astrochimistry – spring 2013
TRANSCRIPT
Astrochimistry – Spring 2013 Astrochimistry – Spring 2013 Lecture 5:Lecture 5:
Gas-grain interaction Gas-grain interaction in the interstellar mediumin the interstellar medium
Julien Montillaud15th February 2013
2
OutlineOutlineI. The major role of gas-grain interactions in ISM evolution (5 p.)
I.1 Thermal balanceI.2 Catalyzed formation of moleculesI.3 From gas phase to solid state: formation of dust grains
II. Formation and destruction of icy mantles (8 p.)II.1 Observational evidenceII.2 ProcessesII.3 What can we learn from interplanetary grains ?
III. Reactivity on/in icy mantles (13 p.)III.1 Formation of glycine on water ice surfaceIII.2 Selective deuteration of water and organic molecules
IV. Summary
3
I. The major role of gas-grain interaction in ISM evolutionI. The major role of gas-grain interaction in ISM evolutionI.1 I.1 Thermal balanceThermal balance
Photoelectric effect
e-
Gas atom or molecule
- ejection of a photo-electron with high kinetic energy (a few eV) from dust particles- collisions between the hot electron and gas particles => gas heating
4
I. The major role of gas-grain interaction in ISM evolutionI. The major role of gas-grain interaction in ISM evolutionI.1 I.1 Thermal balanceThermal balance
Contribution of H2 formation to gas heating
Grain
H
Passive gas heating by depletion of the coolest H-atoms (sticking is more efficient for lower velocity atoms; negligible)
H
Grain
H2
Active heating by collisions between newly formed H
2 molecules and gas
particles(can be important)
H2
UV
H
H
Active heating by collisions between newly photodissociated H-atoms and gas particles(can be significant)
All the steps of the formation/destructioncycle of H2 contribute to gas heating=> H2 can contribute to heating even in regions where H is mainly atomic
5
I. The major role of gas-grain interaction in ISM evolutionI. The major role of gas-grain interaction in ISM evolutionI.1 I.1 Thermal balanceThermal balance
- Photoelectric effect (“Cho.Ph.Gr”)- Contribution of H2 formation to gas heating (“Cho.H2.Gr”)
PDR model for NGC 7023
6
I. The major role of gas-grain interaction in ISM evolutionI. The major role of gas-grain interaction in ISM evolutionI.2 I.2 Catalyzed formation of moleculesCatalyzed formation of molecules
(H20, H2CO, CH3OH,...)
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5)
(1) (2) (3)
Formation of H2 (See Lecture on H2 formation)
And of many other molecules
Consequences on grain emissivity, cooling efficiency, charge balance, … => determinant for star formation
7
I. The major role of gas-grain interaction in ISM evolutionI. The major role of gas-grain interaction in ISM evolutionI.3 I.3 From gas-phase to solide state: formation of dust grainsFrom gas-phase to solide state: formation of dust grains
Cherchneff 2011
Cherchneff 2006
Höfner 2009
Atoms → molecules → grains
Main issue: nucleation
In the atmosphere and circumstellar shell of old starsAGB: Asymptotic giant branch = old low mass star
8
II. Formation and destruction of icy mantlesII. Formation and destruction of icy mantles
I. The major role of gas-grain interaction in the ISM evolution
II. Formation and destruction of icy mantlesII.1 Observational evidenceII.2 ProcessesII.3 What can we learn from interplanetary dust grains ?
III. Reactivity on/in icy mantles
IV. Summary
9
II. II. Formation and destruction of icy mantlesFormation and destruction of icy mantlesII.1 Observational evidenceII.1 Observational evidence
Depletion of molecules in dense cores
Most molecules stick on grain when T is low and n
H is high
Tafalla et al. 2004 – 2006
10
II. II. Formation and destruction of icy mantlesFormation and destruction of icy mantlesII.1 Observational evidenceII.1 Observational evidence
Mid-IR solid H2O absorption band H
2O(ice): absorption band @ ~3µm
Silicates: absorption band @ ~9µm
AV=23.9 mag
AV=20.7 mag
AV=17.5 mag
AV=12.2 mag
AV=11.1 mag
AV=10.1 mag
Threshold for waterice formation ~3 mag
How does water ice Form ?→ sticking of H
20
molecules ?→ formation from O orOH directly on the grainsurface ?
