assessment and selection march 2010

55
Assessing and selecting the right applicant by Fluid March 2010

Upload: timothy-holden

Post on 16-May-2015

344 views

Category:

Business


7 download

DESCRIPTION

One day interactive workshop designed and delivered in Birmingham to an audience of HR professionals, recruiters and line managers from both the public and private sectors. The session covered the latest developments and hot topics for organisations facing vast numbers of applicants when vacancies are posted.

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Assessment and Selection March 2010

Assessing and selecting the right applicant

by Fluid

March 2010

Page 2: Assessment and Selection March 2010

Page 2

Contents3-4 Introduction to Fluid5-7 Refining the selection process8-10 Filtering job applications11-12 Age discrimination13-14 Exercise A15-17 Selection processes18-19 Ability tests20-21 Personality tests22-26 Choosing the right assessment

tools27-28 Exercise B29-31 Selecting women32-34 Assessing board members35-40 Getting the best from your test41-42 Using tests for coaching43-46 Assessment centres47-49 Assessment centres-worth the

cost?50-51 Case studies52-53 Exercise C54-55 Conclusion and questions

Page 3: Assessment and Selection March 2010

Page 3

Introduction

Page 4: Assessment and Selection March 2010

Page 4

Introduction to Fluid• Fluid Consulting Limited (Fluid) is a specialist

human resources consultancy headed by Tim Holden MCIPD

• 10 years in banking• 10 years in Human Resources consultancy• Fluid trading since 2006• The core services provided by Fluid are:

- Retention- Selection- Attraction- Remuneration & Reward - Outplacement- Training & HR consultancy

Page 5: Assessment and Selection March 2010

Page 5

Refining the selection process

Page 6: Assessment and Selection March 2010

Page 6

Refining the selection process 1 of 2

• To avoid spending hours interviewing unsuitable candidates, start thinking about processes that really test the personality and skills of potential candidates before they reach interview stage

• Streamline your paperwork and try to cut administration costs as much as possible

• When developing an online questionnaire prior to interview, make sure it is tailor made and specifically matches the requirement for a particular role to filter out applicants who may not have the right aptitude

Page 7: Assessment and Selection March 2010

Page 7

Refining the selection process 2 of 2

• Put together a mix of questions so that candidates can’t pre-empt them, and so there are no real right or wrong answers

• Try to find out whether there are any potential hidden costs in your recruitment tools. For example, not all candidates have access to a computer so there needs to be a paper version as well

• Get to know all the teams or individuals responsible for implementing the new procedure, and co-ordinate team meetings so that everyone is clued up at all times

Page 8: Assessment and Selection March 2010

Page 8

Filtering job applications

Page 9: Assessment and Selection March 2010

Page 9

Filtering job applications 1 of 2

• Develop clear job descriptions• Use targeted advertising• Think about the application method• Consider automated selection• Profile the candidate as well as the role• Ensure that interviewers know what to

look for• Monitor recruitment activity closely

Page 10: Assessment and Selection March 2010

Page 10

Filtering job applications 2 of 2

• Have clear job descriptions and role profiles

• Advertise in specialist press/media• Brush up the skills of all interviewers• Redeploy resources to the areas with the

greatest need

Page 11: Assessment and Selection March 2010

Page 11

Age discrimination

Page 12: Assessment and Selection March 2010

Page 12

Age discrimination

• Age discrimination laws protect both the young and old from discrimination

• Discrimination can be justified if it is a proportionate means of achieving a legitimate aim

• The test of justification is vague, and difficult to predict

• Employers should avoid stereotypical assumptions as to the impact of age and experience on ability

• Employers may be driven to labourious assessment processes to avoid the risk of being found to have acted on unjustified assumptions

Page 13: Assessment and Selection March 2010

Page 13

Exercise A

Page 14: Assessment and Selection March 2010

Page 14

Exercise A

Page 15: Assessment and Selection March 2010

Page 15

Selection processes

Page 16: Assessment and Selection March 2010

Page 16

Selection processes 1 of 2

• Pick a role• Obtain selection data• Obtain employee performance data• Carry out a simple analysis• Compute the ROI• Apply the findings

