attachment 1 - california
TRANSCRIPT
ATTACHMENT 1 (WMP Guidelines)
R.18-10-007 ALJ/SRT/ilz
FILED12/16/1911:53 AM
1 / 90
1
Wildfire Mitigation Plan (WMP) Guidelines Overall Table of Contents
I. WMP submission and review process and timeline…………...……………….….………2
II. Wildfire Mitigation Plan Guidelines…………...………………...………………...…………….4
III. Cross reference §8386(c) to 2020 WMP Guidelines….….….….….….………..….….86
R.18-10-007 ALJ/SRT/ilz
2 / 90
2
I. WMP submission and review process and timeline The California Public Utilities Commission (henceforth the CPUC or the Commission) Guidance Decision (D.19-05-036) included substantive and procedural requirements for future plans based on lessons learned during the first WMP proceeding and established an expectation for improvement in the WMPs each year. The experience of the 2019 WMP submission and review process points towards the benefit of greater structure and consistency in data, receiving supporting data earlier in the WMP process, and utilizing a structured and consistent approach to evaluate utility wildfire mitigation. Several guiding principles based on lessons learned inform the WMP Guidelines for 2020: frontloading the WMP review cycle where possible, standardizing information collection, and establishing a baseline of risk exposure and maturity for each utility. Accordingly, the WSD will adopt four key elements of the 2020 WMP submission and review process:
1. Frontload data collection. This will extend the timeframe for WSD and party review of relevant utility data in advance of the WMP submission and review period, in addition to reducing the need for follow-up data requests.
2. Standardize templates for utility WMP submission. Templates help WSD staff more easily uncover relevant supporting information and facilitate comparison across utilities.
3. Systematize qualitative evaluation using the utility wildfire mitigation maturity assessment. An assessment framework increases the objectivity of review and allows WSD staff to more efficiently conduct a thorough review.
4. Use audit to validate wildfire mitigation maturity model assessment. Audits can help the WSD ensure accuracy and consistency of the utility wildfire mitigation maturity assessments.
R.18-10-007 ALJ/SRT/ilz
3 / 90
3 Tim
elin
e to
acc
omm
odat
e pr
oces
s upd
ates
W
here
feas
ible
, the
WM
P su
bmiss
ion
and
revi
ew ti
mel
ine
will
be
upda
ted
to a
ccom
mod
ate
thes
e pr
oces
s upd
ates
, as b
elow
. The
202
0 W
MP
cycle
cann
ot a
ccom
mod
ate
the
full
120-
day
pre-
WM
P pr
epar
atio
n ph
ase.
The
refo
re, C
PUC
staf
f sha
ll en
gage
with
util
ities
to b
egin
wor
king
on
unde
rsta
ndin
g m
etho
dolo
gy a
nd d
ata
that
supp
orts
WM
Ps a
head
of t
he 2
020
filin
g. In
futu
re y
ears
, a fu
ller 1
20 d
ay p
re-W
MP
prep
arat
ion
phas
e w
ill b
e us
ed.
Fi
gure
1 o
utlin
es th
e fu
ture
vie
w o
f the
WM
P su
bmiss
ion
and
revi
ew ti
mel
ine.
Eac
h nu
mbe
r in
Figu
re 1
repr
esen
ts th
e im
plem
enta
tion
of o
ne o
f th
e fo
ur k
ey e
lem
ents
abo
ve.
Figu
re 1
: Des
crip
tive
view
of f
utur
e W
MP
subm
issio
n an
d re
view
tim
elin
e
R
.18-
10-0
07 A
LJ/S
RT/
ilz
4 / 90
4
II. Wildfire Mitigation Plan Guidelines
Structure
The WMP itself is composed of five sections and their corresponding templates: 1. Persons responsible for executing the plan, 2. Metrics and underlying data, 3. Baseline ignition probability and wildfire risk exposure, 4. Inputs to the plan, including current and directional vision for wildfire risk exposure, 5. Wildfire mitigation activity for each year of the 3-year WMP term, including expected outcomes
of the 3-year plan.
An additional section 6 in the document provides a location for utilities to attach the GIS files required to support the information reported.
Instructions for filling out the WMP are given with each section of the WMP. Sections of this document contain a portion for the utility to provide a narrative response. This narrative response may include quantitative and qualitative explanations, as well as supporting documentation including relevant maps, spreadsheets, photographs, and other relevant information. Many sections also instruct the utility to provide a separate quantitative-focused response in the tables, where cells must be filled out by utilities according to the instructions provided in each section. Some tables include comment boxes. Utilities may extend the size of comment boxes as needed to provide an adequate description for each aspect of the WMP.
Should any portion of the WMP require information that the utility has not collected itself nor could ascertain based on information that the utility does collect, the utility shall work with federal, state, and local agencies, stakeholders, and partners to collect or compile the information. Where the information in question is not collected by any stakeholder and cannot be collected by the utility, the utility shall indicate this in the comments and include a description of the most similar data point(s) that the utility and/or other stakeholders do track that most closely fits the requirement. For example, by the WMP deadline, the utility may not have a full accounting of the value of property destroyed by utility-ignited wildfire in a given year due to ongoing investigation into the cause of one or more wildfires within its service territory. In this example, the utility shall indicate 1) the known sum of the value of property determined by fire AHJs to have been destroyed by utility-ignited wildfire in that year, albeit incomplete, and 2) a list of the wildfires in that year for which utility facilities are being investigated as a potential source of ignition but for which the cause is still undetermined and an estimation of value of property destroyed by each. Finally, the utility shall describe its plan to improve its data collection and/or cooperation with partners with the goal of collecting the required information, including the timeline to implementation. In the event that any of the requested information is confidential, the utility shall provide 2 versions, 1 which includes all of the information and a second that does not include the confidential information. Clarification of normalization calculation: For those metrics and other figures that are likely to vary year-to-year based on the prevalence of fire-weather conditions, instructions are included to report said metric or figure both 1) as a total for the year and 2) normalized by Red Flag Warning (RFW) circuit mile
R.18-10-007 ALJ/SRT/ilz
5 / 90
5
days. The denominator “RFW circuit mile days” is intended to capture the duration and scope of the fire weather that year and is calculated as the number of circuit miles that were under a RFW multiplied by the number of days those miles were under said RFW. For example, if 100 circuit miles were under a RFW for 1 day, and 10 of those miles were under RFW for an additional day, then the total RFW circuit mile days would be 110.
R.18-10-007 ALJ/SRT/ilz
6 / 90
6
Table of contents 0 Glossary of defined terms ................................................................................................................. 9 1 Persons responsible for executing the WMP .................................................................................. 14
1.1 Verification ........................................................................................................................................ 15
2 Metrics and underlying data ........................................................................................................... 16 2.1 Lessons learned: how tracking metrics on the 2019 plan has informed the 2020 plan ............. 16
2.2 Recent performance on progress metrics, last 5 years .............................................................. 17
2.3 Recent performance on outcome metrics, annual and normalized for weather, last 5 years ... 18
2.4 Description of additional metrics ................................................................................................ 21
2.5 Description of program targets ................................................................................................... 22
2.6 Detailed information supporting outcome metrics .................................................................... 23
2.7 Mapping recent, modelled, and baseline conditions ................................................................. 25
3 Baseline ignition probability and wildfire risk exposure ................................................................. 27 3.1 Recent weather patterns, last 5 years ........................................................................................ 27
3.2 Recent drivers of ignition probability, last 5 years ..................................................................... 28
3.3 Recent use of PSPS, last 5 years .................................................................................................. 30
3.4 Baseline state of equipment and wildfire and PSPS event risk reduction plans ........................ 32
3.4.1 Current baseline state of service territory and utility equipment ...................................... 32
3.4.2 Planned additions, removal, and upgrade of utility equipment by end of 3-year plan term 38
3.4.3 Status quo ignition probability drivers by service territory ................................................ 41
4 Inputs to the plan and directional vision for wildfire risk exposure ............................................... 43 4.1 The objectives of the plan ........................................................................................................... 43
4.2 Understanding major trends impacting ignition probability and wildfire consequence ............ 43
4.2.1 Service territory fire threat evaluation and ignition risk trends ......................................... 44
4.3 Change in ignition probability drivers ......................................................................................... 45
4.4 Directional vision for necessity of PSPS ...................................................................................... 45
5 Wildfire mitigation strategy and programs for 2019 and for each year of the 3-year WMP term 48 5.1 Wildfire mitigation strategy ........................................................................................................ 48
5.2 Wildfire Mitigation Plan implementation ................................................................................... 48
5.3 Detailed wildfire mitigation programs ........................................................................................ 49
5.3.1 Risk assessment and mapping ............................................................................................ 52
5.3.2 Situational awareness and forecasting ............................................................................... 54
5.3.3 Grid design and system hardening...................................................................................... 56
5.3.4 Asset management and inspections ................................................................................... 58
R.18-10-007 ALJ/SRT/ilz
7 / 90
7
5.3.5 Vegetation management and inspections .......................................................................... 60
5.3.6 Grid operations and protocols ............................................................................................ 63
5.3.7 Data governance ................................................................................................................. 65
5.3.8 Resource allocation methodology ...................................................................................... 67
5.3.9 Emergency planning and preparedness .............................................................................. 69
5.3.10 Stakeholder cooperation and community engagement ..................................................... 72
5.3.11 Definitions of initiative activities by category ..................................................................... 74
5.4 Methodology for enterprise-wide safety risk and wildfire-related risk assessment .................. 82
5.5 Planning for workforce and other limited resources .................................................................. 82
5.6 Expected outcomes of 3-year plan ............................................................................................. 83
5.6.1 Planned utility infrastructure construction and upgrades .................................................. 83
5.6.2 Protocols on Public Safety Power Shut-off ......................................................................... 84
6 Utility GIS attachments ................................................................................................................... 85 6.1 Recent weather patterns ............................................................................................................ 85
6.2 Recent drivers of ignition probability ......................................................................................... 85
6.3 Recent use of PSPS ...................................................................................................................... 85
6.4 Current baseline state of service territory and utility equipment .............................................. 85
6.5 Location of planned utility equipment additions or removal ..................................................... 85
6.6 Planned 2020 WMP initiative activity by end-2022 .................................................................... 85
R.18-10-007 ALJ/SRT/ilz
8 / 90
8
List of Tables
Table 1: Recent performance on progress metrics, last 5 years................................................................. 17 Table 2: Recent performance on outcome metrics, last 5 years ................................................................ 18 Table 3: List and description of additional metrics, last 5 years ................................................................. 22 Table 4: List and description of program targets, last 5 years .................................................................... 23 Table 5: Accidental deaths due to utility wildfire mitigation initiatives, last 5 years ................................. 23 Table 6: OSHA-reportable injuries due to utility wildfire mitigation initiatives, last 5 years ..................... 24 Table 7: Methodology for potential impact of ignitions ............................................................................. 25 Table 8: Map file requirements for recent and modelled conditions of utility service territory, last 5 years .................................................................................................................................................................... 25 Table 9: Map file requirements for baseline condition of utility service territory projected for 2020 ...... 26 Table 10: Weather patterns, last 5 years .................................................................................................... 27 Table 11: Key recent drivers of ignition probability, last 5 years ................................................................ 29 Table 12: Recent use of PSPS, last 5 years .................................................................................................. 31 Table 13: Current baseline state of service territory and utility equipment ............................................. 32 Table 14: Summary data on weather station count ................................................................................... 36 Table 15: Summary data on fault indicator count ...................................................................................... 37 Table 16: Location of planned utility equipment additions or removal by end of 3-year plan term ......... 38 Table 17: Location of planned utility infrastructure upgrades ................................................................... 40 Table 18: Key drivers of ignition probability ............................................................................................... 41 Table 19: Macro trends impacting ignition probability and wildfire consequence .................................... 44 Table 20: Anticipated characteristics of PSPS use over next 10 years ........................................................ 46 Table 21: Risk assessment and mapping..................................................................................................... 52 Table 22: Situational awareness and forecasting ....................................................................................... 54 Table 23: Grid design and system hardening .............................................................................................. 57 Table 24: Asset management and inspections ........................................................................................... 59 Table 25: Vegetation management and inspections .................................................................................. 61 Table 26: Grid operations and protocols .................................................................................................... 63 Table 27: Data governance ......................................................................................................................... 66 Table 28: Resource allocation methodology .............................................................................................. 68 Table 29: Emergency planning and preparedness ...................................................................................... 70 Table 30: Stakeholder cooperation and community engagement ............................................................. 73 Table 31: Change in drivers of ignition probability taking into account planned initiatives, for each year of plan ......................................................................................................................................................... 83
R.18-10-007 ALJ/SRT/ilz
9 / 90
9
0 Glossary of defined terms
Term Definition
10-hour dead fuel moisture content
Moisture content of small dead vegetation (e.g. grass, leaves, which burn quickly but not intensely), which can respond to changes in atmospheric moisture content within 10 hours.
Access and functional needs populations
Per Government Code § 8593.3 and D.19-05-042, individuals who have developmental or intellectual disabilities, physical disabilities, chronic conditions, injuries, limited English proficiency or who are non-English speaking, older adults, children, people living in institutionalized settings, or those who are low income, homeless, or transportation disadvantaged, including, but not limited to, those who are dependent on public transit or those who are pregnant.
Authority Having Jurisdiction
AHJ, party with assigned responsibility, depending on location and circumstance.
Asset (utility) Electric lines, equipment, or supporting hardware. At-risk species Species of vegetation that are particularly likely to contact power lines in the event
of high winds and/or ignite if they catch a spark. Baseline (ignition probability, maturity)
A measure, typically of the current state, to establish a starting point for comparison.
Carbon dioxide equivalent
Tons of greenhouse gases (GHG) emitted, multiplied by the global warming potential relative to carbon dioxide.
Contractor Any individual in the temporary and/or indirect employ of the utility whose limited hours and/or time-bound term of employment are not considered as “full-time” for tax and/or any other purposes.
Critical facilities and infrastructure
In accordance with the interim definition adopted in D.19-05-042, those facilities and infrastructure that are essential to the public safety and that require additional assistance and advance planning to ensure resiliency during de energization events, namely: emergency services sector (police stations, fire stations, emergency operations centers), government facilities sector (schools, jails, prisons), healthcare and public health sector (public health departments, medical facilities, including hospitals, skilled nursing facilities, nursing homes, blood banks, health care facilities, dialysis centers and hospice facilities), energy sector (public and private utility facilities vital to maintaining or restoring normal service, including, but not limited to, interconnected publicly owned utilities and electric cooperatives), water and wastewater systems sector (facilities associated with the provision of drinking water or processing of wastewater including facilities used to pump, divert, transport, store, treat and deliver water or wastewater), communications sector (communication carrier infrastructure including selective routers, central offices, head ends, cellular switches, remote terminals and cellular sites), and chemical sector (facilities associated with the provision of manufacturing, maintaining, or distributing hazardous materials and chemicals).
Customer hours Total number of customers, multiplied by the average number of hours (e.g. of power outage).
Data cleaning Calibrating raw data to remove errors (including typographical and numerical mistakes).
Dead fuel moisture content
Moisture content of dead vegetation, which responds solely to current environmental conditions and is critical in determining fire potential.
Detailed inspection In accordance with GO 165, an inspection where individual pieces of equipment and structures are carefully examined, visually and through use of routine diagnostic test, as appropriate, and (if practical and if useful information can be so gathered) opened, and the condition of each rated and recorded.
R.18-10-007 ALJ/SRT/ilz
10 / 90
10
Enhanced inspection Inspection whose frequency and thoroughness exceeds the requirements of the detailed inspection, particularly if driven by risk calculations.
Evacuation impact Number of people evacuated, with the duration for which they are evacuated, from homes and businesses, due to wildfires.
Evacuation zone Areas designated by CAL FIRE and local fire agency evacuation orders, to include both “voluntary” and “mandatory” in addition to other orders such as “precautionary” and “immediate threat”.
Fuel density Mass of fuel (vegetation) per area which could combust in a wildfire. Fuel management Removing or thinning vegetation to reduce the potential rate of propagation or
intensity of wildfires. Fuel moisture content Amount of moisture in a given mass of fuel (vegetation), measured as a percentage
of its dry weight. Full-time employee Any individual in the ongoing and/or direct employ of the utility whose hours
and/or term of employment are considered as “full-time” for tax and/or any other purposes.
GO 95 nonconformance Condition of a utility asset that does not meet standards established by General Order 95.
Greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions
Health and Safety Code 38505 identifies seven greenhouse gases that ARB is responsible to monitor and regulate in order to reduce emissions: carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), sulfur hexafluoride (SF6), hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), perfluorocarbons (PFCs), and nitrogen trifluoride (NF3).
Grid hardening Actions (such as equipment upgrades, maintenance, and planning for more resilient infrastructure) taken in response to the risk of undesirable events (such as outages) or undesirable conditions of the electrical system in order to reduce or mitigate those events and conditions, informed by an assessment of the relevant risk drivers or factors.
Grid topology General design of an electric grid, whether looped or radial, with consequences for reliability and ability to support de-energization (e.g., being able to deliver electricity from an additional source).
High Fire Threat District (HFTD)
Per D.17-01-009, areas of the State designated by the CPUC and CAL FIRE to have elevated wildfire risk, indicating where utilities must take additional action (per GO 95, GO 165, and GO 166) to mitigate wildfire risk.
Highly rural region In accordance with 38 CFR 17.701, “highly rural” shall be defined as those areas with a population of less than 7 persons per square mile.
Ignition probability The relative possibility that an ignition will occur, probability is quantified as a number between 0% and 100% (where 0% indicates impossibility and 100% indicates certainty). The higher the probability of an event, the more certainty there is that the event will occur. (Often informally referred to as likelihood or chance).
Ignition-related deficiency
Any condition which may result in ignition or has previously resulted in ignition, even if not during the past five years.
Impact/consequence of ignitions
The effect or outcome of a wildfire ignition, affecting objectives, which may be expressed by terms including, although not limited to health, safety, reliability, economic and/or environmental damage.
Initiative Measure or activity proposed or in process designed to reduce the consequences and/or probability of wildfire or PSPS.
Inspection protocol Documented procedures to be followed in order to validate that a piece of equipment is in good condition and expected to operate safely and effectively.
Invasive species Non-native species whose proliferation increases the risk of wildfires. Level 1 finding In accordance with GO 95, an immediate safety and/or reliability risk with high
probability for significant impact.
R.18-10-007 ALJ/SRT/ilz
11 / 90
11
Level 2 finding In accordance with GO 95, a variable (non-immediate high to low) safety and/or reliability risk.
Level 3 finding In accordance with GO 95, an acceptable safety and/or reliability risk. Life expectancy Anticipated years that a piece of equipment can be expected to meet safety and
performance requirements. Limited English Proficiency (LEP)
Populations with limited English working proficiency based on the International Language Roundtable scale.
Live fuel moisture content
Moisture content within living vegetation, which can retain water longer than dead fuel.
Lost energy Energy that would have been delivered were it not for an outage. Major roads Interstate highways, U.S. highways, state and county routes. Match drop simulation Wildfire simulation method that takes an arbitrary ignition and forecasts
propagation and consequence/impact. Member of the public Any individual not employed by the utility. Multi-attribute value function
Risk calculation methodology introduced during CPUC's S-MAP and RAMP proceedings.
Near miss An event with significant probability of ignition, including wires down, contacts with objects, line slap, events with evidence of significant heat generation, and other events that cause sparking or have the potential to cause ignition.
Near-miss simulation Simulation of what the consequence would have been of an ignition had it occurred.
Need for PSPS When utilities' criteria for utilizing PSPS are met. Noncompliant clearance Rights-of-way whose vegetation is not trimmed in accordance with the
requirements of GO 95. Outages of the type that could ignite a wildfire
Outages that, in the judgement of the utility, could have ignited a wildfire.
Outcome metrics Measurements of the performance of the utility and its service territory in terms of both leading and lagging indicators of wildfire, PSPS, and other consequences of wildfire risk, including the potential unintended consequences of wildfire mitigation work, such as acreage burned by utility-ignited wildfire.
Overcapacity When the energy transmitted by utility equipment exceeds that of its nameplate capacity.
Patrol inspection In accordance with GO 165, a simple visual inspection of applicable utility equipment and structures that is designed to identify obvious structural problems and hazards. Patrol inspections may be carried out in the course of other company business.
Percentile conditions Top X% of a particular set (e.g. wind speed), based on a historical data set with sufficient detail.
Planned outage Electric outage announced ahead of time by the utility. Preventive maintenance (PM)
The practice of maintaining equipment on a regular schedule, based on risk, elapsed time, run-time meter readings, or number of operations. The intent of PM is to “prevent” maintenance problems or failures before they take place by following routine and comprehensive maintenance procedures. The goal is to achieve fewer, shorter, and more predictable outages.
Priority essential services
Critical first responders, public safety partners, critical facilities and infrastructure, operators of telecommunications infrastructure, and water utilities/agencies.
Program targets Measurements of activity identified in WMPs and subsequent annual updates, in terms of volume or scope of work, such as number trees trimmed or miles of power lines hardened.
R.18-10-007 ALJ/SRT/ilz
12 / 90
12
Progress metrics Measurements that track how much utility wildfire mitigation activity has changed the conditions of utility wildfire risk exposure or utility ability to manage wildfire risk exposure, in terms of leading indicators of ignition probability and wildfire consequences.
Property Private and public property, buildings and structures, infrastructure, and other items of value that were destroyed by wildfire, including both third-party property and utility assets.
PSPS risk The potential for the occurrence of a PSPS event expressed in terms of a combination of various outcomes of the event and their associated probabilities.
PSPS weather Weather that exceeds a utility's risk threshold for initiating a PSPS. Red Flag Warning RFW, level of wildfire risk from weather as declared by the National Weather
Service. RFW Circuit Mile Day Sum of miles of utility grid subject to Red Flag Warning each day. For example, if
100 circuit miles were under a RFW for 1 day, and 10 of those miles were under RFW for an additional day, then the total RFW circuit mile days would be 110.
Risk-spend efficiency An estimate of the cost-effectiveness of initiatives, calculated by dividing the mitigation risk reduction benefit by the mitigation cost estimate based on the full set of risk reduction benefits estimated from the incurred costs.
Rule Section of public utility code requiring a particular activity or establishing a particular threshold.
Run-to-failure A maintenance approach that replaces equipment only when it fails. Rural region In accordance with GO 165, "rural" shall be defined as those areas with a
population of less than 1,000 persons per square mile as determined by the United States Bureau of the Census.
Safety Hazard A condition that poses a significant threat to human life or property. Simulated wildfire Propagation and impact/consequence of a wildfire ignited at a particular point
('match drop'), as simulated by fire spread software. Span The space between adjacent supporting poles or structures on a circuit consisting
of electric line and equipment. "Span level" refers to asset-scale granularity. System Average Interruption Duration Index (SAIDI)
System-wide total number of minutes per year of sustained outage per customer served.
Third-party contact Contact between a piece of electrical equipment and another object, whether natural (tree branch) or human (vehicle).
Time to expected failure Time remaining on the life expectancy of a piece of equipment. Top 30% of proprietary fire potential index
Top 30% of FPI or equivalent scale (e.g., “Extreme” on SCE’s FPI; “extreme”, 15 or greater, on SDG&E’s FPI; and 4 or above on PG&E’s FPI).
Trees with strike potential / hazard trees
Trees that could either 'fall in' to a power line, or have branches detach and 'fly in' to contact a power line in high-wind conditions.
Unplanned outage Electric outage that occurs with no advance notice from the utility (e.g. blackout). Urban region In accordance with GO 165, "urban" shall be defined as those areas with a
population of more than 1,000 persons per square mile as determined by the United States Bureau of the Census.
Utility-ignited wildfire Wildfires ignited by utility infrastructure or employees, including all wildfires determined by AHJ investigation to originate from ignition caused by utility infrastructure.
Vegetation management Trimming and clearance of trees, branches, and other vegetation that poses the risk of contact with electric equipment.
Vegetation risk index Risk index indicating the probability of vegetation-related outages along a particular circuit, based on the vegetation species, density, height, and growth rate.
R.18-10-007 ALJ/SRT/ilz
13 / 90
13
Weather normalization Adjusting metrics based on relative weather risk, with RFW circuit mile days as the normalization factor.
Wildfire impact/ consequence
The effect or outcome of a wildfire affecting objectives, which may be expressed, by terms including, although not limited to health, safety, reliability, economic and/or environmental damage.
Wildfire risk The potential for the occurrence of a wildfire event expressed in terms of a combination of various outcomes of the wildfire and their associated probabilities.
Wildfire-only WMP programs
Activities, practices, and strategies that are only necessitated by wildfire risk, unrelated to or beyond that required by minimum reliability and/or safety requirements. Such programs are not indicated or in common use in areas where wildfire risk is minimal (e.g., territory with no vegetation or fuel) or under conditions where wildfires are unlikely to ignite or spread (e.g., when rain is falling).
Wildland urban interface (WUI)
A geographical area identified by the state as a “Fire Hazard Severity Zone”, or other areas designated by the enforcing agency to be a significant risk from wildfires, established pursuant to Title 24, Part 2, Chapter 7A.
Wire down Instance where an electric transmission or distribution conductor is broken and falls from its intended position to rest on the ground or a foreign object.
R.18-10-007 ALJ/SRT/ilz
14 / 90
14
1 Persons responsible for executing the WMP
Provide an accounting of the responsibilities of the responsible person(s) executing the plan, including: 1. Executive level with overall responsibility 2. Program owners specific to each component of the plan
Ensure that the plan components described in (2) include an accounting for each of the WMP sections and subsections.
R.18-10-007 ALJ/SRT/ilz
15 / 90
15
1.1 Verification
Complete the following verification for the WMP submission:
(See Rule 1.11) (Where Applicant is a Corporation)
I am an officer of the applicant corporation herein, and am authorized to make this verification
on its behalf. The statements in the foregoing document are true of my own knowledge, except as to matters which are therein stated on information or belief, and as to those matters I believe them to be true.
I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
Executed on ___________________ at ________________________, California. (Date) (Name of city)
_____________________________________________ (Signature and Title of Corporate Officer)
R.18-10-007 ALJ/SRT/ilz
16 / 90
16 M
etric
s and
und
erly
ing
data
Inst
ruct
ions
: Rep
ort p
erfo
rman
ce o
n th
e fo
llow
ing
prog
ress
and
out
com
e m
etric
s with
in th
e ut
ility
’s se
rvice
terr
itory
ove
r the
pas
t fiv
e ye
ars.
Whe
re a
util
ity d
oes n
ot co
llect
its o
wn
data
for a
giv
en m
etric
, tha
t util
ity sh
all w
ork
with
the
rele
vant
sour
ces t
o co
llect
the
info
rmat
ion
for i
ts
serv
ice te
rrito
ry, a
nd cl
early
iden
tify
the
owne
r and
dat
aset
use
d to
pro
vide
the
resp
onse
in “C
omm
ents
” col
umn.
Prog
ress
met
rics,
liste
d be
low
, tra
ck h
ow m
uch
utili
ty w
ildfir
e m
itiga
tion
activ
ity h
as m
anag
ed to
chan
ge th
e co
nditi
ons o
f util
ity w
ildfir
e ris
k ex
posu
re in
term
s of d
river
s of i
gniti
on p
roba
bilit
y.
Out
com
e m
etric
s mea
sure
the
perfo
rman
ce o
f a u
tility
and
its s
ervi
ce te
rrito
ry in
term
s of b
oth
lead
ing
and
lagg
ing
indi
cato
rs o
f wild
fire
risk,
PS
PS ri
sk, a
nd o
ther
dire
ct a
nd in
dire
ct co
nseq
uenc
es o
f wild
fire
and
PSPS
, inc
ludi
ng th
e po
tent
ial u
nint
ende
d co
nseq
uenc
es o
f wild
fire
miti
gatio
n w
ork.
In th
e 20
19 W
MPs
, util
ities
pro
pose
d se
ts o
f “pr
ogra
m ta
rget
s” th
at e
nabl
e tr
acki
ng im
plem
enta
tion
of p
ropo
sed
wild
fire
miti
gatio
n ac
tiviti
es
agai
nst t
he sc
ope
of th
ose
activ
ities
as l
aid
out i
n th
e W
MPs
but
do
not t
rack
the
effic
acy
of th
ose
activ
ities
. Util
ities
shal
l con
tinue
to re
port
pr
ogra
m ta
rget
s, ho
wev
er, t
he p
rimar
y us
e of
thes
e w
ill b
e to
gau
ge fo
llow
-thro
ugh
on W
MPs
whi
le re
cogn
izing
that
som
e W
MP
initi
ativ
es
shou
ld b
e ad
just
ed a
fter p
lan
subm
ittal
bas
ed o
n ne
w in
form
atio
n an
d le
sson
s lea
rned
.
2.1
Less
ons l
earn
ed: h
ow tr
acki
ng m
etric
s on
the
2019
pla
n ha
s inf
orm
ed th
e 20
20 p
lan
Desc
ribe
how
the
utili
ty’s
plan
has
evo
lved
sinc
e th
e 20
19 W
MP
subm
issio
n. O
utlin
e an
y m
ajor
them
es a
nd le
sson
s lea
rned
from
the
2019
pla
n an
d su
bseq
uent
impl
emen
tatio
n of
the
initi
ativ
es. I
n pa
rticu
lar,
focu
s on
how
util
ity p
erfo
rman
ce a
gain
st th
e m
etric
s use
d ha
s inf
orm
ed th
e ut
ility
’s 20
20 W
MP.
R.1
8-10
-007
ALJ
/SR
T/ilz
17 / 90
17
2.2
Rece
nt p
erfo
rman
ce o
n pr
ogre
ss m
etric
s, la
st 5
yea
rs
Inst
ruct
ions
for T
able
1:
Repo
rt p
erfo
rman
ce o
n th
e fo
llow
ing
met
rics w
ithin
the
utili
ty’s
serv
ice te
rrito
ry o
ver t
he p
ast f
ive
year
s. W
here
the
utili
ty d
oes n
ot co
llect
its
own
data
on
a gi
ven
met
ric, t
he u
tility
shal
l wor
k w
ith th
e re
leva
nt st
ate
agen
cies t
o co
llect
the
rele
vant
info
rmat
ion
for i
ts se
rvice
terr
itory
, and
cle
arly
iden
tify
the
owne
r and
dat
aset
use
d to
pro
vide
the
resp
onse
in th
e “C
omm
ents
” col
umn.
Tabl
e 1:
Rec
ent p
erfo
rman
ce o
n pr
ogre
ss m
etric
s, la
st 5
yea
rs
# Pr
ogre
ss m
etric
nam
e An
nual
per
form
ance
Un
it(s)
Co
mm
ents
20
15
2016
20
17
2018
20
19
1 Gr
id co
nditi
on fi
ndin
gs
from
insp
ectio
n
Nu
mbe
r of L
evel
1, 2
, and
3 fi
ndin
gs p
er m
ile o
f circ
uit i
n HF
TD, a
nd p
er
tota
l mile
s of c
ircui
t for
eac
h of
the
follo
win
g in
spec
tion
type
s:
1.Pa
trol
insp
ectio
ns
2.De
taile
d in
spec
tions
3.
Oth
er in
spec
tion
type
s
2 Ve
geta
tion
clea
ranc
e fin
ding
s fro
m in
spec
tion
Pe
rcen
tage
of r
ight
-of-w
ay w
ith n
onco
mpl
iant
clea
ranc
e ba
sed
on
appl
icabl
e ru
les a
nd re
gula
tions
at t
he ti
me
of in
spec
tion,
as a
pe
rcen
tage
of a
ll rig
ht-o
f-way
insp
ecte
d
3 Ex
tent
of g
rid
mod
ular
izatio
n
Nu
mbe
r of s
ectio
naliz
ing
devi
ces p
er c
ircui
t mile
plu
s num
ber o
f au
tom
ated
grid
cont
rol e
quip
men
t in:
1.
HFTD
2.
Non-
HFTD
4 Da
ta co
llect
ion
and
repo
rtin
g
Perc
ent o
f dat
a re
ques
ted
in S
DR a
nd W
MP
colle
cted
in in
itial
su
bmiss
ion
R.1
8-10
-007
ALJ
/SR
T/ilz
18 / 90
18
2.3
Rece
nt p
erfo
rman
ce o
n ou
tcom
e m
etric
s, an
nual
and
nor
mal
ized
for w
eath
er, l
ast 5
yea
rs
Inst
ruct
ions
for T
able
2:
Repo
rt p
erfo
rman
ce o
n th
e fo
llow
ing
met
rics w
ithin
the
utili
ty’s
serv
ice te
rrito
ry o
ver t
he p
ast f
ive
year
s. W
here
the
utili
ty d
oes n
ot co
llect
its
own
data
on
a gi
ven
met
ric, t
he u
tility
shal
l wor
k w
ith th
e re
leva
nt st
ate
agen
cies t
o co
llect
the
rele
vant
info
rmat
ion
for i
ts se
rvice
terr
itory
, and
cle
arly
iden
tify
the
owne
r and
dat
aset
use
d to
pro
vide
the
resp
onse
in “C
omm
ents
” col
umn.
Prov
ide
a lis
t of a
ll ty
pes o
f fin
ding
s and
num
ber o
f fin
ding
s per
type
, in
tota
l and
in n
umbe
r of f
indi
ngs p
er ci
rcui
t mile
. Ta
ble
2: R
ecen
t per
form
ance
on
outc
ome
met
rics,
last
5 y
ears
Met
ric ty
pe
# O
utco
me
met
ric n
ame
Annu
al p
erfo
rman
ce
Unit(
s)
Com
men
ts
2015
20
16
2017
20
18
2019
1. N
ear m
isses
1.a.
Nu
mbe
r of a
ll ev
ents
(suc
h as
un
plan
ned
outa
ges,
faul
ts,
conv
entio
nal b
low
n fu
ses,
etc.
