art%3a10.1007%2fs12098-012-0858-x

Upload: lucassantos54

Post on 07-Aug-2018

213 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/20/2019 art%3A10.1007%2Fs12098-012-0858-x

    1/3

    CLINICAL BRIEF

    Pericardial Tamponade in Nephrotic Syndrome:

    An Uncommon Complication

    Sunita Namdev   &  Sriram Krishnamurthy   &

    Niranjan Biswal   &  Barath Jagadisan

    Received: 22 March 2012 /Accepted: 3 July 2012 /Published online: 20 July 2012# Dr. K C Chaudhuri Foundation 2012

    Abstract  An 11 y   – old boy with steroid resistant nephrotic

    syndrome (SRNS) secondary to focal segmental glomerulo-

    sclerosis (FSGS) developed pericardial tamponade duringthe course of illness. He was promptly managed with peri-

    cardiocentesis. Pericardial tamponade is an extremely rare

    complication in childhood nephrotic syndrome and very few

    cases have been reported in literature. Recognition of this

    rare, yet serious and life threatening complication in child-

    hood nephrotic syndrome (NS) is emphasized to prevent 

    fatalities in children with nephrotic syndrome.

    Keywords  Pericardial tamponade . Nephrotic syndrome .

    Steroid resistance . Focal segmental glomerulosclerosis

    Introduction

    Fluid retention in nephrotic syndrome (NS) often leads to

     peripheral edema, ascites, and pleural effusions. Intuitively,

     pericardial effusions could be anticipated as well, but liter-

    ature is scarce regarding this complication in NS [1, 2]. The

    authors herein describe an 11 y-old boy with NS who

    developed pericardial tamponade.

    Case Report

    An 11 y-old boy presented to the authors’ hospital in August 

    2011 with anasarca and oliguria. There was no hematuria,

    rash, joint swelling, fever or jaundice. His blood pressure

    was 130/90 mm Hg (>95th centile). Cardiovascular and

    chest examination were normal. Investigations showed mas-sive proteinuria (urine protein 3+, urinary protein/creatinine

    ratio03.1), hypoalbuminemia (1.8 g/dl) and hypercholester-

    olemia (780 mg/dl). Blood urea, serum creatinine and T3,

    T4, TSH levels were normal. He was treated with prednis-

    olone (2 mg/kg) and amlodipine. However, proteinuria (4+)

     persisted even after 4 wk. In view of steroid resistance, he

    underwent a renal biopsy, which revealed focal segmental

    glomerulosclerosis (FSGS), with immunofluorescence

    showing IgM and C3 deposits. He was then treated with

    cyclosporine, prednisolone and enalapril. Due to uncon-

    trolled hypertension, he required additional treatment with

     prazosin and atenolol.

    After completion of 3 mo of cyclosporine therapy, he

    continued to have hypoalbuminemia (1.9 g/dl) and massive

     proteinuria (4+). He was admitted for edema control with

    diuretics (frusemide and spironolactone), without much suc-

    cess. Albumin infusion could not be given due to persistent 

    hypertension.

    On the seventh day of admission, he developed tachyp-

    nea (respiratory rate of 40/min), pulse rate 100/min with

     pulsus paradoxus. Heart sounds were muffled. Chest radio-

    graph showed massive cardiac enlargement (Fig.   1); elec-

    trocardiogram showed low QRS voltages. Echocardiogram

    confirmed pericardial tamponade with right atrium and right 

    ventricular collapse (Fig.   2). Blood urea and serum creati-

    nine were normal. Pericardiocentesis was done and 400 ml

    of fluid drained. Pericardial fluid was clear with no cells;

     protein was 150 mg/dl, glucose was 90 mg/dl; Gram stain

    and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for tuberculosis were

    negative. The pericardial fluid protein: serum protein was

    0.3, while pericardial fluid LDH: serum LDH was 0.4,

    suggestive of a transudate. Pericardial fluid culture was

    sterile. He had significant clinical improvement and the

    S. Namdev : S. Krishnamurthy : N. Biswal (*) : B. Jagadisan

    Department of Pediatrics, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate

    Medical Education and Research (JIPMER),

    Pondicherry 605006, India 

    e-mail: [email protected]

    Indian J Pediatr (July 2013) 80(7):598 – 600

    DOI 10.1007/s12098-012-0858-x

  • 8/20/2019 art%3A10.1007%2Fs12098-012-0858-x

    2/3

     pigtail catheter was removed. Repeat echocardiogram 1 wk 

    later showed no effusion. Anti-nuclear antibody (ANA),

    dsDNA and anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA),

    C3 levels, HBsAg and HIV serology were negative. Ultra-

    sonogram showed normal size, shape and echotexture of the

    kidneys and ureters.

    Proteinuria (4+) continued to persist despite cyclosporine

    therapy. Thereafter he demonstrated worsening urea and

    creatinine over a period of 2 wk (blood urea 108 mg/dl,

    creatinine 3.6 mg/dl) with oliguria. In view of nephrotoxicity,

    cyclosporine and enalapril were discontinued. Treatment with

    mycophenolate mofetil and plasmapheresis were initiated

    which led to improvement in edema and partial remission of 

     proteinuria (2+) on follow up with a weight loss of 3 kg andserum albumin 2.6 g/dL.

