly equation httparXivnlinSI0512043

[14] S V Manakov and P M Santini Inverse scattering problem forvector fields and the Cauchy problem for the heavenly equationPhys Lett A 359 613-619 (2006) doi101016jphysleta200607011httparXivnlinSI0604017

[15] S V Manakov and P M Santini The Cauchy problem on theplane for the dispersionless Kadomtsev-Petviashvili equation JETPLetters 83 No 10 462-466 (2006) 101134S0021364006100080httparXivnlinSI0604016

[16] P G Grinevich P M Santini and D Wu The Cauchy problem for thePavlov equation Nonlinearity 28 (2015) 3709-3754 doi1010880951-771528113709 Preprint arXiv13105834v2

[17] M V Pavlov Integrable hydrodynamic chains J Math Phys 44 (2003)4134-4156

30

For n = 1 forallm uasmn reduces to the general solution of the Riemann equation

(12) [3] The cases (mn) = (2 1) and (mn) = (3 1) the dKP and theKZ equations have been already investigated in [18] and [2] respectivelytherefore in the following section we mainly focus on the case (mn) = (2 2)corresponding to the nonintegrable modified dKP equation (15) and to itsasymptotic solution

u ≃ uas22(x y t) =

1radictǫG

(

x+y2

4tminus u2t ln t

y

2t

)

(412)

comparing the results with the dKP case (mn) = (1 2) investigated in [18]with its asymptotic solution

u ≃ uas12(x y t) =

1radictǫG

(

x+y2

4tminus 2ut

y

2t

)

(413)

Remark 1 The estimate of the first correction to the asymptotics (49)reads

u = uasnm(x ~y t)(1 +O(tminus1)) (414)

Indeed if cmn gt 0 one has

u sim uasnm(x ~y t) +

ǫ1+ m

cmn

tnminus12

H

(

x+1

4t

nminus1sum

i=1

y2i ~y

2t τ

)

(415)

where τ = ǫmτ and H(ξ ~η τ ) is expressed in terms of G(ζ ~η) (ζ is definedin the second of equations (51)) through the PDE

(

Hτ +GmHξ

1 +mGmminus1Gζ τ

)

ξ

+1

4(cmnτ )1+cminus1mn

nminus1sum

j=1

(

Gηj

1 +mGmminus1Gζ τ

)

ηj

= 0 (416)

Since from (43) ǫm

cmn = O(tminus1) equation (415) yields (414) Similarly ifcmn = 0

u sim uasnm(x ~y t) +

ǫ

tn+12

H

(

x+1

4t

nminus1sum

i=1

y2i ~y

2t τ

)

(417)

where H(ξ ~η τ) now solves the PDE

(

H

1 +mGmminus1Gζ τ

)

ξ

=1

4

nminus1sum

j=1

(

Gηj

1 +mGmminus1Gζ τ

)

ηj

(418)

13

Then equation (417) yields equation (414) too

Remark 2 As is was observed in [2] for a gaussian initial condition

u0(x y) = d exp

[

minusx2 + ~y2

4

]

(419)

where d is constant the asymptotic solution can be written in terms of specialfunctions obtaining for G(ξ ~η)

G(ξ ~η) =dradicπ

1

(1+~η2)n+14

[

cos(

π4(nminus 1)

)

Γ(

n+14

)

1F1

(

n+14 12minusY 2

4

)

+ sin(

π4(nminus 1)

)

Γ(

n+34

)

Y 1F1

(

n+34 32minusY 2

4

) ]

(420)

where

Y =ξ

radic

1 + ~η2 (421)

Γ is the Euler gamma function and 1F1 is the Kummer confluent hypergeo-metric function [22 23] For n = 2 and d =

radic2π it yields respectively

G(ξ η) =1

(1+η2)34

[

Γ(

34

)

1F1

(

34 12minusY 2

4

)

+ Y Γ(

54

)

1F1

(

54 32minusY 2

4

)]

(422)

Remark 3 The fact that small data break only when the inequality (410) issatisfied was expected from physical considerations Indeed as already men-tioned in the introduction in equation (11) there are two competing termsthe nonlinear term umux responsible for the steepening of the profile andthe perpu term describing diffraction in the transversal (n minus 1) dimensionalhyperplane (reminiscence through the multiscale expansion leading to (11)of the wave operator) therefore diffraction increases as (nminus 1) increases [2]For small initial data the umux term is initially smaller and smaller increas-ing m and the solution evolves in a linear way for a longer and longer timediffracting transversally through the (nminus1) diffraction channels So diffrac-tion increasing with (n minus 1) acts on a very long time increasing with mbefore the nonlinear regime could become relevant and if (nminus 1) andor mare sufficiently large one expects that the solution would be diffracted awayalmost completely before reaching the nonlinear regime and will not break

14

We have in particular that breaking takes place in the following longtimeregimes (see (43))m = n = 1 (the Riemann equation with quadratic nonlinearity) tb = O(ǫminus1)m = 1 n = 2 (the dKP equation) tb = O(ǫminus2)m = 1 n = 3 (the KZ equation) tb = O(eǫ

minus1)

m = 2 n = 1 (the Riemann equation with cubic nonlinearity) tb = O(ǫminus2)m = 2 n = 2 (the mdKP equation) O(tb = eǫ

minus2)

It is interesting to remark that as it was observed in [2] if m = 1 (thephysically more relevant case) wave breaking takes place only for n le 3 iein physical space

We end this section remarking that also in the longtime behaviour of thesolutions of the small data Cauchy problem for equation (11) the depen-dence of the solution u on x as in the case of the exact solutions (314) isnot consistent with the formal ansatz recently made in [20]

5 Analytic aspects of the wave breaking

In this section we use the longtime behavior of solutions of the small dataCauchy problem for dKP (mn) to show explicitly the analytic aspects ofthe solution in the neighbourhood of the breaking time in terms of the initialdata represented by function G defined in (47) as it was already done in[18 2]

Choosing cmn ge 0 we rewrite equation (49) in the characteristic form

q sim ǫG(ζ ~η)ξ = ǫmF (ζ ~ηm)τ + ζ F (ζ ~ηm) equiv Gm(ζ ~η)

(51)

where

q = utnminus12 ξ = x+

1

4t

nminus1sum

j=1

y2j ~η =~y

2t(52)

and

τ(t) =

1cmn

tcmn if cmn gt 0

ln t if cmn = 0(53)

One solves the second of equations (51) with respect to the parameterζ obtaining ζ(ξ ~η τ) and replaces it into the first to obtain the solutionq sim ǫG(ζ(ξ ~η τ) ~η) The inversion of the second of equations (51) is possibleiff its ζ-derivative is different from zero Therefore the singularity manifold

15

(SM) of the solution is the n - dimensional manifold characterized by theequation

S(ζ ~η τ) equiv 1 + ǫmFζ(ζ ~ηm)τ = 0 rArr τ = minus 1

ǫmFζ(ζ ~ηm) (54)

Sincenabla(ξ~η)q =

ǫnabla(ζ~η)G(ζ~η)

1+ǫmFζ(ζ~ηm)τ (55)

the slope of the localized wave becomes infinity (the so-called gradient catas-trophe) on the SM and the n-dimensional wave ldquobreaksrdquo except on the di-

rection represented by the vector field V =nminus1sum

i=1

partηi +mǫmGmminus1(nminus1sum

i=1

Gηi)partξ [2]

[19] on which

V q = ǫ

nminus1sum

i=1

Gηi (56)

Since the KZ case (mn) = (1 3) has been studied in detail in [2] in thefollowing we mainly concentrate on the mdKP case (mn) = (2 2) and wecompare it with the dKP case (mn) = (1 2) investigated in [18]

From (54) the first breaking time τb and the corresponding characteristic

parameters ~ζb = (ζb ηb) are defined by the global minimum of a function ofthe 2 variables (ζ η)

τb = minus 1

ǫmFζ(ζb ηbm)= inf

(

minus 1

ǫmFζ(ζ ηm)

)

gt 0 (57)

and it is characterized together with the condition Fζ(~ζbm) lt 0 by thefollowing equations

Fζζ(~ζbm) = Fζη(~ζbm) = 0

α equiv Fζζζ(~ζbm)Fζηη(~ζbm)minus F 2ζζη(

~ζbm) gt 0 Fζζζ(~ζbm) gt 0(58)

The corresponding point at which the first wave breaking takes place is from(51) ~ξb = (ξb ηb) isin R

2 where

ξb = ζb + ǫmF (~ζbm)τb = ζb minusF (~ζbm)

Fζ(~ζbm) (59)

Now we evaluate equations (51) and (54) near breaking in the regime

ξ = ξb + ξprime η = ηb + ηprime τ = τb + τ prime ζ = ζb + ζ prime (510)

16

where ξprime ηprime τ prime ζ prime are small Using (57) - (59) the second of equations (51)becomes at the leading order the following cubic equation in ζ prime

ζ prime3+ a(ηprime)ζ prime

2+ b(ηprime τ)ζ prime minus γX(ξprime ηprime τ) = 0 (511)

where

a(ηprime) =3Fζζη

Fζζζηprime

b(ηprime τ) = 3Fζζζ

[

2Fζ τ + Fζηηηprime2]

X(ξprime ηprime τ ) = ξprime minus ǫF (ζb ηb + ηprime)τ prime minus ǫ [F (ζb ηb + ηprime)minus F ] τb simξprime minus Fη

|Fζ |ηprime minus F

|Fζ | τ minus Fηη

2|Fζ |ηprime2 minus Fη

|Fζ |ηprimeτ minus Fηηη

6|Fζ |ηprime3 γ =

6|Fζ |Fζζζ

(512)

and

τ equiv τ prime

τb=

τ minus τbτb

(513)

corresponding to the maximal balance

|ζ prime| |ηprime| = O(|τ |12) |X| = O(|τ |32) (514)

In (512) and in the rest of this section G F = Gm and all their partialderivatives whose arguments are not indicated are meant to be evaluated at~ζb = (ζb ηb)

The three roots of the cubic are given by the well-known Cardano-Tartagliaformula

ζ prime0 (ξprime ~ηprime τ) = minusa

3+ (A+)

13 + (Aminus)

13

ζ primeplusmn (ξprime ~ηprime τ) = minusa3minus 1

2

(

(A+)13 + (Aminus)

13

)

plusmnradic32i(

(A+)13 minus (Aminus)

13

)

(515)where

Aplusmn = Rplusmnradic∆ (516)

and the discriminant ∆ reads

∆ = R2 +Q3 (517)

withQ(ηprime τ ) = 3bminusa2

9= minus2|Fζ |

Fζζζτ + α

F 2ζζζ

ηprime2

R(ξprime ηprime τ) = γ2X(ξprime ηprime τ ) + ab

18+ a

3Q(ηprime τ)

(518)

17

At the same order function S in (54) becomes

S(ζ prime ηprime τ ) = minusτ + 12|Fζ |

[

Fζζζζprime2 + 2Fζζηζ

primeηprime + Fζηηηprime2]

=

Fζζζ

2|Fζ |

(

Q(ηprime τ ) +(

ζ prime +Fζζη

Fζζζηprime)2)

(519)

Known ζ prime as function of (ξprime ηprime τ) from the cubic (511) the solution q andits gradient are then approximated near breaking by the formulae

q(ξ η τ) sim ǫG(ζb + ζ prime ηb + ηprime) = ǫ (G+Gζζprime +Gηη

prime +O(|τ |)) nabla(ξη)q sim ǫ

nabla(ζprimeηprime)G(ζb+ζprimeηb+ηprime)

S(ζprimeηprimeτ) (520)

Before breaking

Before breaking τ lt τb (τ lt 0) the coefficient Q in (518) is strictlypositive (see the second of (58)) then the discriminant ∆ = R2 + Q3 isalso strictly positive and only the root ζ prime0 is real Correspondingly the realsolution q is single valued and described by Cardanorsquos formula and by (520)In addition function S in (519) is also strictly positive and nabla(ξ~η)q is finiteforall ξ η

To have a more explicit solution than that provided by Cardanorsquos formulawe first restrict the asymptotic region to a narrower area so that the cubic(511) reduces to the linear equation bζ prime = γX and X contains only linearterms This is achieved choosing

ηprime = O(τ r) X = O(τ p+1) 12lt p lt p+1

2lt r lt p+ 1 (521)

implying

ζ prime = O(τ p)

X = ξprime + Fη

Fζηprime + F

Fζτ + o(τ p+1) = ξprime + Gη

Gζηprime + G

mGζτ + o(τ p+1)

bζ prime = γX rArr ζ prime sim minus 1τ

(

ξprime + Gη

Gζηprime + G

mGζτ)

(522)

Then

q = ǫG(ζb + ζ prime ηb + ηprime) sim ǫG + ǫGζζprime sim ǫ

(

1minus 1

m

)

Gminus ǫGζ

τ

(

ξprime +Gη

Gζηprime)

(523)

18

Since q sim ǫG and recalling the definitions (57)(513) it follows that q isdescribed by the exact similarity solution

q sim(

ξ + (GηGζ)ηprime

τ prime

)1m

(524)

of equation (37)The cubic simplifies also in the asymptotic region in which ξprime ηprime are of

the same order while τ prime le O(|ηprime|) reducing to ζ prime3 = γX so that the solutionq and its gradient are

q sim ǫG(ζb +3radic

γX(ξprime ηprime τ) ηb + ηprime) (525)

nablaξηq sim3radicγ

3

ǫnablaζηG3radic

X2(ξprime ηprime τ ) (526)

At breaking

When τ = τb the singularity manifold S (519) is positive everywhere inthe (ξ η) plane except at the breaking point (ξb ηb) in which it is zerotogether with Q R and the discriminant ∆ The solution q is well describedagain by Cardanorsquos formula and by (520) To have a more explicit solutionthan that provided by Cardanorsquos formula we choose ξprime ηprime of the same orderthe cubic (511) reduces to ζ prime3 = γX and equations (525) become

q sim ǫG(ζb +3radic

γX(ξprime ηprime 0) ηb + ηprime)

nablaξηq sim 3radicγ

3

ǫnablaξηG3radic

X2(ξprimeηprime0)

(527)

The expression of Xb(ξprime ~ηprime) equiv X(ξprime ~ηprime 0) is given in (512) Xb(ξ

prime ηprime) simξprime minus Fη

|Fζ |ηprime if ξprime prop ηprime but ξprime 6= (FηFζ)η

prime while X(ξprime ηprime 0) = minus Fηη

2|Fζ |ηprime2 if

ξprime = (FηFζ)ηprime

Equation (527) implies that all the derivatives of q blow up at τ = τb in

the breaking point (ξb ηb) with the universal lawXminus23b except the derivative

along the transversal line Xb(ξprime ηprime 0) = 0 represented by the vector field

V = partη minusXbηpartξ (compare with (56)) for which [2 19]

V q|(ξbηb) = ǫGη (528)

After breaking I the overturning profile

19

After breaking the solution becomes three-valued in a compact regionof the (ξ η) - plane (see Figures 3) and in general does not describe anyphysics nevertheless a detailed study of the multivalued region is importantin view of a proper regularization of the models

If τ gt τb (τ gt 0) in the regime (514) the SM equation S = 0

2|Fζ|τ = Fζζζζprime2 + 2Fζζηζ

primeηprime + Fζηηηprime2 (529)

describes an ellipsoidal paraboloid in the (ζ prime ηprime τ) space with minimum at

the breaking point (~ξb τb)One can check that eliminating ζ prime from equations (529) and (511) one

obtains the SM equation in space-time coordinates coinciding with the equa-tion ∆ = R2+Q3 = 0 where ∆ is the discriminant (517) of the cubic (511)and Q and R are defined in (518) Such equation can be satisfied only ifQ le 0 ie only if

|ηprime| le ηprimecusp(τ) (530)

where

ηprimecusp(τ ) equivradic

2|Fζ |Fζζζ

α

radicτ (531)

and is given by the following analytic and universal expression

ξprime minus Fη

|Fζ |ηprime minus F

|Fζ | τ minus Fηη

2|Fζ |ηprime2 minus

(

Fη

|Fζ | +Fζζη

Fζζζ

)

ηprimeτ + 16|Fζ |F 2

ζζζ

[

minus FηηηF2ζζζ

+Fζζη(3FζζζFζηη minus 2F 2ζζη)]

ηprime32

= α3

9F 2ζ F

4ζζζ

(

(

ηprimecusp(τ))2 minus ηprime2

)3

(532)Equation (532) describes a closed curve with two cusps in the (ξ η) - planeat the points

~ξplusmncusp(τ ) = (ξb ηb) + (ξplusmnprime

cusp(τ )plusmnηprimecusp(τ)) (533)

where

ξplusmnprime

cusp(τ ) sim plusmnFη

radic

2Fζζζ

α|Fζ|radicτ +

(

F

|Fζ |+

FηηFζζζ

α

)

τ plusmn Bτ 32 (534)

where B = O(1) (see Figures 6 for dKP and 7 for mdKP) corresponding tothe conditions Q = R = 0 on which the three real solutions of the cubiccoincide (in 1 + 1 dimensions it is not possible to have three coincidentsolutions)

ζ0 = ζplusmn = minusFζζη

Fζζζηprime rArr q0 = qplusmn =sim ǫ

(

G+ (Gη minusGζFζζη

Fζζζ)ηprime)

(535)

20

On the remaining part of the closed curve ∆ = 0 two of the three realbranches coincide Outside the closed curve ∆ gt 0 and the real solution q issingle valued inside the closed curve ∆ lt 0 and the real solution q is threevalued with the three branches

q = ǫG(ζb + ζ prime ηb + ηprime) sim ǫ(G +Gζζprime +Gηη

prime +O(τ)) (536)

where ζ prime are the three real solutions of the cubic (511) (see fi Figures 2for dKP)

Figures 2 Plotting of the dKP analytic solution in the (q ξ η τ) variablesfor G given by (422) ǫ = 02 at times τ = 0 τb minus 2 τb τb + 2 whereτb = 657

Such a three-valued region of the (ξ η) plane is characterized by the

21

conditions|ηprime| lt ηprimecusp(τ) ξminusM(ηprime τ) lt ξprime lt ξ+M(ηprime τ) (537)

where

ξplusmnM(ηprime τ) equiv Fη

|Fζ |ηprime + F

|Fζ | τ + Fηη

2|Fζ |ηprime2 +

(

Fη

|Fζ | +Fζζη

Fζζζ

)

ηprimeτ minus 16|Fζ |F 2

ζζζ

[

minus FηηηF2ζζζ

+Fζζη(3FζζζFζηη minus 2F 2ζζη)]

ηprime3 plusmn Fζζζ

3|Fζ | |Q| 32(538)

(see Figures 3 for dKP)Since

∆ξ equiv ξ+M(ηprime τ)minus ξminusM(ηprime τ) =2Fζζζ

3|Fζ||Q(ηprime τ)|32 le 4

radic2

3

radic

|Fζ|Fζζζ

τ 32 (539)

we infer that the longitudinal width of the multivalued region is O(τ 32) thetransversal widths delimited by the two cusps is instead O(τ 12) thereforethe multivalued region develops at τ = τb from the breaking point (ξb ηb)with an infinite speed in the tranversal direction and with zero speed in thelongitudinal direction All these results are a common feature to the class ofdynamics (11) (see the previously derived results for the dKP equation forfinite times [18 19] and in the longtime regime [18] and those for the KZequation in the longtime regime [2])

-15-10-050005101-15-10-0500051015

-15-10-050005101-15-10-0500051015

Figures 3 Plotting of the three valued regions of the (ξ η) plane for dKPat times τ = 02 05 for G given by (422) and ǫ = 02 The center of thesquare frame is the breaking point (ξb ηb) Notice that the two cusps havethe same ξ coordinate ξ+cusp(τ) sim ξminuscusp(τ) since for solution (422) Gη = 0(see (531)(534))

22

We end this subsection remarking that as it was already observed in [19]since dKP (mn) is symmetric wrt y if the initial datum is also symmetricwrt y like the Gaussian (419) also its evolution will be so u(x y t) =u(xminusy t) This implies that ηb = yb = 0 and that all partial derivatives ofF and G containing an odd number of η derivatives are 0 at breaking As aconsequence the transversal direction on which the derivative of the profiledoes not blow up is the η (y) direction and on it the derivative is 0 atbreaking (see (56))

After breaking II the discontinuous shock

Using the matching rules of sect3 the shock formulae (310) become

parts

partτ=

ǫm

m+ 1

Gm+1(ζ1 η)minusGm+1(ζ2 η)

G(ζ1 η)minusG(ζ2 η) (540)

s = ζ1 + ǫmGm(ζ1 η) τ = ζ2 + ǫmGm(ζ2 η) τ (541)

where subscript 2 is for values behind the shock and subscript 1 for valuesahead Equations (541) are two implicit equations for ζ1 and ζ2 solvingthese equations yields ζ1(s η τ) ζ2(s η τ) and substituting these expres-sions in (540) it results in a nonlinear first order differential equation fors This equation and the initial conditions (311) give uniquely s(η τ) andconsequently ζ12(η τ) = ζ12(s(η τ) η τ)

We recall that immediately after breaking and if (530) holds equation(541) reduces to the cubic (511)(512) in which ξprime must be replaced by sprimepossessing three real roots where

sprime(ηprime τ) = sminus ξb (542)

Therefore the values of ζ1 and ζ2 are chosen among the three solutions (515)so that q2 = ǫG(ζb + ζ prime2 η) has the maximum value and q1 = ǫG(ζb + ζ prime1 η)the minimum one among the three branches of q Since Gζ lt 0 it followsthat

ζ1 = maxζ prime0 ζ primeplusmn ζ2 = minζ prime0 ζ primeplusmn (543)

To identify ζ12 with one of the three roots ζ prime0 ζprimeplusmn let us rewrite them as

follows

ζ prime0 = minusa

3+ 2 3

radicρ cos

(

θ

3

)

(544)

ζ prime+ = minusa

3minus 3

radicρ

(

cos

(

θ

3

)

+radic3 sin

(

θ

3

))

(545)

23

ζ primeminus = minusa

3minus 3

radicρ

(

cos

(

θ

3

)

minusradic3 sin

(

θ

3

))

(546)

where

ρ =radic

R2 + |∆| θ = arctan

(

radic

|∆|R

)

(547)

We observe that for 0 le θ le π the following inequalities hold

minus cos

(

θ

3

)

minusradic3 sin

(

θ

3

)

le minus cos

(

θ

3

)

+radic3 sin

(

θ

3

)

le 2 cos

(

θ

3

)

so that

ζ prime+ le ζ primeminus le ζ prime0 rArr q(ζb + ζ prime0 η) le q(ζb + ζ primeminus η) le q(ζb + ζ prime+ η) (548)

for q decreasing in ζ Hence

ζ prime1(sprime ηprime τ prime) = ζ prime0(s

prime ηprime τ prime) ζ prime2(sprime ηprime τ prime) = ζ prime+(s

prime ηprime τ prime) (549)

Then (540) reduces to the equations

dsprime

dτ+ G

Gζ+ Gη

Gζηprime + 1

2

[

ζ prime0(sprime ηprime τ ) + ζ prime+(s

prime ηprime τ)]

= 0 for dKPdsprime

dτ+ G

2Gζ+ Gη

Gζηprime + 1

2

[

ζ prime0(sprime ηprime τ) + ζ prime+(s

prime ηprime τ)]

= 0 for mdKP

sprime(0) = ξb

(550)

obtained expanding (540) near the breaking point and recalling that τ equivτ primeτb

We remark that in the differential equations (550) sprime depends on ηprime

parametrically So the discontinuous (dissipative) shocks of the longtime so-lutions of the small data Cauchy problems for dKP and mdKP has a simplegeometric construction given τ gt 0 for any fixed |ηprime| le ηcusp the overturn-ing profile in the (ξ q) plane is intercepted by a vertical straight line cuttingoff equal area lobi in analogy with the 1 + 1 dimensional case

Going back to the dKP variables

The above formulae written in the convenient variables q ξ η τ are es-sentially the same for both dKP and mdKP relevant differences appear whenwe go back to the original variables u x y t inverting equations (52)(53)

u = 1radictq t = τ2

4 y = ητ2

2 x = ξ minus η2τ2

4 for dKP

u = 1radictq t = eτ y = 2ηeτ x = ξ minus η2eτ for mdKP

(551)

24

and all the above universal formulae are easily transfered to the dKP (mn)equations In particular small and localized initial data break i) at tb =τ 2b 4 in the point (xb yb) = (ξb minus τ 2b η

2b4 ηbτ

2b 2) of the parabolic wave front

x+ y2(4tb) = ξb evolving according to dKP and ii) at tb = eτb in the point(xb yb) = (ξb minus η2be

τb 2ηbeτb) of the parabolic wave front x + y2(4tb) = ξb

evolving according to mdKP If for instance we use the same Gaussian initialcondition (419) for both dKP and mdKP with ǫ = 02 then G is given by(422) in both cases Consequently for dKP

ζb = 196 ηb = 0 ξb = 327 τb = 657 (552)

and wave breaking takes place at tb = 108 in the point (xb yb) = (327 0)on the parabola x+ 231 middot 10minus2y2 = 327 (see Figure 4)

Figure 4 Plotting of the analytic dKP solution u in the physical variablesx y t for G given by (422) (corresponding to the gaussian initial condition)ǫ = 02 at breaking

For mdKP

ζb = 161 ηb = 0 ξb = 251 τb = 1431 (553)

and wave breaking takes place at tb = 164middot106 in the point (xb yb) = (251 0)on the parabola x + 152 middot 10minus7y2 = 251 and at breaking the amplitude ofthe wave is u = ǫtb

minus12G(ζb ηb) = 195 middot 10minus4 (see Figure 5)

25

Figure 5 Plotting of the analytic mdKP solution u in the physical variablesx y t for G given by (422) (corresponding to the gaussian initial condition)ǫ = 02 at breaking

Since in the mdKP case tb is very large and the wave amplitude atbreaking is very small we wonder if such a wave breaking could be actuallydetected numerically

Now we go into the analytic details For the dKP case

tprime equiv tminus tb sim 2tbτ yprime = y minus yb ≃ 2tb(ηprime + 2ηbτ + 2ηprimeτ )

xprime = xminus xb sim ξprime minus ηbyprime minus yprime2

4tb+ η2b t

prime + ηbtbyprimetprime

(554)

and we choose τ prime to be sufficiently small to have |tprime| |yprime| ≪ 1The dKP solution reads

u(x y t) =ǫradictG(ζb + ζ prime ηb + ηprime) =

ǫradict

(

G+Gζζprime +Gη

yprime

2tb+O

(

tprime

tb

))

(555)where ζ prime is the solution of the cubic (511) with

a =3Fζζη

2Fζζζ

yprime

tb b = 3

Fζζζ

(

Fζtprime

tb+ Fζηη

yprime2

4t2b

)

X = xprime +(

ηb minus Fη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime minus[

η2b +(

F2minus ηbFη

)

1|Fζ |tb

]

tprime

+(

1minus Fηη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime2

4tb+[

minusηb +(

Fη

2+ ηbFηη

)

12|Fζ |tb

]

yprimetprime

tb

minus Fηηη

48|Fζ |yprime3

t3b

(556)

26

The three-valued region (532) after breaking becomes

xprime +(

ηb minus Fη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime minus[

η2b +(

F2minus ηbFη

)

1|Fζ |tb

]

tprime

+(

1minus Fηη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime2

4tb+[

minusηb +(

Fη

2|Fζ |tb +ηbFηη

|Fζ | minus Fζζη

2Fζζζ

)

12tb

]

yprimetprime

tb

+ 16|Fζ |F 2

ζζζ

[

minus FηηηF2ζζζ + Fζζη(3FζζζFζηη minus 2F 2

ζζη)]

yprime3

8t3b

2

=

α3

9middot64F 2ζF 4ζζζ

t6b

(

(

yprimecusp(tprime))2 minus yprime2

)3

(557)

where

yprimecusp(tprime) = 2

radic

|Fζ |Fζζζ

α

radictbtprime (558)

Equation (557) describes a closed curve with two cusps in the (x y) - planeat the points

~xplusmncusp(t

prime) = (xb yb) + (xplusmnprime

cusp(tprime)plusmnyprimecusp(t

prime)) (559)

where

xplusmnprime

cusp(tprime) sim ∓2ηb

radic

|Fζ |Fζζζ

α

radictbtprime plusmn Fη

radic

Fζζζ

α|Fζ |

radic

tprime

tb

+(

η2b minus|Fζ |Fζζζ

α

)

tprime +(

F|Fζ | +

FηηFζζζ

α

)

tprime

2tbplusmn 2ηb

radic

|Fζ |Fζζζ

αtprime

32radictb+O(τ 32)

(560)At last the analogue of (539) reads

∆xprime le 2

3

radic

|Fζ|Fζζζ

(

tprime

tb

)32

(561)

it follows that the longitudinal width ∆long and the transversal width ∆transv

of the multivalued region are respectively

∆long = O

(

(

tprime

tb

)32

)

∆transv = O(

(tbtprime)

12

)

rArr ∆long

∆transv= O

(

tprime

t2b

)

(562)

For the mdKP case

tprime = tminus tb sim tbτprime yprime = y minus yb sim 2tb(η

prime + ηbtprime

tb+ ηprimetprime

tb)

xprime = xminus xb sim ξprime minus ηbyprime + η2b t

prime minus yprime2

4tb+ ηb

yprimetprime

tb

(563)

27

and we choose τ prime sufficiently small to have |tprime| |yprime| ≪ 1The mdKP solution reads

u(x y t) =ǫradictG(ζb+ζ prime ηb+ηprime) =

ǫradict

(

G+Gζζprime +Gη

yprime

2tb+O

(

tprime

tb log tb

))

(564)where ζ prime is the solution of the cubic (511) with

a =3Fζζη

2Fζζζ

yprime

tb b = 3

Fζζζ

(

2Fζtprime

tb log tb+ Fζηη

yprime2

4t2b

)

X = xprime +(

ηb minus Fη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime minus[

η2b +(

Flog tb

minus ηbFη

)

1|Fζ |tb

]

tprime

+(

1minus Fηη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime2

4tb+[

minusηb +(

Fη

|Fζ |(1minus1

log tb) + ηbFηη

|Fζ |

)

12tb

]

yprimetprime

tb

minus Fηηη

48|Fζ |yprime3

t3b

(565)

The three-valued region (532) after breaking becomes

xprime +(

ηb minus Fη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime minus[

η2b +(

Flog tb

minus ηbFη

)

1|Fζ |tb

]

tprime

+(

1minus Fηη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime2

4tb+[

minusηb +(

Fη

|Fζ |(1minus1

log tb) + ηbFηη

|Fζ| minus Fζζη

Fζζζ log tb

)

12tb

]

yprimetprime

tb

+ 16|Fζ |F 2

ζζζ

[

minus FηηηF2ζζζ + Fζζη(3FζζζFζηη minus 2F 2

ζζη)]

yprime3

8t3b

2

=

α3

9middot64F 2ζ F

4ζζζt

6b

(

(

yprimecusp(tprime))2 minus yprime2

)3

(566)where

yprimecusp(tprime) = 2

radic

2|Fζ |Fζζζ

α

radic

tbtprime

log tb (567)

Equation (566) describes a closed curve with two cusps in the (x y) - planeat the points

~xplusmncusp(t

prime) = (xb yb) + (xplusmnprime

cusp(tprime)plusmnyprimecusp(t

prime)) (568)

where

xplusmnprime

cusp(tprime) sim ∓2ηb

radic

|Fζ |Fζζζ

α

radic

tbtprime

log tbplusmn Fη

radic

Fζζζ

α|Fζ |

radic

tprime

tb log tb

+(

η2b minus|Fζ |Fζζζ

α log tb

)

tprime +(

F|Fζ | +

FηηFζζζ

α

)

tprime

tb log tbplusmn 2ηb

radic

|Fζ |Fζζζ

αtprime

32radic

tb log tb

+O(τ 32)

(569)

28

At last the analogue of (539) reads

∆xprime le 4radic2

3

radic

|Fζ |Fζζζ

(

tprime

tb log tb

)32

(570)

it follows that the longitudinal width ∆long and the transversal width ∆transv

of the multivalued region are respectively

∆long = O

(

(

tprime

tb log tb

)32

)

∆transv = O

(

(

tbtprime

log tb

)12

)

rArr ∆long

∆transv= O

(

tprime

t2blog tb

)

(571)

References

[1] F Santucci Onde debolmente non lineari e quasi unidimensionali in

Natura La rottura di tali onde e il problema della regolarizzazione dis-

sipativa Tesi della Laurea Specialistica in Fisica supervisor P M San-tini Dipartimento di Fisica dellrsquoUniversita di Roma ldquoLa Sapienzardquo AA2011-2012

[2] S V Manakov and P M Santini On the dispersionless Kadomtsev-Petviashvili equation in n + 1 dimensions exact solutions the Cauchyproblem for small initial data and wave breaking J Phys A MathTheor 44 (2011) 405203

[3] G B Whitham Linear and nonlinear waves John Wiley amp Sons 1974

[4] C Lin E Reissner and H S Tien On two-dimensional nonsteadymotion of a slender body in a compressible fluid J Math Phys 27(1948) 220-231

[5] R Timman Unsteady motion in transonic flow Symposium Transson-icum Aachen 1962 EdKOswatitsch Springer 394-401

[6] E A Zobolotskaya and R V Khokhlov Quasi-plane waves in the non-linear acoustics of confined beams Soviet Physics- Acoustics Vol15N1 (1969)

29

[7] B B Kadomtsev and V I Petviashvili On the stability of solitarywaves in weakly dispersing media Soviet Physics-Doklady Vol15 N6(1970)

[8] X P Wang M J Ablowitz and H Segur Wave collapse and instabil-

ity of solitary waves of a generalized Kadomtsev-Petviashvili equationPhysica D 78 (1994) 241-265

[9] M J Ablowitz and H Segur Solitons and the Inverse Scattering Trans-

form SIAM Philadelphia 1981

[10] M J Ablowitz and P A Clarkson Solitons nonlinear evolution equa-

tions and inverse scattering Cambridge University Press 1991

[11] S Turitsyn and G Falkovitch Stability of magneto-elastic solitons andself-focusing of sound in antiferromagnets Sov Phys J Exp TheorPhys 62 (1985) 146-152

[12] S Novikov S V Manakov L P Pitaevskii V E Zakharov Theory of

solitons Consultant Bureau 1984

[13] S V Manakov and P M Santini Inverse scattering problem for vectorfields and the heavenly equation httparXivnlinSI0512043

[14] S V Manakov and P M Santini Inverse scattering problem forvector fields and the Cauchy problem for the heavenly equationPhys Lett A 359 613-619 (2006) doi101016jphysleta200607011httparXivnlinSI0604017

[15] S V Manakov and P M Santini The Cauchy problem on theplane for the dispersionless Kadomtsev-Petviashvili equation JETPLetters 83 No 10 462-466 (2006) 101134S0021364006100080httparXivnlinSI0604016

[16] P G Grinevich P M Santini and D Wu The Cauchy problem for thePavlov equation Nonlinearity 28 (2015) 3709-3754 doi1010880951-771528113709 Preprint arXiv13105834v2

[17] M V Pavlov Integrable hydrodynamic chains J Math Phys 44 (2003)4134-4156

30

Then equation (417) yields equation (414) too

Remark 2 As is was observed in [2] for a gaussian initial condition

u0(x y) = d exp

[

minusx2 + ~y2

4

]

(419)

where d is constant the asymptotic solution can be written in terms of specialfunctions obtaining for G(ξ ~η)

G(ξ ~η) =dradicπ

1

(1+~η2)n+14

[

cos(

π4(nminus 1)

)

Γ(

n+14

)

1F1

(

n+14 12minusY 2

4

)

+ sin(

π4(nminus 1)

)

Γ(

n+34

)

Y 1F1

(

n+34 32minusY 2

4

) ]

(420)

where

Y =ξ

radic

1 + ~η2 (421)

Γ is the Euler gamma function and 1F1 is the Kummer confluent hypergeo-metric function [22 23] For n = 2 and d =

radic2π it yields respectively

G(ξ η) =1

(1+η2)34

[

Γ(

34

)

1F1

(

34 12minusY 2

4

)

+ Y Γ(

54

)

1F1

(

54 32minusY 2

4

)]

(422)

Remark 3 The fact that small data break only when the inequality (410) issatisfied was expected from physical considerations Indeed as already men-tioned in the introduction in equation (11) there are two competing termsthe nonlinear term umux responsible for the steepening of the profile andthe perpu term describing diffraction in the transversal (n minus 1) dimensionalhyperplane (reminiscence through the multiscale expansion leading to (11)of the wave operator) therefore diffraction increases as (nminus 1) increases [2]For small initial data the umux term is initially smaller and smaller increas-ing m and the solution evolves in a linear way for a longer and longer timediffracting transversally through the (nminus1) diffraction channels So diffrac-tion increasing with (n minus 1) acts on a very long time increasing with mbefore the nonlinear regime could become relevant and if (nminus 1) andor mare sufficiently large one expects that the solution would be diffracted awayalmost completely before reaching the nonlinear regime and will not break

14

We have in particular that breaking takes place in the following longtimeregimes (see (43))m = n = 1 (the Riemann equation with quadratic nonlinearity) tb = O(ǫminus1)m = 1 n = 2 (the dKP equation) tb = O(ǫminus2)m = 1 n = 3 (the KZ equation) tb = O(eǫ

minus1)

m = 2 n = 1 (the Riemann equation with cubic nonlinearity) tb = O(ǫminus2)m = 2 n = 2 (the mdKP equation) O(tb = eǫ

minus2)

It is interesting to remark that as it was observed in [2] if m = 1 (thephysically more relevant case) wave breaking takes place only for n le 3 iein physical space

We end this section remarking that also in the longtime behaviour of thesolutions of the small data Cauchy problem for equation (11) the depen-dence of the solution u on x as in the case of the exact solutions (314) isnot consistent with the formal ansatz recently made in [20]

5 Analytic aspects of the wave breaking

In this section we use the longtime behavior of solutions of the small dataCauchy problem for dKP (mn) to show explicitly the analytic aspects ofthe solution in the neighbourhood of the breaking time in terms of the initialdata represented by function G defined in (47) as it was already done in[18 2]

Choosing cmn ge 0 we rewrite equation (49) in the characteristic form

q sim ǫG(ζ ~η)ξ = ǫmF (ζ ~ηm)τ + ζ F (ζ ~ηm) equiv Gm(ζ ~η)

(51)

where

q = utnminus12 ξ = x+

1

4t

nminus1sum

j=1

y2j ~η =~y

2t(52)

and

τ(t) =

1cmn

tcmn if cmn gt 0

ln t if cmn = 0(53)

One solves the second of equations (51) with respect to the parameterζ obtaining ζ(ξ ~η τ) and replaces it into the first to obtain the solutionq sim ǫG(ζ(ξ ~η τ) ~η) The inversion of the second of equations (51) is possibleiff its ζ-derivative is different from zero Therefore the singularity manifold

15

(SM) of the solution is the n - dimensional manifold characterized by theequation

S(ζ ~η τ) equiv 1 + ǫmFζ(ζ ~ηm)τ = 0 rArr τ = minus 1

ǫmFζ(ζ ~ηm) (54)

Sincenabla(ξ~η)q =

ǫnabla(ζ~η)G(ζ~η)

1+ǫmFζ(ζ~ηm)τ (55)

the slope of the localized wave becomes infinity (the so-called gradient catas-trophe) on the SM and the n-dimensional wave ldquobreaksrdquo except on the di-

rection represented by the vector field V =nminus1sum

i=1

partηi +mǫmGmminus1(nminus1sum

i=1

Gηi)partξ [2]

[19] on which

V q = ǫ

nminus1sum

i=1

Gηi (56)

Since the KZ case (mn) = (1 3) has been studied in detail in [2] in thefollowing we mainly concentrate on the mdKP case (mn) = (2 2) and wecompare it with the dKP case (mn) = (1 2) investigated in [18]

From (54) the first breaking time τb and the corresponding characteristic

parameters ~ζb = (ζb ηb) are defined by the global minimum of a function ofthe 2 variables (ζ η)

τb = minus 1

ǫmFζ(ζb ηbm)= inf

(

minus 1

ǫmFζ(ζ ηm)

)

gt 0 (57)

and it is characterized together with the condition Fζ(~ζbm) lt 0 by thefollowing equations

Fζζ(~ζbm) = Fζη(~ζbm) = 0

α equiv Fζζζ(~ζbm)Fζηη(~ζbm)minus F 2ζζη(

~ζbm) gt 0 Fζζζ(~ζbm) gt 0(58)

The corresponding point at which the first wave breaking takes place is from(51) ~ξb = (ξb ηb) isin R

2 where

ξb = ζb + ǫmF (~ζbm)τb = ζb minusF (~ζbm)

Fζ(~ζbm) (59)