Page 17: Assessment and Selection March 2010

Page 17

Selection processes 2 of 2

• Evaluating the selection process is key to choosing high performers

• Evaluation is statistically straightforward and can remove cost from the organisation

• Make sure performance data is as accurate and fair as possible by providing guidelines for managers

• Take time to understand the findings by placing them in the context of the organisation

• Present findings to senior management and propose improvements based on objective data

• Squeeze as much as possible out of the findings

Page 18: Assessment and Selection March 2010

Page 18

Ability tests

Page 19: Assessment and Selection March 2010

Page 6

Ability tests

• Verbal reasoning• Numerical reasoning• Analytical ability

Page 20: Assessment and Selection March 2010

Page 20

Personality tests

Page 21: Assessment and Selection March 2010

Page 21

Personality tests

• Kolb Learning Styles inventory• Parent Adult Child• Fundamental Interpersonal Relations

Orientation

Page 22: Assessment and Selection March 2010

Page 22

Choosing the right assessment tools

Page 23: Assessment and Selection March 2010

Page 23

Choosing the right assessment tools 1 of 4

• Have a clear purpose• Identify your needs• Do your research• Consider your resources• Understand the context• Seek advice• Try on for size

Page 24: Assessment and Selection March 2010

Page 24

Choosing the right assessment tools 2 of 4

• JARGON BUSTER• Face validity• Predictive validity• Norm groups• Self-report questionnaires• Situational judgement tests

Page 25: Assessment and Selection March 2010

Page 25

Choosing the right assessment tools 3 of 4

• MEASURING ROI FROM ASSESSMENT• Identify your objectives• Work out the costs and benefits of testing• Tailor generic tests• Enlist top-level support• Use assessment to build your employer brand• Reuse assessment data• Exploit technology to improve efficiency• Ensure that assessments are fair

Page 26: Assessment and Selection March 2010

Page 26

Choosing the right assessment tools 4 of 4

• Choose the most appropriate assessment tools for the economic climate

• Ensure that recruitment processes are robust• Assessment can help you to build your employer

brand• Programmes should be aligned with business

objectives• Data from testing has a shelf life of about two

years• Assess only the stronger candidates using the

most labour-intensive methods• Ensure that tests do not leads to indirect

discrimination

Page 27: Assessment and Selection March 2010

Page 5

Exercise B

Page 28: Assessment and Selection March 2010

Page 6

Exercise B

Page 29: Assessment and Selection March 2010

Page 29

Selecting women

Page 30: Assessment and Selection March 2010

Page 30

Selecting women 1 of 2

• Business benefits of employing more women• What makes an Employer of Choice for

women?• Legally attracting more applications from

women• Genuine Occupational Qualifications, Skills

and Experience• Finding the right people• Ensuring interviews are fair

Page 31: Assessment and Selection March 2010

Page 31

Selecting women 2 of 2

• Actions speak louder than words• Constructive feedback• Welcoming and supporting women in the

workplace• Avoiding a backlash from other employees• Checklist

Page 32: Assessment and Selection March 2010

Page 32

Assessing board members

Page 33: Assessment and Selection March 2010

Page 33

Assessing board members 1 of 2

• The Chairman, Chief Executive, nomination committee and the evaluation team meet to outline the general process and identify any particular matters that need to be examined.

• A questionnaire covering issues such as the board’s composition and team effectiveness is given to each director.

• An interview guide is prepared based on an analysis of the returned questionnaires.

Page 34: Assessment and Selection March 2010

Page 34

Assessing board members 2 of 2

• The self-assessments from directors are examined and views taken from all relevant parties, including senior executives. Directors may also be asked to assess the performance of the Chairman, their peers and the board as a whole as well as the performance of key committees.

• All input is analysed and tested against corporate governance standards and the practices of comparable organisations.

