assessing the feasibility of synchronous interconnection ... · assessing the feasibility of...
TRANSCRIPT
union for the co-ordination of transmission of electricity
Assessing the feasibility of synchronous interconnection of CIS and Baltic transmission systems with continental EuropeMatthias Luther
Energy in Central and Eastern Europe
Prague, Czech Republic, 26–27 February 2008Supported by:
Assessing the feasibility of synchronous interconnection of CIS and Baltic transmission systems with continental Europe
page 2 Matthias Luther, Prague, 26 February 2008
Presentation Themes
Introduction
Project Organisation
Investigation Program
Preliminary Findings and Outlook
Assessing the feasibility of synchronous interconnection of CIS and Baltic transmission systems with continental Europe
page 3 Matthias Luther, Prague, 26 February 2008
European synchronous areas
HVDC cable HVDC cable
HVDC B2BHVDC B2B
HVAC lineHVAC line
UCTE
UPS/IPS
NORDEL
UKTSOAATSOI
Capacity: 63Capacity: 6311 GWGWPeak load: 390 GWPeak load: 390 GWConsumption: 25Consumption: 25330 0 TWhTWhPopulation: 450 Population: 450 mlnmln
Capacity: 9Capacity: 944 GWGWPeak load: 6Peak load: 666 GWGWConsumption: 40Consumption: 4055 TWhTWhPopulation: 2Population: 244 mlnmln
Capacity: 3Capacity: 33737 GWGWPeak load:Peak load:215215 GWGWConsumption: 12Consumption: 128585 TWhTWhPopulation: 280 Population: 280 mlnmln
Capacity: 85 GWCapacity: 85 GWPeak load: 6Peak load: 666 GWGWConsumption: 400 Consumption: 400 TWhTWhPopulation: 65 Population: 65 mlnmln
Assessing the feasibility of synchronous interconnection of CIS and Baltic transmission systems with continental Europe
page 4 Matthias Luther, Prague, 26 February 2008
UCTE-IPS/UPS Study – three major questions to answer
Is a synchronous coupling of IPS/UPS with UCTE feasible?
What are the mandatory measures and requirements on both sides?
What are the associated costs?
Considering technical, organisational and legal issues the study has to answer the following questions:
Additionally, market aspects and environmental issues are building the conditional framework.
First priority: maintaining the present performance of the systems with respect to system security and reliability.
Assessing the feasibility of synchronous interconnection of CIS and Baltic transmission systems with continental Europe
page 5 Matthias Luther, Prague, 26 February 2008
Thema Datum Bereich
IPS/UPS: parallel operation of 13 power systems
power systems of UCTE
power systems of IPS/UPS
other power systems
IPS/UPS3371.285280
Inst. Capacity/[GW]Consumption/[TWh]Consumers/[mio]
UCTE6312.530450
Dimension of synchronous areas
Assessing the feasibility of synchronous interconnection of CIS and Baltic transmission systems with continental Europe
page 6 Matthias Luther, Prague, 26 February 2008
Facts and framework of the project
The three years investigation is a joint project under the responsibility of UCTE
The project focus on a synchronous coupling of IPS/UPS and UCTE
Additionally, possible non-synchronous link projects are under consideration
Budget: approximately 10 million €
Nearly 100 experts from both sides involved
A unique synchronous transmission system under investigation
- with 960 GW installed generation capacity
- serving 700 million customers
- in 10 time zones
Assessing the feasibility of synchronous interconnection of CIS and Baltic transmission systems with continental Europe
page 7 Matthias Luther, Prague, 26 February 2008
Mandatoryinterconnection
rules
System integration vs. System coupling
System Arules
System Brules
System Arules System B
UCTErules
IPS/UPSrules
Integration
Allocation of corresponding and further mandatory
• technical• organisational • legal
measures and rules on both sides.
