aser pakistan
DESCRIPTION
ASER Pakistan. A citizen led initiative. Azad Jammu and Kashmir Launch February 7, 2013. ASER PAKISTAN 2010-2015. Citizen led large scale national household survey (3-16) Quality of education in rural and some urban areas (5-16) Seeks to provide evidence on learning and access gaps - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
ASER PakistanA citizen led initiative
Azad Jammu and Kashmir LaunchFebruary 7, 2013
ASER PAKISTAN 2010-2015• Citizen led large scale national household
survey (3-16)
• Quality of education in rural and some urban areas (5-16)
• Seeks to provide evidence on learning and access gaps
• Influence National & Provincial policy and actions for RTE.
• Provides information for tracking trends and MDG/EFA Targets up to 2015
• Influence Goal Setting for Post-2015 Agenda
Section I: Scale of Survey
ASER 2012 – SAMPLE DISTRIBUTION
- 10 Districts- 5885 Households- 15,261 Children- 551 Schools
Section II: Access (Schooling)
ASER Survey Sheets
Neelam has the highest number of out-of-school children
% Children who attend different types of pre-schools
Age group Govt.
Non-state providers Out-of-school Total
Pvt. Madrasah Others
3 4.6 6.1 0.2 0.0 89.1 100
4 20.5 24.6 0.4 0.1 54.4 100
5 44.8 37.5 0.2 0.2 17.4 100
3-5 23.8 23.0 0.3 0.1 52.8 100
Total 47.2 52.8 100
By type 50.5 48.8 0.5 0.2
Pre-School Enrollment (3-5 Years) – Rural
Enrollment (6-16 years) 93% of 6-16 year olds in rural
districts are enrolled in schools.
64% are enrolled in Govt. schools.
% Children in different types of schools % Out-of-school
TotalAge
groupGovt
.Non-state providers Never
enrolledDrop-
outPvt. Madrasah Others
6-10 56.3 38.2 0.4 0.2 4.2 0.7 100
11-13 63.1 30.1 0.8 0.2 2.6 3.2 100
14-16 61.3 23.5 0.6 0.4 5.1 9.1 100
6-16 59.3 32.4 0.6 0.2 4.1 3.4 100
Total 92.5 7.5 100
By type 64.1 35.0 0.6 0.3
Highest drop-outs between age bracket (14-16)
Out-of-School children (6-16)
Bagh, Sodhnoti and Bhimber have the lowest number of out-of-school children (6-16)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 100
10
20
30
40
15
5
13 6
Class-wise enrollment2011* 2012
Class
% C
hild
ren
Gender Comparison: Out of School Children (6-16 years) Girl enrollment lags behind boy enrollment in both Government and Private schools The percentage of out-of-school boys and girls decreased to 4% in 2012
Government schools Private schools0
102030405060708090
100
55 5845 42
Enrollment by gender and type of school 6 to 16 years
Boys Girls
% C
hild
ren
2011* 201205
101520253035404550
5 46 4
Out-of-school children by gender6 to 16 years
Boys Girls
% C
hild
ren
Section III: Quality
ASER Pakistan Assessment Tools Grade IIASER Assessment tools are prepared in following Categories• Reading
Urdu Sindhi Pashto
• Arithmetic abilities• English
Class 3 Class 4 Class 5 Class 60
20
40
60
80
100
26 44
58 74
26 45
65 74
Children who can read story Urdu
2011* 2012
% C
hild
ren
Learning Levels – Urdu
Learning levels (URDU) for AJK class 5 have increased by 7% since 2011
Overall, learning levels (Urdu) improved from last year
Despite improvement since 2011, 35% children in Class 5 cannot read Class 2 Urdu Story.
