FY 1995 BUDGET ESTIMATES~. ADA26 70FEBRUARY 1994

ARMIVY NATIONAL GUARDA *P

ELECTEMAR 1 1994

DSrI~TMEo? .TATTENWT itAppmed t pubbe rMaooso

MILITARY CONSTRUCTIONIPROGRAM

JUTIICTINFY 1995JUSIFCATONDATA SUBMISSION TO CONGRESS

94-06536

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY

D41

BestAvailable

Copy

TABLE OF CONTENTS

MILITARY CONSTRUCTION, ARMY NATIONAL GUARD

PAGE NO.

STATE LIST OF PROJECTS i

MISSION LISTING ii

LANGUAGE

PROGRAM AND FINANCE SCHEDULE iv

OBJECT CLASSIFICATION SCHEDULE v

SPECIAL PROGRAM CONSIDERATIONS vi - vii

PROJECT JUSTIFICATION DOCUMENTS 1 - 4

ARMORY UNIT STORAGE BUILDING DOCUMENT 5

INDOOR RANGE MODERNIZATION DOCUMENT 6

PLANNING AND DESIGN JUSTIFICATION DOCUMENT 7

MINOR CONSTRUCTION JUST'FICATION DOCUMENT 8

Accesion to"

NTIS GRA&IDTIC TAB UUnannotriced QJustificato•,

DitzAibution I

Avd!iiolhty Codes

Sr v..i a id/orD!*st ! ,. c.a-

SUMMARY PROJECT LISTMAJOR MILITARY CONSTRUCTION ARMY NATIONAL GUARD

FISCAL YEAR 1995(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)

DD FORMS

AUTH APPROP 1391STATE INSTALLATION AND PROJECT AMOUNT AMOUNT PAGE

INSIDE THE UNITED STATES

FLORIDA CAMP BLANDING (STARKE)WASTE WATER TREATMENT

PLANT COMPLIANCE 2,083 2,083 3REPAIRS, PHASE I

STATE TOTAL 2,083 2,083

VARIOUS VARIOUS/WORLDWIDE LOCATIONSARMORY UNIT STORAGE BUILDINGS 840 840 5INDOOR RANGE MODERNIZATION 839 839 6

STATE TOTAL 1,679 1,679

TOTAL WITHIN THE UNITED STATES 3,762 3,762

TOTAL MAJOR CONSTRUCTION 3,762 3,762

SUPPORT:

PLANNING AND DESIGN 1,000 1,000 7MINOR CONSTRUCTION 5,167 5,167 8

SUPPORT TOTAL 6,167 6,167

GRAND TOTAL AUTHORIZATION/APPROPRIATIONS 9,929 9,929

io

NEW MISSION / CURRENT MISSIONFISCAL YEAR 1995

Cost New/Location Project ($000) Current

Camp Blanding Waste Water Treatment 2,083 C(Starke), FL Plant Compliance

Repairs, Phase I

Recapitulation:

Total Current Mission 2,083Total Various Locations (Armory Unit Storage Buildings) 840Total Various Locations (Indoor Range Modernization) 839Total Planning & Design 1,000Total Minor Construction 5,167

Grand Total 9,929

ii

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY

JUSTIFICATION OF ESTIMATES FOR 1995

APPROPRIATION LANGUAGE

MILITARY CONSTRUCTION, ARMY NATIONAL GUARD

For construction, acquisition, expansion, rehabilitation,and conversion of facilities for the training and administrationof the Army National Guard, as authorized by Chapter 133 of Title10, United States Code, as amended, and the Reserve ForcesFacilities Act $9,929,000 ($302,719,000) to remain availableuntil 30 September 1999 (30 September 1998).

iii

0-0 , C3N P- -- ai Nc,I.1 W N Ln ILf P, LL NI N'

I ~ U q -' 0 0C a)~ N l l N

UlI - I Io I

I In II I rl I (D La! . I . I

IT CD 0 I4 1 I ; _ICN m N - Cl I~n NI

NC Iý N~ NN I0 C i N 0-I Ml- N )C4 .- WI) Il -II lI D ID NoW a ý I I 99i 0

IQ I a C) I - I a II N 1 1 I N24N

I ~ ~ ~ ~ ( 0- 04fO i lN iI lI i ~ f C

> l uWI - 10 c 0 a) Cl iif 0 0-)