Now we evaluate equations (51) and (54) near breaking in the regime

ξ = ξb + ξprime η = ηb + ηprime τ = τb + τ prime ζ = ζb + ζ prime (510)

16

where ξprime ηprime τ prime ζ prime are small Using (57) - (59) the second of equations (51)becomes at the leading order the following cubic equation in ζ prime

ζ prime3+ a(ηprime)ζ prime

2+ b(ηprime τ)ζ prime minus γX(ξprime ηprime τ) = 0 (511)

where

a(ηprime) =3Fζζη

Fζζζηprime

b(ηprime τ) = 3Fζζζ

[

2Fζ τ + Fζηηηprime2]

X(ξprime ηprime τ ) = ξprime minus ǫF (ζb ηb + ηprime)τ prime minus ǫ [F (ζb ηb + ηprime)minus F ] τb simξprime minus Fη

|Fζ |ηprime minus F

|Fζ | τ minus Fηη

2|Fζ |ηprime2 minus Fη

|Fζ |ηprimeτ minus Fηηη

6|Fζ |ηprime3 γ =

6|Fζ |Fζζζ

(512)

and

τ equiv τ prime

τb=

τ minus τbτb

(513)

corresponding to the maximal balance

|ζ prime| |ηprime| = O(|τ |12) |X| = O(|τ |32) (514)

In (512) and in the rest of this section G F = Gm and all their partialderivatives whose arguments are not indicated are meant to be evaluated at~ζb = (ζb ηb)

The three roots of the cubic are given by the well-known Cardano-Tartagliaformula

ζ prime0 (ξprime ~ηprime τ) = minusa

3+ (A+)

13 + (Aminus)

13

ζ primeplusmn (ξprime ~ηprime τ) = minusa3minus 1

2

(

(A+)13 + (Aminus)

13

)

plusmnradic32i(

(A+)13 minus (Aminus)

13

)

(515)where

Aplusmn = Rplusmnradic∆ (516)

and the discriminant ∆ reads

∆ = R2 +Q3 (517)

withQ(ηprime τ ) = 3bminusa2

9= minus2|Fζ |

Fζζζτ + α

F 2ζζζ

ηprime2

R(ξprime ηprime τ) = γ2X(ξprime ηprime τ ) + ab

18+ a

3Q(ηprime τ)

(518)

17

At the same order function S in (54) becomes

S(ζ prime ηprime τ ) = minusτ + 12|Fζ |

[

Fζζζζprime2 + 2Fζζηζ

primeηprime + Fζηηηprime2]

=

Fζζζ

2|Fζ |

(

Q(ηprime τ ) +(

ζ prime +Fζζη

Fζζζηprime)2)

(519)

Known ζ prime as function of (ξprime ηprime τ) from the cubic (511) the solution q andits gradient are then approximated near breaking by the formulae

q(ξ η τ) sim ǫG(ζb + ζ prime ηb + ηprime) = ǫ (G+Gζζprime +Gηη

prime +O(|τ |)) nabla(ξη)q sim ǫ

nabla(ζprimeηprime)G(ζb+ζprimeηb+ηprime)

S(ζprimeηprimeτ) (520)

Before breaking

Before breaking τ lt τb (τ lt 0) the coefficient Q in (518) is strictlypositive (see the second of (58)) then the discriminant ∆ = R2 + Q3 isalso strictly positive and only the root ζ prime0 is real Correspondingly the realsolution q is single valued and described by Cardanorsquos formula and by (520)In addition function S in (519) is also strictly positive and nabla(ξ~η)q is finiteforall ξ η

To have a more explicit solution than that provided by Cardanorsquos formulawe first restrict the asymptotic region to a narrower area so that the cubic(511) reduces to the linear equation bζ prime = γX and X contains only linearterms This is achieved choosing

ηprime = O(τ r) X = O(τ p+1) 12lt p lt p+1

2lt r lt p+ 1 (521)

implying

ζ prime = O(τ p)

X = ξprime + Fη

Fζηprime + F

Fζτ + o(τ p+1) = ξprime + Gη

Gζηprime + G

mGζτ + o(τ p+1)

bζ prime = γX rArr ζ prime sim minus 1τ

(

ξprime + Gη

Gζηprime + G

mGζτ)

(522)

Then

q = ǫG(ζb + ζ prime ηb + ηprime) sim ǫG + ǫGζζprime sim ǫ

(

1minus 1

m

)

Gminus ǫGζ

τ

(

ξprime +Gη

Gζηprime)

(523)

18

Since q sim ǫG and recalling the definitions (57)(513) it follows that q isdescribed by the exact similarity solution

q sim(

ξ + (GηGζ)ηprime

τ prime

)1m

(524)

of equation (37)The cubic simplifies also in the asymptotic region in which ξprime ηprime are of

the same order while τ prime le O(|ηprime|) reducing to ζ prime3 = γX so that the solutionq and its gradient are

q sim ǫG(ζb +3radic

γX(ξprime ηprime τ) ηb + ηprime) (525)

nablaξηq sim3radicγ

3

ǫnablaζηG3radic

X2(ξprime ηprime τ ) (526)

At breaking

When τ = τb the singularity manifold S (519) is positive everywhere inthe (ξ η) plane except at the breaking point (ξb ηb) in which it is zerotogether with Q R and the discriminant ∆ The solution q is well describedagain by Cardanorsquos formula and by (520) To have a more explicit solutionthan that provided by Cardanorsquos formula we choose ξprime ηprime of the same orderthe cubic (511) reduces to ζ prime3 = γX and equations (525) become

q sim ǫG(ζb +3radic

γX(ξprime ηprime 0) ηb + ηprime)

nablaξηq sim 3radicγ

3

ǫnablaξηG3radic

X2(ξprimeηprime0)

(527)

The expression of Xb(ξprime ~ηprime) equiv X(ξprime ~ηprime 0) is given in (512) Xb(ξ

prime ηprime) simξprime minus Fη

|Fζ |ηprime if ξprime prop ηprime but ξprime 6= (FηFζ)η

prime while X(ξprime ηprime 0) = minus Fηη

2|Fζ |ηprime2 if

ξprime = (FηFζ)ηprime

Equation (527) implies that all the derivatives of q blow up at τ = τb in

the breaking point (ξb ηb) with the universal lawXminus23b except the derivative

along the transversal line Xb(ξprime ηprime 0) = 0 represented by the vector field

V = partη minusXbηpartξ (compare with (56)) for which [2 19]

V q|(ξbηb) = ǫGη (528)

After breaking I the overturning profile

19

After breaking the solution becomes three-valued in a compact regionof the (ξ η) - plane (see Figures 3) and in general does not describe anyphysics nevertheless a detailed study of the multivalued region is importantin view of a proper regularization of the models

If τ gt τb (τ gt 0) in the regime (514) the SM equation S = 0

2|Fζ|τ = Fζζζζprime2 + 2Fζζηζ

primeηprime + Fζηηηprime2 (529)

describes an ellipsoidal paraboloid in the (ζ prime ηprime τ) space with minimum at

the breaking point (~ξb τb)One can check that eliminating ζ prime from equations (529) and (511) one

obtains the SM equation in space-time coordinates coinciding with the equa-tion ∆ = R2+Q3 = 0 where ∆ is the discriminant (517) of the cubic (511)and Q and R are defined in (518) Such equation can be satisfied only ifQ le 0 ie only if

|ηprime| le ηprimecusp(τ) (530)

where

ηprimecusp(τ ) equivradic

2|Fζ |Fζζζ

α

radicτ (531)

and is given by the following analytic and universal expression

ξprime minus Fη

|Fζ |ηprime minus F

|Fζ | τ minus Fηη

2|Fζ |ηprime2 minus

(

Fη

|Fζ | +Fζζη

Fζζζ

)

ηprimeτ + 16|Fζ |F 2

ζζζ

[

minus FηηηF2ζζζ

+Fζζη(3FζζζFζηη minus 2F 2ζζη)]

ηprime32

= α3

9F 2ζ F

4ζζζ

(

(

ηprimecusp(τ))2 minus ηprime2

)3

(532)Equation (532) describes a closed curve with two cusps in the (ξ η) - planeat the points

~ξplusmncusp(τ ) = (ξb ηb) + (ξplusmnprime

cusp(τ )plusmnηprimecusp(τ)) (533)

where

ξplusmnprime

cusp(τ ) sim plusmnFη

radic

2Fζζζ

α|Fζ|radicτ +

(

F

|Fζ |+

FηηFζζζ

α

)

τ plusmn Bτ 32 (534)

where B = O(1) (see Figures 6 for dKP and 7 for mdKP) corresponding tothe conditions Q = R = 0 on which the three real solutions of the cubiccoincide (in 1 + 1 dimensions it is not possible to have three coincidentsolutions)

ζ0 = ζplusmn = minusFζζη

Fζζζηprime rArr q0 = qplusmn =sim ǫ

(

G+ (Gη minusGζFζζη

Fζζζ)ηprime)

(535)

20

On the remaining part of the closed curve ∆ = 0 two of the three realbranches coincide Outside the closed curve ∆ gt 0 and the real solution q issingle valued inside the closed curve ∆ lt 0 and the real solution q is threevalued with the three branches

q = ǫG(ζb + ζ prime ηb + ηprime) sim ǫ(G +Gζζprime +Gηη

prime +O(τ)) (536)

where ζ prime are the three real solutions of the cubic (511) (see fi Figures 2for dKP)

Figures 2 Plotting of the dKP analytic solution in the (q ξ η τ) variablesfor G given by (422) ǫ = 02 at times τ = 0 τb minus 2 τb τb + 2 whereτb = 657

Such a three-valued region of the (ξ η) plane is characterized by the

21

conditions|ηprime| lt ηprimecusp(τ) ξminusM(ηprime τ) lt ξprime lt ξ+M(ηprime τ) (537)

where

ξplusmnM(ηprime τ) equiv Fη

|Fζ |ηprime + F

|Fζ | τ + Fηη

2|Fζ |ηprime2 +

(

Fη

|Fζ | +Fζζη

Fζζζ

)

ηprimeτ minus 16|Fζ |F 2

ζζζ

[

minus FηηηF2ζζζ

+Fζζη(3FζζζFζηη minus 2F 2ζζη)]

ηprime3 plusmn Fζζζ

3|Fζ | |Q| 32(538)

(see Figures 3 for dKP)Since

∆ξ equiv ξ+M(ηprime τ)minus ξminusM(ηprime τ) =2Fζζζ

3|Fζ||Q(ηprime τ)|32 le 4

radic2

3

radic

|Fζ|Fζζζ

τ 32 (539)

we infer that the longitudinal width of the multivalued region is O(τ 32) thetransversal widths delimited by the two cusps is instead O(τ 12) thereforethe multivalued region develops at τ = τb from the breaking point (ξb ηb)with an infinite speed in the tranversal direction and with zero speed in thelongitudinal direction All these results are a common feature to the class ofdynamics (11) (see the previously derived results for the dKP equation forfinite times [18 19] and in the longtime regime [18] and those for the KZequation in the longtime regime [2])

-15-10-050005101-15-10-0500051015

-15-10-050005101-15-10-0500051015

Figures 3 Plotting of the three valued regions of the (ξ η) plane for dKPat times τ = 02 05 for G given by (422) and ǫ = 02 The center of thesquare frame is the breaking point (ξb ηb) Notice that the two cusps havethe same ξ coordinate ξ+cusp(τ) sim ξminuscusp(τ) since for solution (422) Gη = 0(see (531)(534))

22

We end this subsection remarking that as it was already observed in [19]since dKP (mn) is symmetric wrt y if the initial datum is also symmetricwrt y like the Gaussian (419) also its evolution will be so u(x y t) =u(xminusy t) This implies that ηb = yb = 0 and that all partial derivatives ofF and G containing an odd number of η derivatives are 0 at breaking As aconsequence the transversal direction on which the derivative of the profiledoes not blow up is the η (y) direction and on it the derivative is 0 atbreaking (see (56))

After breaking II the discontinuous shock

Using the matching rules of sect3 the shock formulae (310) become

parts

partτ=

ǫm

m+ 1

Gm+1(ζ1 η)minusGm+1(ζ2 η)

G(ζ1 η)minusG(ζ2 η) (540)

s = ζ1 + ǫmGm(ζ1 η) τ = ζ2 + ǫmGm(ζ2 η) τ (541)

where subscript 2 is for values behind the shock and subscript 1 for valuesahead Equations (541) are two implicit equations for ζ1 and ζ2 solvingthese equations yields ζ1(s η τ) ζ2(s η τ) and substituting these expres-sions in (540) it results in a nonlinear first order differential equation fors This equation and the initial conditions (311) give uniquely s(η τ) andconsequently ζ12(η τ) = ζ12(s(η τ) η τ)

We recall that immediately after breaking and if (530) holds equation(541) reduces to the cubic (511)(512) in which ξprime must be replaced by sprimepossessing three real roots where

sprime(ηprime τ) = sminus ξb (542)

Therefore the values of ζ1 and ζ2 are chosen among the three solutions (515)so that q2 = ǫG(ζb + ζ prime2 η) has the maximum value and q1 = ǫG(ζb + ζ prime1 η)the minimum one among the three branches of q Since Gζ lt 0 it followsthat

ζ1 = maxζ prime0 ζ primeplusmn ζ2 = minζ prime0 ζ primeplusmn (543)

To identify ζ12 with one of the three roots ζ prime0 ζprimeplusmn let us rewrite them as

follows

ζ prime0 = minusa

3+ 2 3

radicρ cos

(

θ

3

)

(544)

ζ prime+ = minusa

3minus 3

radicρ

(

cos

(

θ

3

)

+radic3 sin

(

θ

3

))

(545)

23

ζ primeminus = minusa

3minus 3

radicρ

(

cos

(

θ

3

)

minusradic3 sin

(

θ

3

))

(546)

where

ρ =radic

R2 + |∆| θ = arctan

(

radic

|∆|R

)

(547)

We observe that for 0 le θ le π the following inequalities hold

minus cos

(

θ

3

)

minusradic3 sin

(

θ

3

)

le minus cos

(

θ

3

)

+radic3 sin

(

θ

3

)

le 2 cos

(

θ

3

)

so that

ζ prime+ le ζ primeminus le ζ prime0 rArr q(ζb + ζ prime0 η) le q(ζb + ζ primeminus η) le q(ζb + ζ prime+ η) (548)

for q decreasing in ζ Hence

ζ prime1(sprime ηprime τ prime) = ζ prime0(s

prime ηprime τ prime) ζ prime2(sprime ηprime τ prime) = ζ prime+(s

prime ηprime τ prime) (549)

Then (540) reduces to the equations

dsprime

dτ+ G

Gζ+ Gη

Gζηprime + 1

2

[

ζ prime0(sprime ηprime τ ) + ζ prime+(s

prime ηprime τ)]

= 0 for dKPdsprime

dτ+ G

2Gζ+ Gη

Gζηprime + 1

2

[

ζ prime0(sprime ηprime τ) + ζ prime+(s

prime ηprime τ)]

= 0 for mdKP

sprime(0) = ξb

(550)

obtained expanding (540) near the breaking point and recalling that τ equivτ primeτb

We remark that in the differential equations (550) sprime depends on ηprime

parametrically So the discontinuous (dissipative) shocks of the longtime so-lutions of the small data Cauchy problems for dKP and mdKP has a simplegeometric construction given τ gt 0 for any fixed |ηprime| le ηcusp the overturn-ing profile in the (ξ q) plane is intercepted by a vertical straight line cuttingoff equal area lobi in analogy with the 1 + 1 dimensional case

Going back to the dKP variables

The above formulae written in the convenient variables q ξ η τ are es-sentially the same for both dKP and mdKP relevant differences appear whenwe go back to the original variables u x y t inverting equations (52)(53)

u = 1radictq t = τ2

4 y = ητ2

2 x = ξ minus η2τ2

4 for dKP

u = 1radictq t = eτ y = 2ηeτ x = ξ minus η2eτ for mdKP

(551)

24

and all the above universal formulae are easily transfered to the dKP (mn)equations In particular small and localized initial data break i) at tb =τ 2b 4 in the point (xb yb) = (ξb minus τ 2b η

2b4 ηbτ

2b 2) of the parabolic wave front

x+ y2(4tb) = ξb evolving according to dKP and ii) at tb = eτb in the point(xb yb) = (ξb minus η2be

τb 2ηbeτb) of the parabolic wave front x + y2(4tb) = ξb

evolving according to mdKP If for instance we use the same Gaussian initialcondition (419) for both dKP and mdKP with ǫ = 02 then G is given by(422) in both cases Consequently for dKP

ζb = 196 ηb = 0 ξb = 327 τb = 657 (552)

and wave breaking takes place at tb = 108 in the point (xb yb) = (327 0)on the parabola x+ 231 middot 10minus2y2 = 327 (see Figure 4)

Figure 4 Plotting of the analytic dKP solution u in the physical variablesx y t for G given by (422) (corresponding to the gaussian initial condition)ǫ = 02 at breaking

For mdKP

ζb = 161 ηb = 0 ξb = 251 τb = 1431 (553)

and wave breaking takes place at tb = 164middot106 in the point (xb yb) = (251 0)on the parabola x + 152 middot 10minus7y2 = 251 and at breaking the amplitude ofthe wave is u = ǫtb

minus12G(ζb ηb) = 195 middot 10minus4 (see Figure 5)

25

Figure 5 Plotting of the analytic mdKP solution u in the physical variablesx y t for G given by (422) (corresponding to the gaussian initial condition)ǫ = 02 at breaking

Since in the mdKP case tb is very large and the wave amplitude atbreaking is very small we wonder if such a wave breaking could be actuallydetected numerically

Now we go into the analytic details For the dKP case

tprime equiv tminus tb sim 2tbτ yprime = y minus yb ≃ 2tb(ηprime + 2ηbτ + 2ηprimeτ )

xprime = xminus xb sim ξprime minus ηbyprime minus yprime2

4tb+ η2b t

prime + ηbtbyprimetprime

(554)

and we choose τ prime to be sufficiently small to have |tprime| |yprime| ≪ 1The dKP solution reads

u(x y t) =ǫradictG(ζb + ζ prime ηb + ηprime) =

ǫradict

(

G+Gζζprime +Gη

yprime

2tb+O

(

tprime

tb

))

(555)where ζ prime is the solution of the cubic (511) with

a =3Fζζη

2Fζζζ

yprime

tb b = 3

Fζζζ

(

Fζtprime

tb+ Fζηη

yprime2

4t2b

)

X = xprime +(

ηb minus Fη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime minus[

η2b +(

F2minus ηbFη

)

1|Fζ |tb

]

tprime

+(

1minus Fηη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime2

4tb+[

minusηb +(

Fη

2+ ηbFηη

)

12|Fζ |tb

]

yprimetprime

tb

minus Fηηη

48|Fζ |yprime3

t3b

(556)

26

The three-valued region (532) after breaking becomes

xprime +(

ηb minus Fη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime minus[

η2b +(

F2minus ηbFη

)

1|Fζ |tb

]

tprime

+(

1minus Fηη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime2

4tb+[

minusηb +(

Fη

2|Fζ |tb +ηbFηη

|Fζ | minus Fζζη

2Fζζζ

)

12tb

]

yprimetprime

tb

+ 16|Fζ |F 2

ζζζ

[

minus FηηηF2ζζζ + Fζζη(3FζζζFζηη minus 2F 2

ζζη)]

yprime3

8t3b

2

=

α3

9middot64F 2ζF 4ζζζ

t6b

(

(

yprimecusp(tprime))2 minus yprime2

)3

(557)

where

yprimecusp(tprime) = 2

radic

|Fζ |Fζζζ

α

radictbtprime (558)

Equation (557) describes a closed curve with two cusps in the (x y) - planeat the points

~xplusmncusp(t

prime) = (xb yb) + (xplusmnprime

cusp(tprime)plusmnyprimecusp(t

prime)) (559)

where

xplusmnprime

cusp(tprime) sim ∓2ηb

radic

|Fζ |Fζζζ

α

radictbtprime plusmn Fη

radic

Fζζζ

α|Fζ |

radic

tprime

tb

+(

η2b minus|Fζ |Fζζζ

α

)

tprime +(

F|Fζ | +

FηηFζζζ

α

)

tprime

2tbplusmn 2ηb

radic

|Fζ |Fζζζ

αtprime

32radictb+O(τ 32)

(560)At last the analogue of (539) reads

∆xprime le 2

3

radic

|Fζ|Fζζζ

(

tprime

tb

)32

(561)

it follows that the longitudinal width ∆long and the transversal width ∆transv

of the multivalued region are respectively

∆long = O

(

(

tprime

tb

)32

)

∆transv = O(

(tbtprime)

12

)

rArr ∆long

∆transv= O

(

tprime

t2b

)

(562)

For the mdKP case

tprime = tminus tb sim tbτprime yprime = y minus yb sim 2tb(η

prime + ηbtprime

tb+ ηprimetprime

tb)

xprime = xminus xb sim ξprime minus ηbyprime + η2b t

prime minus yprime2

4tb+ ηb

yprimetprime

tb

(563)

27

and we choose τ prime sufficiently small to have |tprime| |yprime| ≪ 1The mdKP solution reads

u(x y t) =ǫradictG(ζb+ζ prime ηb+ηprime) =

ǫradict

(

G+Gζζprime +Gη

yprime

2tb+O

(

tprime

tb log tb

))

(564)where ζ prime is the solution of the cubic (511) with

a =3Fζζη

2Fζζζ

yprime

tb b = 3

Fζζζ

(

2Fζtprime

tb log tb+ Fζηη

yprime2

4t2b

)

X = xprime +(

ηb minus Fη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime minus[

η2b +(

Flog tb

minus ηbFη

)

1|Fζ |tb

]

tprime

+(

1minus Fηη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime2

4tb+[

minusηb +(

Fη

|Fζ |(1minus1

log tb) + ηbFηη

|Fζ |

)

12tb

]

yprimetprime

tb

minus Fηηη

48|Fζ |yprime3

t3b

(565)

The three-valued region (532) after breaking becomes

xprime +(

ηb minus Fη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime minus[

η2b +(

Flog tb

minus ηbFη

)

1|Fζ |tb

]

tprime

+(

1minus Fηη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime2

4tb+[

minusηb +(

Fη

|Fζ |(1minus1

log tb) + ηbFηη

|Fζ| minus Fζζη

Fζζζ log tb

)

12tb

]

yprimetprime

tb

+ 16|Fζ |F 2

ζζζ

[

minus FηηηF2ζζζ + Fζζη(3FζζζFζηη minus 2F 2

ζζη)]

yprime3

8t3b

2

=

α3

9middot64F 2ζ F

4ζζζt

6b

(

(

yprimecusp(tprime))2 minus yprime2

)3

(566)where

yprimecusp(tprime) = 2

radic

2|Fζ |Fζζζ

α

radic

tbtprime

log tb (567)

Equation (566) describes a closed curve with two cusps in the (x y) - planeat the points

~xplusmncusp(t

prime) = (xb yb) + (xplusmnprime

cusp(tprime)plusmnyprimecusp(t

prime)) (568)

where

xplusmnprime

cusp(tprime) sim ∓2ηb

radic

|Fζ |Fζζζ

α

radic

tbtprime

log tbplusmn Fη

radic

Fζζζ

α|Fζ |

radic

tprime

tb log tb

+(

η2b minus|Fζ |Fζζζ

α log tb

)

tprime +(

F|Fζ | +

FηηFζζζ

α

)

tprime

tb log tbplusmn 2ηb

radic

|Fζ |Fζζζ

αtprime

32radic

tb log tb

+O(τ 32)

(569)

28

At last the analogue of (539) reads

∆xprime le 4radic2

3

radic

|Fζ |Fζζζ

(

tprime

tb log tb

)32

(570)

it follows that the longitudinal width ∆long and the transversal width ∆transv

of the multivalued region are respectively

∆long = O

(

(

tprime

tb log tb

)32

)

∆transv = O

(

(

tbtprime

log tb

)12

)

rArr ∆long

∆transv= O

(

tprime

t2blog tb

)

(571)

References

[1] F Santucci Onde debolmente non lineari e quasi unidimensionali in

Natura La rottura di tali onde e il problema della regolarizzazione dis-

sipativa Tesi della Laurea Specialistica in Fisica supervisor P M San-tini Dipartimento di Fisica dellrsquoUniversita di Roma ldquoLa Sapienzardquo AA2011-2012

[2] S V Manakov and P M Santini On the dispersionless Kadomtsev-Petviashvili equation in n + 1 dimensions exact solutions the Cauchyproblem for small initial data and wave breaking J Phys A MathTheor 44 (2011) 405203

[3] G B Whitham Linear and nonlinear waves John Wiley amp Sons 1974

[4] C Lin E Reissner and H S Tien On two-dimensional nonsteadymotion of a slender body in a compressible fluid J Math Phys 27(1948) 220-231

[5] R Timman Unsteady motion in transonic flow Symposium Transson-icum Aachen 1962 EdKOswatitsch Springer 394-401

[6] E A Zobolotskaya and R V Khokhlov Quasi-plane waves in the non-linear acoustics of confined beams Soviet Physics- Acoustics Vol15N1 (1969)

29

[7] B B Kadomtsev and V I Petviashvili On the stability of solitarywaves in weakly dispersing media Soviet Physics-Doklady Vol15 N6(1970)

[8] X P Wang M J Ablowitz and H Segur Wave collapse and instabil-

ity of solitary waves of a generalized Kadomtsev-Petviashvili equationPhysica D 78 (1994) 241-265

[9] M J Ablowitz and H Segur Solitons and the Inverse Scattering Trans-

form SIAM Philadelphia 1981

[10] M J Ablowitz and P A Clarkson Solitons nonlinear evolution equa-

tions and inverse scattering Cambridge University Press 1991

[11] S Turitsyn and G Falkovitch Stability of magneto-elastic solitons andself-focusing of sound in antiferromagnets Sov Phys J Exp TheorPhys 62 (1985) 146-152

[12] S Novikov S V Manakov L P Pitaevskii V E Zakharov Theory of

solitons Consultant Bureau 1984

[13] S V Manakov and P M Santini Inverse scattering problem for vectorfields and the heavenly equation httparXivnlinSI0512043

[14] S V Manakov and P M Santini Inverse scattering problem forvector fields and the Cauchy problem for the heavenly equationPhys Lett A 359 613-619 (2006) doi101016jphysleta200607011httparXivnlinSI0604017

[15] S V Manakov and P M Santini The Cauchy problem on theplane for the dispersionless Kadomtsev-Petviashvili equation JETPLetters 83 No 10 462-466 (2006) 101134S0021364006100080httparXivnlinSI0604016

[16] P G Grinevich P M Santini and D Wu The Cauchy problem for thePavlov equation Nonlinearity 28 (2015) 3709-3754 doi1010880951-771528113709 Preprint arXiv13105834v2

[17] M V Pavlov Integrable hydrodynamic chains J Math Phys 44 (2003)4134-4156

30

We have in particular that breaking takes place in the following longtimeregimes (see (43))m = n = 1 (the Riemann equation with quadratic nonlinearity) tb = O(ǫminus1)m = 1 n = 2 (the dKP equation) tb = O(ǫminus2)m = 1 n = 3 (the KZ equation) tb = O(eǫ

minus1)

m = 2 n = 1 (the Riemann equation with cubic nonlinearity) tb = O(ǫminus2)m = 2 n = 2 (the mdKP equation) O(tb = eǫ

minus2)

It is interesting to remark that as it was observed in [2] if m = 1 (thephysically more relevant case) wave breaking takes place only for n le 3 iein physical space

We end this section remarking that also in the longtime behaviour of thesolutions of the small data Cauchy problem for equation (11) the depen-dence of the solution u on x as in the case of the exact solutions (314) isnot consistent with the formal ansatz recently made in [20]

5 Analytic aspects of the wave breaking

In this section we use the longtime behavior of solutions of the small dataCauchy problem for dKP (mn) to show explicitly the analytic aspects ofthe solution in the neighbourhood of the breaking time in terms of the initialdata represented by function G defined in (47) as it was already done in[18 2]

Choosing cmn ge 0 we rewrite equation (49) in the characteristic form

q sim ǫG(ζ ~η)ξ = ǫmF (ζ ~ηm)τ + ζ F (ζ ~ηm) equiv Gm(ζ ~η)

(51)

where

q = utnminus12 ξ = x+

1

4t

nminus1sum

j=1

y2j ~η =~y

2t(52)

and

τ(t) =

1cmn

tcmn if cmn gt 0

ln t if cmn = 0(53)

One solves the second of equations (51) with respect to the parameterζ obtaining ζ(ξ ~η τ) and replaces it into the first to obtain the solutionq sim ǫG(ζ(ξ ~η τ) ~η) The inversion of the second of equations (51) is possibleiff its ζ-derivative is different from zero Therefore the singularity manifold

15

(SM) of the solution is the n - dimensional manifold characterized by theequation

S(ζ ~η τ) equiv 1 + ǫmFζ(ζ ~ηm)τ = 0 rArr τ = minus 1

ǫmFζ(ζ ~ηm) (54)

Sincenabla(ξ~η)q =

ǫnabla(ζ~η)G(ζ~η)

1+ǫmFζ(ζ~ηm)τ (55)

the slope of the localized wave becomes infinity (the so-called gradient catas-trophe) on the SM and the n-dimensional wave ldquobreaksrdquo except on the di-

rection represented by the vector field V =nminus1sum

i=1

partηi +mǫmGmminus1(nminus1sum

i=1

Gηi)partξ [2]

[19] on which

V q = ǫ

nminus1sum

i=1

Gηi (56)

Since the KZ case (mn) = (1 3) has been studied in detail in [2] in thefollowing we mainly concentrate on the mdKP case (mn) = (2 2) and wecompare it with the dKP case (mn) = (1 2) investigated in [18]

From (54) the first breaking time τb and the corresponding characteristic

parameters ~ζb = (ζb ηb) are defined by the global minimum of a function ofthe 2 variables (ζ η)

τb = minus 1

ǫmFζ(ζb ηbm)= inf

(

minus 1

ǫmFζ(ζ ηm)

)

gt 0 (57)

and it is characterized together with the condition Fζ(~ζbm) lt 0 by thefollowing equations

Fζζ(~ζbm) = Fζη(~ζbm) = 0

α equiv Fζζζ(~ζbm)Fζηη(~ζbm)minus F 2ζζη(

~ζbm) gt 0 Fζζζ(~ζbm) gt 0(58)

The corresponding point at which the first wave breaking takes place is from(51) ~ξb = (ξb ηb) isin R

2 where

ξb = ζb + ǫmF (~ζbm)τb = ζb minusF (~ζbm)

Fζ(~ζbm) (59)

Now we evaluate equations (51) and (54) near breaking in the regime

ξ = ξb + ξprime η = ηb + ηprime τ = τb + τ prime ζ = ζb + ζ prime (510)

16

where ξprime ηprime τ prime ζ prime are small Using (57) - (59) the second of equations (51)becomes at the leading order the following cubic equation in ζ prime

ζ prime3+ a(ηprime)ζ prime

2+ b(ηprime τ)ζ prime minus γX(ξprime ηprime τ) = 0 (511)

where

a(ηprime) =3Fζζη

Fζζζηprime

b(ηprime τ) = 3Fζζζ

[

2Fζ τ + Fζηηηprime2]

X(ξprime ηprime τ ) = ξprime minus ǫF (ζb ηb + ηprime)τ prime minus ǫ [F (ζb ηb + ηprime)minus F ] τb simξprime minus Fη

|Fζ |ηprime minus F

|Fζ | τ minus Fηη

2|Fζ |ηprime2 minus Fη

|Fζ |ηprimeτ minus Fηηη

6|Fζ |ηprime3 γ =

6|Fζ |Fζζζ

(512)

and

τ equiv τ prime

τb=

τ minus τbτb

(513)

corresponding to the maximal balance

|ζ prime| |ηprime| = O(|τ |12) |X| = O(|τ |32) (514)

In (512) and in the rest of this section G F = Gm and all their partialderivatives whose arguments are not indicated are meant to be evaluated at~ζb = (ζb ηb)

The three roots of the cubic are given by the well-known Cardano-Tartagliaformula

ζ prime0 (ξprime ~ηprime τ) = minusa

3+ (A+)

13 + (Aminus)

13

ζ primeplusmn (ξprime ~ηprime τ) = minusa3minus 1

2

(

(A+)13 + (Aminus)

13

)

plusmnradic32i(

(A+)13 minus (Aminus)

13

)

(515)where

Aplusmn = Rplusmnradic∆ (516)

and the discriminant ∆ reads

∆ = R2 +Q3 (517)

withQ(ηprime τ ) = 3bminusa2

9= minus2|Fζ |

Fζζζτ + α

F 2ζζζ

ηprime2

R(ξprime ηprime τ) = γ2X(ξprime ηprime τ ) + ab

18+ a

3Q(ηprime τ)

(518)

17

At the same order function S in (54) becomes

S(ζ prime ηprime τ ) = minusτ + 12|Fζ |

[

Fζζζζprime2 + 2Fζζηζ

primeηprime + Fζηηηprime2]

=

Fζζζ

2|Fζ |

(

Q(ηprime τ ) +(

ζ prime +Fζζη

Fζζζηprime)2)

(519)

Known ζ prime as function of (ξprime ηprime τ) from the cubic (511) the solution q andits gradient are then approximated near breaking by the formulae

q(ξ η τ) sim ǫG(ζb + ζ prime ηb + ηprime) = ǫ (G+Gζζprime +Gηη

prime +O(|τ |)) nabla(ξη)q sim ǫ

nabla(ζprimeηprime)G(ζb+ζprimeηb+ηprime)

S(ζprimeηprimeτ) (520)

Before breaking

Before breaking τ lt τb (τ lt 0) the coefficient Q in (518) is strictlypositive (see the second of (58)) then the discriminant ∆ = R2 + Q3 isalso strictly positive and only the root ζ prime0 is real Correspondingly the realsolution q is single valued and described by Cardanorsquos formula and by (520)In addition function S in (519) is also strictly positive and nabla(ξ~η)q is finiteforall ξ η

To have a more explicit solution than that provided by Cardanorsquos formulawe first restrict the asymptotic region to a narrower area so that the cubic(511) reduces to the linear equation bζ prime = γX and X contains only linearterms This is achieved choosing

ηprime = O(τ r) X = O(τ p+1) 12lt p lt p+1

2lt r lt p+ 1 (521)

implying

ζ prime = O(τ p)

X = ξprime + Fη

Fζηprime + F

Fζτ + o(τ p+1) = ξprime + Gη

Gζηprime + G

mGζτ + o(τ p+1)

bζ prime = γX rArr ζ prime sim minus 1τ

(

ξprime + Gη

Gζηprime + G

mGζτ)

(522)

Then

q = ǫG(ζb + ζ prime ηb + ηprime) sim ǫG + ǫGζζprime sim ǫ

(

1minus 1

m

)

Gminus ǫGζ

τ

(

ξprime +Gη

Gζηprime)

(523)

18

Since q sim ǫG and recalling the definitions (57)(513) it follows that q isdescribed by the exact similarity solution

q sim(

ξ + (GηGζ)ηprime

τ prime

)1m

(524)

of equation (37)The cubic simplifies also in the asymptotic region in which ξprime ηprime are of

the same order while τ prime le O(|ηprime|) reducing to ζ prime3 = γX so that the solutionq and its gradient are

q sim ǫG(ζb +3radic

γX(ξprime ηprime τ) ηb + ηprime) (525)

nablaξηq sim3radicγ

3

ǫnablaζηG3radic

X2(ξprime ηprime τ ) (526)

At breaking

When τ = τb the singularity manifold S (519) is positive everywhere inthe (ξ η) plane except at the breaking point (ξb ηb) in which it is zerotogether with Q R and the discriminant ∆ The solution q is well describedagain by Cardanorsquos formula and by (520) To have a more explicit solutionthan that provided by Cardanorsquos formula we choose ξprime ηprime of the same orderthe cubic (511) reduces to ζ prime3 = γX and equations (525) become

q sim ǫG(ζb +3radic

γX(ξprime ηprime 0) ηb + ηprime)

nablaξηq sim 3radicγ

3

ǫnablaξηG3radic

X2(ξprimeηprime0)

(527)

The expression of Xb(ξprime ~ηprime) equiv X(ξprime ~ηprime 0) is given in (512) Xb(ξ

prime ηprime) simξprime minus Fη

|Fζ |ηprime if ξprime prop ηprime but ξprime 6= (FηFζ)η

prime while X(ξprime ηprime 0) = minus Fηη

2|Fζ |ηprime2 if

ξprime = (FηFζ)ηprime

Equation (527) implies that all the derivatives of q blow up at τ = τb in

the breaking point (ξb ηb) with the universal lawXminus23b except the derivative

along the transversal line Xb(ξprime ηprime 0) = 0 represented by the vector field

V = partη minusXbηpartξ (compare with (56)) for which [2 19]

V q|(ξbηb) = ǫGη (528)

After breaking I the overturning profile

19

After breaking the solution becomes three-valued in a compact regionof the (ξ η) - plane (see Figures 3) and in general does not describe anyphysics nevertheless a detailed study of the multivalued region is importantin view of a proper regularization of the models

If τ gt τb (τ gt 0) in the regime (514) the SM equation S = 0

2|Fζ|τ = Fζζζζprime2 + 2Fζζηζ

primeηprime + Fζηηηprime2 (529)

describes an ellipsoidal paraboloid in the (ζ prime ηprime τ) space with minimum at

the breaking point (~ξb τb)One can check that eliminating ζ prime from equations (529) and (511) one

obtains the SM equation in space-time coordinates coinciding with the equa-tion ∆ = R2+Q3 = 0 where ∆ is the discriminant (517) of the cubic (511)and Q and R are defined in (518) Such equation can be satisfied only ifQ le 0 ie only if

|ηprime| le ηprimecusp(τ) (530)

where

ηprimecusp(τ ) equivradic

2|Fζ |Fζζζ

α

radicτ (531)

and is given by the following analytic and universal expression

ξprime minus Fη

|Fζ |ηprime minus F

|Fζ | τ minus Fηη

2|Fζ |ηprime2 minus

(

Fη

|Fζ | +Fζζη

Fζζζ

)

ηprimeτ + 16|Fζ |F 2

ζζζ

[

minus FηηηF2ζζζ

+Fζζη(3FζζζFζηη minus 2F 2ζζη)]

ηprime32

= α3

9F 2ζ F

4ζζζ

(

(

ηprimecusp(τ))2 minus ηprime2

)3

(532)Equation (532) describes a closed curve with two cusps in the (ξ η) - planeat the points

~ξplusmncusp(τ ) = (ξb ηb) + (ξplusmnprime

cusp(τ )plusmnηprimecusp(τ)) (533)

where

ξplusmnprime

cusp(τ ) sim plusmnFη

radic

2Fζζζ

α|Fζ|radicτ +

(

F

|Fζ |+

FηηFζζζ

α

)

τ plusmn Bτ 32 (534)

where B = O(1) (see Figures 6 for dKP and 7 for mdKP) corresponding tothe conditions Q = R = 0 on which the three real solutions of the cubiccoincide (in 1 + 1 dimensions it is not possible to have three coincidentsolutions)

ζ0 = ζplusmn = minusFζζη

Fζζζηprime rArr q0 = qplusmn =sim ǫ

(

G+ (Gη minusGζFζζη

Fζζζ)ηprime)

(535)

20

On the remaining part of the closed curve ∆ = 0 two of the three realbranches coincide Outside the closed curve ∆ gt 0 and the real solution q issingle valued inside the closed curve ∆ lt 0 and the real solution q is threevalued with the three branches

q = ǫG(ζb + ζ prime ηb + ηprime) sim ǫ(G +Gζζprime +Gηη

prime +O(τ)) (536)

where ζ prime are the three real solutions of the cubic (511) (see fi Figures 2for dKP)

Figures 2 Plotting of the dKP analytic solution in the (q ξ η τ) variablesfor G given by (422) ǫ = 02 at times τ = 0 τb minus 2 τb τb + 2 whereτb = 657

Such a three-valued region of the (ξ η) plane is characterized by the

21

conditions|ηprime| lt ηprimecusp(τ) ξminusM(ηprime τ) lt ξprime lt ξ+M(ηprime τ) (537)

where

ξplusmnM(ηprime τ) equiv Fη

|Fζ |ηprime + F

|Fζ | τ + Fηη

2|Fζ |ηprime2 +

(

Fη

|Fζ | +Fζζη

Fζζζ

)

ηprimeτ minus 16|Fζ |F 2

ζζζ

[

minus FηηηF2ζζζ

+Fζζη(3FζζζFζηη minus 2F 2ζζη)]

ηprime3 plusmn Fζζζ

3|Fζ | |Q| 32(538)

