august 2, 2007 tac meeting texas nodal program update tim pare

16
August 2, 2007 TAC Meeting Texas Nodal Program Update Tim Pare

Upload: barbra-doyle

Post on 28-Dec-2015

217 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: August 2, 2007 TAC Meeting Texas Nodal Program Update Tim Pare

August 2, 2007TAC Meeting

Texas Nodal Program Update

Tim Pare

Page 2: August 2, 2007 TAC Meeting Texas Nodal Program Update Tim Pare

August 2, 2007TAC Meeting

Texas Nodal Program Update

Tim Pare

Page 3: August 2, 2007 TAC Meeting Texas Nodal Program Update Tim Pare

3Texas Nodal Program UpdateAugust 2, 2007 3

Agenda

Item Who Purpose

Nodal Program Status Tim Pare For Information

Nodal Organization Structure Tim Pare For Information

Nodal Schedule Update Tim Pare For Information

Nodal Scorecard Demonstration Tim Pare For Information

Market Readiness Update Tim Pare For Information

Testing Tim Pare For Information

Budget Update Tim Pare For Information

Page 4: August 2, 2007 TAC Meeting Texas Nodal Program Update Tim Pare

4Texas Nodal Program UpdateAugust 2, 2007 4

The program remains at overall Amber status with Scope / Quality improving following recent Change Control Baseline

CostScheduleScope / Quality

Legend

Summary

Green

The program is spending under budget through June’s actuals. Discussions with the ERCOT

Executive Committee outlined possible ways to ensure we are on

budget at completion.

Amber Amber

Baseline 1 & 2 were approved by the BoD on

July 17 and changes are now being

incorporated

Red

Amber

Green Estimate at Complete = <$248m

Estimate at Complete = $248 - $263m

Estimate at Complete = >$263m

Go-live = 12/1/08

Go-live = <30 days+

Go-live = >30 days+

Program is aligned with current protocols

Program is aligned to previous protocol version

Program is not aligned to protocols

There are several schedule risks in Baseline 1 & 2 which we are

analyzing.

Amber

Current product quality is not sufficient for Nodal launch

Most Nodal products currently achieve quality standards

All Nodal products currently achieve quality standards

All Nodal projects have submitted

Quality Assurance plans, and are in

the process of completing

internal Quality reviews.

Scope/Quality

Nodal

Cost

ScheduleScope/Quality

Schedule

Cost

Nodal Delivery

Page 5: August 2, 2007 TAC Meeting Texas Nodal Program Update Tim Pare

5Texas Nodal Program UpdateAugust 2, 2007 5

Nodal Organization Chart

July 2007

1 Murray Nixon assumes MMS effective July 23, and Al Hirsch retains EMS project management

2+3 Changes as a result of Steve Grendel assuming new roles in Zonal

1 2

3

Page 6: August 2, 2007 TAC Meeting Texas Nodal Program Update Tim Pare

6Texas Nodal Program UpdateAugust 2, 2007 6

Market Readiness Update - Market Readiness Metrics Scorecard

Metrics scorecard development late Hired new analyst (C. Wilkinson) Moved responsibility to Program Control Office

Scorecard Iteration 1 Lays foundation for future releases Provides top-level, drill-down, and individual MP results based on survey TPTF Beta available August 10, 2007 Anticipated full release August 17, 2007

Scorecard Iteration 2 in-progress Will display status of ERCOT internal readiness metrics (E1, E8, and E9) Begin to display related EDS metrics Planned go-live end of September

Page 7: August 2, 2007 TAC Meeting Texas Nodal Program Update Tim Pare

7Texas Nodal Program UpdateAugust 2, 2007 7

Market Readiness Update – Inventory Update & In-Progress and Near-Term Metrics

Current Readiness Metric Inventory to be reviewed by TPTF July 24, 2007

In Progress and Near-Term: ERCOT Departmental reporting

Training and Organization Design - In progress Internal procedures beginning August 1, 2007 Nodal Operating Guides beginning December 1, 2007

ERCOT-observable metrics MP Engagement – In progress EDS 1 Telemetry Alarm Processing – In progress

30 percent validated (30,000 points-to-points complete out of 100,000) MP Registration Activities – September 2007 MP EDS-2 Trials Participation – October 2007

MP Self Reporting First Self Reporting Questionnaire completed July 9, 2007

55 responses received Cleansing data now to ensure consistency across responses

Planned follow-up bi-monthly/quarterly thereafter

Page 8: August 2, 2007 TAC Meeting Texas Nodal Program Update Tim Pare

8Texas Nodal Program UpdateAugust 2, 2007 8

Market Readiness Update – Wall of Shame*

The following Market Participants have not completed the Self-Reporting Questionnaire:

APN Starfirst LP Barclays Bank PLC Pegasus Alliance Corporation DBA Onpac Energy Pepco Energy Services Inc Pre Buy Electric LLC Sitara Energy Inc Urban Energy Source LLC W Power And Light LP WCW International Inc Young Energy LLC

* Experience in other countries has proven the Terminology based on Hall of Fame / Wall of Shame to be effective.