* 0 L I Cc) M - 0 I C - 0 I . I C O -

I3 0 V V I I I, Iý Iý Iý c 1C, c l I I M I 0

(A I 1 a)I I N I Il

I V I mI

~~~I I I O N I In-I I� 3 U WI N 0C l Cl 10IA. I 0. . . I

E > I3 I u (1 -I l Cl1M1I

c I W I I M u

01 I I

L~ ~~~~ a~0I W 0 I NN

7- l (iD C CLflI INN

I . Cc - 0 1 0

E C 00- I II

0C ZI m II

LI L'0 I' QC' L fl:l

I-k-I L L~f l 10 W' W1o7C0LI~ .1 IL 2 C a1

L0~ WI 0 1 -E L~- > N. IN IN NLI

MI MIAI) CI - M l( L W C0aCIO ICI c I LI IDc )4

LI LI C LI )XcI L dl I MI 3u u 4

CI CI C.-Z- D LI -- -.

(I I m- a0(D ( q l~O 4) 1 c "- >I o I LUU EL E 3 01 C Cl I0 CI 0a m ~W 0d m mI )(

LI I o .LCM LOI 0u 0 dlLI I, Id W O _ I C mI

I to C ~ ~ C .) T1f ILI E Ui)~df "O 1 2 L Im i V

> ifI 01-WL-W0 L1 W U

I L a . -0LL-C 0LL LI '4- 1(a ) a-0 ' 0 0.1 .0 j 0 M

4- 1 dl' -- CI. - dl I )ii ? E L>L0 Co L LI aOO I

I 00 0 qI qN 0f al WW0 d0 0 0.1 0 Cdl- I:.1, C C L dl 0 i u d L0 . II ~o Oli CC 01 V,-E '~ 1iC -1

coI NN N'.' C q000 -I.' r'0. Ir

I ~ ~~~~~~ v ' C L C l . L W (

"1 10 '0)

LACD1011

CID 0-N D l 0I" 1I -II

u I -. ID 1 0

Dal

c- m

0 I

WI 0 11

>. I

I m

I LI- I 0-

- I U

jo

VL I I

10 I L

.C V I

I Go I z

:) I

C- IOW, In0

1U D0 1I u I j L

0 L O

MD I L 0 44L .1-I U I

a i C 0 0z

1: i c D

SPECIAL PROGRAM CONSIDERATIONS

POLLUTION ABATEMENT: The military construction projects proposedin the program will be designed to meet environmental standards.Military construction projects proposed primarily for abatementof existing pollution programs at installations have beenreviewed to ensure that corrective design is accomplished inaccordance with specific standards and criteria.ENERGY CONSERVATION: Military construction projects specificallyfor energy conservation at installations have been developed,reviewed, and selected with prioritization by energy savings perinvestment cost. Projects include improvements to existingfacilities and utility systems to upgrade design, eliminatewaste, and install energy savings devices. Projects are designedfor minimum energy consumption.FLOOD PLAIN MANAGEMENT AND WETLANDS PROTECTION: Proposed landacquisition, disposition, and installation construction projectshave been planned to allow the proper management of flood plainsand the protection of wetlands by avoiding long and short-termadverse impacts, reducing the risk of flooding losses, andminimizing the loss or degradation of wetlands. Project planningis in accordance with the requirements of Executive Order No.11988 and 11990.DESIGN FOR ACCESSIBILITY OF PHYSICALLY HANDICAPPED PERSONNEL:. In accordance with Public Law 90-480, provisions for physicallyhandicapped personnel will be provided for, where appropriate, inthe design of facilities included in this program.PRESERVATION OF HISTORICAL SITES AND STRUCTURES: Facilitiesincluded in this program do not directly or indirectly affect adistrict, site, building, structure, object, or setting listed inthe National Register of Historic Places except as noted on DDForm 1391.USE OF EXCESS SCHOOLS AND OTHER BUILDINGS: Considerations weremade, to utilize available commercial or academic buildings butnone were found suitable.ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION: In accordance with Section 102(2) (c)of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (PL 91-190), theenvironmental impact analysis process has been completed or isactively underway for all projects in the Military ConstructionProgram.NON-MILCON CONSTRUCTION: $90.0 Million in the FY 95 ARNG RealProperty Operations and Maintenance program will maintain 39.6Million SF in 16,000 logistical support buildings. Furthermore,it supports 278 training sites, 6,200 buildings totaling 30.5Million SF in the 54 States, Territories and Commonwealths usedby the ARNG, and other DOD component forces. The funding isdedicated to Annual Recurring Requirements of $52.5 Million androutine or emergency maintenance and repair projects of approxi-mately $37.5 Million. No funding is dedicated to the containmentand reduction of Backlog of Maintenance and Repair (BMAR). BMARwill grow from $170.8 Million in FY 94 to a projected $230.9Million in FY 95.

