asbestos & lead-based paint survey report fort gordon gate
TRANSCRIPT
Asbestos & Lead-Based Paint
Survey Report
Fort Gordon
Gate 1 AAFES Station
Augusta, Georgia
S&ME Project No. 1419-15-020
Prepared for:
Marshall Waters Woody Associates
1736 E. Sunshine Street, #311
Springfield, Missouri 65809
Prepared by:
S&ME, Inc.
134 Suber Road
Columbia, SC 29210
November 10, 2015
Inspection Performed by:
Owen Astwood, P.G.
SCDHEC Lic. BI-00475
Inspection Date: October 23, 2015
S&ME, Inc. | 134 Suber Road | Columbia, SC 29210 | p 803.561.9024 | f 803.561.9177 | www.smeinc.com
November 10, 2015
Marshall Waters Woody Associates
1736 E. Sunshine Street, #311
Springfield, Missouri 65809
Attention: Mr. William Woody, AIA
Reference: Asbestos and Lead-Based Paint Survey Report
Gate 1 AAFES Station
Fort Gordon
Augusta, Georgia
S&ME Project No. 1419-15-020
Dear Mr. Woody:
S&ME, Inc. (S&ME) is pleased to provide the enclosed report detailing our Asbestos and Lead-Based Paint
Survey of the AAFES station building located at Gate 1 on Fort Gordon in Augusta, Georgia. Our services
consisted of an asbestos survey and lead-based paint survey of the subject building. The work was
performed in general accordance with S&ME Proposal No. 14-1500511, dated July 8, 2015. The enclosed
report includes the executive summary, project background, investigative procedures, findings and results,
and conclusions and recommendations for the proper treatment of identified hazardous materials, if
applicable.
This report is provided for the use of the client. Use of this report by any other parties will be at such
party's sole risk and S&ME, Inc. disclaims liability for any such use or reliance by third parties. The results
presented in this report are indicative of conditions only during the time of the assessment and of the
specific areas referenced. The information provided in this assessment report should not be used as a
bidding document, and building conditions and asbestos quantities should be verified by contractors
bidding on asbestos removal.
We appreciate the opportunity to provide you with our industrial hygiene/environmental services. If you
have any questions concerning this report, please call us at (803) 561-9024.
Sincerely,
S&ME, Inc.
Owen Astwood, P.G. Tom Behnke, P.G., CHMM
Asbestos Building Inspector Senior Reviewer
(SCDHEC License No. BI-00475) (SCDHEC License No. MP-00004)
Asbestos and Lead-Based Paint Survey Report
Gate 1 AAFES Station
Augusta, Georgia
S&ME Project No. 1419-15-020
November 10, 2015 i
Table of Contents
Executive Summary ......................................................................................................... 1
1.0 Introduction ............................................................................................................ 2
2.0 Asbestos Survey ..................................................................................................... 3
2.1 Purpose .............................................................................................................................. 3
2.2 Site Description ................................................................................................................. 3
2.3 Investigative Procedures ................................................................................................. 3
2.4 Assessment ........................................................................................................................ 3
2.5 Findings and Results ........................................................................................................ 4
3.0 Lead-Based Paint Survey ..................................................................................... 4
3.1 Investigative Procedures ................................................................................................. 5
3.2 Findings and Results ........................................................................................................ 5
4.0 Conclusions and Recommendations ................................................................. 5
4.1 Asbestos Conclusions ....................................................................................................... 6
4.2 Lead-Based Paint Conclusions ........................................................................................ 6
5.0 Limitations .............................................................................................................. 6
Appendices Appendix I – Summary of Asbestos Sampling
Appendix II – Photographs
Appendix III – Asbestos Bulk Sample Analysis Sheets and Chain of Custody Record
Appendix IV – XRF Lead-Based Paint Reading Summary Table
Appendix V – Copy of SDHEC Inspector’s License
Asbestos and Lead-Based Paint Survey Report
Gate 1 AAFES Station
Augusta, Georgia
S&ME Project No. 1419-15-020
November 10, 2015 1
Executive Summary
An asbestos survey and lead-based paint assessment were conducted on October 23, 2015 of the AAFES
station located at 100 Chamberlain Avenue on Fort Gordon in Augusta, Georgia. The building is a single-
story convenience store that was constructed in 1995. The building is approximately 4,100 square feet
and consists of retail space, offices, storage/warehouse area and walk-in coolers. We understand that an
addition is planned for the eastern side of the building.
Asbestos The asbestos survey was performed in general accordance with the National Emission Standards for
Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) and the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA). The
purpose of the asbestos survey is to identify the presence and quantity of asbestos-containing materials
(ACMs) that may be disturbed by the planned renovations. The asbestos survey included the bulk
sampling and analysis of suspect ACMs from the interior and exterior of the subject building. The suspect
materials identified consist of: three styles of vinyl floor tiles, drywall, drywall joint compound, exterior
caulking, stucco, acoustic ceiling tiles and vinyl baseboards.