) th
at co
uld
resu
lt in
igni
tion,
by
type
acc
ordi
ng to
util
ity-p
rovi
ded
list (
tota
l)
Nu
mbe
r per
yea
r
1.b.
Nu
mbe
r of a
ll ev
ents
(suc
h as
un
plan
ned
outa
ges,
faul
ts,
conv
entio
nal b
low
n fu
ses,
etc.
) th
at co
uld
resu
lt in
igni
tion,
by
type
acc
ordi
ng to
util
ity-p
rovi
ded
list (
norm
alize
d)
Nu
mbe
r per
RFW
circ
uit m
ile
day
per y
ear
1.c.
Nu
mbe
r of w
ires d
own
(tota
l)
Num
ber o
f wire
s dow
n pe
r yea
r
1.d.
Nu
mbe
r of w
ires d
own
(nor
mal
ized)
Num
ber p
er R
FW ci
rcui
t mile
da
y pe
r yea
r
2. U
tility
insp
ectio
n fin
ding
s
2.a.
Nu
mbe
r of L
evel
1 fi
ndin
gs th
at
coul
d in
crea
se th
e pr
obab
ility
of
igni
tion
disc
over
ed p
er ci
rcui
t mile
in
spec
ted
Av
erag
e nu
mbe
r of L
evel
1
findi
ngs t
hat c
ould
incr
ease
the
prob
abili
ty o
f ign
ition
di
scov
ered
by
all i
nspe
ctio
ns p
er
circu
it m
ile p
er y
ear
R.1
8-10
-007
ALJ
/SR
T/ilz
19 / 90
19
Met
ric ty
pe
# O
utco
me
met
ric n
ame
Annu
al p
erfo
rman
ce
Unit(
s)
Com
men
ts
2015
20
16
2017
20
18
2019
2.b.
Nu
mbe
r of L
evel
2 fi
ndin
gs th
at
coul
d in
crea
se th
e pr
obab
ility
of
igni
tion
disc
over
ed p
er ci
rcui
t mile
in
spec
ted
Av
erag
e nu
mbe
r of L
evel
2
findi
ngs t
hat c
ould
incr
ease
the
prob
abili
ty o
f ign
ition
di
scov
ered
by
all i
nspe
ctio
ns p
er
circu
it m
ile p
er y
ear
2.c.
Nu
mbe
r of L
evel
3 fi
ndin
gs th
at
coul
d in
crea
se th
e pr
obab
ility
of
igni
tion
disc
over
ed p
er ci
rcui
t mile
in
spec
ted
Av
erag
e nu
mbe
r of L
evel
3
findi
ngs t
hat c
ould
incr
ease
the
prob
abili
ty o
f ign
ition
di
scov
ered
by
all i
nspe
ctio
ns p
er
circu
it m
ile p
er y
ear
3. C
usto
mer
hou
rs o
f PS
PS a
nd o
ther
ou
tage
s
3.a.
Cu
stom
er h
ours
of p
lann
ed
outa
ges i
nclu
ding
PSP
S (to
tal)
To
tal c
usto
mer
hou
rs o
f pla
nned
ou
tage
s per
yea
r
3.b.
Cu
stom
er h
ours
of p
lann
ed
outa
ges i
nclu
ding
PSP
S (n
orm
alize
d)
To
tal c
usto
mer
hou
rs o
f pla
nned
ou
tage
s per
RFW
circ
uit m
ile
day
per y
ear
3.c.
Cu
stom
er h
ours
of u
npla
nned
ou
tage
s, no
t inc
ludi
ng P
SPS
(tota
l)
Tota
l cus
tom
er h
ours
of
unpl
anne
d ou
tage
s per
yea
r
3.d.
Cu
stom
er h
ours
of u
npla
nned
ou
tage
s, no
t inc
ludi
ng P
SPS
(nor
mal
ized)
To
tal c
usto
mer
hou
rs o
f un
plan
ned
outa
ges p
er R
FW
circu
it m
ile d
ay p
er y
ear
3.e.
In
crea
se in
Sys
tem
Ave
rage
In
terr
uptio
n Du
ratio
n In
dex
(SAI
DI)
Ch
ange
in m
inut
es c
ompa
red
to
the
prev
ious
yea
r
4. U
tility
igni
ted
wild
fire
fata
litie
s
4.a.
Fa
talit
ies d
ue to
util
ity-ig
nite
d w
ildfir
e (to
tal)
Nu
mbe
r of f
atal
ities
per
yea
r
4.b.
Fa
talit
ies d
ue to
util
ity-ig
nite
d w
ildfir
e (n
orm
alize
d)
Nu
mbe
r of f
atal
ities
per
RFW
cir
cuit
mile
day
per
yea
r
5. A
ccid
enta
l dea
ths
resu
lting
from
util
ity
wild
fire
miti
gatio
n in
itiat
ives
5.a.
De
aths
due
to u
tility
wild
fire
miti
gatio
n ac
tiviti
es (t
otal
)
Num
ber o
f fat
aliti
es p
er y
ear
R.1
8-10
-007
ALJ
/SR
T/ilz
20 / 90
20
Met
ric ty
pe
# O
utco
me
met
ric n
ame
Annu
al p
erfo
rman
ce
Unit(
s)
Com
men
ts
2015
20
16
2017
20
18
2019
6. O
SHA-
repo
rtab
le
inju
ries f
rom
util
ity
wild
fire
miti
gatio
n in
itiat
ives
6.a.
O
SHA-
repo
rtab
le in
jurie
s due
to
utili
ty w
ildfir
e m
itiga
tion
activ
ities
(to
tal)
Nu
mbe
r of O
SHA-
repo
rtab
le
inju
ries p
er y
ear
6.b.
O
SHA-
repo
rtab
le in
jurie
s due
to
utili
ty w
ildfir
e m
itiga
tion
activ
ities
(n
orm
alize
d)
Nu
mbe
r of O
SHA-
repo
rtab
le
inju
ries p
er y
ear p
er 1
000
line
mile
s of g
rid
7. V
alue
of a
sset
s de
stro
yed
by u
tility
-ig
nite
d w
ildfir
e, li
sted
by
ass
et ty
pe
7.a.
Va
lue
of a
sset
s des
troy
ed b
y ut
ility
-igni
ted
wild
fire
(tota
l)
Dolla
rs o
f dam
age
or
dest
ruct
ion
per y
ear
7.b.
Va
lue
of a
sset
s des
troy
ed b
y ut
ility
-igni
ted
wild
fire
(nor
mal
ized)
Do
llars
of d
amag
e or
de
stru
ctio
n pe
r RFW
circ
uit m
ile
day
per y
ear
8. S
truc
ture
s da
mag
ed o
r de
stro
yed
by u
tility
-ig
nite
d w
ildfir
e
8.a.
Nu
mbe
r of s
truc
ture
s des
troy
ed
by u
tility
-igni
ted
wild
fire
(tota
l)
Num
ber o
f str
uctu
res d
estr
oyed
pe
r yea
r
8.b.
Nu
mbe
r of s
truc
ture
s des
troy
ed
by u
tility
-igni
ted
wild
fire
(nor
mal
ized)
Nu
mbe
r of s
truc
ture
s des
troy
ed
per R
FW ci
rcui
t mile
day
per
ye
ar
9. A
crea
ge b
urne
d by
ut
ility
-igni
ted
wild
fire
9.a.
Ac
reag
e bu
rned
by
utili
ty-ig
nite
d w
ildfir
e (to
tal)
Ac
res b
urne
d pe
r yea
r
9.b.
Ac
reag
e bu
rned
by
utili
ty-ig
nite
d w
ildfir
e (n
orm
alize
d)
Ac
res b
urne
d pe
r RFW
circ
uit
mile
day
per
yea
r
10. N
umbe
r of u
tility
w
ildfir
e ig
nitio
ns
10.a
. Nu
mbe
r of i
gniti
ons (
tota
l) ac
cord
ing
to e
xist
ing
igni
tion
data
re
port
ing
requ
irem
ent
Nu
mbe
r per
yea
r
10.b
. Nu
mbe
r of i
gniti
ons (
norm
alize
d)
Nu
mbe
r per
RFW
circ
uit m
ile
day
per y
ear
10.c
. Nu
mbe
r of i
gniti
ons i
n HF
TD
(sub
tota
l)
Num
ber i
n HF
TD p
er y
ear
10.c
.i.
Num
ber o
f ign
ition
s in
HFTD
Zon
e 1
Nu
mbe
r in
HFTD
Zon
e 1
per y
ear
10.c
.ii.
Num
ber o
f ign
ition
s in
HFTD
Tie
r 2
Nu
mbe
r in
HFTD
Tie
r 2 p
er y
ear
10.c
.iii.
Num
ber o
f ign
ition
s in
HFTD
Tie
r 3
Nu
mbe
r in
HFTD
Tie
r 3 p
er y
ear
R.1
8-10
-007
ALJ
/SR
T/ilz
21 / 90
21
Met
ric ty
pe
# O
utco
me
met
ric n
ame
Annu
al p
erfo
rman
ce
Unit(
s)
Com
men
ts
2015
20
16
2017
20
18
2019
10.d
. Nu
mbe
r of i
gniti
ons i
n HF
TD
(sub
tota
l, no
rmal
ized)
Num
ber i
n HF
TD p
er R
FW ci
rcui
t m
ile d
ay p
er y
ear
10.d
.i.
Num
ber o
f ign
ition
s in
HFTD
Zon
e 1
(nor
mal
ized)
Num
ber i
n HF
TD Z
one
1 pe
r RF
W ci
rcui
t mile
day
per
yea
r
10.d
.ii.
Num
ber o
f ign
ition
s in
HFTD
Tie
r 2
(nor
mal
ized)
Num
ber i
n HF
TD T
ier 2
per
RFW
cir
cuit
mile
day
per
yea
r
10.d
.iii.
Num
ber o
f ign
ition
s in
HFTD
Tie
r 3
(nor
mal
ized)
Num
ber i
n HF
TD T
ier 3
per
RFW
cir
cuit
mile
day
per
yea
r
10.e
. Nu
mbe
r of i
gniti
ons i
n no
n-HF
TD
(sub
tota
l)
Num
ber i
n no
n-HF
TD p
er y
ear
10.f.
Nu
mbe
r of i
gniti
ons i
n no
n-HF
TD
(nor
mal
ized)
Num
ber i
n no
n-HF
TD p
er R
FW
circu
it m
ile d
ay p
er y
ear
11. C
ritica
l in
frast
ruct
ure
impa
cted
11.a
. Cr
itica
l inf
rast
ruct
ure
impa
cted
by
PSPS
Num
ber o
f crit
ical i
nfra
stru
ctur
e (in
acc
orda
nce
with
D.1
9 -05
-04
2) lo
catio
ns im
pact
ed p
er
hour
mul
tiplie
d by
hou
rs o
fflin
e pe
r yea
r
11.b
. Cr
itica
l inf
rast
ruct
ure
impa
cted
by
PSPS
(nor
mal
ized)
Num
ber o
f crit
ical i
nfra
stru
ctur
e (in
acc
orda
nce
with
D.1
9 -05
-04
2) lo
catio
ns im
pact
ed p
er
hour
mul
tiplie
d by
hou
rs o
fflin
e pe
r RFW
circ
uit m
ile d
ay p
er
year
2.4
Desc
riptio
n of
add
ition
al m
etric
s
Inst
ruct
ions
for T
able
3:
In a
dditi
on to
the
met
rics s
pecif
ied
abov
e, li
st a
nd d
escr
ibe
all o
ther
met
rics t
he u
tility
use
s to
eval
uate
wild
fire
miti
gatio
n pe
rform
ance
, the
ut
ility
’s pe
rform
ance
on
thos
e m
etric
s ove
r the
last
five
yea
rs, t
he u
nits
repo
rted
, the
ass
umpt
ions
that
und
erlie
the
use
of th
ose
met
rics,
and
how
the
perfo
rman
ce re
port
ed co
uld
be v
alid
ated
by
third
par
ties o
utsid
e th
e ut
ility
, suc
h as
ana
lyst
s or a
cade
mic
rese
arch
ers.
Iden
tifie
d
R.1
8-10
-007
ALJ
/SR
T/ilz
22 / 90
22
met
rics m
ust b
e of
eno
ugh
deta
il an
d sc
ope
to e
ffect
ivel
y in
form
the
perfo
rman
ce (i
.e.,
redu
ctio
n in
igni
tion
prob
abili
ty o
r wild
fire
cons
eque
nce)
of
eac
h pr
even
tive
stra
tegy
and
pro
gram
.
Tabl
e 3:
List
and
des
crip
tion
of a
dditi
onal
met
rics,
last
5 y
ears
Met
ric
Perf
orm
ance
Un
its
Unde
rlyin
g as
sum
ptio
ns
Third
-par
ty v
alid
atio
n 20
15
2016
20
17
2018
20
19
Note
: Add
mor
e ro
ws a
s nee
ded.
2.
5De
scrip
tion
of p
rogr
am ta
rget
s
Inst
ruct
ions
for T
able
4:
In a
dditi
on to
the
met
rics s
pecif
ied
abov
e, li
st a
nd d
escr
ibe
all p
rogr
am ta
rget
s the
ele
ctric
al co
rpor
atio
n us
es to
trac
k ut
ility
WM
P im
plem
enta
tion,
the
utili
ty’s
perfo
rman
ce o
n th
ose
met
rics o
ver t
he la
st fi
ve y
ears
, the
uni
ts re
port
ed, t
he a
ssum
ptio
ns th
at u
nder
lie th
e us
e of
th
ose
met
rics,
and
how
the
perfo
rman
ce re
port
ed co
uld
be v
alid
ated
by
third
par
ties o
utsid
e th
e ut
ility
, suc
h as
ana
lyst
s or a
cade
mic
rese
arch
ers.
Iden
tifie
d m
etric
s mus
t be
of e
noug
h de
tail
and
scop
e to
effe
ctiv
ely
info
rm th
e pe
rform
ance
(i.e
., re
duct
ion
in ig
nitio
n pr
obab
ility
or
wild
fire
cons
eque
nce)
of e
ach
prev
entiv
e st
rate
gy a
nd p
rogr
am.
Each
pro
gram
targ
et sh
all b
e as
socia
ted
with
a p
erce
nt co
mpl
eten
ess a
nd b
ased
upo
n th
e co
nten
ts o
f the
WM
P.
R.1
8-10
-007
ALJ
/SR
T/ilz
23 / 90
23
Tabl
e 4:
List
and
des
crip
tion
of p
rogr
am ta
rget
s, la
st 5
yea
rs
Prog
ram
targ
et
2019
per
form
ance
Un
its
Unde
rlyin
g as
sum
ptio
ns
Third
-par
ty v
alid
atio
n
Note
: Add
mor
e ro
ws a
s nee
ded.
2.6
Deta
iled
info
rmat
ion
supp
ortin
g ou
tcom
e m
etric
s
Inst
ruct
ions
for T
able
5:
Enclo
se d
etai
led
info
rmat
ion
as re
ques
ted
for t
he m
etric
s bel
ow. R
epor
t num
bers
of a
ccid
enta
l dea
ths a
ttrib
uted
to a
ny u
tility
wild
fire
miti
gatio
n ac
tiviti
es, a
s list
ed in
the
utili
ty’s
2019
WM
P fil
ing
or o
ther
wise
, acc
ordi
ng to
the
type
of a
ctiv
ity in
colu
mn
one,
and
by
the
rela
tions
hip
to th
e ut
ility
, for
eac
h of
the
last
five
yea
rs. F
or fa
talit
ies c
ause
d by
act
iviti
es b
eyon
d th
ese
cate
gorie
s, ad
d ro
ws t
o sp
ecify
ac
cord
ingl
y. T
he re
latio
nshi
p to
the
utili
ty st
atus
es o
f ful
l-tim
e em
ploy
ee, c
ontr
acto
r, an
d m
embe
r of p
ublic
are
mut
ually
exc
lusiv
e, su
ch th
at n
o in
divi
dual
can
be co
unte
d in
mor
e th
an o
ne ca
tego
ry, n
or ca
n an
y in
divi
dual
fata
lity
be a
ttrib
uted
to m
ore
than
one
act
ivity
. Re
port
subt
otal
s cal
cula
ted
for e
ach
row
and
colu
mn.
Ta
ble
5: A
ccid
enta
l dea
ths d
ue to
util
ity w
ildfir
e m
itiga
tion
initi
ativ
es, l
ast 5
yea
rs
Activ
ity
Vict
im
Tota
l Fu
ll-tim
e em
ploy
ee
Cont
ract
or
Mem
ber o
f pub
lic
Year
20
15
2016
20
17
2018
20
19
2015
20
16
2017
20
18
2019
20
15
2016
20
17
2018
20
19
Insp
ectio
n
Vege
tatio
n m
anag
emen
t
Utili
ty fu
el m
anag
emen
t
Grid
har
deni
ng
R.1
8-10
-007
ALJ
/SR
T/ilz
24 / 90
24
Oth
er
Tota
l
Note
: Add
mor
e ro
ws a
s nee
ded.
In
stru
ctio
ns fo
r Tab
le 6
: Re
port
num
bers
of O
SHA-
repo
rtab
le in
jurie
s att
ribut
ed to
any
util
ity w
ildfir
e m
itiga
tion
initi
ativ
es, a
s list
ed in
the
utili
ty’s
2019
WM
P fil
ing
or
othe
rwise
, acc
ordi
ng to
the
type
of a
ctiv
ity in
colu
mn
one,
and
by
the
iden
tity
of th
e vi
ctim
, for
eac
h of
the
last
five
yea
rs. F
or m
embe
rs o
f the
pu
blic,
all
inju
ries t
hat m
eet O
SHA-
repo
rtab
le st
anda
rds o
f sev
erity
(i.e
., in
jury
or i
llnes
s res
ultin
g in
loss
of c
onsc
ious
ness
or r
equi
ring
med
ical
trea
tmen
t bey
ond
first
aid
) sha
ll be
inclu
ded,
eve
n if
thos
e in
ciden
ts a
re n
ot re
port
ed to
OSH
A du
e to
the
iden
tity
of th
e vi
ctim
s.
For O
SHA-
repo
rtab
le in
jurie
s cau
sed
by a
ctiv
ities
bey
ond
thes
e ca
tego
ries,
add
row
s to
spec
ify a
ccor
ding
ly. T
he v
ictim
iden
titie
s list
ed a
re
mut
ually
exc
lusiv
e, su
ch th
at n
o in
divi
dual
vict
im ca
n be
coun
ted
as m
ore
than
one
iden
tity,
nor
can
any
indi
vidu
al O
SHA-
repo
rtab
le in
jury
be
attr
ibut
ed to
mor
e th
an o
ne a
ctiv
ity. R
epor
t sub
tota
ls ca
lcula
ted
for e
ach
row
and
colu
mn.
Ta
ble
6: O
SHA-
repo
rtab
le in
jurie
s due
to u
tility
wild
fire
miti
gatio
n in
itiat
ives
, las
t 5 y
ears
Activ
ity
Vict
im
Tota
l Fu
ll-tim
e em
ploy
ee
Cont
ract
or
Mem
ber o
f pub
lic
Year
20
15
2016
20
17
2018
20
19
2015
20
16
2017
20
18
2019
20
15
2016
20
17
2018
20
19
Insp
ectio
n
Vege
tatio
n m
anag
emen
t
Utili
ty fu
el m
anag
emen
t
Grid
har
deni
ng
Oth
er
Tota
l
R.1
8-10
-007
ALJ
/SR
T/ilz
25 / 90
25
Note
: Add
mor
e ro
ws a
s nee
ded.
In
stru
ctio
ns fo
r Tab
le 7
: Re
port
det
ails
on m
etho
dolo
gy u
sed
to ca
lcula
te o
r mod
el p
oten
tial i
mpa
ct o
f ign
ition
s, in
cludi
ng li
st o
f all
inpu
t use
d in
impa
ct si
mul
atio
n; d
ata
sele
ctio
n an
d tr
eatm
ent m
etho
dolo
gies
; ass
umpt
ions
, inc
ludi
ng S
ubje
ct M
atte
r Exp
ert (
SME)
inpu
t; eq
uatio
n(s)
, fun
ctio
ns, o
r oth
er a
lgor
ithm
s us
ed to
obt
ain
outp
ut; o
utpu
t typ
e(s)
, e.g
., w
ind
spee
d m
odel
; and
com
men
ts.
Tabl
e 7:
Met
hodo
logy
for p
oten
tial i
mpa
ct o
f ign
ition
s
List
of a
ll da
ta in
puts
us
ed in
impa
ct
simul
atio
n
Sour
ces o
f da
ta in
puts
Data
sele
ctio
n an
d tr
eatm
ent
met
hodo
logi
es
Assu
mpt
ions
, in
clud
ing
SME
inpu
t
Equa
tion(
s), f
unct
ions
, or
othe
r alg
orith
ms u
sed
to
obta
in o
utpu
t
Out
put t
ype(
s),
e.g.
, win
d sp
eed
mod
el
Com
men
ts
Note
: Add
mor
e ro
ws a
s nee
ded.
2.7
Map
ping
rece
nt, m
odel
led,
and
bas
elin
e co
nditi
ons
Inst
ruct
ions
for T
able
8:
Repo
rt u
nder
lyin
g da
ta fo
r rec
ent c
ondi
tions
(ove
r the
last
five
yea
rs) o
f the
util
ity se
rvice
terr
itory
in a
dow
nloa
dabl
e sh
apef
ile G
IS fo
rmat
, to
inclu
de th
e fo
llow
ing
laye
rs o
f dat
a pl
otte
d on
the
utili
ty se
rvice
terr
itory
map
as s
pecif
ied
belo
w, a
t a m
inim
um. P
rovi
de in
form
atio
n fo
r eac
h ye
ar; c
alcu
late
and
pro
vide
a fi
ve-y
ear a
vera
ge. N
ame
and
atta
ch fi
les a
ccor
ding
to th
e ta
ble
belo
w.
Tabl
e 8:
Map
file
requ
irem
ents
for r
ecen
t and
mod
elle
d co
nditi
ons o
f util
ity se
rvic
e te
rrito
ry, l
ast 5
yea
rs
Laye
r nam
e M
easu
rem
ents
Un
its
Atta
chm
ent
loca
tion
Rece
nt w
eath
er
patt
erns
Av
erag
e an
nual
num
ber o
f Red
Fla
g W
arni
ng
days
per
squa
re m
ile a
cros
s ser
vice
terr
itory
Ar
ea, d
ays,
squa
re m
ile re
solu
tion
6.1
Aver
age
95th
and
99th
per
cent
ile w
ind
spee
d an
d pr
evai
ling
dire
ctio
n (a
ctua
l) Ar
ea, m
iles p
er h
our,
at a
squa
re m
ile re
solu
tion
or b
ette
r, no
ting
whe
re m
easu
rem
ents
are
act
ual o
r int
erpo
late
d Re
cent
driv
ers o
f ig
nitio
n pr
obab
ility
Da
te o
f rec
ent i
gniti
ons c
ateg
orize
d by
igni
tion
prob
abili
ty d
river
Po
int,
GPS
coor
dina
te, d
ays,
squa
re m
ile re
solu
tion
6.2
Rece
nt u
se o
f PSP
S Du
ratio
n of
PSP
S ev
ents
and
are
a of
the
grid
af
fect
ed in
cust
omer
hou
rs p
er y
ear
Area
, cus
tom
er h
ours
, squ
are
mile
reso
lutio
n 6.
3
R.1
8-10
-007
ALJ
/SR
T/ilz
26 / 90
26
Inst
ruct
ions
for T
able
9:
Repo
rt u
nder
lyin
g da
ta fo
r bas
elin
e co
nditi
ons (
proj
ecte
d fo
r 202
0) o
f the
util
ity se
rvice
terr
itory
in a
dow
nloa
dabl
e sh
apef
ile G
IS fo
rmat
and
da
taba
se, t
o in
clude
the
follo
win
g la
yers
of d
ata
plot
ted
on th
e ut
ility
serv
ice te
rrito
ry m
ap a
s spe
cifie
d be
low
, at a
min
imum
. Rep
ort m
ore
gran
ular
reso
lutio
ns w
here
ava
ilabl
e (e
.g.,
asse
t-lev
el in
stea
d of
by
circu
it m
ile).
Tabl
e 9:
Map
file
requ
irem
ents
for b
asel
ine
cond
ition
of u
tility
serv
ice
terr
itory
pro
ject
ed fo
r 202
0
Laye
r nam
e M
easu
rem
ents
/ v
aria
bles
Un
its
Appe
ndix
lo
catio
n Cu
rren
t bas
elin
e st
ate
of se
rvic
e te
rrito
ry a
nd u
tility
equ
ipm
ent
Non-
HFTD
vs H
FTD
(Zon
e 1,
Tie
r 2, T
ier 3
) reg
ions
of u
tility
serv
ice
terr
itory
Ar
ea, s
quar
e m
ile re
solu
tion
per t
ype
6.4
Urba
n vs
. rur
al v
s. hi
ghly
rura
l reg
ions
of u
tility
serv
ice te
rrito
ry
Area
, squ
are
mile
reso
lutio
n pe
r typ
e W
UI re
gion
s of u
tility
serv
ice
terr
itory
Ar
ea, s
quar
e m
ile re
solu
tion
Num
ber a
nd lo
catio
n of
criti
cal f
acili
ties
Poin
t, GP
S co
ordi
nate
Nu
mbe
r and
loca
tion
of cu
stom
ers
Area
, num
ber o
f peo
ple,
sq
uare
mile
reso
lutio
n
Num
ber a
nd lo
catio
n of
cus
tom
ers b
elon
ging
to a
cces
s and
fu
nctio
nal n
eeds
pop
ulat
ions
Ar
ea, n
umbe
r of p
eopl
e,
squa
re m
ile re
solu
tion
O
verh
ead
tran
smiss
ion
lines
Lin
e, q
uart
er m
ile re
solu
tion
Ove
rhea
d di
strib
utio
n lin
es
Line,
qua
rter
mile
reso
lutio
n Lo
catio
n of
subs
tatio
ns
Poin
t, GP
S co
ordi
nate
Lo
catio
n of
wea
ther
stat
ions
Po
int,
GPS
coor
dina
te
All u
tility
ass
ets b
y as
set t
ype,
mod
el, a
ge, s
pecif
icat
ions
, and
co
nditi
on
Poin
t, GP
S co
ordi
nate
Loca
tion
of p
lann
ed u
tility
eq
uipm
ent a
dditi
ons o
r rem
oval
Non-
HFTD
vs H
FTD
(Zon
e 1,
Tie
r 2, T
ier 3
) reg
ions
of u
tility
serv
ice
terr
itory
Lin
e, q
uart
er m
ile re
solu
tion
6.5
Urba
n vs
. rur
al v
s. hi
ghly
rura
l reg
ions
of u
tility
serv
ice te
rrito
ry
Line,
qua
rter
mile
reso
lutio
n W
UI re
gion
s of u
tility
serv
ice
terr
itory
Lin
e, q
uart
er m
ile re
solu
tion
Circ
uit m
iles o
f ove
rhea
d tr
ansm
issio
n lin
es
Line,
qua
rter
mile
reso
lutio
n
Circ
uit m
iles o
f ove
rhea
d di
strib
utio
n lin
es
Line,
qua
rter
mile
reso
lutio
n Lo
catio
n of
subs
tatio
ns
Poin
t, GP
S co
ordi
nate
Pl
anne
d 20
20 W
MP
initi
ativ
e ac
tivity
per
yea
r Lo
catio
n of
202
0 W
MP
initi
ativ
e ac
tivity
for e
ach
activ
ity a
s pla
nned
to
be
com
plet
ed b
y th
e en
d of
eac
h ye
ar o
f the
pla
n te
rm
Line,
qua
rter
mile
reso
lutio
n 7.
6
R.1
8-10
-007
ALJ
/SR
T/ilz
27 / 90
27 Ba
selin
e ig
nitio
n pr
obab
ility
and
wild
fire
risk
expo
sure
3.1
Rece
nt w
eath
er p
atte
rns,
last
5 y
ears
Inst
ruct
ions
for T
able
10:
Re
port
wea
ther
mea
sure
men
ts b
ased
upo
n th
e du
ratio
n an
d sc
ope
of N
WS
Red
Flag
War
ning
s and
upo
n pr
oprie
tary
Fire
Pot
entia
l Ind
ex (o
r ot
her s
imila
r fire
risk
pot
entia
l mea
sure
) for
eac
h ye
ar. C
alcu
late
and
repo
rt 5
-yea
r hist
orica
l ave
rage
. Ens
ure
unde
rlyin
g da
ta is
pro
vide
d pe
r Se
ctio
n 2.
7.
Tabl
e 10
: Wea
ther
pat
tern
s, la
st 5
yea
rs
Wea
ther
mea
sure
men
t 20
15
2016
20
17
2018
20
19
5-ye
ar
hist
oric
al
aver
age
Unit(
s)
Red
Flag
War
ning
day
s
RF
W ci
rcui
t mile
day
s per
yea
r
Days
rate
d at
the
top
30%
of
prop
rieta
ry fi
re p
oten
tial i
ndex
or
simila
r fire
risk
inde
x m
easu
re
Circ
uit m
ile d
ays w
here
pro
prie
tary
mea
sure
rate
d ab
ove
top
30%
thre
shol
d1 per
yea
r
95th
per
cent
ile w
ind
cond
ition
s
Ci
rcui
t mile
day
s with
win
d gu
sts o
ver 9
5th p
erce
ntile
hi
stor
ical (
mea
ning
the
prio
r 10
year
s, 20
05-2
014)
co
nditi
ons p
er y
ear
99th
per
cent
ile w
ind
cond
ition
s
Ci
rcui
t mile
day
s with
win
d gu
sts o
ver 9
9th p
erce
ntile
hi
stor
ical (
mea
ning
the
prio
r 10
year
s, 20
05-2
014)
co
nditi
ons p
er y
ear
Oth
er
Note
: Add
add
ition
al ro
ws a
s nee
ded.
1 T
hres
hold
her
e de
fined
as t
op 3
0% o
f FPI
or e
quiv
alen
t sca
le (e
.g.,
“Ext
rem
e” o
n SC
E’s F
PI; “
extr
eme”
, 15
or g
reat
er, o
n SD
G&E’
s FPI
; and
4 o
r abo
ve o
n PG
&E’
s FPI
), .
R.1
8-10
-007
ALJ
/SR
T/ilz
28 / 90
28
3.2
Rece
nt d
river
s of i
gniti
on p
roba
bilit
y, la
st 5
yea
rs
Inst
ruct
ions
for T
able
11:
Re
port
rece
nt d
river
s of i
gniti
on p
roba
bilit
y ac
cord
ing
to w
heth
er o
r not
nea
r miss
es o
f tha
t typ
e ar
e tr
acke
d, th
e nu
mbe
r of i
ncid
ents
per
yea
r (e
.g.,
all i
nsta
nces
of a
nim
al co
ntac
t reg
ardl
ess o
f whe
ther
they
caus
ed a
n ou
tage
, an
igni
tion,
or n
eith
er),
the
rate
at w
hich
thos
e in
ciden
ts (e
.g.,
obje
ct co
ntac
t, eq
uipm
ent f
ailu
re, e
tc.)
caus
e an
igni
tion
in th
e co
lum
n, a
nd th
e nu
mbe
r of i
gniti
ons t
hat t
hose
incid
ents
caus
ed b
y ca
tego
ry, f
or
each
of l
ast f
ive
year
s.
Calcu
late
and
inclu
de 5
-yea
r hist
orica
l ave
rage
s. Th
is re
quire
men
t app
lies t
o al
l util
ities
, not
onl
y th
ose
requ
ired
to su
bmit
annu
al ig
nitio
n da
ta.
Any
utili
ty th
at d
oes n
ot h
ave
com
plet
e 20
19 ig
nitio
n da
ta co
mpi
led
by th
e W
MP
dead
line
shal
l ind
icate
in th
e 20
19 co
lum
ns th
at sa
id
info
rmat
ion
is in
com
plet
e. Li
st a
dditi
onal
driv
ers t
rack
ed in
the
“oth
er” r
ow a
nd a
dd a
dditi
onal
row
s as n
eede
d. E
nsur
e un
derly
ing
data
is
prov
ided
per
Sec
tion
2.7.
R.1
8-10
-007
ALJ
/SR
T/ilz
29 / 90
29
Tabl
e 11
: Key
rece
nt d
river
s of i
gniti
on p
roba
bilit
y, la
st 5
yea
rs
Inci
dent
type
by
igni
tion
prob
abili
ty
driv
er
Near misses tracked (y/n)?
Num
ber o
f inc
iden
ts p
er y
ear
Aver
age
perc
enta
ge p
roba
bilit
y of
ig
nitio
n pe
r inc
iden
t N
umbe
r of i
gniti
ons p
er y
ear f
rom
this
driv
er
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
Average
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
Average
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
Average
Cont
act
from
ob
ject
All t
ypes
of
obje
ct
cont
act
Anim
al
cont
act
Ballo
on
cont
act
Veg.
co
ntac
t
Vehi
cle
cont
act
All t
ypes
of
eq
uipm
ent /
facil
ity
failu
re
All t
ypes
Capa
citor
ba
nk fa
ilure
Cond
ucto
r fa
ilure
—al
l
R.1
8-10
-007
ALJ
/SR
T/ilz
30 / 90
30
Cond
ucto
r fa
ilure
—w
ires d
own
Fuse
fa
ilure
—al
l
Fuse
fa
ilure
—co
nven
tion
al
blow
n fu
se
Light
ning
ar
rest
or
failu
re
Switc
h fa
ilure
Tran
sfor
me
r fai
lure
Wire
-to-w
ire co
ntac
t /
cont
amin
atio
n
Oth
er
Note
: Add
add
ition
al ro
ws a
s nee
ded.
3.