Page 9: August 2, 2007 TAC Meeting Texas Nodal Program Update Tim Pare

9Texas Nodal Program UpdateAugust 2, 2007 9

Market Readiness Update – Wall of Shame*

The following QSEs Without Resources have not identified their NODAL Accountable Executive (AE):

Citadel Energy Products LLC Clearview Electric Inc DPI Energy LLC Duke Energy Ohio Inc Hwy 3 MHP LLC Kansas City Power and Light Company National Power Company Inc Northern States Power Company Texpo Power LP DBA Texpo Energy

These Market Participants have not been engaged in readiness to the degree QSEs With Resources and TSPs have been. ERCOT will increase contact with these Market Participants as the project approaches testing with QSEs Without Resources on MIS and/or API and other key activities.

* Experience in other countries has proven the Terminology based on Hall of Fame / Wall of Shame to be effective.

Page 10: August 2, 2007 TAC Meeting Texas Nodal Program Update Tim Pare

10Texas Nodal Program UpdateAugust 2, 2007 10

Testing - The approach to get there…

Start simple, incrementally add complexity, and repeat the process until it becomes second nature

Testing

Page 11: August 2, 2007 TAC Meeting Texas Nodal Program Update Tim Pare

11Texas Nodal Program UpdateAugust 2, 2007 11

The EDS Artifacts detailing the test effort…

EDS 1 Approach EDS 2

ApproachEDS 3

Approach EDS 4 Approach

SCED Handbook

LFC Handbook CRR

HandbookDAM

Handbook

ERCOT Nodal Transition Plan

_____________

Map to: ERCOT Nodal Transition Plan Sections Protocol Sections

Map to: Functional Requirements

Are based on the same inputs as internal testing artifacts, but the focus of the testing is different

Page 12: August 2, 2007 TAC Meeting Texas Nodal Program Update Tim Pare

12Texas Nodal Program UpdateAugust 2, 2007 12

Testing - Summary Release ScheduleE

DS

4

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

Alarms Processing

FAT

EMS 2A

ED

S 1

ED

S 2

ED

S 3

FAT – Rel 3

EMS 2B EDW 1

FAT – Release 4

NMMS 1 NMMS 2 EIP 1

FAT – Release 5

REG 1 MMS 1

EMS 2C

EIP 2 S&B 1MIS 1EIP 3

EDW 2

FAT – Release 6

EMS 3EDW 3

EIP 4

FAT – Release 7

EDW 4CRR 1CMM 1 EIP 5

FAT – Release 8

MMS 2S&B 2

EDW 5 EIP 6

FAT – Release 9

MMS 2S&B 2

OS

NMMS 3 EMS 4EDW 6

EIP 7EMS 5 DIS

P2P Checkout

SE Verification

ITEST

RTM Go-Live

DAM Go-Live

EDS 2 Release 3: SE VerEMS- State Estimator & Tel Perf Stds,NSA, SPS/RAP, SCADA and DynRatings for Single Model

EDW– SE Statistics

EDS 2 Release 4: NM VerNMMS- Network Model, NOMCR

EMS- EMS /NMMS Interface

EIP

EDS 3 Release 5: LMPsMMS– SCED

EMS- NSA, RLC

COMS- S&B (FIP, FOP,Ver Costs)- Registration

EIPMISEDW

EDS 3 Release 6: LFC TestingEMS- LFC

EIPEDW

EDS 3 Release 7: CRRCRRCOMS- CMM

EIPEDW

EDS 4 Release 8: RT SettlementsMMS- RT Settlements InterfaceS&BEIP, EDWEDS 4 Release 9: DAM, RUCMMS- All Markets- OSEMS – Load Forecast, Out EvalNMMSS&BEIP, EDW