(see Figures 3 for dKP)Since

∆ξ equiv ξ+M(ηprime τ)minus ξminusM(ηprime τ) =2Fζζζ

3|Fζ||Q(ηprime τ)|32 le 4

radic2

3

radic

|Fζ|Fζζζ

τ 32 (539)

we infer that the longitudinal width of the multivalued region is O(τ 32) thetransversal widths delimited by the two cusps is instead O(τ 12) thereforethe multivalued region develops at τ = τb from the breaking point (ξb ηb)with an infinite speed in the tranversal direction and with zero speed in thelongitudinal direction All these results are a common feature to the class ofdynamics (11) (see the previously derived results for the dKP equation forfinite times [18 19] and in the longtime regime [18] and those for the KZequation in the longtime regime [2])

-15-10-050005101-15-10-0500051015

-15-10-050005101-15-10-0500051015

Figures 3 Plotting of the three valued regions of the (ξ η) plane for dKPat times τ = 02 05 for G given by (422) and ǫ = 02 The center of thesquare frame is the breaking point (ξb ηb) Notice that the two cusps havethe same ξ coordinate ξ+cusp(τ) sim ξminuscusp(τ) since for solution (422) Gη = 0(see (531)(534))

22

We end this subsection remarking that as it was already observed in [19]since dKP (mn) is symmetric wrt y if the initial datum is also symmetricwrt y like the Gaussian (419) also its evolution will be so u(x y t) =u(xminusy t) This implies that ηb = yb = 0 and that all partial derivatives ofF and G containing an odd number of η derivatives are 0 at breaking As aconsequence the transversal direction on which the derivative of the profiledoes not blow up is the η (y) direction and on it the derivative is 0 atbreaking (see (56))

After breaking II the discontinuous shock

Using the matching rules of sect3 the shock formulae (310) become

parts

partτ=

ǫm

m+ 1

Gm+1(ζ1 η)minusGm+1(ζ2 η)

G(ζ1 η)minusG(ζ2 η) (540)

s = ζ1 + ǫmGm(ζ1 η) τ = ζ2 + ǫmGm(ζ2 η) τ (541)

where subscript 2 is for values behind the shock and subscript 1 for valuesahead Equations (541) are two implicit equations for ζ1 and ζ2 solvingthese equations yields ζ1(s η τ) ζ2(s η τ) and substituting these expres-sions in (540) it results in a nonlinear first order differential equation fors This equation and the initial conditions (311) give uniquely s(η τ) andconsequently ζ12(η τ) = ζ12(s(η τ) η τ)

We recall that immediately after breaking and if (530) holds equation(541) reduces to the cubic (511)(512) in which ξprime must be replaced by sprimepossessing three real roots where

sprime(ηprime τ) = sminus ξb (542)

Therefore the values of ζ1 and ζ2 are chosen among the three solutions (515)so that q2 = ǫG(ζb + ζ prime2 η) has the maximum value and q1 = ǫG(ζb + ζ prime1 η)the minimum one among the three branches of q Since Gζ lt 0 it followsthat

ζ1 = maxζ prime0 ζ primeplusmn ζ2 = minζ prime0 ζ primeplusmn (543)

To identify ζ12 with one of the three roots ζ prime0 ζprimeplusmn let us rewrite them as

follows

ζ prime0 = minusa

3+ 2 3

radicρ cos

(

θ

3

)

(544)

ζ prime+ = minusa

3minus 3

radicρ

(

cos

(

θ

3

)

+radic3 sin

(

θ

3

))

(545)

23

ζ primeminus = minusa

3minus 3

radicρ

(

cos

(

θ

3

)

minusradic3 sin

(

θ

3

))

(546)

where

ρ =radic

R2 + |∆| θ = arctan

(

radic

|∆|R

)

(547)

We observe that for 0 le θ le π the following inequalities hold

minus cos

(

θ

3

)

minusradic3 sin

(

θ

3

)

le minus cos

(

θ

3

)

+radic3 sin

(

θ

3

)

le 2 cos

(

θ

3

)

so that

ζ prime+ le ζ primeminus le ζ prime0 rArr q(ζb + ζ prime0 η) le q(ζb + ζ primeminus η) le q(ζb + ζ prime+ η) (548)

for q decreasing in ζ Hence

ζ prime1(sprime ηprime τ prime) = ζ prime0(s

prime ηprime τ prime) ζ prime2(sprime ηprime τ prime) = ζ prime+(s

prime ηprime τ prime) (549)

Then (540) reduces to the equations

dsprime

dτ+ G

Gζ+ Gη

Gζηprime + 1

2

[

ζ prime0(sprime ηprime τ ) + ζ prime+(s

prime ηprime τ)]

= 0 for dKPdsprime

dτ+ G

2Gζ+ Gη

Gζηprime + 1

2

[

ζ prime0(sprime ηprime τ) + ζ prime+(s

prime ηprime τ)]

= 0 for mdKP

sprime(0) = ξb

(550)

obtained expanding (540) near the breaking point and recalling that τ equivτ primeτb

We remark that in the differential equations (550) sprime depends on ηprime

parametrically So the discontinuous (dissipative) shocks of the longtime so-lutions of the small data Cauchy problems for dKP and mdKP has a simplegeometric construction given τ gt 0 for any fixed |ηprime| le ηcusp the overturn-ing profile in the (ξ q) plane is intercepted by a vertical straight line cuttingoff equal area lobi in analogy with the 1 + 1 dimensional case

Going back to the dKP variables

The above formulae written in the convenient variables q ξ η τ are es-sentially the same for both dKP and mdKP relevant differences appear whenwe go back to the original variables u x y t inverting equations (52)(53)

u = 1radictq t = τ2

4 y = ητ2

2 x = ξ minus η2τ2

4 for dKP

u = 1radictq t = eτ y = 2ηeτ x = ξ minus η2eτ for mdKP

(551)

24

and all the above universal formulae are easily transfered to the dKP (mn)equations In particular small and localized initial data break i) at tb =τ 2b 4 in the point (xb yb) = (ξb minus τ 2b η

2b4 ηbτ

2b 2) of the parabolic wave front

x+ y2(4tb) = ξb evolving according to dKP and ii) at tb = eτb in the point(xb yb) = (ξb minus η2be

τb 2ηbeτb) of the parabolic wave front x + y2(4tb) = ξb

evolving according to mdKP If for instance we use the same Gaussian initialcondition (419) for both dKP and mdKP with ǫ = 02 then G is given by(422) in both cases Consequently for dKP

ζb = 196 ηb = 0 ξb = 327 τb = 657 (552)

and wave breaking takes place at tb = 108 in the point (xb yb) = (327 0)on the parabola x+ 231 middot 10minus2y2 = 327 (see Figure 4)

Figure 4 Plotting of the analytic dKP solution u in the physical variablesx y t for G given by (422) (corresponding to the gaussian initial condition)ǫ = 02 at breaking

For mdKP

ζb = 161 ηb = 0 ξb = 251 τb = 1431 (553)

and wave breaking takes place at tb = 164middot106 in the point (xb yb) = (251 0)on the parabola x + 152 middot 10minus7y2 = 251 and at breaking the amplitude ofthe wave is u = ǫtb

minus12G(ζb ηb) = 195 middot 10minus4 (see Figure 5)

25

Figure 5 Plotting of the analytic mdKP solution u in the physical variablesx y t for G given by (422) (corresponding to the gaussian initial condition)ǫ = 02 at breaking

Since in the mdKP case tb is very large and the wave amplitude atbreaking is very small we wonder if such a wave breaking could be actuallydetected numerically

Now we go into the analytic details For the dKP case

tprime equiv tminus tb sim 2tbτ yprime = y minus yb ≃ 2tb(ηprime + 2ηbτ + 2ηprimeτ )

xprime = xminus xb sim ξprime minus ηbyprime minus yprime2

4tb+ η2b t

prime + ηbtbyprimetprime

(554)

and we choose τ prime to be sufficiently small to have |tprime| |yprime| ≪ 1The dKP solution reads

u(x y t) =ǫradictG(ζb + ζ prime ηb + ηprime) =

ǫradict

(

G+Gζζprime +Gη

yprime

2tb+O

(

tprime

tb

))

(555)where ζ prime is the solution of the cubic (511) with

a =3Fζζη

2Fζζζ

yprime

tb b = 3

Fζζζ

(

Fζtprime

tb+ Fζηη

yprime2

4t2b

)

X = xprime +(

ηb minus Fη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime minus[

η2b +(

F2minus ηbFη

)

1|Fζ |tb

]

tprime

+(

1minus Fηη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime2

4tb+[

minusηb +(

Fη

2+ ηbFηη

)

12|Fζ |tb

]

yprimetprime

tb

minus Fηηη

48|Fζ |yprime3

t3b

(556)

26

The three-valued region (532) after breaking becomes

xprime +(

ηb minus Fη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime minus[

η2b +(

F2minus ηbFη

)

1|Fζ |tb

]

tprime

+(

1minus Fηη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime2

4tb+[

minusηb +(

Fη

2|Fζ |tb +ηbFηη

|Fζ | minus Fζζη

2Fζζζ

)

12tb

]

yprimetprime

tb

+ 16|Fζ |F 2

ζζζ

[

minus FηηηF2ζζζ + Fζζη(3FζζζFζηη minus 2F 2

ζζη)]

yprime3

8t3b

2

=

α3

9middot64F 2ζF 4ζζζ

t6b

(

(

yprimecusp(tprime))2 minus yprime2

)3

(557)

where

yprimecusp(tprime) = 2

radic

|Fζ |Fζζζ

α

radictbtprime (558)

Equation (557) describes a closed curve with two cusps in the (x y) - planeat the points

~xplusmncusp(t

prime) = (xb yb) + (xplusmnprime

cusp(tprime)plusmnyprimecusp(t

prime)) (559)

where

xplusmnprime

cusp(tprime) sim ∓2ηb

radic

|Fζ |Fζζζ

α

radictbtprime plusmn Fη

radic

Fζζζ

α|Fζ |

radic

tprime

tb

+(

η2b minus|Fζ |Fζζζ

α

)

tprime +(

F|Fζ | +

FηηFζζζ

α

)

tprime

2tbplusmn 2ηb

radic

|Fζ |Fζζζ

αtprime

32radictb+O(τ 32)

(560)At last the analogue of (539) reads

∆xprime le 2

3

radic

|Fζ|Fζζζ

(

tprime

tb

)32

(561)

it follows that the longitudinal width ∆long and the transversal width ∆transv

of the multivalued region are respectively

∆long = O

(

(

tprime

tb

)32

)

∆transv = O(

(tbtprime)

12

)

rArr ∆long

∆transv= O

(

tprime

t2b

)

(562)

For the mdKP case

tprime = tminus tb sim tbτprime yprime = y minus yb sim 2tb(η

prime + ηbtprime

tb+ ηprimetprime

tb)

xprime = xminus xb sim ξprime minus ηbyprime + η2b t

prime minus yprime2

4tb+ ηb

yprimetprime

tb

(563)

27

and we choose τ prime sufficiently small to have |tprime| |yprime| ≪ 1The mdKP solution reads

u(x y t) =ǫradictG(ζb+ζ prime ηb+ηprime) =

ǫradict

(

G+Gζζprime +Gη

yprime

2tb+O

(

tprime

tb log tb

))

(564)where ζ prime is the solution of the cubic (511) with

a =3Fζζη

2Fζζζ

yprime

tb b = 3

Fζζζ

(

2Fζtprime

tb log tb+ Fζηη

yprime2

4t2b

)

X = xprime +(

ηb minus Fη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime minus[

η2b +(

Flog tb

minus ηbFη

)

1|Fζ |tb

]

tprime

+(

1minus Fηη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime2

4tb+[

minusηb +(

Fη

|Fζ |(1minus1

log tb) + ηbFηη

|Fζ |

)

12tb

]

yprimetprime

tb

minus Fηηη

48|Fζ |yprime3

t3b

(565)

The three-valued region (532) after breaking becomes

xprime +(

ηb minus Fη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime minus[

η2b +(

Flog tb

minus ηbFη

)

1|Fζ |tb

]

tprime

+(

1minus Fηη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime2

4tb+[

minusηb +(

Fη

|Fζ |(1minus1

log tb) + ηbFηη

|Fζ| minus Fζζη

Fζζζ log tb

)

12tb

]

yprimetprime

tb

+ 16|Fζ |F 2

ζζζ

[

minus FηηηF2ζζζ + Fζζη(3FζζζFζηη minus 2F 2

ζζη)]

yprime3

8t3b

2

=

α3

9middot64F 2ζ F

4ζζζt

6b

(

(

yprimecusp(tprime))2 minus yprime2

)3

(566)where

yprimecusp(tprime) = 2

radic

2|Fζ |Fζζζ

α

radic

tbtprime

log tb (567)

Equation (566) describes a closed curve with two cusps in the (x y) - planeat the points

~xplusmncusp(t

prime) = (xb yb) + (xplusmnprime

cusp(tprime)plusmnyprimecusp(t

prime)) (568)

where

xplusmnprime

cusp(tprime) sim ∓2ηb

radic

|Fζ |Fζζζ

α

radic

tbtprime

log tbplusmn Fη

radic

Fζζζ

α|Fζ |

radic

tprime

tb log tb

+(

η2b minus|Fζ |Fζζζ

α log tb

)

tprime +(

F|Fζ | +

FηηFζζζ

α

)

tprime

tb log tbplusmn 2ηb

radic

|Fζ |Fζζζ

αtprime

32radic

tb log tb

+O(τ 32)

(569)

28

At last the analogue of (539) reads

∆xprime le 4radic2

3

radic

|Fζ |Fζζζ

(

tprime

tb log tb

)32

(570)

it follows that the longitudinal width ∆long and the transversal width ∆transv

of the multivalued region are respectively

∆long = O

(

(

tprime

tb log tb

)32

)

∆transv = O

(

(

tbtprime

log tb

)12

)

rArr ∆long

∆transv= O

(

tprime

t2blog tb

)

(571)

References

[1] F Santucci Onde debolmente non lineari e quasi unidimensionali in

Natura La rottura di tali onde e il problema della regolarizzazione dis-

sipativa Tesi della Laurea Specialistica in Fisica supervisor P M San-tini Dipartimento di Fisica dellrsquoUniversita di Roma ldquoLa Sapienzardquo AA2011-2012

[2] S V Manakov and P M Santini On the dispersionless Kadomtsev-Petviashvili equation in n + 1 dimensions exact solutions the Cauchyproblem for small initial data and wave breaking J Phys A MathTheor 44 (2011) 405203

[3] G B Whitham Linear and nonlinear waves John Wiley amp Sons 1974

[4] C Lin E Reissner and H S Tien On two-dimensional nonsteadymotion of a slender body in a compressible fluid J Math Phys 27(1948) 220-231

[5] R Timman Unsteady motion in transonic flow Symposium Transson-icum Aachen 1962 EdKOswatitsch Springer 394-401

[6] E A Zobolotskaya and R V Khokhlov Quasi-plane waves in the non-linear acoustics of confined beams Soviet Physics- Acoustics Vol15N1 (1969)

29

[7] B B Kadomtsev and V I Petviashvili On the stability of solitarywaves in weakly dispersing media Soviet Physics-Doklady Vol15 N6(1970)

[8] X P Wang M J Ablowitz and H Segur Wave collapse and instabil-

ity of solitary waves of a generalized Kadomtsev-Petviashvili equationPhysica D 78 (1994) 241-265

[9] M J Ablowitz and H Segur Solitons and the Inverse Scattering Trans-

form SIAM Philadelphia 1981

[10] M J Ablowitz and P A Clarkson Solitons nonlinear evolution equa-

tions and inverse scattering Cambridge University Press 1991

[11] S Turitsyn and G Falkovitch Stability of magneto-elastic solitons andself-focusing of sound in antiferromagnets Sov Phys J Exp TheorPhys 62 (1985) 146-152

[12] S Novikov S V Manakov L P Pitaevskii V E Zakharov Theory of

solitons Consultant Bureau 1984

[13] S V Manakov and P M Santini Inverse scattering problem for vectorfields and the heavenly equation httparXivnlinSI0512043

[14] S V Manakov and P M Santini Inverse scattering problem forvector fields and the Cauchy problem for the heavenly equationPhys Lett A 359 613-619 (2006) doi101016jphysleta200607011httparXivnlinSI0604017

[15] S V Manakov and P M Santini The Cauchy problem on theplane for the dispersionless Kadomtsev-Petviashvili equation JETPLetters 83 No 10 462-466 (2006) 101134S0021364006100080httparXivnlinSI0604016

[16] P G Grinevich P M Santini and D Wu The Cauchy problem for thePavlov equation Nonlinearity 28 (2015) 3709-3754 doi1010880951-771528113709 Preprint arXiv13105834v2

[17] M V Pavlov Integrable hydrodynamic chains J Math Phys 44 (2003)4134-4156

30

(SM) of the solution is the n - dimensional manifold characterized by theequation

S(ζ ~η τ) equiv 1 + ǫmFζ(ζ ~ηm)τ = 0 rArr τ = minus 1

ǫmFζ(ζ ~ηm) (54)

Sincenabla(ξ~η)q =

ǫnabla(ζ~η)G(ζ~η)

1+ǫmFζ(ζ~ηm)τ (55)

the slope of the localized wave becomes infinity (the so-called gradient catas-trophe) on the SM and the n-dimensional wave ldquobreaksrdquo except on the di-

rection represented by the vector field V =nminus1sum

i=1

partηi +mǫmGmminus1(nminus1sum

i=1

Gηi)partξ [2]

[19] on which

V q = ǫ

nminus1sum

i=1

Gηi (56)

Since the KZ case (mn) = (1 3) has been studied in detail in [2] in thefollowing we mainly concentrate on the mdKP case (mn) = (2 2) and wecompare it with the dKP case (mn) = (1 2) investigated in [18]

From (54) the first breaking time τb and the corresponding characteristic

parameters ~ζb = (ζb ηb) are defined by the global minimum of a function ofthe 2 variables (ζ η)

τb = minus 1

ǫmFζ(ζb ηbm)= inf

(

minus 1

ǫmFζ(ζ ηm)

)

gt 0 (57)

and it is characterized together with the condition Fζ(~ζbm) lt 0 by thefollowing equations

Fζζ(~ζbm) = Fζη(~ζbm) = 0

α equiv Fζζζ(~ζbm)Fζηη(~ζbm)minus F 2ζζη(

~ζbm) gt 0 Fζζζ(~ζbm) gt 0(58)

The corresponding point at which the first wave breaking takes place is from(51) ~ξb = (ξb ηb) isin R

2 where

ξb = ζb + ǫmF (~ζbm)τb = ζb minusF (~ζbm)

Fζ(~ζbm) (59)

Now we evaluate equations (51) and (54) near breaking in the regime

ξ = ξb + ξprime η = ηb + ηprime τ = τb + τ prime ζ = ζb + ζ prime (510)

16

where ξprime ηprime τ prime ζ prime are small Using (57) - (59) the second of equations (51)becomes at the leading order the following cubic equation in ζ prime

ζ prime3+ a(ηprime)ζ prime

2+ b(ηprime τ)ζ prime minus γX(ξprime ηprime τ) = 0 (511)

where

a(ηprime) =3Fζζη

Fζζζηprime

b(ηprime τ) = 3Fζζζ

[

2Fζ τ + Fζηηηprime2]

X(ξprime ηprime τ ) = ξprime minus ǫF (ζb ηb + ηprime)τ prime minus ǫ [F (ζb ηb + ηprime)minus F ] τb simξprime minus Fη

|Fζ |ηprime minus F

|Fζ | τ minus Fηη

2|Fζ |ηprime2 minus Fη

|Fζ |ηprimeτ minus Fηηη

6|Fζ |ηprime3 γ =

6|Fζ |Fζζζ

(512)

and

τ equiv τ prime

τb=

τ minus τbτb

(513)

corresponding to the maximal balance

|ζ prime| |ηprime| = O(|τ |12) |X| = O(|τ |32) (514)

In (512) and in the rest of this section G F = Gm and all their partialderivatives whose arguments are not indicated are meant to be evaluated at~ζb = (ζb ηb)

The three roots of the cubic are given by the well-known Cardano-Tartagliaformula

ζ prime0 (ξprime ~ηprime τ) = minusa

3+ (A+)

13 + (Aminus)

13

ζ primeplusmn (ξprime ~ηprime τ) = minusa3minus 1

2

(

(A+)13 + (Aminus)

13

)

plusmnradic32i(

(A+)13 minus (Aminus)

13

)

(515)where

Aplusmn = Rplusmnradic∆ (516)

and the discriminant ∆ reads

∆ = R2 +Q3 (517)

withQ(ηprime τ ) = 3bminusa2

9= minus2|Fζ |

Fζζζτ + α

F 2ζζζ

ηprime2

R(ξprime ηprime τ) = γ2X(ξprime ηprime τ ) + ab

18+ a

3Q(ηprime τ)

(518)

17

At the same order function S in (54) becomes

S(ζ prime ηprime τ ) = minusτ + 12|Fζ |

[

Fζζζζprime2 + 2Fζζηζ

primeηprime + Fζηηηprime2]

=

Fζζζ

2|Fζ |

(

Q(ηprime τ ) +(

ζ prime +Fζζη

Fζζζηprime)2)

(519)

Known ζ prime as function of (ξprime ηprime τ) from the cubic (511) the solution q andits gradient are then approximated near breaking by the formulae

q(ξ η τ) sim ǫG(ζb + ζ prime ηb + ηprime) = ǫ (G+Gζζprime +Gηη

prime +O(|τ |)) nabla(ξη)q sim ǫ

nabla(ζprimeηprime)G(ζb+ζprimeηb+ηprime)

S(ζprimeηprimeτ) (520)

Before breaking

Before breaking τ lt τb (τ lt 0) the coefficient Q in (518) is strictlypositive (see the second of (58)) then the discriminant ∆ = R2 + Q3 isalso strictly positive and only the root ζ prime0 is real Correspondingly the realsolution q is single valued and described by Cardanorsquos formula and by (520)In addition function S in (519) is also strictly positive and nabla(ξ~η)q is finiteforall ξ η

To have a more explicit solution than that provided by Cardanorsquos formulawe first restrict the asymptotic region to a narrower area so that the cubic(511) reduces to the linear equation bζ prime = γX and X contains only linearterms This is achieved choosing

ηprime = O(τ r) X = O(τ p+1) 12lt p lt p+1

2lt r lt p+ 1 (521)

implying

ζ prime = O(τ p)

X = ξprime + Fη

Fζηprime + F

Fζτ + o(τ p+1) = ξprime + Gη

Gζηprime + G

mGζτ + o(τ p+1)

bζ prime = γX rArr ζ prime sim minus 1τ

(

ξprime + Gη

Gζηprime + G

mGζτ)

(522)

Then

q = ǫG(ζb + ζ prime ηb + ηprime) sim ǫG + ǫGζζprime sim ǫ

(

1minus 1

m

)

Gminus ǫGζ

τ

(

ξprime +Gη

Gζηprime)

(523)

18

Since q sim ǫG and recalling the definitions (57)(513) it follows that q isdescribed by the exact similarity solution

q sim(

ξ + (GηGζ)ηprime

τ prime

)1m

(524)

of equation (37)The cubic simplifies also in the asymptotic region in which ξprime ηprime are of

the same order while τ prime le O(|ηprime|) reducing to ζ prime3 = γX so that the solutionq and its gradient are

q sim ǫG(ζb +3radic

γX(ξprime ηprime τ) ηb + ηprime) (525)

nablaξηq sim3radicγ

3

ǫnablaζηG3radic

X2(ξprime ηprime τ ) (526)

At breaking

When τ = τb the singularity manifold S (519) is positive everywhere inthe (ξ η) plane except at the breaking point (ξb ηb) in which it is zerotogether with Q R and the discriminant ∆ The solution q is well describedagain by Cardanorsquos formula and by (520) To have a more explicit solutionthan that provided by Cardanorsquos formula we choose ξprime ηprime of the same orderthe cubic (511) reduces to ζ prime3 = γX and equations (525) become

q sim ǫG(ζb +3radic

γX(ξprime ηprime 0) ηb + ηprime)

nablaξηq sim 3radicγ

3

ǫnablaξηG3radic

X2(ξprimeηprime0)

(527)

The expression of Xb(ξprime ~ηprime) equiv X(ξprime ~ηprime 0) is given in (512) Xb(ξ

prime ηprime) simξprime minus Fη

|Fζ |ηprime if ξprime prop ηprime but ξprime 6= (FηFζ)η

prime while X(ξprime ηprime 0) = minus Fηη

2|Fζ |ηprime2 if

ξprime = (FηFζ)ηprime

Equation (527) implies that all the derivatives of q blow up at τ = τb in

the breaking point (ξb ηb) with the universal lawXminus23b except the derivative

along the transversal line Xb(ξprime ηprime 0) = 0 represented by the vector field

V = partη minusXbηpartξ (compare with (56)) for which [2 19]

V q|(ξbηb) = ǫGη (528)

After breaking I the overturning profile

19

After breaking the solution becomes three-valued in a compact regionof the (ξ η) - plane (see Figures 3) and in general does not describe anyphysics nevertheless a detailed study of the multivalued region is importantin view of a proper regularization of the models

If τ gt τb (τ gt 0) in the regime (514) the SM equation S = 0

2|Fζ|τ = Fζζζζprime2 + 2Fζζηζ

primeηprime + Fζηηηprime2 (529)

describes an ellipsoidal paraboloid in the (ζ prime ηprime τ) space with minimum at

the breaking point (~ξb τb)One can check that eliminating ζ prime from equations (529) and (511) one

obtains the SM equation in space-time coordinates coinciding with the equa-tion ∆ = R2+Q3 = 0 where ∆ is the discriminant (517) of the cubic (511)and Q and R are defined in (518) Such equation can be satisfied only ifQ le 0 ie only if

|ηprime| le ηprimecusp(τ) (530)

where

ηprimecusp(τ ) equivradic

2|Fζ |Fζζζ

α

radicτ (531)

and is given by the following analytic and universal expression

ξprime minus Fη

|Fζ |ηprime minus F

|Fζ | τ minus Fηη

2|Fζ |ηprime2 minus

(

Fη

|Fζ | +Fζζη

Fζζζ

)

ηprimeτ + 16|Fζ |F 2

ζζζ

[

minus FηηηF2ζζζ

+Fζζη(3FζζζFζηη minus 2F 2ζζη)]

ηprime32

= α3

9F 2ζ F

4ζζζ

(

(

ηprimecusp(τ))2 minus ηprime2

)3

(532)Equation (532) describes a closed curve with two cusps in the (ξ η) - planeat the points

~ξplusmncusp(τ ) = (ξb ηb) + (ξplusmnprime

cusp(τ )plusmnηprimecusp(τ)) (533)

where

ξplusmnprime

cusp(τ ) sim plusmnFη

radic

2Fζζζ

α|Fζ|radicτ +

(

F

|Fζ |+

FηηFζζζ

α

)

τ plusmn Bτ 32 (534)

where B = O(1) (see Figures 6 for dKP and 7 for mdKP) corresponding tothe conditions Q = R = 0 on which the three real solutions of the cubiccoincide (in 1 + 1 dimensions it is not possible to have three coincidentsolutions)

ζ0 = ζplusmn = minusFζζη

Fζζζηprime rArr q0 = qplusmn =sim ǫ

(

G+ (Gη minusGζFζζη

Fζζζ)ηprime)

(535)

20

On the remaining part of the closed curve ∆ = 0 two of the three realbranches coincide Outside the closed curve ∆ gt 0 and the real solution q issingle valued inside the closed curve ∆ lt 0 and the real solution q is threevalued with the three branches

q = ǫG(ζb + ζ prime ηb + ηprime) sim ǫ(G +Gζζprime +Gηη

prime +O(τ)) (536)

where ζ prime are the three real solutions of the cubic (511) (see fi Figures 2for dKP)

Figures 2 Plotting of the dKP analytic solution in the (q ξ η τ) variablesfor G given by (422) ǫ = 02 at times τ = 0 τb minus 2 τb τb + 2 whereτb = 657

Such a three-valued region of the (ξ η) plane is characterized by the

21

conditions|ηprime| lt ηprimecusp(τ) ξminusM(ηprime τ) lt ξprime lt ξ+M(ηprime τ) (537)

where

ξplusmnM(ηprime τ) equiv Fη

|Fζ |ηprime + F

|Fζ | τ + Fηη

2|Fζ |ηprime2 +

(

Fη

|Fζ | +Fζζη

Fζζζ

)

ηprimeτ minus 16|Fζ |F 2

ζζζ

[

minus FηηηF2ζζζ

+Fζζη(3FζζζFζηη minus 2F 2ζζη)]

ηprime3 plusmn Fζζζ

3|Fζ | |Q| 32(538)

(see Figures 3 for dKP)Since

∆ξ equiv ξ+M(ηprime τ)minus ξminusM(ηprime τ) =2Fζζζ

3|Fζ||Q(ηprime τ)|32 le 4

radic2

3

radic

|Fζ|Fζζζ

τ 32 (539)

we infer that the longitudinal width of the multivalued region is O(τ 32) thetransversal widths delimited by the two cusps is instead O(τ 12) thereforethe multivalued region develops at τ = τb from the breaking point (ξb ηb)with an infinite speed in the tranversal direction and with zero speed in thelongitudinal direction All these results are a common feature to the class ofdynamics (11) (see the previously derived results for the dKP equation forfinite times [18 19] and in the longtime regime [18] and those for the KZequation in the longtime regime [2])

-15-10-050005101-15-10-0500051015

-15-10-050005101-15-10-0500051015

Figures 3 Plotting of the three valued regions of the (ξ η) plane for dKPat times τ = 02 05 for G given by (422) and ǫ = 02 The center of thesquare frame is the breaking point (ξb ηb) Notice that the two cusps havethe same ξ coordinate ξ+cusp(τ) sim ξminuscusp(τ) since for solution (422) Gη = 0(see (531)(534))

22

We end this subsection remarking that as it was already observed in [19]since dKP (mn) is symmetric wrt y if the initial datum is also symmetricwrt y like the Gaussian (419) also its evolution will be so u(x y t) =u(xminusy t) This implies that ηb = yb = 0 and that all partial derivatives ofF and G containing an odd number of η derivatives are 0 at breaking As aconsequence the transversal direction on which the derivative of the profiledoes not blow up is the η (y) direction and on it the derivative is 0 atbreaking (see (56))

After breaking II the discontinuous shock

Using the matching rules of sect3 the shock formulae (310) become

parts

partτ=

ǫm

m+ 1

Gm+1(ζ1 η)minusGm+1(ζ2 η)

G(ζ1 η)minusG(ζ2 η) (540)

s = ζ1 + ǫmGm(ζ1 η) τ = ζ2 + ǫmGm(ζ2 η) τ (541)

where subscript 2 is for values behind the shock and subscript 1 for valuesahead Equations (541) are two implicit equations for ζ1 and ζ2 solvingthese equations yields ζ1(s η τ) ζ2(s η τ) and substituting these expres-sions in (540) it results in a nonlinear first order differential equation fors This equation and the initial conditions (311) give uniquely s(η τ) andconsequently ζ12(η τ) = ζ12(s(η τ) η τ)

We recall that immediately after breaking and if (530) holds equation(541) reduces to the cubic (511)(512) in which ξprime must be replaced by sprimepossessing three real roots where

sprime(ηprime τ) = sminus ξb (542)

Therefore the values of ζ1 and ζ2 are chosen among the three solutions (515)so that q2 = ǫG(ζb + ζ prime2 η) has the maximum value and q1 = ǫG(ζb + ζ prime1 η)the minimum one among the three branches of q Since Gζ lt 0 it followsthat

ζ1 = maxζ prime0 ζ primeplusmn ζ2 = minζ prime0 ζ primeplusmn (543)

To identify ζ12 with one of the three roots ζ prime0 ζprimeplusmn let us rewrite them as

follows

ζ prime0 = minusa

3+ 2 3

radicρ cos

(

θ

3

)

(544)

ζ prime+ = minusa

3minus 3

radicρ

(

cos

(

θ

3

)

+radic3 sin

(

θ

3

))

(545)

23

ζ primeminus = minusa

3minus 3

radicρ

(

cos

(

θ

3

)

minusradic3 sin

(

θ

3

))

(546)

where

ρ =radic

R2 + |∆| θ = arctan

(

radic

|∆|R

)

(547)

We observe that for 0 le θ le π the following inequalities hold

minus cos

(

θ

3

)

minusradic3 sin

(

θ

3

)

le minus cos

(

θ

3

)

+radic3 sin

(

θ

3

)

le 2 cos

(

θ

3

)

so that

ζ prime+ le ζ primeminus le ζ prime0 rArr q(ζb + ζ prime0 η) le q(ζb + ζ primeminus η) le q(ζb + ζ prime+ η) (548)

for q decreasing in ζ Hence

ζ prime1(sprime ηprime τ prime) = ζ prime0(s

prime ηprime τ prime) ζ prime2(sprime ηprime τ prime) = ζ prime+(s

prime ηprime τ prime) (549)

Then (540) reduces to the equations

dsprime

dτ+ G

Gζ+ Gη

Gζηprime + 1

2

[

ζ prime0(sprime ηprime τ ) + ζ prime+(s

prime ηprime τ)]

= 0 for dKPdsprime

dτ+ G

2Gζ+ Gη

Gζηprime + 1

2

[

ζ prime0(sprime ηprime τ) + ζ prime+(s

prime ηprime τ)]

= 0 for mdKP

sprime(0) = ξb

(550)

obtained expanding (540) near the breaking point and recalling that τ equivτ primeτb

We remark that in the differential equations (550) sprime depends on ηprime

parametrically So the discontinuous (dissipative) shocks of the longtime so-lutions of the small data Cauchy problems for dKP and mdKP has a simplegeometric construction given τ gt 0 for any fixed |ηprime| le ηcusp the overturn-ing profile in the (ξ q) plane is intercepted by a vertical straight line cuttingoff equal area lobi in analogy with the 1 + 1 dimensional case

Going back to the dKP variables

The above formulae written in the convenient variables q ξ η τ are es-sentially the same for both dKP and mdKP relevant differences appear whenwe go back to the original variables u x y t inverting equations (52)(53)

u = 1radictq t = τ2

4 y = ητ2

2 x = ξ minus η2τ2

4 for dKP

u = 1radictq t = eτ y = 2ηeτ x = ξ minus η2eτ for mdKP

(551)

24

and all the above universal formulae are easily transfered to the dKP (mn)equations In particular small and localized initial data break i) at tb =τ 2b 4 in the point (xb yb) = (ξb minus τ 2b η

2b4 ηbτ

2b 2) of the parabolic wave front

x+ y2(4tb) = ξb evolving according to dKP and ii) at tb = eτb in the point(xb yb) = (ξb minus η2be

τb 2ηbeτb) of the parabolic wave front x + y2(4tb) = ξb

evolving according to mdKP If for instance we use the same Gaussian initialcondition (419) for both dKP and mdKP with ǫ = 02 then G is given by(422) in both cases Consequently for dKP

ζb = 196 ηb = 0 ξb = 327 τb = 657 (552)

and wave breaking takes place at tb = 108 in the point (xb yb) = (327 0)on the parabola x+ 231 middot 10minus2y2 = 327 (see Figure 4)

Figure 4 Plotting of the analytic dKP solution u in the physical variablesx y t for G given by (422) (corresponding to the gaussian initial condition)ǫ = 02 at breaking

For mdKP

ζb = 161 ηb = 0 ξb = 251 τb = 1431 (553)

and wave breaking takes place at tb = 164middot106 in the point (xb yb) = (251 0)on the parabola x + 152 middot 10minus7y2 = 251 and at breaking the amplitude ofthe wave is u = ǫtb

minus12G(ζb ηb) = 195 middot 10minus4 (see Figure 5)

25

Figure 5 Plotting of the analytic mdKP solution u in the physical variablesx y t for G given by (422) (corresponding to the gaussian initial condition)ǫ = 02 at breaking

Since in the mdKP case tb is very large and the wave amplitude atbreaking is very small we wonder if such a wave breaking could be actuallydetected numerically

Now we go into the analytic details For the dKP case

tprime equiv tminus tb sim 2tbτ yprime = y minus yb ≃ 2tb(ηprime + 2ηbτ + 2ηprimeτ )

xprime = xminus xb sim ξprime minus ηbyprime minus yprime2

4tb+ η2b t

prime + ηbtbyprimetprime

(554)

and we choose τ prime to be sufficiently small to have |tprime| |yprime| ≪ 1The dKP solution reads

u(x y t) =ǫradictG(ζb + ζ prime ηb + ηprime) =

ǫradict

(

G+Gζζprime +Gη

yprime

2tb+O

(

tprime

tb

))

(555)where ζ prime is the solution of the cubic (511) with

a =3Fζζη

2Fζζζ

yprime

tb b = 3

Fζζζ

(

Fζtprime

tb+ Fζηη

yprime2

4t2b

)

X = xprime +(

ηb minus Fη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime minus[

η2b +(

F2minus ηbFη

)

1|Fζ |tb

]

tprime

+(

1minus Fηη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime2

4tb+[

minusηb +(

Fη

2+ ηbFηη

)

12|Fζ |tb

]

yprimetprime

tb

minus Fηηη

48|Fζ |yprime3

t3b

(556)

26

The three-valued region (532) after breaking becomes

xprime +(

ηb minus Fη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime minus[

η2b +(

F2minus ηbFη

)

1|Fζ |tb

]

tprime

+(

1minus Fηη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime2

4tb+[

minusηb +(

Fη

2|Fζ |tb +ηbFηη

|Fζ | minus Fζζη

2Fζζζ

)

12tb

]

yprimetprime

tb

+ 16|Fζ |F 2

ζζζ

[

minus FηηηF2ζζζ + Fζζη(3FζζζFζηη minus 2F 2

ζζη)]

yprime3

8t3b

2

=

α3

9middot64F 2ζF 4ζζζ

t6b

(

(

yprimecusp(tprime))2 minus yprime2

)3

(557)

where

yprimecusp(tprime) = 2

radic

|Fζ |Fζζζ

α

radictbtprime (558)

Equation (557) describes a closed curve with two cusps in the (x y) - planeat the points

~xplusmncusp(t

prime) = (xb yb) + (xplusmnprime

cusp(tprime)plusmnyprimecusp(t

prime)) (559)

where

xplusmnprime

cusp(tprime) sim ∓2ηb

radic

|Fζ |Fζζζ

α

radictbtprime plusmn Fη

radic

Fζζζ

α|Fζ |

radic

tprime

tb

+(

η2b minus|Fζ |Fζζζ

α

)

tprime +(

F|Fζ | +

FηηFζζζ

α

)

tprime

2tbplusmn 2ηb

radic

|Fζ |Fζζζ

αtprime

32radictb+O(τ 32)

(560)At last the analogue of (539) reads

∆xprime le 2

3

radic

|Fζ|Fζζζ

(

tprime

tb

)32

(561)

it follows that the longitudinal width ∆long and the transversal width ∆transv

of the multivalued region are respectively

∆long = O

(

(

tprime

tb

)32

)

∆transv = O(

(tbtprime)

12

)

rArr ∆long

∆transv= O

(

tprime

t2b

)

(562)

For the mdKP case

tprime = tminus tb sim tbτprime yprime = y minus yb sim 2tb(η

prime + ηbtprime

tb+ ηprimetprime

tb)

xprime = xminus xb sim ξprime minus ηbyprime + η2b t

prime minus yprime2

4tb+ ηb

yprimetprime

tb

(563)

27

and we choose τ prime sufficiently small to have |tprime| |yprime| ≪ 1The mdKP solution reads

u(x y t) =ǫradictG(ζb+ζ prime ηb+ηprime) =

ǫradict

(

G+Gζζprime +Gη

yprime

2tb+O

(

tprime

tb log tb

))

(564)where ζ prime is the solution of the cubic (511) with

a =3Fζζη

2Fζζζ

yprime

tb b = 3

Fζζζ

(

2Fζtprime

tb log tb+ Fζηη

yprime2

4t2b

)

X = xprime +(

ηb minus Fη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime minus[

η2b +(

Flog tb

minus ηbFη

)

1|Fζ |tb

]

tprime

+(

1minus Fηη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime2

4tb+[

minusηb +(

Fη

|Fζ |(1minus1

log tb) + ηbFηη

|Fζ |

)

12tb

]

yprimetprime

tb

minus Fηηη

48|Fζ |yprime3

t3b

(565)

The three-valued region (532) after breaking becomes

xprime +(

ηb minus Fη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime minus[

η2b +(

Flog tb

minus ηbFη

)

1|Fζ |tb

]

tprime

+(

1minus Fηη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime2

4tb+[

minusηb +(

Fη

|Fζ |(1minus1

log tb) + ηbFηη

|Fζ| minus Fζζη

Fζζζ log tb

)