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Georgia Environmental Protection Division (GEPD)
define materials as asbestos-containing if an asbestos content of greater than one percent (>1%) is
detected in a representative sample. Asbestos in concentrations greater than one percent was not identified
as a result of this assessment.
A material with an asbestos content of one percent or less is not classified as an ACM applicable to EPA
and GEPD; however, trace levels of asbestos (less than one percent) in a material is subject to
Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) regulatory requirements, to include, but not
limited to, worker protection, using wet methods, proper clean-up, use of proper tools/equipment,
engineering controls, etc.
This summary is for convenience only and should not be relied upon without first reading the full contents
of this report, including appended materials.
Lead-Based Paint Painted surfaces throughout the interior and exterior of the subject building were considered suspect and
analyzed for lead content. The EPA considers a paint to be lead-based if it contains lead at a
concentration of one milligram per square centimeter (1.0 mg/cm2) or higher. Lead-based paint was not
identified as a result of this assessment.
Asbestos and Lead-Based Paint Survey Report
Gate 1 AAFES Station
Augusta, Georgia
S&ME Project No. 1419-15-020
November 10, 2015 2
1.0 Introduction
Marshall Waters Woody Associates retained S&ME to conduct an asbestos and lead-based paint survey of
the AAFES store building located on Chamberlain Street on Fort Gordon in Augusta, Georgia. An ACM is
defined by State and Federal regulations as a building material containing greater than one percent (>1%)
of one of the six asbestos minerals regulated by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the
OSHA.
This asbestos and lead-based paint survey was performed in general accordance with S&ME proposal 14-
1500511, dated July 8, 2015.
Demolition and renovation activities in public and commercial buildings are regulated by OSHA, EPA and
GEPD. The EPA and GEPD require asbestos assessments, conducted by licensed individuals, prior to
renovation and/or demolition projects. Code 40 of Federal Regulations Part 61, Subpart M, Final Rule,
National Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) and SCDHEC Regulation 61-86.1
require asbestos assessments, followed by the proper removal, and disposal of ACM that is affected by
renovation or demolition. The identification of ACMs will aid in the prevention of occupational exposures
and/or environmental releases of airborne asbestos. Identification of ACM is also required by OSHA
1926.1101. The EPA, OSHA and GEPD define ACM as materials containing greater than one (1) percent
asbestos in a representative sample. However, OSHA also regulates materials containing less than or
equal to one percent asbestos.
Asbestos Survey The purpose of the asbestos survey is to identify the presence and quantity of asbestos-containing
materials (ACMs) that may be disturbed by the planned renovations. The identification of ACMs will aid in
the prevention of occupational exposures and/or environmental releases of airborne asbestos.
Identification of ACMs also complies with Title 40 Code of the Federal Regulations, part 61, and GEPD
Regulations, along with Title 29 Code of Federal Regulations, part 1926 enforced by OSHA.
Section 2.0 describes the assessment procedures used, results of the suspect ACMs sampled and
analyzed, confirmed ACMs located in the structure, and conclusions and recommendations regarding the
subject building as related to ACMs.
Lead-based Paint Assessment The purpose of the lead-based paint survey was to identify any existing lead-based paint finishes
associated with the structure which may be adversely affected by future renovation or demolition
activities. The identification of these materials will aid in the compliance of occupational exposure (OSHA)
and/or environmental releases of airborne lead dust in accordance with 29 CFR 1926.62 (Lead in
Construction) and provide information to facilitate proper disposal of lead-based paint coated
components and debris in accordance with the EPA.
Asbestos and Lead-Based Paint Survey Report
Gate 1 AAFES Station
Augusta, Georgia
S&ME Project No. 1419-15-020
November 10, 2015 3
2.0 Asbestos Survey
2.1 Purpose
The purpose of this asbestos assessment was to identify the presence and quantity of asbestos-containing
materials associated with the subject building that may be disturbed by the proposed demolition
activities. The identification of ACMs will aid in the prevention of occupational exposures and/or
environmental releases of airborne asbestos. Identification of ACMs also complies with Title 40 Code of
the Federal Regulations, part 61, enforced by the GEPD, along with Title 29 Code of Federal Regulations,
part 1926 enforced by OSHA.
The assessment included the interior and exterior of the subject building, including roofing materials. An
assessment strategy believed by S&ME to be appropriate for this purpose was presented in our proposal
and is described in this report. The report should be interpreted only with regard to the specific locations
and materials referenced.
2.2 Site Description
The subject site is the AAFES store building located by Gate 1 on Fort Gordon in Augusta, Georgia. The
building is a masonry and wood frame structure on a slab foundation. The building contains
approximately 4,100 square feet of floor space and has a pitched metal roof. Interior finishes include vinyl
floor tiles, limited painted drywall walls, and acoustic ceiling tiles. The structure was constructed in 1995
and was open and active at the time the surveys were performed.
