audit presentation rewriting depot prescription card …
TRANSCRIPT
AUDIT AND REAUDIT OFREWRITING DEPOT PRESCRIPTION CARDS
IN TREATMENT TEAM IN FOLLY HALL, HUDDERSFIELD
BY DR CHINWE VIOLA UTOMI
CT2 PSYCHIATRY TRAINEE, OLD AGE INPATIENT
SOUTH WEST YORKSHIRE PARTNERSHIP NHS TRUST
SUPERVISED BY DR DOUGLAS
INTRODUCTION
• WHY THIS AUDIT?
• I carried out a retrospective study of cards re-
written between April and June 2020 in the
treatment team in Folly Hall in July 2020.
• To evaluate whether we were re-writing depot
cards according to Trust's guideline.
• The outcome was noted, recommendations were
made and followed.
• Then a re-audit was done in July 2021 using
cards re-written between April and June 2021.
TRUST GUIDELINES FOR PRESCRIBERS ON RE-WRITING DEPOT PRESCRIPTIONS
Is the dose within the BNF limit? If not, is there a high dose
antipsychotic form?
Has the patient had a set of bloods and ECG done as per
guideline?
Has the patient had a BMI check and set of observation recorded within the past year?
Has the patient been asked about side
effects?
Has the patient been reviewed by a medic in the past 1 year?
TABLE SHOWING SUMMARISED INVESTIGATION GUIDELINE
INVESTIGATION BASELINE 6 MONTHS 12 MONTHS ONGOING
Full blood count ** ** Annually
Urea & Electrolytes ** ** Annually
Liver function ** ** Annually
Thyroid function ** ** Annually
Prolactin ** ** ** Annually
Glucose/ HbA1c ** ** ** Annually
Lipid profile ** ** Annually
ECG ** ** Annually
SAMPLING METHOD
Cards were chosen randomly from the shelves and sorted by choosing cards re-written in the specified period of the audit.
Sample size of 40 prescription cards.
Same method was used for the re-audit.
In addition, cards were grouped into the Core team and Enhanced team.
DATA GATHERING
Prescription cards – Information retrieved includes Dose of antipsychotic and side effects chart
SystmOne- Last review by medics, BMI and observations record
ICE – Date of last blood result
RESULTAUDIT REAUDIT
DOSE 100% 100%
BLOOD RESULT 34 OUT OF 40
(85%)
40 OUT OF 40
(100%)
BMI AND OBS 100% 100%
SIDE EFFECTS 100% ON
SYSTEM1
100% ON
SYSTEM1
REVIEWED BY
MEDIC
34 OUT OF 40
(85%)
35 OUT OF 40
(87%)
ECG 26 OUT OF 40
(65%)
30 OUT OF 40
(75%)
GRAPHIC REPRESENTATION OF AUDIT AND REAUDIT RESULTS
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120%
BLOOD RESULT BMI AND OBS SIDE EFFECTS REVIEWED BY MEDIC ECG
Chart Title
AUDIT REAUDIT Column1
RESULT INTERPRETATION
• The result showed an improvement across board as service users that had up
to date bloods moved from 80% to 100%, BMI/Obs check and side effect
charts remained at 100%, those that has been reviewed by a medic in the
last 1 year increased to 87%, while those that have had ECG done moved
from 65% to 75%.
RESULT CONTINUED
CORE TEAM ENHANCED TEAM
DOSE OF
MEDICATION
24 OUT OF 24
(100%)
16 OUT OF 16 (100%)
BLOOD RESULT 24 OUT OF 24
(100%)
16 OUT OF 16 (100%)
OBS AND BMI 24 OUT OF 24
(100%)
16 OUT OF 16 (100%)
SIDE EFFECT CHART 24 OUT OF 24
(100%)
16 OUT OF 16 (100%)
REVIEWED BY MEDIC 21 OUT OF 24
(87.5%)
14 OUT OF 16 (87.25%)
ECG 17 OUT OF 24 (70%) 13 OUT OF 16 (81%)
RECOMMENDATIONS FROM AUDIT
Report Audit result according to teams.
Redesign a reminder chart to paste in the treatment team (next slide is a sample of the reminder chart posted in the treatment team)
Liaise with the treatment team nurses on the best way to record side effects, and possibly blood result.
In addition, a reminder email was sent out.
GUIDELINES FOR REWRITING DEPOT CARDS
Are you about to rewrite Depot cards? Please check, fill the date and tick boxes
completed.
Is the dose of the antipsychotic
within the BNF limit? If not, is
there a high dose monitoring card
attached?
Are the bloods up to date?
Has the patient done a recent
ECG?
Are the Observations and BMI
recorded?
Have you looked at the side effect
chart?
Has the patient been reviewed by
a medic in the last one year?
Can you please record your
findings on systemone
RECOMMENDATIONS FROM REAUDIT
To continue using the reminder chart as it proved effective
For nursing staff to continue recording the due date for next set of bloods at the top corner of the prescription cards.
A similar audit can be carried out in other treatment teams
RECOMMENDATION
These were further recommendations after presentation-
To clarify if waist measurement is part of the guideline.
To clarify if patients turned up for annual review, as this may account for some of the lapses.
CONCLUSION
The full audit cycle of audit and reaudit has been completed with improvement seen in some aspects of the service provided. It is important to continue following the recommendations that produced these results.
The audit has also highlighted areas that needs further improvement. An audit may be carried out again to assess for further improvements.