assessmentof positive psychotherapybased life’s4 ... · assessmentof positive psychotherapybased...
TRANSCRIPT
ASSESSMENT of POSITIVEPSYCHOTHERAPY BASED
LIFE’S 4 DIMENSIONSWORKSHOP
Dr Gülşen VARLIKLI (Master Trainer of PPT) [email protected] Zeynep Ece TEZEL (Master Student of PPT) [email protected]
INTRODUCTION
This study aimed to give participants an insight on body, performance, contact and fantasy dimensions of their lifestyles.
Study; have been conducted with total 69participants as workshopsin Kocaeli, Samsun andBursa.
In workshops; philosophy and principles of positive psychotherapy had introduced. Also necessary explanations were made on model balance which is one of the principles of positive psychotherapy.
As method; participants answered Model Balance questions of WIPPF. They make assessments through occurred profile with examples from their lives.
As a result; participants gave feedbacks on theirexperience and thought on Positive Psychotherapy
What is Positive Psychotherapy?
◦ Positive Psychotherapy; developed by Nossrat Peseschkian and colleagues in Germany since 1968, it is a resource-oriented psychotherapeutic counseling and treatment method for individuals, couples and families in 24 countries today.
◦ Positive Psychotherapy defined as a humanist and transcultural psychodynamic psychotherapy.
◦ Main aim of positive psychotherapy is to develop their basic capacities and with the help of model balance to gain balance in their life.
The 4 Forms of Dealing with Conflict
ACHIEVEMENT
BODY
CONTACT
FANTASY
The 4 Forms of the Model Dimensions
I
YOU
WE
PRIMAL WE
Aims of This Study
◦ This study aimed to create awareness on Positive and Transcultural Psychotherapy as a psychotherapymethod which has a dynamic and positive approach to individuals.
◦ Also, give participants who are emerging adults an insight on body, performance, contact and fantasy dimensions of their lifestyles.
◦ Another aim of the study is to bring insight on «The 4 Forms of the Model Dimensions» where participantscan see the reflections of their understanding on I, You, We and Primal We subjects.
Aims of This Study- Continues
◦ While the data analysis have conducted;
◦ Mean differences between marital status and balance model
◦ Mean differences between balance model and the economic status of individuals in the emerging adulthood period
◦ Mean difference between marital status The 4 Forms of the Model Dimensions of emerging adults
◦ Mean difference between the economic status of the emerging adults and The 4 Forms of the Model Dimensions
◦ Mean difference between gender difference and balance model
◦ Mean difference between gender difference and The Forms of the Model Dimensions
Methods• Data Analysis
Programs
• Techniques
Data Analysis & Techniques
◦ IBM SPSS Statistics Data Editor 22 and Microsoft Excel is used to assess descriptive statistics and means of data.
◦ As an introduction «Positive Psychotherapy», history and principles of the therapy and «4 Forms of Dealing with Conflict» explained.
◦ Firstly, it was asked them to draw how they would distribute their 100 units of energy to «Model Balance».
◦ During the workshops; 30 questions of WIPPF, which are assessing «4 Forms of Dealing with Conflict» and «4 Forms of the Model Dimension», applied to participants and asked them to evaluate their forms.
◦ For termination of the workshops; feedbacks about workshop, what attracted their most attention on Positive Psychotherapy and their comments on their results.
DescriptiveStatistics
• Gender• Age• Maritial Status• Perceived
Economic Status• Educational Status• Vocation• Province of
Participants• With Whom Do
They Live?
PARTICIPANTS
Participants of workshops are 69 people who voluntarily choose to
join.
Age mean of the participants is 24.72 while the minimum value is
18 and maximum value is 59.
Gender
Frequency Percent
Female 55 79.7
Male 14 20.3
Total 69 100.0
MaritialStatus
◦ Marital status of participants as shown at graphic; single participants were 62.3%, married were 10.1% and participants who have a romantic relation were 27.5%.
Marital Status
Frequency Percent
Single 43 62.3
Married 7 10.1
In a romantic relationship 19 27.5
Total 69 100.0
PercievedEconomicStatus
◦ When the descriptive analysis of perceived economic status of participants examined; 92.8% of participants considered themselves at moderate status while just 2.9% of them considered themselves at high and 4.3% considered at low economic status.
Perceived Economic Status of Participants
Frequency Percent
Low 2 2.9
Moderate 64 92.8
High 3 4.3
Total 69 100.0
EducationalStatus
◦ Educational status of participants shows that; 84.1% of participants were undergraduates, 14.5% of them graduate and only one participant (1.4%) have doctorate.