2.3 Investigative Procedures
The asbestos assessment was performed by observing and collecting random samples of suspect
asbestos-containing materials located on the interior and exterior of the subject building. Significant
destructive investigative techniques and sampling was not performed as part of this assessment.
Consequently, the possibility exists that suspect materials were not detected in inaccessible areas such as
pipe chases, wall voids or above the drywall fire ceiling. If additional suspect materials are discovered
during future renovation or demolition activities, bulk samples should be collected and analyzed for
asbestos content.
Suspect surfacing materials that were identified in the building consisted of joint compound associated
with the limited interior drywall wall systems and stucco located on the underside of the exterior porticos.
No suspect Thermal System Insulation (TSI) or additional surfacing materials were observed in the
building. Suspect flooring materials consisted of three styles of 12-inch vinyl floor tiles. Additional
suspect ACMs that were observed and sampled include two colors of exterior caulking, drywall, acoustic
ceiling tiles and vinyl baseboard and associated mastic.
A sampling strategy was developed to provide representative samples of the observed suspect asbestos-
containing materials in accordance with OSHA, GEPD and EPA. Bulk samples were then extracted from
suspect ACMs and recorded on a chain of custody record and submitted to EMSL Analytical’s asbestos
laboratory in Charlotte, North Carolina for analysis via the following method:
Asbestos and Lead-Based Paint Survey Report
Gate 1 AAFES Station
Augusta, Georgia
S&ME Project No. 1419-15-020
November 10, 2015 4
Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM)
The suspect materials were analyzed by trained microscopists using PLM techniques coupled with
dispersion staining in accordance with EPA Test Method Title 40 Code of Federal Regulations, Chapter I
(1-1-87 edition), Part 763, Subpart F-APPENDIX A. This method identifies asbestos mineral fibers based
on six optical characteristics: morphology, birefringence, refractive index, extinction angle, sign of
elongation and dispersion staining colors. The laboratory analysis reports the specific type of asbestos
identified (there are six asbestos minerals) and the percentage of asbestos present.
The PLM laboratory are accredited by the National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP),
which is administered by the National Institute of Standards and Technology.
2.4 Assessment
The identified suspect ACMs were assessed based on the observed condition (good, damaged or
significantly damaged) and potential for disturbance due to the scheduled renovation/demolition.
Identified ACM were also categorized based on the EPA’s NESHAP regulation categories. A friable ACM is
classified as an ACM that can be crumbled to a powder by moderate hand pressure. A non-friable ACM is
classified as either Category I Non-friable ACM or Category II Non-friable ACM. Category I and Category
II Non-friable ACM are distinguished from each other by their fiber release potential when damaged.
Generally, Category I Non-friable ACM, which by definition includes intact ACM roofing materials, gaskets,
packing, and resilient floor coverings is less likely to become friable and release fibers in a damaged state.
Category II Non-friable ACM include all other non-friable ACM excluding Category I that have a high
probability of being rendered friable during removal activities or demolition. All Friable ACM, Category I
Non-friable ACM that has become friable, Category I Non-friable ACM that will be or has been subjected
to sanding, grinding, cutting or abrading, or Category II Non-friable ACM that has a high probability of
becoming or has become crumbled, pulverized, or reduced to powder by the forces expected to act on
the material in the course of demolition or renovation operations are considered to be a Regulated
Asbestos-Containing Material (RACM). The NESHAP category for each identified ACM is provided in Table
2-1.
2.5 Findings and Results
The asbestos survey conducted on October 23, 2015 included the quantification and random bulk
sampling of observed suspect asbestos-containing materials located on the interior and exterior of the
subject structure. These suspect materials include: exterior caulking, stucco, acoustic ceiling tiles, three
styles of vinyl floor tiles, drywall, drywall joint compound and vinyl baseboard. Of the representative
materials sampled and analyzed during this assessment, asbestos in concentrations >1% was not identified.
If materials were assumed to contain asbestos and were not sampled, the materials must be treated as
asbestos-containing unless sampling indicates the materials are not ACM.
A material with an asbestos content of one percent or less is not classified as an ACM applicable to EPA
and GEPD; however, trace levels of asbestos (less than one percent) in a material is subject to OSHA
regulatory requirements in 29 CFR 1926.1101, to include but not limited to worker protection, using wet
methods, proper clean-up, use of proper tools/equipment, engineering controls, etc.
Asbestos and Lead-Based Paint Survey Report
Gate 1 AAFES Station
Augusta, Georgia
S&ME Project No. 1419-15-020
November 10, 2015 5
A summary of bulk sample locations and asbestos results is provided in Appendix I. Representative site
photographs are provided in Appendix II. A copy of the asbestos inspector’s license is provided in
Appendix V. The laboratory report and chain of custody records are provided in Appendix III.