Chiar et al. 2010
11
II. II. Formation and destruction of icy mantlesFormation and destruction of icy mantlesII.2 ProcessesII.2 Processes
Formation in gas-phase + sticking on dust grains
Branching ratio ? → 0.33 ? (Vejby-Christensen et al. 1997)→ 0.05 ? (Williams et al. 1996)
Starting with cosmic ray ionization: (efficient at very low temperature ~10 K)
If shock waves are frequent:
(endothermal with activation energiesof 3160 K and 1660 K, respectively)
Sticking: → physisorption + hopping → chemisorption
(cf. Lecture on H2 formation)
12
II. II. Formation and destruction of icy mantlesFormation and destruction of icy mantlesII.2 ProcessesII.2 Processes
Formation of H20 on grain surface → still unclear !
Many processes proposed and probably coexist
Kouchi et al. 2009
13
II. II. Formation and destruction of icy mantlesFormation and destruction of icy mantlesII.2 ProcessesII.2 Processes
Formation of H20 on grain surface
Kouchi et al. 2009
H-atom irradiation of O2 ice
H2O
2 and H
2O followed by IR spectro.
Measurement of formation rates
14
II. II. Formation and destruction of icy mantlesFormation and destruction of icy mantlesII.2 ProcessesII.2 Processes
Photodesorption of H2O from grain surface
(here, from molecular dynamics simulations)
Andersson and van Dishoeck 2008
Total H20-loss from ice = 1 molecule for 2-3%
of absorbed UV-photons
15
II. II. Formation and destruction of icy mantlesFormation and destruction of icy mantlesII.2 ProcessesII.2 Processes
Thermodesorption of H2O from grain surface
(here, from TPD experiment)TPD = temperature programmed desorption
Temperature [K]
3 categories of molecules:CO-like molecules (CO, N2, O2, CH4)→ volatile species→ desorption at low temperature→ double peak (mono/multilayers, or diffusion in H20
porous structure)
H20-like molecules (H20, NH3, CH3OH, HCOOH)→ strong binding / high temperature desorption→ single peak (multilayer desorption, diffusion impossible)
Intermediate species (H2S, OCS, CO2, C2H2, SO2, CS2 & CH3CN)→ volcano desorption when mixed with water => trappedin water and desorption with water
Collings et al. 2004
Pure With H2O
16
II. II. Formation and destruction of icy mantlesFormation and destruction of icy mantlesII.3 What can we learn from interplanetary dust grains ?II.3 What can we learn from interplanetary dust grains ?
