assessment - bes/erp(best enterprise system)erp.mjmetal.com/download/mjn/2005662840.pdf · welding...

74
i i Special Process: Welding. System Assessment i I I I

Upload: truongnguyet

Post on 25-Jun-2018

234 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Assessment - BES/ERP(Best Enterprise System)erp.mjmetal.com/Download/MJN/2005662840.pdf · WELDING SYSTEM ASSESSMENT PROCEDURE ... CQI-15. Speciai Process: Welding System Assessmenf

i i Sp

ecia

l Pro

cess

: W

eldin

g. Sy

stem

Ass

essm

ent

i I I I

Page 2: Assessment - BES/ERP(Best Enterprise System)erp.mjmetal.com/Download/MJN/2005662840.pdf · WELDING SYSTEM ASSESSMENT PROCEDURE ... CQI-15. Speciai Process: Welding System Assessmenf

AB

OU

T A

IA G A

1A G

$f rd

cy

Pur

pose

Sta

tem

ent

qq

32

F

ound

ed in

198

2, A

IAG

is

a gl

obal

ly r

ecog

nize

d or

gani

zatio

n w

here

OE

Ms

and

supp

liers

uni

te t

o

addr

ess

and

reso

lve

issu

es a

ffect

ing

the

wor

ldw

ide

auto

mot

ive

supp

ly c

hain

. AIA

G's

goal

s ar

e to

redu

ce c

ost

and

com

plex

ity t

hrou

gh c

olla

bora

tion;

impr

ove

prod

uct

qual

ity,

heal

th, s

afet

y an

d th

e

AIA

G O

rgan

izat

ion

AIA

G ?

Eq

AIA

G i

s m

ade

up o

f a

boar

d of

dire

ctor

s, a

n ex

ecut

ive

dire

ctor

, ex

ecut

ives

on

loan

fro

m m

embe

r

com

pani

es,

asso

ciat

e di

rect

ors,

a f

u!l-t

ime

staf

f, an

d vo

lunt

eers

ser

ving

on

pro

ject

tea

ms.

Dire

ctor

s,

depa

rtm

ent

man

ager

s, a

nd p

rogr

am m

anag

ers

plan

, di

rect

and

coo

rdin

ate

the

asso

ciat

ion'

s

activ

ities

und

er t

he d

irect

ion

of t

he e

xecu

tive

dire

ctor

.

AIA

Gf

o(A

tP1,

GF

OIA

t, g

ziy

9

9,

&)?

XI,

Z.Z

qE

z

Df(

Aj tB

6t.k X

t$$j

-AtX

tg

1;L+J

lEl

q

%E

l.

OlA

t, Fh-

fgL

312

12

2!S

Il$j ?

jlq

g

tZ]X

t, O

lhf

12

/2

2Q

jOfh

lgl

Xl$

lBtq

l 9

YIQ

gkgs

E

EE

tCt.

AIA

G P

roje

cts

AIA

C 4

I=(Z

SY

E)

Vol

unte

er c

omm

ittee

s fo

cus

on b

usin

ess

proc

esse

s or

sup

port

ing

tech

nolo

gies

and

met

hodo

logi

es. T

hey

cond

uct

rese

arch

and

dev

elop

, pu

blis

h, a

nd p

rovi

de t

rain

ing

on

sta

ndar

ds,

conv

entio

ns,

stan

dard

bus

ines

s pr

actic

es, w

hite

pap

ers,

and

gui

delin

es in

the

area

s o

f au

tom

atic

iden

tific

atio

n, C

AD

/CA

M,

ED

I/ele

ctro

nic

com

mer

ce,

cont

inuo

us q

ualit

y im

prov

emen

t, he

alth

focu

s,

mat

eria

ls a

nd p

roje

ct m

anag

emen

t, oc

cupa

tiona

l hea

lth &

saf

ety,

ret

urna

ble

cont

aine

rs a

nd

pack

agin

g sy

stem

s, t

rans

port

atio

n/cu

stom

s an

d tr

uck

& h

eavy

equ

ipm

ent.

Xt%

gh

k

Ab

g 2

13 g

g 7

1921 g

taE

s X

/gZ

t+C

jl

ZE

$j$

gt+

z %El. lgg

h- 0

g? 2 7

H2

, x*=

Gtq

, BF, a%

k, A

tZ %

%,

qA

jq1

CH

3 g

ss fi

1g6t

qr x\

%X

~

AIW

, 7 ~

2

CA

D/C

AM

, E

DI/

gX

t +jg,

7;Ie

qg gg g

ks, d

gPI-

Eg

, X

Hg,

gzqK $

t21,

7;Y

qg

384 C

tg,

Fk&

ts +

2%

g7

1, E

&t hl&

g, +

e/A

iIct

EEY, a

71g

%tH

lq1

CHEt

XlG

g xi1

gE

t Lt.

Page 3: Assessment - BES/ERP(Best Enterprise System)erp.mjmetal.com/Download/MJN/2005662840.pdf · WELDING SYSTEM ASSESSMENT PROCEDURE ... CQI-15. Speciai Process: Welding System Assessmenf

AIA

G P

UB

LIC

ATI

ON

S A

aAG

SS

Z

An

AIA

G p

ublic

atio

n re

flect

s a

cons

ensu

s of

tho

se s

ubst

antia

lly c

once

rned

with

its

sco

pe a

nd

prov

isio

ns. A

iAG

jZzrg

g F

g Z

Fl

Egt

ql Z

tgg

212 9x1s T

tgEt

Et.

The

exis

tenc

e o

f an

AIA

G p

ublic

atio

n do

es n

ot

in a

ny r

espe

ct p

recl

ude

anyo

ne f

rom

man

ufac

turin

g, m

arke

ting,

pur

chas

ing,

or

usin

g pr

oduc

ts,

proc

esse

s, o

r pr

oced

ures

no

t ......

conf

orm

ing

to t

he p

ublic

atio

n. A

IAG

$Z

Et%

OI

5X

Hk

Xil

E3

, Uk

YI 3

, ;ln

H s+

P 4

1s A

E,

gg, $jA

tq]

7tkt

6t+ +-?s $Et-!j$s

30

19

GI+

3

% g7

t%G

tAl

EtCt

. C

AU

TIQ

!\aA

RY

NO

TIC

E 3

2 3x1

A

IAG

pub

licat

ions

are

sub

ject

to

per

iodi

c re

view

and

use

rs a

re c

autio

ned

to o

btai

n th

e la

test

editi

ons.

~

MA

INT

EN

AN

CE

PR

OC

EDU

RE

331

Rec

ogni

zing

that

thi

s A

IAG

pub

licat

ion

may

no

t co

ver

all

circ

umst

ance

s, A

IAG

has

est

ablis

hed

a

mai

nten

ance

pro

cedu

re.

Ple

ase

refe

r to

the

Mai

nten

ance

Req

uest

For

m a

t th

e ba

ck o

f th

is

docu

men

t to

sub

mit

a re

ques

t.

AIA

GS

i;ikS

Ol

Pg

&tg

t$

CtT

Xl F

zQq,

AIA

Gf

gA

/g ~

~~

6t

~~

t.

Q

.;l-g

Aj

g fl$

O/l

$-&

Mai

nren

ance

Req

uest

Fo

rms

gZ 6

i;tS

hl.Q

. P

ublis

hed

by:

Au

tom

oti

ve I

nd

ust

ry A

ctio

n G

rou

p

2620

0 La

hser

Roa

d, S

uite

200

So

uth

field

, M

ich

igan

480

33

Pho

ne:

(248

) 35

8-35

70

Fax: (

248)

358

-325

3

AP

PR

OV

AL

STA

TUS

Page 4: Assessment - BES/ERP(Best Enterprise System)erp.mjmetal.com/Download/MJN/2005662840.pdf · WELDING SYSTEM ASSESSMENT PROCEDURE ... CQI-15. Speciai Process: Welding System Assessmenf

FO

RE

WO

RD

Ajg

A

utom

otiv

e In

dust

ry A

ctio

n G

roup

(A

1

com

pani

es i

n th

e au

tom

otiv

e in

dust

ry

tech

nica

l co

mm

ittee

s. A

IAG

Fj S

djk

Xtg

Rl

kt3

01 bl

At ;Is

ysp!

Xt%

gA

tXtg

Z 3+3 5) Df

YLE

f. gg j?

jA.t qg $

H\+

A

iAG

71%

913

517t

3

E i3

lEL

t.

The

mai

n ta

sk o

f te

chni

cal c

omm

ittee

s is

to

pre

pare

Aut

omot

ive

Sta

ndar

ds a

nd S

yste

m

Req

uire

men

ts.

71%

9)3

5)5

?1 F2

ZFk X

tgi.

;tf

71S

ZI

hlh

q

Atg

ts U

tp6

t+

30

lq.

Dra

ft do

cum

ents

ado

pted

by

the

tech

nica

l com

mitt

ees

are

circ

ulat

ed to

the

Ste

erin

g C

omm

ittee

for

revi

ew a

nd c

onse

nsus

app

rova

l. P

ublic

atio

n o

f th

e do

cum

ents

req

uire

s ap

prov

al b

y th

e Q

ualit

y

Ste

erin

g C

omm

ittee

. 7[

+?1Y

617t

RH

qEt

ZS F

hj&

7;i

EQ

l 01 Z

%f;l

OJ 29s P

l6H

--F

---

P%

F1+Z

JZlZ

9L

H $

4.

The

Qua

lity

Ste

erin

g C

omm

ittee

wou

ld l

ike

to a

ckno

wle

dge

and

than

k th

e fo

llow

ing

indi

vidu

als

and

thei

r co

mpa

nies

who

hav

e co

ntrib

uted

tim

e an

d e

ffo

rt t

o th

e de

velo

pmen

t of

thi

s do

cum

ent.

$$3 gg P

l%5l

+ E

Y$?

l 7H

z%

9\61

kq

6tI

1)

1-32

1 A

17L

ts 7j

qgt

7H

7H

g

1-3

9 P

I ht

ql 7

,ch@

ir

gtC

f.

AC

KN

OW

LED

GE

ME

NTS

gjq

S/

Co

re Members:

Jose

ph B

eckh

am

Gilb

ert

Chr

osto

wsk

i

Vire

nder

Cho

udhr

i

Tho

mas

Lop

icco

lo

Nea

l McM

icha

el

Car

l Occ

hial

ini

Ver

onic

a S

ebal

d

Rya

n T

urnw

ald

Dav

e W

illig

Chr

ysle

r G

roup

LLC

TRW

Aut

omot

ive

Del

phi C

orpo

ratio

n

Gen

eral

Mot

ors

Com

pany

For

d M

oto

r C

ompa

ny

The

Linc

oln

Ele

ctric

Com

pany

6

Toy

ota

Mo

tor

Eng

inee

ring

€2 M

anuf

actu

ring,

No

rth

Am

eric

a

Hon

da o

f A

mer

ica

Man

ufac

turin

g, In

c.

Nex

teer

Aut

omot

ive

TA

BL

E O

F C

ON

TE

NT

S

AB

OU

T ........

........

........

........

........

........

........

........

........

........

........

........

........

........

........

........

........

........

........

....

AlA

G

1 ....

........

........

........

........

........

........

........

........

........

........

........

........

........

........

........

........

... F

OR

EW

OR

D

3 ....

........

........

........

........

........

........

... ....

........

........

........

........

....

........

........

......

AC

KN

OW

LE

DG

EM

EN

TS

..

:

3 T

AB

LE

OF

........

........

........

........

........

........

........

........

........

........

........

........

........

........

........

........

........

... C

ON

TE

NT

S 4

........

........

........

........

........

........

........

........

........

........

........

........

........

........

........

........

........

.....

INT

RO

DU

CT

lON

5

GEN

ERA

L .....

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

.5

PR

OC

ESS

Page 5: Assessment - BES/ERP(Best Enterprise System)erp.mjmetal.com/Download/MJN/2005662840.pdf · WELDING SYSTEM ASSESSMENT PROCEDURE ... CQI-15. Speciai Process: Welding System Assessmenf

APP

RO

AC

H

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

. 5

WE

LD

ING

SYST

EM A

SSE

SSM

EN

T

GO

AL

S.. ......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

5

ASS

ESS

ME

NT

PR

OC

ESS

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

....

5 A

SSE

SSO

R QU

AL

IFIC

AT

ION

S ......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

. 6

OT

HE

R RE

QU

IRE

ME

NT

S ...

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

6

1 SCO

PE

........

........

........

........

........

........

........

........

........

........

........

........

........

........

........

........

........

........

........

........

......

7 1.1

GE

NE

RA

L ............................................................................................................................................................

7 1.

2 A

PPL

ICA

TIO

N

......................................................................................................................................................

7 1.

3 R

EFE

RE

NC

E ........................................................................................................................................................

.8

2 T

HE

WE

LD

ING

SY

STE

M A

SSE

SSM

EN

T

PR

OC

ED

UR

E ...

........

........

........

........

........

........

........

........

........

.....

9 3

SPE

CIA

L P

RO

CE

SS:

WE

LD

ING

A

SSE

SSM

EN

T ...

........

........

........

........

........

........

........

........

........

........

........

. 10

AP

PE

ND

IX A

- P

RO

CE

SS

TA

BL

ES ..

....................................................................................................................

31

GL

OSS

AR

Y .................................................................................................................................................

49

The

wor

k o

f pr

epar

ing

CQ

I-15

. Spe

ciai

Pro

cess

: W

eldi

ng S

yste

m A

sses

smen

f (W

SA

) was

car

ried

ou

t th

rou

gh

th

e A

IAG

Wel

ding

Wor

k G

roup

. CQ

I-15

SH

lS P

IE1

i,tt%

: %

2Ct

SZ

: W

eldi

ng

Sys

tem

Ass

essm

ent+

A

IAG

Wel

ding

Wor

k G

rou

ps

55

1 2

% ;,H

E[.

Thes

e w

eldi

ng r

equi

rem

ents

are

com

plem

enta

ry to

cus

tom

er a

nd p

rod

uct

sta

ndar

ds.

oli

q~

t gg ~

-;

lh

tg

g 24

4 x

jjg

ggq

1 ga 9

gt.

qo

lq.

The

WSA

can

be

used

to

ass

ess

an o

rgan

izat

ion'

s ab

ility

to

mee

t th

e r

equi

rem

ents

in th

is

asse

ssm

ent,

as w

ell

as c

usto

mer

, re

gula

tory

, and

the

org

aniz

atio

n's

own

requ

irem

ents

.

WS

A(W

eldi

ng S

yste

m A

sses

smen

t)+ E 3

7'1 %

2.4

, +7i

llPl

Zq

XtR

jlOI

Q;L

ht2;

otH

9

qh

l3

3. y

l+

Zq"

1 &

qs

E71

6t7

1 P

IGH

At%

3 +

CE

t.

The

WSA

can

als

o be

use

d be

twee

n an

org

aniz

atio

n an

d its

sup

plie

rs.

WS

Ak

Eq 3

Zl1

2(

9SgZ

ilql

hj A

t@ fd $

. Y

lLt.

In th

e W

SA,

the

wor

d "s

hall"

indi

cate

s a

req

uire

men

t fo

r pu

rpos

es o

f th

e se

lf as

sess

men

t.

WS

AqI

Aj 2q "

sha

ll"2

Xt7

(Fj7

t01

gq

g F

lCt

Qq

Atg

tg

LtE

t$rt

.

Fai

lure

to

mee

t th

e r

equi

rem

ents

resu

lts in

an

asse

ssm

ent t

hat

is e

ither

"N

ot

Sat

isfa

ctor

y" o

r

"Nee

ds I

mm

edia

te A

ctio

n."

%7

'Iq

[Aj 83 h

tgt%

Ft+

h1

71X

I 1

32

"~

~t

~"

gg

""7k 17-

xk

17

t gQ

%ki

' 5 5

5tL

t O

(Ct.

The

wo

rd "

shou

ld"

indi

cate

s a

rec

omm

enda

tion.

2G

j "s

houl

d"&

+

yg

LtE

tf$

~t.

Whe

re th

e te

rm "

such

as"

is

used

, any

sug

gest

ions

giv

en a

re f

or g

uida

nce

only

.

"suc

h as

"7t

%+

zp C

tLH

S Pli

;H PqP X

jItt

O

lCt.

Page 6: Assessment - BES/ERP(Best Enterprise System)erp.mjmetal.com/Download/MJN/2005662840.pdf · WELDING SYSTEM ASSESSMENT PROCEDURE ... CQI-15. Speciai Process: Welding System Assessmenf

Pro

cess

Ap

pro

ach

3%

gz

The

WSA

sup

port

s th

e au

tom

otiv

e pr

oces

s ap

proa

ch a

s de

scrib

ed i

n IS

O/T

S 1

6949

.

WS

Ak

ISU

/TS

16

94

9q

lhj

QA

tgk

!i!kS?

t X

tgX

} gz

Xis

ztC

[.

Wel

ldin

g S

yste

m A

sses

smen

t G

oals

g2 A

IAg

37

9

---id

The

goal

of

the

WSA

is

the

de

vel~

pm

en

t of

a w

eldi

ng m

anag

emen

t sys

tem

th

at

prov

ides

fo

r

cont

inua

l im

prov

emen

t, em

phas

izin

g de

fect

pre

vent

ion

and

the

redu

ctio

n o

f va

riatio

n an

d w

aste

in th

e su

pply

cha

in.

WS

Aol

+B$

g&b

qlIJg

t, 3

% L

b*,

gsoo

tgl

&tt

1/9

&tE

Zi;tg

k/,

XI+

qg

gkh,

tg X

j(g6t

+ gg

Alr

gcl

7~

~o

lct.

.

The

WSA

, co

uple

d w

ith a

n in

tern

atio

nally

rec

ogni

zed

qual

ity m

anag

emen

t sys

tem

and

app

licab

le

cust

omer

-spe

cific

req

uire

men

ts, d

efin

es th

e fu

ndam

enta

l re

quire

men

ts fo

r w

eldi

ng m

anag

emen

t

syst

ems.

WS

A&

+

ql;"

if2.

Z

$Js E

t21

Alh

g %

24

g$j

Q-F

LAtg

tZf-

g34((31 :,&q,

ski?(

A(&

E?

jg F

lgt zgq

$ 83 A

tgls

%';lo

1 E

tCt.

The

WSA

is

inte

nded

to

pro

vide

a c

omm

on a

ppro

ach

to a

wel

ding

man

agem

ent s

yste

m f

or

auto

mot

ive

prod

uctio

n an

d se

rvic

e pa

rt o

rgan

izat

ions

.

WS

Ak

XI&

%)

gh,li!

t A

jH/h

41s

71qq

1 CHct

ZtZ

1 hl

hE?f

ql +Ig

q$

32% X

jlg

gtC

t.

Ass

essm

ent

Pro

cess

33 i$?

?

Ong

oing

ass

essm

ents

sha

ll be

con

duct

ed a

nnua

lly,

unle

ss o

ther

wis

e sp

ecifi

ed b

y th

e cu

stom

er, t

o

reex

amin

e th

e co

ntin

uing

com

plia

nce

with

the

WSA

. 41

% 9

% 5

9 3

71&

;1

-?

%.!2f

iol 3h17t

32t"

Y X

/+E

/$

WSA

01

$+

g

XHaA

t St

71 7

16H

g$ql

30

1%

Eac

h as

sess

men

t sha

ll in

clud

e a

revi

ew o

f th

e or

gani

zatio

n's

syst

ems

usin

g th

e W

SA.

4 g

7tk

WS

AS

Atg

&t&

Z;"

-I A

Ikg

gI L22A

j{ag)g

sgL

3014

. S

ucce

ssiv

e Jo

b A

udits

(S

ectio

n 6.

0 of

thi

s do

cum

ent)

sha

ll sa

mpl

e pa

rts

from

diff

eren

t au

tom

otiv

e

com

pone

nt m

anuf

actu

rers

that

req

uire

com

plia

nce

to t

he W

SA d

ocum

ent.

2%q $)!

4 A\

&(%

A

jg

qg

6.0

) W

SA

SA

jS '

CLt

ZtO

l C

tg

Xt+$

At ?$$ X

jlZ

Atg

?E

j

-$%

8

AIf6

H g

O[C

t.

The

asse

ssm

ent

shal

l us

e th

e pr

oces

s ap

proa

ch t

o a

uditi

ng a

s id

entif

ied

by t

he r

equi

rem

ents

of

ISO

/TS

169

49.

g7

tt IS

O/T

S 1

6949

01 .

Q;1

Ak%

s qtg

zt

3g

gM

j g$

j ;;

!z 3h

t-h A

tgSt

YI

3 3

0lC

t.

Page 7: Assessment - BES/ERP(Best Enterprise System)erp.mjmetal.com/Download/MJN/2005662840.pdf · WELDING SYSTEM ASSESSMENT PROCEDURE ... CQI-15. Speciai Process: Welding System Assessmenf

1 S

CO

PE

1-1 G

ener

al

This

doc

umen

t sp

ecifi

es p

roce

ss r

equi

rem

ents

for

an o

rgan

izat

ion

or i

ts s

uppl

iers

per

form

ing

appl

icab

le w

eldi

ng,

who

nee

d to

: de

mon

stra

te a

bilit

y to

con

sist

ently

pro

vide

pro

duct

that

mee

ts

cust

omer

and

app

licab

le r

egul

ator

y re

quire

men

ts, a

nd e

nhan

ce c

usto

mer

sat

isfa

ctio

n th

roug

h th

e

effe

ctiv

e ap

plic

atio

n of

the

sys

tem

, in

clud

ing

proc

esse

s fo

r co

ntin

ual i

mpr

ovem

ent o

f th

e sy

stem

.

ZA

j4

3:

4s E

Lzlrl

Ss

2R

jl7

t 2;joH

;itk 6

i;Hgt

ggD

fl CH

Ek g

g Q

I;L h

tgbg

sA(if

.tO(

24

sq[q

g X

I3 Q

;1A

tgts

3q

hl?'

1_;1

. XI+

y0,!

A[&%

@

g-Z$

9JE

t gss q

?;d.

&tgA

j A

Jh

gg

l z2j-??!o

,!

Y3

-g g6H

114

TtS

j2 +

01Cfl

x[

+;x

lfgs

xj1

g-g

xjIgif

.t&

%qg

l ggs

32

% Et

Et.

The

Wel

ding

Sys

tem

Ass

essm

ent

is a

pplic

able

to

site

s w

here

cus

tom

er-s

peci

fied

part

s fo

r

prod

uctio

n an

d/or

ser

vice

are

pro

cess

ed th

roug

hout

the

aut

omot

ive

supp

ly c

hain

.

8X;1 A

l&g

g7tk

#kt

gs

Ajtj

lh71

Xtg

Rt gs %

g g-i;H

fi9

21

71

Pl6W

2401 g

A]g

k

$I-g

o\

htol.s.

(3'ot3-

)ql q

g 5

tq.

1.2

Ap

plic

atio

n q

s A

ll re

quire

men

ts o

f th

e W

SA

are

gene

ric a

nd a

re i

nten

ded

to b

e ap

plic

able

to

all

orga

niza

tions

pe

rfo

rmin

g t

he w

eldi

ng o

pera

tions

add

ress

ed i

n t

his

docu

men

t, re

gard

less

of

type

, si

ze,

and

prod

uct.

WS

AO

( P

g B

I;LAf

-%tS

E2!

,CyO

lq

Pg Z

;r_f

Ol

915

S;;1

F$?jz

EtG

uj

Not

e: F

our

Pro

cess

Tab

les

have

bee

n de

velo

ped

and

the

appr

opria

te ta

ble(

s) is

to

be

refe

renc

ed d

urin

g th

e as

sess

men

t. Th

e P

roce

ss T

able

s ar

e sp

ecifi

c to

wel

ding

pro

cess

es

as n

oted

bel

ow:

Sq

: 4

42

1 g

g gs

$71

8tE

Z1,

97t

&t-

& g

i-o,t q

gj3J

gq &

bz g

~t

.

sgg& -

iJ-$i[*

-

0s O

tZH

g

Al5

lq Y

LCt.

Pro

cess

Tab

le A

- A

rc W

eldi

ng

Arc

Stu

d/F

aste

ner

Wel

ding

Flu

x-C

ored

Arc

Wel

ding

Gas

Met

al A

rc w

eldi

ng

Sub

mer

ged

Arc

Wel

ding

Shi

elde

d M

etal

Arc

Wel

ding

Pla

sma

Arc

Wel

ding

Gas

Tun

gste

n A

rc W

eldi

ng

Gas

Met

al A

rc B

raze

Wel

ding

Page 8: Assessment - BES/ERP(Best Enterprise System)erp.mjmetal.com/Download/MJN/2005662840.pdf · WELDING SYSTEM ASSESSMENT PROCEDURE ... CQI-15. Speciai Process: Welding System Assessmenf

Pro

cess

Tab

le B

- R

esis

tanc

e W

eld

ing

Res

ista

nce

Sp

ot

We

ldin

g

Pro

ject

ion W

eld

ing

Res

ista

nce

Sea

m W

eld

ing

Hig

h-F

requency

Sea

m W

eld

ing

Ind

uct

ion

Sea

m W

eld

ing

Mash

Sea

m W

eld

ing

Fla

sh W

eld

ing

Pro

cess

Tab

le C

- La

ser

Wel

din

g

Nd

YA

G

C0

2

DIO

DE

Wir

e F

ed

Pro

cess

Tab

le D

- S

olid

Sta

te W

eld

ing

Ine

rtia

Fri

ctio

n W

eld

ing

Dir

ect

Drive

Fri

ctio

n W

eld

ing

Frict

ion S

tir W

eld

ing

Fla

sh B

utt W

eld

ing

Res

ista

nce

Bu

tt W

eld

ing

Ultr

aso

nic

We

ldin

g

Thes

e P

roce

ss T

able

s co

ntai

n re

quire

men

ts fo

r:

01

5 S

$!g

0121

83-A\%kS

32%

C

IEt.

1. M

anag

emen

t R

espo

nsib

ility

& Q

ualit

y P

lann

ing

El21

O,!

/ $

$S 4

1%

2. F

loor

and

Mat

eria

l Han

dlin

g R

espo

nsib

ility

2 X

HE 922d

Z$od

3. E

quip

men

t / F

acili

ties/

Con

trol

s gtrl/hl9/gXi;ll

4. T

oolin

g/F

ixtu

ring

3 g

/Fix

turing

5. P

roce

ss C

ontrol

s an

d C

onfir

mat

ion

S3

:;!Xj\ 2 %

bg

6. E

ssen

tial V

aria

bles

F$jq

9 7

tgg

The

Pro

cess

Tab

les

spec

ify th

e to

lera

nces

of

proc

ess

para

met

ers

and

the fr

eque

ncie

s fo

r ch

ecki

ng

proc

ess

cont

rol p

aram

eter

s an

d pa

rts. T

he R

equi

rem

ents

and

Gui

danc

e in

the

WS

A f

orm

will

notif

y th

e as

sess

or w

hen

to r

efer

to t

he P

roce

ss T

able

s.

=xi

o 0

4fr

-c

-

3x4

o o

IE

xfl

0

gts

% 9

S-g

826

t71

Flzt

g$! %

+ 2

9s

qgg %

A/ S

JlCt.

WS

A

"k

hf

0 1-

01 B

q h

lgk 9 Xlgg gg

gz

s

%7t

K\q

IA(

3 3

01

C(-

.

Page 9: Assessment - BES/ERP(Best Enterprise System)erp.mjmetal.com/Download/MJN/2005662840.pdf · WELDING SYSTEM ASSESSMENT PROCEDURE ... CQI-15. Speciai Process: Welding System Assessmenf

1.3

Ref

eren

ce g3

The

follo

win

g st

anda

rds

are

used

as

refe

renc

e m

ater

ial.

The

re a

re o

ther

ref

eren

ce m

ater

ials

that

con

tain

mor

e in

to b

e in

clus

ive.

The

app

licab

ility

is l

imite

d to

the

sub

ject

mat

ter

refe

renc

ed.

Sta

nd

ard

Nu

mb

er

AN

SI 2

49.1

( Def

initi

ons

I I

AWS

A3.

0

Tit

le

Saf

ety

in W

eldi

ng a

nd C

uttin

g

I I La

ser

Bea

m a

nd W

eldi

ng

I I

Sta

nd

ard

's O

rgan

izat

ion

AN

SI -

ww

w.a

nsi.o

rg

g;";1i!t 33 q

IAj0

1 E

t?

Sta

ndar

d W

eldi

ng T

erm

s an

d

AWS

C7.

2

2 TH

E W

ELD

ING

SYS

TEM

AS

SE

SS

ME

NT

PR

OC

ED

UR

E

ww

w.a

ws.

org

AE

J

ZJ7

1 g

Af

-

1. 0 bt

a in

cur

rent

cop

y o

f C

QI-

15 S

peci

al P

roce

ss:

Wel

ding

Sys

tem

Ass

essm

enl;

from

AIA

G.

CQ

I-15

53

Sg2l

YXH

S$$ %

+tit2

1 : A

IAG

OI

Wel

ding

Sys

tem

Ass

esse

men

t

2. Id

entif

y al

l wel

ding

pro

cess

es t

o w

hich

CQ

I-15

Spe

cial

Pro

cess

: W

eldi

ng S

yste

m A

sses

smen

t;

appl

ies

(see

CQ

I-15

, 1.2

). R

ecor

d th

ese

proc

esse

s on

the

WS

A.

CQ

I-15

%f#

2 3%~

ng

+;";1

gq

-gg

gty

qzt

. ~

15

%

g7tq

1 q

sctc

t.

WSA

ql C

Hct

OlZ

]Et ii,tsz 7

1% 6

tZt.

3. C

ompl

ete

the

WSA

, de

term

inin

g th

e le

vel o

f co

mpl

ianc

e. A

min

imum

of

one

job

aud

it

(Sec

tion

6) s

hall

be p

erfo

rmed

dur

ing

each

ass

essm

ent.

0

341%

:$:t

7;lyA

f W

SA

S g

t$j

$Hi?\.

4&

01

gjht

+

qqt

371s

- s

ot h

ij

~ C

I A

. o

tc E

-L

T

o z T

4. A

ddre

ss e

ach

"Not

Sat

isfa

ctor

y" it

em a

nd d

eter

min

e co

rrec

tive

actio

n, i

nclu

ding

ro

ot

caus

e

anal

ysis

and

im

plem

enta

tion

of t

he c

orre

spon

ding

cor

rect

ive

actio

n(s)

.

qh "z

Et,t$

"2 $,

kqql

tH

ZH 2&

!6i;tZ

, ZFqO

,! 3

2 g&/ 3 +

$!zR

Iql

&kgt

it+

33

.g

zg-.titq

+$!E

XlZ

3% q

2t.

The

corr

ectiv

e ac

tion(

s) s

hall

be c

ompl

eted

with

in 9

0 da

ys.

$..szX

1+ 90%

0ILH

oll g

ttrrr

5lqo

l 3C

t.

gE

Zg

2t

SSrl

Rec

omm

ende

d P

ract

ices

for

ww

w.a

ws.

org

Page 10: Assessment - BES/ERP(Best Enterprise System)erp.mjmetal.com/Download/MJN/2005662840.pdf · WELDING SYSTEM ASSESSMENT PROCEDURE ... CQI-15. Speciai Process: Welding System Assessmenf

Rec

ords

of

the

corr

ectiv

e ac

tion,

incl

udin

g ve

rific

atio

n, s

hall

be m

aint

aine

d.

gA

ts

Zgk

Et

+Z

ZX

l 7

lq

s %XI

Slq

Ol

EtC

t.

5. "

Nee

ds I

mm

edia

te A

ctio

n" r

equi

res

imm

edia

te c

onta

inm

ent

of s

usp

ect

pro

du

ct.

"Z

7C

11 -L

Xk

17

t s

Qg

tl'g

+$,tq

P

xjls

gi +

7,t

qxj

ls Q

T6J

kCt.

6. A

sses

smen

ts s

hall

be c

ondu

cted

ann

ually

unl

ess

othe

rwis

e sp

ecifi

ed b

y th

e cu

stom

er.

g7t- L

27

Ho

[ 1-

Ew

?;k

1

2~

%

A{

go

( sg

ql

%A

1 3 2

OlE

t.

3 SP

ECIA

L PR

OC

ESS:

WE

LDIN

G A

SS

ES

SM

EN

T C

over

She

et .......

........

........

........

........

........

........

........

........

........

........

........

........

........

.......

15

Sec

tion

1-5

........

........

........

........

........

........

........

........

........

........

........

........

........

........

......

18

Sec

tion 1: M

anag

emen

t Res

pons

ibili

ty &

Qua

lity

Pla

nnin

g ....

........

........

........

........

........

18

........

........

........

........

........

.....

Sec

tion

2: F

loor

and

Mat

eria

l Han

dlin

g R

espo

nsib

ility

24

Sec

tion

3: E

quip

men

t .......

........

........

........

........

........

........

........

........

........

........

.....

26

Sec

tion

4: T

oolin

g/F

ixtu

ring

........

........

........

........

........

........

........

........

........

........

27

Sec

tion

5: P

roce

ss C

ontr

ols

and

Con

firm

atio

n ....

........

........

........

........

........

........

27

Inst

ruct

ions

for

com

plet

ing

the

Cov

er S

hee

t C

ove

r S

he

etz

9s

jSk

71

g!G

J 1. F

acili

ty N

ame:

Nam

e o

f th

e f

acili

ty b

eing

ass

esse

d. A

Ig

01s:

7/&

.5/&

A

13

01

01s

One

for

m s

hall

be u

sed

for

each

fac

ility

. The

fac

ility

may

hav

e se

vera

l bui

ldin

gs o

r ph

ysic

al

loca

tions

in

the

sam

e ge

nera

l are

a. I

f the

re is

a s

epar

ate

man

agem

ent t

eam

or

diffe

rent

man

agem

ent s

yste

m,

then

the

se l

ocat

ions

sha

ll be

con

side

red

as s

epar

ate

faci

litie

s.

fjtLt0

1 g

b-&

P 4

Al$

jql

Atg

BH

2t.

Al

gP

2p %2E/$ XI

qq

1 9

321

fig

$p 5

321;

"11$

&t&

71 3

$.

TlC

f. Et2,b

Ztg

3%

Stt2

13

g

g

El21

Al&

E?]

OI

TjC

tY

OI

zP

%

+

A1s

$ijs

;I$. 3 3

01

Ct.

2. A

ddre

ss: T

he s

tree

t ad

dres

s o

f th

e fa

cilit

y be

ing

asse

ssed

; P

.0 B

ox n

umbe

rs m

ay b

e gi

ven

as

addi

tiona

l inf

orm

atio

n.

7-&

: 7

t$r

lk

Al+jO

( st

reet

add

ress

; P

.0

LY&

$7

tq $

3 Z

9.Z

Fq $j 3

OjC

f.

3. P

hone

Num

ber:

The

phon

e nu

mbe

r o

f th

e f

acili

ty. Z

'$3 : A

)$0

1

98

If

ther

e is

no

com

mon

pho

ne n

umbe

r fo

r th

e fa

cilit

y, t

he p

hone

num

ber

of

the

Ope

ratio

ns

Man

ager

or

Qua

lity

Man

ager

sha

ll be

use

d.

301,

Al$

jqI

CHTt

Sg

OI

$ 9

87

1 a

Ct

gr

$

\2IX

t gz

~k217;~

01 93s

At8

StjW

21.

4. F

ax N

umbe

r: Th

e fa

x nu

mbe

r o

f th

e fa

cilit

y.

h '$3: A

19

21

y&

'$3.