3Re
cent
use
of P
SPS,
last
5 y
ears
Inst
ruct
ions
for T
able
12:
Re
port
use
of P
SPS
acco
rdin
g to
the
num
ber a
nd d
urat
ion
of P
SPS
even
ts in
tota
l and
nor
mal
ized
acro
ss w
eath
er co
nditi
ons e
ach
year
(by
divi
ding
by
the
num
ber o
f RFW
circ
uit m
ile d
ays)
. List
add
ition
al P
SPS
char
acte
ristic
s tra
cked
in th
e “o
ther
” row
and
add
ition
al ro
ws a
s nee
ded.
R
.18-
10-0
07 A
LJ/S
RT/
ilz
31 / 90
31
Tabl
e 12
: Rec
ent u
se o
f PSP
S, la
st 5
yea
rs
PSPS
char
acte
ristic
20
15
2016
20
17
2018
20
19
Unit(
s)
Freq
uenc
y of
PSP
S ev
ents
(tot
al)
Nu
mbe
r of i
nsta
nces
whe
re u
tility
ope
ratin
g pr
otoc
ol re
quire
s de -
ener
giza
tion
of a
circ
uit o
r po
rtio
n th
ereo
f to
redu
ce ig
nitio
n pr
obab
ility
, per
ye
ar
Freq
uenc
y of
PSP
S ev
ents
(nor
mal
ized)
Num
ber o
f ins
tanc
es w
here
util
ity o
pera
ting
prot
ocol
requ
ires d
e-en
ergi
zatio
n of
a ci
rcui
t or
port
ion
ther
eof i
n or
der t
o re
duce
igni
tion
prob
abili
ty, p
er R
FW ci
rcui
t mile
day
per
yea
r
Scop
e of
PSP
S ev
ents
(tot
al)
Ci
rcui
t-eve
nts,
mea
sure
d in
num
ber o
f eve
nts
mul
tiplie
d by
num
ber o
f circ
uits
de-
ener
gize
d pe
r ye
ar
Scop
e of
PSP
S ev
ents
(nor
mal
ized)
Circ
uit-e
vent
s, m
easu
red
in n
umbe
r of e
vent
s m
ultip
lied
by n
umbe
r of c
ircui
ts ta
rget
ed fo
r de-
ener
giza
tion
per R
FW c
ircui
t mile
day
per
yea
r
Dura
tion
of P
SPS
even
ts (t
otal
)
Cust
omer
hou
rs p
er y
ear
Dura
tion
of P
SPS
even
ts (n
orm
alize
d)
Cu
stom
er h
ours
per
RFW
circ
uit m
ile d
ay p
er y
ear
Oth
er
Note
: Add
add
ition
al ro
ws a
s nee
ded.
R.1
8-10
-007
ALJ
/SR
T/ilz
32 / 90
32
3.4
Base
line
stat
e of
equ
ipm
ent a
nd w
ildfir
e an
d PS
PS e
vent
risk
redu
ctio
n pl
ans
3.4.
1Cu
rren
t bas
elin
e st
ate
of se
rvice
terr
itory
and
util
ity e
quip
men
t
Inst
ruct
ions
for T
able
13:
Pr
ovid
e su
mm
ary
data
for t
he cu
rren
t bas
elin
e st
ate
of H
FTD
and
non-
HFTD
serv
ice te
rrito
ry in
term
s of c
ircui
t mile
s; o
verh
ead
tran
smiss
ion
lines
, ove
rhea
d di
strib
utio
n lin
es, s
ubst
atio
ns, a
nd cr
itica
l fac
ilitie
s loc
ated
with
in th
e te
rrito
ry; a
nd cu
stom
ers b
y ty
pe, l
ocat
ed in
urb
an v
ersu
s ru
ral v
ersu
s hig
hly
rura
l are
as a
nd in
cludi
ng th
e su
bset
with
in th
e W
ildla
nd-U
rban
Inte
rface
(WUI
).
The
tota
ls of
the
cells
for e
ach
cate
gory
of i
nfor
mat
ion
(e.g
., “c
ircui
t mile
s” o
r “cir
cuit
mile
s in
WUI
”) w
ould
be
equa
l to
the
over
all s
ervi
ce
terr
itory
tota
l (e.
g., t
he to
tal o
f num
ber o
f cus
tom
ers i
n ur
ban,
rura
l, an
d hi
ghly
rura
l are
as o
f HFT
D pl
us th
ose
in u
rban
, rur
al, a
nd h
ighl
y ru
ral
area
s of n
on-H
FTD
wou
ld e
qual
the
tota
l num
ber o
f cus
tom
ers o
f the
ent
ire se
rvice
terr
itory
). En
sure
und
erly
ing
data
is p
rovi
ded
per S
ectio
n 2.
7.
Tabl
e 13
: Cur
rent
bas
elin
e st
ate
of se
rvic
e te
rrito
ry a
nd u
tility
equ
ipm
ent
Land
use
Ch
arac
teris
tic tr
acke
d In
non
-HF
TD
In H
FTD
Zone
1
In H
FTD
Tier
2
In H
FTD
Tier
3
In u
rban
are
as
Circ
uit m
iles
Circ
uit m
iles i
n W
UI
Num
ber o
f crit
ical f
acili
ties
Num
ber o
f crit
ical f
acili
ties i
n W
UI
Num
ber o
f cus
tom
ers
Num
ber o
f cus
tom
ers i
n W
UI
Num
ber o
f cus
tom
ers b
elon
ging
to a
cces
s and
func
tiona
l nee
ds p
opul
atio
ns
Num
ber o
f cus
tom
ers b
elon
ging
to a
cces
s and
func
tiona
l nee
ds p
opul
atio
ns
in W
UI
R.1
8-10
-007
ALJ
/SR
T/ilz
33 / 90
33
Land
use
Ch
arac
teris
tic tr
acke
d In
non
-HF
TD
In H
FTD
Zone
1
In H
FTD
Tier
2
In H
FTD
Tier
3
Circ
uit m
iles o
f ove
rhea
d tr
ansm
issio
n lin
es
Circ
uit m
iles o
f ove
rhea
d tr
ansm
issio
n lin
es in
WUI
Circ
uit m
iles o
f ove
rhea
d di
strib
utio
n lin
es
Circ
uit m
iles o
f ove
rhea
d di
strib
utio
n lin
es in
WUI
Num
ber o
f sub
stat
ions
Num
ber o
f sub
stat
ions
in W
UI
In ru
ral a
reas
Circ
uit m
iles
Circ
uit m
iles i
n W
UI
Num
ber o
f crit
ical f
acili
ties
Num
ber o
f crit
ical f
acili
ties i
n W
UI
Num
ber o
f cus
tom
ers
Num
ber o
f cus
tom
ers i
n W
UI
Num
ber o
f cus
tom
ers b
elon
ging
to a
cces
s and
func
tiona
l nee
ds p
opul
atio
ns
Num
ber o
f cus
tom
ers b
elon
ging
to a
cces
s and
func
tiona
l nee
ds p
opul
atio
ns
in W
UI
Circ
uit m
iles o
f ove
rhea
d tr
ansm
issio
n lin
es
Circ
uit m
iles o
f ove
rhea
d tr
ansm
issio
n lin
es in
WUI
R.1
8-10
-007
ALJ
/SR
T/ilz
34 / 90
34
Land
use
Ch
arac
teris
tic tr
acke
d In
non
-HF
TD
In H
FTD
Zone
1
In H
FTD
Tier
2
In H
FTD
Tier
3
Circ
uit m
iles o
f ove
rhea
d di
strib
utio
n lin
es
Circ
uit m
iles o
f ove
rhea
d di
strib
utio
n lin
es in
WUI
Num
ber o
f sub
stat
ions
Num
ber o
f sub
stat
ions
in W
UI
In h
ighl
y ru
ral
area
s Ci
rcui
t mile
s
Circ
uit m
iles i
n W
UI
Num
ber o
f crit
ical f
acili
ties
Num
ber o
f crit
ical f
acili
ties i
n W
UI
Num
ber o
f cus
tom
ers
Num
ber o
f cus
tom
ers i
n W
UI
Num
ber o
f cus
tom
ers b
elon
ging
to a
cces
s and
func
tiona
l nee
ds p
opul
atio
ns
Num
ber o
f cus
tom
ers b
elon
ging
to a
cces
s and
func
tiona
l nee
ds p
opul
atio
ns
in W
UI
Circ
uit m
iles o
f ove
rhea
d tr
ansm
issio
n lin
es
Circ
uit m
iles o
f ove
rhea
d tr
ansm
issio
n lin
es in
WUI
Circ
uit m
iles o
f ove
rhea
d di
strib
utio
n lin
es
Circ
uit m
iles o
f ove
rhea
d di
strib
utio
n lin
es in
WUI
R.1
8-10
-007
ALJ
/SR
T/ilz
35 / 90
35
Land
use
Ch
arac
teris
tic tr
acke
d In
non
-HF
TD
In H
FTD
Zone
1
In H
FTD
Tier
2
In H
FTD
Tier
3
Num
ber o
f sub
stat
ions
Num
ber o
f sub
stat
ions
in W
UI
R.1
8-10
-007
ALJ
/SR
T/ilz
36 / 90
36
Inst
ruct
ions
for T
able
14:
In
put s
umm
ary
data
on
num
ber o
f util
ity w
eath
er st
atio
ns lo
cate
d in
util
ity se
rvice
terr
itory
by
type
.
Tabl
e 14
: Sum
mar
y da
ta o
n w
eath
er st
atio
n co
unt
Wea
ther
stat
ion
coun
t typ
e Cu
rren
t co
unt
Unit(
s)
Num
ber o
f wea
ther
stat
ions
(tot
al)
To
tal n
umbe
r loc
ated
in se
rvic
e te
rrito
ry a
nd o
pera
ted
by u
tility
Num
ber o
f wea
ther
stat
ions
(n
orm
alize
d)
To
tal n
umbe
r loc
ated
in se
rvic
e te
rrito
ry a
nd o
pera
ted
by u
tility
, div
ided
by
tota
l num
ber o
f circ
uit
mile
s in
utili
ty se
rvic
e te
rrito
ry
Num
ber o
f wea
ther
stat
ions
in n
on-
HFTD
(tot
al)
To
tal n
umbe
r loc
ated
in n
on-H
FTD
serv
ice
terr
itory
and
ope
rate
d by
util
ity
Num
ber o
f wea
ther
stat
ions
in n
on-H
FTD
(nor
mal
ized)
Tota
l num
ber l
ocat
ed in
non
-HFT
D se
rvic
e te
rrito
ry a
nd o
pera
ted
by u
tility
, div
ided
by
tota
l nu
mbe
r of c
ircui
t mile
s in
non-
HFTD
serv
ice
terr
itory
Num
ber
of w
eath
er s
tatio
ns i
n HF
TD
Zone
1 (t
otal
)
Tota
l num
ber l
ocat
ed in
HFT
D Zo
ne 1
serv
ice
terr
itory
and
ope
rate
d by
util
ity
Num
ber
of w
eath
er s
tatio
ns i
n HF
TD
Zone
1 (n
orm
alize
d)
To
tal n
umbe
r lo
cate
d in
HFT
D Zo
ne 1
ser
vice
ter
ritor
y an
d op
erat
ed b
y ut
ility
, div
ided
by
tota
l nu
mbe
r of c
ircui
t mile
s in
HFTD
Zon
e 1
serv
ice
terr
itory
Num
ber o
f wea
ther
stat
ions
in H
FTD
Tier
2
(tota
l)
Tota
l num
ber l
ocat
ed in
HFT
D Ti
er 2
serv
ice
terr
itory
and
ope
rate
d by
util
ity
Num
ber o
f wea
ther
stat
ions
in H
FTD
Tier
2
(nor
mal
ized)
Tota
l num
ber
loca
ted
in H
FTD
Tier
2 s
ervi
ce t
errit
ory
and
oper
ated
by
utili
ty, d
ivid
ed b
y to
tal
num
ber o
f circ
uit m
iles i
n HF
TD T
ier 2
serv
ice
terr
itory
Num
ber o
f wea
ther
stat
ions
in H
FTD
Tier
3
(tota
l)
Tota
l num
ber l
ocat
ed in
HFT
D Ti
er 3
serv
ice
terr
itory
and
ope
rate
d by
util
ity
Num
ber o
f wea
ther
stat
ions
in H
FTD
Tier
3
(nor
mal
ized)
Tota
l num
ber
loca
ted
in H
FTD
Tier
3 s
ervi
ce t
errit
ory
and
oper
ated
by
utili
ty, d
ivid
ed b
y to
tal
num
ber o
f circ
uit m
iles i
n HF
TD T
ier 3
serv
ice
terr
itory
R.1
8-10
-007
ALJ
/SR
T/ilz
37 / 90
37
Inst
ruct
ions
for T
able
15:
In
put s
umm
ary
data
on
num
ber o
f util
ity fa
ult i
ndica
tors
loca
ted
in u
tility
serv
ice te
rrito
ry b
y ty
pe.
Tabl
e 15
: Sum
mar
y da
ta o
n fa
ult i
ndic
ator
coun
t
Faul
t ind
icat
or co
unt t
ype
Curr
ent
coun
t Un
it(s)
Num
ber o
f fau
lt in
dica
tors
(tot
al)
To
tal n
umbe
r loc
ated
in se
rvic
e te
rrito
ry a
nd o
pera
ted
by u
tility
Num
ber o
f fau
lt in
dica
tors
(nor
mal
ized)
Tota
l num
ber l
ocat
ed in
serv
ice
terr
itory
and
ope
rate
d by
util
ity, d
ivid
ed b
y to
tal n
umbe
r of c
ircui
t m
iles i
n ut
ility
serv
ice
terr
itory
Num
ber o
f fau
lt in
dica
tors
in n
on-H
FTD
(tota
l)
Tota
l num
ber l
ocat
ed in
non
-HFT
D se
rvic
e te
rrito
ry a
nd o
pera
ted
by u
tility
Num
ber o
f fau
lt in
dica
tors
in n
on-H
FTD
(nor
mal
ized)
Tota
l num
ber l
ocat
ed in
non
-HFT
D se
rvic
e te
rrito
ry a
nd o
pera
ted
by u
tility
, div
ided
by
tota
l nu
mbe
r of c
ircui
t mile
s in
non-
HFTD
serv
ice
terr
itory
Num
ber o
f fau
lt in
dica
tors
in H
FTD
Zone
1
(tota
l)
Tota
l num
ber l
ocat
ed in
HFT
D Zo
ne 1
serv
ice
terr
itory
and
ope
rate
d by
util
ity
Num
ber o
f fau
lt in
dica
tors
in H
FTD
Zone
1
(no r
mal
ized)
Tota
l num
ber
loca
ted
in H
FTD
Zone
1 s
ervi
ce t
errit
ory
and
oper
ated
by
utili
ty, d
ivid
ed b
y to
tal
num
ber o
f circ
uit m
iles i
n HF
TD Z
one
1 se
rvic
e te
rrito
ry
Num
ber o
f fau
lt in
dica
tors
in H
FTD
Tier
2
(tota
l)
Tota
l num
ber l
ocat
ed in
HFT
D Ti
er 2
serv
ice
terr
itory
and
ope
rate
d by
util
ity
Num
ber o
f fau
lt in
dica
tors
in H
FTD
Tier
2
(nor
mal
ized)
Tota
l num
ber l
ocat
ed in
HFT
D Ti
er 2
serv
ice te
rrito
ry a
nd o
pera
ted
by u
tility
, div
ided
by t
otal
num
ber
of ci
rcui
t mile
s in
HFTD
Tie
r 2 se
rvic
e te
rrito
ry
Num
ber o
f fau
lt in
dica
tors
in H
FTD
Tier
3
(tota
l)
Tota
l num
ber l
ocat
ed in
HFT
D Ti
er 3
serv
ice
terr
itory
and
ope
rate
d by
util
ity
Num
ber o
f fau
lt in
dica
tors
in H
FTD
Tier
3
(nor
mal
ized)
Tota
l num
ber l
ocat
ed in
HFT
D Ti
er 3
serv
ice te
rrito
ry a
nd o
pera
ted
by u
tility
, div
ided
by t
otal
num
ber
of ci
rcui
t mile
s in
HFTD
Tie
r 3 se
rvic
e te
rrito
ry
R.1
8-10
-007
ALJ
/SR
T/ilz
38 / 90
38
3.4.
2Pl
anne
d ad
ditio
ns, r
emov
al, a
nd u
pgra
de o
f util
ity e
quip
men
t by
end
of 3
-yea
r pla
n te
rm
Inst
ruct
ions
for T
able
16:
In
put s
umm
ary
info
rmat
ion
for t
he p
lann
ed a
dditi
ons o
r rem
oval
of u
tility
equ
ipm
ent t
o be
com
plet
ed b
y th
e en
d of
the
3-ye
ar p
lan
term
in
2022
. Rep
ort n
et a
dditi
ons u
sing
posit
ive
num
bers
and
net
rem
oval
s and
und
ergr
ound
ing
usin
g ne
gativ
e nu
mbe
rs fo
r circ
uit m
iles a
nd n
umbe
rs
of su
bsta
tions
.
Tabl
e 16
: Loc
atio
n of
pla
nned
util
ity e
quip
men
t add
ition
s or r
emov
al b
y en
d of
3-y
ear p
lan
term
Land
use
Ch
arac
teris
tic tr
acke
d Ch
ange
s by
end-
2022
In n
on-H
FTD
In H
FTD
Zone
1
In H
FTD
Tier
2
In H
FTD
Tier
3
In u
rban
are
as
Circ
uit m
iles o
f ove
rhea
d tr
ansm
issio
n lin
es
Circ
uit m
iles o
f ove
rhea
d di
strib
utio
n lin
es
Circ
uit m
iles o
f ove
rhea
d tr
ansm
issio
n lin
es in
WUI
Circ
uit m
iles o
f ove
rhea
d di
strib
utio
n lin
es in
WUI
Num
ber o
f sub
stat
ions
Num
ber o
f sub
stat
ions
in W
UI
Num
ber o
f wea
ther
stat
ions
Num
ber o
f wea
ther
stat
ions
in W
UI
In ru
ral a
reas
Circ
uit m
iles o
f ove
rhea
d tr
ansm
issio
n lin
es
Circ
uit m
iles o
f ove
rhea
d di
strib
utio
n lin
es
Circ
uit m
iles o
f ove
rhea
d tr
ansm
issio
n lin
es in
WUI
R.1
8-10
-007
ALJ
/SR
T/ilz
39 / 90
39
Circ
uit m
iles o
f ove
rhea
d di
strib
utio
n lin
es in
WUI
Num
ber o
f sub
stat
ions
Num
ber o
f sub
stat
ions
in W
UI
Num
ber o
f wea
ther
stat
ions
Num
ber o
f wea
ther
stat
ions
in W
UI
In h
ighl
y ru
ral a
reas
Ci
rcui
t mile
s of o
verh
ead
tran
smiss
ion
lines
Circ
uit m
iles o
f ove
rhea
d di
strib
utio
n lin
es
Circ
uit m
iles o
f ove
rhea
d tr
ansm
issio
n lin
es in
WUI
Circ
uit m
iles o
f ove
rhea
d di
strib
utio
n lin
es in
WUI
Num
ber o
f sub
stat
ions
Num
ber o
f sub
stat
ions
in W
UI
Num
ber o
f wea
ther
stat
ions
Num
ber o
f wea
ther
stat
ions
in W
UI
Tran
smiss
ion
lines
refe
r to
all l
ines
at o
r abo
ve 6
5kV,
and
dist
ribut
ion
lines
refe
r to
all l
ines
bel
ow 6
5kV.
Inst
ruct
ions
for T
able
17:
Refe
rrin
g to
the
prog
ram
targ
ets d
iscus
sed
abov
e, re
port
pla
n fo
r har
deni
ng u
pgra
des i
n de
tail
belo
w. R
epor
t pla
n in
term
s of n
umbe
r of c
ircui
t m
iles o
r sub
stat
ions
to b
e up
grad
ed fo
r eac
h ye
ar, a
ssum
ing
com
plet
e im
plem
enta
tion
of w
ildfir
e m
itiga
tion
activ
ities
, for
HFT
D an
d no
n-HF
TD
serv
ice te
rrito
ry fo
r circ
uit m
iles o
f tra
nsm
issio
n lin
es, c
ircui
t mile
s of t
rans
miss
ion
lines
loca
ted
in W
ildla
nd-U
rban
Inte
rfac
e (W
UI),
circu
it m
iles
of d
istrib
utio
n lin
es, c
ircui
t mile
s of d
istrib
utio
n lin
es in
WUI
, num
ber o
f sub
stat
ions
, and
num
ber o
f sub
stat
ions
in th
e W
UI.
Inclu
de a
list
of t
he h
arde
ning
initi
ativ
es in
clude
d in
the
calc
ulat
ions
for t
he b
elow
tabl
e.
R.1
8-10
-007
ALJ
/SR
T/ilz
40 / 90
40
Tabl
e 17
: Loc
atio
n of
pla
nned
util
ity in
fras
truc
ture
upg
rade
s
Land
use
Ch
arac
teris
tic tr
acke
d In
non
-HFT
D In
HFT
D Zo
ne 1
In
HFT
D Ti
er 2
In
HFT
D Ti
er 3
20
20 2
021
2022
202
0 20
21 2
022
2020
202
1 20
22 2
020
2021
202
2 To
tal c
ircui
t mile
s pla
nned
for h
arde
ning
eac
h ye
ar, a
ll ty
pes a
nd lo
catio
ns
Tota
l num
ber o
f sub
stat
ions
pla
nned
for h
arde
ning
eac
h ye
ar, a
ll lo
catio
ns
In u
rban
are
as
Circ
uit m
iles p
lann
ed fo
r grid
har
deni
ng o
f ove
rhea
d tr
ansm
issio
n lin
es
Circ
uit m
iles o
f ove
rhea
d tr
ansm
issio
n lin
es in
WUI
to h
arde
n
Ci
rcui
t mile
s of o
verh
ead
dist
ribut
ion
lines
to h
arde
n
Ci
rcui
t mile
s of o
verh
ead
dist
ribut
ion
lines
in W
UI to
har
den
Circ
uit m
iles o
f ove
rhea
d tr
ansm
issio
n lin
es in
WUI
to h
arde
n
Nu
mbe
r of s
ubst
atio
ns to
har
den
Num
ber o
f sub
stat
ions
in W
UI to
har
den
In ru
ral a
reas
Ci
rcui
t mile
s of o
verh
ead
tran
smiss
ion
lines
to h
arde
n
Ci
rcui
t mile
s of o
verh
ead
tran
smiss
ion
lines
in W
UI to
har
den
Circ
uit m
iles o
f ove
rhea
d di
strib
utio
n lin
es to
har
den
Circ
uit m
iles o
f ove
rhea
d di
strib
utio
n lin
es in
WUI
to h
arde
n
Ci
rcui
t mile
s of o
verh
ead
tran
smiss
ion
lines
in W
UI to
har
den
Num
ber o
f sub
stat
ions
to h
arde
n
Nu
mbe
r of s
ubst
atio
ns in
WUI
to h
arde
n
In
hig
hly
rura
l ar
eas
Circ
uit m
iles o
f ove
rhea
d tr
ansm
issio
n lin
es to
har
den
Circ
uit m
iles o
f ove
rhea
d tr
ansm
issio
n lin
es in
WUI
to h
arde
n
Ci
rcui
t mile
s of o
verh
ead
dist
ribut
ion
lines
to h
arde
n
Ci
rcui
t mile
s of o
verh
ead
dist
ribut
ion
lines
in W
UI to
har
den
Circ
uit m
iles o
f ove
rhea
d tr
ansm
issio
n lin
es in
WUI
to h
arde
n
Nu
mbe
r of s
ubst
atio
ns to
har
den
Num
ber o
f sub
stat
ions
in W
UI to
har
den
Tran
smiss
ion
lines
refe
r to
all l
ines
at o
r abo
ve 6
5kV,
and
dist
ribut
ion
lines
refe
r to
all l
ines
bel
ow 6
5kV.
R.1
8-10
-007
ALJ
/SR
T/ilz
41 / 90
41
3.4.
3St
atus
quo
igni
tion
prob
abili
ty d
river
s by
serv
ice
terr
itory
Inst
ruct
ions
for T
able
18:
Re
port
5-y
ear h
istor
ical a
vera
ge d
river
s of i
gniti
on p
roba
bilit
y ac
cord
ing
to:
the
aver
age
num
ber o
f inc
iden
ts p
er y
ear
the
likel
ihoo
d of
igni
tion
per i
ncid
ent,
mea
ning
, the
rate
at w
hich
thos
e in
ciden
ts (e
.g.,
obje
ct co
ntac
t, eq
uipm
ent f
ailu
re, e
tc.)
wou
ld b
e ex
pect
ed to
caus
e an
igni
tion
(e.g
., if
50%
of v
eget
atio
n co
ntac
ts re
sult
in ig
nitio
n, th
en th
e va
lue
for t
he “L
ikel
ihoo
d of
igni
tion
per
incid
ent”
colu
mn
wou
ld b
e “5
0%” i
n th
at ro
w);
and
th
e 5-
year
hist
orica
l ave
rage
of t
he n
umbe
r of i
gniti
ons f
rom
this
driv
er b
y lo
catio
n in
non
-HFT
D, H
FTD
Zone
1, H
FTD
Tier
2, a
nd H
FTD
Tier
3. L
ist a
dditi
onal
risk
driv
ers t
rack
ed in
the
“oth
er” r
ow a
nd a
dditi
onal
row
s as n
eede
d. If
chan
ges w
ould
be
expe
cted
for p
lan
year
s 2
and
3, d
escr
ibe.
Ta
ble
18: K
ey d
river
s of i
gniti
on p
roba
bilit
y
Igni
tion
prob
abili
ty d
river
s N
umbe
r of i
ncid
ents
per
yea
r (a
ccor
ding
to 5
-yea
r hi
stor
ical
ave
rage
)
Aver
age
likel
ihoo
d of
igni
tion
per
inci
dent
Igni
tions
from
this
driv
er (a
ccor
ding
to 5
-yea
r hi
stor
ical
ave
rage
)
Tota
l In
non
-HF
TD
In H
FTD
Zone
1
In H
FTD
Tier
2
In H
FTD
Tier
3
Cont
act f
rom
ob
ject
Al
l typ
es o
f obj
ect
cont
act
Anim
al co
ntac
t
Ballo
on co
ntac
t
Vege
tatio
n co
ntac
t
Vehi
cle c
onta
ct
All t
ypes
of
equi
pmen
t / fa
cility
fa
ilure
All t
ypes
Capa
citor
ban
k fa
ilure
R.1
8-10
-007
ALJ
/SR
T/ilz
42 / 90
42
Cond
ucto
r fai
lure
—al
l
Cond
ucto
r fai
lure
—w
ires d
own
Fuse
failu
re—
all
Fuse
failu
re—
conv
entio
nal b
low
n fu
se
Light
ning
arr
esto
r fa
ilure
Switc
h fa
ilure
Tran
sfor
mer
failu
re
Wire
-to-w
ire co
ntac
t / co
ntam
inat
ion
Oth
er
R.1
8-10
-007
ALJ
/SR
T/ilz
43 / 90
43 In
puts
to th
e pl
an a
nd d
irect
iona
l visi
on fo
r wild
fire
risk
expo
sure
4.1
Th
e ob
ject
ives
of t
he p
lan
The
obje
ctiv
es o
f the
pla
n sh
all,
at a
min
imum
, be
cons
isten
t with
the
requ
irem
ents
of C
alifo
rnia
Pub
lic U
tiliti
es C
ode
§838
6(a)
. Des
crib
e ut
ility
W
MP
obje
ctiv
es, c
ateg
orize
d by
eac
h of
the
follo
win
g tim
efra
mes
: 1.
Befo
re th
e up
com
ing
wild
fire
seas
on, a
s def
ined
by
the
Calif
orni
a De
part
men
t of F
ores
try
and
Fire
Pro
tect
ion
(CAL
FIR
E),
2.Be
fore
the
next
ann
ual u
pdat
e,
3.W
ithin
the
next
3 y
ears
, and
4.
With
in th
e ne
xt 1
0 ye
ars.
4.2
Unde
rsta
ndin
g m
ajor
tren
ds im
pact
ing
igni
tion
prob
abili
ty a
nd w
ildfir
e co
nseq
uenc
e
Desc
ribe
how
the
utili
ty a
sses
ses w
ildfir
e ris
k in
term
s of i
gniti
on p
roba
bilit
y an
d es
timat
ed w
ildfir
e co
nseq
uenc
e, in
cludi
ng u
se o
f Mul
ti-At
trib
ute
Risk
Sco
re (M
ARS)
and
Mul
ti-At
trib
ute
Valu
e Fu
nctio
n (M
AVF)
as i
n th
e Sa
fety
Mod
el a
nd A
sses
smen
t Pro
ceed
ing
(S-M
AP) a
nd R
isk
Asse
ssm
ent M
itiga
tion
Phas
e (R
AMP)
. Inc
lude
des
crip
tion
of h
ow th
e ut
ility
dist
ingu
ishes
bet
wee
n th
ese
risks
and
the
risks
to sa
fety
and
re
liabi
lity.
List
and
des
crib
e ea
ch “k
now
n lo
cal c
ondi
tion”
that
the
utili
ty m
onito
rs p
er G
O 95
, Rul
e 31
.1, i
nclu
ding
how
the
cond
ition
is
mon
itore
d an
d ev
alua
ted.
In a
dditi
on:
A.De
scrib
e ho
w th
e ut
ility
mon
itors
and
acc
ount
s for
the
cont
ribut
ion
of w
eath
er to
igni
tion
prob
abili
ty a
nd e
stim
ated
wild
fire
cons
eque
nce
in it
s dec
ision
-mak
ing,
inclu
ding
des
crib
ing
any
utili
ty-g
ener
ated
Fire
Pot
entia
l Ind
ex o
r oth
er m
easu
re (i
nclu
ding
inpu
t var
iabl
es,
equa
tions
, the
scal
e or
ratin
g sy
stem
, an
expl
anat
ion
of h
ow u
ncer
tain
ties a
re a
ccou
nted
for,
an e
xpla
natio
n of
how
this
inde
x is
used
to
info
rm o
pera
tiona
l dec
ision
s, an
d an
exp
lana
tion
of h
ow tr
ends
in in
dex r
atin
gs im
pact
med
ium
-term
dec
ision
s suc
h as
mai
nten
ance
and
lo
nger
-term
dec
ision
s suc
h as
capi
tal i
nves
tmen
ts, e
tc.).
B.
Desc
ribe
how
the
utili
ty m
onito
rs a
nd a
ccou
nts f
or th
e co
ntrib
utio
n of
fuel
cond
ition
s to
igni
tion
prob
abili
ty a
nd e
stim
ated
wild
fire
cons
eque
nce
in it
s dec
ision
-mak
ing,
inclu
ding
des
crib
ing
any
prop
rieta
ry fu
el co
nditi
on in
dex (
or o
ther
mea
sure
s tra
cked
), th
e ou
tput
s of
said
inde
x or o
ther
mea
sure
s, an
d th
e m
etho
dolo
gy u
sed
for p
roje
ctin
g fu
ture
fuel
cond
ition
s. In
clude
disc
ussio
n of
mea
sure
men
ts a
nd
units
for l
ive
fuel
moi
stur
e co
nten
t, de
ad fu
el m
oist
ure
cont
ent,
dens
ity o
f eac
h fu
el ty
pe, a
nd a
ny o
ther
var
iabl
es tr
acke
d. D
escr
ibe
the
mea
sure
s and
thre
shol
ds th
e ut
ility
use
s to
dete
rmin
e ex
trem
e fu
el co
nditi
ons,
inclu
ding
wha
t fue
l moi
stur
e m
easu
rem
ents
and
thre
shol
d va
lues
the
utili
ty co
nsid
ers “
extr
eme”
and
its s
trat
egy
for h
ow fu
el co
nditi
ons i
nfor
m o
pera
tiona
l dec
ision
-mak
ing.
R.1
8-10
-007
ALJ
/SR
T/ilz
44 / 90
44
4.2.
1Se
rvic
e te
rrito
ry fi
reth
reat
eva
luat
ion
and
igni
tion
risk
tren
ds
Disc
uss f
ire-th
reat
eva
luat
ion
of th
e se
rvice
terr
itory
to d
eter
min
e w
heth
er a
n ex
pand
ed H
igh
Fire
Thr
eat D
istric
t (HF
TD) i
s war
rant
ed (i
.e.,
beyo
nd e
xist
ing
Tier
2 a
nd T
ier 3
are
as).
This
sect
ion
shal
l inc
lude
a d
iscus
sion
of a
ny fi
re th
reat
ass
essm
ent o
f its
serv
ice
terr
itory
per
form
ed b
y th
e el
ectr
ical c
orpo
ratio
n. In
the
even
t tha
t the
ele
ctric
al co
rpor
atio
n’s a
sses
smen
t det
erm
ines
the
fire
thre
at ra
ting
for a
ny p
art o
f its
serv
ice
terr
itory
is in
suffi
cient
(i.e
., th
e ac
tual
fire
thre
at is
gre
ater
than
wha
t is i
ndica
ted
in th
e CP
UC F
ire T
hrea
t Map
and
Hig
h Fi
re T
hrea
t Dist
rict
desig
natio
ns),
the
corp
orat
ion
shal
l ide
ntify
thos
e ar
eas f
or co
nsid
erat
ion
of H
FTD
mod
ifica
tion,
bas
ed o
n th
e ne
w in
form
atio
n or
env
ironm
enta
l ch
ange
s. To
the
exte
nt th
is id
entif
icatio
n re
lies u
pon
a m
eteo
rolo
gica
l or c
limat
olog
ical s
tudy
, a th
orou
gh e
xpla
natio
n an
d co
py o
f the
stud
y sh
all
be in
clude
d.