12tb

]

yprimetprime

tb

+ 16|Fζ |F 2

ζζζ

[

minus FηηηF2ζζζ + Fζζη(3FζζζFζηη minus 2F 2

ζζη)]

yprime3

8t3b

2

=

α3

9middot64F 2ζ F

4ζζζt

6b

(

(

yprimecusp(tprime))2 minus yprime2

)3

(566)where

yprimecusp(tprime) = 2

radic

2|Fζ |Fζζζ

α

radic

tbtprime

log tb (567)

Equation (566) describes a closed curve with two cusps in the (x y) - planeat the points

~xplusmncusp(t

prime) = (xb yb) + (xplusmnprime

cusp(tprime)plusmnyprimecusp(t

prime)) (568)

where

xplusmnprime

cusp(tprime) sim ∓2ηb

radic

|Fζ |Fζζζ

α

radic

tbtprime

log tbplusmn Fη

radic

Fζζζ

α|Fζ |

radic

tprime

tb log tb

+(

η2b minus|Fζ |Fζζζ

α log tb

)

tprime +(

F|Fζ | +

FηηFζζζ

α

)

tprime

tb log tbplusmn 2ηb

radic

|Fζ |Fζζζ

αtprime

32radic

tb log tb

+O(τ 32)

(569)

28

At last the analogue of (539) reads

∆xprime le 4radic2

3

radic

|Fζ |Fζζζ

(

tprime

tb log tb

)32

(570)

it follows that the longitudinal width ∆long and the transversal width ∆transv

of the multivalued region are respectively

∆long = O

(

(

tprime

tb log tb

)32

)

∆transv = O

(

(

tbtprime

log tb

)12

)

rArr ∆long

∆transv= O

(

tprime

t2blog tb

)

(571)

References

[1] F Santucci Onde debolmente non lineari e quasi unidimensionali in

Natura La rottura di tali onde e il problema della regolarizzazione dis-

sipativa Tesi della Laurea Specialistica in Fisica supervisor P M San-tini Dipartimento di Fisica dellrsquoUniversita di Roma ldquoLa Sapienzardquo AA2011-2012

[2] S V Manakov and P M Santini On the dispersionless Kadomtsev-Petviashvili equation in n + 1 dimensions exact solutions the Cauchyproblem for small initial data and wave breaking J Phys A MathTheor 44 (2011) 405203

[3] G B Whitham Linear and nonlinear waves John Wiley amp Sons 1974

[4] C Lin E Reissner and H S Tien On two-dimensional nonsteadymotion of a slender body in a compressible fluid J Math Phys 27(1948) 220-231

[5] R Timman Unsteady motion in transonic flow Symposium Transson-icum Aachen 1962 EdKOswatitsch Springer 394-401

[6] E A Zobolotskaya and R V Khokhlov Quasi-plane waves in the non-linear acoustics of confined beams Soviet Physics- Acoustics Vol15N1 (1969)

29

[7] B B Kadomtsev and V I Petviashvili On the stability of solitarywaves in weakly dispersing media Soviet Physics-Doklady Vol15 N6(1970)

[8] X P Wang M J Ablowitz and H Segur Wave collapse and instabil-

ity of solitary waves of a generalized Kadomtsev-Petviashvili equationPhysica D 78 (1994) 241-265

[9] M J Ablowitz and H Segur Solitons and the Inverse Scattering Trans-

form SIAM Philadelphia 1981

[10] M J Ablowitz and P A Clarkson Solitons nonlinear evolution equa-

tions and inverse scattering Cambridge University Press 1991

[11] S Turitsyn and G Falkovitch Stability of magneto-elastic solitons andself-focusing of sound in antiferromagnets Sov Phys J Exp TheorPhys 62 (1985) 146-152

[12] S Novikov S V Manakov L P Pitaevskii V E Zakharov Theory of

solitons Consultant Bureau 1984

[13] S V Manakov and P M Santini Inverse scattering problem for vectorfields and the heavenly equation httparXivnlinSI0512043

[14] S V Manakov and P M Santini Inverse scattering problem forvector fields and the Cauchy problem for the heavenly equationPhys Lett A 359 613-619 (2006) doi101016jphysleta200607011httparXivnlinSI0604017

[15] S V Manakov and P M Santini The Cauchy problem on theplane for the dispersionless Kadomtsev-Petviashvili equation JETPLetters 83 No 10 462-466 (2006) 101134S0021364006100080httparXivnlinSI0604016

[16] P G Grinevich P M Santini and D Wu The Cauchy problem for thePavlov equation Nonlinearity 28 (2015) 3709-3754 doi1010880951-771528113709 Preprint arXiv13105834v2

[17] M V Pavlov Integrable hydrodynamic chains J Math Phys 44 (2003)4134-4156

30

where ξprime ηprime τ prime ζ prime are small Using (57) - (59) the second of equations (51)becomes at the leading order the following cubic equation in ζ prime

ζ prime3+ a(ηprime)ζ prime

2+ b(ηprime τ)ζ prime minus γX(ξprime ηprime τ) = 0 (511)

where

a(ηprime) =3Fζζη

Fζζζηprime

b(ηprime τ) = 3Fζζζ

[

2Fζ τ + Fζηηηprime2]

X(ξprime ηprime τ ) = ξprime minus ǫF (ζb ηb + ηprime)τ prime minus ǫ [F (ζb ηb + ηprime)minus F ] τb simξprime minus Fη

|Fζ |ηprime minus F

|Fζ | τ minus Fηη

2|Fζ |ηprime2 minus Fη

|Fζ |ηprimeτ minus Fηηη

6|Fζ |ηprime3 γ =

6|Fζ |Fζζζ

(512)

and

τ equiv τ prime

τb=

τ minus τbτb

(513)

corresponding to the maximal balance

|ζ prime| |ηprime| = O(|τ |12) |X| = O(|τ |32) (514)

In (512) and in the rest of this section G F = Gm and all their partialderivatives whose arguments are not indicated are meant to be evaluated at~ζb = (ζb ηb)

The three roots of the cubic are given by the well-known Cardano-Tartagliaformula

ζ prime0 (ξprime ~ηprime τ) = minusa

3+ (A+)

13 + (Aminus)

13

ζ primeplusmn (ξprime ~ηprime τ) = minusa3minus 1

2

(

(A+)13 + (Aminus)

13

)

plusmnradic32i(

(A+)13 minus (Aminus)

13

)

(515)where

Aplusmn = Rplusmnradic∆ (516)

and the discriminant ∆ reads

∆ = R2 +Q3 (517)

withQ(ηprime τ ) = 3bminusa2

9= minus2|Fζ |

Fζζζτ + α

F 2ζζζ

ηprime2

R(ξprime ηprime τ) = γ2X(ξprime ηprime τ ) + ab

18+ a

3Q(ηprime τ)

(518)

17

At the same order function S in (54) becomes

S(ζ prime ηprime τ ) = minusτ + 12|Fζ |

[

Fζζζζprime2 + 2Fζζηζ

primeηprime + Fζηηηprime2]

=

Fζζζ

2|Fζ |

(

Q(ηprime τ ) +(

ζ prime +Fζζη

Fζζζηprime)2)

(519)

Known ζ prime as function of (ξprime ηprime τ) from the cubic (511) the solution q andits gradient are then approximated near breaking by the formulae

q(ξ η τ) sim ǫG(ζb + ζ prime ηb + ηprime) = ǫ (G+Gζζprime +Gηη

prime +O(|τ |)) nabla(ξη)q sim ǫ

nabla(ζprimeηprime)G(ζb+ζprimeηb+ηprime)

S(ζprimeηprimeτ) (520)

Before breaking

Before breaking τ lt τb (τ lt 0) the coefficient Q in (518) is strictlypositive (see the second of (58)) then the discriminant ∆ = R2 + Q3 isalso strictly positive and only the root ζ prime0 is real Correspondingly the realsolution q is single valued and described by Cardanorsquos formula and by (520)In addition function S in (519) is also strictly positive and nabla(ξ~η)q is finiteforall ξ η

To have a more explicit solution than that provided by Cardanorsquos formulawe first restrict the asymptotic region to a narrower area so that the cubic(511) reduces to the linear equation bζ prime = γX and X contains only linearterms This is achieved choosing

ηprime = O(τ r) X = O(τ p+1) 12lt p lt p+1

2lt r lt p+ 1 (521)

implying

ζ prime = O(τ p)

X = ξprime + Fη

Fζηprime + F

Fζτ + o(τ p+1) = ξprime + Gη

Gζηprime + G

mGζτ + o(τ p+1)

bζ prime = γX rArr ζ prime sim minus 1τ

(

ξprime + Gη

Gζηprime + G

mGζτ)

(522)

Then

q = ǫG(ζb + ζ prime ηb + ηprime) sim ǫG + ǫGζζprime sim ǫ

(

1minus 1

m

)

Gminus ǫGζ

τ

(

ξprime +Gη

Gζηprime)

(523)

18

Since q sim ǫG and recalling the definitions (57)(513) it follows that q isdescribed by the exact similarity solution

q sim(

ξ + (GηGζ)ηprime

τ prime

)1m

(524)

of equation (37)The cubic simplifies also in the asymptotic region in which ξprime ηprime are of

the same order while τ prime le O(|ηprime|) reducing to ζ prime3 = γX so that the solutionq and its gradient are

q sim ǫG(ζb +3radic

γX(ξprime ηprime τ) ηb + ηprime) (525)

nablaξηq sim3radicγ

3

ǫnablaζηG3radic

X2(ξprime ηprime τ ) (526)

At breaking

When τ = τb the singularity manifold S (519) is positive everywhere inthe (ξ η) plane except at the breaking point (ξb ηb) in which it is zerotogether with Q R and the discriminant ∆ The solution q is well describedagain by Cardanorsquos formula and by (520) To have a more explicit solutionthan that provided by Cardanorsquos formula we choose ξprime ηprime of the same orderthe cubic (511) reduces to ζ prime3 = γX and equations (525) become

q sim ǫG(ζb +3radic

γX(ξprime ηprime 0) ηb + ηprime)

nablaξηq sim 3radicγ

3

ǫnablaξηG3radic

X2(ξprimeηprime0)

(527)

The expression of Xb(ξprime ~ηprime) equiv X(ξprime ~ηprime 0) is given in (512) Xb(ξ

prime ηprime) simξprime minus Fη

|Fζ |ηprime if ξprime prop ηprime but ξprime 6= (FηFζ)η

prime while X(ξprime ηprime 0) = minus Fηη

2|Fζ |ηprime2 if

ξprime = (FηFζ)ηprime

Equation (527) implies that all the derivatives of q blow up at τ = τb in

the breaking point (ξb ηb) with the universal lawXminus23b except the derivative

along the transversal line Xb(ξprime ηprime 0) = 0 represented by the vector field

V = partη minusXbηpartξ (compare with (56)) for which [2 19]

V q|(ξbηb) = ǫGη (528)

After breaking I the overturning profile

19

After breaking the solution becomes three-valued in a compact regionof the (ξ η) - plane (see Figures 3) and in general does not describe anyphysics nevertheless a detailed study of the multivalued region is importantin view of a proper regularization of the models

If τ gt τb (τ gt 0) in the regime (514) the SM equation S = 0

2|Fζ|τ = Fζζζζprime2 + 2Fζζηζ

primeηprime + Fζηηηprime2 (529)

describes an ellipsoidal paraboloid in the (ζ prime ηprime τ) space with minimum at

the breaking point (~ξb τb)One can check that eliminating ζ prime from equations (529) and (511) one

obtains the SM equation in space-time coordinates coinciding with the equa-tion ∆ = R2+Q3 = 0 where ∆ is the discriminant (517) of the cubic (511)and Q and R are defined in (518) Such equation can be satisfied only ifQ le 0 ie only if

|ηprime| le ηprimecusp(τ) (530)

where

ηprimecusp(τ ) equivradic

2|Fζ |Fζζζ

α

radicτ (531)

and is given by the following analytic and universal expression

ξprime minus Fη

|Fζ |ηprime minus F

|Fζ | τ minus Fηη

2|Fζ |ηprime2 minus

(

Fη

|Fζ | +Fζζη

Fζζζ

)

ηprimeτ + 16|Fζ |F 2

ζζζ

[

minus FηηηF2ζζζ

+Fζζη(3FζζζFζηη minus 2F 2ζζη)]

ηprime32

= α3

9F 2ζ F

4ζζζ

(

(

ηprimecusp(τ))2 minus ηprime2

)3

(532)Equation (532) describes a closed curve with two cusps in the (ξ η) - planeat the points

~ξplusmncusp(τ ) = (ξb ηb) + (ξplusmnprime

cusp(τ )plusmnηprimecusp(τ)) (533)

where

ξplusmnprime

cusp(τ ) sim plusmnFη

radic

2Fζζζ

α|Fζ|radicτ +

(

F

|Fζ |+

FηηFζζζ

α

)

τ plusmn Bτ 32 (534)

where B = O(1) (see Figures 6 for dKP and 7 for mdKP) corresponding tothe conditions Q = R = 0 on which the three real solutions of the cubiccoincide (in 1 + 1 dimensions it is not possible to have three coincidentsolutions)

ζ0 = ζplusmn = minusFζζη

Fζζζηprime rArr q0 = qplusmn =sim ǫ

(

G+ (Gη minusGζFζζη

Fζζζ)ηprime)

(535)

20

On the remaining part of the closed curve ∆ = 0 two of the three realbranches coincide Outside the closed curve ∆ gt 0 and the real solution q issingle valued inside the closed curve ∆ lt 0 and the real solution q is threevalued with the three branches

q = ǫG(ζb + ζ prime ηb + ηprime) sim ǫ(G +Gζζprime +Gηη

prime +O(τ)) (536)

where ζ prime are the three real solutions of the cubic (511) (see fi Figures 2for dKP)

Figures 2 Plotting of the dKP analytic solution in the (q ξ η τ) variablesfor G given by (422) ǫ = 02 at times τ = 0 τb minus 2 τb τb + 2 whereτb = 657

Such a three-valued region of the (ξ η) plane is characterized by the

21

conditions|ηprime| lt ηprimecusp(τ) ξminusM(ηprime τ) lt ξprime lt ξ+M(ηprime τ) (537)

where

ξplusmnM(ηprime τ) equiv Fη

|Fζ |ηprime + F

|Fζ | τ + Fηη

2|Fζ |ηprime2 +

(

Fη

|Fζ | +Fζζη

Fζζζ

)

ηprimeτ minus 16|Fζ |F 2

ζζζ

[

minus FηηηF2ζζζ

+Fζζη(3FζζζFζηη minus 2F 2ζζη)]

ηprime3 plusmn Fζζζ

3|Fζ | |Q| 32(538)

(see Figures 3 for dKP)Since

∆ξ equiv ξ+M(ηprime τ)minus ξminusM(ηprime τ) =2Fζζζ

3|Fζ||Q(ηprime τ)|32 le 4

radic2

3

radic

|Fζ|Fζζζ

τ 32 (539)

we infer that the longitudinal width of the multivalued region is O(τ 32) thetransversal widths delimited by the two cusps is instead O(τ 12) thereforethe multivalued region develops at τ = τb from the breaking point (ξb ηb)with an infinite speed in the tranversal direction and with zero speed in thelongitudinal direction All these results are a common feature to the class ofdynamics (11) (see the previously derived results for the dKP equation forfinite times [18 19] and in the longtime regime [18] and those for the KZequation in the longtime regime [2])

-15-10-050005101-15-10-0500051015

-15-10-050005101-15-10-0500051015

Figures 3 Plotting of the three valued regions of the (ξ η) plane for dKPat times τ = 02 05 for G given by (422) and ǫ = 02 The center of thesquare frame is the breaking point (ξb ηb) Notice that the two cusps havethe same ξ coordinate ξ+cusp(τ) sim ξminuscusp(τ) since for solution (422) Gη = 0(see (531)(534))

22

We end this subsection remarking that as it was already observed in [19]since dKP (mn) is symmetric wrt y if the initial datum is also symmetricwrt y like the Gaussian (419) also its evolution will be so u(x y t) =u(xminusy t) This implies that ηb = yb = 0 and that all partial derivatives ofF and G containing an odd number of η derivatives are 0 at breaking As aconsequence the transversal direction on which the derivative of the profiledoes not blow up is the η (y) direction and on it the derivative is 0 atbreaking (see (56))

After breaking II the discontinuous shock

Using the matching rules of sect3 the shock formulae (310) become

parts

partτ=

ǫm

m+ 1

Gm+1(ζ1 η)minusGm+1(ζ2 η)

G(ζ1 η)minusG(ζ2 η) (540)

s = ζ1 + ǫmGm(ζ1 η) τ = ζ2 + ǫmGm(ζ2 η) τ (541)

where subscript 2 is for values behind the shock and subscript 1 for valuesahead Equations (541) are two implicit equations for ζ1 and ζ2 solvingthese equations yields ζ1(s η τ) ζ2(s η τ) and substituting these expres-sions in (540) it results in a nonlinear first order differential equation fors This equation and the initial conditions (311) give uniquely s(η τ) andconsequently ζ12(η τ) = ζ12(s(η τ) η τ)

We recall that immediately after breaking and if (530) holds equation(541) reduces to the cubic (511)(512) in which ξprime must be replaced by sprimepossessing three real roots where

sprime(ηprime τ) = sminus ξb (542)

Therefore the values of ζ1 and ζ2 are chosen among the three solutions (515)so that q2 = ǫG(ζb + ζ prime2 η) has the maximum value and q1 = ǫG(ζb + ζ prime1 η)the minimum one among the three branches of q Since Gζ lt 0 it followsthat

ζ1 = maxζ prime0 ζ primeplusmn ζ2 = minζ prime0 ζ primeplusmn (543)

To identify ζ12 with one of the three roots ζ prime0 ζprimeplusmn let us rewrite them as

follows

ζ prime0 = minusa

3+ 2 3

radicρ cos

(

θ

3

)

(544)

ζ prime+ = minusa

3minus 3

radicρ

(

cos

(

θ

3

)

+radic3 sin

(

θ

3

))

(545)

23

ζ primeminus = minusa

3minus 3

radicρ

(

cos

(

θ

3

)

minusradic3 sin

(

θ

3

))

(546)

where

ρ =radic

R2 + |∆| θ = arctan

(

radic

|∆|R

)

(547)

We observe that for 0 le θ le π the following inequalities hold

minus cos

(

θ

3

)

minusradic3 sin

(

θ

3

)

le minus cos

(

θ

3

)

+radic3 sin

(

θ

3

)

le 2 cos

(

θ

3

)

so that

ζ prime+ le ζ primeminus le ζ prime0 rArr q(ζb + ζ prime0 η) le q(ζb + ζ primeminus η) le q(ζb + ζ prime+ η) (548)

for q decreasing in ζ Hence

ζ prime1(sprime ηprime τ prime) = ζ prime0(s

prime ηprime τ prime) ζ prime2(sprime ηprime τ prime) = ζ prime+(s

prime ηprime τ prime) (549)

Then (540) reduces to the equations

dsprime

dτ+ G

Gζ+ Gη

Gζηprime + 1

2

[

ζ prime0(sprime ηprime τ ) + ζ prime+(s

prime ηprime τ)]

= 0 for dKPdsprime

dτ+ G

2Gζ+ Gη

Gζηprime + 1

2

[

ζ prime0(sprime ηprime τ) + ζ prime+(s

prime ηprime τ)]

= 0 for mdKP

sprime(0) = ξb

(550)

obtained expanding (540) near the breaking point and recalling that τ equivτ primeτb

We remark that in the differential equations (550) sprime depends on ηprime

parametrically So the discontinuous (dissipative) shocks of the longtime so-lutions of the small data Cauchy problems for dKP and mdKP has a simplegeometric construction given τ gt 0 for any fixed |ηprime| le ηcusp the overturn-ing profile in the (ξ q) plane is intercepted by a vertical straight line cuttingoff equal area lobi in analogy with the 1 + 1 dimensional case

Going back to the dKP variables

The above formulae written in the convenient variables q ξ η τ are es-sentially the same for both dKP and mdKP relevant differences appear whenwe go back to the original variables u x y t inverting equations (52)(53)

u = 1radictq t = τ2

4 y = ητ2

2 x = ξ minus η2τ2

4 for dKP

u = 1radictq t = eτ y = 2ηeτ x = ξ minus η2eτ for mdKP

(551)

24

and all the above universal formulae are easily transfered to the dKP (mn)equations In particular small and localized initial data break i) at tb =τ 2b 4 in the point (xb yb) = (ξb minus τ 2b η

2b4 ηbτ

2b 2) of the parabolic wave front

x+ y2(4tb) = ξb evolving according to dKP and ii) at tb = eτb in the point(xb yb) = (ξb minus η2be

τb 2ηbeτb) of the parabolic wave front x + y2(4tb) = ξb

evolving according to mdKP If for instance we use the same Gaussian initialcondition (419) for both dKP and mdKP with ǫ = 02 then G is given by(422) in both cases Consequently for dKP

ζb = 196 ηb = 0 ξb = 327 τb = 657 (552)

and wave breaking takes place at tb = 108 in the point (xb yb) = (327 0)on the parabola x+ 231 middot 10minus2y2 = 327 (see Figure 4)

Figure 4 Plotting of the analytic dKP solution u in the physical variablesx y t for G given by (422) (corresponding to the gaussian initial condition)ǫ = 02 at breaking

For mdKP

ζb = 161 ηb = 0 ξb = 251 τb = 1431 (553)

and wave breaking takes place at tb = 164middot106 in the point (xb yb) = (251 0)on the parabola x + 152 middot 10minus7y2 = 251 and at breaking the amplitude ofthe wave is u = ǫtb

minus12G(ζb ηb) = 195 middot 10minus4 (see Figure 5)

25

Figure 5 Plotting of the analytic mdKP solution u in the physical variablesx y t for G given by (422) (corresponding to the gaussian initial condition)ǫ = 02 at breaking

Since in the mdKP case tb is very large and the wave amplitude atbreaking is very small we wonder if such a wave breaking could be actuallydetected numerically

Now we go into the analytic details For the dKP case

tprime equiv tminus tb sim 2tbτ yprime = y minus yb ≃ 2tb(ηprime + 2ηbτ + 2ηprimeτ )

xprime = xminus xb sim ξprime minus ηbyprime minus yprime2

4tb+ η2b t

prime + ηbtbyprimetprime

(554)

and we choose τ prime to be sufficiently small to have |tprime| |yprime| ≪ 1The dKP solution reads

u(x y t) =ǫradictG(ζb + ζ prime ηb + ηprime) =

ǫradict

(

G+Gζζprime +Gη

yprime

2tb+O

(

tprime

tb

))

(555)where ζ prime is the solution of the cubic (511) with

a =3Fζζη

2Fζζζ

yprime

tb b = 3

Fζζζ

(

Fζtprime

tb+ Fζηη

yprime2

4t2b

)

X = xprime +(

ηb minus Fη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime minus[

η2b +(

F2minus ηbFη

)

1|Fζ |tb

]

tprime

+(

1minus Fηη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime2

4tb+[

minusηb +(

Fη

2+ ηbFηη

)

12|Fζ |tb

]

yprimetprime

tb

minus Fηηη

48|Fζ |yprime3

t3b

(556)

26

The three-valued region (532) after breaking becomes

xprime +(

ηb minus Fη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime minus[

η2b +(

F2minus ηbFη

)

1|Fζ |tb

]

tprime

+(

1minus Fηη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime2

4tb+[

minusηb +(

Fη

2|Fζ |tb +ηbFηη

|Fζ | minus Fζζη

2Fζζζ

)

12tb

]

yprimetprime

tb

+ 16|Fζ |F 2

ζζζ

[

minus FηηηF2ζζζ + Fζζη(3FζζζFζηη minus 2F 2

ζζη)]

yprime3

8t3b

2

=

α3

9middot64F 2ζF 4ζζζ

t6b

(

(

yprimecusp(tprime))2 minus yprime2

)3

(557)

where

yprimecusp(tprime) = 2

radic

|Fζ |Fζζζ

α

radictbtprime (558)

Equation (557) describes a closed curve with two cusps in the (x y) - planeat the points

~xplusmncusp(t

prime) = (xb yb) + (xplusmnprime

cusp(tprime)plusmnyprimecusp(t

prime)) (559)

where

xplusmnprime

cusp(tprime) sim ∓2ηb

radic

|Fζ |Fζζζ

α

radictbtprime plusmn Fη

radic

Fζζζ

α|Fζ |

radic

tprime

tb

+(

η2b minus|Fζ |Fζζζ

α

)

tprime +(

F|Fζ | +

FηηFζζζ

α

)

tprime

2tbplusmn 2ηb

radic

|Fζ |Fζζζ

αtprime

32radictb+O(τ 32)

(560)At last the analogue of (539) reads

∆xprime le 2

3

radic

|Fζ|Fζζζ

(

tprime

tb

)32

(561)

it follows that the longitudinal width ∆long and the transversal width ∆transv

of the multivalued region are respectively

∆long = O

(

(

tprime

tb

)32

)

∆transv = O(

(tbtprime)

12

)

rArr ∆long

∆transv= O

(

tprime

t2b

)

(562)

For the mdKP case

tprime = tminus tb sim tbτprime yprime = y minus yb sim 2tb(η

prime + ηbtprime

tb+ ηprimetprime

tb)

xprime = xminus xb sim ξprime minus ηbyprime + η2b t

prime minus yprime2

4tb+ ηb

yprimetprime

tb

(563)

27

and we choose τ prime sufficiently small to have |tprime| |yprime| ≪ 1The mdKP solution reads

u(x y t) =ǫradictG(ζb+ζ prime ηb+ηprime) =

ǫradict

(

G+Gζζprime +Gη

yprime

2tb+O

(

tprime

tb log tb

))

(564)where ζ prime is the solution of the cubic (511) with

a =3Fζζη

2Fζζζ

yprime

tb b = 3

Fζζζ

(

2Fζtprime

tb log tb+ Fζηη

yprime2

4t2b

)

X = xprime +(

ηb minus Fη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime minus[

η2b +(

Flog tb

minus ηbFη

)

1|Fζ |tb

]

tprime

+(

1minus Fηη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime2

4tb+[

minusηb +(

Fη

|Fζ |(1minus1

log tb) + ηbFηη

|Fζ |

)

12tb

]

yprimetprime

tb

minus Fηηη

48|Fζ |yprime3

t3b

(565)

The three-valued region (532) after breaking becomes

xprime +(

ηb minus Fη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime minus[

η2b +(

Flog tb

minus ηbFη

)

1|Fζ |tb

]

tprime

+(

1minus Fηη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime2

4tb+[

minusηb +(

Fη

|Fζ |(1minus1

log tb) + ηbFηη

|Fζ| minus Fζζη

Fζζζ log tb

)

12tb

]

yprimetprime

tb

+ 16|Fζ |F 2

ζζζ

[

minus FηηηF2ζζζ + Fζζη(3FζζζFζηη minus 2F 2

ζζη)]

yprime3

8t3b

2

=

α3

9middot64F 2ζ F

4ζζζt

6b

(

(

yprimecusp(tprime))2 minus yprime2

)3

(566)where

yprimecusp(tprime) = 2

radic

2|Fζ |Fζζζ

α

radic

tbtprime

log tb (567)

Equation (566) describes a closed curve with two cusps in the (x y) - planeat the points

~xplusmncusp(t

prime) = (xb yb) + (xplusmnprime

cusp(tprime)plusmnyprimecusp(t

prime)) (568)

where

xplusmnprime

cusp(tprime) sim ∓2ηb

radic

|Fζ |Fζζζ

α

radic

tbtprime

log tbplusmn Fη

radic

Fζζζ

α|Fζ |

radic

tprime

tb log tb

+(

η2b minus|Fζ |Fζζζ

α log tb

)

tprime +(

F|Fζ | +

FηηFζζζ

α

)

tprime

tb log tbplusmn 2ηb

radic

|Fζ |Fζζζ

αtprime

32radic

tb log tb

+O(τ 32)

(569)

28

At last the analogue of (539) reads

∆xprime le 4radic2

3

radic

|Fζ |Fζζζ

(

tprime

tb log tb

)32

(570)

it follows that the longitudinal width ∆long and the transversal width ∆transv

of the multivalued region are respectively

∆long = O

(

(

tprime

tb log tb

)32

)

∆transv = O

(

(

tbtprime

log tb

)12

)

rArr ∆long

∆transv= O

(

tprime

t2blog tb

)

(571)

References

[1] F Santucci Onde debolmente non lineari e quasi unidimensionali in

Natura La rottura di tali onde e il problema della regolarizzazione dis-

sipativa Tesi della Laurea Specialistica in Fisica supervisor P M San-tini Dipartimento di Fisica dellrsquoUniversita di Roma ldquoLa Sapienzardquo AA2011-2012

[2] S V Manakov and P M Santini On the dispersionless Kadomtsev-Petviashvili equation in n + 1 dimensions exact solutions the Cauchyproblem for small initial data and wave breaking J Phys A MathTheor 44 (2011) 405203

[3] G B Whitham Linear and nonlinear waves John Wiley amp Sons 1974

[4] C Lin E Reissner and H S Tien On two-dimensional nonsteadymotion of a slender body in a compressible fluid J Math Phys 27(1948) 220-231

[5] R Timman Unsteady motion in transonic flow Symposium Transson-icum Aachen 1962 EdKOswatitsch Springer 394-401

[6] E A Zobolotskaya and R V Khokhlov Quasi-plane waves in the non-linear acoustics of confined beams Soviet Physics- Acoustics Vol15N1 (1969)

29

[7] B B Kadomtsev and V I Petviashvili On the stability of solitarywaves in weakly dispersing media Soviet Physics-Doklady Vol15 N6(1970)

[8] X P Wang M J Ablowitz and H Segur Wave collapse and instabil-

ity of solitary waves of a generalized Kadomtsev-Petviashvili equationPhysica D 78 (1994) 241-265

[9] M J Ablowitz and H Segur Solitons and the Inverse Scattering Trans-

form SIAM Philadelphia 1981

[10] M J Ablowitz and P A Clarkson Solitons nonlinear evolution equa-

tions and inverse scattering Cambridge University Press 1991

[11] S Turitsyn and G Falkovitch Stability of magneto-elastic solitons andself-focusing of sound in antiferromagnets Sov Phys J Exp TheorPhys 62 (1985) 146-152

[12] S Novikov S V Manakov L P Pitaevskii V E Zakharov Theory of

solitons Consultant Bureau 1984

[13] S V Manakov and P M Santini Inverse scattering problem for vectorfields and the heavenly equation httparXivnlinSI0512043

[14] S V Manakov and P M Santini Inverse scattering problem forvector fields and the Cauchy problem for the heavenly equationPhys Lett A 359 613-619 (2006) doi101016jphysleta200607011httparXivnlinSI0604017

[15] S V Manakov and P M Santini The Cauchy problem on theplane for the dispersionless Kadomtsev-Petviashvili equation JETPLetters 83 No 10 462-466 (2006) 101134S0021364006100080httparXivnlinSI0604016

[16] P G Grinevich P M Santini and D Wu The Cauchy problem for thePavlov equation Nonlinearity 28 (2015) 3709-3754 doi1010880951-771528113709 Preprint arXiv13105834v2

[17] M V Pavlov Integrable hydrodynamic chains J Math Phys 44 (2003)4134-4156

30

At the same order function S in (54) becomes

S(ζ prime ηprime τ ) = minusτ + 12|Fζ |

[

Fζζζζprime2 + 2Fζζηζ

primeηprime + Fζηηηprime2]

=

Fζζζ

2|Fζ |

(

Q(ηprime τ ) +(

ζ prime +Fζζη

Fζζζηprime)2)

(519)

Known ζ prime as function of (ξprime ηprime τ) from the cubic (511) the solution q andits gradient are then approximated near breaking by the formulae

q(ξ η τ) sim ǫG(ζb + ζ prime ηb + ηprime) = ǫ (G+Gζζprime +Gηη

prime +O(|τ |)) nabla(ξη)q sim ǫ

nabla(ζprimeηprime)G(ζb+ζprimeηb+ηprime)

S(ζprimeηprimeτ) (520)

Before breaking

Before breaking τ lt τb (τ lt 0) the coefficient Q in (518) is strictlypositive (see the second of (58)) then the discriminant ∆ = R2 + Q3 isalso strictly positive and only the root ζ prime0 is real Correspondingly the realsolution q is single valued and described by Cardanorsquos formula and by (520)In addition function S in (519) is also strictly positive and nabla(ξ~η)q is finiteforall ξ η

To have a more explicit solution than that provided by Cardanorsquos formulawe first restrict the asymptotic region to a narrower area so that the cubic(511) reduces to the linear equation bζ prime = γX and X contains only linearterms This is achieved choosing

ηprime = O(τ r) X = O(τ p+1) 12lt p lt p+1

2lt r lt p+ 1 (521)

implying

ζ prime = O(τ p)

X = ξprime + Fη

Fζηprime + F

Fζτ + o(τ p+1) = ξprime + Gη

Gζηprime + G

mGζτ + o(τ p+1)

bζ prime = γX rArr ζ prime sim minus 1τ

(

ξprime + Gη

Gζηprime + G

mGζτ)

(522)

Then

q = ǫG(ζb + ζ prime ηb + ηprime) sim ǫG + ǫGζζprime sim ǫ

(

1minus 1

m

)

Gminus ǫGζ

τ

(

ξprime +Gη

Gζηprime)

(523)

18

Since q sim ǫG and recalling the definitions (57)(513) it follows that q isdescribed by the exact similarity solution

q sim(

ξ + (GηGζ)ηprime

τ prime

)1m

(524)

of equation (37)The cubic simplifies also in the asymptotic region in which ξprime ηprime are of

the same order while τ prime le O(|ηprime|) reducing to ζ prime3 = γX so that the solutionq and its gradient are

q sim ǫG(ζb +3radic

γX(ξprime ηprime τ) ηb + ηprime) (525)

nablaξηq sim3radicγ

3

ǫnablaζηG3radic

X2(ξprime ηprime τ ) (526)

At breaking

When τ = τb the singularity manifold S (519) is positive everywhere inthe (ξ η) plane except at the breaking point (ξb ηb) in which it is zerotogether with Q R and the discriminant ∆ The solution q is well describedagain by Cardanorsquos formula and by (520) To have a more explicit solutionthan that provided by Cardanorsquos formula we choose ξprime ηprime of the same orderthe cubic (511) reduces to ζ prime3 = γX and equations (525) become

q sim ǫG(ζb +3radic

γX(ξprime ηprime 0) ηb + ηprime)

nablaξηq sim 3radicγ

3

ǫnablaξηG3radic

X2(ξprimeηprime0)

(527)

The expression of Xb(ξprime ~ηprime) equiv X(ξprime ~ηprime 0) is given in (512) Xb(ξ

prime ηprime) simξprime minus Fη

|Fζ |ηprime if ξprime prop ηprime but ξprime 6= (FηFζ)η

prime while X(ξprime ηprime 0) = minus Fηη

2|Fζ |ηprime2 if

ξprime = (FηFζ)ηprime

Equation (527) implies that all the derivatives of q blow up at τ = τb in

the breaking point (ξb ηb) with the universal lawXminus23b except the derivative

along the transversal line Xb(ξprime ηprime 0) = 0 represented by the vector field

V = partη minusXbηpartξ (compare with (56)) for which [2 19]

V q|(ξbηb) = ǫGη (528)

After breaking I the overturning profile

19

After breaking the solution becomes three-valued in a compact regionof the (ξ η) - plane (see Figures 3) and in general does not describe anyphysics nevertheless a detailed study of the multivalued region is importantin view of a proper regularization of the models

If τ gt τb (τ gt 0) in the regime (514) the SM equation S = 0

2|Fζ|τ = Fζζζζprime2 + 2Fζζηζ

primeηprime + Fζηηηprime2 (529)

describes an ellipsoidal paraboloid in the (ζ prime ηprime τ) space with minimum at

the breaking point (~ξb τb)One can check that eliminating ζ prime from equations (529) and (511) one

obtains the SM equation in space-time coordinates coinciding with the equa-tion ∆ = R2+Q3 = 0 where ∆ is the discriminant (517) of the cubic (511)and Q and R are defined in (518) Such equation can be satisfied only ifQ le 0 ie only if

|ηprime| le ηprimecusp(τ) (530)

where

ηprimecusp(τ ) equivradic

2|Fζ |Fζζζ

α

radicτ (531)

and is given by the following analytic and universal expression

ξprime minus Fη

|Fζ |ηprime minus F

|Fζ | τ minus Fηη

2|Fζ |ηprime2 minus

(

Fη

|Fζ | +Fζζη

Fζζζ

)

ηprimeτ + 16|Fζ |F 2

ζζζ

[

minus FηηηF2ζζζ

+Fζζη(3FζζζFζηη minus 2F 2ζζη)]

ηprime32

= α3

9F 2ζ F

4ζζζ

(

(

ηprimecusp(τ))2 minus ηprime2

)3

(532)Equation (532) describes a closed curve with two cusps in the (ξ η) - planeat the points

~ξplusmncusp(τ ) = (ξb ηb) + (ξplusmnprime

cusp(τ )plusmnηprimecusp(τ)) (533)

where

ξplusmnprime

cusp(τ ) sim plusmnFη

radic

2Fζζζ

α|Fζ|radicτ +

(

F

|Fζ |+

FηηFζζζ

α

)

τ plusmn Bτ 32 (534)

where B = O(1) (see Figures 6 for dKP and 7 for mdKP) corresponding tothe conditions Q = R = 0 on which the three real solutions of the cubiccoincide (in 1 + 1 dimensions it is not possible to have three coincidentsolutions)

ζ0 = ζplusmn = minusFζζη

Fζζζηprime rArr q0 = qplusmn =sim ǫ

(

G+ (Gη minusGζFζζη

Fζζζ)ηprime)

(535)

20

On the remaining part of the closed curve ∆ = 0 two of the three realbranches coincide Outside the closed curve ∆ gt 0 and the real solution q issingle valued inside the closed curve ∆ lt 0 and the real solution q is threevalued with the three branches

q = ǫG(ζb + ζ prime ηb + ηprime) sim ǫ(G +Gζζprime +Gηη

prime +O(τ)) (536)

where ζ prime are the three real solutions of the cubic (511) (see fi Figures 2for dKP)

Figures 2 Plotting of the dKP analytic solution in the (q ξ η τ) variablesfor G given by (422) ǫ = 02 at times τ = 0 τb minus 2 τb τb + 2 whereτb = 657

Such a three-valued region of the (ξ η) plane is characterized by the

21

conditions|ηprime| lt ηprimecusp(τ) ξminusM(ηprime τ) lt ξprime lt ξ+M(ηprime τ) (537)

where

ξplusmnM(ηprime τ) equiv Fη

|Fζ |ηprime + F

|Fζ | τ + Fηη

2|Fζ |ηprime2 +

(

Fη

|Fζ | +Fζζη

Fζζζ

)

ηprimeτ minus 16|Fζ |F 2

ζζζ

[

minus FηηηF2ζζζ

+Fζζη(3FζζζFζηη minus 2F 2ζζη)]

ηprime3 plusmn Fζζζ

3|Fζ | |Q| 32(538)

(see Figures 3 for dKP)Since

∆ξ equiv ξ+M(ηprime τ)minus ξminusM(ηprime τ) =2Fζζζ

3|Fζ||Q(ηprime τ)|32 le 4

radic2

3

radic

|Fζ|Fζζζ

τ 32 (539)

we infer that the longitudinal width of the multivalued region is O(τ 32) thetransversal widths delimited by the two cusps is instead O(τ 12) thereforethe multivalued region develops at τ = τb from the breaking point (ξb ηb)with an infinite speed in the tranversal direction and with zero speed in thelongitudinal direction All these results are a common feature to the class ofdynamics (11) (see the previously derived results for the dKP equation forfinite times [18 19] and in the longtime regime [18] and those for the KZequation in the longtime regime [2])

-15-10-050005101-15-10-0500051015

-15-10-050005101-15-10-0500051015

Figures 3 Plotting of the three valued regions of the (ξ η) plane for dKPat times τ = 02 05 for G given by (422) and ǫ = 02 The center of thesquare frame is the breaking point (ξb ηb) Notice that the two cusps havethe same ξ coordinate ξ+cusp(τ) sim ξminuscusp(τ) since for solution (422) Gη = 0(see (531)(534))

22

We end this subsection remarking that as it was already observed in [19]since dKP (mn) is symmetric wrt y if the initial datum is also symmetricwrt y like the Gaussian (419) also its evolution will be so u(x y t) =u(xminusy t) This implies that ηb = yb = 0 and that all partial derivatives ofF and G containing an odd number of η derivatives are 0 at breaking As aconsequence the transversal direction on which the derivative of the profiledoes not blow up is the η (y) direction and on it the derivative is 0 atbreaking (see (56))

After breaking II the discontinuous shock

Using the matching rules of sect3 the shock formulae (310) become

parts

partτ=

ǫm

m+ 1

Gm+1(ζ1 η)minusGm+1(ζ2 η)

