asia connect center-hsg: a performance review of european institutional frameworks

15
MARKET ENTRY/EXPANSION FOR ASIAN COMPANIES IN EUROPE: A CRITICAL REVIEW OF THE EUROPEAN INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK Dr. Roger Moser Director, Asia Connect Center, University of St.Gallen (HSG) Adjunct Professor, IIM Udaipur, Visiting Faculty, IIM Bangalore www.acc.unisg.ch [email protected] / [email protected] / [email protected] Switzerland/India, 2013

Upload: asia-connect-center

Post on 14-Apr-2017

453 views

Category:

Business


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

MARKET ENTRY/EXPANSION FOR ASIAN COMPANIES IN EUROPE:

A CRITICAL REVIEW OF THE EUROPEAN

INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK

Dr. Roger Moser

Director, Asia Connect Center, University of St.Gallen (HSG)

Adjunct Professor, IIM Udaipur,

Visiting Faculty, IIM Bangalore

www.acc.unisg.ch

[email protected] / [email protected] / [email protected]

Switzerland/India, 2013

Europe

• Combined the largest economy in the

world

• Largest economies: • Germany • France • United Kingdom • Italy • Spain

• Europe is marked by a large divide;

• Culture • Wealth • Institutions

Starting Point: Europe is still one of the most relevant and interesting markets in the world: Wealth, Innovation, Infrastructure, Consumer Markets…

Overview: From an institutional perspective, Europe is divided into three major areas [1/2].

EU 17 – Euro area EU – Souvereign

Description: Countries using the single Euro currency. Countries include: Austria, Belgium, Cyprus, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Ireland, Italy, Luxembourg, Malta, Netherlands, Portugal, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain.

Description: Countries in the European Union, not using the Euro currency. Countries include: Bulgaria, Czech Republic, Denmark, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Romania, Sweden, United Kingdom.

Overview: From an institutional perspective, Europe is divided into three major areas [2/2].

Non-EU

Description: Countries outside the European Union. Countries include: Albania, Belarus, Bosnia, Croatia, Iceland, Kosovo, Macedonia, Moldova, Montenegro, Norway, Serbia, Switzerland, Ukraine.

Comparison

Critical analysis is done through the comparison of six “exemplar” countries within the three separate regions. Seleted comparison variables (28 in total) are categorized according to personal wealth, country wealth and ease of doing business (see appendix for full details).

EU-17: France and Germany The two largest economies in the Eurozone. On monetary level, very intertwined due to its common currency, the Euro.

EU-Souvereign: Sweden and the UK Two strong economies of the Eurogroup, not using the single currency. Able to set (largerly) their own monetary policy concerning currency. Highly dependent upon Eurogroup however.

Non-EU: Norway and Switzerland Complete souvereign economies. Full-control over policy setting.

Status Quo: When comparing the three groups the non-EU members are performing best from an institutional perspective [1/2].

EU-17

EU-Souvereign

Non-EU

Non-EU performing best

Highest wealth, personal & finance • Highest GDP per capita • Highest national savings rate (to national GDP) • Lowest inflation rates • Switzerland shows highest quality of living • Norway ranks #1 in personal development

High security • Lowest national unemployment rates • Lowest crime rates Efficient government • High government spending per capita • Government budget surpluses Business friendly environment • Switzerland ranks #1 in 5 out of 7 criteria • Highest business investment rates (to national GDP)

Broad outperformance

#3 – EU-17

Germany scores significantly better than France • France scores lowest in ease of doing business, as

well as general country wealth indicators • Germany competitive in government efficiency and

costs of doing business

High equality • France, on the other hand, has the least number of

households living below the poverty line, this however goes at the cost of government efficieny (high government spending per capita, as well as a large budget deficit)

Business unfriendly environment • France has an excessive business-unfriendly

environment, scoring lowest on all 7 measures • Germany scores average

Significant within-group differences

#2 – EU-Souvereign

Large differences within group • Sweden performing significantly better than UK • Difference large in personal wealth indicators;

personal freedom, quality of living and inequality • GDP per capital, savings as well as inflation show

large differences, attributed to differing monetary strategies, and effect of crisis on important sectors

Country wealth indicators similar • Country governance, in institutional framework as

well as efficiency of legal framework, outperforms EU-17

• Infrastructure and government efficiency within the group score average overall

Business friendly environment • Competitive corporate income tax and social

security system • Burden of regulation is lower than the EU-17 group

Eurocrisis significantly impeding EU-17

Status Quo: When comparing the three groups the non-EU members are performing best from an institutional perspective [2/2].

Future developments in Europe: There is a lot of uncertainty about the further institutional developments in Europe [1/3].