Inst
ruct
ions
for T
able
19:
In th
e “R
ank”
colu
mn,
num
erica
lly ra
nk th
e tr
ends
ant
icipa
ted
to e
xhib
it th
e gr
eate
st ch
ange
and
hav
e th
e gr
eate
st im
pact
on
igni
tion
prob
abili
ty
and
estim
ated
wild
fire
cons
eque
nce
(be
it to
incr
ease
or d
ecre
ase
igni
tion
prob
abili
ty a
nd e
stim
ated
wild
fire
cons
eque
nce)
in te
n ye
ars.
Rank
in
orde
r fro
m 1
to 8
, whe
re 1
repr
esen
ts th
e gr
eate
st a
ntici
pate
d ch
ange
or i
mpa
ct o
n ig
nitio
n pr
obab
ility
and
est
imat
ed w
ildfir
e co
nseq
uenc
e an
d 8
is th
e le
ast a
ntici
pate
d ch
ange
or i
mpa
ct.
In th
e “C
omm
ents
” col
umn,
pro
vide
a n
arra
tive
to d
escr
ibe
the
expe
cted
chan
ge a
nd e
xpec
ted
impa
ct o
n th
e ut
ility
’s ne
twor
k, in
cludi
ng
whe
ther
the
tren
d is
expe
cted
to si
gnifi
cant
ly in
crea
se ri
sk, m
oder
atel
y in
crea
se ri
sk, h
ave
limite
d or
no
impa
ct, m
oder
atel
y de
crea
se ri
sk, o
r sig
nific
antly
dec
reas
e ris
k. U
se q
uant
itativ
e es
timat
es w
here
ver p
ossib
le. A
lso o
utlin
e an
y pr
ogra
ms b
eing
impl
emen
ted
to sp
ecifi
cally
add
ress
th
is tr
end.
Tabl
e 19
: Mac
ro tr
ends
impa
ctin
g ig
nitio
n pr
obab
ility
and
/or w
ildfir
e co
nseq
uenc
e
Rank
M
acro
tren
ds im
pact
ing
utili
ty ig
nite
d ig
nitio
n pr
obab
ility
and
es
timat
ed w
ildfir
e co
nseq
uenc
e by
yea
r 10
Com
men
ts
Chan
ge in
igni
tion
prob
abili
ty a
nd e
stim
ated
wild
fire
cons
eque
nce
due
to cl
imat
e ch
ange
Ch
ange
in ig
nitio
n pr
obab
ility
and
est
imat
ed w
ildfir
e co
nseq
uenc
e du
e to
rele
vant
inva
sive
spec
ies,
such
as b
ark
beet
les
Ch
ange
in ig
nitio
n pr
obab
ility
and
est
imat
ed w
ildfir
e co
nseq
uenc
e du
e to
oth
er d
river
s of c
hang
e in
fuel
den
sity
and
moi
stur
e
Po
pula
tion
chan
ges (
inclu
ding
Acc
ess a
nd F
unct
iona
l Nee
ds
popu
latio
n) th
at co
uld
be im
pact
ed b
y ut
ility
igni
tion
Po
pula
tion
chan
ges i
n HF
TD th
at co
uld
be im
pact
ed b
y ut
ility
ig
nitio
n
R.1
8-10
-007
ALJ
/SR
T/ilz
45 / 90
45
Po
pula
tion
chan
ges i
n W
UI th
at co
uld
be im
pact
ed b
y ut
ility
ig
nitio
n
Ut
ility
infra
stru
ctur
e lo
catio
n in
HFT
D vs
non
-HFT
D
Ut
ility
infra
stru
ctur
e lo
catio
n in
urb
an v
s rur
al v
s hig
hly
rura
l are
as
2 Lis
t and
des
crib
e an
y ad
ditio
nal m
acro
tren
ds im
pact
ing
igni
tion
prob
abili
ty a
nd e
stim
ated
wild
fire
cons
eque
nce
with
in u
tility
serv
ice te
rrito
ry,
inclu
ding
tren
ds w
ithin
the
cont
rol o
f the
util
ity, t
rend
s with
in th
e ut
ility
’s ab
ility
to in
fluen
ce, a
nd e
xter
nalit
ies (
i.e.,
tren
ds b
eyon
d th
e ut
ility
’s co
ntro
l, su
ch a
s pop
ulat
ion
chan
ges w
ithin
the
utili
ty’s
terr
itory
).
List a
nd d
escr
ibe
all r
elev
ant d
river
s of i
gniti
on p
roba
bilit
y an
d es
timat
ed w
ildfir
e co
nseq
uenc
es a
nd th
e m
itiga
tions
that
are
iden
tifie
d in
the
Risk
Ass
essm
ent M
itiga
tion
Phas
e (R
AMP)
and
not
inclu
ded
in th
e ab
ove,
inclu
ding
how
thes
e ar
e ex
pect
ed to
evo
lve.
Ran
k th
ese
driv
ers f
rom
hi
ghes
t to
low
est r
isk a
nd d
escr
ibe
how
they
are
exp
ecte
d to
evo
lve.
4.3
Chan
ge in
igni
tion
prob
abili
ty d
river
s
Base
d on
the
impl
emen
tatio
n of
the
abov
e w
ildfir
e m
itiga
tion
initi
ativ
es, e
xpla
in h
ow th
e ut
ility
sees
its i
gniti
on p
roba
bilit
y dr
iver
s evo
lvin
g ov
er
the
3 ye
ar te
rm o
f the
WM
P. F
ocus
on
igni
tion
prob
abili
ty a
nd e
stim
ated
wild
fire
cons
eque
nce
redu
ctio
n by
igni
tion
prob
abili
ty d
river
, det
aile
d ris
k dr
iver
, and
inclu
de a
des
crip
tion
of h
ow th
e ut
ility
exp
ects
to se
e in
ciden
ts e
volv
e ov
er th
e sa
me
perio
d, b
oth
in to
tal n
umbe
r (of
occ
urre
nce
of a
giv
en in
ciden
t typ
e, w
heth
er re
sulti
ng in
a n
ear m
iss o
r in
an ig
nitio
n) a
nd in
like
lihoo
d of
caus
ing
an ig
nitio
n by
type
. Out
line
met
hodo
logy
fo
r det
erm
inin
g ig
nitio
n pr
obab
ility
from
eve
nts,
inclu
ding
dat
a us
ed to
det
erm
ine
likel
ihoo
d of
igni
tion
prob
abili
ty, s
uch
as p
ast i
gniti
on e
vent
s, nu
mbe
r of n
ear m
isses
, and
des
crip
tion
of e
vent
s (in
cludi
ng v
eget
atio
n an
d eq
uipm
ent c
ondi
tion)
.
4.4
Dire
ctio
nal v
ision
for n
eces
sity
of P
SPS
Desc
ribe
any
less
ons l
earn
ed fr
om P
SPS
since
the
utili
ty’s
last
WM
P su
bmiss
ion
and
expe
ctat
ions
for h
ow th
e ut
ility
’s PS
PS p
rogr
am w
ill e
volv
e ov
er th
e co
min
g 1,
3, a
nd 1
0 ye
ars.
Be sp
ecifi
c by
inclu
ding
a d
escr
iptio
n of
the
utili
ty’s
prot
ocol
s and
thre
shol
ds fo
r PSP
S im
plem
enta
tion.
In
clude
a q
uant
itativ
e de
scrip
tion
of h
ow th
e cir
cuits
and
num
bers
of c
usto
mer
s tha
t the
util
ity e
xpec
ts w
ill b
e im
pact
ed b
y an
y ne
cess
ary
PSPS
ev
ents
is e
xpec
ted
to e
volv
e ov
er ti
me.
The
des
crip
tion
of p
roto
cols
mus
t be
suffi
cient
ly d
etai
led
and
clear
to e
nabl
e a
skill
ed o
pera
tor t
o fo
llow
th
e sa
me
prot
ocol
s.
2 C
omm
ent o
n di
ffere
nce
in a
ppro
ach
to se
rvin
g cu
stom
ers i
n ur
ban
vers
us ru
ral v
ersu
s hig
hly
rura
l are
as.
R.1
8-10
-007
ALJ
/SR
T/ilz
46 / 90
46
Whe
n ca
lcula
ting
antic
ipat
ed P
SPS,
cons
ider
rece
nt w
eath
er e
xtre
mes
, inc
ludi
ng p
eak
wea
ther
cond
ition
s ove
r the
pas
t 10
year
s as w
ell a
s re
cent
wea
ther
yea
rs a
nd h
ow th
e ut
ility
’s cu
rren
t PSP
S pr
otoc
ols w
ould
be
appl
ied
to th
ose
year
s.
Inst
ruct
ions
for T
able
20:
Rank
ord
er th
e ch
arac
teris
tic o
f PSP
S ev
ents
(in
term
s of n
umbe
rs o
f cus
tom
ers a
ffect
ed, f
requ
ency
, sco
pe, a
nd d
urat
ion)
ant
icipa
ted
to ch
ange
th
e m
ost a
nd h
ave
the
grea
test
impa
ct o
n re
liabi
lity
(be
it to
incr
ease
or d
ecre
ase)
ove
r the
nex
t ten
yea
rs. R
ank
in o
rder
from
1 to
9, w
here
1
mea
ns g
reat
est a
ntici
pate
d ch
ange
or i
mpa
ct a
nd 9
mea
ns m
inim
al ch
ange
or i
mpa
ct o
n ig
nitio
n pr
obab
ility
and
est
imat
ed w
ildfir
e co
nseq
uenc
e. T
o th
e rig
ht o
f the
rank
ed m
agni
tude
of i
mpa
ct, i
ndica
te w
heth
er th
e im
pact
is to
sign
ifica
ntly
incr
ease
relia
bilit
y, m
oder
atel
y in
crea
se re
liabi
lity,
hav
e lim
ited
or n
o im
pact
, mod
erat
ely
decr
ease
relia
bilit
y, o
r sig
nific
antly
dec
reas
e re
liabi
lity.
For
eac
h, in
clude
com
men
ts
desc
ribin
g ex
pect
ed ch
ange
and
exp
ecte
d im
pact
, usin
g qu
antit
ativ
e es
timat
es w
here
ver p
ossib
le.
Tabl
e 20
: Ant
icip
ated
char
acte
ristic
s of P
SPS
use
over
nex
t 10
year
s
Rank
ord
er
1-9
PSPS
char
acte
ristic
Si
gnifi
cant
ly in
crea
se; i
ncre
ase;
no
chan
ge;
decr
ease
; sig
nific
antly
dec
reas
e Co
mm
ents
Nu
mbe
r of c
usto
mer
s affe
cted
by
PSPS
eve
nts
(tota
l)
Nu
mbe
r of c
usto
mer
s affe
cted
by
PSPS
eve
nts
(nor
mal
ized
by fi
re w
eath
er, e
.g.,
Red
Flag
W
arni
ng li
ne m
ile d
ays)
Fr
eque
ncy
of P
SPS
even
ts in
num
ber o
f in
stan
ces w
here
util
ity o
pera
ting
prot
ocol
re
quire
s de-
ener
giza
tion
of a
circ
uit o
r por
tion
ther
eof t
o re
duce
igni
tion
prob
abili
ty (t
otal
)
Fr
eque
ncy
of P
SPS
even
ts in
num
ber o
f in
stan
ces w
here
util
ity o
pera
ting
prot
ocol
re
quire
s de -
ener
giza
tion
of a
circ
uit o
r por
tion
ther
eof t
o re
duce
igni
tion
prob
abili
ty
(nor
mal
ized
by fi
re w
eath
er, e
.g.,
Red
Flag
W
arni
ng li
ne m
ile d
ays)
Sc
ope
of P
SPS
even
ts in
circ
uit-e
vent
s, m
easu
red
in n
umbe
r of e
vent
s mul
tiplie
d by
nu
mbe
r of c
ircui
ts ta
rget
ed fo
r de -
ener
giza
tion
(tota
l)
Sc
ope
of P
SPS
even
ts in
circ
uit-e
vent
s, m
easu
red
in n
umbe
r of e
vent
s mul
tiplie
d by
R.1
8-10
-007
ALJ
/SR
T/ilz
47 / 90
47
num
ber o
f circ
uits
targ
eted
for d
e-en
ergi
zatio
n (n
orm
alize
d by
fire
wea
ther
, e.g
., Re
d Fl
ag W
arni
ng li
ne m
ile d
ays)
Dura
tion
of P
SPS
even
ts in
cust
omer
hou
rs
(tota
l)
Du
ratio
n of
PSP
S ev
ents
in cu
stom
er h
ours
(n
orm
alize
d by
fire
wea
ther
, e.g
., Re
d Fl
ag
War
ning
line
mile
day
s)
O
ther
R.1
8-10
-007
ALJ
/SR
T/ilz
48 / 90
48 W
ildfir
e m
itiga
tion
stra
tegy
and
pro
gram
s for
201
9 an
d fo
r eac
h ye
ar o
f the
3-y
ear W
MP
term
5.1
Wild
fire
miti
gatio
n st
rate
gy
Desc
ribe
orga
niza
tion-
wid
e w
ildfir
e m
itiga
tion
stra
tegy
and
goa
ls fo
r eac
h of
the
follo
win
g tim
e pe
riods
: 1.
Befo
re th
e up
com
ing
wild
fire
seas
on, a
s def
ined
by
the
Calif
orni
a De
part
men
t of F
ores
try
and
Fire
Pro
tect
ion
(CAL
FIR
E),
2.Be
fore
the
next
ann
ual u
pdat
e,
3.W
ithin
the
next
3 y
ears
, and
4.
With
in th
e ne
xt 1
0 ye
ars.
The
desc
riptio
n of
util
ity w
ildfir
e m
itiga
tion
stra
tegy
shal
l:
A.Di
scus
s the
util
ity’s
appr
oach
to d
eter
min
ing
how
to m
anag
e w
ildfir
e ris
k (in
term
s of i
gniti
on p
roba
bilit
y an
d es
timat
ed w
ildfir
e co
nseq
uenc
e) a
s dist
inct
from
man
agin
g ris
ks to
safe
ty a
nd/o
r rel
iabi
lity.
Des
crib
e ho
w th
is de
term
inat
ion
is m
ade
both
for (
1) th
e ty
pes o
f ac
tiviti
es n
eede
d an
d (2
) the
ext
ent o
f tho
se a
ctiv
ities
nee
ded
to m
itiga
te th
ese
two
diffe
rent
gro
ups o
f risk
s. De
scrib
e to
wha
t deg
ree
the
activ
ities
nee
ded
to m
anag
e w
ildfir
e ris
k m
ay b
e in
crem
enta
l to
thos
e ne
eded
to a
ddre
ss sa
fety
and
/or r
elia
bilit
y ris
ks.
B.In
clude
a su
mm
ary
of w
hat m
ajor
inve
stm
ents
and
impl
emen
tatio
n of
wild
fire
miti
gatio
n in
itiat
ives
ach
ieve
d ov
er th
e pa
st y
ear,
any
less
ons l
earn
ed, a
ny ch
ange
d cir
cum
stan
ces f
or th
e 20
20 W
MP
term
(i.e
., 20
20-2
022)
, and
any
corr
espo
ndin
g ad
just
men
t in
prio
ritie
s for
th
e up
com
ing
plan
term
. Org
anize
sum
mar
ies o
f ini
tiativ
es b
y th
e w
ildfir
e m
itiga
tion
cate
gorie
s list
ed in
Sec
tion
5.3.
C.
List a
nd d
escr
ibe
all c
halle
nges
ass
ocia
ted
with
lim
ited
reso
urce
s and
how
thes
e ch
alle
nges
are
exp
ecte
d to
evo
lve
over
the
next
3 y
ears
. D.
Out
line
how
the
utili
ty e
xpec
ts n
ew te
chno
logi
es a
nd in
nova
tions
to im
pact
the
utili
ty’s
stra
tegy
and
impl
emen
tatio
n ap
proa
ch o
ver t
he
next
3 y
ears
, inc
ludi
ng th
e ut
ility
’s pr
ogra
m fo
r int
egra
ting
new
tech
nolo
gies
into
the
utili
ty’s
grid
.
5.2
Wild
fire
Miti
gatio
n Pl
an im
plem
enta
tion
Desc
ribe
the
proc
esse
s and
pro
cedu
res t
he e
lect
rical
corp
orat
ion
will
use
to d
o al
l the
follo
win
g:
A.M
onito
r and
aud
it th
e im
plem
enta
tion
of th
e pl
an. I
nclu
de w
hat i
s bei
ng a
udite
d, w
ho co
nduc
ts th
e au
dits
, wha
t typ
e of
dat
a is
bein
g co
llect
ed, a
nd h
ow th
e da
ta u
nder
goes
qua
lity
assu
ranc
e an
d qu
ality
cont
rol.
B.
Iden
tify
any
defic
ienc
ies i
n th
e pl
an o
r the
pla
n’s i
mpl
emen
tatio
n an
d co
rrec
t tho
se d
efici
encie
s.
C.M
onito
r and
aud
it th
e ef
fect
iven
ess o
f ins
pect
ions
, inc
ludi
ng in
spec
tions
per
form
ed b
y co
ntra
ctor
s, ca
rrie
d ou
t und
er th
e pl
an a
nd o
ther
ap
plica
ble
stat
utes
and
com
miss
ion
rule
s. D.
For a
ll da
ta th
at is
use
d to
driv
e w
ildfir
e-re
late
d de
cisio
ns, i
nclu
ding
grid
ope
ratio
ns, c
apita
l allo
catio
n, co
mm
unity
eng
agem
ent,
and
othe
r ar
eas,
prov
ide
a th
orou
gh d
escr
iptio
n of
the
utili
ty’s
data
arc
hite
ctur
e an
d flo
ws.
List a
nd d
escr
ibe
1) a
ll da
shbo
ards
and
repo
rts d
irect
ly o
r in
dire
ctly
rela
ted
to ig
nitio
n pr
obab
ility
and
est
imat
ed w
ildfir
e co
nseq
uenc
es a
nd re
duct
ion,
and
2) a
ll av
aila
ble
GIS
data
and
pro
duct
s. Fo
r ea
ch, i
nclu
de m
etad
ata
and
a da
ta d
ictio
nary
that
def
ines
all
info
rmat
ion
abou
t the
dat
a. F
or e
ach,
also
des
crib
e ho
w th
e ut
ility
colle
cts
R.1
8-10
-007
ALJ
/SR
T/ilz
49 / 90
49
data
, inc
ludi
ng a
list
of a
ll w
ildfir
e-re
late
d da
ta e
lem
ents
, whe
re it
is st
ored
, how
it is
acc
esse
d, a
nd b
y w
hom
. Exp
lain
pro
cess
es fo
r Q
A/Q
C, cl
eani
ng a
nd a
naly
zing,
nor
mal
izing
, and
util
izing
dat
a to
driv
e in
tern
al d
ecisi
ons.
Inclu
de li
st o
f int
erna
l dat
a st
anda
rds a
nd cr
oss-
refe
renc
e fo
r the
y da
tase
ts o
r map
pro
duct
s to
whi
ch th
e st
anda
rds a
pply
.
5.3
Deta
iled
wild
fire
miti
gatio
n pr
ogra
ms
In th
is se
ctio
n, d
escr
ibe
how
the
utili
ty’s
spec
ific p
rogr
ams a
nd in
itiat
ives
pla
n to
exe
cute
the
stra
tegy
set o
ut in
Sec
tion
5.1.
The
spec
ific
prog
ram
s and
initi
ativ
es a
re d
ivid
ed in
to 1
0 ca
tego
ries,
with
eac
h pr
ovid
ing
a sp
ace
for a
nar
rativ
e de
scrip
tion
of th
e ut
ility
’s in
itiat
ives
and
a
sum
mar
y ta
ble
for n
umer
ic in
put i
n th
e su
bseq
uent
tabl
es in
this
sect
ion.
The
initi
ativ
es a
re o
rgan
ized
by th
e fo
llow
ing
cate
gorie
s pro
vide
d in
th
is se
ctio
n:
1.Ri
sk a
sses
smen
t and
map
ping
2.
Situ
atio
nal a
war
enes
s and
fore
cast
ing
3.Gr
id d
esig
n an
d sy
stem
har
deni
ng
4.As
set m
anag
emen
t and
insp
ectio
ns
5.Ve
geta
tion
man
agem
ent a
nd in
spec
tions
6.
Grid
ope
ratio
ns a
nd p
roto
cols
7.Da
ta g
over
nanc
e 8.
Reso
urce
allo
catio
n m
etho
dolo
gy
9.Em
erge
ncy
plan
ning
and
pre
pare
dnes
s 10
.Sta
keho
lder
coop
erat
ion
and
com
mun
ity e
ngag
emen
t R
.18-
10-0
07 A
LJ/S
RT/
ilz
50 / 90
50
To th
e ex
tent
app
licab
le a
nd re
leva
nt, i
f an
elec
tric
utili
ty h
as co
mpl
eted
a S
afet
y M
odel
and
Ass
essm
ent P
roce
edin
g (S
-MAP
) and
Risk
As
sess
men
t Miti
gatio
n Ph
ase
(RAM
P) a
s par
t of i
ts G
ener
al R
ate
Case
that
iden
tifie
s saf
ety
mod
els o
r pro
gram
s the
ele
ctric
al co
rpor
atio
n ha
s im
plem
ente
d to
miti
gate
igni
tion
prob
abili
ty a
nd e
stim
ated
wild
fire
cons
eque
nce,
then
the
mod
els o
r pro
gram
s ide
ntifi
ed p
ursu
ant t
o th
is se
ctio
n m
ust c
ompo
rt w
ith th
ose
iden
tifie
d in
the
S-M
AP p
roce
edin
g. D
escr
ibe
any
diffe
renc
es w
ith S
-MAP
and
RAM
P an
d pr
ovid
e ra
tiona
le.
Inst
ruct
ions
for T
able
21
thro
ugh
Tabl
e 30
: Lis
t and
sum
mar
ize e
ach
initi
ativ
e us
ing
the
tabl
es b
elow
for e
ach
corr
espo
ndin
g ca
tego
ry. P
rovi
de a
sepa
rate
line
item
for e
ach
initi
ativ
e w
ithin
ea
ch ca
tego
ry. U
se th
e in
itiat
ive
row
s pro
vide
d fo
r the
se in
itiat
ives
und
erta
ken
by th
e ut
ility
and
crea
te n
ew ro
ws f
or in
itiat
ives
onl
y w
hen
abso
lute
ly n
eces
sary
. Whe
re th
e ut
ility
pla
ns to
cond
uct a
dditi
onal
act
iviti
es th
at ca
nnot
be
cate
goriz
ed in
to th
e in
itiat
ives
bel
ow, a
dd a
co
rres
pond
ing
row
to th
e ta
ble
in th
e re
leva
nt ca
tego
ry a
nd a
dd d
etai
ls on
eac
h ac
tivity
to co
mpl
ete
the
row
acc
ordi
ng to
inst
ruct
ions
bef
ore.
For e
ach
wild
fire
miti
gatio
n ac
tivity
, rep
ort i
nfor
mat
ion
on:
1.to
tal p
er-in
itiat
ive
spen
d in
dol
lars
($);
2.lin
e m
iles t
o be
trea
ted
(as a
pplic
able
)3 in m
iles (
mi);
3.
spen
d pe
r tre
ated
line
mile
(or,
whe
re in
itiat
ive
is no
t im
plem
ente
d on
a p
er-li
ne-m
ile b
asis,
per
tota
l lin
e m
iles o
f the
syst
em);
4.ig
nitio
n pr
obab
ility
driv
ers t
arge
ted
(from
the
list o
f ign
ition
pro
babi
lity
driv
ers i
ndica
ted
in u
tility
SDR
Tab
le 2
4 Ke
y dr
iver
s of i
gniti
on
prob
abili
ty, o
r oth
er a
s nee
ded)
; 5.
risk
redu
ctio
n of
the
activ
ity a
ccor
ding
to u
tility
mul
ti-at
trib
ute
valu
e fu
nctio
n (M
AVF)
; and
6.
risk-
spen
d ef
ficie
ncy
in d
olla
rs p
er u
nit o
f risk
redu
ctio
n; a
nd
7.ot
her r
isk d
river
s add
ress
ed.
For t
he q
uant
itativ
e ch
arac
teris
tics o
f the
act
iviti
es, s
ix va
lues
shal
l be
repo
rted
for e
ach
activ
ity. T
hese
inclu
de n
umbe
rs fo
r the
pla
n fo
r 201
9,
actu
al a
ctiv
ity sp
endi
ng a
nd o
ther
calcu
latio
ns fo
r the
act
ivity
as a
ctua
lly im
plem
ente
d in
201
9, th
e pl
an fo
r yea
r 1 o
f thi
s WM
P, e
stim
ates
for
year
s 2 a
nd 3
of t
his W
MP,
and
a su
btot
al fo
r the
3-y
ear W
MP
term
(“20
20-2
022
plan
tota
l”).
For e
ach
activ
ity, a
lso:
1.id
entif
y w
heth
er th
e pr
ogra
m/s
trat
egy
is ex
istin
g or
new
; 2.
if ex
istin
g, id
entif
y th
e pr
ocee
ding
whe
re th
e pr
ogra
m/s
trat
egy
cost
s hav
e be
en su
bjec
ted
to C
omm
issio
n re
view
; 3.
if ne
w, i
dent
ify a
ny m
emor
andu
m a
ccou
nt w
here
rela
ted
cost
s are
bei
ng tr
acke
d an
d pr
ovid
e an
exp
lana
tion
of h
ow d
oubl
e tr
acki
ng is
pr
even
ted
in th
e co
mm
ents
;
3 W
here
a g
iven
act
ivity
doe
s not
take
pla
ce in
geo
grap
hic d
istrib
utio
n ac
ross
the
serv
ice
terr
itory
(e.g
., pe
rson
nel w
ork
proc
edur
es a
nd tr
aini
ng in
cond
ition
s of
elev
ated
fire
risk
), in
put “
N/A”
in th
e co
rres
pond
ing
cell.
R.1
8-10
-007
ALJ
/SR
T/ilz
51 / 90
51
4.in
dica
te w
heth
er th
e pr
ogra
m/s
trat
egy
is im
plem
ente
d in
com
plia
nce
with
exi
stin
g re
gula
tions
or e
xcee
ds cu
rren
t reg
ulat
ory
requ
irem
ents
; 5.
if a
prog
ram
/str
ateg
y is
iden
tifie
d as
mee
ting
a cu
rren
t reg
ulat
ory
requ
irem
ent,
cite
the
asso
ciate
d or
der,
rule
, or c
ode;
6.
inclu
de co
mm
ents
as n
eede
d to
clar
ify o
r exp
lain
the
data
pro
vide
d.
R.1
8-10
-007
ALJ
/SR
T/ilz
52 / 90
52
5.3.
1Ri
sk a
sses
smen
t and
map
ping
Desc
riptio
n of
pro
gram
s to
redu
ce ig
nitio
n pr
obab
ility
and
wild
fire
cons
eque
nce
For e
ach
of th
e be
low
initi
ativ
es, p
rovi
de a
det
aile
d de
scrip
tion
and
appr
oxim
ate
timel
ine
of e
ach,
whe
ther
alre
ady
impl
emen
ted
or p
lann
ed, t
o m
inim
ize th
e ris
k of
its e
quip
men
t or f
acili
ties c
ausin
g w
ildfir
es. I
nclu
de a
des
crip
tion
for t
he u
tility
’s pr
ogra
ms,
the
utili
ty’s
ratio
nale
beh
ind
each
of
the
elem
ents
of t
his p
rogr
am, t
he u
tility
’s pr
iorit
izatio
n ap
proa
ch/m
etho
dolo
gy to
det
erm
ine
spen
ding
and
dep
loym
ent o
f hum
an a
nd o
ther
re
sour
ces,
how
the
utili
ty w
ill co
nduc
t aud
its o
r oth
er q
ualit
y ch
ecks
on
each
pro
gram
, how
the
utili
ty p
lans
to d
emon
stra
te o
ver t
ime
whe
ther
ea
ch co
mpo
nent
is e
ffect
ive
and,
if n
ot, h
ow th
e ut
ility
pla
ns to
evo
lve
each
com
pone
nt to
ens
ure
effe
ctiv
e sp
end
of ra
tepa
yer f
unds
.
Inclu
de d
escr
iptio
ns a
cros
s eac
h of
the
follo
win
g in
itiat
ives
. Inp
ut th
e fo
llow
ing
initi
ativ
e na
mes
into
a sp
read
shee
t for
mat
ted
acco
rdin
g to
the
tem
plat
e be
low
and
inpu
t inf
orm
atio
n fo
r eac
h ce
ll in
the
row
. 1.
A su
mm
arize
d ris
k m
ap sh
owin
g th
e ov
eral
l ign
ition
pro
babi
lity
and
estim
ated
wild
fire
cons
eque
nce
alon
g el
ectr
ic lin
es a
nd e
quip
men
t 2.
Clim
ate-
driv
en ri
sk m
ap a
nd m
odel
ling
base
d on
var
ious
rele
vant
wea
ther
scen
ario
s 3.
Igni
tion
prob
abili
ty m
appi
ng sh
owin
g th
e pr
obab
ility
of i
gniti
on a
long
the
elec
tric
lines
and
equ
ipm
ent
4.In
itiat
ive
map
ping
and
est
imat
ion
of w
ildfir
e an
d PS
PS ri
sk-r
educ
tion
impa
ct
5.M
atch
dro
p sim
ulat
ions
show
ing
the
pote
ntia
l wild
fire
cons
eque
nce
of ig
nitio
ns th
at o
ccur
alo
ng th
e el
ectr
ic lin
es a
nd e
quip
men
t 6.
Wea
ther
-driv
en ri
sk m
ap a
nd m
odel
ling
base
d on
var
ious
rele
vant
wea
ther
scen
ario
s 7.
Oth
er /
not l
isted
[onl
y if
an in
itiat
ive
cann
ot fe
asib
ly b
e cla
ssifi
ed w
ithin
thos
e lis
ted
abov
e]
Tabl
e 21
: Risk
ass
essm
ent a
nd m
appi
ng
Initiative activity
Year
Total per-initiative spend
Line miles to be treated
Spend/ treated line mile
Ignition probability drivers targeted
Risk reduction
Risk-spend efficiency
Other risk drivers addressed
Existing/ new
Existing: What proceeding has reviewed program
If new: Memorandum account
In / exceeding compliance with regulations
Cite associated rule
Comments
***[
EXAM
PLE]
***
A
sum
mar
ized
risk
map
show
ing
the
over
all i
gniti
on
prob
abili
ty a
nd
estim
ated
wild
fire
cons
eque
nce
alon
g el
ectr
ic lin
es a
nd
equi
pmen
t
2019
pla
n
2019
ac
tual
2020
2021
2022
2020
-202
2 pl
an to
tal
R.1
8-10
-007
ALJ
/SR
T/ilz
53 / 90
53
For e
ach
of th
e ab
ove
initi
ativ
es, d
escr
ibe
the
utili
ty’s
curr
ent p
rogr
am a
nd p
rovi
de a
n ex
plan
atio
n of
how
the
utili
ty e
xpec
ts to
evo
lve
the
utili
ty’s
prog
ram
ove
r eac
h of
the
follo
win
g tim
e pe
riods
:
1.Be
fore
the
upco
min
g w
ildfir
e se
ason
, 2.
Befo
re th
e ne
xt a
nnua
l upd
ate,
3.
With
in th
e ne
xt 3
yea
rs, a
nd
4.W
ithin
the
next
10
year
s.
R.1
8-10
-007
ALJ
/SR
T/ilz
54 / 90
54
5.3.
2Si
tuat
iona
l aw
aren
ess a
nd fo
reca
stin
g
Desc
riptio
n of
pro
gram
s to
redu
ce ig
nitio
n pr
obab
ility
and
wild
fire
cons
eque
nce
For e
ach
of th
e be
low
initi
ativ
es, p
rovi
de a
det
aile
d de
scrip
tion
and
appr
oxim
ate
timel
ine
of e
ach,
whe
ther
alre
ady
impl
emen
ted
or p
lann
ed, t
o m
inim
ize th
e ris
k of
its e
quip
men
t or f
acili
ties c
ausin
g w
ildfir
es. I
nclu
de a
des
crip
tion
of th
e ut
ility
’s in
itiat
ives
, the
util
ity’s
ratio
nale
beh
ind
each
of
the
elem
ents
of t
he in
itiat
ives
, the
util
ity’s
prio
ritiza
tion
appr
oach
/met
hodo
logy
to d
eter
min
e sp
endi
ng a
nd d
eplo
ymen
t of h
uman
and
oth
er
reso
urce
s, ho
w th
e ut
ility
will
cond
uct a
udits
or o
ther
qua
lity
chec
ks o
n ea
ch in
itiat
ive,
how
the
utili
ty p
lans
to d
emon
stra
te o
ver t
ime
whe
ther
ea
ch co
mpo
nent
of t
he in
itiat
ives
is e
ffect
ive
and,
if n
ot, h
ow th
e ut
ility
pla
ns to
evo
lve
each
com
pone
nt to
ens
ure
effe
ctiv
e sp
end
of ra
tepa
yer
fund
s.
Inclu
de d
escr
iptio
ns a
cros
s eac
h of
the
follo
win
g in
itiat
ives
. Inp
ut th
e fo
llow
ing
initi
ativ
e na
mes
into
a sp
read
shee
t for
mat
ted
acco
rdin
g to
the
tem
plat
e be
low
and
inpu
t inf
orm
atio
n fo
r eac
h ce
ll in
the
row
. 1.
Adva
nced
wea
ther
mon
itorin
g an
d w
eath
er st
atio
ns
2.Co
ntin
uous
mon
itorin
g se
nsor
s 3.
Faul
t ind
icato
rs fo
r det
ectin
g fa
ults
on
elec
tric
lines
and
equ
ipm
ent
4.Fo
reca
st o
f a fi
re ri
sk in
dex,
fire
pot
entia
l ind
ex, o
r sim
ilar
5.Pe
rson
nel m
onito
ring
area
s of e
lect
ric li
nes a
nd e
quip
men
t in
elev
ated
fire
risk
cond
ition
s 6.