5. N

umbe

r of

Wel

ding

Em

ploy

ees

at t

his

Fac

ility:

The

num

ber

of

empl

oyee

s, s

alar

ied

and

hour

ly,

asso

ciat

ed w

ith t

he w

eldi

ng o

pera

tion

at t

his

faci

lity.

AI-$j21

g2+2l +

: ss

s k

gX

f2

1 +

, $ A

Igq

lAj

gE

&.k

a2t

AiL

tXjl

h5

Xf-

21

3.

Page 11: Assessment - BES/ERP(Best Enterprise System)erp.mjmetal.com/Download/MJN/2005662840.pdf · WELDING SYSTEM ASSESSMENT PROCEDURE ... CQI-15. Speciai Process: Welding System Assessmenf

6. C

aptiv

e W

eld

Org

aniz

atio

n (Y

/N):

Ent

er "

Y" i

f th

is f

acili

ty w

elds

com

pone

nts

for

thei

r ow

n

com

pany

. Ent

er "

N"

if th

e co

mpa

ny d

oes

no

t w

eld

any

com

pone

nts

for

thei

r ow

n co

mpa

ny.

Et%k

A/$

jOl 3s

&+

+21 ZlA

lq!

t~

ct

+

gs

+$ac

tK\$

''\~

''~

3

4 S

'Z).

51A

t71 2s

O'"

Ct9

"N

W!g

zq

7;H

2t,

&g

g\ 2

lAtq

l C

Hct

C-

jC~jck

+gS g

E5

tXl

L~

~

7. C

omm

erci

al W

eld

Org

aniz

atio

n (Y

/N):

Ent

er "

Y" i

f th

is f

acili

ty w

elds

com

pone

nts

for

com

pani

es

othe

r th

an t

heir

ow

n co

mpa

ny. E

nter

"N

" if

this

fac

ility

doe

s no

t w

eld

any

com

pone

nts

for

othe

r

com

pani

es.

$,t$

?jq0,

! ga ;;

Iq(Y

/N)

: yf%

b g h

l$JO

] E

\81A

tql

+g

s $$

E?lC

[$

"Y

"~

211

H21.

hl,g

ol ~

tblh

tql c

H~

I q

~j

gt

=;?g

-gz'

;lf Gt

xI f&

+ct

s "N

us

zq

211

H2t.

8. D

ate

of A

sses

smen

t: E

nter

the

date

(s) o

f th

e as

sess

men

t. A

n al

phan

umer

ic f

orm

at s

hall

be u

sed

to a

void

con

fusi

on w

ith d

iffer

ent

num

eric

form

ats.

Exa

mpl

e: M

ay 3

- 4

, 20

10

797t

E

jlOlE

j :

7971

tjl

OlE

j2

4H;it

. C

tz

+ A

j42

12

1 g

2g

iiIJ

dt71

Fl6H

S

A~

P~

?lit2

hj +

OI A

t%

21 O/ 3

+ %

El.

Exa

mpl

e: M

ay 3

- 4

, 20

10

9. D

ate

of

Pre

viou

s A

sses

smen

t: Li

st th

e da

te o

f th

e pr

evio

us C

QI-

15 S

peci

al P

roce

ss: W

eldi

ng

Sys

tem

Ass

essm

ent o

f th

is f

acili

ty.

A/$

s

7t

: CQ

I-15

A

@

q$!

j $-g

:(g

h!S

g\ g

g A

!&%

%

71)2

1 '&

Xfg

%

?j%

HZ

).

10. T

ype(

s) o

f W

eldi

ng P

roce

ssin

g at

thi

s F

acili

ty:

Pla

ce a

che

ckm

ark

to d

esig

nate

all

wel

ding

proc

ess(

es)

perf

orm

ed a

t th

is f

acili

ty. Z

ql

Aj 8E g$!0

1 S

$ :

g

q1A

j ol

251&

2s

gg s

sg S

hl6

t71

716H

7;1

htn

t3%

tl

HX

lZfl

Zt.

This

inf

orm

atio

n de

term

ines

the

appr

opria

te P

roce

ss T

able

tha

t sh

all

be u

sed

duri

ng t

he

asse

ssm

ent.

Z2

.g 3

71

A

tg

S 4

2ct

jlt3

3'2

11H

2t.

Pro

cess

es n

ot

liste

d on

the

cov

er s

heet

are

no

t pa

rt o

f th

e W

eldi

ng S

yste

m A

sses

smen

t.

Cov

er S

heet

hd.q

l %

711;

17;1

S

E S

3Z

SG

%

7f

0tL

lEt.

11. C

urre

nt Q

ualit

y C

ertif

icat

ion(

s): T

he w

eld

orga

niza

tion

shal

l lis

t the

ir cu

rren

t qu

ality

cert

ifica

tions

, e.

g.,

ISO

/TS

1694

9, I

S0

900

1. C

ertif

icat

ions

may

be

fro

m 3

rd p

arty

sou

rces

or

cust

omer

qua

lity

cert

ifica

tions

. If

cus

tom

er q

ualit

y ce

rtifi

catio

n is

giv

en,

then

the

yea

r of

the

las

t

asse

ssm

ent b

y th

e cu

stom

er s

hall

also

be

give

n.

=X

I Z

SC

H

: =Xi

XX

lS

xsg

l SJX

H gs

sg

s ?

lAE

6\

6101

EtL

t.

$XH

sa

otri

-7

,

Ol

OlC

t.

(ql :

ISO

/TS

169

49, I

S0

900

1) %%S 3

'" pa

rty

sour

ces qg ;1

? g

3 %

g;t

O.Z

f==

FE

j , ,

2%~ zq

92

5g01 $

.qxlg

, xg4

23

011

~[

gt

g

7t7

t 70

1 2c

t.

12. D

ate

of R

e-as

sess

men

t (if

nec

essa

ry):

If "

No

t S

atis

fact

ory"

find

ings

wer

e ob

serv

ed f

rom

the

orig

inal

ass

essm

ent,

then

the

wel

d or

gani

zatio

n sh

all a

ddre

ss e

ach

item

and

det

erm

ine

corr

ect

actio

n, in

clud

ing

roo

t ca

use

anal

ysis

and

im

plem

enta

tion

of

the

corr

espo

ndin

g co

rrec

tive

actio

n(s)

.

XH

g7t

'$l($

5jQG

bC/p4

) : 31

3 g

7tq

lAj

''g

~t+

''O

I 2

lsE

tg, 2CCH ga ~

qg

Z,k

gt+

s C

tqO

1 81131, t.z

39

zq,

&t$

i;t+

Zj$

iEl

EA

l O

/%g

E5J

LEt

qsB

t z

k(

s g3 6H

OI

&

The

date

of

the

re-a

sses

smen

t sha

ll be

giv

en h

ere,

and

the

app

ropr

iate

Que

stio

n(s)

fro

m S

ectio

ns

1 -

5, in

the

orig

inal

ass

essm

ent,

shal

l be

mod

ified

to

ref

lect

that

th

e e

vide

nce,

rel

atin

g to

the

Page 12: Assessment - BES/ERP(Best Enterprise System)erp.mjmetal.com/Download/MJN/2005662840.pdf · WELDING SYSTEM ASSESSMENT PROCEDURE ... CQI-15. Speciai Process: Welding System Assessmenf

impl

emen

tatio

n o

f th

e co

rrec

tive

actio

n(s)

, has

bee

n ob

serv

ed.

XH

37t

TqX

lg, q$

dck

3%

12\ O

\si!

t $

7js

5f

tS5t

91 F

16H

$1

3 @

7tq

lAi

1-5

q2

ql

SHgt

g

g 3 z

$OlC

t.

Als

o, t

he "

Num

ber

of

No

t S

atis

fact

ory

Fin

ding

s" s

hall

be m

odifi

ed a

s ap

prop

riate

.

EEL,

qg

El$

gl

+'I

&

S5t

71

g$

j 3

01

Lt.

13

. P

erso

nnel

Con

tact

ed: L

ist

the

nam

e@),

title

(s),

pho

ne n

umbe

r(s)

, and

em

ail a

ddre

ss(e

s), i

f

avai

labl

e, o

f th

e pr

inci

pal p

artic

ipan

ts fr

om t

he

wel

d or

gani

zatio

n.

43

3%

t%j :

OlG

, ?%

I,

g332,

01L

>I1

%+&

, 7

1&

6/C

tg ga

ZIP

;_Iq

1 &t7

tgl

At

3 7

lFX

lfE.

14

. Aud

itors

/Ass

esso

rs:

List

the

nam

e(s)

, Com

pany

(ies)

, pho

ne n

umbe

r(s)

and

em

ail a

ddre

ss(e

s), i

f

avai

labl

e, o

f th

e au

dito

r/ass

esso

r(s)

.

gh

&t/

g7

tXf

: 7

tgG

t49

7,th

tzl,

g7

tXtE

l O

lg,

blht

, g2d, 01

41 O

IXA

Z

T-

15.

Num

ber

of "

Not

Sat

isfa

ctor

y" F

indi

ngs:

Ent

er t

he n

umbe

r o

f "N

ot

Sat

isfa

ctor

y" fi

ndin

gs

obse

rved

dur

ing

the

asse

ssm

ent.

1r

M~

=

>+

""0

-1 +

: i3

7t

228 '

'~

~~

''

Ol

+

g z

q6

HZ

t.

16

. Num

ber

of "

Nee

ds I

mm

edia

te A

ctio

n" F

indi

ngs:

Ent

er th

e nu

mbe

r o

f "N

eeds

Im

med

iate

Act

ion"

fin

ding

s ob

serv

ed d

urin

g th

e as

sess

men

t.

""71

XR

( sQ

gLt1

0J + : s7

t .5E

?t tj2

C7J

sJ

z'E

7t

Xf;

l yQ

gL1'

d."(

>l

$3 g

qq

Zt

, 11 -

11 2-

17.

Num

ber

of "

Fai

l" F

indi

ngs

in t

he J

ob A

udit(

s):

Ent

er t

he n

umbe

r o

f "F

ail"

findi

ngs

obse

rved

from

the

job

aud

it.

39

&tA

tqIA

j 33%

"Fai

l"Ol $

: z

+g

h\q

1A

i %

ZsJ

"F

ailn

Ol $3 y

q6H

2t.

Page 13: Assessment - BES/ERP(Best Enterprise System)erp.mjmetal.com/Download/MJN/2005662840.pdf · WELDING SYSTEM ASSESSMENT PROCEDURE ... CQI-15. Speciai Process: Welding System Assessmenf

Fai

lab

Ylsr

nc:

~+cd

re?&

I

Pro

oses

Tab

la 3

- Sol

id 2t32.i

Wa

Il

r~

Pts

nt ?

Jur n

ee

Fax

h~

mc

tc

hlrmtsr

37 I?

! tk

hj

E~

2ts

y:e

d tt

r'r F

a:lil

g:

C5g

:~r

%:t3

O

~a

ntz

ak

cr :Y

:YI

C3mf~r:s

Y~flt

J. 13

rjar

lzai

rm

GsC c

6hi~

sr~s

rncr

l:

,

CY

C Gf

Prf

~!su

s hs~

c5sm

r?l:

Hu

-nt.

rir~

t '\@

c~

G

lrnm

so a

t: C

ot o

r' F

indl

r QG

I Ty~eSsi .s

f Wa

d F

ra*t

sri~

tng a:

tn2

s F

anZ

2y:

Prm

as

~

TaB

la A

- &m

Wts

'a"d

$t~

Arc

:lua:

fac:

mrr

fV

Jcc r

j

Fb

fi ',c

.*cc

.%r:

'tJ~

Ml8

g B

as U

eta;

Arx

&Vr

.tf!n

c 31

itm

rrge

d 4r

c ~k

'rir

llng

.:hie

!dt3

M

~ls

! Arc W

e301

ng

Plar

.ma

hrc

rTzl

riln

g &

as T

un js

icn 4T !*iC CP J

Gaa

Nsh, *%rr S

rmc

l.a

'tc

Y3

Pru

anm

ra

bla

B - Rw

lc%

iiau~

YC

aldln

nl

~,z

&s&

Yc~

Z

i%~.

t rg

P

rs&

~dis

n

!Vrb

:t"r

~ f%

e%

~t;

S~

cz

arm

*tt'

tldh

g

C g

*rcr

tenc

j %

=am

lYdd

ing(

Incu

ztln

n Ze

am %

Ye;

llng

fidss

a S

eam

I~

V~

I~

FQ

Fc

m i%

'tfe

rq

Pmrs

aG k

bk

Q .

Lsw

r W

sI@

lma

hJ.Y

AG

'24t131ng

CD;

'Bea

rZ,?

ce*: at.<$ il

'Fitr

e Fe

d

Hu

mb

araf

"is

3f"F

f~d

ittg

s IS

&I%

- S

at A

udf7

lsf.

I I

Page 14: Assessment - BES/ERP(Best Enterprise System)erp.mjmetal.com/Download/MJN/2005662840.pdf · WELDING SYSTEM ASSESSMENT PROCEDURE ... CQI-15. Speciai Process: Welding System Assessmenf

Inst

ruct

ions

for

com

plet

ing

Sect

ions

1 -

5 qs 1-5s 3

sZ

j.7

1 9

12r

gs

Sec

tions

1 -

5 co

ntai

n qu

estio

ns a

nd t

he r

equi

rem

ents

and

gui

danc

e fo

r ea

ch q

uest

ion.

The

Sec

tions

are

: 1

-50

fk qq S

gGjl

CilEt

sg, 5

27hk

gL X

lgS

Eg 61.2 F

lC\.

Sec

tion 1

- M

anag

emen

t Res

pons

ibili

ty &

Qua

lity

Pla

nnin

g

Sec

tion

2 - F

loor

and

Mat

eria

l Han

dlin

g R

espo

nsib

ility

Sec

tion

3 - E

quip

men

t/Fac

ilitie

s/C

ontr

ol

Sec

tion

4 - T

oolin

g/F

ixtu

ring

Sec

tion

5 - P

roce

ss C

ontr

ols

and

Con

firm

atio

n

The

asse

ssor

sha

ll as

sess

the

wel

d or

gani

zatio

n co

mpl

ianc

e to

Sec

tions

1 -

5 b

y co

mpa

ring

the

evid

ence

pre

sent

ed b

y th

e w

eld

orga

niza

tion

to t

he

req

uire

men

ts li

sted

in th

e "R

equi

rem

ents

and

Gui

danc

e" c

olum

n.

g7

tXtk

"R

equi

rem

ents

and

Gui

danc

e" 2

3011

(374 2

Eqq

1 C

Hgt

QaA

tgG

jI

2\6

1 X

jI-$$a

x

=7

45

tll;;lg@

SMI

q+

j 1-5

011

CHkt

+$E EE/ $rf

is g7

18

tYI 3 3

01

Ct.

NO

TE 1: I

n th

e "R

equi

rem

ents

and

Gui

danc

e" c

olum

n, t

he w

ord

"sha

ll" in

dica

tes

a re

quire

men

t and

the

ter

m "

such

as"

ind

icat

es th

at a

ny s

ugge

stio

ns g

iven

are

for

1 gui

danc

e on

ly.

7.y

1 :

"Rec

juiie

rne~

~is

at

-ld G

uida

nce"

ga q

j~i E

tOj

"sh

ail"

s B

TA

tgg 7

t217

113(

,

Etq

"su

ch a

s"k

XIg

ql C

HEt q2 $-

q;l

;,! Xllc

t8 7

12

(3II

t.

NO

TE 2

: Th

e "R

equi

rem

ents

and

Gui

danc

e" c

olum

n w

ill i

ndic

ate

to th

e as

sess

or

whe

n th

e P

roce

ss T

able

s ar

e pe

rtin

ent

to th

e Q

uest

ions

. Whe

n th

e P

roce

ss T

able

s ar

e

pert

inen

t to

the

Que

stio

n, t

he a

sses

sor

shal

l as

sess

the

wel

d or

gani

zatio

n co

mpl

ianc

e to

the

spec

ified

sec

tion(

s) in

the

Pro

cess

Tab

les

T4

2 :

"R

equi

rem

ents

and

Gui

danc

eW33

% 3%

3371 ?&

!silt

st2

UH

s7

tX

ts

71ii!]

3

2O

lCt.

g3

z7

1 ?

&!Z

I1t zt$j

Eq,

s'd7

tXt+

gs

Sqf

(A1

qgql

LH9

EE/ $

3-5

37

1 gb

30

1C

t.

Page 15: Assessment - BES/ERP(Best Enterprise System)erp.mjmetal.com/Download/MJN/2005662840.pdf · WELDING SYSTEM ASSESSMENT PROCEDURE ... CQI-15. Speciai Process: Welding System Assessmenf

NO

TE 3

: If

the

ques

tion

is n

ot

appl

icab

le t

o th

e w

eld

orga

niza

tion,

then

the

asse

ssor

sha

ll pl

ace

a ch

eckm

ark

in th

e "N

/An

Ass

essm

ent

colu

mn.

If t

he o

bser

ved

evid

ence

is i

n c

ompl

ianc

e to

the

ques

tion,

the

ass

esso

r sh

all

note

the

evid

ence

in

the

"Obj

ectiv

e E

vide

nce"

col

umn

and

plac

e a

chec

k m

ark

in t

he "

Sat

isfa

ctor

y" c

olum

n.

3 :

YtCi

k 33 z

Z/q1 Z

jg.E

lXl

zSO

l219

, 37

tK/.&

IIN

/A"

37

1 s

$jq

I Xf/

3C

lI3

7-1 gk

OIL

^. E

tq 9

7171

"1" 2rro

fl E

Hzt

$

9

"EtY

, %

713;1

& "O

bjec

tive

Evi

de

nce

w2

a

57

13

71-

3 z

Olq

, "S

atis

fact

ory"

gg

ql

jtl(

3Ut3

g $?J 3

01C

t. 94

1 A

AL

0

1

If th

e ob

serv

ed e

vide

nce

is n

ot

in c

ompl

ianc

e to

the

ques

tion,

then

the

ass

esso

r sh

all n

ote

the

non-

com

plia

nce

in t

he "

Obj

ectiv

e E

vide

nce"

col

umn

and

plac

e a

chec

k m

ark

in t

he "

No

t =

A

Sat

isfa

ctor

y"

colu

mn.

g

q

S7-1

71 $

i!

sq

l

CUE1

:,E

T O,

tqI

ECtf?i, %

7tKt

+ "O

bjec

tive

Evi

denc

e" g

gql g01$!Jg 7

1%

201q

, "N

ot

Sat

isfa

ctor

y" g

gq

l 31

3 U

t33

st 3

01

Lt.

NO

TE 4

: W

here

non

conf

orm

ing

prod

uct

is i

dent

ified

in th

e a

sses

smen

t of

a gi

ven

ques

tion

the

asse

ssor

sha

ll pl

ace

a ch

eck

mar

k in

the

"Nee

ds Im

med

iate

Act

ion"

(N

IA)

colu

mn.

NIA

req

uire

s im

med

iate

con

tain

men

t of

susp

ect

prod

uct.

F&

j 4: $+=-$?j

CLtS

Xl O

F0

L*

c X

jlgO

l %

k sg F

qc 3

s 3

7tqI

Aj 3

g5

]q, g

7tX

t2

"+7,

t 3

Al

2Q

sbn

(NIA

) 3%

q1

Rjl

3 0

13%

3 3

0lC

t.

NIA

k O

l+JY

g X

j;11g

01 $

qtq?

J Lj

oEX

lS

.Q;IEtL

t.

Que

stio

n 1.1

Is th

ere

a de

dica

ted

and

qual

ified

tech

nica

l wel

ding

per

son

on-s

ite?

ggtq

l 9

~E

/OlZ

7l$

jE/ K

t301

%&

gEX

t7t

ZeL

Iqt?

Req

uire

men

ts a

nd G

uida

nce

Q+

At2

Z

XI a A

Ig-

To e

nsur

e re

adily

ava

ilabl

e ex

perti

se, t

here

sha

ll be

a d

edic

ated

and

qua

lifie

d w

eldi

ng p

erso

n on

site

. 7

Z

01g7

tk Z

t_LZ

g $1

71 B

l6H 3

&tDf

l 3

$+

01

3

71=

&q 3

;\q01

yl&

8jC

;IXts

+q

21.

This

ind

ivid

ual s

hall

be o

ne o

f th

e fo

llow

ing:

Deg

reed

Wel

ding

Eng

inee

r, or

equ

ival

ent s

cien

ce

degr

ee,

Cer

tifie

d W

eldi

ng I

nspe

ctor

from

app

rove

d in

tern

atio

nally

rec

ogni

zed

body

,

or p

erso

n ag

reed

up

on

bet

wee

n cu

stom

er a

nd s

uppl

ier.

ol-gi~

qg g ~

t ~y

gtol

qok ~

tct:

~/t

q gts

gz

~J

KI

LI

~

qg I

nk g

g7;,t

gsg

1 34

x1,

~X

j\~

S?

.l=

93

% 2

rkjI

jZF

Ej

Xtq

s 2

% g

E a

AbXt

GP

231

21 &

+g;tl

lqlA

j $

)lg

2 At

st.

This

per

son

shal

l be

a fu

ll-tim

e em

ploy

ee a

nd t

he p

ositi

on s

hall

be r

efle

cted

in th

e or

gani

zatio

n

char

t. 01

At

5tg-

g 3

3q

Olq

OF

ZtW

, lZ

.21 q

?k 3

54

ZIZ

ql 2g 5

lqO

k ZC

t.

A jo

b d

escr

iptio

n sh

all e

xist

iden

tifyi

ng t

he q

ualif

icat

ions

for

the

posi

tion

incl

udin

g m

etal

lurg

ical

and

wel

ding

kno

wle

dge.

q?g

yZE

k 01

s 2 %

E xl

-^-iS

35

gtO

t qyq

1 C

HOt

Xtq

g 2

0tlrt

71

Page 16: Assessment - BES/ERP(Best Enterprise System)erp.mjmetal.com/Download/MJN/2005662840.pdf · WELDING SYSTEM ASSESSMENT PROCEDURE ... CQI-15. Speciai Process: Welding System Assessmenf

qg

ol E

l. Th

e qu

alifi

catio

ns s

hall

incl

ude

a m

inim

um o

f 5

year

s ex

perie

nce

in w

eldi

ng o

pera

tions

or

a

com

bina

tion

of

a m

inim

um o

f 5

year

s of

for

mal

met

allu

rgic

al e

duca

tion

and

wel

ding

exp

erie

nce.

xtq

g g

z ?q

tgjX

tZ Z

I*

5921

gg gg z

-qq

y 0

12 3%

3 sz

2g

s q

*

59

59

71x1

71 ?

)+ g5

gjy/

xt.

1.2

Is th

ere

a re

spon

sibi

lity

mat

rix t

o e

nsur

e th

at a

ll ke

y m

anag

emen

t an

d su

perv

isor

y fu

nctio

ns

are

perF

orm

ed b

y qu

alifi

ed p

erso

nnel

?

eg

28 zt

z1 g %

q~

t7t 9

151

g+

+,t-,l 71kg g

;"ott7

;t71

-f?l

gt q3

qlg

qh

7t

~G

L~

JI

~?

Req

uire

men

ts a

nd

Gui

danc

e B

~A

~~

!

%

Ak$Jk

The

orga

niza

tion

shal

l m

aint

ain

a re

spon

sibi

lity

mat

rix id

entif

ying

all

key

man

agem

ent a

nd

supe

rvis

ory

func

tions

and

the

qua

lifie

d pe

rson

nel w

ho m

ay s

uch

func

tions

.

zq

i 9~ z.

Q zF21,

g+."

,t" 7

1% 9 O

/Ygt

77

/&g

Olg

sC $

=. 3&

Xtq

Ktg

qL

96tk

hH

"1

1 n

q

IE+

hg

$XI

61

11 2

01 01

EIL

t. It

sha

ll id

entif

y b

oth

prim

ary

and

seco

ndar

y (b

acku

p) p

erso

nnel

for

the

key

func

tions

(as

def

ined

by th

e o

rgan

izat

ion)

. Thi

s m

atrix

sha

ll be

rea

dily

ava

ilabl

e to

man

agem

ent

and

cust

omer

at

all

times

. PP

ISX

t 9 H

t.Z 3

6tP

ISX

t %

El g

.Q 7

1sq1

tH6H

sk

+ $

1q 01

Et~

t. 01

qIE

+&

+

GE

GY

I $tE

!lg 9 S

qO

l 6\

11 Z

qO

l 9X

jlZ

01

8%

9 f

rq01

FtL

t.

1.3

Do

you

use

onl

y qu

alifi

ed w

elde

rs (

pers

onne

l)? X

I? $+

g'1C;

171h

tEtfg

O

lg(R

Hg

) 61

4 L17

7t?

The

orga

niza

tion

shal

l pr

ovid

e em

ploy

ee tr

aini

ng f

or a

ll w

eldi

ng o

pera

tions

spe

cific

to

the

ir jo

b

func

tion.

Eq

g k

EXtq

l7jI

1s01

71%0

11

9s 88 %

t%ql

.hd-

AjlE

t ii,

t-ll

Xj1

g

6HO

k Et

Ct.

All

wel

ding

em

ploy

ees,

inc

ludi

ng b

acku

p an

d te

mpo

rary

em

ploy

ees,

sha

ll be

tra

ined

.

qlt-jl

E

Q+$

J ~

ML

0

1

R.-

I~L

T

JJ,

7

22

*a

-31

~1

9~

++j+~+

g ~

ZJ

t

o to^

6~L

t.

Doc

umen

ted

evid

ence

sha

ll be

mai

ntai

ned

show

ing

the

empl

oyee

s w

ere

trai

ned;

the

evi

denc

e

shal

l inc

lude

an

asse

ssm

ent

of t

he e

ffect

iven

ess

of

the

trai

ning

, m

ust

prov

e kn

owle

dge

of t

he

cust

omer

's s

peci

fic r

equi

rem

ents

and

int

erna

l sta

ndar

ds,

and

whe

re a

ppro

pria

te,

empl

oyee

cert

ifica

tion,

suc

h as

for

a m

anua

l wel

der.

&$j~

t7\ gg !$

%g

g g

q+

& s

hj$

@

57

jg

gg6

tO/O

l Ft

Ct.

$37{

+ g$ g

Z321

s7

tg Egk

6t

O/0

1 61

2, 714

01

Ajl

Fq

9 .

Q-T;

lAtZ

0l 9x

1 3 L

HF

7/5

3 1

21

11

kg

Xk

2I

Xt4

g S

Ch

l 2%

6tqO

/: F

tLt.

Man

agem

ent a

nd c

usto

mer

sha

ll de

fine

the

qual

ifica

tion

requ

irem

ents

for

each

fun

ctio

n an

d

ongo

ing

or f

ollo

w-u

p tr

aini

ng s

hall

also

be

addr

esse

d.

Etz

Iz 3

;14g q

7_t

715q

I CH

Et ~;

lAt'i

;t%

3% st

ZO

lEij,

41%

3%

39

P+

%o so

l 2% 55

3 Ct

SYI

3 3

OlC

t.

Page 17: Assessment - BES/ERP(Best Enterprise System)erp.mjmetal.com/Download/MJN/2005662840.pdf · WELDING SYSTEM ASSESSMENT PROCEDURE ... CQI-15. Speciai Process: Welding System Assessmenf

1.4

How

do

you

mai

ntai

n w

elde

r ce

rtifi

catio

n? o

f 271

++

Eg

S S'?J6tk

3%

-$+XI

61s L

I?lt?

Req

uire

d qu

alifi

catio

n m

aint

enan

ce.

XI4

++X

I71

8T

2 El

. If

the

wel

der

has

no

t wel

ded

in th

e

spec

ific

oper

atio

n in

a 6

mo

nth

tim

e fra

me,

the

wel

der

mus

t be

req

ualif

ied

to t

ha

t op

erat

ion.

Bas

ed o

n th

e w

elde

r's q

ualit

y pe

rfor

man

ce, i

t m

ust

be e

stab

lishe

d w

hen

retr

aini

ng a

nd

requ

alifi

catio

n of

the

ind

ivid

ual

mus

t be

per

form

ed.

g2sO

l 6

7H

s 7I

Lk

q$jlq$

j %I%$$

6tXl

OJe

CtFf

! 2 E

//aq1 EH

Ek

XH

Xtq

E

gs

'&tO

tOI

EtCt

. g

s g

Jt0{

1 2

7j6

tq X

Hgg

3, KH 35%

h171j5

gt

z &H

Ok E

tCt.

1.5

Is s

et-u

p pr

actic

e in

com

plia

nce

with

doc

umen

ted

wor

k in

stru

ctio

ns?

MW

hjq

l C~

t2t 3

20

1 $

t1151q

%$L1

77t?

-gAi

9t3

qg

Set

-up

verif

icat

ion

to t

he p

roce

dure

s (a

s ex

ampl

e: e

quip

men

t se

tting

s, c

lam

ping

seq

uenc

e, w

eld

sequ

ence

, dire

ctio

n of

tra

vel

and

othe

r pr

oces

s co

ntro

ls)

in c

ompl

ianc

e to

doc

umen

ted

wor

k

inst

ruct

ions

.

EAiZ

tfil

4G

2g

Aiq

l [[t

2t

$JRt(

Oll:

gtH

l SR

I, c

lam

ping

seq

uenc

e, w

eld

sequ

ence

, dire

ctio

n of

trav

ei a

nd i

rk5

gs zX

.1) yl

CHE

t g

%s

6tC

AlQ

.

1.6

Doe

s th

e w

eldi

ng o

rgan

izat

ion

perf

orm

adv

ance

d qu

ality

pla

nnin

g?

+j-a

EqP

$sgI gs

qY(g

$ +j

g B

~~

LI

J]

~.?

The

orga

niza

tion

shal

l inc

orpo

rate

a d

ocum

ente

d ad

vanc

e qu

ality

pla

nnin

g pr

oced

ure.

xx

l2 s

Aj$

\2 $2 g2 4

13Zj

YX

IE Z

gk3f

l01

$jLL

t. -

1~

A f

easi

bilit

y st

udy

shal

l be

per

form

ed a

nd i

nter

nally

app

rove

d fo

r ea

ch p

art.

qltl

lsht

7t $

!3f;1q

01

8t17rl

47,c

iitED

fl CH

8H

LH

FY

g

Bq

01

EtC

t.

Sim

ilar

part

s ca

n be

gro

uped

in

to p

art f

amili

es f

or t

his

effo

rt a

s de

fined

by

the

orga

niza

tion.

tll5

6t

A.L

iit

E+ Z

7C_f q

lA-[

CH

Z.

+;l

SS

g F

ISH

part

fa

mili

esz

Itg

at

+ 914.

Afte

r th

e pa

rt a

ppro

val p

roce

ss is

app

rove

d by

the

cus

tom

er, n

o pr

oces

s ch

ange

s ar

e al

low

ed

unle

ss a

ppro

ved

by th

e cu

stom

er. .X

!.qq[

Ol6

H F

+$ e2

% 9s $

flq($

2q01 e

$)j $0

1 2%

gB

s 6

45t

SIX1

?&+

El.

The

wel

ding

org

aniz

atio

n sh

all c

onta

ct th

e cu

stom

er w

hen

clar

ifica

tion

of

proc

ess

chan

ges

is

requ

ired.

Thi

s cl

arifi

catio

n o

f pr

oces

s ch

ange

s sh

all

be d

ocum

ente

d.

g'l;;f E

qE

g$j

330

1 Q

s 5l

jH,g

K/

/ zl

qlrt

EG

'dHO

l EtE

t. g

;"df g

G"1

+!%g S

h-[

$' 3

30

1 E

l.

Page 18: Assessment - BES/ERP(Best Enterprise System)erp.mjmetal.com/Download/MJN/2005662840.pdf · WELDING SYSTEM ASSESSMENT PROCEDURE ... CQI-15. Speciai Process: Welding System Assessmenf

1.7

Are

wel

ding

FM

EA

's up

to

dat

e an

d re

flect

ing

curr

ent

proc

essi

ng?

$$';;;l

FM

EA

S Z

E/lO

lE 6

13

YXH

g$js

gt

L]71

t?

The

orga

niza

tion

shal

l in

corp

orat

e th

e us

e o

f a

docu

men

ted

Fai

lure

Mod

e an

d E

ffect

s A

naly

sis

(FM

EA

) pr

oced

ure

and

ensu

re t

he F

ME

A's

are

upda

ted

to r

efle

ct c

urre

nt p

art

qual

ity s

tatu

s.

Zjc

-ig 2

Aj.

latg

FM

EA

SR

I.21 htg

z P

GtZ

tZ,

9XH

Fg

gs

&tE

HS

3

%8

t71

718

H F

ME

AZ

Z El

l 01 E

61

21.

The

FMEA

sha

ll be

wri

tten

for

eac

h pa

rt o

r pa

rt f

amily

or

they

may

be

proc

ess-

spec

ific

and

wri

tten

for

each

pro

cess

. FM

EA

k qtq

t Par

t FE

& pa

rt fa

mily

ql

EHEt

L

Hg

2.Z

%

t%6t

LS(,

32s

+Ailq

0s %

tgE

tct.

In a

ny c

ase,

the

y sh

all a

ddre

ss a

ll pr

oces

s st

eps

fro

m p

art

rece

ipt t

o p

art

ship

men

t an

d al

l ke

y

wel

ding

pro

cess

par

amet

ers

as d

efin

ed b

y th

e or

gani

zatio

n. q

T,!!E

+%

j.$

?

(414

++$ dY

3tX

l

eg g

2 3

41

3 ct

qo

k q

q,

z7;-1ql~

j z

gl

~t

i,t

gzfij

ng 5

2 g'

";

1 g% 352 c

tgo

k

9e

t.

A c

ross

fun

ctio

nal t

eam

sha

ll be

use

d in

the

deve

lopm

ent

of t

he F

ME

A. A

ll sp

ecia

l cha

ract

eris

tics,

as d

efin

ed b

y th

e or

gani

zatio

n an

d its

cus

tom

ers,

sha

ll be

iden

tifie

d, d

efin

ed,

and

addr

esse

d in

the

FME

A.

Q5

71

k z

g FM

EA

Ol

7H2q

l &

tq?i

HO

k E

tEt.

FME

AE

tOIIA

j 7

13

01

32

lEt i,tg

gg

, 2

zq-g

gtO

,!tjt;l-

32lS

;'t;l.

c

tqo

1 E

tet.

1.8

Are

wel

ding

pro

cess

con

trol

pla

ns u

p to

dat

e an

d re

flect

ing

curr

ent

proc

essi

ng?

g'"

;1

8%

Y

Iqg

Eq

lOls

61

2 2

XH g

3-g

Kt%

ZtL

IVt?

The

orga

niza

tion

shal

l in

corp

orat

e th

e us

e o

f a

docu

men

ted

Con

trol

Pla

n pr

oced

ure

and

ensu

re

the

Con

trol

Pla

ns a

re u

pdat

ed t

o r

efle

ct c

urre

nt c

ontr

ols.

Zq@ F

AiP

tg C

ontr

ol P

lan

$jX

tOI

At

gs

Sita

Bt;l

, C

ontr

ol P

lanq

l 3

XH

EX

jIs

32

61

% 3

s g

tz6H

ok

EtE

t.

The

Con

trol

Pla

ns s

hall

be w

ritt

en f

or e

ach

part

or

part

fam

ily o

r th

ey m

ay b

e pr

oces

s-sp

ecifi

c an

d

writ

ten

for

each

pro

cess

. Con

trol

Pla

nss

2 J

itE 3

g p

art f

amily

ql

EH6H

7

lgS

lq 7

,tq S

zql

EHGH

g

iijl6

tYI

$t-$J

6H01

E

IEt.

