asia–pacific journal of clinical oncology cochrane highlights

3
Asia–Pacific Journal of Clinical Oncology Cochrane HighlightsThese highlights are produced with permission from the Cochrane Collaboration. To read the full findings and any updates, please visit: http://www.thecochranelibrary.com Erythropoietin as an additional treatment with (chemo) radiation therapy for head and neck cancer Severe anaemia in cancer patients is linked with decreased tumour oxygen supply (hypoxia), which is associated with more rapid tumour progression, poor response to therapy and consequently has a negative impact on prognosis. Erythropoietin (EPO), a hormone which controls red blood cell production, is widely used to correct anaemia. It was therefore thought logical that using erythropoietin to correct anaemia, before or during chemotherapy, radiotherapy (or both), would improve tumour oxygenation and as a result improve prognosis. The authors of this review found strong suggestions based on five randomised controlled trials (1397 patients) that for head and neck cancer, radiotherapy plus erythropoietin compared to radiotherapy alone negatively affects patient outcome in terms of overall survival and local-regional progression free survival. Lambin P, Ramaekers BLT, van Mastrigt GAPG, Van den Ende P, de Jong J, De Ruysscher DKM, Pijls-Johannesma M. Erythropoietin as an adjuvant treatment with (chemo) radiation therapy for head and neck cancer. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2009, Issue 3. Art. No.: CD006158. DOI: 10.1002/ 14651858.CD006158.pub2. Hyperfractionated or accelerated radiotherapy for head and neck cancer Radiotherapy is often used to treat head and neck cancers. The dosage of radiation is measured in Gray (Gy). When radiotherapy is given alone, the most commonly used schedule is 2 Gy in a single fraction per day, five days a week, for seven weeks. However, alternative radiotherapy regimens to reduce the total treatment time for head and neck cancers have been assessed. ‘Acceleration’ of the treatment (delivering the same total dose in a shorter time) should reduce the regrowth of the tumour between sessions, resulting in improved local control of the disease. In ‘hyperfractionated’ regimens, two to three fractions are delivered each day, with a reduced dose per fraction equal to 1.1 to 1.2 Gy. The reduction of the dose per fraction may reduce the risk of late toxicity, despite an increased total dose. Acceleration and hyperfractionation can be combined, in particular for regimens in which overall treatment time is reduced. This Cochrane Review is an individual patient data based meta-analysis and the aim was to assess whether this type of radiotherapy could improve survival. We identified randomised trials comparing conventional radiotherapy with hyperfractionated or accelerated radiotherapy, or both, in patients with non- metastatic head and neck cancers and grouped trials into three pre-specified categories: hyperfractionated, accelerated without total dose reduction and accelerated with total dose reduction. The results of this meta-analysis suggest that altered fractionation radiotherapy improves survival in patients with head and neck cancer. Comparison of the different types of altered fractionation radiotherapy suggests that hyperfractionation provides the greatest benefit. Individual patient data meta-analysis is a long process and this review included all eligible trials which had completed recruiting patients by 1998. A major update of the analysis, including data from more recent trials, is currently underway. Baujat B, Bourhis J, Blanchard P, Overgaard J, Ang KK, Saunders M, Le Maître A, Bernier J, Horiot JC, Maillard E, Pajak TF, Poulsen MG, Asia–Pacific Journal of Clinical Oncology 2011; 7: 318–320 doi:10.1111/j.1743-7563.2011.01440.x © 2011 Blackwell Publishing Asia Pty Ltd

Post on 21-Jul-2016

218 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Asia–Pacific Journal of Clinical Oncology Cochrane Highlights

Asia–Pacific Journal of Clinical OncologyCochrane Highlightsajco_1440 318..320

These highlights are produced with permission from the Cochrane Collaboration. To read the fullfindings and any updates, please visit: http://www.thecochranelibrary.com

Erythropoietin as an additionaltreatment with (chemo)radiation therapy for headand neck cancer

Severe anaemia in cancer patientsis linked with decreased tumouroxygen supply (hypoxia), which isassociated with more rapid tumourprogression, poor response totherapy and consequently has anegative impact on prognosis.Erythropoietin (EPO), a hormonewhich controls red blood cellproduction, is widely used tocorrect anaemia. It was thereforethought logical that usingerythropoietin to correct anaemia,before or during chemotherapy,radiotherapy (or both), wouldimprove tumour oxygenation andas a result improve prognosis.