• The chairman is presented with specific, practical recommendations on how to improve performance.

Page 35: Assessment and Selection March 2010

Page 35

Getting the best from your test

Page 36: Assessment and Selection March 2010

Page 36

Getting the best from your test 1 of 5

• Create consistency• Is the test user friendly?• Brief candidates• Provide easily accessible support• Ensure equivalence• Can your system cope?• Keep data safe • Feedback

Page 37: Assessment and Selection March 2010

Page 37

Getting the best from your test 2 of 5

• DOS AND DON’TS• Don’t choose a test that takes too long• Don’t allow the technology to set the agenda• Don’t overcomplicate the process• Don’t skimp on training• Don’t stick to an old favourite• Don’t assess staff and then do nothing with

the data• Don’t keep people in the dark about what you

are doing

Page 38: Assessment and Selection March 2010

Page 38

Getting the best from your test 3 of 5

• DOS AND DON’TS• Do be sure about your objective• Do calculate your sums• Do weigh up the true costs of recruitment• Do make sure job specifications are up-to-

date• Do try the tools yourself• Do use tools early to filter the quality of

applicants• Do give feedback to all applicants• Do put providers on the best contract

Page 39: Assessment and Selection March 2010

Page 39

Getting the best from your test 4 of 5

• Identify your target• Pick a test• Make it appropriate• Engage your people• Beat the cheats• Don’t use in isolation

Page 40: Assessment and Selection March 2010

Page 40

Getting the best from your test 5 of 5

• BEFORE-Gain trust• DURING-measure and evaluate• AFTER-share and discuss

Page 41: Assessment and Selection March 2010

Page 41

Using tests for coaching

Page 42: Assessment and Selection March 2010

Page 42

Using tests for coaching

• Tests or competencies?• Which test?• Context is key• Offer a plan• Avoiding discrimination

Page 43: Assessment and Selection March 2010

Page 43

Assessment centres

Page 44: Assessment and Selection March 2010

Page 44

Assessment centres 1 of 3

• ACTIVITIES USED BY EMPLOYERS IN ASSESSMENT CENTRES

• Welcome and introduction• One or more interviews• Group exercises• Role-play exercises• Psychometric tests• Written analysis exercise• Presentations by candidates• Presentations by employers

Page 45: Assessment and Selection March 2010

Page 45

Assessment centres 2 of 3

• TYPE OF JOB ASSESSMENT CENTRES ARE USED FOR

• Graduates 64%• Senior managers 60%• Middle managers 62%• Line managers 46%• Management trainees 24%• Senior specialist & technical staff 42%

Page 46: Assessment and Selection March 2010

Page 46

Assessment centres 3 of 3

• HOW TO SET ONE UP• Be clear about objectives• Look for competencies rather than ‘nice to haves’• Ensure the assessment reflects the working

environment• Limited the competencies that you measure• Have a good variety of exercises to let candidates

shine• Don’t overlook the details when staffing• Don’t cut corners on training observers• Give feedback to everyone, not just the

successful ones

Page 47: Assessment and Selection March 2010

Page 47

Assessment centres-worth the cost?

Page 48: Assessment and Selection March 2010

Page 48

Assessment centres-worth the cost? 1 of 2

• ALL VACANCIES• Upper quartile• Median• Lower quartile• MANAGEMENT• Senior• Middle • Line

Page 49: Assessment and Selection March 2010

Page 49

Assessment centres-worth the cost? 2 of 2

• Graduates• Management trainees• Senior specialist & technical staff

Page 50: Assessment and Selection March 2010

Page 50

Case studies

Page 51: Assessment and Selection March 2010

Page 51

Case studies

Page 52: Assessment and Selection March 2010

Page 52

Exercise C

Page 53: Assessment and Selection March 2010

Page 53

Exercise C

Page 54: Assessment and Selection March 2010

Page 54

Conclusion & Questions

Page 55: Assessment and Selection March 2010

Page 55

Conclusion

• Summary• Questions