Educational Status
Frequency Percent
Undergraduate Degree 58 84.1
Graduate 10 14.5
Doctorate 1 1.4
Total 69 100.0
What Do They Do?
◦ According to descriptive analysis results; more than half of the workshop participants are students (55.1%). 29% of them are psychological counselor and 5.8% are psychologist.
Vocation
Frequency Percent
Left Blank 3 4.3
Academician 1 1.4
Counselor 1 1.4
Student 38 55.1
Student (Turkish Language and Literature) 1 1.4
Psychologist 4 5.8
Psychological Counselor 20 29.0
Psychologist (MA) 1 1.4
Total 69 100.0
Where TheyLive?
◦ As the results of descriptive statistics show; top three province that participants were living are Bursa (30.4%), İstanbul (29%) and Kocaeli(24.6%).
Province of Participants
Frequency PercentBitlis 1 1.4Bursa 21 30.4İstanbul 20 29.0İzmit 2 2.9Kocaeli 17 24.6Manisa 2 2.9Muğla 1 1.4Rize 1 1.4Samsun 3 4.3Yalova 1 1.4Total 69 100.0
With WhomDo They Live?
◦ When descriptive analysis results are examined; participants mostly (42%) live with their parents. Second highest status is other (30.4%) which contains situations like living with a housemate, in a dorm and other relatives. Third highest is living alone with 11.6%.
People Living With
Frequency Percent
Alone 8 11.6
Parents 29 42.0
Spouse 4 5.8
Extended Family 2 2.9
Mother 2 2.9
Spouse and Children 3 4.3
Other 21 30.4
Total 69 100.0
Results
• Distribution of Means of «The 4 Forms of Dealingwith Conflict»
• Distribution of Means of «The 4 Forms of theModel Dimensions»
Distribution of Means of «The 4 Forms of Dealing with Conflict» According toGender
Gender Mean of Body Mean of
Achievement
Mean of Contact Mean of Fantasy
Female 8,146 7,782 6,764 9,055
Male 7,786 8,000 6,571 8,714
Distribution of Means of «The 4 Forms of Dealing with Conflict» According toAge Groups
Age Group Mean of Body Mean of
Achievement
Mean of Contact Mean of Fantasy
18-21 8,167 7,083 7,375 9,083
22-26 8,125 8,063 6,344 9,000
27-31 7,500 7,833 6,500 8,167
32 and Above 8,000 9,286 6,429 9,286
Distribution of Means of «The 4 Forms of Dealing with Conflict» According toRelationship StatusRelationship
Status
Mean of Body Mean of
Achievement
Mean of Contact Mean of Fantasy
Single 8,023 7,907 6,581 8,744
Married 8,000 8,571 6,286 9,429
In a RomanticRelationship 8,211 7,368 7,211 9,368
Distribution of Means of «The 4 Forms of Dealing with Conflict» According to PerceivedEconomic StatusPercieved
Economic Status
Mean of Body Mean of
Achievement
Mean of Contact Mean of Fantasy
Low 6,500 7,500 5,500 7,000
Moderate 8,125 7,766 6,750 9,063
High 8,000 9,333 7,000 8,667
Distribution of Means of «The 4 Forms of Dealing with Conflict» According to EducationalStatusEducational
Status
Mean of Body Mean of
Achievement
Mean of Contact Mean of Fantasy
Undergraduate Degree 8,104 7,810 6,845 8,948Graduate 8,100 7,900 5,800 9,400Doctorate 6,000 8,000 9,000 7,000
Distribution of Means of «The 4 Forms of Dealing with Conflict» According to Vocation (Top 3)Vocation Mean of Body Mean of
Achievement
Mean of Contact Mean of Fantasy
Student 8,158 7,526 6,605 8,842Psychologist 7,750 8,000 6,000 8,500Psychological Counselor 8,050 8,200 7,250 9,250
Distribution of Means of «The 4 Forms of Dealing with Conflict» According to People ThatParticipants Live WithWho They Live With Mean of Body Mean of
Achievement
Mean of Contact Mean of Fantasy
Alone 7,250 8,250 6,875 9,125Parents 8,276 7,862 6,621 9,000Spouse 7,250 7,500 6,000 9,500Extended Family 8,000 8,000 6,500 7,500Mother 7,500 11,000 4,000 10,500Spouse and Children 9,000 10,000 6,667 9,333Other 8,191 7,048 7,238 8,762
Distribution of Means of «The 4 Forms of Dealing with Conflict» According to RelationshipStatus and Perceived Economic StatusRelationship