3.0 Lead-Based Paint Survey
3.1 Investigative Procedures
The assessment and test methods used to identify lead-based paints as part of this assessment generally
followed the guidelines set forth by the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) entitled
Guidelines for the Evaluation and Control of Lead-based Paint Hazards in Housing, June 1995 and the
Chapter 7 revision issued in 1997. Representative components were tested by collecting paint chip
samples and analyzing them for lead content utilizing a Niton XLp-300A X-Ray Fluorescence (XRF)
spectrum analyzer (serial #95004). The EPA defines a lead-based paint as any paint containing lead at
concentrations of 1.0 mg/cm2.
OSHA does not recognize a threshold level of lead for definition purposes, only the presence or absence
of lead. The current OSHA regulations recognize an airborne action level of thirty micrograms per cubic
meter (30 µg/m3) during an eight-hour day and a permissible exposure limit of fifty micrograms per cubic
meter (50 µg/m3).
Attached in Appendix IV is a summary of the paint readings analyzed by the XRF spectrum lead analyzer.
The XRF summary provides the sample numbers, sample location, component, substrate, paint color,
condition, and results. Only a limited amount of paint was observed in the building. The observed
painted finishes consisted of white drywall walls and one office with brown drywall walls.
3.2 Findings and Results
Coated surfaces throughout the interior and exterior of the subject building were observed for the
presence of potential lead-based paint. A limited amount of paint was observed on the interior of the
building. No painted surfaces were observed on the exterior of the building. Paint chip samples were
collected from three locations on the interior of the retail building. The paint chip samples were
subsequently analyzed for lead content with XRF spectrum analyzer.
Lead-based paint as defined by the EPA (≥1.0 mg/cm2) was not detected. The summary of the XRF
readings is provided in Appendix IV.
4.0 Conclusions and Recommendations
An asbestos survey and lead-based paint assessment was conducted of the Gate 1 AAFES station building
on Fort Gordon in Augusta, Georgia on October 23, 2015. Our findings and conclusions are summarized
below:
Asbestos and Lead-Based Paint Survey Report
Gate 1 AAFES Station
Augusta, Georgia
S&ME Project No. 1419-15-020
November 10, 2015 6
4.1 Asbestos Conclusions
The asbestos survey conducted on the Gate 1 AAFES retail building did not identify the presence of
asbestos-containing materials.
Significant destructive sampling was not performed during the asbestos survey. If additional suspect
ACMs not included in this report are discovered and will be disturbed by the renovation/demolition
activities, bulk samples must be collected by a licensed asbestos inspector and analyzed for asbestos
content, prior to disturbance of the suspect material(s).
The EPA and GEPD require proper removal and disposal of ACMs that will be destructively affected by
demolition activities, therefore we recommend that if ACMs are identified in the future, they should be
properly removed and disposed by a qualified contractor licensed by the GEPD prior to any renovation
and demolition activities.
A copy of this report must be submitted to the GEPD, along with a separate asbestos notification, 10
business days prior to destructive actions. This report should also be provided to the contractor(s) to
assist with compliance with applicable State and Federal regulations.
4.2 Lead-Based Paint Conclusions
Lead-based paint, as defined by the EPA (≥1.0 mg/cm2) was not identified in association with the retail
structure at Fort Gordon’s Gate 1 AAFES station.
The client is advised that OSHA does not recognize a threshold level of lead for definition purposes, only
the presence or absence of lead. Consequently, the OSHA regulations governing worker protection for
lead-based paint may apply to work practices including the disturbance of paint systems with detectable
levels of lead. Destructive actions (sanding, burning, demolition, component removal, paint preparation)
to the lead-containing paint surfaces will require the contractor comply with the standards of OSHA,
including but not limited to initial exposure monitoring, the use of personal protective equipment, and
medical surveillance.
5.0 Limitations
This report is provided for the sole use of the Client. Use of this report by any other parties will be at such
party’s sole risk, and S&ME disclaims liability for any such use or reliance by third parties. The results
presented in this report are indicative of conditions only during the time of the sampling period and of
the specific areas referenced. Under no circumstances is this report to be used as a bidding document, or
as a project design or specification.
S&ME performed the services in accordance with generally accepted practices of reputable industrial
hygiene consultants undertaking similar studies at the same time and in the same geographical area.
S&ME has endeavored to meet this standard of care. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is
intended or made with respect to this report or S&ME’s services. Users of this report should consider the
scope and limitations related to these services when developing opinions as to risks associated with the
site.
Asbestos and Lead-Based Paint Survey Report
Gate 1 AAFES Station
Augusta, Georgia
S&ME Project No. 1419-15-020
November 10, 2015 7
The possibility exists that suspect materials were undetected in inaccessible or concealed areas such as
under multiple flooring layers, and inside pipe chases or wall voids. If additional suspect materials are
discovered during the planned destructive activities, bulk samples must be collected by a licensed
asbestos inspector and analyzed for asbestos content.
Appendices
Appendix I – Summary of Asbestos Sampling
Summary of Asbestos Sampling
Project Name: Gate 1 AAFES Station Project Number: 1419-15-020
Location: Ft. Gordon, Augusta, GA Sampling Date(s): October 23, 2015
Former Power Plant
Sample
No. Sample Location Material
Approx.