Wea
ther
fore
cast
ing
and
estim
atin
g im
pact
s on
elec
tric
lines
and
equ
ipm
ent
7.O
ther
/ no
t list
ed [o
nly
if an
initi
ativ
e ca
nnot
feas
ibly
be
class
ified
with
in th
ose
liste
d ab
ove]
Tabl
e 22
: Situ
atio
nal a
war
enes
s and
fore
cast
ing
Initiative activity
Year
Total per-initiative spend
Line miles to be treated
Spend/ treated line mile
Ignition probability drivers targeted
Risk reduction
Risk-spend efficiency
Other risk drivers addressed
Existing/ new
Existing: What proceeding has reviewed program
If new: Memorandum account
In / exceeding compliance with regulations
Cite associated rule
Comments
***[
EXAM
PLE]
***
Adva
nced
w
eath
er
mon
itorin
g an
d w
eath
er st
atio
ns
2019
pla
n
2019
ac
tual
2020
2021
2022
2020
-202
2 pl
an to
tal
R.1
8-10
-007
ALJ
/SR
T/ilz
55 / 90
55
For e
ach
of th
e ab
ove
initi
ativ
es, d
escr
ibe
the
utili
ty’s
curr
ent p
rogr
am a
nd p
rovi
de a
n ex
plan
atio
n of
how
the
utili
ty e
xpec
ts to
evo
lve
the
utili
ty’s
prog
ram
ove
r eac
h of
the
follo
win
g tim
e pe
riods
:
1.Be
fore
the
upco
min
g w
ildfir
e se
ason
, 2.
Befo
re th
e ne
xt a
nnua
l upd
ate,
3.
With
in th
e ne
xt 3
yea
rs, a
nd
4.W
ithin
the
next
10
year
s.
R.1
8-10
-007
ALJ
/SR
T/ilz
56 / 90
56
5.3.
3Gr
id d
esig
n an
d sy
stem
har
deni
ng
Desc
ribe
utili
ty a
ppro
ach
to th
e fo
llow
ing
cate
gorie
s of m
aint
enan
ce o
f tra
nsm
issio
n lin
es, d
istrib
utio
n lin
es, a
nd e
quip
men
t, re
spec
tivel
y:
1.Ro
utin
e m
aint
enan
ce p
rogr
ams a
nd p
roto
cols
(i.e.
, cov
erin
g ge
nera
l mai
nten
ance
app
roac
h an
d pr
ogra
mm
atic
stru
ctur
e),
2.No
n-ro
utin
e m
aint
enan
ce, f
urth
er d
elin
eate
d in
to:
a.Em
erge
ncy
resp
onse
mai
nten
ance
/rep
air,
and
b.
Insp
ectio
n re
spon
se m
aint
enan
ce/r
epai
r.
Disc
uss p
roac
tive
repl
acem
ent p
rogr
ams v
ersu
s run
-to-fa
ilure
mod
els f
or e
ach
grou
p, in
cludi
ng:
1.W
heth
er th
ere
are
spec
ific l
ine
elem
ents
or e
quip
men
t tha
t are
prio
ritize
d fo
r pre
vent
ive
mai
nten
ance
or r
epla
cem
ent,
2.Ho
w th
ose
prog
ram
s are
est
ablis
hed,
3.
Wha
t dat
a or
info
rmat
ion
is ut
ilize
d to
mak
e th
ose
dete
rmin
atio
ns, a
nd
4.W
hat l
evel
of s
ubje
ctiv
ity is
impl
emen
ted
in m
akin
g th
ose
dete
rmin
atio
ns
Desc
riptio
n of
pro
gram
s to
redu
ce ig
nitio
n pr
obab
ility
and
wild
fire
cons
eque
nce
For e
ach
of th
e be
low
initi
ativ
es, p
rovi
de a
det
aile
d de
scrip
tion
and
appr
oxim
ate
timel
ine
of e
ach,
whe
ther
alre
ady
impl
emen
ted
or p
lann
ed, t
o m
inim
ize th
e ris
k of
its e
quip
men
t or f
acili
ties c
ausin
g w
ildfir
es. I
nclu
de a
des
crip
tion
of th
e ut
ility
’s in
itiat
ives
, the
util
ity’s
ratio
nale
beh
ind
each
of
the
elem
ents
of t
he in
itiat
ives
, the
util
ity’s
prio
ritiza
tion
appr
oach
/met
hodo
logy
to d
eter
min
e sp
endi
ng a
nd d
eplo
ymen
t of h
uman
and
oth
er
reso
urce
s, ho
w th
e ut
ility
will
cond
uct a
udits
or o
ther
qua
lity
chec
ks o
n ea
ch in
itiat
ive,
how
the
utili
ty p
lans
to d
emon
stra
te o
ver t
ime
whe
ther
ea
ch co
mpo
nent
of t
he in
itiat
ives
is e
ffect
ive
and,
if n
ot, h
ow th
e ut
ility
pla
ns to
evo
lve
each
com
pone
nt to
ens
ure
effe
ctiv
e sp
end
of ra
tepa
yer
fund
s.
Inclu
de d
escr
iptio
ns a
cros
s eac
h of
the
follo
win
g in
itiat
ives
. Inp
ut th
e fo
llow
ing
initi
ativ
e na
mes
into
a sp
read
shee
t for
mat
ted
acco
rdin
g to
the
tem
plat
e be
low
and
inpu
t inf
orm
atio
n fo
r eac
h ce
ll in
the
row
. 1.
Capa
citor
mai
nten
ance
and
repl
acem
ent p
rogr
am
2.Ci
rcui
t bre
aker
mai
nten
ance
and
inst
alla
tion
to d
e-en
ergi
ze li
nes u
pon
dete
ctin
g a
faul
t 3.
Cove
red
cond
ucto
r ins
talla
tion
4.
Cove
red
cond
ucto
r mai
nten
ance
5.
Cros
sarm
mai
nten
ance
, rep
air,
and
repl
acem
ent
6.Di
strib
utio
n po
le re
plac
emen
t and
rein
forc
emen
t, in
cludi
ng w
ith co
mpo
site
pole
s 7.
Expu
lsion
fuse
repl
acem
ent
8.Gr
id to
polo
gy im
prov
emen
ts to
miti
gate
or r
educ
e PS
PS e
vent
s 9.
Inst
alla
tion
of sy
stem
aut
omat
ion
equi
pmen
t 10
.Mai
nten
ance
, rep
air,
and
repl
acem
ent o
f con
nect
ors,
inclu
ding
hot
line
clam
ps
R.1
8-10
-007
ALJ
/SR
T/ilz
57 / 90
57
11.M
itiga
tion
of im
pact
on
cust
omer
s and
oth
er re
siden
ts a
ffect
ed d
urin
g PS
PS e
vent
12
.Oth
er co
rrec
tive
actio
n
13.P
ole
load
ing
infra
stru
ctur
e ha
rden
ing
and
repl
acem
ent p
rogr
am b
ased
on
pole
load
ing
asse
ssm
ent p
rogr
am
14.T
rans
form
ers m
aint
enan
ce a
nd re
plac
emen
t 15
.Tra
nsm
issio
n to
wer
mai
nten
ance
and
repl
acem
ent
16.U
nder
grou
ndin
g of
ele
ctric
line
s and
/or e
quip
men
t 17
.Upd
ates
to g
rid to
polo
gy to
min
imize
risk
of i
gniti
on in
HFT
Ds
18.O
ther
/ no
t list
ed [o
nly
if an
initi
ativ
e ca
nnot
feas
ibly
be
class
ified
with
in th
ose
liste
d ab
ove]
Tabl
e 23
: Grid
des
ign
and
syst
em h
arde
ning
Initiative activity
Year
Total per-initiative spend
Line miles to be treated
Spend/ treated line mile
Ignition probability drivers targeted
Risk reduction
Risk-spend efficiency
Other risk drivers addressed
Existing/ new
Existing: What proceeding has reviewed program
If new: Memorandum account
In / exceeding compliance with regulations
Cite associated rule
Comments
***[
EXAM
PLE]
***
Capa
citor
mai
nten
ance
an
d re
plac
emen
t pro
gram
2019
pla
n
2019
ac
tual
2020
2021
2022
2020
-20
22 p
lan
tota
l
For e
ach
of th
e ab
ove
initi
ativ
es, d
escr
ibe
the
utili
ty’s
curr
ent p
rogr
am a
nd p
rovi
de a
n ex
plan
atio
n of
how
the
utili
ty e
xpec
ts to
evo
lve
the
utili
ty’s
prog
ram
ove
r eac
h of
the
follo
win
g tim
e pe
riods
:
1.Be
fore
the
upco
min
g w
ildfir
e se
ason
, 2.
Befo
re th
e ne
xt a
nnua
l upd
ate,
3.
With
in th
e ne
xt 3
yea
rs, a
nd
4.W
ithin
the
next
10
year
s.
R.1
8-10
-007
ALJ
/SR
T/ilz
58 / 90
58
5.3.
4As
set m
anag
emen
t and
insp
ectio
ns
Expl
ain
the
ratio
nale
for a
ny u
tility
igni
tion
prob
abili
ty-s
pecif
ic in
spec
tions
(e.g
., “e
nhan
ced
insp
ectio
ns”)
with
in th
e HF
TD a
s dee
med
nec
essa
ry
over
and
abo
ve th
e st
anda
rd in
spec
tions
. Thi
s sha
ll in
clude
info
rmat
ion
abou
t how
(i.e
., cr
iteria
, pro
toco
ls, e
tc.)
the
elec
trica
l cor
pora
tion
dete
rmin
es a
dditi
onal
insp
ectio
ns a
re n
eces
sary
.
Desc
ribe
the
utili
ty’s
mai
nten
ance
pro
toco
ls re
latin
g to
mai
nten
ance
of a
ny e
lect
ric li
nes o
r equ
ipm
ent t
hat c
ould
, dire
ctly
or i
ndire
ctly
, rel
ate
to
wild
fire
igni
tion.
Inclu
de in
the
desc
riptio
n th
e th
resh
old
by w
hich
the
utili
ty m
akes
dec
ision
s of w
heth
er to
(1) r
epai
r, or
(2) r
epla
ce e
lect
ric li
nes
and
equi
pmen
t. De
scrib
e al
l ele
ctric
line
s and
equ
ipm
ent t
hat t
he u
tility
“run
s-to
-failu
re”,
thos
e th
at th
e ut
ility
mai
ntai
ns o
n a
risk-
base
d m
aint
enan
ce p
lan,
and
thos
e th
at a
re m
anag
ed b
y ot
her a
ppro
ache
s; de
scrib
e ea
ch a
ppro
ach.
Exp
lain
the
mai
nten
ance
pro
gram
that
the
utili
ty
follo
ws a
nd ra
tiona
le fo
r all
lines
and
equ
ipm
ent.
Desc
riptio
n of
pro
gram
s to
redu
ce ig
nitio
n pr
obab
ility
and
wild
fire
cons
eque
nce
For e
ach
of th
e be
low
initi
ativ
es, p
rovi
de a
det
aile
d de
scrip
tion
and
appr
oxim
ate
timel
ine
of e
ach,
whe
ther
alre
ady
impl
emen
ted
or p
lann
ed, t
o m
inim
ize th
e ris
k of
its e
quip
men
t or f
acili
ties c
ausin
g w
ildfir
es. I
nclu
de a
des
crip
tion
for t
he u
tility
’s pr
ogra
ms,
the
utili
ty’s
ratio
nale
beh
ind
each
of
the
elem
ents
of t
his p
rogr
am, t
he u
tility
’s pr
iorit
izatio
n ap
proa
ch/m
etho
dolo
gy to
det
erm
ine
spen
ding
and
dep
loym
ent o
f hum
an a
nd o
ther
re
sour
ces,
how
the
utili
ty w
ill co
nduc
t aud
its o
r oth
er q
ualit
y ch
ecks
on
each
pro
gram
, how
the
utili
ty p
lans
to d
emon
stra
te o
ver t
ime
whe
ther
ea
ch co
mpo
nent
is e
ffect
ive
and,
if n
ot, h
ow th
e ut
ility
pla
ns to
evo
lve
each
com
pone
nt to
ens
ure
effe
ctiv
e sp
end
of ra
tepa
yer f
unds
.
Inclu
de d
escr
iptio
ns a
cros
s eac
h of
the
follo
win
g in
itiat
ives
. Inp
ut th
e fo
llow
ing
initi
ativ
e na
mes
into
a sp
read
shee
t for
mat
ted
acco
rdin
g to
the
tem
plat
e be
low
and
inpu
t inf
orm
atio
n fo
r eac
h ce
ll in
the
row
. 1.
Deta
iled
insp
ectio
ns o
f dist
ribut
ion
elec
tric
lines
and
equ
ipm
ent
2.De
taile
d in
spec
tions
of t
rans
miss
ion
elec
tric
lines
and
equ
ipm
ent
3.Im
prov
emen
t of i
nspe
ctio
ns
4.In
frare
d in
spec
tions
of d
istrib
utio
n el
ectr
ic lin
es a
nd e
quip
men
t 5.
Infra
red
insp
ectio
ns o
f tra
nsm
issio
n el
ectr
ic lin
es a
nd e
quip
men
t 6.
Intr
usiv
e po
le in
spec
tions
7.
LiDAR
insp
ectio
ns o
f dist
ribut
ion
elec
tric
lines
and
equ
ipm
ent
8.LiD
AR in
spec
tions
of t
rans
miss
ion
elec
tric
lines
and
equ
ipm
ent
9.O
ther
disc
retio
nary
insp
ectio
n of
dist
ribut
ion
elec
tric
lines
and
equ
ipm
ent,
beyo
nd in
spec
tions
man
date
d by
rule
s and
regu
latio
ns
10.O
ther
disc
retio
nary
insp
ectio
n of
tran
smiss
ion
elec
tric
lines
and
equ
ipm
ent,
beyo
nd in
spec
tions
man
date
d by
rule
s and
regu
latio
ns
11.P
atro
l ins
pect
ions
of d
istrib
utio
n el
ectr
ic lin
es a
nd e
quip
men
t 12
.Pat
rol i
nspe
ctio
ns o
f tra
nsm
issio
n el
ectr
ic lin
es a
nd e
quip
men
t 13
.Pol
e lo
adin
g as
sess
men
t pro
gram
to d
eter
min
e sa
fety
fact
or
14.Q
ualit
y as
sura
nce
/ qua
lity
cont
rol o
f ins
pect
ions
15
.Sub
stat
ion
insp
ectio
ns
R.1
8-10
-007
ALJ
/SR
T/ilz
59 / 90
59
16.O
ther
/ no
t list
ed [o
nly
if an
initi
ativ
e ca
nnot
feas
ibly
be
class
ified
with
in th
ose
liste
d ab
ove]
Tabl
e 24
: Ass
et m
anag
emen
t and
insp
ectio
ns
Initiative activity
Year
Total per-initiative spend
Line miles to be treated
Spend/ treated line mile
Ignition probability drivers targeted
Risk reduction
Risk-spend efficiency
Other risk drivers addressed
Existing/ new
Existing: What proceeding has reviewed program
If new: Memorandum account
In / exceeding compliance with regulations
Cite associated rule
Comments
***[
EXAM
PLE]
***
Deta
iled
insp
ectio
ns o
f di
strib
utio
n el
ectr
ic lin
es a
nd
equi
pmen
t
2019
pla
n
2019
act
ual
20
20
20
21
20
22
20
20-2
022
plan
tota
l
For e
ach
of th
e ab
ove
initi
ativ
es, d
escr
ibe
the
utili
ty’s
curr
ent p
rogr
am a
nd p
rovi
de a
n ex
plan
atio
n of
how
the
utili
ty e
xpec
ts to
evo
lve
the
utili
ty’s
prog
ram
ove
r eac
h of
the
follo
win
g tim
e pe
riods
:
1.Be
fore
the
upco
min
g w
ildfir
e se
ason
, 2.
Befo
re th
e ne
xt a
nnua
l upd
ate,
3.
With
in th
e ne
xt 3
yea
rs, a
nd
4.W
ithin
the
next
10
year
s.
R.1
8-10
-007
ALJ
/SR
T/ilz
60 / 90
60
5.3.
5Ve
geta
tion
man
agem
ent a
nd in
spec
tions
Expl
ain
the
ratio
nale
for a
ny u
tility
igni
tion
prob
abili
ty-s
pecif
ic in
spec
tions
(e.g
., “e
nhan
ced
insp
ectio
ns”)
with
in th
e HF
TD a
s dee
med
nec
essa
ry
over
and
abo
ve th
e st
anda
rd in
spec
tions
. Thi
s sha
ll in
clude
info
rmat
ion
abou
t how
(i.e
., cr
iteria
, pro
toco
ls, e
tc.)
the
elec
trica
l cor
pora
tion
dete
rmin
es a
dditi
onal
insp
ectio
ns a
re n
eces
sary
.
Desc
ribe
the
utili
ty’s
vege
tatio
n tr
eatm
ent p
roto
cols
rela
ting
to tr
eatm
ent o
f any
veg
etat
ion
that
coul
d po
se a
gro
w-in
or f
all-i
n ris
k to
util
ity
equi
pmen
t. In
clude
in th
e de
scrip
tion
the
thre
shol
d by
whi
ch th
e ut
ility
mak
es d
ecisi
ons o
f whe
ther
to (1
) tre
at, o
r (2)
rem
ove
vege
tatio
n.
Disc
uss t
he o
vera
ll ob
ject
ives
, str
ateg
ies,
and
tact
ics o
f the
ele
ctric
al co
rpor
atio
n fo
r veg
etat
ion
man
agem
ent.
In th
e di
scus
sion,
1.
Addr
ess h
ow th
e el
ectr
ical c
orpo
ratio
n ha
s col
labo
rate
d w
ith lo
cal l
and
man
ager
s to
leve
rage
opp
ortu
nitie
s for
fuel
trea
tmen
t act
iviti
es
and
fire
brea
k cr
eatio
n, a
nd co
mpl
ianc
e w
ith o
ther
loca
l, st
ate,
and
fede
ral f
ores
try
and
timbe
r reg
ulat
ions
. 2.
Disc
uss h
ow th
e el
ectr
ical c
orpo
ratio
n id
entif
ies a
nd d
eter
min
es w
hich
veg
etat
ion
is at
risk
of i
gniti
on fr
om u
tility
ele
ctric
line
s and
eq
uipm
ent.
3.De
scrib
e ho
w (i
.e.,
crite
ria, d
ata,
pro
toco
ls, st
udie
s, et
c.) t
he u
tility
mad
e th
e de
term
inat
ion
to tr
im a
ny v
eget
atio
n be
yond
requ
ired
clear
ance
s in
GO 9
5.
4.De
scrib
e ut
ility
pla
n to
miti
gate
iden
tifie
d tr
ees w
ith st
rike
pote
ntia
l, in
cludi
ng in
form
atio
n ab
out h
ow (i
.e.,
crite
ria, p
roto
cols,
dat
a,
stat
utes
, etc
.) th
e el
ectr
ical c
orpo
ratio
n id
entif
ies a
nd d
efin
es “h
azar
d tr
ees”
and
“tre
es w
ith st
rike
pote
ntia
l” ba
sed
on h
eigh
t and
fe
asib
le p
ath
to st
rike
pow
erlin
es o
r equ
ipm
ent.
Desc
ribe
utili
ty p
lan
to id
entif
y re
liabi
lity/
at-ri
sk tr
ee sp
ecie
s to
trim
or r
emov
e, w
here
fe
asib
le, p
er lo
catio
n-sp
ecifi
c crit
eria
. 5.
Inclu
de a
disc
ussio
n of
how
the
utili
ty’s
over
all v
eget
atio
n m
anag
emen
t ini
tiativ
es a
ddre
ss ri
sks t
hat m
ay a
rise
from
trim
min
g or
re
mov
ing
tree
s, in
cludi
ng b
ut n
ot li
mite
d to
ero
sion,
win
d, fl
oodi
ng, e
tc.
Desc
riptio
n of
pro
gram
s to
redu
ce ig
nitio
n pr
obab
ility
and
wild
fire
cons
eque
nce
For e
ach
of th
e be
low
initi
ativ
es, p
rovi
de a
det
aile
d de
scrip
tion
and
appr
oxim
ate
timel
ine
of e
ach,
whe
ther
alre
ady
impl
emen
ted
or p
lann
ed, t
o m
inim
ize th
e ris
k of
its e
quip
men
t or f
acili
ties c
ausin
g w
ildfir
es. I
nclu
de a
des
crip
tion
of th
e ut
ility
’s in
itiat
ives
, the
util
ity’s
ratio
nale
beh
ind
each
of
the
elem
ents
of t
he in
itiat
ives
, the
util
ity’s
prio
ritiza
tion
appr
oach
/met
hodo
logy
to d
eter
min
e sp
endi
ng a
nd d
eplo
ymen
t of h
uman
and
oth
er
reso
urce
s, ho
w th
e ut
ility
will
cond
uct a
udits
or o
ther
qua
lity
chec
ks o
n ea
ch in
itiat
ive,
how
the
utili
ty p
lans
to d
emon
stra
te o
ver t
ime
whe
ther
ea
ch co
mpo
nent
of t
he in
itiat
ives
is e
ffect
ive
and,
if n
ot, h
ow th
e ut
ility
pla
ns to
evo
lve
each
com
pone
nt to
ens
ure
effe
ctiv
e sp
end
of ra
tepa
yer
fund
s.
Inclu
de d
escr
iptio
ns a
cros
s eac
h of
the
follo
win
g in
itiat
ives
. Inp
ut th
e fo
llow
ing
initi
ativ
e na
mes
into
a sp
read
shee
t for
mat
ted
acco
rdin
g to
the
tem
plat
e be
low
and
inpu
t inf
orm
atio
n fo
r eac
h ce
ll in
the
row
. 1.
Addi
tiona
l effo
rts t
o m
anag
e co
mm
unity
and
env
ironm
enta
l im
pact
s 2.
Deta
iled
insp
ectio
ns o
f veg
etat
ion
arou
nd d
istrib
utio
n el
ectr
ic lin
es a
nd e
quip
men
t
R.1
8-10
-007
ALJ
/SR
T/ilz
61 / 90
61
3.De
taile
d in
spec
tions
of v
eget
atio
n ar
ound
tran
smiss
ion
elec
tric
lines
and
equ
ipm
ent
4.Em
erge
ncy
resp
onse
veg
etat
ion
man
agem
ent d
ue to
red
flag
war
ning
or o
ther
urg
ent c
ondi
tions
5.
Fuel
man
agem
ent a
nd re
duct
ion
of “s
lash
” fro
m v
eget
atio
n m
anag
emen
t act
iviti
es
6.Im
prov
emen
t of i
nspe
ctio
ns
7.LiD
AR in
spec
tions
of v
eget
atio
n ar
ound
dist
ribut
ion
elec
tric
lines
and
equ
ipm
ent
8.LiD
AR in
spec
tions
of v
eget
atio
n ar
ound
tran
smiss
ion
elec
tric
lines
and
equ
ipm
ent
9.O
ther
disc
retio
nary
insp
ectio
n of
veg
etat
ion
arou
nd d
istrib
utio
n el
ectr
ic lin
es a
nd e
quip
men
t, be
yond
insp
ectio
ns m
anda
ted
by ru
les
and
regu
latio
ns
10.O
ther
disc
retio
nary
insp
ectio
n of
veg
etat
ion
arou
nd tr
ansm
issio
n el
ectr
ic lin
es a
nd e
quip
men
t, be
yond
insp
ectio
ns m
anda
ted
by ru
les
and
regu
latio
ns
11.P
atro
l ins
pect
ions
of v
eget
atio
n ar
ound
dist
ribut
ion
elec
tric
lines
and
equ
ipm
ent
12.P
atro
l ins
pect
ions
of v
eget
atio
n ar
ound
tran
smiss
ion
elec
tric
lines
and
equ
ipm
ent
13.Q
ualit
y as
sura
nce
/ qua
lity
cont
rol o
f ins
pect
ions
14
.Rec
ruiti
ng a
nd tr
aini
ng o
f veg
etat
ion
man
agem
ent p
erso
nnel
15
.Rem
edia
tion
of a
t-risk
spec
ies
16.R
emov
al a
nd re
med
iatio
n of
tree
s with
strik
e po
tent
ial t
o el
ectr
ic lin
es a
nd e
quip
men
t 17
.Sub
stat
ion
insp
ectio
ns
18.S
ubst
atio
n ve
geta
tion
man
agem
ent
19.V
eget
atio
n in
vent
ory
syst
em
20.V
eget
atio
n m
anag
emen
t to
achi
eve
clear
ance
s aro
und
elec
tric
lines
and
equ
ipm
ent
21.O
ther
/ no
t list
ed [o
nly
if an
initi
ativ
e ca
nnot
feas
ibly
be
class
ified
with
in th
ose
liste
d ab
ove]
Ta
ble
25: V
eget
atio
n m
anag
emen
t and
insp
ectio
ns
Initiative activity
Year
Total per-initiative spend
Line miles to be treated
Spend/ treated line mile
Ignition probability drivers targeted
Risk reduction
Risk-spend efficiency
Other risk drivers addressed
Existing/ new
Existing: What proceeding has reviewed program
If new: Memorandum account
In / exceeding compliance with regulations
Cite associated rule
Comments
***[
EXAM
PLE]
***
Ad
ditio
nal
effo
rts t
o m
anag
e
2019
pl
an
2019
ac
tual
2020
R.1
8-10
-007
ALJ
/SR
T/ilz
62 / 90
62
com
mun
ity a
nd
envi
ronm
enta
l im
pact
s
2021
2022
2020
-20
22
plan
tota
l
For e
ach
of th
e ab
ove
initi
ativ
es, d
escr
ibe
the
utili
ty’s
curr
ent p
rogr
am a
nd p
rovi
de a
n ex
plan
atio
n of
how
the
utili
ty e
xpec
ts to
evo
lve
the
utili
ty’s
prog
ram
ove
r eac
h of
the
follo
win
g tim
e pe
riods
:
1.Be
fore
the
upco
min
g w
ildfir
e se
ason
, 2.
Befo
re th
e ne
xt a
nnua
l upd
ate,
3.
With
in th
e ne
xt 3
yea
rs, a
nd
4.W
ithin
the
next
10
year
s.
R.1
8-10
-007
ALJ
/SR
T/ilz
63 / 90
63
5.3.
6Gr
id o
pera
tions
and
pro
toco
ls
Desc
riptio
n of
pro
gram
s to
redu
ce ig
nitio
n pr
obab
ility
and
wild
fire
cons
eque
nce
For e
ach
of th
e be
low
initi
ativ
es, p
rovi
de a
det
aile
d de
scrip
tion
and
appr
oxim
ate
timel
ine
of e
ach,
whe
ther
alre
ady
impl
emen
ted
or p
lann
ed, t
o m
inim
ize th
e ris
k of
its e
quip
men
t or f
acili
ties c
ausin
g w
ildfir
es. I
nclu
de a
des
crip
tion
of th
e ut
ility
’s in
itiat
ives
, the
util
ity’s
ratio
nale
beh
ind
each
of
the
elem
ents
of t
he in
itiat
ives
, the
util
ity’s
prio
ritiza
tion
appr
oach
/met
hodo
logy
to d
eter
min
e sp
endi
ng a
nd d
eplo
ymen
t of h
uman
and
oth
er
reso
urce
s, ho
w th
e ut
ility
will
cond
uct a
udits
or o
ther
qua
lity
chec
ks o
n ea
ch in
itiat
ive,
how
the
utili
ty p
lans
to d
emon
stra
te o
ver t
ime
whe
ther
ea
ch co
mpo
nent
of t
he in
itiat
ives
is e
ffect
ive
and,
if n
ot, h
ow th
e ut
ility
pla
ns to
evo
lve
each
com
pone
nt to
ens
ure
effe
ctiv
e sp
end
of ra
tepa
yer
fund
s.
Inclu
de d
escr
iptio
ns a
cros
s eac
h of
the
follo
win
g in
itiat
ives
. Inp
ut th
e fo
llow
ing
initi
ativ
e na
mes
into
a sp
read
shee
t for
mat
ted
acco
rdin
g to
the
tem
plat
e be
low
and
inpu
t inf
orm
atio
n fo
r eac
h ce
ll in
the
row
. 1.
Auto
mat
ic re
close
r ope
ratio
ns
2.Cr
ew-a
ccom
pany
ing
igni
tion
prev
entio
n an
d su
ppre
ssio
n re
sour
ces a
nd se
rvice
s 3.
Pers
onne
l wor
k pr
oced
ures
and
trai
ning
in co
nditi
ons o
f ele
vate
d fir
e ris
k
4.Pr
otoc
ols f
or P
SPS
re-e
nerg
izatio
n 5.
PSPS
eve
nts a
nd m
itiga
tion
of P
SPS
impa
cts
6.St
atio
ned
and
on-c
all i
gniti
on p
reve
ntio
n an
d su
ppre
ssio
n re
sour
ces a
nd se
rvice
s 7.
Oth
er /
not l
isted
[onl
y if
an in
itiat
ive
cann
ot fe
asib
ly b
e cla
ssifi
ed w
ithin
thos
e lis
ted
abov
e]
Tabl
e 26
: Grid
ope
ratio
ns a
nd p
roto
cols
Initiative activity
Year
Total per-initiative spend
Line miles to be treated
Spend/ treated line mile
Ignition probability drivers targeted
Risk reduction
Risk-spend efficiency
Other risk drivers addressed
Existing/ new
Existing: What proceeding has reviewed program
If new: Memorandum account
In / exceeding compliance with regulations
Cite associated rule
Comments
**[E
XAM
PLE]
***
Auto
mat
ic re
close
r op
erat
ions
2019
pl
an
2019
ac
tual
2020
2021
2022
2020
-20
22
R.1
8-10
-007
ALJ
/SR
T/ilz
64 / 90
64
plan
to
tal
For e
ach
of th
e ab
ove
initi
ativ
es, d
escr
ibe
the
utili
ty’s
curr
ent p
rogr
am a
nd p
rovi
de a
n ex
plan
atio
n of
how
the
utili
ty e
xpec
ts to
evo
lve
the
utili
ty’s
prog
ram
ove
r eac
h of
the
follo
win
g tim
e pe
riods
:
1.Be
fore
the
upco
min
g w
ildfir
e se
ason
, 2.
Befo
re th
e ne
xt a
nnua
l upd
ate,
3.
With
in th
e ne
xt 3
yea
rs, a
nd
4.W
ithin
the
next
10
year
s.
R.1
8-10
-007
ALJ
/SR
T/ilz
65 / 90
65
5.3.
7Da
ta g
over
nanc
e
Desc
riptio
n of
pro
gram
s to
redu
ce ig
nitio
n pr
obab
ility
and
wild
fire
cons
eque
nce
For e
ach
of th
e be
low
initi
ativ
es, p
rovi
de a
det
aile
d de
scrip
tion
and
appr
oxim
ate
timel
ine
of e
ach,
whe
ther
alre
ady
impl
emen
ted
or p
lann
ed, t
o m
inim
ize th
e ris
k of
its e
quip
men
t or f
acili
ties c
ausin
g w
ildfir
es. I
nclu
de a
des
crip
tion
of th
e ut
ility
’s in
itiat
ives
, the
util
ity’s
ratio
nale
beh
ind
each
of
the
elem
ents
of t
he in
itiat
ives
, the
util
ity’s
prio
ritiza
tion
appr
oach
/met
hodo
logy
to d
eter
min
e sp
endi
ng a
nd d
eplo
ymen
t of h
uman
and
oth
er
reso
urce
s, ho
w th
e ut
ility
will
cond
uct a
udits
or o
ther
qua
lity
chec
ks o
n ea
ch in
itiat
ive,
how
the
utili
ty p
lans
to d
emon
stra
te o
ver t
ime
whe
ther
ea
ch co
mpo
nent
of t
he in
itiat
ives
is e
ffect
ive
and,
if n
ot, h
ow th
e ut
ility
pla
ns to
evo
lve
each
com
pone
nt to
ens
ure
effe
ctiv
e sp
end
of ra
tepa
yer
fund
s.
Inclu
de d
escr
iptio
ns a
cros
s eac
h of
the
follo
win
g in
itiat
ives
. Inp
ut th
e fo
llow
ing
initi
ativ
e na
mes
into
a sp
read
shee
t for
mat
ted
acco
rdin
g to
the
tem
plat
e be
low
and
inpu
t inf
orm
atio
n fo
r eac
h ce
ll in
the
row
. 1.
Cent
raliz
ed re
posit
ory
for d
ata
2.Co
llabo
rativ
e re
sear
ch o
n ut
ility
igni
tion
and/
or w
ildfir
e 3.
Docu
men
tatio
n an
d di
sclo
sure
of w
ildfir
e-re
late
d da
ta a
nd a
lgor
ithm
s 4.
Trac
king
and
ana
lysis
of n
ear m
iss d
ata
5.O
ther
/ no
t list
ed [o
nly
if an
initi
ativ
e ca
nnot
feas
ibly
be
class
ified
with
in th
ose
liste
d ab
ove]
The
list p
rovi
ded
is no
n-ex
haus
tive
and
utili
ties s
hall
add
addi
tiona
l ini
tiativ
es to
this
tabl
e as
thei
r ind
ivid
ual p
rogr
ams a
re d
esig
ned
and
stru
ctur
ed. D
o no
t cre
ate
a ne
w in
itiat
ive
if th
e ut
ility
’s in
itiat
ives
can
be cl
assif
ied
unde
r a p
rovi
ded
initi
ativ
e.