System coupling:UCTErules
IPS/UPSrules
Coupling
Assessing the feasibility of synchronous interconnection of CIS and Baltic transmission systems with continental Europe
page 8 Matthias Luther, Prague, 26 February 2008
The UCTE-Consortium of 11 TSOs
Assessing the feasibility of synchronous interconnection of CIS and Baltic transmission systems with continental Europe
page 9 Matthias Luther, Prague, 26 February 2008
The IPS/UPS Group of 8 Companies
Assessing the feasibility of synchronous interconnection of CIS and Baltic transmission systems with continental Europe
page 10 Matthias Luther, Prague, 26 February 2008
Initial time schedule and project phases
pre-phase
phase 2Verification
and Simulation
phase 1Model
Preparation
April 20
08
Final Rep
ort
• verification ofmodels
• power system simulations
• sensitivity analyses
• ToR• TEN-E
Application• Set up of
consortia• Cooperation
Agreement
• Project kick-off• survey of IPS/UPS
system• installation of
measurement devices
• power system measurements
• data collection• preparation of
models
• further analyses • evaluation ofresults
• identification of measures and theircosts
• presentation of results
• preparation of draftof final report
phase 3Assessmentand Results
finalphase
• final report • final accounting• end of project
2005 2006 2007
Conceptual
Report
2004 April 20
05
2008
“go” for
simulat
ions
Assessing the feasibility of synchronous interconnection of CIS and Baltic transmission systems with continental Europe
page 11 Matthias Luther, Prague, 26 February 2008
Summary of Analysis ProgramSteady State Analysis
Load flow simulation of nominal and emergency conditions Estimation of interface transmission capacityIdentification of most probable load flow scenarios
System DynamicsTransient and small signal stability analysisImpact of IPS/UPS Emergency Control Automatics
Power System ControlPower / frequency controlVoltage / reactive power controlAnalysis of defense, disconnection and restoration plans
Operation and OrganizationAnalysis of operational practiceGuidelines for interface proceduresCoordination of operation (i. e. data exchange, congestion management, etc.)
Legal AspectsAnalysis of legal frameworksLegal case studiesIdentification of legal requirements for synchronous operation
Assessing the feasibility of synchronous interconnection of CIS and Baltic transmission systems with continental Europe
page 12 Matthias Luther, Prague, 26 February 2008
Volume of UCTE-IPS/UPS load flow study model
The load flow model includes representation for the planning horizon 2008 of
HV and UHV network (220 kV and above)
Important transmission lines of lower voltages (inter-system transmission lines, generator lines of large power stations)
Significant power stations in the interface area
Volume of load flow model
3,910 nodes
9,730 ties (lines and transformers)
770 generator nodes
Total load (winter peak load): 530 GW
Assessing the feasibility of synchronous interconnection of CIS and Baltic transmission systems with continental Europe
page 13 Matthias Luther, Prague, 26 February 2008
Flow of control power (outage of 3,000 MW in Germany)
UCTE Middle
UCTE East
UCTE West
UCTE South
Russia/Central Asia
Turkey
Ukraine/Moldova
Baltic States/Belarus/RU510
1,820
1,100560
80
370
70
1,190
all figures in MW
Assessing the feasibility of synchronous interconnection of CIS and Baltic transmission systems with continental Europe
page 14 Matthias Luther, Prague, 26 February 2008
UCTE Middle
UCTE East
UCTE West
UCTE South
Russia/Central Asia
Turkey
Ukraine/Moldova
Baltic States/Belarus/RU1,020
3,650
2,1901,130
150
730
140
2,380
all figures in MW
Flow of control power (outage of 6,000 MW in Germany)
Assessing the feasibility of synchronous interconnection of CIS and Baltic transmission systems with continental Europe
page 15 Matthias Luther, Prague, 26 February 2008
1 Cartelle2 Montearenas3 Aldeadavila4 San Sebastian de las Reyes5 Hernani6 Arkale7 Biescas8 Vic9 Rubi10 Benejama11 Puerto de la Cruz12 Cedillo13 Saucelle14 Albertville15 Tavel16 Saucats17 Tabarderie18 Lonny19 Uchtelfangen20 Hagenwerder21 Röhrsdorf22 Krajnik23 Wielopole24 Rogowiec25 Polaniec26 Györ27 Göd28 Sajoszöged29 Heviz30 Paks
31 Portile de Fier
32 Tantareni33 Blagoevgrad34 Ag.Stefanos35 Bassecourt36 Mettlen37 Lavorgo38 Soazza39 Rondissone40 Redipuglia41 Aurelia42 Brindisi43 Sorgente44 Avelgem
measuring devices:installedplanned