Quantity1
Asbestos
Type %2 Condition P.F.D.3 H.A.4
C-1 Base of west wall Gray exterior caulking
196 LF
NAD NA NA NA NA
C-2 Base of NW pillar by front door Gray exterior caulking NAD NA NA NA NA
C-3 Base of south wall Gray exterior caulking NAD NA NA NA NA
C-4 Vertical joint in west wall Brown exterior caulking
10 LF
NAD NA NA NA NA
C-5 Vertical joint in west wall Brown exterior caulking NAD NA NA NA NA
C-6 Vertical joint in west wall Brown exterior caulking NAD NA NA NA NA
S-1 Portico ceiling – leaking corner over Redbox
machine
Exterior stucco – white layer
Gray layer
200 SF
NAD
NAD
NA
NA NA NA NA
S-2 Portico ceiling by front door Exterior stucco – white layer
Gray layer
NAD
NAD
NA
NA NA NA NA
S-3 Portico ceiling over loading dock Exterior stucco NAD NA NA NA NA
CT-1 Middle of retail area 2’ x 4’ Acoustic ceiling tile
2,672 SF
NAD NA NA NA NA
CT-2 Break room 2’ x 4’ Acoustic ceiling tile NAD NA NA NA NA
CT-3 Office 2’ x 4’ Acoustic ceiling tile NAD NA NA NA NA
FT-1 Break room, by door Red 12” vinyl floor tile
Tan mastic
20 SF
NAD
NAD
NA
NA NA NA NA
FT-2 Break room, under table Red 12” vinyl floor tile
Tan mastic
NAD
NAD
NA
NA NA NA NA
FT-3 Break room corner Red 12” vinyl floor tile
Tan mastic
NAD
NAD
NA
NA NA NA NA
FT-4 Break room, by door Gray 12” vinyl floor tile
140 SF
NAD NA NA NA NA
FT-5 Break room, under table Gray 12” vinyl floor tile
Tan mastic
NAD
NAD
NA
NA NA NA NA
FT-6 Break room corner Gray 12” vinyl floor tile
Tan mastic
NAD
NAD
NA
NA NA NA NA
Summary of Asbestos Sampling
Project Name: Gate 1 AAFES Station Project Number: 1419-15-020
Location: Ft. Gordon, Augusta, GA Sampling Date(s): October 23, 2015
Former Power Plant
Sample
No. Sample Location Material
Approx.
Quantity1
Asbestos
Type %2 Condition P.F.D.3 H.A.4
FT-7 Break room, by door White with blue 12” vinyl floor tile
Tan mastic
2,512 SF
NAD
NAD
NA
NA NA NA NA
FT-8 Break room, under table White with blue 12” vinyl floor tile
Tan mastic
NAD
NAD
NA
NA NA NA NA
FT-9 Break room corner White with blue 12” vinyl floor tile
Tan mastic
NAD
NAD
NA
NA NA NA NA
DW-1 Damaged area by back electrical panel Drywall
800 SF
NAD NA NA NA NA
DW-2 Break room wall, above ceiling Drywall NAD NA NA NA NA
DW-3 Office, north wall Drywall NAD NA NA NA NA
JC-1 Damaged area by back electrical panel Joint compound
800 SF
NAD NA NA NA NA
JC-2 Break room wall, above ceiling Joint compound NAD NA NA NA NA
JC-3 Office, north wall Joint compound NAD NA NA NA NA
BB-1 By cooler 4’ Black/gray vinyl baseboard
Tan mastic
450 LF
NAD
NAD
NA
NA NA NA NA
BB-2 Office 4’ Black/gray vinyl baseboard
Tan mastic
NAD
NAD
NA
NA NA NA NA
BB-3 Break room 4’ Black/gray vinyl baseboard
Tan mastic
NAD
NAD
NA
NA NA NA NA
SF = square feet LF = linear feet NAD = No Asbestos Detected NA = Not Applicable
Note 1: Estimated quantities. The quantities should not be used for bidding purposes, as field conditions should be verified.
Note 2: The EPA, GEPD and OSHA define a material as asbestos-containing if an asbestos content greater than one percent (>1%) is detected in a representative sample.
Note 3: Potential for Disturbance
Note 4: Hazard Assessment
Abbreviations and Hazard Assessment Key
In accordance with the EPA and GEPD, a confirmed ACM is assigned a hazard assessment based on its
present condition and potential for disturbance. The hazard assessment is used as a tool for prioritization
in remedial actions regarding any identified ACM(s). The following key exhibits the criteria that compose
the hazard assessment.