vi

LONG-TERM FACILITIES CONTRACTS: The National Guard does not haveany long-term facilities contracts.CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA: Unless otherwise noted, the projectscomply with the scope and design criteria prescribed in Part IIof Military Handbook 1190, "Facility Planning and Design Guide."AREA COST FACTOR: Area Cost Factor (ACF) indexes displayed foreach appropriate area were developed from State and historicalconstruction cost records and may not directly collate withspecific cost factors developed by the U.S. Army Corps ofEngineer for Service-wide use.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS: Economics are an inherent aspect of projectdevelopment and design of military construction projects.Therefore, all projects included in this program represent themost economical use of resources.RESERVE MANPOWER POTENTIAL: The Reserve manpower potential tomeet and maintain authorized strengths of all Reserve units inthe areas where units are to be located has been reviewed inaccordance with the procedures described in DoD Directive 1225.7.It has been determined, in coordination with the other MilitaryDepartments having Reserve units in the area, that the number ofReserve Components presently located in the area, and those unitshaving been allocated to this area for future activation, is notand shall not be larger than the number that reasonably may bemaintained at authorized strength.RESOLUTION TRUST CORPORATION PROPERTY: Requested constructionprojects have been reviewed, consistent to the Senate ArmedServices Committee Report on the National Defense AuthorizationAct for FY 1991, for cost effective utilization of properties tobe disposed of by the Resolution Trust Corporation (Trust). Itwas determined that the requested projects corrects OccupationalHealth and Safety or environmental noncompliance requirements notamenable to the types of facilities available through theResolution Trust Corporation.

vii

i C NT FY igs5 GUARD AND RESERVE 2. DATE

AJNG MILITARY CONSTRUCTION FEB 9943. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION 4, AREA CONSTR

COST INDEXCAMP BLANDING (STARKE), FLORIDA 83.9

5. FREQUENCY AND TYPE UTILIZATION

UTILIZED 365 DAYS A YEAR.

. OTHER ACTIVE/GUAROIRESERV1E INSTALLATIONS WITHIN 15 MILE RAMSARNO: STARKE (13 MILES) ARMORY 17,480 SF 1967

JACKSONVILLE (34 MILES) ARMORY 14,806 SF 1958JACKSONVILLE (38 MILES) ARMORY 33,995 SF 1973

USAR: GAINESVILLE (26 MILES) ARMORY 26,150 SF 1960

7. PROJECTS REQUESTED IN THIS PROGRAM

CATEGORY COST DESIGN STATUSCODE PROJECT TITLE SCOPE ($000) START COMPLETE

171 WASTE WATER LS $2,083 07/92 07/94TREATMENT PLANTCOMPLIANCEREPAIRS, PH I

5. STATE RESERVE FORCES FACILITIES BOARD RECOMMENDATION 19 Nov 93NONE (Date)

9. LAND ACQUISITION REOUIRED 0

NONE (Number of Acres)

10. PROJECTS PLANNED IN NEXT FOUR YEARS

NONE

S"SITE SURVEY HAS BEEN COMPLETED AND SITE IS SUITABLE FOR CONSTRUCTINGTHE PROPOSED PROJECT AT THE ESTIMATED COST INDICATED"

DO Form 1390S/1, MAY 78 120/215 Page of 2

I

t. COMONENTFY ig95 GUARD AND RESERVE2.DT

NGA O MILITARY CONSTRUCTION FE 8 1994

CAMP BLANDING (STARKE), FLORIDA

i i PER5014L STRNOTh ASOF I AUG 93

PERMANENT GUW4*1SERVE

TOTAL OFFIM ENI&STED CU&mU TOTAL ENLISTED

AUTHOR- -- 1,1 .73 .1. -3.0 in.,93

ACTUAL 10.907 1 0o 9. 37

f2. RESERVE UNIT DATASTRENGTH

UNIT DESIGNATON MJTHOFIZED ACTUAL

ALL FLORIDA ARMY NATIONAL GUARD 11,793 10,907

13. MAJOR EOL.PMENT AN AIRCRAFT

TYPE AUTHORIZED ACTUAL

N/A

14. OUTSTANOING POLLUTION AND SAFETY OEFICIENOES

(5000)

A. AIR POLLUTION NONE

B. WATER POLLUTION NONE

C. OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH NONE

DD Form 1390S/2, MAY 78 REPLACAS 00 FORM 1390S DEC 7MWHICH IS OBSOLETE Page2 of 2

2

I. COMPONENT 2. DATE

ARNG FY 1953 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA FEB 19943INSTALLAT1ON ANO LOCATION 4. PROJECT TITLE

CAMP BLANDING (STARKE), FLORIDA WASTE WATER TREATMENT PLANTCOMPLIANCE REPAIRS, PH I