Learning Levels (Class 5): Urdu/Sindhi/Pashto
36%
46%43%
56%
65%55%
67%
40%
Class 3 Class 4 Class 5 Class 60
20
40
60
80
100
26
43
60
73
22
40
58 69
Children who can read English sen-tences
2011* 2012
% C
hild
ren
Learning Levels - English
Learning levels (English) for AJK Class 5 have decreased by 2% since 2011
Only 58% of Class 5 students in AJK can read a Class 2 level English sentence in 2012.
g
Learning Levels (Class 5): English
32%25%
61%
62%
58%
68%47%
50%
Learning Levels - Arithmetic
Learning levels (Arithmetic) for AJK for class 5 have remained same since 2011
Class 3 Class 4 Class 5 Class 60
20
40
60
80
100
17
32 44
63
16 28
44
57
Children who can do division
2011* 2012
% C
hild
ren
Only 44% of Class 5 students can do Class 2 Division.
Learning Levels (Class 5): Arithmetic
44%
34%
42%
56%
56%
44%
27%
56%
Girls Boys0
20
40
60
80
100
57 59
Learning levels by gender Arithmetic
Who can at least do subtraction
% C
hild
rern
Girls Boys0
20
40
60
80
100
65 67
Learning levels by gender English
Who can read at least words
% C
hild
ren
Learning levels – Gender Comparison (5-16)
In all three categories, girls marginally lag behind boys in learning levels.
Girls Boys0
20406080
100
60 62
Learning levels by genderUrdu
Who can read at least sentences
% C
hild
ren
Overall, learning levels of boys continue to be higher than girls.
Learning Levels – Out-of-School Children (5-16) Even Out-of-School children were Tested:
Beginner Number recognition
1-9
Number recognition
10-99
Subtration Division0
20
40
60
80
100
67
12 6 7 8
Learning levels: out-of-school children Arithmetic
% C
hild
ren
Beginner Capital let-ters
Small let-ters
Words Sentences0
20
40
60
80
100
69
9 6 6 10
Learning levels: out-of-school children English
% C
hild
ren
Beginner Letters Words Sentences Story 0
20
40
60
80
100
69
10 7 6 9
Learning levels: out-of-school children Urdu
%C
hild
ren
• Modest percentage of out-of-school children are at beginner level in all three categories.
Learning levels Public vs. Private (5-16 boys and girls)
49% of Class 5 students in Private school can do division compared to 42% students in Government schools
Class 1: Can read at least
letters
Class 3: Can read at least
sentences
Class 5: Can read at least
story
0
20
40
60
80
10085
5164
89
5467
Learning levels by school type Urdu
Government Private
% C
hild
ren
Class 1: Can read at least small letters
Class 3: Can read at least
words
Class 5: Can read at least sentences
0
20
40
60
80
100
5161 5662 64 63
Learning levels by school typeEnglish
Government Private
% C
hild
ren
Class 1: Can recognize at
least numbers (10-99)
Class 3: Can at least do subtraction
Class 5: Can at least do
division
0
20
40
60
80
100
41 42 4255
47 49
Learning levels by school typeArithmetic
Government Private
% C
hild
ren
Private school students are performing better than Government school students.
There is highest incidence of tuition in Class 10 students in Private schools with 29%
Additional learning support – Paid Tuition
9% Government and 20% Private enrolled children take paid tuitions in AJK.
Paid private tuition trend is higher in Private schools.
2011* 20120
20
40
60
80
100
7 914 20
Children attending paid tuition
Government schools Private schools
% C
hild
ren
Class-wise % children attending paid tuition
Type I II III IV V VI VII VIII IX X
Govt. 9.4 10 8.2 9.6 12 10.5 9.1 8.7 7.9 8.4
Pvt. 22.7 18.5 17.1 17.8 21.7 22.7 20.8 23.2 23.9 28.9
Section IV: School Attendance & Facilities
Attendance (%) on the day of visitGovernment schools Private schools
Primary Elementary High Others Overall Primary Elementary High Others Overall
Children attendance 86.6 89.0 87.5 98.9 87.7 88.2 86.2 89.4 79.9 87.7
Teacher attendance 86.9 84.9 89.0 92.2 87.6 84.0 89.8 85.3 88.2 86.7
Attendance - Students and Teachers
12% children were absent on the day of survey in both Government and Private schools
Teacher attendance in both Government and Private schools was 12% and 13% respectively.