ITEST

ITEST

LegendIntegration TestingProject FAT Activities

Settlements Statements

Upload Bids

Test Settlements

Outages DAM, RUC, SASMFull Nodal Functionality

24*7 Operation 168 Hr Test

NOMCR Chk out Network Model Verification

Rel 1

Rel 2

EDS 1 Release 1:EMS COTS

EDS 1 Release 2:ICCP Upgrade

Rel 3

FAT

EDS

FAT

ITEST

EDS

FAT

ITEST

EDS

SCED TestingRegUpload Offers

Rel 4

Rel 5

Rel 7

Rel 6

6 month LMP Posting

CRR Data Validation Trial Ops of CRR

LFC Comms Testing

ITEST

EDS

FAT

FAT

EDS

ITEST

ED

S 4 Go-Live

Activities

EDS 1 EDS 2 EDS 3 EDS 4

MP Interface Spec

Start of EDS activities

FAT milestones

EDS Preparatory Milestones

Rel 8

Rel 9

LFC Testing

ReadinessDeclaration

Readiness Declarations

Page 13: August 2, 2007 TAC Meeting Texas Nodal Program Update Tim Pare

13Texas Nodal Program UpdateAugust 2, 2007 13

EDS 1 – Testing Results

EDS 1 will verify each of the approximately 90,000 ICCP points, as the scheduled MP operator manually changes a point’s status or data value.

ERCOT operations observes the update within the specified timeframe and records a pass or failure and the type of failure.

Market Participants

ESD1 Test Progress to-date

Missing Equipment Missing Points Mis-Mapped Points

No Change in Quality Code Value Polarity Reversed Scan Rate failure

Suspect Point Value

Testing Failures by Type of Failure

Start Date: 6/1/2007 End Date: 9/30/2007

Testing Schedule is on track.

Testing results and failure rate are within expectations.

Test observations

Total ICCP Points Verified = 33,040 of 90,132 ~ 40% complete, Error Rate ~ 4%

Page 14: August 2, 2007 TAC Meeting Texas Nodal Program Update Tim Pare

14Texas Nodal Program UpdateAugust 2, 2007 14

Testing – EDS3 & EDS4 Test Plans

EDS4EDS3

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

ED

S 3

LMP Data ValidationRegUpload OffersRel 5

Rel 7

Rel 6

6 month LMP Posting

CRR Data Validation Trial Ops of CRR

LFC COMs TestingEDS LFC Testing

ED

S 4

RTM Go-Live

DAM Go-Live

Settlements Statements

Upload Bids

Test Settlements

Outages DAM, RUC, SASMFull Nodal Functionality

24*7 Operation 168 Hr Test

EDS

Go-LiveActivities

MP Interface Spec

Rel 8

Rel 9

EDSApproach

EDS 3 Approach

SCED Handbook

Phase 1 to 4

LFC Handbook

Phase1 & 2

EDS 4 Approach

CRR Handbook

S&B Handbook

DAM Handbook

168 Hour Test

Handbook

Nodal Cutover

Handbook

Zonal Wind Down

HandbookOutage

Handbook

RUCHandbook

SASMHandbookEDS 3

EDS 4

Major milestones

EDS Preparation Milestones

Approved

In progress

TPTF Submission (approximate)

Legend

http://nodal.ercot.com/docs/pd/eds/eds3/eds3dp/EDS_3_Approach_v1.0_061107.dochttp://nodal.ercot.com/docs/pd/eds/eds3/scedhdbk/EDS_SCED_MP_Handbook_V1.02.doc

Approved Documents

Summary Release Schedule

On track for milestoneDocument Status

Ahead

Document Status

Page 15: August 2, 2007 TAC Meeting Texas Nodal Program Update Tim Pare

15Texas Nodal Program UpdateAugust 2, 2007 15

We have made improvements from our “Early” EDS3 experience

We have proved the “Cloning” process for migrating applications Installation of MMS SCED in the EDS environment is already complete Migration experience of MMS applications has improved internally Additional practice migrations were conducted to further reduce future

migration durations Cycle time for migration defect resolution has now been reduced from days to a

few hours

The good news is, we are addressing these issues today before the key critical path milestones

Page 16: August 2, 2007 TAC Meeting Texas Nodal Program Update Tim Pare

16Texas Nodal Program UpdateAugust 2, 2007 16

The cost impact of Baseline 1 & 2 will be negated through cost savings across the Program

Nodal Program Budget 263.0$

Fund savings from various projects (6.4) All Projects - anticipated staffing reductions, being analyzed

Other reductions, being analyzed

Total 263.0$

Nodal ProgramPlan to achieve $263 Budget

($ Millions)

(3.7)

Increased costs associated with Baseline 1 & 2 10.1