5. PROGRAM ELEMENT 6. CATEGORY CODE 7 PROJECT NUMNJ S. PROJECT COST ($000)

0505896A 171 120131 2,083

9. COST ESTIMATES

ITEM UM OUANTITY UNIT COST COST

PRIMARY FACILITY ...................... ......... 1,785INFILTRATION/INFLOW/DECHLORINATIONFACILITY

TV/CLEANING TRUNK LINES ................... LS ( 280)REPAIR POINTS ............................ EA 15 7000.00 ( 105)SLIPLINING PIPES ......................... FT 40000 30.00 (1,200)CLEAR SEWER RIGHT-OF-WAY OF ROOTS/GROWTH. FT 50000 4.00 ( 200)

SUPPORTING FACILITIES ...................... 172AUXILLARY EQUIPMENT POWER GENERATOR ...... LS ( 36)FLOW PROPORTION CHLORINATOR/RECORDER ..... LS C 17)MONITORING EQUIPMENT ......................... LS C 3)AUTOMATED INTERRUPT INTERFACE .............. LS ( 116)

SUBTOTAL ............................................ 1,957CONTINGENCY (5%) ........................... 98SUPERVISION, INSP & OVERHEAD (1.4%) ........ 28TOTAL REQUEST ........................ ........... 2,083EQUIP PROVIDED FROM OTHER APPR ...... NON ADD ( 0)

10. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION

Construction of a dechlorination facility, rehabilitation of primary sewerlines with infiltration/inflow problems, blocking unused sewer lines, andprovide auxillary/backup equipment for plant operation.Air Conditioning: NONE11. REQUIREMENT: 0 SF ADEQUATE: 0 SF SUBSTANDARD: 0 SFPROJECT: Proposed construction will eliminate a chlorine residueproblem, eliminate infiltration/inflow of the sewer lines which is grosslyoverloading the system with ground water, and will provide auxillaryoperations in case of power failure. (Current Mission)REQUIREMENT: Rehabilitation is required to correct problem areas in theoperation of the plant and supply system identified by the recentlyconducted Enviromental Compliance Assessment Survey.CURRENT SITUATION: The waste water treatment plant at Camp Blanding wasconstructed in 1940 in support of a basic training operation for the WorldWar II effort. The system is over fifty years old and, while operating atfar less than capacity, suffers from the failure to adhere to currentDepartment of Environmental Regulation requirements. The major problemareas are lack of dechlorination, water intrusion of the system throughmultiple breaks and fractures of the sewer supply lines, and total lack ofa backup/auxillary power source to maintain operations in case of powerfailure.IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED: The Florida National Guard is liable fornoncompliance, could be subject to a Notice of Violation and be forced toshut down all operations immediately.

DDIOT76 1391PAGE NO 3

¶. COMPONENT 2. DATE

RG FY 1995 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA FEB 1994

3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION

CAMP BLANDING (STARKE), FLORIDA

4. PROJECT TITLE 5.PROJECT NUMSA•E

WASTE WATER TREATMENT PLANT 103COMPLIANWCE REPAIRS, PH I 10

12. SUPPLEMENTAL DATA:

a. ESTIMATED DESIGN DATA:

(1) STATUS:(a) Date Design Started ...................... 07/92(b) Percent complete as of 1 January 1994.... 65%(c) Date Design Expected to be 35% Complete.. 10/93(d) Date Design Completed .................... 07/94

(2) BASIS:(a) Standard or Definitive Design - Yes__ No X(b) Where was Design Previously Used? NEA

(3) COST (TOTAL) (c) = (a)+(b) or (d)+(e): ($000)(a) Production of Plans and Specifications... ( 0 )(b) All Other Design Costs ................... (__ _)(c) Total .................................... 8 )(d) Contract..................................( 6(e) In-House................................. 0

(4) CONSTRUCTION START ............................ 1/95

b. Equipment associated with this project which will be providedfrom other appropriations:

Fiscal YearEquipment Procuring Appropriated CostNomenclature Appropriation or Requested (S000)

NONE

S DDFOR 6 1391c DEC 7PAGE NO

1. COMPONENT 2. DATE

ARNG FY 1995 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA FEB 1994

3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION 4. PROJECT TITLE