Flynn et al. 2010
Interplanetarydust grain (~10µm)
Organic carbonaceous coating (~100nm thick):→ C=C functional groups “most likely C-rings”→ C=O functional group→ C-N → O bonded to an aromatic C-ring
Silicatecore
Coagulation of ~1e4small grains (<1µm)=
Formation of the coat: Scenario 1: catalyzed growth(1) Organic coat properties independent of core composition (2) 100nm thick (numerous layers)=> not built by catalysis by the core, could be self-catalyzed by the coat
Scenario 2: → condensation of C-bearing ices→ formation of refractory material by ionizing radiations
17
III. Reactivity on/in icy mantlesIII. Reactivity on/in icy mantles
I. The major role of gas-grain interaction in the ISM evolution
II. Formation and destruction of icy mantles
III. Reactivity on/in icy mantlesIII.1 Formation of glycine on water ice surfaceIII.2 Selective deuteration of water and organic
molecules
IV. Summary
18
III. Reactivity in/on icy mantlesIII. Reactivity in/on icy mantlesIII.1 Formation of glycine on water ice surfaceIII.1 Formation of glycine on water ice surface
N
C
C
O
OH
H H
H H
Glycine
Amino-aceto-nitrile
N
N
C
C
H H
HH
Motivations:→ glycine is the simplest amino acid (=building blocks of proteins)→ amino acetonitrile (NH2 CH2 CN) detected in the ISM, and possible precursor of
glycine (see Belloche et al. 2008; note the unsuccessful searches by Wirström et al. 2007)
→ amino acids found in meteorites, with isotopic ratios pointing to ISM origin (or ISM Origin of their direct precursor)
→ successfully formed in experiences on ISM ice analogs (H2O, NH
3, CH
4, CH
3OH, CO,
CO2 , HCN, CH
3CN) irradiated by UV or CR
19
III. Reactivity in/on icy mantlesIII. Reactivity in/on icy mantlesIII.1 Formation of glycine on water ice surfaceIII.1 Formation of glycine on water ice surface
Example of a computational study: Rimola et al. 2012
Step 1: modeling the ice water moleculesCalculations performed using Density Functional Theory (DFT) with Functional BHLYP and basis 6-311++G(d,p)
→ Ice reduced to a cluster of 8 H2O molecules
→ effects of energetic irradiation (CR, UV) modeled by considering neutral and cationicradicals
20
III. Reactivity in/on icy mantlesIII. Reactivity in/on icy mantlesIII.1 Formation of glycine on water ice surfaceIII.1 Formation of glycine on water ice surface
Example of a computational study: Rimola et al. 2012
Step 2: modeling the interaction between water cluster (OH radical) and CO molecule Coming from the gas phase.
→ formation of the COOH radicalphysisorbed on the water cluster
-energies in kcal/mol-distance in Angström
21
III. Reactivity in/on icy mantlesIII. Reactivity in/on icy mantlesIII.1 Formation of glycine on water ice surfaceIII.1 Formation of glycine on water ice surface
Example of a computational study: Rimola et al. 2012
Step 3: modeling the interaction between COOH(surf) and NH=CH2 molecule coming from the gas phase.
→ formation of the glycine radicalphysisorbed on the water cluster
-energies in kcal/mol-distance in Angström
Note1: NH=CH2 can easily be formedIn the gas phase by hydrogenationof HCN (abundant molecule in the ISM)
Note2: Glycine now needs to be released in the gas phase
Note3: more complicated mechanisms withthe cationic radical water cluster, but alsomore favorable
22
III. Reactivity in/on icy mantlesIII. Reactivity in/on icy mantlesIII.1 Formation of glycine on water ice surfaceIII.1 Formation of glycine on water ice surface
Example of a computational study: Rimola et al. 2012
Conclusions of the study:
→ several significant activation barriers => limiting at low temperatures→ for T=100 – 200 K formation could be reasonably rapid→ cold cores are not the good targets ! Go to hot cores instead
→ cationic radical more reactive than neutral radical thanks to H3O+ being prone sharing its
H-atoms (activation barrier divided by 6 !)
23
III. Reactivity in/on icy mantlesIII. Reactivity in/on icy mantlesIII.1 Formation of glycine on water ice surfaceIII.1 Formation of glycine on water ice surface
More general conclusions:→ Quantum chemistry computational studies are very powerful to provide detailed mechanisms, but to what extent is it applicable ?
→ 8 water molecules only→ other reactions neglected→ what would happen with mixed ice ?