They

sha

ll ad

dres

s al

l pro

cess

ste

ps fr

om p

art

rece

ipt t

o p

art s

hipm

ent

and

iden

tify

all e

quip

men

t

used

and

all

esse

ntia

l wel

ding

pro

cess

par

amet

ers

as d

efin

ed b

y th

e re

leva

nt i

ndiv

idua

l pro

cess

tabl

es o

r no

n-es

sent

ial a

s ag

reed

upo

n be

twee

n su

pplie

r an

d cu

stom

er.

!+%

2+

qlh

i+E

j +$$ 33

3tX

l 9s g

% E

tYIC

ctq

ok

6tq

, ~

tgq

k sg

goc

tllat

$1

~

Ol

k

AA

L 7H

7H g% &

?&ql

221

3 32.z

fii g

g 2

+3

2 g

@ 32

Ets

Z g

t96

1q

, S

SgA

jl

gg

32

j 6;

r)ql

gol

f-,!

2i;

rqO

lxI

o&p g

-g

~lt

~1

~

stO

,!Etc

t.

A c

ross

fun

ctio

nal t

eam

, in

clud

ing

a pr

oduc

tion

oper

ator

, sha

ll be

use

d in

the

dev

elop

men

t of

Con

trol

Pla

ns,

whi

ch s

hall

be c

onsi

sten

t with

all

asso

ciat

ed d

ocum

enta

tion

such

as

wor

k

inst

ruct

ions

, sho

p tra

vele

rs,

and

FME

A's.

2 Lt

+?

%K

t5 P

gtE

t C

t7/ 5

FJg

X

I hf h

i, s

hop

trave

lers

, FM

EA

Qt

9E

tg F

A{ O

,! C

ontr

ol P

lans

21 7

H2q

1 &

tq?i

HO

k E

tCt.

Page 19: Assessment - BES/ERP(Best Enterprise System)erp.mjmetal.com/Download/MJN/2005662840.pdf · WELDING SYSTEM ASSESSMENT PROCEDURE ... CQI-15. Speciai Process: Welding System Assessmenf

All

spec

ial c

hara

cter

istic

s, a

s de

fined

by

the

orga

niza

tion

and

its c

usto

mer

s, s

hall

be id

entif

ied,

defin

ed, a

nd a

ddre

ssed

in

the

Con

trol

Pla

ns. 2S

q -1

31

91

2Z

j of1

9l6

H %

2/9

9g %

%.tl

& C

ontr

ol P

lans

ql/il

%t?

JEt2

, 3

2Ie

tq L

tZC

t.

Sam

ple

size

s an

d fr

eque

ncie

s fo

r ev

alua

tion

of

proc

ess

and

prod

uct

char

acte

ristic

s sh

all a

lso

be

addr

esse

d co

nsis

tent

with

the

min

imum

req

uire

men

ts li

sted

in t

he P

roce

ss T

able

s.

xx

.1

o o

z

7t

2 A

HA

t C

~ lc=z PIg

t +!

Jg A

t01

2 2

y5+ P

roce

ss T

able

sofI/

{j 9

71

3 Z

IlF

t2l

QT

Atg

!I!t

$!z

kSl q

rtg

Ct.

1.9

Are

all

wel

ding

rel

ated

and

ref

eren

ced

spec

ifica

tions

cur

rent

and

ava

ilabl

e? F

or e

xam

ple:

SAE

,

AIA

G,

AS

TM,

AS

ME

, AW

S, 1

80, G

ener

al M

otor

s, H

onda

, For

d, T

oyot

a an

d C

hrys

ler.

ztz

45

12

&!s

s +

o

lg 7

t.gE

t $lL

JAjs

3xH

71x

12 y

I$Ll

71t?

eg g

gz

t , ,

0/1

$j +?jY :

SAE,

AIA

G,

AS

TM,

ASM

E, A

WS,

180

, Gen

eral

Mot

ors,

Hon

da,

For

d, T

oyot

a an

d C

hrys

ler.

To e

nsur

e al

l cus

tom

er r

equi

rem

ents

are

bo

th u

nder

stoo

d an

d sa

tisfie

d, th

e or

gani

zatio

n sh

all

have

all

spec

ifica

lly r

elat

ed w

eldi

ng a

nd c

usto

mer

ref

eren

ced

stan

dard

s an

d sp

ecifi

catio

ns

avai

labl

e fo

r us

e an

d a

met

hod

to e

nsur

e th

at t

hey

are

curr

ent.

PE

24

.Q?A

t$++ij

QZ

93

t71

?li;H

Ol8

;iHA

171Z

L, 9

qA

l7lU

/, T

qP

Pg

gz?

lt $

t$s

3

24

+

g, 1

2111 3

x1

- 012

yk&

gzg

gfjk

otet

k g

tzz

t A

tg

S

2

7tX

I.J

3q

0F

EtL

t.

Suc

h st

anda

rds

and

spec

ifica

tions

may

incl

ude,

bu

t ar

e n

ot

limite

d to

, th

ose

rele

vant

doc

umen

ts

publ

ishe

d by

SAE

, N

AG

, AS

TM,

ASM

E, A

WS,

IS

O,

Gen

eral

Mot

ors,

Hon

da,

For

d, T

oyot

a, a

nd

Chr

ysle

r. ol

Y$-t

3%

+

J!$

jAjg

Z 3Z

gt +g

7j7

1y

5t4

17

t %

_TI,

13

5-

3

EA

js

S S

AE,

AIA

G,

AS

TM,

ASM

E, A

WS,

IS

O, G

ener

al M

otor

s, H

onda

, For

d, T

oyot

a 1

21

11

Chr

ysle

rqJ

OJS

H

sE

t.

The

orga

niza

tion

shal

l ha

ve a

pro

cess

to e

nsur

e th

e tim

ely

revi

ew,

dist

ribut

ion,

and

impl

emen

tatio

n of

all

cust

omer

and

ind

ustr

y en

gine

erin

g st

anda

rds/

spec

ifica

tions

an

d ch

ange

s

base

d on

cus

tom

er r

equi

red

sche

dule

. E

qE

A17

1 q3

Ek

FJZ,

SH

H 2s J

Zj,

9x1

Llq

$!,

;Fg,

+J!

$jA

j(A

tgk)

3 2

4 Q

Zq

I 0

10

t &Y

l%

g301 O

l$Jg

gt

3i;t

71

gzs

7tX

J1

1

2q 0

1 gt

q.

Tim

ely

revi

ew s

houl

d be

as

soon

as

poss

ible

and

sha

ll no

t ex

ceed

tw

o w

orki

ng w

eeks

.

47

1 q

gg

t ~

AI

+ s

lrq

%zt

of: q

q, 2

7s

32

1 31

$;

g.s

q 5

~0

1

~t

ct

.

The

orga

niza

tion

shal

l do

cum

ent t

his

proc

ess

of

revi

ew a

nd i

mpl

emen

tatio

n, a

nd i

t sh

all

addr

ess

how

cus

tom

er a

nd i

ndus

try

docu

men

ts a

re o

btai

ned,

how

the

y ar

e m

aint

aine

d w

ithin

the

orga

niza

tion,

how

the

curr

ent

stat

us is

est

ablis

hed,

and

how

the

rele

vant

info

rmat

ion

is c

asca

ded

to t

he s

hop

floo

r w

ithin

the

tw

o-w

eek

perio

d. T

he o

rgan

izat

ion

shal

l id

entif

y w

ho i

s re

spon

sibl

e

for

perf

orm

ing

thes

e ta

sks.

2S

qE

F G

201

SZ

Zt

01

3

.J.Z12

q

%A

l 27-tfQ

E

t?&

Xl,

Ojgql X

jl3

zk/

s %

+XI,

qZA

1 3

32

% 3

q L

Hof

IAj

$tZ

l5t&

Xl

qZA

1 3

XH

gl

&)E

HS

gtg

+t&

xl,

2

7 ~

Hql

gP

a&

g!2

B

7;t

gg

gs

rz

qzA

I +I

LHX

1+X

IZ

g~

jzt 8

~0

1

gtc

l.

xX

I 0

01%

C

Z(

0

ASHq

I 1

2

~J

T

TO

fi

7t

qy0

1

%LO,!

8

10

1 T

tEt.

Page 20: Assessment - BES/ERP(Best Enterprise System)erp.mjmetal.com/Download/MJN/2005662840.pdf · WELDING SYSTEM ASSESSMENT PROCEDURE ... CQI-15. Speciai Process: Welding System Assessmenf

1.10

Is

ther

e a

writ

ten

proc

ess

spec

ifica

tion

for

all a

ctiv

e pr

oces

ses?

9s %&kg

i!t3q

l C

Hgt

g";i

$j%

hi?t

25

L177

/.?

The

wel

ding

org

aniz

atio

n sh

all h

ave

writ

ten

proc

ess

spec

ifica

tions

for

all a

ctiv

e pr

oces

ses

and

repa

ir pr

oces

ses

whi

ch i

dent

ify a

ll st

eps

of

the

proc

ess

incl

udin

g re

leva

nt o

pera

ting

para

met

ers.

8x

4

OH

AI

L

xx

lo

p+

%kg

g3q1 C

HEt g

s 33hiS

7tX

12 y

lq0F

ijt

q, Z

I-3 ?

)+ q

pJ E

tSS

zS

ti5\+

Q

g xx

+

o o

E

tAlg

st2

gf

2";iq

l CH

Et g

z $

jgA

is 7

tXIJ

y)

qOk

EtCt

. E

xam

ples

of

oper

atin

g pa

ram

eter

s as

def

ined

by

the

rele

vant

pro

cess

tabl

es.

ql) zk

g y)+

g3 t

able

sql

%9

l3

El5

S

uch

para

met

ers

shal

l n

ot

only

be

defin

ed, t

hey

shal

l ha

ve o

pera

ting

tole

ranc

es a

s de

fined

by

the

orga

niza

tion

in o

rder

to

mai

ntai

n pr

oces

s co

ntro

l. 01

2iF

t E

ts+

2x1

3O

IFljr

lFt

OJ-

Elq,

$5

^xlq

lAj

3g

Igl C

Hg

8]g

(gg)0

1

f

%Kt

. S

XiI

z +$

;C.li5

t71

PI6H

-,

Thes

e pr

oces

s sp

ecifi

catio

ns m

ay t

ake

the

form

of

wor

k in

stru

ctio

ns, j

ob

car

d, s

et-u

p sh

eets

, or

othe

r si

mila

r do

cum

ents

.

OlE!{E

l sg

sgA

i+ 5

1% X

lAlA

i, +

kg

7k

s,

$jX

l, A

lZ %

+ C

IS

Hl$=

El Fhis

f

zct.

1.11 H

as a

val

id p

rodu

ct c

apab

ility

stu

dy b

een

perf

orm

ed i

nitia

lly a

nd a

fter

proc

ess

chan

ges?

87

1 $

%%

01

qq1

GgE

t 3k

k kq

g;17

t sh

l .5

1geL

17]1

?

The

orga

niza

tion

shal

l per

form

pro

duct

cap

abili

ty s

tudi

es f

or t

he i

nitia

l val

idat

ion

of e

ach

proc

ess,

afte

r re

loca

tion

of a

ny p

roce

ss e

quip

men

t, an

d af

ter

a m

ajor

pro

cess

cha

nge

of

any

equi

pmen

t or

para

met

er. ZqS 4

gz0

1 Z

71

2 O

fy sz

";ttH

lgl

01%

$,

qs

&kt1

1 g

g F

IFO

[ F

Q g2 ;

jg $

011

CHEt

%fit

+q

975j sh

l 6H

OF

FtEt

. Th

e or

gani

zatio

n an

d cu

stom

er s

hall

defin

e w

hat

cons

titut

es a

maj

or p

roce

ss c

hang

e.

54

2 z

qz F

Q g

g 9

3s

+$jet

+ g

ql

CH6H

-$$

6101

Et

Et.

Initi

al p

rodu

ct c

apab

ility

stu

dies

sha

ll be

con

duct

ed f

or a

ll w

eldi

ng p

roce

sses

per

eac

h pr

oces

s

path

def

ined

in

scop

e of

wor

k an

d in

acc

orda

nce

with

cus

tom

er r

equi

rem

ents

.

$tfi

gl

LHql

Z-

kqk

g%

UtC

t g

a %kg 2 2

q Q

qAtg

tgl

+]E

l El&

kq

9';17

t 2

~1

rl

qoI:

gtc

t.

In th

e ab

senc

e o

f cu

stom

er r

equi

rem

ents

, the

org

aniz

atio

n sh

all

esta

blis

h ac

cept

able

ran

ges

for

mea

sure

s o

f ca

pabi

lity.

24

Q-;lA

tgb;d.

o +X

H A

], E

48

+f 5

j 6]g

$jb

f

gtg

6H

Ol

ctct

. A

n ac

tion

plan

sha

ll ex

ist

to a

ddre

ss t

he s

teps

to

be

follo

wed

in

case

cap

abili

ty in

dice

s fa

ll ou

tsid

e

cust

omer

req

uire

men

ts o

r es

tabl

ishe

d ra

nges

.

ZL

~

zo A

IiL

zq

Q?A\

~I

~8

y;ql

$-$

kq

~1

~5

j

[[t~

k ~

t4

1~

~

tq7

1

6101

EkC

t.

Page 21: Assessment - BES/ERP(Best Enterprise System)erp.mjmetal.com/Download/MJN/2005662840.pdf · WELDING SYSTEM ASSESSMENT PROCEDURE ... CQI-15. Speciai Process: Welding System Assessmenf

Eac

h pr

oces

s pa

th in

clud

es a

ll co

mbi

natio

ns o

f eq

uipm

ent t

hat

are

inte

grat

ed i

n th

e pe

rfor

man

ce

of

a w

eldi

ng p

roce

ss, e

.g.,

wel

d ce

ll w

ith A

and

B s

ide

fixtu

re f

eedi

ng a

noth

er w

eld

cell

with

A a

nd

B si

de f

ixtu

re o

r m

ultip

le m

achi

nes.

7,tq

gs 7

llqs

gd

;fs

+?zJ

(q1S

59

gfi c

ell ,4

21 B

fixtu

reql

E 4

E

cell

AAPt

B g3 fi

xtur

e CC

& 7

IYI3

fee

ding

GI&

Z

.)q

lAj

q+

2s

&y3l

gl E

QjZ

ggt

TtC

l.

Cap

abili

ty s

tudy

tech

niqu

es s

hall

incl

ude

boun

dary

sam

ple

cond

ition

s as

def

ined

by

the

cont

rol

plan

that

are

rob

ust

and

mee

t al

l cus

tom

er r

equi

rem

ents

.

%Zj

gq

7Iz

g R

tsA

jl Y

lZ !2g

24

Q+L

Atg

ts 2

qA

l7l&

2i

lqql

216

H

5212

bo

unda

ry s

ampl

e &

tEH

S 4g

t E

tCk.

Exa

mpl

e, a

ny c

ombi

natio

n o

f to

lera

nces

as

defin

ed b

y P

roce

ss T

able

s.

q18

zF4L

Pro

cess

Ta

ble

ss 5

2lZ

D19

6ig

2l Z

E.

1.12

Doe

s th

e w

eldi

ng o

rgan

izat

ion

mon

itor

and

anal

yze

data

ove

r tim

e, a

nd r

eact

to

this

dat

a?

g;"d

ZT

E 2

LIE

jS i

dtq

EjlO

lEi

Z2t

A1

2g

gq

6tq

, 01

ql

OlE

jq1 35%

$1gt

Ll71

t?

The

anal

ysis

of

prod

ucts

or

proc

esse

s ov

er t

ime

can

yiel

d vi

tal

info

rmat

ion

for

defe

ct p

reve

ntio

n

effo

rts.

24

48

sz

321 A

las $gk

qlgt

81

tS +

lGH

%+&

j O,!

39s k

tg 31

+

zct.

Th

e or

gani

zatio

n sh

all h

ave

a sy

stem

to

col

lect

, an

alyz

e, a

nd r

eact

to

pro

duct

or

esse

ntia

l pro

cess

data

ove

r tim

e. z

E!g

f j5

J6tZ

irl

"A

46

tk

hl&

g 2 4

18 4

g $

ij+&

js ss ';!ilk

A1

2

E-llO

lE]q

l 3;H

Ss

=+ ek A

I&g-

$ij

7tX

lZ ?

,)@/01

ELL

/. M

etho

ds o

f an

alys

is s

hall

incl

ude

ongo

ing

tren

d or

his

toric

al d

ata

anal

ysis

of

prod

uct

or p

roce

ss

para

met

ers.

The

org

aniz

atio

n sh

all d

eter

min

e w

hich

par

amet

ers

to in

clud

e in

suc

h an

alys

is.

q~

io

11

-1 t-

'ta"

o n

L 4

1%

3%

$jY

ggk

%&

X

jI$j0

1 hi

stor

ical

qIO

IE{

gq 9& g

z E

iGs

A

ggt6

tqok

~t

q.

ol

zi~

t ,tq

s ~

gb

$;&

~ts

-g

~3

6tq

oj:

gt

ct.

1.13

Is

man

agem

ent

revi

ewin

g th

e w

eld

cont

rol

syst

em a

t a

freq

uenc

y de

term

ined

by

the

cont

rol

plan

? g1

;jI 7j

Izql

ZI6

H 339 yf q

lhj g

c

h[&

gs @

7--d

Gf+

P2

[~

0[

Yle

Ll>

Jf?

Man

agem

ent s

hall

revi

ew t

he w

eld

proc

ess

cont

rol

syst

ems.

The

man

agem

ent r

evie

w s

hall

incl

ude

effo

rts

to d

etec

t ou

t-of

-con

trol

con

ditio

ns o

r al

arm

con

ditio

ns. T

he p

roce

ss o

f re

view

ing

the

cont

rol s

yste

m s

hall

be d

ocum

ente

d an

d re

cord

ed in

the

cont

rol

plan

.

Pz1X

Jg ga

8% g

x-/I

AI&

gg

6H

01 E

bC

t. ck

Z]g

C,!gg SX

llgI +

$+

+,tEH

s&

BZ

&tE

HS

G

7;lg

+

$--

l&

kqf 4

.gt 514

YlCt

.

Page 22: Assessment - BES/ERP(Best Enterprise System)erp.mjmetal.com/Download/MJN/2005662840.pdf · WELDING SYSTEM ASSESSMENT PROCEDURE ... CQI-15. Speciai Process: Welding System Assessmenf

1.14

Are

int

erna

l as

sess

men

ts b

eing

cot

nple

ted

on a

n an

nual

bas

is, a

t a

min

imum

, usi

ng A

IAG

A

WS

A?

Z/&

2 9

7122S

LH

F S

7t

Aj

AIA

G W

SA

S A

t%

gtL17

7t?

The

orga

niza

tion

shal

l co

nduc

t in

tern

al a

sses

smen

ts o

n an

ann

ual b

asis

, at

a m

inim

um, u

sing

the

AIA

G W

SA

. C

once

rns

shal

l be

add

ress

ed i

n a

tim

ely

man

ner.

zq

g %

I& 9 7

1+

0 S

LH

F 3

71

hl

AIA

G W

SA

S A

tgijH

OI

EtEt

. 5Qz

b gg A

171

9 gj

6tYI

q$

q 4

01

EtE

t.

1.15

Doe

s th

e Q

ualit

y D

epar

tmen

t rev

iew

, ad

dres

s, a

nd d

ocum

ent

cust

omer

and

int

erna

l

conc

erns

? SE.J 77

H3

8 g

';1761;1

EI-

Fq 2

4 3

LH

FyO

,! 5ifs

:t A

tst8

+hi

e} E

tL177

\?

The

qual

ity m

anag

emen

t sys

tem

sha

ll in

clud

e a

proc

ess

for

docu

men

ting,

rev

iew

ing,

and

addr

essi

ng c

usto

mer

con

cern

s an

d an

y ot

her

conc

erns

inte

rnal

to

the

orga

niza

tion.

gs

7f12

A

lkg

g S

Aig

t, ag, 24

ZQ

Ats

t 2 z

qq

l tflg

t q

g E

te L

flF

qg $

Q

,J,t?&t2

& E

tFk

L

zx

i=

0 0 2

*a

oH

OI

-61

- 2'1

.

A d

isci

plin

ed p

robl

em-s

olvi

ng a

ppro

ach

shal

l be

use

d.

z!- E

A~

!.

LXjl

6HS

;T;1

201 h

tg!G

1q W

ok E

tct.

1.16

Is th

ere

a co

ntin

ual i

mpr

ovem

ent

plan

app

licab

le t

o e

ach

proc

ess

defin

ed i

n th

e sc

ope

of

the

asse

ssm

ent?

g7

t +sq

1 g

Olfi

! 4 3

3q1 C

Hct

iLt7;14

+/ $j 7

H3

Yl2

!OI

lsLl

?7t?

The

wel

ding

org

aniz

atio

n sh

all d

efin

e a

proc

ess

for

cont

inua

l im

prov

emen

t fo

r th

eir

wel

ding

proc

esse

s id

entif

ied

in th

e sc

ope

of

the

WS

A. gjc;j ZqS W

SA

OI 2

9 ql

gt$

.jfi! g;T;1 S

3 q

l CH

Et

Xl+

qg

7H-$

3

3%

qtz6

HO

l Et

Et.

The

cont

inua

l im

prov

emen

t pr

oces

s sh

all b

e de

sign

ed t

o b

ring

abo

ut i

mpr

ovem

ents

in q

ualit

y

and

prod

uctiv

ity.

XI+Y

O,!

7H

3 3

3E

%2

3 %

kt$! 7

12%

916

1 Y

Yl

5lq

$E

l.

Iden

tifie

d ac

tions

sha

ll be

prio

ritiz

ed a

nd s

hall

incl

ude

timin

g (

estim

ated

com

plet

ion

date

s). T

he

orga

niza

tion

shal

l sho

w e

vide

nce

of p

rogr

am e

ffect

iven

ess.

3qg ~

.Z

~$

!j

O~

gz$!q

574s

Yq

Fq

Ok

Etq

.

1.17

Doe

s th

e Q

ualit

y M

anag

er o

r de

sign

ee a

utho

rize

the

disp

ositi

on o

f m

ater

ial f

rom

qua

rant

ine

stat

us?

%E.J

SlZl

Xt g

g X

lsX

t+

321f

i! &t

jt%ql

Aj X

HS.

ZtlH

S 6

471

gtLl

77t?

The

Qua

lity

Man

ager

or

desi

gnee

is r

espo

nsib

le fo

r au

thor

izin

g an

d do

cum

entin

g th

e di

spos

ition

of q

uara

ntin

ed m

ater

ial

gs

ZtZ

lXt

gs

XIs

Xt+

43

19

XHSO

l gtlH

g

6{7/

6t;l

SA

iat

6t+4

1 q

wl

?,!El.

Page 23: Assessment - BES/ERP(Best Enterprise System)erp.mjmetal.com/Download/MJN/2005662840.pdf · WELDING SYSTEM ASSESSMENT PROCEDURE ... CQI-15. Speciai Process: Welding System Assessmenf

1.18

Are

the

re p

roce

dure

s or

wor

k in

stru

ctio

ns a

vaila

ble

to t

he w

eldi

ng p

erso

nnel

that

def

ine

the

wel

ding

pro

cess

? +$

a ZZ

O)

SO

]$!

7H

g ga;;f

oll EH

Et O

lg 71

+55t

3x

1 4

s 4

pJ

XlAl

Aj7t

%2L

lIlt

?

The

re s

hall

be p

roce

dure

s or

wor

k in

stru

ctio

ns a

vaila

ble

to w

eldi

ng p

erso

nnel

cov

erin

g th

e

wel

ding

pro

cess

. tfl

ct 7

H9

gas C

tF

k O

Ig 7

t%Ft

ZZ

tAj gs %

tgXl

AlAj

7\

y1q0

1 Et

Ct.

Thes

e pr

oced

ures

or

wor

k in

stru

ctio

ns s

hall

incl

ude

met

hods

of

addr

essi

ng p

oten

tial e

mer

genc

ies

(suc

h as

pow

er fa

ilure

), e

quip

men

t st

art-

up,

equi

pmen

t sh

ut-d

own,

pro

duct

seg

rega

tion

(See

2.8),

prod

uct

insp

ectio

n, s

afet

y, h

ouse

-kee

ping

, an

d ge

nera

l ope

ratin

g pr

oced

ures

.

012iE

I 2

x1

gs

XI

AlA

j+

&tX

Hq$

j as-$

,tgt2

CtF

& S

XjI

z Zg

tZtJ

yl

OjO1

Stq

, ztti1

21 A

Ist,

&tH

]21

g

2, gb

k ?

g, g&

t g

a, 93, ztE!

lgy

eE

tq2 +

La

Ct$/

Ok

A zt q.

Thes

e pr

oced

ures

or

wor

k in

stru

ctio

ns s

hall

be a

cces

sibl

e to

sho

p flo

or p

erso

nnel

.

0)2

{$)

3x

1 %

&

X\A

JA

f+

%bg

2&t

;oty

%O

l 71

%

ijHO1

E\;L

trt.

1.19

Is

ther

e a

prev

entiv

e m

aint

enan

ce p

rogr

am?

Is m

aint

enan

ce d

ata

bein

g ut

ilize

d to

fo

rm a

pred

ictiv

e m

aint

enan

ce p

rogr

am?

41%

t $+X

I Z

S1

3 01

%

$LI7

Jt?

$+XI

EtZl

ti1

01 Yk

41%

t %X

I

nS32,H

g ?

36t7

1 91

81 2

g a

L17Jt

?

-

The

orga

niza

tion

shal

l ha

ve a

doc

umen

ted

prev

entiv

e m

aint

enan

ce p

rogr

am f

or p

roce

ss

equi

pmen

t (a

s id

entif

ied

by th

e P

roce

ss T

able

s).

EY

F g% $

!Bl41

S

AiB

t2 q

l?J

$+Xl

gt2]

gs32?fg

7tX1

2 yj

q01:

EtLt

ct.

The

prog

ram

sha

ll be

a c

lose

d-lo

op p

roce

ss t

hat

track

s m

aint

enan

ce e

ffort

s fr

om

req

uest

to

com

plet

ion

to a

sses

smen

t o

f ef

fect

iven

ess.

E..Z

It$jF

528;

;folIA

jFEj

It2

t.Y

$j g7tO

j1 C

Hgt

%t%7

?tXI

%XI

kq

g F

q6ijt

t cl

osed

-loop

gg O

lqO

k ?L

C).

Equ

ipm

ent o

pera

tors

sha

ll ha

ve th

e op

port

unity

to

rep

ort

prob

lem

s, a

nd p

robl

ems

shal

l al

so b

e

hand

led

in a

clo

sed-

loop

man

ner.

%!ti\ +t

gXt+

9

2h

f SX

iIql

CHEt

71815 3

;YS

t.Z

%

q01

6tq,

ZX

ilk c

lose

d-lo

op 3

&0

S C

t$/o

k %

30

1 C

t.

Com

pany

dat

a, e

.g.,

dow

ntim

e, q

ualit

y re

ject

s, fi

rst-

time

thro

ugh

capa

bilit

y, r

ecur

ring

mai

nten

ance

wor

k or

ders

, an

d op

erat

or-r

epor

ted

prob

lem

s, s

hall

be u

sed

to im

prov

e th

e pr

even

tive

mai

nten

ance

pro

gram

. bl

At 4

1olE

i 41

% 55 %

XlAl

Lt, gs

7{?

, %

qg

set

2 A

/!G,

.5l%

OlSl

+ 3

Zl

5?E

/ IL

E!lJ

%tg

Xtq1

41 2

2JZ

gqlk q

/%t

%XI

Z

slg

gb-$

,tg $/8H

At+$

8HOl

30101t.

Mai

nten

ance

dat

a sh

all

be c

olle

cted

and

ana

lyze

d as

par

t of

a p

redi

ctiv

e m

aint

enan

ce p

rogr

am.

EX

1 tj

lOlE

{k q

lgt

$XI

Z.ZIL$jL?

I F

Z2

.ZM

i S

4.5

lq~

jOl 9E

t.

Page 24: Assessment - BES/ERP(Best Enterprise System)erp.mjmetal.com/Download/MJN/2005662840.pdf · WELDING SYSTEM ASSESSMENT PROCEDURE ... CQI-15. Speciai Process: Welding System Assessmenf

1.20

Has

the

wel

ding

org

aniz

atio

n de

velo

ped

a cr

itica

l spa

re p

art

list

and

are

the

parts

ava

ilabl

e

to t

nini

miz

e pr

oduc

tion

disr

uptio

ns?

8x3

Ot

l -J-11-

X7

;IA

lo

a/iit

Xi

LT

L

01

9%

?p ES 7H

gGtl;

l 25

1 Z

EtS

Z[&

Pt6\

7] q

l6J L$gg

7H 2

$J L

l ?]I?

The

wel

ding

org

aniz

atio

n sh

all d

evel

op a

nd m

aint

ain

a cr

itica

l spa

re p

arts

list

and

sha

ll en

sure

the

avai

labi

lity

of s

uch

part

s to

min

imiz

e pr

oduc

tion

disr

uptio

ns.

gz z

qg td

lEtq0

,! ql

Hl F

g i?

I^Es

7H

s6t.7

1 $X

IGHO

I 6

tq g

kt

2E

tg Z

l&Zt

Et71

91

51

01

g7

t-5

Et F

gs ~

t~

GH

0~

Ct

Ct.

1.21

HOIN

do

es t

he o

rgan

izat

ion

docu

men

t an

d re

spon

d to

qua

lity

spill

s, n

onco

nfor

man

ce,

cust

omer

con

cern

s?

zqg q241 gz $+532t

+g

OIZ

X!~

J!.

2qpj

zjq1

qgq-2

$JAjPt

%tL

l77t?

Rea

ctio

n pl

ans

are

to b

e fo

llow

ed p

er t

he c

ontr

ol p

lan

and

PFM

EA

or,

in th

e ca

se o

f ne

wly

inde

ntifi

ed is

sues

PFM

EA

and

con

trol

pla

n m

ust

be u

pdat

ed t

o r

efle

ct th

e ne

w f

ailu

re m

ode

and

reac

tion

step

s ta

ken.

XHE

Xl Y

IyP

Con

trol

pla

n %

PF

ME

AS

[[12

tolr

6tq

%k, 4-

2-

+5xj1

01

PFM

EA

P~ C

ontr

ol p

lan2

1 3-$

l. failu

re m

ode

PI

XHEX

I 2Y

lqIA

l $.le

HP

3%

2%-;i

t7l

~G

H

%I=

A~

~4

10

1~

G

HO

F ~t

i~tr-

1.

1.22

Wha

t is

the

proc

ess

devi

atio

n re

quire

men

ts o

f yo

ur c

usto

mer

?

g;";

i 2+jq

l 24.'.7-I

Q_TL

h1;Sd.S

$!.9zL1

771?

If th

ere

are

to b

e ch

ange

s in

pro

cess

out

side

of

the

curr

ent

cont

rol

plan

and

las

t ag

reed

up

on

proc

ess

and

part

s si

gn o

ff, d

o yo

u kn

ow w

hat

your

cus

tom

er r

equi

rem

ents

are

, ha

ve y

ou n

otifi

ed

your

cus

tom

er,

and

do y

ou h

ave

cust

omer

app

rova

l prio

r to

mak

ing

the

chan

ge?

%Q-k

2xH

Y

Iq Q

IJll g;

";i 3

% 3

Z]$

"S

gz

L$g si

ng o

ffql

3301 %

c~

Y

oq

olx

O

tl

0

10

Z

qg

I Q

?AI%

Ol

TA

z

1 Z

J-

M-q

, 2

4q

IAl

gxl&

tL!,

335171 2

ql 2

4 $

2z

'&I$

L1

?It?

1.23

Is

ther

e a

syst

em i

n p

lace

to

aut

horiz

e re

proc

essi

ng a

nd r

epai

r? Is

it d

ocum

ente

d?

x~

gg

zt 3 +

i?lg-

q

7tz

tk z

ql

~la

qo

l Y~

~L

IJ

~?

13-g

~~

jg

t

LIT

^?

The

qual

ity m

anag

emen

t sys

tem

sha

ll in

clud

e a

docu

men

ted

proc

ess

for

repr

oces

sing

and

rep

air

that

sha

ll in

clud

e au

thor

izat

ion

from

a c

usto

mer

des

igna

ted

indi

vidu

al.

=X

I iL

tz1

hlhf

ig 2401 q

kqt

xX/z

Ef a

7tS

Pgk

Et

THgS

gt 3

3-2 L

+21q

1 CH

E1

zAj$

t$j

533 g

gt

GH

OI

EtEt

.

Page 25: Assessment - BES/ERP(Best Enterprise System)erp.mjmetal.com/Download/MJN/2005662840.pdf · WELDING SYSTEM ASSESSMENT PROCEDURE ... CQI-15. Speciai Process: Welding System Assessmenf

The

proc

ess

shal

l de

scrib

e pr

oduc

t ch

arac

teris

tics

for

whi

ch r

epro

cess

ing

is a

llow

ed a

s w

ell

as

thos

e ch

arac

teris

tics

for

whi

ch r

epro

cess

ing

is n

ot p

erm

issi

ble.

g%g X

H 7

tzO

I $jg

7jL

t, 3

jg 5

1x1 ($s X

j]gs!

?l q

zs 77

lXIG

QA

tSH

OI 3L

Any

rep

roce

ssin

g ac

tivity

sha

ll re

quire

a n

ew p

roce

ssin

g co

ntro

l sh

eet

issu

ed b

y qu

alifi

ed t

echn

ical

pers

onne

l den

otin

g th

e ne

cess

ary

wel

ding

mod

ifica

tions

.

qW,E

t XH

5%

sigp

%+

y2

@E

+ss

LtEtL

H*

yL&

719q

I 11

6H gL

$g A

H!g gs g

Xj1

3 Q

Tgt

Ct.

Rec

ords

sha

ll cl

early

indi

cate

whe

n an

d ho

w a

ny m

ater

ial h

as b

een

repr

oces

sed.

71G

g qC

qgt

XH

Z7t

D

JZY

] XH

71

s S

I+x1

, 21

2]_1

;! 1 1

ql3

gg

6l

L~

E~

LH

~O

~

~t

~t

.

The

Qua

lity

Man

ager

or

a de

sign

ee s

hall

auth

oriz

e th

e re

leas

e of

rep

roce

ssed

pro

duct

.

gg z

tzlx

t g

g 2

41 +

$X

I+ xH 7

tgg x

jlg

gl

gb%

g g

7tq

qo

l gt

ct.

2.1

Doe

s th

e fa

cilit

y en

sure

tha

t th

e da

ta e

nter

ed in

the

rece

ivin

g sy

stem

mat

ches

the

info

rmat

ion

on t

he c

usto

mer

's s

hipp

ing

docu

men

ts?

Pq

Z 7

1Y

0/ 3

% E

hi"o

:oll

';i6i

*S ;

";llZ

gP Al

hE?t

oll

CjlO

lE-1

"d

3 I;1

g C

,ttL1

71\?

It is

crit

ical

that

all

cust

omer

req

uire

men

ts a

nd i

ot

iden

tific

atio

n be

ade

quat

ely

tran

sfer

red

to

inte

rnal

wel

ding

doc

umen

ts. 42 7

1q

83

Af

g

;,C

Ek$k

OJ

gX

J5 LH

? ZA

jZ %

71&

3s

CH 261

U

HF

6

tEt.