EXISTING ARMORIES IN VARIOUS STATES ARMORY UNIT STORAGE BUILDINGS

5. PROGRAM ELEMENT 6. CATEGORY CODE 7. PROJECT NUMBER 8. PROJECT COST ($000)

0505896A 171 999913 840

9. COST ESTIMATES

ITEM U/M OUANTITY UNIT COST COST($o00)

PRIMARY FACILITY ........................... 664STORAGE BUILDING ......................... LS ( 664)

SUPPORTING FACILITIES ...................... 120SITE PREPARATION ......................... LS ( 60)FENCING .................................. LS ( 35)SECURITY LIGHTING ........................ LS ( 25)

SUBTOTAL ................................... 784CONTINGENCY (5%) ........................... 40SUPERVISION, INSP & OVERHEAD (2.0%) ........ 16TOTAL REQUEST .............................. 840EQUIP PROVIDED FROM OTHER FED APPR..NON ADD ( 0)

10. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED CONSTRUCTIONAn unheated pre-engineered metal, pre-cast or masonry building on aconcrete slab foundation with minimal lighting and electrical outlets, andgravity ventilation. Support facilities for this type building includesecurity lighting and security fencing.Air Conditioning: NONEii. REQUIREMENT: N/A ADEQUATE: N/A SUBSTANDARD: N/APROJECT: The various States have identified a shortage in armory unitstorage, estimated at $6.1 million for 50 buildings of various sizes andcapacities. These buildings, with minimal support features, will beconstructed adjacent to existing armories. This is a multi-year program,with this phase acquiring approximately 8 storage buildings for variouslocations throughout the country.REQUIREMENT: These facilities are required to supplement the existinginadequate supply rooms at armories where increases in mission hasoutstripped all storage capabilities.CURRENT SITUATION: Most armories do not have adequate space within theexisting building to store and safeguard the equipment issued currentAuthorized Level of Organization (ALO) for mobilization.IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED: Increased amounts of authorized supplies andequipment must be safeguarded and be reasonably secure from the elements.Other training and administrative space will be converted into securestorage space with the adverse effects on the unit's training andreadiness mission.

DID, FOR 1391 DEC 76PAGE NO

1. COMPONENT 2. DATE

FY 1995 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA FEB 19ý4ARNG

3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION 4. PROJECT TITLE

EXISTING ARMORIES IN VARIOUS STATES INDOOR RANGE MODERNIZATION

5. PROGRAM ELEMENT 6. CATEGORY CODE 7. PROJECT NUMBER 8. PROJECT COST ($000)

0505896A 179 999914 839

9. COST ESTIMATES

ITEM U/M OUANTITY UNIT COST COST($000)

PRIMARY FACILITY ............................ 693INDOOR RANGES ............................. LS (693)

SUPPORTING FACILITIES ....................... 90SITE PREPARATION .......................... LS ( 90)

SUBTOTAL .............................................. 783CONTINGENCY (5%) ............................ 40SUPERVISION, INSPECTION & OVERHEAD..(2.00%). 16TOTAL REQUEST ............................... 839EQUIP PROVIDED FROM OTHER FED APPR..NON ADD. ( 0)

10. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED CONSTRUCTIONCorrect environmental conditions, remove hazardous lead particlescontamination at armory indoor rifle ranges, install ventilation systems,air exhaust systems, adequate bullet traps and acoustical treatment.Construct new ranges if necessary with these same features.Air Conditioning: None11. REQUIREMENT: 1 ADEQUATE: N/A SUBSTANDARD: N/APROJECT: Modernize or replacement of closed indoor rifle ranges arerequired for small arms and marksmanship training for members of reservecomponents assigned at various locations throughout the country. This isa multi year program to correct the deficiencies which have closed indoorranges at 100 armories. If range modernization is not cost effective,replacement indoor ranges will be constructed. Approximately 8 closedranges will be corrected during this phase of the program.REOUIREMENT: The