Wide Area Measuring System (WAMS)in UCTE
) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
) ) ) )
) ) )
(
(
(
( (
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
( (
(
( ( (
) ) )
) ) )
) ) )
( (
( (
( (
( (
(
time synchronisationby GPS
1
2
3
4 5 6 7
14
19
( (
(
2022 24
25
26
29
31
32
33
34
36
3738
40
35(
(
(
(
(
(
( ( (
( (
(
( (
44
( ( (
( ( (
( (
) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
( (
(
( (
(
4549
53
46 47 48 51 5250
15
16
17
18
21
39
4142
43
3
13
1110
912
23
2728
30
8
45 Oujda46 Ghazaouet47 Tlemcen48 Oued Sly49 Jijel50 Biskra51 El Aouinet52 Tajerouine53 Tataouine
Assessing the feasibility of synchronous interconnection of CIS and Baltic transmission systems with continental Europe
page 16 Matthias Luther, Prague, 26 February 2008
Verification of UCTE dynamic simulation model:Outage of 1200 MW generation capacity in Spain (9 February 2006)
recordings
Thu, 2006-02-09; 11:26:47 - Generation Outage: NUEVA ESCOMBRERAS (ES) dPa
49,930
49,940
49,950
49,960
49,970
49,980
49,990
50,000
50,010
50,020
50,030
11:26:35 11:26:40 11:26:45 11:26:50 11:26:55 11:27:00 11:27:05 11:27
f [Hz]
Portile de Fier (RO)
SS Reyes (ES)
Uchtelfangen (D) Röhrsdorf (D)
Tabarderie (F)
simulations
49,930
49,950
49,970
49,990
50,010
50,030
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30
Time [s]
f [Hz]
ES/PORGERPortile de FierRöhrsdorf
Assessing the feasibility of synchronous interconnection of CIS and Baltic transmission systems with continental Europe
page 17 Matthias Luther, Prague, 26 February 2008
Preliminary findings (1/2)
A synchronous operation of IPS/UPS and UCTE may appear feasible under implementation of several technical, operational and legal pre-conditions. Therefore a synchronous operation can only be considered as a long term perspective for system coupling.Regarding the investigated scenarios a synchronous coupling would require substantial investments for maintaining the system security in both systems. Additional investments are necessary to substantially increase the available transfer capacity for the market.The analysis of dynamic stability of both coupled systems indicates a higher potential risk for system security compared to their current performance operating separately. Necessary countermeasures concern investments in generation and transmission sectors.
Assessing the feasibility of synchronous interconnection of CIS and Baltic transmission systems with continental Europe
page 18 Matthias Luther, Prague, 26 February 2008
Preliminary findings (2/2)
The need for substantial adaptation and harmonization of currently existing defense and restoration plans in both synchronous areas in order to avoid and overcome major disturbances.The need for a legally binding environment with interzonal, bilateral and multilateral agreements in order to set-up a legal basis for establishing a future reliable platform that would cover the main organizational and operational issues corresponding to EU requirements and standards.As support to the creation of a joint electricity market platform between UCTE and IPS/UPS countries i.e. the construction of HVDCback-to-back links between the interface countries may be considered as an advantageous alternative solution. Additionally, back-to-back links may result beside their technical, economic and environmental advantages in a more cost-effective and thus “easier to realize perspective”.
Assessing the feasibility of synchronous interconnection of CIS and Baltic transmission systems with continental Europe
page 19 Matthias Luther, Prague, 26 February 2008
Outlook: expected results in Summer 2008
An evaluation of the feasibility considering technical, operational, organisational and legal aspects based on available results.
An allocation of necessary measures and their associated costs to be made on both sides of the interface.
An open outlook on non-synchronous system coupling possibilities aiming at an economic comparison for the investigated system coupling and an indication for the time horizon for a possible implementation for both variants.
The final study results may form a basis for further steps under supervision of the European Commission and other stakeholders.
Nevertheless, any decision need to be made by stakeholders taking into account the two further fundamental pillars
- reciprocity in market conditions
- compatibility of environmental standards including nuclear safety.