The

faci

lity

shal

l ens

ure

that

the

dat

a en

tere

d in

the

rece

ivin

g sy

stem

mat

ch th

e in

form

atio

n o

n

the

cust

omer

's s

hipp

ing

docu

men

ts.

E7

;g 2

1401

2g F

A1

3q

l lg

B,

XilZ

tj,tS

hlh

E?f

LY

l

qlOl

Ej

aTS

i;t&

3s

9%

$Hot:

Eti,t

q.

Doc

umen

ted

proc

esse

s an

d ev

iden

ce o

f co

mpl

ianc

e sh

all e

xist

, e.g

., sh

op tr

avel

ers,

wor

k or

ders

,

etc.

Ehi

4tg

Es

O/?

!Jj?+0

1 $5

7fg

7tK

(Z!

2qO

f Eb

Ltr-1.

Oil)

sho

p tra

vele

rs, zF Q

r-]

Som

etim

es t

he m

ater

ial r

ecei

ved

does

not

pre

cise

ly c

orre

spon

d to

cus

tom

er s

hipp

ing

docu

men

ts.

qqS

, X

l{$g

Xtz

&

tf&

Al

712.

k/O

l gt

+Fl

ZhiS

?t ~

XI

S~

XI

?&

-&K

t.

The

faci

lity

shal

l ha

ve a

det

aile

d pr

oces

s in

pla

ce t

o r

esol

ve r

ecei

ving

dis

crep

anci

es.

z&

!g g$

ijX

\s

6H

9617J

2ql

&tA

ilFb s

s$$

71

x1

2 3q

OF

EbCt

. Th

e re

quire

men

ts s

tate

d ab

ove

also

app

ly t

o c

aptiv

e w

eldi

ng d

epar

tmen

ts. T

his

proc

ess

refe

rs t

o

rece

ivin

g an

d sh

ippi

ng t

he p

arts

in

and

out

of

the

wel

ding

dep

artm

ent.

2.2

Is p

rodu

ct c

lear

ly i

dent

ified

and

sta

ged

thro

ugho

ut t

he w

eldi

ng p

roce

ss?

A,Hktg

zlg

?L

J4C5l

gt2a

Cri

;"dL

Iqt?