Present Condition
F = Friable G = Good (Very localized limited damage)
NF = Non-friable D = Damaged (Damage of less than 10% distributed and less than 25% localized)
SD = Significantly Damaged (Damage equal to or greater than 10% distributed,
25% localized)
Potential for Future Disturbance
LPD = Low Potential for Disturbance (Contact, Vibration, and Air Erosion all of Low Concern)
PD = Potential for Disturbance (Contact, Vibration, or Air Erosion of Moderate Concern)
SPD = Significant Potential for Disturbance (Contact, Vibration, or Air Erosion of High Concern)
Hazard Assessment
Significantly
Damaged
(SD)
Damaged
(D) Good
(G)
SPD PD LPD SPD PD LPD
7 6 5 4 3 2 1
Appendix II – Photographs
Site Photographs Gate 1 AAFES Station – Fort Gordon
Augusta, Georgia
S&ME Project No. 1419-15-020
Taken by: O. Astwood Date: October 23, 2015
1 The front (west) side of the AAFES store building. 2 The east side of the subject AAFES store building. An addition is reportedly planned for this area.
3 The stucco ceilings on the exterior porticos tested negative for asbestos.
4 The gray caulking at the base of the exterior walls and pillars tested negative for asbestos.
Site Photographs Gate 1 AAFES Station – Fort Gordon
Augusta, Georgia
S&ME Project No. 1419-15-020
Taken by: O. Astwood Date: October 23, 2015
5 The brown exterior caulking in the vertical joint on the west side of the building tested negative for asbestos.
6 Non-suspect fiberglass pipe insulation was observed on the interior of the building.
7 No asbestos was reported in samples of the red and gray floor tiles located in the store’s break room.
8 No suspect asbestos-containing materials were observed above the ceilings in the store building.
Appendix III – Asbestos Bulk Sample Analysis Sheets and
Chain of Custody Record
EMSL Analytical, Inc.376 Crompton Street Charlotte, NC 28273
Tel/Fax: (704) 525-2205 / (704) 525-2382
http://www.EMSL.com / [email protected]
411508081EMSL Order:
Customer ID: S&ME50
Customer PO: 1419-15-020
Project ID:
Attention: Phone:Owen Astwood (803) 561-9024
Fax:S&ME, Inc. (803) 561-9177
Received Date:134 Suber Rd. 10/27/2015 9:35 AM
Analysis Date:Columbia, SC 29210 10/29/2015
Collected Date: 10/23/2015
Project: Ft. Gordon/ AAFES Store
Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized
Light Microscopy
Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous
Non-Asbestos Asbestos
% Type
C-1
411508081-0001
Gray
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
None DetectedAt Base of W. Wall -
Exterior Caulking
(Grey)
<1% Cellulose 10%
90%
Ca Carbonate
Non-fibrous (Other)
C-2
411508081-0002
Gray/Beige
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
None DetectedAt Base of NW Pillar
by Door - Exterior
Caulking (Grey)
10%
90%
Ca Carbonate
Non-fibrous (Other)
C-3
411508081-0002A
Gray
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
None DetectedAt Base of NW Pillar
by Door - Exterior
Caulking (Grey)
15%
85%
Ca Carbonate
Non-fibrous (Other)
C-4
411508081-0003
Brown
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
None DetectedVertical Seam in W.
Wall - Brown Exterior
Caulking
5%
95%
Ca Carbonate
Non-fibrous (Other)
C-5
411508081-0004
Brown
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
None DetectedVertical Seam in W.
Wall - Brown Exterior
Caulking
5%
95%
Ca Carbonate
Non-fibrous (Other)
C-6
411508081-0004A
Brown
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
None DetectedVertical Seam in W.
Wall - Brown Exterior
Caulking
<1% Cellulose 5%
95%
Ca Carbonate
Non-fibrous (Other)
S-1-White Layer
411508081-0005
White
Fibrous
Homogeneous
None DetectedPortico Ceiling -
Corner over Red Box
- Stucco
3% Glass 5%
5%
87%
Quartz
Ca Carbonate
Non-fibrous (Other)
S-1-Gray Layer
411508081-0005A
Gray
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
None DetectedPortico Ceiling -
Corner over Red Box
- Stucco
20%
5%
75%
Quartz
Ca Carbonate
Non-fibrous (Other)
S-2-White Layer
411508081-0006
White
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
None DetectedPortico Ceiling - by
Front Door - Stucco
10%
5%
85%
Quartz
Ca Carbonate
Non-fibrous (Other)
S-2-Gray Layer
411508081-0006A
Gray
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
None DetectedPortico Ceiling - by
Front Door - Stucco
25%
5%
70%
Quartz
Ca Carbonate
Non-fibrous (Other)
S-3
411508081-0007
White
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
None DetectedPortico Ceiling - Over
Loading Dock -
Stucco