G(ζ1 η)minusG(ζ2 η) (540)

s = ζ1 + ǫmGm(ζ1 η) τ = ζ2 + ǫmGm(ζ2 η) τ (541)

where subscript 2 is for values behind the shock and subscript 1 for valuesahead Equations (541) are two implicit equations for ζ1 and ζ2 solvingthese equations yields ζ1(s η τ) ζ2(s η τ) and substituting these expres-sions in (540) it results in a nonlinear first order differential equation fors This equation and the initial conditions (311) give uniquely s(η τ) andconsequently ζ12(η τ) = ζ12(s(η τ) η τ)

We recall that immediately after breaking and if (530) holds equation(541) reduces to the cubic (511)(512) in which ξprime must be replaced by sprimepossessing three real roots where

sprime(ηprime τ) = sminus ξb (542)

Therefore the values of ζ1 and ζ2 are chosen among the three solutions (515)so that q2 = ǫG(ζb + ζ prime2 η) has the maximum value and q1 = ǫG(ζb + ζ prime1 η)the minimum one among the three branches of q Since Gζ lt 0 it followsthat

ζ1 = maxζ prime0 ζ primeplusmn ζ2 = minζ prime0 ζ primeplusmn (543)

To identify ζ12 with one of the three roots ζ prime0 ζprimeplusmn let us rewrite them as

follows

ζ prime0 = minusa

3+ 2 3

radicρ cos

(

θ

3

)

(544)

ζ prime+ = minusa

3minus 3

radicρ

(

cos

(

θ

3

)

+radic3 sin

(

θ

3

))

(545)

23

ζ primeminus = minusa

3minus 3

radicρ

(

cos

(

θ

3

)

minusradic3 sin

(

θ

3

))

(546)

where

ρ =radic

R2 + |∆| θ = arctan

(

radic

|∆|R

)

(547)

We observe that for 0 le θ le π the following inequalities hold

minus cos

(

θ

3

)

minusradic3 sin

(

θ

3

)

le minus cos

(

θ

3

)

+radic3 sin

(

θ

3

)

le 2 cos

(

θ

3

)

so that

ζ prime+ le ζ primeminus le ζ prime0 rArr q(ζb + ζ prime0 η) le q(ζb + ζ primeminus η) le q(ζb + ζ prime+ η) (548)

for q decreasing in ζ Hence

ζ prime1(sprime ηprime τ prime) = ζ prime0(s

prime ηprime τ prime) ζ prime2(sprime ηprime τ prime) = ζ prime+(s

prime ηprime τ prime) (549)

Then (540) reduces to the equations

dsprime

dτ+ G

Gζ+ Gη

Gζηprime + 1

2

[

ζ prime0(sprime ηprime τ ) + ζ prime+(s

prime ηprime τ)]

= 0 for dKPdsprime

dτ+ G

2Gζ+ Gη

Gζηprime + 1

2

[

ζ prime0(sprime ηprime τ) + ζ prime+(s

prime ηprime τ)]

= 0 for mdKP

sprime(0) = ξb

(550)

obtained expanding (540) near the breaking point and recalling that τ equivτ primeτb

We remark that in the differential equations (550) sprime depends on ηprime

parametrically So the discontinuous (dissipative) shocks of the longtime so-lutions of the small data Cauchy problems for dKP and mdKP has a simplegeometric construction given τ gt 0 for any fixed |ηprime| le ηcusp the overturn-ing profile in the (ξ q) plane is intercepted by a vertical straight line cuttingoff equal area lobi in analogy with the 1 + 1 dimensional case

Going back to the dKP variables

The above formulae written in the convenient variables q ξ η τ are es-sentially the same for both dKP and mdKP relevant differences appear whenwe go back to the original variables u x y t inverting equations (52)(53)

u = 1radictq t = τ2

4 y = ητ2

2 x = ξ minus η2τ2

4 for dKP

u = 1radictq t = eτ y = 2ηeτ x = ξ minus η2eτ for mdKP

(551)

24

and all the above universal formulae are easily transfered to the dKP (mn)equations In particular small and localized initial data break i) at tb =τ 2b 4 in the point (xb yb) = (ξb minus τ 2b η

2b4 ηbτ

2b 2) of the parabolic wave front

x+ y2(4tb) = ξb evolving according to dKP and ii) at tb = eτb in the point(xb yb) = (ξb minus η2be

τb 2ηbeτb) of the parabolic wave front x + y2(4tb) = ξb

evolving according to mdKP If for instance we use the same Gaussian initialcondition (419) for both dKP and mdKP with ǫ = 02 then G is given by(422) in both cases Consequently for dKP

ζb = 196 ηb = 0 ξb = 327 τb = 657 (552)

and wave breaking takes place at tb = 108 in the point (xb yb) = (327 0)on the parabola x+ 231 middot 10minus2y2 = 327 (see Figure 4)

Figure 4 Plotting of the analytic dKP solution u in the physical variablesx y t for G given by (422) (corresponding to the gaussian initial condition)ǫ = 02 at breaking

For mdKP

ζb = 161 ηb = 0 ξb = 251 τb = 1431 (553)

and wave breaking takes place at tb = 164middot106 in the point (xb yb) = (251 0)on the parabola x + 152 middot 10minus7y2 = 251 and at breaking the amplitude ofthe wave is u = ǫtb

minus12G(ζb ηb) = 195 middot 10minus4 (see Figure 5)

25

Figure 5 Plotting of the analytic mdKP solution u in the physical variablesx y t for G given by (422) (corresponding to the gaussian initial condition)ǫ = 02 at breaking

Since in the mdKP case tb is very large and the wave amplitude atbreaking is very small we wonder if such a wave breaking could be actuallydetected numerically

Now we go into the analytic details For the dKP case

tprime equiv tminus tb sim 2tbτ yprime = y minus yb ≃ 2tb(ηprime + 2ηbτ + 2ηprimeτ )

xprime = xminus xb sim ξprime minus ηbyprime minus yprime2

4tb+ η2b t

prime + ηbtbyprimetprime

(554)

and we choose τ prime to be sufficiently small to have |tprime| |yprime| ≪ 1The dKP solution reads

u(x y t) =ǫradictG(ζb + ζ prime ηb + ηprime) =

ǫradict

(

G+Gζζprime +Gη

yprime

2tb+O

(

tprime

tb

))

(555)where ζ prime is the solution of the cubic (511) with

a =3Fζζη

2Fζζζ

yprime

tb b = 3

Fζζζ

(

Fζtprime

tb+ Fζηη

yprime2

4t2b

)

X = xprime +(

ηb minus Fη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime minus[

η2b +(

F2minus ηbFη

)

1|Fζ |tb

]

tprime

+(

1minus Fηη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime2

4tb+[

minusηb +(

Fη

2+ ηbFηη

)

12|Fζ |tb

]

yprimetprime

tb

minus Fηηη

48|Fζ |yprime3

t3b

(556)

26

The three-valued region (532) after breaking becomes

xprime +(

ηb minus Fη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime minus[

η2b +(

F2minus ηbFη

)

1|Fζ |tb

]

tprime

+(

1minus Fηη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime2

4tb+[

minusηb +(

Fη

2|Fζ |tb +ηbFηη

|Fζ | minus Fζζη

2Fζζζ

)

12tb

]

yprimetprime

tb

+ 16|Fζ |F 2

ζζζ

[

minus FηηηF2ζζζ + Fζζη(3FζζζFζηη minus 2F 2

ζζη)]

yprime3

8t3b

2

=

α3

9middot64F 2ζF 4ζζζ

t6b

(

(

yprimecusp(tprime))2 minus yprime2

)3

(557)

where

yprimecusp(tprime) = 2

radic

|Fζ |Fζζζ

α

radictbtprime (558)

Equation (557) describes a closed curve with two cusps in the (x y) - planeat the points

~xplusmncusp(t

prime) = (xb yb) + (xplusmnprime

cusp(tprime)plusmnyprimecusp(t

prime)) (559)

where

xplusmnprime

cusp(tprime) sim ∓2ηb

radic

|Fζ |Fζζζ

α

radictbtprime plusmn Fη

radic

Fζζζ

α|Fζ |

radic

tprime

tb

+(

η2b minus|Fζ |Fζζζ

α

)

tprime +(

F|Fζ | +

FηηFζζζ

α

)

tprime

2tbplusmn 2ηb

radic

|Fζ |Fζζζ

αtprime

32radictb+O(τ 32)

(560)At last the analogue of (539) reads

∆xprime le 2

3

radic

|Fζ|Fζζζ

(

tprime

tb

)32

(561)

it follows that the longitudinal width ∆long and the transversal width ∆transv

of the multivalued region are respectively

∆long = O

(

(

tprime

tb

)32

)

∆transv = O(

(tbtprime)

12

)

rArr ∆long

∆transv= O

(

tprime

t2b

)

(562)

For the mdKP case

tprime = tminus tb sim tbτprime yprime = y minus yb sim 2tb(η

prime + ηbtprime

tb+ ηprimetprime

tb)

xprime = xminus xb sim ξprime minus ηbyprime + η2b t

prime minus yprime2

4tb+ ηb

yprimetprime

tb

(563)

27

and we choose τ prime sufficiently small to have |tprime| |yprime| ≪ 1The mdKP solution reads

u(x y t) =ǫradictG(ζb+ζ prime ηb+ηprime) =

ǫradict

(

G+Gζζprime +Gη

yprime

2tb+O

(

tprime

tb log tb

))

(564)where ζ prime is the solution of the cubic (511) with

a =3Fζζη

2Fζζζ

yprime

tb b = 3

Fζζζ

(

2Fζtprime

tb log tb+ Fζηη

yprime2

4t2b

)

X = xprime +(

ηb minus Fη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime minus[

η2b +(

Flog tb

minus ηbFη

)

1|Fζ |tb

]

tprime

+(

1minus Fηη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime2

4tb+[

minusηb +(

Fη

|Fζ |(1minus1

log tb) + ηbFηη

|Fζ |

)

12tb

]

yprimetprime

tb

minus Fηηη

48|Fζ |yprime3

t3b

(565)

The three-valued region (532) after breaking becomes

xprime +(

ηb minus Fη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime minus[

η2b +(

Flog tb

minus ηbFη

)

1|Fζ |tb

]

tprime

+(

1minus Fηη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime2

4tb+[

minusηb +(

Fη

|Fζ |(1minus1

log tb) + ηbFηη

|Fζ| minus Fζζη

Fζζζ log tb

)

12tb

]

yprimetprime

tb

+ 16|Fζ |F 2

ζζζ

[

minus FηηηF2ζζζ + Fζζη(3FζζζFζηη minus 2F 2

ζζη)]

yprime3

8t3b

2

=

α3

9middot64F 2ζ F

4ζζζt

6b

(

(

yprimecusp(tprime))2 minus yprime2

)3

(566)where

yprimecusp(tprime) = 2

radic

2|Fζ |Fζζζ

α

radic

tbtprime

log tb (567)

Equation (566) describes a closed curve with two cusps in the (x y) - planeat the points

~xplusmncusp(t

prime) = (xb yb) + (xplusmnprime

cusp(tprime)plusmnyprimecusp(t

prime)) (568)

where

xplusmnprime

cusp(tprime) sim ∓2ηb

radic

|Fζ |Fζζζ

α

radic

tbtprime

log tbplusmn Fη

radic

Fζζζ

α|Fζ |

radic

tprime

tb log tb

+(

η2b minus|Fζ |Fζζζ

α log tb

)

tprime +(

F|Fζ | +

FηηFζζζ

α

)

tprime

tb log tbplusmn 2ηb

radic

|Fζ |Fζζζ

αtprime

32radic

tb log tb

+O(τ 32)

(569)

28

At last the analogue of (539) reads

∆xprime le 4radic2

3

radic

|Fζ |Fζζζ

(

tprime

tb log tb

)32

(570)

it follows that the longitudinal width ∆long and the transversal width ∆transv

of the multivalued region are respectively

∆long = O

(

(

tprime

tb log tb

)32

)

∆transv = O

(

(

tbtprime

log tb

)12

)

rArr ∆long

∆transv= O

(

tprime

t2blog tb

)

(571)

References

[1] F Santucci Onde debolmente non lineari e quasi unidimensionali in

Natura La rottura di tali onde e il problema della regolarizzazione dis-

sipativa Tesi della Laurea Specialistica in Fisica supervisor P M San-tini Dipartimento di Fisica dellrsquoUniversita di Roma ldquoLa Sapienzardquo AA2011-2012

[2] S V Manakov and P M Santini On the dispersionless Kadomtsev-Petviashvili equation in n + 1 dimensions exact solutions the Cauchyproblem for small initial data and wave breaking J Phys A MathTheor 44 (2011) 405203

[3] G B Whitham Linear and nonlinear waves John Wiley amp Sons 1974

[4] C Lin E Reissner and H S Tien On two-dimensional nonsteadymotion of a slender body in a compressible fluid J Math Phys 27(1948) 220-231

[5] R Timman Unsteady motion in transonic flow Symposium Transson-icum Aachen 1962 EdKOswatitsch Springer 394-401

[6] E A Zobolotskaya and R V Khokhlov Quasi-plane waves in the non-linear acoustics of confined beams Soviet Physics- Acoustics Vol15N1 (1969)

29

[7] B B Kadomtsev and V I Petviashvili On the stability of solitarywaves in weakly dispersing media Soviet Physics-Doklady Vol15 N6(1970)

[8] X P Wang M J Ablowitz and H Segur Wave collapse and instabil-

ity of solitary waves of a generalized Kadomtsev-Petviashvili equationPhysica D 78 (1994) 241-265

[9] M J Ablowitz and H Segur Solitons and the Inverse Scattering Trans-

form SIAM Philadelphia 1981

[10] M J Ablowitz and P A Clarkson Solitons nonlinear evolution equa-

tions and inverse scattering Cambridge University Press 1991

[11] S Turitsyn and G Falkovitch Stability of magneto-elastic solitons andself-focusing of sound in antiferromagnets Sov Phys J Exp TheorPhys 62 (1985) 146-152

[12] S Novikov S V Manakov L P Pitaevskii V E Zakharov Theory of

solitons Consultant Bureau 1984

[13] S V Manakov and P M Santini Inverse scattering problem for vectorfields and the heavenly equation httparXivnlinSI0512043

[14] S V Manakov and P M Santini Inverse scattering problem forvector fields and the Cauchy problem for the heavenly equationPhys Lett A 359 613-619 (2006) doi101016jphysleta200607011httparXivnlinSI0604017

[15] S V Manakov and P M Santini The Cauchy problem on theplane for the dispersionless Kadomtsev-Petviashvili equation JETPLetters 83 No 10 462-466 (2006) 101134S0021364006100080httparXivnlinSI0604016

[16] P G Grinevich P M Santini and D Wu The Cauchy problem for thePavlov equation Nonlinearity 28 (2015) 3709-3754 doi1010880951-771528113709 Preprint arXiv13105834v2

[17] M V Pavlov Integrable hydrodynamic chains J Math Phys 44 (2003)4134-4156

30

Since q sim ǫG and recalling the definitions (57)(513) it follows that q isdescribed by the exact similarity solution

q sim(

ξ + (GηGζ)ηprime

τ prime

)1m

(524)

of equation (37)The cubic simplifies also in the asymptotic region in which ξprime ηprime are of

the same order while τ prime le O(|ηprime|) reducing to ζ prime3 = γX so that the solutionq and its gradient are

q sim ǫG(ζb +3radic

γX(ξprime ηprime τ) ηb + ηprime) (525)

nablaξηq sim3radicγ

3

ǫnablaζηG3radic

X2(ξprime ηprime τ ) (526)

At breaking

When τ = τb the singularity manifold S (519) is positive everywhere inthe (ξ η) plane except at the breaking point (ξb ηb) in which it is zerotogether with Q R and the discriminant ∆ The solution q is well describedagain by Cardanorsquos formula and by (520) To have a more explicit solutionthan that provided by Cardanorsquos formula we choose ξprime ηprime of the same orderthe cubic (511) reduces to ζ prime3 = γX and equations (525) become

q sim ǫG(ζb +3radic

γX(ξprime ηprime 0) ηb + ηprime)

nablaξηq sim 3radicγ

3

ǫnablaξηG3radic

X2(ξprimeηprime0)

(527)

The expression of Xb(ξprime ~ηprime) equiv X(ξprime ~ηprime 0) is given in (512) Xb(ξ

prime ηprime) simξprime minus Fη

|Fζ |ηprime if ξprime prop ηprime but ξprime 6= (FηFζ)η

prime while X(ξprime ηprime 0) = minus Fηη

2|Fζ |ηprime2 if

ξprime = (FηFζ)ηprime

Equation (527) implies that all the derivatives of q blow up at τ = τb in

the breaking point (ξb ηb) with the universal lawXminus23b except the derivative

along the transversal line Xb(ξprime ηprime 0) = 0 represented by the vector field

V = partη minusXbηpartξ (compare with (56)) for which [2 19]

V q|(ξbηb) = ǫGη (528)

After breaking I the overturning profile

19

After breaking the solution becomes three-valued in a compact regionof the (ξ η) - plane (see Figures 3) and in general does not describe anyphysics nevertheless a detailed study of the multivalued region is importantin view of a proper regularization of the models

If τ gt τb (τ gt 0) in the regime (514) the SM equation S = 0

2|Fζ|τ = Fζζζζprime2 + 2Fζζηζ

primeηprime + Fζηηηprime2 (529)

describes an ellipsoidal paraboloid in the (ζ prime ηprime τ) space with minimum at

the breaking point (~ξb τb)One can check that eliminating ζ prime from equations (529) and (511) one

obtains the SM equation in space-time coordinates coinciding with the equa-tion ∆ = R2+Q3 = 0 where ∆ is the discriminant (517) of the cubic (511)and Q and R are defined in (518) Such equation can be satisfied only ifQ le 0 ie only if

|ηprime| le ηprimecusp(τ) (530)

where

ηprimecusp(τ ) equivradic

2|Fζ |Fζζζ

α

radicτ (531)

and is given by the following analytic and universal expression

ξprime minus Fη

|Fζ |ηprime minus F

|Fζ | τ minus Fηη

2|Fζ |ηprime2 minus

(

Fη

|Fζ | +Fζζη

Fζζζ

)

ηprimeτ + 16|Fζ |F 2

ζζζ

[

minus FηηηF2ζζζ

+Fζζη(3FζζζFζηη minus 2F 2ζζη)]

ηprime32

= α3

9F 2ζ F

4ζζζ

(

(

ηprimecusp(τ))2 minus ηprime2

)3

(532)Equation (532) describes a closed curve with two cusps in the (ξ η) - planeat the points

~ξplusmncusp(τ ) = (ξb ηb) + (ξplusmnprime

cusp(τ )plusmnηprimecusp(τ)) (533)

where

ξplusmnprime

cusp(τ ) sim plusmnFη

radic

2Fζζζ

α|Fζ|radicτ +

(

F

|Fζ |+

FηηFζζζ

α

)

τ plusmn Bτ 32 (534)

where B = O(1) (see Figures 6 for dKP and 7 for mdKP) corresponding tothe conditions Q = R = 0 on which the three real solutions of the cubiccoincide (in 1 + 1 dimensions it is not possible to have three coincidentsolutions)

ζ0 = ζplusmn = minusFζζη

Fζζζηprime rArr q0 = qplusmn =sim ǫ

(

G+ (Gη minusGζFζζη

Fζζζ)ηprime)

(535)

20

On the remaining part of the closed curve ∆ = 0 two of the three realbranches coincide Outside the closed curve ∆ gt 0 and the real solution q issingle valued inside the closed curve ∆ lt 0 and the real solution q is threevalued with the three branches

q = ǫG(ζb + ζ prime ηb + ηprime) sim ǫ(G +Gζζprime +Gηη

prime +O(τ)) (536)

where ζ prime are the three real solutions of the cubic (511) (see fi Figures 2for dKP)

Figures 2 Plotting of the dKP analytic solution in the (q ξ η τ) variablesfor G given by (422) ǫ = 02 at times τ = 0 τb minus 2 τb τb + 2 whereτb = 657

Such a three-valued region of the (ξ η) plane is characterized by the

21

conditions|ηprime| lt ηprimecusp(τ) ξminusM(ηprime τ) lt ξprime lt ξ+M(ηprime τ) (537)

where

ξplusmnM(ηprime τ) equiv Fη

|Fζ |ηprime + F

|Fζ | τ + Fηη

2|Fζ |ηprime2 +

(

Fη

|Fζ | +Fζζη

Fζζζ

)

ηprimeτ minus 16|Fζ |F 2

ζζζ

[

minus FηηηF2ζζζ

+Fζζη(3FζζζFζηη minus 2F 2ζζη)]

ηprime3 plusmn Fζζζ

3|Fζ | |Q| 32(538)

(see Figures 3 for dKP)Since

∆ξ equiv ξ+M(ηprime τ)minus ξminusM(ηprime τ) =2Fζζζ

3|Fζ||Q(ηprime τ)|32 le 4

radic2

3

radic

|Fζ|Fζζζ

τ 32 (539)

we infer that the longitudinal width of the multivalued region is O(τ 32) thetransversal widths delimited by the two cusps is instead O(τ 12) thereforethe multivalued region develops at τ = τb from the breaking point (ξb ηb)with an infinite speed in the tranversal direction and with zero speed in thelongitudinal direction All these results are a common feature to the class ofdynamics (11) (see the previously derived results for the dKP equation forfinite times [18 19] and in the longtime regime [18] and those for the KZequation in the longtime regime [2])

-15-10-050005101-15-10-0500051015

-15-10-050005101-15-10-0500051015

Figures 3 Plotting of the three valued regions of the (ξ η) plane for dKPat times τ = 02 05 for G given by (422) and ǫ = 02 The center of thesquare frame is the breaking point (ξb ηb) Notice that the two cusps havethe same ξ coordinate ξ+cusp(τ) sim ξminuscusp(τ) since for solution (422) Gη = 0(see (531)(534))

22

We end this subsection remarking that as it was already observed in [19]since dKP (mn) is symmetric wrt y if the initial datum is also symmetricwrt y like the Gaussian (419) also its evolution will be so u(x y t) =u(xminusy t) This implies that ηb = yb = 0 and that all partial derivatives ofF and G containing an odd number of η derivatives are 0 at breaking As aconsequence the transversal direction on which the derivative of the profiledoes not blow up is the η (y) direction and on it the derivative is 0 atbreaking (see (56))

After breaking II the discontinuous shock

Using the matching rules of sect3 the shock formulae (310) become

parts

partτ=

ǫm

m+ 1

Gm+1(ζ1 η)minusGm+1(ζ2 η)

G(ζ1 η)minusG(ζ2 η) (540)

s = ζ1 + ǫmGm(ζ1 η) τ = ζ2 + ǫmGm(ζ2 η) τ (541)

where subscript 2 is for values behind the shock and subscript 1 for valuesahead Equations (541) are two implicit equations for ζ1 and ζ2 solvingthese equations yields ζ1(s η τ) ζ2(s η τ) and substituting these expres-sions in (540) it results in a nonlinear first order differential equation fors This equation and the initial conditions (311) give uniquely s(η τ) andconsequently ζ12(η τ) = ζ12(s(η τ) η τ)

We recall that immediately after breaking and if (530) holds equation(541) reduces to the cubic (511)(512) in which ξprime must be replaced by sprimepossessing three real roots where

sprime(ηprime τ) = sminus ξb (542)

Therefore the values of ζ1 and ζ2 are chosen among the three solutions (515)so that q2 = ǫG(ζb + ζ prime2 η) has the maximum value and q1 = ǫG(ζb + ζ prime1 η)the minimum one among the three branches of q Since Gζ lt 0 it followsthat

ζ1 = maxζ prime0 ζ primeplusmn ζ2 = minζ prime0 ζ primeplusmn (543)

To identify ζ12 with one of the three roots ζ prime0 ζprimeplusmn let us rewrite them as

follows

ζ prime0 = minusa

3+ 2 3

radicρ cos

(

θ

3

)

(544)

ζ prime+ = minusa

3minus 3

radicρ

(

cos

(

θ

3

)

+radic3 sin

(

θ

3

))

(545)

23

ζ primeminus = minusa

3minus 3

radicρ

(

cos

(

θ

3

)

minusradic3 sin

(

θ

3

))

(546)

where

ρ =radic

R2 + |∆| θ = arctan

(

radic

|∆|R

)

(547)

We observe that for 0 le θ le π the following inequalities hold

minus cos

(

θ

3

)

minusradic3 sin

(

θ

3

)

le minus cos

(

θ

3

)

+radic3 sin

(

θ

3

)

le 2 cos

(

θ

3

)

so that

ζ prime+ le ζ primeminus le ζ prime0 rArr q(ζb + ζ prime0 η) le q(ζb + ζ primeminus η) le q(ζb + ζ prime+ η) (548)

for q decreasing in ζ Hence

ζ prime1(sprime ηprime τ prime) = ζ prime0(s

prime ηprime τ prime) ζ prime2(sprime ηprime τ prime) = ζ prime+(s

prime ηprime τ prime) (549)

Then (540) reduces to the equations

dsprime

dτ+ G

Gζ+ Gη

Gζηprime + 1

2

[

ζ prime0(sprime ηprime τ ) + ζ prime+(s

prime ηprime τ)]

= 0 for dKPdsprime

dτ+ G

2Gζ+ Gη

Gζηprime + 1

2

[

ζ prime0(sprime ηprime τ) + ζ prime+(s

prime ηprime τ)]

= 0 for mdKP

sprime(0) = ξb

(550)

obtained expanding (540) near the breaking point and recalling that τ equivτ primeτb

We remark that in the differential equations (550) sprime depends on ηprime

parametrically So the discontinuous (dissipative) shocks of the longtime so-lutions of the small data Cauchy problems for dKP and mdKP has a simplegeometric construction given τ gt 0 for any fixed |ηprime| le ηcusp the overturn-ing profile in the (ξ q) plane is intercepted by a vertical straight line cuttingoff equal area lobi in analogy with the 1 + 1 dimensional case

Going back to the dKP variables

The above formulae written in the convenient variables q ξ η τ are es-sentially the same for both dKP and mdKP relevant differences appear whenwe go back to the original variables u x y t inverting equations (52)(53)

u = 1radictq t = τ2

4 y = ητ2

2 x = ξ minus η2τ2

4 for dKP

u = 1radictq t = eτ y = 2ηeτ x = ξ minus η2eτ for mdKP

(551)

24

and all the above universal formulae are easily transfered to the dKP (mn)equations In particular small and localized initial data break i) at tb =τ 2b 4 in the point (xb yb) = (ξb minus τ 2b η

2b4 ηbτ

2b 2) of the parabolic wave front

x+ y2(4tb) = ξb evolving according to dKP and ii) at tb = eτb in the point(xb yb) = (ξb minus η2be

τb 2ηbeτb) of the parabolic wave front x + y2(4tb) = ξb

evolving according to mdKP If for instance we use the same Gaussian initialcondition (419) for both dKP and mdKP with ǫ = 02 then G is given by(422) in both cases Consequently for dKP

ζb = 196 ηb = 0 ξb = 327 τb = 657 (552)

and wave breaking takes place at tb = 108 in the point (xb yb) = (327 0)on the parabola x+ 231 middot 10minus2y2 = 327 (see Figure 4)

Figure 4 Plotting of the analytic dKP solution u in the physical variablesx y t for G given by (422) (corresponding to the gaussian initial condition)ǫ = 02 at breaking

For mdKP

ζb = 161 ηb = 0 ξb = 251 τb = 1431 (553)

and wave breaking takes place at tb = 164middot106 in the point (xb yb) = (251 0)on the parabola x + 152 middot 10minus7y2 = 251 and at breaking the amplitude ofthe wave is u = ǫtb

minus12G(ζb ηb) = 195 middot 10minus4 (see Figure 5)

25

Figure 5 Plotting of the analytic mdKP solution u in the physical variablesx y t for G given by (422) (corresponding to the gaussian initial condition)ǫ = 02 at breaking

Since in the mdKP case tb is very large and the wave amplitude atbreaking is very small we wonder if such a wave breaking could be actuallydetected numerically

Now we go into the analytic details For the dKP case

tprime equiv tminus tb sim 2tbτ yprime = y minus yb ≃ 2tb(ηprime + 2ηbτ + 2ηprimeτ )

xprime = xminus xb sim ξprime minus ηbyprime minus yprime2

4tb+ η2b t

prime + ηbtbyprimetprime

(554)

and we choose τ prime to be sufficiently small to have |tprime| |yprime| ≪ 1The dKP solution reads

u(x y t) =ǫradictG(ζb + ζ prime ηb + ηprime) =

ǫradict

(

G+Gζζprime +Gη

yprime

2tb+O

(

tprime

tb

))

(555)where ζ prime is the solution of the cubic (511) with

a =3Fζζη

2Fζζζ

yprime

tb b = 3

Fζζζ

(

Fζtprime

tb+ Fζηη

yprime2

4t2b

)

X = xprime +(

ηb minus Fη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime minus[

η2b +(

F2minus ηbFη

)

1|Fζ |tb

]

tprime

+(

1minus Fηη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime2

4tb+[

minusηb +(

Fη

2+ ηbFηη

)

12|Fζ |tb

]

yprimetprime

tb

minus Fηηη

48|Fζ |yprime3

t3b

(556)

26

The three-valued region (532) after breaking becomes

xprime +(

ηb minus Fη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime minus[

η2b +(

F2minus ηbFη

)

1|Fζ |tb

]

tprime

+(

1minus Fηη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime2

4tb+[

minusηb +(

Fη

2|Fζ |tb +ηbFηη

|Fζ | minus Fζζη

2Fζζζ

)

12tb

]

yprimetprime

tb

+ 16|Fζ |F 2

ζζζ

[

minus FηηηF2ζζζ + Fζζη(3FζζζFζηη minus 2F 2

ζζη)]

yprime3

8t3b

2

=

α3

9middot64F 2ζF 4ζζζ

t6b

(

(

yprimecusp(tprime))2 minus yprime2

)3

(557)

where

yprimecusp(tprime) = 2

radic

|Fζ |Fζζζ

α

radictbtprime (558)

Equation (557) describes a closed curve with two cusps in the (x y) - planeat the points

~xplusmncusp(t

prime) = (xb yb) + (xplusmnprime

cusp(tprime)plusmnyprimecusp(t

prime)) (559)

where

xplusmnprime

cusp(tprime) sim ∓2ηb

radic

|Fζ |Fζζζ

α

radictbtprime plusmn Fη

radic

Fζζζ

α|Fζ |

radic

tprime

tb

+(

η2b minus|Fζ |Fζζζ

α

)

tprime +(

F|Fζ | +

FηηFζζζ

α

)

tprime

2tbplusmn 2ηb

radic

|Fζ |Fζζζ

αtprime

32radictb+O(τ 32)

(560)At last the analogue of (539) reads

∆xprime le 2

3

radic

|Fζ|Fζζζ

(

tprime

tb

)32

(561)

it follows that the longitudinal width ∆long and the transversal width ∆transv

of the multivalued region are respectively

∆long = O

(

(

tprime

tb

)32

)

∆transv = O(

(tbtprime)

12

)

rArr ∆long

∆transv= O

(

tprime

t2b

)

(562)

For the mdKP case

tprime = tminus tb sim tbτprime yprime = y minus yb sim 2tb(η

prime + ηbtprime

tb+ ηprimetprime

tb)

xprime = xminus xb sim ξprime minus ηbyprime + η2b t

prime minus yprime2

4tb+ ηb

yprimetprime

tb

(563)

27

and we choose τ prime sufficiently small to have |tprime| |yprime| ≪ 1The mdKP solution reads

u(x y t) =ǫradictG(ζb+ζ prime ηb+ηprime) =

ǫradict

(

G+Gζζprime +Gη

yprime

2tb+O

(

tprime

tb log tb

))

(564)where ζ prime is the solution of the cubic (511) with

a =3Fζζη

2Fζζζ

yprime

tb b = 3

Fζζζ

(

2Fζtprime

tb log tb+ Fζηη

yprime2

4t2b

)

X = xprime +(

ηb minus Fη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime minus[

η2b +(

Flog tb

minus ηbFη

)

1|Fζ |tb

]

tprime

+(

1minus Fηη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime2

4tb+[

minusηb +(

Fη

|Fζ |(1minus1

log tb) + ηbFηη

|Fζ |

)

12tb

]

yprimetprime

tb

minus Fηηη

48|Fζ |yprime3

t3b

(565)

The three-valued region (532) after breaking becomes

xprime +(

ηb minus Fη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime minus[

η2b +(

Flog tb

minus ηbFη

)

1|Fζ |tb

]

tprime

+(

1minus Fηη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime2

4tb+[

minusηb +(

Fη

|Fζ |(1minus1

log tb) + ηbFηη

|Fζ| minus Fζζη

Fζζζ log tb

)

12tb

]

yprimetprime

tb

+ 16|Fζ |F 2

ζζζ

[

minus FηηηF2ζζζ + Fζζη(3FζζζFζηη minus 2F 2

ζζη)]

yprime3

8t3b

2

=

α3

9middot64F 2ζ F

4ζζζt

6b

(

(

yprimecusp(tprime))2 minus yprime2

)3

(566)where

yprimecusp(tprime) = 2

radic

2|Fζ |Fζζζ

α

radic

tbtprime

log tb (567)

Equation (566) describes a closed curve with two cusps in the (x y) - planeat the points

~xplusmncusp(t

prime) = (xb yb) + (xplusmnprime

cusp(tprime)plusmnyprimecusp(t

prime)) (568)

where

xplusmnprime

cusp(tprime) sim ∓2ηb

radic

|Fζ |Fζζζ

α

radic

tbtprime

log tbplusmn Fη

radic

Fζζζ

α|Fζ |

radic

tprime

tb log tb

+(

η2b minus|Fζ |Fζζζ

α log tb

)

tprime +(

F|Fζ | +

FηηFζζζ

α

)

tprime

tb log tbplusmn 2ηb

radic

|Fζ |Fζζζ

αtprime

32radic

tb log tb

+O(τ 32)

(569)

28

At last the analogue of (539) reads

∆xprime le 4radic2

3

radic

|Fζ |Fζζζ

(

tprime

tb log tb

)32

(570)

it follows that the longitudinal width ∆long and the transversal width ∆transv

of the multivalued region are respectively

∆long = O

(

(

tprime

tb log tb

)32

)

∆transv = O

(

(

tbtprime

log tb

)12

)

rArr ∆long

∆transv= O

(

tprime

t2blog tb

)

(571)

References

[1] F Santucci Onde debolmente non lineari e quasi unidimensionali in

Natura La rottura di tali onde e il problema della regolarizzazione dis-

sipativa Tesi della Laurea Specialistica in Fisica supervisor P M San-tini Dipartimento di Fisica dellrsquoUniversita di Roma ldquoLa Sapienzardquo AA2011-2012

[2] S V Manakov and P M Santini On the dispersionless Kadomtsev-Petviashvili equation in n + 1 dimensions exact solutions the Cauchyproblem for small initial data and wave breaking J Phys A MathTheor 44 (2011) 405203

[3] G B Whitham Linear and nonlinear waves John Wiley amp Sons 1974

[4] C Lin E Reissner and H S Tien On two-dimensional nonsteadymotion of a slender body in a compressible fluid J Math Phys 27(1948) 220-231

[5] R Timman Unsteady motion in transonic flow Symposium Transson-icum Aachen 1962 EdKOswatitsch Springer 394-401

[6] E A Zobolotskaya and R V Khokhlov Quasi-plane waves in the non-linear acoustics of confined beams Soviet Physics- Acoustics Vol15N1 (1969)

29

[7] B B Kadomtsev and V I Petviashvili On the stability of solitarywaves in weakly dispersing media Soviet Physics-Doklady Vol15 N6(1970)

[8] X P Wang M J Ablowitz and H Segur Wave collapse and instabil-

ity of solitary waves of a generalized Kadomtsev-Petviashvili equationPhysica D 78 (1994) 241-265

[9] M J Ablowitz and H Segur Solitons and the Inverse Scattering Trans-

form SIAM Philadelphia 1981

[10] M J Ablowitz and P A Clarkson Solitons nonlinear evolution equa-

tions and inverse scattering Cambridge University Press 1991

[11] S Turitsyn and G Falkovitch Stability of magneto-elastic solitons andself-focusing of sound in antiferromagnets Sov Phys J Exp TheorPhys 62 (1985) 146-152

[12] S Novikov S V Manakov L P Pitaevskii V E Zakharov Theory of

solitons Consultant Bureau 1984

[13] S V Manakov and P M Santini Inverse scattering problem for vectorfields and the heavenly equation httparXivnlinSI0512043

[14] S V Manakov and P M Santini Inverse scattering problem forvector fields and the Cauchy problem for the heavenly equationPhys Lett A 359 613-619 (2006) doi101016jphysleta200607011httparXivnlinSI0604017

[15] S V Manakov and P M Santini The Cauchy problem on theplane for the dispersionless Kadomtsev-Petviashvili equation JETPLetters 83 No 10 462-466 (2006) 101134S0021364006100080httparXivnlinSI0604016

[16] P G Grinevich P M Santini and D Wu The Cauchy problem for thePavlov equation Nonlinearity 28 (2015) 3709-3754 doi1010880951-771528113709 Preprint arXiv13105834v2

[17] M V Pavlov Integrable hydrodynamic chains J Math Phys 44 (2003)4134-4156

30

After breaking the solution becomes three-valued in a compact regionof the (ξ η) - plane (see Figures 3) and in general does not describe anyphysics nevertheless a detailed study of the multivalued region is importantin view of a proper regularization of the models

If τ gt τb (τ gt 0) in the regime (514) the SM equation S = 0

2|Fζ|τ = Fζζζζprime2 + 2Fζζηζ

primeηprime + Fζηηηprime2 (529)

describes an ellipsoidal paraboloid in the (ζ prime ηprime τ) space with minimum at

the breaking point (~ξb τb)One can check that eliminating ζ prime from equations (529) and (511) one

obtains the SM equation in space-time coordinates coinciding with the equa-tion ∆ = R2+Q3 = 0 where ∆ is the discriminant (517) of the cubic (511)and Q and R are defined in (518) Such equation can be satisfied only ifQ le 0 ie only if

|ηprime| le ηprimecusp(τ) (530)

where

ηprimecusp(τ ) equivradic

2|Fζ |Fζζζ

α

radicτ (531)

and is given by the following analytic and universal expression

ξprime minus Fη

|Fζ |ηprime minus F

|Fζ | τ minus Fηη

2|Fζ |ηprime2 minus

(

Fη

|Fζ | +Fζζη

Fζζζ

)

ηprimeτ + 16|Fζ |F 2

ζζζ

[

minus FηηηF2ζζζ

+Fζζη(3FζζζFζηη minus 2F 2ζζη)]

ηprime32

= α3

9F 2ζ F

4ζζζ

(

(

ηprimecusp(τ))2 minus ηprime2

)3

(532)Equation (532) describes a closed curve with two cusps in the (ξ η) - planeat the points

~ξplusmncusp(τ ) = (ξb ηb) + (ξplusmnprime

cusp(τ )plusmnηprimecusp(τ)) (533)

where

ξplusmnprime

cusp(τ ) sim plusmnFη

radic

2Fζζζ

α|Fζ|radicτ +

(

F

|Fζ |+

FηηFζζζ

α

)

τ plusmn Bτ 32 (534)

where B = O(1) (see Figures 6 for dKP and 7 for mdKP) corresponding tothe conditions Q = R = 0 on which the three real solutions of the cubiccoincide (in 1 + 1 dimensions it is not possible to have three coincidentsolutions)

ζ0 = ζplusmn = minusFζζη

Fζζζηprime rArr q0 = qplusmn =sim ǫ

(

G+ (Gη minusGζFζζη

Fζζζ)ηprime)

(535)

20

On the remaining part of the closed curve ∆ = 0 two of the three realbranches coincide Outside the closed curve ∆ gt 0 and the real solution q issingle valued inside the closed curve ∆ lt 0 and the real solution q is threevalued with the three branches

q = ǫG(ζb + ζ prime ηb + ηprime) sim ǫ(G +Gζζprime +Gηη

prime +O(τ)) (536)

where ζ prime are the three real solutions of the cubic (511) (see fi Figures 2for dKP)

Figures 2 Plotting of the dKP analytic solution in the (q ξ η τ) variablesfor G given by (422) ǫ = 02 at times τ = 0 τb minus 2 τb τb + 2 whereτb = 657

Such a three-valued region of the (ξ η) plane is characterized by the

21

conditions|ηprime| lt ηprimecusp(τ) ξminusM(ηprime τ) lt ξprime lt ξ+M(ηprime τ) (537)

where

ξplusmnM(ηprime τ) equiv Fη

|Fζ |ηprime + F

|Fζ | τ + Fηη

2|Fζ |ηprime2 +

(

Fη

|Fζ | +Fζζη

Fζζζ

)