Pro

cedu

res

for

part

and

con

tain

er i

dent

ifica

tion

help

to

avo

id in

corr

ect

proc

essi

ng o

r m

ixin

g of

lots

. qzq

l EH

Fb $j

x\ 2

$37

1 "-(g F

q$jE

t $j$

\$t sk

~~~~ ~

l$t&

7-1

9

A2

EL

tJC

~1

App

ropr

iate

loc

atio

n an

d st

agin

g w

ithin

the

fac

ility

als

o he

lp t

o e

nsur

e th

at o

rder

s ar

e n

ot

Page 26: Assessment - BES/ERP(Best Enterprise System)erp.mjmetal.com/Download/MJN/2005662840.pdf · WELDING SYSTEM ASSESSMENT PROCEDURE ... CQI-15. Speciai Process: Welding System Assessmenf

ship

ped

un

til a

ll re

quire

d op

erat

ions

are

per

form

ed.

LHql

3251 9

1x1

3 Y

EtP

5?E 9%

Xtw

Ol

1 tl

+3

3 U

j/j]

tXl

Tg

Ol

+!q

S/X

l y?

-gs g

&t6

\+ 3%

Cus

tom

er p

rodu

ct s

hall

be c

lear

ly id

entif

ied

and

stag

ed t

hrou

ghou

t th

e w

eldi

ng p

roce

ss.

24

XjIS

S gz s

zs g6

H

gg

61

gt$

slJ

36H

XjO

I E

tEf.

Non

-wel

ded,

in-p

roce

ss,

and

finis

hed

prod

uct

shal

l be

prop

erly

seg

rega

ted

and

iden

tifie

d. A

ll

mat

eria

l sha

ll be

sta

ged

in a

ded

icat

ed a

nd c

lear

ly d

efin

ed a

rea.

-g%

~tq

lhj ~

lgz

x

jlg

ol~

hj

qlg

g q

26

1 g

z16H

.z

%t?

jsgO

k E

tct.

!2g X

HE

k

Xlz

g z

q1

3Z

12

3gk:t

qX

Iq1

ylq

ok

EtC

t.

2.3

Is lo

t tr

acea

bilit

y an

d in

tegr

ity m

aint

aine

d th

roug

hout

all

proc

esse

s?

eE

83g -gq LO

^ +

q+

j 9 g

g~

01

G

XI

~L

~~

I~

?

Out

-goi

ng l

ot(s

) sha

ll be

trac

eabl

e to

the

inc

omin

g lo

t(s)

. The

dis

cipl

ine

of

prec

isel

y id

entif

ying

lots

and

lin

king

all

pert

inen

t in

form

atio

n to

the

m e

nhan

ces

the

abili

ty t

o d

o r

oo

t ca

use

anal

ysis

and

cont

inua

l im

prov

emen

t. h

Xi

6!

-

01

7;ils

lg l

otg

S(4

41+

lo

ts -,-,,

-,- ,qOF

E

tEt.

g26ijl

G

Yr,!

lot

21 3%

.QE 33

$+ 3

yQ

t 2$

jg &

$q

s

39

gq2t

XI+

q?

j 7

H3

01

&qz gb-

h,t A

IgC

t.

2.4

Are

pro

cedu

res

adeq

uate

to

pre

vent

mov

emen

t of

non

conf

orm

ing

prod

uct

into

the

prod

uctio

n sy

stem

? ?X

I+

Hl$

S.2

E/l$

$Ol

+!j+j A

lh9

03

01

G(4

z q

l gtft

7;tk

ql

ggtL

/77t?

The

cont

rol

of s

uspe

ct o

r no

n-co

nfor

min

g pr

oduc

t is

req

uire

d to

pre

vent

inad

vert

ent s

hipm

ent

or

cont

amin

atio

n o

f ot

her

lots

. O

l+J

qS

541

4s

Hl$

+g

;E

(1IgS F

q 9

Et +!q

C

tE

lots

ol

g7

1.Z

G"d

1Xl

"5%

ql'$

jf;lq

ol:

E'E

t.

Pro

cedu

res

shal

l be

ade

quat

e to

pre

vent

mov

emen

t of

non

-con

form

ing

prod

uct

into

the

prod

uctio

n sy

stem

. Z

Xtk

UI$

+g

X

jl++

ol

AI

I9

oS

ftod

5lX

l OJ

.£%

(rll%

ZHO

k E

tCt.

Pro

cedu

res

shal

l ex

ist

addr

essi

ng p

rope

r di

spos

ition

, pr

oduc

t id

entif

icat

ion,

and

tra

ckin

g o

f

mat

eria

l flo

w i

n an

d ou

t of

the

hol

d ar

ea. 3C

:;ttk q

351

HH

kl,

7;11+

+ 4

S 1

21

2 g

!q

Y+q

IAjO

I

x~

g

+q

+jg

c

tqo

l: ~

tct.

A n

on-c

onfo

rmin

g ho

ld a

rea

shal

l be

clea

rly d

esig

nate

d to

mai

ntai

n se

greg

atio

n o

f su

ch m

ater

ial.

HI$

+ %

jqg

OIZ

jEt XH

s0l

SHHS

%

XI6

171

+lEH

~

2jl

Slq

OI E

tEt.

2.5

Are

con

tain

ers

free

of

inap

prop

riate

mat

eria

l and

con

tam

inan

ts?

"x

36

tZt

XH

s 9 ~

ZJ

~~

~F

E]

XtG

z$L1

77t?

T

lH

L

Con

tain

ers

hand

ling

cust

omer

pro

duct

sha

ll be

free

of

inap

prop

riate

mat

eria

l and

con

tam

inan

ts.

Zq

OI

XiIS

s g

7Ig

Fq

Sz

t XH

iZ 2 Q

.$jz

ZI.Z

FE

j X

t%S

+O

k E

kEt.

Afte

r em

ptyi

ng a

nd b

efor

e re

-usi

ng c

onta

iner

s, c

onta

iner

s sh

all

be in

spec

ted

to e

nsur

e th

at

all

Page 27: Assessment - BES/ERP(Best Enterprise System)erp.mjmetal.com/Download/MJN/2005662840.pdf · WELDING SYSTEM ASSESSMENT PROCEDURE ... CQI-15. Speciai Process: Welding System Assessmenf

A

part

s an

d in

appr

opria

te m

ater

ial h

ave

been

rem

oved

. g71S tflB

+, 2

1213 371s

XH

htg8

1-71

gqlk

gg F

g 2

+!-E

/sEt X

Hz71

Xjl7

jS/2

+Xlg

34

98t7

1 9/

61 g

E &

$OF

EtCt

. T

he s

ourc

e of

ina

ppro

pria

te m

ater

ial s

hall

be id

entif

ied

and

addr

esse

d.

J+Z.jz

gt X

Hsg

l ?%g q

tg8t

3, [

TtqO

l EtC

t.

Thi

s is

to

ens

ure

that

no

nonc

onfo

rmin

g w

elde

d pa

rts

or i

napp

ropr

iate

mat

eria

l con

tam

inat

e th

e

finis

hed

lot.

013s

g

o1

22

+$E

?$$ g

e F

Z.jz

F X

flS

7t 33Zy

10

tg S

L~A

I?lX

/ y2

sg

L otk

3s 4

I-O,!G

t71 9

l$&tO

ICt.

2.6

Is p

art

load

ing

spec

ified

, do

cum

ente

d an

d co

ntro

lled?

Fg

XHs

Algt

GtJ,

zAj.1

PtCt

q, %

7;11%

tL177

t?

Load

ing

para

met

ers

shal

l be

spec

ified

, doc

umen

ted,

and

con

trol

led.

Exa

mpl

es in

clud

e pa

rt l

oad

sequ

ence

and

cla

mp

sequ

ence

. P

arar

nete

rsg

q

3s i. A

lBtG

tZ,

zAj$

t 6

t-q

5;ijli;H 01

iii,t

Ct.

ql) 9s

$q

QA

j 3 c

la~

mp

$A

jg Z

gt

2.7

Is th

ere

a co

ntai

nmen

t re

actio

n pl

an a

nd a

re o

pera

tors

trai

ned

in t

he p

roce

ss?

O'^L

l?Jt

? gs$-q

1 g$g

7;t=

Xt71

5"

5L17

71?

'2x1

XH

ZX

l Y

lqol

,w

w

Ope

rato

rs s

hall

be tr

aine

d in

mat

eria

l han

dlin

g, c

onta

inm

ent

actio

n, a

nd p

rodu

ct s

egre

gatio

n in

the

even

t of

an

equi

pmen

t em

erge

ncy

incl

udin

g po

wer

failu

re.

7;ta

Xt-k

X

HS

. Lt

+'l,

%tX

I 35

x1

9 3

712ltgl gg3 c

ttllg

l z

~$

t@q

lAj~

l Xjlg

ZtlH

qI tH

3 g

gs P

OIO

F %

El.

Tra

inin

g sh

all

be d

ocum

ente

d. g

P&

? Fhj

Pt

Slo

f 01

9Ct.

W

ork

inst

ruct

ions

spe

cific

ally

add

ress

ing

pote

ntia

l typ

es o

f eq

uipm

ent

emer

genc

ies

and

failu

res

shal

l be

acc

essi

ble

to a

nd u

nder

stoo

d by

equ

ipm

ent

oper

ator

s. &

tXH

q O,!

lt:d

-tll z

s&tg

t d-E

2

xix

jo

, , , q,- "

k 7;tg

XI

Alq1

g?

715

6HO1

iftq

, $tk

J17;tzX

t7t

Olii

H%

f

Ylof

01 F

tCt.

Thes

e in

stru

ctio

ns s

hall

addr

ess

cont

ainm

ent/r

eact

ion

plan

s re

late

d to

all

elem

ents

of

the

wel

ding

proc

ess.

OlZ

jEl

XlA

lAtg

te 9

.E +

$g gs

91 Q

kQ

t 923 %

tXl/;

iHZX

l 7j

l$Z!

$Zj

Ctq

Ol

FlC

t.

Evi

denc

e sh

all e

xist

sho

win

g di

spos

ition

and

tra

ceab

ility

of

affe

cted

pro

duct

.

$374&

gtlH

"1

;5

00

2 c,

7;11$

3!21

++

$%

9.

qTfl

F

XH

6H

Ol

ZtCt

. U

npla

nned

or

emer

genc

y do

wnt

ime

grea

tly r

aise

s th

e ris

k o

f im

prop

er p

roce

ssin

g.

~~

Zl

~~

X~

y2

7jLt

as

2GtA

lctg

Fqgiii,

t gG

gt21

91";d

s Cf

lEk61

57t

AIg

Ct.

2.8

Is th

e ha

ndlin

g, s

tora

ge a

nd p

acka

ging

ade

quat

e to

pre

serv

e pr

oduc

t qu

ality

?

The

wel

der's

load

ing

syst

em,

in-p

roce

ss h

andl

ing,

and

shi

ppin

g pr

oces

s sh

all

be a

sses

sed

for

risk

of p

art

dam

age

or o

ther

qua

lity

conc

erns

. S

ag21 sq

A\&

%,

gs

Ekq1

Aj01

92% 1

2/2

1

~4

x4

, , ZX

-IS ,

Tb

n =

AA

~O

Tl@

o - 52 c

t~

3

23

ggq1 c

~g

q";dg ct

qo1

3~

1.

Page 28: Assessment - BES/ERP(Best Enterprise System)erp.mjmetal.com/Download/MJN/2005662840.pdf · WELDING SYSTEM ASSESSMENT PROCEDURE ... CQI-15. Speciai Process: Welding System Assessmenf

Oth

er p

ract

ices

suc

h as

sta

ckin

g of

ove

rload

ed c

onta

iner

s ca

n al

so i

ncre

ase

the

risk

of p

art

dam

age.

;lt;lQ

ty 8

71

01

?I4

71

qx

Het

C

IS

%e X

i/g

$hot2

1 q[g

g 5

7tA

Is +

?A

ct.

2.9

Are

pla

nt c

lean

lines

s, h

ouse

keep

ing,

env

ironm

enta

l and

wor

king

con

ditio

ns c

ondu

cive

to

cont

rol

and

impr

oved

qua

lity?

g.&

t ~

3,

;1

tq

a?,

gtg

12

12

$.)EH

& c$

gbk

tg

gz

ql 5

0 a

s0

lt

J~l'

~t?

RI

Pla

nt c

lean

lines

s, h

ouse

keep

ing,

env

ironm

enta

l, an

d w

orki

ng c

ondi

tions

sha

ll be

con

duci

ve t

o

cont

rolli

ng a

nd i

mpr

ovin

g qu

ality

. S

gt

;,tS

, ZtZ.1

a?,

12

12

kt

EH

+ g

ql

'&!

$j&

t;tfi!

8sq

1 $8 $

j;ii,G

&. O

lXdO

1 E

tEt.

The

wel

ding

org

aniz

atio

n sh

all

eval

uate

suc

h co

nditi

ons

and

thei

r ef

fect

on

qua

lity.

gz z

qg

Oli?

jEt

$,tEHQt

gsql

CUE1 1s.L

ll &Zt

(3i!t

)qI

g7

tg 61

01 E

tCt.

A h

ouse

keep

ing

polic

y sh

all b

e cl

early

def

ined

and

exe

cute

d.

61

73

M

t*

lo

S

36l

521

512, 9%

5101

CtE

t. tlT

LO ooL

The

faci

lity

shal

l be

rev

iew

ed fo

r co

nditi

ons

that

are

det

rimen

tal t

o q

ualit

y pr

oces

sing

suc

h as

loos

e pa

rts

on

floo

r, c

onta

min

ants

, oil,

ina

dequ

ate

plan

t lig

htin

g, f

umes

, et

c.

0 x

tax

tql~

j ~--ijHxJ ;

~!g

, Q

W

XI

2c

1M

O

MX

-iC

ttjt

x

xt xw, 7

th

521

gts

gi,J

o

SZ

, 71

Et

7-7

-L

oo -

0

2-1 21

011 G

HZ

g -&

tEHq

l tH

Et z

gg

%to

t01

EtE

t.

2.10

Are

pal

% f

ree

fro

m c

onta

min

ants

that

wou

ld b

e de

trim

enta

l to

the

qua

lity

of

the

wel

ding

proc

esse

s, s

ubse

quen

t pr

oces

ses,

or

the

prod

uct?

n=

o xi

2x

3

2tq

2x

3 E

L

xjlg

gl g

sql ij~sg sg

bs 2

+ y

)&

~g

.ggz.!+

~j

TX

TL

- 0 tJ

0 0

,

0 0 -,-

xta

ga

~1 T

I?

Par

ts s

hall

be fr

ee f

rom

con

tam

inan

ts th

at a

re d

etrim

enta

l to

the

qua

lity

of

the

wel

ding

pro

cess

es,

subs

eque

nt p

roce

sses

, or

the

pro

duct

. F

gg 8

fi S%, 748

$3

%P

41%

01 S

Sq

I &HZ+$

aebG

002 2 T

* 0

1"

ML

2

% S

SZ

;L!E

j 7

;t

~Z

~O

~

",CEt.

If a

pplic

able

, pre

-was

h an

d po

st-w

ash

para

met

ers

shal

l be

mon

itore

d an

d do

cum

ente

d.

qg;t

fi!Ct

2, A

t3 A

iifl%t

c$

At+

414

EtS

s QL

IE-1

~

Aj~

t8H

O~

E

tEt.

3.1

Are

the

fac

ilitie

s su

ffici

ent f

or t

he w

eldi

ng o

pera

tion?

gfi q

taql

CH

gt

AIs

g gg $

5tL17

71?

This

cou

ld i

nclu

de b

ut

is n

ot li

mite

d to

, fa

cilit

ies

capa

bilit

ies

such

as

safe

ly,

envi

ronm

enta

l

regu

latio

ns/p

ract

ice,

suf

ficie

nt i

ncom

ing

pow

er (

bala

nce

and

load

ing)

, air

(siz

ing,

filte

ring

and

clea

nlin

ess)

, wat

er,

pow

er s

uppl

y gr

ound

ing

per OEM a

nd r

egul

ator

y sp

ecifi

catio

ns, g

as m

ixin

g

Page 29: Assessment - BES/ERP(Best Enterprise System)erp.mjmetal.com/Download/MJN/2005662840.pdf · WELDING SYSTEM ASSESSMENT PROCEDURE ... CQI-15. Speciai Process: Welding System Assessmenf

syst

em (

equi

pmen

t an

d si

zing

), ve

ntila

tion,

and

ade

quat

e lig

htin

g.

0174

" 2

g~

HO

k

--

LA

6

txl9

,

$3

, 33 2

XiI

/2%

, %

9F

ZS

$7l

(bal

ance

an

d lo

adin

g),

s7/(

sizi

ng

, filt

erin

g an

d

clea

nlin

ess)

, g

, OE

MS

t 71

32

, +X

j1 Zjs

XI 9 A

t0$A

j, 7

th S

zt

Al&

fr?l

, gt

7l$k

Xl,

g$F

2 7321 6

)s A1

2 s

Zj9

j3

7471

$K

t. -

3.2

Are

the

pow

er s

uppl

ies

suffi

cien

tly s

ized

?

37

1 S

SS

Sg

Et

LIJ7

\?

The

pow

er s

uppl

y sh

ould

be

adeq

uate

for

the

man

ufac

turin

g pr

oces

s w

ith c

onsi

dera

tion

no

t

limite

d to

ou

tpu

t en

ergy

, du

ty c

ycle

, coo

ling,

flow

rat

es a

nd g

roun

ding

.

37

1 -

SS

e

Z%

!g IL

a6

H E

T301 (4

14x1

, 019

At0

19

, 3

3, 3% ~

$2

,

gro

un

din

gq

l

XjlE

t 2

01

3gi3

H 0

1 E

tCt.

3.3

Are

pro

cess

equ

ipm

ent

calib

ratio

ns a

nd/o

r ve

rific

atio

n ce

rtifi

ed, d

ocum

ente

d, a

vaila

ble,

and

curr

ent?

gg %

tHl

calib

ratio

ns2t

7;l

Atk

$j%

5lq,

s

Ajb

t5lq

, O

lg 7

t~~

tL]J

lt?

The

caiib

ratio

n an

d ce

ftiii

catio

n o

i the

pro

cess

equ

ipm

ent

shal

l be

chec

ked

at r

egul

ar s

peci

fied

inte

rval

s. R

efer

to

the

app

licab

le P

roce

ss T

able

s.

gz ;;!tB

c,ttll01

calib

ratio

niit

$g

P %

Alb

tr,!

;;1-q

+o,! ctq2Z

y7;

l S

lq0

/: E

tCt.

Pro

cess

Ta

ble

g *d

.2 6t"

d A

lP.

3.4

Has

a p

reve

ntat

ive

mai

nten

ance

pro

gram

bee

n es

tabl

ishe

d an

d do

cum

ente

d?

U($

Jt

ES

Il.%

E iZ

t35

12

ZA

j5t

5lE

&L

l~lt?

Sup

plie

r sh

all

have

a p

reve

ntat

ive

mai

nten

ance

pro

gram

that

is d

ocum

ente

d an

d im

plem

ente

d.

Ref

er t

o S

ectio

n 1.

19 a

nd t

he a

pplic

able

Pro

cess

Tab

les.

~~

$?

jAil

k

sA

jbt5

12

AI$

!j512

y

lk q

]$Jf

%X

I EZI.L

$!js

7tX

l.Z.

ylq

01

EtC

t.

49

1.1

901

Pro

cess

Ta

ble

ss &

I2 6

16

Al P

.

3.5

Hav

e th

e ne

cess

ary

repl

acem

ent

parts

and

pro

cess

con

sum

able

s be

en id

entif

ied

and

mad

e

read

ily a

vaila

ble?

XIA

X+

2

Ti

~

01

JL

1 xjl F

gs 7

1x1

2 y

jz, gg &

g+g %

to,!

6tq

$441

0

1~

7t

~

8\41

ztL

l?lt?

The

repl

acem

ent

parts

and

pro

cess

con

sum

able

s sh

all

be id

entif

ied,

mai

ntai

ned

in th

e ap

prop

riate

volu

mes

and

pro

per

stor

age.

3A

j/ F

g2t +

g &

.5?$$s %

to,!

6101 6

tq,

qs

Et

gks

qg

Et

I;j&

t2ql

~

tZl6

HO

~

Kt K

t.

Con

sum

able

s m

ust

be o

n th

e cu

stom

er's

app

rove

d so

urce

list

(if

appl

icab

le).

Page 30: Assessment - BES/ERP(Best Enterprise System)erp.mjmetal.com/Download/MJN/2005662840.pdf · WELDING SYSTEM ASSESSMENT PROCEDURE ... CQI-15. Speciai Process: Welding System Assessmenf

&2

gg

Ft&

Al

Zq

OI

+0,!

ct X

IS

2l&

g&

tCj/

gO

lqO

[ E

tCf.

(7tk

6tC

tg)

Ref

er t

o t

he a

pplic

able

Pro

cess

Tab

les,

Sec

tion

2.0

and

Sec

tion

1.19

.

-11-t

o

h&

5l

+ P

roce

ss T

able

s, q

fJ 2

.0 1.192 g

2E

ZlZ

t.

This

sha

ll be

cap

ture

d in

tool

s su

ch a

s th

e se

t up

pro

cedu

re,

PFM

EA a

nd C

ontr

ol P

lans

. It

shou

ld

be in

clud

ed in

the

lay

ered

pro

cess

aud

it or

oth

er s

imila

r ty

pe q

ualit

y re

view

pro

cess

.

01

3Z

set

up

2kf

Al,

PF

MEA

, Con

trol

Pla

ni!t

2s

Bql

i#%jBI-

SHO

I: T

ct.

01

gE

941

s 0

1s

X

i

2

tl he\ ZE E

? 0

11 X

I X

i 7

4

ZX

i

o o

7

L... I

I,, 0,-1

Z2

o o

o

oO

fl P

gk ~l

O1A

O1I

TLt.

3.6

Are

the

pro

cess

, equ

ipm

ent,

and

safe

ty a

larm

che

cks

bein

g te

sted

at

the

requ

ired

freq

uenc

y or

afte

r an

y re

pair

or r

ebui

ld?

"Xi

o 0

1

gtt

ll 22 2

9 7

;lA

tk Q

7g

YE

sg 0

19

P%

XH

9+

gq

1 E

jlh

E z

L177

f?

The

wel

ding

ope

ratio

n sh

all

have

a li

st o

f w

eldi

ng p

roce

ss,

equi

pmen

t, an

d sa

fety

ala

rms.

g;";

1 %

;";1

21&

E,

gH1,

92 2

gs 7

tX1

2 Y

lqO

l TE

t.

Thes

e al

arm

s sh

all

be in

divi

duai

ly te

sted

at

the

requ

ired

freq

uenc

y as

lis

ted

in th

e co

ntro

l pl

an,

and

afte

r an

y re

pair,

pro

cess

cha

nge

or r

ebui

ld. T

hese

che

cks

shal

l be

docu

men

ted.

OlZ

igt

39

+ c

ontr

ol p

lan

12

12

3.9, 8% Y

3Ofl

21

&E

dt

9 ;

,!gZM

i 4qt

Ejl

hE

51

q0

1

CkE

t. 01

2jgt

7;

lAk+

P

AjP

t 5l

OF

gI-C

t.

4.1

Is th

ere

a re

cord

of

the

desi

gn a

nd s

et-u

p o

f th

e fix

ture

?

SY

I 71

G

% f

ixtu

re21

set

-up

71

g0

1 Z

&L

I?I~

?

Sup

plie

r sh

all h

ave

docu

men

tatio

n of

the

fix

ture

des

ign,

tha

t ar

e st

ored

pro

perl

y an

d ac

cess

ible

.

gs

a?

jl&

q

se

l X

igt5

12

sz2

+ %

& fix

ture

541

FA

js

71

x12

3q

OF

EtE

t.

Pro

per

iden

tific

atio

n an

d re

visi

on le

vel o

n th

e fix

ture

or

rela

ted

to t

he f

ixtu

re.

q3

9 h

_l%

IZ

l2

fixtu

re21

+%

E

+ f

ixtu

reet

ztg

yl+

3.

Doc

umen

ted

fixtu

re s

et-u

p (i.

e.,

clam

ps, p

ins,

loca

ting

devi

ces)

SA

jBt

@ F

ixtu

re s

et-u

p.

4.2

Is th

e po

sitio

ning

of

each

par

t be

ing

cont

rolle

d?

7,t

?lf;l

&k0

171

%Xi]

5f;l2

yle

L177

t?

A m

etho

d to

det

ect

prop

er fi

xtur

e an

d pa

rt p

ositi

on is

req

uire

d fo

r ea

ch p

art,

such

as

the

use

of

prox

imity

sw

itche

s, o

ptic

al s

enso

rs,

mec

hani

cal p

robe

s, p

art

pres

ence

or

poke

yok

es.,

etc.

gg ?

ll;lQt

qg

ct

fixt

ure%

S

t0tL

H71

PlE

t g

tgG

2g h

Plk

lS?l

At%

, A

IqZ

jo,!

3x1

,

7141

q 0,!

Z

ht

fEr+

poke

yok

es 5

01 A

tEZ

t 2

01

qtq

t +$$

%

Pl6

H B?

9C

t.

Page 31: Assessment - BES/ERP(Best Enterprise System)erp.mjmetal.com/Download/MJN/2005662840.pdf · WELDING SYSTEM ASSESSMENT PROCEDURE ... CQI-15. Speciai Process: Welding System Assessmenf

4.3

Has

fix

turin

g/to

olin

g pr

even

tativ

e m

aint

enan

ce p

rogr

am b

een

esta

blis

hed?

fixtu

ring

/too

ling

ql?.J

8x1

2ZZ

3

30

1 %

titad

512

?l$

L177t?

Sup

plie

r sh

all h

ave

a pr

even

tativ

e m

aint

enan

ce p

rogr

am th

at is

doc

umen

ted

and

impl

emen

ted.

+z

gX

{l+

Z

hjg

t 212 hIg

212 $

+ ql

gt Z

tZl Z

S3

3s 7

tXIZ

YA

q01

CtC

t.

Ref

er t

o S

ectio

n 1.

18 a

nd t

he a

pplic

able

Pro

cess

Tab

les.

Exa

mpl

es: c

lean

ing,

deg

reas

ing,

and

fixtu

ring

int

egrit

y.

qg

1.1

821

01

g 7

t%3

Pro

cess

Ta

ble

sg %

?E6;

;J-2

\. q/)

clea

ning

, deg

reas

ing,

fixt

urin

g in

tegr

ity

4.4

Are

the

fix

ture

com

pone

nts

robu

st?

Fix

ture

-t=

.s@

E

t9 E

JtLIV

t?

Gas

, ai

r, se

nsor

s, c

ontr

ol c

able

s, e

tc.

are

adeq

uate

ly p

rote

cted

for

the

pro

cess

env

ironm

ent.

7th

, +

7(,

$A

j, %X

i\ ?'

j10\

% g

g +

%

glg

s 9

\61

3=7;\ I;I

P!Z

lqO

t: E

tCt.

4.5

Are

the

too

ling

com

pone

nts

desi

gned

for

the

wel

ding

pro

cess

? E.2

1 tra 0

QM

ZX

iS

2 0'

, , ,=;= , , , , TIO

H 2

41

!ZI%

SLI

~I~?

Fix

turin

g/to

olin

g w

as d

evel

oped

con

side

ring

mov

emen

t, re

ach,

acc

essi

bilit

y, to

ol c

ente

r po

int,

mai

nten

ance

, an

d er

gono

mic

s (m

anua

l, au

tom

atic

, and

rob

otic

s)

Fix

turi

ng

/to

olin

gg

01

5,

7-1 2

1, S

T g

&! PYE, 32

1,

$j%j1g

qbs

IlZ

j8tg

A-j

7H

2

5lq?

!Et.

Sect

ion

5 -

PRO

CES

S C

ON

TR

OL

S A

ND

CO

NF

IRM

AT

ION

+jE

gXf

l5!t.

qe

5.1

Doe

s w

eldi

ng o

pera

tion

incl

ude

the

follo

win

g? g

'C;j

;Ic,tg

g 01

2H

Atg

ks ~

gb

gt~

l17t?

Iden

tify

the

proc

ess

cont

rol e

quip

men

t ne

cess

ary

to m

onito

r, c

ontr

ol a

nd p

rovi

de f

eedb

ack

on a

ll

esse

ntia

l pro

cess

var

iabl

es a

s lis

ted

belo

w a

nd i

n th

e ap

plic

able

Pro

cess

Tab

les.

g+

q$

j g

z df

XjI

&ttl

lC Q

LIE

j8t.

Z

%1;1

17;t+

34 g

b$j"

;q 0

t2H

2i

+Z+o

/ pg

g+

+0

12

7tY

q 9 g

g2t

6Hkt

2

Ik P

roce

ss T

abel

sql

CHEl

ElE

qg X

j1g8

t2t.

Logi

c ha

s be

en e

stab

lishe

d to

effe

ctiv

ely

iden

tify

and

addr

ess

proc

ess

or e

quip

men

t fa

ults

.

0s Z

t21G

1 ~

tc

tM

O

61-0

1"

2-

7u

L

oo

2

-.,,O

tll,

gz

5%

StXgttll

7=fs

t=

2D

2

CI

S.

Page 32: Assessment - BES/ERP(Best Enterprise System)erp.mjmetal.com/Download/MJN/2005662840.pdf · WELDING SYSTEM ASSESSMENT PROCEDURE ... CQI-15. Speciai Process: Welding System Assessmenf

With

ove

r rid

es o

r re

sets

, lo

gs m

ust

be m

aint

aine

d.

Rid

es Gg r

eset

s, lo

gs71

Ett

EA

l Z

kZl

l]

qO

l FtCk.

Wel

d fa

ults

aud

ible

, vi

sibl

e an

d lin

e sh

ut d

own.

xb

2

-=Z

IT

2

-, x

o\+

ga 3g\2\ zt

y 3

%.

At

wel

d cy

cle

inte

rrup

t, pa

rt m

ust

no

t be

rem

oved

or

pass

ed u

ntil

dis

posi

tione

d by

app

ropr

iate

pers

onne

l.

g;"

;t h\

O(

g %

eH A

!, F

gg q

[7-l

&kx

( 027-(

Lt, ;C

-(%

sq(

o(6

H H

Hg

qq

177\

X(

%i!

.\A

(3/2

\.

Cal

ibra

tion

of

met

ers

and

syst

em c

ontr

ols.

415

k710

1 +i=

gi!t Al

CIg

E

Xjl

of

prev

ious

ope

ratio

ns h

ave

occu

rred

and

qua

lity

of

part

s ha

s be

en v

erifi

ed b

efor

e

the

next

ope

ratio

n be

gins

.

Lt

g %

tsO

l hI~

t51

71

$q

l 0

13

?itZ

g] z

ltg f

i36

tZ

$$sg

ZJj.

Sec

ure

back

ups

of

all p

rogr

ams

and

proc

edur

es (

elec

tron

ic p

refe

rred

).

eE

2~3134 3x10

1 tt

gg

+ %k q

lt

~~

g(

c~

~j

~g

)

Hig

h/Lo

w l

imit

alar

ms

esta

blis

hed

by a

ctua

l dat

a.

+jX

j140

,! 41

01E

]011

21Z

t E

SZ

?I

Ztq

lol SzdB g

t2.

Pro

cess

var

iabl

es h

ave

been

def

ined

and

dev

elop

ed b

y da

ta a

nd s

how

n to

be

stat

istic

ally

cap

able

.

Eil

OlE

jZ 7

\5q

o,!

2;"d

g -;

f.S

sf;l

, SY

I$!S?Z

S!.

q+

/Zt.

Acc

epta

ble

trac

eabi

lity

(seq

uenc

e/da

te c

odin

g) e

igs

+ %

+ +

q %

All

tool

ing

and

proc

ess

chan

ges

are

docu

men

ted.

.Q

E i-$!i!k

2%

Y2

S F

AiP

t 6H

Elt..

Doc

umen

ted

wel

ding

pro

cedu

res

for

each

wel

d lo

catio

n an

d ea

ch p

roce

ss v

aria

ble.

qt ?

lXlQ

t 7

tY

49

g;"

dql

tHgt

ghjg

tg

3x1.

Cha

nge

over

pro

cedu

re (

fille

r m

ater

ial,

fixtu

res)

3;tt

z tl

\qZ

t

Mus

t hav

e do

cum

ente

d st

art-

up a

nd s

hut-

dow

n pr

oced

ure.

Sh

jPt3

sta

rt-u

pzt

shut

-dow

n Z

RtS

Et_

tcA

l 7

1x

12

zq2t.

Page 33: Assessment - BES/ERP(Best Enterprise System)erp.mjmetal.com/Download/MJN/2005662840.pdf · WELDING SYSTEM ASSESSMENT PROCEDURE ... CQI-15. Speciai Process: Welding System Assessmenf

5.2

Are

pro

cess

con

trol

par

amet

ers

mon

itore

d at

est

ablis

hed

freq

uenc

ies?

Pro

cess

con

trol

par

amet

ers

shal

l be

mon

itore

d pe

r fr

eque

ncie

s es

tabl

ishe

d in

the

cont

rol

plan

.

An

appr

opria

te p

erso

n sh

all v

erify

the

pro

cess

con

trol

par

amet

ers.

Man

agem

ent

revi

ew is

req

uire

d

per

Que

stio

n 1.

13. ;is

51

qYO

l 1%

g

ql

Elf

S %

t$j.i

fHO

I E

tEt.

25

1.1

3qIh

j $1

21

g;;/7

;j 01 Q

+

get.

5.3

How

doe

s th

e or

gani

zatio

n re

view

and

rea

ct t

o o

ut o

f co

ntro

l/spe

cific

atio

n pa

ram

eter

s?

Eq'

-fP

;llX

jl/ht

Od

para

met

ersq

lhj

%q'-,t

3%

q%Y

I G

7dZ

tZ1.

3S

2LlT

Jt?

Are

the

re d

ocum

ente

d re

actio

n pl

ans

with

app

ropr

iate

lev

els

of c

onta

inm

ent

for

bo

th o

ut o

f

cont

rol

and

ou

t of

tol

eran

ce p

roce

ss p

aram

eter

s?

+Xi1

2 S

Fj

64+$

Q;tt

para

niet

erql

Aj

YqF

r 3011

CHEt

E

hjP

tg q

3E

t q7

;11 +

gi~-n

t xHzX

~

ylq

ol

%$

LlT

t?

Is th

ere

docu

men

ted

evid

ence

that

rea

ctio

n pl

ans

are

follo

wed

?

XH

EX

I 41

52s

[LIE

SA

jgtr

,!

e7

iXtS

7t

%$

LIT

t?

5.4

How

doe

s th

e or

gani

zatio

n ha

ndle

cha

nges

to

pro

cess

con

trol

par

amet

ers

afte

r in

itial

cust

omer

app

rova

l?

37

1 2

401 e

y S% Z

7r.11

para

met

ersq

l CH

El LC

gs

q%

Al

Its

L1

Tt?

Ther

e sh

all b

e a

hier

arch

y es

tabl

ishe

d fo

r m

akin

g an

d ap

prov

ing

proc

ess

chan

ges.

83% L

CS$

t.r;l,

2Y

$tf

3011

tHEt

gtzf

i! f;i

l417

/ 20

-101

EtI

t.

Each

pro

cess

sho

uld

be a

cted

on

acco

rdin

g to

the

leve

l of

chan

ge.

Rev

iew

pro

cess

cha

nges

with

your

cus

tom

er. 3qg 4

qt S

% g3 9

4I(

+$

F)q

l [[

IZt

?J

gs T

l6H

O1

EtE

t. ;14

71t g-3

9sql

EH6H

G

;;/7;j 5

tZt.

5.5

Are

In-

Pro

cess

and

Fin

al T

ests

per

form

ed a

t es

tabl

ishe

d fr

eque

ncie

s?

1%

21

3, 1

21

2 ~

ltX

lyt E

jlh

E+

gtz

fi! f

requ

enci

esql

Aj

.rfA

l G

l+7t

?

In-P

roce

ss a

nd F

inal

Tes

ts s

hall

be p

erfo

rmed

per

fre

quen

cies

in t

he c

ontr

ol p

lan

as a

gree

d up

on

betw

een

the

supp

lier

and

the

cust

omer

.

Page 34: Assessment - BES/ERP(Best Enterprise System)erp.mjmetal.com/Download/MJN/2005662840.pdf · WELDING SYSTEM ASSESSMENT PROCEDURE ... CQI-15. Speciai Process: Welding System Assessmenf

5.6

Are

wel

d qu

ality

req

clire

men

ts c

lear

ly d

efin

ed p

er c

usto

mer

spe

cific

atio

ns?

gs gz Q

+A

tgtg

2

4 A

t2

OtC

t g361 %

?I E

l%k

7/?

Wel

d qu

ality

req

uire

men

ts p

er i

nter

nal a

nd c

usto

mer

spe

cific

atio

ns, s

uch

as b

ut

no

t lim

ited

to t

he

follo

win

g te

stin

g m

etho

dolo

gy:

Xjl

~t

~O

lXl gg O

t2H

gI

$!,tagY

!t L

HF

ga gs Q

;LA

tgt

24

Atg

k

5.6.

1 C

ut a

nd e

tch

5.6.

2 P

art

loca

tion,

war

ping

, gap

, an

d di

men

sion

al r

equi

rem

ents

5.6.

3 C

orre

ct n

umbe

r o

f w

elds

5.6.

4 W

eld

leng

thls

ize

5.6.

5 W

eld

loca

tion

5.6.

6 N

on D

estr

uctiv

e T

estin

g (N

DT)

5.6.

7 S

patte

r, un

derc

ut,

poro

sity

, dis

cont

inui

ties,

.

5.6.

8 W

eld

dire

ctio

n co

nfirm

atio

n

5.6.

9 D

estr

uctiv

e te

stin

g

5.6.

10 A

dditi

onal

tes

ting

Inst

ruct

ion

s fo

r co

mp

leti

ng

th

e Jo

b A

ud

it qZ G

fflitS

gSi;

t71

TI

Et g

s

The

orga

niza

tion

is t

o c

ompl

ete

a m

inim

um o

f on

e w

eldi

ng p

art j

ob

aud

it du

ring

eac

h

asse

ssm

ent.

E;E

;-IP

<t 3

71

E

l+

8tL

t01 g

jc;f qg

7;1hts o

l%$H

ok E

tct.

This

sho

uld

be d

one

pref

erab

ly o

n a

part

iden

tifie

d fo

r on

e o

f th

e cu

stom

ers

requ

iring

com

plia

nce

A

to th

is d

ocum

ent.

01

32

Z

Aj0

11

CH6H

24

01

Q+

6t+

01

% A

tgk

gt7

tX/s

.szt$

j6t+

Fgs g

tq6

l 8H

Ok

ctC

t&

30

ICt.

Mor

e pa

rt jo

b a

udits

may

be

done

if ti

me

perm

its. P

refe

rabl

y, s

afet

y or

crit

ical

par

ts s

houl

d be

audi

ted.

A1

ctO

l 84

%t

EtC

tg

PLg

+$$

&A

t71

2

% ;ct

! 3

OlC

t. 7

tS

q0

19

Ftg

;!k

ZQ

ct

gh

t ;ct

! ?<

OIC

t.

This

may

not

be

easi

ly d

eter

min

ed w

ith fa

sten

ers,

esp

ecia

lly i

f the

fas

tene

r m

anuf

actu

rer

does

not

iden

tify

the

end

cust

omer

(au

to m

anuf

actu

rer,

tier

one

, et

c.).

q61,

Fast

ener

XjI

E6

1 A

t71

end

cu

sto

me

rs %

\96

tXl

O&

&C

tg

fast

ern

ers

s 9 %.

i;t+

gg 4

XI

Page 35: Assessment - BES/ERP(Best Enterprise System)erp.mjmetal.com/Download/MJN/2005662840.pdf · WELDING SYSTEM ASSESSMENT PROCEDURE ... CQI-15. Speciai Process: Welding System Assessmenf

?$%

+ ?A

ct.

It is

rec

omm

ende

d th

at t

he jo

b a

udit

be p

erfo

rmed

at

the

end

of

the

wel

ding

sys

tem

ass

essm

ent.

9x3

o n

A

I&g

37\0

1 9U

lqly

??

%

aA

tg +3,H

7;t+

3%

+ezt

Et.

The

job

aud

it is

not

the

onl

y or

mai

n fo

cus

of

the

WS

A.

eq

7;tg

~

;IA

~E

~O

I O

~L

I~

W

SA

~~

~

iz

5

~0

1

24

ge

t.

The

othe

r fiv

e se

ctio

ns o

n M

anag

emen

t Res

pons

ibili

ty a

nd Q

ualit

y P

lann

ing,

Flo

or a

nd M

ater

ial

Han

dlin

g R

espo

nsib

ility

, and

Equ

ipm

ent/F

acili

ties/

Con

trol

, T

oolin

g/F

ixtu

ring,

and

Pro

cess

Con

trol

s

and

Con

firm

atio

n ar

e eq

ually

if n

ot

even

mor

e im

port

ant.

58 t

jtXl

Sct

Y,

ZtZI

Y

gil

t g$J 41

2, H

t%t

12

1.2

XH

Z Y

52

Yg

gtH

l/Al$I

/~XI[,

%$J

/Fix

turin

g 221.2

SgE

Xil,

gtO,!q

l C

Hzt

Etg

Kt3

421

q+lg

3%

GtCt

. Th

e jo

b a

udit

of

one

part

, on

e w

eld

proc

ess,

is n

ot

suffi

cien

t to

use

as

a ba

sis

to c

ompl

ete

the

othe

r se

ctio

ns o

f th

e co

mpl

ete

WS

A.

0

QX

i 3

x4

0 X

-a

7-lA

tZk

WSA

OI C

tg q

+l$

j- 2b

sZt7

1 PI

EL 7

1E

tEZ

M{

"JtLt"

1 -F

gr S

t!-1-1

o H

0 0-1

7

tl o

At+$

6t7l

ql $g 6

tXl

"El.

The

job

aud

it is

a c

ompl

ianc

e ty

pe a

uditi

revi

ew o

f a

spec

ific

part

and

its

rel

ated

pap

er w

ork

and

proc

essi

ng, i

nclu

ding

wel

ding

equ

ipm

ent

and

proc

essi

ng r

ecor

ds fo

r th

at jo

b f

rom

the

begi

nnin

g

rece

ipt

of

a pa

rt t

hrou

gh p

roce

ssin

g in

the

wel

ding

ope

ratio

n an

d in

spec

tion

to p

acka

ging

.

xta

7 tl

GA

tk Z

qtE

t Fg2l

z+(o

[g)

gE

ZA

t/=a

ilt

%+

FA

1 E

.,,;o

1ct.

32

12

@j+J

E.,tgz

t zg

t =a

&&

74

3 F

gg

I z$

fJ

O,!+

%kg&

& sj

+J ZkH

l, 0

0 7

1=

2

12

zgtg

t El.

Par

ts s

hall

be ta

ken

fro

m t

he s

hipp

ing

area

at

the

dock

or

the

end

of t

he w

eldi

ng o

pera

tion.

tla

o 2

~2

~4

.

CC

L e

x4

xta

o

gku[

%qq

lh-I

5q

3C

t.

Tx-ill. 2

AI3

--LL

OM

T

M-1

If a

n au

tom

otiv

e m

anuf

actu

rer's

par

t is

no

t av

aila

ble

or i

dent

ifiab

le, t

hen

part

s fr

om o

ther

cust

omer

s re

quiri

ng c

ompl

ianc

e w

ith t

his

docu

men

t sh

all

be u

sed

for

the

asse

ssm

ent.

Xt$j

-At X

jIEZl

At01

qgs O

l-@st

+ Z

7jLt

%Ot

+

gE

t9,

3[q

s F

AjS

!]

% C

tg .L!q

I/% 01

%

Atst

% g

7tq1

At8

31

ZOIE

t. Th

e pa

rt c

heck

ed s

hall

repr

esen

t a m

ajor

wel

d op

erat

ion

such

as

an i

ndiv

idua

l ope

ratio

n, c

ell,

or

asse

mbl

y lin

e. 7

;1At

g $!

.%?

7H7H

0l

;",F%

, $3

, 5E

+ E

S 2

tgil

t $01

1 38 g

j+J %

tgO

l S

ZO

\ g

30

1q

.

In s

ubse

quen

t w

eldi