<1%
1%
Cellulose
Glass
20%
5%
74%
Quartz
Ca Carbonate
Non-fibrous (Other)
CT-1
411508081-0008
Gray
Fibrous
Homogeneous
None DetectedMiddle of Store - 2'x4'
Ceiling Tile
45%
20%
Cellulose
Min. Wool
15%
20%
Perlite
Non-fibrous (Other)
CT-2
411508081-0009
Gray
Fibrous
Homogeneous
None DetectedBreak Room - 2'x4'
Ceiling Tile
45%
20%
Cellulose
Min. Wool
15%
20%
Perlite
Non-fibrous (Other)
CT-3
411508081-0010
Gray/White
Fibrous
Homogeneous
None DetectedOffice - 2'x4' Ceiling
Tile
45%
25%
Cellulose
Min. Wool
15%
15%
Perlite
Non-fibrous (Other)
FT-1-Floor Tile
411508081-0011
Red
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
None DetectedBreak Room by Door
- Red 12" VCT w/ Tan
Mastic
30%
70%
Ca Carbonate
Non-fibrous (Other)
FT-1-Mastic
411508081-0011A
Tan
Fibrous
Homogeneous
None DetectedBreak Room by Door
- Red 12" VCT w/ Tan
Mastic
2% Cellulose 98% Non-fibrous (Other)
Initial report from: 10/29/2015 13:40:13
Page 1 of 3PLM - 1.65 Printed: 10/30/2015 9:14 AM
EMSL Analytical, Inc.376 Crompton Street Charlotte, NC 28273
Tel/Fax: (704) 525-2205 / (704) 525-2382
http://www.EMSL.com / [email protected]
411508081EMSL Order:
Customer ID: S&ME50
Customer PO: 1419-15-020
Project ID:
Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized
Light Microscopy
Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous
Non-Asbestos Asbestos
% Type
FT-2-Floor Tile
411508081-0012
Red
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
None DetectedBreak Room under
Table - Red 12" VCT
w/ Tan Mastic
30%
70%
Ca Carbonate
Non-fibrous (Other)
FT-2-Mastic
411508081-0012A
Tan
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
None DetectedBreak Room under
Table - Red 12" VCT
w/ Tan Mastic
<1% Cellulose 100% Non-fibrous (Other)
FT-3-Floor Tile
411508081-0012B
Red
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
None DetectedBreak Room under
Table - Red 12" VCT
w/ Tan Mastic
35%
65%
Ca Carbonate
Non-fibrous (Other)
FT-3-Mastic
411508081-0012C
Tan
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
None DetectedBreak Room under
Table - Red 12" VCT
w/ Tan Mastic
100% Non-fibrous (Other)
FT-4-Floor Tile
411508081-0013
Gray/Tan/Blue
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
None DetectedS.A. FT-1 - Grey 12"
VCT w/ Tan Mastic
30%
70%
Ca Carbonate
Non-fibrous (Other)
No mastic present
FT-5-Floor Tile
411508081-0014
Gray/Tan
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
None DetectedS.A. FT-2 - Grey 12"
VCT w/ Tan Mastic
30%
70%
Ca Carbonate
Non-fibrous (Other)
FT-5-Mastic
411508081-0014A
Tan
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
None DetectedS.A. FT-2 - Grey 12"
VCT w/ Tan Mastic
<1% Cellulose 100% Non-fibrous (Other)
FT-6-Floor Tile
411508081-0014B
Gray/Blue
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
None DetectedS.A. FT-2 - Grey 12"
VCT w/ Tan Mastic
35%
65%
Ca Carbonate
Non-fibrous (Other)
FT-6-Mastic
411508081-0014C
Tan
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
None DetectedS.A. FT-2 - Grey 12"
VCT w/ Tan Mastic
100% Non-fibrous (Other)
FT-7-Floor Tile
411508081-0015
Gray/Blue
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
None DetectedThreshold to Store -
White w/ Blue 12"
VCT w/ Tan Mastic
35%
65%
Ca Carbonate
Non-fibrous (Other)
FT-7-Mastic
411508081-0015A
Tan
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
None DetectedThreshold to Store -
White w/ Blue 12"
VCT w/ Tan Mastic
<1% Cellulose 100% Non-fibrous (Other)
FT-8-Floor Tile
411508081-0016
Beige
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
None DetectedFreezer Door - White
w/ Blue 12" VCT w/
Tan Mastic
35%
65%
Ca Carbonate
Non-fibrous (Other)
FT-8-Mastic
411508081-0016A
Tan
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
None DetectedFreezer Door - White
w/ Blue 12" VCT w/
Tan Mastic
<1% Cellulose 100% Non-fibrous (Other)
FT-9-Floor Tile
411508081-0016B
Gray
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
None DetectedFreezer Door - White
w/ Blue 12" VCT w/
Tan Mastic
35%
65%
Ca Carbonate
Non-fibrous (Other)
FT-9-Mastic
411508081-0016C
Tan
Fibrous
Homogeneous
None DetectedFreezer Door - White
w/ Blue 12" VCT w/
Tan Mastic
2% Cellulose 98% Non-fibrous (Other)
DW-1
411508081-0017
Brown/Gray
Fibrous
Homogeneous
None DetectedDamaged Area by
Elec. Panel - Drywall
4% Cellulose 96% Non-fibrous (Other)
DW-2
411508081-0018
Brown/Gray
Fibrous
Heterogeneous
None DetectedBreak Room Wall
(Above Ceiling) -
Drywall
5% Cellulose 95% Non-fibrous (Other)