The authors of this review foundstrong suggestions based on fiverandomised controlled trials (1397patients) that for head and neckcancer, radiotherapy pluserythropoietin compared toradiotherapy alone negativelyaffects patient outcome in terms ofoverall survival and local-regionalprogression free survival.

Lambin P, Ramaekers BLT, vanMastrigt GAPG, Van den Ende P,de Jong J, De Ruysscher DKM,Pijls-Johannesma M. Erythropoietinas an adjuvant treatment with(chemo) radiation therapy for head

and neck cancer. CochraneDatabase of Systematic Reviews2009, Issue 3. Art. No.:CD006158. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD006158.pub2.

Hyperfractionated oraccelerated radiotherapyfor head and neck cancer

Radiotherapy is often used to treathead and neck cancers. The dosageof radiation is measured in Gray(Gy). When radiotherapy is givenalone, the most commonly usedschedule is 2 Gy in a single fractionper day, five days a week, for sevenweeks. However, alternativeradiotherapy regimens to reduce thetotal treatment time for head andneck cancers have been assessed.‘Acceleration’ of the treatment(delivering the same total dose ina shorter time) should reduce theregrowth of the tumour betweensessions, resulting in improvedlocal control of the disease. In‘hyperfractionated’ regimens, twoto three fractions are delivered eachday, with a reduced dose perfraction equal to 1.1 to 1.2 Gy. Thereduction of the dose per fractionmay reduce the risk of late toxicity,despite an increased total dose.Acceleration and hyperfractionationcan be combined, in particular forregimens in which overall treatmenttime is reduced.

This Cochrane Review is anindividual patient data basedmeta-analysis and the aim wasto assess whether this type ofradiotherapy could improvesurvival. We identified randomisedtrials comparing conventionalradiotherapy with hyperfractionatedor accelerated radiotherapy, orboth, in patients with non-metastatic head and neck cancersand grouped trials into threepre-specified categories:hyperfractionated, acceleratedwithout total dose reduction andaccelerated with total dosereduction. The results of thismeta-analysis suggest that alteredfractionation radiotherapy improvessurvival in patients with headand neck cancer. Comparison ofthe different types of alteredfractionation radiotherapy suggeststhat hyperfractionation providesthe greatest benefit.

Individual patient datameta-analysis is a long process andthis review included all eligibletrials which had completedrecruiting patients by 1998.A major update of the analysis,including data from more recenttrials, is currently underway.

Baujat B, Bourhis J, Blanchard P,Overgaard J, Ang KK, Saunders M,Le Maître A, Bernier J, Horiot JC,Maillard E, Pajak TF, Poulsen MG,

Asia–Pacific Journal of Clinical Oncology 2011; 7: 318–320 doi:10.1111/j.1743-7563.2011.01440.x

© 2011 Blackwell Publishing Asia Pty Ltd

Page 2: Asia–Pacific Journal of Clinical Oncology Cochrane Highlights

Bourredjem A, O’Sullivan B,Dobrowsky W, Andrzej H,Skladowski K, Hay JH, Pinto LHJ,Fu KK, Fallai C, Sylvester R,Pignon JP, MARCH CollaborativeGroup. Hyperfractionated oraccelerated radiotherapy for headand neck cancer. CochraneDatabase of Systematic Reviews2010, Issue 12. Art. No.:CD002026. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD002026.pub2.

Interventions for the treatmentof oral and oropharyngealcancers: surgical treatment

Oral cancer and oropharyngealcancer are significant worldwidediseases with over 400,000 peopledeveloping them every year andwith an increasing incidence.Two common symptoms of oralcancer are an ulcer that will notheal, or persistent pain anddiscomfort in the mouth. Survivalfrom the cancers is poor with onlyjust over half of the patientssurviving. In many countriessurgery remains the first line oftreatment for oral cancer, althoughradiotherapy, chemotherapy andimmunotherapy/biotherapy arealso used (either alone or incombination). The aim of thisreview is to establish whichtreatments involving a surgicalprocedure alone or in combinationwith any other treatment typeare the most effective for oraland oropharyngeal cancers andprovide the best outcomes interms of survival and qualityof life of the patient. The reviewfound weak evidence that surgeryin combination with othertreatment options (chemotherapyand radiotherapy) can benefitpatients in terms of overallsurvival and disease-free survival.However, few trials report on

adverse events associated withthe treatment or subsequentquality of life.