    Discussion

    Edema, one of the major clinical manifestations of the

     NS, results from hypoalbuminemia which diminishes the

    colloid osmotic pressure of plasma leading to seepage

    of fluid from intravascular into interstitial compartment,

    with contraction of plasma volume causing salt and

    water retention [3,   4]. Large pericardial effusions are

    very rare in childhood idiopathic nephrotic syndrome.Pericardial effusion has been also described to occur in

    idiopathic NS as well as systemic lupus erythematosus

    (SLE)- associated NS [2,   5 – 7]. The index patient did

    not satisfy biochemical, histopathological or clinical criteria 

    for the diagnosis of SLE. Investigations for secondary

    etiology (ANA, dsDNA, ANCA, C3 levels, HBsAg and

    HIV serology) were also negative.

    Pericardial tamponade is an even rarer complication in

     NS. On MEDLINE search, the authors could find only two

    reports of pericardial tamponade in association with child-

    hood NS. The first was an 8 y- old Turkish girl with

    idiopathic steroid resistant NS (due to FSGS) on cyclospor-

    ine therapy, similar to the present case, who developed life

    threatening pericardial tamponade, attributed to fluid over-

    load, diminished glomerular filtration rate and hypoalbumi-

    nemia; managed with pericardiocentesis [1]. The other 

    report describes a 4 y-old Indian girl with steroid-resistant 

     NS (Minimal change disease) who developed chylopericar-

    dial tamponade secondary to superior vena cava thrombosis

    [8]. In the index case , pericardial tamponade was transuda-

    tive, non-chylous, and occurred possibly due to hypoalbu-

    minemia and fluid overload [7]. There are anecdotal reports

    of cyclosporine in association with pericardial effusion in

     patients undergoing cardiac transplantation; this could also

    have been contributory in the index patient [9]. Other causes

    such as hypothyroidism, tuberculosis and SLE were ruled

    out by appropriate investigations. Since the renal function

    tests at the time of detection of pericardial effusion were

    normal, it is unlikely that pericardial effusion was a 

    manifestation of uremia. Similarly, pericardial effusions

    due to viral infections   e.g.,   echovirus or coxsackievirus

    were unlikely since the nature of the pericardial effusion

    was transudative.

    Fig. 1   Chest x-ray of the patient showing massive cardiac enlargement 

    a  before and  b   after pericardiocentesis

    Fig. 2   Echocardiogram showing pericardial tamponade with right 

    atrium and ventricular collapse.  PE   Pericardial tamponade;  RA   Right 

    atrium;  RV   Right ventricle;  LA  Left atrium;  LV   Left ventricle

    Indian J Pediatr (July 2013) 80(7):598 – 600 599

  • 8/20/2019 art%3A10.1007%2Fs12098-012-0858-x

    3/3

    In conclusion, the authors emphasize that although

     pericardial tamponade is exceedingly rare in childhood

     NS, recognition of this serious complication in children

    with NS complicated by respiratory distress, is essential

    to initiate a prompt and life saving pericardiocentesis.

    Conflict of Interest   None.

    Role of Funding Source   None.

    References

    1. Kavaz A, Ozçakar ZB, Karadeniz C, Tutar E, Yalçınkaya F.

    Pericardial tamponade in a child with nephrotic syndrome.

    Pediatr Nephrol. 2011;26:993 – 4.

    2. Kirschbaum B, Romhilt DW. Pericardial effusion in nephrotic syn-

    drome. Arch Intern Med. 1988;148:233.

    3. Barratt TM, Niaudet P. Clinical Evaluation. In: Avner ED, Harmon

    WE, Niaudet P, ed. Pediatric Nephrology. 5th ed. Philadelphia:

    Lippincott Williams & Willkins; 2004. pp. 391 – 2.

    4. Vande Walle JG, Donckerwolcke RA. Pathogenesis of edema for-

    mation in the nephrotic syndrome. Pediatr Nephrol. 2001;16:283 – 

    93.

    5. Gobel U, Mauersberger B, Kettritz R, Bohlender J, Luft FC. Peri-

    cardial effusion in the nephrotic syndrome. Clin Nephrol.2002;58:329 – 32.

    6. Kietkajornkul C, Klinklom A, Kirawittaya T. Pericardial effusion in

    childhood nephrotic syndrome. J Med Assoc Thai. 2008;91:s35 – 40.

    7. Guyton AC, Hall JE. The Body Fluids and Kidneys. In: Guyton AC,

    Hall JE, eds. Textbook of the Medical Physiology. 11th ed. Phila-

    delphia: Elsevier; 2006. pp. 301 – 2.

    8. Suri D, Gupta N, Morigeri C, Saxena A, Manoj R. Chylopericardial

    tamponade secondary to superior vena cava thrombosis in a child with

    nephrotic syndrome. Pediatr Nephrol. 2009;24:1243 – 5.

    9. Hauptman PJ, Couper GS, Aranki SF, Kartashov A, Mudge Jr GH,

    Loh E. Pericardial effusions after cardiac transplantation. J Am Coll

    Cardiol. 1994;23:1625 – 9.

    600 Indian J Pediatr (July 2013) 80(7):598 – 600