DW-3
411508081-0019
Gray
Fibrous
Homogeneous
None DetectedOffice N. Wall (Above
Ceiling) - Drywall
2%
1%
Cellulose
Glass
97% Non-fibrous (Other)
JC-1
411508081-0020
White
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
None DetectedS.A. DW-1 - Joint
Compound
25%
75%
Ca Carbonate
Non-fibrous (Other)
Initial report from: 10/29/2015 13:40:13
Page 2 of 3PLM - 1.65 Printed: 10/30/2015 9:14 AM
EMSL Analytical, Inc.376 Crompton Street Charlotte, NC 28273
Tel/Fax: (704) 525-2205 / (704) 525-2382
http://www.EMSL.com / [email protected]
411508081EMSL Order:
Customer ID: S&ME50
Customer PO: 1419-15-020
Project ID:
Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized
Light Microscopy
Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous
Non-Asbestos Asbestos
% Type
JC-2
411508081-0021
White
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
None DetectedS.A. DW-2 - Joint
Compound
30%
70%
Ca Carbonate
Non-fibrous (Other)
JC-3
411508081-0022
White
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
None DetectedS.A. DW-3 - Joint
Compound
30%
70%
Ca Carbonate
Non-fibrous (Other)
BB-1-Baseboard
411508081-0023
Gray
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
None DetectedBy Cooler - 4" Black/
Grey BB & Tan
Mastic
5%
95%
Ca Carbonate
Non-fibrous (Other)
BB-1-Mastic
411508081-0023A
Tan
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
None DetectedBy Cooler - 4" Black/
Grey BB & Tan
Mastic
10%
90%
Ca Carbonate
Non-fibrous (Other)
BB-2-Baseboard
411508081-0024
Gray
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
None DetectedOffice - 4" Black/
Grey BB & Tan
Mastic
5%
95%
Ca Carbonate
Non-fibrous (Other)
BB-2-Mastic
411508081-0024A
Tan
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
None DetectedOffice - 4" Black/
Grey BB & Tan
Mastic
<1% Cellulose 100% Non-fibrous (Other)
BB-3-Baseboard
411508081-0024B
Gray
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
None DetectedOffice - 4" Black/
Grey BB & Tan
Mastic
5%
95%
Ca Carbonate
Non-fibrous (Other)
BB-3-Mastic
411508081-0024C
Tan
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
None DetectedOffice - 4" Black/
Grey BB & Tan
Mastic
10%
90%
Ca Carbonate
Non-fibrous (Other)
Analyst(s)
Kristie Elliott (14)
Maria Cao (29)
Lee Plumley, Laboratory Manager
or Other Approved Signatory
EMSL maintains liability limited to cost of analysis . This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by EMSL. EMSL bears no
responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. This report must not be used by the client to claim
product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST or any agency of the federal government . Non-friable organically bound materials present a problem matrix and therefore EMSL
recommends gravimetric reduction prior to analysis. Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted. Estimated accuracy, precision and uncertainty data available upon request. Unless
requested by the client, building materials manufactured with multiple layers (i.e. linoleum, wallboard, etc.) are reported as a single sample. Reporting limit is 1%
Samples analyzed by EMSL Analytical, Inc. Charlotte, NC NVLAP Lab Code 200841-0, VA 3333 00312
Initial report from: 10/29/2015 13:40:13
Page 3 of 3PLM - 1.65 Printed: 10/30/2015 9:14 AM
OrderID: 411508081
Page 1 Of 3
OrderID: 411508081
Page 2 Of 3
OrderID: 411508081
Page 3 Of 3
Appendix IV – XRF Lead-Based Paint Reading Summary Table
Serial #95004
PAINT
Project No.: 1419-15-020
Site: Ft. Gordon Gate 1 AAFES Store
Date: October 24, 2015
Ranges (NEG<INC<POS): Device PCS
Reading
NumberArea Room Feature Substrate Condition Color Result
XRF
Reading
(mg/cm²)
1 Shutter Calibrate -- NA
2 Calibrate Positive 1.0
3 Calibrate Positive 0.9
4 Calibrate Positive 1.0
5 Interior Break room Wall paint Drywall Good White Negative 0
6 Interior Break room Wall paint Drywall Good White Negative 0
7 Interior North office Wall paint Drywall Good White Negative 0
8 Interior South office Wall paint Drywall Good Brown Negative 0
9 Calibrate Positive 1.1
10 Calibrate Positive 1.1
11 Calibrate Positive 0.9
1 of 1
Appendix V – Copy of SDHEC Inspector’s License
S&ME, INC. / 134 Suber Road / Columbia, SC 29210 / p 803.561.9024 / f 803.561.9177 / www.smeinc.com
South Carolina Department
of
Health and Environmental Control
Asbestos License
Owen R. Astwood
Air Sampler AS-00226
Building Inspector BI-00475
Project Designer PD-00085
Asbestos Supervisor SA-01241