→ Still, it provides a good understanding of the key elements in the process (e.g. the role ofH3O+ here)
→ possible to increase the complexity of the model: → molecular diffusion in ices can be studied by classical molecular dynamics gives
access to large clusters (~1000 molecules)→ Born-Oppenheimer quantum molecular dynamics can gives details for a few tens of
molecules, and first clues of reactivity→ reactivity can studied in details from ab initio quantum calculation, but only on small
systems
24
III. Reactivity in/on icy mantlesIII. Reactivity in/on icy mantlesIII.2 Selective deuteration of water and organic moleculesIII.2 Selective deuteration of water and organic molecules
Herbst & van Dishoeck 2009
25
III. Reactivity in/on icy mantlesIII. Reactivity in/on icy mantlesIII.2 Selective deuteration of water and organic moleculesIII.2 Selective deuteration of water and organic molecules
cosmic D/H ratio ~ 1e-5 << D/H in H20 and formaldehyde (H2CO)
→ problem solved when considering that H20 and H2CO form on dust grains
Step1: modeling of H/D ratio in the gas phase
Step2: modeling of gas-phase composition (O, CO) & grain surface chemistryin the diffuse ISM, before cloud gravitational collapse
Step3: modeling of gas-phase composition (O, CO) & grain surface chemistryin the dense cloud, during cloud gravitational collapse
Problem: too much deuterium in some environments
Cazaux et al. 2010
26
III. Reactivity in/on icy mantlesIII. Reactivity in/on icy mantlesIII.2 Selective deuteration of water and organic moleculesIII.2 Selective deuteration of water and organic molecules
Step1: modeling of H/D ratio in the gas phase→ formation of H2 and HD on dust grains by Langmuir-Hinshelwood→ D heavier => lower kinetic velocity, higher hopping barrier
Cazaux et al. 2010
HD forms deeper in the cloud => enrichment of D/H in the atomic gas-phaseInitial conditions for next steps
27
III. Reactivity in/on icy mantlesIII. Reactivity in/on icy mantlesIII.2 Selective deuteration of water and organic moleculesIII.2 Selective deuteration of water and organic molecules
Step2: modeling of gas-phase composition (O, CO) & grain surface chemistryin the diffuse ISM, before cloud gravitational collapse Cazaux et al. 2010
O and CO depletion onto dust grains: (rate equations)
Grain surface chemistry: (rate equations)
(hopping)
Formaldehydeformation
Waterformation
28
III. Reactivity in/on icy mantlesIII. Reactivity in/on icy mantlesIII.2 Selective deuteration of water and organic moleculesIII.2 Selective deuteration of water and organic molecules
Step3: modeling of gas-phase composition (O, CO) & grain surface chemistryin the dense cloud, during cloud gravitational collapse Cazaux et al. 2010
Same chemistry, but now nH is increasing with time:
G: gravitational constant: mass density
+ accretion on dust grains stops when nH~1e6 cm-3 because of the formation of a H2 monolayer that prevent other molecules from sticking
29
III. Reactivity in/on icy mantlesIII. Reactivity in/on icy mantlesIII.2 Selective deuteration of water and organic moleculesIII.2 Selective deuteration of water and organic molecules
Results: Cazaux et al. 2010
12 K: both H & H2 on grains, but more H2→ best reaction = H2+O, but D is atomic15 K: H-atoms react with ices → only H2 leftat long timescales17 K: H2 evaporates quickly → main reaction = H+O
30
III. Reactivity in/on icy mantlesIII. Reactivity in/on icy mantlesIII.2 Selective deuteration of water and organic moleculesIII.2 Selective deuteration of water and organic molecules
Results:
On later phases of star formation, ices evaporates and deuterated molecules end up in the gas-phase=> comparison with observations
Cazaux et al. 2010
31
V. SummaryV. Summary
Physics and chemistry on/of dust grains cannot be neglected anymore when dealing with the evolution of astrophysical environments
Chemistry on dust grains is involved in the growth of molecular complexity
Chemistry on dust grains is not isolated from gas phase: ices and gas are chemically coupled
2 main access to ice chemistry: → observing star forming regions→ collecting particles in the solar system
To progress requires the collaboration between → theoretical calculations, → experiments, → astrochemical modeling, → observations
Theoretical Theoretical chemistrychemistry
Experiments Experiments (on ice analogs)
Astrophysical Astrophysical modellingmodelling
(core structure, radiative transfer, chemical network)
ObservationsObservations