Economical - crisis Low growth • Growth rates low, or even negative, for a sustained

period. Looking for growth in far-away countries • Inability to stimulate economy

Uncompetitiveness • Large economies uncompetitive, due to high labour

costs, uncooperative institutions

Access to financing • Investment is halted, due to banking crisis • Failure to create a platform for future growth

Debt - crisis

“Currency war”

Unsustainable debt levels • Due to shrinking GDP and government stimulants,

Government households becoming unsustainable Trade-off between stimulus and sustainability • Governments have to choose between stimulating

their economies and reducing unemployment, at the risk of going bankrupt (due to high debt yields)

Ineffective governments • Governments unwilling to make tough decisions,

due to fear of losing elections

Stimulus packages • Extensive stimulus packages introduced by various

national banks (US, Japan, UK) • Result in weaker currencies in countries that receive

stimulus (Dollar, Yen and Pound)

Adverse affects • “Stronger” countries see stronger currencies (due to

lower inflation expectations) • Puts a halt on export growth

• Countries with competitive, export driven, economies are to benefit

• Governments and national banks need the power to decisively act, to, e.g., stimulate the economy or reform their economies

• Access to financing and human development is crucial for long-term development

#2 – EU-Souvereign

Divide between countries • United Kingdom is facing increasing difficulties,

wherin stimulting measures are not taking the desired effect

• Sweden is stimulating the economy, still the budget deficit remains very small, and the economy is growing

Favourable business environment • Both countries show business friendly

environments, although Sweden’s costs of social security is significantly higher

Personal wealth • Sweden’s population has high wealth, savings levels

and social security, combined with lower inflation results in a confident economy

• UK has low wealth, social security and employment wherin confidence in the economy is low

Sustainable leading position

#1 – Non-EU

Effective action by governments • Both Switzerland and Norway have been acting

decisively during the crisis, protecting and stimulating their economies to good effect

• More power to act by governments, due to budget surpluses and strong economies

Investment in the future • Education and human development are important

factors within these countries, providing fertile ground for future development

• Leading business investment rates Business friendly environment • Economies prove attractive to companies, given the

ease of doing business as well as the superior living conditions within these countries

• Low inflation environments supporting further investments

Divide, Sweden model superior

Future developments in Europe: There is a lot of uncertainty about the further institutional developments in Europe [2/3].

#3 – EU-17 Non-effective government action • Budget pressures, due to EU regulation • Appropriate actions for all the Euro economies hard

to define, give the large differences between the individual economies

• Stimulation (like Japan, UK and US) fended off due to inflationary fears, holding back exports

Large economies impeded • Economies like Spain and France in difficulties, with

high budget deficits, high unemployment • Reforms in labour markets are not decisively

implemented by the governments (often with public unrest)

European wide recovery slow • Due to the intertwinement of the countries in the

single currency, healthier countries like Germany are slowed down due to lower demand for their products in the internal EU market

• Further integration (e.g. Eurobonds), to even out the differences between countries, will take a long time to materialize, if at all

Future Expectations EU-17

• Long-term low growth environment • High unemployment to sustain, due to low

confidence in the economy, resulting in low investments in new employment

• More displeasure amongst the population, due to unemployment, lower purchasing power (higher inflation), deteriorating infrastructure and investments in education Lower personal wealth

EU-Souvereign

• Large divide between separate countries, due to different monetary and political directions

• Sweden model to come out of the crisis with significant advantages over the UK, and the EU-17; especially in the personal wealth sphere

Non-EU • Strong growth of non-EU countries. Able to set their

own policies, with reliable governments and currencies, resulting in large confidence

• Low inflation; companies continue investing in these countries, at the expense of other European countries

Future developments in Europe: There is a lot of uncertainty about the further institutional developments in Europe [3/3].

Comparison: Indicators for an analysis of the three institutional ‘models’ in Europe.

Type Measure Source measure

Wealth indicators

Financial GDP per capita PPP (2012) Worldfactbook Absolute

Gross national savings, % of GDP (2011) World competitiveness report Percentage

Inflation rate (2011 year average) World competitiveness report Percentage

Below poverty line Worldfactbook

Security Organized crime World competitiveness report Rank 1-7 (+)

Job security (Unemployment) Worldfactbook Percentage

Personal Life expectancy Worldfactbook Absolute in years

Education/development HD Index - United Nations 0-1 (+)

Personal freedom Legatum Prosperity index Rank (worldwide)

Quality of living (capital city) Mercer Rank (worldwide)

Inequality index Gini index (Worldfactbook) 0-100 (100=unequality)

Country wealth indicators

Governance Institutional framework World competitiveness report Rank 1-7 (+) combined score

Efficiency of Legal framework World competitiveness report Rank 1-7 (+) combined score

Infrastructure Quality of overall infrastructure World competitiveness report Rank 1-7 (+) combined score

Quality of electricity supply World competitiveness report Rank 1-7 (+)