Oliver R, Clarkson JE, Conway D,Glenny AM, Macluskey M, PavittS, Sloan P, The CSROC ExpertPanel, Worthington HV.Interventions for the treatment oforal and oropharyngeal cancers:surgical treatment. CochraneDatabase of Systematic Reviews2007, Issue 4. Art. No.:CD006205. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD006205.pub2.

Interventions for thetreatment of oral cavity andoropharyngeal cancer:chemotherapy

Oral cavity (mouth) cancer isusually detected earlier and treatedwith surgery and radiotherapy.Oropharyngeal (throat) cancer maybe advanced when it is found and istreated with radiotherapy. Bothtreatments may be associated withdisfigurement and decreased abilityto eat, drink and talk. Treatmentwith chemotherapy (drugs whichkill cancer cells), in addition toradiotherapy (and surgery wherepossible) offers prolonged survival.Chemotherapy given at the sametime as radiotherapy, is moreeffective than chemotherapy givenbefore radiotherapy, and mayreduce the need for surgery. Theimprovement in overall survivalwith the use of chemotherapy isestimated to be between 8% and22%. The additional side effectsof combined chemoradiotherapy(nausea, vomiting, diarrhoea,hair loss, and infections) werenot measured.

Furness S, Glenny AM,Worthington HV, Pavitt S, Oliver

R, Clarkson JE, Macluskey M,Chan KKW, Conway DI.Interventions for the treatment oforal cavity and oropharyngealcancer: chemotherapy. CochraneDatabase of Systematic Reviews2011, Issue 4. Art. No.:CD006386. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD006386.pub3.

Radiotherapy versus opensurgery versus endolaryngealsurgery (with or without laser)for early laryngeal squamouscell cancer

Cancer of the larynx (voice box)usually begins in the glottis(vocal cords) as a squamous cellcancer (cancer in the membranes).Most people survive these cancerswhen they get treatment early(before the cancer spreads furtherinto the larynx and surroundingarea). Options include radiotherapy,open surgery (through the neck)or, more commonly now,endolaryngeal excision (surgeryreaching the throat via the mouth,sometimes with a laser). The reviewof trials found there is not enoughevidence to show which form oftreatment might be better forpeople with early stage laryngealsquamous cell carcinoma. Suchevidence may come from newtrials comparing radiotherapyand endolaryngeal excision, whichhave started.

Dey P, Arnold D, Wight R, KellyCG, McKenzie K. Radiotherapyversus open surgery versusendolaryngeal surgery (with orwithout laser) for early laryngealsquamous cell cancer.CochraneDatabase of Systematic Reviews2002, Issue 2. Art. No.:CD002027. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD002027.

Asia–Pacific Journal of Clinical Oncology Cochrane Highlights 319

© 2011 Blackwell Publishing Asia Pty LtdAsia–Pac J Clin Oncol 2011; 7: 318–320

Page 3: Asia–Pacific Journal of Clinical Oncology Cochrane Highlights

Chemotherapy as an adjunctto radiotherapy in locallyadvanced nasopharyngealcarcinoma

Eight trials (1753 patients) met thecriteria for inclusion in this review.The addition of chemotherapy tostandard radiotherapy provides asmall but significant benefit inpatients with nasopharyngeal

cancer, especially whenchemotherapy is administered at thesame time as radiotherapy. The roleof chemotherapy given before orafter the radiotherapy is morequestionable.

Baujat B, Audry H, Bourhis J,Chan ATC, Onat H, Chua DTT,Kwong DLW, Al-Sarraf M, ChiKH, Hareyama M, Leung SF,

Thephamongkhol K, Pignon JP,MAC-NPC Collaborative Group.Chemotherapy as an adjunct toradiotherapy in locally advancednasopharyngeal carcinoma.Cochrane Database of SystematicReviews 2006, Issue 4. Art.No.: CD004329. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004329.pub2.

320 Asia–Pacific Journal of Clinical Oncology Cochrane Highlights

© 2011 Blackwell Publishing Asia Pty Ltd Asia–Pac J Clin Oncol 2011; 7: 318–320