ng s

yste

m a

sses

smen

ts, d

iffer

ent

part

s an

d w

eldi

ng p

roce

sses

sha

ll be

chec

ked.

9

gg";1

P 74

901 gg A

IL%

g7t

qIA

j \17

;I 3 3

01Et

. Th

e sp

ecifi

c w

eldi

ng p

roce

ssin

g pa

ram

eter

s (a

pplie

s to

6.1

and

6.1

3 in

the

Job

Aud

it) t

hat

are

requ

ired

in th

e jo

b a

udit

shal

l be

add

ed t

o th

e jo

b a

udit

form

.

IS

7;iA

tql

8-fL

5lk

7;1YI

q O,!

+

% ';i

s Par

smet

ers(

gh

to,!

6.13

1 5.

13qf

qg!G

l&)+

q

a 7

;IAt

%q

ql $

-7t.

3 3

OlE

t. Th

is c

an b

e do

ne b

y re

view

ing

the

cust

omer

spe

cific

atio

n(s)

, the

Con

trol

Pla

n, t

he F

MEA

, and

the

floor

wor

kijo

b or

der.

ol3

g .2

q A

/-%,

Con

trol

Pla

n, F

ME

A 1

21

.2 fl

oor

Pq

S

Page 36: Assessment - BES/ERP(Best Enterprise System)erp.mjmetal.com/Download/MJN/2005662840.pdf · WELDING SYSTEM ASSESSMENT PROCEDURE ... CQI-15. Speciai Process: Welding System Assessmenf

;";1agtO

?Mi

$jA

l +

$:lE

t,

Eac

h pr

oces

sing

ste

p sh

all

be r

evie

wed

for

prop

er p

rodu

ctio

n re

cord

s/co

mpl

ianc

e/in

spec

tion.

4 $3 s

kYI& qE

J3

71

$$

/2+

/7;f

Ats

q/

$H

3 3

0/E

\.

Thes

e st

eps

can

be

com

pare

d to

thos

e in

the

Wel

ding

Sys

tem

Ass

essm

ent f

or

the

act

ual

job/

wel

ding

pro

cess

bei

ng r

evie

wed

for

com

plia

nce.

0lZ

iEt

Et7

j% $

jXjl

q$

j %kg,

ILZ

ljj,

01

2%

$/E

t -$

j-E g

%g

l ;";1

j?jql

CHEt

g

d A

l&g

37

tq1

hj IB

z;lt

Hl;;l

$t %

+ $:

JEt.

The

wel

ding

rec

ords

fo

r th

e ac

tual

tim

e fr

ame/

shift

etc

. tha

t th

e jo

b w

as p

roce

ssed

sha

ll al

so b

e

chec

ked.

%9

7\

RjZ

Iz A

171

+zE

l AIL

! G

i!.{lg

/shi

f 5011

CHEt

@

E 71

% E.c

t zj?

j 3 3

01

Ct.

The

actu

al w

eldi

ng e

quip

men

t an

d in

stru

men

tatio

n ce

rtifi

catio

n sh

all

be v

erifi

ed a

s be

ing

in

com

plia

nce

to th

e ap

prop

riate

equ

ipm

ent

requ

irem

ents

in th

e e

quip

men

t se

ctio

n.

-$$%

S

ttIlQ

t 7

14

lztX

l e

gg

&tH

l q$

q]A

j q

gE

t g

tH1

QTA

tgF%

O

l~

gt

~~

&-

/

gt$

j

% +

%E

l.

6.1

Has

the

wel

ding

ope

ratio

n id

entif

ied

the

proc

ess

cont

rol

equi

pmen

t ne

cess

ary

to m

onito

r,

cont

rol

and

prov

ide

feed

back

on

all

esse

ntia

l pro

cess

var

iabl

es a

s lis

ted

in th

e a

pplic

able

Pro

cess

Tab

les?

@d

qg

g g

+q O,

! g3

StCo

ttjlS Q

LlE

j6t2

, ;rll

q.i;tU

j, qg-

f-tb

ct

Pro

cess

Tab

lesq

l Lt

'#,z

3Rjg

$J+

q0

(2

7t$j

q$j

g%

ql

CH

ct iil5qs X

j1g

$12

$+

7t?

Rel

ated

WSA

Que

stio

n #

gts

r,!

WAS

$4g

1.8

/ 5.1

/5.2

6.2

Has

the

log

ic b

een

esta

blis

hed

to e

ffect

ivel

y id

entif

y an

d ad

dres

s pr

oces

s o

r eq

uipm

ent

faul

ts?

CtM

0

2x

4

CC

rl

gtC

ottjlsg

ks

~j

-l

t~

~~

3.

t$j6t

2 E

tg $

r y

,llg

5Jg

glg

.kf-

t?

Et

oo

z o

o -I

Rel

ated

WSA

Que

stio

n #

W

AS $!g

5.1

6.3

Are

ove

r rid

es o

r re

sets

logs

mai

ntai

ned?

over

rid

es E

.+

rese

ts l

ogs

f-1 E

l21 5

12

?1&

7l?

Rel

ated

WSA

Que

stio

n #

$1

9 r,! W

AS $!g

5.1.

2

6.4

Are

wel

d fa

ults

aud

ible

, vis

ible

and

doe

s th

e lin

e sh

ut d

own?

Page 37: Assessment - BES/ERP(Best Enterprise System)erp.mjmetal.com/Download/MJN/2005662840.pdf · WELDING SYSTEM ASSESSMENT PROCEDURE ... CQI-15. Speciai Process: Welding System Assessmenf

Rel

ated

WSA

Que

stio

n #

zt

gs W

AS 9s

5.1.

3

6.5

If th

e w

eld

cycl

e is

int

erru

pted

, is

the

par

t co

ntro

lled

or c

onta

ined

un

til d

ispo

sitio

ned

by

appr

opria

te p

erso

nnel

?

Atol

SOl

",'&

/IS 3

tEtg

, +

gP

qs

ql

OlCH

tlHR1

7t q7

1tX1

%7;1

1S17

-ILt

'L/Xj

141k

71?

Rel

ated

WSA

Que

stio

n #

$

3 W

AS 3 g

2.7 /

5.1

.4

6.6

Are

the

met

ers

and

feed

back

con

trol

s ca

libra

ted

per

esta

blis

hed

freq

uenc

ies?

Rel

ated

WSA

Que

stio

n #

E

l33 W

AS

3

%

5.1.

5 3.

3

6.7

If a

pplic

able

, is

the

re a

n in

ter-

lock

ing

of

the

prev

ious

ope

ratio

n an

d ha

s th

e qu

ality

of

part

s

been

ver

ified

?

y@

7t

k 6

CK

t9, qt

z gql

ZG

tOl

7fk

6\@

,,

$3

gty

Ol

7t%&tL

ltL171

\?

Rel

ated

WSA

Que

stio

n #

",

I33 W

AS gg

5.1.

6

6.8

Are

the

re s

ecur

e ba

ckup

s o

f al

l pro

gram

s an

d pr

oced

ures

(el

ectr

onic

pre

ferr

ed)?

ng

~11371t 31

;tqI

CHEI

+ $+

O/ltl

l%(tH

Xj;11

$$)0

1 T~G

L~II~

?

Rel

ated

WSA

Que

stio

n #

E

l33

WAS

33

5.1.

7

6.9

Are

hig

h/lo

w l

imit

alar

ms

esta

blis

hed

by a

ctua

l dat

a.

sXj[E

,O,! t{

(OIE

-(q(

O(c

t gS

Et

qlO

( g

21

36

71

glZ

5(q

$$L\7

7[?

Rel

ated

WSA

Que

stio

n #

E

t33 W

AS 3

5

5.1.

8 5.

1.1

Page 38: Assessment - BES/ERP(Best Enterprise System)erp.mjmetal.com/Download/MJN/2005662840.pdf · WELDING SYSTEM ASSESSMENT PROCEDURE ... CQI-15. Speciai Process: Welding System Assessmenf

6.10 H

ave

proc

ess

varia

bles

bee

n de

fined

and

dev

elop

ed b

y da

ta a

nd s

how

n to

be

stat

istic

ally

capa

ble?

7t

gy

9 2

3s L

j/O/E

-lqI 2

/61

ZLt

pJrlc

q, 4

/33 9

yl$

L[n

t? 12111

gA

/q~

g

9q

s $:

yl$

Lf?

It?

Rel

ated

WSA

Que

stio

n i7

grgg

WA

S

5.1.9

6.11 Is

ther

e ac

cept

able

trac

eabi

lity

(seq

uenc

e/da

te c

odin

g)?

+g

7tk

Et

?$

so

l ~L

%LI

?I~?

Rel

ated

VJS

A Q

uest

ion

#

WAS

9s

5.1.10 / 5.1.11 / 2.3 12.7

6.12 Is

ther

e tr

acea

bilit

y of

all

proc

ess

and

too

ling

cha

nges

?

9s Z

Zilb

g'$

j f$

Bq

f CHE

t +qsO

l y1

3L17

7t?

Rel

ated

WSA

Que

stio

n #

zt

g 9 W

AS

$jg

4.1 /

5.1.11 /

5.4

6.13 A

re t

here

doc

umen

ted

wel

ding

pro

cedu

res

for

each

wel

d lo

catio

n an

d ea

ch p

roce

ss v

aria

ble?

7,t gE F

lklP

t 7,C

715

E/$

j 23

011

CHTt

gA

jSt9

ga

gR

t7t

ZeL

IVt?

Rel

ated

WSA

Que

stio

n #

E

tgg

WA

S $j

z 5.1.121 1.5 / 1.10

6.14 Is

ther

e a

docu

men

ted

chan

ge o

ver

proc

edur

e (f

iller

mat

eria

l, fix

ture

s)?

3x1

53

01

FA

jBt

S/%

&L1

?7t?

Rel

ated

WSA

Que

stio

n #

W

AS

1.5 /

5.1.13 / 3.6

6.15 Is

ther

e a

docu

men

ted

star

t-up

and

shu

tdow

n pr

oced

ure?

EA

j2tg

sta

rt-u

pOlL

t sh

utdo

wn

?At7

1 Z

eLlV

t?

Rel

ated

WSA

Que

stio

n #

Et

3 9

WAS

2 F

1.5 / 1.10 / 5.1.14

Page 39: Assessment - BES/ERP(Best Enterprise System)erp.mjmetal.com/Download/MJN/2005662840.pdf · WELDING SYSTEM ASSESSMENT PROCEDURE ... CQI-15. Speciai Process: Welding System Assessmenf

6.16

Are

pro

cess

con

trol

par

amet

ers

mon

itore

d at

est

ablis

hed

freq

uenc

ies?

Rel

ated

WS

A Q

uest

ion

#

WAS

5.2

6.17

Are

the

re d

ocum

ente

d re

actio

n pl

ans

with

app

ropr

iate

leve

ls o

f co

ntai

nmen

t to

bo

th o

ut

of

cont

rol

and

ou

t o

f to

lera

nce

proc

ess

para

met

ers

and

prov

ide

docu

men

ted

evid

ence

that

rea

ctio

n

plan

s ar

e fo

llow

ed?

3q

474

4, ifig

391

2 3

q 8 $3 p

aram

eter

sofl

CHEt

",txl

("fjl

)ol

Etq

lh 7

ty s

AjP

t9 x

H3R

I qI

qOI

?1

3~

17

7t?

12

12

xH

3RI q1qg C

C~$

57

4%

gA

jZt

6tjtq

Xjlg

ztL(?

lt?

Rel

ated

WSA

Que

stio

n #

st3

3 W

AS $lE

5.3

/ 1.

21 /

5.6

/ 1.

8 / 2.7

6.18

How

doe

s th

e o

rgan

izat

ion

hand

le c

hang

es t

o p

roce

ss c

ontr

ol p

aram

eter

s af

ter

initi

al

cust

omer

app

rova

l an

d ho

w d

o y

ou n

otify

you

r cu

stom

er?

2

11

$9

01%

g3 %

57;11

para

met

erso

fl CH

zt p4gg E

qg

qg

YI

Cts

Lj7

?1

?

12

11

1 1

1qqI

YI

q%

YI

$Lt,'L

177t?

Rel

ated

WSA

Que

stio

n #

st2

2 W

AS

$4

g 1.

6 / 5.4 /

1.2

2 /

1.16

6.19

Are

In-

Pro

cess

and

Fin

al T

ests

per

form

ed a

t es

tabl

ishe

d fr

eque

ncie

s?

g3 21% 9 D

tXlT

t E

jlA

ES

gtg

g Y

zqlA

j g

2 z

tL1771?

Rel

ated

WSA

Que

stio

n #

W

AS ZP

1.8

/ 5.5

6.20

Are

wel

d qu

ality

req

uire

men

ts c

lear

ly d

efin

ed p

er c

usto

mer

spe

cific

atio

ns?

htgk

ql C

Ct2

t g;

.;1 %

$l

.Q.I;

rAtg

S

sgifi;l

3610

1&tL

l??t?

Re!

ated

WSA

Que

stio

n #

Ztp

g W

AS $4

g 1.

9 /

5.6

Page 40: Assessment - BES/ERP(Best Enterprise System)erp.mjmetal.com/Download/MJN/2005662840.pdf · WELDING SYSTEM ASSESSMENT PROCEDURE ... CQI-15. Speciai Process: Welding System Assessmenf

2zr;C X t q O I ?A+ 8 3 x 1 s f-qi!/ This individual shall be one of the following Degreed Welding Engineer, or equivalent sctence degree, Certified Welding Inspector from approved internationally recognized body, or person agreed upon between customer and supplier.

O l z g qg El A f & t O I q O l EkCt. -i;tPI t&g g g 2,KILIq $g 3 Q t i;,tzgl +jYXt, f"X]lzr;C"S gss ~ T . j l 3 + E j X f q g 3s 433 g A t X t 4s 244 ~ ~ ~ X j l

qualified techn~cal welding person on-site?

Th~s person shall be a full-ttme employee and the position shall be reflected in the organization chart.

xtq01 g g x t 7 t

supervisory funct~ons are

performed by qualrfied

ggEt &t+321 7 l % g y

g t s t 7 1 y/i;_t q15-q*

Page 41: Assessment - BES/ERP(Best Enterprise System)erp.mjmetal.com/Download/MJN/2005662840.pdf · WELDING SYSTEM ASSESSMENT PROCEDURE ... CQI-15. Speciai Process: Welding System Assessmenf

1 4

1 5

Do you use only qualified

welders (personnel)?

Xi .+ ,, 7 1 A t e i P 01 g ( R H 8 ) Ll7767

How do you maintain welder cert~f~cation?

qgi711 r r w i z o xu#- 0 M 0 E? a sot+

zg -:XI -&t.*d LI747

I s set-up practrce rn

complrance wrth documented work

~nstructrons?

g A j Z ? @ ,̂tZ ":%h-/Oll CCt 21 2601 gd.ti{4.101 Z l G L I

7/17

Ft ggg X I 1 2 GHOI K tC t All weldrng employees, includrng backup and temporary employees, shall be trained

qlul 3 i i t ~ ~ q . x t ~ g zg~ t ng g g g ~ gg %tot01 gtct Documented evrdence shall be marntarned showrng the employees were trarned, the

evidence shall rnclude an assessment of the effectiveness of the trarnrng, must prove

knowledge of the customer's specifrc requirements and Internal standards, and where approprrate, employee certifrcatron, such as for a manual welder

=.?I( 02 i g X t 7 t gg 5&t($53& .!$,q++ @Ajst.fi! g g $ t q O k K t C t %7j+ r, TT

321 g 7 1 5 Pgt jd-tqok 6171, 2221 YJ.=1qO,! Q-;lAtgt2J 9x1 % LH=;? 71$, 221;1

b g X 1 2 1 X t q S 9LtChl $5FJ6tqOk E tC t Management and customer shall defrne the qualifrcatron requirements for each

functron and ongoing or follow-up trarnrng shall also be addressed

st21P 9 24s 47,C 71gq1 EHEt Q ; 1 A t g t g 33 :;!b Z O l W , 71% Y g $9 g - ," ",tgs!!l Jl ctgy1 g 301 C t Requrred qualrficatron marntenance ft.ZSOI X t q =;XI 7 1 Q-;l ;L E t If the welder has not welded In the specifrc operation rn a 6 month time frame, the

welder must be requalifred to that operatron Based on the welder's qualrty performance, it must be establrshed when retrarnrng and requalrfrcatron of the rndivrdual must be performed 8ESOl 671% 71711 ?-;l?;ilqg 61Xl ~ ~ ~ l C 1 ~ 1 E(IKt ,Cl{Xt+ a$

E t O t O I F t E t 8 ;̂fS2l $$$) si!fql t Y 6 t q XIS$ 9, XH 7;1$P 9% A1715

41 01 F IE1

Set-up verifrcat~on to the procedures (as example equipment settrngs, clamprng sequence, weld sequence, drrectron of travel and other process controls) In

compliance to documented work rnstructrons @4Z?t;L 5tZ 25FJAjq l C[t2t YR}(Oll %td.til 2x1, clamping sequence, weld sequence,

direction of travel and E l 5 Sgi SXi1) 011 LllEt % g S Stfi A l Q

$/~i",,.i .\ ;/$p-l J ~ / 9k f lb " & J

Page 42: Assessment - BES/ERP(Best Enterprise System)erp.mjmetal.com/Download/MJN/2005662840.pdf · WELDING SYSTEM ASSESSMENT PROCEDURE ... CQI-15. Speciai Process: Welding System Assessmenf

17

Does the weldrng

organrzatron perform

advanced qualrty planning?

83 Eqs $521 Ys 41 2% iftg Llj7t? -1 2

Are weldrng FMEA's up to

date and reflectrng current

processrng? FMEAS SqlOlE 61

2 yx1j gsg Kt% ZtLI 711 7

A feasrbrlrty study shall be performed and rnternally approved for each part CllltllEAt7t ~ ~ E l ~ O ~ 6tCfl q4 IitEql CH6H LH.t=qg 7;lzOl %of01 ZtCt Srmrlar parts can be grouped Into part famrlres for thrs effort as defrned by the

organrzatron.

Z t E k Z q q l A i gC;lol$J E H S $-2S?T;Q FlCl{ part famrlresS Igf-Pt 8 $- 91 Et After the part approval process is approved by the customer, no process changes are

allowed unless approved by the customer. ;l?oll Olsl F8 EttP floilk 2.74

01 eg 201 gs zgs 614 51x1 Y & k C t

The weldrng organrzatron shall contact the customer when clarrfrcatron of process

changes IS requrred Thrs clarrficatron of process changes shall be documented 8E z+ls gg 9 3 0 1 2% rl%H,9 I I H 1;1q1/ EZ$Ztl01 EtCt sg $8301 s2jg P A141 3 301Ct

The organrzatron shall Incorporate the use of a docuniented Farlure Mode and Effects Analysrs (FMEA) procedure and ensure the FMEA's are updated to reflect current part

qualrty status. X X I g ohj$t$J FMEA jC:Tt~;lol ~tgg ~g$t;l, ~ x H Fg g z &t;t~Hg 3g6t71 -1L ir

FMEAS ~ 4 1 0 1 ~ id~zt

The FMEA shall be wrrtten for each part or part family or they may be process-

specrfrc and wrrtten for each process. FMEAk qtq Part %+ part famrly 011 LljFt Ll18

og +t%;;}u/< 44 ggQ + x j l q g s q s g t q -

In any case, they shall address all process steps from part recerpt to part shrpment and all key weldrng process parameters as defrned by the organrzatron q'/?,ff ?=-% +%ol l~ j ~g +jq17tx1 s~ ~3 9 4 1 s 4 q o ~ q q , Z ~ O I I A - ~ 3~;lolgt ' , ~ ~ c s I A ~ ng 32 g~ g.;! ~ 1 5 % q q o k gtct

A cross functional team shall be used rn the development of the FMEA All special characterrstics, as defined by the organrzatron and Its customers, shall be ~dentrfred, def~ned, and addressed In the FMEA. C t g 71% 9 s FMEAGI 7Hfj,tOj/ gOj6H01 EtCt FMEAgOllAj ;1?01 $jC;lolEt Qg g s c t

6 x 1 - o z r nl h L 1 z 1 7 ! 1 0 ZtOl6t2 T L 3216t;l Ct?$JOl ZtCt

Page 43: Assessment - BES/ERP(Best Enterprise System)erp.mjmetal.com/Download/MJN/2005662840.pdf · WELDING SYSTEM ASSESSMENT PROCEDURE ... CQI-15. Speciai Process: Welding System Assessmenf

Sp

eci

al P

roce

ss: W

eld

ing

Sys

tem

Ass

ess

me

nt

I

I I

I I

I I

I S

ectio

n 1 -

Man

agem

ent R

espo

nsib

ility

& Q

ualit

y P

lann

ing

I

The

orga

niza

tion

shal

l inc

orpo

rate

the

use

of

a d

ocum

ente

d C

ontr

ol P

lan

proc

edur

e an

d en

sure

the

Con

trol

Pla

ns a

re u

pdat

ed t

o r

efle

ct c

urre

nt c

ontr

ols.

X

Xl

S n

AiP

t3 C

ontr

ol P

lan

3Z

tol

At+

+%

GtE

ift2

, C

ontr

ol P

lano

ll 3x

1 %

Xi\$

Et

-1L TT

93i;tk 3s

+kaB

HO

k E

tEt.

The

Con

trol

Pla

ns s

hall

be w

ritte

n f

or

each

pa

rt o

r pa

rt f

amily

or

they

may

be

proc

ess-

spec

ific

and

writte

n for

eac

h pr

oces

s.

Con

trol

Pla

nse

qt

part

fa

mlly

ql

EH-tjH

7

1g

frlq

7,c4

g3

01

1 IIllijH

htA

il%tA

I r;

,cgij[

lot.

Et;,

trt.

Are

wel

ding

pro

cess

Th

ey s

hall

addr

ess

all

proc

ess

step

s fr

om

pa

rt r

ecei

pt to

pa

rt s

hipm

ent

and

~d

en

tify

a

contr

ol p

lans

up t

a d

ate

equi

pmen

t us

ed a

nd a

ll es

sent

ial w

eldi

ng p

roce

ss p

aram

eter

s as

def

ined

by

the

and

refle

ctin

g cu

rren

t re

leva

nt in

divi

dual

pro

cess

tabl

es o

r no

n-es

sent

ial a

s ag

reed

up

on

bet

wee

n su

pplie

r

proc

essi

ng?

and

cust

omer

.

gs

;!XI/ 41qg z

ql 9%

g~

ql~

jy

~j

+g ~

~I

I~

XI

2%

.,c

qlg

rt$do

k qt

q, ~

tgq

+

-ef

~tt

l~la

t

OIL

$

12

gA[

l g$

jg

zty

?l.+

714 g

$j

S+Z+

Oll

391Z

3gSM{ gs

s+

qg g

z g3 E

tSg

zbgiftq

i;,t L

1 I)}

? gz

'=fx

jl 4

s 3

4 if

tql 5

013

%q

E/O

lXl ?

&@ a

-$j7

7tX

1E

g~

~C

t.

A

cro

ss f

unct

iona

l tea

m,

incl

ud

ing

a p

rod

uct

ion

ope

rato

r, s

hall

be u

sed

in th

e de

velo

pmen

t of

Con

trol

Pla

ns, w

hich

sha

ll be

con

sist

ent w

ith a

ll as

soci

ated

docu

men

tatio

n su

ch a

s w

ork

inst

ruct

ions

, sh

op t

rave

lers

, an

d FM

EA

's.

251

29

JX\$

P

ZE

t E

t77

1g

gg

?tz

X1

A]A

j, sh

op t

rave

lers

, FM

EA

Pt

9gtr,!

Z

Aj p

j C

All

spec

lal c

hara

cter

ist~

cs, as

def

ined

by

the

org

an

iza

tfo

n an

d its

cus

tom

ers,

sha

ll be

i~

Zq 3 1

501 J

qq1 2

161 3';l.

rrlg

Q9.

f %

%X

I+

Con

trol

Pla

nsO

llhj g

tgif

[J,

gO

lift

[

Sam

ple

size

s an

d fr

eque

ncie

s fo

r ev

alua

tion

of p

roce

ss a

nd p

rod

uct

cha

ract

eris

tics

sh

gs

37

1 2 2

51 %

sg .=?I

Et 4

% At

OlZ

3 Y

Sk

Pro

cess

Tab

lesO

(1A

j bl+

i

Que

st~

on

Num

ber

Ass

essm

ent

Que

stio

n N

/A

Req

uire

men

ts a

nd G

uida

nce

Sat

isfa

ctor

y O

bjec

tive

Evid

ence

N

ot

Sat

isfa

ctor

y N

eeds

Imm

edia

te

Act

ion

Page 44: Assessment - BES/ERP(Best Enterprise System)erp.mjmetal.com/Download/MJN/2005662840.pdf · WELDING SYSTEM ASSESSMENT PROCEDURE ... CQI-15. Speciai Process: Welding System Assessmenf

I Sp

ecia

l Pro

cess

: Wel

ding

Sys

tem

Ass

essm

ent

Req

u~re

rnen

ts an

d G

uida

nce

1.9

Are

all

weld

lng r

elat

ed a

nd

refe

renc

ed s

peci

ficat

ions

cu

rren

t an

d av

aila

ble?

For

ex

ampl

e: S

AE,

AIA

G,

AS

TM,

AS

ME

, A

WS

, IS

O,

Gen

eral

Mot

ors,

Hon

da,

For

d,

Toy

ota

and

Chr

ysle

r. LZ

g g

az

t Et",tPIJ.

&L3

i

3 +

yl+

olg

7t5

Et 2

gh

js g

A}l

7tX

lJ.

YJeL

I 17

1.7

" ' IA

E1

*IA

G'

Aw

Sz IS

*'

Gen

eral

Moto

rs, H

onda

, F

ord,

Toy

ota

and

Chr

ysle

r

To e

nsur

e al

l cus

tom

er r

equi

rem

ents

are

bo

th u

nders

tood a

nd s

atis

fied,

the

org

aniz

atio

n s

hall

have

all

spec

ifica

lly re

late

d w

eldi

ng a

nd c

usto

mer

ref

eren

ced

stan

dard

s an

d sp

ecifi

catio

ns a

vaila

ble

for

use

and

a m

eth

od t

o e

nsur

e th

at

they

are

curr

ent.

LZE

;1q Q

TA

tgtg

jl&t

Zt71

PlC

H O

lCHA

lYl2

, Et

$AI?

lq,

3iq

P L

ZE 8

32

1 ztg

g 3

2 2

q &

I3 S

Z, I

LZ

l2 3

x1 $1

2 ?I

+ 3gg jl

&%t+

'&

tg2t

A

tg

Q q

~t

',tg

~j~

7t

xl.z

?~

qo

b gtrt

S

uch

stan

dard

s an

d sp

ecifr

catro

ns m

ay in

clud

e, b

ut

are

not

lim~

ted

to,

thos

e re

leva

nt

docu

men

ts p

ublis

hed

by

SAE,

AIA

G,

AS

TM,

ASM

E, A

WS

, IS

O,

Gen

eral

Mot

ors,

Hon

da,

---

For

d, T

oyot

a, a

nd C

hrys

ler.

0149

_t;7

-"d

$iiA

j%e

3ZZ

;,C

f!E

71

71fl 3

74/7

1 g2, I

3S

ilt gtg

?A+

S

Ajs

S S

AE,

AIA

G,

AS

TM,

AS

ME

, A

WS

, 1x

0, G

ener

al

Mot

ors,

Hon

da,

For

d, T

oyot

a 1

21

2 C

hrys

lerq

l OlB

ll 29

The

org

aniz

atio

n s

hall

have

a p

roce

ss t

o e

nsur

e th

e t

itnely

rev

iew

, di

strr

butio

n, a

nd

impl

emen

tatio

n of

all

cust

omer

and

indust

ry e

ngin

eerr

ng s

tand

ards

/spe

crfic

atio

ns a

nd

chan

ges

base

d on c

usto

mer

req

uire

d sc

hedu

le.

zq

? A

171 7

39

Ez

, FB

I Gj) Q

e 24

, YX1

L101

21, i

jg, $

igY

(Afg

) 2

q Q

zql 213 A

flIg

013s

3E

$[7

1 9

13 z

?%

Jg

71x1

2 Y

jqO

b 3

Et

Tlm

ely

revi

ew s

houl

d be

as

soon

as

poss

ible

and

sha

ll not

exce

ed t

wo

work

ing w

eeks

. A

171

-;/-d

At+ %

IS%

2tZ

tOF

6t[fl

r 2

Tt

32

1

f

6101

9E

t

The

org

aniz

atio

n s

hall

docu

men

t this

pro

cess

of

revi

ew a

nd im

ple

menta

tion, a

nd i

t sh

i

Zyg

g2

2t

01%

I

21

2 q

zll

2.q

g E

tFkX

l, qz7

11 X

jl3

FA

jg

9%.

zqg 01

% E

f? f %

Oil +

=7t

Yg

OI

$"J+;*

.I$ 6H

OI

EtEt

Page 45: Assessment - BES/ERP(Best Enterprise System)erp.mjmetal.com/Download/MJN/2005662840.pdf · WELDING SYSTEM ASSESSMENT PROCEDURE ... CQI-15. Speciai Process: Welding System Assessmenf

Nee

ds Im

med

~ate

R

equ~

rem

ents

and

Gui

danc

e

proc

esse

s an

d re

patr

pro

cess

es w

hlch

ide

nttfy

all

step

s of

the

pro

cess

incl

udin

g re

leva

nt o

pera

ttng

para

met

ers

88

3q.g

2s

ztg

g3ql

c~

zt ~3 s

pj

~g

7t

xi;l

ylq

o~

qq, ztg

2lk

%tz

E

tz

s z&

Lt!it+

92 g

s E

t7jls s

t3 f

l+ g

+ g

gOl]

Cllc

t g

z -$

jgA

is 7

fXlJ

1 10

111

Is th

ere

a w

ritten

pro

cess

sp

eclft

catr

on fo

r al

l act

ive

proc

esse

s?

ng 3

% i!l%

oll

CHkt

gs

2

A-j 7

1 ?,!$

LI 77

17

Has

a v

al~

d pro

duct

capab~

ltty s

tudy

bee

n

perf

orm

ed ln

~tia

lly an

d af

ter

proc

ess

chan

ges?

37

1 2

g3 ;dg O

I+O

lj

++a$ $jL

t %q

g-7

71

n2j

A1 S

l2&

L177

17

Exa

mpl

es o

f op

erat

tng

para

met

ers

as d

efln

ed b

y th

e re

leva

nt p

roce

ss ta

bles

41)

ztg

8

% ta

bles

ol/ s0

1g qC

,COd

21

s

Suc

h pa

ram

eter

s sh

all n

ot

only

be

defln

ed, t

hey

shal

l hav

e o

pe

ratin

g t

oler

ance

s as

deftn

ed b

y th

e or

ganl

zatlo

n In

ord

er t

o m

alnt

aln

proc

ess

con

tro

l o

lqg

t ~

ts

t

51x1

;'d

olr

(xlg

p,to

cq, g

g g

41

5 g

xle

f71

QIG

~ ~

~q

ql

~i

g

ol

~t

c1

lf1

.E2 %

tg 6

{g(g

9)0

/ 21%

+

Thes

e pr

oces

s sp

ecifi

catio

ns m

ay tak

e th

e fo

rm o

f w

ork

Inst

ruct

tons

, jo

b c

ard,

set

-up

shee

ts,

or o

ther

s~

mlla

r doc

umen

ts

OlZ

{gt 3

% 4

pjA

jk

XIA

lAj,

+t,c

p?

YtZ

, -$

jXl*

A1

5 &

+ C

tg

tlle

gt

ZA

jS

$lg

t 3 %

't

The

orga

ntza

tton

shal

l pe

rfo

rm p

rod

uct

ca

pa

bll~

ty stu

d~

es fo

r th

e tn

rtlal

va

l~d

at~

on

of

each

pro

cess

, af

ter

relo

catio

n of

any

pro

cess

equ

lpm

ent,

and

afte

r a

maj

or p

roce

ss

chan

ge o

f an

y eq

ulpm

ent

or p

aram

eter

2E

qg

g

%O

I Z

71

o

-f%

gy &

tC,ttll

21

01%

4, q

rg g

ttil 4

s $

ti,tE

gl Fg a

s g7

d +O

il CH

Et %

kt k

q $

j?$

gh

l 61

."

--

1_1_-

---4 -

OF

Wt

Th

e or

gani

zatlo

n an

d cu

stom

er s

hall

defln

e w

hat

const

itute

s a

maj

or p

roce

ss c

hang

e

?S7;

-j %

34s 7

8 g

z ;!g

Q

?%

if/+

30

11 tH

8H 2

7;dt

iHoI

Etq

In

~tt

al pro

duct

capabll~

ty stud

tes

shal

l be

cond

ucte

d fo

r al

l wel

dlng

pro

cess

es p

er e

ach

proc

ess

path

def

lned

In

scop

e of

wor

k an

d tn

acc

orda

nce

wlth

cus

tom

er

requ

irem

ents

%tE

J0l 3

91 L

Hql s

013

7112

g3

OtC

t gz

%tPJ

%

34

B_

iLA

tgt?

I

ygg q

g 5

13 %

kt 2q g_

1;171

2

A(

f(Of

O1 g

tq

In th

e ab

senc

e of

cust

omer

requirem

ents

, th

e o

rgan

izat

ron

shal

l est

ablis

h ac

cept

able

rang

es fo

r m

easu

res

of c

ap

ab

ll~ty

_71?

Q

';LA

tgtC

l J.

1, 3

Y.g

gq01 y

-f;S

7151

6];

-18$

$1 +

?,!+ q

tzd

8B

Ol E

tCI

An

actio

n pl

an s

hall

exls

t to

add

ress

the

ste

ps t

o b

e fo

llow

ed

In c

ase

capa

bilit

y ln

dlce

s fa

ll ou

tstd

e cu

stom

er r

equi

rem

ents

or

esta

blis

hed

rang

es

g-%

7j1

qg

;lq ~

7~

tg

t

gg

y;o{l

yl+

~

1%

%q

x1

zg

rc1.

z.k

5141

q

T7

1 F

IG\{ FXH

G

flOk

gtE

t

Page 46: Assessment - BES/ERP(Best Enterprise System)erp.mjmetal.com/Download/MJN/2005662840.pdf · WELDING SYSTEM ASSESSMENT PROCEDURE ... CQI-15. Speciai Process: Welding System Assessmenf

Eac

h pr

oces

s p

ath

incl

udes

all

com

bina

tions

of

equi

pmen

t tha

t ar

e in

tegr

ated

in th

e pe

rfor

man

ce o

f a

wel

ding

pro

cess

, e.

g.,

wel

d ce

ll w

ith A

and

B s

ide

f~xt

ure

feed

ing

anot

her

wel

d ce

ll w

ith A

and

B s

ide

fixtu

re o

r m

ultip

le m

achi

nes.

44

g?2

J Ylq

E g

3 5% +

?iJ

(0115 s

g gE

cel

l APt

B +

$ f~

xtu

req

l P C

tg g

fi c

ell A

Pt B

f~xt

ure

P&

Ctz

714

/+Ej

feed

ingS

t&

g.)0

11Aj

51

& 9.g

gtk

Jl2l 5

EtS

Zgk

i,c

tq.

Cap

abili

ty s

tudy

tech

niqu

es s

hall

incl

ude

boun

dary

sam

ple

cond

ition

s as

def

ined

by

the

cont

rol

plan

tha

t ar

e ro

bust

and

mee

t al

l cu

stom

er r

equi

rem

ents

. 4

q y

+ 7

1gg ~

~g

hj

l

$2

9.g

24

s+h

tg,tg

~

j+~

lq+

gx

j1 41

qo11

qi;ll

321

8

boun

dary

sam

ple

%tE

H+E

j P

g 34.

Exa

mpl

e, a

ny c

orn

b~

na

tion

of t

oler

ance

s as

def

ined

by

Pro

cess

Tab

les.

41

5 s$

Proce

ss T

ab

less

qg 6{84 52

.

Spec

ial P

roce

ss: W

eldi

ng S

yste

m A

sses

smen

t I

Page 47: Assessment - BES/ERP(Best Enterprise System)erp.mjmetal.com/Download/MJN/2005662840.pdf · WELDING SYSTEM ASSESSMENT PROCEDURE ... CQI-15. Speciai Process: Welding System Assessmenf
Page 48: Assessment - BES/ERP(Best Enterprise System)erp.mjmetal.com/Download/MJN/2005662840.pdf · WELDING SYSTEM ASSESSMENT PROCEDURE ... CQI-15. Speciai Process: Welding System Assessmenf

Que

stio

n Q

uest

ion

1 Numbe

r1

I R

equi

rem

ents

and

Gui

danc

e O

bjec

tive

Evid

ence

N

/A

Sat

isfa

ctor

y I

I I

I I

I I

Sec

tion

1 -

Ma

na

ge

mw

t R

espo

nsib

ility

& Q

ualit

y P

lann

ing

Are

int

erna

l ass

essm

ents

be

ing

com

plet

ed o

n an

an

nual

bas

is,

at a

m

inim

um, u

sing

AIA

G

WS

A?

El*

'gg7

lF0

;=

The

orga

niza

tion

shal

l con

duct

inte

rnal

ass

essm

ents

on

an a

nnua

l bas

is,

at a

m

inim

um,

usin

g th

e A

IAG

WS

A.

Con

cern

s sh

all b

e ad

dres

sed

in a

tim

ely

man

ner.

Eyp

El&

gg 7

lg5

23

Ll{

F g

7t A

1 A

IAG

WS

AZ

Atg

6HOk

CtC

t. gQ

.3 3

s A

171

y36

tYI

CtF

q 40

k 2C

t.

At-$

$ $)L

I??t

? D

oes

the

Qua

lity

The

qual

ity m

anag

emen

t sys

tem

sha

ll in

clud

e a

pro

cess

for

docu

men

ting,

rev

iew

ing,

Dep

artm

ent r

evie

w,

and

addr

essi

ng c

usto

mer

con

cern

s an

d an

y ot

her

conc

erns

inte

rnal

to

the

addr

ess,

and

doc

umen

t or

gani

zatio

n.

cust

omer

and

int

erna

l 82 71

% A

lC1

qP

ZA

jZt,

zg, ;1q

3QAt

St 2 Z

;CAq

I tH

ct q

g C

tg L

HF

Zj 9

2

conc

erns

? 3s

7Hg

s z

Q.

Atst

$$ C

tF$

g%

g Pg

t$HO

k i;tC

t. 7;

l$t21

q-2

,q 21

4 L

HF

A d

isci

plin

ed p

robl

em-s

olvi

ng a

ppro

ach

shal

l be

used

.

q 9

2Q

Et

Atg

t2 -2

AjC

l g

3g

FiH

S 3201 A

tgsl

q X

jOI

FtCt

. I

zt L

[ 7717

l~h

e

wel

ding

org

aniz

atio

n sh

all d

efin

e a

pro

cess

for

cont

inua

l im

prov

emen

t fo

r th

eir

I I

lwel

dina

oro

cess

es id

entif

ied

in th

e sc

ope

of t

he W

SA

. 83 Z

qP

WSA

Ol +'$loll

3

1 Is

ther

e a

con

trnu

al

d

8

zg

gjlC

j g%

O{l

CHct

Xl+

q9

71

13 -;!%

$$ lZ

tz$

fiO

I Ft

Ct

impr

ovem

ent

plan

Th

e co

ntin

ual i

mpr

ovem

ent

proc

ess

shal

l be

desi

gned

to

bri

ng

abo

ut i

mpr

ovem

ents

ap

plic

able

to e

ach

proc

ess

. In q

ualit

y an

d pr

oduc

tivity

. Xl

+Y 9

713

g%

s $$

% 3 :!

kt%

7H

32

716ijJ

i 241

51

defin

ed i

n th

e sc

ope

of t

he

rC

-1

L-I.

asse

ssm

ent?

';id

71 9% 011

Iden

tifie

d ac

tions

sha

ll be

prio

ritiz

ed a

nd s

hall

incl

ude

timin

g (

estim

ated

com

plet

ion

4 a

go11

rlfc

t XI+

da

tes)

. The

org

aniz

atio

n sh

all s

how

evi

denc

e o

f pr

ogra

m e

ffect

iven

ess.

yo

,! 7

/{d

qyIq

01 0

j$L17

?t?

5y

P Z

Z1$j0

1 sB

$!O

1

g7

jg Y

;lq f

q0

)

EtCt

.

Doe

s th

e Q

ualit

y M

anag

er

or

desi

gnee

aut

horiz

e th

e

disp

ositi

on o

f m

ater

ial

fro

m q

uara

ntin

e st

atus

? g

g gt,

t21K1

gp 7

11rg

Xt+

zj 2

1 g g

gto

ll~

j 7;fl.s EH

II 6{

7\

LlJ7

t?

The

Qua

lity

Man

ager

or

desi

gnee

is r

espo

nsib

le fo

r au

thor

izin

g an

d do

cum

entin

g th

e

disp

ositi

on o

f qu

aran

tined

mat

eria

l 32 E

tZlX

t gg

XIg

Xtt

zjZ

.12

XH

SO

l SH

HS

647t

6tJ

FA19

1 6tt

qI X!!

s01

YlCt

.

Spe

cial

Pro

cess

: Wel

ding

Sys

tem

Ass

essm

ent

Ass

essm

ent

Obj

ectiv

e E

viden

ce

Req

uire

men

ts a

nd G

uida

nce

Que

stio

n N

umbe

r

Nee

ds Im

med

iate

A

ctio

n Q

uest

ion

Not

Sat

isfa

ctor

y N

/A

Sat

isfa

ctor

y

Page 49: Assessment - BES/ERP(Best Enterprise System)erp.mjmetal.com/Download/MJN/2005662840.pdf · WELDING SYSTEM ASSESSMENT PROCEDURE ... CQI-15. Speciai Process: Welding System Assessmenf

Spec

ial

Pro

cess

: Wel

ding

Sys

tem

Ass

essm

ent

I A

sses

smen

t

Pla

nnin

g

(\\99

!~\

~ki"

'f{iv%

jb

Sec

tion

I - M

anag

emen

t Res

pons

ibili

ty &

Qua

lity

I ne

E s

nail

ws

or

w- e

10 W

WT

ilq -.

pers-~

cove

ring

the

wel

ding

pro

cess

. +$

E S

%ql C

HE

t 7/19 %

g'aQ

Kf

Fk

018 7

tkE

t i;

Al

Aj ;1$ $

taX

/ A

IAj7

t y,

!qO

[ E

kEt.

Thes

e pr

oced

ures

or

wor

k in

stru

ctio

ns s

hall

incl

ude

met

hods

of

addr

essi

ng p

ote

ntia

l em

erge

ncie

s (s

uch

as p

ower

fai

lure

), eq

uipm

ent s

tart

-up,

equ

ipm

ent s

hut-

dow

n,

pro

duct

seg

rega

tion

(See

2.8

)' p

rod

uct

insp

ectio

n, s

afet

y, h

ouse

-kee

ping

, and

gen

eral

oper

atin

g pr

oced

ures

.

01

3T.t 4

s $

tz X

lAl A

jk

9 a

&A

,t%

g

ZX

jIS

Pg

tGt;

L

Ylq

Oi

St@

=,

ZtH

lGl

Al$