Mobile phone connections World competitiveness report Absolute/100

Government efficiency Government spending per capita Worldfactbook Absolute

Government spending / GDP (PPP) Worldfactbook Factor

Government budget surplus/deficit of GDP Worldfactbook Percentage

10 year bond interest yield Wall street journal Percentage

Investment Gross investment business/ GDP Worldfactbook Percentage

Doing Business

Costs Corporate income taxes KPMG report Percentage

Employer effective social security rates KPMG report $100,000 income Percentage

Employer effective social security rates KPMG report $300,000 income Percentage

Framework Irregular payments and bribes World competitiveness report Rank 1-7 (+)

cost of crime and violence World competitiveness report Rank 1-7 (+)

Bureaucracy Burden of regulation World competitiveness report Rank 1-7 (+)

Effective governance Legatum Prosperity index Rank (worldwide)

34,60% 37,50%

12,90%

26,80%

23,70%

18,80%

34000

39000

44000

49000

54000

59000

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

GDP per capita (PPP) 2012, $ Gross national savings, % of GDP

0,20%

1,30%

4,50%

1,40%

2,50% 2,30%

0,0%

0,5%

1,0%

1,5%

2,0%

2,5%

3,0%

3,5%

4,0%

4,5%

5,0%

0%

2%

4%

6%

8%

10%

12%

Unemployment rate Inflation rate

Personal Wealth Doing business

21,17% 28%

23% 22% 29,55% 33,33%

6,30%

14,10%

12,20%

31,40% 14,80%

41,00%

Corporate income tax Employer social security rate

6,2 6,3

5,9 6,2

5,9

5,4

6,1 5,8

5,3 5,7 5,8

5,3

4,3

3,4 3,4

4

3,4

2,7

2,0

2,5

3,0

3,5

4,0

4,5

5,0

5,5

6,0

6,5

7,0

Bribes Cost of crime and violence Burden of regulation

1 =

wo

rst,

7 =

bes

t

Comparison: Wealth, consumer power and ease of doing business.

Country Wealth Government efficiency

54600 55300

36700

41700 39100

35500

26401

43767

18660

31723

18571

22107

15000

20000

25000

30000

35000

40000

45000

50000

55000

60000

GDP per capita (PPP) 2012, $ Government spending per capita

5,7 5,5

5,3

5,6

5

4,5

6,6

5,2

5,6 5,8

6,2 6,4

4,0

4,5

5,0

5,5

6,0

6,5

7,0

Legal framework efficiency Quality of infrastructure

0,62%

2,18%

1,77% 1,64%

1,30%

1,83%

-1,50%

-1,00%

-0,50%

0,00%

0,50%

1,00%

1,50%

2,00%

2,50%

-10%

-5%

0%

5%

10%

15%

Government budget surplus Government 10 year bond yield

1 =

wo

rst,

7 =

bes

t

0,20%

1,30%

4,50%

1,40%

2,50%

2,30%

0,00%

0,50%

1,00%

1,50%

2,00%

2,50%

3,00%

3,50%

4,00%

4,50%

5,00%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

Gross business investment / GDP Inflation rate

Comparison: Country wealth and government efficiency.

Best in class

Worst in class

Type Measure Source measure Switzerland Norway UK Sweden Germany France

Wealth indicators

Financial GDP per capita PPP (2012) Worldfactbook Absolute $54600 $55300 $36700 $41700 $39100 $35500

Gross national savings, % of GDP (2011) World competitiveness report Percentage 34,60% 37,50% 12,90% 26,80% 23,70% 18,80%

Inflation rate (2011 year average) World competitiveness report Percentage 0,20% 1,30% 4,50% 1,40% 2,50% 2,30%

Below poverty line Worldfactbook 7,90% - 14% - 15,50% 7,80%

Security Organized crime World competitiveness report Rank 1-7 (+) 6,4 6,2 6 6 6 5,8

Job security (Unemployment) Worldfactbook Percentage 2,90% 3,10% 7,80% 7,50% 6,50% 10,30%

Personal Life expectancy Worldfactbook Absolute in years 81,17 80,32 80,17 81,18 80,19 81,46

Education/development HD Index - United Nations 0-1 (+) 0,913 0,955 0,875 0,916 0,92 0,893

Personal freedom Legatum Prosperity index Rank (worldwide) #22 #6 #11 #5 #12 #16

Quality of living (capital city) Mercer Rank (worldwide) #2 #32 #38 #19 #16 #29

Inequality index Gini index (Worldfactbook) 0-100 (100=unequality) 33,7 (2008) 25 (2008) 34 (2005) 23 (2005) 27 (2006) 32,7 (2008)

Country wealth indicators

Governance Institutional framework World competitiveness report Rank 1-7 (+) combined score 5,8 5,7 5,4 5,7 5,3 4,8