ηprimeτ minus 16|Fζ |F 2

ζζζ

[

minus FηηηF2ζζζ

+Fζζη(3FζζζFζηη minus 2F 2ζζη)]

ηprime3 plusmn Fζζζ

3|Fζ | |Q| 32(538)

(see Figures 3 for dKP)Since

∆ξ equiv ξ+M(ηprime τ)minus ξminusM(ηprime τ) =2Fζζζ

3|Fζ||Q(ηprime τ)|32 le 4

radic2

3

radic

|Fζ|Fζζζ

τ 32 (539)

we infer that the longitudinal width of the multivalued region is O(τ 32) thetransversal widths delimited by the two cusps is instead O(τ 12) thereforethe multivalued region develops at τ = τb from the breaking point (ξb ηb)with an infinite speed in the tranversal direction and with zero speed in thelongitudinal direction All these results are a common feature to the class ofdynamics (11) (see the previously derived results for the dKP equation forfinite times [18 19] and in the longtime regime [18] and those for the KZequation in the longtime regime [2])

-15-10-050005101-15-10-0500051015

-15-10-050005101-15-10-0500051015

Figures 3 Plotting of the three valued regions of the (ξ η) plane for dKPat times τ = 02 05 for G given by (422) and ǫ = 02 The center of thesquare frame is the breaking point (ξb ηb) Notice that the two cusps havethe same ξ coordinate ξ+cusp(τ) sim ξminuscusp(τ) since for solution (422) Gη = 0(see (531)(534))

22

We end this subsection remarking that as it was already observed in [19]since dKP (mn) is symmetric wrt y if the initial datum is also symmetricwrt y like the Gaussian (419) also its evolution will be so u(x y t) =u(xminusy t) This implies that ηb = yb = 0 and that all partial derivatives ofF and G containing an odd number of η derivatives are 0 at breaking As aconsequence the transversal direction on which the derivative of the profiledoes not blow up is the η (y) direction and on it the derivative is 0 atbreaking (see (56))

After breaking II the discontinuous shock

Using the matching rules of sect3 the shock formulae (310) become

parts

partτ=

ǫm

m+ 1

Gm+1(ζ1 η)minusGm+1(ζ2 η)

G(ζ1 η)minusG(ζ2 η) (540)

s = ζ1 + ǫmGm(ζ1 η) τ = ζ2 + ǫmGm(ζ2 η) τ (541)

where subscript 2 is for values behind the shock and subscript 1 for valuesahead Equations (541) are two implicit equations for ζ1 and ζ2 solvingthese equations yields ζ1(s η τ) ζ2(s η τ) and substituting these expres-sions in (540) it results in a nonlinear first order differential equation fors This equation and the initial conditions (311) give uniquely s(η τ) andconsequently ζ12(η τ) = ζ12(s(η τ) η τ)

We recall that immediately after breaking and if (530) holds equation(541) reduces to the cubic (511)(512) in which ξprime must be replaced by sprimepossessing three real roots where

sprime(ηprime τ) = sminus ξb (542)

Therefore the values of ζ1 and ζ2 are chosen among the three solutions (515)so that q2 = ǫG(ζb + ζ prime2 η) has the maximum value and q1 = ǫG(ζb + ζ prime1 η)the minimum one among the three branches of q Since Gζ lt 0 it followsthat

ζ1 = maxζ prime0 ζ primeplusmn ζ2 = minζ prime0 ζ primeplusmn (543)

To identify ζ12 with one of the three roots ζ prime0 ζprimeplusmn let us rewrite them as

follows

ζ prime0 = minusa

3+ 2 3

radicρ cos

(

θ

3

)

(544)

ζ prime+ = minusa

3minus 3

radicρ

(

cos

(

θ

3

)

+radic3 sin

(

θ

3

))

(545)

23

ζ primeminus = minusa

3minus 3

radicρ

(

cos

(

θ

3

)

minusradic3 sin

(

θ

3

))

(546)

where

ρ =radic

R2 + |∆| θ = arctan

(

radic

|∆|R

)

(547)

We observe that for 0 le θ le π the following inequalities hold

minus cos

(

θ

3

)

minusradic3 sin

(

θ

3

)

le minus cos

(

θ

3

)

+radic3 sin

(

θ

3

)

le 2 cos

(

θ

3

)

so that

ζ prime+ le ζ primeminus le ζ prime0 rArr q(ζb + ζ prime0 η) le q(ζb + ζ primeminus η) le q(ζb + ζ prime+ η) (548)

for q decreasing in ζ Hence

ζ prime1(sprime ηprime τ prime) = ζ prime0(s

prime ηprime τ prime) ζ prime2(sprime ηprime τ prime) = ζ prime+(s

prime ηprime τ prime) (549)

Then (540) reduces to the equations

dsprime

dτ+ G

Gζ+ Gη

Gζηprime + 1

2

[

ζ prime0(sprime ηprime τ ) + ζ prime+(s

prime ηprime τ)]

= 0 for dKPdsprime

dτ+ G

2Gζ+ Gη

Gζηprime + 1

2

[

ζ prime0(sprime ηprime τ) + ζ prime+(s

prime ηprime τ)]

= 0 for mdKP

sprime(0) = ξb

(550)

obtained expanding (540) near the breaking point and recalling that τ equivτ primeτb

We remark that in the differential equations (550) sprime depends on ηprime

parametrically So the discontinuous (dissipative) shocks of the longtime so-lutions of the small data Cauchy problems for dKP and mdKP has a simplegeometric construction given τ gt 0 for any fixed |ηprime| le ηcusp the overturn-ing profile in the (ξ q) plane is intercepted by a vertical straight line cuttingoff equal area lobi in analogy with the 1 + 1 dimensional case

Going back to the dKP variables

The above formulae written in the convenient variables q ξ η τ are es-sentially the same for both dKP and mdKP relevant differences appear whenwe go back to the original variables u x y t inverting equations (52)(53)

u = 1radictq t = τ2

4 y = ητ2

2 x = ξ minus η2τ2

4 for dKP

u = 1radictq t = eτ y = 2ηeτ x = ξ minus η2eτ for mdKP

(551)

24

and all the above universal formulae are easily transfered to the dKP (mn)equations In particular small and localized initial data break i) at tb =τ 2b 4 in the point (xb yb) = (ξb minus τ 2b η

2b4 ηbτ

2b 2) of the parabolic wave front

x+ y2(4tb) = ξb evolving according to dKP and ii) at tb = eτb in the point(xb yb) = (ξb minus η2be

τb 2ηbeτb) of the parabolic wave front x + y2(4tb) = ξb

evolving according to mdKP If for instance we use the same Gaussian initialcondition (419) for both dKP and mdKP with ǫ = 02 then G is given by(422) in both cases Consequently for dKP

ζb = 196 ηb = 0 ξb = 327 τb = 657 (552)

and wave breaking takes place at tb = 108 in the point (xb yb) = (327 0)on the parabola x+ 231 middot 10minus2y2 = 327 (see Figure 4)

Figure 4 Plotting of the analytic dKP solution u in the physical variablesx y t for G given by (422) (corresponding to the gaussian initial condition)ǫ = 02 at breaking

For mdKP

ζb = 161 ηb = 0 ξb = 251 τb = 1431 (553)

and wave breaking takes place at tb = 164middot106 in the point (xb yb) = (251 0)on the parabola x + 152 middot 10minus7y2 = 251 and at breaking the amplitude ofthe wave is u = ǫtb

minus12G(ζb ηb) = 195 middot 10minus4 (see Figure 5)

25

Figure 5 Plotting of the analytic mdKP solution u in the physical variablesx y t for G given by (422) (corresponding to the gaussian initial condition)ǫ = 02 at breaking

Since in the mdKP case tb is very large and the wave amplitude atbreaking is very small we wonder if such a wave breaking could be actuallydetected numerically

Now we go into the analytic details For the dKP case

tprime equiv tminus tb sim 2tbτ yprime = y minus yb ≃ 2tb(ηprime + 2ηbτ + 2ηprimeτ )

xprime = xminus xb sim ξprime minus ηbyprime minus yprime2

4tb+ η2b t

prime + ηbtbyprimetprime

(554)

and we choose τ prime to be sufficiently small to have |tprime| |yprime| ≪ 1The dKP solution reads

u(x y t) =ǫradictG(ζb + ζ prime ηb + ηprime) =

ǫradict

(

G+Gζζprime +Gη

yprime

2tb+O

(

tprime

tb

))

(555)where ζ prime is the solution of the cubic (511) with

a =3Fζζη

2Fζζζ

yprime

tb b = 3

Fζζζ

(

Fζtprime

tb+ Fζηη

yprime2

4t2b

)

X = xprime +(

ηb minus Fη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime minus[

η2b +(

F2minus ηbFη

)

1|Fζ |tb

]

tprime

+(

1minus Fηη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime2

4tb+[

minusηb +(

Fη

2+ ηbFηη

)

12|Fζ |tb

]

yprimetprime

tb

minus Fηηη

48|Fζ |yprime3

t3b

(556)

26

The three-valued region (532) after breaking becomes

xprime +(

ηb minus Fη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime minus[

η2b +(

F2minus ηbFη

)

1|Fζ |tb

]

tprime

+(

1minus Fηη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime2

4tb+[

minusηb +(

Fη

2|Fζ |tb +ηbFηη

|Fζ | minus Fζζη

2Fζζζ

)

12tb

]

yprimetprime

tb

+ 16|Fζ |F 2

ζζζ

[

minus FηηηF2ζζζ + Fζζη(3FζζζFζηη minus 2F 2

ζζη)]

yprime3

8t3b

2

=

α3

9middot64F 2ζF 4ζζζ

t6b

(

(

yprimecusp(tprime))2 minus yprime2

)3

(557)

where

yprimecusp(tprime) = 2

radic

|Fζ |Fζζζ

α

radictbtprime (558)

Equation (557) describes a closed curve with two cusps in the (x y) - planeat the points

~xplusmncusp(t

prime) = (xb yb) + (xplusmnprime

cusp(tprime)plusmnyprimecusp(t

prime)) (559)

where

xplusmnprime

cusp(tprime) sim ∓2ηb

radic

|Fζ |Fζζζ

α

radictbtprime plusmn Fη

radic

Fζζζ

α|Fζ |

radic

tprime

tb

+(

η2b minus|Fζ |Fζζζ

α

)

tprime +(

F|Fζ | +

FηηFζζζ

α

)

tprime

2tbplusmn 2ηb

radic

|Fζ |Fζζζ

αtprime

32radictb+O(τ 32)

(560)At last the analogue of (539) reads

∆xprime le 2

3

radic

|Fζ|Fζζζ

(

tprime

tb

)32

(561)

it follows that the longitudinal width ∆long and the transversal width ∆transv

of the multivalued region are respectively

∆long = O

(

(

tprime

tb

)32

)

∆transv = O(

(tbtprime)

12

)

rArr ∆long

∆transv= O

(

tprime

t2b

)

(562)

For the mdKP case

tprime = tminus tb sim tbτprime yprime = y minus yb sim 2tb(η

prime + ηbtprime

tb+ ηprimetprime

tb)

xprime = xminus xb sim ξprime minus ηbyprime + η2b t

prime minus yprime2

4tb+ ηb

yprimetprime

tb

(563)

27

and we choose τ prime sufficiently small to have |tprime| |yprime| ≪ 1The mdKP solution reads

u(x y t) =ǫradictG(ζb+ζ prime ηb+ηprime) =

ǫradict

(

G+Gζζprime +Gη

yprime

2tb+O

(

tprime

tb log tb

))

(564)where ζ prime is the solution of the cubic (511) with

a =3Fζζη

2Fζζζ

yprime

tb b = 3

Fζζζ

(

2Fζtprime

tb log tb+ Fζηη

yprime2

4t2b

)

X = xprime +(

ηb minus Fη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime minus[

η2b +(

Flog tb

minus ηbFη

)

1|Fζ |tb

]

tprime

+(

1minus Fηη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime2

4tb+[

minusηb +(

Fη

|Fζ |(1minus1

log tb) + ηbFηη

|Fζ |

)

12tb

]

yprimetprime

tb

minus Fηηη

48|Fζ |yprime3

t3b

(565)

The three-valued region (532) after breaking becomes

xprime +(

ηb minus Fη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime minus[

η2b +(

Flog tb

minus ηbFη

)

1|Fζ |tb

]

tprime

+(

1minus Fηη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime2

4tb+[

minusηb +(

Fη

|Fζ |(1minus1

log tb) + ηbFηη

|Fζ| minus Fζζη

Fζζζ log tb

)

12tb

]

yprimetprime

tb

+ 16|Fζ |F 2

ζζζ

[

minus FηηηF2ζζζ + Fζζη(3FζζζFζηη minus 2F 2

ζζη)]

yprime3

8t3b

2

=

α3

9middot64F 2ζ F

4ζζζt

6b

(

(

yprimecusp(tprime))2 minus yprime2

)3

(566)where

yprimecusp(tprime) = 2

radic

2|Fζ |Fζζζ

α

radic

tbtprime

log tb (567)

Equation (566) describes a closed curve with two cusps in the (x y) - planeat the points

~xplusmncusp(t

prime) = (xb yb) + (xplusmnprime

cusp(tprime)plusmnyprimecusp(t

prime)) (568)

where

xplusmnprime

cusp(tprime) sim ∓2ηb

radic

|Fζ |Fζζζ

α

radic

tbtprime

log tbplusmn Fη

radic

Fζζζ

α|Fζ |

radic

tprime

tb log tb

+(

η2b minus|Fζ |Fζζζ

α log tb

)

tprime +(

F|Fζ | +

FηηFζζζ

α

)

tprime

tb log tbplusmn 2ηb

radic

|Fζ |Fζζζ

αtprime

32radic

tb log tb

+O(τ 32)

(569)

28

At last the analogue of (539) reads

∆xprime le 4radic2

3

radic

|Fζ |Fζζζ

(

tprime

tb log tb

)32

(570)

it follows that the longitudinal width ∆long and the transversal width ∆transv

of the multivalued region are respectively

∆long = O

(

(

tprime

tb log tb

)32

)

∆transv = O

(

(

tbtprime

log tb

)12

)

rArr ∆long

∆transv= O

(

tprime

t2blog tb

)

(571)

References

[1] F Santucci Onde debolmente non lineari e quasi unidimensionali in

Natura La rottura di tali onde e il problema della regolarizzazione dis-

sipativa Tesi della Laurea Specialistica in Fisica supervisor P M San-tini Dipartimento di Fisica dellrsquoUniversita di Roma ldquoLa Sapienzardquo AA2011-2012

[2] S V Manakov and P M Santini On the dispersionless Kadomtsev-Petviashvili equation in n + 1 dimensions exact solutions the Cauchyproblem for small initial data and wave breaking J Phys A MathTheor 44 (2011) 405203

[3] G B Whitham Linear and nonlinear waves John Wiley amp Sons 1974

[4] C Lin E Reissner and H S Tien On two-dimensional nonsteadymotion of a slender body in a compressible fluid J Math Phys 27(1948) 220-231

[5] R Timman Unsteady motion in transonic flow Symposium Transson-icum Aachen 1962 EdKOswatitsch Springer 394-401

[6] E A Zobolotskaya and R V Khokhlov Quasi-plane waves in the non-linear acoustics of confined beams Soviet Physics- Acoustics Vol15N1 (1969)

29

[7] B B Kadomtsev and V I Petviashvili On the stability of solitarywaves in weakly dispersing media Soviet Physics-Doklady Vol15 N6(1970)

[8] X P Wang M J Ablowitz and H Segur Wave collapse and instabil-

ity of solitary waves of a generalized Kadomtsev-Petviashvili equationPhysica D 78 (1994) 241-265

[9] M J Ablowitz and H Segur Solitons and the Inverse Scattering Trans-

form SIAM Philadelphia 1981

[10] M J Ablowitz and P A Clarkson Solitons nonlinear evolution equa-

tions and inverse scattering Cambridge University Press 1991

[11] S Turitsyn and G Falkovitch Stability of magneto-elastic solitons andself-focusing of sound in antiferromagnets Sov Phys J Exp TheorPhys 62 (1985) 146-152

[12] S Novikov S V Manakov L P Pitaevskii V E Zakharov Theory of

solitons Consultant Bureau 1984

[13] S V Manakov and P M Santini Inverse scattering problem for vectorfields and the heavenly equation httparXivnlinSI0512043

[14] S V Manakov and P M Santini Inverse scattering problem forvector fields and the Cauchy problem for the heavenly equationPhys Lett A 359 613-619 (2006) doi101016jphysleta200607011httparXivnlinSI0604017

[15] S V Manakov and P M Santini The Cauchy problem on theplane for the dispersionless Kadomtsev-Petviashvili equation JETPLetters 83 No 10 462-466 (2006) 101134S0021364006100080httparXivnlinSI0604016

[16] P G Grinevich P M Santini and D Wu The Cauchy problem for thePavlov equation Nonlinearity 28 (2015) 3709-3754 doi1010880951-771528113709 Preprint arXiv13105834v2

[17] M V Pavlov Integrable hydrodynamic chains J Math Phys 44 (2003)4134-4156

30

On the remaining part of the closed curve ∆ = 0 two of the three realbranches coincide Outside the closed curve ∆ gt 0 and the real solution q issingle valued inside the closed curve ∆ lt 0 and the real solution q is threevalued with the three branches

q = ǫG(ζb + ζ prime ηb + ηprime) sim ǫ(G +Gζζprime +Gηη

prime +O(τ)) (536)

where ζ prime are the three real solutions of the cubic (511) (see fi Figures 2for dKP)

Figures 2 Plotting of the dKP analytic solution in the (q ξ η τ) variablesfor G given by (422) ǫ = 02 at times τ = 0 τb minus 2 τb τb + 2 whereτb = 657

Such a three-valued region of the (ξ η) plane is characterized by the

21

conditions|ηprime| lt ηprimecusp(τ) ξminusM(ηprime τ) lt ξprime lt ξ+M(ηprime τ) (537)

where

ξplusmnM(ηprime τ) equiv Fη

|Fζ |ηprime + F

|Fζ | τ + Fηη

2|Fζ |ηprime2 +

(

Fη

|Fζ | +Fζζη

Fζζζ

)

ηprimeτ minus 16|Fζ |F 2

ζζζ

[

minus FηηηF2ζζζ

+Fζζη(3FζζζFζηη minus 2F 2ζζη)]

ηprime3 plusmn Fζζζ

3|Fζ | |Q| 32(538)

(see Figures 3 for dKP)Since

∆ξ equiv ξ+M(ηprime τ)minus ξminusM(ηprime τ) =2Fζζζ

3|Fζ||Q(ηprime τ)|32 le 4

radic2

3

radic

|Fζ|Fζζζ

τ 32 (539)

we infer that the longitudinal width of the multivalued region is O(τ 32) thetransversal widths delimited by the two cusps is instead O(τ 12) thereforethe multivalued region develops at τ = τb from the breaking point (ξb ηb)with an infinite speed in the tranversal direction and with zero speed in thelongitudinal direction All these results are a common feature to the class ofdynamics (11) (see the previously derived results for the dKP equation forfinite times [18 19] and in the longtime regime [18] and those for the KZequation in the longtime regime [2])

-15-10-050005101-15-10-0500051015

-15-10-050005101-15-10-0500051015

Figures 3 Plotting of the three valued regions of the (ξ η) plane for dKPat times τ = 02 05 for G given by (422) and ǫ = 02 The center of thesquare frame is the breaking point (ξb ηb) Notice that the two cusps havethe same ξ coordinate ξ+cusp(τ) sim ξminuscusp(τ) since for solution (422) Gη = 0(see (531)(534))

22

We end this subsection remarking that as it was already observed in [19]since dKP (mn) is symmetric wrt y if the initial datum is also symmetricwrt y like the Gaussian (419) also its evolution will be so u(x y t) =u(xminusy t) This implies that ηb = yb = 0 and that all partial derivatives ofF and G containing an odd number of η derivatives are 0 at breaking As aconsequence the transversal direction on which the derivative of the profiledoes not blow up is the η (y) direction and on it the derivative is 0 atbreaking (see (56))

After breaking II the discontinuous shock

Using the matching rules of sect3 the shock formulae (310) become

parts

partτ=

ǫm

m+ 1

Gm+1(ζ1 η)minusGm+1(ζ2 η)

G(ζ1 η)minusG(ζ2 η) (540)

s = ζ1 + ǫmGm(ζ1 η) τ = ζ2 + ǫmGm(ζ2 η) τ (541)

where subscript 2 is for values behind the shock and subscript 1 for valuesahead Equations (541) are two implicit equations for ζ1 and ζ2 solvingthese equations yields ζ1(s η τ) ζ2(s η τ) and substituting these expres-sions in (540) it results in a nonlinear first order differential equation fors This equation and the initial conditions (311) give uniquely s(η τ) andconsequently ζ12(η τ) = ζ12(s(η τ) η τ)

We recall that immediately after breaking and if (530) holds equation(541) reduces to the cubic (511)(512) in which ξprime must be replaced by sprimepossessing three real roots where

sprime(ηprime τ) = sminus ξb (542)

Therefore the values of ζ1 and ζ2 are chosen among the three solutions (515)so that q2 = ǫG(ζb + ζ prime2 η) has the maximum value and q1 = ǫG(ζb + ζ prime1 η)the minimum one among the three branches of q Since Gζ lt 0 it followsthat

ζ1 = maxζ prime0 ζ primeplusmn ζ2 = minζ prime0 ζ primeplusmn (543)

To identify ζ12 with one of the three roots ζ prime0 ζprimeplusmn let us rewrite them as

follows

ζ prime0 = minusa

3+ 2 3

radicρ cos

(

θ

3

)

(544)

ζ prime+ = minusa

3minus 3

radicρ

(

cos

(

θ

3

)

+radic3 sin

(

θ

3

))

(545)

23

ζ primeminus = minusa

3minus 3

radicρ

(

cos

(

θ

3

)

minusradic3 sin

(

θ

3

))

(546)

where

ρ =radic

R2 + |∆| θ = arctan

(

radic

|∆|R

)

(547)

We observe that for 0 le θ le π the following inequalities hold

minus cos

(

θ

3

)

minusradic3 sin

(

θ

3

)

le minus cos

(

θ

3

)

+radic3 sin

(

θ

3

)

le 2 cos

(

θ

3

)

so that

ζ prime+ le ζ primeminus le ζ prime0 rArr q(ζb + ζ prime0 η) le q(ζb + ζ primeminus η) le q(ζb + ζ prime+ η) (548)

for q decreasing in ζ Hence

ζ prime1(sprime ηprime τ prime) = ζ prime0(s

prime ηprime τ prime) ζ prime2(sprime ηprime τ prime) = ζ prime+(s

prime ηprime τ prime) (549)

Then (540) reduces to the equations

dsprime

dτ+ G

Gζ+ Gη

Gζηprime + 1

2

[

ζ prime0(sprime ηprime τ ) + ζ prime+(s

prime ηprime τ)]

= 0 for dKPdsprime

dτ+ G

2Gζ+ Gη

Gζηprime + 1

2

[

ζ prime0(sprime ηprime τ) + ζ prime+(s

prime ηprime τ)]

= 0 for mdKP

sprime(0) = ξb

(550)

obtained expanding (540) near the breaking point and recalling that τ equivτ primeτb

We remark that in the differential equations (550) sprime depends on ηprime

parametrically So the discontinuous (dissipative) shocks of the longtime so-lutions of the small data Cauchy problems for dKP and mdKP has a simplegeometric construction given τ gt 0 for any fixed |ηprime| le ηcusp the overturn-ing profile in the (ξ q) plane is intercepted by a vertical straight line cuttingoff equal area lobi in analogy with the 1 + 1 dimensional case

Going back to the dKP variables

The above formulae written in the convenient variables q ξ η τ are es-sentially the same for both dKP and mdKP relevant differences appear whenwe go back to the original variables u x y t inverting equations (52)(53)

u = 1radictq t = τ2

4 y = ητ2

2 x = ξ minus η2τ2

4 for dKP

u = 1radictq t = eτ y = 2ηeτ x = ξ minus η2eτ for mdKP

(551)

24

and all the above universal formulae are easily transfered to the dKP (mn)equations In particular small and localized initial data break i) at tb =τ 2b 4 in the point (xb yb) = (ξb minus τ 2b η

2b4 ηbτ

2b 2) of the parabolic wave front

x+ y2(4tb) = ξb evolving according to dKP and ii) at tb = eτb in the point(xb yb) = (ξb minus η2be

τb 2ηbeτb) of the parabolic wave front x + y2(4tb) = ξb

evolving according to mdKP If for instance we use the same Gaussian initialcondition (419) for both dKP and mdKP with ǫ = 02 then G is given by(422) in both cases Consequently for dKP

ζb = 196 ηb = 0 ξb = 327 τb = 657 (552)

and wave breaking takes place at tb = 108 in the point (xb yb) = (327 0)on the parabola x+ 231 middot 10minus2y2 = 327 (see Figure 4)

Figure 4 Plotting of the analytic dKP solution u in the physical variablesx y t for G given by (422) (corresponding to the gaussian initial condition)ǫ = 02 at breaking

For mdKP

ζb = 161 ηb = 0 ξb = 251 τb = 1431 (553)

and wave breaking takes place at tb = 164middot106 in the point (xb yb) = (251 0)on the parabola x + 152 middot 10minus7y2 = 251 and at breaking the amplitude ofthe wave is u = ǫtb

minus12G(ζb ηb) = 195 middot 10minus4 (see Figure 5)

25

Figure 5 Plotting of the analytic mdKP solution u in the physical variablesx y t for G given by (422) (corresponding to the gaussian initial condition)ǫ = 02 at breaking

Since in the mdKP case tb is very large and the wave amplitude atbreaking is very small we wonder if such a wave breaking could be actuallydetected numerically

Now we go into the analytic details For the dKP case

tprime equiv tminus tb sim 2tbτ yprime = y minus yb ≃ 2tb(ηprime + 2ηbτ + 2ηprimeτ )

xprime = xminus xb sim ξprime minus ηbyprime minus yprime2

4tb+ η2b t

prime + ηbtbyprimetprime

(554)

and we choose τ prime to be sufficiently small to have |tprime| |yprime| ≪ 1The dKP solution reads

u(x y t) =ǫradictG(ζb + ζ prime ηb + ηprime) =

ǫradict

(

G+Gζζprime +Gη

yprime

2tb+O

(

tprime

tb

))

(555)where ζ prime is the solution of the cubic (511) with

a =3Fζζη

2Fζζζ

yprime

tb b = 3

Fζζζ

(

Fζtprime

tb+ Fζηη

yprime2

4t2b

)

X = xprime +(

ηb minus Fη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime minus[

η2b +(

F2minus ηbFη

)

1|Fζ |tb

]

tprime

+(

1minus Fηη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime2

4tb+[

minusηb +(

Fη

2+ ηbFηη

)

12|Fζ |tb

]

yprimetprime

tb

minus Fηηη

48|Fζ |yprime3

t3b

(556)

26

The three-valued region (532) after breaking becomes

xprime +(

ηb minus Fη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime minus[

η2b +(

F2minus ηbFη

)

1|Fζ |tb

]

tprime

+(

1minus Fηη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime2

4tb+[

minusηb +(

Fη

2|Fζ |tb +ηbFηη

|Fζ | minus Fζζη

2Fζζζ

)

12tb

]

yprimetprime

tb

+ 16|Fζ |F 2

ζζζ

[

minus FηηηF2ζζζ + Fζζη(3FζζζFζηη minus 2F 2

ζζη)]

yprime3

8t3b

2

=

α3

9middot64F 2ζF 4ζζζ

t6b

(

(

yprimecusp(tprime))2 minus yprime2

)3

(557)

where

yprimecusp(tprime) = 2

radic

|Fζ |Fζζζ

α

radictbtprime (558)

Equation (557) describes a closed curve with two cusps in the (x y) - planeat the points

~xplusmncusp(t

prime) = (xb yb) + (xplusmnprime

cusp(tprime)plusmnyprimecusp(t

prime)) (559)

where

xplusmnprime

cusp(tprime) sim ∓2ηb

radic

|Fζ |Fζζζ

α

radictbtprime plusmn Fη

radic

Fζζζ

α|Fζ |

radic

tprime

tb

+(

η2b minus|Fζ |Fζζζ

α

)

tprime +(

F|Fζ | +

FηηFζζζ

α

)

tprime

2tbplusmn 2ηb

radic

|Fζ |Fζζζ

αtprime

32radictb+O(τ 32)

(560)At last the analogue of (539) reads

∆xprime le 2

3

radic

|Fζ|Fζζζ

(

tprime

tb

)32

(561)

it follows that the longitudinal width ∆long and the transversal width ∆transv

of the multivalued region are respectively

∆long = O

(

(

tprime

tb

)32

)

∆transv = O(

(tbtprime)

12

)

rArr ∆long

∆transv= O

(

tprime

t2b

)

(562)

For the mdKP case

tprime = tminus tb sim tbτprime yprime = y minus yb sim 2tb(η

prime + ηbtprime

tb+ ηprimetprime

tb)

xprime = xminus xb sim ξprime minus ηbyprime + η2b t

prime minus yprime2

4tb+ ηb

yprimetprime

tb

(563)

27

and we choose τ prime sufficiently small to have |tprime| |yprime| ≪ 1The mdKP solution reads

u(x y t) =ǫradictG(ζb+ζ prime ηb+ηprime) =

ǫradict

(

G+Gζζprime +Gη

yprime

2tb+O

(

tprime

tb log tb

))

(564)where ζ prime is the solution of the cubic (511) with

a =3Fζζη

2Fζζζ

yprime

tb b = 3

Fζζζ

(

2Fζtprime

tb log tb+ Fζηη

yprime2

4t2b

)

X = xprime +(

ηb minus Fη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime minus[

η2b +(

Flog tb

minus ηbFη

)

1|Fζ |tb

]

tprime

+(

1minus Fηη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime2

4tb+[

minusηb +(

Fη

|Fζ |(1minus1

log tb) + ηbFηη

|Fζ |

)

12tb

]

yprimetprime

tb

minus Fηηη

48|Fζ |yprime3

t3b

(565)

The three-valued region (532) after breaking becomes

xprime +(

ηb minus Fη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime minus[

η2b +(

Flog tb

minus ηbFη

)

1|Fζ |tb

]

tprime

+(

1minus Fηη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime2

4tb+[

minusηb +(

Fη

|Fζ |(1minus1

log tb) + ηbFηη

|Fζ| minus Fζζη

Fζζζ log tb

)

12tb

]

yprimetprime

tb

+ 16|Fζ |F 2

ζζζ

[

minus FηηηF2ζζζ + Fζζη(3FζζζFζηη minus 2F 2

ζζη)]

yprime3

8t3b

2

=

α3

9middot64F 2ζ F

4ζζζt

6b

(

(

yprimecusp(tprime))2 minus yprime2

)3

(566)where

yprimecusp(tprime) = 2

radic

2|Fζ |Fζζζ

α

radic

tbtprime

log tb (567)

Equation (566) describes a closed curve with two cusps in the (x y) - planeat the points

~xplusmncusp(t

prime) = (xb yb) + (xplusmnprime

cusp(tprime)plusmnyprimecusp(t

prime)) (568)

where

xplusmnprime

cusp(tprime) sim ∓2ηb

radic

|Fζ |Fζζζ

α

radic

tbtprime

log tbplusmn Fη

radic

Fζζζ

α|Fζ |

radic

tprime

tb log tb

+(

η2b minus|Fζ |Fζζζ

α log tb

)

tprime +(

F|Fζ | +

FηηFζζζ

α

)

tprime

tb log tbplusmn 2ηb

radic

|Fζ |Fζζζ

αtprime

32radic

tb log tb

+O(τ 32)

(569)

28

At last the analogue of (539) reads

∆xprime le 4radic2

3

radic

|Fζ |Fζζζ

(

tprime

tb log tb

)32

(570)

it follows that the longitudinal width ∆long and the transversal width ∆transv

of the multivalued region are respectively

∆long = O

(

(

tprime

tb log tb

)32

)

∆transv = O

(

(

tbtprime

log tb

)12

)

rArr ∆long

∆transv= O

(

tprime

t2blog tb

)

(571)

References

[1] F Santucci Onde debolmente non lineari e quasi unidimensionali in

Natura La rottura di tali onde e il problema della regolarizzazione dis-

sipativa Tesi della Laurea Specialistica in Fisica supervisor P M San-tini Dipartimento di Fisica dellrsquoUniversita di Roma ldquoLa Sapienzardquo AA2011-2012

[2] S V Manakov and P M Santini On the dispersionless Kadomtsev-Petviashvili equation in n + 1 dimensions exact solutions the Cauchyproblem for small initial data and wave breaking J Phys A MathTheor 44 (2011) 405203

[3] G B Whitham Linear and nonlinear waves John Wiley amp Sons 1974

[4] C Lin E Reissner and H S Tien On two-dimensional nonsteadymotion of a slender body in a compressible fluid J Math Phys 27(1948) 220-231

[5] R Timman Unsteady motion in transonic flow Symposium Transson-icum Aachen 1962 EdKOswatitsch Springer 394-401

[6] E A Zobolotskaya and R V Khokhlov Quasi-plane waves in the non-linear acoustics of confined beams Soviet Physics- Acoustics Vol15N1 (1969)

29

[7] B B Kadomtsev and V I Petviashvili On the stability of solitarywaves in weakly dispersing media Soviet Physics-Doklady Vol15 N6(1970)

[8] X P Wang M J Ablowitz and H Segur Wave collapse and instabil-

ity of solitary waves of a generalized Kadomtsev-Petviashvili equationPhysica D 78 (1994) 241-265

[9] M J Ablowitz and H Segur Solitons and the Inverse Scattering Trans-

form SIAM Philadelphia 1981

[10] M J Ablowitz and P A Clarkson Solitons nonlinear evolution equa-

tions and inverse scattering Cambridge University Press 1991

[11] S Turitsyn and G Falkovitch Stability of magneto-elastic solitons andself-focusing of sound in antiferromagnets Sov Phys J Exp TheorPhys 62 (1985) 146-152

[12] S Novikov S V Manakov L P Pitaevskii V E Zakharov Theory of

solitons Consultant Bureau 1984

[13] S V Manakov and P M Santini Inverse scattering problem for vectorfields and the heavenly equation httparXivnlinSI0512043

[14] S V Manakov and P M Santini Inverse scattering problem forvector fields and the Cauchy problem for the heavenly equationPhys Lett A 359 613-619 (2006) doi101016jphysleta200607011httparXivnlinSI0604017

[15] S V Manakov and P M Santini The Cauchy problem on theplane for the dispersionless Kadomtsev-Petviashvili equation JETPLetters 83 No 10 462-466 (2006) 101134S0021364006100080httparXivnlinSI0604016

[16] P G Grinevich P M Santini and D Wu The Cauchy problem for thePavlov equation Nonlinearity 28 (2015) 3709-3754 doi1010880951-771528113709 Preprint arXiv13105834v2

[17] M V Pavlov Integrable hydrodynamic chains J Math Phys 44 (2003)4134-4156

30

conditions|ηprime| lt ηprimecusp(τ) ξminusM(ηprime τ) lt ξprime lt ξ+M(ηprime τ) (537)

where

ξplusmnM(ηprime τ) equiv Fη

|Fζ |ηprime + F

|Fζ | τ + Fηη

2|Fζ |ηprime2 +

(

Fη

|Fζ | +Fζζη

Fζζζ

)

ηprimeτ minus 16|Fζ |F 2

ζζζ

[

minus FηηηF2ζζζ

+Fζζη(3FζζζFζηη minus 2F 2ζζη)]

ηprime3 plusmn Fζζζ

3|Fζ | |Q| 32(538)

(see Figures 3 for dKP)Since

∆ξ equiv ξ+M(ηprime τ)minus ξminusM(ηprime τ) =2Fζζζ

3|Fζ||Q(ηprime τ)|32 le 4

radic2

3

radic

|Fζ|Fζζζ

τ 32 (539)

we infer that the longitudinal width of the multivalued region is O(τ 32) thetransversal widths delimited by the two cusps is instead O(τ 12) thereforethe multivalued region develops at τ = τb from the breaking point (ξb ηb)with an infinite speed in the tranversal direction and with zero speed in thelongitudinal direction All these results are a common feature to the class ofdynamics (11) (see the previously derived results for the dKP equation forfinite times [18 19] and in the longtime regime [18] and those for the KZequation in the longtime regime [2])

-15-10-050005101-15-10-0500051015

-15-10-050005101-15-10-0500051015

Figures 3 Plotting of the three valued regions of the (ξ η) plane for dKPat times τ = 02 05 for G given by (422) and ǫ = 02 The center of thesquare frame is the breaking point (ξb ηb) Notice that the two cusps havethe same ξ coordinate ξ+cusp(τ) sim ξminuscusp(τ) since for solution (422) Gη = 0(see (531)(534))

22

We end this subsection remarking that as it was already observed in [19]since dKP (mn) is symmetric wrt y if the initial datum is also symmetricwrt y like the Gaussian (419) also its evolution will be so u(x y t) =u(xminusy t) This implies that ηb = yb = 0 and that all partial derivatives ofF and G containing an odd number of η derivatives are 0 at breaking As aconsequence the transversal direction on which the derivative of the profiledoes not blow up is the η (y) direction and on it the derivative is 0 atbreaking (see (56))

After breaking II the discontinuous shock

Using the matching rules of sect3 the shock formulae (310) become

parts

partτ=

ǫm

m+ 1

Gm+1(ζ1 η)minusGm+1(ζ2 η)

G(ζ1 η)minusG(ζ2 η) (540)

s = ζ1 + ǫmGm(ζ1 η) τ = ζ2 + ǫmGm(ζ2 η) τ (541)

where subscript 2 is for values behind the shock and subscript 1 for valuesahead Equations (541) are two implicit equations for ζ1 and ζ2 solvingthese equations yields ζ1(s η τ) ζ2(s η τ) and substituting these expres-sions in (540) it results in a nonlinear first order differential equation fors This equation and the initial conditions (311) give uniquely s(η τ) andconsequently ζ12(η τ) = ζ12(s(η τ) η τ)

We recall that immediately after breaking and if (530) holds equation(541) reduces to the cubic (511)(512) in which ξprime must be replaced by sprimepossessing three real roots where

sprime(ηprime τ) = sminus ξb (542)

Therefore the values of ζ1 and ζ2 are chosen among the three solutions (515)so that q2 = ǫG(ζb + ζ prime2 η) has the maximum value and q1 = ǫG(ζb + ζ prime1 η)the minimum one among the three branches of q Since Gζ lt 0 it followsthat

ζ1 = maxζ prime0 ζ primeplusmn ζ2 = minζ prime0 ζ primeplusmn (543)

To identify ζ12 with one of the three roots ζ prime0 ζprimeplusmn let us rewrite them as

follows

ζ prime0 = minusa

3+ 2 3

radicρ cos

(

θ

3

)

(544)

ζ prime+ = minusa

3minus 3

radicρ

(

cos

(

θ

3

)

+radic3 sin

(

θ

3

))

(545)

23

ζ primeminus = minusa

3minus 3

radicρ

(

cos

(

θ

3

)

minusradic3 sin

(

θ

3

))

(546)

where

ρ =radic

R2 + |∆| θ = arctan

(

radic

|∆|R

)

(547)

We observe that for 0 le θ le π the following inequalities hold

minus cos

(

θ

3

)

minusradic3 sin

(

θ

3

)

le minus cos

(

θ

3

)

+radic3 sin

(

θ

3

)

le 2 cos

(

θ

3

)

so that

ζ prime+ le ζ primeminus le ζ prime0 rArr q(ζb + ζ prime0 η) le q(ζb + ζ primeminus η) le q(ζb + ζ prime+ η) (548)

for q decreasing in ζ Hence

ζ prime1(sprime ηprime τ prime) = ζ prime0(s

prime ηprime τ prime) ζ prime2(sprime ηprime τ prime) = ζ prime+(s

prime ηprime τ prime) (549)

Then (540) reduces to the equations

dsprime

dτ+ G

Gζ+ Gη

Gζηprime + 1

2

[

ζ prime0(sprime ηprime τ ) + ζ prime+(s

prime ηprime τ)]

= 0 for dKPdsprime

dτ+ G

2Gζ+ Gη

Gζηprime + 1

2

[

ζ prime0(sprime ηprime τ) + ζ prime+(s

prime ηprime τ)]

= 0 for mdKP

sprime(0) = ξb

(550)

obtained expanding (540) near the breaking point and recalling that τ equivτ primeτb