t, s

tHl2

l %

$$,

g&

t hLt;lg, 9

Ct

52

, FIE

, gt

2I

gF

B

J-tE

j9 $

tz

3x1

5 E

f$J

O[

2E

t.

Thes

e pr

oced

ures

or

wor

k in

stru

ctio

ns s

hall

be a

cces

sibl

e to

sho

p flo

or

pers

onne

l.

OlY

Eb

221

Sk

Xlh

lAj+

$t

-fg&

t :d.?

lsOl

cE

71%

61

101

EtE

1.

- -.

r.---

- 3

-. pr

oces

s eq

uipm

ent

(as

ide

ntif

ied

by

the

Pro

cess

Tab

les)

. Z

qg

gz

&tB

Jq

j t/

jEt

,tA

j

atg

qlg

gx

l~

t2

1

GS

IL

~~

~

~X

IZ! ~

jolo

~

~t

q.

The

prog

ram

sha

ll be

a c

lose

d-lo

op p

roce

ss th

at t

rack

s m

aint

enan

ce e

ffort

s fr

om

re

ques

t to

com

ple

tion

to a

sses

smen

t of

effe

ctiv

enes

s. GZ1%$ Q

.?$

q/A

jqE

] S

ilt

q0,! $7

tqJ

tf

fgt '

,tt";f

BtX

I kqs +

qG

t+

clos

ed-lo

op g

g 0

1 of

Of

EtE

t

Equ

ipm

ent o

pera

tors

sha

ll ha

ve t

he o

pp

ort

un

ity t

o r

ep

ort

pro

blem

s, a

nd p

robl

ems

shal

l als

o be

han

dled

in a

clo

sed-

loop

man

ner.

&tB

[ X

,tg

Xt+

&

t;l;lA

j g4

1ql C

llgt

71

PIS

q9

Zt

.J

?iq

Ol 6

tq, S

Jilk

clos

ed-lo

op 380s E

t74O

l: 2

3O

lEt.

Com

pany

dat

a, e

.g.,

dow

ntim

e, q

ua

l~ty

reje

cts,

first

-tim

e t

hro

ug

h c

apab

ility

, re

curr

ing

mai

nten

ance

wor

k or

ders

, and

op

era

tor-

rep

ort

ed

pro

blem

s, s

hall

be u

sed

to im

prov

e

the

prev

entiv

e m

aint

enan

ce p

rogr

am. b

l At

41 01

Ej

415

g'?

! zX

lA[L

t, E

B 7{

?,

4q

%

3 A

l5,

5Is

OIS

I+ zk2

1 Q

Ej 1

21

2 7

c,tz

XtO

flY

I X

;Lr,

! Z

Xjl

k

XI

Gj2

1-@

gb

A,t

s B

l$H

At8

40

1 sb

30

lEly

.

Mai

nten

ance

dat

a sh

all b

e co

llect

ed a

nd a

naly

zed

as p

art

of

a p

redi

ctiv

e m

aint

enan

ce

prog

ram

.

%XI

t

i~o

~~

j+

uj

l~

g

x~

~

~1

8~

1

F~

OZ

M~

+zrl;

L g

y E

I~

X~

O~

sq

.

1.18

1.19

Are

the

re p

roce

dure

s or

wor

k in

stru

ctro

ns a

vaila

ble

to th

e w

eldi

ng p

erso

nnel

th

at

defin

e

the

wel

ding

pro

cess

?

40

,! +

$a01

1 C

HE

t 01

"

o

7t"

CI 0,- Z

At

%$

Z;t

g

XIA

lAj7

t %

2L

I17

}?

Is th

ere

a p

reve

ntiv

e m

aint

enan

ce p

rogra

m? Is

mai

nten

ance

dat

a bein

g

ut~

lize

d to

form

a

pred

ictlv

e m

aint

enan

ce

pro

gra

m? 01

1%

%X

I E

Z1

9 01

?je

LJ

77

J?

$+X

Jzt2

1

01 E

l+

qlg

t -

84

E5513

s ;L

$J6/

7/

?/$I

[ 3 L

I 77

17

Obj

ectiv

e E

viden

ce

--

N/A

R

equi

rem

ents

and

Gui

danc

e Q

ue

st~

on

Num

ber

Not

S

atis

fact

ory

Sat

isfa

ctor

y Q

uest

ion

Nee

ds Im

med

iate

A

ctro

n

Page 50: Assessment - BES/ERP(Best Enterprise System)erp.mjmetal.com/Download/MJN/2005662840.pdf · WELDING SYSTEM ASSESSMENT PROCEDURE ... CQI-15. Speciai Process: Welding System Assessmenf

Sp

eci

al P

roce

ss: W

eld

ing

Sys

tem

Ass

essm

ent

I A

sses

smen

t

Que

stio

n

1.20

1.21

Req

uire

men

ts a

nd G

uida

nce

Sec

tion I

- Man

agem

ent R

espo

nsib

ility

& Q

ualit

y

"$'.

The

wel

ding

org

aniz

atio

n sh

all d

evel

op a

nd m

aint

ain

a c

ritic

al s

pare

par

ts l

~s

t and

shal

l ens

ure

the a

vaila

bilit

y o

f su

ch p

arts

to

min

imiz

e p

rod

uct

ion

dis

rupt

ions

.

gz

Zq

g tl

l2qO,

! q1

Hl F;;

21hE.S

7tl"

,t7;!;

1 f;

XIG

HO

[ iftq

Ge

gsQ

Zl&

gt

6}71

8)E

t 01871%

F

ss gk

s8H

Ol $

tEf.

y 51

~<+

4

'cL"

Y b

\"z7';

, ,, J$

~/+X

;~

3$

1 5

'5 5

, -

/ /\\

*

A Th

!'" "/

\

":

Rea

ctio

n pl

ans

are

to b

e fo

llow

ed

per

the

con

tro

l pla

n an

d PF

MEA

or,

in th

e c

ase

of

new

ly r

nden

tifie

d is

sues

PFM

EA a

nd c

on

tro

l pla

n m

ust

be u

pdat

ed t

o r

efle

ct th

e ne

w

fa~

lure

mod

e an

d re

actio

n st

eps

take

n. X

NZXI

YIS

2s C

ontr

ol p

lan

2 P

FMEA

S cC

t2tOb

6t

q %

+, E

l2 qO

LJr,! 9

Xjl!?

l PF

MEA

SI C

ontr

ol p

lan2

1 g

+ fa

~lu

re m

ode

St

AHZX

I Et

Ylql

Aj

2s

'j,t2

8}7

1 $)

";I F

litch

] S

CfI

OIE

Gl(O

[ $b_C

C/.

"74

If th

ere

are

to b

e ch

ange

s in

pro

cess

out

side

of

the

curr

ent co

ntr

ol p

lan

and

last

agre

ed u

pon p

roce

ss a

nd p

arts

sig

n of

f, d

o y

ou k

now

wha

t yo

ur c

usto

mer

re

quire

men

ts a

re,

have

you

no

t~fie

d yo

ur c

usto

mer

, an

d d

o y

ou h

ave

cust

omer

ap

prov

al p

rior

to m

akin

g th

e ch

ange

?

",

i~

~r

~t

X~

l

4/91

s/G

l tg e

g g

~l

g~

~f

~l

~

gg

g+

fsln

go

ffo

~l

~g

al

;1

q01

Q?

A~

~O

I ~91x1 2

2. y

joq

, Z~

~I

IY

I

gx

lift

~, g

3rl

71 y

o1

1 s

7H

CzO

lO t

(th

L/J

]t?

1012 ctl

" "r'l 7q

!8"\

&

4--;

',"A

I la>

LI I

L

vv

el

ul

l ~

y

orga

niza

tion

deve

lope

d a

critl

cal s

pare

part

list

and

ar

e th

e pa

rts

avai

labl

e to

m

inim

ize

pro

duct

ion

disr

uptio

ns?

8fl

EZ

/g td

lEtZ

? OLJ

q/tj

J L$g

2/&

Eg

yll

g ~

~2

%

';! ~

~~

ts

z1

&gt

et71

yl

~t

"=

%Q

711

3gt

q 77

t?

How

doe

s th

e or

gant

zatr

on

docu

men

t an

d re

spon

d to

qual

ity s

pills

,

nonc

onfo

rman

ce,

cust

omer

con

cern

s?

3Z

jg

O{$

ql 8

%

E%

i!/

SO

/%

j?ft!lz

Jqs2

jOll

K1

1++6

tY!

@A

-fS

t atL

177t7

Wha

t is

the p

roce

ss

de

v~a

tion

requ~

rem

ents

of

your

cus

tom

er?

-2s 2

3~

1

~~

1~

~~

~~

/

a

-;L ~

lg

g

990t

l~17

11?

I I

/ SatiVd

;tov I N

eeds

Imm

edia

te

Obj

ectiv

e E

viden

ce

N/A

S

atis

fact

ory

Act

ion

Pla

nFin

g

,dzr

6% g"

(iL$

4~

.+ fl

-, ~x

.. 4 I. @@

'""

\ I I

I I

I S

ectio

n 1 -

Man

agem

ent R

espo

nsib

ility

& Q

ualit

y P

lann

ing

. - . . . . . - - -

Page 51: Assessment - BES/ERP(Best Enterprise System)erp.mjmetal.com/Download/MJN/2005662840.pdf · WELDING SYSTEM ASSESSMENT PROCEDURE ... CQI-15. Speciai Process: Welding System Assessmenf

Spe

cial

Pro

cess

: W

eldi

ng S

yste

m A

sses

smen

t

Ass

essm

ent

om

er

desi

gnat

ed ln

dlv

ldu

al

Is th

ere

a s

yste

m I

n p

lace

w

ell

as t

ho

se c

hara

cter

lstlc

s fo

r w

hlc

h r

epro

cess

lng

1s n

ot

perm

lssl

ble

to a

utho

rize

repr

oces

slng

zzs XI]

7tz

01 54

-18

7-fL

t, ?jig

5lXl

gg X

fl%S"

l 5

3%

77tX

1G Q

AtZi

HOl 2

lIt

Any

rep

roce

ssln

g a

ctlv

lty s

hall

req

ulr

e a

ne

w p

roce

ssin

g c

on

tro

l sh

eet

Issu

ed b

y

do

cum

en

ted

?

qu

al~

f~e

d

tech

nrca

l p

ers

on

ne

l de

no

tln

g t

he

nec

essa

ry w

eld

lng

mo

dlfl

catlo

ns

qCqE

k X

I g2 g

tze

s+

qg

+?$

a $222 Lt

EtLH

2 X

I?

yl+

7190

11 01

811 gtF

g

AllS

S ZB S

XjI

g Q

+gtc

t R

ecor

ds s

hall

clea

rly

lnd

lca

te w

he

n a

nd

ho

w a

ny m

ate

rla

l has

be

en

rep

roce

ssed

2 1

on

th

e c

usto

mer

's s

htp

pln

g

do

cum

en

ts?

Zq

g 2

401

Ut*

At

27

;.

1 011

3rjil.5

Xi(

S

Etg

Alh

gOll

LjIO

IEl gq

Q -

q;r;

,t g

~1

77

17

wo

rk o

rder

s, e

tc

EA

jhtg

S3

:d 0

ISF

S;o

l SY

S 7

1x12

2lq

om

Ct

011) s

ho

p

- -_I_---

trav

eler

s, E

.=L S

LEj 5

?1 S

om

et~

me

s th

e m

ate

rla

l re

celv

ed d

oes

no

t pr

ecis

ely

corr

esp

on

d t

o c

ust

om

er

shlp

p~

ng

do

cum

en

ts

~111

41s~

x

ga

g X

~Z

+ ~

GA

I 2401 g

gg

',t~

j~t g

x1qx

1 %

kc1

The

fa

clllt

y sh

all

have

a d

eta

lled

pro

cess

In

pla

ce t

o r

esol

ve r

ecel

vlng

dls

crep

ancl

es

%7C

,'P $&

%XI

S 6f

l381

71

;_C

q1 &t

Ajlg

t g%J9 71

x12

y'J0{

01 Z

tEt

Obj

ectiv

e E

vide

nce

Nee

ds Im

med

iate

A

ctio

n R

equi

rem

ents

and

Gui

danc

e Q

uest

ion

Num

ber

Not

S

atis

fact

ory

N/A

Q

uest

ion

Sat

isfa

ctor

y

Page 52: Assessment - BES/ERP(Best Enterprise System)erp.mjmetal.com/Download/MJN/2005662840.pdf · WELDING SYSTEM ASSESSMENT PROCEDURE ... CQI-15. Speciai Process: Welding System Assessmenf

Sec

tion

2 -

Flo

or a

nd M

ater

ial H

andl

ing

Res

pons

ibili

ty

Pro

cedu

res

tor

part

and

con

tain

er l

ue

ntlr

ica

tion

hel

p to

avo

id in

corr

ect p

roce

ssin

g or

mi:t

ing

of l

ots.

y$+

Oll

Ellz

t 9P

;tt 2 g

71

h_l

$Zg y

qs

ct

sf;/

$[

%+ f!!s

P5Js ii(

L

0t&

3

s &

%K

t

App

ropr

iate

loca

tion a

nd s

tagi

ng w

ithin

the

fac

ility

als

o he

lp t

o e

nsur

e th

at

orde

rs a

re

not

ship

ped

until

all

requ

ired

oper

atio

ns a

re p

erfo

rmed

. LH

q1 q

ZE

t 91

x1 3

gt

Etg

4E

.Qs Tt

zo

j S

,gs [C

HTJtX

I $q

!ilXl

g

gs

Aii;

",tti;

\k

.I.g

zeq.

Cus

tom

er p

roduct

sha

ll be

cle

arly

ide

ntif

ied

and

sta

ged

thro

ug

ho

ut

the

wel

ding

proc

ess.

24

Xjl$

$E

8g

ggs S

BH

Sg

EI

gL$)

jGl;l

. ~

61

17

i~O

~

FtC

t N

on-w

elde

d, in

-pro

cess

, and

fin

ishe

d p

rod

uct

sha

ll be

pro

perly

seg

rega

ted

and

iden

tifie

d. A

ll m

ater

ial s

hall

be s

tage

d in

a d

edic

ated

and

cle

arly

def

ined

are

a.

OtO

llAj tillg

a X

jl$$

Oly

Aj g

t+js

Xj]

$$

S q9

61

sZ1

6H;l.

gk

$)j6

H01

EtC

t. .Q

+$ X

H 0

0 L

gk X

Iq$J

Eql 1

21

J 339 8

11ilO

jl %

Of0

1 9

Ct

d

,'

~d

en

tifyi

ng

lots

and

lin

kin

g a

ll p

ert

ine

nt i

nfo

rma

tion

to t

hem

enh

ance

s th

e a

bili

ty to

J

J

.,

do r

oot

caus

e an

alys

is a

nd c

ontin

ual i

mpr

ovem

ent.

XJ

~Q

J~

I lo

tp ro

ds]+

lots

+q

3 +

$.lq

01

gt~

t.

~g.ij-

1 q

t$)j

~

lot0

1 3% 3

2s

.i!\Z

q O

IL

Sg

QI g

zg S

SJq

s 3

9 $qz[ x

l+q

fi

)H$g1 g

qs

9%

A

IaC

t.

-" ̂"

ship

men

t or

con

tam

inat

ion

of o

ther

lots

. Olz

YS

%xi

1 gE

MI$+

3

;_!I$

$@ F

q3

&

pj $

q 2

CIS

Iots

OI g

71

z -;=

0d51

7;1

OGGZ

q

lgtq

q0

~ glq

. P

roce

dure

s sh

all b

e ad

equa

te t

o p

reve

nt m

ovem

ent

of n

on

-co

nfo

rmin

g p

rod

uct

into

the

pro

duct

ion s

yste

m. 7

C:f;te

Hl$

+g

X

{(gO

t 39 A

(zL

$jo

Z g

gGF

;lx(

O&

f ql

gt

3HoI

EtK

t. P

roce

dure

s sh

all e

xist

add

ress

ing

prop

er d

ispo

sitio

n, p

rod

uct

iden

tific

atio

n, a

nd

trac

king

of

mat

eria

l flo

w i

n a

nd o

ut

of t

he h

old

are

a. g

Xt&

q2-d

HHXl

, XI

IS

", 1

21

2 g

q t

:,tq

l~jo

l xllY

Zg01 +

q+

js

43

01

Etc

t A

non-c

onfo

rmin

g h

old

are

a sh

all b

e cl

early

des

igna

ted

to m

aint

ain

segr

egat

ion

of

such

mat

eria

l. til

Ig-3

s(

11S

o

li?

{g X

ilgO

I g

HH

5 $

Xlti

;t7

I 9

/61

gg

61

h:Y

lZlq

oI get

2.2

2.3

2.4

Spe

cial

Pro

cess

: Wel

ding

Sys

tem

Ass

essm

ent

Is p

roduct

cle

arly

identif

ied

and

stag

ed t

hro

ug

hout

the

wel

ding

pro

cess

? *

iih

ts 2

x1

=x:-ia

3

OL

L-

O

M 0

02

gLE

l qL

s4Ctj

36

1 ~

Ll3

7t7

Is lot tr

aceability

and

~n

teg

rity

main

ta~

ned

thro

ughout

all

proc

esse

s?

nc

=;rig

LL

" "' "

o"

2 3

gg

+jo

1 X

xIgL

l77t

?

Are

pro

cedu

res

adeq

uate

to p

reve

nt m

ovem

ent

of

nonco

nfo

rmin

g p

roduct

In

to th

e p

roduct

ion

syst

em?

sX

t+

Hl+

F+

g ~

jlg

ol s$

AIk

ge

so

l g

gQ

01

IgtT

;ttC

iI q

?c:%

t L1

77\?

Sec

tion

2 -

Flo

or a

nd M

ater

ial H

andl

ing

Res

pons

ibili

ty

I I

c-ng c

u~

ro

ou

cr

sn

alt -71

an0

[con

tam

inan

ts.

--.II-I

-,

I~

~

rl;.~

OT

IL

t

t~

x4

-(

=;

~

TI

I-

mi

nm

o;

li~

tt

~J

~

Lo

zg

tn

t

6L

rL

i i

I I

Ass

essm

ent

Obj

ectiv

e E

viden

ce

Req

uire

men

ts a

nd G

uida

nce

Que

stio

n N

umbe

r

Nee

ds Im

med

iate

A

ctio

n Q

uest

ion

Not

S

atis

fact

ory

N/A

S

atts

fact

ory

Page 53: Assessment - BES/ERP(Best Enterprise System)erp.mjmetal.com/Download/MJN/2005662840.pdf · WELDING SYSTEM ASSESSMENT PROCEDURE ... CQI-15. Speciai Process: Welding System Assessmenf

Sp

eci

al P

roce

ss: W

eld

ing

Sys

tem

Ass

ess

me

nt

2.5

2 6

Ass

essm

ent

Que

stio

n Q

uest

ion

1 Numbe

r 1 I

Are

con

taln

ers

free

of

~n

appro

pnate

mat

erra

l and

cont

amin

ants

?

-r-7

uL

l=

~~

,t,t

~

/lg

9 ~

gf

2

ZF

E]

XI%

g$L

l71t

?

IS

part

loadin

g

docu

men

ted

and

contr

olle

d?

q X

/(z

hl

Pt?

f{ 2

,

Aj$

l.-t

jtq,

~

X%

~~

L1

71

t?

Is th

ere

a c

onta

rnni

ent

reac

tion

plan

and

are

Ope

rato

rs

In th

e pr

oces

s?

g1;r.l nl

lzxl

41

~o

l R=;

' I-

77t7

ggE

tol/ $28 ?

q$?j

xt

71 $3 LI

77t-7

Req

uire

men

ts a

nd G

uida

nce

I I

Nee

ds Im

med

iate

O

bjec

tive

Evid

ence

N

/A

Sat

isfa

ctor

y A

ctio

n

Afte

r em

ptyl

ng a

nd b

efor

e re

-usl

ng c

onta

lner

s, c

onta

lner

s sh

all b

e In

spec

ted

to

ensu

re t

hat

all

part

s an

d In

appr

opria

te m

ater

ial h

ave

been

rem

oved

. 87

1s

UlB

+,

L=

ni

x0

1

12

1.2

87

15

;~A

J-&

~~

JJ~

~I&

e-

c.-

T-6

x

1 X~

I~-E

I%&

XIS

gt

gq

--I---- --

- --

-- 7

l.3

Ztl. Z

-7;1

-4tlS

3tG

t- Th

e so

urce

of

lnap

prop

rlate

ma

ter~

al sh

all b

e rd

entif

ied

and

addr

esse

d F

qsE

t X

Hg

gl S

BI

qtf

l6t2

, E

tqjO

k E

tCt

This

IS

to

ens

ure

that

no n

onco

nfor

min

g w

elde

d pa

rts

or

Inap

prop

riate

mat

erla

l co

ntam

mat

e th

e fl

nish

ed l

ot 01

3p S

Oli

;,HY

%

2 F

S gS F

-";'Z

Et x

ltS

7/ @

S@

lo

ts S

LE

A17

1X1

yg

g4

61%

3%

qk96t7

1 q

l&k

Olq

Load~

ng pa

ram

eter

s sh

all b

e sp

ecifl

ed,

docu

men

ted,

and

co

ntr

olle

d E

xam

ples

incl

ude

part

load

seq

uenc

e an

d cl

amp

sequ

ence

. P

aram

eter

s5 q

XH

St&

3% %

Al5

t6l;

l,

%

Aja

t 6

tq b

Jjl6

ijHO

I:

2C

t (4

1) +

g d

q

3 c

lam

pe

Aj5

3Z

gt

Ope

rato

rs s

hall

be tr

arne

d In

mat

eria

l ha

nd

l~n

g, co

ntai

nmen

t act

lon,

and

pro

du

ct

segr

egat

ion

In th

e e

vent

of

an e

qurp

men

t em

erge

ncy

lncl

udln

g po

wer

fal

lure

. $

tzX

t

& X

tlS

EfF

71

, %

XI

5x1

2 3

7l.

2221 4

23 3

,tUlg

l az

$,t%

qlAj2l

X

iIg

EHH

Oll C

H

zt $

$I3

$tJCCO

tOF

ztct

T

rain

lng

shal

l be

docu

men

ted

$?$IF

~

Aj

$~

~l

qO

~~

t~

Wor

k in

stru

ctio

ns

spec

rflca

lly a

2dre

ssln

g p

ote

ntla

l typ

es o

f eq

uipm

ent

emer

genc

ies

and

failu

res

shal

l be

acce

ssib

le t

o a

nd u

nder

stoo

d by

equ

ipm

ent o

pera

tors

7C

d.XH-

";' fl

_H

I a&*,igt

3-1

3

qz

AlO

il *(2 71

bZ

H0

1 d

jq

, g

,tU

Iqz

Xt7

/ 01

Zll$

g +

I;,!q

01 E

lCf

Thes

e in

stru

ctro

ns s

hall

addr

ess

con

ta~

nrn

en

t/re

act

~o

n

plan

s re

late

d to

all

elem

ents

of

the w

eldi

ng p

roce

ss

01 Y

Ft x

;rlA

lAf%

IS iZ

g e88

$321 Q

+Qt 9

23

%tX

l/x

HZ

ll

---

.----

<.~m

"g-g

t740

F 3E

f

Evi

denc

e sh

all e

xist

sho

win

g dl

spos

ltlon

and

tra

ceab

llrty

of

affe

cted

pro

du

ct

g7

j& F

tIH

2

'$t&

XjIg.4

11 qqg-6

8 F

q871 P

IG)I

FX

HZ

HO

f E

tCt

Unp

lann

ed o

r em

erge

ncy

dow

ntlm

e gr

eatly

rai

ses

the

rlsk

of

Impr

oper

pro

cess

ing.

4

1g

51

X1

27

jL

t 3

2 .2

%tA

1cts

F

qzE

t gS

5101

91%

;; .",ts6l

$7

tAIa

Et.

I I

I I

I I

I

Sec

tion

2 -

Flo

or a

nd M

ater

ial H

andl

ing

Res

pons

ibili

ty

J,

2

I

I I

I I

I I

;$I E l

or&

Zy b

?iA

~:4

'<L

k?'d

:~

I I an

d pa

ckag

ing

adeq

uate

to o

rese

rve

orod

uct

The

wel

der's

loadin

g s

yste

m,

in-p

roce

ss h

andl

ing,

and

shi

ppin

g pr

oces

s sh

all b

e

asse

ssed

for

risk

of p

art

dam

aqe

or o

ther

qua

lity

conc

erns

. g35

!01 ";! A

ICE

, 2

Page 54: Assessment - BES/ERP(Best Enterprise System)erp.mjmetal.com/Download/MJN/2005662840.pdf · WELDING SYSTEM ASSESSMENT PROCEDURE ... CQI-15. Speciai Process: Welding System Assessmenf
Page 55: Assessment - BES/ERP(Best Enterprise System)erp.mjmetal.com/Download/MJN/2005662840.pdf · WELDING SYSTEM ASSESSMENT PROCEDURE ... CQI-15. Speciai Process: Welding System Assessmenf

Tor

rne

wer

olng

ope

ra.c

lonc

g7

,j ;1

!"dlI

CtlF

t A

lg!g

S

g

1-1 7

717

Are

the

pow

er s

uppl

ies

suffi

cien

tly s

ized

? 73

71 g

5.g

ggFt

',tk%

LI

71t?

Are

pro

cess

equ

ipm

ent

calib

ratio

ns a

nd/o

r ve

rific

at~

on ce

rtifi

ed,

docu

men

ted,

ava

ilabl

e, a

nc

curr

ent?

5%

ca

lrbta

t~on

sJl 7

;lA

tk g5'j

rlq

, g

~j~

~.s

i:_

lq,

01

8 7

1%

zt LIJ7

7I.7

Has

a p

reve

ntat

ive

mai

nten

ance

pro

gra

m

been

est

ablis

hed

and

docu

men

ted?

q1

et

0 lT

"XI

~~

~2

?]

~

qg

E

/ 2

A1 41

51 22 L1

77}?

regu

laro

ry s

pecl

Tlc

arlo

ns, g

as m

ixin

g sy

srem

(eq

ulpm

enr a

na s

lzin

gj,

venr

llano

n, a

na

adeq

uate

I~

gh

ting

.

OE

J,

-;;LYI/zt%J,

ggct

gz

97

l(b

ala

nce

and

loa

ding

), a

7l(

slzr

ng

, f~

lte

t~n

g

and

\-I___

- _

__-

clea

nlrn

ess)

, 2, O

EM

% $

71 -5

3, ;F

Xilq

i% X

I9 A

tOd-

Al,

7th

SZ

t AlhY, E

t71j

lCgt

Xl,

g+$F

t zg

4 2s

zg

ggtd

.$H

Ok

tjtX

IKt, A

12

&Zj

P!

Ft4

17

t

r,

2

d,

cons

ider

atio

n not

limite

d t

o o

utp

ut

ener

gy,

duty

cyc

le,

cool

ing,

flo

w r

ates

and

grou

ndin

g.

The

calib

rat~

on an

d ce

rtrf

icat

ion

of t

he p

roce

ss e

quip

men

t sha

ll be

che

cked

at

regu

lar

spec

ifled

inte

rval

s. R

efer

to

the

app

licab

le P

roce

ss T

able

s

gs ~

b'I

21

ca

lrbra

t1on

2t g

gg

$jA

/2t8

;Fq?

?-?!

?S!%

-E

E E

lOiO

k 2

rt

_ --

we

--

Pro

cess

~a

bl'

es

g~

iftG

lP

&&

it

A,\l

L;V\

L i ,

Siip

plie

r sh

all

have

a p

reve

ntat

ive

mai

nten

ance

pro

gra

m th

at

is d

ocum

ente

d an

d

impl

emen

ted.

Ref

er t

o S

ectio

n 1.

19 a

nd t

he a

pplic

able

Pro

cess

Tab

les.

The

repl

acem

ent p

arts

and

pro

cess

con

sum

able

s sh

all b

e id

entif

ied,

mai

ntai

ned

in th

e ap

prop

riate

vol

umes

and

pro

per

stor

age.

?$$2t

a%

:d!2

..$$8

9 gk

o,! 8H

Ok 61

4,

Page 56: Assessment - BES/ERP(Best Enterprise System)erp.mjmetal.com/Download/MJN/2005662840.pdf · WELDING SYSTEM ASSESSMENT PROCEDURE ... CQI-15. Speciai Process: Welding System Assessmenf

"r"~

5 @

?%!?

LJ \

ye

..,I\?%

pa

rt b

e~

ng

cont

rolle

d7

42

4 -=

1$$01

81~

l301

7/

IL

- -

. - .

- - -

-

--.-

.-

t-8

-

--

--

- -

- -

, -,

,- -

-,

*ngg 3

.~

~1

x

qo

1 %

$7;,t

xts

E:I&

E$~

O~~

?,!+

30

1q

oi g

tct

(7t%

iit~

tg)

Ref

er t

o th

e ap

plic

able

Pro

cess

Tab

les,

Sec

tron

2.0

and

Sec

tron 1.19.

iil(C,

c 51%

Pro

cess

Tab

les,

qy

2 0

11

95

",'356

[2t

This

sha

ll b

e c

aptu

red

In to

ols

such

as

the

set

up

pro

cedu

re,

PFM

EA a

nd C

ontr

ol

Pla

ns I

t sh

ould

be

Incl

uded

in th

e la

yere

d pr

oces

s a

ud

~t o

r ot

her

s~

m~

lar

type

qu

al~

ty

revl

ew p

roce

ss.

013s

se

t up Z

AtA

j, P

FME

A, C

ontr

ol P

lan2

1 2s =

Oil

lit(

&jh

[ 6HO

I 2

Ct

01a

P 9

41

a

2 0

1s

ro

o

2x3 aJ

.1 $g C

tg

b'l+E

t G

EL?

[ g$j

gzq[ g

gk 5

lqX

jOb

$,LC1

35

rl2

2~1

171t

7

proc

ess

cons

umab

les

been

ide

nt~

f~e

d

and

mad

e re

adrly

ava

~la

ble

?

Lil

hE

;-lO

, -

2-r 1 L

&A

il 93%

7tx1

2 2

12, sz &Qgg

361q

&27

-JI 01

971%

61

711 zt L

1771

7

c.

LI

IC

1

UC

t33

9,

,, -,-

lXlQ

t qZ

Et

fixt

ure

s O,

tOtLH

71 8

19 %

tzg 2% &

elZl

0l A

t+$,

A1

4q

Lt

xl,

714I

q3 E

Af

SE*

po

ke y

okes

gi-o

l At8

1f L

t0l q

tt7,t F

$$

s ?/s

f( 83

-

Page 57: Assessment - BES/ERP(Best Enterprise System)erp.mjmetal.com/Download/MJN/2005662840.pdf · WELDING SYSTEM ASSESSMENT PROCEDURE ... CQI-15. Speciai Process: Welding System Assessmenf
Page 58: Assessment - BES/ERP(Best Enterprise System)erp.mjmetal.com/Download/MJN/2005662840.pdf · WELDING SYSTEM ASSESSMENT PROCEDURE ... CQI-15. Speciai Process: Welding System Assessmenf

Doe

s w

eldi

ng o

pera

tion

incl

ude

the

follo

win

g?

9:

4z

g 0t

ZH A

tgtg

pgt

2 L1

Jlt?

With

ove

r rid

es o

r re

sets

, log

s m

ust

be m

aint

aine

d.

Rid

es $

P r

eset

s, lo

gs71

EtS

AI

.£lq

Ok c

ict.

Wel

d fa

ults

aud

ible

, vis

ible

and

lin

e sh

ut d

own.

sb

SZ

IZ, st

go

/& g

g s

gklt

ztg

fig

. A

t w

eld

cycl

e in

terr

upt,

part

mus

t n

ot

be r

emov

ed o

r pa

ssed

un

til d

ispo

sitio

ned

by

appr

opri

ate

pers

onne

l. g

B A

t01

3 g

t6;H

A/,

4gQ

Xi17

ji;}xl

%74

Lt,

q+&lgo1

J ol6

H HH

$j

3 C

TH77t7

11 gZ

tAlY

4.

Cal

ibra

tion

of

met

ers

and

syst

em c

ontr

ols.

YI%J

7/0/ +=si!t

Alh

E?

j --.-"--*..-4

Inte

r-lo

ckin

g o

f pr

evio

us o

pera

tions

hav

e oc

curr

ed a

nd q

ualit

y of

par

ts h

as b

een

verif

ied

befo

re t

he

nex

t op

erat

ion

begi

ns.

Ci

s %

kzO

l A

lY47

1 ?O

f/

01g

%t,tO

dol a

gtg

$$!j?%b;! +$$jg

%

kg.

Sec

ure

back

ups

of a

ll pr

ogra

ms

and

proc

edur

es (

elec

tron

ic p

refe

rred

).

Q" I -

=319Ji+

":%tO

I ?td

$&

t ;2C T

i+

(qltll

g(cH

xfl+$

) H

igh/

Low

lim

it al

arm

s es

tabl

ishe

d b

y ac

tual

dat

a.

SX

jIq

g tj

lO/E

jql 2

19 gSi

$+j?l

34

121

32

3Z

qkz

. P

roce

ss v

aria

bles

hav

e be

en d

efin

ed a

nd d

evel

oped

by

data

and

sho

wn

to b

e st

atis

t

4lO

lEjZ

7tY

q9

93s fi

%eI

;1,

SY

l"dO

Z gil

(z14

2t.

Acc

epta

ble

trac

eabi

lity

(seq

uenc

e/da

te c

odin

g) 8

{gs +

Ti+

+?%

A

ll to

olin

g a

nd p

roce

ss c

hang

es a

re d

ocum

ente

d. P

E 5

32

t 9

%

FAj-I

Pt 611

D

ocum

ente

d w

eldi

ng p

roce

dure

s fo

r ea

ch w

eld

loca

tion

and

each

pro

cess

var

iabl

e.

4 g

g :d

l;tla

f 7tg

qg g

gql qgt

~~

je

tg

g

g ":

XI.

Cha

nge

over

pro

cedu

re (

fille

r m

ater

ial,

fixtu

res)

s;t

}g tlt3

fi111

2t.

Mus

t ha

ve d

ocum

ente

d st

art-

up a

nd s

hut-

dow

n pr

oced

ure.

gA

j$tr_

! st

art

-up

lt s

hut-

dow

n 3

ztS

Y5

Al

7txl

Z 9

lqzt

.

I I

Spe

cial

Pro

cess

: We

ldin

g S

yste

m A

sses

smen

t

Que

stio

n

Are

pro

cess

con

trol

para

met

ers

mo

nito

red

at

esta

blis

hed

freq

uenc

ies?

2x3

00

=XI]

0

EtZ

+ ?

22?J

r_!

I&

GO

Ilkl 1

LI E

j 3 4

1+7t

?

How

doe

s th

e o

rga

n~

zat~

or

revt

ew a

nd r

eact

to

ou

t of

con

tro

l/sp

eci

f~ca

t~o

n

Req

uire

men

ts a

nd G

uida

nce

Obj

ectiv

e E

viden

ce

I S

ectio

n 5

- PR

OC

ESS

CO

NTR

OLS

AN

D C

ON

FIR

MA

TIO

N

Pro

cess

con

trol

par

amet

ers

shal

l be

mon

itore

d pe

r fr

eque

ncie

s es

tabl

ishe

d in

the

I

cont

rol

plan

.

9%

E

tEg

Ylq

qlA

j F

IGS

'?LI

E12

SlO

]O~

EtCt

. ..-.

----,"

..-.

.?

An

appr

opri

ate

pers

on s

hall

verif

y th

e pr

oces

s co

ntro

l pa

ram

eter

s. M

anag

emen

t re

view

is r

equi

red

per

Que

stio

n 1.

13. qggt

g% g

Xj1

%

k26f

l01 E

tcf.

zg 1.

1301

/Aj

$ti21

3401 /?

9

Ct.

Are

the

re d

ocum

ente

d re

actio

n pl

ans

with

app

ropr

iate

lev

els

of c

onta

inm

ent

for

bo

th

ou

t of

con

trol

and

ou

t of

tol

eran

ce p

roce

ss p

aram

eter

s?

Ass

essm

ent

I

Page 59: Assessment - BES/ERP(Best Enterprise System)erp.mjmetal.com/Download/MJN/2005662840.pdf · WELDING SYSTEM ASSESSMENT PROCEDURE ... CQI-15. Speciai Process: Welding System Assessmenf

-.. ..

--..

...\

orga

niza

tion

ha

nd

le

chan

ges

to p

roce

ss c

on

tro

pa

ram

eter

s a

fte

r In

itial

cust

om

er

ap

pro

val?

E

7] ,1

7421

50

1 S

."

?Xi

OL

T 00

EX

11 p

~ra

rne

ters

oll

qfg

3

2 01?&!?/1

C/S

L177

}?

Are

In-

Pro

cess

an

d F

inal

Tes

ts p

erf

orm

ed

at

esta

blis

hed

freq

uenc

ies?

3% iyg, l

zlz

nlx

lq

A. E C

51-2

1 G

I E

ll--L

7 id L

freq

uenc

~es

oll A

j !G

I+

71-7

=-;~^

d o

je

rq

para

mer

erql

A1

~y -,r

qq

l L

nE

t )

l~

le

tr

=~

*~

pt

~

~1

1

yy11t

-- -

_ --

----

- \-

XH

ZX

l 4

13

01

%&

LlJ7

t?

Is th

ere

do

cum

en

ted

evi

denc

e th

at

reac

tion

pla

ns a

re f

ollo

we

d?

XllZ

SX

l 41

32 E

qz

gA

i6ta

S7

jXtS

71

93L

1771

? ,< X

u -;i

,A"+'

I Th

ere

sha

ll b

e a

hie

rarc

hy e

stab

lishe

d fo

r m

aki

ng

an

d a

pp

rovi

ng

pro

cess

cha

nges

. I g

zg

$gtit;1

, %gi;t

+ 3

ql E

Hct

213

9 xj

1417

t y

~q

ol ct

ct,

Eac

h pr

oces

s sh

ou

ld b

e a

cted

on

acc

ordi

ng t

o th

e le

vel

of

chan

ge.

Rev

iew

pro

cess

chan

ges

w~

th

you

r cu

stom

er. Zqs qq sg $3 g

ql(i;

$)O

ll CC

t21. %

%g

$-lif.H

?l &

..

"-tE

t. 2

44

$3- E-7d

-ftlICHH

B et

zt.

, \J

4

il

I\

% a \ 4 tk

4' "4

f', In

-Pro

cess

an

d F

inal

Tes

ts s

hall

be

per

For

med

pe

r fr

eque

ncie

s in

th

e c

on

tro

l pla

n a

s

ag

ree

d u

po

n b

etw

ee

n th

e s

uppl

ier

an

d t

he

cus

tom

er. $3 9 31s

Eil

hF

k ~

~~

Ri

l

Qt 2

q A

tolo

llAj

;L!X

jI Y

lqS

S q7

,ttol

Y

LS

9%

510

lXj0

1 i;_

tCt.

Page 60: Assessment - BES/ERP(Best Enterprise System)erp.mjmetal.com/Download/MJN/2005662840.pdf · WELDING SYSTEM ASSESSMENT PROCEDURE ... CQI-15. Speciai Process: Welding System Assessmenf
Page 61: Assessment - BES/ERP(Best Enterprise System)erp.mjmetal.com/Download/MJN/2005662840.pdf · WELDING SYSTEM ASSESSMENT PROCEDURE ... CQI-15. Speciai Process: Welding System Assessmenf

Sec

tion

6 -

Job

~udi

tf*?

J'ih

%T

>)ip'i q

d:: \;

3k74

~

Job

Id

en

tity

: ey

A,\t

zb't

Cu

sto

me

r:

- i - Y

Sh

op

Ord

er

Nu

mb

er:

-'I

%'?%

P

art

Nu

mb

er:

-

Pa

rt D

esc

rip

tio

n: ,

Bas

e M

eta

l S

pe

cifi

cati

on

s:

- F

ille

r M

eta

l S

pe

cifi

cati

on

(if

req

uir

ed

):

.. W

eld

ina

Pro

cess

(es)

: -

6.1

Has

th

e w

eldi

ng o

pe

ratio

n id

en

tifie

d th

e

proc

ess

con

tro

l e

qu

ipm

en

t ne

cess

ary

to m

onito

r,

con

tro

l an

d p

rovi

de

feed

back

on

all

esse

ntia

l

proc

ess

varia

bles

as

liste

d in

th

e a

pplic

able

Pro

cess

Tab

les?

+3-

E %

tEP

%+

q ?j gz

%H

IS QL/ E

46t;

L, X

IIq6tU

i, qg- 7\

$7

9 P

roce

ss

Tab

leso

il L

ts",

r 3X

-1%

24=

yOll;

! 7-

-

Are

ove

r rid

es o

r re

sets

logs

mai

ntai

ned?

oile

r rid

es 4k re

sets

log

s 71 $

I21

512 $

"+7t?

-_

-- --

-

Que

stio

n K

Has

th

e lo

gic

bee

n es

tabl

ishe

d to

effe

ctiv

ely

ide

ntif

y an

d ad

dres

s pr

oces

s o

r e

qu

ipm

en

t fa

ults

? 4L

:tA

i"

BX-J

C-Ck

&d.

tlls?5

lz Zllty 0

$ gi

kY6t

U

U

L

=

Ol

Sg

gig

51 %

&7

t?

2 ~

l-2

7 7- .

A

Rel

ated

WS

A Q

uest

ion

#

Job

Au

dit

Que

stio

n

5.1

Cus

tom

er o

r In

tern

al

Req

uire

men

t

Job

(Sho

p) O

rder

or

Ref

eren

ce D

ocum

enta

tion

Req

uire

men

t

Act

ual

Co

nd

itio

n

(Obj

ectiv

e E

vide

nce)

Page 62: Assessment - BES/ERP(Best Enterprise System)erp.mjmetal.com/Download/MJN/2005662840.pdf · WELDING SYSTEM ASSESSMENT PROCEDURE ... CQI-15. Speciai Process: Welding System Assessmenf

shut

do

wn

?

xk

2 z

21

2,

2

yo

lk g

E s

gt0

1 ?

]*7t

? 2.1

9 pj

go1

Oj+7

t?

If th

e w

eld

cycl

e is

int

erru

pted

, is

th

e p

art

con

tro

lled

or

cont

aine

d u

ntil

dis

posi

tione

d b

y

ap

pro

pri

ate

per

sonn

el?

gz A

tOlS

Ol '&)$l{s

Et+

Cf$

, q

gp

qgql

01

611

HI{ X

I 71 3 [

[[Tf

Xl

51 74

Lt

Qj Xi1

51 +7

/?

L$-y

?

Que

stio

n H

Are

th

e m

eter

s an

d fe

edba

ck c

ontr

ols

calib

rate

d

Rel

ated

WS

A Q

uest

ion

#

\

Job

Aud

ir. Q

uest

ion

%

Are

wel

d fa

ults

aud

ible

, vl

slbl

e an

d do

es t

he

lin

e

pe

r es

tabl

ishe

d fr

eque

ncie

s?

4 q

tEJS

Yf;.5

% m

eter

s 91 i

ilcy

gX

llql $

29

^V

UH 7

1+

7t?

If a

pplic

able

, is

the

re a

n in

ter-

lock

ing

-of t

he

prev

ious

op

era

tion

and

has

th

e q

ualit

y o

f pa

rts

been

ver

ified

? q

g 7

1% Z

tCt$

, 5t

y yo

11 J

et0

1

7tL

Ztr

q, F

g

L"-

"1 g

g $

kg01

7tk

&tL(

7Jt?

Cus

tom

er o

r In

tern

al

Req

uire

men

t

Job

(Sho

p) O

rder

or

Ref

eren

ce D

ocum

enta

tion

Req

uire

men

t

Act

ual

Co

nd

itio

n

(Obj

ectiv

e E

vide

nce)

P

ass /

Fai

l

/ N

/A

Page 63: Assessment - BES/ERP(Best Enterprise System)erp.mjmetal.com/Download/MJN/2005662840.pdf · WELDING SYSTEM ASSESSMENT PROCEDURE ... CQI-15. Speciai Process: Welding System Assessmenf

Sec

tion

6 -

Job A

ud

it

Job

Id

en

tity

:

Cu

sto

me

r:

Sh

op

Ord

er

Nu

mb

er:

Par

t N

um

be

r:

Par

t D

esc

rip

tio

n:

Bas

e M

eta

l Spe

cifi

cati

ons:

Fill

er M

eta

l S

pe

cifi

cati

on

(if

requ

ired

):

We

ldin

a P

roce

ssfe

s):

d

. ,

Que

stio

n H

6.8

6.9

1 I

Is th

ere

acce

ptab

le t

race

abili

ty (

sequ

ence

/dat

e 1

5.1.

10

Job

Aud

it Q

uest

ion

Are

the

re s

ecur

e ba

ckup

s o

f al

l pro

