arma las vegas october chapter meeting
DESCRIPTION
ARMA LAS VEGAS OCTOBER CHAPTER MEETING. ANITA WARD CEO, SIGNATUREWARE CORPORATION. THE COOL KIDS ARE IN VEGAS. WHY AREN’T THEY TALKING ABOUT US?. MY RECORDS MANAGEMENT RANT. ANITA WARD CEO, SIGNATUREWARE CORPORATION. IMAGE AND BRANDING. Everyone wants cool technology - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
ANITA WARDCEO, SIGNATUREWARE CORPORATION
ARMA LAS VEGAS OCTOBER CHAPTER MEETING
THE COOL KIDS ARE IN VEGAS
WHY AREN’T THEY TALKING ABOUT US?
ANITA WARDCEO, SIGNATUREWARE CORPORATION
MY RECORDS MANAGEMENT
RANT
IMAGE AND BRANDING
Everyone wants cool technologyBut like a bad episode of Friends, this new
world of technology is a cozy chat over lattes with no controls
Image and brand are based on perception: Cool freedom vs. structured control Openness vs. compliance Socks vs. SOX James Dean vs. the Cops
The profession of RM has changed, now the perception must change too JT … Bring Sexy Back
A STRATEGY MODEL
THERE IS A PENALTY FOR LONGEVITY
Must re-think basic tenets or they become blocks to progress
Records managers are accustomed to thinking of themselves as belonging to a new discipline whose value is just being recognized
REALLY? In the 6th century The Emperor Justinian said,”
Let your Eminence give orders throughout each and every province that a building be erected in which to store the records …
THE BRAND CALLED YOU
WHAT IS THE BRAND?
What is the brand perception?
ComplianceControlsDivorced from day-to-day businessCost CenterOverly complex … enterprise StandardsFOIA, SOX, Data Protection ActMonolith
If the brand was a character, who would it be? A car? A color? A single word?
THE BRAND CALLED YOU
WHAT CHANGE IS THE BRAND EXPERIENCING?
CHANGE ONE: The Nature of the Record
Definitional perspective: Records are the evidence we leave behind from the transactions we carry out. Definition is several decades old, but is the accepted rule. A record is recorded information, regardless of physical form or characteristics, created in the
course of an institution’s business
What is the record? What is evidence? In a collaborative, open world, RM no longer manages individual objects with finite life-spans. In
the collaborative new world, RM manages links, threads, conversations, and contexts. A powerful global conversation is underway. People are discovering and inventing new ways
to share relevant knowledge with blinding speed … markets are getting smarter and faster than most companies. These markets are conversations. They are genuine. They are human.
Definition implies that a record must be tangible which is confusing in a digital world … fluid, manipulable, decoupled from physical format, transitory
Electronic records yield greater challenges The nature of the conversation is inherently seditious, undermining centralized authority. Google Wave … everything is geared around content … email, blogs, wp, dpcument … all are
inconsequential …what matters is content and the conversation it represents Higher customer expectations Accessibility challenges
Traditionally, RM professionals have made the distinction between information and records Is this really the best perspective, or just the easiest?
The distinctions have blurred considerably.
In contrast with the records definition, information is more than evidence. Drucker” data endowed with relevance and purpose The use of information is what makes it important
People and behavior need to be at the center of both discussions
CHANGE ONE: The Nature of the Record
Brand implications New definitions lead to new ideas Information has been re-conceptualized and is thought of as
equal in importance to people and financial assets The output of collaboration is a business transaction, or
evidence of one Even as an end in itself, collaboration requires some controls
to work effectively: authentication, versioning, access control, audit trails …
Knowledge and information management have “intellectual curb appeal” – embracing them as segments of the RM discipline expands the brand and offers brand halo. Convergence will present synergistic results. Without convergence, the “seductive” technologies will displace the “less glamorous”. Similar goals … make accurate, relevant info available when
and where needed. KM literature generally ignores records … calling them “explicit knowledge” … dismissive.
CHANGE ONE: The Nature of the Record
CHANGE TWO: The Role of Paper
We are almost there … the Holy Grail … the paperless office
Unfortunately, this is a behavior change and HUMANS LOVE PAPER(so do RM professionals)
WE CREATED IT.
WE ENSHRINED IT.
WE REPRODUCED IT.
WE MISS IT WHEN IT’S GONE.
CHANGE TWO: The Role of Paper
In a paperless world, RM professionals need to develop new frameworks and enter new discussions EDM and RM will increasingly become a part of the underlying
infrastructure with an even greater degree of automationRM cannot dismiss the Web 2.0 world as “information”
The perception of records as static, recorded, tangible, created, tied to a format (costs)
This contrasts significantly with electronic information that is changing, updating, refreshing, instantaneous (revenue)
This is not about technology but rather about behavior Why does an individual worry about classification schemes and
descriptive metadata when they have Google and Accutag? Why should someone worry about retention policies when storage
is so cheap?
CHANGE TWO: The Role of Paper
Brand Implications The world is changing fast. Strategically positioning RM for the future reinforces
its relevance. Links RM to organizational benefit, not just cost RM needs to assume a higher profile in the
organization, or senior management will focus elsewhere as the business pressures arise.
CHANGE THREE: RM Systems
RM technology and systems are all about “big thinking” Size and scale are overwhelming Everything must be transformed
Due to their size, the enterprise systems have homogenized the solution (RM one-size-fits-all)
“If it is a mess to begin with, then it will be a mess at the end”
The rest of the world has shifted to widgets Simple specific applications designed to solve specific problems RM has been looking at the problem from the wrong end of the
telescope Organizational vs. individual perspective Need small solutions that solve specific problems
CHANGE THREE: RM Systems
Brand Implications Enterprise systems will reinforce the unwieldy
perception of RM. Small focused solutions will demonstrate the agility
and benefit of RM
CHANGE FOUR: Models of Work(ers)
HUMANS DON’T HELP THE SITUATION! Worker behaviors must be accommodated by RM strategies.
ME – protectionism, isolation, hierarchy, walls, single data repositories, standalone applications
Unilateral ME – Push-based sharing, knowledge as needed, closed communities, structured teams, semi-permeable walls, shared repositories, channeled communication
TeamME – team focused, shared repositories, knowledge seekers, closed communities, limited networks, cross-team collaboration, intranets, extranets, groupware
ProactiveME - Push/pull 24/7. network, extended enterprise, semi-automatic collaboration, personalized web, portals, dashboards
BilateralME – Proactive community building, knowledge management, collective intelligence, strategic collaboration, open source, social networking, information management/taxonomies
WE – social, profiling, virtual teaming, collaborative content development
EnterpriseME – transparency, participative, mass customization, agility, strategic collective intelligence
CHANGE FOUR: Models of Work(ers)
• Brand Implications • RM professionals can reposition
themselves as allies to HR and IT.• Records are language and at their core
reflect humanity and behaviors. • New skills for RM professionals contribute
to individual growthGround is shifting and new skills are necessaryManagement, teamwork, communication, sales
• New services can emerge
Anita [email protected]
(702) 332-7961