States have identified indoor ranges that are closedor severely curtailed because of hazardous amounts of airborne lead andlead oxide particles, lack of ventilation, inadequate acoustics and otherhealth and safety problems. Return of these ranges to functional traininguse is required to acquire necessary individual weapons and marksmanshiptraining by assigned Army National Guard units during periods of inactiveduty training.CURRENT SITUATION The indoor ranges are closed, limited, or severelyrestricted because of health risk to military personnel.IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED The lack of marksmanship familiarization andqualification practice during inactive duty training periods will effectcombat readiness.

nn FORM 1391DEC 76PAGE NO

i. CIOWIPGNET a. DATE

ARNO FY 1995 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA FEB 1994& WTALLATION LOCATION 4. PPROJECT TITLE

VARIOUS LOCATIONS PLANNING AND DESIGN& PROORAM ELEMENT CATEGORY CODE PPR0OJ-CT NM.MS & PROJECT COST (S000)

0505896A N/A 999995 1,000

0. COST ESTiMATES _

ITEM U/M OIJANTITY LITCOT (OW OS0)

PRIMARY FACILITY ............................CONCEPT AND FINAL DESIGN ................. ( 600)FUTURE YEAR PROJECTS ...................... ( 400)

SUPPORTING FACILITIES .......................SUBTOTAL .................................... 1,000CONTINGENCY (0%) ............................ 0TOTAL REQUEST ............................... 1,000

10. DE.CPTION OF PROPOSED CONSTRUCTIONItems provide for concept and final design of construction for ArmyNational Guard facilities.

11. RQIR•MEN•: Funds requested are required for completing theoutstanding final design of Military Construction Army National Guardprojects programed for execution during FY 95 and for execution of theplanned designs of the FY 96 program. Funding request is considered to bethe absolute minimum to achieve only the mandated design status incrementfor projects programed during the cited fiscal years. Funding foradvanced concept design of critical FY 95 projects vill be addressedvithin overall program constraints. The requested funding permits thedesign of unspecified or undefined minor construction projects intended tobe executed during FY 95.

DDIFoeM, 1391

PAGE NO 7!

I COMPONENT 2 DATE

ARNG FY 1995 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA 3 1,994

3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION 4 PROJECT TITLE

APPROPRIATE ARMY NATIONAL GUARDINSTALLATIONS AS NECESSARY UNSPECIFIED MINOR CONSTRUCTION

5. PROGRAM ELEMENT 6 CATEGORY CODE 7 PROJECT NUMBER 8. PROJECT COST ($000)

0505896A N/A 999905 5,167

9. COST ESTIMATES

ITEM UiM QUANTITY UNIT COST COST($000)

PRIMARY FACILITY ....................... ......... 5,060MINOR CONSTRUCTION FACILITIES UNSPECIFIED

LOCATIONS ......................................... (5,060)SUPPORTING FACILITIES ....................... 0SUBTOTAL ................................................ 5,060CONTINGENCY (0%) ............................ 0SUPERVISION, INSPECTION & OVERHEAD (2.001).. 107TOTAL REQUEST ....................................... 5,16.7EQUIP PROVIDED FROM OTHER APPR. .NON ADD ..... ( 0)

10. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION

Unspecified minor construction projects which have a funded cost of$400,000 or less, including construction, alterations, or conversion ofpermanent or temporary facilities or land acquisition as authorized.Air Conditioning: NONE11. REQUIREMENT: To provide funds for the construction of projects nototherwise authorized by law when the dollar costs are less than $400,000.Such requirements are the result of recognized facilities shortfalls, orunforeseen conditions resulting from changes in mission and equipment, orto correct damage caused by severe weather or other acts of nature. Basedon prior program execution experience, the dollar costs for correctingthese identified shortfalls are such that they do not require specificauthorization in the regular Military Construction Program.

0S DD91°PAGE3NO

DD , EC 761391PAGE NO