R.1
8-10
-007
ALJ
/SR
T/ilz
66 / 90
66
Tabl
e 27
: Dat
a go
vern
ance
Initiative activity
Year
Total per-initiative spend
Line miles to be treated
Spend/ treated line mile
Ignition probability drivers targeted
Risk reduction
Risk-spend efficiency
Other risk drivers addressed
Existing/ new
Existing: What proceeding has reviewed program
If new: Memorandum account
In / exceeding compliance with regulations
Cite associated rule
Comments
***[
EXAM
PLE]
***
Ce
ntra
lized
re
posit
ory
for
data
2019
pl
an
2019
ac
tual
2020
2021
2022
2020
-20
22
plan
to
tal
For e
ach
of th
e ab
ove
initi
ativ
es, d
escr
ibe
the
utili
ty’s
curr
ent p
rogr
am a
nd p
rovi
de a
n ex
plan
atio
n of
how
the
utili
ty e
xpec
ts to
evo
lve
the
utili
ty’s
prog
ram
ove
r eac
h of
the
follo
win
g tim
e pe
riods
:
1.Be
fore
the
upco
min
g w
ildfir
e se
ason
, 2.
Befo
re th
e ne
xt a
nnua
l upd
ate,
3.
With
in th
e ne
xt 3
yea
rs, a
nd
4.W
ithin
the
next
10
year
s.
R.1
8-10
-007
ALJ
/SR
T/ilz
67 / 90
67
5.3.
8Re
sour
ce a
lloca
tion
met
hodo
logy
Desc
riptio
n of
pro
gram
s to
redu
ce ig
nitio
n pr
obab
ility
and
wild
fire
cons
eque
nce
For e
ach
of th
e be
low
initi
ativ
es, p
rovi
de a
det
aile
d de
scrip
tion
and
appr
oxim
ate
timel
ine
of e
ach,
whe
ther
alre
ady
impl
emen
ted
or p
lann
ed, t
o m
inim
ize th
e ris
k of
its e
quip
men
t or f
acili
ties c
ausin
g w
ildfir
es. I
nclu
de a
des
crip
tion
of th
e ut
ility
’s in
itiat
ives
, the
util
ity’s
ratio
nale
beh
ind
each
of
the
elem
ents
of t
he in
itiat
ives
, the
util
ity’s
prio
ritiza
tion
appr
oach
/met
hodo
logy
to d
eter
min
e sp
endi
ng a
nd d
eplo
ymen
t of h
uman
and
oth
er
reso
urce
s, ho
w th
e ut
ility
will
cond
uct a
udits
or o
ther
qua
lity
chec
ks o
n ea
ch in
itiat
ive,
how
the
utili
ty p
lans
to d
emon
stra
te o
ver t
ime
whe
ther
ea
ch co
mpo
nent
of t
he in
itiat
ives
is e
ffect
ive
and,
if n
ot, h
ow th
e ut
ility
pla
ns to
evo
lve
each
com
pone
nt to
ens
ure
effe
ctiv
e sp
end
of ra
tepa
yer
fund
s.
Inclu
de d
escr
iptio
ns a
cros
s eac
h of
the
follo
win
g re
sour
ce a
lloca
tion
met
hodo
logy
and
sens
itivi
ties i
nitia
tives
, inc
ludi
ng a
des
crip
tion
of th
e da
ta
flow
into
the
calcu
latio
ns in
volv
ed in
eac
h. In
put t
he fo
llow
ing
initi
ativ
e na
mes
into
a sp
read
shee
t for
mat
ted
acco
rdin
g to
the
tem
plat
e be
low
an
d in
put i
nfor
mat
ion
for e
ach
cell
in th
e ro
w.
1.Al
loca
tion
met
hodo
logy
dev
elop
men
t and
app
licat
ion
2.Ri
sk re
duct
ion
scen
ario
dev
elop
men
t and
ana
lysis
3.
Risk
spen
d ef
ficie
ncy
anal
ysis
4.O
ther
/ no
t list
ed [o
nly
if an
initi
ativ
e ca
nnot
feas
ibly
be
class
ified
with
in th
ose
liste
d ab
ove]
For e
ach
of th
e be
low
initi
ativ
es, d
escr
ibe
the
utili
ty’s
curr
ent p
rogr
am a
nd p
rovi
de a
n ex
plan
atio
n of
how
the
utili
ty e
xpec
ts to
evo
lve
the
utili
ty’s
prog
ram
ove
r eac
h of
the
follo
win
g tim
e pe
riods
: 1.
Befo
re th
e up
com
ing
wild
fire
seas
on
2.Be
fore
the
next
ann
ual u
pdat
e
3.W
ithin
the
next
3 y
ears
4.
With
in th
e ne
xt 1
0 ye
ars
The
list p
rovi
ded
is no
n-ex
haus
tive
and
utili
ties s
hall
add
addi
tiona
l ini
tiativ
es to
this
tabl
e as
thei
r ind
ivid
ual p
rogr
ams a
re d
esig
ned
and
stru
ctur
ed. D
o no
t cre
ate
a ne
w in
itiat
ive
if th
e ut
ility
’s in
itiat
ives
can
be cl
assif
ied
unde
r a p
rovi
ded
initi
ativ
e. W
here
the
colu
mns
list
ed d
o no
t ap
ply
or ca
nnot
be
mea
ning
fully
calcu
late
d fo
r a g
iven
reso
urce
allo
catio
n m
etho
dolo
gy a
nd se
nsiti
vitie
s ini
tiativ
e, “
N/A”
may
be
logg
ed in
the
corr
espo
ndin
g ce
ll.
R.1
8-10
-007
ALJ
/SR
T/ilz
68 / 90
68
Tabl
e 28
: Res
ourc
e al
loca
tion
met
hodo
logy
Initiative activity
Year
Total per-initiative spend
Line miles to be treated
Spend/ treated line mile
Ignition probability drivers targeted
Risk reduction
Risk-spend efficiency
Other risk drivers addressed
Existing/ new
Existing: What proceeding has reviewed program
If new: Memorandum account
In / exceeding compliance with regulations
Cite associated rule
Comments
***[
EXAM
PLE]
***
Allo
catio
n m
etho
dolo
gy
deve
lopm
ent a
nd
appl
icatio
n
2019
pl
an
2019
ac
tual
2020
2021
2022
2020
-20
22
plan
to
tal
For e
ach
of th
e ab
ove
initi
ativ
es, d
escr
ibe
the
utili
ty’s
curr
ent p
rogr
am a
nd p
rovi
de a
n ex
plan
atio
n of
how
the
utili
ty e
xpec
ts to
evo
lve
the
utili
ty’s
prog
ram
ove
r eac
h of
the
follo
win
g tim
e pe
riods
:
1.Be
fore
the
upco
min
g w
ildfir
e se
ason
, 2.
Befo
re th
e ne
xt a
nnua
l upd
ate,
3.
With
in th
e ne
xt 3
yea
rs, a
nd
4.W
ithin
the
next
10
year
s.
R.1
8-10
-007
ALJ
/SR
T/ilz
69 / 90
69
5.3.
9Em
erge
ncy
plan
ning
and
pre
pare
dnes
s
Inclu
de a
gen
eral
des
crip
tion
of th
e ov
eral
l em
erge
ncy
prep
ared
ness
and
resp
onse
pla
n, a
nd d
etai
l:
1.A
desc
riptio
n of
how
pla
n is
cons
isten
t with
disa
ster
and
em
erge
ncy
prep
ared
ness
pla
n pr
epar
ed p
ursu
ant t
o Pu
blic
Utili
ties C
ode
Sect
ion
768.
6, in
cludi
ng:
a.Pl
ans t
o pr
epar
e fo
r and
rest
ore
serv
ice, i
nclu
ding
wor
kfor
ce m
obili
zatio
n (in
cludi
ng m
utua
l aid
and
cont
ract
ors)
and
pre
posit
ioni
ng
equi
pmen
t and
em
ploy
ees
b.Em
erge
ncy
com
mun
icatio
ns, i
nclu
ding
com
mun
ity o
utre
ach,
pub
lic a
war
enes
s, an
d co
mm
unica
tions
effo
rts b
efor
e, d
urin
g, a
nd a
fter a
w
ildfir
e in
Eng
lish,
Spa
nish
, and
the
top
thre
e pr
imar
y la
ngua
ges u
sed
in C
alifo
rnia
oth
er th
an E
nglis
h or
Spa
nish
, as d
eter
min
ed b
y Un
ited
Stat
es C
ensu
s dat
a
c.Sh
owin
g th
at th
e ut
ility
has
an
adeq
uate
and
trai
ned
wor
kfor
ce to
pro
mpt
ly re
stor
e se
rvice
afte
r a m
ajor
eve
nt, t
akin
g in
to a
ccou
nt
mut
ual a
id a
nd co
ntra
ctor
s
2.Cu
stom
er su
ppor
t in
emer
genc
ies,
inclu
ding
pro
toco
ls fo
r com
plia
nce
with
requ
irem
ents
ado
pted
by
the
CPUC
rega
rdin
g ac
tiviti
es to
su
ppor
t cus
tom
ers d
urin
g an
d af
ter a
wild
fire,
inclu
ding
: a.
Out
age
repo
rtin
g
b.Su
ppor
t for
low
inco
me
cust
omer
s c.
Billi
ng a
djus
tmen
ts
d.De
posit
wai
vers
e.
Exte
nded
pay
men
t pla
ns
f.Su
spen
sion
of d
iscon
nect
ion
and
nonp
aym
ent f
ees
g.Re
pair
proc
essin
g an
d tim
ing
h.
Acce
ss to
util
ity re
pres
enta
tives
3.Co
ordi
natio
n w
ith P
ublic
Saf
ety
Part
ners
, suc
h as
stat
ioni
ng u
tility
per
sonn
el in
coun
ty E
mer
genc
y O
pera
tions
Cen
ters
De
scrib
e ut
ility
effo
rts t
o id
entif
y w
hich
add
ition
al la
ngua
ges a
re in
use
with
in th
e ut
ility
’s se
rvice
terr
itory
, inc
ludi
ng p
lan
to id
entif
y an
d m
itiga
te la
ngua
ge a
cces
s cha
lleng
es.
Desc
riptio
n of
pro
gram
s to
redu
ce ig
nitio
n pr
obab
ility
and
wild
fire
cons
eque
nce
For e
ach
of th
e be
low
initi
ativ
es, p
rovi
de a
det
aile
d de
scrip
tion
and
appr
oxim
ate
timel
ine
of e
ach,
whe
ther
alre
ady
impl
emen
ted
or p
lann
ed, t
o m
inim
ize th
e ris
k of
its e
quip
men
t or f
acili
ties c
ausin
g w
ildfir
es. I
nclu
de a
des
crip
tion
of th
e ut
ility
’s in
itiat
ives
, the
util
ity’s
ratio
nale
beh
ind
each
of
the
elem
ents
of t
he in
itiat
ives
, the
util
ity’s
prio
ritiza
tion
appr
oach
/met
hodo
logy
to d
eter
min
e sp
endi
ng a
nd d
eplo
ymen
t of h
uman
and
oth
er
reso
urce
s, ho
w th
e ut
ility
will
cond
uct a
udits
or o
ther
qua
lity
chec
ks o
n ea
ch in
itiat
ive,
how
the
utili
ty p
lans
to d
emon
stra
te o
ver t
ime
whe
ther
R.1
8-10
-007
ALJ
/SR
T/ilz
70 / 90
70
each
com
pone
nt o
f the
initi
ativ
es is
effe
ctiv
e an
d, if
not
, how
the
utili
ty p
lans
to e
volv
e ea
ch co
mpo
nent
to e
nsur
e ef
fect
ive
spen
d of
rate
paye
r fu
nds.
Inclu
de d
escr
iptio
ns a
cros
s eac
h of
the
follo
win
g in
itiat
ives
. Inp
ut th
e fo
llow
ing
initi
ativ
e na
mes
into
a sp
read
shee
t for
mat
ted
acco
rdin
g to
the
tem
plat
e be
low
and
inpu
t inf
orm
atio
n fo
r eac
h ce
ll in
the
row
. 1.
Adeq
uate
and
trai
ned
wor
kfor
ce fo
r ser
vice
rest
orat
ion
2.
Com
mun
ity o
utre
ach,
pub
lic a
war
enes
s, an
d co
mm
unica
tions
effo
rts
3.Cu
stom
er su
ppor
t in
emer
genc
ies
4.Di
sast
er a
nd e
mer
genc
y pr
epar
edne
ss p
lan
5.Pr
epar
edne
ss a
nd p
lann
ing
for s
ervi
ce re
stor
atio
n 6.
Prot
ocol
s in
plac
e to
lear
n fro
m w
ildfir
e ev
ents
7.
Oth
er /
not l
isted
[onl
y if
an in
itiat
ive
cann
ot fe
asib
ly b
e cla
ssifi
ed w
ithin
thos
e lis
ted
abov
e]
The
list p
rovi
ded
is no
n-ex
haus
tive
and
utili
ties s
hall
add
addi
tiona
l ini
tiativ
es to
this
tabl
e as
thei
r ind
ivid
ual p
rogr
ams a
re d
esig
ned
and
stru
ctur
ed. D
o no
t cre
ate
a ne
w in
itiat
ive
if th
e ut
ility
’s in
itiat
ives
can
be cl
assif
ied
unde
r a p
rovi
ded
initi
ativ
e.
Tabl
e 29
: Em
erge
ncy
plan
ning
and
pre
pare
dnes
s
Initiative activity
Year
Total per-initiative spend
Line miles to be treated
Spend/ treated line mile
Ignition probability drivers targeted
Risk reduction
Risk-spend efficiency
Other risk drivers addressed
Existing/ new
Existing: What proceeding has reviewed program
If new: Memorandum account
In / exceeding compliance with regulations
Cite associated rule
Comments
***[
EXAM
PLE]
***
Adeq
uate
and
tr
aine
d w
orkf
orce
fo
r ser
vice
re
stor
atio
n
2019
pl
an
2019
ac
tual
2020
2021
2022
2020
-20
22
plan
to
tal
For e
ach
of th
e ab
ove
initi
ativ
es, d
escr
ibe
the
utili
ty’s
curr
ent p
rogr
am a
nd p
rovi
de a
n ex
plan
atio
n of
how
the
utili
ty e
xpec
ts to
evo
lve
the
utili
ty’s
prog
ram
ove
r eac
h of
the
follo
win
g tim
e pe
riods
:
1.Be
fore
the
upco
min
g w
ildfir
e se
ason
,
R.1
8-10
-007
ALJ
/SR
T/ilz
71 / 90
71
2.Be
fore
the
next
ann
ual u
pdat
e,
3.W
ithin
the
next
3 y
ears
, and
4.
With
in th
e ne
xt 1
0 ye
ars.
R.1
8-10
-007
ALJ
/SR
T/ilz
72 / 90
72
5.3.
10St
akeh
olde
r coo
pera
tion
and
com
mun
ity e
ngag
emen
t
Desc
riptio
n of
pro
gram
s to
redu
ce ig
nitio
n pr
obab
ility
and
wild
fire
cons
eque
nce
For e
ach
of th
e be
low
initi
ativ
es, p
rovi
de a
det
aile
d de
scrip
tion
and
appr
oxim
ate
timel
ine
of e
ach,
whe
ther
alre
ady
impl
emen
ted
or p
lann
ed, t
o m
inim
ize th
e ris
k of
its e
quip
men
t or f
acili
ties c
ausin
g w
ildfir
es. I
nclu
de a
des
crip
tion
of th
e ut
ility
’s in
itiat
ives
, the
util
ity’s
ratio
nale
beh
ind
each
of
the
elem
ents
of t
he in
itiat
ives
, the
util
ity’s
prio
ritiza
tion
appr
oach
/met
hodo
logy
to d
eter
min
e sp
endi
ng a
nd d
eplo
ymen
t of h
uman
and
oth
er
reso
urce
s, ho
w th
e ut
ility
will
cond
uct a
udits
or o
ther
qua
lity
chec
ks o
n ea
ch in
itiat
ive,
how
the
utili
ty p
lans
to d
emon
stra
te o
ver t
ime
whe
ther
ea
ch co
mpo
nent
of t
he in
itiat
ives
is e
ffect
ive
and,
if n
ot, h
ow th
e ut
ility
pla
ns to
evo
lve
each
com
pone
nt to
ens
ure
effe
ctiv
e sp
end
of ra
tepa
yer
fund
s.
Inclu
de d
escr
iptio
ns a
cros
s eac
h of
the
follo
win
g in
itiat
ives
. Inp
ut th
e fo
llow
ing
initi
ativ
e na
mes
into
a sp
read
shee
t for
mat
ted
acco
rdin
g to
the
tem
plat
e be
low
and
inpu
t inf
orm
atio
n fo
r eac
h ce
ll in
the
row
. 1.
Com
mun
ity e
ngag
emen
t 2.
Coop
erat
ion
and
best
pra
ctice
shar
ing
with
age
ncie
s out
side
CA
3.Co
oper
atio
n w
ith su
ppre
ssio
n ag
encie
s 4.
Fore
st se
rvice
and
fuel
redu
ctio
n co
oper
atio
n an
d jo
int r
oadm
ap
5.O
ther
/ no
t list
ed [o
nly
if an
initi
ativ
e ca
nnot
feas
ibly
be
class
ified
with
in th
ose
liste
d ab
ove]
The
list p
rovi
ded
is no
n-ex
haus
tive
and
utili
ties s
hall
add
addi
tiona
l ini
tiativ
es to
this
tabl
e as
thei
r ind
ivid
ual p
rogr
ams a
re d
esig
ned
and
stru
ctur
ed. D
o no
t cre
ate
a ne
w in
itiat
ive
if th
e ut
ility
’s in
itiat
ives
can
be cl
assif
ied
unde
r a p
rovi
ded
initi
ativ
e.
R.1
8-10
-007
ALJ
/SR
T/ilz
73 / 90
73
Tabl
e 30
: Sta
keho
lder
coop
erat
ion
and
com
mun
ity e
ngag
emen
t
Initiative activity
Year
Total per-initiative spend
Line miles to be treated
Spend/ treated line mile
Ignition probability drivers targeted
Risk reduction
Risk-spend efficiency
Other risk drivers addressed
Existing/ new
Existing: What proceeding has reviewed program
If new: Memorandum account
In / exceeding compliance with regulations
Cite associated rule
Comments
***[
EXAM
PLE]
***
Co
mm
unity
en
gage
men
t
2019
pl
an
2019
ac
tual
2020
2021
2022
2020
-20
22
plan
to
tal
For e
ach
of th
e ab
ove
initi
ativ
es, d
escr
ibe
the
utili
ty’s
curr
ent p
rogr
am a
nd p
rovi
de a
n ex
plan
atio
n of
how
the
utili
ty e
xpec
ts to
evo
lve
the
utili
ty’s
prog
ram
ove
r eac
h of
the
follo
win
g tim
e pe
riods
:
1.Be
fore
the
upco
min
g w
ildfir
e se
ason
, 2.
Befo
re th
e ne
xt a
nnua
l upd
ate,
3.
With
in th
e ne
xt 3
yea
rs, a
nd
4.W
ithin
the
next
10
year
s.
R.1
8-10
-007
ALJ
/SR
T/ilz
74 / 90
74
5.3.
11De
finiti
ons o
f ini
tiativ
es b
y ca
tego
ry
Cate
gory
In
itiat
ive
De
finiti
on
A. R
isk m
appi
ng a
nd
simul
atio
n A
sum
mar
ized
risk
map
that
show
s the
ov
eral
l ign
ition
pro
babi
lity
and
estim
ated
w
ildfir
e co
nseq
uenc
e al
ong
the
elec
tric
lines
and
equ
ipm
ent
Deve
lopm
ent a
nd u
se o
f too
ls an
d pr
oces
ses t
o de
velo
p an
d up
date
risk
map
and
sim
ulat
ions
and
to e
stim
ate
risk
redu
ctio
n po
tent
ial o
f ini
tiativ
es fo
r a g
iven
por
tion
of
the
grid
(or m
ore
gran
ular
ly, e
.g.,
circu
it, sp
an, o
r ass
et).
May
inclu
de v
erifi
catio
n ef
fort
s, in
depe
nden
t ass
essm
ent b
y ex
pert
s, an
d up
date
s.
Clim
ate-
driv
en ri
sk m
ap a
nd m
odel
ling
base
d on
var
ious
rele
vant
wea
ther
sc
enar
ios
Deve
lopm
ent a
nd u
se o
f too
ls an
d pr
oces
ses t
o es
timat
e in
crem
enta
l risk
of f
ores
eeab
le
clim
ate
scen
ario
s, su
ch a
s dro
ught
, acr
oss a
giv
en p
ortio
n of
the
grid
(or m
ore
gran
ular
ly,
e.g.
, circ
uit,
span
, or a
sset
). M
ay in
clude
ver
ifica
tion
effo
rts,
inde
pend
ent a
sses
smen
t by
expe
rts,
and
upda
tes.
Ig
nitio
n pr
obab
ility
map
ping
show
ing
the
prob
abili
ty o
f ign
ition
alo
ng th
e el
ectr
ic
lines
and
equ
ipm
ent
Deve
lopm
ent a
nd u
se o
f too
ls an
d pr
oces
ses t
o as
sess
the
risk
of ig
nitio
n ac
ross
regi
ons
of th
e gr
id (o
r mor
e gr
anul
arly
, e.g
., cir
cuits
, spa
ns, o
r ass
ets)
.
Initi
ativ
e m
appi
ng a
nd e
stim
atio
n of
w
ildfir
e an
d PS
PS ri
sk-re
duct
ion
impa
ct
Deve
lopm
ent o
f a to
ol to
est
imat
e th
e ris
k re
duct
ion
effic
acy
(for b
oth
wild
fire
and
PSPS
ris
k) a
nd ri
sk-s
pend
effi
cienc
y of
var
ious
initi
ativ
es.
Mat
ch d
rop
simul
atio
ns sh
owin
g th
e po
tent
ial w
ildfir
e co
nseq
uenc
e of
ig
nitio
ns th
at o
ccur
alo
ng th
e el
ectr
ic
lines
and
equ
ipm
ent
Deve
lopm
ent a
nd u
se o
f too
ls an
d pr
oces
ses t
o as
sess
the
impa
ct o
f pot
entia
l ign
ition
an
d ris
k to
com
mun
ities
(e.g
., in
term
s of p
oten
tial f
atal
ities
, str
uctu
res b
urne
d,
mon
etar
y da
mag
es, a
rea
burn
ed, i
mpa
ct o
n ai
r qua
lity
and
gree
nhou
se g
as, o
r GHG
, re
duct
ion
goal
s, et
c.).
B. S
ituat
iona
l aw
aren
ess a
nd
fore
cast
ing
Adva
nced
wea
ther
mon
itorin
g an
d w
eath
er st
atio
ns
Purc
hase
, ins
talla
tion,
mai
nten
ance
, and
ope
ratio
n of
wea
ther
stat
ions
. Col
lect
ion,
re
cord
ing,
and
ana
lysis
of w
eath
er d
ata
from
wea
ther
stat
ions
and
from
ext
erna
l so
urce
s. Co
ntin
uous
mon
itorin
g se
nsor
s In
stal
latio
n, m
aint
enan
ce, a
nd m
onito
ring
of se
nsor
s and
sens
orize
d eq
uipm
ent u
sed
to
mon
itor t
he co
nditi
on o
f ele
ctric
line
s and
equ
ipm
ent.
Fa
ult i
ndica
tors
for d
etec
ting
faul
ts o
n el
ectr
ic li
nes a
nd e
quip
men
t In
stal
latio
n an
d m
aint
enan
ce o
f fau
lt in
dica
tors
.
Fore
cast
of a
fire
risk
inde
x, fi
re p
oten
tial
inde
x, o
r sim
ilar
Inde
x th
at u
ses a
com
bina
tion
of w
eath
er p
aram
eter
s (su
ch a
s win
d sp
eed,
hum
idity
, an
d te
mpe
ratu
re),
vege
tatio
n an
d/or
fuel
cond
ition
s, an
d ot
her f
acto
rs to
judg
e cu
rren
t fir
e ris
k an
d to
crea
te a
fore
cast
indi
cativ
e of
fire
risk
. A su
fficie
ntly
gra
nula
r ind
ex sh
all
info
rm o
pera
tiona
l dec
ision
-mak
ing.
Pe
rson
nel m
onito
ring
area
s of e
lect
ric
lines
and
equ
ipm
ent i
n el
evat
ed fi
re ri
sk
cond
ition
s
Pers
onne
l pos
ition
with
in u
tility
serv
ice
terr
itory
to m
onito
r sys
tem
cond
ition
s and
w
eath
er o
n sit
e. F
ield
obs
erva
tions
shal
l inf
orm
ope
ratio
nal d
ecisi
ons.
R.1
8-10
-007
ALJ
/SR
T/ilz
75 / 90
75
Wea
ther
fore
cast
ing
and
estim
atin
g im
pact
s on
elec
tric
lines
and
equ
ipm
ent
Deve
lopm
ent m
etho
dolo
gy fo
r for
ecas
t of w
eath
er co
nditi
ons r
elev
ant t
o ut
ility
op
erat
ions
, for
ecas
ting
wea
ther
cond
ition
s and
cond
uctin
g an
alys
is to
inco
rpor
ate
into
ut
ility
dec
ision
-mak
ing,
lear
ning
and
upd
ates
to re
duce
false
pos
itive
s and
false
ne
gativ
es o
f for
ecas
t PSP
S co
nditi
ons.
C. G
rid d
esig
n an
d sy
stem
har
deni
ng
Capa
citor
mai
nten
ance
and
repl
acem
ent
prog
ram
Re
med
iatio
n, a
djus
tmen
ts, o
r ins
talla
tions
of n
ew e
quip
men
t to
impr
ove
or re
plac
e ex
istin
g ca
pacit
or e
quip
men
t. Ci
rcui
t bre
aker
mai
nten
ance
and
in
stal
latio
n to
de -
ener
gize
line
s upo
n de
tect
ing
a fa
ult
Rem
edia
tion,
adj
ustm
ents
, or i
nsta
llatio
ns o
f new
equ
ipm
ent t
o im
prov
e or
repl
ace
exist
ing
fast
switc
hing
circ
uit b
reak
er e
quip
men
t to
impr
ove
the
abili
ty to
pro
tect
el
ectr
ical
circ
uits
from
dam
age
caus
ed b
y ov
erlo
ad o
f ele
ctric
ity o
r sho
rt ci
rcui
t. Co
vere
d co
nduc
tor i
nsta
llatio
n
Inst
alla
tion
of co
vere
d or
insu
late
d co
nduc
tors
to re
plac
e st
anda
rd b
are
or u
npro
tect
ed
cond
ucto
rs (d
efin
ed in
acc
orda
nce
with
GO
95
as su
pply
cond
ucto
rs, i
nclu
ding
but
not
lim
ited
to le
ad w
ires,
not e
nclo
sed
in a
gro
unde
d m
etal
pol
e or
not
cove
red
by: a
“s
uita
ble
prot
ectiv
e co
verin
g” (i
n ac
cord
ance
with
Rul
e 22
.8 ),
gro
unde
d m
etal
cond
uit,
or g
roun
ded
met
al sh
eath
or s
hiel
d). I
n ac
cord
ance
with
GO
95,
cond
ucto
r is d
efin
ed a
s a
mat
eria
l sui
tabl
e fo
r: (1
) car
ryin
g el
ectr
ic cu
rren
t, us
ually
in th
e fo
rm o
f a w
ire, c
able
or
bus
bar
, or (
2) tr
ansm
ittin
g lig
ht in
the
case
of f
iber
opt
ics;
insu
late
d co
nduc
tors
as
thos
e w
hich
are
surr
ound
ed b
y an
ins u
latin
g m
ater
ial (
in a
ccor
danc
e w
ith R
ule
21.6
), th
e di
elec
tric
stre
ngth
of w
hich
is su
fficie
nt to
with
stan
d th
e m
axim
um d
iffer
ence
of
pote
ntia
l at n
orm
al o
pera
ting
volta
ges o
f the
circ
uit w
ithou
t bre
akdo
wn
or p
unct
ure;
an
d su
itabl
e pr
otec
tive
cove
ring
as a
cove
ring
of w
ood
or o
ther
non
-con
duct
ive
mat
eria
l hav
ing
the
elec
trica
l ins
ulat
ing
effic
ienc
y (1
2kV/
in. d
ry) a
nd im
pact
stre
ngth
(2
0ft. -
lbs)
of 1
.5 in
ches
of r
edw
ood
or o
ther
mat
eria
l mee
ting
the
requ
irem
ents
of R
ule
22.8
-A, 2
2.8-
B, 2
2.8-
C or
22.
8-D.
Co
vere
d co
nduc
tor m
aint
enan
ce
Rem
edia
tion
and
adju
stm
ents
to in
stal
led
cove
red
or in
sula
ted
cond
ucto
rs. I
n ac
cord
ance
with
GO
95,
cond
ucto
r is d
efin
ed a
s a m
ater
ial s
uita
ble
for:
(1) c
arry
ing
elec
tric
curr
ent,
usua
lly in
the
form
of a
wire
, cab
le o
r bus
bar
, or (
2) tr
ansm
ittin
g lig
ht
in th
e ca
se o
f fib
er o
ptics
; ins
ulat
ed co
nduc
tors
as t
hose
whi
ch a
re su
rrou
nded
by
an
insu
latin
g m
ater
ial (
in a
ccor
danc
e w
ith R
ule
21.6
), th
e di
elec
tric
stre
ngth
of w
hich
is
suffi
cient
to w
ithst
and
the
max
imum
diff
eren
ce o
f pot
entia
l at n
orm
al o
pera
ting
volta
ges o
f the
circ
uit w
ithou
t bre
akdo
wn
or p
unct
ure;
and
suita
ble
prot
ectiv
e co
verin
g as
a co
verin
g of
woo
d or
oth
er n
on-c
ondu
ctiv
e m
ater
ial h
avin
g th
e el
ectr
ical
insu
latin
g ef
ficie
ncy
(12k
V/in
. dry
) and
impa
ct st
reng
th (2
0ft.-
lbs)
of 1
.5 in
ches
of r
edw
ood
or
othe
r mat
eria
l mee
ting
the
requ
irem
ents
of R
ule
22.8
-A, 2
2.8-
B, 2
2.8-
C or
22.
8-D.
Cr
ossa
rm m
aint
enan
ce, r
epai
r, an
d re
plac
emen
t Re
med
iatio
n, a
djus
tmen
ts, o
r ins
talla
tions
of n
ew e
quip
men
t to
impr
ove
or re
plac
e ex
istin
g cr
ossa
rms,
defin
ed a
s hor
izont
al su
ppor
t att
ache
d to
pol
es o
r str
uctu
res
gene
rally
at r
ight
ang
les t
o th
e co
nduc
tor s
uppo
rted
in a
ccor
danc
e w
ith G
O 9
5.
R.1
8-10
-007
ALJ
/SR
T/ilz
76 / 90
76
Dist
ribut
ion
pole
repl
acem
ent a
nd
rein
forc
emen
t, in
cludi
ng w
ith co
mpo
site
pole
s
Rem
edia
tion,
adj
ustm
ents
, or i
nsta
llatio
ns o
f new
equ
ipm
ent t
o im
prov
e or
repl
ace
exist
ing
dist
ribut
ion
pole
s (i.e
., th
ose
supp
ortin
g lin
es u
nder
65k
V), i
nclu
ding
with
eq
uipm
ent s
uch
as co
mpo
site
pole
s man
ufac
ture
d w
ith m
ater
ials
redu
ce ig
nitio
n pr
obab
ility
by
incr
easin
g po
le li
fesp
an a
nd re
silie
nce
agai
nst f
ailu
re fr
om o
bjec
t con
tact
an
d ot
her e
vent
s.
Expu
lsion
fuse
repl
acem
ent
Inst
alla
tions
of n
ew a
nd C
AL F
IRE-
appr
oved
pow
er fu
ses t
o re
plac
e ex
istin
g ex
pulsi
on
fuse
equ
ipm
ent.
Grid
topo
logy
impr
ovem
ents
to m
itiga
te
or re
duce
PSP
S ev
ents
Pl
an to
supp
ort a
nd a
ctio
ns ta
ken
to m
itiga
te o
r red
uce
PSPS
eve
nts i
n te
rms o
f ge
ogra
phic
scop
e an
d nu
mbe
r of c
usto
mer
s affe
cted
, suc
h as
inst
alla
tion
and
oper
atio
n of
ele
ctric
al e
quip
men
t to
sect
iona
lize
or is
land
por
tions
of t
he g
rid, m
icrog
rids,
or lo
cal
gene
ratio
n.
Inst
alla
tion
of sy
stem
aut
omat
ion
equi
pmen
t In
stal
latio
n of
ele
ctric
equ
ipm
ent t
hat i
ncre
ases
the
abili
ty o
f the
util
ity to
aut
omat
e sy
stem
ope
ratio
n an
d m
onito
ring,
inclu
ding
equ
ipm
ent t
hat c
an b
e ad
just
ed re
mot
ely
such
as a
utom
atic
reclo
sers
(sw
itchi
ng d
evice
s des
igne
d to
det
ect a
nd in
terr
upt
mom
enta
ry fa
ults
that
can
reclo
se a
utom
atic
ally
and
det
ect i
f a fa
ult r
emai
ns,
rem
aini
ng o
pen
if so
). M
aint
enan
ce, r
epai
r, an
d re
plac
emen
t of
conn
ecto
rs, i
nclu
ding
hot
line
clam
ps
Rem
edia
tion,
adj
ustm
ents
, or i
nsta
llatio
ns o
f new
equ
ipm
ent t
o im
prov
e or
repl
ace
exist
ing
conn
ecto
r equ
ipm
ent,
such
as h
otlin
e cla
mps
. M
itiga
tion
of im
pact
on
cust
omer
s and
ot
her r
esid
ents
affe
cted
dur
ing
PSP S
ev
ent
Actio
ns ta
ken
to im
prov
e ac
cess
to e
lect
ricity
for c
usto
mer
s and
oth
er re
siden
ts d
urin
g PS
PS e
vent
s, su
ch a
s ins
talla
tion
and
oper
atio
n of
loca
l gen
erat
ion
equi
pmen
t (at
the
com
mun
ity, h
ouse
hold
, or o
ther
leve
l).