We remark that in the differential equations (550) sprime depends on ηprime

parametrically So the discontinuous (dissipative) shocks of the longtime so-lutions of the small data Cauchy problems for dKP and mdKP has a simplegeometric construction given τ gt 0 for any fixed |ηprime| le ηcusp the overturn-ing profile in the (ξ q) plane is intercepted by a vertical straight line cuttingoff equal area lobi in analogy with the 1 + 1 dimensional case

Going back to the dKP variables

The above formulae written in the convenient variables q ξ η τ are es-sentially the same for both dKP and mdKP relevant differences appear whenwe go back to the original variables u x y t inverting equations (52)(53)

u = 1radictq t = τ2

4 y = ητ2

2 x = ξ minus η2τ2

4 for dKP

u = 1radictq t = eτ y = 2ηeτ x = ξ minus η2eτ for mdKP

(551)

24

and all the above universal formulae are easily transfered to the dKP (mn)equations In particular small and localized initial data break i) at tb =τ 2b 4 in the point (xb yb) = (ξb minus τ 2b η

2b4 ηbτ

2b 2) of the parabolic wave front

x+ y2(4tb) = ξb evolving according to dKP and ii) at tb = eτb in the point(xb yb) = (ξb minus η2be

τb 2ηbeτb) of the parabolic wave front x + y2(4tb) = ξb

evolving according to mdKP If for instance we use the same Gaussian initialcondition (419) for both dKP and mdKP with ǫ = 02 then G is given by(422) in both cases Consequently for dKP

ζb = 196 ηb = 0 ξb = 327 τb = 657 (552)

and wave breaking takes place at tb = 108 in the point (xb yb) = (327 0)on the parabola x+ 231 middot 10minus2y2 = 327 (see Figure 4)

Figure 4 Plotting of the analytic dKP solution u in the physical variablesx y t for G given by (422) (corresponding to the gaussian initial condition)ǫ = 02 at breaking

For mdKP

ζb = 161 ηb = 0 ξb = 251 τb = 1431 (553)

and wave breaking takes place at tb = 164middot106 in the point (xb yb) = (251 0)on the parabola x + 152 middot 10minus7y2 = 251 and at breaking the amplitude ofthe wave is u = ǫtb

minus12G(ζb ηb) = 195 middot 10minus4 (see Figure 5)

25

Figure 5 Plotting of the analytic mdKP solution u in the physical variablesx y t for G given by (422) (corresponding to the gaussian initial condition)ǫ = 02 at breaking

Since in the mdKP case tb is very large and the wave amplitude atbreaking is very small we wonder if such a wave breaking could be actuallydetected numerically

Now we go into the analytic details For the dKP case

tprime equiv tminus tb sim 2tbτ yprime = y minus yb ≃ 2tb(ηprime + 2ηbτ + 2ηprimeτ )

xprime = xminus xb sim ξprime minus ηbyprime minus yprime2

4tb+ η2b t

prime + ηbtbyprimetprime

(554)

and we choose τ prime to be sufficiently small to have |tprime| |yprime| ≪ 1The dKP solution reads

u(x y t) =ǫradictG(ζb + ζ prime ηb + ηprime) =

ǫradict

(

G+Gζζprime +Gη

yprime

2tb+O

(

tprime

tb

))

(555)where ζ prime is the solution of the cubic (511) with

a =3Fζζη

2Fζζζ

yprime

tb b = 3

Fζζζ

(

Fζtprime

tb+ Fζηη

yprime2

4t2b

)

X = xprime +(

ηb minus Fη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime minus[

η2b +(

F2minus ηbFη

)

1|Fζ |tb

]

tprime

+(

1minus Fηη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime2

4tb+[

minusηb +(

Fη

2+ ηbFηη

)

12|Fζ |tb

]

yprimetprime

tb

minus Fηηη

48|Fζ |yprime3

t3b

(556)

26

The three-valued region (532) after breaking becomes

xprime +(

ηb minus Fη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime minus[

η2b +(

F2minus ηbFη

)

1|Fζ |tb

]

tprime

+(

1minus Fηη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime2

4tb+[

minusηb +(

Fη

2|Fζ |tb +ηbFηη

|Fζ | minus Fζζη

2Fζζζ

)

12tb

]

yprimetprime

tb

+ 16|Fζ |F 2

ζζζ

[

minus FηηηF2ζζζ + Fζζη(3FζζζFζηη minus 2F 2

ζζη)]

yprime3

8t3b

2

=

α3

9middot64F 2ζF 4ζζζ

t6b

(

(

yprimecusp(tprime))2 minus yprime2

)3

(557)

where

yprimecusp(tprime) = 2

radic

|Fζ |Fζζζ

α

radictbtprime (558)

Equation (557) describes a closed curve with two cusps in the (x y) - planeat the points

~xplusmncusp(t

prime) = (xb yb) + (xplusmnprime

cusp(tprime)plusmnyprimecusp(t

prime)) (559)

where

xplusmnprime

cusp(tprime) sim ∓2ηb

radic

|Fζ |Fζζζ

α

radictbtprime plusmn Fη

radic

Fζζζ

α|Fζ |

radic

tprime

tb

+(

η2b minus|Fζ |Fζζζ

α

)

tprime +(

F|Fζ | +

FηηFζζζ

α

)

tprime

2tbplusmn 2ηb

radic

|Fζ |Fζζζ

αtprime

32radictb+O(τ 32)

(560)At last the analogue of (539) reads

∆xprime le 2

3

radic

|Fζ|Fζζζ

(

tprime

tb

)32

(561)

it follows that the longitudinal width ∆long and the transversal width ∆transv

of the multivalued region are respectively

∆long = O

(

(

tprime

tb

)32

)

∆transv = O(

(tbtprime)

12

)

rArr ∆long

∆transv= O

(

tprime

t2b

)

(562)

For the mdKP case

tprime = tminus tb sim tbτprime yprime = y minus yb sim 2tb(η

prime + ηbtprime

tb+ ηprimetprime

tb)

xprime = xminus xb sim ξprime minus ηbyprime + η2b t

prime minus yprime2

4tb+ ηb

yprimetprime

tb

(563)

27

and we choose τ prime sufficiently small to have |tprime| |yprime| ≪ 1The mdKP solution reads

u(x y t) =ǫradictG(ζb+ζ prime ηb+ηprime) =

ǫradict

(

G+Gζζprime +Gη

yprime

2tb+O

(

tprime

tb log tb

))

(564)where ζ prime is the solution of the cubic (511) with

a =3Fζζη

2Fζζζ

yprime

tb b = 3

Fζζζ

(

2Fζtprime

tb log tb+ Fζηη

yprime2

4t2b

)

X = xprime +(

ηb minus Fη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime minus[

η2b +(

Flog tb

minus ηbFη

)

1|Fζ |tb

]

tprime

+(

1minus Fηη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime2

4tb+[

minusηb +(

Fη

|Fζ |(1minus1

log tb) + ηbFηη

|Fζ |

)

12tb

]

yprimetprime

tb

minus Fηηη

48|Fζ |yprime3

t3b

(565)

The three-valued region (532) after breaking becomes

xprime +(

ηb minus Fη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime minus[

η2b +(

Flog tb

minus ηbFη

)

1|Fζ |tb

]

tprime

+(

1minus Fηη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime2

4tb+[

minusηb +(

Fη

|Fζ |(1minus1

log tb) + ηbFηη

|Fζ| minus Fζζη

Fζζζ log tb

)

12tb

]

yprimetprime

tb

+ 16|Fζ |F 2

ζζζ

[

minus FηηηF2ζζζ + Fζζη(3FζζζFζηη minus 2F 2

ζζη)]

yprime3

8t3b

2

=

α3

9middot64F 2ζ F

4ζζζt

6b

(

(

yprimecusp(tprime))2 minus yprime2

)3

(566)where

yprimecusp(tprime) = 2

radic

2|Fζ |Fζζζ

α

radic

tbtprime

log tb (567)

Equation (566) describes a closed curve with two cusps in the (x y) - planeat the points

~xplusmncusp(t

prime) = (xb yb) + (xplusmnprime

cusp(tprime)plusmnyprimecusp(t

prime)) (568)

where

xplusmnprime

cusp(tprime) sim ∓2ηb

radic

|Fζ |Fζζζ

α

radic

tbtprime

log tbplusmn Fη

radic

Fζζζ

α|Fζ |

radic

tprime

tb log tb

+(

η2b minus|Fζ |Fζζζ

α log tb

)

tprime +(

F|Fζ | +

FηηFζζζ

α

)

tprime

tb log tbplusmn 2ηb

radic

|Fζ |Fζζζ

αtprime

32radic

tb log tb

+O(τ 32)

(569)

28

At last the analogue of (539) reads

∆xprime le 4radic2

3

radic

|Fζ |Fζζζ

(

tprime

tb log tb

)32

(570)

it follows that the longitudinal width ∆long and the transversal width ∆transv

of the multivalued region are respectively

∆long = O

(

(

tprime

tb log tb

)32

)

∆transv = O

(

(

tbtprime

log tb

)12

)

rArr ∆long

∆transv= O

(

tprime

t2blog tb

)

(571)

References

[1] F Santucci Onde debolmente non lineari e quasi unidimensionali in

Natura La rottura di tali onde e il problema della regolarizzazione dis-

sipativa Tesi della Laurea Specialistica in Fisica supervisor P M San-tini Dipartimento di Fisica dellrsquoUniversita di Roma ldquoLa Sapienzardquo AA2011-2012

[2] S V Manakov and P M Santini On the dispersionless Kadomtsev-Petviashvili equation in n + 1 dimensions exact solutions the Cauchyproblem for small initial data and wave breaking J Phys A MathTheor 44 (2011) 405203

[3] G B Whitham Linear and nonlinear waves John Wiley amp Sons 1974

[4] C Lin E Reissner and H S Tien On two-dimensional nonsteadymotion of a slender body in a compressible fluid J Math Phys 27(1948) 220-231

[5] R Timman Unsteady motion in transonic flow Symposium Transson-icum Aachen 1962 EdKOswatitsch Springer 394-401

[6] E A Zobolotskaya and R V Khokhlov Quasi-plane waves in the non-linear acoustics of confined beams Soviet Physics- Acoustics Vol15N1 (1969)

29

[7] B B Kadomtsev and V I Petviashvili On the stability of solitarywaves in weakly dispersing media Soviet Physics-Doklady Vol15 N6(1970)

[8] X P Wang M J Ablowitz and H Segur Wave collapse and instabil-

ity of solitary waves of a generalized Kadomtsev-Petviashvili equationPhysica D 78 (1994) 241-265

[9] M J Ablowitz and H Segur Solitons and the Inverse Scattering Trans-

form SIAM Philadelphia 1981

[10] M J Ablowitz and P A Clarkson Solitons nonlinear evolution equa-

tions and inverse scattering Cambridge University Press 1991

[11] S Turitsyn and G Falkovitch Stability of magneto-elastic solitons andself-focusing of sound in antiferromagnets Sov Phys J Exp TheorPhys 62 (1985) 146-152

[12] S Novikov S V Manakov L P Pitaevskii V E Zakharov Theory of

solitons Consultant Bureau 1984

[13] S V Manakov and P M Santini Inverse scattering problem for vectorfields and the heavenly equation httparXivnlinSI0512043

[14] S V Manakov and P M Santini Inverse scattering problem forvector fields and the Cauchy problem for the heavenly equationPhys Lett A 359 613-619 (2006) doi101016jphysleta200607011httparXivnlinSI0604017

[15] S V Manakov and P M Santini The Cauchy problem on theplane for the dispersionless Kadomtsev-Petviashvili equation JETPLetters 83 No 10 462-466 (2006) 101134S0021364006100080httparXivnlinSI0604016

[16] P G Grinevich P M Santini and D Wu The Cauchy problem for thePavlov equation Nonlinearity 28 (2015) 3709-3754 doi1010880951-771528113709 Preprint arXiv13105834v2

[17] M V Pavlov Integrable hydrodynamic chains J Math Phys 44 (2003)4134-4156

30

We end this subsection remarking that as it was already observed in [19]since dKP (mn) is symmetric wrt y if the initial datum is also symmetricwrt y like the Gaussian (419) also its evolution will be so u(x y t) =u(xminusy t) This implies that ηb = yb = 0 and that all partial derivatives ofF and G containing an odd number of η derivatives are 0 at breaking As aconsequence the transversal direction on which the derivative of the profiledoes not blow up is the η (y) direction and on it the derivative is 0 atbreaking (see (56))

After breaking II the discontinuous shock

Using the matching rules of sect3 the shock formulae (310) become

parts

partτ=

ǫm

m+ 1

Gm+1(ζ1 η)minusGm+1(ζ2 η)

G(ζ1 η)minusG(ζ2 η) (540)

s = ζ1 + ǫmGm(ζ1 η) τ = ζ2 + ǫmGm(ζ2 η) τ (541)

where subscript 2 is for values behind the shock and subscript 1 for valuesahead Equations (541) are two implicit equations for ζ1 and ζ2 solvingthese equations yields ζ1(s η τ) ζ2(s η τ) and substituting these expres-sions in (540) it results in a nonlinear first order differential equation fors This equation and the initial conditions (311) give uniquely s(η τ) andconsequently ζ12(η τ) = ζ12(s(η τ) η τ)

We recall that immediately after breaking and if (530) holds equation(541) reduces to the cubic (511)(512) in which ξprime must be replaced by sprimepossessing three real roots where

sprime(ηprime τ) = sminus ξb (542)

Therefore the values of ζ1 and ζ2 are chosen among the three solutions (515)so that q2 = ǫG(ζb + ζ prime2 η) has the maximum value and q1 = ǫG(ζb + ζ prime1 η)the minimum one among the three branches of q Since Gζ lt 0 it followsthat

ζ1 = maxζ prime0 ζ primeplusmn ζ2 = minζ prime0 ζ primeplusmn (543)

To identify ζ12 with one of the three roots ζ prime0 ζprimeplusmn let us rewrite them as

follows

ζ prime0 = minusa

3+ 2 3

radicρ cos

(

θ

3

)

(544)

ζ prime+ = minusa

3minus 3

radicρ

(

cos

(

θ

3

)

+radic3 sin

(

θ

3

))

(545)

23

ζ primeminus = minusa

3minus 3

radicρ

(

cos

(

θ

3

)

minusradic3 sin

(

θ

3

))

(546)

where

ρ =radic

R2 + |∆| θ = arctan

(

radic

|∆|R

)

(547)

We observe that for 0 le θ le π the following inequalities hold

minus cos

(

θ

3

)

minusradic3 sin

(

θ

3

)

le minus cos

(

θ

3

)

+radic3 sin

(

θ

3

)

le 2 cos

(

θ

3

)

so that

ζ prime+ le ζ primeminus le ζ prime0 rArr q(ζb + ζ prime0 η) le q(ζb + ζ primeminus η) le q(ζb + ζ prime+ η) (548)

for q decreasing in ζ Hence

ζ prime1(sprime ηprime τ prime) = ζ prime0(s

prime ηprime τ prime) ζ prime2(sprime ηprime τ prime) = ζ prime+(s

prime ηprime τ prime) (549)

Then (540) reduces to the equations

dsprime

dτ+ G

Gζ+ Gη

Gζηprime + 1

2

[

ζ prime0(sprime ηprime τ ) + ζ prime+(s

prime ηprime τ)]

= 0 for dKPdsprime

dτ+ G

2Gζ+ Gη

Gζηprime + 1

2

[

ζ prime0(sprime ηprime τ) + ζ prime+(s

prime ηprime τ)]

= 0 for mdKP

sprime(0) = ξb

(550)

obtained expanding (540) near the breaking point and recalling that τ equivτ primeτb

We remark that in the differential equations (550) sprime depends on ηprime

parametrically So the discontinuous (dissipative) shocks of the longtime so-lutions of the small data Cauchy problems for dKP and mdKP has a simplegeometric construction given τ gt 0 for any fixed |ηprime| le ηcusp the overturn-ing profile in the (ξ q) plane is intercepted by a vertical straight line cuttingoff equal area lobi in analogy with the 1 + 1 dimensional case

Going back to the dKP variables

The above formulae written in the convenient variables q ξ η τ are es-sentially the same for both dKP and mdKP relevant differences appear whenwe go back to the original variables u x y t inverting equations (52)(53)

u = 1radictq t = τ2

4 y = ητ2

2 x = ξ minus η2τ2

4 for dKP

u = 1radictq t = eτ y = 2ηeτ x = ξ minus η2eτ for mdKP

(551)

24

and all the above universal formulae are easily transfered to the dKP (mn)equations In particular small and localized initial data break i) at tb =τ 2b 4 in the point (xb yb) = (ξb minus τ 2b η

2b4 ηbτ

2b 2) of the parabolic wave front

x+ y2(4tb) = ξb evolving according to dKP and ii) at tb = eτb in the point(xb yb) = (ξb minus η2be

τb 2ηbeτb) of the parabolic wave front x + y2(4tb) = ξb

evolving according to mdKP If for instance we use the same Gaussian initialcondition (419) for both dKP and mdKP with ǫ = 02 then G is given by(422) in both cases Consequently for dKP

ζb = 196 ηb = 0 ξb = 327 τb = 657 (552)

and wave breaking takes place at tb = 108 in the point (xb yb) = (327 0)on the parabola x+ 231 middot 10minus2y2 = 327 (see Figure 4)

Figure 4 Plotting of the analytic dKP solution u in the physical variablesx y t for G given by (422) (corresponding to the gaussian initial condition)ǫ = 02 at breaking

For mdKP

ζb = 161 ηb = 0 ξb = 251 τb = 1431 (553)

and wave breaking takes place at tb = 164middot106 in the point (xb yb) = (251 0)on the parabola x + 152 middot 10minus7y2 = 251 and at breaking the amplitude ofthe wave is u = ǫtb

minus12G(ζb ηb) = 195 middot 10minus4 (see Figure 5)

25

Figure 5 Plotting of the analytic mdKP solution u in the physical variablesx y t for G given by (422) (corresponding to the gaussian initial condition)ǫ = 02 at breaking

Since in the mdKP case tb is very large and the wave amplitude atbreaking is very small we wonder if such a wave breaking could be actuallydetected numerically

Now we go into the analytic details For the dKP case

tprime equiv tminus tb sim 2tbτ yprime = y minus yb ≃ 2tb(ηprime + 2ηbτ + 2ηprimeτ )

xprime = xminus xb sim ξprime minus ηbyprime minus yprime2

4tb+ η2b t

prime + ηbtbyprimetprime

(554)

and we choose τ prime to be sufficiently small to have |tprime| |yprime| ≪ 1The dKP solution reads

u(x y t) =ǫradictG(ζb + ζ prime ηb + ηprime) =

ǫradict

(

G+Gζζprime +Gη

yprime

2tb+O

(

tprime

tb

))

(555)where ζ prime is the solution of the cubic (511) with

a =3Fζζη

2Fζζζ

yprime

tb b = 3

Fζζζ

(

Fζtprime

tb+ Fζηη

yprime2

4t2b

)

X = xprime +(

ηb minus Fη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime minus[

η2b +(

F2minus ηbFη

)

1|Fζ |tb

]

tprime

+(

1minus Fηη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime2

4tb+[

minusηb +(

Fη

2+ ηbFηη

)

12|Fζ |tb

]

yprimetprime

tb

minus Fηηη

48|Fζ |yprime3

t3b

(556)

26

The three-valued region (532) after breaking becomes

xprime +(

ηb minus Fη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime minus[

η2b +(

F2minus ηbFη

)

1|Fζ |tb

]

tprime

+(

1minus Fηη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime2

4tb+[

minusηb +(

Fη

2|Fζ |tb +ηbFηη

|Fζ | minus Fζζη

2Fζζζ

)

12tb

]

yprimetprime

tb

+ 16|Fζ |F 2

ζζζ

[

minus FηηηF2ζζζ + Fζζη(3FζζζFζηη minus 2F 2

ζζη)]

yprime3

8t3b

2

=

α3

9middot64F 2ζF 4ζζζ

t6b

(

(

yprimecusp(tprime))2 minus yprime2

)3

(557)

where

yprimecusp(tprime) = 2

radic

|Fζ |Fζζζ

α

radictbtprime (558)

Equation (557) describes a closed curve with two cusps in the (x y) - planeat the points

~xplusmncusp(t

prime) = (xb yb) + (xplusmnprime

cusp(tprime)plusmnyprimecusp(t

prime)) (559)

where

xplusmnprime

cusp(tprime) sim ∓2ηb

radic

|Fζ |Fζζζ

α

radictbtprime plusmn Fη

radic

Fζζζ

α|Fζ |

radic

tprime

tb

+(

η2b minus|Fζ |Fζζζ

α

)

tprime +(

F|Fζ | +

FηηFζζζ

α

)

tprime

2tbplusmn 2ηb

radic

|Fζ |Fζζζ

αtprime

32radictb+O(τ 32)

(560)At last the analogue of (539) reads

∆xprime le 2

3

radic

|Fζ|Fζζζ

(

tprime

tb

)32

(561)

it follows that the longitudinal width ∆long and the transversal width ∆transv

of the multivalued region are respectively

∆long = O

(

(

tprime

tb

)32

)

∆transv = O(

(tbtprime)

12

)

rArr ∆long

∆transv= O

(

tprime

t2b

)

(562)

For the mdKP case

tprime = tminus tb sim tbτprime yprime = y minus yb sim 2tb(η

prime + ηbtprime

tb+ ηprimetprime

tb)

xprime = xminus xb sim ξprime minus ηbyprime + η2b t

prime minus yprime2

4tb+ ηb

yprimetprime

tb

(563)

27

and we choose τ prime sufficiently small to have |tprime| |yprime| ≪ 1The mdKP solution reads

u(x y t) =ǫradictG(ζb+ζ prime ηb+ηprime) =

ǫradict

(

G+Gζζprime +Gη

yprime

2tb+O

(

tprime

tb log tb

))

(564)where ζ prime is the solution of the cubic (511) with

a =3Fζζη

2Fζζζ

yprime

tb b = 3

Fζζζ

(

2Fζtprime

tb log tb+ Fζηη

yprime2

4t2b

)

X = xprime +(

ηb minus Fη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime minus[

η2b +(

Flog tb

minus ηbFη

)

1|Fζ |tb

]

tprime

+(

1minus Fηη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime2

4tb+[

minusηb +(

Fη

|Fζ |(1minus1

log tb) + ηbFηη

|Fζ |

)

12tb

]

yprimetprime

tb

minus Fηηη

48|Fζ |yprime3

t3b

(565)

The three-valued region (532) after breaking becomes

xprime +(

ηb minus Fη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime minus[

η2b +(

Flog tb

minus ηbFη

)

1|Fζ |tb

]

tprime

+(

1minus Fηη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime2

4tb+[

minusηb +(

Fη

|Fζ |(1minus1

log tb) + ηbFηη

|Fζ| minus Fζζη

Fζζζ log tb

)

12tb

]

yprimetprime

tb

+ 16|Fζ |F 2

ζζζ

[

minus FηηηF2ζζζ + Fζζη(3FζζζFζηη minus 2F 2

ζζη)]

yprime3

8t3b

2

=

α3

9middot64F 2ζ F

4ζζζt

6b

(

(

yprimecusp(tprime))2 minus yprime2

)3

(566)where

yprimecusp(tprime) = 2

radic

2|Fζ |Fζζζ

α

radic

tbtprime

log tb (567)

Equation (566) describes a closed curve with two cusps in the (x y) - planeat the points

~xplusmncusp(t

prime) = (xb yb) + (xplusmnprime

cusp(tprime)plusmnyprimecusp(t

prime)) (568)

where

xplusmnprime

cusp(tprime) sim ∓2ηb

radic

|Fζ |Fζζζ

α

radic

tbtprime

log tbplusmn Fη

radic

Fζζζ

α|Fζ |

radic

tprime

tb log tb

+(

η2b minus|Fζ |Fζζζ

α log tb

)

tprime +(

F|Fζ | +

FηηFζζζ

α

)

tprime

tb log tbplusmn 2ηb

radic

|Fζ |Fζζζ

αtprime

32radic

tb log tb

+O(τ 32)

(569)

28

At last the analogue of (539) reads

∆xprime le 4radic2

3

radic

|Fζ |Fζζζ

(

tprime

tb log tb

)32

(570)

it follows that the longitudinal width ∆long and the transversal width ∆transv

of the multivalued region are respectively

∆long = O

(

(

tprime

tb log tb

)32

)

∆transv = O

(

(

tbtprime

log tb

)12

)

rArr ∆long

∆transv= O

(

tprime

t2blog tb

)

(571)

References

[1] F Santucci Onde debolmente non lineari e quasi unidimensionali in

Natura La rottura di tali onde e il problema della regolarizzazione dis-

sipativa Tesi della Laurea Specialistica in Fisica supervisor P M San-tini Dipartimento di Fisica dellrsquoUniversita di Roma ldquoLa Sapienzardquo AA2011-2012

[2] S V Manakov and P M Santini On the dispersionless Kadomtsev-Petviashvili equation in n + 1 dimensions exact solutions the Cauchyproblem for small initial data and wave breaking J Phys A MathTheor 44 (2011) 405203

[3] G B Whitham Linear and nonlinear waves John Wiley amp Sons 1974

[4] C Lin E Reissner and H S Tien On two-dimensional nonsteadymotion of a slender body in a compressible fluid J Math Phys 27(1948) 220-231

[5] R Timman Unsteady motion in transonic flow Symposium Transson-icum Aachen 1962 EdKOswatitsch Springer 394-401

[6] E A Zobolotskaya and R V Khokhlov Quasi-plane waves in the non-linear acoustics of confined beams Soviet Physics- Acoustics Vol15N1 (1969)

29

[7] B B Kadomtsev and V I Petviashvili On the stability of solitarywaves in weakly dispersing media Soviet Physics-Doklady Vol15 N6(1970)

[8] X P Wang M J Ablowitz and H Segur Wave collapse and instabil-

ity of solitary waves of a generalized Kadomtsev-Petviashvili equationPhysica D 78 (1994) 241-265

[9] M J Ablowitz and H Segur Solitons and the Inverse Scattering Trans-

form SIAM Philadelphia 1981

[10] M J Ablowitz and P A Clarkson Solitons nonlinear evolution equa-

tions and inverse scattering Cambridge University Press 1991

[11] S Turitsyn and G Falkovitch Stability of magneto-elastic solitons andself-focusing of sound in antiferromagnets Sov Phys J Exp TheorPhys 62 (1985) 146-152

[12] S Novikov S V Manakov L P Pitaevskii V E Zakharov Theory of

solitons Consultant Bureau 1984

[13] S V Manakov and P M Santini Inverse scattering problem for vectorfields and the heavenly equation httparXivnlinSI0512043

[14] S V Manakov and P M Santini Inverse scattering problem forvector fields and the Cauchy problem for the heavenly equationPhys Lett A 359 613-619 (2006) doi101016jphysleta200607011httparXivnlinSI0604017

[15] S V Manakov and P M Santini The Cauchy problem on theplane for the dispersionless Kadomtsev-Petviashvili equation JETPLetters 83 No 10 462-466 (2006) 101134S0021364006100080httparXivnlinSI0604016

[16] P G Grinevich P M Santini and D Wu The Cauchy problem for thePavlov equation Nonlinearity 28 (2015) 3709-3754 doi1010880951-771528113709 Preprint arXiv13105834v2

[17] M V Pavlov Integrable hydrodynamic chains J Math Phys 44 (2003)4134-4156

30

ζ primeminus = minusa

3minus 3

radicρ

(

cos

(

θ

3

)

minusradic3 sin

(

θ

3

))

(546)

where

ρ =radic

R2 + |∆| θ = arctan

(

radic

|∆|R

)

(547)

We observe that for 0 le θ le π the following inequalities hold

minus cos

(

θ

3

)

minusradic3 sin

(

θ

3

)

le minus cos

(

θ

3

)

+radic3 sin

(

θ

3

)

le 2 cos

(

θ

3

)

so that

ζ prime+ le ζ primeminus le ζ prime0 rArr q(ζb + ζ prime0 η) le q(ζb + ζ primeminus η) le q(ζb + ζ prime+ η) (548)

for q decreasing in ζ Hence

ζ prime1(sprime ηprime τ prime) = ζ prime0(s

prime ηprime τ prime) ζ prime2(sprime ηprime τ prime) = ζ prime+(s

prime ηprime τ prime) (549)

Then (540) reduces to the equations

dsprime

dτ+ G

Gζ+ Gη

Gζηprime + 1

2

[

ζ prime0(sprime ηprime τ ) + ζ prime+(s

prime ηprime τ)]

= 0 for dKPdsprime

dτ+ G

2Gζ+ Gη

Gζηprime + 1

2

[

ζ prime0(sprime ηprime τ) + ζ prime+(s

prime ηprime τ)]

= 0 for mdKP

sprime(0) = ξb

(550)

obtained expanding (540) near the breaking point and recalling that τ equivτ primeτb

We remark that in the differential equations (550) sprime depends on ηprime

parametrically So the discontinuous (dissipative) shocks of the longtime so-lutions of the small data Cauchy problems for dKP and mdKP has a simplegeometric construction given τ gt 0 for any fixed |ηprime| le ηcusp the overturn-ing profile in the (ξ q) plane is intercepted by a vertical straight line cuttingoff equal area lobi in analogy with the 1 + 1 dimensional case

Going back to the dKP variables

The above formulae written in the convenient variables q ξ η τ are es-sentially the same for both dKP and mdKP relevant differences appear whenwe go back to the original variables u x y t inverting equations (52)(53)

u = 1radictq t = τ2

4 y = ητ2

2 x = ξ minus η2τ2

4 for dKP

u = 1radictq t = eτ y = 2ηeτ x = ξ minus η2eτ for mdKP

(551)

24

and all the above universal formulae are easily transfered to the dKP (mn)equations In particular small and localized initial data break i) at tb =τ 2b 4 in the point (xb yb) = (ξb minus τ 2b η

2b4 ηbτ

2b 2) of the parabolic wave front

x+ y2(4tb) = ξb evolving according to dKP and ii) at tb = eτb in the point(xb yb) = (ξb minus η2be

τb 2ηbeτb) of the parabolic wave front x + y2(4tb) = ξb

evolving according to mdKP If for instance we use the same Gaussian initialcondition (419) for both dKP and mdKP with ǫ = 02 then G is given by(422) in both cases Consequently for dKP

ζb = 196 ηb = 0 ξb = 327 τb = 657 (552)

and wave breaking takes place at tb = 108 in the point (xb yb) = (327 0)on the parabola x+ 231 middot 10minus2y2 = 327 (see Figure 4)

Figure 4 Plotting of the analytic dKP solution u in the physical variablesx y t for G given by (422) (corresponding to the gaussian initial condition)ǫ = 02 at breaking

For mdKP

ζb = 161 ηb = 0 ξb = 251 τb = 1431 (553)

and wave breaking takes place at tb = 164middot106 in the point (xb yb) = (251 0)on the parabola x + 152 middot 10minus7y2 = 251 and at breaking the amplitude ofthe wave is u = ǫtb

minus12G(ζb ηb) = 195 middot 10minus4 (see Figure 5)

25

Figure 5 Plotting of the analytic mdKP solution u in the physical variablesx y t for G given by (422) (corresponding to the gaussian initial condition)ǫ = 02 at breaking

Since in the mdKP case tb is very large and the wave amplitude atbreaking is very small we wonder if such a wave breaking could be actuallydetected numerically

Now we go into the analytic details For the dKP case

tprime equiv tminus tb sim 2tbτ yprime = y minus yb ≃ 2tb(ηprime + 2ηbτ + 2ηprimeτ )

xprime = xminus xb sim ξprime minus ηbyprime minus yprime2

4tb+ η2b t

prime + ηbtbyprimetprime

(554)

and we choose τ prime to be sufficiently small to have |tprime| |yprime| ≪ 1The dKP solution reads

u(x y t) =ǫradictG(ζb + ζ prime ηb + ηprime) =

ǫradict

(

G+Gζζprime +Gη

yprime

2tb+O

(

tprime

tb

))

(555)where ζ prime is the solution of the cubic (511) with

a =3Fζζη

2Fζζζ

yprime

tb b = 3

Fζζζ

(

Fζtprime

tb+ Fζηη

yprime2

4t2b

)

X = xprime +(

ηb minus Fη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime minus[

η2b +(

F2minus ηbFη

)

1|Fζ |tb

]

tprime

+(

1minus Fηη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime2

4tb+[

minusηb +(

Fη

2+ ηbFηη

)

12|Fζ |tb

]

yprimetprime

tb

minus Fηηη

48|Fζ |yprime3

t3b

(556)

26

The three-valued region (532) after breaking becomes

xprime +(

ηb minus Fη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime minus[

η2b +(

F2minus ηbFη

)

1|Fζ |tb

]

tprime

+(

1minus Fηη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime2

4tb+[

minusηb +(

Fη

2|Fζ |tb +ηbFηη

|Fζ | minus Fζζη

2Fζζζ

)

12tb

]

yprimetprime

tb

+ 16|Fζ |F 2

ζζζ

[

minus FηηηF2ζζζ + Fζζη(3FζζζFζηη minus 2F 2

ζζη)]

yprime3

8t3b

2

=

α3

9middot64F 2ζF 4ζζζ

t6b

(

(

yprimecusp(tprime))2 minus yprime2

)3

(557)

where

yprimecusp(tprime) = 2

radic

|Fζ |Fζζζ

α

radictbtprime (558)

Equation (557) describes a closed curve with two cusps in the (x y) - planeat the points

~xplusmncusp(t

prime) = (xb yb) + (xplusmnprime

cusp(tprime)plusmnyprimecusp(t

prime)) (559)

where

xplusmnprime

cusp(tprime) sim ∓2ηb

radic

|Fζ |Fζζζ

α

radictbtprime plusmn Fη

radic

Fζζζ

α|Fζ |

radic

tprime

tb

+(

η2b minus|Fζ |Fζζζ

α

)

tprime +(

F|Fζ | +

FηηFζζζ

α

)

tprime

2tbplusmn 2ηb

radic

|Fζ |Fζζζ

αtprime

32radictb+O(τ 32)

(560)At last the analogue of (539) reads

∆xprime le 2

3

radic

|Fζ|Fζζζ

(

tprime

tb

)32

(561)

it follows that the longitudinal width ∆long and the transversal width ∆transv

of the multivalued region are respectively

∆long = O

(

(

tprime

tb

)32

)

∆transv = O(

(tbtprime)

12

)

rArr ∆long

∆transv= O

(

tprime

t2b

)

(562)

For the mdKP case

tprime = tminus tb sim tbτprime yprime = y minus yb sim 2tb(η

prime + ηbtprime

tb+ ηprimetprime

tb)

xprime = xminus xb sim ξprime minus ηbyprime + η2b t

prime minus yprime2

4tb+ ηb

yprimetprime

tb

(563)

27

and we choose τ prime sufficiently small to have |tprime| |yprime| ≪ 1The mdKP solution reads

u(x y t) =ǫradictG(ζb+ζ prime ηb+ηprime) =

ǫradict

(

G+Gζζprime +Gη

yprime

2tb+O

(

tprime

tb log tb

))

(564)where ζ prime is the solution of the cubic (511) with

a =3Fζζη

2Fζζζ

yprime

tb b = 3

Fζζζ

(

2Fζtprime

tb log tb+ Fζηη

yprime2

4t2b

)

X = xprime +(

ηb minus Fη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime minus[

η2b +(

Flog tb

minus ηbFη

)

1|Fζ |tb

]

tprime

+(

1minus Fηη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime2

4tb+[

minusηb +(

Fη

|Fζ |(1minus1

log tb) + ηbFηη

|Fζ |

)

12tb

]

yprimetprime

tb

minus Fηηη

48|Fζ |yprime3

t3b

(565)

The three-valued region (532) after breaking becomes

xprime +(

ηb minus Fη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime minus[

η2b +(

Flog tb

minus ηbFη

)

1|Fζ |tb

]

tprime

+(

1minus Fηη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime2

4tb+[

minusηb +(

Fη

|Fζ |(1minus1

log tb) + ηbFηη

|Fζ| minus Fζζη

Fζζζ log tb

)

12tb

]

yprimetprime

tb

+ 16|Fζ |F 2

ζζζ

[

minus FηηηF2ζζζ + Fζζη(3FζζζFζηη minus 2F 2

ζζη)]

yprime3

8t3b

2

=

α3

9middot64F 2ζ F

4ζζζt

6b

(

(

yprimecusp(tprime))2 minus yprime2

)3

(566)where

yprimecusp(tprime) = 2

radic

2|Fζ |Fζζζ

α

radic

tbtprime

log tb (567)

Equation (566) describes a closed curve with two cusps in the (x y) - planeat the points

~xplusmncusp(t

prime) = (xb yb) + (xplusmnprime

cusp(tprime)plusmnyprimecusp(t

prime)) (568)

where

xplusmnprime

cusp(tprime) sim ∓2ηb

radic

|Fζ |Fζζζ

α

radic

tbtprime

log tbplusmn Fη

radic

Fζζζ

α|Fζ |

radic

tprime

tb log tb

+(

η2b minus|Fζ |Fζζζ

α log tb

)

tprime +(

F|Fζ | +

FηηFζζζ

α

)

tprime

tb log tbplusmn 2ηb

radic

|Fζ |Fζζζ

αtprime

32radic

tb log tb

+O(τ 32)

(569)

28

At last the analogue of (539) reads

∆xprime le 4radic2

3

radic

|Fζ |Fζζζ

(

tprime

tb log tb

)32

(570)

it follows that the longitudinal width ∆long and the transversal width ∆transv

of the multivalued region are respectively

∆long = O

(

(

tprime

tb log tb

)32

)

∆transv = O

(

(

tbtprime

log tb

)12

)

rArr ∆long

∆transv= O

(

tprime

t2blog tb

)

(571)

References

[1] F Santucci Onde debolmente non lineari e quasi unidimensionali in

Natura La rottura di tali onde e il problema della regolarizzazione dis-

sipativa Tesi della Laurea Specialistica in Fisica supervisor P M San-tini Dipartimento di Fisica dellrsquoUniversita di Roma ldquoLa Sapienzardquo AA2011-2012

[2] S V Manakov and P M Santini On the dispersionless Kadomtsev-Petviashvili equation in n + 1 dimensions exact solutions the Cauchyproblem for small initial data and wave breaking J Phys A MathTheor 44 (2011) 405203

[3] G B Whitham Linear and nonlinear waves John Wiley amp Sons 1974

[4] C Lin E Reissner and H S Tien On two-dimensional nonsteadymotion of a slender body in a compressible fluid J Math Phys 27(1948) 220-231

[5] R Timman Unsteady motion in transonic flow Symposium Transson-icum Aachen 1962 EdKOswatitsch Springer 394-401

[6] E A Zobolotskaya and R V Khokhlov Quasi-plane waves in the non-linear acoustics of confined beams Soviet Physics- Acoustics Vol15N1 (1969)

29

[7] B B Kadomtsev and V I Petviashvili On the stability of solitarywaves in weakly dispersing media Soviet Physics-Doklady Vol15 N6(1970)

[8] X P Wang M J Ablowitz and H Segur Wave collapse and instabil-

ity of solitary waves of a generalized Kadomtsev-Petviashvili equationPhysica D 78 (1994) 241-265

[9] M J Ablowitz and H Segur Solitons and the Inverse Scattering Trans-

form SIAM Philadelphia 1981

[10] M J Ablowitz and P A Clarkson Solitons nonlinear evolution equa-

tions and inverse scattering Cambridge University Press 1991

[11] S Turitsyn and G Falkovitch Stability of magneto-elastic solitons andself-focusing of sound in antiferromagnets Sov Phys J Exp TheorPhys 62 (1985) 146-152

[12] S Novikov S V Manakov L P Pitaevskii V E Zakharov Theory of

solitons Consultant Bureau 1984

[13] S V Manakov and P M Santini Inverse scattering problem for vectorfields and the heavenly equation httparXivnlinSI0512043

[14] S V Manakov and P M Santini Inverse scattering problem forvector fields and the Cauchy problem for the heavenly equationPhys Lett A 359 613-619 (2006) doi101016jphysleta200607011httparXivnlinSI0604017

[15] S V Manakov and P M Santini The Cauchy problem on theplane for the dispersionless Kadomtsev-Petviashvili equation JETPLetters 83 No 10 462-466 (2006) 101134S0021364006100080httparXivnlinSI0604016

[16] P G Grinevich P M Santini and D Wu The Cauchy problem for thePavlov equation Nonlinearity 28 (2015) 3709-3754 doi1010880951-771528113709 Preprint arXiv13105834v2

[17] M V Pavlov Integrable hydrodynamic chains J Math Phys 44 (2003)4134-4156

30

and all the above universal formulae are easily transfered to the dKP (mn)equations In particular small and localized initial data break i) at tb =τ 2b 4 in the point (xb yb) = (ξb minus τ 2b η