Efficiency of Legal framework World competitiveness report Rank 1-7 (+) combined score 5,7 5,5 5,3 5,6 5 4,5

Infrastructure Quality of overall infrastructure World competitiveness report Rank 1-7 (+) combined score 6,6 5,2 5,6 5,8 6,2 6,4

Quality of electricity supply World competitiveness report Rank 1-7 (+) 6,8 6,5 6,7 6,6 6,4 6,7

Mobile phone connections (2011) World competitiveness report Absolute/100 130,1 116,8 130,8 118,6 132,3 105

Government efficiency Government spending per capita Worldfactbook Absolute $26401 $43767 $18660 $31723 $18571 $22107

Government spending / GDP (PPP) Worldfactbook Factor 58,25% 74,30% 50,93% 73,10% 48,25% 64,70%

Government budget surplus/deficit of GDP Worldfactbook Percentage 0,30% 15,20% -7,70% -0,30% 0,10% -4,50%

10 year bond interest yield Wall street journal Percentage 0,62% 2,18% 1,77% 1,64% 1,30% 1,83%

Investment Gross investment business/ GDP Worldfactbook Percentage 20,60% 21,40% 13,90% 18,20% 17,80% 19,90%

Doing Business

Costs Corporate income taxes KPMG report Percentage 21,17% (Zurich) 28% 23% 22% 29,55% 33,33%

Employer effective social security rates KPMG report $100,000 income Percentage 6,30% 14,10% 12,20% 31,40% 14,80% 41,00%

Employer effective social security rates KPMG report $300,000 income Percentage 5,90% 14,10% 13,30% 31,40% 4,90% 39,00%

Framework Irregular payments and bribes World competitiveness report Rank 1-7 (+) 6,2 6,3 5,9 6,2 5,9 5,4

cost of crime and violence World competitiveness report Rank 1-7 (+) 6,1 5,8 5,3 5,7 5,8 5,3

Bureaucracy Burden of regulation World competitiveness report Rank 1-7 (+) 4,3 3,4 3,4 4 3,4 2,7

Effective governance Legatum Prosperity index Rank (worldwide) 1 13 7 4 16 18

Total Green 14 7 0 2 3 2

Total Red 1 3 9 0 3 13

Score (green - red) 13 4 -9 2 0 -11

Rank 1 2 5 3 4 6

Performance: A comparison of the extreme values shows that non-EU states and especially Switzerland are the top performers.

Type Measure Switzerland Norway UK Sweden Germany France

Wealth indicators

Financial GDP per capita PPP (2012) 5 6 2 4 3 1

Gross national savings, % of GDP (2011) 5 6 1 4 3 2

Inflation rate (2011 year average) 6 5 1 4 2 3

Below poverty line 5 - 4 - 3 6

Security Organized crime 6 5 4 4 4 1

Job security (Unemployment) 6 5 2 3 4 1

Personal Life expectancy 4 3 1 5 2 6

Education/development 3 6 1 4 5 2

Personal freedom 1 5 4 6 3 2

Quality of living (capital city) 6 2 1 4 5 3

Inequality index 2 5 1 6 4 3

Country wealth indicators

Governance Institutional framework 6 5 3 5 2 1

Efficiency of Legal framework 6 4 3 5 2 1

Infrastructure Quality of overall infrastructure 6 1 2 3 4 5

Quality of electricity supply 6 2 5 3 1 5

Mobile phone connections 4 2 5 3 6 1

Government efficiency Government spending per capita 4 6 2 5 1 3

Government spending / GDP (PPP) 4 1 5 2 6 3

Government budget surplus/deficit of GDP 5 6 1 3 4 2

10 year bond interest yield 6 1 3 4 5 2

Investment Gross investment business/ GDP 5 6 1 3 2 4

Doing Business

Costs Corporate income taxes 6 3 4 5 2 1

Employer effective social security rates 6 3 5 2 4 1

Employer effective social security rates 5 3 4 2 6 1

Framework Irregular payments and bribes 5 6 3 5 3 1

cost of crime and violence 6 5 2 3 5 2

Bureaucracy Burden of regulation 6 4 4 5 4 1

Effective governance 6 3 4 5 2 1

Total Score 141 109 78 107 97 65

Rank 1 2 5 3 4 6

Performance: A comparison of all indicators shows that non-EU states and especially Switzerland are the top performers.

Getting started: Do not hesitate to contact the “Gateway-to-Europe Lab” of the ASIA CONNECT Center for support for your market entry/expansion activities in Europe.

ASIA CONNECT Center-HSG Dr. Roger Moser, Director University of St.Gallen Dufourstrasse 40a CH-9000 St.Gallen, Switzerland Tel: +41 71 224 73 54 E-mail: [email protected] Web: www.acc.unisg.ch