Multi-Grade Classes
• 40% grade 2 students in government schools and 28% grade 2 students in private schools sit with other classes.
• However, for Class 8, 19% students in Private schools sit with other classes compared to 15% in Government schools.
Class 2 Class 80
20
40
60
80
100
40
1528
19
Multi grade teachingGovernment Private
% S
choo
lsMulti-Grade Teaching: When one teacher has to teach more than one classes at a time
Basic Facilities
64% primary Government schools still do not have toilet facilities.43% primary Private schools still do not have toilet facilities.
Private schools outperform government schools in terms of basic facilities
Playground Boundary wall
Playground Boundary wall
Government Private
0
20
40
60
80
100
2839 38
53
1934 36 38
Playground and boundary wall facility in primary schools
2011 2012
%Pr
imar
y sc
hool
s
Toilet Water Toilet WaterGovernment Private
0
20
40
60
80
100
4250
7482
36
57 57
81
Water and toilet facility in primary schools
2011 2012
% P
rimar
y sc
hool
s
Section V: Other dimensions that influence teaching and learning
Mother tongue/ Home Language• ASER 2012 survey findings revealed that 15 different
languages were used in the surveyed households in AJK.
• Four languages used commonly were;• Hindko (34%)• Pahari (21%)• Urdu (15%)• Punjabi (15%)
• Fifteen percent of the remaining households used other languages
Other Languages included : Gujrati, Potwari, Kashmiri, Persion , Pashto, Brahvi, English, Marwari, Bolari and Chitrali
Households’ preferred medium of instruction in school
• Each household surveyed was also asked their preferred medium of instruction for their children in schools.
• 70% percent of the households preferred Urdu as the medium of instruction in schools.• Private schools showed a significant trend towards English medium instruction at 68% English
Medium institutions.
For households, preferred medium of instruction was Urdu.
English13%
Urdu69%
Home language
17%
English Urdu0
20
40
60
80
100
3
97
68
32
Medium of instruction in schools
Government Private
Preferred Medium of Instruction (Households)
Actual Medium of Instruction (Schools)
Mothers Fathers0
20
40
60
80
100
48
64
Parents having at least primary schooling
% P
aren
ts
Parental Education48% mothers vs.64% fathers have completed primary education.
More than half of mothers had NOT completed primary schooling.
Section VI: How far have we come on RTE compliance?
How can ASER 2012 inform the planning, drafting, resourcing and implementation of 25-A?
ASER can help assess education with respect to :QualityAccessEquity
Planning according to district based assessment – generating District Report Cards (DRCs) linked to the Roadmap to Reforms and/or Sector Plans of the Provincial Governments .
Holding ASER Baithaks in ASER survey villages, parents, communities with parliamentarians and political holding ALL to account for ACTION!
Use of ASER data and teams for focusing on gender & the excluded groups
Forming District RTE Vigilante Committees mobilizing coalitions, teachers, youth, media and bar associations.
Action to RTE 25 A Implementation• Milestone achievement: “The Right to Free and Compulsory
Education Act 2012” - challenge is tracking implementation• ASER data to help in drafting of RTE Acts & using ASER
data for continued advocacy on Right to Education (RTE) 25 A
• Each province has district by district data for addressing gaps in access, quality, equity/gender and financing
• Continued Dialogues with Parliamentarians and Politicians in 2013 for elections, manifestoes and actionable steps that can be tracked
• Linking the ASER information to national data and GMR /UN Human Development Reports /others in the run up to 2015 & post 2015 debates
ASER 2012 Supporters & Partners
Thank You
www.aserpakistan.orgASER-PakistanASERPAKISTAN
You can follow us on