Oth
er co
rrec
tive
actio
n
Oth
er m
aint
enan
ce, r
epai
r, or
repl
acem
ent o
f util
ity e
quip
men
t and
stru
ctur
es so
that
th
ey fu
nctio
n pr
oper
ly a
nd sa
fely
, inc
ludi
ng re
med
iatio
n ac
tiviti
es (s
uch
as in
sula
tor
was
hing
) of o
ther
ele
ctric
equ
ipm
ent d
efic
ienc
ies t
hat m
ay in
crea
se ig
nitio
n pr
obab
ility
du
e to
pot
entia
l equ
ipm
ent f
ailu
re o
r oth
er d
river
s.
Pole
load
ing
infra
stru
ctur
e ha
rden
ing
and
repl
acem
ent p
rogr
am b
ased
on
pole
lo
adin
g as
sess
men
t pro
gram
Actio
ns ta
ken
to re
med
iate
, adj
ust,
or in
stal
l rep
lace
men
t equ
ipm
ent f
or p
oles
that
the
utili
ty h
as id
entif
ied
as fa
iling
to m
eet s
afet
y fa
ctor
requ
irem
ents
in a
ccor
danc
e w
ith
GO 9
5 or
add
ition
al u
tility
stan
dard
s in
the
utili
ty's
pole
load
ing
asse
ssm
ent p
rogr
am.
Tran
sfor
mer
s mai
nten
ance
and
re
plac
emen
t Re
med
iatio
n, a
djus
tmen
ts, o
r ins
talla
tions
of n
ew e
quip
men
t to
impr
ove
or re
plac
e ex
istin
g tr
ansf
orm
er e
quip
men
t. Tr
ansm
issio
n to
wer
mai
nten
ance
and
re
plac
emen
t Re
med
iatio
n, a
djus
tmen
ts, o
r ins
talla
tions
of n
ew e
quip
men
t to
impr
ove
or re
plac
e ex
istin
g tr
ansm
issio
n to
wer
s (e.
g., s
truc
ture
s suc
h as
latt
ice
stee
l tow
ers o
r tub
ular
st
eel p
oles
that
supp
ort l
ines
at o
r abo
ve 6
5kV)
. Un
derg
roun
ding
of e
lect
ric li
nes a
nd/o
r eq
uipm
ent
Actio
ns ta
ken
to co
nver
t ove
rhea
d el
ectr
ic lin
es a
nd/o
r equ
ipm
ent t
o un
derg
roun
d el
ectr
ic li
nes a
nd/o
r equ
ipm
ent (
i.e.,
loca
ted
unde
rgro
und
and
in a
ccor
danc
e w
ith G
O
128)
.
R.1
8-10
-007
ALJ
/SR
T/ilz
77 / 90
77
Upda
tes t
o gr
id to
polo
gy to
min
imize
risk
of
igni
tion
in H
FTDs
Ch
ange
s in
the
plan
, ins
talla
tion,
cons
truc
tion,
rem
oval
, and
/or u
nder
grou
ndin
g to
m
inim
ize th
e ris
k of
igni
tion
due
to th
e de
sign,
loca
tion,
or c
onfig
urat
ion
of u
tility
el
ectr
ic e
quip
men
t in
HFTD
s.
D. A
sset
m
anag
emen
t and
in
spec
tions
Deta
iled
insp
ectio
ns o
f dist
ribut
ion
elec
tric
line
s and
equ
ipm
ent
In a
ccor
danc
e w
ith G
O 1
65, c
aref
ul v
isual
insp
ectio
ns o
f ove
rhea
d el
ectr
ic di
strib
utio
n lin
es a
nd e
quip
men
t whe
re in
divi
dual
pie
ces o
f equ
ipm
ent a
nd st
ruct
ures
are
care
fully
ex
amin
ed, v
isual
ly a
nd th
roug
h us
e of
rout
ine
diag
nost
ic te
st, a
s app
ropr
iate
, and
(if
prac
tical
and
if u
sefu
l inf
orm
atio
n ca
n be
so g
athe
red)
ope
ned,
and
the
cond
itio n
of
each
rate
d an
d re
cord
ed.
Deta
iled
insp
ectio
ns o
f tra
nsm
issio
n el
ectr
ic li
nes a
nd e
quip
men
t Ca
refu
l visu
al in
spec
tions
of o
verh
ead
elec
tric
tran
smiss
ion
lines
and
equ
ipm
ent w
here
in
divi
dual
pie
ces o
f equ
ipm
ent a
nd st
ruct
ures
are
care
fully
exa
min
ed, v
isual
ly a
nd
thro
ugh
use
of ro
utin
e di
agno
stic
test
, as a
ppro
pria
te, a
nd (i
f pra
ctica
l and
if u
sefu
l in
form
atio
n ca
n be
so g
athe
red)
ope
ned,
and
the
cond
ition
of e
ach
rate
d an
d re
cord
ed.
Impr
ovem
ent o
f ins
pect
ions
Id
entif
ying
and
add
ress
ing
defic
ienc
ies i
n in
spec
tions
pro
toco
ls an
d im
plem
enta
tion
by
impr
ovin
g tr
aini
ng a
nd th
e ev
alua
tion
of in
spec
tors
. In
frare
d in
spec
tions
of d
istrib
utio
n el
ectr
ic li
nes a
nd e
quip
men
t In
spec
tions
of o
verh
ead
elec
tric
dist
ribut
ion
lines
, equ
ipm
ent,
and
right
-of-w
ay u
sing
infra
red
(hea
t -sen
sing)
tech
nolo
gy a
nd ca
mer
as th
at ca
n id
entif
y "h
ot sp
ots"
, or
cond
ition
s tha
t ind
icate
det
erio
ratio
n or
pot
entia
l equ
ipm
ent f
ailu
res,
of e
lect
rical
eq
uipm
ent.
In
frare
d in
spec
tions
of t
rans
miss
ion
elec
tric
line
s and
equ
ipm
ent
Insp
ectio
ns o
f ove
rhea
d el
ectr
ic tr
ansm
issio
n lin
es, e
quip
men
t, an
d rig
ht-o
f-way
usin
g in
frare
d (h
eat -s
ensin
g) te
chno
logy
and
cam
eras
that
can
iden
tify
"hot
spot
s", o
r co
nditi
ons t
hat i
ndica
te d
eter
iora
tion
or p
oten
tial e
quip
men
t fai
lure
s, of
ele
ctric
al
equi
pmen
t.
Intr
usiv
e po
le in
spec
tions
In
acc
orda
nce
with
GO
165
, int
rusiv
e in
spec
tions
invo
lve
mov
emen
t of s
oil,
taki
ng
sam
ples
for a
naly
sis, a
nd/o
r usin
g m
ore
soph
istic
ated
dia
gnos
tic to
ols b
eyon
d vi
sual
in
spec
tions
or i
nstr
umen
t rea
ding
. LiD
AR in
spec
tions
of d
istrib
utio
n el
ectr
ic lin
es a
nd e
quip
men
t In
spec
tions
of o
verh
ead
elec
tric
tran
smiss
ion
lines
, equ
ipm
ent,
and
right
-of-w
ay u
sing
LiDAR
(Lig
ht D
etec
tion
and
Rang
ing,
a re
mot
e se
nsin
g m
etho
d th
at u
ses l
ight
in th
e fo
rm o
f a p
ulse
d la
ser t
o m
easu
re v
aria
ble
dist
ance
s).
LiDAR
insp
ectio
ns o
f tra
nsm
issio
n el
ectr
ic li
nes a
nd e
quip
men
t In
spec
tions
of o
verh
ead
elec
tric
dist
ribut
ion
lines
, equ
ipm
ent,
and
right
-of-w
ay u
sing
LiDAR
(Lig
ht D
etec
tion
and
Rang
ing,
a re
mot
e se
nsin
g m
etho
d th
at u
ses l
ight
in th
e fo
rm o
f a p
ulse
d la
ser t
o m
easu
re v
aria
ble
dist
ance
s).
Oth
er d
iscre
tiona
ry in
spec
tion
of
dist
ribut
ion
elec
tric
lines
and
equ
ipm
ent,
beyo
nd in
spec
tions
man
date
d by
rule
s an
d re
gula
tions
Insp
ectio
ns o
f ove
rhea
d el
ectr
ic tr
ansm
issio
n lin
es, e
quip
men
t, an
d rig
ht-o
f-way
that
ex
ceed
or o
ther
wise
go
beyo
nd th
ose
man
date
d by
rule
s and
regu
latio
ns, i
nclu
ding
GO
16
5, in
term
s of f
requ
ency
, ins
pect
ion
chec
klist
requ
irem
ents
or d
etai
l, an
alys
is of
and
re
spon
se to
pro
blem
s ide
ntifi
ed, o
r oth
er a
spec
ts o
f ins
pect
ion
or re
cord
s kep
t. O
ther
disc
retio
nary
insp
ectio
n of
tr
ansm
issio
n el
ectr
ic li
nes a
nd
Insp
ectio
ns o
f ove
rhea
d el
ectr
ic di
strib
utio
n lin
es, e
quip
men
t, an
d rig
ht-o
f-way
that
ex
ceed
or o
ther
wise
go
beyo
nd th
ose
man
date
d by
rule
s and
regu
latio
ns, i
nclu
ding
GO
R.1
8-10
-007
ALJ
/SR
T/ilz
78 / 90
78
equi
pmen
t, be
yond
insp
ectio
ns
man
date
d by
rule
s and
regu
latio
ns
165,
in te
rms o
f fre
quen
cy, i
nspe
ctio
n ch
eckl
ist re
quire
men
ts o
r det
ail,
anal
ysis
of a
nd
resp
onse
to p
robl
ems i
dent
ified
, or o
ther
asp
ects
of i
nspe
ctio
n or
reco
rds k
ept.
Patr
ol in
spec
tions
of d
istrib
utio
n el
ectr
ic lin
es a
nd e
quip
men
t In
acc
orda
nce
with
GO
165
, sim
ple
visu
al in
spec
tions
of o
verh
ead
elec
tric
dist
ribut
ion
lines
and
equ
ipm
ent t
hat i
s des
igne
d to
iden
tify
obvi
ous s
truc
tura
l pro
blem
s and
ha
zard
s. Pa
trol
insp
ectio
ns m
ay b
e ca
rrie
d ou
t in
the
cour
se o
f oth
er co
mpa
ny b
usin
ess.
Pa
trol
insp
ectio
ns o
f tra
nsm
issio
n el
ectr
ic li
nes a
nd e
quip
men
t Si
mpl
e vi
sual
insp
ectio
ns o
f ove
rhea
d el
ectr
ic tr
ansm
issio
n lin
es a
nd e
quip
men
t tha
t is
desig
ned
to id
entif
y ob
viou
s str
uctu
ral p
robl
ems a
nd h
azar
ds. P
atro
l ins
pect
ions
may
be
carr
ied
out i
n th
e co
urse
of o
ther
com
pany
bus
ines
s.
Pole
load
ing
asse
ssm
ent p
rogr
am to
de
term
ine
safe
ty fa
ctor
Ca
lcula
tions
to d
eter
min
e w
heth
er a
pol
e m
eets
pol
e lo
adin
g sa
fety
fact
or
requ
irem
ents
of G
O 9
5, in
cludi
ng p
lann
ing
and
info
rmat
ion
colle
ctio
n ne
eded
to
supp
ort s
aid
calcu
latio
ns. C
alcu
latio
ns sh
all c
onsid
er m
any
fact
ors i
nclu
ding
the
size,
lo
catio
n, a
nd ty
pe o
f pol
e; ty
pes o
f att
achm
ents
; len
gth
of c
ondu
ctor
s att
ache
d; a
nd
num
ber a
nd d
esig
n of
supp
ortin
g gu
ys, p
er D
.15-
11-0
21.
Qua
lity
assu
ranc
e / q
ualit
y co
ntro
l of
insp
ectio
ns
Esta
blish
men
t and
func
tion
of a
udit
proc
ess t
o m
anag
e an
d co
nfirm
wor
k co
mpl
eted
by
empl
oyee
s or s
ubco
ntra
ctor
s, in
cludi
ng p
acka
ging
QA/
QC
info
rmat
ion
for i
nput
to
decis
ion-
mak
ing
and
rela
ted
inte
grat
ed w
orkf
orce
man
agem
ent p
roce
sses
. Su
bsta
tion
insp
ectio
ns
In a
ccor
danc
e w
ith G
O 1
75, i
nspe
ctio
n of
subs
tatio
ns p
erfo
rmed
by
qual
ified
per
sons
an
d ac
cord
ing
to th
e fre
quen
cy e
stab
lishe
d by
the
utili
ty, i
nclu
ding
reco
rd-k
eepi
ng.
E. V
eget
atio
n m
anag
emen
t and
in
spec
tion
Addi
tiona
l effo
rts t
o m
anag
e co
mm
unity
an
d en
viro
nmen
tal i
mpa
cts
Plan
and
exe
cutio
n of
str
ateg
y to
miti
gate
neg
ativ
e im
pact
s fro
m u
tility
veg
etat
ion
man
agem
ent
to lo
cal c
omm
uniti
es a
nd t
he e
nviro
nmen
t, su
ch a
s co
ordi
natio
n w
ith
com
mun
ities
to p
lan
and
exec
ute
vege
tatio
n m
anag
emen
t w
ork
or p
rom
otio
n of
fire
-re
sista
nt p
lant
ing
prac
tices
Deta
iled
insp
ectio
ns o
f veg
etat
ion
arou
nd d
istrib
utio
n el
ectr
ic lin
es a
nd
equi
pmen
t
Care
ful v
isual
insp
ectio
ns o
f veg
etat
ion
arou
nd th
e rig
ht-o
f-way
, whe
re in
divi
dual
tree
s ar
e ca
refu
lly e
xam
ined
, visu
ally
, and
the
cond
ition
of e
ach
rate
d an
d re
cord
ed.
Deta
iled
insp
ectio
ns o
f veg
etat
ion
arou
nd tr
ansm
issio
n el
ectr
ic li
nes a
nd
equi
pmen
t
Care
ful v
isual
insp
ectio
ns o
f veg
etat
ion
arou
nd th
e rig
ht-o
f-way
, whe
re in
divi
dual
tree
s ar
e ca
refu
lly e
xam
ined
, visu
ally
, and
the
cond
ition
of e
ach
rate
d an
d re
cord
ed.
Emer
genc
y re
spon
se v
eget
atio
n m
anag
emen
t due
to re
d fla
g w
arni
ng o
r ot
her u
rgen
t con
ditio
ns
Plan
and
exe
cutio
n of
veg
etat
ion
man
agem
ent a
ctiv
ities
, suc
h as
trim
min
g or
rem
oval
, ex
ecut
ed b
ased
upo
n an
d in
adv
ance
of f
orec
ast w
eath
er c
ondi
tions
that
indi
cate
hig
h fir
e th
reat
in te
rms o
f ign
ition
pro
babi
lity
and
wild
fire
cons
eque
nce.
Fu
el m
anag
emen
t and
redu
ctio
n of
“s
lash
” fro
m v
eget
atio
n m
anag
emen
t ac
tiviti
es
Plan
and
exe
cutio
n of
fuel
man
agem
ent a
ctiv
ities
that
redu
ce th
e av
aila
bilit
y of
fuel
in
prox
imity
to p
oten
tial s
ourc
es o
f ign
ition
, inc
ludi
ng b
oth
redu
ctio
n or
adj
ustm
ent o
f liv
e fu
el (i
n te
rms o
f spe
cies
or o
ther
wise
) and
of d
ead
fuel
, inc
ludi
ng "s
lash
" fro
m v
eget
atio
n
R.1
8-10
-007
ALJ
/SR
T/ilz
79 / 90
79
man
agem
ent a
ctiv
ities
that
pro
duce
veg
etat
ion
mat
eria
l suc
h as
bra
nch
trim
min
gs a
nd
felle
d tr
ees.
Im
prov
emen
t of i
nspe
ctio
ns
Iden
tifyi
ng a
nd a
ddre
ssin
g de
ficie
ncie
s in
insp
ectio
ns p
roto
cols
and
impl
emen
tatio
n by
im
prov
ing
trai
ning
and
the
eval
uatio
n of
insp
ecto
rs.
LiDAR
insp
ectio
ns o
f veg
etat
ion
arou
nd
dist
ribut
ion
elec
tric
lines
and
equ
ipm
ent
Insp
ectio
ns o
f rig
ht-o
f-way
usin
g LiD
AR (L
ight
Det
ectio
n an
d Ra
ngin
g, a
rem
ote
sens
ing
met
hod
that
use
s lig
ht in
the
form
of a
pul
sed
lase
r to
mea
sure
var
iabl
e di
stan
ces)
. LiD
AR in
spec
tions
of v
eget
atio
n ar
ound
tr
ansm
issio
n el
ectr
ic li
nes a
nd
equi
pmen
t
Insp
ectio
ns o
f rig
ht-o
f-way
usin
g LiD
AR (L
ight
Det
ectio
n an
d Ra
ngin
g, a
rem
ote
sens
ing
met
hod
that
use
s lig
ht in
the
form
of a
pul
s ed
lase
r to
mea
sure
var
iabl
e di
stan
ces)
.
Oth
er d
iscre
tiona
ry in
spec
tions
of
vege
tatio
n ar
ound
dist
ribut
ion
elec
tric
lines
and
equ
ipm
ent
Insp
ectio
ns o
f rig
hts-
of-w
ay a
nd a
djac
ent
vege
tatio
n th
at m
ay b
e ha
zard
ous,
whi
ch
exce
eds
or o
ther
wise
go
beyo
nd th
ose
man
date
d by
rule
s an
d re
gula
tions
, in
term
s of
fre
quen
cy,
insp
ectio
n ch
eckl
ist r
equi
rem
ents
or
deta
il, a
naly
sis o
f an
d re
spon
se t
o pr
oble
ms i
dent
ified
, or o
ther
asp
ects
of i
nspe
ctio
n or
reco
rds k
ept.
Oth
er d
iscre
tiona
ry in
spec
tions
of
vege
tatio
n ar
ound
tran
smiss
ion
elec
tric
lines
and
equ
ipm
ent
Insp
ectio
ns o
f rig
hts-
of-w
ay a
nd a
djac
ent
vege
tatio
n th
at m
ay b
e ha
zard
ous,
whi
ch
exce
eds
or o
ther
wise
go
beyo
nd th
ose
man
date
d by
rule
s an
d re
gula
tions
, in
term
s of
fre
quen
cy,
insp
ectio
n ch
eckl
ist r
equi
rem
ents
or
deta
il, a
naly
sis o
f an
d re
spon
se t
o pr
oble
ms i
dent
ified
, or o
ther
asp
ects
of i
nspe
ctio
n or
reco
rds k
ept.
Patr
ol in
spec
tions
of v
eget
atio
n ar
ound
di
strib
utio
n el
ectr
ic lin
es a
nd e
quip
men
t Vi
sual
insp
ectio
ns o
f veg
etat
ion
alon
g rig
hts-
of-w
ay th
at is
des
igne
d to
iden
tify
obvi
ous
haza
rds.
Patr
ol in
spec
tions
may
be
carr
ied
out i
n th
e co
urse
of o
ther
com
pany
bus
ines
s.
Patr
ol in
spec
tions
of v
eget
atio
n ar
ound
tr
ansm
issio
n el
ectr
ic li
nes a
nd
equi
pmen
t
Visu
al in
spec
tions
of v
eget
atio
n al
ong
right
s-of
-way
that
is d
esig
ned
to id
entif
y ob
viou
s ha
zard
s. Pa
trol
insp
ectio
ns m
ay b
e ca
rrie
d ou
t in
the
cour
se o
f oth
er co
mpa
ny b
usin
ess.
Qua
lity
assu
ranc
e / q
ualit
y co
ntro
l of
vege
tatio
n in
spec
tions
Es
tabl
ishm
ent a
nd fu
nctio
n of
aud
it pr
oces
s to
man
age
and
conf
irm w
ork
com
plet
ed b
y em
ploy
ees
or s
ubco
ntra
ctor
s, in
cludi
ng p
acka
ging
QA/
QC
info
rmat
ion
for
inpu
t to
de
cisio
n-m
akin
g an
d re
late
d in
tegr
ated
wor
kfor
ce m
anag
emen
t pro
cess
es.
Recr
uitin
g an
d tr
aini
ng o
f veg
etat
ion
man
agem
ent p
erso
nnel
Pr
ogra
ms
to e
nsur
e th
at t
he u
tility
is
able
to
iden
tify
and
hire
qua
lifie
d ve
geta
tion
man
agem
ent
pers
onne
l and
to
ensu
re t
hat
both
full -
time
empl
oyee
s an
d co
ntra
ctor
s ta
sked
with
veg
etat
ion
man
agem
ent r
espo
nsib
ilitie
s ar
e ad
equa
tely
trai
ned
to p
erfo
rm
vege
tatio
n m
anag
emen
t w
ork,
acc
ordi
ng t
o th
e ut
ility
's w
ildfir
e m
itiga
tion
plan
, in
ad
ditio
n to
rule
s and
regu
latio
ns fo
r saf
ety.
Re
med
iatio
n of
at-r
isk sp
ecie
s Ac
tions
take
n to
redu
ce th
e ig
nitio
n pr
obab
ility
and
wild
fire
cons
eque
nce
attr
ibut
able
to
at-r
isk v
eget
atio
n sp
ecie
s, su
ch a
s trim
min
g, re
mov
al, a
nd re
plac
emen
t. Re
mov
al a
nd re
med
iatio
n of
tree
s with
st
rike
pote
ntia
l to
elec
tric
lines
and
eq
uipm
ent
Actio
ns ta
ken
to re
mov
e or
oth
erw
ise re
med
iate
tree
s tha
t cou
ld p
oten
tially
strik
e el
ectr
ical
equ
ipm
ent,
if ad
vers
e ev
ents
such
as f
ailu
re a
t the
gro
und-
leve
l of t
he tr
ee o
r br
anch
bre
akou
t with
in th
e ca
nopy
of t
he tr
ee, o
ccur
. Su
bsta
tion
insp
ectio
n In
spec
tion
of v
eget
atio
n su
rrou
ndin
g su
bsta
tions
, per
form
ed b
y qu
alifi
ed p
erso
ns a
nd
acco
rdin
g to
the
frequ
ency
est
ablis
hed
by th
e ut
ility
, inc
ludi
ng re
cord
-kee
ping
.
R.1
8-10
-007
ALJ
/SR
T/ilz
80 / 90
80
Subs
tatio
n ve
geta
tion
man
agem
ent
Base
d on
loca
tion
and
risk
to su
bsta
tion
equi
pmen
t onl
y, a
ctio
ns ta
ken
to re
duce
the
igni
tion
prob
abili
ty a
nd w
ildfir
e co
nseq
uenc
e at
trib
utab
le to
cont
act f
rom
veg
etat
ion
to
subs
tatio
n eq
uipm
ent.
Ve
geta
tion
inve
ntor
y sy
stem
In
puts
, ope
ratio
n, a
nd su
ppor
t for
cent
raliz
ed in
vent
ory
of v
eget
atio
n cle
aran
ces
upda
ted
base
d up
on in
spec
tion
resu
lts, i
nclu
ding
(1) i
nven
tory
of s
pecie
s, (2
) fo
reca
stin
g of
gro
wth
, (3)
fore
cast
ing
of w
hen
grow
th th
reat
ens m
inim
um ri
ght-
of-w
ay
clear
ance
s (“g
row
-in” r
isk) o
r cre
ates
fall-
in/f
ly-in
risk
. Ve
geta
tion
man
agem
ent t
o ac
hiev
e cle
aran
ces a
roun
d el
ectr
ic lin
es a
nd
equi
pmen
t
Actio
ns ta
ken
to e
nsur
e th
at v
eget
atio
n do
es n
ot e
ncro
ach
upon
the
min
imum
cle
aran
ces s
et fo
rth
in T
able
1 o
f GO
95,
mea
sure
d be
twee
n lin
e co
nduc
tors
and
ve
geta
tion,
such
as t
rimm
ing
adja
cent
or o
verh
angi
ng tr
ee li
mbs
. F.
Grid
ope
ratio
ns
and
prot
ocol
s Au
tom
atic
reclo
ser o
pera
tions
De
signi
ng a
nd e
xecu
ting
prot
ocol
s to
deac
tivat
e au
tom
atic
reclo
sers
bas
ed o
n lo
cal
cond
ition
s for
igni
tion
prob
abili
ty a
nd w
ildfir
e co
nseq
uenc
e.
Crew
-acc
ompa
nyin
g ig
nitio
n pr
even
tion
and
supp
ress
ion
reso
urce
s and
serv
ices
Thos
e fir
efig
htin
g st
aff a
nd e
quip
men
t (su
ch a
s fire
supp
ress
ion
engi
nes a
nd tr
aile
rs,
firef
ight
ing
hose
, val
ves,
and
wat
er) t
hat a
re d
eplo
yed
with
cons
truc
tion
crew
s and
ot
her e
lect
ric w
orke
rs to
pro
vide
site
-spe
cific
fire
prev
entio
n an
d ig
nitio
n m
itiga
tion
durin
g on
-site
wor
k Pe
rson
nel w
ork
proc
edur
es a
nd tr
aini
ng
in co
nditi
ons o
f ele
vate
d fir
e ris
k
Wor
k ac
tivity
gui
delin
es th
at d
esig
nate
wha
t typ
e of
wor
k ca
n be
per
form
ed d
urin
g op
erat
ing
cond
ition
s of d
iffer
ent l
evel
s of w
ildfir
e ris
k. T
rain
ing
for p
erso
nnel
on
thes
e gu
idel
ines
and
the
proc
edur
es th
ey p
resc
ribe,
from
nor
mal
ope
ratin
g pr
oced
ures
to
incr
ease
d m
itiga
tion
mea
sure
s to
cons
trai
nts o
n w
ork
perfo
rmed
. Pr
otoc
ols f
or P
SPS
re-e
nerg
izatio
n De
signi
ng a
nd e
xecu
ting
proc
edur
es th
at a
ccel
erat
e th
e re
stor
atio
n of
ele
ctric
ser
vice
in
area
s tha
t wer
e de
-ene
rgize
d, w
hile
mai
ntai
ning
safe
ty a
nd re
liabi
lity
stan
dard
s.
PSPS
eve
nts a
nd m
itiga
tion
of P
SPS
impa
cts
Desig
ning
, exe
cutin
g, a
nd im
prov
ing
upon
pro
toco
ls to
cond
uct P
SPS
even
ts, i
nclu
ding
de
velo
pmen
t of a
dvan
ced
met
hodo
logi
es to
det
erm
ine
whe
n to
use
PSP
S, a
nd to
m
itiga
te th
e im
pact
of P
SPS
even
ts o
n af
fect
ed cu
stom
ers a
nd lo
cal r
esid
ents
. St
atio
ned
and
on-c
all i
gniti
on p
reve
ntio
n an
d su
ppre
ssio
n re
sour
ces a
nd se
rvice
s Fi
refig
htin
g st
aff a
nd e
quip
men
t (su
ch a
s fire
supp
ress
ion
engi
nes a
nd tr
aile
rs,
firef
ight
ing
hose
, val
ves,
firef
ight
ing
foam
, che
mica
l ext
ingu
ishin
g ag
ent,
and
wat
er)
stat
ione
d at
util
ity fa
ciliti
es a
nd/o
r sta
ndin
g by
to re
spon
d to
calls
for f
ire su
ppre
ssio
n as
sista
nce.
G.
Dat
a go
vern
ance
Ce
ntra
lized
repo
sitor
y fo
r dat
a De
signi
ng, m
aint
aini
ng, h
ostin
g, a
nd u
pgra
ding
a p
latfo
rm th
at su
ppor
ts st
orag
e,
proc
essin
g, a
nd u
tiliza
tion
of a
ll ut
ility
pro
prie
tary
dat
a an
d da
ta co
mpi
led
by th
e ut
ility
fro
m o
ther
sour
ces.
Co
llabo
rativ
e re
sear
ch o
n ut
ility
igni
tion
and/
or w
ildfir
e De
velo
ping
and
exe
cutin
g re
sear
ch w
ork
on u
tility
igni
tion
and/
or w
ildfir
e to
pics
in
colla
bora
tion
with
oth
er n
on-u
tility
par
tner
s, su
ch a
s aca
dem
ic in
stitu
tions
and
re
sear
ch g
roup
s, to
inclu
de d
ata-
shar
ing
and
fund
ing
as a
pplic
able
.
R.1
8-10
-007
ALJ
/SR
T/ilz
81 / 90
81
Docu
men
tatio
n an
d di
sclo
sure
of
wild
fire -
rela
ted
data
and
alg
orith
ms
Desig
n an
d ex
ecut
ion
of p
roce
sses
to d
ocum
ent a
nd d
isclo
se w
ildfir
e-re
late
d da
ta a
nd
algo
rithm
s to
acco
rd w
ith ru
les a
nd re
gula
tions
, inc
ludi
ng u
se o
f sce
nario
s for
fo
reca
stin
g an
d st
ress
test
ing.
Tr
acki
ng a
nd a
naly
sis o
f nea
r miss
dat
a To
ols a
nd p
roce
dure
s to
mon
itor,
reco
rd, a
nd co
nduc
t ana
lysis
of d
ata
on n
ear m
iss
even
ts.
H. R
esou
rce
allo
catio
n m
etho
dolo
gy
Allo
catio
n m
etho
dolo
gy d
evel
opm
ent
and
appl
icatio
n De
velo
pmen
t of p
riorit
izatio
n m
etho
dolo
gy fo
r hum
an a
nd fi
nanc
ial r
esou
rces
, in
cludi
ng a
pplic
atio
n of
said
met
hodo
logy
to u
tility
dec
ision
-mak
ing.
Ri
sk re
duct
ion
scen
ario
dev
elop
men
t an
d an
alys
is De
velo
pmen
t of m
odel
ling
capa
bilit
ies f
or d
iffer
ent r
isk re
duct
ion
scen
ario
s bas
ed o
n w
ildfir
e m
itiga
tion
initi
ativ
e im
plem
enta
tion;
ana
lysis
and
app
licat
ion
to u
tility
dec
ision
-m
akin
g.
Risk
spen
d ef
ficie
ncy
anal
ysis
Tool
s, pr
oced
ures
, and
exp
ertis
e to
supp
ort a
naly
sis o
f wild
fire
miti
gatio
n in
itiat
ive
risk-
spen
d ef
ficie
ncy,
in te
rms o
f MAV
F an
d/ o
r MAR
S m
etho
dolo
gies
. I.
Emer
genc
y pl
anni
ng a
nd
prep
ared
ness
Adeq
uate
and
trai
ned
wor
kfor
ce fo
r se
rvic
e re
stor
atio
n Ac
tions
take
n to
iden
tify,
hire
, ret
ain,
and
trai
n qu
alifi
ed w
orkf
orce
to co
nduc
t ser
vice
re
stor
atio
n in
resp
onse
to e
mer
genc
ies,
inclu
ding
shor
t-te
rm co
ntra
ctin
g st
rate
gy a
nd
impl
emen
tatio
n.
Com
mun
ity o
utre
ach,
pub
lic a
war
enes
s, an
d co
mm
unica
tions
effo
rts
Actio
ns to
iden
tify
and
cont
act k
ey c
omm
unity
stak
ehol
ders
; inc
reas
e pu
blic
awar
enes
s of
em
erge
ncy
plan
ning
and
pre
pare
dnes
s inf
orm
atio
n; a
nd d
esig
n, tr
ansla
te, d
istrib
ute,
an
d ev
alua
te e
ffect
iven
ess o
f com
mun
icatio
ns ta
ken
befo
re, d
urin
g, a
nd a
fter a
w
ildfir
e, in
cludi
ng A
cces
s and
Fun
ctio
nal N
eeds
pop
ulat
ions
and
Lim
ited
Engl
ish
Prof
icien
cy p
opul
atio
ns in
par
ticul
ar.
Cust
omer
supp
ort i
n em
erge
ncie
s Re
sour
ces d
edic
ated
to cu
stom
er su
ppor
t dur
ing
emer
genc
ies,
such
as w
ebsit
e pa
ges
and
othe
r dig
ital r
esou
rces
, ded
icate
d ph
one
lines
, etc
. Di
sast
er a
nd e
mer
genc
y pr
epar
edne
ss
plan
De
velo
pmen
t of p
lan
to d
eplo
y re
sour
ces a
ccor
ding
to p
riorit
izatio
n m
etho
dolo
gy fo
r di
sast
er a
nd e
mer
genc
y pr
epar
edne
ss o
f util
ity a
nd w
ithin
util
ity se
rvic
e te
rrito
ry (s
uch
as co
nsid
erat
ions
for c
ritica
l fac
ilitie
s and
infra
stru
ctur
e), i
nclu
ding
stra
tegy
for
colla
bora
tion
with
Pub
lic S
afet
y Pa
rtne
rs a
nd co
mm
uniti
es.
Prep
ared
ness
and
pla
nnin
g fo
r ser
vice
re
stor
atio
n De
velo
pmen
t of p
lans
to p
repa
re th
e ut
ility
to re
stor
e se
rvic
e af
ter e
mer
genc
ies,
such
as
dev
elop
ing
empl
oyee
and
staf
f tra
inin
gs, a
nd to
cond
uct i
nspe
ctio
ns a
nd
rem
edia
tion
nece
ssar
y to
re-e
nerg
ize li
nes a
nd re
stor
e se
rvic
e to
cust
omer
s.