Status
Perceived
Economic Status
Mean of
Body
Mean of
Achievement
Mean of
Contact
Mean of
Fantasy
Single
Low 5,000 8,000 5,000 3,000Moderate 8,122 7,902 6,707 8,854High 7,000 8,000 3,000 10,000
Married
Low 8,000 7,000 6,000 11,000Moderate 8,000 8,800 6,000 9,200High 8,000 9,000 8,000 9,000
In a RomanticRelationship
Low - - - -Moderate 8,167 7,167 7,056 9,500High 9,000 11,000 10,000 7,000
Distribution of Means of «The 4 Forms of the Model Dimensions» According toGender
Gender Mean of I Mean of You Mean of We Mean of Primal
We
Female 7,249 7,491 8,800 7,727
Male 7,096 7,500 8,857 7,429
Distribution of Means of «The 4 Forms of the Model Dimensions» According toAge Groups
Age Groups Mean of I Mean of You Mean of We Mean of Primal
We
18-21 7,653 7,333 9,167 8,583
22-26 7,198 7,031 8,625 6,656
27-31 7,613 9,167 9,333 9,333
32 and Above 5,477 8,714 8,000 7,714
Distribution of Means of «The 4 Forms of theModel Dimensions» According to RelationshipStatusRelationship Status Mean of I Mean of You Mean of We Mean of Primal
We
Single 7,078 7,698 8,977 7,698
Married 6,619 6,857 9,000 6,571In a RomanticRelationship 7,755 7,263 8,368 8,000
Distribution of Means of «The 4 Forms of theModel Dimensions» According to PerceivedEconomic StatusPerceived Economic
Status
Mean of I Mean of You Mean of We Mean of Primal
We
Low 7,835 8,000 10,000 7,500
Moderate 7,214 7,422 8,734 7,547
High 6,887 8,667 9,667 10,333
Distribution of Means of «The 4 Forms of theModel Dimensions» According to EducationalStatusEducational
Status
Mean of I Mean of You Mean of We Mean of Primal
We
Undergraduate Degree 7,150 7,448 8,914 7,621Graduate 7,600 7,900 8,400 8,100Doctorate 7,330 6,000 7,000 6,000
Distribution of Means of «The 4 Forms of theModel Dimensions» According to Vocation (Top 3)
Vocation Mean of I Mean of You Mean of We Mean of Primal
We
Student 7,062 7,737 9,421 8,368Psychologist 7,750 7,250 8,500 7,750Psychological Counselor 7,467 7,350 7,800 6,550
Distribution of Means of «The 4 Forms of theModel Dimensions» According to People ThatParticipants Live WithWho They Live With Mean of I Mean of You Mean of We Mean of Primal
We
Alone 6,890 6,667 6,833 7,333Parents 7,655 7,571 8,786 7,964Spouse 6,668 7,250 8,500 5,500Extended Family 5,665 8,500 11,000 9,000Mother 7,500 7,000 6,000 6,000Spouse and Children 6,330 10,000 12,000 12,000Other 7,036 7,790 9,526 7,842
Distribution of Means of «The 4 Forms of theModel Dimensions» According to RelationshipStatus and Perceived Economic StatusRelationship
Status
Perceived
Economic Status
Mean of I Mean of You Mean of We Mean of
Primal We
Single
Low 7,670 10,000 10,000 9,000Moderate 7,082 7,537 8,927 7,585High 6,330 12,000 10,000 11,000
Married
Low 8,000 6,000 10,000 6,000Moderate 6,400 6,400 8,200 5,600High 6,330 10,000 12,000 12,000
In a RomanticRelationship
Low - - - -Moderate 7,741 7,444 8,444 8,000High 8,000 4,000 7,000 8,000
RESULTS
◦ As a result of this study, participants who participated in a 1.5-hour workshop practice contributed to develop an insight into the sources of balance in their daily lives and the life events they define on these balance dimensions. In this context, it can be said that even short-term studies based on PPT can contribute to individual's self-help skills.
SUGGESTIONS
◦ This study can be developed with a contious study to determine whether these workshops are useful toincrease awareness on Positive and Transcultural Psychotherapy or not.
◦ Also possible relations of WIPPF results with different inventories on self-awareness and life satisfactionmight looked at different studies.
◦ For further studies; the number of participants can be increased to examine possible significant differences.