2b4 ηbτ

2b 2) of the parabolic wave front

x+ y2(4tb) = ξb evolving according to dKP and ii) at tb = eτb in the point(xb yb) = (ξb minus η2be

τb 2ηbeτb) of the parabolic wave front x + y2(4tb) = ξb

evolving according to mdKP If for instance we use the same Gaussian initialcondition (419) for both dKP and mdKP with ǫ = 02 then G is given by(422) in both cases Consequently for dKP

ζb = 196 ηb = 0 ξb = 327 τb = 657 (552)

and wave breaking takes place at tb = 108 in the point (xb yb) = (327 0)on the parabola x+ 231 middot 10minus2y2 = 327 (see Figure 4)

Figure 4 Plotting of the analytic dKP solution u in the physical variablesx y t for G given by (422) (corresponding to the gaussian initial condition)ǫ = 02 at breaking

For mdKP

ζb = 161 ηb = 0 ξb = 251 τb = 1431 (553)

and wave breaking takes place at tb = 164middot106 in the point (xb yb) = (251 0)on the parabola x + 152 middot 10minus7y2 = 251 and at breaking the amplitude ofthe wave is u = ǫtb

minus12G(ζb ηb) = 195 middot 10minus4 (see Figure 5)

25

Figure 5 Plotting of the analytic mdKP solution u in the physical variablesx y t for G given by (422) (corresponding to the gaussian initial condition)ǫ = 02 at breaking

Since in the mdKP case tb is very large and the wave amplitude atbreaking is very small we wonder if such a wave breaking could be actuallydetected numerically

Now we go into the analytic details For the dKP case

tprime equiv tminus tb sim 2tbτ yprime = y minus yb ≃ 2tb(ηprime + 2ηbτ + 2ηprimeτ )

xprime = xminus xb sim ξprime minus ηbyprime minus yprime2

4tb+ η2b t

prime + ηbtbyprimetprime

(554)

and we choose τ prime to be sufficiently small to have |tprime| |yprime| ≪ 1The dKP solution reads

u(x y t) =ǫradictG(ζb + ζ prime ηb + ηprime) =

ǫradict

(

G+Gζζprime +Gη

yprime

2tb+O

(

tprime

tb

))

(555)where ζ prime is the solution of the cubic (511) with

a =3Fζζη

2Fζζζ

yprime

tb b = 3

Fζζζ

(

Fζtprime

tb+ Fζηη

yprime2

4t2b

)

X = xprime +(

ηb minus Fη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime minus[

η2b +(

F2minus ηbFη

)

1|Fζ |tb

]

tprime

+(

1minus Fηη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime2

4tb+[

minusηb +(

Fη

2+ ηbFηη

)

12|Fζ |tb

]

yprimetprime

tb

minus Fηηη

48|Fζ |yprime3

t3b

(556)

26

The three-valued region (532) after breaking becomes

xprime +(

ηb minus Fη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime minus[

η2b +(

F2minus ηbFη

)

1|Fζ |tb

]

tprime

+(

1minus Fηη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime2

4tb+[

minusηb +(

Fη

2|Fζ |tb +ηbFηη

|Fζ | minus Fζζη

2Fζζζ

)

12tb

]

yprimetprime

tb

+ 16|Fζ |F 2

ζζζ

[

minus FηηηF2ζζζ + Fζζη(3FζζζFζηη minus 2F 2

ζζη)]

yprime3

8t3b

2

=

α3

9middot64F 2ζF 4ζζζ

t6b

(

(

yprimecusp(tprime))2 minus yprime2

)3

(557)

where

yprimecusp(tprime) = 2

radic

|Fζ |Fζζζ

α

radictbtprime (558)

Equation (557) describes a closed curve with two cusps in the (x y) - planeat the points

~xplusmncusp(t

prime) = (xb yb) + (xplusmnprime

cusp(tprime)plusmnyprimecusp(t

prime)) (559)

where

xplusmnprime

cusp(tprime) sim ∓2ηb

radic

|Fζ |Fζζζ

α

radictbtprime plusmn Fη

radic

Fζζζ

α|Fζ |

radic

tprime

tb

+(

η2b minus|Fζ |Fζζζ

α

)

tprime +(

F|Fζ | +

FηηFζζζ

α

)

tprime

2tbplusmn 2ηb

radic

|Fζ |Fζζζ

αtprime

32radictb+O(τ 32)

(560)At last the analogue of (539) reads

∆xprime le 2

3

radic

|Fζ|Fζζζ

(

tprime

tb

)32

(561)

it follows that the longitudinal width ∆long and the transversal width ∆transv

of the multivalued region are respectively

∆long = O

(

(

tprime

tb

)32

)

∆transv = O(

(tbtprime)

12

)

rArr ∆long

∆transv= O

(

tprime

t2b

)

(562)

For the mdKP case

tprime = tminus tb sim tbτprime yprime = y minus yb sim 2tb(η

prime + ηbtprime

tb+ ηprimetprime

tb)

xprime = xminus xb sim ξprime minus ηbyprime + η2b t

prime minus yprime2

4tb+ ηb

yprimetprime

tb

(563)

27

and we choose τ prime sufficiently small to have |tprime| |yprime| ≪ 1The mdKP solution reads

u(x y t) =ǫradictG(ζb+ζ prime ηb+ηprime) =

ǫradict

(

G+Gζζprime +Gη

yprime

2tb+O

(

tprime

tb log tb

))

(564)where ζ prime is the solution of the cubic (511) with

a =3Fζζη

2Fζζζ

yprime

tb b = 3

Fζζζ

(

2Fζtprime

tb log tb+ Fζηη

yprime2

4t2b

)

X = xprime +(

ηb minus Fη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime minus[

η2b +(

Flog tb

minus ηbFη

)

1|Fζ |tb

]

tprime

+(

1minus Fηη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime2

4tb+[

minusηb +(

Fη

|Fζ |(1minus1

log tb) + ηbFηη

|Fζ |

)

12tb

]

yprimetprime

tb

minus Fηηη

48|Fζ |yprime3

t3b

(565)

The three-valued region (532) after breaking becomes

xprime +(

ηb minus Fη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime minus[

η2b +(

Flog tb

minus ηbFη

)

1|Fζ |tb

]

tprime

+(

1minus Fηη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime2

4tb+[

minusηb +(

Fη

|Fζ |(1minus1

log tb) + ηbFηη

|Fζ| minus Fζζη

Fζζζ log tb

)

12tb

]

yprimetprime

tb

+ 16|Fζ |F 2

ζζζ

[

minus FηηηF2ζζζ + Fζζη(3FζζζFζηη minus 2F 2

ζζη)]

yprime3

8t3b

2

=

α3

9middot64F 2ζ F

4ζζζt

6b

(

(

yprimecusp(tprime))2 minus yprime2

)3

(566)where

yprimecusp(tprime) = 2

radic

2|Fζ |Fζζζ

α

radic

tbtprime

log tb (567)

Equation (566) describes a closed curve with two cusps in the (x y) - planeat the points

~xplusmncusp(t

prime) = (xb yb) + (xplusmnprime

cusp(tprime)plusmnyprimecusp(t

prime)) (568)

where

xplusmnprime

cusp(tprime) sim ∓2ηb

radic

|Fζ |Fζζζ

α

radic

tbtprime

log tbplusmn Fη

radic

Fζζζ

α|Fζ |

radic

tprime

tb log tb

+(

η2b minus|Fζ |Fζζζ

α log tb

)

tprime +(

F|Fζ | +

FηηFζζζ

α

)

tprime

tb log tbplusmn 2ηb

radic

|Fζ |Fζζζ

αtprime

32radic

tb log tb

+O(τ 32)

(569)

28

At last the analogue of (539) reads

∆xprime le 4radic2

3

radic

|Fζ |Fζζζ

(

tprime

tb log tb

)32

(570)

it follows that the longitudinal width ∆long and the transversal width ∆transv

of the multivalued region are respectively

∆long = O

(

(

tprime

tb log tb

)32

)

∆transv = O

(

(

tbtprime

log tb

)12

)

rArr ∆long

∆transv= O

(

tprime

t2blog tb

)

(571)

References

[1] F Santucci Onde debolmente non lineari e quasi unidimensionali in

Natura La rottura di tali onde e il problema della regolarizzazione dis-

sipativa Tesi della Laurea Specialistica in Fisica supervisor P M San-tini Dipartimento di Fisica dellrsquoUniversita di Roma ldquoLa Sapienzardquo AA2011-2012

[2] S V Manakov and P M Santini On the dispersionless Kadomtsev-Petviashvili equation in n + 1 dimensions exact solutions the Cauchyproblem for small initial data and wave breaking J Phys A MathTheor 44 (2011) 405203

[3] G B Whitham Linear and nonlinear waves John Wiley amp Sons 1974

[4] C Lin E Reissner and H S Tien On two-dimensional nonsteadymotion of a slender body in a compressible fluid J Math Phys 27(1948) 220-231

[5] R Timman Unsteady motion in transonic flow Symposium Transson-icum Aachen 1962 EdKOswatitsch Springer 394-401

[6] E A Zobolotskaya and R V Khokhlov Quasi-plane waves in the non-linear acoustics of confined beams Soviet Physics- Acoustics Vol15N1 (1969)

29

[7] B B Kadomtsev and V I Petviashvili On the stability of solitarywaves in weakly dispersing media Soviet Physics-Doklady Vol15 N6(1970)

[8] X P Wang M J Ablowitz and H Segur Wave collapse and instabil-

ity of solitary waves of a generalized Kadomtsev-Petviashvili equationPhysica D 78 (1994) 241-265

[9] M J Ablowitz and H Segur Solitons and the Inverse Scattering Trans-

form SIAM Philadelphia 1981

[10] M J Ablowitz and P A Clarkson Solitons nonlinear evolution equa-

tions and inverse scattering Cambridge University Press 1991

[11] S Turitsyn and G Falkovitch Stability of magneto-elastic solitons andself-focusing of sound in antiferromagnets Sov Phys J Exp TheorPhys 62 (1985) 146-152

[12] S Novikov S V Manakov L P Pitaevskii V E Zakharov Theory of

solitons Consultant Bureau 1984

[13] S V Manakov and P M Santini Inverse scattering problem for vectorfields and the heavenly equation httparXivnlinSI0512043

[14] S V Manakov and P M Santini Inverse scattering problem forvector fields and the Cauchy problem for the heavenly equationPhys Lett A 359 613-619 (2006) doi101016jphysleta200607011httparXivnlinSI0604017

[15] S V Manakov and P M Santini The Cauchy problem on theplane for the dispersionless Kadomtsev-Petviashvili equation JETPLetters 83 No 10 462-466 (2006) 101134S0021364006100080httparXivnlinSI0604016

[16] P G Grinevich P M Santini and D Wu The Cauchy problem for thePavlov equation Nonlinearity 28 (2015) 3709-3754 doi1010880951-771528113709 Preprint arXiv13105834v2

[17] M V Pavlov Integrable hydrodynamic chains J Math Phys 44 (2003)4134-4156

30

Figure 5 Plotting of the analytic mdKP solution u in the physical variablesx y t for G given by (422) (corresponding to the gaussian initial condition)ǫ = 02 at breaking

Since in the mdKP case tb is very large and the wave amplitude atbreaking is very small we wonder if such a wave breaking could be actuallydetected numerically

Now we go into the analytic details For the dKP case

tprime equiv tminus tb sim 2tbτ yprime = y minus yb ≃ 2tb(ηprime + 2ηbτ + 2ηprimeτ )

xprime = xminus xb sim ξprime minus ηbyprime minus yprime2

4tb+ η2b t

prime + ηbtbyprimetprime

(554)

and we choose τ prime to be sufficiently small to have |tprime| |yprime| ≪ 1The dKP solution reads

u(x y t) =ǫradictG(ζb + ζ prime ηb + ηprime) =

ǫradict

(

G+Gζζprime +Gη

yprime

2tb+O

(

tprime

tb

))

(555)where ζ prime is the solution of the cubic (511) with

a =3Fζζη

2Fζζζ

yprime

tb b = 3

Fζζζ

(

Fζtprime

tb+ Fζηη

yprime2

4t2b

)

X = xprime +(

ηb minus Fη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime minus[

η2b +(

F2minus ηbFη

)

1|Fζ |tb

]

tprime

+(

1minus Fηη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime2

4tb+[

minusηb +(

Fη

2+ ηbFηη

)

12|Fζ |tb

]

yprimetprime

tb

minus Fηηη

48|Fζ |yprime3

t3b

(556)

26

The three-valued region (532) after breaking becomes

xprime +(

ηb minus Fη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime minus[

η2b +(

F2minus ηbFη

)

1|Fζ |tb

]

tprime

+(

1minus Fηη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime2

4tb+[

minusηb +(

Fη

2|Fζ |tb +ηbFηη

|Fζ | minus Fζζη

2Fζζζ

)

12tb

]

yprimetprime

tb

+ 16|Fζ |F 2

ζζζ

[

minus FηηηF2ζζζ + Fζζη(3FζζζFζηη minus 2F 2

ζζη)]

yprime3

8t3b

2

=

α3

9middot64F 2ζF 4ζζζ

t6b

(

(

yprimecusp(tprime))2 minus yprime2

)3

(557)

where

yprimecusp(tprime) = 2

radic

|Fζ |Fζζζ

α

radictbtprime (558)

Equation (557) describes a closed curve with two cusps in the (x y) - planeat the points

~xplusmncusp(t

prime) = (xb yb) + (xplusmnprime

cusp(tprime)plusmnyprimecusp(t

prime)) (559)

where

xplusmnprime

cusp(tprime) sim ∓2ηb

radic

|Fζ |Fζζζ

α

radictbtprime plusmn Fη

radic

Fζζζ

α|Fζ |

radic

tprime

tb

+(

η2b minus|Fζ |Fζζζ

α

)

tprime +(

F|Fζ | +

FηηFζζζ

α

)

tprime

2tbplusmn 2ηb

radic

|Fζ |Fζζζ

αtprime

32radictb+O(τ 32)

(560)At last the analogue of (539) reads

∆xprime le 2

3

radic

|Fζ|Fζζζ

(

tprime

tb

)32

(561)

it follows that the longitudinal width ∆long and the transversal width ∆transv

of the multivalued region are respectively

∆long = O

(

(

tprime

tb

)32

)

∆transv = O(

(tbtprime)

12

)

rArr ∆long

∆transv= O

(

tprime

t2b

)

(562)

For the mdKP case

tprime = tminus tb sim tbτprime yprime = y minus yb sim 2tb(η

prime + ηbtprime

tb+ ηprimetprime

tb)

xprime = xminus xb sim ξprime minus ηbyprime + η2b t

prime minus yprime2

4tb+ ηb

yprimetprime

tb

(563)

27

and we choose τ prime sufficiently small to have |tprime| |yprime| ≪ 1The mdKP solution reads

u(x y t) =ǫradictG(ζb+ζ prime ηb+ηprime) =

ǫradict

(

G+Gζζprime +Gη

yprime

2tb+O

(

tprime

tb log tb

))

(564)where ζ prime is the solution of the cubic (511) with

a =3Fζζη

2Fζζζ

yprime

tb b = 3

Fζζζ

(

2Fζtprime

tb log tb+ Fζηη

yprime2

4t2b

)

X = xprime +(

ηb minus Fη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime minus[

η2b +(

Flog tb

minus ηbFη

)

1|Fζ |tb

]

tprime

+(

1minus Fηη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime2

4tb+[

minusηb +(

Fη

|Fζ |(1minus1

log tb) + ηbFηη

|Fζ |

)

12tb

]

yprimetprime

tb

minus Fηηη

48|Fζ |yprime3

t3b

(565)

The three-valued region (532) after breaking becomes

xprime +(

ηb minus Fη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime minus[

η2b +(

Flog tb

minus ηbFη

)

1|Fζ |tb

]

tprime

+(

1minus Fηη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime2

4tb+[

minusηb +(

Fη

|Fζ |(1minus1

log tb) + ηbFηη

|Fζ| minus Fζζη

Fζζζ log tb

)

12tb

]

yprimetprime

tb

+ 16|Fζ |F 2

ζζζ

[

minus FηηηF2ζζζ + Fζζη(3FζζζFζηη minus 2F 2

ζζη)]

yprime3

8t3b

2

=

α3

9middot64F 2ζ F

4ζζζt

6b

(

(

yprimecusp(tprime))2 minus yprime2

)3

(566)where

yprimecusp(tprime) = 2

radic

2|Fζ |Fζζζ

α

radic

tbtprime

log tb (567)

Equation (566) describes a closed curve with two cusps in the (x y) - planeat the points

~xplusmncusp(t

prime) = (xb yb) + (xplusmnprime

cusp(tprime)plusmnyprimecusp(t

prime)) (568)

where

xplusmnprime

cusp(tprime) sim ∓2ηb

radic

|Fζ |Fζζζ

α

radic

tbtprime

log tbplusmn Fη

radic

Fζζζ

α|Fζ |

radic

tprime

tb log tb

+(

η2b minus|Fζ |Fζζζ

α log tb

)

tprime +(

F|Fζ | +

FηηFζζζ

α

)

tprime

tb log tbplusmn 2ηb

radic

|Fζ |Fζζζ

αtprime

32radic

tb log tb

+O(τ 32)

(569)

28

At last the analogue of (539) reads

∆xprime le 4radic2

3

radic

|Fζ |Fζζζ

(

tprime

tb log tb

)32

(570)

it follows that the longitudinal width ∆long and the transversal width ∆transv

of the multivalued region are respectively

∆long = O

(

(

tprime

tb log tb

)32

)

∆transv = O

(

(

tbtprime

log tb

)12

)

rArr ∆long

∆transv= O

(

tprime

t2blog tb

)

(571)

References

[1] F Santucci Onde debolmente non lineari e quasi unidimensionali in

Natura La rottura di tali onde e il problema della regolarizzazione dis-

sipativa Tesi della Laurea Specialistica in Fisica supervisor P M San-tini Dipartimento di Fisica dellrsquoUniversita di Roma ldquoLa Sapienzardquo AA2011-2012

[2] S V Manakov and P M Santini On the dispersionless Kadomtsev-Petviashvili equation in n + 1 dimensions exact solutions the Cauchyproblem for small initial data and wave breaking J Phys A MathTheor 44 (2011) 405203

[3] G B Whitham Linear and nonlinear waves John Wiley amp Sons 1974

[4] C Lin E Reissner and H S Tien On two-dimensional nonsteadymotion of a slender body in a compressible fluid J Math Phys 27(1948) 220-231

[5] R Timman Unsteady motion in transonic flow Symposium Transson-icum Aachen 1962 EdKOswatitsch Springer 394-401

[6] E A Zobolotskaya and R V Khokhlov Quasi-plane waves in the non-linear acoustics of confined beams Soviet Physics- Acoustics Vol15N1 (1969)

29

[7] B B Kadomtsev and V I Petviashvili On the stability of solitarywaves in weakly dispersing media Soviet Physics-Doklady Vol15 N6(1970)

[8] X P Wang M J Ablowitz and H Segur Wave collapse and instabil-

ity of solitary waves of a generalized Kadomtsev-Petviashvili equationPhysica D 78 (1994) 241-265

[9] M J Ablowitz and H Segur Solitons and the Inverse Scattering Trans-

form SIAM Philadelphia 1981

[10] M J Ablowitz and P A Clarkson Solitons nonlinear evolution equa-

tions and inverse scattering Cambridge University Press 1991

[11] S Turitsyn and G Falkovitch Stability of magneto-elastic solitons andself-focusing of sound in antiferromagnets Sov Phys J Exp TheorPhys 62 (1985) 146-152

[12] S Novikov S V Manakov L P Pitaevskii V E Zakharov Theory of

solitons Consultant Bureau 1984

[13] S V Manakov and P M Santini Inverse scattering problem for vectorfields and the heavenly equation httparXivnlinSI0512043

[14] S V Manakov and P M Santini Inverse scattering problem forvector fields and the Cauchy problem for the heavenly equationPhys Lett A 359 613-619 (2006) doi101016jphysleta200607011httparXivnlinSI0604017

[15] S V Manakov and P M Santini The Cauchy problem on theplane for the dispersionless Kadomtsev-Petviashvili equation JETPLetters 83 No 10 462-466 (2006) 101134S0021364006100080httparXivnlinSI0604016

[16] P G Grinevich P M Santini and D Wu The Cauchy problem for thePavlov equation Nonlinearity 28 (2015) 3709-3754 doi1010880951-771528113709 Preprint arXiv13105834v2

[17] M V Pavlov Integrable hydrodynamic chains J Math Phys 44 (2003)4134-4156

30

The three-valued region (532) after breaking becomes

xprime +(

ηb minus Fη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime minus[

η2b +(

F2minus ηbFη

)

1|Fζ |tb

]

tprime

+(

1minus Fηη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime2

4tb+[

minusηb +(

Fη

2|Fζ |tb +ηbFηη

|Fζ | minus Fζζη

2Fζζζ

)

12tb

]

yprimetprime

tb

+ 16|Fζ |F 2

ζζζ

[

minus FηηηF2ζζζ + Fζζη(3FζζζFζηη minus 2F 2

ζζη)]

yprime3

8t3b

2

=

α3

9middot64F 2ζF 4ζζζ

t6b

(

(

yprimecusp(tprime))2 minus yprime2

)3

(557)

where

yprimecusp(tprime) = 2

radic

|Fζ |Fζζζ

α

radictbtprime (558)

Equation (557) describes a closed curve with two cusps in the (x y) - planeat the points

~xplusmncusp(t

prime) = (xb yb) + (xplusmnprime

cusp(tprime)plusmnyprimecusp(t

prime)) (559)

where

xplusmnprime

cusp(tprime) sim ∓2ηb

radic

|Fζ |Fζζζ

α

radictbtprime plusmn Fη

radic

Fζζζ

α|Fζ |

radic

tprime

tb

+(

η2b minus|Fζ |Fζζζ

α

)

tprime +(

F|Fζ | +

FηηFζζζ

α

)

tprime

2tbplusmn 2ηb

radic

|Fζ |Fζζζ

αtprime

32radictb+O(τ 32)

(560)At last the analogue of (539) reads

∆xprime le 2

3

radic

|Fζ|Fζζζ

(

tprime

tb

)32

(561)

it follows that the longitudinal width ∆long and the transversal width ∆transv

of the multivalued region are respectively

∆long = O

(

(

tprime

tb

)32

)

∆transv = O(

(tbtprime)

12

)

rArr ∆long

∆transv= O

(

tprime

t2b

)

(562)

For the mdKP case

tprime = tminus tb sim tbτprime yprime = y minus yb sim 2tb(η

prime + ηbtprime

tb+ ηprimetprime

tb)

xprime = xminus xb sim ξprime minus ηbyprime + η2b t

prime minus yprime2

4tb+ ηb

yprimetprime

tb

(563)

27

and we choose τ prime sufficiently small to have |tprime| |yprime| ≪ 1The mdKP solution reads

u(x y t) =ǫradictG(ζb+ζ prime ηb+ηprime) =

ǫradict

(

G+Gζζprime +Gη

yprime

2tb+O

(

tprime

tb log tb

))

(564)where ζ prime is the solution of the cubic (511) with

a =3Fζζη

2Fζζζ

yprime

tb b = 3

Fζζζ

(

2Fζtprime

tb log tb+ Fζηη

yprime2

4t2b

)

X = xprime +(

ηb minus Fη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime minus[

η2b +(

Flog tb

minus ηbFη

)

1|Fζ |tb

]

tprime

+(

1minus Fηη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime2

4tb+[

minusηb +(

Fη

|Fζ |(1minus1

log tb) + ηbFηη

|Fζ |

)

12tb

]

yprimetprime

tb

minus Fηηη

48|Fζ |yprime3

t3b

(565)

The three-valued region (532) after breaking becomes

xprime +(

ηb minus Fη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime minus[

η2b +(

Flog tb

minus ηbFη

)

1|Fζ |tb

]

tprime

+(

1minus Fηη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime2

4tb+[

minusηb +(

Fη

|Fζ |(1minus1

log tb) + ηbFηη

|Fζ| minus Fζζη

Fζζζ log tb

)

12tb

]

yprimetprime

tb

+ 16|Fζ |F 2

ζζζ

[

minus FηηηF2ζζζ + Fζζη(3FζζζFζηη minus 2F 2

ζζη)]

yprime3

8t3b

2

=

α3

9middot64F 2ζ F

4ζζζt

6b

(

(

yprimecusp(tprime))2 minus yprime2

)3

(566)where

yprimecusp(tprime) = 2

radic

2|Fζ |Fζζζ

α

radic

tbtprime

log tb (567)

Equation (566) describes a closed curve with two cusps in the (x y) - planeat the points

~xplusmncusp(t

prime) = (xb yb) + (xplusmnprime

cusp(tprime)plusmnyprimecusp(t

prime)) (568)

where

xplusmnprime

cusp(tprime) sim ∓2ηb

radic

|Fζ |Fζζζ

α

radic

tbtprime

log tbplusmn Fη

radic

Fζζζ

α|Fζ |

radic

tprime

tb log tb

+(

η2b minus|Fζ |Fζζζ

α log tb

)

tprime +(

F|Fζ | +

FηηFζζζ

α

)

tprime

tb log tbplusmn 2ηb

radic

|Fζ |Fζζζ

αtprime

32radic

tb log tb

+O(τ 32)

(569)

28

At last the analogue of (539) reads

∆xprime le 4radic2

3

radic

|Fζ |Fζζζ

(

tprime

tb log tb

)32

(570)

it follows that the longitudinal width ∆long and the transversal width ∆transv

of the multivalued region are respectively

∆long = O

(

(

tprime

tb log tb

)32

)

∆transv = O

(

(

tbtprime

log tb

)12

)

rArr ∆long

∆transv= O

(

tprime

t2blog tb

)

(571)

References

[1] F Santucci Onde debolmente non lineari e quasi unidimensionali in

Natura La rottura di tali onde e il problema della regolarizzazione dis-

sipativa Tesi della Laurea Specialistica in Fisica supervisor P M San-tini Dipartimento di Fisica dellrsquoUniversita di Roma ldquoLa Sapienzardquo AA2011-2012

[2] S V Manakov and P M Santini On the dispersionless Kadomtsev-Petviashvili equation in n + 1 dimensions exact solutions the Cauchyproblem for small initial data and wave breaking J Phys A MathTheor 44 (2011) 405203

[3] G B Whitham Linear and nonlinear waves John Wiley amp Sons 1974

[4] C Lin E Reissner and H S Tien On two-dimensional nonsteadymotion of a slender body in a compressible fluid J Math Phys 27(1948) 220-231

[5] R Timman Unsteady motion in transonic flow Symposium Transson-icum Aachen 1962 EdKOswatitsch Springer 394-401

[6] E A Zobolotskaya and R V Khokhlov Quasi-plane waves in the non-linear acoustics of confined beams Soviet Physics- Acoustics Vol15N1 (1969)

29

[7] B B Kadomtsev and V I Petviashvili On the stability of solitarywaves in weakly dispersing media Soviet Physics-Doklady Vol15 N6(1970)

[8] X P Wang M J Ablowitz and H Segur Wave collapse and instabil-

ity of solitary waves of a generalized Kadomtsev-Petviashvili equationPhysica D 78 (1994) 241-265

[9] M J Ablowitz and H Segur Solitons and the Inverse Scattering Trans-

form SIAM Philadelphia 1981

[10] M J Ablowitz and P A Clarkson Solitons nonlinear evolution equa-

tions and inverse scattering Cambridge University Press 1991

[11] S Turitsyn and G Falkovitch Stability of magneto-elastic solitons andself-focusing of sound in antiferromagnets Sov Phys J Exp TheorPhys 62 (1985) 146-152

[12] S Novikov S V Manakov L P Pitaevskii V E Zakharov Theory of

solitons Consultant Bureau 1984

[13] S V Manakov and P M Santini Inverse scattering problem for vectorfields and the heavenly equation httparXivnlinSI0512043

[14] S V Manakov and P M Santini Inverse scattering problem forvector fields and the Cauchy problem for the heavenly equationPhys Lett A 359 613-619 (2006) doi101016jphysleta200607011httparXivnlinSI0604017

[15] S V Manakov and P M Santini The Cauchy problem on theplane for the dispersionless Kadomtsev-Petviashvili equation JETPLetters 83 No 10 462-466 (2006) 101134S0021364006100080httparXivnlinSI0604016

[16] P G Grinevich P M Santini and D Wu The Cauchy problem for thePavlov equation Nonlinearity 28 (2015) 3709-3754 doi1010880951-771528113709 Preprint arXiv13105834v2

[17] M V Pavlov Integrable hydrodynamic chains J Math Phys 44 (2003)4134-4156

30

and we choose τ prime sufficiently small to have |tprime| |yprime| ≪ 1The mdKP solution reads

u(x y t) =ǫradictG(ζb+ζ prime ηb+ηprime) =

ǫradict

(

G+Gζζprime +Gη

yprime

2tb+O

(

tprime

tb log tb

))

(564)where ζ prime is the solution of the cubic (511) with

a =3Fζζη

2Fζζζ

yprime

tb b = 3

Fζζζ

(

2Fζtprime

tb log tb+ Fζηη

yprime2

4t2b

)

X = xprime +(

ηb minus Fη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime minus[

η2b +(

Flog tb

minus ηbFη

)

1|Fζ |tb

]

tprime

+(

1minus Fηη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime2

4tb+[

minusηb +(

Fη

|Fζ |(1minus1

log tb) + ηbFηη

|Fζ |

)

12tb

]

yprimetprime

tb

minus Fηηη

48|Fζ |yprime3

t3b

(565)

The three-valued region (532) after breaking becomes

xprime +(

ηb minus Fη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime minus[

η2b +(

Flog tb

minus ηbFη

)

1|Fζ |tb

]

tprime

+(

1minus Fηη

2|Fζ |tb

)

yprime2

4tb+[

minusηb +(

Fη

|Fζ |(1minus1

log tb) + ηbFηη

|Fζ| minus Fζζη

Fζζζ log tb

)

12tb

]

yprimetprime

tb

+ 16|Fζ |F 2

ζζζ

[

minus FηηηF2ζζζ + Fζζη(3FζζζFζηη minus 2F 2

ζζη)]

yprime3

8t3b

2

=

α3

9middot64F 2ζ F

4ζζζt

6b

(

(

yprimecusp(tprime))2 minus yprime2

)3

(566)where

yprimecusp(tprime) = 2

radic

2|Fζ |Fζζζ

α

radic

tbtprime

log tb (567)

Equation (566) describes a closed curve with two cusps in the (x y) - planeat the points

~xplusmncusp(t

prime) = (xb yb) + (xplusmnprime

cusp(tprime)plusmnyprimecusp(t

prime)) (568)

where

xplusmnprime

cusp(tprime) sim ∓2ηb

radic

|Fζ |Fζζζ

α

radic

tbtprime

log tbplusmn Fη

radic

Fζζζ

α|Fζ |

radic

tprime

tb log tb

+(

η2b minus|Fζ |Fζζζ

α log tb

)

tprime +(

F|Fζ | +

FηηFζζζ

α

)

tprime

tb log tbplusmn 2ηb

radic

|Fζ |Fζζζ

αtprime

32radic

tb log tb

+O(τ 32)

(569)

28

At last the analogue of (539) reads

∆xprime le 4radic2

3

radic

|Fζ |Fζζζ

(

tprime

tb log tb

)32

(570)

it follows that the longitudinal width ∆long and the transversal width ∆transv

of the multivalued region are respectively

∆long = O

(

(

tprime

tb log tb

)32

)

∆transv = O

(

(

tbtprime

log tb

)12

)

rArr ∆long

∆transv= O

(

tprime

t2blog tb

)

(571)

References

[1] F Santucci Onde debolmente non lineari e quasi unidimensionali in

Natura La rottura di tali onde e il problema della regolarizzazione dis-

sipativa Tesi della Laurea Specialistica in Fisica supervisor P M San-tini Dipartimento di Fisica dellrsquoUniversita di Roma ldquoLa Sapienzardquo AA2011-2012

[2] S V Manakov and P M Santini On the dispersionless Kadomtsev-Petviashvili equation in n + 1 dimensions exact solutions the Cauchyproblem for small initial data and wave breaking J Phys A MathTheor 44 (2011) 405203

[3] G B Whitham Linear and nonlinear waves John Wiley amp Sons 1974

[4] C Lin E Reissner and H S Tien On two-dimensional nonsteadymotion of a slender body in a compressible fluid J Math Phys 27(1948) 220-231

[5] R Timman Unsteady motion in transonic flow Symposium Transson-icum Aachen 1962 EdKOswatitsch Springer 394-401

[6] E A Zobolotskaya and R V Khokhlov Quasi-plane waves in the non-linear acoustics of confined beams Soviet Physics- Acoustics Vol15N1 (1969)

29

[7] B B Kadomtsev and V I Petviashvili On the stability of solitarywaves in weakly dispersing media Soviet Physics-Doklady Vol15 N6(1970)

[8] X P Wang M J Ablowitz and H Segur Wave collapse and instabil-

ity of solitary waves of a generalized Kadomtsev-Petviashvili equationPhysica D 78 (1994) 241-265

[9] M J Ablowitz and H Segur Solitons and the Inverse Scattering Trans-

form SIAM Philadelphia 1981

[10] M J Ablowitz and P A Clarkson Solitons nonlinear evolution equa-

tions and inverse scattering Cambridge University Press 1991

[11] S Turitsyn and G Falkovitch Stability of magneto-elastic solitons andself-focusing of sound in antiferromagnets Sov Phys J Exp TheorPhys 62 (1985) 146-152

[12] S Novikov S V Manakov L P Pitaevskii V E Zakharov Theory of

solitons Consultant Bureau 1984

[13] S V Manakov and P M Santini Inverse scattering problem for vectorfields and the heavenly equation httparXivnlinSI0512043

[14] S V Manakov and P M Santini Inverse scattering problem forvector fields and the Cauchy problem for the heavenly equationPhys Lett A 359 613-619 (2006) doi101016jphysleta200607011httparXivnlinSI0604017

[15] S V Manakov and P M Santini The Cauchy problem on theplane for the dispersionless Kadomtsev-Petviashvili equation JETPLetters 83 No 10 462-466 (2006) 101134S0021364006100080httparXivnlinSI0604016

[16] P G Grinevich P M Santini and D Wu The Cauchy problem for thePavlov equation Nonlinearity 28 (2015) 3709-3754 doi1010880951-771528113709 Preprint arXiv13105834v2

[17] M V Pavlov Integrable hydrodynamic chains J Math Phys 44 (2003)4134-4156

30

At last the analogue of (539) reads

∆xprime le 4radic2

3

radic

|Fζ |Fζζζ

(

tprime

tb log tb

)32

(570)

it follows that the longitudinal width ∆long and the transversal width ∆transv

of the multivalued region are respectively

∆long = O

(

(

tprime

tb log tb

)32

)

∆transv = O

(

(

tbtprime

log tb

)12

)

rArr ∆long

∆transv= O

(

tprime

t2blog tb

)

(571)

References

[1] F Santucci Onde debolmente non lineari e quasi unidimensionali in

Natura La rottura di tali onde e il problema della regolarizzazione dis-

sipativa Tesi della Laurea Specialistica in Fisica supervisor P M San-tini Dipartimento di Fisica dellrsquoUniversita di Roma ldquoLa Sapienzardquo AA2011-2012

[2] S V Manakov and P M Santini On the dispersionless Kadomtsev-Petviashvili equation in n + 1 dimensions exact solutions the Cauchyproblem for small initial data and wave breaking J Phys A MathTheor 44 (2011) 405203

[3] G B Whitham Linear and nonlinear waves John Wiley amp Sons 1974

[4] C Lin E Reissner and H S Tien On two-dimensional nonsteadymotion of a slender body in a compressible fluid J Math Phys 27(1948) 220-231

[5] R Timman Unsteady motion in transonic flow Symposium Transson-icum Aachen 1962 EdKOswatitsch Springer 394-401

[6] E A Zobolotskaya and R V Khokhlov Quasi-plane waves in the non-linear acoustics of confined beams Soviet Physics- Acoustics Vol15N1 (1969)

29

[7] B B Kadomtsev and V I Petviashvili On the stability of solitarywaves in weakly dispersing media Soviet Physics-Doklady Vol15 N6(1970)

[8] X P Wang M J Ablowitz and H Segur Wave collapse and instabil-

ity of solitary waves of a generalized Kadomtsev-Petviashvili equationPhysica D 78 (1994) 241-265

[9] M J Ablowitz and H Segur Solitons and the Inverse Scattering Trans-

form SIAM Philadelphia 1981

[10] M J Ablowitz and P A Clarkson Solitons nonlinear evolution equa-

tions and inverse scattering Cambridge University Press 1991

[11] S Turitsyn and G Falkovitch Stability of magneto-elastic solitons andself-focusing of sound in antiferromagnets Sov Phys J Exp TheorPhys 62 (1985) 146-152

[12] S Novikov S V Manakov L P Pitaevskii V E Zakharov Theory of

solitons Consultant Bureau 1984

[13] S V Manakov and P M Santini Inverse scattering problem for vectorfields and the heavenly equation httparXivnlinSI0512043

[14] S V Manakov and P M Santini Inverse scattering problem forvector fields and the Cauchy problem for the heavenly equationPhys Lett A 359 613-619 (2006) doi101016jphysleta200607011httparXivnlinSI0604017

[15] S V Manakov and P M Santini The Cauchy problem on theplane for the dispersionless Kadomtsev-Petviashvili equation JETPLetters 83 No 10 462-466 (2006) 101134S0021364006100080httparXivnlinSI0604016

[16] P G Grinevich P M Santini and D Wu The Cauchy problem for thePavlov equation Nonlinearity 28 (2015) 3709-3754 doi1010880951-771528113709 Preprint arXiv13105834v2

[17] M V Pavlov Integrable hydrodynamic chains J Math Phys 44 (2003)4134-4156

30

[7] B B Kadomtsev and V I Petviashvili On the stability of solitarywaves in weakly dispersing media Soviet Physics-Doklady Vol15 N6(1970)

[8] X P Wang M J Ablowitz and H Segur Wave collapse and instabil-

ity of solitary waves of a generalized Kadomtsev-Petviashvili equationPhysica D 78 (1994) 241-265

[9] M J Ablowitz and H Segur Solitons and the Inverse Scattering Trans-

form SIAM Philadelphia 1981

[10] M J Ablowitz and P A Clarkson Solitons nonlinear evolution equa-

tions and inverse scattering Cambridge University Press 1991

[11] S Turitsyn and G Falkovitch Stability of magneto-elastic solitons andself-focusing of sound in antiferromagnets Sov Phys J Exp TheorPhys 62 (1985) 146-152

[12] S Novikov S V Manakov L P Pitaevskii V E Zakharov Theory of

solitons Consultant Bureau 1984

[13] S V Manakov and P M Santini Inverse scattering problem for vectorfields and the heavenly equation httparXivnlinSI0512043

[14] S V Manakov and P M Santini Inverse scattering problem forvector fields and the Cauchy problem for the heavenly equationPhys Lett A 359 613-619 (2006) doi101016jphysleta200607011httparXivnlinSI0604017

[15] S V Manakov and P M Santini The Cauchy problem on theplane for the dispersionless Kadomtsev-Petviashvili equation JETPLetters 83 No 10 462-466 (2006) 101134S0021364006100080httparXivnlinSI0604016

[16] P G Grinevich P M Santini and D Wu The Cauchy problem for thePavlov equation Nonlinearity 28 (2015) 3709-3754 doi1010880951-771528113709 Preprint arXiv13105834v2

[17] M V Pavlov Integrable hydrodynamic chains J Math Phys 44 (2003)4134-4156

30

[18] S V Manakov and P M Santini On the solutions of the dKP equa-tion nonlinear Riemann Hilbert problem longtime behaviour implicitsolutions and wave breaking JPhysA MathTheor 41 (2008) 055204doi1010881751-8113415055204 (arXiv07071802 (2007))

[19] S V Manakov and P M Santini On the wave breaking of solutions ofthe dispersionless Kadomtsev-Petviashvili equation at finite time TeorMat Phys 1722(2012) 1118-1126

[20] B Dubrovin T Grava and C Klein On the critical behaviour in gen-eralized Kadomtsev-Petviashvili equation arXiv151001580v1

[21] S V Manakov and P M Santini Solvable vector nonlinear Rie-mann problems exact implicit solutions of dispersionless PDEs andwave breaking J Phys A Math Theor 44 (2011) 345203 (19pp)doi1010881751-81134434345203 arXiv10112619

[22] M Abramowitz and I A Stegun ed Handbook of mathematical func-

tions with formulas graphs and mathematical tables Dover Publica-tions New York 1972

[23] A Erdelyi W Magnus F Oberhettinger F G Tricomi Higher tran-

scendental functions volume I McGraw-Hill 1953

31