Prot
ocol
s in
plac
e to
lear
n fro
m w
ildfir
e ev
ents
To
ols a
nd p
roce
dure
s to
mon
itor e
ffect
iven
ess o
f str
ateg
y an
d ac
tions
take
n to
pre
pare
fo
r em
erge
ncie
s and
of s
trat
egy
and
actio
ns ta
ken
durin
g an
d af
ter e
mer
genc
ies,
inclu
ding
bas
ed o
n an
acc
ount
ing
of th
e ou
tcom
es o
f wild
fire
even
ts.
J. St
akeh
olde
r co
oper
atio
n an
d co
mm
unity
en
gage
men
t
Com
mun
ity e
ngag
emen
t St
rate
gy a
nd a
ctio
ns ta
ken
to id
entif
y an
d co
ntac
t key
com
mun
ity st
akeh
olde
rs;
incr
ease
pub
lic a
war
enes
s and
supp
ort o
f util
ity w
ildfir
e m
itiga
tion
activ
ity; a
nd d
esig
n,
tran
slate
, dist
ribut
e, a
nd e
valu
ate
effe
ctiv
enes
s of r
elat
ed co
mm
unica
tions
. Inc
lude
s sp
ecifi
c str
ateg
ies a
nd a
ctio
ns ta
ken
to a
ddre
ss co
ncer
ns a
nd se
rve
need
s of A
cces
s and
Fu
nctio
nal N
eeds
pop
ulat
ions
and
Lim
ited
Engl
ish P
rofic
ienc
y po
pula
tions
in p
artic
ular
.
R.1
8-10
-007
ALJ
/SR
T/ilz
82 / 90
82
Coop
erat
ion
and
best
pra
ctice
shar
ing
with
age
ncie
s out
side
CA
Stra
tegy
and
act
ions
take
n to
eng
age
with
age
ncie
s out
side
of C
alifo
rnia
to e
xcha
nge
best
pra
ctice
s bot
h fo
r util
ity w
ildfir
e m
itiga
tion
and
for s
take
hold
er co
oper
atio
n to
m
itiga
te a
nd re
spon
d to
wild
fires
. Co
oper
atio
n w
ith su
ppre
ssio
n ag
encie
s Co
ordi
natio
n w
ith C
AL F
IRE,
fede
ral f
ire a
utho
ritie
s, co
unty
fire
aut
horit
ies,
and
loca
l fir
e au
thor
ities
to su
ppor
t pla
nnin
g an
d op
erat
ions
, inc
ludi
ng su
ppor
t of a
eria
l and
gr
ound
fire
fight
ing
in re
al-ti
me,
inclu
ding
info
rmat
ion-
shar
ing,
disp
atch
of r
esou
rces
, an
d de
dica
ted
staf
f. Fo
rest
serv
ice
and
fuel
redu
ctio
n co
oper
atio
n an
d jo
int r
oadm
ap
Stra
tegy
and
act
ions
take
n to
eng
age
with
loca
l, st
ate,
and
fede
ral e
ntiti
es re
spon
sible
fo
r or p
artic
ipat
ing
in fo
rest
man
agem
ent a
nd fu
el re
duct
ion
activ
ities
; and
des
ign
utili
ty co
oper
atio
n st
rate
gy a
nd jo
int s
take
hold
er ro
adm
ap (p
lan
for c
oord
inat
ing
stak
ehol
der e
ffort
s for
fore
st m
anag
emen
t and
fuel
redu
ctio
n ac
tiviti
es).
5.4
Met
hodo
logy
for e
nter
prise
-wid
e sa
fety
risk
and
wild
fire-
rela
ted
risk
asse
ssm
ent
Desc
ribe
met
hodo
logy
for i
dent
ifyin
g an
d ev
alua
ting
ente
rpris
e w
ide
safe
ty ri
sk a
nd w
ildfir
e re
late
d ris
k, a
nd h
ow th
at m
etho
dolo
gy is
co
nsist
ent w
ith th
e m
etho
dolo
gy u
sed
by o
ther
ele
ctric
util
ities
or e
lect
rical
corp
orat
ions
. If t
he ri
sk id
entif
icatio
n an
d ev
alua
tion
met
hodo
logy
is
diffe
rent
, the
util
ity sh
all e
xpla
in w
hy in
this
sect
ion.
5.5
Plan
ning
for w
orkf
orce
and
oth
er li
mite
d re
sour
ces
Inclu
de a
show
ing
that
the
utili
ty h
as a
n ad
equa
tely
size
d an
d tr
aine
d w
orkf
orce
to p
rom
ptly
rest
ore
serv
ice a
fter a
maj
or e
vent
, tak
ing
into
ac
coun
t em
ploy
ees o
f oth
er u
tiliti
es p
ursu
ant t
o m
utua
l aid
agr
eem
ents
and
em
ploy
ees o
f ent
ities
that
hav
e en
tere
d in
to co
ntra
cts w
ith th
e ut
ility
.
R.1
8-10
-007
ALJ
/SR
T/ilz
83 / 90
83
5.6
Expe
cted
out
com
es o
f 3-y
ear p
lan
5.6.
1Pl
anne
d ut
ility
infr
astr
uctu
re co
nstr
uctio
n an
d up
grad
es
Expl
ain
how
the
utili
ty e
xpec
ts th
e ge
ogra
phic
loca
tion
of tr
ansm
issio
n an
d di
strib
utio
n lin
es to
shift
ove
r the
thre
e-ye
ar p
lan
perio
d an
d di
scus
s its
impa
ct o
n 1)
the
utili
ty’s
risk
expo
sure
and
2) t
he u
tility
’s w
ildfir
e m
itiga
tion
stra
tegy
. Out
line
port
ions
of g
rid w
ithin
HFT
D th
at a
re h
ighe
st
cost
to se
rve,
by
high
light
ing
circu
its o
r por
tions
of c
ircui
ts th
at e
xcee
d $0
.5M
per
cust
omer
in ca
pita
l cos
t req
uire
d to
har
den.
Pro
vide
ju
stifi
catio
n fo
r the
leve
l of h
arde
ning
requ
ired
and
why
the
low
est c
ost p
ath
to h
arde
n th
is eq
uipm
ent e
xcee
ds $
0.5M
per
cust
omer
, inc
ludi
ng
by d
escr
ibin
g th
e va
rious
alte
rnat
ives
that
wer
e co
nsid
ered
to re
duce
igni
tion
prob
abili
ty a
nd e
stim
ated
wild
fire
cons
eque
nce.
For
eac
h of
thes
e se
ctio
ns o
f the
grid
, out
line
any
anal
ysis
that
was
cond
ucte
d ar
ound
isla
ndin
g, se
rvin
g w
ith m
icrog
rids,
or p
rovi
ding
bac
kup
gene
ratio
n, a
ll to
re
duce
the
impa
ct o
f PSP
S ev
ents
and
redu
ce ig
nitio
n pr
obab
ility
and
est
imat
ed w
ildfir
e co
nseq
uenc
e at
the
low
est p
ossib
le co
st.
Disc
uss h
ow th
e ut
ility
wild
fire
miti
gatio
n st
rate
gy in
fluen
ced
its p
lan
for i
nfra
stru
ctur
e co
nstr
uctio
n (in
term
s of a
dditi
ons o
r rem
oval
of
over
head
line
s, in
cludi
ng u
nder
grou
ndin
g of
ove
rhea
d lin
es) a
s det
aile
d in
Sec
tion
3.4.
2. D
iscus
s how
the
utili
ty w
ildfir
e m
itiga
tion
stra
tegy
in
fluen
ced
its p
lan
for u
pgra
des t
o ov
erhe
ad li
nes a
nd su
bsta
tions
as d
etai
led
in th
e Se
ctio
n 3.
4.2.
Inst
ruct
ions
for T
able
31:
Assu
me
wea
ther
pat
tern
s for
eac
h ye
ar a
re a
s con
siste
nt w
ith th
e 5-
year
hist
orica
l ave
rage
and
that
wild
fire
miti
gatio
n in
itiat
ives
are
im
plem
ente
d ac
cord
ing
to p
lan.
Rep
ort c
hang
e in
driv
ers o
f ign
ition
pro
babi
lity
base
d on
WM
P im
plem
enta
tion
acco
rdin
g to
whe
ther
or n
ot
near
miss
es o
f tha
t typ
e ar
e tr
acke
d, th
e nu
mbe
r of i
ncid
ents
ant
icipa
ted
per y
ear (
e.g.
, all
inst
ance
s of a
nim
al co
ntac
t reg
ardl
ess o
f whe
ther
th
ey ca
used
an
outa
ge, a
n ig
nitio
n, o
r nei
ther
), th
e ra
te a
t whi
ch th
ose
incid
ents
(e.g
., ob
ject
cont
act,
equi
pmen
t fai
lure
, etc
.) ar
e an
ticip
ated
to
caus
e an
igni
tion
in th
e co
lum
n, a
nd th
e nu
mbe
r of i
gniti
ons t
hat t
hose
incid
ents
are
ant
icipa
ted
to ca
use
by ca
tego
ry. L
ist a
dditi
onal
risk
driv
ers
trac
ked
in th
e “o
ther
” row
and
add
ition
al ro
ws a
s nee
ded.
Tabl
e 31
: Cha
nge
in d
river
s of i
gniti
on p
roba
bilit
y ta
king
into
acc
ount
pla
nned
initi
ativ
es, f
or e
ach
year
of p
lan
Inci
dent
type
by
igni
tion
prob
abili
ty d
river
De
taile
d ris
k dr
iver
Ar
e ne
ar m
isses
tr
acke
d?
Num
ber o
f in
cide
nts
per
yea
r
Aver
age
perc
enta
ge li
kelih
ood
of
igni
tion
per i
ncid
ent
Num
ber o
f ig
nitio
ns
per
yea
r 20
20 2
021
2022
20
20
2021
20
22
2020
202
1 20
22
Cont
act f
rom
obj
ect
All t
ypes
of o
bjec
t con
tact
An
imal
cont
act
Ballo
on co
ntac
t
Ve
geta
tion
cont
act
Vehi
cle c
onta
ct
R.1
8-10
-007
ALJ
/SR
T/ilz
84 / 90
84
All t
ypes
of e
quip
men
t /
facil
ity fa
ilure
Al
l typ
es
Capa
citor
ban
k fa
ilure
Co
nduc
tor f
ailu
re—
all
Cond
ucto
r fai
lure
—w
ires
dow
n
Fuse
failu
re—
all
Fuse
failu
re—
conv
entio
nal
blow
n fu
se
Light
ning
arr
esto
r fai
lure
Sw
itch
failu
re
Tran
sfor
mer
failu
re
Wire
-to-w
ire co
ntac
t / co
ntam
inat
ion
Oth
er
5.6.
2Pr
otoc
ols o
n Pu
blic
Saf
ety
Pow
er S
hut-
off
Desc
ribe
prot
ocol
s on
Publ
ic Sa
fety
Pow
er S
hut-o
ff (P
SPS
or d
e-en
ergi
zatio
n), t
o in
clude
: 1.
Stra
tegy
to m
inim
ize p
ublic
safe
ty ri
sk d
urin
g hi
gh w
ildfir
e ris
k co
nditi
ons a
nd d
etai
ls of
the
cons
ider
atio
ns, i
nclu
ding
but
not
lim
ited
to li
st
and
desc
riptio
n of
com
mun
ity a
ssist
ance
loca
tions
and
serv
ices p
rovi
ded
durin
g a
de-e
nerg
izatio
n ev
ent.
2.O
utlin
e of
tact
ical a
nd st
rate
gic d
ecisi
on-m
akin
g pr
otoc
ol fo
r ini
tiatin
g a
PSPS
/de-
ener
giza
tion
(e.g
., de
cisio
n tr
ee).
3.
Stra
tegy
to p
rovi
de fo
r saf
e an
d ef
fect
ive
re-e
nerg
izatio
n of
any
are
a th
at w
as d
e-en
ergi
zed
due
to P
SPS
prot
ocol
. 4.
Com
pany
stan
dard
s rel
ativ
e to
cust
omer
com
mun
icatio
ns, i
nclu
ding
cons
ider
atio
n fo
r the
nee
d to
not
ify p
riorit
y es
sent
ial s
ervi
ces –
cr
itica
l firs
t res
pond
ers,
publ
ic sa
fety
par
tner
s, cr
itica
l fac
ilitie
s and
infra
stru
ctur
e, o
pera
tors
of t
elec
omm
unica
tions
infra
stru
ctur
e, a
nd
wat
er u
tiliti
es/a
genc
ies.
This
sect
ion,
or a
n ap
pend
ix to
this
sect
ion,
shal
l inc
lude
a co
mpl
ete
listin
g of
whi
ch e
ntiti
es th
e el
ectr
ical
corp
orat
ion
cons
ider
s to
be p
riorit
y es
sent
ial s
ervi
ces.
This
sect
ion
shal
l also
inclu
de d
escr
iptio
n of
stra
tegy
and
pro
toco
ls to
ens
ure
timel
y no
tifica
tions
to cu
stom
ers,
inclu
ding
acc
ess a
nd fu
nctio
nal n
eeds
pop
ulat
ions
, in
the
lang
uage
s pre
vale
nt w
ithin
the
utili
ty’s
serv
ice
terr
itory
. 5.
Prot
ocol
s for
miti
gatin
g th
e pu
blic
safe
ty im
pact
s of t
hese
pro
toco
ls, in
cludi
ng im
pact
s on
first
resp
onde
rs, h
ealth
care
facil
ities
, ope
rato
rs
of te
leco
mm
unica
tions
infra
stru
ctur
e, a
nd w
ater
util
ities
/age
ncie
s.
R.1
8-10
-007
ALJ
/SR
T/ilz
85 / 90
85 Ut
ility
GIS
att
achm
ents
6.1
Rece
nt w
eath
er p
atte
rns
6.2
Rece
nt d
river
s of i
gniti
on p
roba
bilit
y
6.3
Rece
nt u
se o
f PSP
S
6.4
Curr
ent b
asel
ine
stat
e of
serv
ice te
rrito
ry a
nd u
tility
equ
ipm
ent
6.5
Loca
tion
of p
lann
ed u
tility
equ
ipm
ent a
dditi
ons o
r rem
oval
6.6
Plan
ned
2020
WM
P in
itiat
ive
activ
ity b
y en
d-20
22
R.1
8-10
-007
ALJ
/SR
T/ilz
86 / 90
86
III. C
ross
refe
renc
e §8
386(
c) to
202
0 W
MP
Guid
elin
es
Sum
mar
y Th
e W
ildfir
e M
itiga
tion
Plan
(WM
P) G
uide
lines
out
line
the
data
and
nar
rativ
e th
at u
tiliti
es a
re e
xpec
ted
to in
clude
in th
eir W
MPs
for t
he 2
020
WM
P pr
oces
s. Th
is bu
ilds u
pon
the
tem
plat
e us
ed in
the
2019
WM
P pr
oces
s and
inco
rpor
ates
less
ons l
earn
ed.
Chan
ges r
elat
ive
to 2
019
guid
elin
es
The
2020
WM
P Gu
idel
ines
seek
to b
uild
upo
n th
e 20
19 W
MP
tem
plat
e by
add
ing
requ
irem
ents
to re
port
add
ition
al in
form
atio
n on
util
ity
wild
fire
risk
expo
sure
and
wild
fire
miti
gatio
n ou
tcom
es p
erfo
rman
ce a
nd b
y in
corp
orat
ing
tem
plat
es in
to th
e gu
idel
ines
whe
re p
ossib
le to
st
anda
rdize
repo
rtin
g of
dat
a an
d ot
her i
nfor
mat
ion.
Th
e go
al o
f the
202
0 W
MP
Guid
elin
es is
to co
llect
det
aile
d in
form
atio
n ab
out:
1.Ut
ilitie
s’ w
ildfir
e m
itiga
tion
perfo
rman
ce a
ccor
ding
to m
etric
s and
und
erly
ing
data
, 2.
Utili
ties’
base
line
igni
tion
prob
abili
ty a
nd w
ildfir
e ris
k ex
posu
re,
3.In
puts
to u
tiliti
es’ p
lans
, inc
ludi
ng cu
rren
t and
dire
ctio
nal v
ision
for w
ildfir
e ris
k ex
posu
re,
4.W
ildfir
e m
itiga
tion
activ
ity fo
r eac
h ye
ar o
f the
3-y
ear W
MP
term
, inc
ludi
ng e
xpec
ted
outc
omes
of t
he 3
-yea
r pla
n.
The
annu
al u
pdat
es ca
n th
en fo
cus o
n an
y ad
just
men
ts to
(1) a
nd (2
) and
repo
rtin
g on
act
ual o
utco
mes
for (
3).
See
Tabl
e 1
belo
w fo
r a m
appi
ng o
f the
requ
ired
WM
P se
ctio
ns fr
om C
alifo
rnia
Pub
lic U
tiliti
es C
ode
§838
6(c)
to th
e 20
19 W
MPs
and
the
2020
W
MP
Guid
elin
es.
Tabl
e 1:
Map
ping
of W
MP
requ
irem
ents
to 2
020
Guid
elin
es
Code
Ref
eren
ce §
8386
(c)
2019
WM
P se
ctio
n Se
ctio
n of
202
0 W
MP
Guid
elin
es
(1) A
n ac
coun
ting
of th
e re
spon
sibili
ties o
f per
sons
resp
onsib
le fo
r ex
ecut
ing
the
plan
. VI
. Per
form
ance
Met
rics a
nd M
onito
ring
A. A
ccou
ntin
g of
resp
onsib
ilitie
s 1
Pers
ons r
espo
nsib
le fo
r exe
cutin
g th
e W
MP
(2) T
he o
bjec
tives
of t
he p
lan.
I.
Obj
ectiv
es co
nsist
ent w
ith §
8386
(a)
A. C
ateg
orize
d by
follo
win
g tim
efra
mes
: A.
Bef
ore
upco
min
g w
ildfir
e se
ason
B.
Bef
ore
next
Pla
n fil
ing
C. W
ithin
nex
t 5 y
ears
4.1
The
obje
ctiv
es o
f the
pla
n
(3) A
des
crip
tion
of th
e pr
even
tive
stra
tegi
es a
nd p
rogr
ams t
o be
ad
opte
d by
the
elec
trica
l cor
pora
tion
to m
inim
ize th
e ris
k of
its
II. D
escr
iptio
n of
pre
vent
ive
stra
tegi
es a
nd
prog
ram
s B.
Cat
egor
ized
by fo
llow
ing
timef
ram
es:
5.1
Wild
fire
miti
gatio
n st
rate
gy
R.1
8-10
-007
ALJ
/SR
T/ilz
87 / 90
87
elec
tric
al li
nes a
nd e
quip
men
t cau
sing
cata
stro
phic
wild
fires
, in
cludi
ng co
nsid
erat
ion
of d
ynam
ic cli
mat
e ch
ange
risk
s.
A. B
efor
e up
com
ing
wild
fire
seas
on
B. B
efor
e ne
xt P
lan
filin
g C.
With
in n
ext 5
yea
rs
(4) A
des
crip
tion
of th
e m
etric
s the
ele
ctric
al co
rpor
atio
n pl
ans t
o us
e to
eva
luat
e th
e pl
an’s
perf
orm
ance
and
the
assu
mpt
ions
that
un
derli
e th
e us
e of
thos
e m
etric
s.
(Sec
tion
VI)
B. D
escr
iptio
n of
met
rics a
nd a
ssum
ptio
ns
2.4
Desc
riptio
n of
met
rics
(5) A
disc
ussio
n of
how
the
appl
icatio
n of
pre
viou
sly id
entif
ied
met
rics t
o pr
evio
us p
lan
perfo
rman
ces h
as in
form
ed th
e pl
an.
(Sec
tion
VI)
C. D
iscus
sion
on h
ow p
revi
ous m
etric
s pe
rform
ance
has
info
rmed
curr
ent p
lan
2.1
Less
ons l
earn
ed: h
ow tr
acki
ng
met
rics o
n th
e 20
19 p
lan
has
info
rmed
the
2020
pla
n (6
) Pro
toco
ls fo
r disa
blin
g re
clos
ers a
nd d
e-en
ergi
zing
port
ions
of t
he
elec
tric
al d
istrib
utio
n sy
stem
that
cons
ider
the
asso
ciate
d im
pact
s on
publ
ic sa
fety
, as w
ell a
s pro
toco
ls re
late
d to
miti
gatin
g th
e pu
blic
safe
ty im
pact
s of t
hose
pro
toco
ls, in
cludi
ng im
pact
s on
criti
cal f
irst
resp
onde
rs a
nd o
n he
alth
and
com
mun
icatio
n in
frast
ruct
ure.
IV. W
ildfir
e Pr
even
tion
Stra
tegi
es a
nd
Prog
ram
s D.
Ope
ratio
nal p
ract
ices
5.3.
6 Gr
id o
pera
tions
and
pro
toco
ls
5.3.
9 Em
erge
ncy
plan
ning
and
pr
epar
edne
ss
5.3.
10 S
take
hold
er co
oper
atio
n an
d co
mm
unity
eng
agem
ent
(7) A
ppro
pria
te a
nd fe
asib
le p
roce
dure
s for
not
ifyin
g a
cust
omer
w
ho m
ay b
e im
pact
ed b
y th
e de
-ene
rgizi
ng o
f ele
ctric
al li
nes.
The
proc
edur
es sh
all c
onsid
er th
e ne
ed to
not
ify, a
s a p
riorit
y, cr
itica
l fir
st re
spon
ders
, hea
lth ca
re fa
ciliti
es, a
nd o
pera
tors
of
tele
com
mun
icatio
ns in
frast
ruct
ure.
(Sec
tion
IV)
I. De
ener
giza
tion
prot
ocol
5.
6.2
Prot
ocol
s on
Publ
ic Sa
fety
Po
wer
Shu
t -off
5.
3.6
Grid
ope
ratio
ns a
nd p
roto
cols
5 .
3.9
Emer
genc
y pl
anni
ng a
nd
prep
ared
ness
5.
3.10
Sta
keho
lder
coop
erat
ion
and
com
mun
ity e
ngag
emen
t (8
) Pla
ns fo
r veg
etat
ion
man
agem
ent.
(S
ectio
n IV
) G.
Veg
etat
ion
man
agem
ent p
lan
5.3.
5 Ve
geta
tion
man
agem
ent a
nd
insp
ectio
ns
(9) P
lans
for i
nspe
ctio
ns o
f the
ele
ctric
al co
rpor
atio
n’s e
lect
rical
in
frast
ruct
ure.
(S
ectio
n IV
) E.
Insp
ectio
n an
d m
aint
enan
ce p
lans
5.
3.4
Asse
t man
agem
ent a
nd
insp
ectio
ns
(10)
A li
st th
at id
entif
ies,
desc
ribes
, and
prio
ritize
s all
wild
fire
risks
, an
d dr
iver
s for
thos
e ris
ks, t
hrou
ghou
t the
ele
ctric
al co
rpor
atio
n’s
serv
ice
terr
itory
, inc
ludi
ng a
ll re
leva
nt w
ildfir
e ris
k an
d ris
k m
itiga
tion
info
rmat
ion
that
is p
art o
f Saf
ety
Mod
el A
sses
smen
t Pr
ocee
ding
and
Risk
Ass
essm
ent M
itiga
tion
Phas
e fil
ings
. The
list
sh
all i
nclu
de, b
ut n
ot b
e lim
ited
to, b
oth
of th
e fo
llow
ing:
(A
) Risk
s and
risk
driv
ers a
ssoc
iate
d w
ith d
esig
n, co
nstr
uctio
n,
oper
atio
ns, a
nd m
aint
enan
ce o
f the
ele
ctric
al co
rpor
atio
n’s
equi
pmen
t and
facil
ities
. (B
) Par
ticul
ar ri
sks a
nd ri
sk d
river
s ass
ocia
ted
with
topo
grap
hic a
nd
clim
atol
ogic
al ri
sk fa
ctor
s thr
ough
out t
he d
iffer
ent p
arts
of t
he
elec
tric
al co
rpor
atio
n’s s
ervi
ce te
rrito
ry.
(Sec
tion
III)
B. W
ildfir
e ris
ks a
nd d
river
s list
C.
List
ed in
the
follo
win
g ca
tego
ries:
1.
Des
ign
and
Cons
truc
tion
2. In
spec
tion
and
Mai
nten
ance
3.
Ope
ratio
nal P
ract
ices
4. S
ituat
iona
l/Con
ditio
nal A
war
enes
s 5.
Res
pons
e an
d Re
cove
ry
4.4
Dire
ctio
nal v
ision
for f
utur
e ig
nitio
n pr
obab
ility
driv
ers
R.1
8-10
-007
ALJ
/SR
T/ilz
88 / 90
88
(11)
A d
escr
iptio
n of
how
the
plan
acc
ount
s for
the
wild
fire
risk
iden
tifie
d in
the
elec
trica
l cor
pora
tion’
s Risk
Ass
essm
ent M
itiga
tion
Phas
e fil
ing.
(Sec
tion
III)
C. D
escr
iptio
n of
how
pla
n ac
coun
ts fo
r w
ildfir
e ris
k id
entif
ied
in R
AMP
5.3
Deta
iled
wild
fire
miti
gatio
n pr
ogra
ms
(12)
A d
escr
iptio
n of
the
actio
ns th
e el
ectr
ical c
orpo
ratio
n w
ill ta
ke
to e
nsur
e its
syst
em w
ill a
chie
ve th
e hi
ghes
t lev
el o
f saf
ety,
re
liabi
lity,
and
resil
ienc
y, a
nd to
ens
ure
that
its s
yste
m is
pre
pare
d fo
r a m
ajor
eve
nt, i
nclu
ding
har
deni
ng a
nd m
oder
nizin
g its
in
frast
ruct
ure
with
impr
oved
eng
inee
ring,
syst
em d
esig
n, st
anda
rds,
equi
pmen
t, an
d fa
ciliti
es, s
uch
as u
nder
grou
ndin
g, in
sula
tion
of
dist
ribut
ion
wire
s, an
d po
le re
plac
emen
t.
IV. W
ildfir
e Pr
even
tion
Stra
tegi
es a
nd
Prog
ram
s D.
Ope
ratio
nal p
ract
ices
E. In
spec
tion
and
mai
nten
ance
pla
ns
F. S
yste
m h
arde
ning
to a
chie
ve h
ighe
st
leve
l of s
afet
y, re
liabi
lity,
and
resil
ienc
y G.
Veg
etat
ion
man
agem
ent p
lan
H. S
ituat
iona
l aw
aren
ess p
roto
cols
and
dete
rmin
atio
n of
loca
l con
ditio
ns
I. De
ener
giza
tion
prot
ocol
J.
Alte
rnat
ive
tech
nolo
gies
K.
Pos
tin
ciden
t rec
over
y, re
stor
atio
n, a
nd
rem
edia
tion
activ
ities
5.3.
3 Gr
id d
esig
n an
d sy
stem
ha
rden
ing
(13)
A sh
owin
g th
at th
e ut
ility
has
an
adeq
uate
size
d an
d tr
aine
d w
orkf
orce
to p
rom
ptly
rest
ore
serv
ice
afte
r a m
ajor
eve
nt, t
akin
g in
to a
ccou
nt e
mpl
oyee
s of o
ther
util
ities
pu r
suan
t to
mut
ual a
id
agre
emen
ts a
nd e
mpl
oyee
s of e
ntiti
es th
at h
ave
ente
red
into
co
ntra
cts w
ith th
e ut
ility
.
(Sec
tion
V)
3. W
orkf
orce
ade
quac
y sh
owin
g 5.
5 Pl
anni
ng fo
r wor
kfor
ce a
nd o
ther
lim
ited
reso
urce
s
(14)
Iden
tific
atio
n of
any
geo
grap
hic a
rea
in th
e el
ectr
ical
corp
orat
ion’
s ser
vice
terr
itory
that
is a
hig
her w
ildfir
e th
reat
than
is
curr
ently
iden
tifie
d in
a C
PUC
fire
thre
at m
ap, a
nd w
here
the
CPUC
m
ay co
nsid
er e
xpan
ding
the
high
fire
thre
at d
istric
t bas
ed o
n ne
w
info
rmat
ion
or ch
ange
s in
the
envi
ronm
ent.
(Sec
tion
III)
D. S
ervi
ce te
rrito
ry fi
reth
reat
eva
luat
ion
4.2.
1 Se
rvic
e te
rrito
ry fi
reth
reat
ev
alua
tion
(15)
A m
etho
dolo
gy fo
r ide
ntify
ing
and
pres
entin
g en
terp
rise-
wid
e sa
fety
risk
and
wild
fire-
rela
ted
risk
that
is co
nsist
ent w
ith th
e m
etho
dolo
gy u
sed
by o
ther
ele
ctric
al co
rpor
atio
ns u
nles
s the
Co
mm
issio
n de
term
ines
oth
erw
ise.
III. R
isk A
naly
sis a
nd R
isk D
river
s A.
Saf
ety
and
wild
fire
risk
iden
tific
atio
n an
d as
sess
men
t met
hodo
logy
5.4
Met
hodo
logy
for e
nter
prise
-wid
e sa
fety
risk
and
wild
fire-
rela
ted
risk
(16)
A d
escr
iptio
n of
how
the
plan
is co
nsist
ent w
ith th
e el
ectr
ical
corp
orat
ion’
s disa
ster
and
em
erge
ncy
prep
ared
ness
pla
n pr
epar
ed
purs
uant
to S
ectio
n 76
8.6,
incl
udin
g bo
th o
f the
follo
win
g:
(A) P
lans
to p
repa
re fo
r, an
d to
rest
ore
serv
ice
afte
r, a
wild
fire,
in
cludi
ng w
orkf
orce
mob
iliza
tion
and
prep
ositi
onin
g eq
uipm
ent a
nd
empl
oyee
s.
(B) P
lans
for c
omm
unity
out
reac
h an
d pu
blic
awar
enes
s bef
ore,
du
ring,
and
afte
r a w
ildfir
e, in
cludi
ng la
ngua
ge n
otifi
catio
n in
Eng
lish,
V. E
mer
genc
y Pr
epar
edne
ss a
nd R
espo
nse
A. G
ener
al d
escr
iptio
n of
ove
rall
plan
B.
Des
crip
tion
of co
nsist
ency
with
em
erge
ncy
prep
ared
ness
and
resp
onse
pl
an
1. S
ervi
ce re
stor
atio
n pl
an
2. E
mer
genc
y co
mm
unica
tions
5.3.
9 Em
erge
ncy
plan
ning
and
pr
epar
edne
ss
R.1
8-10
-007
ALJ
/SR
T/ilz
89 / 90
Span
ish, a
nd th
e to
p th
ree
prim
ary
lang
uage
s use
d in
the
stat
e ot
her
than
Eng
lish
or S
pani
sh, a
s det
erm
ined
by
the
Com
miss
ion
base
d on
th
e Un
ited
Stat
es C
ensu
s dat
a.
(17)
A st
atem
ent o
f how
the
elec
trica
l cor
pora
tion
will
rest
ore
serv
ice
afte
r a w
ildfir
e.
(Sec
tion
V)
1. S
ervi
ce re
stor
atio
n pl
an
5.3.
9 Em
erge
ncy
plan
ning
and
pr
epar
edne
ss
(18)
Pro
toco
ls fo
r com
plia
nce
with
requ
irem
ents
ado
pted
by
the
C om
miss
ion
rega
rdin
g ac
tiviti
es to
supp
ort c
usto
mer
s dur
ing
and
afte
r a w
ildfir
e, o
utag
e re
port
ing,
supp
ort f
or lo
w-in
com
e cu
stom
ers,
billi
ng a
djus
tmen
ts, d
epos
it w
aive
rs, e
xten
ded
paym
ent p
lans
, su
spen
sion
of d
iscon
nect
ion
and
nonp
aym
ent f
ees,
repa
ir pr
oces
sing
and
timin
g, a
cces
s to
utili
ty re
pres
enta
tives
, and
em
erge
ncy
com
mun
icatio
ns.
(Sec
tion
V)
C. C
usto
mer
supp
ort i
n em
erge
ncie
s 1.
1.1.
Pro
toco
ls fo
r com
plia
nce
with
CPU
C re
quire
men
ts
5.3.
9 Em
erge
ncy
plan
ning
and
pr
epar
edne
ss
(19)
A d
escr
iptio
n of
the
proc
esse
s and
pro
cedu
res t
he e
lect
rical
co
rpor
atio
n w
ill u
se to
do
all o
f the
follo
win
g:
(A) M
onito
r and
aud
it th
e im
plem
enta
tion
of th
e pl
an.
(B) I
dent
ify a
ny d
efici
encie
s in
the
plan
or t
he p
lan’
s im
plem
enta
tion
and
corr
ect t
hose
def
icie
ncie
s.
(C) M
onito
r and
aud
it th
e ef
fect
iven
ess o
f ele
ctric
al li
ne a
nd
equi
pmen
t ins
pect
ions
, inc
ludi
ng in
spec
tions
per
form
ed b
y co
ntra
ctor
s, ca
rrie
d ou
t und
er th
e pl
an a
nd o
ther
app
licab
le st
atut
es
and
Com
miss
ion
rule
s.
(Sec
tion
VI)
D. P
roce
sses
and
pro
cedu
res f
or:
1. P
lan
mon
itorin
g an
d au
ditin
g 2.
Iden
tifyi
ng a
nd co
rrec
ting
Plan
de
ficie
ncie
s 3.
Mon
itorin
g an
d au
ditin
g ef
fect
iven
ess o
f eq
uipm
ent a
nd li
n e in
spec
tions
5.2
Wild
fire
Miti
gatio
n Pl
an
impl
emen
tatio
n
(20)
Any
oth
er in
form
atio
n th
at th
e Co
mm
issio
n m
ay re
quire
. VI
I. An
y ot
her i
nfor
mat
ion
the
CPUC
may
re
quire
A.
Cos
t inf
orm
atio
n
5.3
Deta
iled
wild
fire
miti
gatio
n pr
ogra
ms
R.1
8-10
-007
ALJ
/SR
T/ilz
(EN
D O
F AT
TAC
HM
ENT
1)
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
90 / 90