gram

s an

d pr

oced

ures

(el

ectr

onic

pre

ferr

ed)?

gg g

g.1

$j?

r1. ZX

tOfl

EHgt

+

yl+

qltll

-+

$(LH

T{I+

$)O

l yle

L177

t?

6.10

1 6.1

1 /

codi

ng)?

-;--+

$ 7tg

.Et ;,

tq 3 01

WJL

I]~~

? 5.

1.11

1 2.

3

5.1.

7

Are

hig

h/lo

w l

imit

alar

ms

esta

blis

hed

by

actu

al

data

.

~XII

YO

,! UE

~OU

o

~p

t gr ~

-=_

LS

JZ

-",!

.

a71

sq

t~

~~

q

~L

GL

I~J

~?

Rel

ated

W

SA

Que

stio

n #

5.1.

8 5.

1.1

Hav

e pr

oces

s va

riabl

es b

een

defin

ed a

nd

deve

lope

d b

y da

ta a

nd s

how

n to

be

sta

tistic

ally

capa

ble?

71.@

?4 O,! gGg tj

lOlE

jql S

lI6II

qy

Zl

q, 7

Htj,ts +

yl&L1

77t?

1212 7

!Alq

oZ

.k!

qg

$.

y15L

1771

?

5.1.

9

6.12

Cus

tcm

er o

r In

tern

al

Req

uire

men

t

chan

ges?

9E

Z?3

1t 5

% 3g

oil

ct/E

t +Y

%O

I yl

9~17

]t?

Job

(Sho

p) O

rder

or

Ref

eren

ce D

ocum

enta

tion

Req

uire

men

t

4.1

5.1.

11

5.4

Act

ual

Con

ditio

n (O

bjec

tive

Evi

denc

e)

Pass

/ F

ail

/ N

/A

Page 64: Assessment - BES/ERP(Best Enterprise System)erp.mjmetal.com/Download/MJN/2005662840.pdf · WELDING SYSTEM ASSESSMENT PROCEDURE ... CQI-15. Speciai Process: Welding System Assessmenf

?' v

01

I!?! D

UE

rE

2

rs T 8

2%

:

ksg

E2

O

tJ =:

io3

2 u:\a

im

-7-

.* 3

" e

;;;

4.l "

'2 ". ID %

2

-

m

2 E

OF

a

t-n

w

'Ir Vi

N

0,

CL

V1

flu

2i

lob

rt

-7-

rE

2 2 ,

EI: R -0 2 ;

0

5 - q 9

$

%

8

=a

n

c 02

"

4

T, I3

w

--,-

)f

V -

:s

1.

;n 2

5$ uI}

n

0

,L

\\'+

Y

5

y

%h +: 3 ?<

t.n

2. :P

Y .v

?<

CL

gm

z"kP

t: -r"

E IUY H --

oL!g

flu 2

3 2

. ar

Dl-

-

-

>Q $

El}

,m- -

r.4

.J

Vi

?'p

at;

c7?

v

W 'U- OD

X

~2 s

-lo 2

-

-

H

o~

K

nY

JU-

%. 0

IUY

VI

2 rg

u _

I? n

- $0 '2

2 UIZ

0tJ 4

ro3

: -

-7- "

3:

'

-

* z! %

Ln

r$

<

flu 2.

k g

lot

-7- rE !"

K~

.P

O

W,

N

i-?

,\A 5

\J~

r~

> g /

-A '&

$, ;

t..-. 9

<> 3%

$% 3,

J ,--

-+

Page 65: Assessment - BES/ERP(Best Enterprise System)erp.mjmetal.com/Download/MJN/2005662840.pdf · WELDING SYSTEM ASSESSMENT PROCEDURE ... CQI-15. Speciai Process: Welding System Assessmenf

Sec

tion

6 -

Job

Au

dit

Jo

b I

de

nti

ty:

Cu

sto

me

r:

Sh

op

Ord

er

Nu

mb

er:

Pa

rt N

um

be

r:

Pa

rt D

esc

rip

tio

n:

Bas

e M

eta

l S

pe

cifi

cati

on

s:

Fill

er

Me

tal

Sp

eci

fica

tio

n (

if re

qu

ire

d):

We

ldin

q P

roce

ss(e

s):

ap

pro

pri

ate

leve

ls o

f co

ntai

nmen

t to

bo

th o

ut

of

con

tro

l an

d o

ut

of

tole

ranc

e pr

oces

s pa

ram

eter

s

and

pro

vid

e d

ocum

ente

d ev

iden

ce t

ha

t re

actio

n

plan

s ar

e fo

llow

ed

? 8

7;11

S %q 4

7-1 4

, 648 2

jd81

S g

q Y

g?2

par

amet

erso

il C

IiEt + Y

Et

%tX

l(q

7;

11)q

g?

llg

71.

3;

gA1e

l.y X

HE

XI

qg

ol

~~

GL

I

7117

12

1.2

XII

EX

l 71

+j$

[qg g

mg

~j

21 61

q X

i1 gzt

L-1 J

Jf?

4

4

proc

ess

con

tro

l par

amet

ers

afte

r in

itial

cus

tom

er

appr

oval

and

ho

w d

o y

ou

no

tify

yo

ur

cust

omer

?

EIZ

21

2.4

$0,

! 0

14

gs

gX1l

_par

amet

erso

fl El

l 'd

l w

73

0

02

LT

L

XX

lO

(Y

%Y

~-

Azz

l';Lm

?g 71 0,' 2d

L, J

lt?

-

esta

blis

hed

freq

uenc

ies?

I

Que

stio

n #

I I

I I

cust

omer

spe

cific

atio

ns?

Eac

h p

art

may

hav

e on

e or

mo

re r

equi

rem

ents

det

erm

ined

by

the

wel

ding

spe

cific

atio

n.

I

Job

Au

dit

Que

stio

n

6.17

Are

th

ere

doc

umen

ted

reac

tion

plan

s w

ith

62

6201

Rel

ated

WS

A Q

uest

ion

#

Tes

t M

eth

od

:

Tes

t F

requ

ency

and

Qua

ntity

:

Spe

cific

atio

n:

71, t

;1q

~tso

11 ~4

21

gg -3~

gt.g

gg

?jl

-

--

x-I 0

ok

0 -I Z '-I

'It7

,$"-

y$cb

,&:

Y\' '

- --

Cus

tom

er o

r In

tern

al

Req

uire

men

t

<.

19

5.6

2

Job

(Sho

p) O

rder

or

Ref

eren

ce D

ocum

enta

tion

Req

uire

men

t #

Par

ts m

ust

mee

t ea

ch r

equi

rem

ent

List

req

uire

men

ts b

elo

w a

nd v

alid

ate

Tt iit

E+ gz

Atg

cofl

"IE

t 6tL

t $-@

It

Ol&

tCl

.~;l

Alg

t+j$

2!

'6lz

ii

t~+

zkq

a.;1.~tgts 3

4~

17

ok

~t

rt

ot

;lljg

l a

-;~

~tg

tg

ZIA

E~

IZ~

Z gg6t 2

1

Act

ual

Co

nd

itio

n

(Obj

ectiv

e E

vide

nce)

P

ass /

Fai

l

/ N

/A

Page 66: Assessment - BES/ERP(Best Enterprise System)erp.mjmetal.com/Download/MJN/2005662840.pdf · WELDING SYSTEM ASSESSMENT PROCEDURE ... CQI-15. Speciai Process: Welding System Assessmenf

Sec

tion

6 -

Job A

ud

it

Job

Iden

tity:

Cus

tom

er:

Sho

p O

rder

Num

ber:

Par

t N

umbe

r:

Par

t D

escr

iptio

n:

Bas

e M

etal

Spe

cific

atio

ns:

Fill

er M

etal

Spe

cific

atio

n (if

req

uire

d):

i

Wel

dina

Pro

cess

(es1

: i

*

a

pp

-

Tes

t M

eth

od

:

Tes

t F

requ

ency

and

Qua

ntity

:

Spe

cific

atio

n:

--

-

6.20.2

., .

.

Tes

t M

eth

od

: --

Tes

t F

requ

ency

and

Qua

ntity

:

Spe

cific

atio

n:

6 204

Cus

tom

er o

r In

tern

al

Req

uire

men

t '

W

LV

Rel

ated

WS

A Q

uest

ion

# u

Que

stio

n K

Tes

t M

eth

od

Tes

t F

requ

ency

and

Qua

ntity

:

Spe

cific

atio

n:

6.20.3

f ., .lo

b A

udit

Que

stio

n

,

/

Job

(Sho

p) O

rder

or

Ref

eren

ce D

ocur

nent

atio

n

Req

uire

men

t

Act

ual

Co

nd

itio

n

(Obj

ectiv

e E

vide

nce)

Pas

s /

Fai

l

/ N

/A

Page 67: Assessment - BES/ERP(Best Enterprise System)erp.mjmetal.com/Download/MJN/2005662840.pdf · WELDING SYSTEM ASSESSMENT PROCEDURE ... CQI-15. Speciai Process: Welding System Assessmenf

Aut

orrio

tive

Indust

ry A

ct~

on

Gro

up

Sp

eci

al

Pro

cess

: W

eld

ing

Sys

tem

As

se

ss

me

nt

Ve

rslo

n 1

, Y2010

PR

OC

ES

S T

AB

LE

D - S

olid

Sta

te W

eld

ing

Pro

cess

es

The

con

tent

s of

allp

ub

fish

ed

mat

eria

ls a

re c

opyr

ight

ed b

y th

e A

utom

otiv

e In

dust

ry A

ctio

n G

mu

p u

nles

s ot

herw

ise

indi

cate

d. A

ll rig

hts

are

pres

erve

d by

AIA

G, a

nd c

onte

nt m

ay n

ot b

e al

tere

d o

rdis

sem

ina

led

, po

bl~

she

d, or

tran

sfer

red

in p

art

of s

uch

cont

ent.

The

info

rmat

fon

is n

ot t

o b

e so

ld in

par

t o

r w

hole

to a

nyon

e w

ithin

you

r or

gani

zatio

n o

r to

ano

ther

com

pany

. C

opyr

ight

infr

inge

men

t is

a v

iola

tion

of f

eder

al la

w s

ubje

ct to

crim

inal

and

civ

il pe

nalti

es.

AIA

G a

nd

the

Aut

omot

ive

Indu

stry

Act

ion

Gm

up

are

reg

iste

red

serv

ice

mar

ks o

f th

e A

utom

otiv

e In

dust

ry A

ctio

n G

mup

.

AUI c

on

tro

l of va

ria

ble

s g

ive

n b

elo

w a

re s

ub

ord

ina

te t

o c

ust

om

er

spe

cifi

c re

quirem

ents

.

I~

he

cu

sto

me

r m

ay

have

ad

diti

on

al

requirem

ents

, e.

g.,

insp

ect

ion

test

ing,

gre

ate

r fr

equenci

es,

etc

. W

hen p

esf

orm

ing th

e jo

b a

udit,

the a

ud

itor

I sh

all

veri

fy w

eld

ing

is

co

nfo

rmin

g to

the

cust

om

er's

requirem

ents

. 4

$ b

:AJq

dLh<

' D

ash

es

be

low

ind

ica

te "

no

t applic

able

".

+\Q

)\ct\

ab

~?

?(

-\ f Q \

%

IX

ind

ica

tes

an

ess

en

tial v

ari

ab

le w

hic

h s

ha

ll be d

ocu

mente

d a

nd

contr

olle

d.-

- \

/ D4.1

I (T

ole

rance

s on

axia

l alig

nmen

t I

1 I

J i

nd

ica

tes

tha

t p

roce

du

re s

ho

uld

be

revi

ew

ed

an

d d

ocu

mente

d w

hen n

ece

ssary

.

04.2

1 IF

ayin

g su

rfac

e ar

ea

X

X

1x

1

04.3

1 IF

avin

a su

rfac

e cl

eanl

ines

s x

x I

YI

I

Ine

rtia

F

rict

ion

W

eld

ing

(F

RW

-I)

Cate

gory

lPro

cesb

Ste

ps

Ite

m #

D4.4

04.5

D4.6

D4.7

O 2

010 A

uto

mo

tive

Indu

stry

Act

ion

Gro

up (

AIA

G)

Rela

ted W

SA

Q

ue

stio

n #

D4.8

D4.9

04.10

134.1 I

04.12

04.13

D4.14

04.15

D4.16

Dir

ect

Dri

ve

Fri

ctio

n

We

ldin

g

(FR

W-D

D)

Initi

al s

pind

al s

peed

W

eldi

ng s

pind

al s

peed

Spi

ndal

torq

ue -

to n

ot d

amag

e eq

uipm

ent

Flw

he

els

; to

tal m

omen

t of i

nert

ia

I -

Spr

ndle

cla

mp

pres

sure

Fix

ture

cla

mp

pres

sure

Par

t stlc

kout

Pre

heat (

Fir

st fr

icti

on

phase

) if

needed

-Pro

ject

~on on

fayr

ng s

urfa

ce

-Pre

heat

forc

e

-Pre

heat

trm

e or

RP

M

Pre

heat

bur

noff

leng

th-a

mou

nt o

f dlln

ensl

on lo

ss d

ur~

ng

pr

ehea

t W

eld

Heat (

Seco

nd fr

icti

on

phase

)

-Fn

ct~

on

wel

d fo

rce

-Frlc

tlon

spee

d at

whr

ch fo

rgln

g be

grns

Fri

ctio

n

Stir

W

eld

ing

(FS

W)

X

X

X

X

X x X'

X' X' X

X

Fla

sh B

utt

W

eld

ing

(FW

)

X

X

X

X

X

Resi

stance

B

utt

We

ldin

g

(UW

)

X

X x X' X'

X'

X' X

X

Ultr

aso

nic

W

eld

ing

X

X

x x

Page 68: Assessment - BES/ERP(Best Enterprise System)erp.mjmetal.com/Download/MJN/2005662840.pdf · WELDING SYSTEM ASSESSMENT PROCEDURE ... CQI-15. Speciai Process: Welding System Assessmenf

Au

torr

ioti

ve

Indu

stry

Act

ion

Gro

up

Sp

eci

al

Pro

cess

: W

eld

ing

Sy

ste

m A

ss

es

sm

en

t V

ers

on

1, 3

/2010

PR

OC

ES

S T

AB

LE

D - S

olid

Sta

te W

eld

ing

Pro

cess

es

The

con

tent

s o

f al

l pub

lishe

d m

afer

ials

am

cop

yrig

hted

by

the

Aut

omot

ive

Indu

stry

Act

ion

Gm

up

unl

ess

othe

rwis

e in

dica

ted.

AN

right

s ar

e pr

eser

ved

by A

IAG

, and

con

tent

may

not

be

alte

red

or d

isse

min

ated

, pu

bls

he

d,

or

tran

sfer

red

in p

art

of s

uch

cont

ent.

The

info

ma

tion

is

not t

o b

e so

ld in

par

t or

who

le to

any

one

wit

h~

n yo

ur o

rgan

izat

ion

or to

ano

ther

com

pany

. C

opyr

ight

infr

inge

men

t is

a v

iola

tion

of f

eder

al la

w s

ubje

ct t

o c

rimin

al a

nd c

ivil

pena

lties

A

IAG

and

th

e A

utom

otiv

e In

dust

!y A

ctio

n G

roup

are

reg

iste

red

serv

ice

mar

ks o

f th

e A

utom

otiv

e In

dust

ry A

ctio

n G

roup

.

Ail

co

ntr

ol o

f va

ria

ble

s g

ive

n b

elo

w a

re s

ub

ord

ina

te t

o c

ust

om

er

spe

cifi

c re

quirem

ents

.

The c

ust

om

er

may

have

ad

diti

on

al r

equirem

ents

, e.g.,

insp

ect

ion

test

ing,

gre

ate

r fr

equenci

es,

etc

. W

hen p

erf

orm

ing

the jo

b a

udit,

th

e a

ud

itor

sha

ll ve

rify

we

ldin

g is

co

nfo

rmin

g to

the c

ust

om

er's

requirem

ents

.

Dash

es

be

low

ind

ica

te "

no

t applic

able

".

X i

nd

ica

tes

an e

sse

ntia

l va

ria

ble

wh

ich

sh

all

be

do

cum

en

ted

an

d c

on

tro

lled

. J in

dic

ate

s th

at

pro

ced

ure

sh

ou

ld b

e re

view

ed a

nd

docu

mente

d w

he

n n

ece

ssary

.

I I

I I

I I

I I

Cate

gory

IPro

cess

Ste

ps

Ite

m #

R

ela

ted W

SA

Q

ue

stio

n #

Ine

rtia

F

rict

ion

W

eld

ing

(F

RW

-I)

04.1

7

04.1

8

D4.

19

D4.

20

D4.

21

D4.

22

D4.

23

, D

4.24

,

Dir

ect

Drive

F

rict

ion

W

eld

ing

(F

RW

-DD

)

I 1

.

I I

8 I

I I

Fo

rgin

g S

tage

-For

ging

spe

ed

-For

ge fo

rce

-For

ge t

ime

-For

ge le

ngth

~f lr

mlte

d up

set i

s us

ed

-For

ge d

elay

-Ups

et d

~st

ance

-Ups

et r

emov

al I m

anag

emen

t

,-U

~s

et ho

ld ti

me

D4.

25

1 ]-

up

set r

ate

Fri

ctio

n

Stir

W

eld

ing

(FS

W)

D4.

26

D4.

27

04

.28

D4.

29

D4.

30

D4.

31

O 2

01

0 A

utom

otiv

e ln

dust

ly A

ctio

n G

rou

p (

AIA

G)

x X

X x ..

-Fric

tion

upse

t dis

tanc

e an

d tim

e

Bra

ke s

ettin

g or

sto

ppin

g tim

e di

men

sion

s an

d to

lere

nces

Bra

ke fo

rce

D4.

32

D4.

33

Fla

sh B

utt

We

ldin

g

(FW

'

X

X

X

X

X

X X

,Y

,Y

,

x

Bra

ke d

elay

prio

r to

upse

t

Fin

al p

ositi

on

Pos

fwel

d he

at tr

eatm

ent i

f nee

ded

base

d on

mat

eria

ls

. .

X

X x

join

ed

Pro

tect

ive

atm

osph

ere

if ne

cess

ary

for

the

base

mat

eria

l

Tot

al b

urno

ff-am

ount

of d

imen

sion

loss

dur

ing

tota

l pro

cess

Resi

stance

B

utt

W

eld

ing

(U

W)

I

J

Ultr

aso

nic

W

eld

ing

J

I I

X

X

J

X

J

X

X

Page 69: Assessment - BES/ERP(Best Enterprise System)erp.mjmetal.com/Download/MJN/2005662840.pdf · WELDING SYSTEM ASSESSMENT PROCEDURE ... CQI-15. Speciai Process: Welding System Assessmenf

Auto

rrio

t~ve

Indust

ry A

ctio

n G

roup

Sp

eci

al

Pro

cess

: W

eld

ing

Sys

tem

As

se

ss

me

nt

Ve

rno

n 1

, 3/2

010

PR

OC

ES

S T

AB

LE D

- So

lid S

tate

Wel

din

g P

roce

sses

The

con

tent

s of

all

publ

ishe

d m

ater

ials

are

cop

yrig

hted

by

the

Aut

omot

ive

lndu

stry

Act

ion

Gro

up u

nles

s ot

herw

ise

indi

cate

d. A

ll rig

hts

are

pres

erve

d by

AIA

G,

and

cont

ent m

ay n

ot b

e al

tere

d or

dis

sem

inat

ed, p

ublis

hed,

or

tran

sfen

ed

in p

art

of s

uch

con

tent

. T

he in

form

atio

n is

not

to

be

sold

in p

art

or w

hole

to a

nyon

e w

ithin

you

r or

gani

zatio

n or

to a

noth

er c

ompa

ny.

Cop

yrig

ht in

frin

gem

ent i

s a

vio

latio

n of

fed

eral

law

sub

lect

to

crim

mal

and

civ

d pe

nalli

es.

AIA

G a

nd

the

Aut

omot

ive

Indu

stry

AcB

on G

mu

p a

re r

egis

tere

d se

rvic

e m

aa

s o

f th

e A

utom

obve

Indu

stty

Act

ion

Gro

up

All

con

tro

l of

vari

ab

les

giv

en

be

low

are

su

bo

rdin

ate

to

cu

sta

me

r sp

eci

fic

requirem

ents

.

The

cu

sto

me

r m

ay

have

ad

diti

on

al r

equirem

ents

, e.

g.,

insp

ect

ion

test

ing,

gre

ate

r fr

equenci

es,

etc

. W

hen .p

erf

orm

ing t

he

job

audit,

th

e a

ud

itor

sha

ll ve

rify

we

ldin

g is

co

nfo

rmin

g to

the c

ust

om

er's

requirem

ents

.

O 2

01 0

Auto

motiv

e In

dust

ry A

ctio

n G

roup (

AIA

G)

3o

f8

Rela

ted W

SA

C

ate

gory

/Pro

c~?ss

Ste

ps

D4.

36

D4.

37

04

38

D4.

39

D4.

40

04

.41

134.

42

04.4

3

Q4.

44

194.

45

194.

46

D4.

47

194.

48

D4.

49

D4.

50

04

.51

-Prn

to s

houl

der r

atfo

-Pfn

leng

th

-Inc

lude

d an

gle

for

prn

-Inc

lude

d an

gle

for

shou

lder

-Thr

ead

on p

fn s

urfa

ce

-Pin

rna

terr

al

Plu

ng

e P

ract

ice

-S

peed

of p

lung

e

-Spr

ndal

spe

ed d

urrn

g pl

unge

-Pre

heat

dw

ell t

tme

afte

r pl

unge

-Plu

nge

forc

e

We

ld

-Wel

d fo

rce

-Tra

vel s

peed

-T

ool t

rlt a

ngle

-Wel

d sp

inda

l spe

ed

We

ld te

rmin

atio

n

-Ex~

t mot

ton

of t

ool s

uch

as tf

lt an

gle

rota

tion

---

-Spt

ndal

spe

ed a

t too

l ext

ract

ron

X X X X X X x X X X X X X X x X

------

Page 70: Assessment - BES/ERP(Best Enterprise System)erp.mjmetal.com/Download/MJN/2005662840.pdf · WELDING SYSTEM ASSESSMENT PROCEDURE ... CQI-15. Speciai Process: Welding System Assessmenf

Au

tom

otive

In

du

stry

Ac

t~o

ri Gro

up

Sp

ec

ial P

roce

ss:

We

ldin

g S

yste

m A

ss

es

sm

en

t V

erno

n 1

, 32

01

0

PR

OC

ES

S T

AB

LE

D -S

oli

d S

tate

Wel

din

g P

roce

sses

The

con

tent

s of

all

publ

ishe

d m

ater

ials

are

cop

yrig

hted

by

the

Aut

omot

ive

lndo

stry

Act

ion

Gro

up u

nles

s o

the

wis

e in

dica

ted.

AN

right

s ar

e p

wse

rve

d b

y A

iAG

, a

nd

con

tent

may

no

t be

elte

wd

ord

isse

min

atw

, pub

lishe

d, o

rtn

ns

iem

d

in p

art

of s

uch

cont

ent.

The

inio

nnat

ion

is n

ot t

o b

e so

ld in

par

t or

who

le t

o a

nyon

e w

ithin

you

r or

gani

zatio

n or

to a

noth

er c

ompa

ny.

Cop

yrig

ht in

frin

gem

ent i

s a

vio

latio

n of

fede

ral l

aw s

ubje

ct to

crim

inal

and

civ

il pe

nalti

es.

AIA

G a

nd

the

Aut

omot

ive

Indu

stry

Aci

ion

Gro

up a

re r

egis

tere

d se

rvic

e m

afi

s o

f th

e A

utom

otiv

e In

dust

ry A

ctio

n G

mup

.

All

con

tro

l of v

ari

ab

les

giv

en

belo

w a

re s

ub

ord

ina

te t

o c

ust

om

er

spe

cific

requirem

ents

.

The

cu

sto

me

r m

ay

have

ad

diti

on

al r

equirem

ents

, e.

g.,

insp

ect

ion

te

stin

g,

gre

ate

r fr

equenci

es,

etc

. W

hen p

erf

orm

ing

the jo

b a

udit,

the a

ud

itor

sha

ll ve

rify

we

ldin

g i

s c

on

form

ing

to

the

cust

om

er's

requirem

ents

.

Dash

es

be

low

ind

ica

te "

no

t applic

able

".

X i

nd

ica

tes

an

ess

en

tial v

ari

ab

le w

hic

h s

ha

ll b

e d

ocu

me

nte

tl and c

on

tro

lled

. 4 in

dic

ate

s th

at

pro

ced

ure

sh

ou

ld b

e r

evi

ew

ed a

nd

docu

mente

d w

he

n n

ece

ssary

.

I I

I I

I I

I 1

Gate

gory

lPro

cess

Ste

ps

Ite

m #

R

ela

ted W

SA

Q

ue

stio

n #

I I

I I

I I

I I

D4.

52

1- we

ll at e

nd o

f tra

vel

1x

1

Ine

rtia

F

rict

ion

W

eld

ing

(F

RW

-I)

D 2

010

Aul

omol

lve

tndu

stry

Aci

lon

Gro

up (

AIA

G)

Dir

ect

Drive

F

rict

ion

W

eld

ing

(F

RW

-DD

)

Fri

ctio

n

Sti

r W

eld

ing

(FS

W)

Fla

sh B

utt

Weld

ing

fFW

)

Resi

stance

B

utt

W

eld

ing

(UW

)

Ultr

aso

nic

W

eld

ing

Page 71: Assessment - BES/ERP(Best Enterprise System)erp.mjmetal.com/Download/MJN/2005662840.pdf · WELDING SYSTEM ASSESSMENT PROCEDURE ... CQI-15. Speciai Process: Welding System Assessmenf

Sp

ec

ial P

roce

ss:

We

ldin

g S

yste

m A

ss

es

sm

en

t V

ersi

on 1

. 3/2

010

Aut

orr>

otiv

e ln

tjust

ry A

ctlo

r? G

rou

p

PR

OC

ES

S T

AB

LE D

- So

lid S

tate

Wel

din

g P

roce

sses

The

con

tent

s o

f aN

publ

ishe

d m

ater

ials

are

cop

yrig

hted

by

the

Aut

omot

ive

lndu

stry

Act

ion

Gro

up u

nles

s o

the

wis

e in

dica

ted.

All

rig

hh

are

pre

serv

ed b

y A

IAG

, an

d co

nten

t may

not

be

alte

red

ord

isse

min

ale

d, p

ublis

hed,

or

tran

sfen

ed

in n

sd

nf

cs

~h

rn

nre

nr

Th

e in

form

atio

n is

no1

to b

e so

ld in

Dar

t or

who

le to

any

one

with

in y

our

orga

niza

tion

or to

ano

ther

com

pany

, C

opyn

ght i

nfrin

gem

ent i

s a

vio

latio

n of

fed

eral

law

sub

ject

lo c

nmin

al a

nd c

ivil

pena

lties

. A

IAG

and

,., ""

.. -.

. -.

~

the

Aut

omot

ive

Indu

stry

Act

ion

Gm

up

are

reg

iste

red

serv

ice

mar

ks of

the

Aut

omol

ive

Indu

stry

Act

ion

Gro

up.

All

co

ntr

ol o

f va

ria

ble

s g

ive

n b

elo

w a

re s

ub

ord

ina

te t

o c

ust

om

er

spe

cific

requirem

ents

.

The

cu

sto

me

r m

ay

have

ad

diti

on

al

requirem

ents

, e.

g.,

insp

ect

ion

test

ing

, gre

ate

r fr

equenci

es,

etc

. W

hen p

erf

orm

ing

the

job

audit,

th

e a

ud

itor

sha

ll ve

rify

we

ldin

g is

co

nfo

rmin

g to

the

cust

om

er's

requirem

ents

.

Dash

es

be

low

ind

ica

te "

no

t applic

able

".

X in

dic

ate

s a

n e

sse

ntia

l va

ria

ble

wh

ich

sh

all

be d

ocu

mente

tf a

nd

co

ntr

olle

d.

J i

nd

ica

tes

tha

t p

roce

du

re s

ho

uld

be r

evi

ew

ed a

nd

docu

mente

d w

hen n

ece

ssary

.

I I

I I

I I

Cate

gory

lPro

cess

Ste

ps

Ine

rtia

D

ire

ct D

rive

F

rict

ion

F

lash

R

esi

stance

F

rict

ion

F

rict

ion

S

tir

Bu

tt

Ultr

aso

nic

W

eld

ing

W

eld

ing

W

eld

ing

W

eld

ing

We

ldin

g

We

ldin

g

(FR

W-I

) (F

RW

-DD

) (F

SW

) (F

W'

(UW

)

O 2

01

0 A

utom

otiv

e In

dustr

y Act

ion

Gro

up (

AIA

G)

Page 72: Assessment - BES/ERP(Best Enterprise System)erp.mjmetal.com/Download/MJN/2005662840.pdf · WELDING SYSTEM ASSESSMENT PROCEDURE ... CQI-15. Speciai Process: Welding System Assessmenf

Aut

orri

ot~v

e lnci

ustr

y A

ct~

on

Gro

up

Sp

eci

al P

roce

ss:

We

ldin

g S

yste

m A

ss

es

sm

en

t V

ers~

on 1, 3

R01

0

PR

OC

ES

S T

AB

LE

D - S

olid

Sta

te W

eld

ing

Pro

cess

es

The

con

tent

s of

all

publ

ishe

d m

ater

ials

are

cop

yrig

hted

by

the

Aut

omot

ive

tndu

stry

Act

ion

Gm

up u

nles

s o

the

wis

e in

dica

ted.

All

right

s ar

e pr

eser

ved

by A

IAG

, and

con

tent

may

not

be

aner

ed o

r dis

sem

inat

ed, p

ublis

hed,

or

tmn

sfe

md

in

par

t of

suc

h co

nten

t. T

he in

form

atio

n is

not

to b

e so

ld in

par

t or

who

le to

any

one

with

in y

our

orga

niza

tion

or to

ano

ther

com

pany

. C

opyr

ight

infr

inge

men

t is

a vi

olat

,on

of Ie

dera

l law

sub

ject

to

cnm

inal

and

cw

il pe

naltr

es.

AIA

G a

nd

the

Aut

omot

ive

lndu

stry

Aci

ion

Gm

up a

le re

gist

ered

ser

vice

ma&

s of

the

Aut

omot

ive

Indu

stry

Act

ion

Gm

up.

All

co

ntr

ol o

f va

ria

ble

s g

ive

n b

elo

w a

re s

ub

ord

ina

te t

o c

ust

om

er

spe

cifi

c re

quirem

ents

.

The

cu

sto

me

r m

ay

ha

ve a

dd

itio

na

l re

quirem

ents

, e.

g.,

insp

ect

ion

test

ing

, gre

ate

r fr

equenci

es,

etc

. W

hen p

erf

orm

ing

the

job

audit,

th

e a

ud

itor

sha

ll ve

rify

we

ldin

g i

s c

on

form

ing

to

the

cu

sto

me

r's

requirem

ents

.

Dash

es

be

low

ind

ica

te "

no

t applic

able

".

X in

dic

ate

s a

n e

sse

ntia

l va

ria

ble

wh

ich

sh

all

be

docu

mente

d a

nd

co

ntr

olle

d.

J i

nd

ica

tes

tha

t pro

ced

ure

sh

ou

ld b

e r

evi

ew

ed a

nd d

ocu

mente

d w

hen n

ece

ssary

.

62 2

010 A

utom

otiv

e In

dust

ry A

clio

n G

roup

(A

IAG

)

D4.

71

D4.

72

D4

73

04.7

4

D4.

75

04.7

6

D4.

77

04.7

8

D4.

79

D4

80

04

.81

D4

82

D4.

83

D4.

84

04

85

Ultr

aso

nic

W

eld

ing

Resi

stance

B

utt

W

eld

ing

(UW

)

Fla

shin

g

-Fla

sh~

ng rate

-T

ype

of p

latten m

ovem

ent (

I~near or

para

bol~

c)

-Vol

tage

-F

lash

ing

d~

stance

or tl

me

-Per

cent

hea

t

-Tap

sel

ectio

n

Fla

sh

Weld

ing

(FW

'

Fri

ctio

n

Sti

r W

eld

ing

(FS

W)

X

X

X X

X

X

Dir

ect

Dri

ve

Fri

ctio

n

We

ldin

g

(FR

W-D

D)

I

Ine

rtia

F

rict

ion

W

eld

ing

(F

RW

-I)

X

X X

X

X

X

X

X X

--

--

Cate

gory

lPro

cess

Ste

ps

Ite

m #

-Per

cent

hea

t -T

ap s

elec

tion

volta

ge

-For

ce

-Puls

at~

on (o

n, o

ff an

d nu

mbe

r of p

ulse

s)

-Off

tlme

befo

re s

tage

cha

nge

Weld

Sta

ge 2

(ca

n b

e m

ult

iple

sta

ge

s w

ith

diff

ere

nt

para

mete

rs)

-Per

cent

hea

t -T

ap s

ele

ct~

on vo

ltage

-For

ce

-Puls

at~

on (o

n, o

ff an

d nu

mbe

r of

puls

es)

Rela

ted W

SA

Q

ue

stio

n #

Page 73: Assessment - BES/ERP(Best Enterprise System)erp.mjmetal.com/Download/MJN/2005662840.pdf · WELDING SYSTEM ASSESSMENT PROCEDURE ... CQI-15. Speciai Process: Welding System Assessmenf

Auto

rr~

otiv

e ln

cius

try

Act

ion G

roup

Sp

ec

ial P

roce

ss:

We

ldin

g S

yste

m A

ss

es

sm

en

t V

ersi

on 1

, 3/2

010

PR

OC

ES

S T

AB

LE

- S

olid

Sta

te W

eld

ing

Pro

cess

es

Th

e c

onte

nts

of a

ll pu

blis

hed

mat

eria

ls a

re c

opyr

ighf

ed b

y th

e A

utom

otiv

e In

dust

ry A

ctio

n G

mup

unl

ess

othe

rwis

e in

dica

ted.

All

"gh

ts a

re p

rese

rved

by

AIA

G,

and

cont

ent m

ay n

ot b

e al

tere

d or

dis

sem

inat

ed, p

ublis

hed,

or

tmn

sfe

md

in

par

t o

f suc

h co

nten

t. T

he in

form

atio

n is

not

to

be

sold

!n

par

t or

who

le to

any

one

with

rn y

our

orga

niza

tion

or to

ano

ther

com

pany

. C

opyn

ght i

nfrin

gem

ent i

s a

vio

latio

n of

fede

ral l

aw s

ubje

ct t

o c

nmin

al a

nd c

ivil

pena

lfies

. A

IAG

and

th

e A

utom

otiv

e In

dust

ry A

ctio

n G

roup

are

reg

iste

red

serv

ice

mar

ks o

f the

Aut

omot

ive

Indu

stry

Acf

ion

Gro

up.

All

con

tro

l of

vari

ab

les

giv

en

be

low

are

su

bo

rdin

ate

to

cu

sto

me

r sp

eci

fic

requirem

ents

.

The

cu

sto

me

r m

ay

ha

ve a

dd

itio

na

l re

quirem

ents

, e.

g.,

insp

ect

ion

test

ing,

gre

ate

r fr

equenci

es,

etc

. W

hen p

erf

orm

ing

the

job

audit,

the a

ud

itor

sha

ll ve

rify

we

ldin

g i

s c

on

form

ing

to th

e c

ust

om

er's

requirem

ents

.

Dash

es

be

low

ind

ica

te "

no

t applic

able

".

X I

nd

ica

tes

an

ess

en

tial v

ari

ab

le w

hic

h s

ha

ll b

e d

ocu

me

nte

ll a

nd

contr

olle

d.

J in

dic

ate

s th

at

pro

ced

ure

sh

ou

ld b

e r

evi

ew

ed a

nd

docu

mente

d w

hen n

ece

ssary

.

I I

I I

I

Cate

gory

lPro

cess

Ste

ps

ite

m #

R

ela

ted W

SA

Q

ue

stio

n #

Ine

rtia

F

rict

ion

W

eld

ing

(F

RW

-I)

O 2

010

Au

tom

ot~

ve In

dust

ry A

cllo

n G

roup

(A

IAG

)

D4.

86

D4.

87

D4

88

D4.

89

D4.

90

04

.91

D4.

92

D4.

93

D4.

94

04

95

D4.

96

D4.

97

04

.98

D4.

99

D4.

100

D4.

101

Dir

ect

Dri

ve

Fri

ctio

n

We

ldin

g

(FR

W-D

D)

--

--

Fri

ctio

n

Sti

r W

eld

ing

(F

SW

)

Fo

rge

lup

set

-For

ge r

ate

-For

ge fo

rce

-For

ge d

ista

nce I tota

l ups

et

-Ups

et tl

me

-Ups

et c

urre

nt

-Fla

sh~

ng vo

ltage

cut

off

-Fla

shin

g re

mov

al I m

anag

emen

t

Fla

sh B

utt

Weld

ing

(Fw

)

--

Tap

sel

ectio

n I de

sign

of r

ibbo

n st

ruct

ure

Fre

quen

cy o

f pow

er s

uppl

y fo

r ap

plic

atto

n (4

0130

120k

Hz)

F

ixtu

re &

par

t des

ign

with

max

d~

me

ns~

on

d

ev~

atio

n an

d m

ater

ial s

pecs

J

J

J

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

Resi

stance

B

utt

W

eld

ing

(UW

)

X

X

X

X

X

X

Ultr

aso

nic

W

eld

ing

Po

st w

eld

heat t

rea

tme

nt i

f needed

J

J

J

J

J

X

-Hea

t tre

atm

ent c

lam

plng

dis

tanc

e

-Que

nch

time

-Tap

sele

ct~

on

-Pre

cent

hea

t

-Tem

per

tlme

Fin

al d

~e

op

enrn

g P

J

J

J

J

J

X

--

-

Page 74: Assessment - BES/ERP(Best Enterprise System)erp.mjmetal.com/Download/MJN/2005662840.pdf · WELDING SYSTEM ASSESSMENT PROCEDURE ... CQI-15. Speciai Process: Welding System Assessmenf

Au

torr

loti

ve

Indu

stry

Act

ion

Gro

up

Sp

ec

ial P

roce

ss:

We

ldin

g S

yste

m A

sse

ssm

en

t.

Ver

s~on

1, 3

/201

0

PR

OC

ES

S T

AB

L.E

D - S

olid

Sta

te W

eld

ing

Pro

cess

es

The

con

tent

s of

all

publ

ishe

d m

ater

ials

are

cop

yrig

hted

by

the

Aut

omot

ive

Indu

stry

Act

ion

Gm

up

unl

ess

othe

rwis

e in

dica

ted.

All

right

s ar

e pr

eser

ved

by A

IAG

, an

d co

nten

t may

not

be

alte

red

or d

isse

min

ated

, pob

llshe

d, o

r tr

ansf

ened

in

par

t o

f suc

h co

nte

nt

The

info

rmat

ion

is n

ot lo

be

sold

in p

art

or w

hole

to a

nyon

e w

ithin

you

r or

gani

zatio

n or

lo a

noth

er c

ompa

ny.

Cop

yrig

ht in

frin

gem

ent i

s a

viol

atio

n of

fed

eral

law

sub

ject

to

crim

inal

and

civ

il pe

nalti

es.

AlA

G a

nd

the

Aut

omot

ive

lndu

stry

Acl

ion

Gm

up

are

reg

iste

red

serv

ice

mar

ks o

f the

Aut

omot

ive

lndu

stry

Act

ion

Gro

up.

All

con

tro

l of v

ari

ab

les

giv

en

be

low

are

su

bo

rdin

ate

to

cu

sto

me

r sp

eci

fic

requirem

ents

.

The c

ust

om

er

may

have

ad

diti

on

al r

equirem

ents

, e.

g.,

insp

ect

ion

te

stin

g,

gre

ate

r fr

equenci

es,

etc

. W

hen p

erf

orm

ing

the

job

audit,

th

e a

ud

itor

sha

ll ve

rify

we

ldin

g is

co

nfo

rmin

g to

the

cust

om

er's

requirem

ents

.

Dash

es

be

low

ind

ica

te "

no

t applic

able

".

X i

nd

ica

tes

an

ess

en

tial v

ari

ab

le w

hic

h s

ha

ll b

e d

ocu

mente

d a

nd

co

ntr

olle

d.

J i

nd

ica

tes

tha

t p

roce

du

re s

ho

uld

be

revi

ew

ed a

nd

docu

mente

d w

he

n n

ece

ssary

.

I I

I I

Cate

gory

lPro

cess

Ste

ps

Ite

m #

R

ela

ted W

SA

Q

ue

stio

n #

Ine

rtia

F

rict

ion

W

eld

ing

(F

RW

-I)

Resi

stance

B

utt

W

eld

ing

(UW

)

D4.102

D4.103

D4.104

014.1 05

04.106

D4.107

014.108

D4.109

D4.110

014.1 11

014.112

194.113

D4.114

Ultr

aso

nic

W

eld

ing

Dir

ect

Dri

ve

Fri

ctio

n

We

ldin

g

(FR

W-D

D)

O 2

010

Aut

omot

ive

Indu

stry

Act

ion

Gro

up (A

IAG

)

x':

If re

quire

d to

ach

ieve

hea

t bal

ance

. Exa

mpl

e th

in p

art t

o th

ick

part

or

vario

us h

ardn

esse

s.

Upse

t an

d M

on

ito

rin

g (w

ind

ow

ing

) W

eldi

ng-E

nerg

y W

eldi

ng-T

ime

Wel

ding

-Am

plitu

de

Wel

ding

-For

ce

Wel

ding

-Cur

rent

W

eldi

ng p

re H

eigh

t and

trave

l (co

mpa

ctio

n)

Ene

rgy

with

hei

ght c

ompe

nsat

ion

Wel

d H

ead

Coo

ling

Env

ironm

enta

l con

ditio

ns c

ontr

ol (

i.e.,

tem

pera

ture

, hum

idity

, T

AP

lDie

cle

anlin

ess

TA

PlD

ie c

lam

ping

pre

ssur

e P

art c

lean

lines

s an

d sc

ale

rem

oval

P

art a

lignm

ent

O 2

010 A

utam

otlv

e ln

dusl

ry A

cilo

n G

roup

(A

IAG

)

Fri

ctio

n

Sti

r W

eld

ing

(FS

W)

dust

, etc

.)

Flas

h B

utt

Wel

ding

(Fw

)